Category Archives: Feminism

Jordan Peterson: (Most) Everything He Says Is True

I really hate this guy mostly because he’s a reactionary, but honestly, almost every single thing he says is true.

He’s right that it’s insane that you can talk to a female student behind closed doors anymore. That’s insane! Way to go feminists! Way to backwards, bitches!

Sexual impropriety? What the Hell is that? Can you define it? Define it. Define sexual impropriety. See? You can’t. This Orwellian concept has no definition at all. Truth is, sexual impropriety is anything a woman says it is! Isn’t that great? Now we have a real definition we can all live with. I do want to know what his sexual impropriety bullshit charges are though, just out of curiosity.

Right. Women are not as interested in things as men. So women in academia are not going to be as much into those fields that focus on things. Well, that’s obvious! I don’t even think women like ideas very much. The airy world of pure ideation, the realm of the prowling intellectual, is pretty much a male thing. It’s not that women can’t conceptualize this stuff – it’s more that they think it is flat out boring. I have met women with IQ’s very close to mine – I recall one woman with an IQ of 143 – but she simply could not fathom why I would engage in some wild Herculean task of chopping up German into 138 languages. Why in the Hell would you even do that in the first place? Was her attitude. She was just as smart as I was, not one bit less, but her brain worked differently, being a typical female brain. Women are just as smart as we men are, but their brains work differently so they are interested in different things than we are. Which is fine of course. Vive la difference!

Of course, the more women dress up to be sexually attractive, the more they will contribute to sexual harassment (What the Hell is that anyway?) in the workplace. The more women sexualize themselves to make them look sexually enticing to men, the more men are going to be turned on by them, so the more women will interact with them in a sexual manner because they are getting turned on. I mean, it’s not rocket science, right.

And yes, lipstick does in fact mirror the swelling and reddening of the labia during sex. That’s why it exists in the first place. And I believe cheek blush is based on the same thing. And yes, high heels do indeed mimic a sort of estrus in females, more specifically, heels directly sexualize women by making them appear more as they do in the sex act. Which is, after all, why women wear heels in the first place. Of course.

Women are innately competitive, of course. They especially compete for men. Anyone knows that. And they compete on the basis of beauty too. I know this because women told me so. They told me that women dress up for other women, not for men. I never believed it until I heard it from them.

Of course a man has to remove about 90% of himself when he’s around women, particularly in the case of Peterson, a professor who is banned from having any sexual feelings or even thoughts for that matter. I have to do it myself.

Of course politeness trumps truth with women. Any man knows that. Hell, I learned that in high school!

Of course women manipulate men sexually to advance in the workplace. Duh! Anyone knows that.

Of course makeup is sexually provocative, but I do not agree with Peterson that makeup should be banned in the workplace.

Of course there’s a war on masculine behavior among boys. Boys being banned from throwing snowballs is a straight up war on masculinity itself. Even picking up snow off the ground was seen as toxic masculinity. Of course the bad boys didn’t care and broke all of these stupid rules. Only the good boys obeyed the rules not to act masculine. The worst boys, who probably needed to act less masculine, were not deterred at all. So all you are doing is neutering the mildest displays of masculinity in the best of boys, putting at the back of the pack, while shoving the worst boys to the front. Good job feminists! And he’s correct, in such a dispensation (a topsy turvy morality turned upside down Sadean one at that) the worst boys will get the most women and the most psychopathic males will be fathering the most children while the most decent males will father few if any kids. Way to go feminists!

Of course a transwoman is not a real woman! A transwoman is a man who thinks he’s a woman. His delusion that he is a woman is so fixed that he often has surgery to try to turn himself into some sort of a fake woman, but a man is a man is a man. No man can ever be transformed into a woman. Of course not. Why would anyone think a man can be turned into a woman? That’s ridiculous, I mean given our current technology anyway.

Ok this moron Peterson just compared Chairman Mao, of all people, to trans activists! How ridiculous! Mao was a puritan. The single most awful thing about Peterson is his idiotic fanatical anti-Communism. This dumbass has even covered his entire home with socialist realist paintings just to remind himself, every day mind you, even evil those damned Commies are. Anti-Communism is probably the single driving force behind all of Peterson’s intellectual oeuvre. And that’s where he runs right off the cliff, just like Coyote in the cartoons, following his cartoonish Roadrunner boogeyman of Communism right over the edge of all reason and sense.

