Category Archives: Radical Feminists

“Latest Feminist Trend – Call All Men Pedophiles,” by Magneto

Latest Feminist Trend – Call All Men Pedophiles

by Magneto

Apparently calling all men rapists has gotten tiring for feminists, so now they need a new straw man label to throw at men. Well that new label is to call all men pedophiles. I believe Robert recently dealt with this exact issue.

Let’s say a woman sees something you wrote and doesn’t like it? Rather than logically refute your article, it would be much easier for her to just start throwing pejoratives at you. Nowadays calling men rapists doesn’t carry much weight since they’ve beaten that one to death. Instead the main pejorative women throw at you when they can’t defeat you in an argument is to just call you a pedophile.

One time I was on a Facebook group and I mentioned that I am married to a foreign woman. Immediately some White woman started attacking me and calling me a pedophile. Do White women even realize how racist they are? They are implying that non-White women are all just a bunch of girly dolls and slaves who cannot think for themselves, and thus any man who marries them must be a pedophile. Because after all, docile, feminine, non-feminist foreign women aren’t big, strong, independent women like White women. White women are implying that only White women are “mature adults,” and non-White women are all just “immature children”.

I also dealt with this recently. I’m friends with a lot of younger people from Generation Z (people born after the year 2000) because I really get along well with them. Why do I get along well with them? Because they are all very red-pilled. They all hate feminism, multiculturalism, and SJWs. Being friends with them gives me a feeling of hope for the future, and as a result I became a much more positive person.

So I randomly message a lot of people on Facebook and Instagram, just chatting and getting to know random people. I messaged some White chick from the UK. She asked me my age, and I told her I am in my 30’s. She reacted in a shocked way and said she was 14. I said cool, that’s fine with me.

Then she added me to a private chat group with her mom, dad, and brother and sister and the name of the chat group was “Pedo Help”. They started attacking me and accusing me of being a pedophile, and I told them “What the fuck is wrong with you people? What kind of horrible parents you are that you would brainwash your children to believe the whole world is out to get them, and everyone over age 30 is a pedophile. You should be ashamed of yourselves. And by the way, I’m friends with tons of younger people and none of them have ever accused me of being a pedophile before.”

Then they posted a picture I had posted of an Indian chick and I laughed, typing “LOL” and wrote “That girl is over 18, by the way”. I kept telling the mom that she is a horrible mother and should be ashamed for filling her children’s head with so much fear. The mother was probably 35 or so, a member of the Millennial SJW Generation. I finally just told her to go fuck herself, left the chat and blocked them all.

Unfortunately, the Millennial generation is the worst generation to ever exist. The vast majority are radical SJWs, and this is perhaps why the younger generation, Gen Z, is rejecting all of their SJW bullshit. I can’t wait for Generation Z to reach voting age, so they can start voting against the Millennials’ bullshit SJW politics. Millennial women are all total cancer. They are the worst feminists you will ever encounter.

Now what has been the practical result of this “All men are pedophiles” feminist hysteria?

The result is that men are afraid to even help a child if the child is in a life or death situation. Let’s say a child is drowning in a swimming pool. Most men would be afraid to jump in and help the child for fear that their SJW parents might accuse him of being a pedophile. The toxic man-hatred of Western women has reached such a point that many men are outright saying that they would never help a woman even in a life or death situation. For instance if a woman was getting raped in the street. Many men have openly stated that they would not help the woman because if they stop and help the woman, she might very well accuse him of trying to rape her too.

Western women have completely destroyed men’s natural instinct to protect women. Just think about that. That is the degree of man-hatred that Western women possess. They have successfully pissed off men to such an extent that men will refuse to help them even in a life or death situation. Congratulations, ladies. You got what you wanted. You have been telling us men for decades that you hate us and don’t need us. Fine. Next time you are getting raped or beaten or robbed in the street? Don’t be surprised when no man comes to your aide. You are truly on your own now and have attained the independence that you claimed you have wanted all this time. Enjoy, ladies!

30 Comments

Filed under Cultural Marxists, Feminism, Gender Studies, Guest Posts, Man World, Mass Hysterias, Pedophile Mass Hysteria, Race/Ethnicity, Radical Feminists, Social Problems, Sociology, Whites, Women

Why the Rough and Tumble World of Boyhood is Necessary

(((Beauregard))):  Extroversion is effective for society to function – people have to seek out what they need to progress it. If everyone was timid there would’ve never been group efforts to invent things, etc.

This if anything is more necessary than “boyhood bullying”, etc. Quite simply, that can breed dumbassery.

I am not sure why you think the inverse is true.

If it breeds dumbassery, most men I know must be dumbasses.

The rough and tumble world of Boyhood seems to be a necessity to turning a boy into a man. Without it, you will not have a good transition and you will have a lot of not-men instead of men. It’s important because it teaches how to act like a man and punishes you when you do not act like a man. That’s called learning.

It’s not bullying if you are all doing it to each other, and you are all best friends anyway.

Bullying effeminate boys teaches you the lesson that death is better than effeminacy. It also teaches you that there’s nothing worse than homosexuality, so don’t do it! We used to play Smear the Queer. One guy would get on this huge ball and bounce around on it. He was automatically the Queer. The rules were that the Queer got destroyed. So the Queer would get on the bouncing ball, and we would all try to waste him to knock him off the ball. The Queers actually enjoyed getting hit. This game taught me a simple lesson: Queers get their asses kicked. You do gay stuff, and someone’s going to beat you up.

