Category Archives: Lolitas

Extremely Disturbing “Pedophilia” Video

There is actually some truth to this. Quite a few minors who were “victims” of “pedophiles” feel this way, male and female. However, to be fair, most of the accounts that I have read were from people who were teenagers at the time having sex with adults. It is quite common for people who had sexual relationships with adults as teens to feel that the experience was positive. I have read quite a few such accounts.

However, this is the first account I have read from someone who was an actual child – under the age of 13 – who said that they enjoyed the experience. She was 12 and he was 23 when they met. The relationship continued for a year until she was 13 and he was 24, and they forced him to move.

I do not think kids (people under age 13) ever really want to have sex with anyone much, especially adults. They do engage in childhood sex play a lot, but they’re not doing that because they’re horny, and they want to get laid. They’re doing it because they’re curious.

However, when I was 20, a 12 year old girl propositioned me, that is, she asked me to have sex with her. I worked as a janitor at an elementary school and as a 6th grader at age 11, she was my little “best friend.” She was my “little helper.” She befriended me for some reason and used to go on my rounds with me “helping me” on my job.

She talked a lot about what was going on in her life. She was the child of a single Mom, and she told me about how her Mom used to get drunk and have different men over to have sex with them. So she was pretty worldly, 11 going on 20, in that respect.

If you ask me if I had any sexual feelings for this 11 year old girl, I would not know how to answer because honestly I am not aware if I ever saw her in a sexual way. 11 years old girls are not something I think of as sexual beings or sex objects. To me, they seem “sexless.”

I saw her that summer in the park where we both were running. Now she was 12 going on 25. We got to talking, and she out and out more or less asked me to have sex with her.

Her: I’ve been thinking about sex a lot lately.
Me: Um, uh, yeah, ok…
Her: I’m thinking I want to do it.
Me: Uh, yeah, um, well, uhhh…
Her: And I’m thinking I want to do it with you!

I forget what I said afterwards, but it was something like thanks but no thanks.

Because she asked me to have sex with her, that turned into a sexual type experience in my Sexual History file in my brain. Although she was beautiful and interesting in other ways (top student, star athlete), I wasn’t really interested in having sex with her, and it was not just because of the law. She just didn’t seem like someone I could have sex with at that age. She was just way too young.

In later years, I used to try to fantasize about having sex with her, not because I am into 12 year old girls (I absolutely am not) but more because I am a pervert and I love to think about all sorts of weird, perverted sexual stuff just for the heck of it and as a way of telling society to go to Hell.

The weird thing is I could never make the fantasy work. In the fantasy, we would both be naked next to a bed and I would go to have sex with her, and it never worked. I simply could not and to this day cannot imagine having sex with such a young girl. I do not know what it is. She’s too little and I’m too big. Her vagina is too small and my penis is too big. She has almost zero tits. Or maybe just I’m too old and she’s too young. Whatever it is, the two parts of that fantasy, her and me, are like oil and water.

Anyway, this is an extremely disturbing video that adds a very weird new angle to the whole insane Pedophile debate, an angle that is sure ti ignite a lot of hot emotions.

If you ask me what I think should be done in such cases, I really have no idea. My basic view is men should not be messing with 12 year old girls. It’s just too much of a little girl. It’s just about real pedophilia, and the Hell with pedophilia.

If I think about it more, maybe we should look at this stuff at least with regard to teens and adults more on a case by case basis, and if the minor is totally fine with it, that is, if it is completely consensual, maybe we should not prosecute. But maybe in a case this this, we should tell them to knock it off. Which is precisely how the police dealt with it in this case. But I am not sure of those opinions either, as my feelings are pretty embryonic about this sort of thing.

Right now the law is pretty clear, and any man messing with a 12 year old girl, consensual or not, deserves whatever is coming to him. Not because he’s a bad guy necessarily but more because he’s an idiot. The laws are deadly about this sort of thing, and any man breaking those laws is insanely reckless and I have no sympathy for him or reckless fools in general. I generally feel that reckless fools deserve whatever comes to them, good or bad. They’re asking for it.

26 Comments

Filed under Girls, Law, Lolitas, Mass Hysterias, Pedophile Mass Hysteria, Pedophilia, Sex

Is “Pedophilia” Normal in Adult Men?

I have studied a number of studies that have tested how widespread pedophilic interest is in adult males in the lab. The tests show various things. The results can be summed up below.

83% of men react strongly to adolescent girls
54% react to little girls
20% show a “pedophilic” response – strong response to little girls as strong or stronger than their reaction to adults
1% are preferential pedophiles

Men’s sexual attraction to adolescent females.

Several studies have shown that the rate is actually higher than listed above.

One study found that 100% of males react strongly to all females age 13+

Another study found that 83% of Italian military recruits reacted strongly to 13 year old girls.

Another study found that all adult men react to girls age 16-17 at the same rate as they reacted to older women. Reactions to girls age 13-15 were less but were still 70-90% of maximum.

I do not care at all if men are turned on by teenage girls because when a  man tells me he is turned on by teenage girls, to me that just means he’s normal.

You notice that feminists have a real problem with this idea that men are turned on by teenage girls.

Men with sexual attraction to little girls.

Next comes attraction to little girls, a time bomb of a discussion. But even this study found that 53% of normal men are physically aroused by little girls. I am sure that is shocking to most people. However, I have seen other studies in which much higher percentages were reported.

