More on the Retarded MOAB White Elephant

Assuming we killed 94 ISIS people in this dumb MOAB bomb attack (which is dubious), we just spent 170,000 to kill each one of those ISIS guys. That’s just lame.

They only prevent wars if you never use them!

 

It’s War Porn.

You get is the massively arousing explosion, the erection-inducing mushroom cloud and the ear-shattering cum shot.

Gonzo War Porn. If Max Hardcore went to war, he would use bombs like this, except he would dress them up in schoolgirl outfits and put a lollipop sticking out of one end.

Screw all you idiots cheering this on. I don’t care how many ISIS we kill, but these weapons ought to be banned.

Someone give me a good argument how this is not a WMD?

5 Comments

Filed under Afghanistan, Middle East, Military Doctrine, Radical Islam, Regional, US War in Afghanistan, War

MOAB’s Are WMD’s

Look, let’s face it.  MOAB’s are WMD’s.

WMD’s are outlawed because they are not fair. War is supposed to be at least somewhat fair, as in a fair fight. And to some extent, a fair fight between equals. That’s why you see these situations like in Syria of standoffs going on for two years in some cities and towns. Because that war is being fought so fairly that the SAA cannot even conquer that town or city because ISIS or Al Qaeda is on such an equal footing. That’s the way it is supposed to be!

We are getting to the point with these insane MOAB’s and whatnot where we can drop one bomb that will blow up a whole town or village. That’s fair? What’s left to do? Make a bomb that blows up a whole city?

And guess what? If we can make a MOAB, others can too. It’s not a nuclear weapon. Gee, I wonder what would happen if our troops got hit by a MOAB? We are getting to the point where wars are so destructive that they should not even be fought anymore and perhaps should just be outlawed altogether.

But MOAB’s should surely be banned. Napalm, white phosphorus and cluster bombs are banned, but people keep using the latter two anyway. Not only are they used, but the US uses them enthusiastically, and when (((our allies))) start running out of cluster bombs, we rush delivery huge quantities of them to (((our pals))). Land mines are also banned, but our noble country refuses to sign the treaty because we use thousands of them along the DMZ between North and South Korea.

It was rather sexual, wasn’t it, guys? So tell me, did you get an erection when that weapon ejaculated, I mean orgasmed, I mean exploded? That’s what’s really going on here, isn’t it boys?

What sort of people are we? We drop a bomb on a country, and the whole damn US stands up and cheers like they’re at a baseball game. Screw America. You sick fucks.

83 Comments

Filed under Afghanistan, Asia, Middle East, Military Doctrine, NE Asia, North Korea, Radical Islam, Regional, South Korea, Syria, US War in Afghanistan, USA, War

Patsy Cline, “Crazy”

This is some damn fine music! 1961. Some say this is rockabilly influenced stuff. This is actually considered to be Country/Western, but it is nevertheless some of the finest music ever made. She has other songs too, and they are excellent. She had a tragic early death in a plane crash at age 30. I believe that even in her short life, she was not particularly happy. A couple of real rocky marriages in there.

It’s rather sad, heartbreaking music though, rather like her life, but one of the real breakthroughs you can achieve in life is when you learn to appreciate the beauty in pure, glorious, mournful sadness. Half of life is sadness, and that’s on a good day. Since life’s so full of it, you may as well learn to enjoy it.

2 Comments

Filed under Music

Explain My Enemies’ Criticism of Me Here

See if you can understand how their criticism of the post below me even makes sense.

First, the post:

Rightwing economics is a marker for White racism. Where you find rightwing economics, you often but not always find White racism. Sure, a lot of economic leftwingers are soft racists, but the more rightwing the person’s economics, the more they move out of the softer stuff into the harder stuff. Similarly, the more economically left the person is, the less racist they are. You could almost plot these things on a chart!

White racism is a marker for rightwing economics. Where you find White racism, you nearly always, 95%+ of the time, find rightwing economics.

