Category Archives: Republicans

Something Wicked This Way Comes

From here.

Schindler is on to something here, something which few have acknowledged. The current trends in America, Wall Street getting richer, everyone else getting poorer, politicians of both parties feeding brazenly at Wall Street’s trough, the party of the Left in full blown attack gear not on inequality, which it has done nothing to address, but picking at and rubbing raw the scabs of identity politics — this can’t keep going on indefinitely without something really bad happening.

Indeed, we can’t go on like this indefinitely without something really bad happening: like, for instance, Donald Trump.

All I have to say about Mr. Trump’s rising candidacy is that Americans deserve him. You morons brought this nightmare on yourselves. Both parties created this Frankenstein. They deliberately created the conditions amidst which a monster like Trump could not only be born but was only certain to thrive.

Infected with blind optimism, the ruling class thought they could push an insane combination of a freakazoid Cultural Left Social Project combined however bizarrely with a vicious Neoliberal Economic Project forever. A project like this is bound to please no one. The Right is sure to hate the Cultural Left Circus Act. The Left or what’s left of it anyway is sure to hate the vicious harvests of the pro-oligrach, any-everyone else, TINA, Neoliberal Human Reaper Economic Project.

An economy for the 1% and fuck everyone else!

A culture for the Freaks, and fuck all the normals!

What a plan! What could possibly go wrong?

And then string all this incongruity together via some Rube Goldberg Machine and let the Media Fog Machine mist it all over until no one can even see it anymore, and it’s just normative Zeitgeist that no one even questions, the sun rising over that hill to the east.

This shitheads want to think that there is no such thing as society when it comes to economics, but there’s an all-encompassing, ever expanding Freak Culture that hates normal people when it comes to sociology. There is no society, except there’s society. There is no culture, except there’s culture. It’s all so clear! How could anyone possibly think it’s a scam?

I have no idea why anyone thought this marriage from Hell was going to work, as it was a circular firing squad from Day One. Your average person may be a fool, but he isn’t stupid. Most humans are not permanent marks, and they’re more streetwise than you think. The Elites are arrogant and think that as long as they control the media and the political parties, they can be con and fleece us forever. The scam goes on forever.

Surely in this case the wolves will always be wolves, but there’s no law that says the sheep won’t catch on. The Elite’s problem is that the masses are just not dumb enough. If we were just a bit stupider, they could con and scam us forever and always leave us holding the bag.

The problem for our sociopathic elites is that victims tend to wise up after a while and turn on their abusers.

Hence I present you with Donald Trump, a monster created by the US Elite and both the political parties.

I really have no sympathy for people who deliberately bring catastrophe on themselves via their own hubris and pigheadedness. I am prepared to say that we Americans richly deserve every bad thing that is going to happen to us in the near future, and that includes a possible President Trump.

You can’t say we didn’t ask for it. Reap what you sow, dammit. We sowed it, and we reaped the inevitable result, so we might as well lie back and enjoy it. As long as there’s TINA, right?


Filed under American, Conservatism, Cultural Marxists, Culture, Democrats, Economics, Government, Left, Neoliberalism, Political Science, Politics, Regional, Republicans, Scum, US Politics, USA

I Have Never Been a Conservative. and I Do Not Think I Ever Will Be

Everydayanewday writes:

How could you NOT be with the French Right if you don’t want to see France commit national, ethnic, and cultural suicide? ….They are the ones standing up for reason and survival.

I think people still don’t understand this website. This website has said for the very beginning that it is a leftwing site.

How could I not be for the French New Right? How about because I’m never for the rightwing anything, anywhere in any way at any time?

How about that? I never give one nickel to any conservative political organizations. I never support any rightwing political campaigns that I am aware of and I support political campaigns all the time. I have never been a member of any rightwing political group and I have been a member of a number of groups. I have never given one nickel to any rightwing candidate or organization ever for any reason and I have given to a lot of candidates and campaigns.

I cannot remember the last time I voted for a Republican unless there weren’t any Democrats running. When I vote, I just do down the line and vote for all the Democrats. I never vote for any Republican for any position in this state ever for any reason. If there is more than one Democrat running, I usually vote for whoever is more leftwing. If there is a rightwing Democrat and a liberal Republican running, I vote for whoever is more leftwing (Feinstein versus Campbell). If the Democrat is sufficiently disgusting (rightwing) and it looks like they will win anyway, then I vote Left third party like Green. In nonpartisan office races, I get the Democratic Party guide or ask my friends and I either vote for who the Democrats say to vote for or I vote for my friends’ recommendations.

