Category Archives: Pornography

PUA/Game: Why Are PUA Types So Reactionary?

Sisera: Lindsay,

Why do a lot of the PUA types turn to reactionary politics?

I mean realistically the only way they might find a woman (specifically, gold-diggers) is if they get rich.

But if you’re in your 20’s working a low paying job, aren’t you more concerned about even having money to save in order to get rich and not getting taxed heavily 20 years down the road?

So it seems Roosh might sell false hope. That’s why these incel mass shooters visit sites like “PUA hate”.

BTW, TRASH is now a favorite on Return of Kings. Check it out.

First things first.

Why do a lot of the PUA types turn to reactionary politics?

I don’t know except the Cultural Left is now completely feministed and cucked as far as men and masculinity are concerned. I mean men are the enemy, masculinity is toxic, gay, bi and trans guys are the greatest thing since sliced bread, on and on.

And the Cultural Left really really hate PUA and Game, which to me is insane because all Game is is the Science of Seduction. What the Hell is wrong with seduction for Chrissake? I mean men have been trying to figure out how to get women for millennia now. Check out a famous book called On Love written by the famous Roman writer Seneca. It could be called How to Pick up Girls in Rome in 200 BC. Men have been doing this PUA/Game stuff forever. It’s part of the natural, normal behavior of human men.

Back in the 1970’s and even 1980’s, the pickup/Game scene was all around liberal men. Hef, Bob Guccione, Al Goldstein, and Larry Flynt were all liberal Democrats. Almost everyone in the porn industry was a liberal Democrat, and that’s true to this very day. Back then, being on the liberal/Left implied a “libertine, do it in the streets” mindset.

Now the Left has been taken over by feminists and faggots, it hates straight men, especially straight White men (though fags can take as many fists up their ass as they want, and it’s all good). The Left is all Sex-Negative Feminism now. It’s #metoo bullshit, the sexual harassment weapon on steroids (the worst weapon we ever gave women), ever-expanding definitions of rape, rape culture bullshit, patriarchy bullshit, insane consent rules that force all straights who want to have sex to act like shy, uncertain virgns.

I mean it really seems like the Left doesn’t want us men to get laid at all. It doesn’t even want us to try to get laid, since if we flirt with women, ask for the numbers or for dates or even look a them God forbid, we’re guilty of Sexual Misconduct (What sort of Orwellian nonsense is a concept like that?), Sexual Harassment, maybe Sexual Assault, or Rape, and someone needs to call the cops on us or put a restraining order on us to protect women from our evil roaming eyeballs and flapping lips.

Considering that the Left is now so hostile and hate-filled towards straight men, who can blame them for going reactionary?

On the other hand, the situation we have right now is that it is the rightwingers of all people who are singing the praises of Sexual Liberation and the Sexual Revolution, and the Left wants to roll the clock back to the 1880’s where we put stockings on piano legs. The Modern Left is the precise opposite of all those things we fought for in the Sexual Revolution, one of the great liberation movements of the 1960’s. We’ve turned into the uptight squares we used to mock and hate. It’s pathetic.

“I mean, realistically, the only way they might find a woman (specifically, gold-diggers) is if they get rich.

But if you’re in your 20s working a low paying job, aren’t you more concerned about even having money to save in order to get rich, and not getting taxed heavily 20 years down the road?”

This mindset never made sense to me. All politics is class politics. Low income people should be class conscious. What you describe is the typical phenomenon in the US known as false consciousness.

I would like to point out that I have been getting 7-10’s, hot women, even model types, within my age bracket at least, ever since I was 17 years old, and I’ve never had two nickels to rub together. Hell, my girlfriends have been paying my way most of my life. I’m not proud of that, although the gigolo image is cool, really I would much rather have at least been paying my own way. A girlfriend recently broke up with a long relationship with me and she said, “All I got was a cup of coffee and a card!” I can’t put into words what a piece of crap I felt like when I read that.

