Category Archives: Cultural Marxists

Masculinity and Gay Men: My, What a Tangled Web We Weave

Matt: I am not sure your assessment of homosexuals on the whole is accurate. Most gay guys are not insane ultra left cultural radicals, and most of them like to partner with guys they perceive of as masculine and to view themselves as masculine. To be fair, every gay guy I’ve ever met deviates from conventional masculinity in some way, even if only subtly. But they believe in it.

Blatantly effeminate gay guys complain constantly about being discriminated against by the “straight acting” gay guys whom they too desire. I wonder if the culturally leftist/radical gay guys are not similar to the stereotypical feminist, in that most of those they would desire as partners find them off-putting and unattractive, and they’re angry and frustrated about it.

Most gay men* are effeminate. I would estimate 70-75% of them are at least a little bit effeminate in a way that almost no straight men are. Most want a masc guy though. They hate masculinity, but they want to get fucked by a big mean Daddy bear.

Go on Queera, I mean Quora. They’re all Cultural Left types on there. Plus Gay Politics itself is Cultural Left to the extreme, and how many gays are not into gay politics? I know there are some, but how many? The ones on Quora hate masculinity and extoll effeminacy all the while denying that gay men are effeminate – the typical crazy talk of Gay Politics, almost nothing of which makes any sense at all.

Do most gay men see themselves as masculine? Very good question.

  • You realize that 75% of sissy boys in childhood grow up gay, right?
  • You realize that 7% of gay men identify as trans now, right?
  • You realize that a lot of gay men now identify as nonbinary, right?
  • You realize that 100% of genderqueer types and the 132 genders are homosexuals, right? There are no straight nonbinary people. No such thing.
  • You realize that gays have declared war on gender and have wanted to get rid of that concept from day one, right? I wonder why?
  • You realize they call themselves two-spirit people and the Third Sex, right? Gee I wonder what that means?

Yes, effeminate men do complain about discrimination and I have met gay men who told me, “I don’t like sissies,” and things like that.

However, you make a good point.

  • If they hate masculinity so much, why do they desire masculine partners (tops, basically)?
  • Why are there hordes of submissive sub gay men looking for a mean Daddy dom to put them in their place?
  • Why do so many gay men take pride in being straight-acting?. I have told a couple of gay guys recently, “Hey you’re pretty straight acting, you know that?” And they all thanked me when I said that.

*I don’t mind men who are biologically gay. However, any guy who is choosing to engage in that behavior as a lifestyle (and there are a lot), well, I just don’t approve. I can’t hate them because the Hate Databases in my head are full of more worthy opponents, but they sure are making a stupid decision. My attitude about men engaging in homosexuality by choice is, “What if everyone did that?” I had one friend who started doing that, and I kept associating with him for a bit, and then I got rid of him once and for all. If you want I can write a post on why a continuing friendship with that guy after he went full bisexual would have been a complete nightmare.

I don’t care that biologically gay men are effeminate. Maybe whatever caused the homosexuality is causing the effeminacy. Anyway, they enjoy acting this way. It seems to all be part of the Gay Syndrome.

However, other than that, I despise effeminate or even wimpy behavior in men. Of course I have been guilty of this a few times in my life, but those were mistakes I hope to have stopped doing. The very idea of me acting effeminate is awful and of me acting wimpy is disgusting, and anyone accusing me of effeminacy or even wimpiness just insulted me in a huge way. I live in the hood. Around here, you accuse a man of being gay or even acting gay and you might just get hit. People feel pretty strongly about that stuff around here.


Leave a comment

Filed under Cultural Marxists, Homosexuality, Left, Politics, Psychology, Sex

I Guess All World War Two Generation Males Must Be Toxic

My father wasn’t really an alpha but he thought he was like so many other men. He also wasn’t that extroverted but he thought he was once again like so many other introverts. He had problems speaking on the phone for Chrissake, often collapsing into pathetically amusing stutters. I’m not sure I ever saw him speak to a group. I doubt if he would do well.

He was a teacher though, and I once saw him teach a class. A very good female friend of mine was a student in one of his classes at the college I attended in the day and he taught at night. One night I attended one of his classes. There he was, swimming freely in his own element, quite at home and very pleasant and even stunning to behold. As is so often the case, he was a completely different person roaming about at the head of his class than he was away from the blackboard. He was actually charming up there. He was nothing like that at home. You would have thought they had switched him out.

