Category Archives: Man World

Protected: Boys’ Tree House (No Girlz Allowed!)

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Enter your password to view comments.

Filed under Gender Studies, Man World

Alt Left: The Cultural Left Freakshow – Two Steps forward and One Step Back

Back in the 1970’s we had the idea that most men had a feminine side and most women had a masculine side, the degrees varying among different folks. We straight men had a lot of freedom in terms of gender expression. This was the glam rock and disco era, and we could do all sorts of crazy things without getting called gay. The assumption was everyone was straight until proven otherwise, which makes sense to me. No one talked about homosexuality much. Gays were not much out and consequently you hardly saw one or heard about them. Obviously they were walking about invisibly, but one could almost delude oneself that homosexuals barely existed.

If I wore now those crazy outfits I wore back, people would insist that I was gay. This would be a proven fact and no amount of arguing could convince anyone otherwise. This would also be the case if I acted as androgynous now as I did then. I always had a strong masculine side, but I had a strong feminine side running along with it in such an incomprehensible mix that a lot of people threw up their hands about my sexual orientation. I can’t tell you how many times people asked me in exasperation, “Are you straight or bi or gay or what!?” I didn’t make sense.

I was able to be a much softer, gentler, kinder, man, and I connected to women much better. Most of my friends were women because it seemed like I thought like them and that made it easy to click with them, and frequently macho males often made me sick. I used to joke that guys either wanted to fuck me or beat me up and sometimes both.

I’m angry and sad. I enjoyed having more of my feminine side out. It’s a beautiful part of me, and it softens a lot of my typically male aggression. I adopted a hard, tough, Alpha masculine role, and while I could do this, I had to lower my feminine side to do it. Hypermasculine is not bad and a lot of women like it, but I often feel that I don’t act like myself anymore,

The rise of gay rights also reduced a lot of gender expression for straight men because straight men began constricting their gender expression to hardening the masculine and reducing the feminine as a way to not be seen as gay.

If you want to know why men act hypermasculine, here you go. I am straight but I have been gay-bashed three times, once with a baseball bat. He was beating me in the head with the bat and screaming faggot. Also, people often thought I was gay or bi, and radfems might disagree, but this is not a good thing for a straight man in straight society, as it causes a lot of stupid problems that never seem to go away. And gay men won’t leave you alone.

You can solve all of these problems, avoid getting beaten by bats, and keep gay men at much more of a distance if you just macho it up to hypermasculinity. We men are not stupid. We don’t act hypermasculine to scare off women or hate women. Often it just makes life so much easier.

 

7 Comments

Filed under Culture, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, Man World, Politics, Sex, Social Problems, Sociology

Alt Left: We Are All Trans Now!

Actually, according to trans people, you, me and everyone else are all already trans! What little I knew! This is because I of course have masculine and feminine components, though I am a man. All women have masculine and feminine components also. So the fact that I am a masculine man who definitely has a feminine side somehow means that I can’t be a man, but instead I am some weird species of trans creature! Perhaps I am one that science has not discovered yet. None of you women are women either as you are all both feminine and masculine.

The only way to be a man is to be 100% masculine! Wow, that’s virulent toxic masculinity in a nutshell, that not only bashes gay men but also bashes a lot of straight men for being “fags” too. Such are men socialized into hardcore masculinity. It’s either that you or you get called gay your whole life, plus you get your ass kicked a few times.

The only way to be a woman is to be 100% feminine. Isn’t that a bit ridiculous? Like some swooning Southern belle, a silly, petty, giggly, and ultimately usually moronic creature who has gone so overboard on the femininity train that she is a caricature.

We are all trans now!

1 Comment

Filed under Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Man World, Psychology, Ridiculousness, Sex

Alt Left: A Little Respect Goes a Long Way

Jason: I hate to play the devil’s advocate, but sometimes women, children, men are asking for violence. In other words, without a culture of fear, these people would become so tyrannical as to be worse than possible people who would punch them.

I have always said that the world of men or Man World operates on a Terror Principle. The glue that holds the whole damn thing together is what I call “the threat of a punch in the face.” We men are so violent. Many of us men are terrified of other men. There are countless rules in Man World, and when you break some of them, the penalty can be a punch in the face or worse. I’m nice and decent to men and follow the rules of Man World mostly so other guys won’t punch me in the face.

