Category Archives: Fascism

Repost: Average IQ’s of Liberals Versus Conservatives (with References)

Thought I would repost this with references. This finding is very robust in social science. Liberals are smart. Conservatives are idiots. That’s all there is to it, folks. But you knew that.

Jason Voorhees: Liberals in general have an IQ of 110 or above.

Quite an exaggeration. More like 105. 75% of the population has an IQ below 110. On the other hand, he is onto something.

We don’t call em conservatards for nothing, I guess.

Liberals are actually smarter than conservatives! Quite a bit smarter. And the more liberal you are, the smarter you. And the more conservative you are, the dumber you are. It’s a linear curve.

               IQ
Liberals       106  
Centrists      99
Conservatives  96

Source

I would argue that the reason for that is that conservatism is basically stupid. So of course stupid people support it. Fiscal conservatism is intelligent if you are rich and possibly if you are upper middle class, but it’s idiotic for everyone else because only the top 20% make money under rightwing economics. The entire 80% of the population loses money.

Political ideology

Ha ha! Conservatives are stupid! Liberals are smart! Something we always knew. No wonder they are called conservatards. Neener neener. Conservatives are so stupid they probably spell dumb “dum.” LOL.

Rightwing economics is a massive wealth transfer system from the poor and middle classes to the upper middle class and the rich. It’s basically a scam. Pure class war. Incidentally this has been proved all over the 3rd World, especially in Latin America. Surveys in Latin America under the neoliberal decades of failure showed that only the top 20% benefited under rightwing economics. The entire bottom 80% lost money. Furthermore, death rates skyrocketed and education figures collapsed. Neoliberalism has killed many millions of people. We may not have yet found a good alternative to capitalism, but capitalism surely continues to kill as sure as night follows day.

Oh and there is a reason why liberals control most US institutions. Although the idea of a liberal media is pathetic, 89% of media whores, I mean journalists, call themselves liberal. But universities are liberal. The only major US institution that is not liberal is business, which is conservative for basically self-serving interests because conservatism serves to line their pockets better while it picks the pockets of the poor and middle class. Steal from the poor and give to the rich. Reverse Robin Hood. That’s conservatism in action. The fact that the people calling themselves Christians in the US support Reverse Robin Hood is truly pathetic. Obviously they know nothing about how the Main Man lived his life.

References

Carl, Noah. 2014. Verbal Intelligence Is Correlated with Socially and Economically Liberal Beliefs. Intelligence, Volume 44, Pages 142-148.

Stankov, Lazar. 2009. Conservatism and Cognitive Ability. Intelligence, Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 294-304.

Thompson, James. November 29, 2015. US Academics: Lefty and Liberal Because of High IQ? Unz.com.

Leave a comment

Filed under Capitalism, Christianity, Conservatism, Death, Economics, Education, Fascism, Health, Higher Education, Intelligence, Journalism, Latin American Right, Liberalism, Neoliberalism, Political Science, Psychology, Religion, Social Problems, Sociology

73% of Venezuelans Continue to Support Chavismo

Tulio: Robert, I have two friends from Venezuela, a married couple, the female is white, the male is dark brown. I assure you they are not racist, they have never called me “mono” and they have been completely and 100% kind to me as long as I’ve known them. I have even visited them and stayed in their home, and they have visited me and stayed in mine. Never seen their bank account but I’m pretty sure they are not rich.

They are probably middle class by Venezuelan definition. They are 100% opposed to Chavismo. I don’t even know where they fall on the left-right continuum per se. They really don’t even talk much politics with me outside of opposing the condition their country is in. They are now living in Santiago, Chile where they worked and resided since the rise of Chavez, but frequently go to Venezuela to see family. I’m not an expert of Venezuelan internal affairs by any means. I’ve gotten a lot of my info directly from them.

Neither of them seem “right wing” to me in any sense that I understand the term. They seem to want nothing more than a stable, functional and non-authoritarian government. I also see massive marches in Caracas. I can’t believe all those tens of thousands of people are rich, right wingers. When I see close up photos of the crowd, they look like just ordinary Venezuelans to me. You seem to be painting a broad brush here and assuming anyone against Chavismo is a hard right-winger

Any Venezuelan who has the money to travel out of the country to the US or back and forth to Chile all the time, all by plane, is by definition not middle class. I would call those people upper middle class.

There will never be a government like they want in there as long as Chavismo is in because the Opposition will always be rioting in the streets and tearing stuff up like they have been doing ever since he got in. These people say they want a non-authoritarian government, but they supported the coup against Chavez. The first things the putschists did was to dissolve Congress, the National Assembly and Courts and put in martial law. They put a dictatorship in as soon as the coup took power.

The poster’s friends say they want a non-authoritarian state, but they support the extreme dictatorship that took power in the coup. The Opposition riots in the streets and calls for a coup every time they lose an election. This is because every time they lose an election, they insist against all evidence that it was stolen from them. Their calculus is that the only legitimate elections are the ones that they win. If the other side wins, it’s automatically stolen due to fraud, and we need to have a military coup to put “democracy” back in power. That ideology does not sound very democratic to me.  To the Opposition,  the definition of democracy is “when we win.” The definition of dictatorship is “when the other side wins.” Sound like a democratic project?

streambe_701e8e79-0687-3fce-8148-a667ce920929--1399436008

A decptively large Opposition crowd in Venezuela. You will not find one working class, low income or poor person in that crowd. Everyone is middle class to rich. And no matter how big that crowd is, the Chavista march will always be a lot bigger. That crowd represents 27% of the population. That’s called a minority movement.

They lack majority support. That crowd is the upper class, the upper middle class and unfortunately a lot of the middle class. There are a lot of middle class people in those crowds.

This is where the poster is getting his ideology from. Them and their lies. The Venezuelan Opposition is out of their minds. They are not rational and they are not honest. They lie constantly. They are as bad as Trump and the Trumpster Republicans, and in fact, both movements are very similar.

The project of the Opposition is extreme rightwing. I told you that they regularly call Chavez mono and that they removed Bolivar’s portrait because he was a bit too swarthy and not White enough and replaced it with a more proper Nordic one. The poster’s friends may not be racist reactionaries, but a lot of the people in the Opposition are very racist, and the poster’s friends are not denouncing that. I guess they are OK with it.

The project of the Opposition is to dismantle all of Chavismo and to go back to the way it was.

They are going to take it all down – the free health care, the free education, the neighborhood councils and circles, the public housing, the redistribution of oil income to the people, the cheap government-subsidized food and household goods to the people, the free houses given to the people, the public spending on infrastructure, the whole nine yards. Before Chavez came in, you never went to the doctor, the dentist or the eye doctor because you could not afford it. You either got over the medical issue or you died. Raw sewage ran down the streets of the shantytowns on the hills. In 1989, 91% of the people could afford only one meal a day and that was the same percentage of people in poverty. Venezuela had always been like this since Independence. The oligarchy had always been in charge and had never lifted one damn finger for the people.

All of the opposition politicians want to go back to that. All of them. The poster’s friends may not realize this, or perhaps they do not care. The Latin American middle class has always lined up with the Extreme Right project of the rich and the oligarchs, much to their detriment. This is because they consider the opposition to that  project to be Communists, and they think that is worse.

In Latin America, it’s Commies or Fascists. That’s your choice. Pick your poison. That’s because moderation or a Centrist project never works down there. The problems are too severe, and Centrist projects never touch the power of the oligarchs, so nothing ever changes.