He was a beta introvert, an intellectual who even at the end of his life was inhaling a book a day. He wore glasses. He taught school. He was a prig with Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder. You get the picture.

Yet my father very much valued masculinity as a concept. I once asked my mother why she didn’t call him on some particular aspect of his behavior.

“Oh…” she whispered. “I’m afraid he would see it as an attack on his masculinity and I would never do that to him.”

She would never attack his masculinity. Incredible. Can you imagine a woman of my generation (Baby boomers) ever saying she would not dare attacking her man’s masculinity? What ever happened to later generations of women? Didn’t they get the memo? Actually, I am afraid that what happened was a brain toxin called feminism.

My father despised gay men and mostly saw them as incomprehensible freaks if not mentally ill unfortunates to be pitied at best.

He hated his long hair more than anything else. My father felt that long hair on men was effeminate. As a boy, his mother had grown his hair long and even dressed him up in dresses around the house. At some point as a young boy, he rebelled against this nonsense and demanded to be treated like a man.

He later demanded that his formal first name be reduced to the more macho sounding nickname. He was quite proud of this form of rebellion against the strictures of imposed familial culture.

He took macho jobs in the summer working at Yosemite National Park, where he met my mother, or even working in supermarkets. I remember once visiting a supermarket and there was my bespectacled schoolteacher father, tossing and catching watermelons like they were tennis balls.

When my mother first went to work in 1980, my father objected. He was raised that a good man should not allow his wife to work. If your wife worked, that meant you were a failure as a man because you were failing to earn enough money to support your family. Your wife taking a job was a form of emasculation.

As you can see, my father took great importance in masculinity, as did many men of his generation. However, the Cultural Left seems to deny that things like masculinity and femininity even exist, God forbid that they may be essentialized by Nature.


Filed under Cultural Marxists, Feminism, Gender Studies, Left, Man World, Scum

Masculinity Studies, Yet another Abomination of the Cultural Left

The Cultural Left can’t even agree if masculinity exists or not. On the one hand, it is another one of these “constructed categories” that exist only in minds and not in realis. On the other hand, it exists, but it is evil, referred to as always “toxic” and in need of eradication along with those wicked other constructed qualities like race and gender, which also exist only mentally and ephemerally and not materially.

And even if it does exist, masculinity is apparently evil. All masculinity is “toxic masculinity.” There’s no other kind.

The war on masculinity is led of course by the feminists, who have always hated the masculinity and sexuality of normal heterosexual men. That masculinity exists at all indicates that it is oppressive. In fact, these things cannot exist at all without being oppressive.

It’s little remarked that the gays also wage war on masculinity, a concept along with gender that they despise. Of course gay men hate gender – most of them are men who act like women! And of course they hate masculinity – because so many of them are men who are very unmasculine. The very concept of masculinity at all would seen to be homophobic, and gays online routinely refer to masculinity as toxic.

The fact that masculinity or its caricature at least exists in spades on gay culture would seem to be lost on them. Who are these tops anyway? What’s a bear? What’s with these hard-looking stern-faced leathermen with other men on leashes. More cognitive dissonance or in this case cognitive blindness.

You would think that lesbians who typically act masculine like men would take up the banner of masculinity, but they just don’t. In fact, to suggest that lesbians are masculine is heresy – it is considered to be de facto homophobic and hate speech.

In this case as in so many others with the Cultural Left, truth becomes vicious insult on account of its revelations being unpalatable. The Cultural Left believes that if truths are ugly, then this means that they are not true! An interesting form of philosophy to say the least.

Our universities now have entire fields of studies devoted to “Masculinities.” There are even journals about these manly things, which are always bizarrely pluralized. At first I thought they were onto something as I have a bit of a hard-on for masculinity myself, at least in my own mind and self-image. I’d love to see some real scholarship on the concept of masculinity and how it manifests in the individual and society across classes, races and cultures.

I dipped into it and was quite disappointed. Everyone writing in “Masculinity Studies” is either an insane feminist or a gay man. The entire field is devoted to waging war on the very concept of masculinity and sees its very existence as permanently pathological.