I believe I have actually voted for a few rightwing propostions, but it happens so infrequently that I can’t even remember the last time I did it. I sometimes pass around signature boards for propostions for the ballot. They’re always for leftwing campaigns.

Sure the Left is stupid a lot nowadays, but I will always support Stupid over Evil any day of the week.

I cannot imagine voting for any Republican candidate for anything ever in any competitive race. Why would I?

I did vote Libertarian once in 1980 because I was young and stupid. Never again.

I am simply a man of the Left. When the cards are down and it comes to voting and it’s for the Left or the Right, I simply always vote Left and I never vote Right.

Given all of that, how is it that people keep saying that I am a conservative or a Republican or a reactionary or a fascist? I never vote for reactionary. I doubt if I would vote fascist if one ever showed up. How could I possibly be a conservative in any possible political universe.

And the movement I am pushing is called Alternative Left, not Alternative Right and it ain’t about to change any time soon.

I simply have a strong aversion to core conservative principles that almost every conservative believes in. I just reject them. I always have and I always will. The very fact that a hardcore die-hard, committed, party line, contributing and funding leftwinger gets called “conservative” is more a symptom than anything else. It shows you just how insane the Left has become in the US if someone like me gets pegged conservative.

I am not even sure why conservatives comment here. This is not a happy home for them, and most figure that out after a bit and take off, thank God.

So if I were in France, and I voted French New Right, that would be pretty earthshaking in terms of my political tendencies.


Filed under Conservatism, Democrats, Left, Political Science, Politics, Republicans, US Politics

Alternative Left Getting Some Airplay

Hunter Wallace mentions me and the Alternative Left.

Wallace is a White nationalist. I am not exactly pro-White nationalism, but I would rather ally with those folks than these neoliberal Cultural Left Freakshow types on the so-called “Left”.

Neoliberal corporate globalist economics and the Cultural Left combines the worst of both the Left and the Right. This is today’s DNC Democratic Party. There literally is nothing here for any progressive person in my opinion.

The Left is about economics, or it is about nothing. Basing Left politics on culture is absurd. At best the Cultural Left is a sideshow, a distraction. At worst it is deculturalization as bad the McDonaldization of the globalists. There is nothing “progressive” about man-hating women, promotion of homosexuality, 31 flavors of sexual weirdness and gender-destroyers. What is even slightly progressive about any of this celebration of freakiness?

The Republicans are the same thing minus the Freakshow.

Marie Le Pen said, “There is no more Left and Right. Instead, there are globalists and nationalists.”

Chalk me up with the nationalists, in my case, leftwing nationalists (I know how nuts that sounds). What’s weird is Wallace et al on the Right are nationalists too, so they and I are now in some weird alliance against the Globalist Corporate Right, DNC Left and the Cultural Left. All three of these  are in bed with each other. They are all pushing deculturalization, deracination and what boils down to the dismantling of nation-states.

In this odd alliance, hopefully Wallace’s folks and I are for de-emphasis if not outright hostility to the Cultural Left, preservation of the wisdom or ages (your grandma was right), anti-gender feminism, anti-Gay Politics, anti-laissez faire capitalism, pro-men’s rights, pro-equity feminism, pro-tolerance but anti-celebration on sexual orientation, gender orientation and sexual freakism, pro-worker, pro-consumer, pro-environment, pro-people and most of all pro-community. And for me of course, the preservation of the nation my motto is distinct national cultures and traditions, of course national economies and welfare states. My motto is “Without the Homeland, there is nothing.”


Filed under Culture, Democrats, Economics, Left, Nationalism, Neoliberalism, Political Science, Politics, Republicans, US Politics, Useless Western Left

New Interview with Me Up

Warning! This interview is definitely NSFW! A lot of discussion of explicit sex acts in this interview, so be warned!


