Category Archives: Gender Studies

“India is Not Safe For White Female Tourists,” by Magneto

There was a story three years ago about an American female student who went to study in India on a student exchange program and came back to America diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. I know my first reaction was “Oh, this is just some crybaby Western Woman who is exaggerating,” but after second thought, I began to understand the real trauma she had been through.

Imagine you are a woman and everywhere you walk, you have hundreds of men staring at you, some of them making obnoxious comments toward you and sometimes even grabbing your ass or breasts. Having to endure that kind of abuse for months would cause someone to have a bit of a mental breakdown.

After the gang rape in 2012 of that girl in New Delhi, tourism rates dropped 25%. Even the embassies of some countries have issued travel warnings for women talking about the very real dangers faced by foreign female tourists in India.

The worst part of all of it was the reactions of some Indians. A few Indian women replied with comments along the lines of, “Women are abused everywhere, not just India.” One Indian woman mentioned she felt like she was being stalked when she had lived in Paris for a year. And of course Indian men wrote comments basically saying, “How dare you try to hurt India’s image! Don’t you know that America has a higher rate of rape than India?”

It was the typical idiotic nationalistic/patriotic bullshit, as usual. Indians cannot handle even the slightest criticism of their country, even when women are getting openly raped and murdered in the street!

A large percentage of Indian men blamed the rape on the victim, saying things like, “She shouldn’t have been out that late,” (It was only 9 PM), “She must have been dressed in a slutty way,” or “She must have provoked the men by arguing with them.” Fuck it, I’ll go ahead and list the full quotes below, just so that you can see how evil a lot of Indian men are:

“A girl is far more responsible for rape than a boy.”

“A decent girl won’t roam around at 9 o’clock at night. … Housework and housekeeping is for girls, not roaming in discos and bars at night doing wrong things, wearing wrong clothes.”

“If a girl is dressed decently, a boy will not look at her in the wrong way,” Khattar told reporters, “Freedom has to be limited. These short clothes are Western influences. Our country’s tradition asks girls to dress decently.”

“All by herself till 3 a.m. at night in a city where people believe…you know…you should not be so adventurous.”

“We have to strike a balance. On the one hand you want to have a promiscuous culture, and on the other hand you want a safe and secure environment for the people,” and “Should couples be allowed to kiss in public?…Should they be allowed to indulge in all obscene things?”

Magneto’s comment:

What the fuck is wrong with you? Seeing other men and women kissing and holding hands in public will drive you to rape them? Sorry, but this is not about sex. This is about your Beta male envy and rage. Does anyone remember Elliot Rodgers? He went around filming couples holding hands and kissing in public and making envious and jealous comments about them. He later went on a shooting spree and killed a few people, and his motivation was because he was a 22 year old virgin who couldn’t get a girlfriend. This is not about sexual repression. It’s about mental illness.

Most Indian men are Beta males who cannot stand to see other men be successful with women and will do anything to sabotage them and cockblock them. They are so busy hating on successful men that they have no time left over to work on improving their own Game and trying to become successful with women themselves. They would rather just sit on the sidelines and criticize successful people than do anything to improve their own lives.

This is just so fucking petty. Indians are an incredibly envious group of people, and that’s why they are such nasty, passive-aggressive people and why no sane person wants anything to do with them. That’s the reason why Indians end up living isolated within their own communities and ghettos. It’s like they never matured out of that early teenage phase where if you see a girl talking about sex with a man, you feel really angry, jealous and insecure. Indian men have literally never matured past a pre-teenager level of maturity. It’s no wonder Indian women hate Indian men so much nowadays.

(end of Magneto’s comment)

“The victim is as guilty as her rapists…She should have called the culprits brothers and begged before them to stop.”

“Women are ‘equally responsible’ for crimes committed against them.”

“Women should not venture out with men who are not relatives.”

“What is happening is we have imbibed the US. We have lost all the values we had in cities.”

Magneto’s comment:

Indian men blaming everything on White people, America, and Western culture, as usual. Nope, the real reason is because you Indian men never matured past your puberty stage of development, so you act like a bunch of immature, petty, envious, Beta teenage boys. If you see a boy and girl kissing or holding hands, you burn with jealousy, and all you can think of is, “How can I stop them? How can I destroy their relationship?” Beta male rage can literally lead to rape and murder.

Alpha men do not attach value to any particular woman or put women on a pedestal, so an Alpha male would never consider a woman important enough to want to kill her or kill for her. People think Alpha male behavior causes violence but actually it’s Beta male behavior. Beta males tend to repress their anger and envy until one day it just explodes and they end up doing something horrible like killing someone. That’s why guys in the Manosphere who are training men how to be Alpha are actually saving lives.