Two reported that all men were attracted to little girls. In one group, the men were aroused by females aged 7-12 and in the other to females age 2-12.

Another study found that 90% of men were turned on by girls age 2-12.

I am not sure if the two studies simply aggregated that 2-12 group together and tallied up the group as a whole or if they found that men were attracted to girls at every age of that group. I find it stunning that men would be turned on by very little girls, but anything is possible.

The one study that broke little girls down by age found men attracted to girls aged 7-12 but no attraction below age 7, which is logical to me. The attraction to girls age 7-12 ranged from 10-60%, with declining attraction as the girls got younger. This also seems logical to me. I find the idea that men are attracted to girls age 7-12 understandable, but I can’t stomach the idea that normal men are attracted to girls age 2-6. That’s just crazy. Normal men are not babyfuckers.

Men with both strong sexual attraction to mature females and strong or pedophilic attraction to little girls.

Now we come to the most shocking realization of all, that anywhere from 20-26% of all men test “pedophilic” in the lab. That means that they are as attracted to little girls just as much or more than they are attracted to mature females. That is a very high level of attaction to little girls; in fact, it is as high as the attraction that actual preferential pedophiles experience.

One wonders why 20-25% of all men are not seeking out child porn or molesting children. I assume that if you are maximally or highly attracted to mature females, even if you are turned on by little girls at a high level, you would probably just ignore or even suppress your attraction to little girls and simply focus on mature females instead. You would do this because attraction to little girls, not to mention having sex with them, is seen as anywhere from societally unacceptable to say the least to a criminal act of the worst sort.

Men with preferential pedophilic sexual attraction to little girls.

And here we find a critical difference: the difference between a preferential pedophile and a man with a mere pedophilic response. The difference is that the former is not turned on by mature females at all, while the latter is strongly to maximally attracted to them. The preferential pedophile is a man who is very turned on by little girls but has little to no interest in mature females. So the only way he can fulfill his sexual orientation is by committing a crime.

Preferential pedophiles are dangerous for this very reason. This is because the only thing the gets them off is little girls, and mature females do nothing for them. In order to fulfill his sexual desires, the preferential pedophile has to have sex with a little girl, a serious crime. And preferential pedophiles are much more likely than men with both strong pedophilic and mature attractions to be seriously wrapped up in fantasies about sex with little girls to the point where they are fantasizing about sex with little girls and masturbating to those fantasies a good part of their time.

In a word, the preferential pedophile is simply obsessed with having sex with little girls. The other 20-26% of men who react similar to pedophiles in regard to little girls have the advantage of being highly attracted to mature females also. Therefore, they can just blow off their antisocial pedophilic attaction and focus on the socially acceptable attraction to mature females.

This study found that 1% of men were preferential pedophiles. Another study found .1% or 1 in 1000 men were pedophiles. I am not sure which figure is correct, but it would probably not surprise me if 1% of all men were actual preferential pedophiles. Nevertheless, that is a shocking figure to behold. That means 1 million preferential pedophiles in the US alone. That means 340 preferential pedophiles in my small city alone.

A few conclusions:

All or almost all men are attracted to teenage girls. Such attraction is natural, normal and healthy. There is nothing wrong with it. It’s not sick or evil or pedophilic or any of those things, and anyone who says it is is either insane or retarded or both.

53-100% of all men are attracted to little girls but generally at a level substantially lower than their attraction to mature females. Therefore, being attracted to little girls, at least on a minor level, is completely normal in adult males. Even the low figure of 53% is still a majority, and one definition of normal is something that is done by a majority of the population. I would say it is completely normal to be attracted to little girls at a low level, but if you feel that way, it is probably not something you want to focus on or even think about much as there are much more pro-social ways to meet your sexual needs.

20-26% of all men are attracted to little girls at the same or greater level than mature females. That is, 1/4 – 1/5 of all men have a strong pedophilic response. Therefore, if someone comes to me and tells me that little girls turn them on, I am not necessarily concerned. What I would want to know is if mature females turn him on also.

There is a 95-96% chance that a man who is turned on by little girls is attracted to mature females just as much or at least very strongly. I would simply urge such a man to focus on his desires for mature females and preferably ignore or even suppress his desires for little girls, which are – let’s face it- -, antisocial. If you have two strong desires, one antisocial and one pro-social, why not substitute the pro-social one for the antisocial one?

The last conclusion, that 1% of men are preferential pedophiles, is shocking, but we will need to deal with it nonetheless. First of all, if preferential pedophilia is really that common, then we need to stop all of the pedophile witch-hunts and looking for pedophiles hiding under every bed. The truth is they’re everywhere. If they’re everywhere, we can’t exactly spend all of our time running around hysterically persecuting all of them, and if there are 1 million of them in the country, we cannot well put them all in jail or prison either.

These men need to set up an ongoing relationship with a therapist, the goal of which would be to try to keep them from offending. There are other ways for preferential pedophiles to satisfy their needs than molesting a little girl. Unfortunately one of those ways is via the use of child pornography, the use of which is nearly as illegal as molesting a girl. Given that the use of child pornography is very high among preferential pedophiles, this leaves us with a conundrum. We want to prosecute possession of child porn, but we can’t exactly put 1 million men in prison for doing so.

I have no solutions to these conundrums right now, but they should give you something to think about.

