Category Archives: Man World

Robert Stark Interviews The Truth Will Live about Redpilling Your Family & Catholicism

I am going to run this interview, as I did listen to about half of it. However, this woman has such a boring and poor delivery and she has such rightwing views (We are the
Alternative Left after all!) that I do not think I am going to run her stuff anymore. If any of you readers like The Truth Will Live, then I will continue to run her stuff so you can enjoy it. After all, you readers sort of run this blog in a way.

Interview here.

Topics include:

Wife The Girl by Uncuck the Right.
How the Truth Will Live was Redpilled.
How she was able to Red Pill most of her family.
How most of her family was relatively moderate to conservative to begin with.
How the first reaction to the Redpill is often a hysterical, but after that the person changes their views.
How women tend to be more conformist than men.
How it’s easier to Redpill people of the same gender.
How to Redpill liberals by bringing up how mass immigration harms workers and the environment and that immigration and feminism are driven by capitalism.
How we live in neither a true Patriarchy nor Matriarchy but rather a  culture driven by consumerism and profit.
How our culture is in a spiritual and moral crisis.
Her video Why Have Children?, a response to anti-natalism.
Social Atomization and how it leads to psychological problems.
How Americans are expected to put on a facade of happiness.
The Paleo diet and lifestyle.
The Catholic Church and how it has changed since the 2nd Vatican Council.
The end of the Latin Mass.
How the Catholic Church is suppressing traditional music such as Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, and Gregorian Chants.
How Catholicism has become more like Protestantism.
Aesthetic standards in religion and how it was affected by the prohibition against idolatry.
Traditional Catholics who reject the Vatican.
E Michael Jones and how he views Protestantism as similar to Judaism (ex. Prosperity Doctrine).
How modern Christianity has become synonymous with prole culture and has driven away creative types.
Missa Luba, a choir in the Belgium Congo that was taught to sing the Latin Mass by missionaries.


Filed under American, Catholicism, Christianity, Conservatism, Culture, Feminism, Gender Studies, Liberalism, Man World, Music, Political Science, Psychology, Religion, Social Problems, Sociology

And All the Women Love Him

Miss My freak:

I am pretty sure I just got out of a relationship with a polyamorus man…I was supposedly his only one minus his penis slipping into things here and there. In my experience if you truly care for someone, go with honesty next time. I am now open to the idea…especially if we choose together. It actually turns me on. We would be so incredible together. I can only imagine the possibilities.

Women love womanizers and studs. Many of them truly love women. They don’t treat them very well, but they do love women, Women, as in plural. They’re sons of bitches and they don’t treat women very well. Women can’t get enough of these alluring sons of bitches.

It’s a fatal charm, a human Venus Fly trap. The fly to the web, the moth to the light. Careful ladies! Watch your step.

Even if they hate them, they never hate them fully. There is still that tiny place in their heart, maybe 1%, that can’t help but love this sort of man. After all, all the woman love him! Women love men who other women love. He’s the Man with the Golden Sperm!

And they all love him. And they all want him. For his golden genes.

These guys are just too charming to hate. Look at that face. How can you fully and totally hate such a man? You can’t.


Filed under Gender Studies, Man World, Psychology, Romantic Relationships, Women

How Accessible Are Muslim Women?

Women from the Muslim part of the world can be quite pretty, but you won’t be able to touch them if you are from outside their culture.

I don’t know. I think an Alpha could get a Muslim woman. Or someone with fantastic Game. Which may be a redundancy, since someone with fantastic Game either is an Alpha or he might as well be one.

Please understand that Alphas and guys with great Game pretty much break all the rules when it comes women. You need to throw out all the rules when it comes to these guys because they can get a woman, even a hot woman, in almost any circumstances.


Filed under Gender Studies, Islam, Man World, Psychology, Religion, Romantic Relationships, Women

When It Comes To Women, Alphas Throw Out All the Rules

Understand that Alphas and guys with great Game pretty much break all the rules when it comes women. You need to throw out all the rules when it comes to these guys because they can get a woman, even a hot woman, in almost any circumstance.

Need money to get women? Sure, most of us do. Alphas? Not at all.  A lot of these guys are bums, criminals, drug dealers or gigolos who don’t even work. And that’s when they are not incarcerated! Many of them live off women their whole lives, and it is not common for Alphas to be in and out of jails and prisons. Even into their 30’s, 40’s and 50’s, many Alphas are poor or low income, live in shoddy apartments and drive beat-up old cars and either don’t work or work at some lousy low paying job. Of course none of that keeps them from getting women, even hot women.

