Category Archives: Man World

Americans Love Winners and Hate Losers

Jason Y: Robert said a macho man won’t complain about personal stuff – that makes him a wuss. I appear to be doing that about Korea.

You are complaining about other people being assholes. No one will mind that.

I am saying you cannot complain about stuff that makes you seem weak or lame. You can complain about anything outside of that. In particular, women really, really hate it if you complain about anything that makes you seem weak or lame. Have you ever had pets? Notice that one cat is sort of weak and submissive and frightened? Well, what happens? All the other cats, seeing that weak, frightened, submissive cat, instinctively attack that cat. That sort of behavior brings out the desire to attack in most mammals and we are nothing if not mammals. I am more afraid of women thinking I am weak or lame than men. Women are far harsher on men than our fellow men are.

The cause of “toxic masculinity” is women!

If you say you are being bullied for being weak or you complain about anything that makes you seem weak, women just instinctively hate that in general. The nicer ones will be pleasant about it, especially if she loves you. But a lot of women (and men too) have this winners – losers mindset. If you got bullied for whatever reason by mean, evil fucks, a lot of women and men will both side with bullies and see this as an example of you being a failed pussy wuss. I have actually had this happen to me. I did not get bullied too much as a kid (some) but I did get bullied some as an adult believe it or not. It was just a couple or a few people each time.

People will side with evil people if they bully you for being weak, a wuss, a pussy, etc. A lot of people, men and women, think if you didn’t act so damn weak, wussy, pussy, etc. you would not get bullied. It is called Blame the Victim. America is a Blame the Victim Culture. That is one truly shitty thing about this country.

And if you are siding with evil bullies tormenting some poor schmuck for whatever reason, being a wuss or whatever, frankly you are thinking like a sociopath.

The bullies are the winners. The bullied are the losers.

Americans side with winners. Americans hate losers – this one is particularly true.

This is a winner take all society.

America is a sociopathic country in that sense.


Filed under American, Culture, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Man World, Psychology, Psychopathology, Sex, Sociopathy

Cascada, “Because the Night”

More Electropop, this time out of Germany. Check out the statuesque Tuetonic blonde Nico type fronting the band.

This is actually a new musical movement called Eurodance. This did indeed come out of House and Techno DJ dance music of an earlier era, moreso than Electropop.

The original song is by Patti Smith, and it is excellent. I cannot recommend Patti Smith highly enough. She was one of the original punk rockers and she was actually a poet. Her music is real poetry set to music. She even shacked up with playright Sam Shephard for a while. She’s a bit butch, but she was always heterosexual. This is what I liked about the genderbending of the 1970’s. You could be an androgynous man like the guys in Mott the Hoople or Queen, Bowie’s band or the Dolls and still be 100% heterosexual. Mott were actually hyper-heterosexual, but a lot of people said they dressed like faggots.

Similarly, sure, Patti Smith is a bit butch for a woman, but she is ravenously heterosexual. Once again, in 70’s thinking, even fairly masculine women can be wildly heterosexual, and no one cares.

We are really getting away with this with the insane Cultural Left modern gay culture and the much more insane Trans Culture. We are getting back into essentializing gender again. I thought feminism was the opposite of that? The 1970’s were definitely the opposite of that. Gendered behavior was uprooted from sexual orientation. Men could be feminine. Chicks could be masculine. All without being faggots or dykes. Yay!

The crazy way we are now, most fairly feminine men have either gone over to gay somehow or are quite likely to be bisexual, often by preference and not biology. Worse, feminine behavior in men is seen as proof positive that you are a bit Tranny. There are even radical Trans activists who insist that all gay people are really trans and they all need to come out and transition and get it over with. Gay Politics birthed its child, Trans Politics, and now the offspring is attacking the parents. Once again the Cultural Left keeps sprouting and watering the seeds of its own destruction. Sort of like, you know…capitalism? Cue Marx.

Masculine women who would have been straight in the 1970s are now almost all lez or bi if not out and out transmen as gender has once again been essentialized moronically by the Cultural Left. What is nuts that is that another Cultural Left wing, Feminism, has always hated the essentialization of gender. This hatred is the raison de etre or feminism itself. So the Cultural Left’s various factions promote their own contradictions (cue Marx again) and the contradictions go to war against each other, tearing the host asunder.

If a man is as feminine as Bowie or Marc Bolan or the Dolls nowadays, he’s nearly always gay or bisexual if not out and out trans. All of these men, if growing up nowadays, would have gone seriously bi if not gay and at least Bowie would probably be a damned transwoman by now.

Do you see how the modern Cultural Left has limited the options of men and women. Straight men and women are once again shoved into masculine and feminine boxes, and you step outside, that’s prima facie evidence that you’re not straight and probably not cis anymore.

Way to go Cultural Left! Thanks for bringing 1950’s gender roles back to straight people.



1 Comment

Filed under Cultural Marxists, Culture, Feminism, Gender Studies, Glam, Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, Left, Man World, Music, Politics, Pop Culture, Punk, Rock, Sex

Lily Allen, “Who’d Have Known?”