I recently spent some time on Chimpout, one of the funniest racist sites on the Internet. If I’m in a nasty mood, it’s funny, but if I’m in a Black-sympathetic mood or guilty mood (like “Wow I am really a terrible person for being at this awful, mean, racist website), most of the humor just bombs on me.

My latest excursion was instructive. I read through a thread stretching 100’s of pages. Every single American on there was a virulent anti-Black racist, as that’s all they will allow on the site. And every single one of those virulently anti-Black Americans was a conservative who voted Republican.

Over and over, they equated liberals with niggers* and nigger-lovers. The Democratic Party is the Party of the Niggers and the Nigger-loving Liberals. Endlessly, posters openly stated that the Republican Party is the party to support if you hate niggers. I don’t think I saw one person voting Democratic in that entire thread.

So almost 100% of serious White racists are voting Republican or some other rightwing party and supporting some kind of rightwing economics.

We see this even among Blacks, where there are now some race realist Blacks out there. Some are even socking it to their own kind, calling them genetically inferior. Once again, all of these Blacks are Black conservatives or Black Republicans. Some are Black Libertarians. Once again, it seems to be a marker. The more race realist the Black is, the more they support rightwing economics. It’s a dose-effect response that you could almost plot on a curve, just like with Whites.

*They don’t allow the use of “Black” or other terms for African-Americans on Chimpout. You are only allowed to call them “niggers.” Violation results in a ban. Damn that’s funny as Hell! If you refuse to call Black people niggers, we will ban you! LOL! Such funny fellows. Mean as snakes, but damn is that funny.

Next, their dumbass criticism, which makes no sense at all.

The Vosgian Beast posted:

Someone linked this guy earlier in the thread, and wow, what a brilliant visionary https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com…/beta-uprising/

Study after study… which I won’t link

EDIT: Also in regards to the Kierkegaard thinghttps://robertlindsay.wordpress.com…and-vice-versa/

This reeks of “I compartmentalize minorities between Good Ones and Bad Ones (aka Uppity ones)

Goon Danton: It reeks of something, I’ll grant you that much.

quote:

I recently spent some time on Chimpout, one of the funniest racist sites on the Internet. If I’m in a nasty mood, it’s funny, but if I’m in a Black-sympathetic mood, most of the humor just bombs on me.

Isn’t that a retarded criticism? Read the article. The article notes that racism almost always links up with rightwing economics, politics and voting Republican, whereas racists almost to a man feel that voting Democrat is voting for the niggers and the nigger lovers. Even among Blacks, as they get more and more race realist or even racist against their own kind, they all start going Republican or Libertarian.

Ok this SJW turd just said that my post above which links racism to rightwing economics and politics is “diving minorities up into good ones and bad or uppity ones.” Can anyone see how on Earth I am saying that?

Anyway, I don’t care about uppity Blacks or uppity niggers or whatever you want to call them. MLK is one of my heroes. I even love Malcolm X (post renunciation of anti-White racism). There is even some love in me for the early Black Panthers. In fact, I rather like the Panthers to this very day. Huey Newton was an all right guy. Eldridge Cleaver was a bastard but he moved to North Africa and turned into a good man, so as a Christian, I forgive him. I loved Obama being the first Black president and cried when he got elected. I voted for him twice. My only beef with him is that he’s too rightwing. I really like that advisor of his, Van Jones.

My heroes are Malcolm X, Huey Newton, the Panthers, Malcolm X and Barack Obama, yet I am a vicious anti-Black racist? How does that even make sense?

Uppity Blacks are fine with me. Black people ought to be uppity. All people ought to have pride and dignity and refuse to grovel before others. I don’t see how the post above divides Blacks into good obedient Blacks and bad or uppity Blacks. I’m not getting it. My critics are all insane.

The next clown is a typical no-fun liberal. I’m evil because I went to a racist website. It is a racist humor website albeit with a vicious undercurrent.

I committed the ultimate sin of laughing at some of those jokes because, damn, they were so bloody funny! So I am a bad, evil, low-life, dirty racist scum of a human, a KKK White Supremacist White Nationalist Nazi because I laughed at some racist humor written by some nasty people.