Bullying crybabies teaches you that men don’t cry. In my world, crybabies got hit. No questions asked. We were going to beat the tears right out of those little sissies. So in a way, I was taught, “You cry, you get hit.”

Bullying complete idiots teaches you to not act like a goddamned retard. This teaches you that “Idiots get hit and teased. So don’t be an idiot or you’re going to get hit!”

Bullying pathologically mean boys teaches you not to be a psycho. This teaches you that if you are going to act like a future serial killer, you will have no friends and people will tease you and hit you everywhere you go. Living Hell. So don’t be a psycho!

You want to create a society where men don’t even act like men, go for it. But leave me out of your social experiment.

One final thought: I believe that this rough and tumble world is just boys being boys. Boys will be boys. Left completely alone, boys may well act this way simply because they are programmed to.

There is a radical feminist site I like to go to just to read crazy people. These women absolutely hate all men. Mostly they want to kill us off. They keep talking about “the 10%.” That means we need to get society down to 10% men. One woman said, “Well sure we hate men, but boys are ok, right?”

Another radfem answered: “How well do you know boys? Boys are little monsters!”

That’s sounds bad, but I sat back and thought, “This radfem has really got us figured out. Of course boys are monsters.”

That’s the way I remember Boyhood anyway. Not that that’s a bad thing. I enjoyed being a monster is a world full of little monsters. It was a blast.

I can’t tell you how many times my parents screamed at us and punished us brothers for fighting. Didn’t do the slightest bit of good. Not even 1%. Even my father was outraged.

“I had two brothers and we never fought, ever! Brothers fighting! Disgraceful!”

They might as well have been talking to a wall. I am not sure what my brothers were thinking, but I just thought my parents were being stupid and my Dad was a fuddy-dud stick in the mud. I simply thought that brothers fighting was completely normal because we had been doing it forever. Anyway we three were always pretty much best friends anyway. That’s what people don’t get. Boys fight with the beloved siblings and best friends all the time. Doesn’t harm the relationship because boys just think teasing and fighting is normal behavior.

My mother was raised in a house with five girls so boys were a mystery to her. Nevertheless, I always thought she figured us out better than my father did. She had a sort of “boys will be boys” attitude.

In other words, trying to create this serene Boyhood that’s not rough and tumble Bootcamp for Manhood is probably like shoveling sand against the tide. You can push it all you want, but I don’t think it’s going to work. Sure we’re monsters, and that can be a problem. But we are probably programmed to be little monsters, and all the social engineering in the world won’t do much to that.

220 Comments

Filed under Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, Man World, Psychology, Radical Feminists, Scum, Sex, Sociology

How Leftwingers View Me and This Site

Alex: Why don’t you have the balls to admit you are a Nazi? Why even pretend to be Leftist and use euphemisms like Alt Left and insult real Leftists using derisive terms. It seems even blatant neo-Nazis are better than a pretender like you. Change the avatar to Hitler, and be honest. Stop using those silly quotes and calling yourself a Leftist. You are an embarrassment to Marxism.

Actually I do not like Nazis at all. They’re killers and mass murderers, genocidal maniacs. The Hell with that! I had a Jewish girlfriend for 5 1/2 years. I was seriously thinking about converting to Judaism recently, but modern Judaism seems to tied up in Israel that I am dubious whether I should do this. If they could sever Israel from Judaism like the gangrenous tissue that it is, I would have no problem converting. I would be one of those evil self-haters like Chomsky though. That would be such a kick. Plus then the parentheses around my name would be real! Wow, that would feel so great!

I do not like White Supremacists or White Nationalists that much, although guys like Rabbit are tolerable. They all voted Trump this time around, so I ended every friendship I had with these types. I simply do not agree with being this racist. It’s not ok. And a White state is absurd. The Hell with saving the White race. Who cares!

This is about it. I get mails like this from these guys just about every day. Most liberals react about the same way. Honestly, leftwingers hate me much more than conservatives. I am actually banned from some major liberal websites and at others, there are even bans on linking to me. These tend to be sites run by the base of the ((((Democratic Party))).

Conservatives’ politics are horrific, but mostly they are quite nice to me and a lot of them are very pleasant people, politics aside. Quite a few of them have been very friendly to me, especially Alt Right types. I’m not really wild about racists and Nazis, but at least they are pleasant. Conservatives are generally much nicer to me than leftwingers. Leftwingers generally believe I need to be shot or put in a gulag.  That’s probably true, but I’d prefer to avoid the NKVD for the remainder of my life if I could.

This is actually one of the flagship Alt Left sites. Rabbit and I pretty much founded the movement. Rabbit takes the race thing a lot further than I do, but I am critical of the Sexual Anarchy crowd and Gender Feminism. Rabbit thinks Gay Rights is getting out of hand now too, and he doesn’t like feminazis much either, but he’s into the race thing a lot deeper than I am. I am just a race realist, and I don’t even talk about that very much.