On the other hand, I’ve always Chad or at least Chadlite, even to this day, and whatever the rules of love and sex are for most men, Chad breaks them all. The rules simply do not apply to Chad. He’s the exception to every rule out there, and he’s living proof of Looks Theory and the Black Pill.

So it seems Roosh might sell false hope.

Roosh is obviously a horrible human being. Of course he’s a snake oil selling con artist. All these PUA guys are.

That’s why these incel mass shooters visit sites like “PUA Hate”.

Still in business as Slut Hate. The PUA idiots like the execrable Roosh are selling a fraudulent product called Game, so of course a lot of people who bought the product and got ripped off are pissed. Hence PUA Hate for the victims of the PUA fraud. And by the way, these incels are as bad as Roosh or probably worse. Nevertheless, I feel very sorry for them, and I do feel sorry at all for Rooshbag. He’s one of the most hateable people I can think of.

BTW, TRASH is now a favorite on Return of Kings.

Well, that’s no surprise. They had previously banned for, well, simply being Trash is the best way to put it, but I guess they let him back on. To be fair he’s in his element. Most of the douchebags over there are about as narcissistic as he is.

Check it out.

Better not. Every time I go there I want to smash my computer screen. Monitors are expensive.

I can’t put into words how much I hate those people. They’re just horrible, as bad as Trump.

6 Comments

Filed under Conservatism, Democrats, Feminism, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Left, Liberalism, Little or None, Man World, Political Science, Politics, Pornography, Psychology, Radical Feminists, Romantic Relationships, Scum, Sex, US Politics

The Dangers of Fisting

Here.

I never thought this was a good idea. Gay men have been doing it forever, but it’s only recently that women started doing it too, at least according to the porn I’ve been watching.

Fully 37% of gay men have engaged in fisting.

What is it? Well, the insertive partner takes his fist and shoves up the receptive partners ass. Shoved is not quite right as they go tend to go very slowly with lots of lube.

I almost never look at gay porn, either photos or videos, but of course I’ve run across a tiny bit of it. It’s not my thing, and I find it rather disgusting.

I’ve seen a few gay porn stills of this. I have to admit that it looks pretty weird to see a man with another guy’s fist shoved all the way up his ass.

Here are some of the problems that can result from fisting:

Eleven patients with injuries of the rectum and sigmoid colon secondary to the insertion of the clenched fist are presented. Six patients sustained mucosal lacerations of the rectum and four patients had rectosigmoid perforations requiring laparotomy. One patient sustained a severe sphincter laceration producing complete anal incontinence. The management of these conditions is discussed.

I don’t know much about the mucosal lacerations of the rectum. I’m not sure if that can happen with anal sex. Usually with anal sex you get these little tears called fissures that tend to heal on their own after a bit. Laceration sounds pretty hardcore.

The other four are much more serious. These are rectosigmoid perforations, in other words, a perforated rectum. That’s a very bad thing and it almost never happens from just anal sex. I’m not sure what a laparotomy is.

The last man had a severe sphincter laceration which produced complete anal incontinence. You can have surgeries after this happens to try to fix the problem, but they don’t necessarily work. There are indeed some older gay men who have anal incontinence after years to decades of all sorts of anal sex. These men do indeed have to wear something like a diaper to deal with this issue. It’s not a myth.

I doubt if it’s the typical outcome though. That sounds like a nightmare. Not being able to hold your shit.

I keep seeing the word laceration used here. I’ve never seen that word used in conjunction with an injury from anal sex. That must have something to with the fact of a huge fist being up there instead of a small penis.

I can’t believe 37% of gay men have had a fist shoved up their ass. That sounds nuts. Sometimes I wonder if there is something wrong with gay men, other than simply being gay of course. They seem so self-destructive.

2 Comments

Filed under Gender Studies, Health, Homosexuality, Man World, Medicine, Pornography, Sex

If I Am Attracted to Transgender Women Does That Make Me Gay?

