Category Archives: Women

Who Is This Woman?

3679019_640px

Believe it or not, the hottie on the left somehow transformed into the landwhale on the right. No one knows how this alchemy occurred, but age and sweet tooth may have had something to do with it.

Who is this woman? What was her occupation? What was she famous for? If you can fathom that the woman on the left is the same as the one on the right, what in God’s name did the wages of time inflict on this poor soul. She looks like she swallowed a whale.

4 Comments

Filed under Celebrities, Women

Jordan Peterson: (Most) Everything He Says Is True

I really hate this guy mostly because he’s a reactionary, but honestly, almost every single thing he says is true.

He’s right that it’s insane that you can talk to a female student behind closed doors anymore. That’s insane! Way to go feminists! Way to backwards, bitches!

Sexual impropriety? What the Hell is that? Can you define it? Define it. Define sexual impropriety. See? You can’t. This Orwellian concept has no definition at all. Truth is, sexual impropriety is anything a woman says it is! Isn’t that great? Now we have a real definition we can all live with. I do want to know what his sexual impropriety bullshit charges are though, just out of curiosity.

Right. Women are not as interested in things as men. So women in academia are not going to be as much into those fields that focus on things. Well, that’s obvious! I don’t even think women like ideas very much. The airy world of pure ideation, the realm of the prowling intellectual, is pretty much a male thing. It’s not that women can’t conceptualize this stuff – it’s more that they think it is flat out boring. I have met women with IQ’s very close to mine – I recall one woman with an IQ of 143 – but she simply could not fathom why I would engage in some wild Herculean task of chopping up German into 138 languages. Why in the Hell would you even do that in the first place? Was her attitude. She was just as smart as I was, not one bit less, but her brain worked differently, being a typical female brain. Women are just as smart as we men are, but their brains work differently so they are interested in different things than we are. Which is fine of course. Vive la difference!

Of course, the more women dress up to be sexually attractive, the more they will contribute to sexual harassment (What the Hell is that anyway?) in the workplace. The more women sexualize themselves to make them look sexually enticing to men, the more men are going to be turned on by them, so the more women will interact with them in a sexual manner because they are getting turned on. I mean, it’s not rocket science, right.

And yes, lipstick does in fact mirror the swelling and reddening of the labia during sex. That’s why it exists in the first place. And I believe cheek blush is based on the same thing. And yes, high heels do indeed mimic a sort of estrus in females, more specifically, heels directly sexualize women by making them appear more as they do in the sex act. Which is, after all, why women wear heels in the first place. Of course.

Women are innately competitive, of course. They especially compete for men. Anyone knows that. And they compete on the basis of beauty too. I know this because women told me so. They told me that women dress up for other women, not for men. I never believed it until I heard it from them.

Of course a man has to remove about 90% of himself when he’s around women, particularly in the case of Peterson, a professor who is banned from having any sexual feelings or even thoughts for that matter. I have to do it myself.

Of course politeness trumps truth with women. Any man knows that. Hell, I learned that in high school!

Of course women manipulate men sexually to advance in the workplace. Duh! Anyone knows that.

Of course makeup is sexually provocative, but I do not agree with Peterson that makeup should be banned in the workplace.

Of course there’s a war on masculine behavior among boys. Boys being banned from throwing snowballs is a straight up war on masculinity itself. Even picking up snow off the ground was seen as toxic masculinity. Of course the bad boys didn’t care and broke all of these stupid rules. Only the good boys obeyed the rules not to act masculine. The worst boys, who probably needed to act less masculine, were not deterred at all. So all you are doing is neutering the mildest displays of masculinity in the best of boys, putting at the back of the pack, while shoving the worst boys to the front. Good job feminists! And he’s correct, in such a dispensation (a topsy turvy morality turned upside down Sadean one at that) the worst boys will get the most women and the most psychopathic males will be fathering the most children while the most decent males will father few if any kids. Way to go feminists!

Of course a transwoman is not a real woman! A transwoman is a man who thinks he’s a woman. His delusion that he is a woman is so fixed that he often has surgery to try to turn himself into some sort of a fake woman, but a man is a man is a man. No man can ever be transformed into a woman. Of course not. Why would anyone think a man can be turned into a woman? That’s ridiculous, I mean given our current technology anyway.

