Category Archives: Psychology

University Enrollment and Degrees and Affirmative Action

Zamfir: Yeah it’s harder to fudge in math, but it does happen there too. Where I am schools get money to enroll more women in engineering, grades be damned.

Yeah, and will they pass at university level? If they can’t cut it and got in on AA, 100% will flunk out.

Zamfir: But anyway there are millions of people in humanities where all kinds of fudging can be done pretty easily.

I went to university with a lot of people who muddled through with C’s. They weren’t stupid. They had IQ’s of ~100, which is average. But average IQ doesn’t cut it at a good university.

Furthermore, I got a Masters in Linguistics, and it was the hardest thing I ever did. I almost didn’t get it and had to fight them for it. And I have a 147 IQ, which is genius level. 1/1,000 people have a score that high. That’s .1% If there are 1,000 people in a building, I am smarter than everyone in that damned building, and even I had a hard time with that Humanities Masters. 

They were not giving them out like candy; they made you work like a sleigh dog in the arctic to get it. They kicked your ass until you got the degree. They were not letting you out without a fight, and to say they had high standards is to put it mildly.

I resent this idea you have that MA’s are given out trivially, at least in my field. Bottom line is, in my field, if you didn’t have what it took, no way in Hell you got that degree. Not happening. You will flunk out.

Zamfir: Math grad students from Africa. Sure. But look at grades and IQ for Africans versus the rest of the world or Americans. If there really were lots I would be suspicious. There is a big IQ/grade/achievement gap there. Maybe they skimmed off the top of the African population. But why?

There are going to be lots of better qualified White or Asian applicants out there… Suggests some kind of bias.”

Yes, Africans are remarkably unintelligent but their genetic variability is so high that there are many extraordinarily smart Africans. And I have met some of them. One African I knew from Benin is literally one of the smartest people I have ever met. The Africans with degrees I met here in the US are smart as whips. I met an African Linguistics professor at Berkeley, and I hate to be redundant, but once again I felt like I was meeting the smartest person I had ever met. This man was insanely smart, so smart you wonder if he’s from the same planet as you are.

Yes, we are skimming the cream of the crop in Africa. Of course we are. We don’t let in many Africans, and a lot of the only ones we let in are “the Kenyan with a Masters Degree.” We reject 99% of African immigration requests. The Embassy people are all race realists, and they know what these people are like.

There are indeed quite a few brilliant mathematics students from Africa in our universities. This isn’t the first time I have heard of it. There are not lots of better qualified Asian and White applicants, and anyway his school is open enrollment, so no one gets turned down.

African immigrants have the highest IQ’s of any US immigrant group at 110. You never knew that, did you?

And if those Africans can’t cut it, they will flunk out. In math, you will flunk out real fast at university level if you can’t cut it. They don’t mess around.

13 Comments

Filed under Affirmative Action, Africa, Blacks, Civil Rights, Education, Higher Education, Immigration, Intelligence, Legal, Psychology, Race/Ethnicity, Racism, Regional

Alt Left: Identity Politics People and Groups Are Both Mentally Ill

Zamfir: And why is IP supposed to be bad?

I just gave you a lot of reasons. It’s insane. All the IP’s can’t possibly be true. Only one of the conflicting IP’s can be true and the other must be false, or they must both be wrong. It can’t be true that Blacks are bad and Whites are good and also that Blacks are good and Whites are bad, etc. It’s crazy. Same thing with all of the others.

Basically these are all positions that are various forms of nonsense.

In particular,  they are much too quite to call anyone who says boo about them a hater, to demonize their enemies du jour, and frankly to be paranoid.

Most people who criticize various races, ethnic groups or nationalities are not racists. Most men who criticize women are not misogynists. Most women who criticize men are not misandrists. Most people who criticize Jews are not anti-Semites. Most people who criticize Islam are not Muslim haters. Most people who criticize gays are not homophobes. Most people who criticize transsexuals are not transphobes.

