Category Archives: Bigfoot

Repost: Human-Bigfoot War, Oklahoma, 1855

I am reposting this classic post because it continues to get linked around a lot, and a lot of you have probably never read it and you might get a kick out of it. I have no idea if this story is true or not, but it has a lot of obscure details, and there are quite a few other Indian stories along the same lines. Whether its true or not, it sure is a great story! Wouldn’t this story make a good movie? The original story, which is actually much better written than my version, is here.

Too weird.

The giants in the story appear to be Bigfoots.

Choctaw territory in Indian Territory was in SE Oklahoma, which is Ground Zero for Bigfoots in Oklahoma.

Interesting story. The Bigfoots (only referred to here as the giants) had been raiding human settlements on SE Oklahoma and Arkansas for some time, mostly stealing vegetables. They had also been stealing human children and apparently eating them. A Choctaw search party was organized, led by Joshua LeFlore.

This man actually existed. He was born in the Choctaw Nation in 1797 and died in Indian Territory in 1855. So apparently this story, if it is true, is from 1855. It must be later than 1838 because Indian Territory was only established in that year. It references Arkansas, and that state was let in in 1836. There was not yet a state of Oklahoma, not to come into being until 1907. So the story must have taken place from 1838-1907.

A hunting party tracks the Bigfoots down and finds a giant mound with the bodies of 19 human children the Bigfoots have been kidnapping and eating. The Bigfoots are covered in hair, and the bad smell of their shit and piss is everywhere. Most of the humans’ horses rear up and throw their riders, which is what horses do when they see Bigfoots.

The humans attack the Bigfoots, and LeFlore empties his revolver at one, but it’s useless. The Bigfoot kills LeFlore’s mount with a single blow and then tears off LeFlore’s head. The rest of the Indians open up with .50 caliber Sharp’s buffalo rifles (designed to drop a buffalo) on the beasts, from experience aiming at their heads, as this is the best way to kill them. Two Bigfoots drop. A Choctaw Indian hunts down LeFlore’s killer and finishes it off with a hunting knife. Then he decapitates it for good measure.

The Indians bury what’s left of the kids, then bury their leader, giving him a 21 gun salute. Then they make a bonfire and burn the Bigfoots on the fire. They ride home, heading for bad dreams, maybe lasting a lifetime.

Wild story! The giants certainly seem like Bigfoots. Many Indian tribes describe Bigfoots as highly aggressive, stealers of men, women and even children. Young women were apparently taken for mates. Bigfoots would descend on Indian villages with whistles before raining rocks down on the Indians.

Many Western tribes describe areas of their territory that were totally off limits, and the Indians refused to go there, for these were the territories of the Bigfoots. These territories were full of game, but the Indians were so terrified that they avoided them like the plague. Why would Indians avoid a forage-rich area area due to creatures that don’t even exist?

Probably the Bigfoots were more aggressive against Indians because the Indians did not have good methods for killing them. Power comes from the barrel of a gun after all. Bigfoots are highly intelligent and appear to have a language. Our guns are very powerful, much more powerful than the Indians’ weapons. Bigfoots have probably learned to fear and respect us due to our weaponry, and that is why they are much more pacifistic than they were in the Indian era and even during the early era of White settlement of the West.

Most animals figure out who the apex predator is and leave it alone. In North America, humans are the apex predator par excellance. I would imagine that most animals figure this out at some point, or there is some race memory due to genetic selection. For instance, grizzly bears that are highly aggressive are rapidly killed by humans, and the surviving bears that pass on genes are the most passive and avoidant ones.

There is a precedent for stealing children. During times of famine in Africa, chimpanzees are known to raid human villages, steal human babies and eat them.

Who knows if the story is true, but it sure is cool!

If you think this website is valuable to you, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site.


Filed under Amerindians, Animals, Apes, Bigfoot, History, Mammals, North America, Regional, USA, Wild

Bigfoot News Holidays 2015 Edition


Honestly, I do not have the foggiest idea what that is. But the more I look at it, the more I think that is a Sasquatch. Look at that thing. It has no neck!


This is from Maine. The Tom Pasanen photo. Whatever it is, it sure is weird.



The Tom Pasanen photo from Maine.



A closer look at the bizarro Pasanen photo. Do note how the hair coloration of the thing matches the foliage perfectly.


fake bigfoot

A fake by hoaxers associated with the JREF scum, I do not know what that is – is it a statue, a costume? I think it is statue.



What in the Hell is that?! Shot via a trailcam and entered into a contest. I am not sure if it won or not. I have no idea what that is. If that is a wild animal, would someone please prove it? That doesn’t look like a bear. Nevertheless, part of me thinks this is an animal. I always thought that this is one of the weirdest Bigfoot pictures out there.



Three photos here of three Sasquatches. The first is from the Go-cart video. Boys racing go-carts in Pennsylvania had a Go-Pro camera on their go-cart and shot a video of this thing. They did not even see it at the time and only found out later when they looked at the footage. If you see the video, that can be nothing other than a Sasquatch. I believe those boys, and I do not think they are sophisticated enough to pull off an elaborate hoax like this. In fact, I doubt if anyone is. I have never seen a hoax that matches the quality of this video. Photo 2 is apparently from the Turkey Hunter footage. Is that correct? Someone correct me if I am wrong. I do think that the Turkey Hunter footage is genuine. However, the Turkey Hunter video is also one of the most flat- out weird Bigfoot videos I have ever seen. The last is I think an old one from Alberta Canada, but I am not sure. That sure looks like a Sasquatch to me.



Ok, that is just weird. Someone tell me what the Hell that is? Look at how long that thing’s arms are. It looks like a gorilla. But compare it to the very first photo at the top. Same scene, right? The first photo is the thing when it stood up and the second photo is the same object crouching down. If it’s the same creature as the first video, that’s a Sasquatch. I believe that the man who shot this pic and some other related ones is known. What do we know about him?



This is up there with the craziest Bigfoot photos of all time. We have seen these things carrying deer in the Turkey Hunter video, and now we see a Bigfoot carrying…yes, you got it. A cow. Apparently a dead cow, unless the Bigfoot just killed it. A completely baffled farmer in Indiana submitted this pic, which was taken with a trailcam. He has no idea what this is a picture of. He doesn’t seem to be the type to fake a video, and where do you get fake cow carcasses anyway!? Note the corn to be harvested in the foreground.



A much larger photo of the Bigfoot with the cow. Note the huge foot on that thing! No way did some humble farmer buy a fake cow carcass and dress his farmer friend up in a suit, put on the biggest clown clown shoes I have ever seen and shoot this with a trailcam, of all things. That simply did not happen. Have we even seen a trailcam hoax yet? I don’t believe the hoaxers even try to do those. Would be nice to get a better backstory on this.


Sas Ontario other BFt

Sasquatch Ontario capture of a Sasquatch. Probably genuine.

Brave Hunter Films Massive Bigfoot! Utah 2015. This video is getting ripped to pieces by the skeptards, but I am going to go out on a limb and say that I really do think this is a Sasquatch. It doesn’t move like a man. No man can move like that. It’s not possible.

Do you see how it goes down on all fours a few times? See how many times it hides behind trees and peeks from behind them (tree peaking). Notice how it moves through the forest like a cross-country skier, gliding as it walks? Humans can’t walk like that. Also look at how it gracefully goes up-down, up-down when it walks. Humans don’t walk like that, nor can they.

Notice also the way it grabs trees and brush as it moves through the forest, using the foliage almost as one might use ski poles? That’s how they move through the woods. At one point in the video, you can clearly see that that thing has no damned neck! Furthermore, its shoulders are simply massive.

And a number of times you can see its head and face in profile. Look at the bone structure of that face. That’s not a human face. Human faces are not shaped like that, and you can’t put a monkey mask on that gives your face a different shape. Have we seen a Bigfoot hoax yet with a mask so fancy that it actually changes the shape of the wearer’s face?

It has a browridge. A coned head. How many hoaxes have we seen with coned heads and bony browridges? Notice the weird way it walks hunched over. That’s not a human being. Humans don’t walk like that.

In addition, I have seen so many videos of these damned things by now that I can almost spot a Sasquatch half a mile away blindfolded. They have a certain profile about the bodies. It takes many different forms, but I keep seeing those forms over and over. And no human has a body profile that looks like that, nor can they fake one.

That’s also real fur. You can see that in the very beginning of the video when the sun is shining on the object.

Also if that is a guy in a monkey suit and a mask, there is no way he could move through the woods that fast. Also the mask is going to get so hot towards the end of the video that he is going to have to take it off or else he is going to die.

The hunter’s reaction has been criticized, with people saying that he seems calm. Like Hell he does. You can hear him breathing hard right from the start of the video. He’s hyperventilating. You don’t breathe like that when you are calm.

First video evidence of a Sasquatch at the Alberta Habituation Site! In the video below, we see an episode of Survivorman where Survivorman is looking for Sasquatches up in Todd Standing’s research area, which is the Alberta Habituation Site (wherever precisely that might be) last time I checked. I am pretty out of the loop with regards to the AHS, though I have sent a couple of guys out there looking for it. I definitely know the general area of the site within 25 miles or so.

Anyway, whether or not Todd is still at the site, I know for a fact that the Survivorman episodes where Survivorman is romping around searching for Sasquatches with Todd Standing were absolutely filmed at the AHS in the last couple of years.

This footage is fascinating. Apparently at the time the video was shot, neither Todd nor Survivorman had any idea that a Sasquatch was  spying on them in the distance of the footage.

In fact, it was not until the footage aired on live TV that viewers looking closely at the footage noted what appeared to a Sasquatch spying on Todd and Survivorman from a couple hundred yards in the background. Todd and Survivorman apparently had no idea that this Sasquatch was in the footage until the episode aired on TV! This makes me think that there is no way that this is another Todd Standing hoax.

If it’s a hoax, how come Todd even know about it himself? And why would Todd secretly put a hoaxed guy in a monkey suit in the footage and not tell anyone about it? Todd’s too much of a narcissist and a loudmouth. If he thought there was as Sasquatch in his footage, he would be yelling so loud you could hear him in outer space.

Anyway, my last sources in Canada told me that the word is that Todd is done with hoaxing. There’s no need to hoax anymore, as he has a primo habituation site with real live Sasquatches running around. So why hoax?


Todd Standing’s Early Sasquatch Video. Yes, this is one of the famous ones that people talk about a lot, but you hardly ever see it. Before Todd started hoaxing the world with his made-up stories about the Land of the Lost in British Colombia (a place you can only get to by tunnel) where he was surrounded by Sasquatches one night in his camp. Remember Todd made a movie out of that?