And this is what I mean when I say this guy is a reactionary and he can go take a long walk on a short pier. Sure, he’s right most of the time facts-wise, but his mind is just oh so wrong. He’s motivated by sheer puerile idiocy and reaction. Take your anti-Communism and shove it up your ass, Jordan.

He follows online PUA’s because he finds them interesting psychologically. Well, they are saying a lot of psychologically interesting things and most of what they say is flat out true. Look. Let’s get real. PUA’s are all about success. Men don’t mess around with BS and get lost in wildernesses of psychological defenses like women do. Men’s whole raison de etre is “do what works, and all else be damned.” Men don’t care what the theory is as long as it works. If it works and it smells like roses, fine. If it works and it smells like ordure, well, you hold your nose and plow forth anyway because if it works it works, stink or not, damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead.

These PUA’s are absolutely not going to waste any time on bullshit that doesn’t work. That’s something a woman would do. Women would obviously waste endless time on projects that don’t work simply because the ones that did work were so awful. Women would think, “That’s awful, so it can’t possibly work,” and then focus on some feel-good solution that smells like roses but fails every time. Women aren’t concerned with the destination. They’re concerned about the road you take to get there. If it’s a horrible road, they’re not driving on it. They’re taking the scenic route to feel better about themselves, no matter if it gets you anywhere or not.

The idea that these PUA’s would have wasted all these years of intense study on things that don’t work. Men are far too practical for that. These guys conduct nearly controlled double blind studies to test their theories.

And at the end, Peterson violates Godwin’s Law by equating SJW boneheads and fools with literal Nazis. No, Jordan, no. SJW’s are not Nazis. If they are like anyone, they are like Commies, and Commies are not Nazis as you probably think, you silly man.

Peterson gets an 85% rating, but when he’s wrong, good God is he wrong.

50 Comments

Filed under Conservatism, Cultural Marxists, Feminism, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Left, Man World, Maoism, Marxism, Nazism, Political Science, Psychology, Sex, Women

Game/PUA: The Latest Insult: “You’re an Incel!”

The latest idiotic Internet insult is “You’re an incel!” Even I am getting called an incel lately. That’s laughable because I am about as far from being an incel as a man gets.

There’s nothing new here. This bullshit has been going on forever now, and feminists have always specialized in the insult, “Obviously you can’t get laid!” It also takes other forms. “Neckbeard” means much the same thing. For some reason, it is always feminists and Cultural Left types who wield the “Obviously you can’t get laid”, neckbeard, and incel insults.

For some reason, rightwingers never say this. I suppose that’s because rightwingers don’t care whether some man gets women or not because after all, it’s not that important.

The stupid thing about this insult is that Cultural Left boneheads call every man they hate a neckbeard, incel, or insist, “Obviously you can’t get laid!” Of all the retarded things to say about a human being you don’t even know! Furthermore, this is always done on the Internet, when the Cultural Left types have never met the person and know nothing about him. They read his prose and decide he can’t get laid with God’s help!

I have been reading prose on the Internet for many years now. For the life of me, I have never run across male prose that indicates to me whether a man is successful with women or not. There is no “can’t get laid” style of writing. There’s no such thing! Unless the person is discussing sex, you have no idea if he’s a 50 year old incel or if he’s closing in on Wilt Chamberlain’s record.

Similarly, you can’t diagnose mental illness much less Asperger’s Syndrome on the Internet. I work in mental health. How the Hell can I look at someone’s prose or journalism on the Net and give them a DSM diagnosis? Yet every Cultural Left idiot on Earth can diagnose mental illness better than the finest clinicians – by merely reading a simple gleaning of someone’s prose! Such geniuses!

Of course Asperger’s Syndrome (the most overdiagnosed condition in history) cannot be diagnosed on the Net. Everybody thinks they can, and everyone is always diagnosing everyone else as an “Aspie.” It’s mostly Cultural Left types calling everyone they hate an Aspie. To say this isn’t very nice to Aspies is an understatement. But no clinician can possibly diagnose AS from a snippet of prose. How the Hell can Cultural Left scum outdiagnose the world’s finest diagnosticians?

This insult “Obviously you can’t get laid!” arises from the completely false feminist belief that all men who feminists consider to be misogynists (most of us) cannot possibly get laid. In other words, if you’re a misogynist, obviously you can’t get laid to save your life.

