Category Archives: Bigfoot

Bigfoot News Bastille Day Edition, 2016

Finally, a new Bigfoot news! This long awaited edition will consist only of some very interesting photos that I have found, including one from Fallbrook, California which is being presented to the public for the very first time. Hopefully, I will have another edition coming out soon with more photos and some text too because I definitely have a few things to write about.

I really think I have writer’s block about these Bigfoot posts. I always say I am going to write one, and then I never do it for some reason. I think I associate them with a lot of anxiety due to all the Hellish controversy they inevitably spawn from the semi-human inhabitants of this ghastly field of Earthly Hellions and assorted lowlifes, cranks, fools, idiots, out and out jerkoffs, loudmouths and belligerent know-nothings.

unnamed

Photo from Fallbrook, California, submitted to me. I do believe that that is a Sasquatch in the background.

This photo was submitted to me by a regular housewife from Fallbrook, California who knew nothing whatsoever about Sasquatches and didn’t even necessarily believe in them. It would be hard to find a more naive submitter. She took a photo of her daughter, and when they went to look at the photo, there was what appeared to be a Sasquatch in the background. This happens so many times. She also sent me another photo of the same area, and the Sasquatch looking object was not there.

Do these things make themselves invisible to the photographer somehow (by cloaking?) but somehow they are not invisible to the camera? In other words, you can’t see them with the naked eye for some reason but the camera can pick them up? It might make sense because a camera is not an eyeball. Yes, they both see things, but you eye is an organ in your body that has one way of seeing things, and your camera is a mechanical object that uses a different way of seeing things than your eye uses. Cameras surely do not have irises, optic nerves and an occipital sector in their memory bank.

She was dumbfounded as to what this creature was. She said she was going to France for vacation but would be back in a while. She also said that her dogs had been acting very strange recently, and no one could figure out why. She described the land in the background as “wasteland.” As you can see, the Sasquatch is frozen in some sort of leaning over position. I cannot tell you how many photos I have seen where these things freeze like this. I suppose it is one of their ways of sort of going invisible when they feel they have been seen (freezing). A lot of mammals (and even insects) freeze when spotted by a potential predator. It is a classic means of predator defense to freeze in place.

Thermal-Bigfoot-Face-240x300

A great closeup of the famous Ridge Watcher shot by Derek Randles Olympic Project. Note the two eyes, the nose and what looks like a mouth. Note in the chest area what looks like two breasts.

This is one of the greatest Sasquatch photos that have come out recently. Randles runs a tip-top shape outfit called the Olympic Project. He is a bit controversial in the field, but one thing I know about him is that he is absolutely above hoaxing in any way, shape or form. And the team has some quite professional procedures that they follow. They even have a forensic guy, Rich Germeau, a police officer. Germeau is a very nice guy. I have spoken with him. All in all, I would say that Randles, despite a bit of controversy around him, is one of the best and most ethical people in the field today.

The Olympic Project got a call about suspected Sasquatch activity on the property of an elderly couple who lived on the Olympic Peninsula. It’s hard to say whether they believed in these things before all manner of weirdness began happening on their property. Anyway, they were baffled, and called in the Olympic Project to investigate. The team worked the site for a while and at some point, they set up a night vision camera in a spot and left it on for the night.

There are cows visible in some of the video because the owners run some cattle on their property. Skeptards have been dismissive of this video simply because of the presence of cows! How ridiculous. When the team went back to review the footage later, they saw this obviously alive object peeking over the ridge in the direction of the camera. We know it is alive because it is lit up by the infrared camera, and only living things light up the camera.

The skeptards were once again contemptuously dismissive, and a lot of them claimed the object was obviously a raccoon. Well in that case, it is a raccoon that is quite a bit larger than a man!

It’s not a raccoon. And the shape of the image very much resembles a Sasquatch, which is what the couple suspected was on their property.

Ridge watcher

The Ridge Watcher, a blow up of the original photo. That’s thermal imaging lighting up the image, the lightened areas indicating body heat of a living creature. And no, that’s not a raccoon. Can you believe the skeptard argument is that this thing is a raccoon? WTH.

It’s not a raccoon, no. As you can see in the blowup above, you can make out the shape of a human shaped living object with two eyes, a nose and a mouth. The eyes, nose and mouth are all a lot larger than those of a human. Note also the wide shoulders, maybe 40 inches wide. No human has shoulders that wide. Note also the lit up area around the breasts. I strongly suspect that this creature, like Patty, is a female.

remake

Comparison photo showing a human standing at night in the exact same spot where the Ridge Watcher photo was taken. As you can see, this living creature is massive, much larger than the human. You’re telling me that’s a raccoon?! A raccoon that is much larger than a human?! Where, on Star Trek? Think of something else. How do you get a human to fit into a huge suit like that that is far larger than any human could be and still light up the whole suit with heat imagery? Hint: You can’t, so you don’t. There’s no way to fake that photo, and Randles doesn’t hoax anyway. I know him pretty well.

Here is a comparison shot with a human standing in the same place that the Sasquatch was standing in the photo. As you can see with the superimposition, the human shaped creature is quite a bit larger than the man used as a comparison prop. And it’s no raccoon, unless it’s a raccoon as big as a gorilla.

Ok, then maybe it was a man in a suit. Well first of all, who put a man in a suit out there? Randles doesn’t hoax. This naive elderly couple is sneaking around in a suit in the middle of the night so they can pull off a Bigfoot hoax? Get real. Furthermore, it can’t be a man in a suit because suits cannot expand the size of the human body. Note the size of the body as lit up by the infrared. Your body is as big as it is, no matter what sort of over-fitting suit you put on. The biggest suit around doesn’t make your body any larger, and the suit doesn’t show up on infrared. Only living entities and their components light up on infrared.

mqdefault

Yet another photo of the Ridge Watcher. It looks like this is the actual original Flir image. The skeptards have never been able to dismiss this photo, even though most Bigfooters are now convinced that it’s a hoax. The skeptard argument: That’s a raccoon. I am serious. They really are that stupid. Skeptards are dumber than Alt Righters.

Once again, it’s a raccoon. A raccoon the size of Andre the Giant. Uh huh. This is actually the argument by the “science” side that this photo is not real. The “science” guys say it’s a raccoon. An eight foot tall, 800 pound raccoon. So much for “science.”

Stacy brown human-and-sasquatch-superim-copy1

The great Stacy Brown Flir photo. I forget how they took that. That thing is running through the woods very fast in the pitch black dark night with no flashlight. Now tell me how a guy in a monkey suit does that. The body proportions and running style are perfect. That’s exactly what these things look like when they run, swinging their very long arms and with their legs kicking way up in back. Humans have tried to imitate the way that they walk and run, and no one has been successful yet. The skeptard argument is that this is either Stacy, his father or one of his friends running through the woods at night. Lame. And Brown doesn’t hoax to my knowledge.

The lame skeptard argument here is that either Stacy or his father ran through the deep woods of Florida in the middle of the night without a flashlight extremely fast and using the exact same gait as a Sasquatch does. But humans cannot reproduce the gait or a Sasquatch. It can’t be done. No one can do it. And the Browns are not hoaxers. Stacy Brown is a bit of a controversial figure, but he is no hoaxer, and neither is his father. If you see the original video, this thing is running incredibly fast. How does a human run in the deep woods with no flashlight? It doesn’t. It doesn’t run at all. People cannot run fast in the middle of a thick forest at night with no flashlight. Not possible.

Note also the superimposition of an infrared photo of a human taken in the same where the original was taken imposed on the photo. Look at how much larger the object is than a human. That thing is lit up by infrared on Flir. Even if you put a massively over-fitting suit on, you still can’t light up your body any larger on infrared because the suit won’t show up on infrared. Only your body will. You could put a suit as big as a Volkswagen on, and assuming you did not suffocate in it, your image would not show up in infrared any larger than your body.

Capture

I think this is from the Idaho footage that some skiers shot of something running on a hillside in winter. It’s part of a video. I liked this video, but it is very short, and it is hard to see the object well. That thing was running extremely fast though in deep snow on top of a mountain. You telling me a friend of those skiers put on a monkey suit, climbed a mountain and then ran very fast in deep snow so his skier friends could photograph it? That didn’t happen.

This is one of Meldrum’s favorites. That thing sure is fast. The skiiers seem pretty naive.

Let’s see. The skiiers got their friend to put on a monkey suit, no wait, carry a monkey suit up that very steep hill in the deep snow (How does he do that even?) up to the top of that ridge and then put that monkey suit on and run extremely fast through 2-3 feet deep snow. How does anyone do that?

Furthermore, the thing is only there for 2-3 seconds. Why would anyone hoax for 2-3 seconds? Hoaxes usually last a lot longer than that.

Dogman east texas

All right, this is one of the most out and out weird crypto photos I have ever seen. This photo was shot in Texas and that, folks, is reportedly a Dogman. Yes that’s right. A Dogman. They supposedly do exist. It is some sort of insanely bizarre Sasquatch-type creature the existence of which makes no sense to me at all. That thing has supposedly killed some wild animal, and I believe it has the dead animal draped over its shoulders. Or else it is eating the animal. Or something. Someone needs to get out a pen and draw some lines around this thing so we can see what’s going on here. These Dogmen things scare the living crap out of me!

I have no idea what in the Hell that thing is, but that is one of the most out and out freakiest and most disturbing crypto photos I have ever seen. It has a dead animal draped over its shoulders. Why would a hoaxing human kill a big animal and hang it over this shoulders to hoax a what? A Dogman video. A Dogman video? What the Hell is a Dogman? No one has even heard of these things? Who ever hoaxed a Dogman video? No one did ever. Most people don’t even think they exist, including me (sort of).

And look at the way that freaky thing looks. Someone made a Dogman costume? What? Who did that and why? No one has ever made a Dogman costume. No such costume is known to exist. Anyway, most people don’t have the faintest idea of what these freaky things even look like.