Or worse!

As a result, I have gotten into quite a few fistfights with other men. Hell, I still get into about one fistfight a year, and I’m 60 years old! I have pulled large knives on and pepper sprayed other men, been roughed up by cops a couple of times, had detectives threaten to beat confessions out of me in their office. I took a baseball bat and smashed someone’s front door down with it. I’ve made bombs that blew up car windshields and firebombs that set lawns on fire. I’ve slashed people’s tires. I’ve turned cars upside down with groups of other men. I’ve blown out glass doors with slingshots.

I’m not bragging here but I know just how dangerous men are. Hell, I’m even dangerous myself! How’s that for confirmatory evidence?

And I am actually a pretty pacifistic fellow. It’s just that I don’t take any shit from anyone, and I believe in paybacks. Almost all of the above, someone attacked me first or harmed me in some serious way.

Women sure act a lot better when they defer to men and are afraid of us. I run into this all the time, even with teenage girls. They defer to me and act a bit like they are afraid of me. As a result of this fear, they defer and are also very nice and almost submissive. My end of the deal is to be very nice back to them, a perfect gentleman.

It’s as if they are saying, “I am afraid of you, so I will defer to you and act submissive to you. In return please don’t hit me or kill me and please be nice to me.”

The men say, “Thank you for your deference and submissiveness. I will be very kind and gentlemanly to you as a result.”

It works perfectly. They have their end of the deal to uphold, and I have my end of the deal to uphold. If I act like a dick, they’re free to turn into bitches real fast, which most of them will do, and is their right.

This is how civilization works. Notice how Japanese women or sometimes even men bow in front of you when they meet you. Everybody’s pretty much kissing everyone else’s ass all the time. It may seem degrading and humiliating, but if people are always kissing your own ass too, it’s no big deal. I kiss other people’s ass; they kiss my ass, no problem.

You end up with a very polite society – so polite it is almost neurotic and too polite. It is sort of a transactional thing. People are cutting these ass kissing deals (shows of pure respect) and in response, the person who received the pure respect has to be grateful for the respect and kind to the person who gave it to him.

The Japanese almost like Blacks in a way in that they think the worst thing is to “diss” someone. It’s just that if you diss a Japanese, he will just think you are either a caveman or barely human, almost on the level of a dog and he will act disgusted with you. When you diss a Black man, he puts a bullet in your head. In both cases though, it’s quite clear. Humans, especially males, demand respect. When it’s not given to them, it can be an unpretty picture.

Leave a comment

Filed under Asians, Blacks, Culture, Gender Studies, Japanese, Man World, Northeast Asians, Psychology, Race/Ethnicity, Regional, Sociology

Alt Left: Modern Western Women Have No Fear of Men. Is That Rational?

I think women should fear men a lot more.

Let me give you an example.

I know my people. I am terrified of men. I know what we are like. Already several men have tried to murder me, and the only way I got away was to try to kill or possibly kill them first (I didn’t stick around to judge the results of my counterattack.) And this doesn’t not even account non-fatal attacks like kidnappings, sexual assaults, and beatings, including being jumped by five men at once and being beaten by a baseball bat.

To radical feminists, male violence against men is meaningless, and radfems have zero empathy for male victims of male violence. For radfems, it’s all about the wimmins. And maybe the chillins. That’s right. The only male violence that radfems care about is male violence against women and kids!

As a result of my experiences, I am not impressed by radfems erasure of male violence against men.

Men are violent period.

It makes no sense to single out violence against women. There’s nothing special about violence against women, and I doubt if most is driven by misogyny. Men are just violent period and they lash out at everything around them for various reasons. I haven’t really been a woman beater in my life (I’ve hit a few but they hit me first, and I didn’t do much damage), but if I were a violent man looking around for something to take my rage out on, I would surely attack a woman before a man simply because she would be an easy target to me. I don’t think women realize how dangerous it is for men to attack other men.

