Category Archives: American

The Brainwashing of America Is Complete

Resolved: Americans are truly hopeless.

Fox News the most honest and trusted news station on TV?

LOL! I know that sounds like the punch line of a joke, but actually it is not. The truth is even more terrifying. 29% of Americans actually believe that that statement is true.

I did have a problem with the poll, as it asks which news station out of this list is the most honest and trustworthy:

1. Fox
2. CNN
3. NBC News
4. MicrosoftNBC Yes that is what MSNBC really stands for!
5. CBS News

Um, how about none of the above?

That is like showing me a lineup of pathological liars and asking me which one is the most honest and trustworthy. After I pick myself up from the laughing spasm on the floor, you tell me that a better way to think of it is to decide which one of these lying skunks lies less than the other lying skunks.

And that, my friends, is a difficult question!

But I might just pick BillGatesNBC, and for sure Fox Lies gets last.


Filed under American, Culture, Journalism

Propaganda Works Great


Well at least it does in the West, where no one believes they are being subjected to 24-7 full spectrum dominance propaganda by 100% of the mainstream media! Oh no, we don’t have propaganda here. Of course not. The only people who have propaganda are the enemies of America. Yeah.

I am absolutely stunned at the number of Americans who believe every single word the US government, its allies and the mainstream media says about US foreign policy. I would say that Democratic Party liberals are probably the worst of all, as a lot conservatives now are libertarians and paleocons who are cynical about both the US state and Western media. This type of conservative believes full well that the US state does all sorts of nasty, wicked stuff and both the state and the media are liable to lie on a continuous basis.

But honestly I am shocked at how gullible Americans are. Americans just seem to go along with the propaganda du jour. Very few Americans dissent, and trust me, being a dissenter on US foreign policy is not very pleasant, even in liberal circles. You are called a traitor, a nut and a conspiracy theorist and an agent of the enemy states. I am starting to think that Americans may be some of the most brainwashed people on Earth. Most of the problem is they don’t think they are being brainwashed. The most brainwashable people of all are those who do not think they are being lied to.



Filed under American, Asia, Conservatism, Culture, Democrats, Eurasia, Government, Journalism, Liberalism, NE Asia, North Korea, Political Science, Politics, Regional, Russia, Sociology, US Politics, USA

Does the USA Have a Personality Disorder?

Robert Brandtjen writes:

In the book I Hate You, Don’t Leave Me, the authors spend a chapter on why the USA is a Borderline society, check it out sometime. I find myself in agreement with them.

I am absolutely certain that groups of people, ethnic groups, religions, organizations, corporations, governments, nations and even nation-states can have personality problems. Just as each of us as an individual has a personality, so of course does every human grouping, ethnic group, religion, organization, corporation, government, nation and even nation-state have a personality. Just as an individual can have a disordered personality, so too can any of the human groups listed above.

What do you all think of this. Does the USA suffer from Borderline Personality Disorder or some other personality disorder?


Filed under American, Culture, Psychology, Psychopathology, Regional, Sociology, USA

“News Reporting” in the United States of America

For all intents and purposes, there is no such thing as investigative reporting in the US anymore.

Nor will Hollywood even make dissident films. I listened to an interview with Oliver Stone today and he said that in this climate there is no way that he could make JFK or Nixon and it would be a hard time making Born on the Fourth of July either. Even the somewhat dissident film Bush could not get any money raised in the US because no one would fund it. Instead, Stone had to get his funding from Hong Kong.

So Hollywood, yes, liberal Hollywood, along with the “liberal media,” is now part and parcel of the Deep State and the US State Propaganda System.

So even the word liberal doesn’t mean much anymore. Apparently there is a “liberal” wing of the Deep State/US State Propaganda System and a “conservative” wing of the Deep State/US State Propaganda System. Big deal! This is important? This is a distinction without a difference.

Democratic Party liberals are as much a part of the problem these days as Republican Party conservatives. And on foreign policy, they are more or less advocating the same thing, though the Democrats want a kinder, gentler US imperialism while the Republicans want the usual rabid sociopathic US imperialism that the world knows so well. They both have the same goals – they just differ on how to go about them.

This is what “the news” means in 2015 America.

News in America is made up of two things:

1. Hollywood. And all that implies (sheer entertainment, titillation, gossip, nonsense).

2. Propaganda. And journalism in the US nowadays is yellower than at any time since the early 1960’s. We aren’t going forwards at all. We are going backwards to the Hearst era.