Does that make me an evil racist? If I laugh at a racist joke, am I the same as Davide Duke, Jared Taylor, Richard Spencer and Andrew Anglin? We’re all the same. We all want to hang them niggers and gas those damn kikes. No sense of nuance. These people truly earn the appellation of libtards.

So these are the SJW’s. This is the Left. This is liberalism. This is why almost everyone on the Left hates my guts and insists I am not on the Left and instead I am a far Rightist.

I just got banned from (((Daily Kos))). It was one of my favorite sites but once I started posting, they banned me right off. Every one of those liberal Democrat losers on there has swallowed every dram of that idiotic Assad Chemical Weapons Attack story. This is so obviously Iraqi WMD’s all over again, with the same, ahem, (((people))) that promoted the last lie now shamefully promoting this lie too. Some liberal Democrat loser wrote about how eeeeeevil AssadPutin or PutinAssad, I forget which, dropped chemical weapons on babies. Then he threw in some oh-so-liberal McCarthyite Cold War barbs at the Font of Evil called Russia.

I think I wrote a comment asking him if the capital of his country was Washington DC or Tel Aviv. It was immediately flagged as anti-Semitism (except it was anti-Israelism, not anti-Semitism), and I was permanently banned almost instantly. You just can’t say one peep about ahem (((certain people))) on there. After all, why do you think it’s called (((Daily Kos))) in the first place?

This is pretty typical. Most liberal to Left sites have either banned me or have made bans on posting to me. I was getting a lot of hits from uber-liberal Reddit until they starting flipping on my content and said Reddit should stop linking to me. My hits from Reddit crashed.

I know I said we should ally with SJW’s against Trump but the problem is that I want to kill 95% of SJW’s with my bare hands. They seem to feel the same way
about me.

Stark, Rabbit and Ryan England had a radio show in which they discussed my proposal.

Rabbit said, “Look, no matter how hard Lindsay tries to suck up to these people and say he’s not be racist and whatnot, they will always hate him, and they never accept him or stop calling him racist. Lindsay can’t win with these folks.”

Sadly I think he is onto something. I should link to that podcast.

So we want to murder each other on sight with our bare hands, and yet we are going to form this great alliance. I don’t think so.

47 Comments

Filed under Anti-Semitism, Blacks, Conservatism, Cultural Marxists, Democrats, Economics, Liberalism, Libertarianism, Political Science, Politics, Race Realism, Race/Ethnicity, Racism, Republicans, Scum, US Politics, White Nationalism, White Racism, Whites

How Leftwingers View Me and This Site

Alex: Why don’t you have the balls to admit you are a Nazi? Why even pretend to be Leftist and use euphemisms like Alt Left and insult real Leftists using derisive terms. It seems even blatant neo-Nazis are better than a pretender like you. Change the avatar to Hitler, and be honest. Stop using those silly quotes and calling yourself a Leftist. You are an embarrassment to Marxism.

Actually I do not like Nazis at all. They’re killers and mass murderers, genocidal maniacs. The Hell with that! I had a Jewish girlfriend for 5 1/2 years. I was seriously thinking about converting to Judaism recently, but modern Judaism seems to tied up in Israel that I am dubious whether I should do this. If they could sever Israel from Judaism like the gangrenous tissue that it is, I would have no problem converting. I would be one of those evil self-haters like Chomsky though. That would be such a kick. Plus then the parentheses around my name would be real! Wow, that would feel so great!

I do not like White Supremacists or White Nationalists that much, although guys like Rabbit are tolerable. They all voted Trump this time around, so I ended every friendship I had with these types. I simply do not agree with being this racist. It’s not ok. And a White state is absurd. The Hell with saving the White race. Who cares!

This is about it. I get mails like this from these guys just about every day. Most liberals react about the same way. Honestly, leftwingers hate me much more than conservatives. I am actually banned from some major liberal websites and at others, there are even bans on linking to me. These tend to be sites run by the base of the ((((Democratic Party))).