How many people sling dead animals over their shoulder to make Bigfoot hoax videos? No one does ever.

Dogman

An artist’s rendition of one of those Goddamned Dogman things. I know it makes no sense that they exist, but supposedly they do anyway. Melba Ketchum has gotten into studying these things lately, and she has supposedly observed some down in Texas. There is a radio interview of her talking about her experiences with them. These things are way too weird. Let’s prove the Sasquatches exist first, ok? Then we move onto the Dogmen and whatever else weirdness might be out there. One freakshow at a time please.

Ok, these things are just way too frightening. Sasquatches vary in their temperament, with maybe 75% being pretty easy-going, another 20% being pretty mean and bad-tempered and maybe 3-4% being what experts call “pure evil.” Sort of like humans, right?

But what we hear about these Dogman freaks is that 100% of them are stone evil to the core. There are even reports that they have murdered humans by ripping them to shreds. There is a report out of Appalachia of a Dogman invading a camper parked at a lake and killing everyone in it by tearing them to shreds. Sheriffs came out later but called it a homicide (by a human). Know any killers that rip human beings to shreds? Neither do I. I don’t mind Sasquatches, but I must say that I hate these Dogmen. Kill em all. Let God sort em out.

Bigfoot-Photographed-In-Hutchinson-Kansas

I always liked this photo. It was taken in Hutchinson, Kansas. That thing in the photo is huge. There are other photos of the same area from the same distance in which this object is not present. That is exactly the body shape of these damned things, and that’s something the hoaxers never get right because you can’t put a suit on a human that gives it nonhuman body proportions. Think about it. If you put a tiger suit on a man, does it really look like a tiger? If you put a deer suit on a man, does it really look like a deer? Of course not in both cases, since in each case, the man retains a human body shape even though he’s wearing a funny costume. There’s no costume out there that changes the actual proportions of the human body. Think about it. Real hard.

Ok, that’s weird. This has supposedly been debunked by the skeptards, and almost everyone believes their verdict. The verdict is that that weird object (once again frozen – note that it is frozen in the exact same pose as the Fallbrook creature above) is a cow. Yes, a cow. Isn’t that lame? Well folks, science has spoken, and that creature in that photo is a cow. That’s right, a cow. Does that look like a cow too you? Me either. But hey, science has spoken folks, so the debate is over, science being infallible and all that. All bow down to the Great God of Science!

Skunk-Ape-Bigfoot-Caught-On-Video-In-Mississippi

I like this one too. This is a Skunk Ape shot on video in Mississippi. The actual video is very nice. The man who took it was hunting, and he had no idea what he photographed. Further, he didn’t even believe in Skunk Apes. He thought they were a myth. That’s exactly the way these things look from behind, and I haven’t seen a fake as good as this photo yet. Notice the shape of the hands. Not human.

This is a cool video. The guy who shot is some good old boy who went hunting one day. He had no idea what this is, so he put it up on Youtube saying what the Hell is this? It’s a Skunk Ape. A skunk ape is just a Sasquatch. That’s the name for the ones that live in the Deep South. Look at the shape of the hands on that thing. Those hands are not human. Ever seen a Bigfoot hoax with hands like that? Me either.

See that sheen glowing off the coat of that thing? That means it’s real fur on a real living object. The sheen is from the oils on your skin. They come to the surface and give animals’ coats a sheen in the sun. No hoaxer has ever been able to reproduce this sheen. Actually, they never even try. Furthermore, I have seen many costumes that our Glorious Special Effects Gods have made, and I haven’s one single costume that had a sheen like this on its coat visible in the sun.

But these Special Effects Gods can do anything, right? No really, they can. Go ask them. They can make a costume that perfectly reproduces any living thing on Earth. No really. I’m not kidding. They all say this. All of them, arrogant-as-Hell bunch that they are. And the vast majority of people believe the Special Effects Liars when they say this. One born every day.

Temagami

The Temangami Sasquatch from Ontario. Looked at the domed head, the two deep holes for the eye sockets, the philtrum and the mouth. This is a rather unusual look, but I have seen another Sasquatch photo from Ontario that looked exactly like this. There is another photo that goes with this one, a photo of the rear that shows this very shaggy creature standing there seemingly frozen. Good backstory too.

The skeptard argument about this one is truly stupid. This very old couple, who have a vacation home far out in the wilds of Ontario, somehow hoaxed this video! These are old people, in their 70’s. There’s nothing weird about them. Everyone says they are upstanding folks. But an elderly couple in their 70’s hoaxed a Bigfoot video! Never mind that has never happened. There’s never been one case of an elderly couple doing a Bigfoot hoax, but no matter. Science has spoken, folks! Listen up, the Almighty God of Science has spoken, and the scientific fact is that these old people hoaxed this Bigfoot video.

Look at the very weird way that thing looks. I have seen another photo of a Sasquatch from Ontario and it looks exactly like this one, with the deep-set eye-holes and the very tall domed head. Note the philtrum. That head does not even have human proportions. See those eye holes? The hoaxer goofs have never reproduced that, probably because they never even try. And I’ve never seen a face as good as that one, with a philtrum no less.

That face is way too large for a human. How does a human put on such a large mask and still retain the obvious bone and muscle structure that one can obviously see in the shot. You can’t. A mask too large for your face, if it would even stay on, would droop all over the place and would look very fake. Plus it would probably be falling off all the time if it was way too big for your head like that. And your eyes would not fit in the eye holes, your nose would not fit in the nose protuberance, and your mouth would not fit in the mouth hole. Look at that wild fur. There is another shot of this bizarre creature that shows this fur in much wilder shape. That photo was taken by the same couple. It is a back shot.

The back story. The couple lives part time way out in nowhere in Temangami, Ontario. Temangami means “way out in the sticks so far no one ever goes there.” Or something. Well, that’s what it means to me anyway. The couple were hearing a lot of weird noises, and apparently they started taking some photos of the area outside of the cabin.

One argument is that this is Photoshopped, but very good Ontario researchers did a good job of thoroughly investigating this couple and concluded that they were not hoaxing. Furthermore, it’s not Photoshopped because the photos were still in the camera when the investigator came out to look at the case. Anyway, since when does some ordinary couple in their 70’s have such advanced Photoshop skills that they can make a Bigfoot hoax with Photoshop? And you can’t use Photoshop if the file is still in the camera. Photoshop doesn’t work on images that reside only inside of cameras.

I believe once again, the couple thought they were just taking photos of the outside of their cabin, and they only saw the Sasquatch when they were reviewing the photos in the camera. How many times do we hear this? What the Hell is going on?

Bigfoot-Photod-In-Southern-California-480x270

Well-known fake that fooled a lot of people for a long time. Back story seemed good. Once again from Fallbrook, California, supposedly after major flooding. Photo was taken of twisted branches after flooding and Sasquatch was not noticed until the photo was viewed afterwards. Problem is that’s not a Sasquatch. That’s a gorilla Photoshopped into that photo. The guy who put this up has a Youtube page with a lot of gorilla videos and some “Bigfoot” videos. Obvious hoaxer. I am pretty angry at this moron.

Yep, it’s a gorilla all right. Look closely at the head, face and especially ears. He sure fooled a lot of people though. I am pretty mad at this idiot though because hoaxes are not funny, and the hoaxing ruins this whole field of research because we have to sift through all sorts of hoaxed crap to find anything real. Further, it throws up the spectre of “hoax” in front of every bit of evidence that we have. So far, “science” has proven that 100% of the voluminous evidence for the existence of Sasquatches is all nothing but hoaxes. Thank God for science! Science to the rescue again!

Ontario screengrab controversial

Very strange photo out of Ontario. This is part of a video. The quality is not very good, but that thing is absolutely huge! Look at the massive shoulders and the very long arms. It looks like some sort of a gorilla! Skeptards say this is a gorilla, but I do not think so. A gorilla running around in the Ontario woods? No.

That thing is massive, and if you see the video, it moves in a very bizarre way that does not even seem human. But I have seen other Sasquatch photos and videos with this exact same bizarro movement going on, which I cannot describe here in words.

Also the video is very poor quality. Why would anyone make a hoax of such awful quality? That makes no sense. All known hoaxes are clear as air. That’s the purpose of the hoax. A hoax with very poor visual quality doesn’t even work as a hoax. Hoaxes must be clear, or they are useless.

Look at the size of that damn thing. It looks like a gorilla! These things are not gorillas or even apes anymore than we are, but it’s quite common for people who get a quick look at one to describe them as gorillas. I remember one famous photo out of Maine where a Sasquatch was raiding an apple tree. In that case, the man who owned the property where the photo was taken said he had spoken to some people who asked him if there was a traveling zoo in the area because the man said he saw a gorilla run across the road. Another man fishing on a lake said he saw a gorilla by the shore of the lake. So you see these things are often mistaken for gorillas, which they superficially represent.

The photo is a female Sasquatch kneeling down in front of the motion activated camera. There is apparently a baby Sasquatch hanging onto her back, but that’s what the babies do – they hang onto the backs of the mothers.

See the famous Memorial Day footage of an adolescent female Sasquatch running across a field, picking up a baby halfway, and putting it on her back. The baby rides on her back for most of the rest of the run until it gets up on her shoulders.

45 Comments

Filed under Animals, Apes, Bigfoot, California, Canada, Florida, Idaho, Mammals, Midwest, North America, Regional, South, Texas, USA, West, Wild

Repost: Human-Bigfoot War, Oklahoma, 1855

I am reposting this classic post because it continues to get linked around a lot, and a lot of you have probably never read it and you might get a kick out of it. I have no idea if this story is true or not, but it has a lot of obscure details, and there are quite a few other Indian stories along the same lines. Whether its true or not, it sure is a great story! Wouldn’t this story make a good movie? The original story, which is actually much better written than my version, is here.

Too weird.

The giants in the story appear to be Bigfoots.

