Category Archives: Russia

Update on Mueller’s Investigation of Trump

Mueller’s criminal investigation into Trump is proceeding along three broad fronts:

  1. Investigating Trump for ties to Russian organized crime, especially money laundering (via real estate and casinos) and other illegalities tied to his business dealings with Russian ‘shadow’ banks and criminal oligarchs.
  2. The second front is the Trump campaigns and their collusion and coordination with Putin/Russian Government during the 2016 election.
  3. The third front is Trump’s crimes as president especially obstruction of justice.

There is a high degree of confidence that Trump has committed impeachable offenses on all three fronts.

2 in paticular goes a lot deeper than that. The allegation is that the Russians hacked into voter rolls in many states and then gave that information to Trump and Trump used it for targeted advertising. It’s not certain whether this is illegal or not, but it seems to be impeachable.

3 Trump is surely guilty of obstruction of justice. He’s far more guilty of this than Nixon was. And he keeps hanging himself more and more every day

1 is really the kicker. There is some excellent evidence for this one. We have names of the people involved and the corporations they set up to do this. Jared Kushner was up to his neck in this crap too.

PS Kushner, Ivanka Trump, Jeff Sessions, Mike Flynn and Mr. Manacourt are all under investigation. There are also rumors that Paul Ryan himself is under investigation. This mess is absolutely huge and it threatens to take down much of the Republican Party itself. This party has been wicked for a long time now, but now they are as corrupt as a Third World banana republic kleptocracy like we see in shitholes like Latin America, India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Thailand, Indonesia, the Stans, the Philippines, many African nations, Turkey and other failed and collapsed states.

At one point the GOP stood for something halfway noble. That ended when Reagan came in and turned it into the party of the UltraRight. Eisenhower, Nixon and Ford would not recognize today’s Republican Party. It’s like the Goldwaterites resurrected from the Dead and went zombie for three and half decades of living dead horror as conservatives roamed the nation, massacring its best and brightest while cannibalizing their brains. It’s a Republican Zombie Horrorshow!

 

115 Comments

Filed under Conservatism, Crime, Eurasia, Government, Law, Organized Crime, Political Science, Politics, Regional, Republicans, Russia, US Politics

“Iran: Socialism’s Ignored Success Story,” by Ramin Mazaheri

Iran: Socialism’s Ignored Success Story

May 23, 2017

by Ramin Mazaheri

Iran just completed their presidential election, but this article will not discuss the candidates, the result or the political consequences.

I work for Iran’s Press TV, which essentially makes me a civil servant, and I think it is correct for me to not reveal who I voted for in order to preserve my independence within the government. I’m quite happy to work for “the people” instead of “a person” – as in private media – and I will support which ever candidate the people choose.

Why will I support Iran’s government, whoever is in charge? Truly, it is not for my paycheck.

I support Iran because I support socialism where ever I can find it, and Iran has socialism in abundance.

Iranian Socialism has been so successful at redistributing wealth to the average person; has safeguarded the nation’s security despite being ringed by US military bases and repeated threats; has grown the economy despite an international blockade; has produced a foreign policy motivated on political principles; and has fought against the divisive identity politics which undermine human solidarity.

I have actually seen Iran over the decades, unlike 99% of the journalists who claim to understand Iran, so you can’t dissuade me.

And I’m not even going to try to persuade you. This is not that article, either.

This article is to lay out for left-wing readers and supporters of socialism what should be crystal clear: Iran is a socialist nation. Even more than that: Iran is a socialist success story.

Iran, like all nations, has had its unique developmental history; of course we have been reading Marx just as long as anyone else, as well.

But the most convincing and simplest way I can put it to non-Iranians is this: Europe came to socialism through industrialization, theory and war, but Iran came to socialism through its religious and moral beliefs. The ends are the same, and that is all that should matter to anyone who is truly trying to promote socialism for the benefits it brings to the average person.

The Problem Is Not Us, It Is You

I repeat: The problem is not us, it is you…when it comes to looking at Iran’s contributions to socialism.

I believe that around 99% of Westerners have no idea at all what Iran is really like. Unfortunately, this total ignorance about Iran and the Muslim world is the historical norm in the West.

The greatest contribution of Middle East scholar Edward Said was that his book, “Orientalism”, definitively proved through historical scholarship that the West has never, ever, ever been favorable towards the Muslim world.

Not in the 8th century, when Muslims were occupiers of the Iberian Peninsula, not in the following centuries when Islam was an ideological competitor to Christianity; not in the 15th century, when the Ottoman Empire occupied the Balkans; not in the 19th century, when the Europeans occupied the Middle East & North Africa; not in 1916, when they redrew the borders for the West’s benefit; not in 1945, when they bombed countries like Syria which had fought on their side against the Germans and the Italians; not in the 1960’s, when their reaction to independence was neocolonialism; not in 1979, when they created the forerunner of the Taliban; not during 2 wars in Iraq, a war in Syria today, etc.

Said’s point was: Never has the West viewed or treated the Muslim world as equals, much less intellectual equals.

Given this history, why should us Iranians expect the reality of our high-achieving modernity to be accepted and admired?

LOL, believe me, I am over it! I write this to enlighten you, not me! I humbly hope that it works.

I will address the elephant in the room, and quickly: Yes, I assume that a large part of this prejudice is religious. Some Christians cannot accept that Islam promotes the most recent prophet of the monotheism which they both share.

Such religious prejudices are not my problem, and they do not blind my analysis of 2017 Iran.

No socialist believes in a “clash of civilizations” or “religious war”, anyway.

My point is not to criticize Europe for a lack of brotherhood with their fellow Abrahamic religion: My point is to criticize them in 2017 because most Westerners believe that that even the most leftist Iranian cannot even qualify as merely a “conservative social democrat”!

Can There Never Be a Muslim “Democrat” or an Iranian “Republican”?

The proof of this bias is the decades of Western support for the oppression of the Muslim Brotherhood, the Iranian Revolution and any Muslim attempt to allow their religion into their politics. This is even though Christian Democratic parties governed Europe for decades after WWII, and it is absurd to think that the Christian dogma is not upheld and promoted in European politics today.

So, if Iranians cannot even be allowed to fulfill 19th century notions, why would the West accept that 2017 Iran can be even more truly leftist than the merely centrist ideology of European social democracy?

Of course, the average European cannot accept this, and this is why Western Socialists are aghast at my idea that Iran is an “ignored Socialist success story”.

The radical left of European Socialism, which seeks to destroy organized religion, is especially aghast, but they are a tiny minority and on the way out, thankfully. They do not realize that they have already been drastically tempered, if not ousted, in the still-Socialist countries they purportedly admire: Cuba is full of Santeria and Pope pictures, yin-yangy Confucianism is being promoted in China, etc.

But these Western radicals are a minority who simply cannot accept that spirituality cannot be rubbed out, largely because they see it as a choice or a social conditioning instead of a part of many people’s intrinsic nature (if not theirs). A modern Socialist must accept that this fight has already been fought and decided. The capitalists certainly advance as we chase our tails….

Even if leftist detractors can get past religion, they immediately will talk about Iran’s human rights faults.

I respond: Yawn yawn yawn African-Americans fill US jails; Muslims fill France’s jails; this is the centenary of the British-orchestrated Persian Famine, which killed 8-10 million people and actually made Iran the biggest victim of WWI, that is just one Western/capitalist inspired famine/death/human rights violation yawn yawn yawn.