You need a job to get women? Don’t think so. Alphas don’t. See above.

You need a car to get women? Or as the saying goes, “Must have a job and a car?” Not really. Alphas can surely get women even if they don’t have a car. Anyway, that won’t last long because soon they will be hooked up with a generous woman who gives them the use of her car.

Can’t get a Muslim woman in a Muslim country or from a Muslim culture? Sure, most of can’t. But I would bet good money that an Alpha could. I would guess that North African countries like Morocco, Egypt, etc. would be easier than the rest. People seem to be more secular in much of North Africa than in the rest of the Arab World for some reason. Anyway, North Africans are not even really Arabs. They are better seen as Berbers or Arabized Berbers. There is also a lot of influence from Black culture, and Black culture anywhere generally seems to be more permissive about sex than non-Black cultures.

You need some status to get a woman? Sure it would help for most of us to get some. But Alphas don’t really need it. In fact, Alphas obtain status rather miraculously simply by being Alphas and for no other reason. In other words, an Alpha gets status by opening the door and walking in to the crowded room. As he steps into the room, the people in the room all look up to him to see who he is, and he obtains status immediately simply due to his commanding and yes, superior and all-encompassing vibes. In other words, Alphahood creates its on status, if you can understand that.

you need to dress up nice to get a woman? Most of us would be helped by such a suggestion, but I am dubious whether Alphas need to dress up all that much. A good Alpha could probably do great even with a rather shoddy wardrobe.

Remember what it takes to get women:

1. Money

2. Status

3. Power

4. Fame

5. Game

6. Sexiness

7. Looks

If you don’t have the first four, you better have the next two or three! Really all you need are 5 and 6 or better yet, 5-7. two. Game without Looks can be done, but I don’t think it is all that easy. Anyway a lot of men who are not formally goodlooking at all and are in fact rather ugly by classical terms still do great with women only because they are sexy. Recall that men to not have to be beautiful. Ruggedly handsome brings up all sorts of phenotypes, some of which are even classically ugly. But these men are always very masculine and better yet, they are sexy as all Hell.

If you have Game and Sexiness or Game, Sexiness and Looks, you can forget about the first four. However, Looks alone without Sexiness/Game is probably worth jack. And all Sexy men have good Game. And if you have good Game, you are invariably Sexy, and you are also likely to have Looks, but not necessarily.

Masculine? Not necessarily. I have known quite a few Alphas who were rather feminine. Not effeminate, but feminine, and there is quite a difference. Quite a few were androgynes, often with a strong Feminine aspect going but often at the same time a strong or even extremely strong Masculine aspect.

Having a lot of Feminine aspect is no big deal for a man as long as you have a good Masculine aspect to balance it out. In fact, I often think that Pure Androgynes such as this (Strong Masculine + Strong Feminine) are like honey to bees for women. They simply cannot resist them.

Also the Feminine aspect allows these men to understand women very well, better than most most men. In addition, the Feminine aspect allows these men to feel very comfortable around women. I have met a number of Alpha Pure Androgynes who told me that they preferred to associate with female over males. Many told me that they didn’t even like males – they only liked females.

With a number of them, many of their friends were women. However, these female friends were always fixing these Alphas up with all of their friends. And quite a few of these guys were not able to sustain platonic friendships with women because they told me that sooner or later, the woman would usually try to seduce them. Apparently some men are just irresistible to women, and any women who gets closer to them, even as a close friendship, can’t resist getting sexual with them.

This seems to be true of some of the Alphas that I have known. Sure some Alphas like to have female friends, but it seems that over time, they are not able to sustain them because the relationship invariably turns sexual. It appears that women simply cannot sustain nonsexual friendships with Alphas. It’s like handing out free candy to a kind in a candy store. They can only resist the presence of the Alpha in close proximity to them for a certain period of time before they have to either cut it off or it tuns sexual. Something has to give.The tension and frustration can no longer be sustained.

Fighting off the allure of an Alpha who ma woman is close to may be near impossible. It’s probably like resisting the gravitational pull of a small planet. And indeed, Alphas do resemble micro-planets. They seem to have a gravitational field around them that sucks any woman close to them into its orbit whether she wants to be turned in to an encircling moon of his or not. It’s not like she has any choice in the matter.