(end of Magneto’s comment)

“Where ‘Bharat’ becomes ‘India’ with the influence of Western culture, these type of incidents happen.”

-“If consensual sex with a 16-year-old is not rape, why can’t girls be married at 16?”

Magneto’s comment: Well actually I would agree with this one. The age of consent is a joke. As long as a girl has reached puberty, and has developed physically (breasts), it is not pedophilia. It was perfectly normal for men to marry 13 or 14 year old girls for centuries until the modern feminist culture made such practices illegal. It’s normal for men to be attracted to young women.

I remember one guy even telling me, “God designed women to be at their most attractive right at that same time when they are experiencing puberty.” And either way, it’s totally normal for 14, 15, or 16 year old girls to be having sex nowadays. So why should it be illegal for an older man to have sex with them? I guess all those feminist spinsters who spent their youth chasing their career only to find out that there’s no Prince Charming waiting for them after they hit the wall at age 30 and they end up growing old alone with their 10 cats feel extremely bitter if they see a man of their same age going for an 18 year old girl. Ugly, bitter, older single women are probably the real cultural force behind the demonization of older male-younger female relationships.

(end of Magneto’s comment)

“’Pretty women’ who protest against rapes are ‘dented and painted.'”

“Just because the country attained independence at midnight, is it proper for women moving at midnight?”

Rapes are on the rise because “men and women interact with each other more freely now.”

If women dress provocatively, then “rapes are not in the control of the police.”

Magneto’s comment: Sure, if I see a hot Indian chick wearing short shorts or a mini-skirt, I’ll indeed look at her and check out her ass. Maybe that makes me a male chauvinist pig or whatever, but I have never had the urge to grab her and drag her into a dark alley and gang rape her. All of the rape in India is not caused by sexual repression but by some deep psychological/sexual issues that Indian men are clearly suffering from. “How dare that hot woman dress like that? I’ll teach her a lesson by raping her!”

Here’s a better idea. Instead of raping a woman, learn some social skills. Stop being an autistic retard. Learn how to flirt with women. Learn how to dress instead of looking like some idiot wearing bell bottoms out of a ’70’s disco movie. Learn how to escalate with women and how to take control and seduce them.

But nope. Instead of improving themselves, Indian men would rather just sit back and act like a bunch of Uber-Beta losers. Angry that they’ll never have that hot girl, they will sit there and whine, “Why is she such a slut?”, “Why does she dress like a whore,” or “If she gets raped, she deserves it.” This is all simply caused by Beta male impotent rage.

At the same time, because India is a matriarchal society that is ruled by women, Indian men never have any positive male role models to aspire after. And Indian women themselves will viciously tear down any masculine, strong, Alpha Indian man, resulting in there being no masculine Alpha male role models to follow. It’s a vicious cycle, and Indian women are not completely blameless either.

Ultimately I’ve simply come to the conclusion that the Indian race is a subhuman race, and this is caused by their genetics, their DNA, and there is nothing they can do to ever change. The question the West will need to ask themselves is, “Do we want to keep importing these subhumans into our countries or rather should we ban all immigration from India and isolate India politically, economically, and culturally?” I hope that the West will evolve out of it’s “antiracism” childishness and into a more mature “race realism” mindset, because only then will Westerners be willing to make such hard decisions. And unless the West takes such hard decisions and takes them very soon, the entire Western world is doomed to destruction and extinction.


Filed under Asia, Crime, Culture, East Indians, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Immigration, India, Man World, Psychology, Race/Ethnicity, Regional, Sex, Social Problems, Sociology, South Asia, South Asians

Official Renunciation of Two Alt Left Groups and Two Alt Left Factions

According to Ryan England’s seminal work on the Alt Subtypes these are the main subtypes:

“The Left Wing of the Alt Right” – Rabbit uses this phrase quite explicitly. They are most open to race realism and most opposed to mass immigration and Islamism but are also inclined towards some kind of economic socialism or social democracy and are otherwise put off the Alt-Right somehow or other. Strasserites might be a more explicitly national socialist variant of this, and National Bolshevism would be even more out there still.  Left wing nationalism would be a softer variant of this.

“Gamergate Leftists” – Named from an article I read a while back claiming that most Gamergaters were left-leaning, these are another type. These types need not be big on Gamergate per-se (the more I studied Gamergate personally, the more lost and confused I got) but being anti-feminist (at least against the kind of PC feminist theory you’d find in a women’s studies class or on any left-leaning blog) and anti-SJW is huge with them as is civil and cultural libertarianism.

