Category Archives: Europe

Media Control in the West Is Complete


Robert, do you think we’re going to see a Revolution? Can the Judeo-Anglo-American system be destroyed?

No, because no one cares, one,  and the media control is 100% complete, two. How many papers* are for Trump? How many papers opposed even one of these trade deals? How many papers are pro-labor union? How many papers are opposed the groovy conservatism called “fiscal conservatism?” How many papers opposed this insane new Cold War with Russia? How many papers oppose the confrontation with Iran and Hezbollah? How many papers are pro-Palestinian? How many papers opposed the insanity in Iraq and Libya? How many papers opposed the same madness in Syria?

How many papers reported that there is no evidence whatsoever tying Russia to the m-17 disaster and a ton of evidence linking Ukraine as a false flag (the CIA position) , with the US, the EU and NATO in on a massive coverup?

How many papers reported that there is no evidence at all tying the Syrian government to the sarin gas attacks in Damascus that never even happened in the first place and a ton of evidence tying Turkey and Al Qaeda to this false flag? How many papers reported that it was Iran and Syria who took down the Lockerbie jet and that Ghaddafi was framed?

The answer to all those questions is zero at least in the US. For the foreign policy questions, the number is zero including all of Europe, Australia, New Zealand and Canada.

There literally is no dissident press anywhere in the “free” world on any of these questions. This is what I call the Deep State. When you have that sort of ideological conformity and total media control, I would say that those media outlets are controlled by the Deep States of each of their countries. It is also true that elites in the West are in 100% agreement about most important things, but the profound ideological conformity the utter lack of a dissident media and near lockstep fashion in which propaganda is distributed or certain stories are blacked out all across the West is far too suspicious. That is down to a lot more than “Western elites being a bunch of rich neocon Cold Warriors who agree about everything.

See what I mean?

However, I think we are in for some changes because of the presence of major politicians in the Anglosphere such as Corbyn, Sanders and Trump who are directly opposing the objectives of the Deep States and elites. I am starting to worry for these folks. People who oppose the Deep States tend to get the “Kennedy treatment.”

*”papers” includes radio and TV news and newsmagazines.


Filed under Australia, Canada, Eurasia, Europe, Government, Iran, Journalism, Middle East, Palestine, Politics, Radical Islam, Regional, Russia, Syria, Turkey, Ukraine, US Politics, USA, War

Evidence for 7-24 Point Environmental IQ Gains in the US, UK and Caribbean

RL: Do we know how mixed with Whites Blacks were 100 years ago in the US? Because the Black IQ in the US was 77.5 a century ago. They have gained 7.5 points since then. I suspect White IQ is worth 1 IQ point for every 3-4% White.

jm8: I don’t know about the early US black scores. But i suspect that 3-4% would be worth less since, as I calculated:

Assuming a black iq of 85 and a white iq of 100, a 1/8 white, 7/8 black population would average 86.8.

I’m not sure what the US score was a century ago. Ive heard it was about the same as now for most of the 20th century (starting in the 1920’s-30’s) I remember one very early 1920’s study being late 80’s or 90 (from the old “Occidentalist” blog again), but I’m not sure how representative it was. I will see If I can look for some data on the early US scores.

A 7.5 point reduction in the B-W IQ gap from 1920-present by averaging all test scores has been documented by Charles Murry of all people.

The average IQ scores of around 70 for Black Americans in certain areas of the Deep South of the United States where the degree of White admixture is significantly below the general average (Chakraborty et al., 1992; Parra et al., 1998) are also consistent with the hereditarian interpretation of the effects of hybridization. An average IQ of 71 was found for all of the Black children in an entire school district from a rural county in Georgia; the average White IQ in the same county was 101 (Jensen, 1977).

There is excellent evidence from as late as 1990’s that Black genotypical IQ is as low as 70 as I always suspected. Rushton could not believe that African IQ’s were as low as 70, so he undertook a trip to South Africa and tested Black students there and obtained a 70 score on Raven’s Progressive Matrices. He then tested Black university students and got a score of 85, which is about right as university students tend to average 25 IQ points higher than the general population.

This makes the case for Black environmental IQ gains much stronger.

If Black IQ is really genotypically 70, then each 3% of White admixture in Blacks ought to result in a 1 point IQ gain, which is the figure I have been using for my own work for a long time.

Putting genotypical IQ at 70 and adding 1 IQ point for each 3% White admixture gives us:

US Black IQ of 78 with 25% White admixture. This leaves a 7 point environmental IQ gain to an IQ of 85*.