21 Comments

Filed under Conservatism, Democrats, Fascism, Homosexuality, Jews, Left, Liberalism, National Socialism, Nazism, Political Science, Politics, Race Realism, Race/Ethnicity, Racism, Radical Feminists, Sex, US Politics, White Nationalism, White Racism

What’s with All the Rape and Sex Crimes?

You have to go through a regional paper that segregates articles by theme to actually realize the extent of rape-type sexual offenses, including rape and murder.

Child molestation is a whole other ball of wax, and it’s complicated by the drooling, psychotic autism of calling adults who have sex with teenagers pedophiles and child molesters, but I am absolutely stunned at the number of men who are having sex with actual children, like girls 12-under. And a surprising number of them involve violence too. Are all these guys pedophiles?

Pedophiles are only one of the four types of child molesters.

80-93% of child molesters are non-pedophiles. They’re just criminals. They’re not into girls any more than any other guy. They do this because these are aggressive, manipulative, amoral, probably somewhat sociopathic men who take advantage of young girls due to the fact that they are an easy target. Most of this is familial. On Indian reservations in Canada where it is estimated that 100% of girls are molested, most of the molesting is familial. It’s Daddy or Uncle or Grandpa or whoever.

The others are familial, opportunistic, trysexual and psychopathic.

I won’t deal with the first three right now.

Psychopathic child molesters differ from pedophilic ones in that they have no preference for prepubescent girls. Their sexual orientation age-wise is as normal as any other man’s: They are maximallly attracted to females age 16-up, and progressively less attracted as age goes down. Psychopathic child molesters molest girls because they have no morals, and they have a “screw anything that moves” attitude. A girl, a woman, what differenced does it make? All potential targets. Sure, he doesn’t prefer girls, but they will do in a pinch.

The problem with automatically treating all child molesters as psychologically disordered and having a paraphilia is that most of them are probably neither. They’re not nuts in any way. They’re just criminals. If they don’t prefer girls for sex more than any other man, there’s no sexual disorder to treat.

“Screw anything that moves” is not a sexual disorder. “Take advantage of naive daughters and nephews” is not a sexual disorder. “No morals” is not a sexual disorder. “Manipulative scumbag” is not as sexual disorder. My understanding is that most of these guys get labeled pedophiles and thrown in to pedophile treatment programs. It’s really dubious how many of them get helped by these programs especially when there’s nothing much to fix. Worse many them get labeled “mentally disordered sex offenders.” That means they have a mental disorder, in this case a sexual disorder. See any sexual disorders above? Neither do I.

Obviously true fixated pedophiles need to be in a program. Even out of incarceration, they should probably be in regular therapy to keep them from offending or re-offending.

But when a man’s problem is not that he’s a pedophile but that he’s a psychopathic monster, how are these pedophile treatment programs supposed to help him? How are they supposed to help Weird Uncle who prefers women but goes after girls in a sleazy pinch? They can’t.

I would wager that most of these men, if they have any disorder at all, have an impulse control disorder. That’s not in the DSM yet. But just you wait. It would be a bad idea to put Impulse Control Disorder into the DSM because we just labeled half the population crazy. Probably 50% of the population can’t control their impulses well.

Are there treatment programs that teach men how to control their impulses? No idea. Are there programs that aim to impart morals into a morally barren human? Probably, but how good is that going to work. How do you create something that was never there?

I am starting to wonder what the Hell is the matter with us men. I’ve never done anything like this, not even date rape. I don’t get the appeal. If she’s not willing, it’s no fun, right? If she doesn’t want to do it, shrug your shoulders and say, “Fine, I will sleep on the couch then.” Trust me, she will get up in the middle of the night and drag you back to her room. An abundance mindset is always helpful. I guess I have raped if you count the feminist daffynition of rape, but the feminists are so insane on this subject that they would put 50 million men in prison. The feminist definition of rape isn’t even rape. It’s not nothing. It’s just junk, like most anything a feminut says.

But this stuff below is the real deal. As much as I dislike feminists, I am starting to se why so many of them starting hating us men. We’re pretty hateable you know. Hell, I don’t even like men, and I’m a guy!

I’ve been dating some women around age 50. Nearly every single one of them had either been raped. And they had all had a man try to kill them. I figure by age 50, most women in the US have either been raped by a man or had a man try to kill them. That’s pretty sorry.

Ladies I would like to apologize on behalf of all men for the despicable behavior of my gender. It’s an outrage what we do to you. The rapes, the assaults, the beatings, the kidnappings, the imprisonment, the attempted murders and the murders. I can’t believe what you put up with from us. Sometimes I wonder why any of you like any of us anymore.

If you a law-abiding citizen who rarely if ever commits a crime that victimizes the innocent, or at least one who stays out of jail for more than 5-10 hours in their life, the background level of crime in society is absolutely stunning. Sure you’re likely to avoid being a victim of a serious crime, at least this year, but the sheer numbers of crimes occurring in normal everyday America is mind-blowing. And these are just sexual crimes, some of the worst of all.

If you start doing research on less serious but still victimizing crimes, the number of them occurring on any given day even in your area is out of this world. It’s hard to understand how many heedless fools there are out there who are not inhibited by the threat of imprisonment. And there’s a Hell of a lot of sick fucks out there. Incredible how many sickos are running around. It boggles the mind.