Filed under Cultural Marxists, Feminism, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Higher Education, Homosexuality, Left, Man World, Radical Feminists, Scum, Sex

“The Most Uncomfortably Honest Person On the Net”

Otherwise known as me.

What does /pol/ think of Robert Lindsay?

  ID:y5Kzqn7l No.151000405

Finally, somebody actually gets it. 95% of the stuff you hear about me is flat out wrong and the vast majority of that is simply lies and untruths. People just don’t get me at all. All they do is mischaracterize me. I know my own beliefs and values. I can obviously figure out if I am being mischaracterized or not.

This is one of the most perfect analyses of what I am doing here on the Net that I have ever read. Of course it comes from pol, the Alt Right/Nazi/White nationalist/whatever board.

I’m not a Nazi (I actually hate them) but Nazis, White nationalists, and Alt Right people are some of the few people who have managed to figure me out. Everyone else just doesn’t get it. They read the Book of Me but they didn’t understand it.

I am not sure what this means, except that maybe I really am Alt Left. It’s disturbing that only Alt Right people get me, but maybe that makes sense I am really Alt Left after all, with the original Alt Left being an Alt Right split. The original Alt Left had Alt Right roots (in fact it was an open Alt Right split), and the presence of certain aspects of the Alt Right are present in much of the true Alt Left to this day.

It’s a complicated theory, but Rabbit has written some excellent analyses along these lines. Read him if you don’t get it. Let’s put it this way. One great thing about the Alt Right was this Realism Uber Alles attitude – race realism, gender realism, sexual orientation realism, gender identity realism. It’s a scientific attitude towards the bitter  facts of life that rejects the SJW feel good mythology of Soma and happy pills. The SJW’s hearts are in the right place in a sense – they want everyone to be nice and quit picking on everyone else – but it’s anti-reality and they’ve turned into some weird Church Lady Commissars. They aren’t even fun anymore. SJW’s are as fun as a stern nun with a ruler in her hand.

Sometime I think Brandon Adamson is one the few Alt Left people who has figured me out. We are different, but in a way, Brandon is my child. The deepest roots of Brandon’s Alt Left are found in his reading of my Liberal Race Realism, my previous political project, which set Brandon slowly down the road to the Alt Left. LRR more or less turned into the Alt Left over years.

Most of the Alt Left is still far too rightwing for my and hopefully Brandon’s sensibilities.

It’s interesting though that the very earliest Alt Leftists (I will include Ryan England here also) are the ones who truly understood and stayed faithful to the complicated ethos of the early visions of the Alt Left.

In particular, the early Alt Left was very left on economics. I am some sort of weird liberal-to-Commie type and Brandon likes to call himself a “space Communist.” Ryan was originally know as Agent Commie, and his thinking has Marxist roots.

Brandon is getting some new followers that seem to be onto his Left of the Alt Right project – some sort of weird leftwing White nationalism which I do not support – but I wish him well. I’d be quite happy if more of these Alt Right guys went socialist. I don’t care if they vote of us or not. Why should I care? A sane politics grabs every vote it can.

How many people do Nazis kill, anyway? A few here and there?

And the neoliberalism of the corporate Democrats has killed tens of millions.

And the insane neoconservative wars of the Cold War Democrats has killed close to 2 million since 2003 alone.

What are we talking about here? At least 22 million deaths?

How many have these Alt Right Nazis killed in the last 30 years? It sure ain’t 22 million.

A socialist Nazi is 20 times better than a corporate Democrat, and I hate Nazis.

You pick your poison in life. Life is basically toxic, and you simply choose the poisons that harm you the least. And then you die.

Ashes, ashes, all fall down.

Momento mori!


Filed under Conservatism, Cultural Marxists, Democrats, Economics, Fascism, Left, Marxism, Nazism, Neoconservatism, Neoliberalism, Political Science, Politics, Race Realism, Racism, Socialism, US Politics, Vanity, War, White Nationalism

Cascada, “Because the Night”

More Electropop, this time out of Germany. Check out the statuesque Tuetonic blonde Nico type fronting the band.

This is actually a new musical movement called Eurodance. This did indeed come out of House and Techno DJ dance music of an earlier era, moreso than Electropop.