I found a number of these posting on anti-SJW pages. They come to the Alt-Left usually because of a belief in Leftist economics, though they are usually not that far Left.  Guys who believe in some regulation and a social safety net. Some too get put off by the tendency of anti-SJWs to drift into genuinely misogynistic and racist territory.  Remember kids that SJW and social liberalism are not the same things.  Think YouTubers like Sargon of Akkad or the Amazing Atheist, though they don’t use the term Alt-Left to describe themselves. Not yet, anyway. These kinds are defecting less from Richard Spencer and more from Milo Yiannopoluous. I used Gamergate’s colors in the design of my page’s logo and banner in an attempt to attract these types.

“Red Enlightenment” – These are most passionate about rationalism, skepticism, empiricism and in some cases, transhumanism and futurism. Generally scientifically minded and technocratic sorts of socialists or social democrats.

“True Liberals” – Antiracist and feminist supporters who think the whole thing has gotten out of hand and are concerned for the SJW’s lifestyle puritanism and opposition to free speech. They are more pro-feminist and pro-social liberal than the Gamergaters though. “The Democratic Party of the 1990s,” someone once remarked to me when I described the alt-left to them, to which I replied, “There were no liberals or Leftists in the 1990’s except myself.”

“Brocialists” – Socialists or social democrats with a penchant for men’s rights and anti-misandry. I seem to have drawn a number of these to my page, and a few of my moderators fall into this category. Hillary Clinton supporters have accused Bernie Sanders of using these as his base of support.  Used as a pejorative by the “Lorettas” of the present day left, I’m a firm proponent that we reclaim the term.

“Red Templars” – Especially and specifically anti-Islamic. We get a lot of these from Sam Harris and Bill Maher’s followings. Unlike the Left Wing of the Alt Right types, these sorts are more standard liberals otherwise.

“The New Old Left” – Would dispense with race, culture and identity all together if they could and make Leftism mostly about economic Leftism. The Realist Left page and the blog Social Democracy for the 21st Century are like this. Farther left you’d find /leftypol/ on 8chan and some Marxist/Anarchist groups that reject IdPol.  A whole separate entry could be made of the economic subtypes one might find on the alt left.  I’ve also found a lot of labor nationalists and assorted 3rd positionists: mutualists, distributists, market socialists, state capitalists, syndicalism and so on.

A few types that I have not seen many of and would have expected more are:

Christian Leftists (Catholic Social Teaching, the social gospel and even liberation theology seem especially well suited to alt-leftism),


Dissident Feminists  Surely, some feminists must be frustrated with what’s happened to their movement.  It’s been a long, long time since anything this dogmatic, intolerant, and puritanical has arisen in the western world.  Those well meaning devotees to feminism and social justice time and again are the ones who come under the sternest censure for the most minor of transgressions.  How many women out there, after getting called out one time too many for some sleight micro-aggression or another think “screw this” and drift away from the movement, while still holding to its essential ideals?  Many, I would think.  I would hope.  They can’t be that hive-minded, could they?  In any event, if there are, the alt-left must be the port-of-call for women of liberal sentiment overall who reject this 21st century rehash of 16th century puritan culture.

We have already discussed most of these types here, and we can do so again if you wish. But I would like to highlight one group in particular and say that I am renouncing them and want no part of them in our movement. I am tossing them out, in other words. Well out of my Alt Left faction anyway. And as the person who created the Alt Left, I think I might want to have some say on who’s in and who’s out.

The faction I am renouncing is here:

“Red Templars” – Especially and specifically anti-Islamic. We get a lot of these from Sam Harris and Bill Maher’s followings. Unlike the Left Wing of the Alt Right types, these sorts are more standard liberals otherwise.

I just came from an Alt Left Facebook group that threw me, the founder of the movement, out of the group. And this is apparently the shitposting site for the Sam Harris group on Facebook. So these are the Sam Harris people and this is what Sam Harris people are like. Well, guess what? You’re out. As far as I can tell, you want no part our movement and we want no part of yours. Most of you are not Alt Left anyway – and many of you are actively hostile to us. Well guess what? If you are hostile to us, ou are out. Bye bye. They’re not a part of the Alt Left at all. They can go off and form their own movement and call it Sam Harris’ Jerkoff Boys Movement or whatever.

I am also renouncing two Alt Left Facebook groups who have nothing to do with our movement.