Another great song from Lily Allen. I did not mention it in the last post, but this Electropop stuff is also great dance music. In addition to the 1980ish origins, it also has roots in techno and house dance music produced by DJ’s in dance clubs later on. I liked both techno and house.

Some great dance music, even if I had quit dancing by that time. I actually love to dance and supposedly I can dance pretty well. There’s one great thing about dancing, regardless of whether you think it’s faggy. And that’s because in a real way, dancing is the opposite of faggy. Women and girls love a great dancer, especially in a sexy, attractive and rather masculine male. Dancing is a very sexual activity – it’s nearly vertical sex de facto if you think about it. Dancing makes women horny. An ability to dance is a great component of Game, especially if you are attractive, fairly masculine and sexy.

What I am trying to say is that if you look good and your Game is good, being a great dancer can also get you laid. A lot. One great reason to take up dancing, guys!

That I dance well his is due to the fact that I have a partly Female Character. Face it guys, dancing in the West is a phenomenon rooted deeply in the Female Character. Yes, men do dance sometimes even in hypermasculine Arab, Kurdish and Turkic cultures, but let’s not fool ourselves. There’s nothing masculine in even that dancing. If you dance well, you have a feminine side, and that’s not a bad thing.

Is there any male dancing? Square dancing, line dancing, and of course slow dancing, etc. are rooted in the Female Character. There’s nothing masculine about flowing around in such a friendly way like that. The very fact that you are flowing, smiling, and warm shows you are acting female because females flow when they move while males move like mechanical objects or automatons in harsh, cold, blocky movements. Females also smile and act warm, while men scowl and act cold. These things are called Essential Gender Character. Check out the great Otto Weininger for more.

I would say that slam dancing is pretty masculine. Stage diving and slam pits are are all about the Male Character. Females trolling around the slam pit are acting pretty masculine, not that that’s a bad thing, since most if not all people have both Masculine and Feminine characters, following Weininger.

After all, testosterone is what makes women horny in the first place. The nuking of the female sex drive post-menopause (yeah, it’s real all right) is down to declining testosterone as much as declining estrogen. The greater sexuality of Black women may be down to increased testosterone. There are women who actually take testosterone supplements or get shots to revive a flagging sex drive.

Leave a comment

Filed under Biology, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Man World, Music, Psychology, Rock, Romantic Relationships, Science, Sex

Hebephiles and Their Internet Sites

This is another in our series of posts about sick, disturbing, or fucked up websites and the twisted deviants and perverts who go to them!

First we need to describe some terms, mostly because almost everyone either has no idea what this word means or they have a completely wrong definition of it.

A hebephile is a man who has a sexual preference for girls around the age of puberty.  It usually means something like 11-14 or 12-15.

That’s all he likes. He doesn’t like anything else.

I have been to their forums just because I like to go to anything sick or weird on the Net. I found hebephile forums to be very disturbing, even worse than pedophile forums, and yes, I have been on those a couple of times too.

In case you are now certain that going to those forums a few times makes me a sex offender, let me inform you that only ~50% of the people on your typical pedophile or hebephile forum are actual pedophiles or hebephiles. The rest…pedophile and hebephile haters! Yes, there as many haters as deviants on those forums. The haters threaten these age-regressed folks, abuse them, call them every name in the book, tell them they are all going to prison, threaten to hurt or kill them, etc. It’s an ugly scene.

But there is something creepy about hebephile forums. The very idea that there are adult men out there who think 16 year old girls look like 90 year old grandmas is somehow deeply disturbing. In fact, for a couple of days after visiting that forum, I almost had minor PTSD from the experience and I had a hard time thinking straight. The forum was literally unnerving.

And in case you are wondering, there is none of the real nasty and ugly child porn on any of those aboveground pedophile-hebephile sites. There’s almost none of the real bad pedophilic child porn on the real Net anymore anyway.

There is some hebephilic porn out there involving pubertal young teenage girls posing naked in lascivious positions. Their bodies look like women’s bodies, so it’s not that disturbing. Nevertheless, it is illegal as Hell, and I would not advise anyone to look at that stuff or collect it. Even if you glance at it, there’s a record in your browser, so don’t even get curious. It is also extremely difficult to find, and there is no way to find it accidentally.

I understand that almost all of the real nasty CP is on the Darknet now.

On hebephile forums, you are not allowed to post girls older than 15. If you post a 16 year old girl, the hebephiles all start screaming, “Oh gross…Ewww… Disgusting…I think I’m going to puke…no Grandmas!

Yeah. That’s how hebephiles think. They think 16 year old girls are “grandmas.” 

I assure you that I am certainly the farthest thing form a hebephile.


Filed under Child Porn, Gender Studies, Girls, Heterosexuality, Jailbait, Law, Man World, Pedophilia, Pornography, Psychology, Sex, Sick, Weirdness

Repost: My Theory on “Game”

This ran, incredibly, a full six years ago, but it’s amazing how well it has held up to the test of time. It’s such a good post that it deserves a rerun.