The original song is by Patti Smith, and it is excellent. I cannot recommend Patti Smith highly enough. She was one of the original punk rockers and she was actually a poet. Her music is real poetry set to music. She even shacked up with playright Sam Shephard for a while. She’s a bit butch, but she was always heterosexual. This is what I liked about the genderbending of the 1970’s. You could be an androgynous man like the guys in Mott the Hoople or Queen, Bowie’s band or the Dolls and still be 100% heterosexual. Mott were actually hyper-heterosexual, but a lot of people said they dressed like faggots.

Similarly, sure, Patti Smith is a bit butch for a woman, but she is ravenously heterosexual. Once again, in 70’s thinking, even fairly masculine women can be wildly heterosexual, and no one cares.

We are really getting away with this with the insane Cultural Left modern gay culture and the much more insane Trans Culture. We are getting back into essentializing gender again. I thought feminism was the opposite of that? The 1970’s were definitely the opposite of that. Gendered behavior was uprooted from sexual orientation. Men could be feminine. Chicks could be masculine. All without being faggots or dykes. Yay!

The crazy way we are now, most fairly feminine men have either gone over to gay somehow or are quite likely to be bisexual, often by preference and not biology. Worse, feminine behavior in men is seen as proof positive that you are a bit Tranny. There are even radical Trans activists who insist that all gay people are really trans and they all need to come out and transition and get it over with. Gay Politics birthed its child, Trans Politics, and now the offspring is attacking the parents. Once again the Cultural Left keeps sprouting and watering the seeds of its own destruction. Sort of like, you know…capitalism? Cue Marx.

Masculine women who would have been straight in the 1970s are now almost all lez or bi if not out and out transmen as gender has once again been essentialized moronically by the Cultural Left. What is nuts that is that another Cultural Left wing, Feminism, has always hated the essentialization of gender. This hatred is the raison de etre or feminism itself. So the Cultural Left’s various factions promote their own contradictions (cue Marx again) and the contradictions go to war against each other, tearing the host asunder.

If a man is as feminine as Bowie or Marc Bolan or the Dolls nowadays, he’s nearly always gay or bisexual if not out and out trans. All of these men, if growing up nowadays, would have gone seriously bi if not gay and at least Bowie would probably be a damned transwoman by now.

Do you see how the modern Cultural Left has limited the options of men and women. Straight men and women are once again shoved into masculine and feminine boxes, and you step outside, that’s prima facie evidence that you’re not straight and probably not cis anymore.

Way to go Cultural Left! Thanks for bringing 1950’s gender roles back to straight people.



1 Comment

Filed under Cultural Marxists, Culture, Feminism, Gender Studies, Glam, Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, Left, Man World, Music, Politics, Pop Culture, Punk, Rock, Sex

Torture Sex – The Latest Deviant Sexual Culture Pushed by the Cultural Left Freakshow

Sexual sadists are the freaks that the Cultural Left loves so much in its love affair with hardcore BD/SM sex, which in its hardcore form I prefer to call Torture Sex because that’s what it is. The hardcore stuff, especially 24/7 total control scenarios that a lot of people get into, are really sick. There are many sadistic men into this scene who keep women as slaves, sometimes more than one. The women love being slaves and they get off on being treated like garbage, which is exactly how they are treated.

The men are called Doms or Daddies. The women describe themselves in debasing terms, calling themselves ugly, stupid, fat, worthless, garbage, animals, dumb, useless, etc. This is how these women literally describe themselves because that is exactly how low their self-esteem is. The Doms of course encourage this time of thinking. The male Dom/female Sub scene is fanatically misogynistic. Men are praised as the superior or only capable gender and women derided as inferior, worthless, useless, garbage, incompetent, failures, etc. It’s the sort of sexism that feminists have been railing against for years, yet here is a whole groovy sex culture that revels in this stuff.

There is another culture with Female Dominatrixes and male slaves and boy do they treat those slaves like crap. This is where a lot of your Internet scat videos come in.