So it’s just a bunch of thin-skinned paranoid haters who can’t take any criticism, all with different glorious identities and demonized enemies. I agree with gays hating homophobes, transsexuals hating transphobes, Jews hating anti-Semites, etc., but all of these people are paranoid crazies who think everyone is an evil enemy out to get them, they all have a huge chip on their shoulders, who can’t take any criticism, who think all critics are deadly enemies, and are frankly very narcissistic with inflated self-esteem.

When these qualities are present in a person, we generally say they are unhealthy or mentally ill. Generally they have a personality disorder. If these mentally ill people have the same qualities as these groups, then we say that these groups themselves are paranoid crazies who think everyone is an evil enemy out to get them, all have a huge chip on their shoulders, can’t take any criticism, think all critics are deadly enemies, and are frankly very narcissistic with inflated self-esteem are either groups of mentally ill people or perhaps the groups themselves are mentally ill.

Actual societal structures can become mentally disordered just as a person can. So all of these groups are more or less mentally ill groups full of mentally ill people. The people in the groups have personality disorders and the groups themselves actually have personality disorders!

IP people are crazy. IP groups, being full of crazy people, are crazy groups.

Period.

6 Comments

Filed under Cultural Marxists, Left, Mental Illness, Personality Disorders, Politics, Psychology, Psychopathology, Race/Ethnicity, Social Problems, Sociology, Useless Western Left

How Trump Stole the 2016 Elections: The Blatant Evidence

Zamfir: You say Trump “stole the election with computers”. Really? What are you talking about here? I’ve looked into these bizarre claims and never found any proper evidence of anything.

 

They’re not bizarre. Republicans been doing it since 2000 because the public doesn’t really support them anymore, so like all capitalist, ruling class, and oligarchic political parties, they have to lie, cheat, and steal to stay in power. See the Latin American Right for example. The Republicans been stealing them with computers, especially since 2004. Bush out and out stole the 2004 election.

We can tell they were stolen by how the exit polls went radically off compared to the actual vote. Exit polls are the gold standard of politics for over 50 years now. They always reliably track with results. Out of 50 states, polls will be off in maybe two states, no more. They’ve been going off, often by a lot and almost always in a Republican direction, since 2000. This is when the Republicans started stealing them with the computers. That’s why the Republicans put the computers in in the first place – to steal elections.

In Michigan, all polls for weeks before the election – hundreds of them – were all off, including the exit polls. That can’t possibly happen. So Michigan was stolen. They refused to count 70,000 votes in Detroit for no reason except that they are nigger votes I guess. And many fraudulent votes for Republicans were found even before the recount. A recount was never done because all Michigan politicians opposed it. Why did they oppose a recount?

Wisconsin was also stolen. Exit polls were off but always in Republican districts. There was no real recount in Wisconsin. There was only a fake recount, and some precincts were incredibly shady to where it appeared to witnesses that they were seeing actual fraud taking place.

Also 30,000 fraudulent votes for Republicans were found before the recount even started. The vote in Milwaukee was not possible, and I think they never even recounted it. Write-in’s supported Clinton and those lean rightwing. All exit polls showed Clinton winning. Exit polls were perfect in all precincts that had hand counted ballots but went off in all precincts that had computer counted ballots.

50,000 fraudulent votes were found in Pennsylvania before the recount even started. Write in votes supported Clinton and those tend to lean conservative. There was no recount in Pennsylvania because the DNC governor fought it in court! All exit polls showed Clinton winning.

The vote in Florida was not possible. 70% of votes were write-in’s and they supported Clinton by a decent margin. For Trump to win, a huge number of voters on election day would have had to support Trump. That number was so large as to be statistically impossible. Republican turnout was not elevated on election day anyway. As many Democrats came out as Republicans.