Now I have been observing the dating scene for decades, and one thing that is clear to me is that a lot of misogynistic men get tons of sex. Even the stereotypical bad boys who treat women like crap are well known to be drowning in pussy. Many though not all womanizers are definitely misogynists. The standard male advice about women, particularly from womanizers, is, “You gotta treat women like shit.” This is all pretty awful for those of us who want to be decent men because it seems like a requirement for a successful relationship with women is abusing them.

This goes along with the typical problem of nice guys, which feminists get all wrong.

2 Comments

Filed under Asperger's Syndrome, Autism, Conservatism, Feminism, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Left, Little or None, Man World, Mental Illness, Political Science, Psychology, Psychopathology, Psychotherapy, Romantic Relationships, Sex

Game/PUA: The Confounding Nice Guy Dilemma

Women say they dislike nice guys because “they are not really nice.” They claim that nice guys are only pretending to be nice so they can have sex with the women they are cozying up to. This laughable. Feminists are surprised by this? That men would befriend women in the hopes of somehow bedding them? No kidding, feminists! Of course that’s why we befriend women! Why else would we make friends with women, you fools?

You think bad boys are any nicer about it? Many of them are out an out harassers, assaulters and  more or less rapists. But it’s those fake nice guys we need to hate on!

Let’s say the idiot feminists are right and women really do reject nice guys because “they’re not really all that nice” – in other words, because they are secretly mean, abusive bastards.

If women did reject nice guys for being secretly mean, why then do women flock to men who are far more vicious, violent and abusive like criminals, thugs, gangbangers, sociopaths, murderers, convicts, and even serial killers? I mean how bad could nice guys be? However bad they are deep down inside (dubious), they could not possibly be as bad as the sociopaths above.

So women reject nice guys for being secretly mean, but they flock to out and out evil men who are 10X meaner than nice guys even on a good day. That makes no sense at all. As usual, the feminist analysis is flat out wrong.

As a former nice guy, I can tell you straight up what women dislike about nice guys. In a word, they think they are pussies, sissies, girls, wimps, etc. They’re not men. They’re not masculine enough. “He’s too nice” means he’s a great big fat wimp. She rejects the nice guy who treats her well because he’s wimpy, and she goes for the bad boy who treats her terribly because he’s masculine.

As you can see, women are punishing the men who treat them well and rewarding the men who treat them the worst. Feminism is absolutely blind to this frankly insane characteristic of women. Instead of discussing it, it’s all handwaved away as a big fat misogynistic lie. But any man who has dated women knows differently.

I think part of the problem is that nice guys won’t fight back and often won’t take the initiative.

To be successful with women, you need to take the initiative.

And you definitely need to fight back against your woman when she attacks you, which she is doomed to do fairly regularly no matter what.

Nice guys sit there and take it because they are pussy-whipped. They are afraid that if they stand up to her, she will pull the sex. He needs the sex, so he doesn’t fight back in order to keep the sex around.
Yet the fact that he won’t fight back makes her furious because she sees him as a wimp. Women hate wimps and this is another thing that feminism refuses to discuss and handwaves away as a misogynist lie. Most straight women are also wildly homophobic, at least about the men they date. Feminism lies about this too and insists it is a misogynist lie. If you want to know why men are so homophobic, it’s because their girlfriends demand it.

Treat her well but stand up to her and fight back, even viciously but preferably verbally and not physically. This seems to be the best combination where you are not too much of a a nice guy and yet just enough of a bad boy to be alluring but not evil or abusive.

1 Comment

Filed under Feminism, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Man World, Psychology, Romantic Relationships, Sex, Women

PUA/Game: Why Are PUA Types So Reactionary?

Sisera: Lindsay,

Why do a lot of the PUA types turn to reactionary politics?

I mean realistically the only way they might find a woman (specifically, gold-diggers) is if they get rich.

But if you’re in your 20’s working a low paying job, aren’t you more concerned about even having money to save in order to get rich and not getting taxed heavily 20 years down the road?

So it seems Roosh might sell false hope. That’s why these incel mass shooters visit sites like “PUA hate”.

BTW, TRASH is now a favorite on Return of Kings. Check it out.

First things first.

Why do a lot of the PUA types turn to reactionary politics?

I don’t know except the Cultural Left is now completely feministed and cucked as far as men and masculinity are concerned. I mean men are the enemy, masculinity is toxic, gay, bi and trans guys are the greatest thing since sliced bread, on and on.