As a result of my experiences, I am terrified of men, and I defer to them almost always, even completely breaking down and going disgustingly submissive if I have to keep a violent man at bay. I don’t start fights with men. I don’t insult men and I am very careful of everything I say to men so as not to inadvertently insult them. I never call a man gay unless I am pretty sure that’s what he is. I never attack a straight man’s masculinity. Where I live, you call a straight man gay or attack his masculinity, you are going to get hit. Period. And no one will call the police or defend you.

I have been appalled my entire life at how fearless women act around men. They deliberately pick and start fights with us, and in many cases they seem to be trying to push men to their limits or past them. That’s called “trying to get murdered” in Man World. In Man World, you do that and some guy beats you up or kills you, everyone at the bar will blame you because you basically poked a tiger with a stick. When women fearlessly provoke men like this, it’s as if they are taunting a grizzly bear with a stick and defying it to attack them.

I am not defending male violence against women (or anyone really). But is it too much to ask women to not go out their way to deliberately pick fights with, antagonize, prod, and provoke dangerous men into violence? At the very least this seems profoundly stupid. Of course women have the right to defend themselves. But I’m not talking about that. I’m talking about starting stuff with innocent men, which women do constantly, especially nowadays. How does that make sense? Why pick a fight with a maniac, which is what most of us men are? I don’t get it.

If I am terrified of male violence as a man for God’s sake, why aren’t much weaker women as afraid of men as I am?

Women must regard men as inherently dangerous creatures who are capable of violence, even homicidal violence, at almost any time. The advice would be for women to either avoid dangerous men or at least tread carefully around them, right?

7 Comments

Filed under Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Man World, Psychology, Sane Pro-Woman, Sex

Alt Left: The Madness of the Cultural Left Freakshow Known as the Nonbinary Community

This group also ties in the “queer” movement, which really means nothing at all, pansexual people, which makes little more sense, and nonbinary, which doesn’t make much sense either.

All of this craziness has been taken on by of all people radical feminists, who are not known for being rational. But on this issue they are straight up sane. Radfems argue quite logically that there are only two genders: you’re either a male or a you’re a female. Transwomen are men who think they are women, and radfems are not fond of them for a variety of reasons. Transmen are women who think they are men. Radfems don’t talk about them much, but one criticism is that they are about as extreme as a female self-hater can get. That’s hard to argue with.

Let’s look at some of these silly words coming out of the Queer, Intersectional and Third Wave sex-positive feminist movement (radfems are actually Second Wavers from all the way back in the 1960’s)

What do any of these words mean? Bisexual, lesbian, gay, straight, ok, straightforward and descriptive.

What is queer? So far, no one has given me an answer that makes sense. A professor who I read has recently come out as queer. He’s a geeky straight guy with a normal girlfriend and a little kid, but he’s a radical professor always writing about modern insurrectionary or revolutionary movements.

I don’t care that he’s a dork. His girlfriend loves him and some men are just this way. But as far as I can tell, he identified as queer simply out of solidarity with gay/lesbian/bi/trans people. That’s his way of being an ally. This guy is hardcore straight. He’d never touch another man and he’s not remotely feminine. So he’s completely straight and 100% “cis.” So what does his calling himself queer even mean? What does it mean when anyone says that? I will tell you what it means. Queer means absolutely nothing at all. Put it in the word trashcan.

I don’t like pansexual either. This is an idiotic term. Look, you can be straight, bisexual, or homosexual (lesbian or gay).

Trans is nonsense. It’s nothing. These are very feminine men or very masculine women who mostly have gone so far off the gay scale that they now believe they are opposite sex. Well, that’s dumb.

Look, let’s get real. If you are a very masculine woman and a lesbian, why not just be a lesbian? Everyone knows that extremely masculine lesbians are not rare. In fact they are quite common.

Ok, say you are a very effeminate man who is homosexual. Once again, that’s not uncommon. A recent study found 70% of gay men were effeminate but only 3% of straight men were. This makes sense to me as people have always known that many gay men are at least somewhat effeminate. This goes along with the homosexuality. Not everyone likes it but most just think, “Well gay men are just like that. It’s normal for them to be femmy.”

But what is a pansexual? Does that word even have a meaning? I am a linguist and to me that is an empty semantic concept that is just a “fill in the blank with whatever meaning the word has to you” type thing. In other words, word trash can.