Robert Stark Interviews Robert Lindsay About the Alternative Left, Immigration & Cultural Leftist Insanity

Topics include:

Topics include:
Proposal for an Alternative Left
Robert Lindsay as the Left Wing of the Alternative Right
Why it’s hard to be politically homeless in American politics
How the Establishment Left is a fusion of neoliberal capitalism and cultural leftism
Why Robert Lindsay rejects the term “Cultural Marxism”
The Alternative Left’s stance on immigration, trade, the environment, and social issues.
The corporate push for open borders and the Mainstream Left’s collusion
The Progressive Case for Reducing Immigration
Progressive UC Davis Prof Endorses Trump Immigration Plan
Donald Trump’s stances on immigration and trade
When It Comes To Sex, Nothing Is Too Perverted for the Cultural Left
How society has become more degenerate in general while at the same time becoming puritanical about certain issues


Filed under Capitalism, Conservatism, Culture, Economics, Environmentalism, Immigration, Left, Liberalism, Lunatics, Open Borders, Political Science, Politics, Republicans, Sex, Traitors, US Politics

Republicans Pivot on Climate Change


Acknowledge the science, but say fixing Climate change will be too expensive all renewables are bad for the environment.

This is so not going to work.

The Republitards are venturing into an area that they know nothing about (in fact they don’t even believe in it): science. So of course Carly Fiorina does nothing but step on rakes for all four minutes of her intardview.

Face it morans. Science is bad for capitalism. The truth is bad for capitalism.

Republicans are almost like SJW PCtards.

The Cultural Left hates science too. They call the science they hate “pseudoscience” while the Republicans call the science they hate “junk science,”but the mentality is the same.

Face it. The truth is bad for the PC Dream World, so they simply deny science and say the truth is evil, or racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic or whatever. Most people who figure out that the truth is evil simply can’t cope with that fact because it interferes with the Fantasyland they call Reality, so they simply say that the truth is false, the false is true, Reality is a lie, and Fantasyland is true. That’s the Cultural Left in a nutshell right there.

Republicans don’t say the truth is evil. They just say the truth is bad for capitalism, so therefore it isn’t true.

It’s truly pitiful that the Cultural Left has so much in common with the Teabagger Party. But as a friend of mine noted recently when I told him that I hated PC Commissars far more than Republicans, “Well, the PC people are similar to the Republicans. They both have contempt for the truth.”


Filed under Capitalism, Cultural Marxists, Economics, Environmentalism, Global Warming, Left, Politics, Republicans, Science, Scum, US Politics

Eric Zeusse, “Meet the ‘Moderates’ the U.S. Is Supporting in Syria: They’re Al-Qaeda”

Great article from Global Research on something I have been drumming home for a long time now: The US is backing Al Qaeda in Syria, Lebanon and Yemen. Sickening or what?

This article also lays out some more things you folks ought to be hip to.

First off, the supposed Sarin gas attack that “Assad” did on his own people never even happened. The rebels, in this case, Al Qaeda, shot Sarin at their own people, but the doses were very small. Later, poison gas was used to kill about 600 pro-government civilians Al Qaeda had captured. More here.

Meet the “Moderates” the U.S. Is Supporting in Syria: They’re Al-Qaeda

Eric Zuesse

In Syria, al-Qaeda goes under the name Jabhat al-Nusra, or al-Nusra for short. As will be documented here, the United States has, until recently, been allied with al-Nusra, but, because of the bad image this U.S. alliance has spread about al-Nusra among their fellow-Sunnis, al-Nusra is now separating itself from ISIL, the Islamic State in Iraq and Levant, otherwise known as Islamic State in Iraq and Syria or ISIS, and which the United States is now assisting, to defeat the forces of Assad, notwithstanding ISIL’s infamous videos of their chopping off heads of nonbelievers.

Thus, for example, Britain’s Telegraph headlined on August 10th, “Al-Qaeda withdraws from fighting ISIL in Syria to avoid ‘US cooperation’,” and reporter Nabih Bulos in Istanbul opened with:

Al Qaeda’s affiliate in Syria has declared it will withdraw from frontlines where it has been fighting against Islamic State because it does not want to cooperate with the US-led coalition.

Jabhat Al-Nusra declared on Sunday it would abandon the northern province of Aleppo, where it has been battling Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), leaving other rebel factions to take over its positions in the area.

The region north of the city of Aleppo has designated as a potential anti-ISIL buffer zone by the US and Turkey.

Later, Bulos’ report went on to say:

Jabhat al-Nusra nevertheless insisted that even though it was abandoning its positions in the northern Aleppo countryside, it would continue the fight against ISIL in other parts of the country.