I am not here to say Iran is perfect – only God can be – I am saying that Iran is absolutely no worse than the West. It is an undeniable fact that the current Islamic Republic of Iran has far less blood on its hands than most – and Iran has not invaded a country in 300 years!

Religion, human rights – these are all classic diversions from the facts presented against socialist societies, and Iran certainly is one.

Iran Checks All the Boxes as a Socialist Nation and as Revolutionary Socialist

What are the key components of socialism? Let’s clarify our terms.

The first is leadership by an avant-garde party committed to defending the revolution: Iran certainly has this, and it crosses over Principlist/Reformist party lines.

The second is central planning of the economy: Whoever had won, they would be largely implementing the 6th Five-year plan (2016-2021). And there is also the “Resistance Economy” approach promoted by many, which is certainly anti-globalization.

The third is control over the media: This is mixed – I would say Iran does not really have this in the traditionally Socialist sense. Cuba has no private media, for example, while Iran has dozens of private newspapers and innumerable TV satellites. But Iran does have limitations, so let’s check this box.

The fourth is support for foreign liberation movements: When the history of Palestinian liberation is finally written, just as a now-free South Africa thanks Cuba for sending troops to Angola, will not Palestinians do the same for Iran’s decades of support? The same with Lebanon and now Syria, correct?

The fifth is democratically devolving as much democracy as possible in order to empower the average person: There is no doubt that Iran is the most vibrant democracy in the Middle East, and by a huge margin. The difference between Iran’s social-democratic procedures and guarantees in 2017 when compared with 1978 is obviously laughable. I write this from Paris, a nation in an 18-month state of emergency with no end in sight….

If your country has these five crucial components: Congratulations! You are in a socialist country!

A little bit more on each for the naysayers….

An Avant-Garde Party

Iran is a one-party system – that party defends the 1979 Revolution. China is a one-party system – promoting Chinese communism. Many would say that the US is a one-party system – promoting imperialist capitalism.

The difference between Iran & China and the US is that in the former their one-party systems are formalized, explicit and well-known; in the US it is informal, but just as strong, and maybe even stronger.

I don’t think this needs much further explanation but, for example, you cannot propose to end the Iranian Revolution and run for office. In France a presidential candidate in their recent election (Jean-Luc Melenchon) won 20% of the first-round vote by proposing to abolish France’s current 5th Republic.

Like all socialist countries, Iran is criticized for not having democracy but they do: it is simply within their own particular structure. Just as in the USSR, there was lively debate about how to advance their own system – should we following the right-wing model of socialism of Bukharin/Khrushchev or the left-wing model socialism of Lenin/Trotsky? – but there was no debate about deviating from their chosen national system, i.e. communism. When they did allow such debates under Gorbachev, Soviet Socialism was almost immediately subverted by capitalist reactionaries and consigned to oblivion.

Again, please examine the repression of communism in the US, South Korea, Greece, Italy, Chile, etc. for historical examples of capitalist “one-party systems”, which are definitely NOT avant-garde and promoting socialism….

The idea that Iran has no avant-garde party but is some sort of totalitarian structure governed by the Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei is only expressed by those who are supremely ignorant about Iran. For the second presidential election in a row Hassan Rouhani won despite not seeming to be Khamenei’s preferred candidate, after all.

Central Planning of the Economy

I think I can illustrate Iran’s state of economic socialism with this anecdote: Back in 2013 all 8 presidential candidates were pushing for more privatization…not to promote capitalism, but because everything has already been nationalized for so long, LOL!

So Iran has already done the nationalizing, and maybe they need to do more? However, socialist countries have increasingly agreed that some revenue-producing businesses are needed to meet some of the basic needs of their people: North Korea has the Kaesong Industrial area, Cuba’s Port Mariel is giving some space to completely foreign-owned businesses, Vietnam and China have plenty of state-run capitalist enterprises, etc. The reality is that even producing things as simple as soap need some expertise, and very often only capitalist corporations can have that expertise.

That’s why the Iranian government went on a spending spree in 2016, but it was decidedly not your typical capitalism. (I do not want to appear to credit only the Rouhani administration because economic policy is produced by the entire government in 5-year development plans, as already noted.)

Iran was feted like a king in places like France and Italy because they were prepared to spend dozens of billions of euros. But what pleased me was how Iran spent: They demanded equal partnerships, joint ventures and technology transfers.

These are the ways in which foreign investment can be mutually beneficial and not exploitative – this was good for France too. I am not a dogmatic person who is absolutely against all capitalism, but I am against all exploitative capitalism.

My point is: It was a socialist spending spree, not a capitalist one. Iran did not just give money away; they did not waste money on vanity projects; this was not one billionaire dealing with another for their own benefit; they invested in Iran via long-term central planning, i.e. the socialist view of economic management.

This is not like France’s ruling “Socialist Party” recently selling off national industrial jewel Alstom to the United States’ General Electric: The French people got nothing for that. That was capitalism; that was globalization

Iran is not in favor of globalization – they are not even a member of the World Trade Organization, unlike 164 other countries. Some will say this is solely due to the opposition of the United States, but it is not: As many in Iran said during the election: membership in the WTO is against Iran’s principles…and these are socialist principles regarding the economy – there is nothing about the WTO in the Koran.

Control over the Media

It’s true you can’t have Charlie Hebdo in Iran – hardly a major loss –but Iran is certainly no Cuba.

Iran’s refusal to crack down on TV satellites which permit reactionary, anti-revolutionary channels like BBC Persian and VOA Persian (UK and US government-funded respectively) appears to be a dangerous fire which Havana will not tolerate. This tolerance does give Iran “human rights” credibility with the West – well it doesn’t, but it should!

I would suggest that Iran is simply confident that foreign propaganda cannot overwhelm the obvious successes of the 1979 Revolution. I imagine that Cuba feels that they cannot take chances, being just 100 kilometers from the USA.

Of course, Cubans simply laugh at Western propaganda channels like the US government’s pathetic Radio Marti. Cubans are supremely intelligent politically and, after all, their education programs are decades older than Iran’s.

Iran, like Cuba and China, bans pornography. I note that such respect for sexuality and for women is a very basic tenet of Socialism. If your utopia includes unfettered access to porn I suggest that you are a libertarian, and not a socialist.

I remind again that the media glasnost implemented by Gorbachev was a major driver in the catastrophic implosion of the Russian Revolution. To privatize media means, necessarily, that you are giving those few people rich enough to actually start newspapers the chance to promote their obviously capitalist worldviews.

I, for one, am not about to cry over the lack of published capitalist, imperialist, sexist, racist, regressive anti-revolutionary nonsense, and neither are most Iranians. As sad as the Dutch may be about it – Iran is not Amsterdam!

Support of Foreign Liberation Movements

Some will say that Palestine is just a “distraction” from Iran’s own problems. Nonsense – this is a point of pride to all Iranians. This is a point of admiration for Iran from the entire Muslim world, just as it is a negative point for much of the Western world.

This is another way Iran is revolutionary Socialist country: they support oppressed countries on the basis of ideology. Perhaps Iran is not the “Mecca of Revolutionaries” which Algeria was in the 1960’s, but let’s agree that the rate and scope of revolutionary movements worldwide are at a much lower level today, sadly.

Russia may support Syria, for example, but it appears more for Moscow’s self-interest and the idea of national sovereignty – which is the idea of national self-interest – rather than a moral-based ideology.

Call Iran the same as Russia – no insult there – but you cannot deny that Iran supports Palestine for reasons which are clearly to the detriment of their own success, i.e., they do it out of solidarity and morality. Were Iran to recognize Israel they would surely have the international dogs called off them…but Iran is a revolutionary Socialist society, as you are hopefully agreeing with by now.