And the Cultural Left really really hate PUA and Game, which to me is insane because all Game is is the Science of Seduction. What the Hell is wrong with seduction for Chrissake? I mean men have been trying to figure out how to get women for millennia now. Check out a famous book called On Love written by the famous Roman writer Seneca. It could be called How to Pick up Girls in Rome in 200 BC. Men have been doing this PUA/Game stuff forever. It’s part of the natural, normal behavior of human men.

Back in the 1970’s and even 1980’s, the pickup/Game scene was all around liberal men. Hef, Bob Guccione, Al Goldstein, and Larry Flynt were all liberal Democrats. Almost everyone in the porn industry was a liberal Democrat, and that’s true to this very day. Back then, being on the liberal/Left implied a “libertine, do it in the streets” mindset.

Now the Left has been taken over by feminists and faggots, it hates straight men, especially straight White men (though fags can take as many fists up their ass as they want, and it’s all good). The Left is all Sex-Negative Feminism now. It’s #metoo bullshit, the sexual harassment weapon on steroids (the worst weapon we ever gave women), ever-expanding definitions of rape, rape culture bullshit, patriarchy bullshit, insane consent rules that force all straights who want to have sex to act like shy, uncertain virgns.

I mean it really seems like the Left doesn’t want us men to get laid at all. It doesn’t even want us to try to get laid, since if we flirt with women, ask for the numbers or for dates or even look a them God forbid, we’re guilty of Sexual Misconduct (What sort of Orwellian nonsense is a concept like that?), Sexual Harassment, maybe Sexual Assault, or Rape, and someone needs to call the cops on us or put a restraining order on us to protect women from our evil roaming eyeballs and flapping lips.

Considering that the Left is now so hostile and hate-filled towards straight men, who can blame them for going reactionary?

On the other hand, the situation we have right now is that it is the rightwingers of all people who are singing the praises of Sexual Liberation and the Sexual Revolution, and the Left wants to roll the clock back to the 1880’s where we put stockings on piano legs. The Modern Left is the precise opposite of all those things we fought for in the Sexual Revolution, one of the great liberation movements of the 1960’s. We’ve turned into the uptight squares we used to mock and hate. It’s pathetic.

“I mean, realistically, the only way they might find a woman (specifically, gold-diggers) is if they get rich.

But if you’re in your 20s working a low paying job, aren’t you more concerned about even having money to save in order to get rich, and not getting taxed heavily 20 years down the road?”

This mindset never made sense to me. All politics is class politics. Low income people should be class conscious. What you describe is the typical phenomenon in the US known as false consciousness.

I would like to point out that I have been getting 7-10’s, hot women, even model types, within my age bracket at least, ever since I was 17 years old, and I’ve never had two nickels to rub together. Hell, my girlfriends have been paying my way most of my life. I’m not proud of that, although the gigolo image is cool, really I would much rather have at least been paying my own way. A girlfriend recently broke up with a long relationship with me and she said, “All I got was a cup of coffee and a card!” I can’t put into words what a piece of crap I felt like when I read that.

On the other hand, I’ve always Chad or at least Chadlite, even to this day, and whatever the rules of love and sex are for most men, Chad breaks them all. The rules simply do not apply to Chad. He’s the exception to every rule out there, and he’s living proof of Looks Theory and the Black Pill.

So it seems Roosh might sell false hope.

Roosh is obviously a horrible human being. Of course he’s a snake oil selling con artist. All these PUA guys are.

That’s why these incel mass shooters visit sites like “PUA Hate”.

Still in business as Slut Hate. The PUA idiots like the execrable Roosh are selling a fraudulent product called Game, so of course a lot of people who bought the product and got ripped off are pissed. Hence PUA Hate for the victims of the PUA fraud. And by the way, these incels are as bad as Roosh or probably worse. Nevertheless, I feel very sorry for them, and I do feel sorry at all for Rooshbag. He’s one of the most hateable people I can think of.

BTW, TRASH is now a favorite on Return of Kings.

Well, that’s no surprise. They had previously banned for, well, simply being Trash is the best way to put it, but I guess they let him back on. To be fair he’s in his element. Most of the douchebags over there are about as narcissistic as he is.

Check it out.

Better not. Every time I go there I want to smash my computer screen. Monitors are expensive.

I can’t put into words how much I hate those people. They’re just horrible, as bad as Trump.