Conservatives’ politics are horrific, but mostly they are quite nice to me and a lot of them are very pleasant people, politics aside. Quite a few of them have been very friendly to me, especially Alt Right types. I’m not really wild about racists and Nazis, but at least they are pleasant. Conservatives are generally much nicer to me than leftwingers. Leftwingers generally believe I need to be shot or put in a gulag.  That’s probably true, but I’d prefer to avoid the NKVD for the remainder of my life if I could.

This is actually one of the flagship Alt Left sites. Rabbit and I pretty much founded the movement. Rabbit takes the race thing a lot further than I do, but I am critical of the Sexual Anarchy crowd and Gender Feminism. Rabbit thinks Gay Rights is getting out of hand now too, and he doesn’t like feminazis much either, but he’s into the race thing a lot deeper than I am. I am just a race realist, and I don’t even talk about that very much.

21 Comments

Filed under Conservatism, Democrats, Fascism, Homosexuality, Jews, Left, Liberalism, National Socialism, Nazism, Political Science, Politics, Race Realism, Race/Ethnicity, Racism, Radical Feminists, Sex, US Politics, White Nationalism, White Racism

What the Triple Parentheses Mean on This Site

The Alt Right is using them to mean Jewish, but I am not going to do that. Besides, I have no beef with Jews as Jews per se. My beef is 100% with the pro-Israel crowd, Jewish and Gentile both. And that shitty little country. I don’t care if it burns to the ground, frankly. It would be a better world. Imagine how those secular Arab nationalists like Assad, Qaddafi and Saddam viewed Israel. Well, my views mirror theirs.

So ((( ))) doesn’t mean Jewish, not really. A lot of Jews get parentheses, but some don’t. And some Gentiles get parentheses. Parentheses means “pro-Israel.” That is all it means. Bernie Sanders and Jill Stein to not get bracketed. They’re not the problem.

(((MediaMatters))) means that stupid site is part of the pro-Israel crowd, liberal division I guess. And fuck that.

Most (((liberal))) websites are (((neoconservative))) and (((liberal interventionist)))  with deep ties to the (((Establishment))) and the (((Deep State))), in this case the liberal division. They’re horrible! These liberals are pro-Israeli nuts. These articles are all coming from the pro-Israelis. That’s who is behind all the anti-Russia and anti-Assad crap. Liberals are as much pro-Israel nutcases and the conservatives and centrists. The only people who make sense on Israel are the Alt Right and the Left. Not liberals, Left.

3 Comments

Filed under Anti-Zionism, Conservatism, Government, Israel, Left, Liberalism, Middle East, Neoconservatism, Political Science, Regional, Russia, Syria

Anatomy of a False Flag: Sarin Chemical Weapons Attack by PutinAssad on Khan Shaykun, Syria on April 3, 2017

In fact the evidence that this is a false flag is superb:

  1. CIA Director Pompeo: Pompeo told Trump on April 6 that Assad did not do a chemical weapons attack and in fact, no attack even occurred at all. Trump nodded his head and went ahead and formed a meeting that evening where he decided to attack Syria for the chemical weapons attack that his own CIA told him never happened! Trump didn’t care whether it happened or not! Trump doesn’t care if anything at all is the truth or a lie. Truth and lies are interchangeable for him. If the Truth suits his needs best, he utilizes Truth. However, if Lies suit his needs best, which is true most of the time, then he uses Lies and in fact he automagically transforms Lies into Truths. Apparently Truth is whatever Mr. Trump says or thinks it is. He ought to have a great debate with Plato on that particular philosophical view. Of course, Pompeo along with US Director of Intelligence, along with all other intelligence officials, were ordered not to come to the meeting. They were not invited. Because they knew the Truth. And the Truth was detrimental to the Lie turned Truth that Mr. Trump wished to cynically utilize as his Reichstag Fire by shooting scores of missiles at a foreign country we are not even at war with. So he just launched a war of aggression against a nation based on what he was told by the highest authorities was an out and out lie.
  2. Colonel Pat Lang: Former US military, served a long time in Vietnam and a long career as a US military officer, later high-ranking official in the Defense Intelligence Agency said that all of his intelligence and military contacts told him that Assad did not drop chemical bombs and in fact, no one did on that day. There simply was no chemical weapons attack. It was a nonexistent event.
  3. Philip Giraldi: He is head of the organization of retired CIA officers. Giraldi stated that his CIA contacts were telling him that Assad did stage a chemical weapons attack as alleged and in fact, no such attack even happened at all.
  4. Scott Ritter: Famed US weapons inspector known for blowing the whistle on fake lying claims about Saddam’s WMD’s, is stating that this attack did not occur. He says we are talking about something that does not exist, in Syria’s case an event that does not exist and in Iraq’s case, weapons that did not exist. He says this is the old Iraqi WMD lie all over again. They are repeating the case WMD BS that they did for Iraq. They were called on the carpet for that one and were proved to have out and out lied, with (((Judith Miller))) of the (((New York Times))) playing a starring role for her many reports on what she knew full well were lies. But it was good for (((certain people))), so hey, we stretched the truth a bit, so what?