Iran is also an anti-racist society, like all modern socialist societies.

They constitutionally protect minorities, with parliamentary seats for Armenians, Assyrians, Christians and Jews, despite their small numbers. Iran may not promote them, but their tolerance of local languages like Azeri and Kurdish far exceeds that of many minorities in Western Europe. Iran accommodates the 5th-largest number of refugees in the world, while French authorities put up gates and even ‘’anti-migrant boulders’’ to deny refugees even the barest shelter.

When it comes to religion they are extremely tolerant of ancient Iranian Zoroastrianism and all of the pre-Prophet Muhammad Abrahamic religions. Any religion after Prophet Muhammad? Well…it is an “Islamic” Revolution, after all.

This is perhaps a pedantic point but an important one on a verbal, Foucauldian level: Has there been any “revolution” in the world since WWI which was not “socialist”? I can’t think of any, because without a socialism component it cannot be a revolution – it can only be a continuation of the capitalist/feudalist/bourgeois status quo, or a military coup.

Empowering People

The two fundamental tenets of socialism are redistribution of wealth and empowering the average person so that they can reach their full potential. Dismantling the social roadblocks thrown up by capitalism against the non-wealthy has clearly been a major goal of the Islamic Revolution, and I can quite easily prove it has been achieved with a tremendous amount of real-world success.

Since 1990 – when the West’s attack dog of Iraq was beaten off – no country’s Human Development Index has improved more than Iran’s, with the lone exception of South Korea.

Everyone should take notice, especially Socialists, as it is we anti-capitalists who prize human development – not economic development – above all.

That’s why I’m going to leave the Human Development Index as the only proof of success. For me, I have so many other econometrics, anecdotes and personal reflections to prove that Iran has succeeded in creating a new, better, modern society that to do so is quite boring.

Bottom line: It is obvious that I do not have to make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear. Despite the tremendous amount of opposition, violence and propaganda, Iran has advanced the most in the past 3+ decades.

I say “the most” because, unlike South Korea, Iran has done this without 30,000 US troops currently on its soil; it was not preceded by decades of brutal dictatorship which slaughtered hundreds of thousands of people (mainly leftists); and they did not collaborate with the Americans in the division of their nation which currently causes the greatest possibility of thermonuclear war.

Iran didn’t get to #1 as many others did: by capitalism and imperialism.

Iran’s recent election had a 73% voter turnout rate, ranking it #12 in the world. Unlike many of these other 11 countries, Iran does not compel citizens to vote. There is obviously tremendous support for the Iranian system from the Iranian people because…they are not blind to success, I would say!

The hardest thing to get people to do when it comes to socialism (or Iran) is to think realistically: Nobody can achieve “perfect” socialism. No country has 100% voter turnout. No country has zero human rights violations.

But for Iran you have add on another layer of misconception: Many of the “restrictions” in Iranian society predate 1979 by centuries: women were largely wearing the hejab before then; unmarried people, especially young women, also lived at home before 1979; alcohol could send you to prison then and now.

My point is: Iran is a culturally conservative nation, and it was like that long, long before 1979. You will have to simply trust me that Iranians don’t need a government to make them want to live in a society which appears conservative to modern Western standards.

Again, Iran is not Amsterdam, LOL! Maybe you can talk about the royal court in Shiraz in the 14th century as being a hotbed of drunken poetic reveling, but this is does not reflect the reality of life for the average person.

Only an Iranian will agree quickly with this statement and move on: Take away the 1979 Revolution and you would still have many of the same rules in place – they would just be enforced informally.

I will, lastly, put it this way: Take away the mullahs, and you still have to deal with my grandmother!!!!!

But to believe that the government has not empowered people since 1979…well, back then the average woman had 7 children, was illiterate 70% of the time, and the UN was not calling its health care system “excellent”.

Today, the birthrate is 1.7 children per woman, the overall literacy rate is 93% and the right-wing Washington DC-based think-tank the Brookings Institution runs dumbfounded articles with headlines like “Are Iranian Women Overeducated?”.

All in 30+ years…and have you thought it was capitalism that did it?!

Socialists Who Ignore Iran Are Not Really Socialists At All

Do you still want to think that Iran is a country solely motivated by religious radicalism and not the ideals of socialism? Well, then I place you on the right and the left, and that is the point of this article.

It is bad enough that the right (capitalists, imperialists) not only co-opt Socialist ideas as their own (social security, Medicare, Medicaid, affirmative action programs, welfare, free schooling, free nurseries, etc.), but it is laughable when the left refuses to see the leftism in Iran because it does not fit with their preconceived, totally inflexible notions.

Any true Socialist/Communist should realize that attacking Iran is doing a capitalist’s job for them.

And how can someone who proclaims to be a “leftist” have the exact same interpretation of Iran as a right-wing capitalist does?

Again, it is simply laughable that Iran is “not” what it really is.

But this is what always happens: Chinese communism “is not really communism”…despite having 1-party rule, a state-run economy, control over the media, support for Vietnam and North Korea, and the 2nd highest HDI improvement from 1970-2010.

North Korean communism is just a “cult of personality”…despite expelling the Japanese, resisting the Americans, maintaining their independence, security and high-level of education. Cuba is just the Castro dictatorship and, again, not communism.

This is all anti-socialist propaganda – for capitalism there can never be ANY “Socialist success story”.

You remain adamant that you do not want to implement all the principles of the Iranian Islamic Revolution in your country?

Fine, it is your country to decide for as you like. Like I wrote, no worries – Iran hasn’t invaded in 300 years and it sure seems like our military is necessarily focused on defense.

But just because you disagree with some aspects of the 1979 Revolution I encourage you not to throw the baby out with the bath water. I remind you that I needed only one fact to prove that Iran has been improving at a rate which is essentially the best in the world over the last 3 decades – how far below Iran does your country rank, hmm?

I write this article because practically no media in the English language will ever pursue the links between Iran and socialism. We leftists know this not just anti-Iran bias, but a much larger anti-Socialist bias.

However, it is truly suicidal to ignore the left-wing successes in Iran because, even if you reject some of them, Iran has clearly found MANY modern solutions to our MANY modern problems: surely some of them can be of use to you, right? Is Iran ALL wrong?

Of course not – only Satan can be all wrong.

Therefore, I advise those fighting against capitalism and imperialism: Please afford Iran a bit more respect and interest than you would afford Satan!

And Now I Take Our Victory lap

I can only laugh at those who say Iran’s revolution has failed!

“Oh really? Who was the puppet that was installed? Who was the king that was restored? What is the name of the popular democratic revolution which replaced the peoples’ one of 1979, because I have not heard of it and I still see many familiar faces from 1979?”

The revolution has succeeded, and I am not sorry to say so.

Not that I care about your opinion – this is for YOUR own benefit: YOU will not win socialism, anti-capitalism or anti-imperialism in your country if you cannot learn from the successes of others.

But sadly, your inability to recognize socialism in Iran imperils all of us, because the people worldwide cannot win in the long term if even like-minded leftists cannot stick together to work against fascism, capitalism and racism.

But Iran, Cuba, China, etc. – we can win enough of these things for ourselves, at least.

We are doing just fine – steady as she goes, eh? All thanks to central planning, as the capitalists veer from crisis to crisis, with the 1% sucking up a greater percentage every time. Our election had huge participation rates, as usual, dwarfing the European cultures who probably want to claim they invented voting, along with everything else. Asia has heard it all before….