Choctaw territory in Indian Territory was in SE Oklahoma, which is Ground Zero for Bigfoots in Oklahoma.

Interesting story. The Bigfoots (only referred to here as the giants) had been raiding human settlements on SE Oklahoma and Arkansas for some time, mostly stealing vegetables. They had also been stealing human children and apparently eating them. A Choctaw search party was organized, led by Joshua LeFlore.

This man actually existed. He was born in the Choctaw Nation in 1797 and died in Indian Territory in 1855. So apparently this story, if it is true, is from 1855. It must be later than 1838 because Indian Territory was only established in that year. It references Arkansas, and that state was let in in 1836. There was not yet a state of Oklahoma, not to come into being until 1907. So the story must have taken place from 1838-1907.

A hunting party tracks the Bigfoots down and finds a giant mound with the bodies of 19 human children the Bigfoots have been kidnapping and eating. The Bigfoots are covered in hair, and the bad smell of their shit and piss is everywhere. Most of the humans’ horses rear up and throw their riders, which is what horses do when they see Bigfoots.

The humans attack the Bigfoots, and LeFlore empties his revolver at one, but it’s useless. The Bigfoot kills LeFlore’s mount with a single blow and then tears off LeFlore’s head. The rest of the Indians open up with .50 caliber Sharp’s buffalo rifles (designed to drop a buffalo) on the beasts, from experience aiming at their heads, as this is the best way to kill them. Two Bigfoots drop. A Choctaw Indian hunts down LeFlore’s killer and finishes it off with a hunting knife. Then he decapitates it for good measure.

The Indians bury what’s left of the kids, then bury their leader, giving him a 21 gun salute. Then they make a bonfire and burn the Bigfoots on the fire. They ride home, heading for bad dreams, maybe lasting a lifetime.

Wild story! The giants certainly seem like Bigfoots. Many Indian tribes describe Bigfoots as highly aggressive, stealers of men, women and even children. Young women were apparently taken for mates. Bigfoots would descend on Indian villages with whistles before raining rocks down on the Indians.

Many Western tribes describe areas of their territory that were totally off limits, and the Indians refused to go there, for these were the territories of the Bigfoots. These territories were full of game, but the Indians were so terrified that they avoided them like the plague. Why would Indians avoid a forage-rich area area due to creatures that don’t even exist?

Probably the Bigfoots were more aggressive against Indians because the Indians did not have good methods for killing them. Power comes from the barrel of a gun after all. Bigfoots are highly intelligent and appear to have a language. Our guns are very powerful, much more powerful than the Indians’ weapons. Bigfoots have probably learned to fear and respect us due to our weaponry, and that is why they are much more pacifistic than they were in the Indian era and even during the early era of White settlement of the West.

Most animals figure out who the apex predator is and leave it alone. In North America, humans are the apex predator par excellance. I would imagine that most animals figure this out at some point, or there is some race memory due to genetic selection. For instance, grizzly bears that are highly aggressive are rapidly killed by humans, and the surviving bears that pass on genes are the most passive and avoidant ones.

There is a precedent for stealing children. During times of famine in Africa, chimpanzees are known to raid human villages, steal human babies and eat them.

Who knows if the story is true, but it sure is cool!

If you think this website is valuable to you, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site.

9 Comments

Filed under Amerindians, Animals, Apes, Bigfoot, History, Mammals, North America, Regional, USA, Wild

Bigfoot News Holidays 2015 Edition

10341556_714893888556324_4393432724569907143_n

Honestly, I do not have the foggiest idea what that is. But the more I look at it, the more I think that is a Sasquatch. Look at that thing. It has no neck!

bigfoot-close2

This is from Maine. The Tom Pasanen photo. Whatever it is, it sure is weird.

 

bigfoot-maine-tim-pasanen-cropped

The Tom Pasanen photo from Maine.

 

bigfoot-close1

A closer look at the bizarro Pasanen photo. Do note how the hair coloration of the thing matches the foliage perfectly.

 

fake bigfoot

A fake by hoaxers associated with the JREF scum, I do not know what that is – is it a statue, a costume? I think it is statue.

 

Bigfoot-Caught-Running-Through-The-Bush-On-Trail-Cam-620x270

What in the Hell is that?! Shot via a trailcam and entered into a contest. I am not sure if it won or not. I have no idea what that is. If that is a wild animal, would someone please prove it? That doesn’t look like a bear. Nevertheless, part of me thinks this is an animal. I always thought that this is one of the weirdest Bigfoot pictures out there.

 

gokart

Three photos here of three Sasquatches. The first is from the Go-cart video. Boys racing go-carts in Pennsylvania had a Go-Pro camera on their go-cart and shot a video of this thing. They did not even see it at the time and only found out later when they looked at the footage. If you see the video, that can be nothing other than a Sasquatch. I believe those boys, and I do not think they are sophisticated enough to pull off an elaborate hoax like this. In fact, I doubt if anyone is. I have never seen a hoax that matches the quality of this video. Photo 2 is apparently from the Turkey Hunter footage. Is that correct? Someone correct me if I am wrong. I do think that the Turkey Hunter footage is genuine. However, the Turkey Hunter video is also one of the most flat- out weird Bigfoot videos I have ever seen. The last is I think an old one from Alberta Canada, but I am not sure. That sure looks like a Sasquatch to me.

 

jim-stanley2-2

Ok, that is just weird. Someone tell me what the Hell that is? Look at how long that thing’s arms are. It looks like a gorilla. But compare it to the very first photo at the top. Same scene, right? The first photo is the thing when it stood up and the second photo is the same object crouching down. If it’s the same creature as the first video, that’s a Sasquatch. I believe that the man who shot this pic and some other related ones is known. What do we know about him?

 

10482326_933982693297266_6737918031358340551_n

This is up there with the craziest Bigfoot photos of all time. We have seen these things carrying deer in the Turkey Hunter video, and now we see a Bigfoot carrying…yes, you got it. A cow. Apparently a dead cow, unless the Bigfoot just killed it. A completely baffled farmer in Indiana submitted this pic, which was taken with a trailcam. He has no idea what this is a picture of. He doesn’t seem to be the type to fake a video, and where do you get fake cow carcasses anyway!? Note the corn to be harvested in the foreground.

 

ohiophoto

A much larger photo of the Bigfoot with the cow. Note the huge foot on that thing! No way did some humble farmer buy a fake cow carcass and dress his farmer friend up in a suit, put on the biggest clown clown shoes I have ever seen and shoot this with a trailcam, of all things. That simply did not happen. Have we even seen a trailcam hoax yet? I don’t believe the hoaxers even try to do those. Would be nice to get a better backstory on this.

 

Sas Ontario other BFt

Sasquatch Ontario capture of a Sasquatch. Probably genuine.

Brave Hunter Films Massive Bigfoot! Utah 2015. This video is getting ripped to pieces by the skeptards, but I am going to go out on a limb and say that I really do think this is a Sasquatch. It doesn’t move like a man. No man can move like that. It’s not possible.

Do you see how it goes down on all fours a few times? See how many times it hides behind trees and peeks from behind them (tree peaking). Notice how it moves through the forest like a cross-country skier, gliding as it walks? Humans can’t walk like that. Also look at how it gracefully goes up-down, up-down when it walks. Humans don’t walk like that, nor can they.

Notice also the way it grabs trees and brush as it moves through the forest, using the foliage almost as one might use ski poles? That’s how they move through the woods. At one point in the video, you can clearly see that that thing has no damned neck! Furthermore, its shoulders are simply massive.

And a number of times you can see its head and face in profile. Look at the bone structure of that face. That’s not a human face. Human faces are not shaped like that, and you can’t put a monkey mask on that gives your face a different shape. Have we seen a Bigfoot hoax yet with a mask so fancy that it actually changes the shape of the wearer’s face?

It has a browridge. A coned head. How many hoaxes have we seen with coned heads and bony browridges? Notice the weird way it walks hunched over. That’s not a human being. Humans don’t walk like that.

In addition, I have seen so many videos of these damned things by now that I can almost spot a Sasquatch half a mile away blindfolded. They have a certain profile about the bodies. It takes many different forms, but I keep seeing those forms over and over. And no human has a body profile that looks like that, nor can they fake one.

That’s also real fur. You can see that in the very beginning of the video when the sun is shining on the object.

Also if that is a guy in a monkey suit and a mask, there is no way he could move through the woods that fast. Also the mask is going to get so hot towards the end of the video that he is going to have to take it off or else he is going to die.

The hunter’s reaction has been criticized, with people saying that he seems calm. Like Hell he does. You can hear him breathing hard right from the start of the video. He’s hyperventilating. You don’t breathe like that when you are calm.

First video evidence of a Sasquatch at the Alberta Habituation Site! In the video below, we see an episode of Survivorman where Survivorman is looking for Sasquatches up in Todd Standing’s research area, which is the Alberta Habituation Site (wherever precisely that might be) last time I checked. I am pretty out of the loop with regards to the AHS, though I have sent a couple of guys out there looking for it. I definitely know the general area of the site within 25 miles or so.

Anyway, whether or not Todd is still at the site, I know for a fact that the Survivorman episodes where Survivorman is romping around searching for Sasquatches with Todd Standing were absolutely filmed at the AHS in the last couple of years.

This footage is fascinating. Apparently at the time the video was shot, neither Todd nor Survivorman had any idea that a Sasquatch was  spying on them in the distance of the footage.

In fact, it was not until the footage aired on live TV that viewers looking closely at the footage noted what appeared to a Sasquatch spying on Todd and Survivorman from a couple hundred yards in the background. Todd and Survivorman apparently had no idea that this Sasquatch was in the footage until the episode aired on TV! This makes me think that there is no way that this is another Todd Standing hoax.