6 Comments

Filed under Conservatism, Democrats, Feminism, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Left, Liberalism, Little or None, Man World, Political Science, Politics, Pornography, Psychology, Radical Feminists, Romantic Relationships, Scum, Sex, US Politics

PUA/Game: #Metoo Nonsense: Why It Is Dangerous to Put Women in Power in Society

This is why it is dangerous to put women in power in society. They start instituting blatantly unjust and antiscientific nonsense because their feels tell them it’s the right thing to do. This is exactly what we are seeing with this #metoo insanity. Does anyone even know what Sexual Harassment even is? Nope. Does anyone even know what Sexual Misconduct (What an Orwellian notion that phrase is itself) is? Nope. No definition of Sexual Harassment. No definition of Sexual Misconduct nonsense.

Vague rules and laws are unconstitutional. You have to know what the laws is so you can figure out how not to break it. If you don’t even know what the law is, how can you figure out how to obey it?

Apparently the definitions of Sexual Harassment and Sexual Misconduct are entirely based on women’s feels. Not only that but they are based on the feels of  each individual female! So those phrases of law not only have no definition, but they probably have a separate definition for every woman in the country! How do you know what you are doing is Sexual Harassment or Sexual Misconduct? Because you gave some woman “uncomfortable” feels. How are you supposed to know what makes any given woman uncomfortable so you can figure out how not to do so? You can’t!

Furthermore, women will have one set of rules for Chad (he can pretty much do whatever he wants to her, and she won’t feel bad) and another set of rules for Normans and Omegas. Say you see Chad walk up to a woman and say something and watch the woman swoon. He leaves and now you walk up to her and say the exact same thing Chad said to her, and she flips out, screams Sexual Harassment, and you lose your job or get thrown out of the establishment.

So not only does each individual woman have a separate unknowable definition of Sexual Harassment/Misconduct, each individual woman also has a separate unknowable definition of  Sexual Harassment/Misconduct for every new man she encounters!

It’s almost like something out of a Kafka novel, say The Trial, where the man is arrested, jailed and prosecuted but never learns the charges against him and no one else seems to know what they are either.

Thanks to feminism, modern women have left us men unmoored in a Kafkaesque nightmare. Thanks a lot, ladies!

4 Comments

Filed under Feminism, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Law, Man World, Mass Hysterias, Ridiculousness, Sex, Social Problems, Sociology, Women

PUA/Game: “Staring” at Women

RL: Yeah. Now it’s sexual harassment for looking at them.

You just know these laws are going to be abused by stupid, emotional, vindictive, and evil-minded women, of which there are hundreds of millions.

Women are like Jews, Blacks, LGBTQZKPRBFXYZ, etc. Just another identity politics group.

Jason: So what is the difference between gawking and looking? And yeah, of course, there is a vindictive group of women out to harm men – unless, of course, they’re the ones they specifically like! For instance, if women are showing breast cleavage, then it’s to get attention – but not from retards and nerds – or maybe even blacks.

That’s why women are full of shit. You see why men hate women now? It’s because of crap like that. They walk showing full cleavage and then they get pissed at us for looking and try to cover themselves up. Well, you know what?

“If you don’t want men staring at your tits, quit walking around with your boobs hanging out!”

I told my Mom that and she laughed hard. But my Mom’s not really a feminist. She’s more of a real woman. Like I said, there’s real women and there’s feminists. We love the real women. The feminists can all jump in a lake of fire. Or maybe I will push them in.

You hit it on the head. She’s walking around with her tits hanging out so Chad can look at them. “Hey Chad! My tits are hanging out! Come look at them baby!” But then most of the rest of the Normies and especially the Omegas really have no right to look at her tits, even though they’re hanging out of her shirt! Because sexual attention from unattractive men is outrageous, and as a feminist, she wants to make it illegal! Most women think that unattractive men simply have no right to be obviously interested in or attracted to them at all.

And if you want to know one reason why so many men hate women, there it is. Even those of us who don’t hate women, well we hate that attitude of theirs for sure. Women can stick it. We don’t care what they think. We’re men for Chrissake! We do what we want? Why should we care what some silly woman thinks about anything?

You aren’t supposed to gawk or stare at them. It’s bad form and very bad Game. That said, I have gotten accused of it quite a bit. I must admit I am baffled when I am accused of staring because I try very hard not to do that. I think I was just looking at them. I do like to people look. I mean everyone does that, unless the feminists are going to make that illegal too. I told you females now get mad at me for even looking at them. I guess I’m not allowed to do that.

A blank, open, obvious, idiotic stare is pretty bad. But just looking at  someone isn’t. I told you about that time when I walked into the Roxy and every single woman in that place looked right at me. They’re staring, right? So what! I mean every time a chick has checked me out anywhere ever, of which there have been zillions of times, she was staring at me. But women hate em. Fuck these bitches. They get to stare at us all they want, but we can’t stare at them?