Alt-Left: Those would be the “less crazy but still crazy SJW’s and sexual deviants centered around the Alt-Left site. Renounced. You’re not us. Bye.

Alt-Leftists: The other would be the Alt-Leftists group on Facebook, which is run by Sam Harris execrable crowd. It’s not that we on on the Alt Left do not have concerns with Islam and radical Islam. It’s not that we have no concerns with Muslim integration into the US or even Europe. We just feel that it is not a core issue and it brings in far too many people who are opposed to the core principles of the movement. You’re out. Bye. It was not pleasant having you over.

Also a new faction has emerged in the True Liberals Faction. Suffice to say that these are the crazy SJW’s who are fighting the crazier SJW’s. The movement is mostly made up of sexual deviants to boot, which makes even less palatable to us. Of course true biological gay men and lesbians are welcome in any faction of our movement, but it is beyond me why would need an Alt Left gay faction? I mean I am open to the idea, but what would it look like?

Anyway, here is the new faction:

True Liberals: Anti-racist, pro-feminist (pro equity feminism, in any event) but put off by SJW extremism.  I’ve noticed a subcategory of these who are, say, cisgendered gay males or transgender people who’ve quarreled with trans exclusionary radical feminists (TERF’s.)  I’ll call these kinds Equal Rights Advocates.  Perhaps you recognize yourself among them, dear reader?

These people are not us either. They were hostile to the founder of the movement and in the short time I was in their group, they were violating quite a few of our principles, including some of core principles. They’re not one of us, or they are not part of my group anyway. They need to leave. There is no room for these showboating SJW freaks and weirdos in our Alt Left. We are trying to get away from the 24-7 Gay Pride Parade in the Streets that the Cultural Left seems intent to shove down our throats.

Leave a comment

Filed under Anti-Racism, Catholicism, Christianity, Civil Rights, Conservatism, Cultural Marxists, Democrats, Economics, Feminism, Gender Studies, Government, Homosexuality, Immigration, Islam, Left, Liberalism, Marxism, Nationalism, Political Science, Politics, Racism, Religion, Sane Pro-Woman, Science, Sex, Socialism, US Politics, Weirdos

“Racist, Elitist, Arrogant Indian Man Kanwal Rekhi,” by Magneto

I came across a very disgusting quote in an online news article by an Indian American CEO who lives in Silicon Valley which really got me pissed off. Here is the quote in full, along with the article link:
“He is right about there being too many Asian CEO’s in the Silicon Valley. And there are too many Asian entrepreneurs too. Come to think of it there are too many Asian professors and Asian doctors too. All these are leeching off America, not paying any taxes and hogging the services,” Kanwal Rekhi, a Silicon Valley entrepreneur and angel investor, observed breezily in a Facebook post. “We ought to deport them on a priority basis so we can make room for uneducated whites to take these high paying jobs.”
Kanwal Rekhi was reacting to Steve Bannon’s statement about there being too many Asian CEO’s in Silicon Valley. Kanwal reacts with the typical Indian elitism which is to call White people as “uneducated”. I have also noticed this same attitude in many Indians. They gloat and feel great pride in taking so many high-paying jobs in America and Europe and they are happy to see White people homeless and unemployed. I was once at my dentist and he told me, “The day will soon come when the majority of Americans are unemployed because Indians are taking all of the jobs”.
Now, why do Indians feel this way? It is due to their massive inferiority complex towards White people. Indians know that they are too stupid to ever develop their own country, so they have no choice but to go live in Western countries that were built by White people and parasitize White people’s achievements. Why do Indian men especially have this inferiority complex which they try to mask as a superiority complex?
Because Indian men are the most Beta men on the planet. If you look up the term “Beta Male” in the dictionary, you will find a picture of an Indian man there. Most Indian men are spineless pussies – in essence “momma’s boys” – due to the matriarchal culture of India. So when such Beta male Indian men go to the West, they immediately feel very insecure and inferior to the more masculine and aggressive White men they encounter on a daily basis. Indian men begin to realize that they are too Beta for most White women whom they worship, adore, and fantasize about, so they begin to develop an impotent rage. So whenever you see Indian men making comments like this, you know it is due to the “Little Man Syndrome” Indian men have towards White men.
And a double slap in the face is when Indian men see a huge number of Indian women living in the West voluntarily choosing to be with White guys over Indian guys. A lot of Indian women living in the West openly say that they do not like Indian men and will only date White guys.
All I can suggest to you guys is that if you ever encounter an Indian man acting smug and exhibiting a superiority complex, remind him that over half of his country still defecates outdoors in the 21st century. Bonus points if you have a sexy Indian woman on your arm when you tell him this.
The problem is that the vast majority of Indian men would rather rot in their Beta male envy of White guys rather than become humble, admit they need to work on self-improvement and do the hard work of improving themselves. Learn Game, hit the gym and bulk up, become more aggressive instead of passive-aggressive. Nope, rather than improve themselves, most Indian men are pathetic losers who become bitter and rotten due to their envy and jealously towards White people.
To Mr. Kanwal Rekhi, I would suggest that if you hate White people so much, why don’t you go back to India?