Some US news is pure Hollywood silliness, and some is pure undiluted propaganda.

But the best US news of all mixes the fireworks of Hollywood with the totalization of propaganda to produce a full, dazzling, mesmerizing, nearly all-encompassing Matrix-like alternate reality.

Like any good addicting drug, it takes you under its spell, hooks you til you can’t think straight, and won’t let you kick the habit without nasty withdrawals.

You have heard of full-spectrum warfare?

How about full-spectrum brainwash?

Too late. It’s already here, zapping around in your lulled, dulled and hypnotized brain.

Welcome to the show!


Filed under American, Cinema, Conservatism, Culture, Democrats, Government, Imperialism, Journalism, Liberalism, Political Science, Politics, Regional, Republicans, Sociology, US Politics, USA

Robert Stark Interviews Charles Lincoln on Beverly Hills

Looks like a great interview. I had dinner with Charles recently in Fresno and I must say that I really like him a lot. He is a great guy.

Guest host Charles Lincoln talks about politics, culture, and life in Beverly Hills, California.

Topics include:

  • His article Beverly Hills at 100: Who Sets the Style for This Style-setting Enclave?
  • Mansionization in Beverly Hills
  • The concept of nuisance as the origin of environmental law
  • How banks encourage and profit from overdevelopment
  • How the transaction tax encourages overdevelopment
  • The transformation of wealth and class in the United States
  • The Queen of Versailles
  • The Iranian Jewish community if Beverly Hills
  • The multi million dollar security plan for Beverly Hills High School
  • How we create corrupt elites overseas that come back to change our society

Leave a comment

Filed under American, California, Culture, Economics, Politics, Regional, USA, West

The Decline

Ricks writes:

@ Robert wrote: – It’s just, if you’re honest, well, going from a White town to an Hispanic town, any honest person would have to admit it’s a downgrade. And if you compare a White town to an Hispanic town, well, it’s a decline. Not a severe decline, but a decline nonetheless….

Sure its not a significant decline but I think it sure is a noticeable decline. Also many of these “vibrant” town end up cash strapped because of the vibrancy (Crime) the decent folks move out! Like you sad it is sad why many Hispanics like it like that (many are foreign born) anyone with a bit of common sense and education will move out ASAP…

This is simply the truth. I do not see why anyone with two eyes and ears could possibly not understand this. Anyone who doesn’t believe it must be either deluded or lying to themselves. There is definitely a decline. When a town goes from majority-White to majority-Hispanic, one does sense a sort of general decline in the town. It is not as if it is no longer livable; in fact, it is still quite livable, but it’s just not the same town anymore, and I don’t mean that in a good sense. The decline is not great or extreme, but it not insignificant either, and it is enough to be noticeable. It is sort of a sense that the city “has gone downhill” somewhat. Hard to put your finger on.

Something I have noticed is that apparently a lot of Hispanics actually like this somewhat degraded culture. Even with the crime and ugliness, they seem to think it is all peaches and roses. They are in their element and they love it. I don’t get it.

Now when a city goes from majority-White to majority-Black, typically things are much worse. Of course there is a decline in almost all cases. And it is a very significant and profound decline in all major areas. This is so obvious that I do not understand how anyone could deny it.

It’s also a good argument for not letting the Black populations of cities get too large as a small Black population is generally manageable, but there is a “tipping point” of ~20% where things start to head downhill pretty fast. For instance, we have 4% Blacks in this town. Most of them are ghetto Blacks, and honestly I really dislike them a lot. That is because I have had the misfortune of getting to know some of them. Let’s just say that I probably would have liked these local Blacks a lot better if I had not gotten to know them so well and understood what they are really like!

Even some of the ghetto types are ok (especially the young women) but they have this “ghettoness” about them that bothers me for some reason.

There are also some older Blacks who are not ghetto, but they are not really assimilated either. I am not sure how to describe them, but I know people who would call them “real Blacks.” Real Blacks as opposed to what these types call “White Blacks.” Honestly there is nothing really wrong with them except they are not that smart, and their culture appears somewhat degraded to me. They remind me of the sort of more traditional, well behaved, working class Blacks you might find in a lot of the South. A lot of them are very religious and have strong accents.