If a woman glares at you, you probably are staring too much. That would be one way to tell you are staring.

If you look at a female and she gives you a frightened look, quit looking at her. You are scaring her somehow or other. This even happens to me sometimes.

I try to look out of the corners of my eyes. I look at the whole scene so I am not looking directly at her, shift my eyes around all over the place, look over her head, look to the sides of her, try to be very unobtrusive about it by sort of hiding in the background, look away from them a lot, I have million tricks. It’s hard not to look at a beautiful female.

Especially because men don’t exist for me. I mean I walk into the room and it’s all the attractive females and me. Those are the only people in the room. If there’s one attractive female and 20 unattractive ones, then there’s only one female in the room. And the whole time I am in the room, if I have nothing better to do, I am going to be looking at her.  First of all because I can’t help it. It’s like I am sucked into her by some energy force that I cannot control. I usually look at them out of corners of my eyes and use all the other tricks, so they don’t usually get mad or even notice much.

If you are outside, that’s what sunglasses are for. Sunglasses were not created to protect our eyes from the sun. They were created so we men could look at women.

3 Comments

Filed under Feminism, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Man World, Sex

Emmanuel Macron, Cuck of the Century

Here.

I knew this was going to happen. I happen to think that it should be legal to be an asshole. Obviously women want to make it illegal to be an asshole. Of course the law will only apply to men, women being the equality-minded magnanimous creatures that they are.

I have a feeling it is not going to stop there, and I worry I might get caught up in this latest form of Mass Psychosis.

I think there is a woman I know at a coffeeshop who might think I am stalking her or something. All I’ve done is look at her (Well, she’s a stone fox, how can you not  look at her?) and talked to her a few times, nothing sexual, not really any flirting either. I did get her email address. Emailed her once with some links, got no response, so stopped contact.

She just knows I am interested in her, and I guess that freaks the cunt out and pisses her off.

The other day I was making a very wide u-turn in a street where the U had to go a ways into another street on the curve. Well, I finish the U and get over to turn right in the opposite direction to complete the U. She was coming up the street and ended up right behind me. She’s right there behind me. I think I waved at her maybe. She sees me and throws the car into reverse and starts backing up really fast.

For a while I thought it was nothing, but now I am starting to get worried. Apparently because our cars were in close proximity, I must have been stalking this dumb bitch, right? Hell, I didn’t even know where she lived or that she lived in that area. I knew nothing about her. I had no idea she even had two kids or lived in the city and was not a commuter.

Of course I’m not stalking this dumb cunt. I am barely even talking to her because she’s such a bitch.

I am worried that I could get reported under this bullshit law.

One of the charges against Morgan Freeman was some dumb cunt who said when he was talking to her, he was looking at her tits. She had to tell him, “Hey, my eyes are up here.” This was sexual harassment because the bitch got her panties in a wad over it. This is so stupid. Every straight man on Earth does this routinely or has done it in the past. Why do you think, “Um, my eyes are up here?” is such a popular joke.

Yeah. Now it’s sexual harassment for looking at them.

You just know these laws are going to be abused by stupid, emotional, vindictive, and evil-minded women, of which there are hundreds of millions.

Women are like Jews, Blacks, LGBTQZKPRBF, etc. Just another identity politics group.

One thing about the Jews is they never stopped pushing. I know their history. They would push and push and make the Gentiles more and more angry. Some smart Jews always said,

“Hey, we keep going like this, they’re going to start a pogrom against us.”

Of course that’s an insult to any belligerent Jew, and if you tell him he’s pissing the Gentiles off, the Jew’s response is to get his back up, attack like a psycho, and scream, “The Gentiles don’t like it? Fine! Then we’ll do it 10 times harder!” So what happened after a while. Duh. A pogrom. Another expulsion.

Most sane humans know that if you are really pissing someone off so badly that they are close to their breaking point and may get destructive or dangerous that it’s time to back off on the attack and get away from the person. Many hospital beds have been occupied by idiots who pushed people to their limits, and when people warned them they were pushing people too far, said, “Fine! I’ll do it 10 times as much!” it’s an excellent way to get your ass beat. Which has been happening to the Jews for centuries.