Venezuela has never been more democratic than under Chavez. Venezuela has the freest press in Latin America. The authoritarian dictatorship crap is another big fat lie the Opposition made up.

73% of the Venezuelan people continue to support the Chavista Project because it’s the only one that’s for the people. The Opposition has no numbers. Those people you see marching above are part of the 27% opposition, and that is why they never win. I would also point out that pro-government marches happen at the same time as those Opposition marches, and they are almost always much bigger. You just never read about them in the Western media.

Those 73% are not stupid. They remember life back when the oligarchy ruled. They know that the Opposition wants to go directly back to that and not change one thing. This has been their project from Day One. Yes, it is a very far right, reactionary project. Compared to what the Opposition wants, most of the people want to stay with Chavismo.

14 Comments

Filed under Chile, Conservatism, Fascism, Government, Latin America, Latin American Right, Left, Marxism, Political Science, Politics, Racism, Regional, Social Problems, Sociology, South America, Venezuela, White Racism

Venezuela: The Lies Never Stop

Tulio: Left wing economics aren’t working out in Latin America either. Let’s face it, Latin America is dysfunctional whether it’s run by the left or right. I know Robert is a Chavista and all but the results speak for itself. They are probably a few clicks away from outright civil war.

The poster’s problem is that he gets all his Venezuela news from the Western media. You will not read one true thing about that country in the Western media. It is an all out propaganda war from Day One. If you want to read the truth about Venezuela, go to Venezuelanalysis. It’s all straight up 100% facts there, no spin. And many articles are quite critical of the government.

Yes, it is a civil war because the Right is running through the streets rioting, killing people, burning down buildings, buses and police cars. Let me ask you something. Suppose when Obama was in, Republicans went on a rampage all over the US, rioting, burning stuff down, killing people, firing guns, setting up snipers, setting off bombs, throwing grenades, killing lots of cops. Would you blame Obama for that? Because that is exactly what the commenter is doing.

This is part of the Right’s project down there. They lost the election, so they are trying to overthrow the government by force. What exactly is the state supposedly do about what is in effect a rightwing insurgency?

What they are trying to do is to create so much chaos that the military steps in and does a rightwing coup. Barring that, they are creating so much chaos and disorder that the US steps in with the military, invades and overthrows the Chavistas in the name of humanitarian intervention. It’s the exact same scheme we pulled in Syria when we turned ISIS and Al Qaeda loose on secular regime.

The US government’s official policy in Venezuela now is regime change. Mattis himself said so. The riots, destruction, arson, murders and political assassinations are all being coordinated with the US. We are the cause of all that violence down there.

There are no poor results of Chavismo. Things were booming along for many years. The rightwing has been sabotaging and boycotting the economy since Day One.

Norway is far more socialist than Venezuela. China is orders of magnitude more socialist than Venezuela. There’s nothing socialist at all about Venezuela. The economy is 100% capitalist controlled.

All Chavismo did was take a lot of that oil revenue and spend it on the people. If you think that’s a failed model, I do not know what to say to you.

After the oil price crashed, the government could no longer cover up for the business sector’s sabotage of the economy.

There are shortages? How can there be shortages in a 100% capitalist controlled economy? Answer me that. There cannot be. If there are shortages, why don’t they import some food? Why don’t they make some stuff that is in shortage?

The business sector is refusing to import products, and they are refusing to make products in short supply.

You need to go study how Kissinger and Nixon blew up the Chilean economy. They did the exact same thing, down to the letter. This is the Chilean Model down to the letter.

“We will make the Chilean economy scream.

–  Henry Kissinger.

Every week they seize huge warehouses full of products that are being hoarded by the capitalists in order to create artificial shortages. You heard of a shortage of syringes? A warehouse full of 21 million syringes was recently seized. If you read the Venezuelan papers, these seizures happen all the time, maybe every other day.

Why is there inflation? The capitalists have caused artificial shortages by hoarding stuff, refusing to produce stuff and refusing to import stuff. These artificial shortages of course caused inflation.

This economic sabotage has been going on from Day One, but when the oil prices were high, the government could cover up for the Economic War by importing their own products and selling them to people for cheap. Hence the state covered up all the artificial shortages caused by the refusal to import and manufacture products. When the oil price crashed, the state no longer had the money to import goods to cover up for the shortages, and furthermore, the Economic War went into high gear.

Furthermore, since Maduro has come in, he has made a hard turn to the Right from Chavez. His administration of full of rightwingers and representatives of the business sector. He caves to opposition demands over and over. They are always demanding hikes in the controlled prices, and he keeps raising them. No matter how much they raise the prices, the capitalists do not produce one more item. It’s all a scam.

Keep in mind that the economic crash has occurred against the background of a hard right turn in the government under a government that is now about 50% rightwingers and people from the business community. They can’t get a handle on things either. Did you hear what I said?

The economy crashed as the government turned Right and filled the executive with people from the business sector. According to the poster’s logic, rightwing economics is responsible for the crash.

That’s not really true either. Neither Right nor Left economics is responsible for the crash. The ministers from the business community can’t control the problems either. No one can.

There is a problem with currency, but that was created by the capitalists too. Currency controls were put in because the capitalists were taking all their money out of the country. No country can put up with that for long. So currency controls were put in, but that causes a black market in currency.

Price controls were put in because the capitalists staged a lockout strike that caused horrible shortages and sent prices skyrocketing.

Incidentally, despite currency controls, the business community still takes $50 billion out of the country every year. Do you know how much more they would take out if the currency controls were taken off?  The system would probably collapse.

The fake excuse all along was that price controls make it so the producing the price controlled products is not worthwhile. This is their fake excuse for the shortages. Now the price controls have been almost completely lifted, and they are still refusing to make stuff or import stuff. What’s their fake excuse now?

I agree that the standard Communist model caused a lot of economic problems, but the lie is that Venezuela is a Communist country like Cuba or the USSR, and this is the cause of all the problems. It’s caused by “socialist failure.” Why isn’t socialism failing in Europe? Why isn’t it failing in China? Why isn’t it failing in most of the world that runs social democratic systems?

The Chavistas were simply trying to produce a European style social democracy in Venezuela. Even that’s too much for the Venezuelan elite.

I will have you know that the rightwing Venezuelans the poster cheers for are some of the racist people on Earth. The commenter is Black. I assure you that the people he cheers for hate him because he is Black. Their word for Chavez was Mono. That means monkey. They call him monkey because his White blood is mixed with Indian and Black.

When they came into power, the first thing they did was take down the portrait of Bolivar because they said he looked too dark. They put up a new portrait that showed him as White as a Swede. These are the racists that this Black commenter is supporting.

The government is screwing up badly by not floating the currency, but that’s not a Right versus Left thing so it’s not a fault of Left economics. It would be a very unpopular decision, and Maduro is a weak and not very good leader and he does not have the balls to put in.

Hence I agree that the problems in part are caused by failures of the regime, but those failures having nothing to do with Right or Left economics. They’re not dealing with the currency problems, and that’s a failure on their part, but it has nothing to do with capitalism or socialism or any of that.

The price controls were put in to fight inflation. The Right screams about inflation and about price controls. They took all the price controls off, and the prices went way up. Now they are screaming because the prices went up. They criticize the problem, and they attack the solution to the problem.

You can’t win with these people.

I agree that the Communist model leaves a lot to be desired, and the lie is that the problems of Cuba and the USSR are being replicated in Venezuela. It’s a lie because Venezuela never even made it to social democracy. Venezuela is a capitalist country through and through.