For the non-Western readers: I know that the vast majority of you already support Iran. I have talked with too many of you over my life – I know better. I also know that for us “field slaves” we have to give that impression in order to survive, sometimes, or at least to avoid annoyances.

Anyway, many Westerners appear to misunderstand Socialism completely: they don’t realize it is intrinsically a global idea; they think the Franco-German-Russian (European) variety is the only one. More Eurocentrism blinding them to reality, and necessarily limiting them….

But I look across the West and I see nothing but leftist failure after leftist failure: The fall of communism in Russia, the breakup of Yugoslavia, the obvious absorption of “left” parties into the dominant right-wing parties, the rise of austerity, the advance of globalization at the expense of national interests….

So the next time you look at Iran, you should applaud it as a rare socialist success. Iranians will certainly keep living their path of creating modern socialism, Inshallah.

Ramin Mazaheri is the chief correspondent in Paris for Press TV and has lived in France since 2009. He has been a daily newspaper reporter in the US, and has reported from Iran, Cuba, Egypt, Tunisia, South Korea and elsewhere. His work has appeared in various journals, magazines and websites, as well as on radio and television.

8 Comments

Filed under Anti-Racism, Armenians, Asia, Assyrians, Capitalism, China, Christianity, Conservatism, Cuba, Economics, Eurasia, Europe, European, France, Government, History, Imperialism, Iran, Islam, Israel, Israel-Palestine Conflict, Jews, Journalism, Latin America, Left, Middle East, NE Asia, Near Easterners, North Korea, Palestine, Political Science, Politics, Pornography, Regional, Religion, Revolution, Russia, SE Asia, Socialism, Sociology, Syria, Vietnam, War, Zoroastrianism

No Conservatives Allowed on This Website!

We have had a few conservatives posting here in the past few days. These are US-style conservatives, which are the worst kind of all. US-style conservatives are absolutely banned from posting here in any way, shape or form.

Conservatism means different things in different countries, so conservatives from much of the rest of the world (except Latin America and the UK) can continue to post. Even Canadian conservatives can continue to post, as I do not mind them. It’s not conservatism itself that is so awful. Almost every country on Earth has people who call themselves conservatives, and there are conservative parties in almost every country on Earth. But being a conservative just about anywhere outside of the Americas is more or less an acceptable position for me. I probably won’t like their politics much, but I could at least look at them and say that this is an opposition I could live with.

US conservatives and their brethren in the UK, Latin America, the Philippines, Nepal and and Indonesia are quite a different beast.

I have to think hard about conservatives in Eastern Europe, especially Estonia, Latvia and the Czech Republic. These fools had such a bad experience with Communism that they went 180 degrees in the other direction. I would have to see the positions of these conservative parties in those countries to see whether they would be OK or not.

Just to give you an example, Vladimir Putin is considered to be a right-winger, and his party United Russia advocates a politics called Russian Conservatism. Looking at the party’s platform, this is not only a conservatism that I could live with but one I might even vote for!

Conservatives in South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Australia, New Zealand, Burma, Thailand, Cambodia, and most other places in Asia are acceptable. The conservatives in the Stans, Georgia, Ukraine, and Armenia can be rather awful, particularly in the nationalist sense, but I will not ban them.

I dislike Indian conservatives, but I will not ban them.

Conservatives from the Muslim World are all acceptable. In the Muslim World, conservatism just means religious and sometimes nationalist. I can live with that. Even the ones in Iran are orders of magnitude better than the US type.

Conservatives in the Arab World are acceptable. They are mostly just religious people.

Turkish conservatives are awful, but I will not ban them. They are just religious and a particularly awful type of nationalist.

African conservatives are OK.

Conservatives in Ireland, France, Spain, Portugal, Germany,  the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Italy, Switzerland, Italy, the Balkans, Bulgaria, Greece, Slovakia, Poland, Hungary, and Romania are sometimes good, sometimes pretty bad, but they are all acceptable here. Conservatism in Europe mostly means nationalism. I am actually rather fond of the conservative running Hungary, Orban. LePen conservatives leave something to be desired, but they are acceptable. They’re mostly just nationalists. Hell, I might even vote for Marine LePen! If it was down to LePen versus Macron, I would absolutely support LePen!

Conservatives from Indonesia, Nepal and Philippines are not OK. These are an “everything for the rich elite, nothing for anybody else” type of conservative. Some of them even hide under the labels of Socialist or even Communist.

The word conservative has no real inherent meaning. It means whatever people say it means.

Anyway, the conservatives in the US are pure garbage and recently they have become out and out fascists after moving in that direction for a long time. And a particularly horrible type of fascist at that, a Latin American/Filipino/Indonesian style fascist. I will not allow any US conservatives to post on this board. You all are lucky I even let you lurk here. That’s an idle threat as I can’t ban lurkers, but if they all stopped lurking, I would not mind frankly.

You all really ought to go back to the gutters you crawled out of.

PS This especially applies to Libertarians, the very worst of all the US conservative vermin. We shoot Libertarians on sight here, so you better watch out.

*This applies only to economic conservatives. If you are not an economic conservative, and your conservatism is only of the social variety or you are only conservative on race, religion, guns, law and order, respect for tradition, American nationalism, the military, gender, sexual orientation or gender identity issues, you can stay. I’m not crazy about some social conservatives, but I can live with them. I will probably even let patriotards post as long as they are not economic conservatives.

I am an American nationalist myself. I just don’t like patriotards. Of course, I very much dislike and even hate the country as it is right now, but I sure don’t want to make it worse! I have to live here too you now, and it might as well be as pleasant as possible as long I stay here.

I want what’s best for my country. I don’t want to harm this country or screw it over. That will be bad for me! And believe it or not, most US patriotards do not want what is best for the country! I have dreams of a greater and better America. It’s not impossible, but we will have to undergo some serious cultural changes. One of the reasons I am so against illegal immigration is because it is ruining my country and making this place even worse. Also illegal immigration is terrible for US workers and I am for the workers. I am against H-1B visas for the same reason – they are wrecking my country. IT workers are workers too, so they are my comrades. I want what is best for America and American workers.

I cannot live with economic conservatives. I like cancer way more than I like US conservatives. Cancer is much more decent and respectable.

5 Comments

Filed under Africa, Armenia, Asia, Australia, Belgium, Britain, Cambodia, Conservatism, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Economics, Eurasia, Europe, Fake Guest Workers, Fascism, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Illegal, Immigration, India, Indonesia, Iran, Ireland, Islam, Italy, Japan, Labor, Latin America, Left, Libertarianism, Marxism, Middle East, Nationalism, NE Asia, Near East, Nepal, Netherlands, Norway, Philippines, Poland, Political Science, Portugal, Regional, Religion, Romania, Russia, SE Asia, South Asia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine, USA

Pan-Aryanism: White World Tour

Pan-Aryanism goes beyond the Stormfront criteria and says there are Whites in North Africa, the Arab World, Turks, Georgia, the Caucasus, and even in Afghanistan, Pakistan and India, although true Whites are few in the last few countries. Nevertheless, there are some very interesting people in those three countries who are clearly White. These seem to be the remains of the ancient Aryans who populated the region.

Pan-Aryanists refer to White North Africans, White Turks (35%) and White Arabs as White while stating nonetheless that many North Africans, Turks and Arabs who are not White. How do you tell the difference? Well, try looking at them. Determination of whether someone is White or not is generally just observational.