Answered on Quora: 

I am going to go against the PC line that transwomen are women. I say they are not women. Instead they are men who think they are women. No amount of surgery can make a man a woman.

However, this is an interesting question. There was a fully transitioned transsexual named Lana a while back who made a lot of porn. The porn is straight porn, and the men having sex with her are regular straight men. She looks very much like a woman although she has a pretty strange looking vagina. In fact, she makes a very beautiful woman.

I have no idea what sort of men date fully transitioned transwomen. It’s a mystery to me.

However, there are quite a few straight men who will date and have sex with pre-op transwomen. That is, they still have a penis. These men only play the male role with these pre-ops. The two men I knew like this were extremely masculine and were both serious womanizers. And one man was very homophobic. But as you can see, even a homophobic man might have sex with a pre-op transwoman!

I like to go look at forums of people who odd or bizarre sex fetishes. I am not into any of these fetishes, but I am fascinated by sexual strangeness.

There was a forum for men who were in Thailand who had a fetish for ladyboys. Most of these ladyboys were pre-op transwomen. The men were generally White men from the West.

I was fascinated to see where these men were at sexually because the fetish seemed so odd. Now these men were unusual because most of them played all roles with these ladyboys. For instance, most of them liked receptive anal sex with their ladyboys. Practicing receptive anal sex is quite gay behavior. Many bisexual men who lean more straight will refuse to do this, as it means you are playing the female role in gay sex, and these men often only play the male role.

As I studied them further, it became clear that none of these men were gay or even bisexual! That is, none of them had sex with ordinary men. I am not sure if they had sex with women either. Also they came across very straight in their conservation and photos, and many seemed like masculine straight men except for the fetish (gay men and straight men often talk in very different ways, and I can often tell them apart).

A ladyboy looks and acts like a woman, except in this case, it still has a penis. The man who is attracted to a ladyboy would be a man who is attracted to women.

My conclusion was that these were some odd type of heterosexual men who were attracted to women or people who appear to be women but who had some strange fetish for ladyboys which even extended to getting fucked in the ass by the ladyboy. I did not think they were gay at all or even bisexual.

I admit it’s an odd fetish!

Leave a comment

Filed under Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, Man World, Pornography, Sex

The Story of Mr. Hands

Betiality porn is apparently legal in the US. There are bestiality photos and videos all over the Net. You can go look at them if you wish, but it’s pretty messed up stuff.

Yes, the video is called Mr. Hands, and in that video, you can indeed see this idiot getting fucked in the ass by a horse. The same act that you see on that video ended up killing him hours later. Perforated rectum I think.

I don’t like to rejoice after deaths too much, and I won’t rejoice over his, but I don’t really care that this idiot died. I don’t care when fools do stupid things and die. I don’t care when idiots jump out of airplanes and die. I don’t care when morons climb 20,000+ foot mountains in Alaska or Tibet.

A movie called Zoo was made about his story. It’s excellent, I cannot recommend it highly enough.

10 Comments

Filed under Bestiality, Death, Pornography, Sex

“Child Pornography” on the Darknet

You may have heard that the FBI has people dedicated to infiltrating the Dark Web. They won’t get very far.

The FBI got into one of the invite only child pornography (CP) sites by accident somehow and, they busted the guy who ran it and his clientele. But that’s it. They have not cracked anything else.

It’s hardly crackable anyway. No one knows who anyone is down there, and there’s no way to find out who anyone is. If a cop or anyone for that matter is wandering around down there, mostly what you are going to see is a lot of weird closed doors to sketchy websites. Everything requires an invite or a password. It’s like walking through a huge hotel where all the doors are locked and there are cryptic, possibly sleazy but hard to figure out labels on the doors.

There are all sorts of weird, creepy, and sleazy sites down there, but the hard cold illegal stuff like child pornography is typically invite-only. And I guess the cops are not going to get an invite. One of the largest child porn sites down there is run by a woman who got molested as a girl and apparently liked it and turned into a child molester or child porn fan herself. She runs it with her husband. No one seems to know who she is, and there doesn’t seem to be any way to find out.