What are pansexuals? Pans will have sex with men and women. Not a problem. Those people are called bisexuals and they are quite common, more common than homosexuals. So why not just be bi? Why go full idiot all the way to pan? Well, pan as best I can tell means you will have sex with cis men and women (in other words, real men and women who lack delusions about their gender). Fair enough.

But bi is not ok here because in addition to that, you will also have sex with these trans creatures, who are just men who think they are women and women who think they are men. Obviously they are human, but pan implies that they are not men, nor are they women. Well what are they then? Are they identifying as humans? Humans are all either males or females. What are you if you are neither? An alien?

So pansexuals will have sex with regular men and women. Cool. But they will also have sex with these trans oddities, which are also regular men and women except they are nuts. But according to “pan,” there’s men, there’s women, and then there are these trans creatures, who apparently are two varieties of hominids that are neither male nor female. What a dumb word that is.

Demigirl and Demipan are two of the 133 different types of gender. Each has some silly slice of meaning that I cannot recall now. I have been called a reactionary forever now for calling bullshit on this nonsense. Facebook recently offered users 133 different genders to choose from. Male and female don’t cut it anymore, folks! This should be the subject of a joke, but instead it really happening, and most folks are taking it seriously, shrugging their shoulders, and saying, “Cool, 133 different genders. Like Baskin Robbins, but better.”

Almost all of these crazy genders are simply varieties of homosexual and in some cases bisexual. As far as I can tell, straight people do not go “non-binary.”

The reactionaries laugh at the Left, but can you blame them? The Left is a laughingstock.

2 Comments

Filed under Cultural Marxists, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, Left, Man World, Ridiculousness, Sane Pro-Woman, Sex

What Is Sissy Porn?

Sissy Porn is a type of porn that focuses on transwomen, especially pre-op transwomen. Transwomen are men who think they are women. Many get operations to cut off their penis, but many others just keep it on. The ones who keep it on are called pre-op transsexuals. Pre-op trannies have been popular in porn for a long time now, and oddly enough, many to most of the consumers of Sissy Porn are straight men.

The general term for pre-op transsexuals in porn is sissies. A lot of Sissy Porn focuses on how humiliating it is for these men to admit to being gay or acting like a woman. These things destroy the core of their masculine essence in a degrading way, but that is what the sissies get off on. In this type of porn, many times women are forcing the sissies to put on women’s clothes, have sex with men, etc.

I am sure that radical feminists could come up with a nice theory around these transwomen being humiliated by the very idea of being a woman. I mean being a woman is so humiliating, right?

I can’t help notice that these Sissies are some of the dirtiest “women” out there. There are women who are that dirty, but they are not real common.

Once you figure out that they are really just men, their sexual extremism and ultra-sluttiness all makes sense because male sexuality tends to go in a whorish, porned out, extreme direction if it’s not challenged and halted by straight female gatekeepers. I have always thought straight women gatekeepers were a good thing for keeping straight male sexuality fairly controlled.

I mean think about it. Take the brakes off straight men, and watch us start acting like gay men in a New York minute. The depravity of gay male sexuality is not particular to their homosexuality. This is simply the way that male sexuality looks when you take all the brakes off it that are imposed by women. That unleashed extreme, near-suicidal pure male sexuality is not a pretty picture. We straight men are lucky we have women as gatekeepers.

2 Comments

Filed under Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, Man World, Pornography, Radical Feminists, Sane Pro-Woman, Sex

Alt Left: Be Careful What You Wish for, Feminists

Feminism has been shot through with hatred of men since the day it started. The very first Second Wave feminist demonstrations featured shrewish women yelling in the streets, “Starve a rat!” They were advocating that all women stop cooking dinner for their husbands. All women’s husbands were considered automatically to be rats.

Feminists claim it’s a lie that feminists hate men. I have been testing out this theory for a long time now because I was not sure it was true. It’s true. Most feminists definitely hate men. Or if not then they are angry at men and want paybacks and revenge. Feminists don’t want equality. They want revenge. They want us to suffer for all we did to them in the past. There are some feminists who do not hate men at all, but they are usually not openly involved in the movement to the extent that they are writing articles and commenting on feminist websites.