Before Todd’s infamous Tiki dolls that fooled so many otherwise sane people. Remember the puppets made of Todd’s face morphed into a monkey man by his special effects artist sister?

Yes, before then, Todd shot 2-3 very blurry early videos that caused a lot of controversy. In the case of this one (possibly the first video), I think that is actually a real Sasquatch. For one thing, that looks like real fur, not a costume.

Anyway, that slope on the other side is so remote and steep that I don’t understand how the guy in the monkey suit even climbed the mountain in the first place. And that does look like a Sasquatch. And it moves like one. And the people filming seem genuinely excited (rapid breathing, etc.) Anyway, I do think Todd got one here.

Frightened farmer films massive Bigfoot. North Georgia 2015. Another new one, and yes, I like it a lot. Look at the way it glides through the forest. Look at the way it moves backwards to get behind that tree. Look at how huge it is when it finally stands up. Doesn’t it remind you of that Provo, Utah Sasquatch filmed by the college kids camping out for the weekend?

Notice it has no neck. Notice the coned heard. Note the massive body. I also believe once again that this is real fur, not a costume. And yes, you can tell the difference. There are certain things about real fur that have been impossible to replicate with costumes. And there are a couple of other things that the hoaxers never get right that I will not reveal.

Bigfoot Caught on Fisherman’s Video. I like this one too. Another new one from 2015. The fisherman didn’t notice it at the time, and he only saw the Sasquatch after he got home and was looking at the footage. I also think that is real fur, not a costume. The costume makers have never gotten the fur thing right because they can’t.

Melba Ketchum’s DNA results independently replicated by another scientist! I ran this one a while back based on a video Melba made in which she said another team had replicated her results, but I did not know the details on it. I also said that another “scientific team” replicated the results because that’s how I understood the story. However now that I have more details, I can report that it was not an actual scientific team; instead it was simply another scientist who sequenced the genome on his own in his own lab based on Melba’s data.

The other scientist’s name is Dr. David Swenson, and he is a very famous geneticist along the lines of the rather infamous Dr. Sykes in the UK. Swenson is not as famous as Sykes, but who is? And how famous are even the most famous geneticists? Walk up to the average person on the street and ask them to name a famous geneticist. I bet they cannot name even one.

Anyway, Swenson is pretty well known in the scientific geneticist community because he was the first person to sequence the genome of the Staph Aureus bacteria. He has authored over 125 peer-reviewed papers in scientific genetics journals. That is a very impressive record.

Swenson was interviewed by Joe Rogan in the video below.  Now what Swenson did was he took Ketchum’s raw data and sequenced the genome himself based on that. He focused on a single chromosome, chromosome 13.

He was able to completely replicate Ketchum’s results based on just looking at that one chromosome. He said it had a mix of human and nonhuman characteristics. He described it as a hybrid, and he said that at one time, some other creature must have bred with a human being (he felt that the other creature had to be a male, and it had to breed with a human female).

Rogan, incredulous, asked if it was possible that the results were faked by Ketchum. Swenson shook his head and said “You can’t fake DNA. There’s no way to do it. DNA is DNA.” As Swenson notes, this Sasquatch genome contains much genetic material that is completely unknown to man. You can’t fake that. You can’t make up new genetic sequences. There’s no way to do it. It’s utterly irrational, and it’s not even possible.

This however is the argument that the retards in our community (99% of the Bigfoot community is retarded) have been making. Yes, that is their argument: Ketchum faked the results.

The other retarded argument that they make is that the results were contaminated, but Ketchum has conclusively proved that the results were not contaminated. Anyway, even if they were contaminated, you would not get a result like this.

If, say, the results of the Sasquatch samples were really of bears, contamination would result in a finding of human + bear. So even if Ketchum’s material was contaminated, the results would just be horse + human, bear + human, racoon + human, etc. You follow? So the contamination argument is about as retarded as the hoaxing argument.

At one point, Swenson said, “There is an unknown mammal in the Pacific Northwest.” A stunned Rogan again asked Swenson later in the interview, “So is this proof that Bigfoot is real?” Swenson started to answer but stopped himself. He paused a bit and said, “Well it seems like it is, but as a scientist, I will not believe these things are real until one tries to bite my hand off.” In other words, Swenson is so incredulous of his own results that he still wants a body.

Unbelievably, the few skeptards who have heard about this new evidence from Dr. Swenson have mockingly laughed it off once again. They don’t care. They simply do not believe these things exist no matter how great evidence we throw in their faces. They, like 85% of the US public and nearly 100% of the scientific community, will not believe us until we show them a body.

All of their arguments about “no credible evidence” are crap. We have excellent video and photos that cannot be faked.

We have over 40,000 documented sightings including some by scientists, university and college professors, psychologists, police officers, wildlife biologists (we have several from them), park rangers, firefighters, forestry officials, and medical professionals. The skeptards laugh all of this off mockingly and say that all of these people are either lying, hallucinating or seeing other things and confusing them with Sasquatches. That argument is so preposterous that it is stupid, but this this is the received knowledge, believe it or not.

We have audio recordings that cannot be faked, hair, scat, footprints, handprints and recently teethmarks. Apparently all of this is either from other animals se we faked it. Recently we even acquired blood and even tissue. And now on top of all of that, we have have good hard genetic evidence. And still they laugh us off. What more do we have to do to prove these things exist to these folks?

Incidentally, Swenson, like so many other well credentialed believers, said that before he sequenced this genome, he had thought that Bigfoot was a hoax or a fraud. He no longer believes that.

Rick Dyer fails to come through. Dyer released two interesting videos recently, supposedly part of a three-part series on the San Antonio shooting incident, in which he apologized for all of his shenanigans and asked forgiveness of everyone for his endless bad behavior. This is par for the course for Rick, and it is nothing new.

He also explained in detail what happened on September 6, 2012 when he allegedly shot and killed a Bigfoot in San Antonio, Texas. This is also interesting, however since Rick has not yet offered any evidence that he committed this deed, this video was not very important in that sense either.

However, he did say one thing that I thought was very interesting. He said that all of the remaining footage that was cut out of Morgan Matthews’ Shooting Bigfoot movie will be released in a new edition of the movie to appear on TV  in December. He said that this remaining footage would prove conclusively that he shot and killed a Bigfoot on that day.

The fact that he was so matter of fact about it and attributed the coming footage to Matthews instead of himself is what caught my eye. I doubt if Rick is making this up off the top of his head. First of all, Rick has never been proven to have told one single lie yet about Morgan Matthews, nor has he made any wild and false predictions about him.

All of this makes me think that the release of the remaining footage by Matthews’ film company Minnow Films has at the very least been discussed if not actually planned and authorized.

It is notoriously hard to get Matthews to make any sort of statement about much of anything, and he has said very little about this movie other than some odd and cryptic statements.

Further and most spectacularly, he has refused to deny Rick’s charges that a Bigfoot was shot and killed in the filming of the movie or that those are actual Bigfoots running around in the footage at the end of the film. This makes no sense at all, and the skeptards as usual have absolutely no explanation for Matthews’ behavior whatsoever except to moronically accuse him of being a hoaxer.

Well, here it is January, December has come and gone, nd nothing happened. It would be very nice if Rick is telling the truth and we could see the rest of the footage that was cut out of Shooting Bigfoot and even nicer if it lent credence to Rick’s continuing claim that he shot a Bigfoot that day in Texas.

Rick also said that the Bigfoot body exists, but he has never had possession of it as the investors took possession of it immediately. He also promised that “this will all come out one day” and that the body would one day appear in public. I believe that if this event occurred, it makes sense that the investors immediately took control of the body.

Furthermore, Rick’s wildly dishonest behavior and scamming for a couple of years after the purported shooting makes sense if he never had the body in his possession. Let’s say the body was never in his possession. What would Rick do, being Rick Dyer? Pretend he had it and run around scamming people about the fake body for as long as he could milk money out of the con job, right? Well of course. After all, Mr. Dyer is an excellent con artist.

Nevertheless, it is important to note that there is still no good hard evidence the Rick killed a Bigfoot that night, although I believe there is excellent evidence that there were two Bigfoots running around in the woods there that eve, one running away from Rick and the other slapping down Morgan.

There is also excellent evidence that Rick was shooting live bullets at that thing with a real gun as per Matthews’ statement confirming those facts. The creature that Rick was shooting at was obviously a Bigfoot, as it could not be anything else. And it really does look like he shot the thing as evidenced by the moan we can hear in the movie. But did he kill it? This is what we don’t know. I would say that there is pretty good evidence that he wounded it though.

Also the thing that swats down Matthews, knocking him out with one mere slap of the land (!?) absolutely has to be a Bigfoot because there is no way that could possibly be a mask or a costume.

Furthermore, keep in mind that both of those things are running around in the woods at night with no flashlights! How does a human stunt man in a monkey suit do that?

So from Shooting Bigfoot, there is excellent evidence that the following things are true:

  1. The Tent Video is a real Bigfoot.
  2. The thing running away from Rick later on is a real Bigfoot.
  3. Rick is firing live ammo at the Bigfoot with a real gun (Matthews’s testimony).
  4. One of the shots appears to have hit the Bigfoot, at the very least wounding it.
  5. Another Bigfoot appears out of nowhere and slaps Matthews down onto the ground with an open palm, knocking him out.

The things that are yet unknown and unproven are:

  1. Rick actually killed that Bigfoot he was chasing with one of his shots.
  2.  Any of the events described by Rick after he supposedly shot the Bigfoot actually occurred.
  3.  A dead Bigfoot was retained, transported and stored anywhere after the shooting.
  4.  Musky Allen, whose testimony has not yet been impeached, actually saw a dead Bigfoot from the shooting at a US government facility in Nevada.
  5. Anyone at all has ever been in possession of a dead Bigfoot from the shooting, much less that anyone currently retains one.

In other words, what we are dealing here with the San Antonio Bigfoot story is once again another Bigfoot body story, of which there have been quite a few down through the years.

So far, good hard evidence of any of these bodies has been lacking, though some of the stories are quite intriguing. It is interesting that in all of these cases, hard proof of the existence of a body has not been forthcoming, yet nevertheless, skeptics have presented absolutely zero evidence that any of the body stories are untrue, frauds or hoaxes other than Rick’s two fake Bigfoot bodies.

We don’t know if any of these body stories are true. None have been proven, and yet none have been disproven either. As with so many things in life, it is simply completely up in the air whether any of the shooting and body stories are true.

In order for Rick to prove his claim, he is going to have to present more evidence in the form of:

  1. Additional footage from the Shooting Bigfoot movie.
  2. A body itself retained, if at all, probably by investors and not Rick.
  3. Any other probitive evidence.