If you have read this far, you can see that these sexual deviants are anything but healthy and that this culture violates many feminist principles, reveling in male superiority, female inferiority, misogyny, female self-hatred, and male sadism and mental and physical abuse of women. Of course the feminists hate all of these things, but if you put them all  together into a seven course meal and call it a sexual subculture, then it’s all well and groovy and we all need to take up this sicko deviant stuff tomorrow lest we miss out on the latest and greatest sex fad.

This shows you that the Cultural Left, like Marx’s capitalism, contains the seeds of its own destruction sown right into the very matrix of the system.

Feminists of course despise misogyny, male sexism and superiority, female self-hatred, and the psychological and physical abuse of women by men – to be opposed to these things is a core feminist principle.

However, there is a problem here, and that is that feminism is allied with the GLBTIABCXYZ sexual and gender freako culture. Gay men are very much into SM/BD, and its more common than you think among lesbians. Perhaps there is something about homosexuality, male and female, which makes a human perverse and deviant.

Because SM/BD is this glorious gay male thing, the feminists have had to cheer for it even though it goes against every one of their principles because of their alliance with gay men.

The Cultural Left is riven with these contradictions from top to bottom and this is one of the biggest problems in sustaining this freakshow – the fact that cognitive dissonance, contradiction, hypocrisy and rank irrationality are baked right into the crazy Cultural Left Rube Goldberg contraption from the start.


Filed under Cultural Marxists, Culture, Feminism, Gender Studies, Homosexuality, Left, Masochism, Scum, Sex

I Support Big Earl

At first I thought this guy was messed up, but then when I heard the whole story, I support him. Big Earl does not say no gays and lesbians in his restaurant. In fact, he states that there are many gay and lesbian couples who come there to eat. However, they abide by the Big Earl’s rules – no PDA, act normal, dress appropriately, etc. These guys were thrown out because they were touching each others’ legs and engaging in gay PDA in what is obviously a very redneck restaurant.

  • First of all, don’t go places where you are not wanted.
  • Don’t even live in places where you are not wanted.
  • Don’t try to join crowds or social circles where you are not wanted.
  • Don’t go there, move, avoid that group of people, etc.
  • Move to a place where your kind is accepted, go to businesses that accept you and are nice to you, and go join crowds or groups that will accept you.

Most people learn this stuff in the 5th Grade.

Now there is some weird SJW movement that says all locales, businesses, crowds and friend circles are mandated to accept everyone who lives there, goes there, or wants to join the group. Screw that.

People have a right to their friend circles and their social codes. If you violate their social codes, you may not be welcome in that town, business or group. So play by the rules. When in Rome, do like the Romans. Or move.

Big Earl clearly does not discriminate against gays. Many gays who are known to him eat at his restaurant. However, these gays abide by certain social codes and rules that you need to abide by if you are to eat at Earl’s.

PS. There is a rumor that Big Earl was arrested long ago for some crime involving having sex with a young man. So this Big Earl homophobe seems to be just a tad bit gay himself.

Of course this plays into stereotypes about homophobes. Actually, some homophobes are covering something up or engaging in reaction formation, but most are not. Most homophobes are just straight people who very much dislike homosexuality, probably male homosexuality in particular, for reasons such as masculine codes, personal disgust that straight people normally have, religion, etc.

The whole “Homophobes are gay” thing is a big fat Gay Politics SJW lie. Besides there are serious problems with gays engaging in this argument that I have gone into before on this site.

If you enjoy the hard work that goes into this website, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site. Donations are the only thing that keep the site operating.

1 Comment

Filed under Cultural Marxists, Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, Politics, Sex, Social Problems, Sociology

Thank You, Datalounge: The Wisdom of the Gays

Datalounge is actually a fantastic gay forum, one of the best on the web, but I also enjoy reading about similar things (see below) on Empty Closets, another excellent gay forum.

You don’t have to read stuff that turns you off, but there are a lot of good discussions that straight people might be interested in.

I have never seen topics such as the nature and reality of sexual orientation, masculinity, femininity, bisexuality in men, friendships between gay and straight men, homophobia, etc. discussed with such incisive wisdom. And all of the people doling those most immaculate truths on those subjects were gay men. What is interesting is that are a number of straight women and even straight men who are regulars commenters on that site.

Also a lot of those gay men on there are damned funny. Remember back when gay men were cool and funny? Now they’re a bunch of dour, sanctimonious, humorless, censorious, hardass church ladies with a chip on their shoulder as wide as the Grand Canyon.