15 Comments

Filed under Child Porn, Crime, Gender Studies, Girls, Heterosexuality, Jailbait, Lolitas, Man World, Pedophilia, Pornography, Psychology, Sex

Do Prepubescent Girls Have a Sex Drive?

In my opinion, the answer is basically no. Little girls have no sex drive. Period. Give it up, pedos.

I did a lot of research on the subject, and I just could not come up with anything. I know the pedos insist that little girls are these incredibly sexual creatures just dying to fuck men and boys. I’d say that’s wishful thinking on the part of the pedos. Even worse, I would say it’s a great big fat pedo lie.

Thinking like a girl is essentially sexless thinking. The pedos keep insisting that prepubescent kids have strong sex drives. And I’ve never seen any evidence for this myself. I didn’t have much of a drive myself before puberty. Sex seemed like something weird, boring and stupid, and I didn’t even understand it very well, in part because of the less than optimal sex education. In fact, when I was told the details of sex at age 9, I was absolutely horrified. “You mean he actually puts it in her?!” That seemed like such a weird and horrible thing to do!

I’ve done a lot of research on prepubescent female sexuality (mostly to test out the pedos’ theories), and I can’t find anything there. Yes indeed, young girls can and do start masturbating as early as age 5 (and it’s a lot more common than you think), and they can actually have an orgasm by manipulating the clitoris. Not a few little girls figure out how to do this on their own.

Look around the web for confessions from adult women about how they learned to have orgasm at age 5, 7, 8 or whatever. A lot of interesting stories. Also I have had girlfriends who masturbated regularly from age 5 on. Some of these girls were sexualized early from molestation (another reason molestation is bad), but others just learned it on their own, mostly accidentally.

The bizarre thing is that even when little girls learn to reach orgasm, they never seem to develop an actual sex drive. Sure, they learn to pleasure themselves, but they don’t start getting turned on sexually by men and boys. In other words, they can get themselves off but they are not turned on by anyone, and they don’t actually want to have sex with anyone! Now that is very odd, and it is something that requires observation and explanation.

20 Comments

Filed under Gender Studies, Girls, Lolitas, Pedophilia, Sex

Is This Child Pornography?

Justin Y writes:

YouTube might ban the video cause they don’t want a bad image, but the movie and images aren’t illegal in the United States. In other words, videos like that are “bad for business”.RL: That video was illegal.

The video in question was discussed here in a previous post. A commenter posted it to Youtube and linked it to the comments section of this site, I was suspicious of it especially after his description, so I went to Youtube and looked at it. I watched the video, and then I reported it to Youtube as child pornography. I doubt if I had to do that, but I felt compelled to for some reason. Also I sort of wanted to protect myself for watching it to see what the content was. Youtube took it down within 24 hours.

Video was shot by a White American man with a taste for pubescent girls. He also liked older females and women. Whether he counts as a hebephile or not is not known, but his intense interest in Lolitas probably qualifies him as one alone, since honestly most older adult men are just not particularly interested in Lolis. It’s not true that they have no interest in them at all – studies show that normal men are attracted to 12-14, but only at a lesser rate than to mature females whom they prefer. The attitude of many men towards a girl that age is, yes, there is something to be attracted to there, but it’s not much, and the general POV is something like, “Meh.”

This man traveled around the world so he could have sex with 12-14 year old girls in countries around the world where no one cares about this stuff. He told me he met a lot of other men in these places who were doing the same thing as he was. He told me, “A lot of men will pay good money to have sex with a 12-14 year old girl.” That doesn’t surprise me at all, as I know my gender pretty well. But it’s not something that interests me now, that’s for sure.

The video was shot in the back of a bar in Colombia. The videographer had drunk half a bottle of hard liquor and was pretty loaded. Apparently he got a 12 year old girl to get up on a stage and do a striptease. Perhaps he paid her. I have no idea. Anyway, the video is an account of this striptease. Her sex drive has already come on (this is obvious – don’t ask me how I can tell) and she seems to be enjoying herself. The video is very lascivious with a lot of closeup shots of the genitalia.

Later she gets in the shower for a bit where she is joined by a boy who is maybe 14-16. The mess around a bit in the shower and then retire to a bed where they play around a bit sexually, but no sex occurs.

Is the video illegal?

It is indeed.

Child porn laws are completely nuts, and it often very had to tell if something is illegal or not. However many cases are clear-cut.

Simple nudity of minors is not illegal. There are photos of naked kids all over the Internet. These photos also include many pics of naked teenage girls, many of whom are underage. You can go look at them to your heart’s content – it’s completely legal. Those photos are all in the context of “nudist photos.” They are generally taken outdoors, the minors are often accompanied by other naked minors, and not uncommonly there are adults walking around too. Just kids and adults walking about naked in the outdoors in all sorts of scenes, often at beaches, near bodies of water, or in wooded areas.

That’s all completely legal because simple nudity of anyone of any age is not illegal. Nude pictures of minors are only illegal if there is some sort of lascivious sexual display involved.

It’s hard to say what that might be, but the video of the 12 year old girl doing a lascivious striptease, especially with all the closeups, clearly qualifies. It’s not that she’s naked, no one cares about that. It’s more how she is being naked. This is what is important.