The Second Wavers were of course the worst when it came to man-hating. Most of the heroes of Second Wave feminism were such virulent man-haters that one wondered if their hatred of men was near  psychotic proportions. Mary Daly, Julie Bindel, Valerie Solanis, Robin Morgan, Audre Lourde, Angela Davis, Andrea Dworkin, Catherine McKinnon. All of these were part of a movement called Radical Feminism.

Apologists often say that Dworkin and Solanis were outliers, but even Solanis genocidal SCUM Manifesto is considered one of the canonical texts of modern feminism. I’m serious. Even otherwise sane Betty Friedan led the charge against the male birth control when a scientist in Brazil said he had made one. The idea that men could control whether women got pregnant or not sent the feminists into conniptions.

Apologists also say that Radical Feminism is a tiny movement in modern feminism. That’s not true. Almost all existing Second Wavers are radfems. Nowadays you are either a radfem or a Third Wave intersectional sex-positive liberal feminist. The latter are probably more common, but there’s no shortage of the former.

I would agree that Third Wavers don’t hate men nearly as much as Second Wavers do. After all, the Third Wave is predicated on sex-positivity, which implies that these women have to like us enough to tolerate having sex with us. However, Third Wavers are still man-haters to some extent or at least they apologize for them.

Even Babe Magazine, a Third Wave flagship publication, apologizes for the man-haters, claiming most of them are just joking. Jezebel is one of the better Third Wave feminist sites and many of the commenters are very much involved with men. Nevertheless, I would consider a lot of them to be at least moderate man-haters. The Third Wave toned down the man hatred but it didn’t get rid of it.

Thing is most straight women don’t hate men. I should know, I’ve been dating them and trying to date them my whole life. I am often shocked at how much the average women actually likes or loves us men. I often wonder how much we deserve it. With all the bad things we do to women, they still just can’t stop loving us.

Maybe that’s Natural Law kicking in again. Nature wants women to love men. Man-hating women are going against Nature. Natural Law says that violations of Nature will be tolerated but the violators will often function less well or be less happy. And indeed, the shrillest manhating feminists sure don’t seem very happy. It’s hard to be happy when you’re that pissed off.

All this stupid man-hatred has been very bad for Feminism, which after all, is one of the great Liberation Movements of the 20th Century – the movement for the liberation of women from male domination, control and bondage and towards greater equality between the sexes. Most women are actually in favor of this goal. But feminism has gotten so tainted with man hatred that only 20% of American women say they are feminists. That’s right. 80% of US women refuse to identify as feminists.

Furthermore, I would gather that men are leaving the feminist movement in droves. I was once involved in feminism and identified as a feminist. I was actually a dues-paying member of NOW, the National Organization for Women. I no longer identify as a male feminist, though I do support equity feminism. A stroll around the Web will reveal a wide streak of men who are openly anti-feminist along with a few women who are angry that their desire for equality with men has been ruined by the shrieking manhating harpies.

Why the blowback? I think the feminists have finally pushed us men too far. All Identity Politics movements endlessly push for more benefits for their group. Even after they achieve what looks like success, they will keep pushing because the whole nature of their movement is predicated on endless victimhood and moving the equality goalposts further away each time the movement nears the goal line. Furthermore, I don’t even think most IP movements even want equality. They say they do, but most want to go beyond equality and turn the tables by dominating the group that once dominated them. And there’s your paybacks, revenge, make em pay, etc.

The feminists have only themselves to blame for this whole nasty blowback, with all of the attendant misogynistic MRA’s, MGTOW’s, PUA’s, and incels. They birthed this monster by pushing too far.

By the way, a lot of these feminists have more or less declared war on us men. I don’t like to threaten people, but feminists might want to think twice before they declare war on men. I know my crazy gender very well.  Do feminists really want to go to war with men? Once men declare war on feminists in return for their shots across the bow, it won’t be a pretty picture. In any real war between men and women, the women will always lose. Furthermore, the omnipresent homicidal rage of men, typically suppressed or repressed in most of us, will ensure that any war will ugly indeed. The Incels are already murdering women just for being women. And that won’t be the end of it either.

Be careful what you wish for, feminists.