Further, the evidence that this attack occurred at all is simply zero.

  • There were no planes in the air at the time of the “attack” before 6 AM on that day. The planes showed up at 11:30 and carried out a bombing raid. It is this bombing raid that they are attempting to say actually occurred at 6 AM and dropped the fake chemical bombs. They have craters showing the pure excellent evidence for the attack. Most of the chemicals came from one particular crater in the middle of a road. However, that crater is vastly too large to be from a chemical weapons bomb. The amount explosives needed in such a thing is only 8 ounces, just enough to release the chemicals. The crater instead was obviously caused by a conventional bomb, part of the raid that happened later.
  • Chemical weapons apparently cannot be made into bombs and dropped out of airplanes. They are fired by artillery shells. Anyway the Syrian jets in the 11:30 AM attack would not have been capable of such an attack at any rate.
  • Since the attack by PutinAssad was said to have occurred before 6 AM, it must have happened at nighttime. But Syria’s Air Force does not have the capability of nighttime bombing. So Syria could not have bombed at this time.
  • We have two documented tweets from Al Qaeda associated Twitter accounts, one four hours before the attack and another 24 hours before the attack. Both said that there was going to be a chemical weapons attack in Irbil the next day. Wow! OK, there’s your foreknowledge right there! Either Al Qaeda can see into the future or this whole thing was a charade planned long in advance and known to be scheduled to occur before it did.
  • Two weeks ago, 200 civilians were abducted from two pro-government villages by Al Qaeda. Sometimes Al Qaeda kills these people and other times they ransom them off. A number of those child “chemical weapons victims of PutinAssad” are now being positively identified as these enemy civilian hostages. This is like Ghouta where all identified victims were from a large group of Christians and Alawites abducted in Northern Syria 10 months before.
  • So, PutinAssad is doing all these Sarin gas attacks on enemy controlled areas, but the only people who are getting killed are pro-Assad civilians taken hostage earlier! What? AssadPutin knows where these hostages are and deliberately shoots chemical weapons at them hoping to kill them but trying very hard not to kill any jihadis? No way.
  • No symptoms of Sarin poisoning can be seen in the photos of the dead. They seem to have been killed by a chemical, but the symptoms look like either cyanide or carbon monoxide. The Ghouta victims all had symptoms of carbon monoxide poisoning. So evil PutinAssad dropped Sarin bombs on these poor innocent government supporters, but the Sarin turned into carbon monoxide halfway down by an act of God and that is what killed the people. OK!
  • The White Helmets performance artists, an organization of fakers, liars and actors run by the US and UK to do fake rescues and make constant lying propaganda, are seen administering first aid to the Sarin victims of diabolical PutinAssad. But none of them are wearing protective gear! No way. If those people died of Sarin, the workers would need full protective gear to work with the victims. Without it, they would die or at least be killed because they would get poisoned by the Sarin themselves.
  • There is a “doctor” running around like a chicken with its head cut off in the video. This man is an MD but his license was pulled in the UK because he was associated with ISIS and Al Qaeda. In fact, he was so tight with ISIS that he participated in the kidnapping of John Cantile. So this physician is a known Al Qaeda member and propagandist. He was supposed to be sentenced in the UK on terrorism charges but the charges were dropped so the British could send him back to Syria to work with Al Qaeda and ISIS. I told you the UK is working with ISIS and Al Qaeda!
  • It makes no sense that there were all these child victims. There are many child victims and few adult victims. Did PutinAssad evilly decide to single out the children of government supporters to kill because he likes killing kids more than adults? I guess so.
  • The scene of the “attack” is a cave base for Al Qaeda and the White Helmets near the town but not in the town. So the “attack” appeared to have happened at this base, not in the town where it was said to have happened.
  • All of the “rescue workers” are dressed inappropriately for the job and their behavior is not how the aftermath of a chemical attack would be conducted. The rescue workers would all have full gear on and there would be numerous victims of all ages inside various buildings near the attack site. We should have seen videos of these workers breaking down doors and discovering dead civilians in piles in the structures.
  • Sarin turns you purple. Real purple. Your whole body. Those newly dead bodies in the video are not purple so they were not killed with Sarin. Period. Instead, they are red. This indicates cyanide or carbon monoxide poisoning.
  • The children appear to all have serious head wounds. I guess Satanic PutinAssad decided to drop chemical bombs directly on the heads of these poor babes, hence the head wounds. In fact in such an attack, there would be no head wounds. The only explanation is that someone inflicted these head wounds on these children. I assume that these children were beaten to death or near death prior to be gassed in some sort of gas chambers. The Ghouta victims were all killed in gas chambers. We even have photos of them. This shows there was no chemical weapons attack. A chemical weapons attack would not have caused those serious head wounds.
  • The children are not dressed appropriately. If the attack happened before Dawn, they should be dressed in nightclothes as they would have been asleep.
  • Why is it that a bunch of young kids without their parents are sleeping at an Al Qaeda/White Helmets cave complex base? What are they doing there? Where are their parents?