Despite sharing their origins in al-Qaeda, Jabhat al-Nusra and ISIL have battled each other since a rancorous split in 2013.

Jabhat al-Nusra, whose jihadist militants are credited with being among the most effective on the battlefield, recently achieved a dazzling string of battlefield successes as part of the Army of Conquest, a loose coalition of Islamist factions.

Although it is thought to have received military and financial support from other members of the US-led coalition such as Qatar and Saudi Arabia, Jabhat al-Nusra has nevertheless repeatedly scuttled plans for Western support, branding Western-backed rebel factions as “collaborators.”

This report is consistent with two earlier reports that the famous American journalist, Seymour Hersh, was not able to find a publisher for inside the United States, and which were therefore (like the Telegraph report above) published in Britain, instead, both of them by the London Review of Books. Those Hersh articles were widely dismissed by U.S. news-media as being untrustworthy.

Hersh used unnamed sources — supposedly because the sources didn’t want to be fired. Even Hersh’s main publisher, the New Yorker, has rejected his recent reports about this and related matters, and New York Magazine (a competitor to the New Yorker) has allowed him to express his view of the conflict he’s having with the New Yorker’s current editor. However, New York hasn’t published any of Hersh’s actual articles, either.

Hersh’s first such article was Whose Sarin? on 19 December 2013, and it opened:

Barack Obama did not tell the whole story this autumn when he tried to make the case that Bashar al-Assad was responsible for the chemical weapons attack near Damascus on 21 August. In some instances, he omitted important intelligence, and in others he presented assumptions as facts.

Most significant, he failed to acknowledge something known to the US intelligence community: that the Syrian army is not the only party in the country’s civil war with access to sarin, the nerve agent that a UN study concluded – without assessing responsibility – had been used in the rocket attack. In the months before the attack, the American intelligence agencies produced a series of highly classified reports, culminating in a formal Operations Order – a planning document that precedes a ground invasion – citing evidence that the al-Nusra Front, a jihadi group affiliated with al-Qaida, had mastered the mechanics of creating sarin and was capable of manufacturing it in quantity.

When the attack occurred, al-Nusra should have been a suspect, but the administration cherry-picked intelligence to justify a strike against Assad.

The second one was more definitive, answering the question that the first of his two reports raised. It was issued on 17 April 2014, The Red Line and the Rat Line, and it reported that:

British intelligence had obtained a sample of the sarin used in the 21 August attack, and analysis demonstrated that the gas used didn’t match the batches known to exist in the Syrian army’s chemical weapons arsenal.

During the interim months between the two articles, Hersh was able to answer the Whose Sarin? question. He found, and reported in the second article:

The joint chiefs also knew that the Obama administration’s public claims that only the Syrian army had access to sarin were wrong. The American and British intelligence communities had been aware since the spring of 2013 that some rebel units in Syria were developing chemical weapons.

On 20 June analysts for the US Defense Intelligence Agency issued a highly classified five-page ‘talking points’ briefing for the DIA’s deputy director, David Shedd, which stated that al-Nusra maintained a sarin production cell: its program, the paper said, was ‘the most advanced sarin plot since al-Qaida’s pre-9/11 effort’…

The full extent of US co-operation with Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar in assisting the rebel opposition in Syria has yet to come to light. The Obama administration has never publicly admitted to its role in creating what the CIA calls a ‘rat line’, a back channel highway into Syria.

The rat line, authorized in early 2012, was used to funnel weapons and ammunition from Libya via southern Turkey and across the Syrian border to the opposition. Many of those in Syria who ultimately received the weapons were jihadists, some of them affiliated with al-Qaida. (The DNI spokesperson said: ‘The idea that the United States was providing weapons from Libya to anyone is false.’)

In January, the Senate Intelligence Committee released a report on the assault by a local militia in September 2012 on the American consulate and a nearby undercover CIA facility in Benghazi, which resulted in the death of the US ambassador, Christopher Stevens, and three others.

The report’s criticism of the State Department for not providing adequate security at the consulate, and of the intelligence community for not alerting the US military to the presence of a CIA outpost in the area, received front-page coverage and revived animosities in Washington, with Republicans accusing Obama and Hillary Clinton of a cover-up.