If it’s a hoax, how come Todd even know about it himself? And why would Todd secretly put a hoaxed guy in a monkey suit in the footage and not tell anyone about it? Todd’s too much of a narcissist and a loudmouth. If he thought there was as Sasquatch in his footage, he would be yelling so loud you could hear him in outer space.

Anyway, my last sources in Canada told me that the word is that Todd is done with hoaxing. There’s no need to hoax anymore, as he has a primo habituation site with real live Sasquatches running around. So why hoax?

u

Todd Standing’s Early Sasquatch Video. Yes, this is one of the famous ones that people talk about a lot, but you hardly ever see it. Before Todd started hoaxing the world with his made-up stories about the Land of the Lost in British Colombia (a place you can only get to by tunnel) where he was surrounded by Sasquatches one night in his camp. Remember Todd made a movie out of that?

Before Todd’s infamous Tiki dolls that fooled so many otherwise sane people. Remember the puppets made of Todd’s face morphed into a monkey man by his special effects artist sister?

Yes, before then, Todd shot 2-3 very blurry early videos that caused a lot of controversy. In the case of this one (possibly the first video), I think that is actually a real Sasquatch. For one thing, that looks like real fur, not a costume.

Anyway, that slope on the other side is so remote and steep that I don’t understand how the guy in the monkey suit even climbed the mountain in the first place. And that does look like a Sasquatch. And it moves like one. And the people filming seem genuinely excited (rapid breathing, etc.) Anyway, I do think Todd got one here.

Frightened farmer films massive Bigfoot. North Georgia 2015. Another new one, and yes, I like it a lot. Look at the way it glides through the forest. Look at the way it moves backwards to get behind that tree. Look at how huge it is when it finally stands up. Doesn’t it remind you of that Provo, Utah Sasquatch filmed by the college kids camping out for the weekend?

Notice it has no neck. Notice the coned heard. Note the massive body. I also believe once again that this is real fur, not a costume. And yes, you can tell the difference. There are certain things about real fur that have been impossible to replicate with costumes. And there are a couple of other things that the hoaxers never get right that I will not reveal.

Bigfoot Caught on Fisherman’s Video. I like this one too. Another new one from 2015. The fisherman didn’t notice it at the time, and he only saw the Sasquatch after he got home and was looking at the footage. I also think that is real fur, not a costume. The costume makers have never gotten the fur thing right because they can’t.

Melba Ketchum’s DNA results independently replicated by another scientist! I ran this one a while back based on a video Melba made in which she said another team had replicated her results, but I did not know the details on it. I also said that another “scientific team” replicated the results because that’s how I understood the story. However now that I have more details, I can report that it was not an actual scientific team; instead it was simply another scientist who sequenced the genome on his own in his own lab based on Melba’s data.

The other scientist’s name is Dr. David Swenson, and he is a very famous geneticist along the lines of the rather infamous Dr. Sykes in the UK. Swenson is not as famous as Sykes, but who is? And how famous are even the most famous geneticists? Walk up to the average person on the street and ask them to name a famous geneticist. I bet they cannot name even one.

Anyway, Swenson is pretty well known in the scientific geneticist community because he was the first person to sequence the genome of the Staph Aureus bacteria. He has authored over 125 peer-reviewed papers in scientific genetics journals. That is a very impressive record.

Swenson was interviewed by Joe Rogan in the video below.  Now what Swenson did was he took Ketchum’s raw data and sequenced the genome himself based on that. He focused on a single chromosome, chromosome 13.

He was able to completely replicate Ketchum’s results based on just looking at that one chromosome. He said it had a mix of human and nonhuman characteristics. He described it as a hybrid, and he said that at one time, some other creature must have bred with a human being (he felt that the other creature had to be a male, and it had to breed with a human female).

Rogan, incredulous, asked if it was possible that the results were faked by Ketchum. Swenson shook his head and said “You can’t fake DNA. There’s no way to do it. DNA is DNA.” As Swenson notes, this Sasquatch genome contains much genetic material that is completely unknown to man. You can’t fake that. You can’t make up new genetic sequences. There’s no way to do it. It’s utterly irrational, and it’s not even possible.

This however is the argument that the retards in our community (99% of the Bigfoot community is retarded) have been making. Yes, that is their argument: Ketchum faked the results.

The other retarded argument that they make is that the results were contaminated, but Ketchum has conclusively proved that the results were not contaminated. Anyway, even if they were contaminated, you would not get a result like this.

If, say, the results of the Sasquatch samples were really of bears, contamination would result in a finding of human + bear. So even if Ketchum’s material was contaminated, the results would just be horse + human, bear + human, racoon + human, etc. You follow? So the contamination argument is about as retarded as the hoaxing argument.

At one point, Swenson said, “There is an unknown mammal in the Pacific Northwest.” A stunned Rogan again asked Swenson later in the interview, “So is this proof that Bigfoot is real?” Swenson started to answer but stopped himself. He paused a bit and said, “Well it seems like it is, but as a scientist, I will not believe these things are real until one tries to bite my hand off.” In other words, Swenson is so incredulous of his own results that he still wants a body.

Unbelievably, the few skeptards who have heard about this new evidence from Dr. Swenson have mockingly laughed it off once again. They don’t care. They simply do not believe these things exist no matter how great evidence we throw in their faces. They, like 85% of the US public and nearly 100% of the scientific community, will not believe us until we show them a body.

All of their arguments about “no credible evidence” are crap. We have excellent video and photos that cannot be faked.

We have over 40,000 documented sightings including some by scientists, university and college professors, psychologists, police officers, wildlife biologists (we have several from them), park rangers, firefighters, forestry officials, and medical professionals. The skeptards laugh all of this off mockingly and say that all of these people are either lying, hallucinating or seeing other things and confusing them with Sasquatches. That argument is so preposterous that it is stupid, but this this is the received knowledge, believe it or not.

We have audio recordings that cannot be faked, hair, scat, footprints, handprints and recently teethmarks. Apparently all of this is either from other animals se we faked it. Recently we even acquired blood and even tissue. And now on top of all of that, we have have good hard genetic evidence. And still they laugh us off. What more do we have to do to prove these things exist to these folks?

Incidentally, Swenson, like so many other well credentialed believers, said that before he sequenced this genome, he had thought that Bigfoot was a hoax or a fraud. He no longer believes that.

Rick Dyer fails to come through. Dyer released two interesting videos recently, supposedly part of a three-part series on the San Antonio shooting incident, in which he apologized for all of his shenanigans and asked forgiveness of everyone for his endless bad behavior. This is par for the course for Rick, and it is nothing new.

He also explained in detail what happened on September 6, 2012 when he allegedly shot and killed a Bigfoot in San Antonio, Texas. This is also interesting, however since Rick has not yet offered any evidence that he committed this deed, this video was not very important in that sense either.

However, he did say one thing that I thought was very interesting. He said that all of the remaining footage that was cut out of Morgan Matthews’ Shooting Bigfoot movie will be released in a new edition of the movie to appear on TV  in December. He said that this remaining footage would prove conclusively that he shot and killed a Bigfoot on that day.

The fact that he was so matter of fact about it and attributed the coming footage to Matthews instead of himself is what caught my eye. I doubt if Rick is making this up off the top of his head. First of all, Rick has never been proven to have told one single lie yet about Morgan Matthews, nor has he made any wild and false predictions about him.

All of this makes me think that the release of the remaining footage by Matthews’ film company Minnow Films has at the very least been discussed if not actually planned and authorized.

It is notoriously hard to get Matthews to make any sort of statement about much of anything, and he has said very little about this movie other than some odd and cryptic statements.

Further and most spectacularly, he has refused to deny Rick’s charges that a Bigfoot was shot and killed in the filming of the movie or that those are actual Bigfoots running around in the footage at the end of the film. This makes no sense at all, and the skeptards as usual have absolutely no explanation for Matthews’ behavior whatsoever except to moronically accuse him of being a hoaxer.

Well, here it is January, December has come and gone, nd nothing happened. It would be very nice if Rick is telling the truth and we could see the rest of the footage that was cut out of Shooting Bigfoot and even nicer if it lent credence to Rick’s continuing claim that he shot a Bigfoot that day in Texas.

Rick also said that the Bigfoot body exists, but he has never had possession of it as the investors took possession of it immediately. He also promised that “this will all come out one day” and that the body would one day appear in public. I believe that if this event occurred, it makes sense that the investors immediately took control of the body.

Furthermore, Rick’s wildly dishonest behavior and scamming for a couple of years after the purported shooting makes sense if he never had the body in his possession. Let’s say the body was never in his possession. What would Rick do, being Rick Dyer? Pretend he had it and run around scamming people about the fake body for as long as he could milk money out of the con job, right? Well of course. After all, Mr. Dyer is an excellent con artist.

Nevertheless, it is important to note that there is still no good hard evidence the Rick killed a Bigfoot that night, although I believe there is excellent evidence that there were two Bigfoots running around in the woods there that eve, one running away from Rick and the other slapping down Morgan.

There is also excellent evidence that Rick was shooting live bullets at that thing with a real gun as per Matthews’ statement confirming those facts. The creature that Rick was shooting at was obviously a Bigfoot, as it could not be anything else. And it really does look like he shot the thing as evidenced by the moan we can hear in the movie. But did he kill it? This is what we don’t know. I would say that there is pretty good evidence that he wounded it though.

Also the thing that swats down Matthews, knocking him out with one mere slap of the land (!?) absolutely has to be a Bigfoot because there is no way that could possibly be a mask or a costume.

Furthermore, keep in mind that both of those things are running around in the woods at night with no flashlights! How does a human stunt man in a monkey suit do that?

So from Shooting Bigfoot, there is excellent evidence that the following things are true:

  1. The Tent Video is a real Bigfoot.
  2. The thing running away from Rick later on is a real Bigfoot.
  3. Rick is firing live ammo at the Bigfoot with a real gun (Matthews’s testimony).
  4. One of the shots appears to have hit the Bigfoot, at the very least wounding it.
  5. Another Bigfoot appears out of nowhere and slaps Matthews down onto the ground with an open palm, knocking him out.