Filed under California, Culture, East Indians, Gender Studies, Guest Posts, Immigration, Labor, Legal, Man World, Race Relations, Race/Ethnicity, Regional, Sociology, South Asians, USA, West, Whites

An Alternative Left Position on Transsexualism

Betty: Following the logic of your article, it would be ok to harm these people as the human rights don’t apply to them which is not right. I don’t get why it bothers people when trans humans want to be the opposite gender? Does it have an effect on your personal life in anyway? Are humans and their personality only defined by their gender? Definitely not. They still have emotions, thoughts and needs just like everybody else. They aren’t worse in their behavior than other people only because they feel wrong in their own gender.

And by the way they don’t choose to feel wrong. It’s the same as being gay, you can’t choose it. So it’s not ok to call trans people “things” or “nonhumans” only because they feel to be wrong in their own body/gender. If you define human beings ONLY over their gender then there’s something wrong with your view of humans in this way. Just let people live how they want to without degrading them. That’s not okay and it’s not just “saying your own opinion” when you say that you don’t like them in such a humiliating way.

The Alternative Left should support full human rights and tolerance for transsexuals. We do not wish for them to be harmed in any way. We do not agree with any crazy people being harmed. We believe people should be kind to transsexuals in person because that is how fellow humans who are not hurting anyone else should be treated. We support nondiscrimination against them in employment, with the caveat that you might be able to discriminate if they have to meet the public because they might harm your business by driving customers away. We do not support discrimination against transsexuals in housing, education or any government services. We feel that transsexuals are crazy, but we should be kind to the mentally ill.

We feel that there is no evidence that this is biological. The rate of it has exploded ~100X what it was in the 1960’s. There’s one on every corner now. We feel that that is very strong evidence that it is not biological and that it is some epidemic form of mental illness we are  experiencing. We also feel that it has become a fad and many people are becoming transsexuals because it is the cool thing to be. We believe that most transsexuals are simply homosexuals.

Many homosexuals identify with the opposite sex. It’s rather normal for them to do so. 

We think that in thethe past such folks would simply be the typical homosexual who acts like the opposite sex and they were perfectly happy that way, but nowadays with the transsexual identity open to them, many such persons are choosing to be transsexuals instead of just opposite sex-identifying homosexuals. In other words, we believe that if the people identifying as transsexuals now were alive in the 1960’s instead of 2010’s, 99% of them would not be transsexuals, and presumably they would be fairly happy and well adjusted nevertheless.

Obviously we see no need for people adopt this identity, and we note that in societies that do not tolerate such things, the rate of transsexualism drops up to 99%. In societies that promote or encourage transsexuals like Thailand, there is epidemic transsexualism. Thailand probably has the highest rate of transsexuals on Earth. Apparently the more you promote and encourage transsexuals, the more of it you end up with. Obviously this speaks against a biological disorder and in favor of a societally constructed condition.

13% of transsexuals re-transition. We say If it’s biological, why can’t they make up their mind if they are men or women? We note that there have been documented cases of completely spontaneous cures in which all symptoms of transsexualism lifted, the person simply dropped it as an issue, decided to identify as the birth sex and went on to be happy and healthy. 60% of underage transsexuals (kids and teenagers) lose all symptoms by adulthood. If it’s biological like homosexuality, how come it goes away a lot of the time?

Transsexuals are mentally ill. It’s a mental illness. But it is a mental illness that is being celebrated and  promoted and it is encouraging a lot of people to adopt this mental disorder just because it is the cool thing to do. We strongly disagree with the celebration and promotion of mental illness and especially with encouraging the spread of mental illness. It’s infuriating.

What if anorexics formed a group and called themselves a protected minority like these transsexuals and cheered on their anorexia, promoted anorexia to the world at large and encouraged others to be anorexic? Would this be acceptable?