A highly classified annex to the report, not made public, described a secret agreement reached in early 2012 between the Obama and Erdoğan administrations. It pertained to the rat line. By the terms of the agreement, funding came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar; the CIA, with the support of MI6, was responsible for getting arms from Gaddafi’s arsenals into Syria.

That report is further confirmed by the 10 August 2015 report in Britain’s Telegraph.

Eva Bartlett of Inter Press Service reported, on 8 July 2014, her interviews with victims of the U.S.-supported fighters in the Syrian city of Homs. Typical was this:

Mohammed, a Syrian from the Qussoor district of Homs, is now one of the reported 6.5 million internally-displaced Syrians.

“I’m a refugee in Latakia now. I work in Homs, two days a week, and then return to Latakia to stay at my friend’s home. I left my house at the very end of 2011, before the area was taken over by al-Nusra and al-Farooq brigades.”

He spoke of the sectarian nature of the insurgents and protests from the very beginning in 2011.

I was renting a home in a different neighborhood of Homs, while renovating my own house. Just beyond my balcony there were protests that did not call for ‘freedom’ or even overthrowing the ‘regime’. They chanted sectarian mottoes, they said they would fill al-Zahara – an Alawi [Shiite] neighborhood – with blood. And also al-Nezha – where there are many Alawis and Christians.

An internal Stratfor (private CIA) email report, dated 7 December 2011, concerning the planning stages of the American mission to remove Bashar al-Assad (the mission that created refugees such as “Mohammed” from Homs), described their private meeting at the Pentagon, where the officials

…emphasized how the air campaign in Syria makes Libya look like a piece of cake…It’s still a doable mission, it’s just not an easy one.” Obama’s people were “saying that the idea ‘hypothetically’ is to commit guerrilla attacks, assassination campaigns, try to break the back of the Alawite forces, elicit collapse from within. There wouldn’t be a need for air cover, and they wouldn’t expect these Syrian rebels to be marching in columns anyway.

Obama’s people seem to have underestimated both sides of the war. Some European nations were supportive but not yet fully committed to the operation.

The main base they would use is Cyprus, hands down. Brits and French would fly out of there. They kept stressing how much is stored at Cyprus and how much recce comes out of there. The group was split on whether Turkey would be involved, but said Turkey would be pretty critical to the mission to base stuff out of there.

The Stratfor agent wrote that:

I had a meeting with an incoming Kuwaiti diplomat (will be coded as KU301.) His father was high up in the regime, always by the CP’s/PM’s side. The diplo himself still seems to be getting his feet wet in DC (the new team just arrived less than 2 weeks ago) but he made pretty clear that Kuwait was opening the door to allowing US to build up forces as needed…He said that while KSA and Bahrain they can deal with it as needed and black out the media, Kuwait is a lot more open.”


On the Kuwaiti political scene, the government is having a harder time dealing with a more emboldened opposition, but the opposition is still extremely divided, esp among the Islamists. The MP’s now all have to go back to their tribes to rally support…

for the operation against Assad. All of these Muslims were Sunnis.

An excellent overview article by Steve Chovanec, dated 16 November 2014, included a sub-head, US-Supplied Rebels Align with al-Qaeda, al-Qaeda Aligns with ISIL.

One thing that’s hidden in the West (since the West’s aristocracies are allied with the aristocracies in Arabic countries, which are almost exclusively Sunni) is that Islamic jihad is a specifically Sunni phenomenon, it’s not Shiite; Islamic terrorism that’s directed against Christian-majority nations is basically a Sunni phenomenon, it’s a phenomenon of the Arabic aristocracies that Western aristocracies are allied with, and this is the reason why there’s a tendency to attribute it to Iran and to other Shiite areas, which actually have nothing to do with it and are instead themselves at war against it within the Muslim world.

Whereas Russia is allied with Shiite forces, and is therefore clearly and unequivocally opposed to Islamic terrorism, which is Sunni, the United States and its vassal-nations are basically allied with Sunni forces, and this means that Western aristocracies support the Sunni aristocracies that fund Islamic jihad.

A report from Russian Television on August 12th presents shelling of Damascus by (as the reporter describes it, at 1:38 in the video)

…a rebel faction with very strong ties with Saudi Arabia, news reports saying that it is funded by Saudi Arabia.