Bermudian Black IQ of 85 with 50% White admixture. This leaves a 15 point environmental IQ gain to an IQ of 100**.

Bahamian Black IQ of 75 with with 15% White admixture. This leaves an 18 point environmental IQ gain to 93 IQ**.

UK Black IQ of 74 with 13% White admixture. This leaves a 26 point environmental IQ gain to 100 IQ**.

*By actual IQ test.

**By achievement tests that are considered to be proxies for IQ tests.


Filed under Africa, Americas, Bahamas, Bermudans, Black-White (Mulattos), Blacks, Britain, Caribbean, Europe, Intelligence, Latin America, Mixed Race, North America, Psychology, Race/Ethnicity, Regional, South, South Africa, USA

The Flynn Effect in Blacks Is Ongoing

Jason Y: “Mark my word though, that a bad environment will see NO improvement even over a 1000 years!”

Phil: You forgot something, time is a resource. Second, it’s been noticed in the “Flynn effect” with Blacks that it stopped.

According to my latest information from Bermuda, the Bahamas, Dominica, Kenya, the US and the UK, the Flynn Effect, or whatever it is, is ongoing in Blacks.

Blacks now match Whites on an IQ proxy in the UK, and Half-Black mulattos now match Whites on an IQ proxy in Bermuda.

And in the Bahamas, more or less pure Blacks (9% White) seem to have made some serious IQ gains. Their IQ’s are now 93, whereas on a genetic basis, we might expect an IQ of ~78 or even lower. There also appear to have been actual IQ rises in the UK and Bermuda among Blacks and mulattos respectively.

These three cases actually expand on the Flynn Effect because the FE was previously simply showing rising IQ’s for all races, and while Black IQ’s were going up a lot, White IQ’s were going up by the same amount, so there was no closing of the B-W gap, and there was no actual rise in relative IQ.

In the Bahamas, there was a 15 point gain in relative IQ, that is, Blacks closed 15 pints of the B-W IQ gap.

In the UK, there was a 14 point relative IQ gain, and Blacks closed a 14 point B-W IQ gap.

In Bermuda, there was a 12 point gain in relative IQ, that is, Blacks closed a 12 point B-W IQ gap.

In the US, Dominica, and Kenya, we are still seeing Flynn rises among Blacks, but in the US and possibly in the other two places, there has nevertheless been no closing of the B-W gap.

While it benefits Blacks to get smarter, if Whites are rising at the same rate, some of the gains and all of the relative gains are wiped out.

After all, if there is a tiger chasing both of us, I don’t have to be faster than the tiger. I simply have to be faster than you.

With both Black and White IQ’s rising in tandem, the effect is simply one of an IQ arms race where neither side is gaining on the other while both become more heavily armed.


Filed under Africa, Americas, Bahamas, Black-White (Mulattos), Blacks, Britain, Caribbean, Dominica, East Africa, Europe, Flynn Effect, Intelligence, Kenya, Latin America, Mixed Race, North America, Psychology, Race/Ethnicity, Regional, USA, Whites

Nazis and Communists Fighting in the Streets of Sweden

Fascinating. The real violent people here are the Left, honestly. They are attacking the fascists and Nazis, and the fash are mostly just fighting back from what I can tell. However, some of the Revolutionary Front fighters say that they have gotten death threats from the fascists, so it looks like both sides are ramping up the violence.

It’s fascists/Nazis and Communists/socialists, the Right and the Left, fighting in the streets of Europe. In other words, it’s 1920’s and 1930’s Europe (Germany especially) all over again. History is once again repeating itself.

A Marxist analysis would say that this situation of Hard Right and Hard Left always arises in any capitalist system during a time when the capitalist system is in crisis. They would say that capitalism inevitably leads to oligarchy, the rich inevitably get richer and the poor inevitably get poorer until sooner or later extreme inequality leads to a crisis. In other words, it is inevitable that capitalism will experience periodic crises.

It’s not even a bug of the system. It is actually supposed to work that way! Every time we have an economic crisis in this country, listen to Ron or Rand Paul talk about what is happening. They will simply say that this is part of the natural (boom and bust) business cycle that will correct itself sooner or later, since capitalism is a self-regulating mechanism. Do you understand what they mean when they say that? When they talk like that, they are saying that periodic crises are an unavoidable fact of the capitalist system and that these crises are not bugs at all, but instead they are features!

And in the late 20’s, Herbert Hoover spoke exactly the same way. My father said Hoover advocated doing nothing about the Depression because he did not want to upset the natural rhythm of the business cycle. In other words, the Depression wasn’t awful, it meant the system was working as intended!