Curious asks me about my “game” philosophy. I didn’t want to write this post, but I decided to bang one out anyway.

First of all, women have no understanding of Game, similar to how they do not understand many things. Women think Game is evil. They think Game involves trickery, scamming, deceiving, and manipulating as a form of  seduction. Of course it can be that, and seduction is the biggest scam of them all. Honest player is an oxymoron. But it needn’t be so. It’s possible to have great Game if you are simply a very sexy man who is appealing to women.

Your Game is your sex appeal and everything you do to get women to like you.

Really your Game is simply your sex appeal. Your Game, more specifically, is all of those techniques, styles, behaviors, thoughts, feelings and manners that a man uses to try to get women. All men have Game. Even men with monogamous partners have Game. The monogamous man who is irresistible to women, the guy ever woman in the office wants but can’t have – this man has fantastic Game.

Obviously married men used Game to get into the relationship in the first place. Many monogamous men are nevertheless very smooth operators who are quite sexy to women. That’s their Game right there.

And their Game is also whatever techniques, styles, etc. they are using to keep the relationship on the up and up because all relationships with women, even marriages, must be Gamed. You have to Game your woman. You have to Game your wife. I’m sure there are a lot of men out there who will jump up and scream that they do not use any Game in their relationships or marriages. If that’s true, I feel sorry for them. I can’t think of an easier way to blow up a relationship or marriage than refusing to Game it and Game it well.

There are a set of blogs out there talking about Married Man’s Game. Yep, your Game is ongoing even after you get married, and there is a recognition in the Manosphere that even relationships and marriages must be Gamed to keep them functioning well.

Women will not understand anything I wrote above and will go on insisting that Game is some diabolical form of scammy and sleazy seduction. As I said, it can but it needn’t be. Fine. Let them think that. But you men should know better if you got this far already.

Where do you usually meet women? Bars? Social circle?

What does your Game consist of? What do you talk about with women that gets them attracted to you?

Women like me, and I know how to talk to women. Or at least they used to, and I used to. Now I’m not attractive to anyone. A lot of women still like just fine, but they don’t want me getting to close, especially the younger. It’s a very surface friendliness with the idea behind it that I should not try to make it friendlier and more personable.

I assume I still know how to talk to women. In fact, I just talked to a few women today on some dating sites. Apparently I’ve still got it.

I also understand women extremely well, that is, “I know women.” I know how they operate and how they think, and I can figure them out to some degree to the extent that they can be figured out by anyone. It’s very important to become a “student of women” and try to figure out what makes them tick.

This education should be reality based and subject to reality testing with real world women and not just something you read in some guy’s book or on a website somewhere. Like most things, it comes from real world experience.

Sadly, men who have little experience with women will never learn to understand them well and hence will probably continue messing up with them, acting inappropriately, etc.

I often go quite slow, and women often say I am very nice. That’s why they like me. They say, “You are kind to me”, “You are very nice to me.” Stuff like that. I know you are not supposed to be a nice guy, but it works pretty good for me.

On the other hand, I do not tolerate much in the way of shit from women. If they get out of line, sometimes I just say things like, “Shut up bitch!” Then I give them a big grin and start laughing. Curiously, they often respect that, but I would not overdo it. Women like a guy who stands up to their shit when they overstep their bounds.

I generally “let the woman lead” as far as conversation, flirtation, talking about sex, and whatever goes. I hold back and just make occasional probing remarks here and there and now and then and see how they respond. They are usually the ones who start talking about sexual stuff first, because I am not into jumping off with that. Sometimes I get the impression that they get frustrated with me because I am not moving on them, so they start moving on me.

I also apologize a lot and even ask if I offended them if I say something sexual. The response is usually, “No! Not at all!”

I know that going slow like that is not supposed to work, but it works for me.

My philosophy is “let the woman lead.” If you put her in charge of the situation, she feels empowered. It’s also important to have an accepting role of female sexuality. I don’t slut shame. I even slut praise. This opens them up so they feel relaxed about being sexual.

A lot of times they confess all sorts of wild sexual stuff to me – how they screwed two guys at once, got gangbanged, had sex with a woman, and all of the weird kinks and perversions they have. You would be amazed at how much wild sexual stuff many ordinary women have done and how bizarre, kinky, or even sick their fantasies or kinks are.

I accept all of their wild sexual activities and kinks. I cheer it all on and try not to slut shame in any way whatsoever. In my opinion, slut shaming in any way puts the cooler on female sexuality. Even women who have been to orgies and who like to have sex with other women don’t really like being slut shamed.

If a woman is more proper or takes pride in not being a slut, I cheer that on too, and tell her that I appreciate a woman like that, a woman who’s not a slut and takes pride in her sexual propriety. You praise her for being a good girl.

I know it’s hypocritical to both praise sluts for being sluts and good girls for being good girls, but that’s the way I roll.

I never admit or confess to any sexual weaknesses such as not getting any or being unsuccessful with women in any way, shape, or form. Nothing turns a woman off more than a guy who can’t get any.