Yet again, it’s a Sunni invasion of Shiite-run Syria, this time by Sunnis that are paid directly by the Sauds. And the Sauds, of course, dominate all of Sunni Islam, and are also the main funders of al-Qaeda. U.S. President Obama wants to defeat Russia even more than he wants to defeat ISIS, al-Qaeda, etc.Thus, the fact that Russia has always consistently been against Islamic-jihad groups, does not deter Obama from allying the U.S. with Saudi Arabia (the key backer of Islamic jihad groups), instead of with Russia. If he needs Islamic-jihad groups in order to defeat Russia, he’ll back them, but only secretly.

So, al-Nusra (or al-Qaeda) has now publicly separated itself from ISIL, because ISIL is receiving critically important assistance from the United States, just as al-Nusra is now being blamed by their fellow Sunnis for having done the same, between 2011 and 2013. Back in 2011, Obama thought he wouldn’t need ISIL’s help, but he does.

Furthermore, Obama is just copying all his predecessors back at least to Reagan, and even to the end of the Carter Administration, when Zbig Brzezinski told the Mujahideen (the earlier name for the Taliban) that “God is on your side.”

The U.S. had used Sunnis such as Osama bin Laden to break the Soviet alliance with Afghanistan, much as the U.S. is now using Sunnis to try to break the Russian alliance with Assad, and likewise with Ukraine, including Crimea. Obama’s primary target throughout isn’t jihadists so much as it’s Vladimir Putin. Bush’s “regime change” obsession was Saddam Hussein. Obama’s wasn’t just Muammar Gaddafi, and it wasn’t just Viktor Yanukovych; and it isn’t just Bashar al-Assad — it’s Vladimir Putin himself. It’s defeating Russia. All else is actually subordinate to that.

In this regard, Obama is following the position that was expressed by his friend Brzezinski who has expressed it many times, such as, in 1998, reprinted later under the heading, “How Jimmy Carter and I Started the Mujahideen.”

As I bannered on 6 March 2015,

Brzezinski Says Russia’s Putin Wants to Invade NATO. The U.S. is adding former communist nations to NATO, surrounding Russia with NATO nations all along Russia’s eastern borders and to the south of Russia. But Brzezinski and others of his ilk say that Russia is surrounding NATO. The Obama Administration says such things as, “We’re building up on NATO’s borders. These are NATO countries, these are allies of ours, that are concerned based on what Russia is doing on their borders.”

The Administration pretends that the U.S. isn’t the aggressor here — that Russia is. They’re saying that essential defense is instead aggression; meanwhile, unprovoked aggression is being done for “allies of ours” (but that were traditionally allies of theirs). Russia is supposed to accept that. Russia won’t.

After the end of communism, Brzezinski and some others continued hating Russia because they had hated it ever since childhood or at least ever since young adulthood (Brzezinski was born a Polish nobleman.) They were indoctrinated with this form of racism, not merely with hatred of communism. What was originally a hatred of an ideology thus remains in some people as a hatred of one specific ethnicity: Russians. World War III could result. Unless people like this are booted out of power in the United States — and in Europe.


Filed under Afghanistan, Africa, Asia, Britain, Democrats, Eurasia, Europe, Government, Iraq, Islam, Journalism, Libya, Middle East, North Africa, Obama, Politics, Radical Islam, Regional, Religion, Republicans, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Shiism, South Asia, Sunnism, Syria, Turkey, Ukraine, US Politics, USA, USSR, War

Niggers and Beaners Destroyed the Economy, and Other Disgusting Lies of the Right

A conservative wrote:

And actually, Clinton DID say “Everyone Deserves A House”, which is why he passed laws making it “discrimination” if the banks looked up the habitual welshing of the would-be mortgagers!

I hear this sort of thing all the time from rightwingers, so I thought I really needed to respond to this. What you are about to read below will show you just how disgusting capitalists are. You guys wonder why I hate capitalism. Well keep reading. And all of you readers who cheer for capitalism, how is that you can support what I lay out below? You guys cheer for this stuff? What’s your excuse?

No.! That’s not true. It’s a rightwing lie. The capitalist finance companies and banks created the crisis 100% by themselves. No one forced any banks to loan to unfit borrowers. The banks no longer had to get the loans repaid! After banks loaned out the money, the sold the mortgage to someone else who was left holding the bag. The banks didn’t care and honestly they knew that a lot of those mortgages were shit and many were timebombed and they were almost literally impossible to pay back but the banks set it up that way!