When she’s in the shower, that’s probably legal. When the boy joins her in the shower, things get a bit dicier. See what I mean when I say it’s hard to figure out what’s legal and what’s not? When the two retire to the bed naked and play around, that’s probably illegal. You probably can’t show a minor couple aged 12-15 naked in a bed doing sexual things to each other even if they don’t have sex.

The video poses some important questions. First of all, no one gets hurt. The girl’s having a blast the whole time. The boy doesn’t get hurt either. He’s having a blast himself. If no one got hurt, why is it illegal? And I do think it should be illegal.

I think society is not so much bothered by what is going on in the video (which is just harmless fun) but by the idea that adult men are sitting around in front of computers with their dicks in their hands masturbating to this 12 year old girl doing a striptease. That’s really upsetting to people. Society thinks that men should not be able to have this sort of material as a masturbation aid. There’s something creepy and unseemly about it. I would have to agree with society on this point.

Nevertheless, there is nothing wrong with the video per se. Suppose the girl herself had the video and only watched it herself, with the boy, or with her friends?

Any harm? Nope.

Should it be illegal? Maybe not. Maybe minors can make sexual photos and videos of themselves and pass them around to their friends. I certainly don’t think it’s child porn. They don’t belong in jails or prisons for possessing this stuff. But society doesn’t seem to like it anyway. In that case, perhaps society ought to simply seize the material when they find it in the hands of the minors.

There may be other problems.

Some enterprising minors may take photography of themselves or their friends naked or having sex and then try to sell the videos on the market, especially to adults. Now these kids are pretty much manufacturing and selling child pornography. I don’t know what to do about them, but it shouldn’t be legal.

Here’s another one.

Suppose as a minor, you and your friends made and accessed a lot of sexual material of minors nude and having sex with other minors. You kept it around, and now you are an adult male. You continue to look at this old material from your teenage days as you age, to age 20 to 30 to 40. Now you have a 40 year old man masturbating to videos of what is legally child porn produced by his friends during his teen years. Now what?

I have not the faintest idea what to do here as it opens up a lot of interesting legal and philosophical issues.

3 Comments

Filed under Child Porn, Girls, Law, Lolitas, Mass Hysterias, Pedophile Mass Hysteria, Pornography, Sex, Social Problems, Sociology

Naked 12 Year Old Girls Are Evil

If you ever want to see a naked 12 year old girl, here’s how to find one. Go look up the video of the scene with Brooke Shields in Pretty Baby. It’s on the Net. For some reason apparently it’s not child porn yet. Brooke is working or living in some whorehouse and someone walks in on her in the bath. She stands up and tries to cover herself up with a bath curtain.

This video scene is considered very underground and it’s much whispered about as some sort of “hard to believe it’s legal” shock video on the Net. But a funny thing happens if you go and watch it, which you can do, perfectly legally too I might add.

You watch it and you think, “Wow. Is that all it is? Why is everyone so excited about this. This is nothing. This is bullshit. This is stupid. Why would anyone get turned on by this?”

That’s because even though it’s Brooke Shields, yes, to any normal man who sees that video, it doesn’t look like much anything. You can’t see a whole lot and there’s not much to see anyway. She has no breasts. No body hair. Her body is shaped like a stick. The long legs are nice because that’s starting to look like a woman, but the rest is just a joke. It’s not exciting. It’s not a turn-on. It’s actually stupid. You watch it, shrug your shoulders and say, “Meh? What’s the fuss?” Because there’s nothing even slightly erotic about that video.

I will confess to something now. Some put a link to what has to be classed as “child porn” in my comments section. They uploaded it to Youtube and linked to the Youtube video on my site. I followed it to Youtube, was disturbed and wanted to check out just what this highly dubious and maybe illegal video was that this guy linked to. He said he shot the video in the back of a bar in Colombia, and the girl was 12 years old.

So I watched. It’s a 12 year old Colombian girl doing a striptease in the back of the bar. The camera angle is pretty lascivious, so that’s legally child porn. She seems to be enjoying herself as she is doing this striptease. She’s finally all the way naked, and there’s not much there. Her breasts are there, but they are so small it is ludicrous. Nothing attractive. Her body is stick-like. She has a little girl face, and she acts like a kid. She has a tiny bit of pubic hair, but they’re shaving that off now anyway.

After she does her little show, she gets in the shower and washes off. A teenage boy maybe 14 years old joins her in the shower. Later they retire to a bed where they mess around a bit but don’t have anything resembling sex.

I watched it and the whole time I was thinking, “This isn’t even erotic. This girl doesn’t even turn me on. Why would anyone get turned on by this?” and most importantly, “Why is this evil? Why is this horrible? Why is it sick, vile and diabolical?” because that is what everyone tells us “child porn” is.

The video is not sick, evil, diabolical, horrific or awful. Mostly it’s just boring. You’re lucky if you can stay awake.

But more importantly, there is absolutely nothing wrong with what this girl is doing. Yes, she is doing a striptease. At that age, her sex drive may well be coming on, and surely teenage girls probably like to do stripteases in their bedrooms? Or for their boyfriends? Or with their girlfriends? Is that evil? Why is a pubertal girl doing a striptease and obviously having a blast “evil?” How did she get harmed by doing this striptease? We need to know this because anti-CP folks insist that this girl was obviously “harmed” by this video. How did the video hurt her? How did the striptease hurt her? Was the striptease harmful in some way?