I would go further and class all Turks as White and even include quite a few of the odd Uighurs. The people of the Stans just seem too mixed to be White. Same with Tatars, Bashkirs, and a number of other Turkic groups in Russia. They just seem too mixed with Asians. A very interesting question in the case of people like the Khanty and the Mansi, who like the Uighurs are nearly 50-50 White/Asian. I suppose we would just go observationally here to determine who is White and who isn’t.

I would throw in all of the peoples of the Caucasus – Chechens, Ingush, Ossetians, Circassians, Dagestanis, Nogays, Cherkessiasns, Kabardians, Balkars, and Karachays as White because they just are. The Azeris are also clearly White, as are the Assyrians further to the south in the Middle East.

Most Arabs are White, but at some point, some of them just are not. Quite a few Gulf Arabs would probably not make the cut. Look at Prince Bandar. Not a White man. Most Yemenis would be thrown in. Many Egyptians especially in the north would be thrown in, but this would have to be done on a one to one basis. Many Egyptians, especially in the south, are too mulattized to be White. Same with Libya. Qaddafi was White, but many Libyans are either Black or too mulattized.

Most if not all Tunisians are White as are most Algerians, at least those in the north. Most Moroccans are White except for a number of Blacks in the south. Tuaregs are clearly not White, nor are the Beja, Ethiopians, Somalians, Djiboutians, etc. Eritreans are a tough call, but they are probably not White enough.

That’s it for Whites around the world.

90 Comments

Filed under Afghanistan, Africa, Algeria, Arabs, Assyrians, Azeris, Blacks, Caucasus, Chechens, Circassians, Dagestanis, East Africa, Egyptians, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Eurasia, Europeans, Georgia, India, Ingushetia, Libya, Middle East, Morocco, Near East, Near Easterners, North Africa, North Africans, Pakistan, Race/Ethnicity, Racism, Regional, Russia, Somalia, Somalis, South Asia, Tunisia, Turks, Uighurs, White Nationalism, Whites, Yemenis

Who Are the Savages Anyway? Who Are the Terrorists Anyway? Who Is the Civilized World Anyway?

EPGAH: Compare Yemen to the UAE. Remember TRASH’s long-winded spiel about how one of them FOUGHT the Civilized World, and the other COOPERATED with the Civilized World?

Which approach had better results?

Do you realize that “the Civilized World” has been working directly with “the terrorists” and “the savages” for years now? It’s not a matter of the Civilized World versus the savages. There is no Civilized World because the so-called civilized folks are working directly with the savages and terrorists! The Civilized World, the savages and the terrorists are all on the same side! The Civilized World is the savages and the terrorists. We, the US, are the savages. We, the US, are the terrorists.

Why is that so hard to understand?

UAE is funding and arming both ISIS and Al Qaeda for a long time now. You sure they are not fighting us?

“Yemen” is not fighting the US. The government is not fighting the US. No Yemeni government has ever fought the US. There are some rebel groups in Yemen who have attacked the US such as ISIS and Al Qaeda, but the pro-US government is supporting both ISIS and Al Qaeda and the Saudis, UAE, Qataris, etc. who are fighting the Houthis are arming and funding both ISIS and Al Qaeda in Yemen.

And the US is helping these people to arm, fund and provide intelligence to Al Qaeda and ISIS. Al Qaeda and ISIS fight right alongside Saudi and UAE forces in Yemen. Saudi aircraft carry out air support to help ISIS and Al Qaeda in Yemen. The US shares intelligence with the Saudis and UAE who then share it with ISIS and Al Qaeda.

In Yemen, the US is on the same side as ISIS and Al Qaeda! We are working with them and helping them! How does that make you feel?

So who’s on who’s side here anyway? You still think the UAE are the good guys? Hell, the US is not even the good guys. The US is the enemy of the US! Can be believe it? The US is arming and funding ISIS and Al Qaeda in Yemen and Syria and we are actually coordinating attacks with Al Qaeda via an operational headquarters in Jordan with several of our allies.

And these same allies, Jordan, Israel, Turkey, UAE, Qatar and Saudi Arabia are all arming, funding and even training Al Qaeda in Syria! Worse than that, all of those countries have intelligence officers embedded in Al Qaeda in Syria! Can you believe it? The US has intelligence officers embedded directly in Al Qaeda in Syria helping to arm, train and coordinate intelligence with them. A number of US intelligence were in fact trapped in Aleppo at the end and there were furious negotiations with Syria and Russia to try to evacuate the at the end. Russia and especially Syria wanted to arrest the US intelligence officers and put them on trial for terrorism!

68 Comments

Filed under Eurasia, Europe, Geopolitics, Israel, Jordan, Middle East, Radical Islam, Regional, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Terrorism, Turkey, USA, Yemen

Why Daily Kos Gets Brackets

Here. From a link that Beauregard said was evidence that Daily Kos did not need brackets. Well, yeah they do.

Barring demonstration to the contrary, DK and many contributors more or less supports sufficient intervention in Syria to have Assad deposed.

Daily Kos hates Tulsi Gabbard. I mean hates hates hates hates hates her. Because she tells it like it is in Syria. She says AssadPutin is the good guy and the rebels are the bad guys. She says we should not be intervening to support Al Qaeda and ISIS, which is what we are doing. Yes, the US is using ISIS and Al Qaeda to try to get rid of Assad. Why does Assad have to go? Ahem, becauase (((a certain group of people))) insist that he must. (((These))) are the only people in the US who want him gone. The US insists Assad is a threat to the United States. LOL! How is he a threat to us? Is that some sort of a joke? That depends on which United States you are talking about.

Is he a threat to the United States? Of course not, how ridiculous!
Is he a threat to the (((United States)))? Well of course he is!

You see, (((some people))) have convinced us that all of the enemies of (((these people))) are also the enemies of America. But that’s not true. They’re their enemies, not ours. Unless you say there is no America and all there is is (((America))), in which case it makes sense. (((Those people))) and (((America))) simply become one and the same, inseparable, interchangeble, identical twins, euphemisms for each other.

Well, you know what? I think the name of our country should be the United States. Turning the country’s name into the (((United States))) or “USreal” is not acceptable. Why don’t (((those people))) go fight their own wars, dammit? Why are we fighting all these wars for (((2% of the population)))? Who runs this country anyway?

Any American who thinks this any of the things below automatically gets brackets, ok? No questions asked.

  • Russia is evil and must be fought.
  • Iran is the enemy.
  • Iran must be stopped and regime changed.
  • Iranian expansionism in the Middle East must be stopped!
  • Iran’s fake nuclear program must be halted, and if they don’t we will bomb them.

Iran is not our enemy. Iran is not the enemy. Iran does not even have any aggressive designs on any Arab state. The idea that Iran is a threat to US security is asinine! But then, if the name of the country is not the US, but the (((US))), then of course Iran is a threat to us.

Do you think Hezbollah is the enemy? Do you think Hezbollah is one of the greatest threats to our nation, as the Pentagon insanely believes? Congratulations! You just won yourself  a brand new set of sparkling brackets!

If you hate Russia and think Putin is the enemy, in my opinion, you get brackets. It’s true that this is simply the opinion of US imperialism, the Pentagon, the Deep State and only Soviet haters and Left haters. On the other hand, this is also one of the worst enemies of a certain group of people. Anyway, those phrases are really spelled (((US imperialism))), the (((Pentagon))), the (((Deep State))), the (((Soviet haters))) and the (((Left haters))).