Nowadays, fags are a drag.

Anyway ,in one discussion about homophobia, a number of the gays were insisting on the “All homophobes are really gay” lie, and I remember one very wise gay man said,

Yes, some homophobes are gays hiding something and engaging in some weird psychological defense. But I think most homophobes are just people who hate us. Sure, they’re assholes. I think we need to fess up to the fact that there are a lot of people out there who are completely straight and simply hate us for being who we are.

That was such a brilliant, refined, reflective, thoughtful remark.

You would think that you would hear common wisdom like that all the time, but in fact, common wisdom is in short supply nowadays, having been replaced by often on its face preposterous Cultural Left lies and nonsense pretending to be the truth.

If you enjoy the hard work that goes into this website, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site. Donations are the only thing that keep the site operating.


Leave a comment

Filed under Cultural Marxists, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, Left, Man World, Sex

Wisdom of the Elders: Your Grandparents Were Right

We really had a big beef with my parents’ generation growing up. The Generation Gap was real. It was all their fault, too. They simply declared war on us in most cases. Sure, we were rebelling, but there were a lot of stupid social codes and rules that needed to be rebelled against.

We were rebels with a cause, not without one. Their generation tried to justify their social sadism by saying that all of our behavior was just “teenage rebellion” and “young people rebelling.”

But it wasn’t. If your parents are rational and sane and fun, there’s nothing to rebel against unless you like being perverse. We were actually doing all of those things because we wanted to do them and we liked doing those things. We did out of desire, not to give our parents the finger for no reason.

Now, at 60, I look around me. Something has occurred to me over the past decade that was hard for a lifelong rebel to swallow, and it is this:

In far more ways than we want to acknowledge, and no matter how painful and humbling it is to admit:

Our grandparents were right.

Not just our parents. I mean our grandparents! I think back on the truths that they told me after long and well-lived lives, and there’s not a whole lot I can disagree with.

The Cultural Left wants to take all our collective wisdom of the ages, built up over centuries or even millennia, all of the wisdom of our ought to be revered elders accumulated through time and trial and error, tested and refined over countless generations until the truth came out so bright it blinded you to look at it…

…and set it all on fire.

Our wisdom is our heritage, and it is stored in our elders like flesh and blood libraries from generation to generation, refined through time in what is essentially an empirical and scientific process involving how to run a society and culture.

And we are setting the damn thing on fire like Nazi bookburners just to justify a few sexual, gender and racial ultra-radicals who are trying to engage in a vast social engineering project with ideas that not only have rarely been used by humans, but with concepts and notions that have been rejected over centuries and generations by the common wisdom of our species.

I’d call it folly if it wasn’t so frightening, and even dangerous.


Filed under Cultural Marxists, Culture, Left, Social Problems, Sociology

My Unadulterated Thoughts on Intelligence Variance among the Races

Someone recently asked me my unadulterated views on intelligence variance among the races. Incidentally, he was a Black man. Generally, I take the 5th on that question and simply say that there are intelligence differences among the races, that is, yes, Whites are smarter than Blacks, NE Asians and Jews are smarter than White Gentiles, etc.,  all on average, mind you, but IQ tests prove this very well, and IQ tests absolutely measure intelligence better than any other device we have. Usually just saying that it’s a proven fact that on average Whites are smarter than Blacks is enough to consign me to the Societal Doghouse for eternity,  so I don’t bother piling it on. I say yes, Whites are smarter than Blacks, but we don’t know what causes this, if it is genes or environment or both or something in the air. In public statements I say I am agnostic on the causes.

The truth is that I am lying. I simply do not want to come out and say that there are genetic differences in intelligence between the races because my name is mud enough as it is and there’s no reason to keep digging once your enemies have thrown you in a hole that goes halfway to China already.

But now I will come out and confess that I do believe that there are genetic differences in IQ between the races. I expect that I will now be vastly more ostracized than I am already after I say this.

I do believe there are cognitive differences between the races that are genetic. However, I add one proviso to that. Usually when people that there are behavioral or cognitive differences between the races, what usually follows is a Doomsday statement along the lines of “No hope for Blacks.” They say that Blacks will be less intelligent and highly criminal forever since it’s genetic and genes are destiny.