Trump started saying the election was going to be stolen because he was going to steal it himself. He always accuses his opponents of doing what he does or is going to do. This is called projection but it is particularly prominent in this man. It is considered to be a primitive and immature defense that kids use a lot. Yes, adults use it a lot, but people who project all the time are notably unhealthy. It is particularly prominent in personality disorders.

Also Trump, Conaway, and Guiliani became unusually calm about Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania a few days before the election. All polls were pro-Clinton. Manafort said he had just talked to the Russians, and they said not to worry about Michigan. I assume the Russians may have been in on the vote-hacking. Vote-hacking in this last election was never investigated by the FBI or by anyone.

I will add that sleazy Democrats do this too. Hillary had to have stolen a number of primaries. There is no way for the exit polls to go off like that, and the DNC laid down the law that Sanders could not win. Democrats don’t seem to want to fix these machines either I guess because they use them to steal elections themselves.

Republicans are fanatically opposed to all recounts of elections and to fixing the damned voting machines. They must know that the way they are set up now, they are hackable.

Really we need to get rid of them altogether and go back to hand counted ballots. States that hand count ballots never see their exit polls go off.

3 Comments

Filed under Conservatism, Corruption, Democrats, Florida, Government, Local, Mental Illness, Michigan, Midwest, Northeast, Personality Disorders, Political Science, Politics, Psychology, Psychopathology, Regional, Republicans, Russia, South, US Politics, USA, Wisconsin

Why Trump Is a Disaster: Donald Trump Is Not Mentally or Emotionally Fit to Be President

Zamfir: I’m surprised you have a strong preference for Democrats over Republicans. To me it seems like a hopeless choice. If you vote Republican you’re voting for one set of evil elite interests, but not explicitly against your biology and cultural heritage; if you vote Republican you’re voting for another set of evil elite interests, and explicitly against your biology and cultural heritage.

Hard to pick between those two! What is the real advantage in voting Democrat in your opinion? (I guess I’d vote for Bernie, but then again I’d vote for Trump for similar reasons… Not that I expect either one would ever do much on anything I care about.)

Trump’s incompetent. Trump might be senile and he’s obviously dangerously mentally ill.

Trump suffers from Malignant Narcissism, the same disorder that Ted Bundy and other serial killers had. That’s right. Our President has the same mental illness that serial killers do! Original theoreticians on this disorder said that it was the closest thing to pure evil in the mental illnesses. And that’s correct. The best description for Trump is that he is evil. Trump’s a bad person, a jerk, an ass, a prick, a lousy human being, an idiot, a fool, a moron, and worst of all, he’s dangerous. Trump’s obviously too mentally ill and otherwise impaired with dementia to be President.

3 Comments

Filed under Democrats, Government, Mental Illness, Narcissistic, Personality Disorders, Politics, Psychology, Psychopathology, Republicans, US Politics

Jordan Peterson: (Most) Everything He Says Is True

I really hate this guy mostly because he’s a reactionary, but honestly, almost every single thing he says is true.

He’s right that it’s insane that you can talk to a female student behind closed doors anymore. That’s insane! Way to go feminists! Way to backwards, bitches!

Sexual impropriety? What the Hell is that? Can you define it? Define it. Define sexual impropriety. See? You can’t. This Orwellian concept has no definition at all. Truth is, sexual impropriety is anything a woman says it is! Isn’t that great? Now we have a real definition we can all live with. I do want to know what his sexual impropriety bullshit charges are though, just out of curiosity.

Right. Women are not as interested in things as men. So women in academia are not going to be as much into those fields that focus on things. Well, that’s obvious! I don’t even think women like ideas very much. The airy world of pure ideation, the realm of the prowling intellectual, is pretty much a male thing. It’s not that women can’t conceptualize this stuff – it’s more that they think it is flat out boring. I have met women with IQ’s very close to mine – I recall one woman with an IQ of 143 – but she simply could not fathom why I would engage in some wild Herculean task of chopping up German into 138 languages. Why in the Hell would you even do that in the first place? Was her attitude. She was just as smart as I was, not one bit less, but her brain worked differently, being a typical female brain. Women are just as smart as we men are, but their brains work differently so they are interested in different things than we are. Which is fine of course. Vive la difference!