Why is it evil to show a 12 year old girl in a shower? 12 year old girls get in the shower every day, right? Is that evil or something? Is it sick? It’s “sick” for 12 year old girls to take showers? Why? Did this girl get hurt by taking a shower (because anti-CP folks say she got hurt by this filming so apparently the shower was harmful)?

Yes, she plays with the boy in the shower. A couple of pubertal kids having some sex fun.Yes, later they retire to the bed and mess around sexually a bit, like 12-14 year old’s do all over the damn world every single day. Is it “sick” for her and the boy to mess around in the shower? Is “sick, evil and horrible” for them to play around in bed? Why? Was she harmed by playing with the boy in the shower or the bed (because anti-CP folks say she got hurt)? How? How did messing with the boy hurt her horribly, perhaps irreparably?

Ok, so after I watched the video, what did I do? I reported it to Youtube as child pornography, as is my duty as a citizen. I checked back in a day, and it was gone.Then I banned the idiot who put that on my page and blasted him in the comments for putting CP on my website. He apologized profusely and soon circumvented the ban. I let him stay because he promised to be good.

But I was still disturbed. Yes I watched it, determined it was CP and turned it in, but did I break the law by doing just that? Once you see it, you break the law, right? Ok, so how is anyone supposed to turn this stuff in ever, considering that by merely seeing it they are committing a serious crime?

Are there not anti-CP groups who range around the net finding CP and reporting it? Indeed there are, and I have been to some of these pages where  you can sometimes follow their links to what they call “CP” (really just naked young girls). But everyone in that vigilante group had to look at that page in order to turn it in, right? Did they break the law by looking at the page, even though they had to in order to turn it in?

Society acts like a video of a naked 12 year old girl is the most evil thing on the planet, and anyone who sees one is a diabolical pedophile scum. We all must be shielded from the Satanic evil videos of naked 12 year old girls, the sickest, most vile, most disgusting and perverted and twisted photography on Earth!

Can someone explain to me why society is so freaked out about this sort of thing? There’s nothing to get excited about, there’s nothing even to get interested in, but if some man glimpses this ultimate abyss of boredom, we act like he needs to be shot on site, beaten to death or sentenced to 50 years in prison? What for? For looking at one of the least interesting things known to man? What’s wrong with people?

I do not think this sort of thing should be legal, but is is really sick, evil, horrific, monstrous, diabolical, and vile? Why? It’s a naked girl. So what? Is that a bad thing?

21 Comments

Filed under Child Porn, Cinema, Girls, Law, Lolitas, Mass Hysterias, Pedophile Mass Hysteria, Pornography, Sex, Social Problems, Sociology

Statement on Jared Fogle

Beatrix writes:

Seriously it sounds like Fogle was set up- but he is planning to plead guilty to charges related to the possession of child pornography and having sex with a minor.

The last part of the sentence is not true. They have no evidence that he ever fucked any underage girl. They are charging him with “traveling to have sex with a minor” – what a weird crime!

I read more about this, and I want to throw the book at both of these guys. They are pretty clearly what I would call pedophilic types (nonpreferential). It’s just not normal to have such extreme sexual interest in little girls. The first guy is shooting nudes of girls down to age 6 in his house. He is also collecting a ton of child porn of girls down to age 6. He shared a lot of this with Fogle. So Fogle not only likes to fuck teenage girls (which is an understandable and 100% normal desire in any man and is certainly not pedophilic or even abnormal), he also has an extreme abnormal interest in kids, apparently little girls all the way down to age 6.

He had a ton of that child porn on his servers. It was probably real child porn because simple nudes of kids are pretty much legal. There are nude shots of kids all over the Net, and I believe they are legal. They are often “nudist” type photos. So his CP went beyond nudes. I am not even sure when a nude pic of a minor even becomes illegal. My understanding is that nudes of minors per se are not illegal, but they are if they are posing in a pornographic or sexually provocative way.

Throw the book at both of them.

Fogle also did indeed try to set up a situation where he fucked an underage prostitute, but it fell through. He traveled quite some distance to make that happen. I do not agree with such laws, but you can’t do that. For instance, I can’t make an arrangement with some 14 year girl to go to a hotel somewhere so we can fuck and then drive a ways over to that hotel to meet her. That’s illegal, and I can be arrested.

I just don’t see why he owes this teenage minor whore in New York City one nickel. She’s 17. That’s legal age in New York. What did he do wrong? In what universe is she a “victim?” How on Earth did he “victimize” her?

18 Comments

Filed under Celebrities, Child Porn, Crime, Girls, Jailbait, Law, Lolitas, Pedophilia, Pornography, Sex

Half Your Age Plus Seven

This is an old post, but it is getting posted around now, and some of you have probably not read it. It’s being posted by the male feminist manginas over at Reddit Blue Pill. They are tearing me to pieces, which is ok with me.

Tulio writes:

But alas, that day will come where no young girl mistakes me for being a 20-something and I’ll have to bump it up. What’s the rule for dating younger women? Half your age plus 7 is as low as you can go? Well I’ve broken that rule before and gladly will again, but by that rule you can be a 60 year old man and date a 37 year old. More realistically though, if you’ve taken care of yourself and have some money and status, a 60 year old man should be able to get an attractive 45 year old no problem.