In other words, when capitalism is in crisis, that is “how the system is supposed to work” – well, part of the time anyway.

So capitalism inevitably leads to oligarchy and a crisis, and Marxists would add that capitalism inevitably leads to fascism at some point or another, as a fascist response is one of the unavoidable consequences of a capitalist economic crisis.

So capitalism inevitably leads to fascism sooner or later. However, I would also add, optimistically, that capitalism inevitably leads to some form of socialism too. The rich get richer and richer, and the poor get poorer and poorer, and in addition to  the fascist response, there is also an inevitable Left, socialist or Communist response, the consequences of which are often welded into society via legislation.

Note that the Depression led to both socialist/Communist and fascist responses in the US. The fascist response was rather muted, but Father Coughlin and Mr. Lindberg sure were popular there for a bit. My mother remembers Father Coughlin on the radio. She says that every time you turned on the radio, there he was.

The Left response was melded into society as the New Deal, aspects of which continue to be part of our somewhat socialist society to this very day.

So the situation in Sweden at the moment is replaying Germany of the 20’s and 30’s all over again. If you want to understand the current fighting, go back and study the street fighting during that era.

I do not have much more to add here except that my political development is finally to the point where I not only understand this fighting, but I realize that it is actually normal, natural and inevitable given the economic situation. I shrug my shoulders and say, “Well, of course.”

It sure feels nice to have that sort of understanding of political reality. There is a real sense of mastery that comes with that. Further, you end up a lot calmer because you realize that all of these things are happening for logical reasons.

Whereas before, the world seemed chaotic, unpredictable and irrational. So many things seemed to happen for no reason. This feeling causes fear, insecurity and anxiety.

But with a sense of mastery over political developments, comes instead a feeling of peace that things are not happening for no reason anymore.


Filed under Capitalism, Conservatism, Economics, Europe, European, Fascism, Germany, Government, History, Left, Marxism, Nazism, Political Science, Regional, Socialism, Sweden, US

People Are Getting Tired of the Endless Wait for Blacks to Close IQ and Achievement Gaps with Whites

I am getting a bit tired of endless arguments from environmentalists that if we only provide Blacks with this special magic environment, then they will match Whites in IQ or IQ proxy scores. For decades we hear that if we only do this, that and the other that we will finally raise Black IQ and achievement scores up to the White level.

This debate has been raging since Jensen’s classic paper in 1969. That’s 47 years, and honestly the debate was already going on with a much smaller audience via the polarizing Dr. William Shockley. I suppose I am getting impatient with the failure of Blacks to significantly close these gaps and the endless cries from liberals that this Black Valhalla is right around the corner. Some of us are getting tired of waiting. It’s very frustrating.

I suppose I keep thinking, “So when is it going to happen? When are they going to close the gaps? Ok, Blacks can close the gap. Wonderful. So why don’t they do it? Wow, Blacks closed the gap in this country. Cool! So why don’t they do it here?”

The answer is always the same.

“Well, we just haven’t made the environment magic enough. We need to keep trying endlessly to create this magic Superenvironment that brings Blacks up to par. Come on! Step right up! Let’s create the Superenvironment! Everyone chip in!”

I think that these magic environments of Superenvironments may well exist, but it seems to be awfully hard to create them. Plus no doubt it is seriously expensive.

It reminds me of the Vietnam War. “We’re winning! We’re winning! The enemy is almost defeated! There’s light at the end of the tunnel!” and then we sit around waiting for a victory that never happens.

Forget matching us in behavior. The behavior of even the Blacks in the UK (who may have matched Whites in IQ proxies) is absolutely awful. So even if you make Black people dramatically smarter – a noble goal which I fully support for many reasons – you still end up with an extremely aggressive, impulsive, violent, criminalized and dangerous population whose crime rate is practically a public health crisis.

So what have we achieved by jacking up the Black IQ in the UK? Other than the benefits that will accrue to a lot of them, are we simply creating a new much more intelligent breed of dangerous antisocial criminal? I am not sure how or even if smarter crooks are better for society than dumber crooks. Maybe they are somehow, but someone needs to show me the data.


Filed under Blacks, Britain, Culture, Europe, Intelligence, Liberalism, Political Science, Psychology, Race Relations, Race/Ethnicity, Regional, Social Problems, Sociology, Whites

What Is the African Potential Phenotypic IQ?

Jm8 writes:

It should not be assumed that the genetic potential IQ is ca 80. If a measured IQ of 75-77 (or 81 if Wincherts is correct, to say nothing of if Afro-Sapiens is correct, which I do not know) is suppressed by disease load and malnutrition by about 15 points (which even Lynn believed), potential IQ’s could generally be closer to 90, or the low-mid 90’s (in some cases).