Ok this moron Peterson just compared Chairman Mao, of all people, to trans activists! How ridiculous! Mao was a puritan. The single most awful thing about Peterson is his idiotic fanatical anti-Communism. This dumbass has even covered his entire home with socialist realist paintings just to remind himself, every day mind you, even evil those damned Commies are. Anti-Communism is probably the single driving force behind all of Peterson’s intellectual oeuvre. And that’s where he runs right off the cliff, just like Coyote in the cartoons, following his cartoonish Roadrunner boogeyman of Communism right over the edge of all reason and sense.

And this is what I mean when I say this guy is a reactionary and he can go take a long walk on a short pier. Sure, he’s right most of the time facts-wise, but his mind is just oh so wrong. He’s motivated by sheer puerile idiocy and reaction. Take your anti-Communism and shove it up your ass, Jordan.

He follows online PUA’s because he finds them interesting psychologically. Well, they are saying a lot of psychologically interesting things and most of what they say is flat out true. Look. Let’s get real. PUA’s are all about success. Men don’t mess around with BS and get lost in wildernesses of psychological defenses like women do. Men’s whole raison de etre is “do what works, and all else be damned.” Men don’t care what the theory is as long as it works. If it works and it smells like roses, fine. If it works and it smells like ordure, well, you hold your nose and plow forth anyway because if it works it works, stink or not, damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead.

These PUA’s are absolutely not going to waste any time on bullshit that doesn’t work. That’s something a woman would do. Women would obviously waste endless time on projects that don’t work simply because the ones that did work were so awful. Women would think, “That’s awful, so it can’t possibly work,” and then focus on some feel-good solution that smells like roses but fails every time. Women aren’t concerned with the destination. They’re concerned about the road you take to get there. If it’s a horrible road, they’re not driving on it. They’re taking the scenic route to feel better about themselves, no matter if it gets you anywhere or not.

The idea that these PUA’s would have wasted all these years of intense study on things that don’t work. Men are far too practical for that. These guys conduct nearly controlled double blind studies to test their theories.

And at the end, Peterson violates Godwin’s Law by equating SJW boneheads and fools with literal Nazis. No, Jordan, no. SJW’s are not Nazis. If they are like anyone, they are like Commies, and Commies are not Nazis as you probably think, you silly man.

Peterson gets an 85% rating, but when he’s wrong, good God is he wrong.

54 Comments

Filed under Conservatism, Cultural Marxists, Feminism, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Left, Man World, Maoism, Marxism, Nazism, Political Science, Psychology, Sex, Women

Game/PUA: How Could Chads Possibly Hate Women?

An incel asked how Chads could possibly hate women considering how well females treat them.

My answer: It’s not that simple.

Thing is, a lot of players, playboys, and womanizers hate women.

There are two kinds of slayers.

One type hates women a lot.

The other type really, really love women. They don’t treat them very well, but they do love them.

The first type, the slayers who hate women, well, a female friend said to me about them, “Those guys hate women because they understand what women are really like.”

This is probably true. And that’s straight from a woman’s own mouth!

People don’t understand. A guy dates a couple hundred chicks or fucks a hundred chicks, and he’s seen the good side of women in spades of course. But he has been with so many women that he has also seen a lot of the evil side of women, which is about 50% of their existence.

See, a lot of whores hate men, right? Well, most whores have seen men at their worst, many, many times for years.

The life of Chad is not all golden. The Chads I knew were constantly dealing with chaos and drama, especially if they ran 2-3 chicks at once. They were lying to everyone all the time, and chicks were always screaming at them, breaking into tears, or threatening to kill them. They just laughed it off and said, “LOL! Fuck you, bitch! LOL!,” but you know it got to them. Other men were often threatening to punch them out for pump and dumping their sister or cheating on their cousin or whatever.

Yes, Chad can get lots of sex all right. But there is also a considerable downside to being a manwhore.

Chads really, really, really know women having dealt with a battalion of women over decades. Chads have seen a lot of women at their worst psychocunt behavior literally for decades and, well, they get pretty cynical about women, let’s put it that way.

But there are also the Chads who love women, and that is another story.

If you want all that pussy, you have to deal with the downside of slaying, which is squads of psychobitches going nuts, screaming at you, and threatening to kill you, platoons of guys threatening to punch you, battalions of people hating you, and it never ends.

Moral: Chads are living in Pussy Heaven, but they’re paying for it by living in Cunt Hell at the same time.

Nothing is life free! You pay for everything in life, and I do mean everything!