I do make references to my sexual history, typically just to alleviate concerns that I am some sort of a virgin. I use “fake modesty” when I do this and say it in a matter of fact way like I was talking about drinking water. I also act like I am embarrassed about my history and often say it’s not all beds of roses, that there’s a downside to promiscuity. Women like studs but not braggart studs. More like modest studs who act like it’s no big deal, like breathing air.

I also often say that my promiscuous days are in the past, and now I am looking for one woman, as I am too old to run around now. That’s probably a lie, but it’s a great line. If you come right out and say you’re a player, and that’s the way you roll, you turn a lot of women off who don’t want to be Woman Number 4. Most women want to be Woman Number 1, and you have to make her feel like she has a chance to do that, even if she really doesn’t.

So don’t say, “I’m a player.” She thinks you will pump and dump her or you have various other women, and most women don’t dig that. Much better to come off as “reformed and chagrined player who had his fun but now he’s seen the light and ready to change and be a one-woman man” even if that’s a complete lie, which in my case it always has been. It doesn’t matter if what you tell women is true or not; all that matters is whether this or that line or attitude is going to work or not. If it doesn’t work, don’t say it. If it works, say it. Whether it’s true or a lie is irrelevant when dealing with women. If telling the truth is going to work, you tell the truth. If lying is going to work best, then you lie. Real simple.

I make a point to say how I like women better than men, and I prefer the company of women to the company of men ,and that’s just the kind of guy I am and have always been.

If they ask me why I never married, I say that I dated  200 women and girls in my life, and I had a great life with a lot of great love affairs and even long term relationships. That turns a number of them off right there, but others either laugh or get intrigued. Often they express shock and disbelief. Probably the most common reaction is uncontrolled laughter. For some reason, most humans, boys, girls, men, and women from 8 year old boys to 80 year old women think notorious playboys are hilarious. This is true across cultures too. That holds across cultures too. I told that to an Indian friend of mine and he told his wife, a proper and prim Brahmin women who may have been a virgin when she got married. I was afraid she would act disgusted but he told me she laughed for a good 10 minutes.

Then I say, “I just never married any of them.” Women don’t like older never married men too much. When I was younger, they didn’t even like younger never married men. The idea is that there is something wrong with you that turns off women, or you can’t get laid and you are a 40 year old virgin. Basically, never married screams “Loser!” to a lot of women. On the other hand, players get a pass.

If some notorious player never married, no one really cares too much. That is considered an acceptable way to be a hardcore bachelor. Once again, a lot of people seem to think it is hilarious too. As you get older, it can get even more hilarious because older men are not supposed to be like this. Older players are almost defying the laws of physics and for some reason, they are even more hilarious. They’re like a runaway train that even the US airforce can’t get.

I am happy being alone. I never say I am lonely or miserable even if I am. If I am depressed, I usually lie and say I’m not. I can’t think of anything stupider than telling  a woman you’re lonely, miserable, or depressed. You might as well take a felt pen and write loser across your forehead. This is what I mean when I said you have to lie to women. Being honest to women all the time simply doesn’t work. It’s a guaranteed fail. Why do it? You trying to win points with Jesus?

I admit that I am broke, but I say that I don’t care, and I am not into money. If you say you are broke and miserable, once again that screams loser.

Bottom line is if your life is screwed up in any way, don’t admit it to women. It’s a guaranteed fail. Simply embrace the screwed up areas of your life and say you are perfectly happy living in a slum, driving a rattletrap, or eating cans of beans for dinner or whatever it is that is messed up about your life.

The main thing is that if she sees you as weak, you are not going to get any. It doesn’t matter if you are weak in various ways in your personal life. All of us men are weak. The only men who are not weak are liars and dead men. So what if you’re weak about this or that! Just don’t admit it to women!

Women hate whiners. If you whine, women say get off your ass and solve your problem, idiot! And don’t complain too much, at least about personal stuff. You can complain about non-personal stuff all you want.

I am a very easy-going guy with a great sense of humor.

I ask women a lot about their own lives and get them talking about themselves a lot. This is great because people love to talk about themselves, and most guys don’t listen to women at all. If a woman is going on and on about the latest crazy drama she is involved in, simply lean forward, make occasional comments like, “I see”, “ok”, “And then what happened?”, “Ahhhh”. “He did?”.  you get the picture. That’s called active listening. You don’t have to actually listen to her. I think you should try to listen, but if her crazy hour-long drama story leaves you baffled, just lean forward and pretend you understand.

I’ve been doing this my whole life and women always say what a fantastic listener I am. Truth is a lot of the time I am just pretending to listen to them or humoring them when they are rambling on about some convoluted drama. I doesn’t work to tell women to shut up or that you are bored, that they’ve talked enough, or that you don’t care. That’s a fail. A lot of men do this. Men are notorious for not listening to women at all, telling them they are boring, tuning them out, walking out of the room, telling them to shut up, etc. I understand why men do this because women’s endless soap opera lives are rather insipid from our point of view.