4 Comments

Filed under Conspiracies, Geopolitics, Government, Middle East, Politics, Radical Islam, Regional, Republicans, Russia, Syria, US Politics, War

A Case Study of the Collapse of US Liberalism: (((Media Matters)))

Almost all US liberal (really liberal Democrat) outlets need those damned parentheses around them. They’re cucked to Hell and back. They are not insurgents as the horrific propagandistic mind control apparatus called the (((US media))). Instead they are utterly complicit in the propaganda war themselves. One would think that all (((liberal Democratic))) outlets are employed by the CIA. Every time they open up their mouths, it’s just the voice of the CIA.

Check out this piece

Report Traces How The “Alt-Right” Spread Pro-Assad Propaganda.

I guess when it comes to (((hating Bashar Assad))) and (((supporting his worst enemies))), (((Americans))) are all in the same boat from Right to Left, with only the Far Left (Leftists like Counterpunch and Global Research) and the Far Right (Alt Right, even including the American Conservative and Ron Unz site) seem to be able to see through the gaseous fog of zero-visibility fog to reveal how much we are being lied to.

A report by the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab found that a claim that recent airstrikes in Syria were a “false flag” operation — an operation that either didn’t really occur or that were conducted by a party other than the Syrian government — which went viral among the “alt-right” actually originated with a Syrian propaganda outlet that supports the current regime and spread to a series of pro-Kremlin conspiracy websites and fake news purveyors before being promoted by “alt-right” figures including Infowars’ Alex Jones and Mike Cernovich.

I will discuss the despicable, vile US imperialist neoconservative (((NATO))) terrorists at the disgusting (((Atlantic Council))) later

Wow I never thought I would see the day when the worst McCarthyites and Cold Warriors were (((liberal Democrats))). But that’s how it is now.

  • Russia ate my homework.
  • Russia killed my dog.
  • I can’t get laid because of Russia.
  • Russia gave me cancer.
  • Russia is transmitting laser messages to my brain.