So far, Dyer has failed to present us with this evidence. Until Rick can show us the monkey, this is just another wild Bigfoot story.


Filed under Animals, Apes, Bigfoot, Canada, Cinema, Genetics, Mammals, Midwest, North America, Northeast, Regional, Science, South, Texas, USA, Utah, West, Wild

Bigfoot News September 9, 2015

Great news! Melba Ketchum’s DNA results independently confirmed! Apparently another lab operating completely independently of Melba Ketchum’s group has independently confirmed her much-criticized results on Bigfoot DNA. Now we have two completely independent science groups who have replicated DNA for Bigfoots, first Ketchum’s and then Ketchum’s result was replicated by another group. Reportedly, the other team replicates Ketchum’s results in their entirety.

If you read me on here, you would know that I always said that Melba was right. In part that was due to my good friendship with Richard Stubstad, who assured me that Melba’s methods were good and that there was no way on Earth she would engage in scientific fraud. Also I know a scientist who ran all of her data and said that it looked out to him. Another scientist also run her DNA and said that all the results checked out. I told you so. You guys should listen to me? Why don’t you listen to me?

Best version of Prince Edward Island Bigfoot video ever released! After months of hard work, Nominay has just released the finest version of the PEI Bigfoot ever. This is a legendary Bigfoot film. An indie film producer was shooting a monster movie on Prince Edward Island. As one of the actors was running across a clearing, a Bigfoot suddenly ran out of the woods behind him to the right of the viewer.

The Bigfoot then races across the clearing, partly on two legs and partly on four, at an amazingly fast speed. The speed of the Bigfoot has been calculated and it is running as fast as a competitive sprinter. The speed is even maintained when it goes effortlessly on all fours. There is no way on Earth that a competitive sprinter could run that fast or go down on all fours without slowing up in a bulky monkey suit.

Furthermore, the size of the Bigfoot has been calculated at ~9 feet tall. It also appears to have a massive weight. How do you get a stunt actor to put on a bulky monkey suit, run across a clearing as fast as a competitive sprinter, go down on all fours without losing speed, all the while somehow being 9 feet tall. How do you find a 9 foot tall stunt man. How do you make a shorter stunt man appear to be 9 feet tall. How do you make this stunt man appear so bulky that he appears to weigh 700 pounds?

None of this makes any sense.

Of course, most Bigfoot footage released by indie film producers turns out to be hoaxed, usually in a sleazy attempt by the director to gain publicity for themselves. Many have been much less than forthcoming with investigators. The famous Redwood footage comes to mind. The director, now in film school, simply refuses to discuss the movie at all. It seems almost certain to be a hoax. And many of these film industry hoaxes come to light after a while; that is, the director fesses up that it was a hoax.

None of that seems to be the case with this video. The directors were apparently making cheap straight to video movies and have no need or desire for publicity. They have cooperated completely with investigators. Investigators felt that they were credible. The attitude of the filmmakers towards the even in the footage seems to be utter bafflement. They have no idea what ran across that clearing that day.

Nominay has improved this video so much that it is nearly a brand new video. All serious Bigfooters need to check this new video out.

The original version on Nominay’s fine site is here.

Bigfoot hairs for sale. I have a few Bigfoot hairs gathered in the Michigan Peninsula a while back. They look exactly like those crinkly, pubic hair-type hairs that Erickson collected for Melba’s project. I also have a photo that seems to prove that they are Bigfoot hairs. I used to have a similar photo of a human hair for comparison that showed that this hair is absolutely not a human hair. The only thing it remotely resembled is bear hair, but the hair is lighter brown and all of the bears in the UP have dark brown or black hair.

The man who sent it to me is a very good researcher and he spent a long time studying these hairs. He is quite an expert on Bigfoot hairs. Photo comes with it. I haven’t the faintest idea what to charge. Make offer.

2015: Science amidst the rubble. The response of the mainstream scientific community to Melba’s paper was simply despicable. They refused to even consider it, read it or see if the results were right or wrong. They dismissed it out of hand without even checking to see if the results were right or not.

I know some of the scientists and science writers who engaged in this nonsense, and they are very famous people. They all have Wikipedia entries and are considered top scientists in their field, mainly Paleontology. The science writer is one of the top science writers in the US. The fact that all of them simply dismissed this report out of hand shows us that something is horrifically wrong with science in the West.

Not only are almost all of the biggest scientific figures massive asshats, blowhards, and all-round horrible human beings, but the very structure of scientific inquiry itself seems to be compromised by a new mentality I call Scientific Fundamentalism.

Scientific Fundamentalism, which almost all modern scientists practice, elevates science into a religion itself. The revealed truths are whatever scientific consensus is. Anything attempting to overthrow consensus is treated as apostasy or heresy is in religion. I am surprised the scientists have not tried to kill some of the fringe science guys who are trying to topple these idiotic Edifices of Consensus.

Scientific consensus operates on the utterly insane notion that whatever the scientific consensus is at the moment, these are the facts for any and all of time. This once again is similar to religion in which the revealed facts in the holy books are true for all of time when they were written down and can never be changed, updated or modified.

I know, I know…

Scientists are always lying and saying that all scientific consensus is open to inquiry, that nothing is really true, that everything is just true for now, that all consensus is up for grabs and only a paper away from being toppled, and that science is all about perpetual doubt and endless inquiry. Those are their glorious mantras they repeat to make themselves look good but none of them are true.

But the truth is that all of this is lies. Scientific consensus is indeed treated as Truth with a capital t, and no it is not up for grabs, and no it’s not even just true for now. Go find some scientists and talk to them. Throw out some scientific consensuses and see how many are “true for now” and ready to be toppled at any time, if only disproving conclusions are presented. It’s about 0%.

Another fake mantra of scientists is all about perpetual doubt. Oh really now? And is scientific consensus open to being doubted? Are you kidding? Anyone who tries gets burned to death at one of their “empirical” witch trials. Is science really all about endless inquiry and curiosity? Hardly. When most consensus is walled off from further inquiry, and there’s nothing to be curious about anymore as the consensus has been proven true, there’s not a lot of curiosity or even inquiry going on in science anymore.

What is going on in science nowadays? A lot of conservatism. Granted a certain amount of conservatism is warranted, as we would not want rational science to be overrun with nutcases and their pseudoscientific nonsense. But scientists are already 100X more conservative than they need to be. Surely we could let up on the conservatism a bit and still be rigorous enough to keep the nonsense out?

There is also a serious problem with the abuse of the term pseudoscience. Pseudoscience is probably best described as scientific inquiry that does not even follow the scientific method. If a scientist uses proper method but simply comes up with false results by accident, overeagerness or misinterpretation, that’s hardly pseudoscience. He simply got the wrong result. Happens all the time. So what?

If a scientist is promoting a theory that seems to have good evidence yet the evidence is not yet of sufficient quality or quantity to convince the Vatican of Science, that’s hardly pseudoscience. A more proper term might be Fringe Science. The data and evidence have been assembled, hypotheses have been tested, studies have been undertaken, and conclusions have been reached, often in a high-quality manner. But it’s just not good enough for science, often because science has its eyes shut and its fingers in its ears. Just because science won’t accept the conclusions of something doesn’t mean it’s pseudoscience. And what of that term pseudoscience? Why such an arrogant, snide and vicious term? What’s the point of that? Are the scientists trying to start a war?

There is yet another problem with this loopy notion of pseudoscience for unproven theory. I am 100% certain, and I will swear over my dead body that I know for a fact that certain things that are now called pseudoscience are actually true. And you are reading a column about one of those things right now. These things simply exist, full stop, and it will be proven soon enough. There’s absolutely no doubt about that. If they exist, they will be revealed. There won’t be any way to stop that.

And when they are revealed, then what? Then automagically “pseudoscience” gets elevated to proven scientific fact. There’s something wrong with that model right there. Pseudoscience ought to be the realm of the wreckage of theory, hypotheses and inquiries that are bad more because they are not following scientific model than anything else.

Anything in pseudoscience should be so bizarre, idiotic or unscientific that it could never make it to proven fact. When you start having “pseudoscientific” theory elevated to proven fact, you’ve got an awful problem with your whole notion of pseudoscience, and you need to send it back for a rewrite or trash it all together.

Yet another problem is that modern scientists have turned into Douchebags with a capital d. Practitioners of modern science are some of the meanest, most vicious and downright evil people out there. This petty evil-mindedness stems completely from pride and from nothing else. Science has decided to invest its very self when arrogance such that the two are one and the same. To be a scientist nowadays is to be an arrogant ass. Humble scientist is an oxymoron.

Scientists behave this way supposedly because they are “waging war” against some Evil Entity called Pseudoscience. In order to put on battle gear to fight this war against Existential Evil, many scientists have armed themselves with vast amounts of Douchebaggery. What’s the point of that? Why be a Douchebag?

Yet when it comes to Fringe Science (a valid subfield of science by the way) we see scientific Assholery around the globe, from sea to scientific sea, from snide lab workers to snarling university professors to sneering lecture circuit celebrities. I am having a hard time understanding this. This war against the Evil of Pseudoscience is so important that in order to fight it, scientists must act like the worst people on Earth and engage in behavior that is low, depraved, disgusting and even embarrassing? Why? Is it really that important?

We have yet another problem and that is arrogance. Sooner rather than later, some of these “pseudoscientific” claims will become proven science. Do you think that even one of these scientific Beavis and Buttheads who nearly drove fringe scientists to nervous breakdown and suicide will apologize?

Are you kidding? Science is now the realm where arrogance crowned supreme. It’s worse than Hollywood. Even more appallingly, increasingly, science is Hollywood, and that’s probably the root of a lot of the problem right there. Once again we see a parallel to religion. Ever noticed how arrogant the believer is, how certain he is of his Truth. This is the way the scientist acts towards his precious Consensus.

What do you think will happen when, in the future, some of this pseudoscience is proven fact, which of course we know will happen with 100% certainty? Do you think even one of these strutting jerkoffs will apologize for even one second? Will you hear a single, “Hey, we were wrong. We’re really sorry about that. You guys were right along.”

We will never hear this. Not one scientist on the face of the Earth will ever say this to us. Why not? Because they’re not human enough. Science lost its human face some time past, and it’s gone all asshattery all the time for decades now. In order to practice mainstream science nowadays, first you must lose your humanity. That’s the first thing that has to go. We can’t have any of those measly, petty human emotions getting in the way or Revealed Scientific Truth, now can we?


Filed under Animals, Anthropology, Apes, Assholes, Bigfoot, Canada, Mammals, North America, Paleontology, Regional, Science, Wild

Bigfoot News July 18, 2015

analluv writes:

btw any Bigfoot news?