Leave a comment

Filed under Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Little or None, Man World, Psychology, Romantic Relationships, Sex, Women

Game/PUA: The Confounding Nice Guy Dilemma

Women say they dislike nice guys because “they are not really nice.” They claim that nice guys are only pretending to be nice so they can have sex with the women they are cozying up to. This laughable. Feminists are surprised by this? That men would befriend women in the hopes of somehow bedding them? No kidding, feminists! Of course that’s why we befriend women! Why else would we make friends with women, you fools?

You think bad boys are any nicer about it? Many of them are out an out harassers, assaulters and  more or less rapists. But it’s those fake nice guys we need to hate on!

Let’s say the idiot feminists are right and women really do reject nice guys because “they’re not really all that nice” – in other words, because they are secretly mean, abusive bastards.

If women did reject nice guys for being secretly mean, why then do women flock to men who are far more vicious, violent and abusive like criminals, thugs, gangbangers, sociopaths, murderers, convicts, and even serial killers? I mean how bad could nice guys be? However bad they are deep down inside (dubious), they could not possibly be as bad as the sociopaths above.

So women reject nice guys for being secretly mean, but they flock to out and out evil men who are 10X meaner than nice guys even on a good day. That makes no sense at all. As usual, the feminist analysis is flat out wrong.

As a former nice guy, I can tell you straight up what women dislike about nice guys. In a word, they think they are pussies, sissies, girls, wimps, etc. They’re not men. They’re not masculine enough. “He’s too nice” means he’s a great big fat wimp. She rejects the nice guy who treats her well because he’s wimpy, and she goes for the bad boy who treats her terribly because he’s masculine.

As you can see, women are punishing the men who treat them well and rewarding the men who treat them the worst. Feminism is absolutely blind to this frankly insane characteristic of women. Instead of discussing it, it’s all handwaved away as a big fat misogynistic lie. But any man who has dated women knows differently.

I think part of the problem is that nice guys won’t fight back and often won’t take the initiative.

To be successful with women, you need to take the initiative.

And you definitely need to fight back against your woman when she attacks you, which she is doomed to do fairly regularly no matter what.

Nice guys sit there and take it because they are pussy-whipped. They are afraid that if they stand up to her, she will pull the sex. He needs the sex, so he doesn’t fight back in order to keep the sex around.
Yet the fact that he won’t fight back makes her furious because she sees him as a wimp. Women hate wimps and this is another thing that feminism refuses to discuss and handwaves away as a misogynist lie. Most straight women are also wildly homophobic, at least about the men they date. Feminism lies about this too and insists it is a misogynist lie. If you want to know why men are so homophobic, it’s because their girlfriends demand it.

Treat her well but stand up to her and fight back, even viciously but preferably verbally and not physically. This seems to be the best combination where you are not too much of a a nice guy and yet just enough of a bad boy to be alluring but not evil or abusive.

1 Comment

Filed under Feminism, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Man World, Psychology, Romantic Relationships, Sex, Women

PUA/Game: How to Deal with the Boogeyman of Rejection

Numbers Game

Dating sites are just awful. You really have to run Numbers Game. A friend of mine was a Chad womanizer, and he was on a big dating site. He sent out things called Likes and Flirts to ~100+ women. He would just sit there all day bombarding all these women with IOI’s. He said out of ~100 “approaches,” 2-3 might talk to you, and a lot of those would flake. Nevertheless, this guy was legitimately screwing 2-3 new women every week off that site.

I absolutely play Numbers Game on sites, and I very commonly deal with women flaking after 2-3 days of conversation. Try to analyze how you might have screwed up, but you might not figure it out.

Dealing with Rejection and Learning to Be Hard

If you can figure out how what you did to make her flake, simply say, “Live and learn” and add it to your social skills book in your head, or if you don’t care about what you did to make her flake, just say this self-talk:

So what LOL. I don’t care what bitches think. I’m not going to change. If bitches don’t like it, tough LOL.

I know how to talk to women, and even I screw it up all the time. Women are extremely flighty and emotional and take offense at all sorts of silly comments and remarks. You can literally blow up a whole months-long relationship with a single sentence. So with women generally you are offending her or pissing her off at least a fair part of the time. The main trick is to keep this to a minimum, not to eliminate it.

Now guys like me on dating sites get rejected horribly by lots of women. I start talking to lots of women, and they ghost me all the time. I have had arrangements to meet women for get to know each others or dates, and these have blown up many times by the woman flaking out before the meeting even takes place. And I was talking to these women on the phone a lot. It’s cold, vicious, and brutal out there, and you need to develop a very thick skin for rejection. You get rejected and you just say, “Screw that bitch LOL,” pick yourself up and carry on. You have to be like a ring fighter who gets knocked down over and over and always picks himself up.