I believe 60% of the Dark Net is CP. Ugly place.

I have never been to the Darknet, and I don’t go looking for real CP on the web. I have friends who have seen it on the chans where it gets posted sometimes, and they told me it is awful stuff, so bad that once you see it, you never want to see it again.

CP barely exists on the real web, and your chances of stumbling across it accidentally are vanishingly small, but that depends very much on how you define your “CP.” There are nine different levels of “CP,” and the top 3-4 levels are more or less legal and are actually not even considered CP.

I am talking about photos of nudist camps where people of all ages, including kids, are walking about naked. There are nudist and nudist camp sites all over the Internet, and you can see naked human beings of all ages on those sites walking about in the woods, sitting on the beach, etc. Remember, nudity is not necessarily child pornography. There has to be some sort of focus on the genitalia or lascivious display of the genitalia.

The stuff with little girls (under 13) is basically impossible to get to on the normal web if it even exists at all anymore (it’s probably all gone Darknet). The stuff with puberty aged girls with adult-like bodies posing lasciviously is accessible on the normal Net but extremely hard to find, and you really have to know where to go looking for it and know what you are doing to find it on more or less “hidden” websites. It’s also dead illegal, and I would not go looking for that stuff if I were you.

I have been told that there are are photos of naked teenage girls posed and even having hardcore sex all over the Net. Teenage girls have quite a bit of their own posed nude stuff out there. They post their nudes or porn pics to their personal social media pages like Twitter. There are definitely Russian sites where that post a lot of underage  teenage girls. They’re mostly standing in front of a mirror, standing in their bedroom or by the pool, and playing at the beach. Those sites are quite hard to find and are quite hidden and not marked well. Nevertheless, I am pretty sure that all of the photos described above are legal anyway. But most people are so afraid that it might be illegal that no one in the US wants to post it.

If it looks like she could be 18, there’s no way to find out if she is or not.

I am also told that there is a lot of hardcore porn with underage teenage girls all over the Internet, but I’ve hardly seen any myself other than one famous one by the Bang Brothers that has millions of views by now. She’s 15, but you watch that video, and she doesn’t look 1% different from the legal 18 year olds out there. Nothing’s going to happen if you watch it because LE would have to put millions of men in jail or prison by now.

Hardcore porn with underage teenage girls, although reportedly common, is very hard to find for real though because you are never sure if she’s really underage unless someone tells you. Almost no hardcore porn on the Net actually says it’s an underage girl, and the rare stuff that is might just be marked “16 years old” just try to draw in viewers looking for taboo stuff, and it might not even be illegal. Might be an 18 year old girl with a “16 years old” tag on it to draw in viewers.

What there is instead is a ton of porn out there with young looking teenage girls saying generally saying “18” on it, and Lord knows if the girls are 18 or not. They always look like they could be 18. Unless they know who she is or she could not possibly be 18, LE has no idea if it’s even “CP,” so it stays up.

1 Comment

Filed under Child Porn, Crime, Girls, Jailbait, Law enforcement, Lolitas, Pornography, Sex

Etiologies and Possibilities of Change in Male and Female Sexual Orientation

Huho: I’m surprised that the myth that you can turn gay exists post 1945.

Maybe it’s not a myth? Depends how you define being gay. There are heterosexual men by orientation who have chosen a gay lifestyle because they were terribly rejected by women or straight society. Apparently men don’t turn them on at all, but they go gay because women reject them and they want to have a sex life. Are these men gay? Are they straight? What are they? What determines orientation, attraction or behavior.

We only know that male sexual orientation is fixed at age 15. I report this a lot, but no one else does, and sites linking in to my articles about this often express disbelief and shock.

A large percentage of the  Cultural Right continues to insist that all gay people have chosen a gay lifestyle. The therapists around Saccarides and NARTH have always promoted a line that males apparently turn gay somehow or other in boyhood due to poor father identification.