I will ban any posters who attack Venezuela as a failure of Left economics because it’s nothing of the sort. Now if  you want to talk about problems with the Cuban model, go for it.

 

15 Comments

Filed under Asia, Capitalism, Capitalists, Chile, China, Conservatism, Cuba, Economics, Europe, Fascism, Geopolitics, Government, Journalism, Latin America, Latin American Right, Left, Marxism, Norway, Political Science, Politics, Racism, Regional, Republicans, Scum, Socialism, South America, US Politics, USA, Venezuela, White Racism

Average IQ’s of Liberals Versus Conservatives

Jason Voorhees: Liberals in general have an IQ of 110 or above.

Quite an exaggeration. More like 105. 75% of the population has an IQ below 110. On the other hand, he is onto something.

We don’t call em conservatards for nothing, I guess.

Liberals are actually smarter than conservatives! Quite a bit smarter. And the more liberal you are, the smarter you. And the more conservative you are, the dumber you are. It’s a linear curve.

               IQ
Liberals       106  
Centrists      99
Conservatives  96

Source

I would argue that the reason for that is that conservatism is basically stupid. So of course stupid people support it. Fiscal conservatism is intelligent if you are rich and possibly if you are upper middle class, but it’s idiotic for everyone else because only the top 20% make money under rightwing economics. The entire 80% of the population loses money.

Political ideology

Ha ha! Conservatives are stupid! Liberals are smart! Something we always knew. No wonder they are called conservatards. Neener neener. Conservatives are so stupid they probably spell dumb “dum.” LOL.

Rightwing economics is a massive wealth transfer system from the poor and middle classes to the upper middle class and the rich. It’s basically a scam. Pure class war. Incidentally this has been proved all over the 3rd World, especially in Latin America. Surveys in Latin America under the neoliberal decades of failure showed that only the top 20% benefited under rightwing economics. The entire bottom 80% lost money. Furthermore, death rates skyrocketed and education figures collapsed. Neoliberalism has killed many millions of people. We may not have yet found a good alternative to capitalism, but capitalism surely continues to kill as sure as night follows day.

Oh and there is a reason why liberals control most US institutions. Although the idea of a liberal media is pathetic, 89% of media whores, I mean journalists, call themselves liberal. But universities are liberal. The only major US institution that is not liberal is business, which is conservative for basically self-serving interests because conservatism serves to line their pockets better while it picks the pockets of the poor and middle class. Steal from the poor and give to the rich. Reverse Robin Hood. That’s conservatism in action. The fact that the people calling themselves Christians in the US support Reverse Robin Hood is truly pathetic. Obviously they know nothing about how the Main Man lived his life.

References

Carl, Noah. 2014. Verbal Intelligence Is Correlated with Socially and Economically Liberal Beliefs. Intelligence, Volume 44, Pages 142-148.

Stankov, Lazar. 2009. Conservatism and Cognitive Ability. Intelligence Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 294-304.

Thompson, James. November 29, 2015. US Academics: Lefty and Liberal Because of High IQ? Unz.com.

62 Comments

Filed under Capitalism, Christianity, Conservatism, Death, Economics, Education, Health, Higher Education, Intelligence, Journalism, Latin America, Latin American Right, Liberalism, Neoliberalism, Political Science, Politics, Psychology, Regional, Religion, US Politics, USA

Just Resign Already

Here.

Just get it over with. Enough is enough!

What’s even more frightening than than frighteningly bathetic president is the fact that at any given time, 35-40% of the American people continue to support this psycho. That means that close to 40% of the American people are supporting an out and out fascist from an increasingly openly fascist political party. I don’t care whether they personally identify as fascists or not. They don’t have to. All they have to do is support fascists. That’s all it takes. Their own views are irrelevant.

I wonder if there is anything he could do that would make them quit supporting him? I honestly think he could drop his pants and shit on the White House lawn in front of scores of media cameras, and he would not lose one single point. His fans are with it to the bitter end. They’re going down with the ship, dammit.

87 Comments

Filed under Fascism, Government, Political Science, Politics, Regional, Republicans, US Politics, USA

Pio Baroja

Where’s this guy been all my life? The name sounds familiar, but I didn’t really know anything about him. Another Generation of ’98 writer who barely made it through the Spanish Civil War.

Federico Garcia Lorca, the doomed gay poet, one of the finest poets of the 20th Century, of course was assassinated in this war, but he was from the next generation of Spanish writers, the Generation of ’27. They were much more avant garde than the ’98’ers.

The Generation of ’98 were a whole new crop of Spanish writers who popped up at the turn of the century in Spain. Spain was still a monarchy back then and these were times of fervent. The monarchy was trying to balance between the desire of the people to modernize the humanize their country and the desires of the Church conservatives to keep things as static as they were.

At the same time, in 1898, Spain was reeling from its defeat in several wars around the globe. Thousands of Spaniards were dead, and Spain lost all of its colonies. This was a time of great upheaval in Spain. The ’98’ers attacked traditional culture and the monarchy which they say as conformist and undemocratic. In this sense, they were like the liberal protest movements that arose in Germany after World War 1 who attacked German culture and ways of thinking in the light of their painful defeat in the war.

These liberal movements were met with a conservative backlash or mostly demobbed soldiers who formed gangs called the Brownshirts who fought socialists and communists in the streets of Germany. These conservatives felt that the liberals had “stabbed the country in the back” and been traitorous during the war, leading to the nation’s defeat. One of these demobbed soldiers was an angry, wounded soldier named Adolf Hitler and it was from this Right vs Left firestorm in the streets that the Nazi God of Destruction arose a decade later. The Phoenix rising from the ashes, the regeneration of the illustrious nation of blood and soul, which is fascism in a nutshell. Fascism can best be seen as palingetic revolution of the Right. The word palingetic brings to mind the Phoenix rises to glory from the ashes of defeat.

Baroja was a liberal like most of that generation. He grew up in the Basque Country. He wrote a number of trilogies, including The Sea, The Cities, The Struggle for Life, The Basque Country and a few others. The Struggle for Life is a gritty, harsh trilogy about life in the slums of Madrid. John Dos Passos was very fond of this series. Probably his most famous book is The Tree of Knowledge. Baroja was a pessimist and a nihilist who soured on life at a young age.

I do not mind reading downbeat authors though, even if I am an optimist. Really the optimistic and pessimistic views of life are both true and equally valid.

Baroja was influenced by Nietzsche, but below almost looks like Heidegger. I like the elaborate, ornate, very descriptive prose of the 19th Century. I love the long, fancy sentences where the tail of the sentence almost seems to be the head. I don’t mind getting to the end of a Henry James sentence, commas and all, and then wondering what the start of the sentence was about. It’s fun to decipher fancy writing. People don’t write like this much anymore as it is considered to be too elaborate and difficult for its own sake. I believe some of the finest writing in English was done in the 19th Century though. I can’t get enough of those $64,000 sentences. They’re so good you could almost take them to the bank.

Most of Baroja has not yet been translated into English, though he has been famous in Spain for a century.  Hemingway was heavily influenced by Baroja, although this fact is little known.

Isn’t that some fine writing?

The individual is the only real thing in nature and in life. Neither the species, the genus, nor the race, actually exists; they are abstractions, terminologies, scientific devices, useful as syntheses but not entirely exact. By means of these devices we can discuss and compare; they constitute a measure for our minds to use, but have no external reality. Only the individual exists through himself and for himself. I am, I live, is the sole thing a man can affirm.