I have good self-esteem but the mass rejection that even Normans get on these sites must be utterly devastating to more sensitive types like these incel guys.

It would not be unusual at all to be on different dating sites and get ~4 dates in 3-4 years and have most of those be only single dates.

Ok, here is what I do and what you have to do:

When a woman rejects me, which I deal with all day on these sites, I just say things like this (self-talk):

Fuck that bitch!…Fuck you, dumb cunt, get lost!…You sucked anyway, bitch LOL!…Oh well good thing, you’re ugly anyway bitch ha ha!…I don’t care about you, bitch, fuck off LOL!… You think I care if you reject me? LOL!

I just sit there and laugh at them and call them cunts all day as they reject me.

And I don’t even hate women really at all. On the contrary I rather like them.

People might say that saying all these hateful things would make you a misogynist, a psychopath, or a bad person, but that never happens to me because I am basically a very nice guy, so all of those comments simply serve to leave me a nice guy and just lower my inhibitions a lot and accommodate to all the rejection you get. Anyway, I don’t really believe all those nasty comments I tell myself about those women who reject me. On a certain level, I know it’s bullshit, so it doesn’t change my opinion. It’s just self-protective.

I recommend that you try my plan of self-talk when women reject you on those sites or really anywhere for that matter as long as that talk doesn’t make you hateful or psycho. But I doubt if it would. For men who are just shy, instead of making you a psychopath, it will probably just lower your inhibitions.

You have to get tough and hard to do this game. If you can’t get tough and hard, it will be very hard to get women.

Normies go through the exact same crap these incels do. It’s just that we don’t give up, and they flip.

2 Comments

Filed under Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Man World, Psychology, Romantic Relationships, Sex, Women

PUA/Game: Getting Women Is Always The Hardest Job You Will Ever Have

Getting females has always been work. The hardest thing I ever did in life, other than getting that Master’s degree, was getting females. And let’s not even talk about keeping them around, turning them into girlfriends, starting relationships, and then sustaining them over time.

Sure, I could attract them, but that’s only part of it, or it was back then anyway. There’s so much more to it than that. Just because she’s attracted to you doesn’t mean she’s going to do much of anything. How much you can get her to do with you and how soon and for how long is all dependent on thing – your Game. And that’s where Robert Felix and his 1,000 pound bag of tricks comes in. Gaming females always took all of my supercomputer brain power, and then 10X more (which I didn’t even have).

Seriously, they could offer AA’s, BA’s, Masters’ and PhD’s in Seduction Studies. There’s that much to it, and it goes on and on, and you never stop learning. I’m still learning how to do this at age 60, and as long as I have a sex drive, I’ll keep learning until I die.

Females are maddeningly, insanely complex creatures. But then that’s part of the challenge. Women think they are somehow intelligible, but that’s a conceit. Hell, even women don’t understand women!

I’ve have had women who were my best friends. We called and texted each other all day long. I used to bring my women problems to them, and they would often be stumped. “I don’t know,” they would say. “I don’t what she’s trying to say or do here. Women are weird. I can’t understand them myself half the time.”

But there’s a method to the madness. There always is.

Leave a comment

Filed under Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Man World, Psychology, Romantic Relationships, Sex, Women

The Definitions 99% of the Population Gets Wrong: Pedophilia and Hebephilia

Jynxi: Pedophilia has to prepubescent children. I don’t think these girls qualify as ten year olds. However, the correct term might be hebephilia, a attraction to pubescent young adolescent children. I think the public school teachers union has all the information you need.

I am making fun of all the dangerous idiots out there, almost all of whom are women, who insist that any man who is attracted to any teenage girl is a pedophile. Yeah, these dumb bitches actually believe this!

Women in power won’t rule based on logic because females are simply not logical creatures. It’s men who are logical ones. Women in power will rule based on their feels, which is a bad idea in general and especially for men, at whom most of these women’s persecution will be aimed. Women can help us men run things. I do not object to that. I just don’t want them running things. It’s not a problem. Each gender has its roles. Women can’t do everything.

Hebephilia is not appropriate here either, and the definition is incorrect. Hebephilia is not attraction to pubescent females, otherwise all men would be hebephiles because all men are attracted to pubescent girls. Instead it is a preference for pubescent girls to the point of fixation to where they are simply not attracted at all to mature females. They are not a lot different from pedophiles, but they think they are superior to the pedos.