The only real Bigfoot news out these days is this Mitch Townsend fellow and the bone piles he found. I think it is quite obvious that those are Sasquatch bone piles.

For one thing, at the Alberta Habituation Site, the Sasquatches were raiding the trapper’s traps, stealing the coyotes out of the traps and eating them. They would just plop down right next to the trap and eat that knaw the meat off those bones like it was a spare rib. So I know that they also knaw the meat right off bones. And I heard that in the back country of the AHS where they supposedly winter way back in the thickest, nastiest stuff you could imagine, there are all sorts of weird things like caves and lots of “piles of bones.” I had no idea what these bone piles were when I was told, but now with Townsend’s work, this is all starting to make sense.

Rick Dyer has released a couple of new videos that seem to tie up a lot of loose ends in his San Antonio Bigfoot story. He fesses up to all sorts of nefarious behaviors, seems to show remorse, and displays a wide range of emotions. I am not sure how sociopathic he is after all. I think he is just a narcissist.

You can find them on the Rick Dyer page on Youtube. You won’t find these videos interesting at all if you reject that theory that the Tent Video and Shooting Bigfoot footage show real Bigfoots, that Rick was shooting live bullets at a Bigfoot and may have even hit it, or that Morgan Matthews was slapped down by a Bigfoot in the movie. You certainly won’t like the video if you think he retained a body.

Melba Ketchum is working on the DNA for those weird conehead skulls found in Peru. I believe her hypothesis was that these were Amerindian skulls that had been reshaped via tooling. I am not sure what she has come up with.

Ketchum and David Paulides have supposedly completely dropped out of the Bigfoot game per their own statements. Particularly Paulides says he is done with Bigfoot and he is moving on. Paulides isn’t the most honest fellow around, and he isn’t telling the truth there either. The truth is that Paulides is continuing to do a lot of Bigfoot work under the cover of stating publicly that he is done with Bigfoot. Melba has not explicitly stated that she is done with Bigfoot, but she is mostly just lying low. I assure you that both of them are still very much in the game.

Paulides is now running a Kickstarter for a new 411 movie based on his 411 books. See, I told you he was still in the game.

Melba Ketchum and David Paulides never had any sort of romantic or dating relationship. I may have implied but not explicitly stated that in prior posts. That information came to me from the late Bobbie Short. We were talking about Paulides and Melba and Bobbie said, “That’s a couple, you know. They’re a couple. They’ve been dating for some time now.” I was shocked of course, but she insisted that it was true, and Bobbie tended to be right about things.

I recently talked to an anonymous source who knows both of them very well. This person insists that there has never been any romantic or sexual relationship between those two ever, and this person should know. Apologies to anyone who may have been offended by anything I may have implied.

As long as I am slinging National Enquirer type dirt about, I may as well speak well of the dead. Of course, the dead have no rights, so I can gossip away. One of these parties has now sadly passed on, but the other one is still kicking, very loudly in his usual foghorn voice.

By now all of you know that Bobbie Short and Peter Byrne were involved for a while, right? You don’t? Well listen up then. In fact, they were so involved that Byrne moved into Bobbie’s home in San Diego for a few years. So they were a couple for a while, and now you know. Go sell it to the tabloids. Bobbie once sighed and spoke to me of what she called “the narcissistic men” who crowded the Bigfoot field. No doubt she was speaking from personal experience then. My source for this dirt? Anonymous and impeccable, as usual.

Best wishes to Bobbie Short, wherever she may be.



Filed under Animals, Apes, Bigfoot, Canada, Mammals, Regional, USA, Wild

Bigfoot News May 15, 2015

Sorry for the lack of updates. I have been very tired and busy doing other things. I don’t get paid to write these updates, so they are low priority. Plus not much has been going on lately.

Major breaking new Bigfoot story! I am not sure if the other Bigfoot sites have covered this yet, but there is a huge breaking Bigfoot story out of Washington State. A college professor from the Continuing Education Program at Centralia College named Mitchel Townsend has been studying mysterious piles of bones that have been found in the Mount St. Helens area. The bones are those of prey animals that something has killed and eaten. Wild animals of any sort do not stack bones in piles. They usually scatter them all over the place. Bone stacking can only be done by a hominid.

But the great news is they have gnaw marks on them. The professor had the gnaw marks examined via forensic dentistry and the conclusion was that the bones had been gnawed on by some sort of a hominid. Not only that, but it seemed to be human because of the way it was gnawing on the bones. Furthermore, it left triangular imprints like hominids do, not the round imprints that apes leave.

No predator or tool markings were found on the bones and the local Fish and Wildlife scientists ruled out all natural predators known in the area.

After the first site found by the professor, his students found two more similar bone piles on the south side of Mt. St. Helens with the exact same characteristics. But at the two new sites, the team found huge 16 inch human like footprints. Calculations based on the prints and the stride indicated that the hominid had to be 8 feet, 8 inches tall. The footprints were wider and broader than human prints and lacked an arch.

“If you add it all up, you have an 8-foot, 8-inch tall creature that is killing animals at different areas of Mount St. Helens with its bare hands, chewing them up, literally skin and bones and all, and spitting them out between its legs,” Townsend said.


The tooth marks were incisors and canines and 90% of them were outside of the human range as they were too large to be from any possible human being. The bones also showed signs of bone peeling, which is only done by humans. The teeth had an odd double arch structure that closely resembled Neandertal teeth.

“My theory is it’s not an ape, it’s a hybrid that has been interbreeding with Native Americans for the last 80,000 years,” Townsend said. “That’s why it is so smart and it has human teeth.”

Right. Well, we always knew Bigfoots are not apes.

Townsend will publish his findings in a research paper and he challenged any scientist anywhere to prove him wrong.

“The evidence stands on its own, you prove the evidence wrong,” he said, adding that the bones would be made available for examination to any scientist who wanted to examine the remains. “We’ve put thousands of hours in this. We just want to give this to the world and the scientific community free of charge to add to the scientific body of knowledge.”

There are photos to go along with this story and I will see if I can dredge some up for you.


Filed under Animals, Apes, Bigfoot, Mammals, North America, Regional, USA, Washington, West, Wild

About Matt Moneymaker

I understand that Matt Moneymaker of the BFRO has recently been diagnosed as having Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

But we already knew that, right?

The thing about NPD is that he is probably not going to get better. These people typically do not get better. The reason is because they do not want to get better. Generally, the problem is everyone else and not them. That right there is the essence of the disorder itself. So if you don’t think there is anything wrong with you, why would you want to get better? Another problem is that NPD’s usually enjoy being narcissistic. They get off on it. It’s fun. It’s the way they like to live. And they can’t see that it causes any problems or if it does, they don’t care because it’s too much fun to change and they like being that way.

There are some NPD’s that get into therapy. Therapy with them is typically difficult and long, but results can be achieved after some time.


Filed under Bigfoot, Mental Illness, Narcissistic, Personality Disorders, Psychology, Psychopathology, Psychotherapy

Bigfoot News November 19, 2014

More on the Rick Dyer claimed Bigfoot killing. This saga is continuing. Rick now claims that he and his team killed two Bigfoots at this location in Pennsylvania. You might want to head on over to Randy’s site, as he is keeping up on this story more than I am. I am not really interested in another one of these crazy Dyer stories, so I will just hand it over to Randy and let him take the ball. Randy insists it is another hoax, and indeed, every time Rick claims to have killed a Bigfoot, it ends up being a hoax. The best predictor of present behavior is past behavior. And Rick’s record in this regard does not inspire confidence. I have some photos below of Rick’s latest adventure.

However, Walter Shrum issued an angry video claiming that I lied when I quoted him in an interview I did with him. He said that that tarp over the Sasquatch was clear and not blue and he claimed that I accused him of saying it was a prop. I never accused Shrum of saying that. Mr. Shrum has problems with reading comprehension.

Walter Shrum interview. I would like to clarify what Shrum did say to me in his interview.

He stated that he, his wife and a grandson drove four hours to see the Sasquatch at Rick’s request. When they got there, the Sasquatch was wrapped in a tarp. Walter said it was the same blue tarp that you can see on Rick’s photos, but when you get up next to the tarp, it is actually more transparent than it seems on photos. He described it as semi-transparent. They were all issued surgeon’s masks and were given some sort of Vicks Vaporub to rub all over themselves. He said that he could not tell if the Sasquatch had a smell about it as they could not smell anything with the Vicks stuff all over them.

He said he was able to get down to within about two feet of the Sasquatch in the tarp. He got a very good look at it from the feet up to the shins. He said the feet were hairless on the bottom but haired on top and on the shins. He did not describe much more of it. He said he tried to get a good look at the face, but for some reason, he could not see it well. It was at this part in the interview that I decided that this tarp was maybe not so transparent as it was being made out to be. He described the central part of the body around the chest as being very wide.

Shrum also said that the Sasquatch was turned on its side but with the top part of the body facing upwards. He said he thought there was an actual Sasquatch in the tarp based on what he observed. Shrum did not feel that it was a fake. He described it as “a hairy man.”

This was the extent of what Shrum told me in his interview. I honestly do not see what all the fuss is about between Shrum and me except that Rick is trying to stir stuff up like he always does.

Photos of Tarpsquatch episode. Below are a number of photos of the latest purported Dyer Sasquatch body. In some of these photos, I refer to the object as a Sasquatch. I do not mean that it is really a Sasquatch. Maybe it is, maybe it isn’t. I do think that Rick has something. He either has a dead Sasquatch or he has another doll like he had last time.

But I have no idea what is in that tarp, and Rick has a very bad record as far as these things go. In fact, 100% of the time he has claimed he had a body, the whole story was either an obvious hoax or was so wrapped up in a hoax that no conclusions could be drawn and at any rate, no body ever shows up. Bottom line is every time in the past Rick says he has a body, it turns out he doesn’t have squat. So will this time be different? I have no idea, but look at the law of averages.

Rick and the gang with masks they put on to protect themselves from any diseases the Sasquatch might have.

Rick and the gang with masks on.

In the photo above, Rick and his crew don masks to guard against any diseases the Sasquatch might have.

Tarpsquatch at the campground.

Tarpsquatch at the campground.

The photo above shows the object wrapped under some sort of a tarp at the campground. The object appears to be in a fetal position.

Sasquatch dead in the forest.

Sasquatch dead in the forest.

This photo shows the purported Sasquatch after it was shot dead in the forest. Biff is pointing a rifle at the object. A tree appears to have fallen on the object. I am having a very hard time making out the contours of this object or seeing any identifiable features in it. Maybe my graphics guy can help me.