The categories and divisions arranged for classification are like the series of squares an artist places over a drawing to copy it by. The lines of the squares may cut the lines of the sketch; but they will cut them, not in reality but only in the artist’s eye. In humanity, as in all of nature, the individual is the one thing. Only individuality exists in the realm of life and in the realm of spirit.

Pio Baroja, Caesar or Nothing, 1903

Leave a comment

Filed under Art, Catholicism, Christianity, Conservatism, Culture, Europe, European, Fascism, Germany, History, Liberalism, Literature, National Socialism, Nazism, Novel, Philosophy, Poetry, Political Science, Regional, Religion, Spain, War, World War 1

What Is Conservatism and Why It is Wrong

Ken Curtis: Don’t really say what or who to you represents American conservatism. If you’re under the assumption that Donald Trump is an American conservative, you are wrong.

Define who or what groups are American conservatives. Regardless, I’m not going anywhere unless you block my happy white ass who loves guns and religion.

I am very curious why Ken Curtis feels that Donald Trump is not a conservative.

I could block you, but if you only refrain from advocating conservative economics, you can post here til the cows come home. I have had conservatives on my site for years. They just post on other stuff, and I write about a lot of other stuff. I would not care if there were 10,000 conservatives on my site as long as they were posting about other stuff. I can’t well ban people because of their thoughts.

I was pretty mad the other day, but I am calmed down now.

I am opposed to Trump and all of his Administration and all of the Republican Party in Congress. That party has turned into a monstrosity. They have finally evolved into an American form of fascism. They’ve been headed down that road slowly since Reagan. Reagan started the long march to fascism.

What I am mostly opposed to is rightwing economics. It’s diabolical. We do not buy into this small government bull. It’s idiocy. Rightwing economics is only good for the rich. If you make over $75,000/yr, go ahead and vote Republican. But less than that, you are getting screwed. The Republican agenda is give everything to the rich and screw everybody else. If you’re rich, I get it, but if you’re not rich, why would you support that?

Americans are stupid. They are too dumb to understand class war. Class war is continuous under capitalism. The Republican agenda is to take as much money as they can from those making under $75,000 and give it to those making over $75,000. As money does not grow on trees, the only way the rich can get richer is to take money from the lower classes. If you make under $75,000, the Republicans are trying to take your money and your stuff and give it to a bunch of rich and upper middle class people. Why would anyone support a bunch of rich people who are picking their pockets?

You absolutely must support a safety net on this board. You can’t advocate even cutting the social safety net or cutting any social programs for that matter on this board. You can think that way, but you cannot voice that opinion here.

If you reject the crap rightwing economics and your only conservatism is in religion, guns, etc. I would even let you post that stuff on my board. Just stay away from partisan posting. I can live with religious conservatives and gun nuts. I can’t live with economic conservatives. I would prefer leukemia.

The problem with conservatism is that conservatives believe in rule by aristocracy. Well, if you are an aristocrat, then conservatism is for you. The Left on the other hand, believes in democratic rule or rule by the people. If democratic rule is rule by the people, then conservatives with their divine rule of kings mindset are against democracy.

And indeed, if you study conservatism down through space and time, one thing that is clear is that conservatives have always opposed democracy. They call it mob rule, rule by the rabble, populism and all sorts of nasty things.

That’s is why we are having all this vote suppression going on. Conservatives are trying to stop democracy by stopping the people from voting. You know what? That’s real crappy. Trying to keep American citizens from voting just because they vote Left. That’s downright evil.

To make matters worse, since 2000, conservatives have been hacking the voting machines and stealing elections. Bush 2000, Bush 2004, and Trump 2016 were all won by computer vote fraud via hacking those computerized voting machines.  They plotted this out very well, and the top Republicans all know that they are hacking the system and stealing elections. They just don’t care. I’m sorry, but I think that is evil. If these people are willing to commit fraud and hack votes and steal elections just to keep the Left out of power, well, they’re just evil. So you can see why I think Republicans are simply evil nowadays.

Are you an aristocrat? Do you support the divine rule of kings. Do you believe that the strong must rule the weak? Do you believe that the  Whites must rule the non-Whites? Do you believe that the rich must rule the non-rich? If you do not believe in these things,  why vote Republican? Because the Republican Party is all about all of these things.

For instance, say you are a deeply religious fundamentalist Protestant and you love your guns, but you are opposed to the Economics of the Rich and you support a strong safety net. I would even allow you to advocate that sort of conservatism on here. I’ve had gun nuts on here for years, and I never banned them. One gun nut has been here for I think seven years now.

35 Comments

Filed under Capitalism, Capitalists, Conservatism, Economics, Fascism, Government, Left, Political Science, Politics, Religion, Republicans, Scum, US Politics

No Conservatives Allowed on This Website!

We have had a few conservatives posting here in the past few days. These are US-style conservatives, which are the worst kind of all. US-style conservatives are absolutely banned from posting here in any way, shape or form.

Conservatism means different things in different countries, so conservatives from much of the rest of the world (except Latin America and the UK) can continue to post. Even Canadian conservatives can continue to post, as I do not mind them. It’s not conservatism itself that is so awful. Almost every country on Earth has people who call themselves conservatives, and there are conservative parties in almost every country on Earth. But being a conservative just about anywhere outside of the Americas is more or less an acceptable position for me. I probably won’t like their politics much, but I could at least look at them and say that this is an opposition I could live with.

US conservatives and their brethren in the UK, Latin America, the Philippines, Nepal and and Indonesia are quite a different beast.

I have to think hard about conservatives in Eastern Europe, especially Estonia, Latvia and the Czech Republic. These fools had such a bad experience with Communism that they went 180 degrees in the other direction. I would have to see the positions of these conservative parties in those countries to see whether they would be OK or not.

Just to give you an example, Vladimir Putin is considered to be a right-winger, and his party United Russia advocates a politics called Russian Conservatism. Looking at the party’s platform, this is not only a conservatism that I could live with but one I might even vote for!

Conservatives in South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Australia, New Zealand, Burma, Thailand, Cambodia, and most other places in Asia are acceptable. The conservatives in the Stans, Georgia, Ukraine, and Armenia can be rather awful, particularly in the nationalist sense, but I will not ban them.

I dislike Indian conservatives, but I will not ban them.

Conservatives from the Muslim World are all acceptable. In the Muslim World, conservatism just means religious and sometimes nationalist. I can live with that. Even the ones in Iran are orders of magnitude better than the US type.

Conservatives in the Arab World are acceptable. They are mostly just religious people.

Turkish conservatives are awful, but I will not ban them. They are just religious and a particularly awful type of nationalist.

African conservatives are OK.

Conservatives in Ireland, France, Spain, Portugal, Germany,  the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Italy, Switzerland, Italy, the Balkans, Bulgaria, Greece, Slovakia, Poland, Hungary, and Romania are sometimes good, sometimes pretty bad, but they are all acceptable here. Conservatism in Europe mostly means nationalism. I am actually rather fond of the conservative running Hungary, Orban. LePen conservatives leave something to be desired, but they are acceptable. They’re mostly just nationalists. Hell, I might even vote for Marine LePen! If it was down to LePen versus Macron, I would absolutely support LePen!

Conservatives from Indonesia, Nepal and Philippines are not OK. These are an “everything for the rich elite, nothing for anybody else” type of conservative. Some of them even hide under the labels of Socialist or even Communist.