(((Liberal Democrats))) have now gone full McCarthyite in the worst way. The new line of (((liberal Democrats))): If I don’t like you, you are a Russian spy. And especially:

If you tell the truth about any of the endless false flags, fakeries, nonexistent events and just general straight up seven course meals of fake news, you must be a Russian spy. Go against the Deep State, and you have to be a Russian spy. The latest (((liberal Democrat))) outrage is that there is no such thing as the US Deep State (probably because they are all part of it!), and that everyone who believes in this is a propagandist for a man named PutinAssad.

What is truly pitiful is that if you really want to find out the truth nowadays, the best place to turn is the Russian media. The Russian media does not exactly have a reputation of being extremely honest. But the (((US media))) and general (((Western media))) lies have descended into such a vicious black hole of an abyss that as of right now, Russian media is an order of magnitude more hones than the US media or Western media. Wow! That’s bad. We’re worse liars than some of the biggest liars of all. Pitiful! America really is swirling the bowl right now. I’m not sure if we’re the turd or the water or both, all I know is we are going down the drain.

So MediaMatters, the great (((liberal Democratic))) site to show the rightwing bias of the (((media))), is quite similar to the (((media))) it attacks so much. So let’s just call them (((MediaMatters))) from now on and get it over with for Chrissake.

So these two entities hate each other and one front of the war is a site called (((MediaMatters))). Here are the two deadly enemies:

  • (((Rightwing “establishment” media)))
  • (((Liberal Democratic “opposition” media)))

I don’t get it. Why do they hate each other? What’s the difference? Someone clue me.

Leave a comment

Filed under Cold War, Conservatism, Democrats, Eurasia, Geopolitics, Government, History, Imperialism, Journalism, Left, Liberalism, Middle East, Neoconservatism, Political Science, Politics, Regional, Russia, Syria, US Politics

Resolved: Transgenderism Is a Mental Illness

RL: I work in mental health, and I have to diagnose people a lot, or at least offer my opinion of a diagnosis as I cannot give out legal DSM diagnoses . I even have to do differential diagnosis constantly where I have to figure out which of two diagnoses a person has. Believe me, these cases can be very confusing.

Magneto: In your opinion, is being transgender a mental illness? I mean, I am aware of the statistics that gays/trans people have a far higher suicide rate than heterosexuals, which would seem to suggest that it is a mental disorder.

But it’s kind of hard to think trans are mentally ill when you are looking at a fucking sexy ass Asian ladyboy who is far hotter than any real woman you’ve ever been with. To be honest, I hope trans continues to become more mainstream and more men do the transition into females. Fine with me, more food to choose from, in my opinion.

Ha ha. So, more pussy, even if it’s fake pussy, eh? I’m not sure I am down with that.

 

Is transgenderism a mental illness. Of course it is. In most cases anyway. And the rate has gone up 600X since the 1970’s. If it is some actual biological condition in the brain like sexual orientation, one would not expect the rate to skyrocket like that.

Rates of biological conditions don’t change much. The rate of homosexuality has probably been 3% for a very long time. Homosexuality appears to be an incurable biological condition that gets wired up in their brains somehow. It is a developmental disorder like left-handedness and a number of other things. Something goes wrong hormonally in utero, and the result is male or in some cases female homosexuality. As it is a developmental disorder, would you expect the rates of left-handedness to go up 600X? Real biological conditions just don’t work like that. Why would the hormonal aberrations that cause homosexuality have gone up 600X? They wouldn’t. They would stay at some consistent rate that is close the the rate of things going wrong in utero.

Hence except in a few cases, transgenderism is not a biological disorder. I really feel for these boys who feel like girls from age 2 or whatever. I am willing to consider a biological disorder there.

Yet a biological disorder can also be a mental illness. Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder and even OCD look like biological disorders, and all are also mental illnesses.

These seems to be a “fad” disorder that a lot of folks are developing on their own in a similar way to how these therapists create mental illness in previously healthy girls who got molested. It’s a cool way of going crazy.

Studies in China show that ~3% of the population feels as if they are the opposite sex. So if we let this thing explode, we could end up with a 3% tranny population. In the past, these people became homosexuals (in itself a sort of transgenderism) or perhaps feminine men and masculine women.