The more crucial matter is: You want to get laid or not? Women love good listeners. That’s the best thing you can be. When women are happy with your behavior, they tend to reward you. As in, you get laid. What I am saying is pretend to listen to her if you want to have a sex life. I can’t tell you how many times I listened to some convoluted and absurd drama after dinner for a couple of hours. When she’s done, she typically said what a wonderful listener I am, got a smile on her face, and said let’s go in the bedroom. Get it? If you’re a good listener, she rewards you by fucking you!

With women I know on any level, I figure out where I am with them sexually to the extent if I can say anything remotely sexual or even friendly. Test the waters now and again with friendly conversation and see how far it goes. If she shuts it down, pack up and leave. Too many men keep pounding away and rejecting women like they are broken coke machines, and if you bang on them enough, a bottle comes out.

If you to figure where you are sexually with her, there are things you can say to bring that out. Compliment her on her outfit. Tell her she looks beautiful today. Be very careful about sexual conversations with women you know if you are not sure they are ok with that. That’s a serious danger zone. You can only talk about sexual stuff with women who have greenlighted you to do that. Way too many men get too friendly with unfriendly women and get way too sexual with women are not even friendly to them, forget sexually interested. This is the source of most women’s complaints about creepy behavior.

Women are not broken coke machines. A shutdown is a shutdown. It means bye bye, not try harder, I’m playing hard to get, etc. Way too many men keep persisting in the face of the obvious shutdowns and this the root cause of this #metoo idiocy.

With a lot of young women  nowadays, I can’t even get very friendly with them by engaging them in much conversation, forget talking dirty or flirting. They see me as an old man, and while they are polite to me, any conversation other than perfunctory is regarded as “overly friendly,” and if I try to do it, I tend to get hard shutdowns pretty quickly.

I monitor the situation all the time with all the women I know or in my life and keep a  database in my head regarding where I am with them on a friendly or sexual basis and hence how I am allowed to talk to them. Then I proceed to deal with them accordingly.

You can talk to different women about different things at different levels. Figure out what are the permissible levels of conversation with each women you deal with regularly and then deal proceed. Update regularly as if they were entries in a database. The more you do this, the less you will be accused of inappropriate or creepy behaviors.


Filed under Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Man World, Psychology, Romantic Relationships, Sex, Women

The Big Fat Feminist Lie: Men Can Get Sex Anytime They Want, Just Like Women

Jason: Anyway, these idiots don’t have any real problems I bet. They’re not skinny or fat, disabled,, so why are they so uptight? Surely they can get chicks?

All feminists say this crap. All of them. No exceptions! One more reason why feminists are garbage, as if there weren’t enough already.

This is the feminist bullshit again. Both male and female feminists insist that any man can go out and get laid by a woman anytime he wants. All you have to do is try. There’s all this free sex out there for the taking.

Ok, if this is true, that men can get laid just as easily as women:

Why is there a whore market?

How is it that the average woman has only three sex partners in her entire life if women are such sluts that any man can go get laid by a woman any time he feels like it? Obviously women are not giving it up too much. Sounds like they are only giving it up to a few men in the context of marriages or long-term relationships.

More importantly, if men can get sex from a woman anytime they want, why is that the average man has only six sex partners in his life? If straight men could get laid by a woman anytime they wanted to, I assure you they would have a Hell of a lot more than six sex partners in their lives. More like 50. Or 300!

That’s the way it is for gay men. Gay men can supposedly pretty much get sex anytime they want. If this theory about straight men being able to get women anytime they want is true, then this means that straight women are just as slutty as gay men. Is that true? Gay men are the biggest whores on the planet. Is it true that straight women are just as slutty as gay men? Let’s test this insane feminist theory out with real science and raw facts, the terrain of hard reality where all feminist theory bites the dust of unreason.

Straight women, median number of sex partners: 3.

Straight men, median number of sex partners: 6

Gay men, median number of sex partners, 51.

Gay men, average number of sex partners in a lifetime (asked of elderly gay men), ~300.

Gay men have 300 sex partners in their lives, and straight women have three. Yet straight women are just as whorish and slutty as gay men. Right!

This argument never did make sense. Anyone knows that. If free sex was that easy to get, how many men would buy whores? The whore market would dry up just like that. The only reason a whore market exists at all is because women can get sex anytime they want to and men cannot. I have heard male feminist pussy cucks give all sorts of insane reasons why a whore market exists even though the sexual marketplace is identical for men and women. One argument is that men want perverted stuff and that’s why they buy whores.

And you can’t get perverted sex from women nowadays? I don’t know about younger women, but sex with older women nowadays is like something out of porn movie. Whatever you want to do, they are pretty much down for it except for some really crazy stuff. There’s no need to buy a whore for wild porn sex anymore. Regular women are perfectly willing to accomodate, or at least that’s my experience. It’s so crazy that at my age, they even compete with other women to try to outwhore each other. Before you even have the first date, they list their whole sexual repoirtoire, taking pains to note how they will do things that most other women won’t do, and how their skills in _______ fill in the blank are better than those of 99% of women.

Anyway, straight men are not very perverted. Most straight men have relatively normal sexual tastes. They’re not nearly as perverted as gay men, who win the gold for the Sexual Perversion Triathlon every time.