The word conservative has no real inherent meaning. It means whatever people say it means.

Anyway, the conservatives in the US are pure garbage and recently they have become out and out fascists after moving in that direction for a long time. And a particularly horrible type of fascist at that, a Latin American/Filipino/Indonesian style fascist. I will not allow any US conservatives to post on this board. You all are lucky I even let you lurk here. That’s an idle threat as I can’t ban lurkers, but if they all stopped lurking, I would not mind frankly.

You all really ought to go back to the gutters you crawled out of.

PS This especially applies to Libertarians, the very worst of all the US conservative vermin. We shoot Libertarians on sight here, so you better watch out.

*This applies only to economic conservatives. If you are not an economic conservative, and your conservatism is only of the social variety or you are only conservative on race, religion, guns, law and order, respect for tradition, American nationalism, the military, gender, sexual orientation or gender identity issues, you can stay. I’m not crazy about some social conservatives, but I can live with them. I will probably even let patriotards post as long as they are not economic conservatives.

I am an American nationalist myself. I just don’t like patriotards. Of course, I very much dislike and even hate the country as it is right now, but I sure don’t want to make it worse! I have to live here too you now, and it might as well be as pleasant as possible as long I stay here.

I want what’s best for my country. I don’t want to harm this country or screw it over. That will be bad for me! And believe it or not, most US patriotards do not want what is best for the country! I have dreams of a greater and better America. It’s not impossible, but we will have to undergo some serious cultural changes. One of the reasons I am so against illegal immigration is because it is ruining my country and making this place even worse. Also illegal immigration is terrible for US workers and I am for the workers. I am against H-1B visas for the same reason – they are wrecking my country. IT workers are workers too, so they are my comrades. I want what is best for America and American workers.

I cannot live with economic conservatives. I like cancer way more than I like US conservatives. Cancer is much more decent and respectable.

5 Comments

Filed under Africa, Armenia, Asia, Australia, Belgium, Britain, Cambodia, Conservatism, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Economics, Eurasia, Europe, Fake Guest Workers, Fascism, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Illegal, Immigration, India, Indonesia, Iran, Ireland, Islam, Italy, Japan, Labor, Latin America, Left, Libertarianism, Marxism, Middle East, Nationalism, NE Asia, Near East, Nepal, Netherlands, Norway, Philippines, Poland, Political Science, Portugal, Regional, Religion, Romania, Russia, SE Asia, South Asia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine, USA

Death of a Theory and Clearing of More POI’s in the Delphi Murders

NOTE TO COMMENTERS 1:

I am getting tired of saying this over and over, but most of the material below is made up of rumors and my own opinions and theories. None of that is represented as fact. Furthermore, I am not using rumors as reliable sources as has been alleged. I never said they were reliable sources. How reliable is a rumor? That’s for you to determine, but in general a rumor is not considered to be a reliable source, and they are not treated as such below. 

Also when I say I am 100% sure of something, that means that I am 100% sure of it in my own mind. All of us are 100% sure of all sorts of things we cannot prove. That’s the nature of the human condition. We simply assume many things are facts until proven otherwise. Now many of these things that I was completely certain of were later proven to be wrong. Such is the case with many other things people become certain of in their own mind. Once again, when I say I am sure or certain or 100% certain, it means only that I am sure in my own mind. I am not stating that any of these things are facts. They are simply my convictions. Any of all of these firmly held beliefs of mine about this case could possibly will later prove to be false.

The only thing that is represented as fact are statements sourced from LE or the media. If you have issues with rumors, theories, opinions. etc., just quit reading right now and save yourself the heartache. 

NOTE TO COMMENTERS 2:

I thought I made this one thing perfectly clear as Richard Nixon used to say:

I have no sources whatsoever among the families of the girls.

I have no sources whatsoever in LE, local or otherwise. 

There ya go.

What I do have is sources close to the families. These people generally live in Delphi and the surrounding region. So that makes my rumors even more hearsay. I’m not even talking to the families. I am talking to people who talk to the families!

Of course I have no LE sources. I thought I made that clear. Never have. Yes, I have talked to some of them, but of course they didn’t tell me a thing. A couple of times they told me that a certain person was a POI or that a certain person had been cleared with an airtight alibi. I suppose they don’t mind giving out that information. But other than that, they don’t tell me jack. It’s hard enough to even get them to call you back. I think if I asked them if my name was Robert Lindsay, they would say, “I am sorry, but I cannot comment on matters relating to an ongoing investigation.” That’s how bad it is.

So what do I have? Once again, I have sources who are close to LE. They get their information from LE, then they talk to me. So once again this is even more hearsay, as I am not even talking to LE but to the people who are talking to LE.

I really wish people would quit claiming I have LE or family sources. I just don’t. If you think I have these sources, just quit reading my stuff right now and go away. You will not be missed!

NOTE TO COMMENTERS 3: The lies never end. The latest is “Lindsay takes other people’s theories and claims they are his own.” Of course I don’t. This website is nothing but a compendium of rumors from all over the Net regarding this crime. I go through the rumors and try to rank them on a scale of weak to strong. I compare them against other rumors to see which one is better. All sorts of theories have been flying around since day one. I report those too.

The theories are really just more rumors. I’d say the vast majority of the rumor theories reported here were thought up by other people. I find most of my theories on other sites about this crime. That’s how it works, you know. You get theories about the crime from others. Yes, you use your own theories and you use other people’s theories. I really do not have time to down through the list of theories and say where I got them from. I have come up with a few of my own, but even with those, I guess someone else thought of them first. Also a lot of the theories here are also the result of constant brainstorming I do with my fellow sleuths.

In a homicide, all theories must be considered, all of them, no exception. There is no theory that may not be considered on some grounds like it would upset the persons who are suspected. LE doesn’t care if you don’t like being a suspect. Neither does anyone else. There are no theories that are false right out of the starting gate because the people involved are too nice or groovy to do such a thing.

I was a suspect in this crime myself. Quite a few silly retarded and brain-injured women, maybe a few dozen, reported me to the police for killing those girls. I even got a call from an ISP detective about it. I was not really worried, as I was in California the whole time, and in fact, I have not left this state 3 1/2 years. Further, I have never set one foot in Indiana. It didn’t really bother me that the detective called me. They have to consider all leads, and I was a viable suspect for the reason that the tipsters felt that I knew so much about the crime that I must have committed it. That’s a reasonable hypothesis.

However, all of that information was gleaned by me from available rumors about the crime. I didn’t commit this crime, so I’m not worried about being charged or even people thinking I did it. People who wish to think I did this crime can continue to knock themselves out. Go for it. They can accuse me of committing any other nasty unsolved crimes out there too while they’re at it. Actually the nastier the crime is, the more they should accuse me of it. If I am as awful as my enemies think, there’s clearly no limit to my depravity. Why should I care? I didn’t do any of those nasty unsolved homicides out there. I’m quite certain of that. So my enemies can accuse me of these things until the cows come home.

After considering all of the theories so far, a theory promoted by two women from the area was brought to my attention. This theory first of all involved MP and CP. The women felt that MP was definitely involved, and CP may have been involved too. This was an interesting theory with some nice evidence behind it, but I feel that the evidence was not good.