Of course, the more women dress up to be sexually attractive, the more they will contribute to sexual harassment (What the Hell is that anyway?) in the workplace. The more women sexualize themselves to make them look sexually enticing to men, the more men are going to be turned on by them, so the more women will interact with them in a sexual manner because they are getting turned on. I mean, it’s not rocket science, right.

And yes, lipstick does in fact mirror the swelling and reddening of the labia during sex. That’s why it exists in the first place. And I believe cheek blush is based on the same thing. And yes, high heels do indeed mimic a sort of estrus in females, more specifically, heels directly sexualize women by making them appear more as they do in the sex act. Which is, after all, why women wear heels in the first place. Of course.

Women are innately competitive, of course. They especially compete for men. Anyone knows that. And they compete on the basis of beauty too. I know this because women told me so. They told me that women dress up for other women, not for men. I never believed it until I heard it from them.

Of course a man has to remove about 90% of himself when he’s around women, particularly in the case of Peterson, a professor who is banned from having any sexual feelings or even thoughts for that matter. I have to do it myself.

Of course politeness trumps truth with women. Any man knows that. Hell, I learned that in high school!

Of course women manipulate men sexually to advance in the workplace. Duh! Anyone knows that.

Of course makeup is sexually provocative, but I do not agree with Peterson that makeup should be banned in the workplace.

Of course there’s a war on masculine behavior among boys. Boys being banned from throwing snowballs is a straight up war on masculinity itself. Even picking up snow off the ground was seen as toxic masculinity. Of course the bad boys didn’t care and broke all of these stupid rules. Only the good boys obeyed the rules not to act masculine. The worst boys, who probably needed to act less masculine, were not deterred at all. So all you are doing is neutering the mildest displays of masculinity in the best of boys, putting at the back of the pack, while shoving the worst boys to the front. Good job feminists! And he’s correct, in such a dispensation (a topsy turvy morality turned upside down Sadean one at that) the worst boys will get the most women and the most psychopathic males will be fathering the most children while the most decent males will father few if any kids. Way to go feminists!

Of course a transwoman is not a real woman! A transwoman is a man who thinks he’s a woman. His delusion that he is a woman is so fixed that he often has surgery to try to turn himself into some sort of a fake woman, but a man is a man is a man. No man can ever be transformed into a woman. Of course not. Why would anyone think a man can be turned into a woman? That’s ridiculous, I mean given our current technology anyway.

Ok this moron Peterson just compared Chairman Mao, of all people, to trans activists! How ridiculous! Mao was a puritan. The single most awful thing about Peterson is his idiotic fanatical anti-Communism. This dumbass has even covered his entire home with socialist realist paintings just to remind himself, every day mind you, even evil those damned Commies are. Anti-Communism is probably the single driving force behind all of Peterson’s intellectual oeuvre. And that’s where he runs right off the cliff, just like Coyote in the cartoons, following his cartoonish Roadrunner boogeyman of Communism right over the edge of all reason and sense.

And this is what I mean when I say this guy is a reactionary and he can go take a long walk on a short pier. Sure, he’s right most of the time facts-wise, but his mind is just oh so wrong. He’s motivated by sheer puerile idiocy and reaction. Take your anti-Communism and shove it up your ass, Jordan.

He follows online PUA’s because he finds them interesting psychologically. Well, they are saying a lot of psychologically interesting things and most of what they say is flat out true. Look. Let’s get real. PUA’s are all about success. Men don’t mess around with BS and get lost in wildernesses of psychological defenses like women do. Men’s whole raison de etre is “do what works, and all else be damned.” Men don’t care what the theory is as long as it works. If it works and it smells like roses, fine. If it works and it smells like ordure, well, you hold your nose and plow forth anyway because if it works it works, stink or not, damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead.