 

4 Comments

Filed under Crime, Culture, Feminism, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Man World, Philosophy, Politics, Psychology, Radical Feminists, Romantic Relationships, Scum, Sex, Social Problems, Sociology

Alt Left: The Goal of Feminism: To Make All Flirting Potentially Illegal

According to the feminuts, the definition of sexual harassment is “unwanted sexual advances or attention.”

This crazy daffynition has really taken off among the younger generation. Fully 1/3 of young women now say that winking qualifies as sexual harassment. What about looking? Looking is already sexual harassment if you look at her too long.

The problem is that there is no way to know if sexual attention or advances are unwanted and therefore harassment until you try. Maybe she will like it, maybe she won’t. If she likes it, it’s not harassment. If she doesn’t, you just harassed the poor fragile flower of womanhood.

When “unwanted sexual advances” become illegal, then all flirting is automatically proscribed because you don’t know if it’s going to be harassment or not. The only way to play it safe is to wait for women to come onto you (when Hell freezes over), or just stop flirting altogether.

And indeed we are getting a lot of reports lately about men who have stopped flirting with women altogether for fear of being accused of harassment. Of course, the men who said this were excoriated, tried and sentenced in the Feminist Court of Public Opinion. The most recent one was forced to apologize for hurting the feelings of the perpetually aggrieved weaker sex. So even if you do what the feminuts want and you stop flirting with women altogether, it’s misogynistic hate speech to admit to it! You can’t win with feminists, can you?

Of course this is what the man-hating feminists want, and yes, Feminism is nothing but a hate movement against men.

2 Comments

Filed under Feminism, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Man World, Mass Hysterias, Psychology, Radical Feminists, Romantic Relationships, Scum, Sex, Social Problems, Sociology

Game/PUA: No Means No? Not Necessarily

Amidst all the #metoo and the affirmative consent idiocy, we keep hearing that “No means no!” Be that as it may, even that is not good enough anymore. Why? Because women are stupid. They are too dumb or scared to say no when they are having unwanted sex with a man. How’s the man supposed to know she doesn’t want to have sex if she’s not saying no or trying to push him off of her? He can’t!

So women were too dumb to even make “No means no” work, the feminists had to up the daffynition of consent once again. Now there have to be affirmative and enthusiastic consent. I would think that a lot of consensual sex would be considered rape under this standard. At universities now people who want to have sex have to act like two awkward virgins trying to have sex for the first time.

Man: “Can I kiss you know?”
Women: “Yes.”
Man: “Can I touch your boobs now?”
Women: “Yes, um, no, I mean yes, I mean, let me think about it.”
Man: “WTH?”
 
Yeah. Every time we have sex, we are supposed to act exactly like this. If you don’t do this, it’s rape. How many men will actually go along with this “Mother may I?” nonsense? Many women now are openly admitting that men asking for permission like this is a huge turnoff. What is this? Is it a shit test? No Alpha will ever go along with this asking for permission BS.

A lot of Betas and especially Omegas will fall all over themselves asking women permission for everything. They will probably even ask women permission to breathe so they can stay alive. If this is a shit test then women will use this asking permission silliness to weed out the Betas and Omegas. Once a man starts asking for permission, he will out himself as a Beta. Any man who refuses to ask permission may well be Alpha enough. At any rate forcing men to ask will weed out a lot of the Betas.

You will never understand women until you figure out that a lot of their incomprehensible behavior boils down to simple shit tests or fitness tests. Women test men’s fitness all the time.

But back to “No means no.”

Generally no means no, but it just so happens that women say no when they mean yes all the time. If she is saying no but it sounds like she’s having an orgasm when she’s saying it, I generally just plow right ahead. If she’s forceful about it though, I just stop.

In Russia, if you stop when she says no, you will die a virgin. The women there are expected to say no, and the men are expected to just plow through the no’s until she breaks down. How you tell that apart from rape, I have no idea. I suppose eventually she consents after you keep plowing through the no’s. But if you are a male in Russia, thinking no means no means you will never get laid.

1 Comment

Filed under Eurasia, Feminism, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Higher Education, Lame Cunts, Losers, Man World, Mass Hysterias, Psychology, Radical Feminists, Regional, Romantic Relationships, Russia, Scum, Sex