Forget it. Wincherts is as bad as Lynn when it comes to throwing out studies. I think if you leave all the studies in and average them all together, African IQ is ~76. I forget the exact number. There is no way on Earth Africans have a potential phenotypic IQ of ~90-94, forget it.

In addition, we continue to regularly receive reports of IQ studies out of Africa where the Blacks are scoring ~70 or even lower. That is simply a catastrophically low IQ. Personally I feel that in any group that regularly turns back IQ scores of ~70 has horrible problems. There is no way that a group with potential phenotypic IQ of 92 is going to get scores ~70. It’s just not going to happen. Even in the catastrophic environment of South Asia (often regarded as worse than Black Africa in many ways) the horrific environment only depresses national IQ’s down to ~80. A group that continues to turn in IQ tests scoring ~70 has some very serious genetic IQ issues I am afraid.

I do believe that the Black African IQ is ~70 at the moment. The horribly failed and collapsed nature of the so-called states over there definitely makes sense if note that this is the sort of failed state a 70 IQ population may well produce.

The most intelligent natural Blacks nationwide populations in the whole world are in the US and the UK.

Black IQ in the US = ~85, though you can get 87 if you fiddle around and throw out studies.

Black IQ in the UK = 86.

US Blacks are 20% White. There’s 6 IQ points right there + 9 points for improved environment.
UK Blacks are 13% White. There’s 4 IQ points right there + 12 points for improved environment.

For pure US Blacks, 85 – 6 = 79 IQ.
For pure UK Blacks, 86 – 4 = 82 IQ.

It looks like pure Black phenotypic IQ in Africa is going to top out at 81.5 IQ.

However, if the Black African IQ could be raised from ~70 up to ~82, I think that would be cause for celebration. A 12 point IQ rise in a population is nothing to shake a stick at. And Africa would be a much better place for the Africans and for the rest of us for that matter as African failed states impact all of us.

In fact, I think the Africans might do better than the South Asians.



Filed under Africa, Blacks, Britain, Europe, Genetics, Intelligence, Psychology, Race/Ethnicity, Regional, USA

ISIS Bombings in Brussels

Major attacks in two different places in Brussels – one at Maelbeek Metro Station and the other at Zavantem Airport. There are many dead and wounded. Is this revenge for the arrest of Abdeslam, mastermind of the Paris attacks?

34 dead, 187 wounded. Attacks hit at 8 AM Brussels time, or 11 PM last night my time. Weird that I heard nothing about it until this morning. ISIS just claimed responsibility.


Filed under Belgium, Europe, Islam, Radical Islam, Regional, Religion, Terrorism

Worst Companies in America to Work for Part 1: Amazon

Unbelievably bad.

1 Comment

Filed under Britain, Capitalists, Europe, Germany, Labor, Northeast, Regional, Scum, USA

Three Cheers for Sexual Assault


Good job, Madonna.

I cannot believe the comments over at the Guardian. Are the British people really such prigs? First there’s no statute of limitations on screwing a 15 year old girl or grabbing a woman’s tit 40 years ago, now this – notice the commenters are calling this “sexual assault,” saying it is “child pornography,” and claiming in credibly that it’s still sexual assault even if the girls consented to the action and is ok with it, which is in fact the case.

Are naked 17 year old girls really “child pornography?” Child pornography is kiddie porn. Those are movies of little children having sex, usually with adults. Those are little kids, usually 12-under. The very idea is pretty sickening. But how is a naked 17 year old girl, who in fact looks exactly like a naked female adult (I am serious – have you ever seen a naked 17 year old girl? It looks like a woman, trust me –  I have seen plenty of them) the same thing as a 45 year old man with a beer belly on top of a 9 nine year old girl having sex with her?

Child porn is illegal because we find the very idea to be sickening and horrible. Further the kids are pretty obviously being exploited. By calling naked 17 year old girls “kiddie porn” we imply that there is something sickening, evil and awful about a naked 17 year old girl. What’s so evil about a naked 17 year old girl? Further, it’s usually the case with a naked photo of a 17 year old girl that she’s not being exploited. In fact, in most cases, she took the photo herself. She’s exploiting herself? How the Hell can you do that?

Look at the comments. It doesn’t matter if the girl was ok with it or not? What?

Ok look. I have a woman over at my house. I don’t ask her permission first, but instead I just pull her top down without her permission*. She’s shocked of course, but then she relents and says it’s ok. I just committed sexual assault? Are you kidding?