MP has been accused of this crime by many people since Day One. CP is a newer name that is coming up a lot. Anyway, after deep study, my conclusion is that both CP and MP are innocent of the murders of Abigail Williams and Liberty German. The main rejoinder is that both men have airtight alibis for the time of the crime. In addition, much of the evidence against them falls apart on examination. Nevertheless, it was important to consider these men as suspects. Interesting evidence was available, and we even had a coherent theory to go along with it.

There were two other men involved in these women’s theory. In their opinion, these men were the main ones behind the crime. Their names are BS Senior and MS. This theory was based on the premise that Abigail Williams was discovered to be pregnant on autopsy with BS Junior’s baby, BS Junior being Abigail’s girlfriend. The pregnancy rumor is like the zombies in Night of the Living Dead. People keep shooting it down, but it keeps getting up and walking again. This theory just will not die. Most recently, I talked to a member of Abbie’s family who is close to Anna Williams. She told me that her best theory was the botched abortion theory. This implies to me that the pregnancy rumor carries some weight if even the closest family members seem to believe it.

Poor Abbie was also found with a stake driven into her stomach or abdomen. Attempts have been made to shoot down this theory too, but they have not been common.

Furthermore, someone mentioned that Abbie was impaled in this way in a discussion on a site that is frequented by family members. No one said a thing, and if it was false, they would have all jumped up to smash it down.

A Delphi man posted a crime scene photo on his private website. It was seen by a number of people. The website owner and the people who saw the photo all concurred that Abbie had a stake driven into her. This seems like pretty good evidence to me.

No one quite knows how she was impaled in this way. At first we thought that the killer did it at the dump site, dumping the girls and then driving the stake into the girl before he left.

A recent rumor said she was impaled via the vagina up into her stomach or abdomen. That’s actually a worse way to go. If impaled from above, she may have died quickly. If the stake was driven horizontally instead of vertically, she may well have suffered an agonizing and drawn-out death. A horizontal impalement looks like a botched attempt at an abortion.

Indian women used to give themselves abortions in this way, but they used more caution of course. It was called sticking. They poked a stick up through the cervix into the uterus and moved it around until the stick dislodged the fetus from the uterine wall. Once the fetus is torn off the wall, it is going to die. This will result in the woman having what looks like the Mother of all Periods or even a miscarriage. The fabled wire coat hanger approach worked via the same method.

Even with a vertical impalement, it’s a strange way to kill a girl even as rapist-murderers go. Once again a vertical impalement would look like one final attempt to kill a fetus.

The theory that Abbie was pregnant and the evidence that she was impaled with a sharp stick in the stomach taken together imply an attempt to abort Abbie’s pregnancy and kill the fetus. 

The logical suspects in that case would be the family of the boy who got her pregnant. Presumably they might want to kill a 13 year old girl’s fetus if she refused to get an abortion so as to spare a young son a lifetime of child support payments and the shame of being a teenage father. It’s actually an excellent theory, and LE must consider all theories, if only to rule them out.

According to these women, BS Senior and MS, older relatives of BS Junior, conspired to do this crime in order to abort Abbie’s fetus.

One theory is that they just tried to terrorize her or scare her and things got out of hand. Libby was watching and went wild watching her friend being subjected to an amateur abortion. She ran towards the men and attacked them.

The men were alarmed, stopped the amateur abortion, and wrestled with Libby. Libby was very strong and things got out of hand real fast. All of this was all taking place in the Mears barn. The men reached around and found some baling wire in the barn and used it to double garrot Libby. Libby fought hard and injured her fingers in the double garroting. Now that Libby was dead, the men were panicked. This is not how things were supposed to go. They had intended to leave Abbie alive, but now she was a witness to the murder of her friend. She had to be killed too.

After they killed (or tried to kill) Abbie, they waited nervously in the barn watching until the searchers left. Between 3-7 AM, the coast was clear to put the girls in the car, drive the car across the street to the cemetery, drive to the SE gate of a cemetery where there is an unlocked gate, open the gate, and drive 10 feet onto Ron Logan’s horse pasture. Here there is a trail that the men use to drag the girls down to the dump site, where they were covered with leaves.

Poor Abbie was still alive, and she lingers for an unknown length of time. One source put her time of death at 9 AM. If she was impaled horizontally, she could indeed have lingered for 2-6 hours there, but she would have suffered terribly.

The rumored cause of death was exposure. Abbie somehow did not lose much blood, so this presumably enabled her to survive longer. Or maybe it was sheer willpower. In her weakened state in the cold weather and being naked in the forest, she could have easily died from exposure to the elements.

Of all of the theories put out there so far, this is the only one that was even coherent at all. I now feel that the crime did not take place this way ,and I no longer feel that the crime was a result of a botched abortion. I am also rejecting the murder to end the problematic pregnancy by the boys’ older male relatives theory. It was an excellent theory, but the more we looked at it, it didn’t hold up.

We never had much evidence against the S family. What little was there was certainly tantalizing, and I will go over it in a future post.

This theory bit the dust very quickly when we learned that the women had gotten the boyfriend’s name wrong. They had combined his first name with the S last name, creating a boy who did not exist named JS. After a while, we were corrected that Abbie’s boyfriend was actually a 16 year old boy named LH.

BS Junior is the actual name of the S boy who we mistakenly thought was her boyfriend. He is actually a former boyfriend, and they are still friends. Now that we knew that the S boy was not the boyfriend, the motive for the S boy’s older relatives to commit homicide to end a troublesome pregnancy vanished. The S men, no matter what evidence we had against them, no longer had any motive at all to commit this crime.

With the evaporation of the motive for both MS and BS Senior commit the murders gone as BS Junior was not her boyfriend, we felt we needed to clear MS and BS Senior of involvement. There is still some interesting evidence involving both men, and BS Junior was supposed to meet the girls there that day but failed to make it. This too may be a piece of the puzzle as maybe the killer knew the girls would be at the bridge that day via BS Junior’s statements of social media posts. We initially thought that that was how BS Senior and MS knew the girls would be there. BS Junior was never a suspect in this crime, but the fact that he was supposed to meet the girls there that day and may have discussed it with others or on social media seems to be good evidence. Did the killer hear him talking about this? Did the killer see his social media posts about this meeting?

This is a roundabout way of saying that I consider BS Senior and MS at the moment to be innocent of the murders of Abigail Williams and Liberty German. BS Senior and MS can unlock their Facebook pages, which got locked up soon after people started talking about them.

Honestly we never had much on them anyway, although the evidence was certainly interesting if true. I will go over the evidence against these men and my rejoinders to that evidence in a future post.

Jason Holder

JH, 16, with a new girlfriend after the death of Abbie Williams. I believe he had nothing to do with this crime, and no one has ever suspected him anyway. I wish him the best of luck in the rest of his life.

This led us to the name of the real boyfriend and rumored father of Abbie’s unborn child, LH. He is 16 years old. His relatives are protesting furiously that Abbie was not pregnant, and they are threatening libel lawsuits left and right, but I’m not naming any names, so they won’t get anywhere. Anyway, you can’t libel a dead girl. Sorry. In addition, in order to prove that I libeled that dead girl, even if I did, one would have to prove that she was not pregnant. Best of luck proving that.

LH, who is also hysterical, may be reassured that none of us ever considered him a suspect in this crime. Instead we felt that an older relative may have committed the crime. We went back to the old theory of Abbie being killed to end a problematic pregnancy that threatened to ruin a teenage boy’s life. The suspect in this case would be BH, LH’s father.