That rule is not very good. A better rule would be half your age period. I am close to 60, and if I didn’t have a girlfriend, I could get 28-29 year olds. It would not be easy, but they are certainly out there, and I have had some girlfriends in the 27-29 year old range in the past few years, and I was 53-56!). But then again, maybe I am not an ordinary guy. I have no idea if I am Alpha, Beta, Omega, Sigma or whatever (well I am sure not an Omega) but supposedly I meet at least one definition of being an Alpha.

When I was 20, a 12 year old girl who I was friends with from my job as school janitor openly propositioned me.

Her: I’ve been thinking about sex a lot lately.
Me: (Nervous laugh) Really? LOL.
Her: Yep. And I’m thinking I wan to do it!
Me: LOL ok (Not sure what to say to that!)
Her: (Looking at me intensely and smiling) And I’m thinking I want to do it with you!

I laughed really hard, and yeah, I turned her down.

So that is half my age +2.

When I was 27, I had a 13 year old girl in my class openly proposition me in front of the whole class.

The class pointed it out to me.

Class: Hey teacher! Hey teacher!
Me: What?
Class: See that girl over there, the blond? The pretty one?
Me: Yeah, what about her?
Class: She says she wants to meet you in the park after school so she can have sex with you! She wants to have sex with you, teacher! Do it teacher do it! (Lots of cheers and yells).
Me: (Walking over to her) Is that true? You want me to meet you after school at the park so you can have sex with me?”

She nodded her head very fast, and all the other kids started clapping and cheering. She was seriously beautiful and she was awful sexy too. A hot little Lolita. At that age, I thought 13 year old girls were hot (not really anymore – that is too much of a little girl to me at age now), but I didn’t take her up on her offer.

So that was half my age again.

At age 33, I had 18 year old girls after me. I was a teacher, and they were my students. A couple of them gave me their phone numbers, asked me to be their boyfriend, etc. I turned them down too. One was hard to turn down as she was the Homecoming Queen! She was a real beauty. I believe it was legal, but I was afraid of losing my job.

So that is half my age+1.

When I was 43, I was dating an 18 year old girl.

So that is half my age minus 3.

At the same age, I had a few girls aged 15-17 openly propositioning me, offering to send me nude pics, all sorts of insane stuff. I turned them all down for sex though.

They would be half my age minus 4-6.

Once I got to age 47, all of a sudden I could not talk to or even look at not only underage teenage girls but also women about 18-23. So as low as I could go was half my age or 24. I did in fact get a 24 year old woman at that age, and even then, there were a few hotties 18-23 who acted like they could go for me.

As I got older than age 52 or so, even those few hotties dried up, and at this point, for sure no woman age 18-23 wants me, but I would say no woman aged 18-25 wants me. I just figure those are the facts and run with it and don’t flirt with girls that age very much.

But I did have a 26 year old girlfriend last year, and she was beautiful! I was 56 and she was 26! Wow!

A few years ago, at age 54, I met a 17 year old girl, and it was blatantly obvious to everyone what was going on. That never went anywhere.

That would be half my age -9! Whoa.

However, recently I met a 16 year old girl (!) who was way, way too friendly. She was also 16 going on 30, extremely beautiful with a wonderful personality. Nothing happened, just talked a bit, but it was weird even talking to her, as she scares the crap out of me. I think she is dangerous as Hell, and I really hope I don’t see her anymore. I don’t even want chicks like that to even be around – too tempting.

That would be half my age – 12. Wow!

I can talk to underage teenage girls, especially age 16-17, but I would be much more comfortable if they had only a platonic interest in me, and we got that out of the way fast. Then maybe I could even have a platonic friendship with them. But if you are friends with a 16-17 year old hottie, and she wants to fuck you, it becomes extremely tempting, and it would hard to turn them down.

In 2012, at age 56, I had a couple of girlfriends in the US who were 28-29.

That is 1/2 my age.

However, a few years ago after I joined Facebook, I got barraged by cute little Filipina spinners chasing after me. One of them would somehow friend me, and then pretty soon all of their little friends see the hot American White dude on her friends list, and they all started adding me as a friend.

One by one they would come to me, all from the same area or even from the same city (!), all pretty cute and about 19-35, with most 19-28. Every other day, there was a new one coming up to me.

Every one of them was like, “Hey, you like me? You want me? I like you honey. You are so handsome! Hey baby, you come to Philippines, you stay here with me, you like me, you marry me, ok? And I give you a kid too, as many you want. And I stay with you forever and be your devoted wife.”

I told some of them that their friends were already messaging me with the same lines, and it turned out those were their cousins or sometimes their friends.

Then they would often start fighting and competing and saying, “Pick me, not her. She’s bad. I am better, and here’s why.”

Most do not out and out ask for money, but some hint around about that, yet I still do not think they are scammers. Just desperately poor people.

A lot of them ask to see pics and then ask if you have any nudes. Some want to see any nude pics you have. I even had one offer to take me some nudes, but she wanted some help for a trip to Manila to get work for those choice photos. I never sent any of them any money.

They are genuine as I see it. They are all desperately poor I think, and they figure marrying an American White dude is a great way to get out of poverty.

Most of the were extremely sweet, kind and loving, with little or no aggression, hate or anger in them. 100% submissive females, and all of the aggression has been cultured out of them.

I was a bit tempted not so much for marriage (but they would make cool wives) but more for a kid. I never had a kid, and I would not mind making one at this point except that it requires a young woman.

So they would be mostly anywhere from half my age -9 to half my age.