Filed under Culture, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Man World, Psychology, Romantic Relationships, Sex

On Black Male Violence

EPGAH writes:

Robert Lindsay once called Black violence “Masculinity for people who’ve never had male role models.”

Damn, did I actually write that? I can’t believe I even wrote that. Damn that’s a brilliant concept.

Is there anything to it? What say you all?

I mean, it’s so obvious that this is just men doing when men always do – trying to be tough and hard via aggression, violence, brutality, intimidation, menace, etc.

In other words, by terrorizing people, mostly other men. Which is something we men do you know. Terrorize each other. Not just for the sheer fun of it, though it can be a kick. More for safety, status climbing, competition, pride, honor and especially that thing that everyone insists doesn’t exist anymore called masculinity, which is one of the most important concepts in any males life, and don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.


Filed under Blacks, Gender Studies, Man World, Psychology, Race/Ethnicity

Prevalence of Sex Acts Among Gay Men

These figures are extremely controversial, and in fact, the man who accumulated them is one of the most vilified men in the West. However, all of his conclusions are from legitimate peer reviewed medical journals and books. The people who jump up and down and yell so much about these findings are encouraged to go out and come up with some figures of their own.

These figures appear to be good at least for this particular time period. One argument might be that gay men’s sex practices have changed over the past 30 years, and therefore, these figures are no longer viable. That is an interesting hypothesis, but it remains to be seen if it is true or not. Those who claim that these studies are outdated are encouraged to go out and find some more updated studies so we can compare them to these older results. My gut feeling is that gay men’s behavior has not changed very much.

I am not sure why I am putting this stuff out there, but it’s nice to know such things. It’s also a good counterpoint to the “Gays are just like straights except for the PIV (penis in vagina ) sex.” Obviously that is not true at all.

You can do whatever you want to with this figures – I have no particular agenda here except to disagree with the SJW’s who insist that homosexual sex is the greatest thing since sliced bread. This is clearly not the case.

                Ever  Last yr. Last mo. Last 6 mos.

Sex acts

Oral-penile      99.5  92      67
Anal-penile      93    94      97
Oral-anal        87    63      79       60
Public/orgy sex  82 
Fisting/toys     39
S/M B/D          37
Urine sex        26
Minor sex        23.5
Enemas           11
Shit eating       6   

Based on six different surveys conducted from 1977 to 1991 in the US, Denmark, London, Sydney. The surveys were done a while back – the median year for the surveys was 1984.

It is true that these figures come from the reviled Paul Cameron. Cameron is very much a homophobe all right. The PC crowd and the SJW’s have trashed his figures to Kingdom Come. However, all of Cameron’s figures come from peer reviewed studied studies in medical journals and books (see below). The SPLC in particular has trashed all of his findings, and the American Psychological Association has disassociated itself from Cameron and thrown him out of the organization. All of this apparently because he is coming up with the wrong conclusions.

As usual with these types, it is put up or shut up. While they have completely trashed Cameron’s findings, they have never shown how or why they are wrong, and worse, they have never shown any newer findings that indicates how Cameron is wrong.

Until further studies indicate that Cameron is wrong, his figures must stand.


Beral, V. et al. 1992. Risk of Kaposi’s Sarcoma and Sexual Practices Associated with Fecal Contact in Homosexual or Bisexual Men with AIDS. Lancet.

Biggar, R. J. 1984. Low T-lymphocyte Ratios in Homosexual Men. Journal of the American Medical Association. 7/18/91. Wall Street Journal, p. B1.

Elford, J. et al. 1992. Kaposi’s Sarcoma and Insertive Rimming. Lancet.

Jaffee, H. et al. 1983. National Case-control Study of Kaposi’s Sarcoma. Annals Of Internal Medicine.

Jay, K. & Young, A. 1979. The Gay Report. NY: Summit.

Quinn, T. C. et al. 1983. The Polymicrobial Origin of Intestinal Infection in Homosexual Men. New England Journal of Medicine.


Filed under Gender Studies, Health, Homosexuality, Illness, Man World, Medicine, Science, Sex

Robert Stark Interviews Matt Forney about the Virginia TV Shooting


This one is a bit dated, but it should still be pretty good. And there doesn’t seem to be much ugly conservatism here. Ultimately these views are something the Alt Left could go along with.