When I was growing up in the 1970’s, we had this idea that all men and women have masculine and feminine components, even heterosexual ones. Just because a man has a feminine side or a woman a masculine one doesn’t mean he is not a man and she is not a woman, nor does it mean that either one is a homosexual.

I have a pretty strong feminine side myself, as many people used to think I was gay or bi. I’m not a Man’s Man at all. I’m not macho enough for that. I’m a Ladies’ Man who prefers the company of women. Most Ladies’ Men are not as masculine as Man’s Men.

I worry that if I were growing up today, I might have been sucked into this nonsense and decided that I was a tranny and I was really a woman or something insane like that.

If a man thinks he is a woman or a woman thinks she is a man, that is known as a delusion. It’s just not true. So they’re psychotic in a sense. And the treatment (sex change operation) doesn’t appear to make them any mentally healthier. So why do it? If the treatment doesn’t help the person, we stop doing it.

13% of people who have sex changes actually re-transition. So men who turn into women turn back into men, and women who think they are men turn back into women. If it was a real condition, one would not expect to see that. Homosexuals don’t suddenly decide to be straight. Left-handed people don’t decide to be right-handed one day. Transgenderism in childhood is highly transitory. 73% of transgender children are cured by adulthood. That is, by the time they are 18, they have abandoned the idea that they are the opposite sex. Biological conditions do not have such high spontaneous cure rates.

There have been quite a few spontaneous cures of transgenderism even in adulthood. There are a number of cases where a man was in therapy for transgenderism, and he showed up for therapy one day and announced that he’s no longer transgender. He’s really a man and realizes that and feels like one now. Then he gets up and walks out of the office. Just like that.

30 Comments

Filed under Anxiety Disorders, Asia, Biology, China, Gender Studies, Girls, Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, Mental Illness, Mood Disorders, OCD, Psychology, Psychopathology, Psychotherapy, Psychotic Disorders, Regional, Schizophrenia, Science, Sex, Social Problems, Sociology

Yet Another Gay Lobby Lie: Gays (or Gay Teens) Have Very High Suicide Rates Compared to Straights

RL: I work in mental health, and I have to diagnose people a lot, or at least offer my opinion of a diagnosis as I cannot give out legal DSM diagnoses . I even have to do differential diagnosis constantly where I have to figure out which of two diagnoses a person has. Believe me, these cases can be very confusing.

Magneto: In your opinion, is being transgender a mental illness? I mean, I am aware of the statistics that gays/trans people have a far higher suicide rate than heterosexuals, which would seem to suggest that it is a mental disorder.

Gay men and lesbians in fact do not have a higher suicide rate than heterosexuals. This even applies to gay teens, the ones they scream about suicide risk all the time about. The Gay Lobby has been lying about this one forever now. It’s another one of their lies. It’s not even true.

What is true that at least gay men have a higher rate of attempted suicide than straight men. Lesbians may be similar. This is particularly true in the case of gay teens. If gay men act like women, we would expect to see this, as women have extremely high rates of attempted suicide but the completed rate is much lower. So while women try to kill themselves a lot more, more men actually do it. You know, we men like to get stuff done. We don’t like to mess around or beat around the bush about things.

Partly this is down to method. Women tend to use pills, and men tend to use  guns and ropes. Guns in particularly are quite lethal. Only rarely does a gun suicide fail. However, pills are an inefficient way to commit suicide, as they often do not work.

My own father tried to kill himself with pills and failed. Four of my ex-girlfriends tried to do it, and all failed, although one almost succeeded. Not long ago, I was dating three women at once, and all of them had attempted suicide recently. Two of them did it right under my nose so to speak.

In women, this is often a histrionic gesture, a cry for help, or a desire to get any sort of attention, even negative attention. Suicidal women are a lot more ambivalent than suicidal men. So, assuming gay men are like women, then an elevated attempted suicide rate without an elevated completed rate would make sense.

1 Comment

Filed under Gender Studies, Homosexuality, Mental Illness, Mental Patients, Politics, Psychology, Psychopathology, Self-injury, Sex, Women