Sasquatch dead in the forest. Another view.

Sasquatch dead in the forest. Another view.

Here is another photo of the subject after it was reportedly killed by the men. Rick and Biff are pointing rifles at the subject, which seems to be under a fallen tree. Once again, I have a hard time making out identifiable features on the object.

Tarpsquatch piled with ice.

Tarpsquatch piled with ice.

This is a photo of the object wrapped in a tarp with ice piled on it for preservation. I am not sure where this photo was taken, but it looks like it was taken in someone’s yard.

Tarpsquatch and ice again.

Looks like the back of their truck or van.

This photo looks like the back of an SUV piled high with ice.

Sasquatch wrapped in tarp.

Sasquatch wrapped in tarp.

This photo shows the object wrapped in a tarp. This seems to have a similar shape to the object in the campground photo.

Dyer tying the Sasquatch in the tarp.

Dyer tying the Sasquatch in the tarp.

This photos shows Dyer tying the tarp on the object after he wrapped the object up in it.

Artist rendering of Sasquatch wrapped up in a tarp.

Artist rendering of Sasquatch wrapped up in a tarp.

This photo was drawn for me by my graphics girl who has seen Sasquatches in the wild numerous times. She told me when this story first broke that she thought Rick probably did have a Sasquatch. She said it is probably not that difficult to kill one of these things. “I probably could have killed a few of them myself,” she told me.

We have not discussed the story much since, but she recently sent me this drawing of what she thinks the object in the tarp looks like based on its contours in the tarp. Make what you will of this. That is either a drawing of the Sasquatch she thought Rick killed or of the Sasquatch doll he has made, based on her artist’s eye. I am not going to comment on this photo of all except that I can see how she came to the conclusions that she did.

Enlargement of Sasquatch Ontario photo. I released this photo in my last report. My graphics gal found this screen grab while going through Sasquatch Ontario’s films. This one was taken when Paterson left his camera out for a while. When he came back, he said there were numerous photos on the camera. He said that the Sasquatches must have used the camera somehow. Perhaps they figured out how to work it. That seems completely insane, but whatever. There were a lot of weird photos on there, mostly closeups of the eyes of numerous creatures in the woods. One of the photos was this odd photo below.

This is a photo of what is apparently two Sasquatches in Canada. There is a small one at the top, once again covering its face with its forearm. On the left is the shoulder of another Sasquatch.

This is a photo of what is apparently two Sasquatches in Canada. There is a small one at the top, once again covering its face with its forearm. On the left is the shoulder of another Sasquatch.

I could not make out anything in this photo, so I sent it to my graphics lady. She sent it back marked up.

Markup of a possible woolly Sasquatch baby.

Click to enlarge. Markup of a possible woolly Sasquatch baby.

I have no idea if that photo is what my graphics woman says it is, but it is certainly possible. I will leave it up to you to decide and I will take no stance on this photo for now.

That’s it for now. More later!


Filed under Animals, Apes, Bigfoot, Canada, Mammals, North America, Northeast, Regional, USA, Wild

Bigfoot News November 14, 2014

Rick Dyer Sasquatch kill – continuing story. The story about the supposed Sasquatch kill by Rick Dyer is ongoing. I really urge you to follow it over at Randy’s blog as he keeps up on it far better than I do. His commenters are horrific, but I think Randy himself is a great guy.

I spoke with Walter Shrum, who was one of nine people who were able to see the Sasquatch. However, I must note that Walter saw it inside the blue tarp like the rest of us did. However, he did say that the tarp was somewhat transparent (which is not obvious in the photos) and he could see through the tarp somewhat. Walter feels that this definitely looked like a Sasquatch. He described it as “looking like hairy man” that was “very wide.” On the other hand, viewing it through the tarp, he was not able to see it as well as he could have outside the tarp, and I feel that it is possible that he could have been looking at a prop instead of a Bigfoot.

Walter also told me that he would not be in on a hoax in any way, shape or form. He said that if Rick asked him to be part of a hoax or if he discovered this was a hoax, he would simply refuse to be a part of it because he doesn’t want to taint himself with that, and that sort of thing goes against his strong Christian morals. Yet he did not get a good look at the object, and he could well have been looking at a prop in that tarp.

Shrum also stated that Rick Dyer is the nicest guy you have ever met, and Shrum thinks Rick is a great guy.

Of course many people say this on meeting Dyer, as he can be very charming and gregarious, as these types so often are. We’ve known that since Cleckley, right? I mean, that’s a hallmark trait.

There is not much else to report about this purported Sasquatch kill except that Dyer is promising a press conference in February (Where have we heard that before?) which will apparently be in Georgia. The body is said to be safe in Georgia at the moment.

I would like to add my standard disclaimer here due to the incessant trolls: there is not yet any good, hard, solid, convincing evidence that Rick actually killed a Sasquatch in Pennsylvania at the end of October.

Once again, the onus is on Rick. Prove it, Rick.

Amazing new Sasquatch photos uncovered! All of the photos below came to me via Ray Crowe. They all appeared in his great book, Bigfoot Behavior. I cannot recommend this book highly enough. If you own one Sasquatch book, it might as well be this one.

Ray Crowe's superb book, Bigfoot Behavior. I cannot recommend this book highly enough.

Ray Crowe’s superb book, Bigfoot Behavior. I cannot recommend this book highly enough.

Ray is not a born writer, but he has taught himself to write. At any rate, he has developed his own unique voice that stays constant through all of his writing. I actually enjoy his charming, whimsical and always somewhat skeptical authorial voice. He is a delight to read.

Closeup of the northern Arizona Sasquatch.

Closeup of the northern Arizona Sasquatch. Copyright Lyle Vann.

This is a photo of a Sasquatch taken in Northern Arizona. This is one amazing photo. It was shot by a man named Lyle Vann, who has copyrighted it. The date on the photo is December 2002. As far as I am concerned, that is a Sasquatch, no two ways about it. It’s not a man in a suit. I suppose it could be a statue, but I have never seen a Sasquatch statue that looks this good. The resemblance to Derek Randles’ Ridge Watcher Sasquatch is remarkable. I know nothing about Mr. Vann or the circumstances surrounding this photo except that he is some sort of a Sasquatch researcher.

This is the original of the newspaper photo and the resolution is much better.

This is the original of the newsletter photo, and the resolution is much better.

Dennis W. Marsh is the man who is said to have reported two Sasquatch killings, the first in Wyoming in 1968 and the second in Alabama at a later date. This is a part series of photos he took of a Sasquatch he spotted south of Fayetteville, Arkansas. Once again, as far as I am concerned, that is simply a Sasquatch, especially with the other photos to go along with it. The figure is much too large to be a man in a suit. The other three photos are described below.

Crowe knew Marsh and felt that he was credible, but Ray had not talked to him in 11 years. Ray forwarded me the last communication he had with the man, and here it is:

* 8/28/03 (Dennis W. Marsh)
Been wondering how your research and meetings are going. Rocky called me today, and said that there were some guys that came into his restaurant today and told him about a sighting on their farm. They were cutting trees down, clearing the land to build a house, and when they stopped cutting to take a break, something threw a rock about the size of a 5 gallon bucket at them.

They got to looking around and saw an 8 to 9 foot Bigfoot looking at them, and then it started throwing sticks and limbs at them. They said all they did was to leave the area. I’m not sure if Rocky is going to call the government or not about it being there, so I do not know if he will take it down (shoot). If we do, I need to know how am I going to keep the blood fresh. I am going to do my best to get skin and hair from it also. The Feds lied to us again. They said there were no more of them in that area.

Four stories from unknown newsletter. The first one is Dennis' photo of the Sasquatch in Fayetteville, Arkansas in 1997. The upper right shows the Sasquatch photographed in North Arizona which resembles Derek Randles' Ridgewalker

Click to enlarge. Four stories from unknown newsletter. The first one is Dennis Marsh’s photo of the Sasquatch in Fayetteville, Arkansas in 1997. The upper right shows the Lyle Vann’s Sasquatch photographed in North Arizona which resembles Derek Randles’ Ridge Watcher.

This is a much smaller version of the same photo above. One of the photos apparently came from a website called, which is a website promoting the small nation of Brunei nestled in northeastern Sarawak in Malaysia. The photo at the bottom right is a feature piece on Lyle Vann. The bottom left photo is of some bizarre skeleton of a sea creature that washed up on the beach somewhere. It has nothing to do with Sasquatches.

Purported killed Sasquatch north of Casper Wyoming 1968

Purported killed Sasquatch north of Casper, Wyoming in 1968. One of the men with the gun may be Dennis Marsh, the man said to have helped kill the Sasquatch.

This is an absolutely amazing of a dead Sasquatch said to have been shot dead north of Casper, Wyoming in 1968. Dennis W. Marsh, the same man who photographed the Sasquatch in Arkansas, is said to have shot and killed this Sasquatch.

What is fascinating is that this is an old story in Sasquatch lore than has been going around the community forever. I discussed it in my long piece listing all reports of claimed Sasquatch kills, bodies, burials and funerals up to the present. The photo goes along with this story:

1968: North of Casper, Wyoming. Three men, including Dennis W. Marsh, were hired by a rancher to kill a Sasquatch that was killing his cows and sheep by tearing off their legs. Afterward, the body was picked up by a government helicopter and taken to a research facility in Almogordo, New Mexico to be autopsied and studied. Government coverup. Reported by Ray Crowe.

As you can see, this is another story of a government coverup. Apparently the government found out about this killed Sasquatch quite quickly, rushed to the scene, grabbed the Sasquatch and then sent a helicopter to come pick it up and haul it off to a government lab in Almogordo, New Mexico. I do not know much about that region, but I believe that where we have nuclear weapons testing labs. This is also where the first nuclear bombs were tested before we used them on Japan.

Marsh said his companions killed another Sasquatch in Alabama at some later date and this time the government got mad at him and told him to quit killing these things or else. The disposition of the Alabama kill or the circumstances surrounding it are not known.

Dennis photographed this Sasquatch in Fayetteville Arkansas in 1997.

Dennis Marsh photographed this Sasquatch in Fayetteville, Arkansas in 1997.

I really do think this is a Sasquatch, especially with the other photos to go along with it and the fascinating Wyoming photo. Notice the huge size of the figure and the odd stance it is taken as it appears to be frozen. The resemblance to the Hovey Sasquatch is striking. That’s not a man in a suit. I guess it could be a statue, but then he had to make two other statues for the other photos, and that makes no sense.

Arkansas Sasquatch uproots a huge stump to throw at Dennis.

Arkansas Sasquatch uproots a huge stump to throw at Dennis Marsh.