Anyway, my point is all Identity Politics groups do just this. If you tell them they are crazy and they are pissing people off and causing a huge backlash, they all get outraged, get their backs up and scream, “They don’t like it! Fine! Then we will do it 10 X harder. ”

None of these groups ever stop pushing. Blacks will never stop. They will just push, push, push.

The gays get more demanding, weird and radical every year.

The trannies are the same, except they are far weirder than even the gays.

And like all of these other groups, of course feminists never know when to stop either.

To feminists, the patriarchy is as immobile and untouchable as God Himself. It’s a known physical fact of the universe like black holes that will never go away.

Anyway, keeping the patriarchy around even if it doesn’t exist gives feminists something to do and something to yell about. And indeed the feminists keep pushing. The definition of rape expands nearly every year, as does the concept of sexual harassment, at the same time as the definition of consent gets more narrowed. Of course these policies are designed to completely screw men over while leaving women untouched. Hey, I told you women were fair and magnanimous.

Sex Negative Feminism, now the principal kind of feminism that has taken over all of society, keeps getting worse every year.  #Metoo will not just grow but it will expand in definition because angry ideologues with a punishing agenda – especially grievance feminists – never know when to stop.

I figure looking at a woman will at least be sexual assault in 10-20 years, assuming the female snowflake was made uncomfortable by it of course. Asking for a number or asking for a date will be seen as rape if you made the woman uncomfortable.

Feminists will develop a new stupid slogan, “Making Women Uncomfortable Is Rape!”

Feminist men, cucks, white knights and other fags will of course fall all over themselves saying  that uncomfortableness is rape, and they never make woman uncomfortable, or if they do somehow screw up and do so, they immediately get on their knees and kiss the feet of these superior queens called females.

Expect Jessica Valenti to lead the Crazy Brigade. Have you seen her column? A lot of it is Street Harassment Is Evil! but she recently published a piece called, How Come Men Don’t Look at Me Anymore? talking about how much it hurts to lose all that male attention. What a dumb bitch. And women wonder why we call them stupid.

If anyone is wondering if this post is misogynistic, in my view there are two kinds of women, real women and feminists.

I love real women with all my heart and soul as much as I love my wonderful mother.

The feminists? Well, I would not mind if they all met Mark Lepine. After all, he didn’t act alone. Who else pulled the trigger that day, if only in their minds? I sure did.

34 Comments

Filed under Europe, Feminism, France, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Idiots, Lame Cunts, Law, Losers, Man World, Mass Hysterias, Moralfags, Politics, Radical Feminists, Regional, Scum, Sex, Social Problems, Sociology

Do Gay People Hate Bisexuals?

Answered on Quora.

I am not sure if they hate them, but a fair number of gay men have a low opinion of bisexual men. Their attitude is that bisexual men are really gay. It’s not true. Some men are actually bisexual, and it has actually been proved in the lab recently, the gold standard for sexology. Have you ever noticed that almost nothing in the PC line about LGBT’s has been proven in the lab or published in peer reviewed publications? That is because the PC line on LGBT is largely made up of untruths at best, lies at worst.

Gay Politics is propaganda for gays. Feminism is propaganda for women. Antiracism is propaganda for nonwhites. Trans politics is propaganda for trans people. White Politics is propaganda for Whites. All Identity Politics, including of course Gay Politics, is based on lies. I really wish gay men would get off the Identity Politics bandwagon. I understand that they want to protect themselves, but building a castle of belligerent lies seems a flimsy way to do that.

Anyway, yes a fair number of gay men believe in the falsehood that all bisexual men are really gay. If you do not believe me, head on over to Data Lounge and see for yourself.

However, their argument is more nuanced that that. A large number of so-called bisexual men, especially young men in their 20’s, are actually gay men who are hiding under the bisexual label. But bisexual men do exist, and as I have said, it’s even been proven by science.

Leave a comment

Filed under Anti-Racism, Cultural Marxists, Feminism, Gender Studies, Homosexuality, Politics, Sex

I Guess All World War Two Generation Males Must Be Toxic

My father wasn’t really an alpha but he thought he was like so many other men. He also wasn’t that extroverted but he thought he was once again like so many other introverts. He had problems speaking on the phone for Chrissake, often collapsing into pathetically amusing stutters. I’m not sure I ever saw him speak to a group. I doubt if he would do well.

He was a teacher though, and I once saw him teach a class. A very good female friend of mine was a student in one of his classes at the college I attended in the day and he taught at night. One night I attended one of his classes. There he was, swimming freely in his own element, quite at home and very pleasant and even stunning to behold. As is so often the case, he was a completely different person roaming about at the head of his class than he was away from the blackboard. He was actually charming up there. He was nothing like that at home. You would have thought they had switched him out.