The things that are yet unknown and unproven are:

  1. Rick actually killed that Bigfoot he was chasing with one of his shots.
  2.  Any of the events described by Rick after he supposedly shot the Bigfoot actually occurred.
  3.  A dead Bigfoot was retained, transported and stored anywhere after the shooting.
  4.  Musky Allen, whose testimony has not yet been impeached, actually saw a dead Bigfoot from the shooting at a US government facility in Nevada.
  5. Anyone at all has ever been in possession of a dead Bigfoot from the shooting, much less that anyone currently retains one.

In other words, what we are dealing here with the San Antonio Bigfoot story is once again another Bigfoot body story, of which there have been quite a few down through the years.

So far, good hard evidence of any of these bodies has been lacking, though some of the stories are quite intriguing. It is interesting that in all of these cases, hard proof of the existence of a body has not been forthcoming, yet nevertheless, skeptics have presented absolutely zero evidence that any of the body stories are untrue, frauds or hoaxes other than Rick’s two fake Bigfoot bodies.

We don’t know if any of these body stories are true. None have been proven, and yet none have been disproven either. As with so many things in life, it is simply completely up in the air whether any of the shooting and body stories are true.

In order for Rick to prove his claim, he is going to have to present more evidence in the form of:

  1. Additional footage from the Shooting Bigfoot movie.
  2. A body itself retained, if at all, probably by investors and not Rick.
  3. Any other probitive evidence.

So far, Dyer has failed to present us with this evidence. Until Rick can show us the monkey, this is just another wild Bigfoot story.

27 Comments

Filed under Animals, Apes, Bigfoot, Canada, Cinema, Genetics, Mammals, Midwest, North America, Northeast, Regional, Science, South, Texas, USA, Utah, West, Wild

Bigfoot News September 9, 2015

Great news! Melba Ketchum’s DNA results independently confirmed! Apparently another lab operating completely independently of Melba Ketchum’s group has independently confirmed her much-criticized results on Bigfoot DNA. Now we have two completely independent science groups who have replicated DNA for Bigfoots, first Ketchum’s and then Ketchum’s result was replicated by another group. Reportedly, the other team replicates Ketchum’s results in their entirety.

If you read me on here, you would know that I always said that Melba was right. In part that was due to my good friendship with Richard Stubstad, who assured me that Melba’s methods were good and that there was no way on Earth she would engage in scientific fraud. Also I know a scientist who ran all of her data and said that it looked out to him. Another scientist also run her DNA and said that all the results checked out. I told you so. You guys should listen to me? Why don’t you listen to me?

Best version of Prince Edward Island Bigfoot video ever released! After months of hard work, Nominay has just released the finest version of the PEI Bigfoot ever. This is a legendary Bigfoot film. An indie film producer was shooting a monster movie on Prince Edward Island. As one of the actors was running across a clearing, a Bigfoot suddenly ran out of the woods behind him to the right of the viewer.

The Bigfoot then races across the clearing, partly on two legs and partly on four, at an amazingly fast speed. The speed of the Bigfoot has been calculated and it is running as fast as a competitive sprinter. The speed is even maintained when it goes effortlessly on all fours. There is no way on Earth that a competitive sprinter could run that fast or go down on all fours without slowing up in a bulky monkey suit.

Furthermore, the size of the Bigfoot has been calculated at ~9 feet tall. It also appears to have a massive weight. How do you get a stunt actor to put on a bulky monkey suit, run across a clearing as fast as a competitive sprinter, go down on all fours without losing speed, all the while somehow being 9 feet tall. How do you find a 9 foot tall stunt man. How do you make a shorter stunt man appear to be 9 feet tall. How do you make this stunt man appear so bulky that he appears to weigh 700 pounds?

None of this makes any sense.

Of course, most Bigfoot footage released by indie film producers turns out to be hoaxed, usually in a sleazy attempt by the director to gain publicity for themselves. Many have been much less than forthcoming with investigators. The famous Redwood footage comes to mind. The director, now in film school, simply refuses to discuss the movie at all. It seems almost certain to be a hoax. And many of these film industry hoaxes come to light after a while; that is, the director fesses up that it was a hoax.

None of that seems to be the case with this video. The directors were apparently making cheap straight to video movies and have no need or desire for publicity. They have cooperated completely with investigators. Investigators felt that they were credible. The attitude of the filmmakers towards the even in the footage seems to be utter bafflement. They have no idea what ran across that clearing that day.

Nominay has improved this video so much that it is nearly a brand new video. All serious Bigfooters need to check this new video out.

The original version on Nominay’s fine site is here.

Bigfoot hairs for sale. I have a few Bigfoot hairs gathered in the Michigan Peninsula a while back. They look exactly like those crinkly, pubic hair-type hairs that Erickson collected for Melba’s project. I also have a photo that seems to prove that they are Bigfoot hairs. I used to have a similar photo of a human hair for comparison that showed that this hair is absolutely not a human hair. The only thing it remotely resembled is bear hair, but the hair is lighter brown and all of the bears in the UP have dark brown or black hair.

The man who sent it to me is a very good researcher and he spent a long time studying these hairs. He is quite an expert on Bigfoot hairs. Photo comes with it. I haven’t the faintest idea what to charge. Make offer.

2015: Science amidst the rubble. The response of the mainstream scientific community to Melba’s paper was simply despicable. They refused to even consider it, read it or see if the results were right or wrong. They dismissed it out of hand without even checking to see if the results were right or not.

I know some of the scientists and science writers who engaged in this nonsense, and they are very famous people. They all have Wikipedia entries and are considered top scientists in their field, mainly Paleontology. The science writer is one of the top science writers in the US. The fact that all of them simply dismissed this report out of hand shows us that something is horrifically wrong with science in the West.

Not only are almost all of the biggest scientific figures massive asshats, blowhards, and all-round horrible human beings, but the very structure of scientific inquiry itself seems to be compromised by a new mentality I call Scientific Fundamentalism.

Scientific Fundamentalism, which almost all modern scientists practice, elevates science into a religion itself. The revealed truths are whatever scientific consensus is. Anything attempting to overthrow consensus is treated as apostasy or heresy is in religion. I am surprised the scientists have not tried to kill some of the fringe science guys who are trying to topple these idiotic Edifices of Consensus.

Scientific consensus operates on the utterly insane notion that whatever the scientific consensus is at the moment, these are the facts for any and all of time. This once again is similar to religion in which the revealed facts in the holy books are true for all of time when they were written down and can never be changed, updated or modified.

I know, I know…

Scientists are always lying and saying that all scientific consensus is open to inquiry, that nothing is really true, that everything is just true for now, that all consensus is up for grabs and only a paper away from being toppled, and that science is all about perpetual doubt and endless inquiry. Those are their glorious mantras they repeat to make themselves look good but none of them are true.

But the truth is that all of this is lies. Scientific consensus is indeed treated as Truth with a capital t, and no it is not up for grabs, and no it’s not even just true for now. Go find some scientists and talk to them. Throw out some scientific consensuses and see how many are “true for now” and ready to be toppled at any time, if only disproving conclusions are presented. It’s about 0%.

Another fake mantra of scientists is all about perpetual doubt. Oh really now? And is scientific consensus open to being doubted? Are you kidding? Anyone who tries gets burned to death at one of their “empirical” witch trials. Is science really all about endless inquiry and curiosity? Hardly. When most consensus is walled off from further inquiry, and there’s nothing to be curious about anymore as the consensus has been proven true, there’s not a lot of curiosity or even inquiry going on in science anymore.

What is going on in science nowadays? A lot of conservatism. Granted a certain amount of conservatism is warranted, as we would not want rational science to be overrun with nutcases and their pseudoscientific nonsense. But scientists are already 100X more conservative than they need to be. Surely we could let up on the conservatism a bit and still be rigorous enough to keep the nonsense out?

There is also a serious problem with the abuse of the term pseudoscience. Pseudoscience is probably best described as scientific inquiry that does not even follow the scientific method. If a scientist uses proper method but simply comes up with false results by accident, overeagerness or misinterpretation, that’s hardly pseudoscience. He simply got the wrong result. Happens all the time. So what?

If a scientist is promoting a theory that seems to have good evidence yet the evidence is not yet of sufficient quality or quantity to convince the Vatican of Science, that’s hardly pseudoscience. A more proper term might be Fringe Science. The data and evidence have been assembled, hypotheses have been tested, studies have been undertaken, and conclusions have been reached, often in a high-quality manner. But it’s just not good enough for science, often because science has its eyes shut and its fingers in its ears. Just because science won’t accept the conclusions of something doesn’t mean it’s pseudoscience. And what of that term pseudoscience? Why such an arrogant, snide and vicious term? What’s the point of that? Are the scientists trying to start a war?

There is yet another problem with this loopy notion of pseudoscience for unproven theory. I am 100% certain, and I will swear over my dead body that I know for a fact that certain things that are now called pseudoscience are actually true. And you are reading a column about one of those things right now. These things simply exist, full stop, and it will be proven soon enough. There’s absolutely no doubt about that. If they exist, they will be revealed. There won’t be any way to stop that.

And when they are revealed, then what? Then automagically “pseudoscience” gets elevated to proven scientific fact. There’s something wrong with that model right there. Pseudoscience ought to be the realm of the wreckage of theory, hypotheses and inquiries that are bad more because they are not following scientific model than anything else.

Anything in pseudoscience should be so bizarre, idiotic or unscientific that it could never make it to proven fact. When you start having “pseudoscientific” theory elevated to proven fact, you’ve got an awful problem with your whole notion of pseudoscience, and you need to send it back for a rewrite or trash it all together.