More importantly, why do feminists believe this idiocy in the first place? Feminist ideology is that males and females are completely equal, right? So therefore the sexual marketplace for women must be the same as the sexual marketplace for men. Once you start admitting that the sexual marketplaces differ markedly, you start opening up the scary possibility that maybe men and women are not so equal after all…that maybe they are very different, on an inborn biological level yet. And feminists have to keep that biological gender horse from busting down the barn door, so they keep the barn good and locked. No thought crimes allowed,  for fear of total theoretical collapse. Keep up the charade to save the theory. The very ideology of feminism is at stake! This is an important matter!


Filed under Feminism, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, Man World, Sex, Women

How Many Sexual Partners Does the Average Gay Man Have During his Lifetime?

Answered on Quora.

According to the data from this website, the average older gay man has had 300 sex partners. That figure was from 20 years ago.

A more recent study put the average lifetime sex partners for gay men at ~50, but they did not control for age.

But the figures from the older days of the 1970’s and 1980’s were quite a bit higher than that. It looks gay men are much less promiscuous now than they were in the late 1970’s and 1980’s. The HIV epidemic seems to have dramatically affected their behavior that way.

Your average straight man has 6 sex partners in a lifetime.

So yes, gay men are dramatically more promiscuous than straight men, anywhere from 7 – 45 X more promiscuous.

This has been anecdotal evidence forever now. Gay men were quite promiscuous back in the days of the Kinsey Study too. And there are reports from places like Medieval Florence describing similar promiscuous and anonymous sex among gay men (meeting in parks at night, etc.)

I would say that promiscuity is part of the “Gay Male Syndrome.” Male homosexuality is not a mental illness, but it is a syndrome of some sort. The actual orientation is biological in all true cases, or at least they get wired up that way by age 15 and after that cannot be changed at all. But the cause of the rest of the syndrome is not known. Frankly, much human behavior can be described as syndromal, and it’s often hard to tease out what’s biological and what’s cultural in these syndromes.

I absolutely think that “Masculine Straight Male” is a syndrome, being rather afflicted with this syndrome myself! I would say in my case that a lot of it is cultural because I got it beaten (sometimes literally) into my head that this how I was supposed to act as a boy, but frankly, the way I was enculturated seemed to be boomeranging back somehow into some biological base, hidden, covert, unconscious or otherwise, but more mysteriously and vaguely present than anything else.

The culture and the biology tend to end up being “snake eating its tail” factors of endless feedback mechanisms where each one is feeding back into the other, and it’s hard to tear the strands of ivy apart and figure out what’s what.

If you enjoy the hard work that goes into this website, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site. Donations are the only thing that keep the site operating.

Leave a comment

Filed under Culture, Gender Studies, Health, Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, Illness, Man World, Psychology, Sex

An Example of Scientism

This is an example of scientistic nonsense.

There are many more.

One of my articles shows via a number of, yes, scientific studies, that all adult heterosexual men are attracted to minor females, especially 13-17, but also as many people refuse to believe, age 12-below. The number of adult males attracted to females below age 12 differs across the studies. I recall figures of 100%, 90% and 50%. One study showed a steady decline in attraction towards girls with the decline beginning at age 15 with 90% of max arousal and then steadily declining down to 12-below, where all men were experiencing arousal, but at a lesser and lesser level as the girls got younger. The study bottomed out at age 7.

That all men are attracted to teenage girls is self-evident. The only men who aren’t turned on by jailbaits of JB’s are dead men and gay men. So if you are a straight man who says teenage girls don’t turn you on, you’re either lying or you’re gay. Sure, men can be maximally turned to females 16+ and  turned on, but a lower level, decreasing with age, as girls get younger. In other words, yes, young girls 12-under turn on men, but they don’t turn them on very much. It ends up being a “meh” moment. But no, everything has to be all or nothing. We can’t even have 1% arousal to a girl. That throws you out of the normals and into the sicko pedophile category.

This is because most idiotic humans in our modern era believe that the only normal men are men who experience:

100% arousal to adult women

0% arousal to girls under the age of 18.

This is the only way to be normal. If that bottom figure creeps even into 1%, you go out of the Normal category and into some species of Pedophile category. Of course this goes against everything that sexologists have learned about male sexuality since the field began, but humans are quick to reject science when it doesn’t come up with the right conclusions.

I have no idea why this is so controversial.

Anyway, someone posted this over in some incel forum.  Although the article pointed out that adult men were turned on girls age 7-12 but only at a much lower level, that finding was disregarded. Instead, the findings about JB’s were the source of the conflict. The study found that men were aroused by girls age:

15: 90% of max

14: 80% of max

13: 70% of max

Other studies have found that all normal males react at a maximal level to females age 13+. It is the findings on girls age 2-12 that are so controversial. The teenage girls aren’t even up for grabs. Everyone knows how men feel about them.

Well, the forum went into a wild frenzy. “Scientistic” types began demanding to see good studies documenting this obvious fact that men are turned on by teenage girls. When the studies were presented, the scientistic people immediately began tearing them apart, saying they were poorly done, not controlled, had selection bias, etc. Then there were not enough studies. We needed replication.