I also had a Peruvian woman age 27 come to me in the past several years. We got on cam a lot, and one day she called me.

I asked who it was and she said in Spanish, “It’s the girl who wants to marry you.”

She too said, “Hey, you come down here, you stay with me a while, we see if we like each other, if we do, you marry me, and maybe I give you a kid.”

She was a cutie too, and really smart, a college student. Also pretty poor.

That would be half my age+1.

Then somehow I met this older Peruvian woman about 45 who married some older White guy. She found out I was single, and she started turning me on to these Peruvian chick friends of hers. They were 28-32 or so. I talked to one, and she was extremely sweet. The ones I met were all pretty smart. Same deal, looking to marry an American White guy, and I get out of the 3rd World.

That would be half my age+2.

So for the US and the West, at age 56, I would say that I could go as low as 26-29 at this point with some rare exceptions, but the 26 year old would be quite hard to get. The 28 and 29 year olds would be more doable, but they would still be hard to get.

And for overseas, at age 56, I guess the sky is the limit. So far the youngest was 19.

The problem here is that Alphas can break most any of those formulas.

If you think this website is valuable to you, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site. This is my only job.

15 Comments

Filed under Girls, Heterosexuality, Jailbait, Lolitas, Losers, Mass Hysterias, Moralfags, Pedophile Mass Hysteria, Psychology, Romantic Relationships, Sex, Women

Are Westerners Really More Likely to be Pedophiles?

SHI writes:

I’m afraid stats from an online source don’t tell the entire story. White pedophiles kinda stand out from others due to the sheer gravity of their crimes. Watch NBC: Catch a Predator, most accused on show are white men.

I’ve been to Thailand and Cambodia (for tourism purpose mind you) and saw an overwhelming number of white males, and also a few older white females looking extra cozy around children. I don’t think all of them were social workers with nice intentions. Most white people who are overstaying in SE Asia happen to be freaks of one kind or another, they don’t talk normally to you due to the easy availability of pussy. Somehow the permissive climate of SE countries brings out the worst in human nature.

It is well known in Thailand that the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami which killed a lot of Swedes in Thailand was God’s sweeping punishment against a vile, wicked and sinful people (a lot of them were pedophiles).

To Catch a Predator sets up men who are trying to fuck a 14 or 15 year old girl. Men who try to fuck 14 and 15 year old girls are not pedophiles. I would point out that in Black communities and especially in the ghetto, it is normal for adult men to fuck 14 and 15 year old girls. Nobody bats an eye or calls the cops because it is simply not seen as a crime. Mexicans start fucking their women when they are 14 in both Mexico and the US.

So there we dealt with that one.

I would argue that in much of the 3rd World, it is simply normal for girls to get molested. 53% of all Indian girls get molested as children. Apparently it is mostly done in the family. So do Indian men have a reputation for being pedophiles? Of course not. Because in that culture, it’s normal for adult men to mess with prepubertal girls.

My friends in Canada tell me that in Canada, “all Indian girls get molested, 100% of them.” It’s generally done in the family. And this is before they even hit puberty. By the time they are 14, they are considered women and are already getting fucked normally all the time and no one even thinks it’s weird.

You can read interviews with Black women from the ghetto online. They have women sitting around in groups talking about how they got molested. One says, “In the ghetto, all girls get molested.” And all the other women solemnly nod their heads. And once again, this is mostly in the family.

There is said to be an epidemic of Black men raping or having sex with very young girls in South Africa. The rates of girl-fucking there are absolutely off the charts. A lot of this is due to the idea that if you get a young enough girl, it’s a sure bet she doesn’t have HIV.

Very few studies are done on child molestation in the 3rd World, so we have no idea how many girls in the 3rd World are subjected to this sort of thing, but I think if we studied it, there might be a whole lot more than you might think.

One wonders why White Western pedophiles often relocate to the 3rd World so they can molest freely without getting caught. That is because in places like the the Philippines, Thailand, Cambodia, Sri Lanka and even Mexico, most people don’t even care about some White man from the West who is screwing kids. In fact, many of the locals will hear about the rich White pedo older man ion that house over there and they will gladly rent their kids to him to play with for a handful of cash.

The fact that child molestation seems to be no big deal in these places implies that there is probably a lot of it that goes on and also that they don’t think it’s a moral issue. We in the West definitely think it is a moral issue that implies right there that those 3rd World areas are more pro-pedophilic than the West is.

White culture is different because we actually take exception to this sort of thing – adult men have sex with teenage girls – which is accepted in most of the world.

There are two types of child molesters – pedophilic child molesters and non-pedophilic molesters. Various estimates indicate that 70-92% of all molesters are not even pedophiles. They generally molest in the family and are no more into little girls than anyone else. They are just criminals who are taking advantage of very vulnerable little girls, an easy target.

Now as far as the true pure pedophile type, there may be an argument that Whites are overrepresented among pure preferential pedophiles – the type who deliberately seek out children in various ways – the guys that were the cause of the whole “stranger danger” fad. But that’s not proven yet either.

13 Comments

Filed under Africa, Asia, Asians, Blacks, Cambodia, Canada, Culture, East Indians, Ethics, Girls, Hispanics, India, Jailbait, Lolitas, Mexico, North America, Pedophilia, Philippines, Philosophy, Race/Ethnicity, Regional, SE Asia, Sex, Social Problems, Sociology, South Africa, South Asia, South Asians, Thailand, USA, Whites

How Many Females* Did Casanova Have Sex With?