These PUA’s are absolutely not going to waste any time on bullshit that doesn’t work. That’s something a woman would do. Women would obviously waste endless time on projects that don’t work simply because the ones that did work were so awful. Women would think, “That’s awful, so it can’t possibly work,” and then focus on some feel-good solution that smells like roses but fails every time. Women aren’t concerned with the destination. They’re concerned about the road you take to get there. If it’s a horrible road, they’re not driving on it. They’re taking the scenic route to feel better about themselves, no matter if it gets you anywhere or not.

The idea that these PUA’s would have wasted all these years of intense study on things that don’t work. Men are far too practical for that. These guys conduct nearly controlled double blind studies to test their theories.

And at the end, Peterson violates Godwin’s Law by equating SJW boneheads and fools with literal Nazis. No, Jordan, no. SJW’s are not Nazis. If they are like anyone, they are like Commies, and Commies are not Nazis as you probably think, you silly man.

Peterson gets an 85% rating, but when he’s wrong, good God is he wrong.

54 Comments

Filed under Conservatism, Cultural Marxists, Feminism, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Left, Man World, Maoism, Marxism, Nazism, Political Science, Psychology, Sex, Women

Game/PUA: How Could Chads Possibly Hate Women?

An incel asked how Chads could possibly hate women considering how well females treat them.

My answer: It’s not that simple.

Thing is, a lot of players, playboys, and womanizers hate women.

There are two kinds of slayers.

One type hates women a lot.

The other type really, really love women. They don’t treat them very well, but they do love them.

The first type, the slayers who hate women, well, a female friend said to me about them, “Those guys hate women because they understand what women are really like.”

This is probably true. And that’s straight from a woman’s own mouth!

People don’t understand. A guy dates a couple hundred chicks or fucks a hundred chicks, and he’s seen the good side of women in spades of course. But he has been with so many women that he has also seen a lot of the evil side of women, which is about 50% of their existence.

See, a lot of whores hate men, right? Well, most whores have seen men at their worst, many, many times for years.

The life of Chad is not all golden. The Chads I knew were constantly dealing with chaos and drama, especially if they ran 2-3 chicks at once. They were lying to everyone all the time, and chicks were always screaming at them, breaking into tears, or threatening to kill them. They just laughed it off and said, “LOL! Fuck you, bitch! LOL!,” but you know it got to them. Other men were often threatening to punch them out for pump and dumping their sister or cheating on their cousin or whatever.

Yes, Chad can get lots of sex all right. But there is also a considerable downside to being a manwhore.

Chads really, really, really know women having dealt with a battalion of women over decades. Chads have seen a lot of women at their worst psychocunt behavior literally for decades and, well, they get pretty cynical about women, let’s put it that way.

But there are also the Chads who love women, and that is another story.

If you want all that pussy, you have to deal with the downside of slaying, which is squads of psychobitches going nuts, screaming at you, and threatening to kill you, platoons of guys threatening to punch you, battalions of people hating you, and it never ends.

Moral: Chads are living in Pussy Heaven, but they’re paying for it by living in Cunt Hell at the same time.

Nothing is life free! You pay for everything in life, and I do mean everything!

Leave a comment

Filed under Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Little or None, Man World, Psychology, Romantic Relationships, Sex, Women

Game/PUA: Another Lie about Incels: Most Are Not Even Real Incels

Most Incels, especially on Incels.me, are actually virgins. Worse than that, most have never even had one single date. If they have, it was often a complete catastrophe. If they have had any relationships with females at all, they were utterly Friendzoned the whole time, and they were not happy about it. Many are KHV’s (Kissless Handholdless Virgins) or KHHV’s, (Kissless Handholdless Hugless Virgins).

In fact, on Incels.me, there is a big controversy over whether non-virgins should be allowed on the site at all. There are some non-virgins on there – one man in fact has had sex with 30 women at age 32 – but those are called Blackpilled Normies, and they are always very close to getting banned.