They deliberately loaned to people who they full well knew were not creditworthy but they didn’t care as it didn’t matter to them whether they got paid back or not. Then they timebombed the mortgages so they kept getting more and more expensive to pay back to where no one could pay them back! They were set up to fail! They sold the mortgages to suckers and idiots and got crooked accountants to grade them AAA mortgages and then they got crooked insurance companies to insure the bad loans.

They full well knew most of these loans would go bad but they didn’t care! Places like Countrywide were getting paid per mortgage signed so they would have sold a house to a dog or a seal if they could have gotten away with it. All the banks were criminals, all the mortgage companies were criminals, all the accounting companies were criminals, and all the insurance companies were criminals.

They packaged these crap loans into securities like a stock or a bond and sold them as investments to suckers who were left holding the bag. As they full well knew, sooner or later, all the mortgages started going bad and the people with the investments were screwed. They were left sitting on billions in bad loans. The insurance companies could not pay out on the insurance for the securities so they started going out of business too.

The whole thing was just a giant capitalist crime wave. Everyone knew what was going on, but no one cared. We put in Glass-Steagal to separate the consumer banks from the financial banks and many other things to prevent insanity like this, because if you give the capitalists a rope to hang the economy with, they will gleefully do it every time! They did a very similar thing in the 1920’s when we took all the regulations off the stock market and people were able to buy stocks with borrowed money paying on maybe 5 cents on the dollar down. That crime wave brought down the whole system too.

If you don’t regulate the capitalists, the whole mess turns into nothing but crime and eventually there is a horrific economic crisis as the unregulated capitalists crash the economy. Under capitalism, the capitalists always take over the media to brainwash the people with the capitalists’ lies. Then they take over the state and deregulate business. After the capitalists get deregulated, a crisis soon appears. Remember the deregulation of the power industry in California? Same thing. Deregulated capitalism always blows up the economy sooner or later and causes a horrific crisis.

In this case, the US capitalists not only blew up the whole US economy, but they blew up the economy of the world as they took the whole work with them.

Then the rightwing scum made up a bunch of lies called “niggers and beaners blew up the world economy.” Supposedly the evil Leftist government forced kind, loving, sweet, gentle, compassionate bankers to make loans against their will to worthless Blacks and Browns who the banks knew could not pay back their loans. But the evil Lib Government forced the Mother Theresa-like banksters to loan to these good for nothing, worthless NAM’s, the result being, the non-Whites destroyed the economy of the US and the World.

It is absolutely disgusting and it is a 100% lie. The banks deliberately sought out borrowers often Blacks and Browns and told them they could buy a home on great terms. They banks knew that these NAM’s were not creditworthy but they didn’t care as they were selling the mortgages anyway so it was someone else’s problems.

The banks timebombed the mortgages in fine print that no one could understand with balloon payments that eventually exploded to where anyone making less than Donald Trump couldn’t pay it back. The banksters victimized those poor people! They ripped them off! It was all a gigantic con. Those NAM’s were not bad people. They were just duped by capitalist con artists who took them for a ride and stole everything but the shirt on their back.

And the Republicans had the nerve to blame the victims for getting conned by criminals!


Filed under Blacks, Capitalism, Capitalists, Conservatism, Crime, Economics, Government, Hispanics, Law, Political Science, Politics, Race/Ethnicity, Republicans, Scum, US Politics

So I Am a Republican, Right?

From the Net. Supposedly Republicans and Democrats differ on all of these issues. According to most of the liberals and Leftists on the Net, and I not a liberal or a Leftist. In fact, I am a conservative, Republican, Rightist, fascist, reactionary.

I don’t agree with this. On the vast majority of issues, of course I go liberal or Left.

I come out Democrat on 23 issues and Republican on 3 issues. According to most morons on the liberal/Left, this means I must be a Republican! Some people can’t do math.

This just shows you how utterly insane our political system is. If you’re not 100% on one side, they declare you an infidel, excommunicate you, and throw you over to the other side where they don’t want you and you disagree with them on 90% of the issues. This whole binary political system belongs in the toilet along with everyone retard who thinks like this.