Yet another problem is that modern scientists have turned into Douchebags with a capital d. Practitioners of modern science are some of the meanest, most vicious and downright evil people out there. This petty evil-mindedness stems completely from pride and from nothing else. Science has decided to invest its very self when arrogance such that the two are one and the same. To be a scientist nowadays is to be an arrogant ass. Humble scientist is an oxymoron.

Scientists behave this way supposedly because they are “waging war” against some Evil Entity called Pseudoscience. In order to put on battle gear to fight this war against Existential Evil, many scientists have armed themselves with vast amounts of Douchebaggery. What’s the point of that? Why be a Douchebag?

Yet when it comes to Fringe Science (a valid subfield of science by the way) we see scientific Assholery around the globe, from sea to scientific sea, from snide lab workers to snarling university professors to sneering lecture circuit celebrities. I am having a hard time understanding this. This war against the Evil of Pseudoscience is so important that in order to fight it, scientists must act like the worst people on Earth and engage in behavior that is low, depraved, disgusting and even embarrassing? Why? Is it really that important?

We have yet another problem and that is arrogance. Sooner rather than later, some of these “pseudoscientific” claims will become proven science. Do you think that even one of these scientific Beavis and Buttheads who nearly drove fringe scientists to nervous breakdown and suicide will apologize?

Are you kidding? Science is now the realm where arrogance crowned supreme. It’s worse than Hollywood. Even more appallingly, increasingly, science is Hollywood, and that’s probably the root of a lot of the problem right there. Once again we see a parallel to religion. Ever noticed how arrogant the believer is, how certain he is of his Truth. This is the way the scientist acts towards his precious Consensus.

What do you think will happen when, in the future, some of this pseudoscience is proven fact, which of course we know will happen with 100% certainty? Do you think even one of these strutting jerkoffs will apologize for even one second? Will you hear a single, “Hey, we were wrong. We’re really sorry about that. You guys were right along.”

We will never hear this. Not one scientist on the face of the Earth will ever say this to us. Why not? Because they’re not human enough. Science lost its human face some time past, and it’s gone all asshattery all the time for decades now. In order to practice mainstream science nowadays, first you must lose your humanity. That’s the first thing that has to go. We can’t have any of those measly, petty human emotions getting in the way or Revealed Scientific Truth, now can we?

47 Comments

Filed under Animals, Anthropology, Apes, Assholes, Bigfoot, Canada, Mammals, North America, Paleontology, Regional, Science, Wild

Bigfoot News July 18, 2015

analluv writes:

btw any Bigfoot news?

The only real Bigfoot news out these days is this Mitch Townsend fellow and the bone piles he found. I think it is quite obvious that those are Sasquatch bone piles.

For one thing, at the Alberta Habituation Site, the Sasquatches were raiding the trapper’s traps, stealing the coyotes out of the traps and eating them. They would just plop down right next to the trap and eat that knaw the meat off those bones like it was a spare rib. So I know that they also knaw the meat right off bones. And I heard that in the back country of the AHS where they supposedly winter way back in the thickest, nastiest stuff you could imagine, there are all sorts of weird things like caves and lots of “piles of bones.” I had no idea what these bone piles were when I was told, but now with Townsend’s work, this is all starting to make sense.

Rick Dyer has released a couple of new videos that seem to tie up a lot of loose ends in his San Antonio Bigfoot story. He fesses up to all sorts of nefarious behaviors, seems to show remorse, and displays a wide range of emotions. I am not sure how sociopathic he is after all. I think he is just a narcissist.

You can find them on the Rick Dyer page on Youtube. You won’t find these videos interesting at all if you reject that theory that the Tent Video and Shooting Bigfoot footage show real Bigfoots, that Rick was shooting live bullets at a Bigfoot and may have even hit it, or that Morgan Matthews was slapped down by a Bigfoot in the movie. You certainly won’t like the video if you think he retained a body.

Melba Ketchum is working on the DNA for those weird conehead skulls found in Peru. I believe her hypothesis was that these were Amerindian skulls that had been reshaped via tooling. I am not sure what she has come up with.

Ketchum and David Paulides have supposedly completely dropped out of the Bigfoot game per their own statements. Particularly Paulides says he is done with Bigfoot and he is moving on. Paulides isn’t the most honest fellow around, and he isn’t telling the truth there either. The truth is that Paulides is continuing to do a lot of Bigfoot work under the cover of stating publicly that he is done with Bigfoot. Melba has not explicitly stated that she is done with Bigfoot, but she is mostly just lying low. I assure you that both of them are still very much in the game.

Paulides is now running a Kickstarter for a new 411 movie based on his 411 books. See, I told you he was still in the game.

Melba Ketchum and David Paulides never had any sort of romantic or dating relationship. I may have implied but not explicitly stated that in prior posts. That information came to me from the late Bobbie Short. We were talking about Paulides and Melba and Bobbie said, “That’s a couple, you know. They’re a couple. They’ve been dating for some time now.” I was shocked of course, but she insisted that it was true, and Bobbie tended to be right about things.

I recently talked to an anonymous source who knows both of them very well. This person insists that there has never been any romantic or sexual relationship between those two ever, and this person should know. Apologies to anyone who may have been offended by anything I may have implied.

As long as I am slinging National Enquirer type dirt about, I may as well speak well of the dead. Of course, the dead have no rights, so I can gossip away. One of these parties has now sadly passed on, but the other one is still kicking, very loudly in his usual foghorn voice.

By now all of you know that Bobbie Short and Peter Byrne were involved for a while, right? You don’t? Well listen up then. In fact, they were so involved that Byrne moved into Bobbie’s home in San Diego for a few years. So they were a couple for a while, and now you know. Go sell it to the tabloids. Bobbie once sighed and spoke to me of what she called “the narcissistic men” who crowded the Bigfoot field. No doubt she was speaking from personal experience then. My source for this dirt? Anonymous and impeccable, as usual.

Best wishes to Bobbie Short, wherever she may be.

 

11 Comments

Filed under Animals, Apes, Bigfoot, Canada, Mammals, Regional, USA, Wild

Bigfoot News May 15, 2015

Sorry for the lack of updates. I have been very tired and busy doing other things. I don’t get paid to write these updates, so they are low priority. Plus not much has been going on lately.

Major breaking new Bigfoot story! I am not sure if the other Bigfoot sites have covered this yet, but there is a huge breaking Bigfoot story out of Washington State. A college professor from the Continuing Education Program at Centralia College named Mitchel Townsend has been studying mysterious piles of bones that have been found in the Mount St. Helens area. The bones are those of prey animals that something has killed and eaten. Wild animals of any sort do not stack bones in piles. They usually scatter them all over the place. Bone stacking can only be done by a hominid.

But the great news is they have gnaw marks on them. The professor had the gnaw marks examined via forensic dentistry and the conclusion was that the bones had been gnawed on by some sort of a hominid. Not only that, but it seemed to be human because of the way it was gnawing on the bones. Furthermore, it left triangular imprints like hominids do, not the round imprints that apes leave.

No predator or tool markings were found on the bones and the local Fish and Wildlife scientists ruled out all natural predators known in the area.

After the first site found by the professor, his students found two more similar bone piles on the south side of Mt. St. Helens with the exact same characteristics. But at the two new sites, the team found huge 16 inch human like footprints. Calculations based on the prints and the stride indicated that the hominid had to be 8 feet, 8 inches tall. The footprints were wider and broader than human prints and lacked an arch.

“If you add it all up, you have an 8-foot, 8-inch tall creature that is killing animals at different areas of Mount St. Helens with its bare hands, chewing them up, literally skin and bones and all, and spitting them out between its legs,” Townsend said.

Wow.

The tooth marks were incisors and canines and 90% of them were outside of the human range as they were too large to be from any possible human being. The bones also showed signs of bone peeling, which is only done by humans. The teeth had an odd double arch structure that closely resembled Neandertal teeth.

“My theory is it’s not an ape, it’s a hybrid that has been interbreeding with Native Americans for the last 80,000 years,” Townsend said. “That’s why it is so smart and it has human teeth.”

Right. Well, we always knew Bigfoots are not apes.

Townsend will publish his findings in a research paper and he challenged any scientist anywhere to prove him wrong.

“The evidence stands on its own, you prove the evidence wrong,” he said, adding that the bones would be made available for examination to any scientist who wanted to examine the remains. “We’ve put thousands of hours in this. We just want to give this to the world and the scientific community free of charge to add to the scientific body of knowledge.”

There are photos to go along with this story and I will see if I can dredge some up for you.

18 Comments

Filed under Animals, Apes, Bigfoot, Mammals, North America, Regional, USA, Washington, West, Wild

About Matt Moneymaker

I understand that Matt Moneymaker of the BFRO has recently been diagnosed as having Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

But we already knew that, right?

The thing about NPD is that he is probably not going to get better. These people typically do not get better. The reason is because they do not want to get better. Generally, the problem is everyone else and not them. That right there is the essence of the disorder itself. So if you don’t think there is anything wrong with you, why would you want to get better? Another problem is that NPD’s usually enjoy being narcissistic. They get off on it. It’s fun. It’s the way they like to live. And they can’t see that it causes any problems or if it does, they don’t care because it’s too much fun to change and they like being that way.

There are some NPD’s that get into therapy. Therapy with them is typically difficult and long, but results can be achieved after some time.

7 Comments

Filed under Bigfoot, Mental Illness, Narcissistic, Personality Disorders, Psychology, Psychopathology, Psychotherapy

Bigfoot News November 19, 2014

More on the Rick Dyer claimed Bigfoot killing. This saga is continuing. Rick now claims that he and his team killed two Bigfoots at this location in Pennsylvania. You might want to head on over to Randy’s site, as he is keeping up on this story more than I am. I am not really interested in another one of these crazy Dyer stories, so I will just hand it over to Randy and let him take the ball. Randy insists it is another hoax, and indeed, every time Rick claims to have killed a Bigfoot, it ends up being a hoax. The best predictor of present behavior is past behavior. And Rick’s record in this regard does not inspire confidence. I have some photos below of Rick’s latest adventure.