The Sasquatch in this photo is said to be pulling a huge stump out of the ground to throw it at Marsh. Amazingly, the photo appears to be of just that. That figure is massive. That is not a man in a suit. It could be a statue, but now we have a man making multiple statues.

Arkansas Sasquatch walking away. Notice the resemblance to Patty.

Arkansas Sasquatch walking away from Dennis Marsh. Notice the resemblance to Patty.

This amazing photo shows the same Sasquatch, this time walking away. It is indistinct, but I call your attention to the right leg that is kicked up in back at precisely the same angle that Patty’s is. If you have seen Thinker Thunker’s video showing how humans and Sasquatch walk completely differently and how the Sasquatch gait cannot be reproduced by humans, we see a perfect image of that right here.

Note also the right foot lifting up. Remember in the Patty footage when she lifts up her feet as she walks away. The soles of her feet appeared white, precisely the same color as this Sasquatch. This one actually could be a dead ringer for Patty. Sasquatch palms also appear white in a lot of footage in a similar anatomical development. Talking with a friend of mine who works at the Smithsonian, he said it was his opinion that the soles were not really white but instead they may be light grey. He felt the palms might be the same color, but he was clear that neither the palms nor the soles were actually white. He had an explanation for why the grey bottom skin on the extremities looks white, but it eludes me at the moment.

A few photos here. First a smaller photo of apparently Dennis and another man with the Sasquatch Dennis shot in 1968. Bottom left is a sideways view of the 1997 Arkansas Sasquatch walking away. Bottom right is the 1997 Arkansas Sasquatch uprooting a stump to throw at a human.

A few photos here. First a smaller photo of a man who may be Dennis Marsh and another man with the Sasquatch Marsh helped shoot in 1968. Bottom left is a sideways view of the 1997 Arkansas Sasquatch walking away from Marsh. Bottom right is the 1997 Arkansas Sasquatch uprooting a stump to throw at Marsh.

Here are the same photos in their original form as they came to me from Crowe. The two bottom photos were turned on their sides and we had to right them. We had to blow up the Wyoming photo. I think Marsh may be the man with the rifle. I am not sure who the man with the pistol is.

Self-explanatory markup of the Wyoming Killed Sasquatch photo from 1968. The Sasquatch appears to be covering its face with its arms in a very similar fashion as the famous video of Matilda the Sleeping Sasquatch out of Kentucky 2005.

Self-explanatory markup of the Wyoming Killed Sasquatch photo from 1968. The Sasquatch appears to be covering its face with its arms in a very similar fashion as the famous video of Matilda the Sleeping Sasquatch out of Kentucky 2005.

One of my sources does excellent graphics work, and he manipulated all of these photos for me. He also marked up the photo above. The markup is based on his theory and is not mine. I do not know what to say about this theory except that it is possible that the markup is just what we are seeing here.

Here is his statement about the markup above:

OK, so here is a diagram/comparison of what I think is most likely the image configuration. In the wild, I and others have observed that the Sas often cover mouth and nose reflexively to hide. The dying Sas probably did the same.

This is a photo of what is apparently two Sasquatches in Canada. There is a small one at the top, once again covering its face with its forearm. On the left is the shoulder of another Sasquatch.

This is a photo of what is apparently two Sasquatches in Canada. There is a small one at the top, once again covering its face with its forearm. On the left is the shoulder of another Sasquatch.

I have no idea what is in this photo above. Here is my graphics guy’s description of it:

The other image here is of a very wooly Canadian Sas similar to Matilda @ Kentucky. This young Sas is holding the right hand over nose and mouth. To the left is the shoulder of an adult Sas. In upper center is the squinty right eye, the left eye (also squinting) is ringed with lighter fur. Below the eyes is the right hand, fingers bent. The right pinky is below the left eye. It is a large image, so zoom out a bit to see it.

I cannot see any of these things that he refers to. Hopefully I can get a marked up image of this photo also. I also know nothing whatsoever about the back story of this very odd photo.

The end.

I have quite a bit more to write about (a ton of notes), but I will save that hopefully for a later post.


Filed under Animals, Apes, Asia, Bigfoot, Government, Malaysia, Mammals, North America, Northeast, Regional, SE Asia, South, USA, West, Wild, Wyoming

Bigfoot News November 10, 2014

Here is my statement on the recent purported killing of a Bigfoot in Pennsylvania by Rick Dyer.

Statement on the recent Bigfoot shooting:

A friend asks: Any new Bigfoot news? What’s your opinion on Dyer’s latest claim on killing another Bigfoot?

My response: Not much in the way of new Bigfoot news. I do not know what to think about it.

A good friend of mine named Walter Shrum is said to have seen it, and he reportedly drove four hours to go look at it, and he swears to God it is real. For the life of me I do not understand why he would lie, but maybe I don’t know him as well as I think I do. From what I know of him, he seems to be a very decent, straight up, rather conservative “redneck” rural American with strong Protestant Christian beliefs. He does indeed reside in Southwest Pennsylvania where this Bigfoot was supposedly shot.

Another good friend of mine, Rex Dutton, saw a photo of it via some photo share program that Rick showed him and issued a description of it. Here is Rex’s description along with what seems to be a statement by one or two other parties:

I saw a creature laying on the ground, and then 45 minutes later tied upside down between two trees. That creature was totally covered in brown or reddish brown hair. Only his feet, hands and face were partially not covered in hair. The hands were large and blackish, and so were the feet. But his humanoid face was bluish looking. Both Rick and I spoke about how blue his face was. Mr Dyer allowed me to see this by iPhone FaceTime…

Very broad shoulders…

Earlier Rick mentioned height and weight at 5′ 10” & 350 to 400 lb, so my guesstimation is I’d say he’s a Shorty Sasquatch.

Rick said anyone could come and see it. I’m in Maryland, so I’d love to see it:). Walter Shrum drove for hours at Mr Dyer’s invitation and saw the body with his wife. So proud for Walter. “Searching For Bigfoot” is a great song!

The nose is wide at the nostrils, yet skinny on the bridge. Weirdest thing is the facial skin not covered in hair is blue. But the eyes are huge and alien looking. Does not look human and does not look like an ape. Oh, and the back of the hand is not hairy, but leathery. It almost looks like an armored glove? Just thought you guys would be interested. They started taking precautions against parasites and diseases, as you saw, and it smelled bad. I think that about sums up about all I know that I am allowed to share. Official confirmation tomorrow. Then wow!

The problem here is that the promised official confirmation never took place, as with so many things Dyer. Rick Dyer and broken promises go together like peanut butter and jelly.

Now maybe Rex saw a real Bigfoot or maybe he saw a dummy, but he saw something for sure because I know for a fact that Rex doesn’t lie. Then again, I do not think Walter lies either, but I don’t know Walter as well as I know Rex.

But Rick has not provided us with any evidence that this Bigfoot exists other than his word, so at the moment, we know nothing.

I know that it was said to be a young Bigfoot, possibly an adolescent, and the sex was not given. It was supposedly shot in Southwest Pennsylvania by the four guys and they all shot at once, so we don’t know who killed it. The Bigfoot was shot at some locale where the residents had been feeling it regularly, so it was semi-habituated to humans, similar to the Bigfoot “Hank” rumored but never proven to have been killed also by Dyer in San Antonio in 2012.

Rick released a photo said to be of the Bigfoot. A friend of mine sent it to me and said it definitely shows the dead Bigfoot, but honestly I could not make out much of anything in the photo. The photo shows Rick and Biff pointing at some furry object lying on the ground with sticks. So that photo is definitely inconclusive.

Rick then released a photo of Rick and Biff standing in front of two trees and what looks like a Bigfoot hanging from the tree in between them. But the Bigfoot’s features are blurred out with a blur tool, so we do not know what it is. Maybe it is a Bigfoot, maybe it’s a dummy, who knows?

But Rick made some big promises about this thing, and then it seems to have vanished off the face of the Earth. He did not fulfill even one of his grandiose early promises including scientific confirmation which adds a layer of dubiousness to the story.

At the moment, there is no good, hard, conclusive scientific evidence whatsoever that Rick has killed a Bigfoot in Pennsylvania or for that matter that he has killed a Bigfoot anywhere at any time.

On the other hand, as with the Hank story, no one has ever proven that Rick did not kill a Bigfoot that night in Texas either, and this story is the same: the naysayers are insisting that this is another hoax, but they have not proven that either. To sum it up, there is no proof that Rick killed this Bigfoot, but on the other hand, there is no proof that this is a big hoax either. The matter, as with so many things Bigfoot, remains frustratingly inconclusive.

Bottom line as with all his claims, is “Prove it, Rick.”

A very in depth and excellent treatment of the matter, including all of the relevant statements and photos, can be found at Randy’s blog here and here.

Sorry this is so brief but I am too tired to write much more and also my back hurts.


Filed under Animals, Apes, Bigfoot, Mammals, Northeast, Regional, USA, Wild

Bigfoot News October 19, 2014

Additional evidence in favor of the Stacy Brown story. As you remember, I broke a story a while back about Stacy Brown being offered $500K for a supposed Bigfoot arm he dug up, selling it to a man from Ohio, then buying an alligator arm from a taxidermist and pitching it around to everyone as the Bigfoot arm to the point of even having it DNA tested to prove it was an alligator arm.

Most people have rejected this story, in particular, Randy did over at his blog. His idiot supporters claim that Randy proved that I was wrong. He did no such thing. He simply laid out the evidence and made his case that the story was not true. That’s all he did. He didn’t prove one single thing. As it stands now, no one has proven that the story is either true or false.

But I recently got corroboration from a second party about this story. This man is widely known in the community and has a good reputation. He is not a researcher so much as he is a reporter. Keep in mind that this man, though we are acquaintances, does not necessarily agree with me. In fact, he is dubious of a lot of my breaking stories because he thinks too many of them lack good supporting evidence. However, he did think there was something to this one. This is what he told me on October 1:

Hi…I was told by a reader and Bigfooter (who I believe to be honest) approx two weeks ago (on September 16) that Stacy Brown and an associate had a scheme in order to sell an actual Bigfoot arm (he said ‘body part’) to an enthusiast. I hadn’t heard or read anything else…but when I read your information, it seemed to be on the same wavelength.

Well at least the story has been corroborated coming from an independent source. That doesn’t mean it is true. But it does mean that it is not just coming from me – it is coming from independent sources also.

The nonsense about Rick Dyer. While there are some sites that milk the Dyer rumor mill for all it is worth, I have given up on it entirely. I must be honest and tell you that I and many of my friends and colleagues feel burned by Rick. He ripped off a lot of people, including us. That’s what he does. He rips people off. He’s a con artist. He doesn’t know how to do anything other than con.