Hell, even the Washington Establishment is really spelled (((Washington Establishment))). There are no borders between any of those things. Israel-firstism and hardline Zionism are set in stone principles of every one of those entities bracketed in the paragraph above. At this point, Israel-firstism and radical Zionism are as American as Mom, the flag, apple pie and baseball. I assume at some future time, we will have to start bracketing those beloved Americanisms too. There seems no end to the creeping Zionization of the US Establishment. Maybe we should just end the charade, merge the two countries into one and be done with it.

So to answer the question above, of course (((Daily Kos))) gets brackets! They support military action against and regime change of Assad’s government. That means I’m going to put those damn brackets on them faster than you can say, “Cheese.”

11 Comments

Filed under Asia, Democrats, Eurasia, Geopolitics, Government, Imperialism, Iran, Israel, Liberalism, Middle East, Military Doctrine, Political Science, Politics, Radical Islam, Regional, Russia, Syria, US Politics, USA, Zionism

What the Triple Parentheses Mean on This Site

The Alt Right is using them to mean Jewish, but I am not going to do that. Besides, I have no beef with Jews as Jews per se. My beef is 100% with the pro-Israel crowd, Jewish and Gentile both. And that shitty little country. I don’t care if it burns to the ground, frankly. It would be a better world. Imagine how those secular Arab nationalists like Assad, Qaddafi and Saddam viewed Israel. Well, my views mirror theirs.

So ((( ))) doesn’t mean Jewish, not really. A lot of Jews get parentheses, but some don’t. And some Gentiles get parentheses. Parentheses means “pro-Israel.” That is all it means. Bernie Sanders and Jill Stein to not get bracketed. They’re not the problem.

(((MediaMatters))) means that stupid site is part of the pro-Israel crowd, liberal division I guess. And fuck that.

Most (((liberal))) websites are (((neoconservative))) and (((liberal interventionist)))  with deep ties to the (((Establishment))) and the (((Deep State))), in this case the liberal division. They’re horrible! These liberals are pro-Israeli nuts. These articles are all coming from the pro-Israelis. That’s who is behind all the anti-Russia and anti-Assad crap. Liberals are as much pro-Israel nutcases and the conservatives and centrists. The only people who make sense on Israel are the Alt Right and the Left. Not liberals, Left.

3 Comments

Filed under Anti-Zionism, Conservatism, Government, Israel, Left, Liberalism, Middle East, Neoconservatism, Political Science, Regional, Russia, Syria

Anatomy of a False Flag: Sarin Chemical Weapons Attack by PutinAssad on Khan Shaykun, Syria on April 3, 2017

In fact the evidence that this is a false flag is superb:

  1. CIA Director Pompeo: Pompeo told Trump on April 6 that Assad did not do a chemical weapons attack and in fact, no attack even occurred at all. Trump nodded his head and went ahead and formed a meeting that evening where he decided to attack Syria for the chemical weapons attack that his own CIA told him never happened! Trump didn’t care whether it happened or not! Trump doesn’t care if anything at all is the truth or a lie. Truth and lies are interchangeable for him. If the Truth suits his needs best, he utilizes Truth. However, if Lies suit his needs best, which is true most of the time, then he uses Lies and in fact he automagically transforms Lies into Truths. Apparently Truth is whatever Mr. Trump says or thinks it is. He ought to have a great debate with Plato on that particular philosophical view. Of course, Pompeo along with US Director of Intelligence, along with all other intelligence officials, were ordered not to come to the meeting. They were not invited. Because they knew the Truth. And the Truth was detrimental to the Lie turned Truth that Mr. Trump wished to cynically utilize as his Reichstag Fire by shooting scores of missiles at a foreign country we are not even at war with. So he just launched a war of aggression against a nation based on what he was told by the highest authorities was an out and out lie.
  2. Colonel Pat Lang: Former US military, served a long time in Vietnam and a long career as a US military officer, later high-ranking official in the Defense Intelligence Agency said that all of his intelligence and military contacts told him that Assad did not drop chemical bombs and in fact, no one did on that day. There simply was no chemical weapons attack. It was a nonexistent event.
  3. Philip Giraldi: He is head of the organization of retired CIA officers. Giraldi stated that his CIA contacts were telling him that Assad did stage a chemical weapons attack as alleged and in fact, no such attack even happened at all.
  4. Scott Ritter: Famed US weapons inspector known for blowing the whistle on fake lying claims about Saddam’s WMD’s, is stating that this attack did not occur. He says we are talking about something that does not exist, in Syria’s case an event that does not exist and in Iraq’s case, weapons that did not exist. He says this is the old Iraqi WMD lie all over again. They are repeating the case WMD BS that they did for Iraq. They were called on the carpet for that one and were proved to have out and out lied, with (((Judith Miller))) of the (((New York Times))) playing a starring role for her many reports on what she knew full well were lies. But it was good for (((certain people))), so hey, we stretched the truth a bit, so what?

Further, the evidence that this attack occurred at all is simply zero.

  • There were no planes in the air at the time of the “attack” before 6 AM on that day. The planes showed up at 11:30 and carried out a bombing raid. It is this bombing raid that they are attempting to say actually occurred at 6 AM and dropped the fake chemical bombs. They have craters showing the pure excellent evidence for the attack. Most of the chemicals came from one particular crater in the middle of a road. However, that crater is vastly too large to be from a chemical weapons bomb. The amount explosives needed in such a thing is only 8 ounces, just enough to release the chemicals. The crater instead was obviously caused by a conventional bomb, part of the raid that happened later.
  • Chemical weapons apparently cannot be made into bombs and dropped out of airplanes. They are fired by artillery shells. Anyway the Syrian jets in the 11:30 AM attack would not have been capable of such an attack at any rate.
  • Since the attack by PutinAssad was said to have occurred before 6 AM, it must have happened at nighttime. But Syria’s Air Force does not have the capability of nighttime bombing. So Syria could not have bombed at this time.
  • We have two documented tweets from Al Qaeda associated Twitter accounts, one four hours before the attack and another 24 hours before the attack. Both said that there was going to be a chemical weapons attack in Irbil the next day. Wow! OK, there’s your foreknowledge right there! Either Al Qaeda can see into the future or this whole thing was a charade planned long in advance and known to be scheduled to occur before it did.
  • Two weeks ago, 200 civilians were abducted from two pro-government villages by Al Qaeda. Sometimes Al Qaeda kills these people and other times they ransom them off. A number of those child “chemical weapons victims of PutinAssad” are now being positively identified as these enemy civilian hostages. This is like Ghouta where all identified victims were from a large group of Christians and Alawites abducted in Northern Syria 10 months before.
  • So, PutinAssad is doing all these Sarin gas attacks on enemy controlled areas, but the only people who are getting killed are pro-Assad civilians taken hostage earlier! What? AssadPutin knows where these hostages are and deliberately shoots chemical weapons at them hoping to kill them but trying very hard not to kill any jihadis? No way.
  • No symptoms of Sarin poisoning can be seen in the photos of the dead. They seem to have been killed by a chemical, but the symptoms look like either cyanide or carbon monoxide. The Ghouta victims all had symptoms of carbon monoxide poisoning. So evil PutinAssad dropped Sarin bombs on these poor innocent government supporters, but the Sarin turned into carbon monoxide halfway down by an act of God and that is what killed the people. OK!
  • The White Helmets performance artists, an organization of fakers, liars and actors run by the US and UK to do fake rescues and make constant lying propaganda, are seen administering first aid to the Sarin victims of diabolical PutinAssad. But none of them are wearing protective gear! No way. If those people died of Sarin, the workers would need full protective gear to work with the victims. Without it, they would die or at least be killed because they would get poisoned by the Sarin themselves.
  • There is a “doctor” running around like a chicken with its head cut off in the video. This man is an MD but his license was pulled in the UK because he was associated with ISIS and Al Qaeda. In fact, he was so tight with ISIS that he participated in the kidnapping of John Cantile. So this physician is a known Al Qaeda member and propagandist. He was supposed to be sentenced in the UK on terrorism charges but the charges were dropped so the British could send him back to Syria to work with Al Qaeda and ISIS. I told you the UK is working with ISIS and Al Qaeda!
  • It makes no sense that there were all these child victims. There are many child victims and few adult victims. Did PutinAssad evilly decide to single out the children of government supporters to kill because he likes killing kids more than adults? I guess so.
  • The scene of the “attack” is a cave base for Al Qaeda and the White Helmets near the town but not in the town. So the “attack” appeared to have happened at this base, not in the town where it was said to have happened.
  • All of the “rescue workers” are dressed inappropriately for the job and their behavior is not how the aftermath of a chemical attack would be conducted. The rescue workers would all have full gear on and there would be numerous victims of all ages inside various buildings near the attack site. We should have seen videos of these workers breaking down doors and discovering dead civilians in piles in the structures.
  • Sarin turns you purple. Real purple. Your whole body. Those newly dead bodies in the video are not purple so they were not killed with Sarin. Period. Instead, they are red. This indicates cyanide or carbon monoxide poisoning.
  • The children appear to all have serious head wounds. I guess Satanic PutinAssad decided to drop chemical bombs directly on the heads of these poor babes, hence the head wounds. In fact in such an attack, there would be no head wounds. The only explanation is that someone inflicted these head wounds on these children. I assume that these children were beaten to death or near death prior to be gassed in some sort of gas chambers. The Ghouta victims were all killed in gas chambers. We even have photos of them. This shows there was no chemical weapons attack. A chemical weapons attack would not have caused those serious head wounds.
  • The children are not dressed appropriately. If the attack happened before Dawn, they should be dressed in nightclothes as they would have been asleep.
  • Why is it that a bunch of young kids without their parents are sleeping at an Al Qaeda/White Helmets cave complex base? What are they doing there? Where are their parents?