Topics include:

Did the Media Drive Gay Black Man Vester Flanagan to Murder Two Journalists?
The Black Lives Matter movement which incites violence and has mainstream media and political support.
How the Black Lives Matter movement is biased in favor of Hillary Clinton against Bernie Sanders.
The life and psychological profile of Vester Flanagan.
How Flanagan differs from the profile of white male shooters who tend to be more socially and economically marginalized.
How We’re Now Averaging More Than One Mass Shooting Per Day.
Why mass shootings are on the rise.
How we are seeing a whole class of people pushed to the economic margins.
People with Asperger’s and how they are screwed in modern atomized society.
How bizarre subcultures such as Bronies are forming in reaction to social marginalization.
The phenomenon of young men joining ISIS.
How people will likely form new functioning communities in reaction to a broken society.
Why the Manosphere’s Fear of ‘TradCons’ is Misguided And Cowardly.
More on the Trump campaign and whether his populist stances will repudiate the stupidity of Reagan Conservatism.


Filed under Asperger's Syndrome, Autism, Blacks, Conservatism, Crime, Culture, Economics, Gender Studies, Journalism, Left, Man World, Political Science, Politics, Psychology, Race Relations, Race/Ethnicity, Republicans, Sociology, US Politics, Whites

Money Is An Absolute Necessity to Get Women

Without money, you can’t get a woman with God’s help. No money, no honey. If you are broke, you will die a virgin.


Filed under Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Man World, Northeast, Regional, Romantic Relationships, Sex, Social Problems, Sociology, Urban Studies, USA

Reasons for Men’s Attraction to Teenage Girls

123go (a woman) writes:

Hmmm, no, sorry. This still doesn’t make sense. Growth and pregnancy don’t go together. Pregnancy stunts the growth of any animal. Even animals with indeterminate growth (grow throughout their entire lives, like snakes and crocs) will enter a cycle that stops growth so that they can become pregnant.

In human females, they start to mature faster than boys so that they can reach their max height faster, so that their body can work on widening the hips, and closing the growth plates. Even in modern day society, with girls having their first periods sooner, and growth happening faster, they’re still only seeing full sexual maturity at around or after 19 years of age, when the hips have splayed to open the birth canal.

The pelvis in both males and females doesn’t even start until they’re around 11-15, so that would preclude the ability to effectively carry a pregnancy. This would explain why teen mothers tend to need to have more c-sections in emergency situations, though more older females choose to have them done ahead of time.

Plus, according to the World Health Organization, women 19 and younger are apparently at greater risk of a wide number of adverse outcomes associated with pregnancy and delivery. The offspring they give rise to are also at a much higher risk for a number of adverse outcomes until they reach the age of two as well when compared to women 20+.

Apparently, according to fertility clinics, women 21-31 are in their prime, being the most fertile out of any age demographic, and having the best rates of health for themselves as well as their offspring. If males are looking for the best mates, would it not makes sense to then court young 20 year olds, so that you could be with them for all of their most fertile years?

Going with a younger female would mean standing the risk of stunting her development which would prevent her body from reaching full sexual maturity. It would increase her risk of dying in childbirth, increased risk of miscarriages, and the earlier the pregnancy, the worse the outcome for both the female mate, and the offspring.

Logically, if we’re looking at this scientifically, and based on the statistics, if you chose a younger mate than what was physically optimal in terms of reproduction, you would stand as a male to produce fewer offspring with such a female, and the ones that you had would apparently be weaker, more prone to preterm delivery, and other ailments. Compared to the more robust offspring that young 20 something women would give you. She would be healthy, and capable of providing more offspring soon after as well as their libido is apparently higher as well.

So I don’t think, that based on the evidence, especially with the thousands of articles spewing out of every journal of medicine every year about the dangers of adolescent pregnancy, that natural selection or evolution are the reasons for so many men’s fiction on young girls. If you think about it, it doesn’t explain why so many gay men prefer very young looking boys either. Maybe it’s something psychological. Or, if we’re going the evolutionary route for porn, maybe it’s the fact that most “teen”, “Lolita”, “jailbait” pornstars, aren’t actually teens at all, but actually slim women in their 20’s, which is actually quite common.

If not that, then maybe it has to do with a power fetish being that teens, male or female are often naive. Maybe some guys get off on the idea of being “first”, or more likely, the idea of not being compared to other sexual partners because there is an assumption of “innocence” and “virginity” with teens.