What if schizophrenics were celebrating their symptoms, asking to be a protected identity minority, and encouraging other people to think they hear things, see things, believe things that are not true like the CIA is after you and act in very irrational ways? Would this be acceptable. And we believe that just to be hip, a lot of people adopt the Schizophrenic or Anorexic Identities to be cool, we would even get a new Identity Politics for them and they would become yet another identity protected class. We believe it would be very bad for society if anorexics and schizophrenics did this, and this is exactly what transsexuals are doing.

Alt Left position on transsexuals:

  • Bare minimal human rights for transsexuals.
  • Nondiscrimination against transsexuals employment with some reasonable limits.
  • Kindness and tolerance, but no more than that, to transsexuals because they are after all only humans with a mental illness.
  • Recognition that transsexualism is a mental disorder and the treatment of it as such.
  • A halt to the celebration, promotion and encouragement of the mental illness called transsexualism because it is bad for society and it is senseless to celebrate, promote and encourage mental illness.

* I had a transsexual as a potential client, and I was very nice to him too. I would have taken him on as a client also, and I would have been very nice to him.


Filed under Asia, Civil Rights, Discrimination, Employment, Gender Studies, Homosexuality, Housing, Left, Mental Illness, Psychology, Psychopathology, Regional, SE Asia, Sex, Social Problems, Sociology, Thailand

PUA/ Game: Want Hollywood-Style Wild Love Affairs with Women? Act Alpha.

There are many men out there who are relationship retards. They just do not function well in relationships with women either because they are not cut out for this or they repel the women they are with so much that the relationship is lousy when it lasts at all.

Women may marry and even have kids with relationship retards, but they don’t fall head over heels in love with them because relationship retards are not very lovable men. It is not uncommon for these men to go through their whole lives never having any woman fall in love with them because there is nothing there to fall in love with. There has to be something at least a  bit wonderful, glorious, heroic or beautiful about a man for any woman to even fall in love with him at all in the first place.

And men who regularly have women falling crazy in love with them, especially the point of being wildly jealous, possessive and even combative with rival women over the man tend to have one thing in common.  These men tend to display “Alpha” traits. That does not mean they are statistical Alphas but more that they are behavioral Alphas. If you want women to fall wildly, movie style, Romeo and Juliet head over heels insane in love with you to where she is possessive, jealous and even fighting other women over you, you must act Alpha. That’s how you get women to act that way, and women tend to respond to Alpha behavior in that madly in love, love affair of the century style.

Beta not to mention Omega behavior in men simply does not generate that Hollywood style love affair of all time passion. Behavioral Betas are rather drab men, and they just do not generate passion in women very well. Omega behavior by definition is not only drab and unable to arouse passion but often is actually downright repellent of women’s passion.

A man has women falling head over heels in love with him regularly where there even two or three women mad in love with him at once? He’s a Behavioral Alpha. Almost by definition he cannot be anything else.

Women are actually fighting each other over man? He’s Alpha. He cannot be anything else. Women don’t fight over Betas. Betas fight other men over women. Remember?

A man is getting regular marriage proposals pretty quick into relationships? He is probably an Alpha. Alphas are so irresistible that women start clamoring to marry them forever at a very early time in the relationship. Alphas spend a lot of their time turning down marriage and cohabitation suggestions from women if they are single.

If women are saying, “I want to have your baby, dammit! I want to have your kid!” Guess what? The guys an Alpha. That’s what women say to Alphas.

Sure, women have kids with Betas, but it’s more like, “Let’s have a baby,” or “Let’s you and me have a baby,” or “Do you think we should have a baby?”, like that. She’s having the kid for the couple, not for her. She doesn’t want to “have his kid”; she wants the two of them to have a baby together. See the difference?


Filed under Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Man World, Psychology, Romantic Relationships, Sex

In Praise of Racism


Transphobia FTW! Get help freaks!

There is no shame in racism! Be racist and proud, don’t be shy! Don’t let those liberal dogooders stop you!

I’m a racist! A proud racist! A defiant racist! I love my race, the human race! If there’s one race I hate, it’s the nonhumans! That means you its, whatever the Hell you tranny things are! I don’t know what you are, but you sure ain’t people. Humans are either male or female, period. If you can’t make up your mind if you are male or female, I’m going to call you “it.” If you’re neither male nor female, you’re a thing. Real simple. You are not part of my glorious race. You’re one of those lower races, you know, the nonhumans.

Heshe’s got lost!


Filed under Cultural Marxists, Gender Studies, Humor, Scum, Sex, Weirdos

In Praise of Transphobia


Up with transphobia!