The completely retarded thing about this whole discussion was that the question that they were demanding endless replicated and perfectly conducted studies to decide was one that shouldn’t even need a lab. The only reason it got tested at all, I assume, is because people are idiots. The question is:

Are normal adult men turned on by teenage girls?


Well of course they are!

I arrived at this conclusion independent of any science whatsoever. I don’t scientific studies to live my normal day to day life. To me, this is simply the obvious truth based on years, nay decades of observation of adult males. Of course it’s true! Obviously it’s true! How could it not be true? Over 95% of the things I and probably you believe in our day to day lives were arrived at via this simple method. Observation, hypothesis making, hypothesis testing (call it real life reality testing), and conclusion. We are all (hopefully) engaging in this mini empiricism with and endless variety of objects and ideas about our lives and our world. Most of the things we believe derive from the following principle,  which is after all, the very first principle in science:


Back when science was first getting off the ground, it was soon agreed that the first step in any scientific study was simply observation. The scientist simply observes some interesting natural phenomenon. He then makes some sort of a hypothesis about this phenomenon – either its nature, etiology, or purpose. He decides if it is a temporary phenomenon that means not much or if it is part of some overall pattern. If it is part of a pattern, he conducts studies to try to show what that pattern is.

This is precisely what you, me, and every other thinking human does day in and day out every single day. We know so many things we know because we have observed them a number of times so that we have made a hypothesis about what is going on. We have decided what is true and what is not true, and what is partially true, and when, where, why, and how?

My point is that that is Scientism taken to its most idiotic form.

First humans deny the obvious for sociological reasons – in this case, a preposterous Western society that has decided that any adult man who is aroused by a teenage girls is a pedophile. Of course this goes against the wisdom of our elders and surely the views of over 95% of tribal groups ever studied.

In fact, I would love to see one tribal group anywhere that decided that adult men getting aroused by girls under 18 was anything but 100% normal. Sociological beliefs come with enforcement: social sanction, employment sanction, and possibly even legal sanction. Many sociological beliefs are blatantly false, yet societies continue to believe in them anyway.

This is incidentally true for most tribal societies, who believed crazy things not just because they lacked the science to know that they were wrong but because their societies told them certain things were facts. Society is by its nature conforming, and for good reason. You can hardly have a society of nonconformists. The pressure to believe society’s Lies Du Jour is profound. Your social life, your livelihood, your sanity and even your status as a free man may well depend on it. You defy society’s lies at your own peril.

The very idea that such an obvious fact of human existence like adult men’s arousal to teenage girls would even have to be scientifically tested at all is the worst sort of Scientism. Why in God’s name would anyone test such an obvious thing.

Well, for one, they might test it because society tells them that what they know to be true is actually false.

And this study and its reactions show just how stupid scientistic types are. Not only do they preposterously ask for a scientific test of one of the most obvious truths of mankind – but they reject the obvious conclusion (which lines up with millenia of accumulated cultural wisdom) demanding more tests, better tests, replication, more controls, better selection of subjects, on and on.

If you enjoy the hard work that goes into this website, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site. Donations are the only thing that keep the site operating.


Filed under Gender Studies, Girls, Heterosexuality, Jailbait, Lolitas, Man World, Mass Hysterias, Pedophile Mass Hysteria, Science, Sex, Social Problems, Sociology

The Reality of Anal Sex in the USA in 2018


Personal Confession

Am I the only straight male here who finds heterosexual anal sex awkward?

I don’t think there is nearly as much of this type of sex going on as you might think. You look at porn and the women are getting fucked in the ass all the time like it’s as normal as the missionary position, but that does not seem to represent reality.

One of my best friends is a former porn star, and he told me that he doesn’t like anal sex – it’s not his thing.

A lot of guys have never even done it.

I have had sex with more women and girls than 95% of men, and I’ve only done it once! It was ok, but she made me go really slow, and I could not get off.

I have stuck a finger in woman’s asses before, once by accident. I was with a girlfriend who was an anal sex freak who had probably done it 2,000 times. I went to put my finger in her pussy and I put it in her ass instead, just like all those Asian “Wong ho!” jokes! I guess a lot of anal changes your ass because that finger went right in like it was nothing. The whole finger went in, no problem at all.

I have had women stick their fingers in my ass. But the last time that happened, she pulled her finger out and it was covered with blood. I have hemorrhoids, so maybe that is the problem. Also women need to trim their nails or wear a glove if they are going to do that. I am not sure if I am going to do that act again. I will probably just bleed again.

I recently had a date with a woman, and even before the first date, she reeled off her sexual repertoire like she was bragging or competing with other women. I hadn’t even been talking to her all that long and she rattled out her skills, “Ok, this is what I do: deep throat, anal, you can tie me up, and you can handcuff me. I’m a nympho, and I want to do it all the time, up to 3-4 times a day.” She was 50 years old too!