Keep in mind this is just this year and the year’s barely even getting started. And in just this one country with 4% of the world’s population. So multiply these cases by 25.

And fully 70% of the cases below that occurred in this year alone happened in only two states, North Carolina and Florida.

And then you think about this factoid that only 4% of rape cases ever result in incarceration and it’s even more shocking. So there’s 25X more of this stuff happening that perpetrators are getting away with.

Autopsy: New Mexico girl was raped and strangled on 10th birthday, had STD when she died

Jesus.

Couple charged in ‘rape-murder fantasy’ killing of girl, 14, prosecutors say

Wow, no words. Good Lord! Her own Mom was involved in the imprisonment, beating, torturing, drugging and raping of this girl. I’ve heard of Moms being driven batty by unruly teens, but isn’t this a bit extreme?

 

Florida man held girlfriend for 2 weeks, raped her and used pliers to rip her nails off

Another girlfriend rape, but this guy threw a lot of violence into the mix. This guy needs to get together with Pliers Bittaker.

Sex offender wearing electronic monitor accused of raping woman in NC

Darwin award.

Man accidentally confesses to rape during police job interview

Date rape. OK, you’re a jerk and an idiot. Enjoy your Darwin Award in jail. Perhaps you can tape it to the wall.

Woman stabs man who allegedly tried to rape her, escapes attack

Good for her, but what’s his problem? She stabbed the guy who was trying to rape her. Damn.

Brother of Panthers tight end Greg Olsen given $103,000 bond on rape charges

Hmmm, wait. He raped his own longterm girlfriend? How is that even possible?

Man accused of sexual assault in Burlington arrested

What the Hell is your problem?

Man allegedly pulled gun, attempted to sexually assault woman after she turned down grilled cheese

This one is actually funny. He’s a rapist and a stand-up comedian!

Burlington middle school teacher accused of statutory rape

This last one is the only one I feel sorry for. But she’s 45! And the boy was 15! Jesus. Anyway, it was probably the best thing that ever happened to that kid so far in his life and it looks like his teacher is teaching him a bit more than readin, writin and arithmetic, no?

All right. So what do we do with this silly woman who has an Impulse Control Disorder in the sense that’s not able to inhibit her desires or separate thoughts from actions. Not to mention heedless and foolhardy. This retarded society is probably going to give this cougar 5 years for her extracurricular tutoring of this fortunate young man. Then, our special needs society is going to make this dingbat woman register as a sex offender for the rest of her life when all her victim proabably said was, “Thanks Mom, I mean teacher.”

So what would I do? What do you do when there’s nothing to be done but throw up your hands.

Fire her. Pull her credential. Make it so she can never teach again. That ought to be good enough. If she can’t find a job, I suppose she can always become a cougar porn star. I recommend she specialize in the Mommy-son fantasy market.

4 Comments

Filed under Amerindians, Canada, Corrections, Crime, Criminology, Florida, Gender Studies, Girls, Law enforcement, Man World, Mental Illness, New Mexico, North America, North Carolina, Northeast, Pedophilia, Psychology, Psychopathology, Psychotherapy, Race/Ethnicity, Radical Feminists, Regional, Sex, Social Problems, Sociology, South, USA, West

Dumbest Alt Left Phrase Ever: “The Regressive Left”

Calling the SJW Cultural Left Freakshow “regressive” is absolutely senseless. Originally it meant Leftists who supported reaction such as Political Islam. Political Islam or Islam in general is backwards, conservative if not reactionary, and a throwback to an older era that progressives have moved far beyond in the West. Full-throated Left support for reactionary Islam is indeed regressive.

But the Cultural Left Freakshow is anything but regressive. Really it is progressivism run amok.

Radical gay rights is regressive because it harkens back to the golden era of gay rights in the 1800’s when gays had far more rights than they even do now, right?

Radical feminism is regressive because back in the old days when my Mom was growing up, most women were ultra-radical man-hating dykes who pushed far beyond equal rights, correct?

Anti-racism is regressive because it recalls the the 1700’s when Blacks and Indians ruled society and the White man was a downtrodden minority, no?

Transsexual rights is regressive because back in the Ancien Regime in France, 1/200 men and women were transsexuals, there was a transsexual on every block, and French society cheered for genderbenders and called for gender to be abolished, n’est-ce pas?

The Regressive Left is a preposterous and idiotic slur that the Alt Left has made up for the SJW Cultural Left. It makes sense only in that the Cultural Left voices full support for radical Islam. Otherwise it utterly irrational.

The Cultural Left in general isn’t regressive at all. It’s not even reactionary, conservative or even rightwing. It’s not even Centrist, and it gave up liberalism long ago. No, the Cultural Left is nuts because this is an example of leftwing politics going completely off the deep end. Regressive means backwards, reactionary, conservative, primitive, a throwback to an older, ignorant era before modern progress and progressive politics. The Cultural Left is the opposite of regressive.

We just call them that because it sounds insulting, and it is. But it’s also a lie. I don’t see why the Alt Left should stoop to lying and sliming the opposition with sleazy and false slurs like all the rest of the dirty politics out there. We are beyond that; we are too good for that. We can do better. Let’s do it.