About whether or not Rick shot a Bigfoot, whether he shot at it and missed, whether he shot at it, hit it and wounded it, whether he shot it and killed it, we will simply never know. However, I feel that it is quite clear that Rick was shooting at real Bigfoots that night. That is also a real Bigfoot in the Tent Video. And in Shooting Bigfoot, there are two real Bigfoots in the night scene – the first one that Rick is shooting at (maybe he misses it, maybe he hits it and wounds it, and maybe he kills it), and the second one that knocks Morgan Matthews down. There may also be a baby Bigfoot there. You can hear audio that sounds like one.

To me it is simply obvious that those are real Bigfoots in the Tent Video and in Shooting Bigfoot. The Dyer-haters have gone into conniptions trying to prove that this footage is faked, and they have failed utterly and completely. They have never produced the mask, costume or stunt man for the Tent Video. They have never produced anyone confessing it is fake. They have never produced the stunt men (two of them), masks, and costumes used by the stunt men in Shooting Bigfoot either, and they have had a lot of time. They have never produced one statement from anyone around the film stating that the scene was faked.

If those are obviously real Bigfoots in the night scenes, we know that Rick is shooting real bullets at them. How do we know this? Because Morgan Matthews stated that Rick was shooting real bullets that night. But after that, we know little. We do not know if the bullets missed the Bigfoot or hit it. And if they hit it, did they wound it or kill it? No one knows. Not only that, but we will probably never know, so there is not much point fighting about it. The anti-Dyer case is profoundly weak and truly preposterous. It rests on many absurd assumptions that defy all logic and common sense. Nevertheless, 99% of our community believes them totally.

Morgan Matthews was in on a hoax to hoax Bigfoot footage in a documentary movie. That is truly ridiculous. Anyway, documentaries must be truthful and cannot include faked or hoaxed footage.

The Bigfoots were produced with stunt men, masks, costumes or CGI. There are no credits for costume designers, special effects studios, stunt men or CGI in the final credits. There would have to be if any of those were used in the footage. The notion that Matthews would use any of these and not give credit for them is insane.

The entire scene was hoaxed by the film crew: You would think that with all the people in on this hoaxed movie, someone would have come forward now. That no one has come forward blowing the whistle is truly bizarre.

Masks, stunt men, and costumes were used. The problem is where are these masks? Where are these costumes? Which special effects studio produced them, if any? Matthews was operating on a tight budget and so was Rick. They could not afford to hire a fancy special effects studio. Then Rick would have had to have made them himself. How could Rick Dyer have made two of the greatest Bigfoot masks and costumes ever produced? Makes no sense at all.

The Bigfoot that hit Morgan is holding up a mask. They never proved that.

The Bigfoot that hits Morgan has a face that does not move. I do not believe this is important, nor does it prove that it is not a mask. Anyway, I am told that the face does move.

Morgan was slapped down and beat up by a stunt man: Matthews was beat up fairly bad after his encounter. Apparently all the Bigfoot/stunt man did was slap him down with its bare hand. Can you show me how any stunt man on Earth can slap another human being onto the ground with a bare palm, leaving them badly beat up by being slapped? Not possible. No way.

Morgan Matthews lied and said those were real bullets when they were really blanks. Come on. Get real now.

Rick was shooting real bullets, but he was shooting them at his stunt man, and he was deliberately missing. I do not think even Rick is nuts or evil enough to do so.

Matthews admitted that a stunt man in a costume knocked him over. The quote below is typical of this attitude. Yet it is 100% untrue. Nevertheless, probably 99% of our community believes this:

MM did end this. At the film showing in Edinburgh, when asked what had attacked him, he said he knew it was someone in a costume.

Yes, and that is not what he said in Edinburgh at all. In fact, I do not think he even addressed the question in Edinburgh.

Matthews admitted that the body was a fake. He did no such thing. Here is an example of this line:

Matthews admitted privately to someone closely connected to the movie that the so called “tent” video never happened and the alleged Bigfoot seen in Shooting Bigfoot was a guy in a suit.

Totally fake story. Apparently this is a deliberate lie put out by the Dyer haters. The Dyer haters put out and endless series of deliberate lies, passed out fake info and lies as truth to all sorts of good people, and just in general behaved with horrifying depravity all through this episode. The worst lie manufacturer of all was a scumbag named Don Boucher.

This man invented an endless series of lies and tall tales all proving that this was a scam. If I am not mistaken, the execrable Mr. Boucher made up this lie too and then passed it out as truth. I might add that liars like this guy make it all harder for us to do our job. I am sure that even Dyer haters like Randy do not appreciate being fed lies and crap from his own team. After all, Randy appears interested in uncovering the truth as many of us are.

Now we get to the meat of the story. The body. Rick has so massively and totally bungled this end of the story with his lying, cheating, stealing and general horrific criminal and sociopathic behavior that even if there is a body (still a possibility) I am quite certain that it will never see the light of day. Why? Because Rick Dyer destroyed this story so badly that any body that might exist can never be allowed to turn up. If you think this is odd, check out my past stories about Bigfoot shootings and killings.

There are over 100 documented Bigfoot shootings and 43 documented Bigfoot killings. Now we do not know if any of these are real. Those are just stories. But there are nearly 200 shooting stories and 43 killing stories. What do we have to show from all of that? We have jack. Nothing. F-all. Were there any real Bigfoots shot  or killed in those 250-odd cases? Really no one knows. Not only that, but no one will ever know. Maybe they were, maybe they weren’t. Maybe there have been bodies in the past, maybe there haven’t. Maybe the stories are true, and maybe they aren’t. No one knows.

It’s all a big mystery. I would like to suggest that the Rick Dyer shooting and killing go down in history along with these other 250-odd tales of Bigfoots being shot and/or killed. I suppose it’s about as likely to be true as any of those other stories, and it has about as much evidence for truth as any of those other stories, which is zip, jack all, nada, nothing, none.

I think this is a good place to leave the Rick Dyer story. What could have been a great story, possibly even including a body, was utterly destroyed via the incompetence, sinister behavior, criminality and sociopathy of a two-bit con man and crook named Rick Dyer. Rick has now poisoned the well so badly that nothing truthful or provable can ever come out of this story. And we may as well just leave it at that.

The main problem here is that the finest Bigfoot footage since the Patterson film, the Tent Video and the Shooting Bigfoot footage, is now also tainted for all of time. The finest Bigfoot footage ever shot is now regarded by 99% of our community as a pitiful hoax. And the sole reason for that is because this killer footage is associated with Rick Dyer. Because it is associated with Dyer, it is hoaxed, goes the obvious logical fallacy. If we can get over the unproductive and probably unprovable argument over a body which will in all probability never turn up anyway, we ought to be talking about the movie footage. But we aren’t. And we never will. And that is a tragedy.

Charges never answered. Rick-haters have posted these questions a long time ago. It is very interesting that none of these questions have been answered, even partially. These questions revolve around the idea that the San Antonio footage was a hoax:

1. Whose idea it was.
2. How the whole thing was developed.
3. Who was in on it: Dyer, Musky, FBFB, Matthews, some of them, all of them?
4. When Musky came into it.
5. What role FBFB played in funding, whether it was as collaborators or supporters.
6. How and when the Tent Video was made.
7. Who was in on it during the doc filming, and what costume was used.
8. Whether Matthews was in on it altogether, and if not then why he agreed to keep quiet and play along rather than expose Dyer’s outrageous assault, which arguably would have been a more devastating conclusion to a film about desperate men
9. Whether Dyer will ultimately escape the wrath of those with grievances against him

It is stunning that skeptics are no closer to answering any of these questions than they were when those questions were published. The problem is that none of those questions can be answered because they are all based on a false premise that the San Antonio footage was hoaxed.

Other players. The problem with the nutty conspiracy line is that it has to include all sorts of people. We can’t just agree that Rick is a scumbag who took a lot of good folks, for a ride, nope! His victims have to be in on it!

Here is something of the idiocy being tossed about attempting to implicate FB/FB and Musky Allen in “the hoax,” which incidentally they have never proven to be a hoax. If they mean the fake body, then clearly FB/FB were badly burned victims here, and Musky, instead of being in on it, was the hoax-buster who uncovered it and pulled the plug!

There is not one single word of truth in any of the following:

Matthews must have at least planned the end scenes with Dyer. If Matthews was attacked by a real Bigfoot (which he wasn’t), then Dyer’s story about shooting one would most likely stand up. (which it didn’t) If there was a dead Bigfoot body then a professional cameraman would have conclusive, in-focus 100% undeniable footage (Which there isn’t any).

Plainly Matthews movie set out to take the piss out of redneck Bigfoot hunters, He got all the redneck stuff but needed a big finale, what better than “I was attacked by a Bigfoot…believe it or not.” Then he went home and kept his mouth shut so he could air his movie, mission accomplished. He used Dyer as a the egotistical fool he is, then pissed on him, so good on MM.

FB/FB were coming out with a book and needed promotion, when they heard dyer was in a BF movie = they paid dyer thousands to help promote the book. Lynk and Clancy said someone gave him thousands$.

Of course MM was in on it you fools. If he didn’t agree to keep his mouth shut in some form of agreement with Dyer he would have blabbed about Dyer lying.

Mathews needed a ending for his movie, otherwise that movie was just another yawn fest BF documentary.

FB/FB wanted to push sales on their sorry book which wouldn’t of sold any with out the hype of this hoax.

Rug Boy paid Musky Allen = as soon Allen gets paid he does interview with FB/FB on Youtube about viewing the body.

There’s no way Matthews wasn’t in on it. Come on…they’re out in the woods together, just the two of them? How does Dyer coordinate a hoax on Matthews out there? Matthews may be a sissy but he didn’t become a successful director by being oblivious to what’s going on around him.

I just moseyed over to for the first time in a while and there’s a pretty interesting discussion that’s been going on in the comments among Larry Perkins and some others. We have to remember that this has to go deeper than Dyer to have gone so far, and we need to be as enraged at his accessories (or handlers) as much as him. In my mind that includes Matthews and Issleb, but I’ve been back-and-forth about “Jack Barnes.”

The recent comments over there, including some long ones from Perkins, actually have put me back onto thinking FBFB was in on it…you just can’t look past their claims that seven people and two MD’s examined the body and thought it was real, or at least couldn’t say it wasn’t. That is absolutely laughable.

Was it a psychological experiment? A scam to sell books? Both? They and Musky have been tied together so closely from the beginning, culminating in their trip to see Musky after the premiere to get him to verify the creature when the movie didn’t cause a stir.

