Yes, Mr. Wallace is a White nationalist, with all of the problems that that entails. On the other hand, he doesn’t want to kill all the Jews. He was horrified that a colleague with a radio show was actually advocating such a thing and he broke off all contact with him. For Wallace, mass murder or genocide was a bridge too far.
He comes from Alabama, with the mindset prevalent among Whites in that area. In fact, he comes from an interesting part of central Alabama called the Cotton Belt. If you follow the Cotton Belt through the South, you will notice that a large number of the Blacks in the South are congregated in this somewhat narrow swath through the heart of the South. This was the heart of the cotton-growing region of the South. Of course, huge numbers of Black slaves were used to work on this crop. After slavery ended, many of the Blacks never moved away, and even today, the Cotton Belt remains the heart of the Black community in the Southern United States.
As far as White nationalists go, Wallace is rather tame. One thing I always did like about him is that he is a fine writer. He is one of the best writers to ever come out of that movement. I dare say he is a better writer than I am. I know there are people who write better than I do. It is a bit painful to talk about them, but it’s always nice to have people to look up to, our betters whose skills we can aim to approach or meet.
This article is absolutely excellent. Of course he does not support the mass shooting in any way. Actually he condemns all of the White nationalist terrorist attacks that have taken place in recent years, along with mass murders of Whites by Blacks (yes there have been a few) and other assassination attempts and mass shootings. He tries to find that the ties that bind all of these disparate shootings together, and I think he got somewhere.
He also throws in Bruce or Caitlin Jenner and Rachel Dolezal, the woman who is breaking the frontier for the newest insanity that I assume the Cultural Left will now be promoting – transracialism. I am serious – I fully expect the Cultural Left Freakshow to start promoting this fairly soon. After all, if you can choose which gender you are – today I am a man, tomorrow I am a woman, then gender is as fluid as your choice of socks.
If this is Wednesday we must be in Paris and I am agender, if this is Sunday, it must be Vienna and now I am a bigender, if this is Friday, it must be Madrid and I am now pangender. Deciding what gender to be is becoming like drawing straws – short straw gets to joyously change his gender today, long straw has to stay their birth gender and suffer alone.
Well if we can choose our gender, why can’t we choose our race too? Why not be transracial? Why can’t a Black man identify as White? Why can’t I be Black anyway? I’ve always wanted to be Black. Why can’t a Polynesian choose to be a Pygmy? Why can’t an Aborigine say he is an Eskimo?
Surely if gender is as fluid and changeable as the Lunatic Left says it is, then race should be a choice too, no?
What could possibly tie all of this together? Fantasy ideology, Wallace says, quoting from another work. I think he is onto something here. Good thinking.