Get rid of the slogan “Regressive Left” once and for all. Resign it to the dustbin of recent history.

10 Comments

Filed under Anti-Racism, Cultural Marxists, Homosexuality, Left, Politics, Radical Feminists, Radical Islam, Religion, Sex

Female Rule Is Feminism In Power and Nothing More or Less

TJF: To Rob:

The West is under female rule..? Not sure if I understand, what are you labeling as female rule aside from some rules passed on college campuses regarding consent…?

Look! Female Rule is feminism! Female Rule occurs when feminists gain so much power that they can start imposing their rules and laws on society. Female Rule is Feminism in Power, period.

Female Rule is imposing rules and laws on society that are based on the rules and mores of women and against those of men. We have generally had Male Rule because male rules and mores at best are at least sensible, but they don’t lead to this World of Justice that women want and demand because life is messy, unfair and often cruel with no legal or societal repercussions for this nastiness.

The crazy Consent Rules came about because women are determined to stop date rape on campus. Thing is you cannot stop it. Date rape will go on. And it is almost impossible to prosecute. This is a horribly unfair thing. But men will just shrug and say life is imperfect and unfair. Yet women will try to create a Just World when there is no such thing and there probably cannot ever be such a thing.

First women tried “No means no!.” That’s not even true for starters, but to women it made a lot of sense, and they took it up as a Female Rule mantra. Well, “no is no” did not stop date rape because women were too stupid to make the rule work. Turns out that women are so dumb that a lot of times when they didn’t want to have sex, they were too frightened or frozen or whatever to say no. So they said nothing and the sex went forward. However it was rape because the man could not read her mind to determine that she was not willing even though she never said no. This led to the lunatic “silence is not consent” bullshit that has taken campuses by storm. Men are now expected to be mindreaders.

Because “no is no” was such a miserable failure, women upped the ante to “Affirmative Consent” which has got to be the most insane sexual rule ever imposed by humanity in its history. That’s not working well either as a lot of men are just bailing out of sex altogether rather than negotiate that minefield and women are complaining that men won’t ask them out.

This is the way women try to solve problems. Men just shrug their shoulders and say, “What are you going to do? Life’s not fair. We can’t solve every problem. Some problems cannot be solved. Some problems are best dealt with outside the structures of administrative law and the judicial system.

In the UK and in parts of the US, there are now major moves to make it illegal to have sex with a woman who is intoxicated. I have asked some women about this and they get those hard faces and say that if she’s drunk or loaded, you can’t have sex with her. Well that ends 50% of the sex in the US, as that’s how much is done under the influence. Once more, it’s women trying to solve an unsolvable problem, that of women getting so wasted that they are blacked out and then they have sex against their will. This is an unsolvable problem. It can be solved by women refusing to get blackout drunk,  but women won’t do that, so the problem goes on.

Indeed. But those campus rules are very important. They are spreading across to many other states now. And you are guilty until proven innocent. This is another aspect of Female Rule because women don’t believe in fairness or fair fighting.

The lunatic Pedophile Mass Hysteria that has conflated statutory rape with pedophilia and child molesting was caused by Female Rule. The new Creeper Mass Hysteria in which all men who women are not attracted to are labeled creeps and society agrees was also a creation of Female Rule. Female Rule has also created a situation whereby men are being charged with child molesting for having sex with underage girls who lied about their age. Incidentally, this is a mitigating factor in federal law but not in states’ laws.

Female Rule created the craziness that says that if a US man goes overseas, if he has sex with one under 18 year old girl one time, he has broken US child molestation law, even if he comes from a state where the age of consent is 15.

Female Rule created the sheer idiocy of domestic abuse law where a woman was able to hit me or try to hit me 35-400 times in one night, and I hit her back once and according to Female Rule, I would have had to go to jail. I just barely avoided going to jail that night. Female Rule says any time a man hits a woman, even in self-defense, he’s going to jail. Under Female Rule, you can’t even fight back if a woman hits you, and they hit us all the time now as Female Rule has emboldened them and encouraged them to bring out the innate but suppressed basic insanity and indulge it as much as possible.

Female Rule created idiotic child support laws that throw men in jail for nonpayment even if they are unemployed or disabled. Many homeless men have gone to jail for nonpayment of child support. You can’t make payments if you’re broke!

Female Rule created the lunacy of sexual harassment law which has now spread across the land according to which apparently if I ask any woman at work for her phone number, or ask her out, or make funny comments, or God forbid even look at her too much, I can be fired for sexual harassment. Sexual harassment law, creep-shaming and Feminism’s general hatred for men expressing sexual interest in females at all in any way has led to a lot of men becoming very shy around women for fear of being called a “creep.” There are university campuses where women are openly complaining that men won’t ask them out anymore. It’s because of Female Rule which has made them afraid to even flirt with women.

54 Comments

Filed under Britain, Crime, Europe, Feminism, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Higher Education, Law, Law enforcement, Mass Hysterias, Pedophile Mass Hysteria, Radical Feminists, Regional, Ridiculousness, Scum, Sex, Social Problems, Sociology, USA, Women

Judith Mirville On Feminism and Female Rule

Fantastic. This is the example I was thinking of talking about an African culture where women pretty much run things.