As I said, there is nothing wrong with them to tell the truth except that I just do not and cannot relate to their culture. It is completely alien to the one I grew up with. But I cannot say that they are bad people.

There are some Blacks here who are somehow middle class or above. They have totally assimilated to normative American (White?) culture, act very well and are indistinguishable from anyone else.

Now mind you, these local Blacks still cause problems. But they don’t cause mayhem, which is what you often get with large Black populations.

As with the Hispanics, you get the feeling that a lot of these ghetto types actually like the wildness, chaos, 24-7 party, loud, flashy, belligerent, strutting, blinged out culture of Cadillacs, 40’s, blunts, rims, grills and hos. Even with all the crime and gangs and morbidity, they seem as if they are in their element. It is as if they think it is a continuous wild party. I suppose I understand this, but to this introvert, it just seems so insane.

This is one thing I would agree with the White nationalist types about – that this decline is very real and is not a figment of anyone’s imagination. On the other hand, if you got most White people drunk and alone in a room where no one could hear them, a lot of them would agree with statement just the same.


Filed under American, Blacks, Culture, Hispanics, Race/Ethnicity, Regional, Sociology, Urban Decay, Urban Studies, USA, Whites

Help Support American Hardcore Talk

I know both Robert and Paul, and Robert is a very good friend of mine. I like Paul a lot. Both are very bright guys. It’s great that they are on AM radio now. Let’s help them stay on the air.

American Hardcore talk radio - the underground alternative to NPR.

American Hardcore talk radio – the underground alternative to NPR.

This is a unique opportunity and historic opportunity. You can help provide a voice for alternative voices on AM radio on multiple networks. Support American Hardcore Talk with Robert Stark and Paul Bingham. We need your support to stay on air and expand.

Ever notice how many great and talented artists in every genre of cultural end up struggling for recognition if their work, no matter how brilliant it might be, reflects views outside the mainstream?

Ever wanted to help the hardworking musicians, poets, writers, designers and other artists trying to achieve a bit of fame and gain enough money to fund their projects? Do you know of a struggling artist seeking to promote their works and want to help them but lack the resources?

Now you can be apart of the solution by donating to American Hardcore Talk, the underground alternative to National Public Radio.

Help us build the network to give marginalized artists and writers a platform for interviews, interaction and promotion.

American Hardcore Talk is a listener-supported program which will exist to make your voice heard. For everyone donation you make, we will do an hour interview with you or the artist of your choice.

Donate today and help us restore American culture.

Click here to help fund American Hardcore Talk.

Leave a comment

Filed under American, Art, Culture, Journalism, USA

All Hail Richard Nixon!

Jason Y writes:

He was probably the last “moderate Republican.” At heart, probably a good man, but a “tough love” believer. For instance, civil rights for blacks, yet still negative views about them, among other things.

He wasn’t totally against business (as the far left is), and thought he could work with them to promote pro-worker policies. However, slowly business, ultimately, showed they wanted profit, at the “total” expense of the workers. This was in full show under Reagan.

I respond:

At heart, probably a good man, but a “tough love” believer.

American culture is a “tough love” culture. Always has been. Goes along with rugged individualism and radical individualism.

He wasn’t that much of a tough love type. Anyway, the whole society has gone tough love now ever since Clinton got rid of AFDC. Even Democrats are tough-lovers.

Nixon was absolutely outraged when Clinton wiped out AFDC. He said he would never have done such a thing. He had nothing but contempt for both parties. “Look at them,” he said. “How pitiful are they? Going after the single Moms!”

All hail Richard Nixon!

For instance, civil rights for blacks, yet still negative views about them, among other things.

Big deal. Most sane people have negative views about Black people because Black people act bad. I mean way too many Black people act way too bad. That’s the cause of 90% of anti-Black racism right there. Black people acting terrible.

Nixon told the truth. Nixon was crucified for telling the truth.

He also told the truth about Jews.

He made some comment about the Jew York Times editorial board saying they all wore yarmulkes. The stupid Jews flipped out like they always do and screamed that Nixon was an “anti-Semite,” the favorite bullshit epithet of the Jews. I do not think Nixon was anti-Semitic in the slightest. And about the Jew York Times, he was correct. At the time he made that statement, the whole editorial board was nothing but a bunch of Jews. Not that there is anything necessarily wrong with that – I am not philosophically opposed to papers stuffing their editorial boards with Jews though it does smack anti-Gentile discrimination – but Nixon was simply stating an obvious empirical fact. How stating obvious scientific facts is anti-Semitism is news to me.