Guess.

Answer in the comments.

* I say females because he didn’t just have sex with women. He did teenage girls too. And shockingly, girls even younger than that. Once he had sex with an 11 year old girl and a 9 year old girl on succeeding nights. First he bedded the 11 year old, then the next night, her 9 year old sister came up to him and said something to the effect of, “Well you had sex with my sister, why don’t you have sex with me too?”

Nowadays he would be called “pedophile,” but that’s just stupid. Of course he did not prefer little girls to mature females. I think he falls into the category of “trysexual.” There are a lot of men out there who are just perverts who will do just about anything when it comes to sex, even little girls. Maybe for the rush, the taboo, who knows? Some of these guys will do most females if they can find a hole to put it in. However, it is true that he was a child molester by today’s standards. But perhaps back in those days this sort of thing was no big deal.

 

 

2 Comments

Filed under Gender Studies, Girls, Heterosexuality, Lolitas, Man World, Sex

Was Humbert Humbert a Pedophile?

Cahokia writes:

Is Nabokov’s Humbert Humbert a pedophile? Obviously, he’s just a literary figure and the author was extremely resistant to political interpretations of his work. Nevertheless, in Lolita the narrator expresses a clear preference for girls just on the cusp of adolescence.

I say the protagonist is not a pedophile, despite his distaste for older teenage girls and young women. A Lolita based upon a genuine pedo would not have been palatable enough to become a hit.

Humbert clearly is a hebephile. I always wondered about Nabokov. Teenage girl heartthrobs and the older men who are obsessed with them are woven all through his work. I wonder if he was a bit of an ephebephile himself.

  • Preference for minors 12-under = pedophile
  • Preference for minors 12-14 or 13-15 = hebephile
  • Preference for teens 15-19 or 16-19 = ephebephile

Michael Jackson was clearly a hebephile. He liked boys right around puberty, 12-14. I would wager that a lot of so-called pedophiles are actually more properly called hebephiles. A preference for actual children 12-under must be rather rare I would think. There can’t be too many folks like that around.

Note that it says preference for, not attraction to. This is one of the major pitfalls in definitions of these terms. Studies show that even high attraction to girls aged 2-12 is quite common among normal men, as 26% of normal men are aroused by girls 2-12 the same or more than they are by females aged 13+. I assume the vast majority of these men are not pedophiles. They are probably aware of some attraction to girls, shrug it off as nothing and something they do not want to investigate in their sex life, and as long as they have a high attraction to mature females, they just focus on that and forget about the girls.

A true fixated pedophile is obsessed with young girls and has been since an early age, often as far back as they can remember or at least since puberty. They often have little or no interest in mature females, but some are nonexclusive and are attracted to mature females too.

Fixated pedophilia cannot come on later than age 14, as apparently it is not possible to become sexually fixated after that age. Any interest in young girls developing after age 14 would not be the fixated variety and would instead be the “sexual smorgasbord” or “trysexual” variety. These are men who are turned on by just about anything sexual. Let’s just call them perverts. However the vast majority of their interests are experimental or exploratory in nature, are not fixated and can be dropped or changed at any time. These men are developing these interests out of pure choice, which is surely not the case with the true pedophile.

The true fixated pedophile typically states something like,

I don’t know. All I know is that I have been crazy about little girls for as far back as I can remember, and I have been crazy turned on by them and masturbating all the time thinking about them ever since, and that’s all I know. That’s all I can tell you about why I feel this way.

They often use child pornography. Their fantasy life will be rich and often exclusively about young girls. They will spend a lot of time masturbating to fantasies about young girls. In other words, young girls drive them crazy.

As this is something that they love, they are often not particularly upset by it. Instead the relationship is similar to an addiction to say drugs, gambling or pornography. The addict absolutely loves his object of choice, but sometimes they feel out of control and like they can’t control their desires or urges anymore.

Although there is usually little guilt going on with true fixated pedophiles, many report that after they have an orgasm from masturbation, they feel very guilty. This is common to many other paraphilias and deviant sexual interests also. Men who fantasize about rape and murder of women often report intense arousal followed by serious guilt after orgasm. The guilt is often most intense in the early phase of the paraphilia and is particularly common with teenage boys with a paraphilia.

For the life of me, I cannot understand why any man past his mid-20’s would actually prefer a 13-14 year old girl to a grown woman. Sure, some of them are attractive, but are they more attractive than a grown woman? And talk about immature!

I can’t even understand ephebephiles, although obviously ephebephilia must be quite common. You mean you actually prefer teenyboppers to a grown woman? Once again, I cannot fathom any man past 30 feeling this way. It’s ridiculous. Sure you can legally have sex with an 18-19 year old girl.  I will probably never do it again, but I did it many times in the past. But the  main question is what are you going to talk to her about afterwards?

And why would an 18-19 year old girl be better than a grown woman in the first place? At my age, teenage girls are ridiculous, and they seem more empty-headed and silly with each passing year as a man ages. I am ashamed to say that even most college girls strike me as airheads, and it wasn’t always this way.

4 Comments

Filed under Child Porn, Ephebephilia, Gender Studies, Girls, Heterosexuality, Literature, Lolitas, Man World, Novel, Pedophilia, Pornography, Psychology, Sex