They also insist that gay men can change their sexual orientation with their fraudulent therapy, yet science has now abundantly proven that all studies attempting to turn gay men straight or even bi for that matter, have failed. I remember one article I read that listed ~80 publications documenting the inability to change gay men.

If gay men can’t move at all, straight and bi men may not move either. And indeed the latest science that by age 15, males cannot even be moved around in their orientation – you can’t change a 10-90 gay man to a 20-80 gay man.

Heterosexual orientation cannot be increased in the lab and homosexual orientation cannot be increased. This goes for even the sexual orientation continuum, where they can’t even move a bit on the continuum.

They have not yet documented that straight men cannot be turned gay. We don’t know if heterosexual orientation can be decreased or if homosexual orientation can be increased because no straight man ever shows up in the lab wanting to turn gay.

There is however one tantalizing case in the literature of a straight college man who wanted desperately to turn gay who had tried for several years with no success. He hated women and  spent most of his time with gay men, but he couldn’t move his orientation. He had been trying and failing for several years when he showed up for therapy.

Straight men who go gay in prison nearly always revert right back to heterosexuality when they walk out that gate.

As I said though, if it works one way it has to work the other, otherwise you have to postulate heterosexual orientation as some weird weak force that can always be decreased and and never increased and homosexual orientation as some strange virulent virus that can always be increased but never decreased. That hypothesis fails even before testing, as it doesn’t make sense.

There wasn’t much evidence until recently that male sexual orientation is immutable past age 15 and that sexual orientation may even be fixed or rooted before then. This whole “born gay” business has not been going on very long. How long? 20 years? 30 years?

Homosexuals still insist that “sexuality is fluid,” while insanely saying that “gays are born gay.” They want it so all of them are born gay and can’t change, and all straight people can turn bi or something anytime they want. Clever, right? Gay sites still react with rage and fury when I say that male sexual orientation is fixed at age 15. Then start jumping up and down and yelling that straight men can turn bisexual at any age. Obviously the ideal situation for them is them all being stuck gay forever and us all being able to go halfway anytime we want. It’s so obviously self-serving that it is disgusting.

Gay politics is so insane that you could nearly diagnosis a Delusional Disorder for the whole movement in the DSM. Almost every single notion that they promote is a flat out lie.

A lot of women absolutely turn bisexual. Female sexual orientation is not immutable as men’s is.

I still get a lot of flak from SJW’s  who insist that male and female sexuality is fluid and people can move all over the place all through life on whatever whim of the moment they have, and this is wonderful because “no one cares” who’s gay and who’s not, so I guess if 50% of society turns gay, this is the greatest thing since Kleenex? Many pro-gay people continue to write “sexuality is fluid” at the same time they write “nobody chooses their sexual orientation” and “all gays are born gay.” In fact, these three contradictory notions are part of any Cultural Left discourses on sexual orientation.

There seems to be evidence that women’s attractions and even orientation can move around, and a fair amount of women move around through life. A lot of straight women turn lesbian, and quite a few lesbians turn straight. Straight women turn bi all the time. Teenage girls nowadays go through phases where they are straight, bi, lesbian, asexual, pansexual, etc. shifting between any one of these things to any of the  others all the time. A blob of mercury is easier to pin down.

Female sexual orientation is very poorly understood and a lot of lesbians seem to be lesbians of choice.

Current theories of how women arrive at a lesbian sexual orientation are irrational and even fail the smell test.

For instance, I like to go to porn movie sites. You know what they are. Pornhub, Xhamster, Xmovies. The videos are nice but I especially like to read the comments.  They’re almost better than the videos, which I often skip through and miss most of the video, only watching parts.

I have seen many cases of women cheering wildly for the dirtiest straight porn you could possibly imagine. Gangbangs, blowbangs, bukkakes, etc. with one woman and 26 guys, stuff like that. These videos show women engaging in the most perverse acts of wild heterosexuality with zero lesbianism. Face it, a woman doing that has a heterosexual orientation that is as strong as it can get. Attraction to men doesn’t get any stronger than that.