Show me one Far Left politician in the US who is “totally opposed to business.” Name one Far Left US political party that is. I don’t think even the Communist Party USA can be seen as anti-business anymore.

I keep hearing this from DNC nuts that the DNC was needed because liberal Democrats had turned “anti-business” and the party was unpopular because of this “anti-business” attitude. Show me a case of when the Democratic Party was ever against business, even for one second.


Filed under American, Blacks, Culture, Democrats, Jews, Journalism, Liberalism, Political Science, Politics, Republicans, US Politics

The Lie of Declining Homophobia in America

Probably because schools are so homophobic. Seems like all schools, and including colleges are hate laboratories. I mean there has always been fighting at school, and some kind of caste system, that’s just part of growing up. Nowadays, though, it’s gotten really on the edge.

I will tell you one thing that has gotten way worse is homophobia*. In the 1970’s, no one cared. The assumption was all guys were straight until proven otherwise and no one really worried about this stuff. The gays were mostly closeted and there was not a lot of fagging around by straight guys.

Let me tell you, men had a lot more behavioral freedom in those days because standards of masculinity were so relaxed. This was the era of David Bowie, the New York Dolls, Aerosmith, Mick Jagger, T Rex, Iggy Pop, Mott the Hoople and all sorts of seriously androgynous mostly straight rockstars. It was hip to be a straight androgyne. We do not have that freedom at all anymore, and people are vastly more homophobic now than they were then.

Let us put it this way. If I walk, talk, move, sit, stand, dress, or have mannerisms like I did in the 1970’s, I would be being called a faggot all day long nowadays. Back then, I didn’t hear it much, and most people just assumed I was straight even on first meeting me. Guys would meet me as total strangers and right away start talking about women. It was sort of like, “Well I see you like to fuck chicks, dude. Me too. Let’s you and me go get some chicks, stud.”

Because we have so much less space now, I have started acting a lot more conspicuously masculine. Maybe even macho, I have no idea. And even then I hear that I must be gay now and again. Because, you know, I sit with my legs crossed, so I must be a faggot. I do not mind acting this way, as there is part of me that is like that anyway so I can just plug into that part of myself, but it’s not like I am free to be myself.

If you look at male porn stars from the 1970’s, they were much more androgynous than they are now. Nowadays male porn starts are covered with tattoos, jacked up and hypermasculine looking. They look like they want to kill you. I cannot remember the last time I saw a 70’s style male porn star in a recent porn film.

All this gay rights stuff is a smokescreen. Most straight people are wildly homophobic. Straight men are a disaster, especially Black and Hispanic men who are basically psychotic on the subject. And most straight women are outrageously homophobic too, but only in a strange way. They spend a Hell of a lot of time accusing various straight men around them of being gay!

The gays came out of the closet all right, but I do not think people got any saner as a result. It seems like Gay Lib just made people even nuttier on this subject. I think we were much saner about male homosexuality in the 1970’s than we are now.

We have really gone downhill. Sex roles have totally regressed and we are back into stupid rigid traditional crap.

I would like to close by pointing out that the vast majority of who are gay baited or victims of anti-gay harassment or even gay-bashing are actually straight men. I figure 85% of men who are gay-bashed, gay baited or gay bullied are actually straight. Gay men probably only make up maybe 15% of that total.

I do not think the Gay Lobby has been helpful for these straight men at all. In fact, I think they have just made things even worse for them. Gay Lib was a great idea, but I don’t think many people got liberated.

*When I refer to homophobia, I mean male homosexuality. I do not think anyone cares about female homosexuality. I mean how many women get told, “Well obviously you are a lez. Hey, you act like a dyke.” I never hear anyone saying that to any woman. Women can act any way they want to.


Filed under American, Culture, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, Man World, Politics, Pornography, Sex, US Politics

Robert Stark Interviews Matt Forney about Millenials


I really enjoyed this interview. I like all interviews with Matt. Is there something wrong with me? I am a Leftist, but I keep finding myself nodding my head in agreement at all of these “Alternative Right” guys?. What’s going on?


Filed under American, Conservatism, Culture, Political Science