However, Walter Shrum issued an angry video claiming that I lied when I quoted him in an interview I did with him. He said that that tarp over the Sasquatch was clear and not blue and he claimed that I accused him of saying it was a prop. I never accused Shrum of saying that. Mr. Shrum has problems with reading comprehension.

Walter Shrum interview. I would like to clarify what Shrum did say to me in his interview.

He stated that he, his wife and a grandson drove four hours to see the Sasquatch at Rick’s request. When they got there, the Sasquatch was wrapped in a tarp. Walter said it was the same blue tarp that you can see on Rick’s photos, but when you get up next to the tarp, it is actually more transparent than it seems on photos. He described it as semi-transparent. They were all issued surgeon’s masks and were given some sort of Vicks Vaporub to rub all over themselves. He said that he could not tell if the Sasquatch had a smell about it as they could not smell anything with the Vicks stuff all over them.

He said he was able to get down to within about two feet of the Sasquatch in the tarp. He got a very good look at it from the feet up to the shins. He said the feet were hairless on the bottom but haired on top and on the shins. He did not describe much more of it. He said he tried to get a good look at the face, but for some reason, he could not see it well. It was at this part in the interview that I decided that this tarp was maybe not so transparent as it was being made out to be. He described the central part of the body around the chest as being very wide.

Shrum also said that the Sasquatch was turned on its side but with the top part of the body facing upwards. He said he thought there was an actual Sasquatch in the tarp based on what he observed. Shrum did not feel that it was a fake. He described it as “a hairy man.”

This was the extent of what Shrum told me in his interview. I honestly do not see what all the fuss is about between Shrum and me except that Rick is trying to stir stuff up like he always does.

Photos of Tarpsquatch episode. Below are a number of photos of the latest purported Dyer Sasquatch body. In some of these photos, I refer to the object as a Sasquatch. I do not mean that it is really a Sasquatch. Maybe it is, maybe it isn’t. I do think that Rick has something. He either has a dead Sasquatch or he has another doll like he had last time.

But I have no idea what is in that tarp, and Rick has a very bad record as far as these things go. In fact, 100% of the time he has claimed he had a body, the whole story was either an obvious hoax or was so wrapped up in a hoax that no conclusions could be drawn and at any rate, no body ever shows up. Bottom line is every time in the past Rick says he has a body, it turns out he doesn’t have squat. So will this time be different? I have no idea, but look at the law of averages.

Rick and the gang with masks they put on to protect themselves from any diseases the Sasquatch might have.

Rick and the gang with masks on.

In the photo above, Rick and his crew don masks to guard against any diseases the Sasquatch might have.

Tarpsquatch at the campground.

Tarpsquatch at the campground.

The photo above shows the object wrapped under some sort of a tarp at the campground. The object appears to be in a fetal position.

Sasquatch dead in the forest.

Sasquatch dead in the forest.

This photo shows the purported Sasquatch after it was shot dead in the forest. Biff is pointing a rifle at the object. A tree appears to have fallen on the object. I am having a very hard time making out the contours of this object or seeing any identifiable features in it. Maybe my graphics guy can help me.

Sasquatch dead in the forest. Another view.

Sasquatch dead in the forest. Another view.

Here is another photo of the subject after it was reportedly killed by the men. Rick and Biff are pointing rifles at the subject, which seems to be under a fallen tree. Once again, I have a hard time making out identifiable features on the object.

Tarpsquatch piled with ice.

Tarpsquatch piled with ice.

This is a photo of the object wrapped in a tarp with ice piled on it for preservation. I am not sure where this photo was taken, but it looks like it was taken in someone’s yard.

Tarpsquatch and ice again.

Looks like the back of their truck or van.

This photo looks like the back of an SUV piled high with ice.

Sasquatch wrapped in tarp.

Sasquatch wrapped in tarp.

This photo shows the object wrapped in a tarp. This seems to have a similar shape to the object in the campground photo.

Dyer tying the Sasquatch in the tarp.

Dyer tying the Sasquatch in the tarp.

This photos shows Dyer tying the tarp on the object after he wrapped the object up in it.

Artist rendering of Sasquatch wrapped up in a tarp.

Artist rendering of Sasquatch wrapped up in a tarp.

This photo was drawn for me by my graphics girl who has seen Sasquatches in the wild numerous times. She told me when this story first broke that she thought Rick probably did have a Sasquatch. She said it is probably not that difficult to kill one of these things. “I probably could have killed a few of them myself,” she told me.

We have not discussed the story much since, but she recently sent me this drawing of what she thinks the object in the tarp looks like based on its contours in the tarp. Make what you will of this. That is either a drawing of the Sasquatch she thought Rick killed or of the Sasquatch doll he has made, based on her artist’s eye. I am not going to comment on this photo of all except that I can see how she came to the conclusions that she did.

Enlargement of Sasquatch Ontario photo. I released this photo in my last report. My graphics gal found this screen grab while going through Sasquatch Ontario’s films. This one was taken when Paterson left his camera out for a while. When he came back, he said there were numerous photos on the camera. He said that the Sasquatches must have used the camera somehow. Perhaps they figured out how to work it. That seems completely insane, but whatever. There were a lot of weird photos on there, mostly closeups of the eyes of numerous creatures in the woods. One of the photos was this odd photo below.

This is a photo of what is apparently two Sasquatches in Canada. There is a small one at the top, once again covering its face with its forearm. On the left is the shoulder of another Sasquatch.

This is a photo of what is apparently two Sasquatches in Canada. There is a small one at the top, once again covering its face with its forearm. On the left is the shoulder of another Sasquatch.

I could not make out anything in this photo, so I sent it to my graphics lady. She sent it back marked up.

Markup of a possible woolly Sasquatch baby.

Click to enlarge. Markup of a possible woolly Sasquatch baby.

I have no idea if that photo is what my graphics woman says it is, but it is certainly possible. I will leave it up to you to decide and I will take no stance on this photo for now.

That’s it for now. More later!

83 Comments

Filed under Animals, Apes, Bigfoot, Canada, Mammals, North America, Northeast, Regional, USA, Wild

Bigfoot News November 14, 2014

Rick Dyer Sasquatch kill – continuing story. The story about the supposed Sasquatch kill by Rick Dyer is ongoing. I really urge you to follow it over at Randy’s blog as he keeps up on it far better than I do. His commenters are horrific, but I think Randy himself is a great guy.

I spoke with Walter Shrum, who was one of nine people who were able to see the Sasquatch. However, I must note that Walter saw it inside the blue tarp like the rest of us did. However, he did say that the tarp was somewhat transparent (which is not obvious in the photos) and he could see through the tarp somewhat. Walter feels that this definitely looked like a Sasquatch. He described it as “looking like hairy man” that was “very wide.” On the other hand, viewing it through the tarp, he was not able to see it as well as he could have outside the tarp, and I feel that it is possible that he could have been looking at a prop instead of a Bigfoot.

Walter also told me that he would not be in on a hoax in any way, shape or form. He said that if Rick asked him to be part of a hoax or if he discovered this was a hoax, he would simply refuse to be a part of it because he doesn’t want to taint himself with that, and that sort of thing goes against his strong Christian morals. Yet he did not get a good look at the object, and he could well have been looking at a prop in that tarp.

Shrum also stated that Rick Dyer is the nicest guy you have ever met, and Shrum thinks Rick is a great guy.

Of course many people say this on meeting Dyer, as he can be very charming and gregarious, as these types so often are. We’ve known that since Cleckley, right? I mean, that’s a hallmark trait.

There is not much else to report about this purported Sasquatch kill except that Dyer is promising a press conference in February (Where have we heard that before?) which will apparently be in Georgia. The body is said to be safe in Georgia at the moment.

I would like to add my standard disclaimer here due to the incessant trolls: there is not yet any good, hard, solid, convincing evidence that Rick actually killed a Sasquatch in Pennsylvania at the end of October.

Once again, the onus is on Rick. Prove it, Rick.

Amazing new Sasquatch photos uncovered! All of the photos below came to me via Ray Crowe. They all appeared in his great book, Bigfoot Behavior. I cannot recommend this book highly enough. If you own one Sasquatch book, it might as well be this one.

Ray Crowe's superb book, Bigfoot Behavior. I cannot recommend this book highly enough.

Ray Crowe’s superb book, Bigfoot Behavior. I cannot recommend this book highly enough.

Ray is not a born writer, but he has taught himself to write. At any rate, he has developed his own unique voice that stays constant through all of his writing. I actually enjoy his charming, whimsical and always somewhat skeptical authorial voice. He is a delight to read.

Closeup of the northern Arizona Sasquatch.

Closeup of the northern Arizona Sasquatch. Copyright Lyle Vann.

This is a photo of a Sasquatch taken in Northern Arizona. This is one amazing photo. It was shot by a man named Lyle Vann, who has copyrighted it. The date on the photo is December 2002. As far as I am concerned, that is a Sasquatch, no two ways about it. It’s not a man in a suit. I suppose it could be a statue, but I have never seen a Sasquatch statue that looks this good. The resemblance to Derek Randles’ Ridge Watcher Sasquatch is remarkable. I know nothing about Mr. Vann or the circumstances surrounding this photo except that he is some sort of a Sasquatch researcher.

This is the original of the newspaper photo and the resolution is much better.

This is the original of the newsletter photo, and the resolution is much better.

Dennis W. Marsh is the man who is said to have reported two Sasquatch killings, the first in Wyoming in 1968 and the second in Alabama at a later date. This is a part series of photos he took of a Sasquatch he spotted south of Fayetteville, Arkansas. Once again, as far as I am concerned, that is simply a Sasquatch, especially with the other photos to go along with it. The figure is much too large to be a man in a suit. The other three photos are described below.