I followed a lot of these accounts back, and in many cases, these women cheering wildly for some gangbang with 10 guys are lesbians! Now this makes no sense to me. Lesbians, if the definition makes sense, are turned on by women and lesbian sex but not turned on by men and heterosexual sex. So it looks like a lot of lesbians are very much turned on by men and women engaging in wild straight sex with men, yet nevertheless insist that they are lez.

This makes no sense, and it implies that the decision to go lez is not based on what women are attracted to or turns them on. It’s probably more likely rooted in fear and hatred of men, and just coincidentally, vast numbers of “born that way” lesbians for some odd reason also have virulent hatred of phobic behavior towards men. Apparently they were born with a vicious hatred and terrifying fear of men! What sort of sense does that make?

The only thing that makes sense is that a lot of lesbians have tried men and had a lot of bad experiences with them, so they started hating and fearing men while going lez.
I’m sorry. If you are highly aroused by men and women having sex with men, how can you possibly be a lesbian? Someone lay this out for me.

Further, we have scientifically documented sexual orientation change of some lesbians in the lab. Some lesbians, predictably, are that way due to fear of men (documented by science). If they are motivated to change, these women can be changed by sex therapists who work with them to get rid of their fear of men. I have no idea what happens to the attraction to women. Gay sites go completely crazy, screaming and yelling, whenever I say that because it interferes with their “lesbians are born that way” lie.

3 Comments

Filed under Conservatism, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, Left, Political Science, Politics, Pornography, Psychology, Science, Sex, Women

Hebephiles and Their Internet Sites

This is another in our series of posts about sick, disturbing, or fucked up websites and the twisted deviants and perverts who go to them!

First we need to describe some terms, mostly because almost everyone either has no idea what this word means or they have a completely wrong definition of it.

A hebephile is a man who has a sexual preference for girls around the age of puberty. It usually means something like 11-14 or 12-15.

That’s all he likes. He doesn’t like anything else.

I have been to their forums because I like to go to anything sick or weird on the Net. I found hebephile forums to be very disturbing, even worse than pedophile forums, and yes, I have been on those a couple of times too.

In case you are now certain that going to those forums a few times makes me a sex offender, let me inform you that only ~50% of the people on your typical pedophile or hebephile forum are actual pedophiles or hebephiles. The rest…pedophile and hebephile haters! Yes, there as many haters as deviants on those forums. The haters threaten these age-regressed folks, abuse them, call them every name in the book, tell them they are all going to prison, threaten to hurt or kill them, etc. It’s an ugly scene.

But there is something creepy about hebephile forums. The very idea that there are adult men out there who think 16 year old girls look like 90 year old grandmas is somehow deeply disturbing. In fact, for a couple of days after visiting that forum, I almost had minor PTSD from the experience, and I had a hard time thinking straight. The forum was literally unnerving.

And in case you are wondering, there is none of the real nasty and ugly child porn on any of those aboveground pedophile-hebephile sites. There’s almost none of the real bad pedophilic child porn on the real Net anymore anyway.

There is some hebephilic porn out there involving pubertal young teenage girls posing naked in lascivious positions. Their bodies look like women’s bodies, so it’s not that disturbing. Nevertheless, it is illegal as Hell, and I would not advise anyone to look at that stuff or collect it. Even if you glance at it, there’s a record in your browser, so don’t even get curious. It is also extremely difficult to find, and there is no way to find it accidentally.

I understand that almost all of the real nasty CP is on the Darknet now.

On hebephile forums, you are not allowed to post girls older than 15. If you post a 16 year old girl, the hebephiles all start screaming, “Oh gross…Ewww… Disgusting…I think I’m going to puke…no Grandmas!

Yeah. That’s how hebephiles think. They think 16 year old girls are “grandmas.” 