Judith Mirville: There are quite a few traditional cultures like that where all the brainy and managerial work is done by women, and the men keep content with mere physical work and a more childish, happy-go-lucky personality throughout life. That is the case with the Bamileke culture of Cameroon. But these cultures, by their own avowal, never evolve and keep content with a minimalist standard of living. These cultures, though matriarchal in a technical sense, have no use for any form of vindictive feminism or other left-wing ideology.

Women as a rule are conservative, and the societies where they have the highest real say tend to see all form of progress and experimentation as negative. Instead they idolize a mythical past without technical progress.

Women as a rule when having been in power for a few generations tend also to devalue learning in the academic sense. In the societies where they alone access it, learning is devalued except as an utilitarian means of day-to-day economic survival or of social interaction, so such societies prefer to stay backward.

If feminism is to last as a dominant ideology in the West (which supposes it jettisons all references to any resentment-based progressive thought and also to non-standard sexuality), it will turn the countries it rules into underdeveloped ones, so the Winnipeg picture of the women construction business manager with an attaché-case with a construction worker as a servant is a wholly disconnected fantasy.

What you could get instead as a picture of things to come (in the halcyon case everything goes on well for the feminist cause and their beneficiaries grow wise) is a woman open-air market manager with men acting as cowboys in the background (if the Plains of Winnipeg still exist), the only modern businessperson in the further background being a Chinese or Arab. You may also see male tourist adventurers coming to visit Manitoba as a quite primitive country. Whenever women are really at the top for good, they have no taste for construction, and they prefer to look for a greater profit to be made by existing things that require no invention.

Anyway, right now in Winnipeg, construction workers, especially when they are part of criminal organizations and part-time bouncers, make more money and enjoy higher social status than the nerdy people they despise. The bosses they obey are quite often Sicilian ones who have no use for any feminist manager.

That supposes the feminists in question rediscover a morality and also connect to a traditional spirituality approving of their approach. Maybe an Amerindian one, who knows? But that is far from their present-day perspective: these modern feminists are intent on destroying all morality which they resent against as being of male nature. They may be acting at the behest of vested interests who want to establish a dictatorship based on pure corruption.

Once every whiff of past morality is destroyed, all that remains is self-interest, and even feminism ends up waning as all collective identity causes of the past fade away once the elites have effectively succeeded in rooting out all political idealism and no longer need Identity Politics to divide the masses, a kind of late Ottoman imperial regime is installed, and there are no longer state subventions to special interest groups.

Once public ideals are all destroyed, and all what remains is materialistic self-interest, what do these would-be princesses want? Marrying princes or billionaires, preferably from One and  Thousand Nights-style patriarchal countries such as Qatar or Colombia. The fiercest feminists will be the first to revert to pure gangster-style patriarchy. This just like the fiercest Jewish Marxists were the first to turn into the neocons. Most are now before moving even further to the Right as we see in Israel. That country is growing into another Iran or Qatar with a slightly different Semitic religion.

These feminists only object to idealistic men of ordinary revenues doing the kind of non-work they envy like university tenured professors. When they meet gangsters, even of low life, revenue and status, they enjoy having regular sex with them and settle for traditional family life.

Women are also more egoistical by temperament, and feminism can last as long as there is a progressive ideology justifying the cost of their subventions.

But feminism is not as progressive as it seems since normally women don’t side with their less fortunate sisthren. Even the present-day radical feminists don’t object to FGM as practiced in other cultures.

The reality untold is that sexual pleasure itself however carefully mastered is just contrary to any moral decency and ideal. There is such a thing as carnal sin.

13 Comments

Filed under Africa, Anthropology, Cameroon, Canada, Central Africa, Cultural, Culture, Ethics, Feminism, Gender Studies, Labor, North America, Philosophy, Politics, Radical Feminists, Regional, Social Problems, Sociology, Women

“The Difference between Antifeminism in the West and Antifeminism in India,” by Magneto

The Difference between Antifeminism in the West and Antifeminism in India

by Magneto

There is a huge antifeminism movement in both the Western world and India. But are they the same? After having extensive contact with both movements, I can say definitely that they are not the same.

Men in the West who are antifeminists are basically just demanding equal laws in divorce and custody rights, and this is a completely fair demand to make. It shows how sick a lot of Western women are because many Western women think it’s perfectly okay to destroy a man’s life in divorce court.

Whereas antifeminism in India means a very different thing. There is a smaller subset of MRA’s in India who are only demanding equal laws in divorce courts, but the majority of Indian men who are part of the antifeminism movement have a different demand. In India they are basically demanding a continuation of the backwards, regressive Hindu culture which has literally enslaved women for thousands of years.

On a side note, there is evidence that there was a period in Ancient India where sex was openly practiced and there was no shame or guilt surrounding sex. Sex was considered something spiritual and had certain spiritual practices attached to it called tantra. Modern-day “Satanism” is actually rooted in these ancient tantric practices, and it was considered “White Magic” due to its healing ability. Modern-day “Satanism” is just some pathetic perversion of these ancient hidden practices. If you’re interested in spiritual stuff, it is well worth it to take the time to google and study the two terms “tantra” and “kundalini”.