I met her on a dating site. I was actually shocked. I don’t know if this is a thing with younger women too, but it seems like older women are trying to compete for men by out-whoring each other and trying to be a better fuck than the competition. Of course I encourage this trend.

On the first date, we talked about what kind of sex we would have once we got around to it (she wanted to wait a bit). We ended up talking about anal sex.

She said, “You’re going to get shit on your dick.”

I said, “Nope, don’t think so, you’re going to do an enema, baby!”

She said, “I refuse to do an enema!”

I said, “Fine, no anal.”

She insisted that in anal sex it was completely normal for the guy to get shit on his dick. That leaves me out I guess. I am not getting shit on my dick. If she cleans herself out before I might do it though.

I’ve met an awful lot of women who told me they’re not into it. It’s pretty common for women to not want to do that act.

However, a lot of them have never tried it and are curious about it though. I remember one wanted me to break her in and show her how to do it. We were just talking though, never got around to actual dating. It’s amazing how dirty women talk nowadays before you’ve even had one date with them! Of course I encourage this trend.

So yes, a lot of women are curious anal virgins. I’ve run into that quite a bit with women I was talking to and even women I dated. I just never took any of them up on it. The whole idea that there are all these women out there who love anal sex so much they practically demand it seems absurd. Porn is an alternate universe.

Considering I have only done it once and I am 60 years old, I may well never do it again,  which is fine by me.

If you enjoy the hard work that goes into this website, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site. Donations are the only thing that keep the site operating.



Filed under Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Man World, Pornography, Sex

American Hypersexed Culture An Illusion Propagated by Gay Hollywood

This comment was from a post I wrote noting that the median straight man has sex with six women in his lifetime, and the average straight woman has sex with only three men in her lifetime. Of course, this goes against the literally insane culture that all single straight men can just go out and get sex anytime they want.

Curiously (or perhaps not so curiously) this idiocy is promoted by feminists, especially male feminists, more than anyone else. I am not sure why, but feminism is simply Feminine Thinking Politicized (and Weaponized) or better yet the Feminine Character Politicized (and Weaponized).

Females, at least here in the modern West, are convinced that any single man can go out and get sex anytime they want to. I ask women about this, and they answer, “Well they could just go to a bar and they’re guaranteed to get a woman to have sex with them that night.” I try to tell them that this is not the case at all, and if were that easy to get laid in bars and clubs, men would spent all their time there, and society would come a halt, but it’s like talking to a wall. I don’t get through to them. They simply cannot comprehend it.

Let me tell you something. As noted above, if it were literally that easy to get laid in a bar or even a club, bars and clubs would be swarming with men every night and probably all day long too. In fact, I would probably be  writing this piece at a table at a bar myself, at 11 AM yet.

They think this way because of solipsism. Quite simply, females are solipsistic. Because of this solipsism, women are unable to put themselves in males minds and try to think like men or see the world as men do. This is why women see the world as a fantasy creation of the dream world of Feminine Character instead of how it actually is – a cold, cruel, unfair world where you barely stand a chance.

In this case, most women can  get laid anytime they want to. “By lowering your standards!” They retort. Of course that is true, but the average attractive woman could easily have her pick of 10-15 attractive men every day if she chose, at a minimum. Female humans, like other female animals, are notoriously fickle about their sexual partners and test them for fitness, choosing the best one who will pass on the best genes just like any other mammal, or even a bird or a fish for that matter. Females have been picky for a long way back in our heritage, all the way back to when we were frogs, if any of you can remember that far back.

Hence, due to female solipsism, if a woman can get laid anytime she wants, obviously a man can get laid any time he wants to because whatever is true for women is true for men and woman can only see the world as it is for women and not how it is for men.

Anyway this is a very interesting take only the Big Lie of the Reality of the Hypersexed Culture. What I mean is that the hypersexed culture exists, but not really in reality. Instead it exists as a fantasy world of the media and entertainment, and includes porn.

I believe the hypersexed culture is largely a media creation. The product of a media composed disproportionately of gay men writing about their own hyper promiscuous sex lives under the guise of heterosexual characters. TV has normal males in this culture confused under the delusion that all the other heterosexual men around them are getting random hookups with women in the exact same way the gays get it in the gay bars.

In The Myth of Heterosexual Aids by Fumento, besides his analysis of the particularly filthy, infectious nature of anal sex with gays both giving and receiving it up the ass. He also talks about the general nature of the heterosexual vs. gay lives and shows a statistic that the average straight man has 0.85 sex partners per year vs. 60 for the gays. That’s between 1 and 0 meaning most men are either monogamous in some sort of relationship, or blue balled. Any player types can’t be very common, or the number would be over one rather that under. Only in the faked-out media are there all these girls looking for random sex with strangers. The only ones that do are getting paid for it, or it’s a man in women’s clothes trying to trick men into a Crying Game moment.

If you enjoy the hard work that goes into this website, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site. Donations are the only thing that keep the site operating.


Filed under Culture, Feminism, Gender Studies, Health, Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, Illness, Man World, Pop Culture, Pornography, Psychology, Regional, Romantic Relationships, Sex, USA, Women