The girl is a minor? She is? And even if she is, so what. Guess what idiots? The age of consent in the UK is 16. So that girl could easily consent to have sex with Madonna or any other adult. If she can have consent to have sex with Madonna, surely she can consent to let Madonna pull her top down, right? How can she consent to have sex with Madonna but not consent to let Madonna pull her top down? Why is is it consensual sex if she has sex with Madonna but sexual assault if Madonna pulls her top down? How can she legally have sex with an adult, yet if she takes a photograph of herself with her clothes off, or a photo of herself having sex with that adult, now all of a sudden it’s illegal “child pornography?”

See all the comments about “grooming?” By pulling the girl’s top down, Madonna was “grooming” the girl. Grooming means an adult seducing a child. It’s the lead-up to the actual sex. How is it that Madonna can legally have sex with this girl, but if Madonna tries to seduce the girl beforehand, it’s illegal “grooming?”

Notice how none of this makes any sense at all?

*I never ask permission to do most preliminary sexual things with a woman because there’s nothing more retarded than that. Any man who asks a woman for permission before doing preliminary sexual things with her is a moron. Any man who checks to get a woman’s verbal permission before having sex with her is a moron. You don’t do that. You just attack her. That’s called sexual assault, yes, but sexual assault is essential to seduction. No sexual assault, no seduction.


Filed under Australia, Britain, Celebrities, Child Porn, Europe, Girls, Heterosexuality, Law, Mass Hysterias, Pedophile Mass Hysteria, Pornography, Regional, Sex

Labour Party Member Suspended for Telling the Truth about the Jews

According to Jews, the definition of antisemitism means telling the truth about Jews or Israel.

Vicki Kirby, a Labour Party candidate for office, was suspended from the Labour Party pending an investigation into a series of “antisemitic tweets.” With clickbait like that as a headline, how could I not go read the gruesome details? I was rather shocked that a Labour Party candidate would say something about Jewish people, as vulgar antisemitism of that variety has long been out of favor with the cocktail party classes in favor of the polite antisemitism along the lines of “that shitty little country.” I personally much prefer the polite variety of antisemitism over the vulgar Stormfront variety. It’s so much classier, you know?

Turns out she said nothing wrong at all. She didn’t even attack Jewish people. She attacked their shitty little country.

Here are the tweets:

“We invented Israel when saving them from Hitler, who now seems to be their teacher.”

“I will never forget and I will make sure my kids teach their children how evil Israel is!”

In other words, she told the truth about Israel. Israel is a National Socialist ethnic nationalist country, one of the most Nazi-like countries in that sense in the world today. Palestinians are forced to do just about all but wear gold stars, although I assume that’s coming soon. And if Israel isn’t evil, nothing is.

She also suggested that ISIS should attack Israel, which is a bit much, I agree.

I do not see any antisemitism here. I see some attacks on a vile little pustule on the face of the world called Israel, but attacking a shitty little country isn’t the same thing as attacking Jewish people.

The most annoying thing by far about Jewish people is their incessant screeching about “antisemitism,” 90% of which is hallucinated. Most so-called antisemitism is just people complaining about the horrific behavior of some awful Jewish person, and there are plenty of examples of that.

When Jews are good, they’re pretty damn good, but when they’re bad, they’re truly horrid. I don’t think Jewish scum are any worse than Gentile scum. A Jewish banker-slime is as loathsome as a Gentile banker-slime. It’s not like Gentile white collar crooks act better than Jewish white collar crooks. They’re all just ambulatory sewage.

I suppose the problem is that there are so many scummy Jewish people. Which begs the question of why? Is there something in the Jewish religion that says it’s ok to be a POS? That says it’s ok to lie, cheat and steal and do whatever it takes to get your hands on the grubby loot? Maybe so.

The Jewish religion can be interpreted many ways, but one popular interpretation is about as a moral as Hinduism,though it does not stoop quite that low. It’s a system of dual morality. Sure, Judaism has all sorts of moral rules – there are 13,000 pages of them in the Talmud for God’s sake! But guess what? All that stuff is a list of things you cannot do to other Jews. On the other hand, the list of moral rules when it comes to dealing with Gentiles is…nothing! There’s nothing you cannot do to a Gentile! So perhaps the awful, morally reprehensible behavior we see in so many Jewish people (the source of most antisemitism) is in fact rooted right there in that sleazy tribal religion of theirs.


Filed under Anti-Semitism, Britain, Europe, Israel, Jews, Judaism, Middle East, Politics, Race/Ethnicity, Racism, Regional, Religion, The Jewish Question