BH is having conniption fits because he thinks we are talking about him, but no one is using his name, so Sparky needs to chill. Also from what I can tell, BH’s reputation is as low as whale shit, and that’s at the bottom of the ocean. Libel via defamation of character only works where the person has decent character or a good reputation to begin with. It’s pretty hard to defame someone who has a horrible reputation to start with. The thinking is, “How can it get any lower?” and “Everyone hates him anyway,” so libel seems preposterous.

Furthermore, according to LE, BH was already a suspect in this case, but according to BH, he was cleared. If BH was already an official LE suspect in this case, why is having epileptic fits over people suggesting that he’s a suspect in this case? I mean that’s a fact, right?

One wonders why LE would theorize that the father of Abbie’s boyfriend committed this crime. Could they be considering the same termination of problematic pregnancy via botched abortion to preserve the reputation and finances of Abbie’s boyfriend theory that we were onto? They must be considering the same theory because otherwise there is no reason to suspect BH.

Further, despite BH’s fumings, we are not the only people to suspect him of this crime. BH made a post a while ago complaining that local people were accusing him of committing the Delphi Murders.

He said he was innocent and claimed that police had cleared him. He also said he was hiring someone (presumably his Cousin Vinnie in Detroit) to go take care of the person who had turned him in.

As you can see, BH is not exactly a fine upstanding citizen! But he’s not a bad guy or anything like that! No way! He’s nice!

support your local heathens

A charming, warmhearted symbol from the webpage of the soft-spoken BH.

In fact, BH is a very dark character, a practitioner of the occult who wears all black, delights in looking as sinister and evil as possible, and gives of the general air of a devil worshiper or Satanist. Go to his Facebook site if you do not believe me. This is man who has cultivated an image of himself as the heir to Aleister Crowley’s throne and who seems to be in competition with Anton LeVay to see who can be the evillest man alive.

He is also a practitioner of Odinism, but many Odinists are also occultists and Satanists, and BH is clearly the Odinist-Satanist variety or at least he’s putting on an Academy Award winning act of being one.

There is a lot of overlap between the two. People have described BH to me as a racist of the White Supremacist type. “He has so much hate and anger in him. He’s such a frightening person,” one local told us.

Indeed, the overwhelming majority of Odinists in the US are also White Supremacists. In fact, I have never heard of an Odinist who is not a White Supremacist in the US.

There were some death metal types in Scandinavia who may not have been racists, but they were definitely Satanists. Odinists in Scandinavia who are followers of these bands are known for the charming act of burning down churches. In one famous case, a member of an Odinist death metal band murdered his bandmate and then ate part of the poor fellow’s brain, adding insult to injury. I believe he then committed suicide himself. I may have the facts mixed up. If so, someone help me out.

Anyway, you can see that even when these lovely Odinist fellows are not actual racists, then they are actual Satanists. And many of the racist types are also occultists or Satanists. BH has a photo of himself at a ceremony where a group of men are wearing black hoods and holding candles in the dark. I looked at that and the first thing I thought was, “Black Mass.” The Satanist vibe is overwhelming. I have now been told that this one not one of those evil Satanist ceremonies. Instead it was one of those kind, loving, innocuous Odinist gatherings. Excuse me for confusing the two!

BH has some pretty weird associates. His own girlfriend, VM, is heavy into witchcraft. Her pages are full of dark, creepy and Satanic imagery. Not that she’s a Satanist or anything like that! She’s probably the Good Witch of the West!

SHH appears to be the mother of LH. Looking at her friends list, SHH has some mighty strange associates herself.

One associate, JH, could pass for Bridge Guy. He is a very dark man and has a lot of disturbing and creepy quotes on his page. He appears to be an actual member of a gently caressing rock group called Pure Evil. Not that that would raise any eyebrows! If you go to the page of the harmless and innocent Pure Evil band, they have many dark, creepy, and disturbing pics on that site. Many of them are hard to even look at. That’s how bad they are.

As you can see, BH’s extended family and friends contain a lot of creepy and scary people. A number of them are way off into the Dark Side, for whatever that’s worth. That means they are de facto Satanists if you want the shorthand.

The Case Against BH

BH is a dark, disturbing man, a practitioner of Odinism and probably Satanism. If he’s not a Satanist, he does the best imitation east of the Mississippi, which is apparently his intention. Sources who have looked at his Facebook page have described him variously as “evil, pure evil, frightening and terrifying.” He appears to be the type of person who is capable of committing crimes like these.

BH was so upset that someone would dare to turn him in as a suspect in this crime that he threatened to send one of his gangster tough associates out to teach them a lesson, probably by menacing them and possibly by assaulting them or worse. So BH likes to threaten and menace people.

BH did not seem particularly upset by the girls’ deaths. In one post, he complained about having to take his son to the girls’ funerals. Considering his son was the boyfriend of one of the girls and possibly the father of her unborn baby, BH’s comment seems remarkably callous.

BH does not appear to like women very much. He has some very angry anti-woman posts on his Facebook site.

BH, while not resembling BG, may in fact resemble BG’s helper visible in the photo of Abbie on the bridge.

Rejoinders to the Charges Against BH

I really hate to defend this piece of work because he’s such a nasty fellow. Furthermore, this tool, his foolish son and his other lame family members are all threatening to sue me for libel. Nevertheless, fair is fair, and while he’s clearly not a very nice person, I do not think he is a killer. His son LH was never a suspect in my book in the first place, so there is no evidence to counter.

rites of odin

Rites of Odin. Sorry, nope, not a fun and games religion. In the US, all or almost all Odinists are White Supremacists and occult believes and Satanism are also common. In Scandinavia, you may have non-racist Odinists, but they are nevertheless Satanists who like to burn churches, kill each other and eat each other’s brains and other harmless fun and games. Odinists are not very nice people!

BH is a dark, disturbing man, a practitioner of Odinism and probably Satanism. Sources who have looked at his Facebook page have described him variously as “evil, pure evil, frightening, and terrifying.” He very much appears to be the type of person who is capable of committing crimes like these: Just because someone looks bad doesn’t mean they actually do bad things, and in particular, just because this fellow looks like a very bad man (obviously his intention), does not mean that he committed these murders.

LE considered him a suspect: Yes, and according to BH, they cleared him, too.

Many people accused him of committing these crimes: Many people accused me of killing  those girls too, and I was 2,000 miles away. I’d love to figure out how to kill people from 2,000 miles away because some of my enemies clearly deserve it, but alas, it doesn’t seem to be possible. I’ve tried everything, believe me.

BH was so upset that someone would dare to turn him in as a suspect in this crime that he threatened to send one of his gangster tough associates out to teach them a lesson, probably by menacing them and possibly by assaulting them or worse. So BH likes to threaten and menace people: Yep, he’s not a nice guy! He enjoys threatening and menacing people, which goes along with his Beelzebub persona. Threatening someone who accuses you of committing a crime is one thing, raping and murdering young teenage girls, quite another.

BH did not seem particularly upset by the girls’ deaths. In one post, he complains about having to take his son to the girls’ funerals. Considering his son was the boyfriend of one of the girls and possibly the father of her unborn baby, BH’s comment seems remarkably callous: Damn right that’s callous, but Mr. BH is not a very nice man, and this callousness goes with the territory. I’m sure he’s quite happy to be a callous prick, as he seems to cultivate a persona like that. Not caring a whole lot about the girls’ (including the girlfriend of his own son!) horrible deaths is one thing. Guys like BH are not real caring individuals, nor do they wish to be. On the other hand, being callous about their deaths does not mean that he killed those girls. He’s clearly a callous bastard, but he’s not a murderer.