Anyway, most Indian MRA’s are demanding that women remain as slaves to their husbands. So there is a huge difference between simply wanting fair divorce laws and wanting that women should remain enslaved. And this is just more proof that anything Indians touch turns to shit.

The antifeminism movement in the West is growing tremendously due to how badly men have been treated in divorce courts and how badly boys have been treated in the educational system. These are all fair and rational demands. I don’t know of any Western MRA’s who are demanding that women should become enslaved or anything like that. Men in the West are sick and tired of their wives being able to divorce them on a whim and then destroy them financially by stealing their house, car, assets, incomes, etc in divorce court as well as destroying them emotionally by stealing their kids from them and denying them any custody or visitation rights.

Unfortunately, most women in the West are so brainwashed by feminism that they believe men’s demands for fair and just divorce laws and true equality is the same as the backwards sexism of the older cultures. In the West women are so brainwashed and screwed up by feminism that if you demand that divorce courts should have fair laws they think you are an evil chavinistic pig who wants to enslave women. And this is proof that Western women do not want true equality.

In a truly equal society, women would pay alimony/child support 50% of the time, and 50% of custody time would go towards the father. Instead we have a society where women are so privileged that they get alimony, child support, and custody 90 percent of the time.

Or how about university admissions? Something like 65% of university students are women. Why aren’t feminists demanding that 50% of students be men and 50% be women? After all, that would be equality, right?

Or how about the military draft? Funny how feminists never demanded, not even once, that women should also be required to register for the military draft.

So as you can see, the real sexist bigots in the Western world are the majority of Western women who do support not gender equality but female supremacism. In this way, Western women are no different from Indian men because Indian men are also sexist pigs who support male supremacism. Western women and Indian men are simply two sides of the same coin.

For the world to progress, Indian men need to be willing to evolve and come to terms with the concept of equality. Western women also need to be willing to come to terms with the concept of equality because for far too long Western women have enjoyed a privileged position in society. Until Western women are willing to humble themselves and be ready to embrace true equality, no change will come in the West either.

3 Comments

Filed under Culture, Feminism, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Law, Masculinism, Radical Feminists, Sex, Social Problems, Sociology

Feminut Brainwashing in Australia

Here.

There’s not going to be any end to this. Third wave feminism was bad enough, and now we are in 4th wave, and I have no idea even what that is.

I actually like some 2nd wave feminists. No really, I do. Sex-positive feminism, one of the only useful feminist currents, came directly out of the Second Wave and the Porn Wars. I understand that Jezebel is officially sex-positive, and I have never found that site to be anti-men. They’re anti-asshole, but that’s not the same thing as being anti-men. I always thought I could make alliance with Jezebel types. They seem like they like cock too much to hate men.

This has been the fatal downfall of many a feminist – they need the dick. The more of a cock addict you are, and it’s worse if you’re strictly dickly as so many women really are if you get right down to it, the more that is just going to pull you away from the really nutty feminism right there.

Let’s face it, feminism is man-hatred. They scream and yell, “They say we all hate men! It’s not true!” Well, you know why we say that? Because so many of you are, really, truly and objectively, man-haters by any stretch of the imagination.

Even more accurate is to say that feminism plugs in to the anger and resentment many ordinary straight non-misandrist women feel towards men. Most women have some sort of anger and resentment towards men and vice versa. It’s fairly normal, and it’s called the War of Sexes.

The problem is that feminism plugs right into whatever lingering anger and resentment any particular woman has towards men, and almost all have some. Even with women I have known fairly well, I see their faces harden and become colder when feminism is brought up. They take positions that are deliberately designed to privilege women and screw over men. I point this out, and they shrug their shoulders. So what! It’s paybacks! Feminism is all about paybacks and revenge against the men. Well screw that. I’m a man, and the Hell if I am going to support you attacking me legally and societally by taking revenge on me.

My message to feminists if you want men to quit calling you man-haters, how bout if you quit hating men so much? I mean, just for starters?

12 Comments

Filed under Australia, Education, Feminism, Gender Studies, Radical Feminists, Regional, Scum

Rabbit, “Milo Inc. – Not One of Ours Either”

Another post from Rabbit’s site. This one on the execrable (((Milo Yiannopoulos))), who I really cannot stand. People are trying to say that (((Milo))) is Alt Left, but nope, (((Milo))) ain’t one of us! Sorry (((Milo)))! That’s because the Alt Right is trying to disenfranchise itself from (((Milo))), which actually makes sense. I mean (((Milo))) is a flamboyant homosexual who makes no secret of his penchant for taking large Black cocks up his ass. Well, I would say that goes against 100% of what the Alt Right stands for right there, no? (((Milo))) is part of the Breitbart wing of the Alt Right, which is barely even Alt Right at all. Instead it’s just Republican Party Base Trumpism.

I listened to a whole hour of (((Milo))) speaking on his Dangerous Faggot Tour (well at least he titled the traveling show correctly). He spoke at some university. It was quite bizarre.

He made a number of comments about what a great big fag he is how he likes Black cocks up the ass or sucking Black cocks or something along those lines. There was a fair amount of gay pornographic content in his talk. Anytime he talked about his love of Black dick, the mostly male Trumpist audience went nuts. So this is what Trumpers are for? Black cocks up the ass? Who knew? He talked about Trump. He talked about feminism. He talked about PC. He talked about SJW’s. He talked about Black Lives Matter. He made fun of the last four. He talked about his love of Black dick. He talked about his hatred of Hillary. I believed he proudly announced he was a Zionist which got a huge roar out of the crowd. He made lots of jokes. He was very entertaining.