I was on Incels.me myself for a while, mostly because I wanted to cheer the Incels up, help them, and offer them advice. I was revealed quite quickly as not one of them and was labeled a Blackpilled Normie, which is OK by me. There are many Normies on Incel sites who are there to be Incel allies, commiserate with the Incels, try to help them, offer them advice, etc. Those Normies should not be confused with Incels. So it is important to note that not everyone on an Incel board is actually an Incel.

A few Incels have had one or two very limited sexual encounters in their lives. They are grandfathered in on the boards.

I was banned for “bragging,” which is the fate of most any Normie posting on that board. You cannot talk about any successful experiences you have had with women – that’s all bragging, and it gets you thrown off the board. Try as I might to write my posts in accord with the policy, they kept busting me anyway.

The notion that most Incels are not really true Incels is very problematic.

These are some seriously sex-starved men who in general have shockingly or even frighteningly little sexual or romantic experience with females. They are pitiful creatures, which may or may not be outweighed by their menacing nature.

3 Comments

Filed under Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Little or None, Man World, Psychology, Romantic Relationships, Sex

Game/PUA: The Latest Insult: “You’re an Incel!”

The latest idiotic Internet insult is “You’re an incel!” Even I am getting called an incel lately. That’s laughable because I am about as far from being an incel as a man gets.

There’s nothing new here. This bullshit has been going on forever now, and feminists have always specialized in the insult, “Obviously you can’t get laid!” It also takes other forms. “Neckbeard” means much the same thing. For some reason, it is always feminists and Cultural Left types who wield the “Obviously you can’t get laid”, neckbeard, and incel insults.

For some reason, rightwingers never say this. I suppose that’s because rightwingers don’t care whether some man gets women or not because after all, it’s not that important.

The stupid thing about this insult is that Cultural Left boneheads call every man they hate a neckbeard, incel, or insist, “Obviously you can’t get laid!” Of all the retarded things to say about a human being you don’t even know! Furthermore, this is always done on the Internet, when the Cultural Left types have never met the person and know nothing about him. They read his prose and decide he can’t get laid with God’s help!

I have been reading prose on the Internet for many years now. For the life of me, I have never run across male prose that indicates to me whether a man is successful with women or not. There is no “can’t get laid” style of writing. There’s no such thing! Unless the person is discussing sex, you have no idea if he’s a 50 year old incel or if he’s closing in on Wilt Chamberlain’s record.

Similarly, you can’t diagnose mental illness much less Asperger’s Syndrome on the Internet. I work in mental health. How the Hell can I look at someone’s prose or journalism on the Net and give them a DSM diagnosis? Yet every Cultural Left idiot on Earth can diagnose mental illness better than the finest clinicians – by merely reading a simple gleaning of someone’s prose! Such geniuses!

Of course Asperger’s Syndrome (the most overdiagnosed condition in history) cannot be diagnosed on the Net. Everybody thinks they can, and everyone is always diagnosing everyone else as an “Aspie.” It’s mostly Cultural Left types calling everyone they hate an Aspie. To say this isn’t very nice to Aspies is an understatement. But no clinician can possibly diagnose AS from a snippet of prose. How the Hell can Cultural Left scum outdiagnose the world’s finest diagnosticians?

This insult “Obviously you can’t get laid!” arises from the completely false feminist belief that all men who feminists consider to be misogynists (most of us) cannot possibly get laid. In other words, if you’re a misogynist, obviously you can’t get laid to save your life.

Now I have been observing the dating scene for decades, and one thing that is clear to me is that a lot of misogynistic men get tons of sex. Even the stereotypical bad boys who treat women like crap are well known to be drowning in pussy. Many though not all womanizers are definitely misogynists. The standard male advice about women, particularly from womanizers, is, “You gotta treat women like shit.” This is all pretty awful for those of us who want to be decent men because it seems like a requirement for a successful relationship with women is abusing them.