Transphobia FTW!

Get lost, freaks! Weirdos out!

Get help deviants! There’s no shame in mental illness. A mental health clinician is only a phone call away. Fight stigma now!


Filed under Cultural Marxists, Gender Studies, Humor, Mental Illness, Psychology, Scum, Sex, Weirdos

Sexual Orientation in Males: Theories and Therapies

From Quora.

How can you know if you’re gay?

Currently I’m 15. I felt like I liked both genders from twelve to 14, now I feel I’m gay. I don’t know if it’s just because I like to admire how guys look and wish I looked like them, or if I actually find them attractive. Have many heterosexuals gone through this in puberty as well?

My response: Few if any heterosexual men go through an early phase in puberty or before of being sexually attracted to males in any significant form.

How do I know? Personal experience and conversations with many men about this. I also work as psychological counselor and in the course of my work, I often have to a sexual orientation assessment for one reason or another as part of the therapy. Most everyone simply cooperates just fine. The average heterosexual male simply tells me that he has been attracted to females since puberty or even before, it’s been that way ever since, there’s nothing confusing about it, and that’s all there is to it.

The only men who were confused about their sexual orientation were mentally ill. The therapy in this case is to try to figure out the man’s true sexual orientation, which to me is always quite clear on detailed questioning. These are usually cases of straight men who are worrying that they are gay for no good reason. The therapy is to pound into their head that they are straight and that the gay stuff is nonsensical and idiotic. They usually get over it after a while. Going round and round with these men about their sexual orientation or worse implying that they are gay is very bad therapy and is likely to make them worse, but this is often what clinicians do nowadays.

I doubt if mentally healthy gay or straight men are much confused about this. I do not know how bisexual men feel. I have had a number of men identify as bisexual to me on interview. In general, they were quite ok about it, gave me a good figure percentage-wise (75-25 or mostly straight or 20-80 or mostly gay, for instance) and were not going round and round at all. What’s there to go round and round about? Most males are pretty clear about what turns them on and what doesn’t. If you aren’t, you’re either still young or there’s something wrong with you.

In my experience, most males who are supposed “confused” or “questioning” their sexual orientation are not actually confused about or questioning anything. Instead these are simply gay males who are having some serious problems accepting the fact that they are gay. The therapy of such a person is to first determine that they are definitely gay by questioning and then to hammer home the idea that they are gay, that their sexual orientation cannot and will not change ever for any reason, and if they hope to have a happy life, they have to accept that they are gay. I often tell them that is great that they are gay, that I can relate to them as a sort of mirror image of myself (they are the other side of my sexual mirror), and emphasize our commonality as males who share a certain male worldview.

Sexual orientation in males is surely fixed at age 15 at the latest. We do not know if or when it is fixed earlier than that, and there is no good evidence that sexual orientation is fixed at birth, though that is possible. It is possible for sexual orientation in men to change before or around puberty. There are some case reports that indicate that this is possible. Some changes have been reported in boys age 10-14, but most reports of strong changes even at that age show that actually nothing changed at all and that this person’s sexual orientation was obvious even at a much younger age. Instead of actual changes, these are more “clearing the air” experiences where the person starts to full recognize just who they are and who they have always been sexually. This is true even in females, though they can move around more than men.

In your case, it appears quite clear to me that you are gay. Not bisexual, not heterosexual, but gay. I suppose you can continue to go round and round about this in future years, but I doubt if your orientation is going to change much after today.

What’s wrong with being gay anyway? Maybe God made you this way.

1 Comment

Filed under Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, Man World, Psychology, Psychotherapy, Sex

Not Everyone Who Voted Trump Is a Fascist

Trump himself is absolutely a fascist, all the way. And I would say that quite a few of his followers are headed in that direction also.

But Trump has a lot of other supporters who do not appear to be fascists. Jason discussed many young male Libertarians at his college who support Trump on economic grounds.