They actually claimed to show him many frames from the film which “Musky” absolutely verified as the same creature he saw, and which they then claimed they deleted because of “copyright concerns” without showing anyone else…no other researchers or anyone saw it but Musky. Why not show someone with real credibility if it was truly better than PGF??? Even in private???? That was the big clue right there that they had to make up a quick scenario to keep things going, and it worked.

I’ve been back and forth but now I’m back. Consider that “Jack Barnes” is a successful businessman with a lot of money to blow…these kinds of men are not wishy-washy doormats such as the profile that’s been created to support the theory that he was not in on it. Being calculating and devious is one way to build a fortune, but being a starry-eyed fool is decidedly not.

I strongly disagree that Dyer should be held totally separate from Matthews and Musky and FBFB. It’s a matter of degree.

Dyer may be the ugly face of the thing, and he may regularly go rogue with horrible actions that they wouldn’t condone, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t responsible for creating the monster and constantly nourishing it.

If Matthews and Dyer cooked this up, then Dyer is the instrument, but Matthews is just as culpable and should be held equally accountable for all of Dyer’s misdeeds. Even if Dyer pulled the hoax on Matthews and he simply “went with it,” its really no different. That’s true in any court of law and should be true in this case.

Surely Musky is equally accountable. Whether he planned it with Dyer or came in as an “accessory after the fact” is strictly a matter for the sentencing judge.

As for Barnes and the FBFB gang, they either helped plan and finance it; came in after the incident to promote their agenda; or were duped and just ran with it. Again, it’s a matter of degree.

Dyer could not have done this without Matthews, Musky, and Barnes. Barnes is the only one who could be completely innocent (except of being a fool), but that is looking less likely day by day.

The idea that Matthews or Musky should be applauded for sticking it to Dyer after collaborating with him is giving Dyer too much credit and giving them too much benefit of the doubt. Whatever Matthews and Musky may have done “to” Dyer (lessening the impact of the movie’s BF footage and exposing the fake tour body, respectively), it’s not the same as them totally going “state’s evidence” with clear confessions that publicly hang Dyer out to dry.

And the “Matthews is just a filmmaker” arguments ring hollow to me. He didn’t make Citizen Kane. If anything, exposing Dyer in the film or at any point afterward would have heightened the profile of a film that’s turned out to be just another one of a million documentaries no one cares about anymore. As as Dyer started pulling his shenanigans like accusing Liam Gray of bestiality, Matthews was the only one who could have shut him down, and he didn’t.

Documentary be damned…but Matthews was in too deep I think, and would have exposed his own complicity. At the very least he would have to admit that his “documentary” hedged on telling the whole story, which could affect his reputation. He wasn’t “hyping” a movie like it was some Hollywood blockbuster, he was keeping his ass covered.

That’s my belief at least.

Musky Allen. The argument is that Musky was in on the “hoax” from the very start. They have never proven this. In fact, they have never presented the tiniest bit of evidence that he was in on any sort of a hoax at any time. In fact, the best evidence indicates that he actually uncovered the part of this even that was hoaxed – the fake body taken on tour. So instead of being a hoaxer, Musky instead is the opposite. He is just like the folks at Randy’s blog – a hoax-buster!

The report with resulting audio of Musky’s visit to look at the body of Hank in some government facility has never been disproven, despite tremendous effort expended to do so. I find the report to be very convincing, but then that means that there had to be a body, for which there is not a lot of evidence. In fact, some of the only evidence in favor of a body is Musky’s testimony.

The problem is that Musky’s testimony has not been proven true either. Did he go see a real body at this facility? Was he shown a fake body? Was the physician there at the time a stunt man placed there by Rick? Was this a real government facility? Where was it located? Which branch of the government had the body? Why did the body smell like formaldehyde and embalming fluid?

The truth is that just as skeptics can not and will probably never prove that the Musky body-viewing was made up and never occurred, those of us who find it convincing in spite of the fact that it implies a body will probably never be able to prove that the Musky episode occurred at all. Perhaps it happened. Perhaps he was shown a fake with stunt men. Perhaps he made up the whole thing and is such a great actor that he ought to move to Hollywood.

In Bigfoot history, once again there is nothing new here. If you look at my past body reports, you will see that there have been a number of cases of witnesses reporting that bodies were taken by government officials or were taken to government labs or research hospitals to be studied. The stories have never been proven, but they have never been shown to be lies either. They are just unsolved mysteries which will remain so for all of time. And so it is with the Musky Allen body viewing story – another mystery that will never be solved.

Even more dubious is that Musky was in on “the hoax” from the very start. All  accounts suggest that Musky was a particularly belligerent loudmouthed skeptic who dared Rick to prove his body claim. Rick then took him up on the offer. He later produced a Paul on the road to Damascus audio in which he seemed, stunned, shocked, emotional and newly converted to an unwanted but necessary belief that these creatures were real.

He then reluctantly takes up with Rick based on his conversion experience. Much nonsense follows, including an episode in which he taints all prior testimony by admitting to lying a few times, first about the location of the body and then about feeling me wrong information (which he never did). Sorry this story also has a sorry and sleazy ending, but the skeptics have still never proven that Musky was “in on the hoax.” In fact, other than the fake body, there have never proven that the rest of the story was a hoax at all, try as they might.

Facebook Find Bigfoot. These guys are some of the true losers in this event. They got taken for a ride badly with Rick’s fake body, investing $50,000 in what turned out to be an elaborate hoax that even fooled two physicians. Their reputation in the community is very poor, which is sad because they are very good people. They are regarded as hoaxers and of course they are not. Both are furious at Rick and are considering taking legal action against him, which I can now report for the first time.

What about Andrew Clacy? Just another guy who got played. Andrew is a rather sleazy person, as you can see in the report below someone who knew this scammer back when he was in high school. But then again, this is Late Capitalism we are living in now, and just how many successful folks are not scammers in one way or another anyway? You scam, you win, you play fair, you lose. Late Capitalism is a pond where the scum rises to the top. Virgins and altar boys live hand to mouth when they are not homeless and living out of their cars.

I went to school with Andrew Clacy and now live in the same town. He was full of it at school, and many of his Internet sites prey on the gullible & lonely ( funny that’s how I would describe Clacy). I only got interested in this when Clacy went on local TV saying he was going on tour with a dead Bigfoot.

Straight away I new it would be a hoax. Then I researched Dyer and it all fitted together. I listened to Clacy’s interview and it sounded just like school days. “It wasn’t me miss, I didn’t do it, he made me”. Strangely though he is dumb enough to have been sucked in. But he did say at the start he knew for sure it was real, and he did take part in fleecing money from people. Seems all involved are full-time losers. Glad people are waking up to Clacy. He got blood (if not from a Bigfoot) on his hands.

I do not believe that this is accurate. As we can see, back in school days, Clacy saw the economic writing on the wall and decided to be a successful scammer, er, I mean capitalist! He got involved in the Internet “industry,” surely one of the slimiest, dirtiest and filthiest scam-filled capitalist cesspools, er, I mean industries, on Earth. It’s utterly unregulated, so it’s crawling with liars, cheaters and thieves. In fact you will probably run across 50 people trying to rip you off on the Internet for every one you find in real life. That’s because fraud in real life is illegal (except in India) except on the Internet, where fraud is apparently perfectly legal, thanks to the “don’t regulate the Internet” scum screaming at the top of their lungs every time we try to do something about it.

I figure Clacy figured this was another one of his barely legal Net type scams from the start. He wasn’t sure if the thing was real or not. He didn’t say it was real from the start. I have an inside quote from him from inside TT where he says he is 70% sure it is real. As the tour went on, I have no idea what he thought, but I am certain that he was not certain it was a fraud. We are told that he was getting more and more angry and suspicious as the tour went on.

After Musky and Jeff Barnes uncovered the fake body, Clacy immediately packed up shop and left disgustedly, which was the proper and decent thing to do. I doubt if he did this because his scam was now uncovered. He probably did it because it was the respectable thing to do, and because he was angry at being one more victim of Rick’s scams.

And here is the latest nutty news about Rick. Quote:

Big news on the Rick Dyer front.

Bigfoot press conference will be in Atlanta on Jan 15 2015, Dyer says Hank has been in Georgia since Sept 12, 2012. There will be 26 experts who worked on Hank speaking at the presser. Hank is frozen in a large case and will eventually go to a museum. Dyer invited David Durrett and Pinkfoot to come back if they want. Press conference will be in a 400 plus venue, 100 seats for press. Dyer to release photo of freezer truck and photo of Hank dead. Yikes.

Well, this is most interesting, but Rick has promised us this press conference for some time now, and over and over, it has proven to be a false alarm. It is time to yawn at all of these claims and say put up or shut up. If and when Rick has a body, he needs to show it to us, fake or not. Then we will evaluate if it is even real, as this scumbag has already presented us with two fake bodies. If he has a real body, great. He will go down in history, though this honor could not happen to a less deserving person. Until then, we should not put much stake in this boy who cried wolf announcements.

Update: Rick has recently stated that this press conference may be delayed again and there is a good possibility that it will not even occur. So here we go again, with the endless delays. Really this guy needs to be ignored until once again he shows us something we can examine.

Great Wild Bigfoot Tales. Some great stories about close human Bigfoot encounters, including Bigfoots being hit by trains and trucks, being shot at by teams of humans and a man who was attacked and kill by a Bigfoot. The man even has a name! Note, about the man killed in Alaska, should we not try to track down his relatives or ancestors?

Bigfoots Hit by Vehicles

Unknown City, Hwy 101 location, January 1973. A truck driver hit a 7 foot Bigfoot on US 101. The front of the logging truck was badly damaged, but there was no report on the condition of the Bigfoot.”

Powers, Oregon. One Bigfoot was hit by a train, and a farmer kept it in a barn until it was better.

Portland, Oregon. A Bigfoot was hit and was on the side of the road.

The Apes Among Us, by John Green

Nulato, Alaska: Albert Petka of Nulato, AK was attacked by a reported Bigfoot on his boat. His dogs drove the creature off, but Mr. Petka later died of his injuries.

The Historical Bigfoot, by Chard Arment

Meadville, Mississippi: In 1868, a hair-covered, bipedal creature was pursued by hunters with hounds after terrorizing people in Meadville, MS. The hounds chased the creature westward to the banks of the Mississippi River where they bayed it. When the hunters got there, they urged the dogs onward, and the dogs tried to catch it (dogs are commonly used to catch wild hogs, etc.).

The creature killed one of the dogs, and the men began to fire at it, at which time it leaped into the river and swam for the other side. It should be noted that the river is very wide at this point.


Filed under Animals, Apes, Bigfoot, Cinema, Mammals, North America, Oregon, Regional, South, USA, West, Wild