There are a lot of guys out there with chips on their shoulders, so being “the biggest someone has ever seen” in their minds at least, may be a big confidence boost for them. Plus, socially, mentally, physically etc. they would stand to be more powerful than a teen, and maybe that’s a turn on. After all, some people get their kinks from tying people up and hitting them. Feeling in power during sex is a huge turn on for some people.

Maybe on the other side of things, it could be that some dudes like to re-imagine their first sexual encounter, and this is their way of recapturing that. I don’t know, I’m not a psychologist, I’m just a scientist. But I definitely don’t think that attraction to girls that young has something to do with “evolutionary means” if they’re literally less efficient at popping out healthy brats without dying, hahaha.

This makes no sense. Study after study shows that all males are maximally attracted to all females age 16+. Other studies put maximal attraction at all females age 12+.

One study found that men reacted thus:

Age 16+ = maximal attraction
Age 15 = 90% of max
Age 14 = 80% of max
Age 13 = 70% of max
Age 12 = 60% of max
Age 11 = 50% of max
Age 10 = 40% of max
Age 9 = 30% of max
Age 8 = 20% of max
Age 7 = 10% of max
6-below = 0 attraction

As you can see, a 16 or 17 year old girl and a 18 or 19 year old woman are all the same for men. And they also the same as any mature woman of any age. According to men, once a female hits 16, she is simply a woman (if we define “woman” as “mature female”) and all mature females (or women) are equally attractive to men.

And if indeed there are increasing risks of pregnancy for girls aged 13-15, with the risks increasing as the girl gets younger, then men’s decreasing attraction to them as they get younger makes sense evolutionarily. On the other hand, it is rather difficult to impregnate a girl aged 13-15, although of course it can be done.

I don’t really care if maximal attraction to females aged 16-19 makes little sense evolutionarily. It doesn’t matter. Men are maximally attracted to females in these age ranges, obviously because they are fully developed by age 16.

The commenter suggests that the reasons that a lot men are maximally attracted to teenage females is due psychological reasons or a fetish. But why would these mysterious psychological reasons effect all males equally? Any psychological response experienced by all males would be assumed to be due to biology or an inborn or instinctual reaction.

Similarly, why would 100% of all males be maximally attracted to females aged 16-19 if it were merely due to a fetish? Fetishes are individualistic sexual preferences or attachments that are formed on the basis of experiences in childhood and puberty. Why would 100% of all males go through the exact same experiences in childhood and puberty that would cause them all to develop a fetish for girls age 16-19?

That makes no sense at all.

Evolutionary features in humans need not all make complete sense. As long as the trait is not dramatically maladaptive, it will tend to stick around.

Females are simply incapable of being rational about this teenage girl thing. Al of their arguments are based on emotions, and hence they are all irrational.


Filed under Gender Studies, Girls, Health, Heterosexuality, Jailbait, Man World, Psychology, Romantic Relationships, Sex

Is This Man Gay or Not?

confused male writes:

Hi, I am really confused. I identify myself as a gay male, I am still not out of the closet. I have been in love with my best Friend for about 3 years now, but I don’t know if he’s gay. I do feel a kind of gay vibe coming off from him, he does kind of act attracted to me. He does sometimes start talking about particular woman, that they are pretty or that he would want to have with that woman. I don’t know if he does that on purpose so that nobody would suspect him being gay.He also kind of likes to ”touch” me and other male friends, which make it extra confusing. He does show interest in me, but I am just not sure. About two years ago he asked me if i was gay, of course I panicked and said that I obviously wasn’t gay. We had pretty long conversations at night, normally you wouldn’t want to talk too long to a certain person if you weren’t attracted to them. Sorry for my bad English. I hoped that you maybe had some tips or if you would know if he is gay or not.

But the catch is that he had a female crush, he doesn’t talk about her anymore. But I sometimes think he made the female crush part up, so that he could make me jealous. Even though he did confess to her, but it al seemed really fishy, even the confession.

I am thinking this guy is either straight or leans straight. Never met a gay man who had a crush on a woman or who even talked about them very much or at all. He seems to at least lean straight.