He was a beta introvert, an intellectual who even at the end of his life was inhaling a book a day. He wore glasses. He taught school. He was a prig with Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder. You get the picture.

Yet my father very much valued masculinity as a concept. I once asked my mother why she didn’t call him on some particular aspect of his behavior.

“Oh…” she whispered. “I’m afraid he would see it as an attack on his masculinity and I would never do that to him.”

She would never attack his masculinity. Incredible. Can you imagine a woman of my generation (Baby boomers) ever saying she would not dare attacking her man’s masculinity? What ever happened to later generations of women? Didn’t they get the memo? Actually, I am afraid that what happened was a brain toxin called feminism.

My father despised gay men and mostly saw them as incomprehensible freaks if not mentally ill unfortunates to be pitied at best.

He hated his long hair more than anything else. My father felt that long hair on men was effeminate. As a boy, his mother had grown his hair long and even dressed him up in dresses around the house. At some point as a young boy, he rebelled against this nonsense and demanded to be treated like a man.

He later demanded that his formal first name be reduced to the more macho sounding nickname. He was quite proud of this form of rebellion against the strictures of imposed familial culture.

He took macho jobs in the summer working at Yosemite National Park, where he met my mother, or even working in supermarkets. I remember once visiting a supermarket and there was my bespectacled schoolteacher father, tossing and catching watermelons like they were tennis balls.

When my mother first went to work in 1980, my father objected. He was raised that a good man should not allow his wife to work. If your wife worked, that meant you were a failure as a man because you were failing to earn enough money to support your family. Your wife taking a job was a form of emasculation.

As you can see, my father took great importance in masculinity, as did many men of his generation. However, the Cultural Left seems to deny that things like masculinity and femininity even exist, God forbid that they may be essentialized by Nature.

5 Comments

Filed under Cultural Marxists, Feminism, Gender Studies, Left, Man World, Scum

Masculinity Studies, Yet another Abomination of the Cultural Left

The Cultural Left can’t even agree if masculinity exists or not. On the one hand, it is another one of these “constructed categories” that exist only in minds and not in realis. On the other hand, it exists, but it is evil, referred to as always “toxic” and in need of eradication along with those wicked other constructed qualities like race and gender, which also exist only mentally and ephemerally and not materially.

And even if it does exist, masculinity is apparently evil. All masculinity is “toxic masculinity.” There’s no other kind.

The war on masculinity is led of course by the feminists, who have always hated the masculinity and sexuality of normal heterosexual men. That masculinity exists at all indicates that it is oppressive. In fact, these things cannot exist at all without being oppressive.

It’s little remarked that the gays also wage war on masculinity, a concept along with gender that they despise. Of course gay men hate gender – most of them are men who act like women! And of course they hate masculinity – because so many of them are men who are very unmasculine. The very concept of masculinity at all would seen to be homophobic, and gays online routinely refer to masculinity as toxic.

The fact that masculinity or its caricature at least exists in spades on gay culture would seem to be lost on them. Who are these tops anyway? What’s a bear? What’s with these hard-looking stern-faced leathermen with other men on leashes. More cognitive dissonance or in this case cognitive blindness.

You would think that lesbians who typically act masculine like men would take up the banner of masculinity, but they just don’t. In fact, to suggest that lesbians are masculine is heresy – it is considered to be de facto homophobic and hate speech.

In this case as in so many others with the Cultural Left, truth becomes vicious insult on account of its revelations being unpalatable. The Cultural Left believes that if truths are ugly, then this means that they are not true! An interesting form of philosophy to say the least.

Our universities now have entire fields of studies devoted to “Masculinities.” There are even journals about these manly things, which are always bizarrely pluralized. At first I thought they were onto something as I have a bit of a hard-on for masculinity myself, at least in my own mind and self-image. I’d love to see some real scholarship on the concept of masculinity and how it manifests in the individual and society across classes, races and cultures.

I dipped into it and was quite disappointed. Everyone writing in “Masculinity Studies” is either an insane feminist or a gay man. The entire field is devoted to waging war on the very concept of masculinity and sees its very existence as permanently pathological.

6 Comments

Filed under Cultural Marxists, Feminism, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Higher Education, Homosexuality, Left, Man World, Radical Feminists, Scum, Sex