I assure you that I am certainly the farthest thing form a hebephile. I have no preference at all for pubertal girls, and I’m not even much interested in them at all to be honest.

5 Comments

Filed under Child Porn, Gender Studies, Girls, Heterosexuality, Jailbait, Law, Man World, Pedophilia, Pornography, Psychology, Sex, Sick, Weirdness

The Reality of Anal Sex in the USA in 2018

Trash: ROBERT

Personal Confession

Am I the only straight male here who finds heterosexual anal sex awkward?

I don’t think there is nearly as much of this type of sex going on as you might think. You look at porn and the women are getting fucked in the ass all the time like it’s as normal as the missionary position, but that does not seem to represent reality.

One of my best friends is a former porn star, and he told me that he doesn’t like anal sex – it’s not his thing.

A lot of guys have never even done it.

I have had sex with more women and girls than 95% of men, and I’ve only done it once! It was ok, but she made me go really slow, and I could not get off.

I have stuck a finger in woman’s asses before, once by accident. I was with a girlfriend who was an anal sex freak who had probably done it 2,000 times. I went to put my finger in her pussy and I put it in her ass instead, just like all those Asian “Wong ho!” jokes! I guess a lot of anal changes your ass because that finger went right in like it was nothing. The whole finger went in, no problem at all.

I have had women stick their fingers in my ass. But the last time that happened, she pulled her finger out and it was covered with blood. I have hemorrhoids, so maybe that is the problem. Also women need to trim their nails or wear a glove if they are going to do that. I am not sure if I am going to do that act again. I will probably just bleed again.

I recently had a date with a woman, and even before the first date, she reeled off her sexual repertoire like she was bragging or competing with other women. I hadn’t even been talking to her all that long and she rattled out her skills, “Ok, this is what I do: deep throat, anal, you can tie me up, and you can handcuff me. I’m a nympho, and I want to do it all the time, up to 3-4 times a day.” She was 50 years old too!

I met her on a dating site. I was actually shocked. I don’t know if this is a thing with younger women too, but it seems like older women are trying to compete for men by out-whoring each other and trying to be a better fuck than the competition. Of course I encourage this trend.

On the first date, we talked about what kind of sex we would have once we got around to it (she wanted to wait a bit). We ended up talking about anal sex.

She said, “You’re going to get shit on your dick.”

I said, “Nope, don’t think so, you’re going to do an enema, baby!”

She said, “I refuse to do an enema!”

I said, “Fine, no anal.”

She insisted that in anal sex it was completely normal for the guy to get shit on his dick. That leaves me out I guess. I am not getting shit on my dick. If she cleans herself out before I might do it though.

I’ve met an awful lot of women who told me they’re not into it. It’s pretty common for women to not want to do that act.

However, a lot of them have never tried it and are curious about it though. I remember one wanted me to break her in and show her how to do it. We were just talking though, never got around to actual dating. It’s amazing how dirty women talk nowadays before you’ve even had one date with them! Of course I encourage this trend.

So yes, a lot of women are curious anal virgins. I’ve run into that quite a bit with women I was talking to and even women I dated. I just never took any of them up on it. The whole idea that there are all these women out there who love anal sex so much they practically demand it seems absurd. Porn is an alternate universe.

Considering I have only done it once and I am 60 years old, I may well never do it again,  which is fine by me.

If you enjoy the hard work that goes into this website, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site. Donations are the only thing that keep the site operating.

.

2 Comments

Filed under Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Man World, Pornography, Sex

American Hypersexed Culture An Illusion Propagated by Gay Hollywood

This comment was from a post I wrote noting that the median straight man has sex with six women in his lifetime, and the average straight woman has sex with only three men in her lifetime. Of course, this goes against the literally insane culture that all single straight men can just go out and get sex anytime they want.

Curiously (or perhaps not so curiously) this idiocy is promoted by feminists, especially male feminists, more than anyone else. I am not sure why, but feminism is simply Feminine Thinking Politicized (and Weaponized) or better yet the Feminine Character Politicized (and Weaponized).