4 Comments

Filed under Conspiracies, Geopolitics, Government, Middle East, Politics, Radical Islam, Regional, Republicans, Russia, Syria, US Politics, War

A Case Study of the Collapse of US Liberalism: (((Media Matters)))

Almost all US liberal (really liberal Democrat) outlets need those damned parentheses around them. They’re cucked to Hell and back. They are not insurgents as the horrific propagandistic mind control apparatus called the (((US media))). Instead they are utterly complicit in the propaganda war themselves. One would think that all (((liberal Democratic))) outlets are employed by the CIA. Every time they open up their mouths, it’s just the voice of the CIA.

Check out this piece

Report Traces How The “Alt-Right” Spread Pro-Assad Propaganda.

I guess when it comes to (((hating Bashar Assad))) and (((supporting his worst enemies))), (((Americans))) are all in the same boat from Right to Left, with only the Far Left (Leftists like Counterpunch and Global Research) and the Far Right (Alt Right, even including the American Conservative and Ron Unz site) seem to be able to see through the gaseous fog of zero-visibility fog to reveal how much we are being lied to.

A report by the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab found that a claim that recent airstrikes in Syria were a “false flag” operation — an operation that either didn’t really occur or that were conducted by a party other than the Syrian government — which went viral among the “alt-right” actually originated with a Syrian propaganda outlet that supports the current regime and spread to a series of pro-Kremlin conspiracy websites and fake news purveyors before being promoted by “alt-right” figures including Infowars’ Alex Jones and Mike Cernovich.

I will discuss the despicable, vile US imperialist neoconservative (((NATO))) terrorists at the disgusting (((Atlantic Council))) later

Wow I never thought I would see the day when the worst McCarthyites and Cold Warriors were (((liberal Democrats))). But that’s how it is now.

  • Russia ate my homework.
  • Russia killed my dog.
  • I can’t get laid because of Russia.
  • Russia gave me cancer.
  • Russia is transmitting laser messages to my brain.

(((Liberal Democrats))) have now gone full McCarthyite in the worst way. The new line of (((liberal Democrats))): If I don’t like you, you are a Russian spy. And especially:

If you tell the truth about any of the endless false flags, fakeries, nonexistent events and just general straight up seven course meals of fake news, you must be a Russian spy. Go against the Deep State, and you have to be a Russian spy. The latest (((liberal Democrat))) outrage is that there is no such thing as the US Deep State (probably because they are all part of it!), and that everyone who believes in this is a propagandist for a man named PutinAssad.

What is truly pitiful is that if you really want to find out the truth nowadays, the best place to turn is the Russian media. The Russian media does not exactly have a reputation of being extremely honest. But the (((US media))) and general (((Western media))) lies have descended into such a vicious black hole of an abyss that as of right now, Russian media is an order of magnitude more hones than the US media or Western media. Wow! That’s bad. We’re worse liars than some of the biggest liars of all. Pitiful! America really is swirling the bowl right now. I’m not sure if we’re the turd or the water or both, all I know is we are going down the drain.

So MediaMatters, the great (((liberal Democratic))) site to show the rightwing bias of the (((media))), is quite similar to the (((media))) it attacks so much. So let’s just call them (((MediaMatters))) from now on and get it over with for Chrissake.

So these two entities hate each other and one front of the war is a site called (((MediaMatters))). Here are the two deadly enemies:

  • (((Rightwing “establishment” media)))
  • (((Liberal Democratic “opposition” media)))

I don’t get it. Why do they hate each other? What’s the difference? Someone clue me.

Leave a comment

Filed under Cold War, Conservatism, Democrats, Eurasia, Geopolitics, Government, History, Imperialism, Journalism, Left, Liberalism, Middle East, Neoconservatism, Political Science, Politics, Regional, Russia, Syria, US Politics

Syria: Trump May Just Have Started World War III

Peter Koenig is great. This former pilot proved conclusively the M17 airliner shot down in a Western backed false flag was shot down by a Ukrainian fighter jet and not a Buk missile fired by rebels. There is a massive amount of evidence that conclusively proves that there was no Buk missile attack and there was no Buk missile in the hands of the rebels or Russians anywhere in the Donbass. The US CIA states that there was no Buk missile.

The CIA is not sure who did the attack. Half of the analysts think the rebels did it but not with a Buk – with some other missile instead. The other half say it was shot down by a small Ukrainian faction inside the state via a fighter jet. Evidence supports the latter conclusion. When asked why the CIA does not go forward with its evidence proving that the West is lying about M17, analysts say they do not want to embarrass the Administration. The CIA is very secretive and they almost never come out and saying anything to the people at large. They do not issue press releases or analysts’ findings. All of their reports are secret. The CIA is not supposed to be communicating with the public at all.

Koenig is correct here. Gladio was a wave of false flag and other fake attacks during the Strategy of Tension orchestrated by NATO intelligence and Western intelligence. NATO and Western intel set off bombs all over Europe for many years, blaming them on far right and far leftwing organizations. They were often set in places like train stations. Many civilians were murdered in this NATO and Western intelligence orchestrated campaign, particularly in Italy.

As you can see below, Philip Giraldi a former high ranking CIA officer, says that his contacts in military intelligence and the CIA all say that there was no chemical weapons attack in Idlib, Syria the other day.