I would like to thank you for not perving on this probably straight male with endless persterings for sex was so many gay men to do straight men. You showed a lot of self-restraint and decency here. Also it is quite interesting that a gay man and a straight man can be such good friends, but I had a couple of friends who were gay. Catch was they were not out of the closet yet so there was no way to tell. Further they were suppressing their homosexual interests so well that you could not pick that up.

Have you asked him what his sexual orientation is?

What are you afraid of? If you come out to him, he will end the friendship? You might even be able to continue this very interesting friendship after you come out, after all, you have been a gay man and a straight man who were best friends for 3 years, which is rather unusual.

I doubt if he is very gay at all, but a lot of basically straight young men do indeed play for the other team somewhat when they are young anyway. I have a feeling that if you make a play for him, it will not work out right.

There are probably straight men who like to put their hands on other men, though it is a bit weird. If one of my straight leaning friends liked to put his hands on me, I might wonder if he had some bisexual tendencies. In other words,. I have a feeling that this guy is either a 100-0 like most men or at most he is a 90-10 or and 80-20. These types are very common in the straight male population.

100-0: Maximum heterosexual, minimum homosexual
90-10: Maximum heterosexual, incidental homosexual
80-20: Maximum heterosexual, significant homosexual
70-30: Maximum heterosexual, strong homosexual
60-40: Maximum heterosexual, very strong strong homosexual
50-50: Maximum heterosexual, maximal homosexual
40-60: Maximum homosexual, very strong heterosexual
30-70: Maximum homosexual, strong heterosexual
20-80: Maximum homosexual, significant heterosexual
10-90: Maximum homosexual, incidental heterosexual

As far as having long talks deep into the night, I used to do that with some of my male friends. I used to go over to their house every night where one guy worked on his model railroad track and I would hang out with him in his garage until it was time to go home around 9 or 10. And with another guy, I used to go over to his house almost every night where we would watch TV, usually basketball games,. with as bunch of other guys. We  would often smoke pot too. Once again, I would go home at 10 or so. With another guy, we would go out together, often ice skating, and then come home and have these long wild talks out in front of his house where we talked about everything under the sun. These talks would go on until 1 or 2 AM.

So what I am saying is that in deep straight male friendships, there can be long talks in to the night, and it doesn’t necessarily mean much.

There can also be some sexual attraction between straight male friends. I have seen this before. I am not sure whether these guys are 90-1o’ or 80-20’s who are not covering it up well (some seriously bisexual straight-leaning men can suppress their homosexual side very well) or whether these are 100-0’s who are expressing what I call “leakage.” Leakage is based on the idea that sexual feelings are simply energy – sexual energy. And energy wants to go some-lace. It doesn’t like to be bottled up. So if you bottle4 it up or perhaps for other reasons, sometimes it seemed like when I was with another straight man. Tis often happens when you are alone with another guy – I remember with one very macho guy we were up lately at night doing the most cocaine I have ever done in a night and I started getting these vibes from him. I ignored them, as I figured it was just leakage. With young men, when they are deprived of women for long periods of time, they get a lot of sexual energy bottled up. And this energy wants to come out, so it fills up the body and then begins “leaking” out. When sexual energy leaks out, it seeks whatever objects are nearby to fasten onto. If you are a straight man with a lot of bottled up leakage coming out and you are around a bunch of guys, it will leak out and attach itself to the men around ou even if you are straight and that energy is programmed to be attracted to females.

I do not know if you are aware of this, but two straight men can form very deep and passionate relationships. I mean very deep friendships that border on love. The only thing missing is sexual attraction a a phobia about gay sex. I have had some male best friends who I felt so deeply for that it did seem a type of love, but different from familial lover of the lover you feel for a woman. I remember on e guy who I used to think, “You know what? If I were gay, I think I would fuck this guy. That’s how close I feel towards him.”

But I had no sexual interest in him, and anyway both of us are quite straight with a serious phobia about gay sex such that there could never be anything sexual between us. I don’t even fantasize about men and never have. In fact, with these deep straight male friendships, it often seems that one of the things that makes it so deep is that you refrain from having sex with each other. You just take that off the table and pour all that excess energy into pure platonic friendship. I used to think that having sex with these guys even one time would ruin everything.

I guess my feeling is that this guy is a 100-0 or at most a 90-10 or 80-20  (probably more likely the other two). I do not have any more advice to give you. Maybe the commenters can give you some better advice.


Filed under Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, Man World, Psychology, Romantic Relationships, Sex