Females, at least here in the modern West, are convinced that any single man can go out and get sex anytime they want to. I ask women about this, and they answer, “Well they could just go to a bar and they’re guaranteed to get a woman to have sex with them that night.” I try to tell them that this is not the case at all, and if were that easy to get laid in bars and clubs, men would spent all their time there, and society would come a halt, but it’s like talking to a wall. I don’t get through to them. They simply cannot comprehend it.

Let me tell you something. As noted above, if it were literally that easy to get laid in a bar or even a club, bars and clubs would be swarming with men every night and probably all day long too. In fact, I would probably be  writing this piece at a table at a bar myself, at 11 AM yet.

They think this way because of solipsism. Quite simply, females are solipsistic. Because of this solipsism, women are unable to put themselves in males minds and try to think like men or see the world as men do. This is why women see the world as a fantasy creation of the dream world of Feminine Character instead of how it actually is – a cold, cruel, unfair world where you barely stand a chance.

In this case, most women can  get laid anytime they want to. “By lowering your standards!” They retort. Of course that is true, but the average attractive woman could easily have her pick of 10-15 attractive men every day if she chose, at a minimum. Female humans, like other female animals, are notoriously fickle about their sexual partners and test them for fitness, choosing the best one who will pass on the best genes just like any other mammal, or even a bird or a fish for that matter. Females have been picky for a long way back in our heritage, all the way back to when we were frogs, if any of you can remember that far back.

Hence, due to female solipsism, if a woman can get laid anytime she wants, obviously a man can get laid any time he wants to because whatever is true for women is true for men and woman can only see the world as it is for women and not how it is for men.

Anyway this is a very interesting take only the Big Lie of the Reality of the Hypersexed Culture. What I mean is that the hypersexed culture exists, but not really in reality. Instead it exists as a fantasy world of the media and entertainment, and includes porn.

I believe the hypersexed culture is largely a media creation. The product of a media composed disproportionately of gay men writing about their own hyper promiscuous sex lives under the guise of heterosexual characters. TV has normal males in this culture confused under the delusion that all the other heterosexual men around them are getting random hookups with women in the exact same way the gays get it in the gay bars.

In The Myth of Heterosexual Aids by Fumento, besides his analysis of the particularly filthy, infectious nature of anal sex with gays both giving and receiving it up the ass. He also talks about the general nature of the heterosexual vs. gay lives and shows a statistic that the average straight man has 0.85 sex partners per year vs. 60 for the gays. That’s between 1 and 0 meaning most men are either monogamous in some sort of relationship, or blue balled. Any player types can’t be very common, or the number would be over one rather that under. Only in the faked-out media are there all these girls looking for random sex with strangers. The only ones that do are getting paid for it, or it’s a man in women’s clothes trying to trick men into a Crying Game moment.

If you enjoy the hard work that goes into this website, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site. Donations are the only thing that keep the site operating.

12 Comments

Filed under Culture, Feminism, Gender Studies, Health, Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, Illness, Man World, Pop Culture, Pornography, Psychology, Regional, Romantic Relationships, Sex, USA, Women

Gay Politics Kills a Woman

Wow this is really getting nutty. I recall just a few years ago that many women in the industry were refusing to work with crossover fags, I mean crossover stars, excuse me. For very good reason! Most of the HIV in the straight porn industry has come from male crossover fags, er, stars or straight male porn stars working as gay rentboys on the side (also very common).

Why can’t a woman say, “No thanks! I refuse to suck gay dick!”

Nowadays if a woman says that, she’s a vicious, evil homophobe who needs to be killed.

I have been saying for years that the SJW’s just get more and more weird and insane with each passing year. Every year, they have to crank up the Freakshow to new levels of perversity, weirdness and deviance. I am not sure if they will ever be satisfied.

4 Comments

Filed under Cultural Marxists, Death, Health, Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, Illness, Politics, Pornography, Sex, US Politics