However, Koenig is wrong. The attack was not orchestrated by the CIA. And it was not conducted by Saudi and Turkish warplanes to blame Assad. What occurred is unclear, but those two statements are false.

I also do not agree that Israel wants to expand from the Nile to the Euphrates. It’s a popular myth and early Zionists did make statements along those lines, but there’s no evidence that Israel intends to expand its slimy borders outside of the current ones inside of which it now festers. I hate Israel about as much as Saddam Hussein did, and even I don’t agree with the Greater Israel thing. One must be fair even with enemies.

This piece is also rather hyperbolic, but you get the picture. I’m a fanatic radical myself, so when I call someone hyperbolic, they are pretty off the edge.

Syria: Trump May Just have Started World War III

President Trump just ordered an US attack of at least 59 Tomahawk missiles from US warships in the Mediterranean Sea on Syria’s al-Shayrat airbase near Homs.

Mr. Talal Barazi, governor of Homs province, reports several deaths but at this time does not offer further details. This Tomahawk assault was supposedly in response to Bachar al-Assad’s alleged nerve gas attack on 4 April, targeting the civilian population in Idlib Province that killed in excess of 60 people, among them many children.

It reeks all over of False Flag – Gladio 2 – level ‘world’. But nobody smells it, nobody wants to see it, nobody wants to hear it – and especially, nobody wants to talk about it. The truth cannot be spoken. The attack has to be launched immediately, before any investigation could reveal the truth. That’s the way it’s always been. Kill the witnesses. That’s what Washington and its Zionist masters know best.

The Pentagon says Moscow was informed about the attack. There was no reaction from the Russian Government yet.

Earlier Mr. Putin stated that

“it was unacceptable to bring accusations against anyone until a thorough and impartial international investigation was conducted.”

Philip Giraldi, former CIA officer and Director of the Council for the National Interest, says that “military and intelligence personnel,” “intimately familiar” with the intelligence, say that the narrative that Assad or Russia did it is a “sham”. 

This is a classical case of a false flag, instigated by the CIA and carried out by Saudi-Turkish planes to blame Assad. Western presstitute media propagated and hammered into westerners indoctrinated brains the same lie as in 2013, when the East Ghouta Chemical attacks were killing children to justify US “Humanitarian” Military intervention. Then as today, the Washington assault was to follow quickly before the lie could be discovered, but Mr. Putin intervened by warning Washington not to attack – or else – and insisting on an investigation. Russian naval facility in Tartus and airbase in Khmeimim, Syria, were ready to counter a US attack.

Later it was proven beyond any doubt that the attack did not come from Syria’s army, nor was it ordered by Mr. Assad, that it was indeed, once more, a false flag carried out by the Syrian opposition, the so-called rebels, but in truth the western paid terrorists, with the purpose to blame Mr. Assad and to justify the ‘regime change’ – planned since 2009, since well before the CIA instigated start of the 2011 ‘civil war’.

(http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-ghouta-chemical-attacks-us-backed-false-flag-killing-children-to-justify-a-humanitarian-military-intervention/5351363 ).

It is depressing to see how the world – the corrupted-to-the-bone Western world – swallows these lies and actually openly calls for war against Syria, for the removal of Mr. Assad, Syria’s only legitimate and sovereign President, elected by the Syrians and still enjoying more than 80% support of the people.

Renowned socialists’, so-called peace seekers’ eyes are blurred by the western corporate lie-machine. It is sad to see. They believe the (((Western criminal media))). It is too hard even for them to admit to themselves that they have been duped, perhaps all their lives, and that they must now seek out and see reality. They can’t. But instead to look inside themselves – to ask themselves, what interest would Mr. Assad have to kill his own people, the children of his nation, the future of Syria – and God help Syria to have a future again – these shabby ‘progressives’ are too noble to admit to reality – and instead they join the blinded and call for ‘regime change’. That’s exactly what Washington – and the Zionist murderers behind that foul inner-beltway monument of assassins, called the White House, want.

We are living a higher level of ‘Operation Gladio’ again – where evil reigns, where the most horrendous of what was once called human beings are in power, killing mercilessly innocent people for their BIG PURPOSE, for world hegemony. This Judo-Christian ‘civilization’ (sic-sic) has a history of more than 1,000 years of Crusade killings followed by colonial killing and raping and exploitation of countries and their people around the globe, from Asia to Africa to Latin America – and there is no end. Our Western ‘culture’ is sold to Lucifer and his banking clan – continuing killing for greed and power.

People wake up! – If you don’t, you may be next.

We all have this little spark left somewhere in our brains – that tells you that something is not right – that those who call the shots are liars, that the world’s justice is not with evil – that justice is seeking peace not subjugation, power and material gains, but solidarity and harmony among us, brothers and sisters of the humankind.

But also, be aware that this monstrous beast knows no scruples. It has one goal – Full Spectrum Dominance – and will not let go, under no circumstances, until this goal is fully achieved or itself, the monster, the exceptional nation, is subjugated and disabled.

People stand up and become disabler of the empire!

Syria is a mere square on this murderous chess board, as was Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq, Somalia, Afghanistan, and many more to come. The purpose is not ‘winning a war’ – that would be too simple. The purpose is creating and leaving behind chaos, eternal chaos. In the case of Syria, a balkanization of the country, what Clinton did to Yugoslavia. The old ‘divide to conquer’ – it still works after hundreds of years. People are still blinded to these oldest and most rudimentary of war strategies. They still fall for it; don’t notice; swallow the lies.

In Syria, the stakes are high. In addition to the insane profits of the war and weapons industry – there is the little-talked-about Qatar-Turkey-Syria pipeline that was to bring oil and gas from the Gulf to Europe to demolish the Russian gas market in Europe – and to make trillions for US petro-giants; a pipeline Mr. Assad rejected in 2009.

Instead he approved and promoted the Iran pipeline through Syria to Europe. Iranian hydrocarbons would complement rather than compete with gas and oil from Russia for Europe. That’s when Obama decided that Bachar al-Assad had to go. It also fitted the bigger picture – a balkanized Middle East with steady conflicts fueling the war industry – but eventually leading to a Greater Israel, stretching from the Euphrates to the Nile, absorbing, parts of Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon and Egypt.  

“It’s barbarism. I see it coming masqueraded under lawless alliances and predetermined enslavements. It may not be about Hitler’s furnaces but about the methodical and quasi-scientific subjugation of Man. His absolute humiliation. His disgrace.” – Odysseas Elytis, Greek poet, in a press conference on the occasion of receiving the Nobel Prize (1979).

Peter Koenig is an economist and geopolitical analyst. He is also a former World Bank staff and worked extensively around the world in the fields of environment and water resources. He lectures at universities in the US, Europe and South America. He writes regularly for Global Research, ICH, RT, Sputnik, PressTV, The 4th Media (China), TeleSUR, The Vineyard of The Saker Blog, and other internet sites. He is the author of Implosion – An Economic Thriller about War, Environmental Destruction and Corporate Greed – fiction based on facts and on 30 years of World Bank experience around the globe. He is also a co-author of The World Order and Revolution! – Essays from the Resistance.

13 Comments

Filed under Afghanistan, Africa, Asia, Colonialism, East Africa, Eurasia, Europe, Geopolitics, Government, History, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Journalism, Lebanon, Libya, Middle East, North Africa, Political Science, Regional, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, South Asia, Syria, Turkey, USA, War, Yugoslavia, Zionism