  1. Non-fascist wingnuts. I think a lot of wingnuts are actually appalled by seeing fascism real and in the flesh here. These are all of the Republicans speaking out against him during the campaign. These are just corporate and rich types who want their money and nothing else. They see real fascism in Trump and they do not like it.
  2. Non-fascist racists. Trump has a helluva lot of racist supporters, but it’s important to note that not all racists are fascists. Not at all.
  3. Libertarians, often young men.
  4. MRA’s, but with a lot of overlap above.
  5. A few very confused Leftists who need to have their heads examined. On looking into them, most of them are “leftwing racists” and yes there are such a thing.
  6. 1%’ers. Tulio pointed out that a lot of the rich just voted for him to get their tax cut.
  7. Corporate types. As corporatist as Hillary is, I think many corporate types thought Trump would be good for business, and in fact, he will.
  8. Middle class suburban types in flyover country and in the South. They always vote Republican, especially in the South.
  9. Christian fundamentalists. They just want to ban abortion and get their other judicial stuff done. Purely utilitarian. There are indeed quite a few Christofash out there, but many rightwing evangelicals are not fascists at all, and I am convinced that many are not even racist.
  10. Muslim haters. These are the types who go into the voting booth and vote muh fuck Islam. Lot of overlap with a lot of the above, but a lot of people just pull the lever on screw the Muslims.
  11. Aggrieved workers. Many working class people may well have felt that Trump was their only hope as the Democrats for the 1% like Hillary wrote them off long ago. Trump won’t help them either, but at least he’s addressing their concerns. These people are voting against these horrible trade deals.
  12. Opponents of mass immigration and illegal immigration. Of course,  most of these folks are racist as Hell, and there’s a lot of overlap above, but I could see a guy like me going in there and pulling the lever for Trump because I am sick and tired of mass immigration, want to throw out all the illegals and want to slash 95% of the fake guest worker scabs. It’s possible to be against all of these things and not be particularly racist. I don’t think I am all that racist, and I oppose all of this.
  13. American nationalists. Although there is huge overlap above, and the fash component is all these types, I suppose it is possible to be a US nationalist without being a fash or a racist. I get called America hater all the time, but the truth is that I am an American nationalist. I love my country, so it really pisses me off when I see my country acting evil. It’s like love for a wayward son. As a man who loves his country, I want to see my country doing good, not evil. The main reason  I oppose all this mass, illegal and guest worker immigration is it’s bad for country. That’s why I oppose the trade deals too.


Filed under Christianity, Democrats, Economics, Fake Guest Workers, Fascism, Gender Studies, Illegal, Immigration, Labor, Left, Libertarianism, Masculinism, Nationalism, Neoliberalism, Political Science, Politics, Race/Ethnicity, Racism, Regional, Religion, Republicans, South, US Politics, USA, White Racism, Whites

Who Voted Trump? 100% Rightwingers and Racists, 0% Anyone Else

Every American I know who is voted Trump is either:

A conservative, reactionary, rightwing extremist or fascist.

Those who do not claim they do not fit into those categories (which are very few) are all racists. These are all White people, White men, and they are all voting for Trump on race. They either hate Blacks or Hispanics or both. And furthermore, all of these people identify themselves as rightwing even when they say they are not.

Who did not vote for Trump:

  • I do not know one single person who does not identify as rightwing, conservative, reactionary, rightwing extremist or fascist who voted for Trump. Not one.
  • Almost everyone I know who voted for Trump is White, and almost all of them are men.
  • I do not know any moderate non-racists who voted for Trump.
  • I do not know any non-rightwingers who voted for Trump.
  • I do not know any self-described moderates or leftwingers who voted for Trump.
  • I do not know any Blacks who voted for Trump.
  • I do not know any women who voted for Trump.

So Trump was elected by:

  • Conservatives. I do not know one single non-conservative who voted for him. Right-wingers elected Trump. Everyone who voted for him was rightwing, even if they said they were not. In fact, those who said they are not have been identifying as rightwing for a long time now.
  • Racists. On the off-chance that anyone I knew denied being conservative, then they were absolutely racist. The only possible non-racists who voted for Trump were hardcore conservative Republicans, and that’s a wildly racist position right there. Note that a number of these horrifically racist Whites virulently denied that they were racist to me. All of these people who denied being racist to me were overt Alt Right supporters, and all were more or less Nazis.
  • Whites. Whites elected Trump, mostly White men. Almost everyone I know who voted for him is a White man. I only know one non-White who voted for Trump, and he is Alt Right Hispanic.
  • Men. I do not know one single woman who voted for Trump.
  • Muslims. I do know some Muslims who probably voted for Trump, and it would be nice if Trump would do them a favor and throw them out of the country. I have no idea why they did this, but Muslims are profoundly conservative, even reactionary people.
  • MRA’s. I do know some men who voted for Trump on sexism (MRA types), but almost all of them are also very racist, so it’s a wash. I only know one nonracist MRA who voted Trump.


Filed under Conservatism, Gender Studies, Islam, Masculinism, Political Science, Politics, Race/Ethnicity, Racism, Religion, Republicans, US Politics, White Racism, Whites