The thing is I don’t believe in that. I believe that genes tend to be destiny in a macro but not micro sense, that is among groups but not among individuals and subject to much variation.

But I also believe that environments can modify genetic tendency. A typical environment will result in a typical behavior and cognitive outcome for the group. A bad environment, which we seem to specialize in as humans, will result a catastrophic outcome for the group with behavioral and cognitive outcomes expressed at an extreme level. A good environment will result in the behavioral and  cognitive outcome being relatively better for the group.

And an extremely good environment or a Super-environment as I call it may result in an outcome for the group that completely washes out the behavioral or cognitive profile for the group allows them to match better performing groups. I am reminded of a Black tribe in Burkina Faso of one million members. They have a homicide rate as low as the Japanese, 1/100,000. They are Muslims, they live in the desert, they value education, they live a very traditional life and perhaps most importantly, they place great value on the wisdom of elders, especially male elders.

People like to say that you can never turn Blacks into Norwegians or Japanese. In  terms of sense of humor, I think Blacks not turning into Norwegians is an excellent trend. This syllogism is true as far as it goes, but here we have a tribe of 1 million Blacks in the darkest heart of Black Africa where none of the light of modernity shines who at least on one important variable, have somehow managed to turn themselves into Japs.

In intelligence, we know have a case in the UK similar to the case in Burkina Faso for behavior.

Nevertheless, the latest scores out of the UK have British Blacks matching Whites on high school achievement tests. It’s not an IQ test but it can be a proxy for one. Anyway it predicts job success and performance very well, so it doesn’t matter if it’s not an IQ test.

There is a solution to this conundrum. Even with genetic IQ differences, there still room for environment to close the gap. However, the environment for Blacks to close the gap as British Blacks did would have to be a “super-environment” which may have been achieved in ultra-PC UK. However, I would say that these super-environments are hard to achieve, and most places will not be able to create them, so Blacks will fall behind in most environments.

In contrast, Whites and Asians need only a typical environment to succeed. In a poor environment, a lot of poorer Whites will fall behind but many others will succeed. The Blacks will simply be completely plowed under far worse than in an ordinary environment. Curiously the cognitive power of some groups like Chinese and Jews may be so high that they can surmount genetically even quite poor environments. Their genes just plow right over the environment.

In the same way, Blacks do have a tendency towards crime that I regard as genetic. However, if we set IQ at 113 (about yours) Blacks and Whites have the same crime rates. So if we could raise Black IQ, we could lower Black crime because as Black IQ rises, cognitive capacity rises up and overpowers or overwhelms any genetic tendency towards crime. In other words, an intelligent Black man may have the same genetic tendency towards crime as an 85 IQ Black man, but the 113 IQ Black man’s IQ simply overrides, bulldozes and plows over the genetic tendency towards crime because IQ suppresses criminal behavior and as IQ rises, crime drops because of the crimino-suppressant effect of rising IQ.

As you can see, my views on this are quite nuanced. Yes, Blacks are less intelligent and more criminal than Whites and this is in part due to genes. However, given the right environment, these outcomes can be improved and if you make the environment spectacular enough, you can even wash out these genetic tendencies entirely and Blacks can match Whites or even East Asians. However, creating these Super-environments is going to be very hard to do.

I have also postulated a theory about how increasing IQ serves to suppress genetic tendencies towards crime and how IQ acts as a barrier against bad environments, with the highest IQ’s having nearly suppressive effects on bad environments, average IQ’s have a subset badly affected by bad environments while others weather it and the lowest IQ’s being no barrier at all against bad environments or even worsening their bad effects by introducing  the equation of Low IQ + bad environment which seems to result in an exponential effect worse than either alone.

Not that my nuanced views will matter to the Commissars of the Cultural Left though. I’m already an Enemy of the People, and this will just increase my sentence at the intellectual gulag archipelago where I was shipped to long ago.


Filed under Africa, Asians, Blacks, Britain, Crime, Cultural Marxists, Europe, Genetics, Intelligence, Jews, Left, Northeast Asians, Psychology, Race Relations, Race/Ethnicity, Regional, Social Problems, Sociology, Whites