BH does not appear to like women very much. He has some very angry anti-woman posts on his Facebook site:  I’ve got some news for you all. Men like BH who cultivate an aura of evil and menace, practice frightening occult religions like Odinism with strong overtones of violence and blood sacrifice, are White Supremacists, and threaten to send their toughs out to sort out people who diss them also tend not like women very much. These men are very macho and often extremely conservative. Indeed, BH is an extremely conservative politically just as we would expect.

unnamed

A ceremony of shy, mild-mannered Odinists. Notice they’re all White? That’s no accident. At first I thought this was some sort of a Satanic rite, and the overlap between Odinists and Satanists is high. In the US, all or almost all Odinists are White Supremacists. This religion also has deep fascist roots.

There is strong overlap between Odinism,  Satanism, of course White Supremacism and fascism. While I am uncertain if BH is a fascist, fascist organizations dating back to the 1920’s were very heavily populated with men exactly like him. Indeed, BH is nearly a prototype of the men who formed Brownshirt gangs in the streets.

Let me tell you something about fascist men. They don’t like women very much. Many are heterosexual (but quite a few others are not!), but they tend to look down on women as inferior creatures. The Fuhrer said the woman’s place was the home, the kitchen and raising children. The original German had three k’s in it, but I forget it now. Fascist organizations often promote very backwards and traditional roles for women.

Fascist men are men’s man who prefer the company of men to the women they consider inferior. These men’s disdain for women is part of why that there is a high rate of male homosexuality (of the leather tough type, albeit) among fascist adherents. Popular MRA author Jack Donovan is an archetype of this sort of man. Fascist organizations are all-male affairs because women are not thought to be capable of making important decisions, as they are too irrational and unstable for leadership.

All of this is a roundabout way of saying, “Well, if BH doesn’t like women too much, what do you expect?” This sort of deep sexism is just what you would expect in such a fellow. And misogyny is not illegal yet. I am sure the feminists are getting around to it. Casual misogyny is so common among heterosexual men that I would almost consider it to be the norm. Oh, what little you women know about us men!

So if BH is a sexist and misogynist, OK, he has tens of millions of other American he-men who feel the same way. He’s not alone. With at least 20 million casual misogynists among American men, clearly they can’t all be rapists and killers. Most sexist and misogynist men probably never commit a serious violent crime against a female. Even among those who do, it’s often limited to date rape, wife or girlfriend rape, wife or girlfriend beating, threats, menacing,  etc.

Just because BH may not be fond of women doesn’t mean he’s a rapist-murderer!

Further Acquitting Evidence for BH

People who have been to BH’s page describe him as optimistic, upbeat and very much into self-improvement. He wants to be alive and free and seems well centered despite his odd beliefs. This would seem to argue against the sort of disturbed psyche who would commit this offense.

Some who have gone to BH’s site have said that BH and LH both seem to be broken up over this horror. Although the callous funeral comments argue against that, perhaps BH is a complex fellow.

BH has long had a full dark beard. Bridge Guy has no beard. BH could not have shaved off his beard in time to do this crime and then grown it back so long already.

BH seems to be the wrong height and weight for Bridge Guy. BH seems to be quite a bit heavier than Bridge Guy. He also appears shorter. BG is approximately 5’10, 180 pounds. BH seems shorter and heavier than that. The body type is not correct.

Perhaps most importantly of all, if BH is correct and he may well be, then LE has already cleared this suspicious but ultimately innocent man.

BH, while not resembling BG, may in fact resemble BG’s helper visible in the photo of Abbie on the bridge. I have seen the photo in question, and I do not see any man in that photo, much less a man who looks like BH.

BG6-001

This is BH, the man with the carefully cultivated Mr. Evil Satanist persona who claims I am ruining his good reputation. I wasn’t aware he had one. He is not well-liked, and sources have described him to me as a racist full of hate and anger. But he’s actually a really nice guy! No really! The photos to the right were sent to me by a source who says that they can see BH in the circled area of the photo. I do not see BH or any other human in that circled area. In addition, I am quite certain that BH had nothing to do with this crime.

In conclusion, I believe that both BH and of course LH are innocent of the murders of Abigail Williams and Liberty German.

You know this post won’t satisfy these characters, and they and their ridiculous family will continue to issue silly libel threat lawsuits against me. You just can’t win with some people. You tell them you think they’re innocent, and they still want to beat you up. Go figure.

If you enjoy the hard work that goes into this website, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site. Donations are the only thing that keep the site operating.

72 Comments

Filed under Crime, Fascism, Feminism, Gender Studies, Law, Law enforcement, Midwest, Music, Political Science, Racism, Regional, Religion, Rock, USA, White Racism, Women

US Patriotism as Fundamentalist Religion

Tony Swagger: Read this, EPGAH

Hell EPGAH probably wants a war with Russia.

EPGAH thinks exactly like almost 100% of Americans. Almost all Americans think that US foreign policy can do no wrong. Everything the US does foreign policy-wise is always 100% good and 0% bad. We are always good. We are always the angels. We are never bad. We are never the evildoers.

The Pentagon is always good. The Army is always good. Even the CIA is always good. The vast majority of liberal Democrats I know love the Pentagon, the Army and even the CIA!

It is almost a religious way of thinking. It is extremely prominent to the point where it is very hard to find one American anywhere who will say one word against US foreign policy. I think people believe it is unpatriotic. Foreign policy is the essence of the nation. Attack foreign policy or that silly army with its twisted psychopathic generals and you are spitting right on that darned flag itself. The army is the country. The Pentagon is America. The Pentagon, the army and the flag are all the same thing. They are all America, part of the secular God of patriotism.

Domestic policy can be good or bad, but the country is always still good. If domestic policy sucks, it is not because the country sucks but because the party who put in the domestic policy sucks. People I know always think America is pristine, pure, all white and angelic. If domestic policy is crap, it is because of those evil Republicans. Republicans pure black, pure evil, 100% devils. Democrats wear all white all year, are never wrong and are always right. If you criticize the Godly Democrats than you are one of the dark ones, the Republican evildoers.

They really don’t get that it’s Americans who elect the government. Unless you live in a dictatorship, if your government is crap, it’s because you are crap! Crappy governments exist because crappy humans put them in there. The state is always a reflection of the people. Lousy people, lousy state. Good people, good state. It’s pretty simple. But the people I know never see it that way.

America itself is always that shining city on the Hill, forever fighting for good against the forces of Darkness the world over. Even if right now we are sliding into fascism, the country itself is still pure, virginal and innocent of all guilt. The party sucks, but the country is good. The government sucks, but the country is good. The party and the government suck, but the people are still good.

It’s a very weird way to think. As I write this, I can’t help thinking that this is a fundamentalist religious way of looking at patriotism. American patriotism is a fundamentalist religion as nutty and irrational as any other group of Talibans.

This rabid, lunatic patriotism will be the last thing to ever die as we continue to swirl down this golden toilet we built for ourselves, our shrine to our culture in decline and fall. Even when we are crumbling amidst the ruins, barely able to stand, emaciated, homeless and deadly ill, our dying hands will still reach for that silly flag and wave it in the air like the little children we are.

6 Comments

Filed under American, Culture, Democrats, Fascism, Government, Liberalism, Military Doctrine, Political Science, Politics, Regional, Religion, US Politics, USA