Abortion: Democrat

Balanced Budgets: Democrat

Climate Change: Democrat

Defense Spending: Democrat

Education Vouchers: Democrat

Fracking: Democrat

Gun Control: Democrat

Hate Crimes: Republican

Income Inequality: Democrat

Judicial Nominations: Democrat

Keystone Pipeline: Democrat

Legalized Marijuana: Democrat

Marriage Equality: Democrat

Net Neutrality: Democrat

Obamacare: Democrat

Prayer in Schools: Democrat

Quarantining of Health Care Workers: Republican

Religious Restoration Laws: Democrat

Standardized Testing: Democrat

Teacher Tenure: Democrat

Undocumented Immigrants: Republican: Democrat

Voter Id Laws: Democrat

Workplace Regulations: Democrat

Xenophobia: Democrat

Youthful Offenders: Democrat

Zimmerman (George) Verdict: Republican


Filed under Conservatism, Democrats, Left, Liberalism, Political Science, Politics, Republicans, US Politics

US Debt Has Been Flat for 30 Years

Sam writes:

Our country is going broke. We are very close to being 100% debt to GDP ratio. Greece. When countries hit this point a serious disaster is not far behind and these people you’re crying over don’t give a tinkers damn

That figure is a lie. The CIA figure is 71.8%.

The Big Lie: US Debt Is Skyrocketing and Is Unsustainable

Actually, US debt to GDP ratio has been flat for 29 years. It is about the same now as it was in 1986. I am sure you keep hearing about how we are going broke and we are going to turn into another Greece. It’s nonsense.

For one thing, we can print our own money.

US debt last year was 71.8% of GDP, a perfectly respectable figure. The rate was pretty much flat from 1986-2009, 23 year period. It has risen somewhat in the past 6 years, but it is now at exactly the same level as it was in 1991-1998 under the Clinton Administration.

Bush inherited a huge surplus from Bill Clinton as a result of Clinton’s economic policies. That could have been used for a rainy day fund or to pay down the debt. Instead Republicans screamed to give it back to the American people, which was retarded. Most people only got small rebate checks. So when conservatives scream about the debt, they are lying, just like they lie about everything. Conservatives could care less about the debt. When Bush was in, the debt was rising and all the conservatives were saying “debt doesn’t matter.” As soon as Obama got in, conservatives started screaming about the debt again.

Conservatives care nothing at all about the debt. Ronald Reagan blew up the debt badly, deliberately increasing it by 50% by cutting taxes and vastly increasing military spending. All during the Reagan years, the line was that debt doesn’t matter.

Conservatives only scream about the debt because they want to use the fake debt crisis as an excuse to cut government spending, especially on programs they hate. That is why conservatives often deliberately run up the debt by vast amounts – so they can turn around and scream, “Oh no! Look at the huge debt! We are going broke! We have to cut all these programs right now!” It’s just another rightwing lie, like everything the right says, because conservatives lie about everything as a matter of course. Oh yes, and the “liberal” media supported the Republicans 100% in deliberately running up the debt to cause a debt crisis, then screaming about how we need to gut all these programs to solve the fake debt crisis.

Deliberately run up the debt, then scream we need to cut all these programs! Conservatives are utter scum. I cannot put into words how much sheer hate I feel for them.

American politics frankly is retarded and insane, so consequently that is what most voters are.

US debt has been flat for 30 years.

US debt has been flat for 30 years.


Filed under Conservatism, Democrats, Economics, Government, Political Science, Politics, Regional, Republicans, US Politics, USA

One Corporate Party with “Liberal” and “Conservative” Wings

Jason Y writes:

The media promote extreme social liberalism, but moderate economic liberalism. In other words, they’re for food stamps, but not Communism etc..

Yeah, me too. You always see some right wing fanatic who calls anyone not on Fox a Communist or a homo or whatever.

The Jew York Times has been pushing Jeb Bush very heavily. What kind of liberals do that?!

The media is not moderately liberal on economics. They’re pretty conservative. 100% of  the media is pushing the TIPP like mad. Support for the TIPP does not make you a “moderate liberal.” Screw that. Supporting the TIPP makes you a righting nut.

Of course both parties are supporting rightwing nuttiness when it comes to economics these days. These are just two wings of a Corporate Party, rightwing on economics where it counts and conveniently leftwing on social bullshit, the better to divide and conquer the working class with, my dear.

The Democrats are the “liberal” wing of the Corporate Party and the Republicans are the “conservative” wing of the Corporate Party, but they agree more than they disagree.


Filed under Conservatism, Democrats, Journalism, Liberalism, Political Science, Politics, Republicans, US Politics