I have lurked on one of their 8chan boards, and hebephiles are weird. For instance, people would post a photo of a 16 year old girl, and they would all start screaming, “Ew gross! No grandmas!” Yeah, they actually believe that. 16 year old girls are disgusting Grandmas to these guys. That’s almost as bad as the pedos who think even pubescent females are too old.

I happen to think hebephilia is a disorder, but there was a big debate around Hebephilia in the latest DSM-5, and the consensus was that Hebephilia not only was not a mental illness, it wasn’t even abnormal! Also they were worried that making it a mental illness would allow the authorities to lock up some guy who screws a 14 year old forever on preventive detention bullshit, which I think is unconstitutional.

 

1 Comment

Filed under Dangerous Idiots, Gender Studies, Girls, Heterosexuality, Idiots, Mental Illness, Pedophilia, Psychology, Psychopathology, Sex, Women

PUA/Game: #Metoo Nonsense: Why It Is Dangerous to Put Women in Power in Society

This is why it is dangerous to put women in power in society. They start instituting blatantly unjust and antiscientific nonsense because their feels tell them it’s the right thing to do. This is exactly what we are seeing with this #metoo insanity. Does anyone even know what Sexual Harassment even is? Nope. Does anyone even know what Sexual Misconduct (What an Orwellian notion that phrase is itself) is? Nope. No definition of Sexual Harassment. No definition of Sexual Misconduct nonsense.

Vague rules and laws are unconstitutional. You have to know what the laws is so you can figure out how not to break it. If you don’t even know what the law is, how can you figure out how to obey it?

Apparently the definitions of Sexual Harassment and Sexual Misconduct are entirely based on women’s feels. Not only that but they are based on the feels of  each individual female! So those phrases of law not only have no definition, but they probably have a separate definition for every woman in the country! How do you know what you are doing is Sexual Harassment or Sexual Misconduct? Because you gave some woman “uncomfortable” feels. How are you supposed to know what makes any given woman uncomfortable so you can figure out how not to do so? You can’t!

Furthermore, women will have one set of rules for Chad (he can pretty much do whatever he wants to her, and she won’t feel bad) and another set of rules for Normans and Omegas. Say you see Chad walk up to a woman and say something and watch the woman swoon. He leaves and now you walk up to her and say the exact same thing Chad said to her, and she flips out, screams Sexual Harassment, and you lose your job or get thrown out of the establishment.

So not only does each individual woman have a separate unknowable definition of Sexual Harassment/Misconduct, each individual woman also has a separate unknowable definition of  Sexual Harassment/Misconduct for every new man she encounters!

It’s almost like something out of a Kafka novel, say The Trial, where the man is arrested, jailed and prosecuted but never learns the charges against him and no one else seems to know what they are either.

Thanks to feminism, modern women have left us men unmoored in a Kafkaesque nightmare. Thanks a lot, ladies!

5 Comments

Filed under Feminism, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Law, Man World, Mass Hysterias, Ridiculousness, Sex, Social Problems, Sociology, Women

America, Moral Beacon of Humanity

27994297_10106209950860617_735700233_n

Thank God for the Cultural Left! It’s not leading to the degeneration of society or anything like that. It’s just a collection of extremely healthy alternative lifestyles, sexual orientations and gender identities. Don’t kink shame! Let everyone do what they want! What could possibly go wrong if we do that?

It sure is comforting knowing that we in the West have the moral upper hand against those scummy Muzzies and Russkies and Greeks. American exceptionalism makes sense because we are better. We are the shining city on the hill, the one all of humanity looks up to for progress and moral guidance.

Can you believe those Arab men make their women wear bags over their bodies? How puritanical. Wouldn’t it be so much better if those Arab chicks just strolled around naked in the hot sun. I’m sure that wouldn’t cause any problems or anything like that.

Face it folks, morality is passe! Three cheers for the Cultural Left!

2 Comments

Filed under American, Cultural Marxists, Culture, Left, Scum, Sex, Social Problems, Sociology, Women

Good Lord, What Happened?

3679019_640px

Believe it or not, the hottie on the left somehow transformed into the landwhale on the right. No one knows how this alchemy occurred, but age and sweet tooth may have had something to do with it.

Anyway, who is this woman and why is she famous?

Leave a comment

Filed under Babes, Celebrities, Women