This goes along with the typical problem of nice guys, which feminists get all wrong.

2 Comments

Filed under Asperger's Syndrome, Autism, Conservatism, Feminism, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Left, Little or None, Man World, Mental Illness, Political Science, Psychology, Psychopathology, Psychotherapy, Romantic Relationships, Sex

Game/PUA: The Confounding Nice Guy Dilemma

Women say they dislike nice guys because “they are not really nice.” They claim that nice guys are only pretending to be nice so they can have sex with the women they are cozying up to. This laughable. Feminists are surprised by this? That men would befriend women in the hopes of somehow bedding them? No kidding, feminists! Of course that’s why we befriend women! Why else would we make friends with women, you fools?

You think bad boys are any nicer about it? Many of them are out an out harassers, assaulters and  more or less rapists. But it’s those fake nice guys we need to hate on!

Let’s say the idiot feminists are right and women really do reject nice guys because “they’re not really all that nice” – in other words, because they are secretly mean, abusive bastards.

If women did reject nice guys for being secretly mean, why then do women flock to men who are far more vicious, violent and abusive like criminals, thugs, gangbangers, sociopaths, murderers, convicts, and even serial killers? I mean how bad could nice guys be? However bad they are deep down inside (dubious), they could not possibly be as bad as the sociopaths above.

So women reject nice guys for being secretly mean, but they flock to out and out evil men who are 10X meaner than nice guys even on a good day. That makes no sense at all. As usual, the feminist analysis is flat out wrong.

As a former nice guy, I can tell you straight up what women dislike about nice guys. In a word, they think they are pussies, sissies, girls, wimps, etc. They’re not men. They’re not masculine enough. “He’s too nice” means he’s a great big fat wimp. She rejects the nice guy who treats her well because he’s wimpy, and she goes for the bad boy who treats her terribly because he’s masculine.

As you can see, women are punishing the men who treat them well and rewarding the men who treat them the worst. Feminism is absolutely blind to this frankly insane characteristic of women. Instead of discussing it, it’s all handwaved away as a big fat misogynistic lie. But any man who has dated women knows differently.

I think part of the problem is that nice guys won’t fight back and often won’t take the initiative.

To be successful with women, you need to take the initiative.

And you definitely need to fight back against your woman when she attacks you, which she is doomed to do fairly regularly no matter what.

Nice guys sit there and take it because they are pussy-whipped. They are afraid that if they stand up to her, she will pull the sex. He needs the sex, so he doesn’t fight back in order to keep the sex around.
Yet the fact that he won’t fight back makes her furious because she sees him as a wimp. Women hate wimps and this is another thing that feminism refuses to discuss and handwaves away as a misogynist lie. Most straight women are also wildly homophobic, at least about the men they date. Feminism lies about this too and insists it is a misogynist lie. If you want to know why men are so homophobic, it’s because their girlfriends demand it.

Treat her well but stand up to her and fight back, even viciously but preferably verbally and not physically. This seems to be the best combination where you are not too much of a a nice guy and yet just enough of a bad boy to be alluring but not evil or abusive.

1 Comment

Filed under Feminism, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Man World, Psychology, Romantic Relationships, Sex, Women

Game/PUA: The “Incels Only Want the Best Women” Lie

I am very interested in the Incel scene and I have been studying it for a while. One thing I would like to object to is the notion that these guys all want hot chicks.

There is this idea in the Incel scene that you should go for your Looksmatch. So a 5 man should go for a woman who is no more than a 5, a 3 man should go for a woman who is no more than 3, etc. Sure, you can go for better looking women, but don’t expect anything to happen. A major complaint is that hypergamy is so extreme now that men can’t even get their Looksmatches.

So this notion that Incels are unsuccessful because they all want model types belongs in the dustbin.

Leave a comment

Filed under Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Little or None, Man World, Psychology, Romantic Relationships, Sex