At the end, I was very annoyed. He just stands up there and makes fun of SJW’s and urges everyone to vote for Trump and that’s it. Yes he hates feminism but why? Feminists looooooooooooove gay men. What’s the problem?

What I got out of this is that (((Milo))) is one of those not small faction of gay men who hates women. It’s a little known secret (Shh! Don’t tell the Cultural Left!) that quite a few gay men hate women. In fact, this has been known for quite some time, possibly over 100 years. So (((Milo)))’s hatred of feminism, which sounds disturbingly personal, is all wrapped up in his misogyny, which I get the feeling is considerable. And that left a bad taste in my mouth. You don’t like gender feminists, fine. But if you don’t like them because you are a depraved woman-hating queer, you’re just not so endearing to me. That’s just yucky. If you’re going to hate the Gender Fems, hate them for a good reason!

This whole (((Milo))) thing is just…stupid. Alt Rightists say he is engaging in a hostile takeover or the Alt Right on behalf of (((certain groups))), and they are probably correct. His purpose in the Alt Right is apparently to say hardly any of them are really serious about that White nationalism and that Jew-hating and you know that Hitler stuff because it’s all a big edgy joke. And by inserting a major gay Jewish figure into the Alt Right, he is trying to slay both the Antisemitism and the Homophobia of the Alt Right in one fell swoop. Well that’s a clever move, I must admit.

Honestly though I do not feel there is much substance here, and he feels way too rightwing for my tastes. So if you love (((Milo))), you’re voting for Trump…you love Israel…you hate Democrats…and you think Black cocks up the ass is the greatest thing since sliced bread. Well that’s quite an interesting project but it’s not coherent. In fact, it makes no sense at all. It’s the political equivalent to one of those modern art paintings where they splash a bunch of different colors of paint on a canvas and call it a painting. It’s nearly devoid of meaning, and what meaning it does have is annoying at best and toxic at worst.

(((Milo)))’s sort of a Postmodern Political Figure. It’s like he was created by Derrida. He doesn’t even make sense! And nevertheless, everyone loves him and thinks he is full of all this brilliant wisdom even though he’s incomprehensible and void of meaning anyway even if you could figure him out.

Milo Inc. – Not One of Ours Either

miloinc

I’ve noticed people trying to disassociate Milo Yiannopoulos and some of these other Libertarians from the Alternative Right, by branding them as part of the Alternative Left. 

weev

Not so fast. While we may be a tad more degenerate than the radical traditionalist factions of AltRight, we sure are not Libertarian capitalists (barf.) Milo and Co are not part of our little AltLeft netherworld either. Here are some simple and straightforward reasons why he’s not one of us:

  1. He is a Libertarian capitalist. Milo loves capitalism and the free market and always talks about it. He’s the kind of Republican who will make claims like “Democrats ruined Detroit.”  He’s the type who will brag about Silicon Valley companies as if they are still part of the US in any real sense…rather than just international entities that act in their own interests, which may or may not correlate with the interests of the country at a given time. The Alternative Left (to the extent it’s even a real thing) leans toward Scandinavian socialism, communism,  state capitalism, public works, social credit, etc….all things Milo would disapprove of.
  2. He’s not a race realist. Milo rejects identity politics altogether, in the tradition of Republicans who like to parrot Martin Luther King cliches about “color of skin” and “content of character.” The Alternative Left believes race is real (for practical purposes at least) and race matters. There is some disagreement about how to deal with that reality, which I have discussed elsewhere. Some of us just openly promote a White-Left futurism and others prefer to focus strictly on class struggle issues with the belief that this will minimize ethnic conflict over time. Others are National Bolshevik types. Milo doesn’t fall into any of these camps. He’s just a flamboyant Republican who thinks “Dems are the real racists.”
  3. He supports importing foreign tech workers as well as many of the other items on the globocorp agenda to sell us out. He loves immigration and at the most maybe just wants to cut it down a bit.
  4. From what I can tell, he supports neoconservative foreign policy or some milder version of it along with American exceptionalism and all that jazz. He’s Jewish and makes clear where his tribal loyalties are. I’m pretty sure we can leave it at that.

The only areas where there is any overlap is that he’s “anti-PC” and socially liberal as far as sexual depravity. Well, big deal. Almost everyone opposes the type of low hanging fruit loop, blue haired, fat acceptance, Tumblr feminists and diaper wearing furry activists that he targets. Milo simply is what he is, a Libertarian-Republican free speech advocate of the Breitbart variety with an aggressively marketed, highly successful personal brand. Milo has put himself out there and has done some good things in pushing back against speech police on college campuses, but he’s not “AltLeft” or AltRight. Glad we cleared that up.

35 Comments

Filed under Anti-Semitism, Capitalism, Capitalists, Conservatism, Cultural Marxists, Economics, Homosexuality, Left, Libertarianism, Political Science, Politics, Race Realism, Racism, Radical Feminists, Republicans, Scum, Sex, US Politics, White Nationalism