Crowe knew Marsh and felt that he was credible, but Ray had not talked to him in 11 years. Ray forwarded me the last communication he had with the man, and here it is:

* 8/28/03 (Dennis W. Marsh)
Been wondering how your research and meetings are going. Rocky called me today, and said that there were some guys that came into his restaurant today and told him about a sighting on their farm. They were cutting trees down, clearing the land to build a house, and when they stopped cutting to take a break, something threw a rock about the size of a 5 gallon bucket at them.

They got to looking around and saw an 8 to 9 foot Bigfoot looking at them, and then it started throwing sticks and limbs at them. They said all they did was to leave the area. I’m not sure if Rocky is going to call the government or not about it being there, so I do not know if he will take it down (shoot). If we do, I need to know how am I going to keep the blood fresh. I am going to do my best to get skin and hair from it also. The Feds lied to us again. They said there were no more of them in that area.

Four stories from unknown newsletter. The first one is Dennis' photo of the Sasquatch in Fayetteville, Arkansas in 1997. The upper right shows the Sasquatch photographed in North Arizona which resembles Derek Randles' Ridgewalker

Click to enlarge. Four stories from unknown newsletter. The first one is Dennis Marsh’s photo of the Sasquatch in Fayetteville, Arkansas in 1997. The upper right shows the Lyle Vann’s Sasquatch photographed in North Arizona which resembles Derek Randles’ Ridge Watcher.

This is a much smaller version of the same photo above. One of the photos apparently came from a website called Bruneidirect.com, which is a website promoting the small nation of Brunei nestled in northeastern Sarawak in Malaysia. The photo at the bottom right is a feature piece on Lyle Vann. The bottom left photo is of some bizarre skeleton of a sea creature that washed up on the beach somewhere. It has nothing to do with Sasquatches.

Purported killed Sasquatch north of Casper Wyoming 1968

Purported killed Sasquatch north of Casper, Wyoming in 1968. One of the men with the gun may be Dennis Marsh, the man said to have helped kill the Sasquatch.

This is an absolutely amazing of a dead Sasquatch said to have been shot dead north of Casper, Wyoming in 1968. Dennis W. Marsh, the same man who photographed the Sasquatch in Arkansas, is said to have shot and killed this Sasquatch.

What is fascinating is that this is an old story in Sasquatch lore than has been going around the community forever. I discussed it in my long piece listing all reports of claimed Sasquatch kills, bodies, burials and funerals up to the present. The photo goes along with this story:

1968: North of Casper, Wyoming. Three men, including Dennis W. Marsh, were hired by a rancher to kill a Sasquatch that was killing his cows and sheep by tearing off their legs. Afterward, the body was picked up by a government helicopter and taken to a research facility in Almogordo, New Mexico to be autopsied and studied. Government coverup. Reported by Ray Crowe.

As you can see, this is another story of a government coverup. Apparently the government found out about this killed Sasquatch quite quickly, rushed to the scene, grabbed the Sasquatch and then sent a helicopter to come pick it up and haul it off to a government lab in Almogordo, New Mexico. I do not know much about that region, but I believe that where we have nuclear weapons testing labs. This is also where the first nuclear bombs were tested before we used them on Japan.

Marsh said his companions killed another Sasquatch in Alabama at some later date and this time the government got mad at him and told him to quit killing these things or else. The disposition of the Alabama kill or the circumstances surrounding it are not known.

Dennis photographed this Sasquatch in Fayetteville Arkansas in 1997.

Dennis Marsh photographed this Sasquatch in Fayetteville, Arkansas in 1997.

I really do think this is a Sasquatch, especially with the other photos to go along with it and the fascinating Wyoming photo. Notice the huge size of the figure and the odd stance it is taken as it appears to be frozen. The resemblance to the Hovey Sasquatch is striking. That’s not a man in a suit. I guess it could be a statue, but then he had to make two other statues for the other photos, and that makes no sense.

Arkansas Sasquatch uproots a huge stump to throw at Dennis.

Arkansas Sasquatch uproots a huge stump to throw at Dennis Marsh.

The Sasquatch in this photo is said to be pulling a huge stump out of the ground to throw it at Marsh. Amazingly, the photo appears to be of just that. That figure is massive. That is not a man in a suit. It could be a statue, but now we have a man making multiple statues.

Arkansas Sasquatch walking away. Notice the resemblance to Patty.

Arkansas Sasquatch walking away from Dennis Marsh. Notice the resemblance to Patty.

This amazing photo shows the same Sasquatch, this time walking away. It is indistinct, but I call your attention to the right leg that is kicked up in back at precisely the same angle that Patty’s is. If you have seen Thinker Thunker’s video showing how humans and Sasquatch walk completely differently and how the Sasquatch gait cannot be reproduced by humans, we see a perfect image of that right here.

Note also the right foot lifting up. Remember in the Patty footage when she lifts up her feet as she walks away. The soles of her feet appeared white, precisely the same color as this Sasquatch. This one actually could be a dead ringer for Patty. Sasquatch palms also appear white in a lot of footage in a similar anatomical development. Talking with a friend of mine who works at the Smithsonian, he said it was his opinion that the soles were not really white but instead they may be light grey. He felt the palms might be the same color, but he was clear that neither the palms nor the soles were actually white. He had an explanation for why the grey bottom skin on the extremities looks white, but it eludes me at the moment.

A few photos here. First a smaller photo of apparently Dennis and another man with the Sasquatch Dennis shot in 1968. Bottom left is a sideways view of the 1997 Arkansas Sasquatch walking away. Bottom right is the 1997 Arkansas Sasquatch uprooting a stump to throw at a human.

A few photos here. First a smaller photo of a man who may be Dennis Marsh and another man with the Sasquatch Marsh helped shoot in 1968. Bottom left is a sideways view of the 1997 Arkansas Sasquatch walking away from Marsh. Bottom right is the 1997 Arkansas Sasquatch uprooting a stump to throw at Marsh.

Here are the same photos in their original form as they came to me from Crowe. The two bottom photos were turned on their sides and we had to right them. We had to blow up the Wyoming photo. I think Marsh may be the man with the rifle. I am not sure who the man with the pistol is.

Self-explanatory markup of the Wyoming Killed Sasquatch photo from 1968. The Sasquatch appears to be covering its face with its arms in a very similar fashion as the famous video of Matilda the Sleeping Sasquatch out of Kentucky 2005.

Self-explanatory markup of the Wyoming Killed Sasquatch photo from 1968. The Sasquatch appears to be covering its face with its arms in a very similar fashion as the famous video of Matilda the Sleeping Sasquatch out of Kentucky 2005.

One of my sources does excellent graphics work, and he manipulated all of these photos for me. He also marked up the photo above. The markup is based on his theory and is not mine. I do not know what to say about this theory except that it is possible that the markup is just what we are seeing here.

Here is his statement about the markup above:

OK, so here is a diagram/comparison of what I think is most likely the image configuration. In the wild, I and others have observed that the Sas often cover mouth and nose reflexively to hide. The dying Sas probably did the same.

This is a photo of what is apparently two Sasquatches in Canada. There is a small one at the top, once again covering its face with its forearm. On the left is the shoulder of another Sasquatch.

This is a photo of what is apparently two Sasquatches in Canada. There is a small one at the top, once again covering its face with its forearm. On the left is the shoulder of another Sasquatch.

I have no idea what is in this photo above. Here is my graphics guy’s description of it:

The other image here is of a very wooly Canadian Sas similar to Matilda @ Kentucky. This young Sas is holding the right hand over nose and mouth. To the left is the shoulder of an adult Sas. In upper center is the squinty right eye, the left eye (also squinting) is ringed with lighter fur. Below the eyes is the right hand, fingers bent. The right pinky is below the left eye. It is a large image, so zoom out a bit to see it.

I cannot see any of these things that he refers to. Hopefully I can get a marked up image of this photo also. I also know nothing whatsoever about the back story of this very odd photo.

The end.

I have quite a bit more to write about (a ton of notes), but I will save that hopefully for a later post.

45 Comments

Filed under Animals, Apes, Asia, Bigfoot, Government, Malaysia, Mammals, North America, Northeast, Regional, SE Asia, South, USA, West, Wild, Wyoming

Bigfoot News November 10, 2014

Here is my statement on the recent purported killing of a Bigfoot in Pennsylvania by Rick Dyer.

Statement on the recent Bigfoot shooting:

A friend asks: Any new Bigfoot news? What’s your opinion on Dyer’s latest claim on killing another Bigfoot?

My response: Not much in the way of new Bigfoot news. I do not know what to think about it.

A good friend of mine named Walter Shrum is said to have seen it, and he reportedly drove four hours to go look at it, and he swears to God it is real. For the life of me I do not understand why he would lie, but maybe I don’t know him as well as I think I do. From what I know of him, he seems to be a very decent, straight up, rather conservative “redneck” rural American with strong Protestant Christian beliefs. He does indeed reside in Southwest Pennsylvania where this Bigfoot was supposedly shot.

Another good friend of mine, Rex Dutton, saw a photo of it via some photo share program that Rick showed him and issued a description of it. Here is Rex’s description along with what seems to be a statement by one or two other parties:

I saw a creature laying on the ground, and then 45 minutes later tied upside down between two trees. That creature was totally covered in brown or reddish brown hair. Only his feet, hands and face were partially not covered in hair. The hands were large and blackish, and so were the feet. But his humanoid face was bluish looking. Both Rick and I spoke about how blue his face was. Mr Dyer allowed me to see this by iPhone FaceTime…

Very broad shoulders…

Earlier Rick mentioned height and weight at 5′ 10” & 350 to 400 lb, so my guesstimation is I’d say he’s a Shorty Sasquatch.

Rick said anyone could come and see it. I’m in Maryland, so I’d love to see it🙂. Walter Shrum drove for hours at Mr Dyer’s invitation and saw the body with his wife. So proud for Walter. “Searching For Bigfoot” is a great song!

The nose is wide at the nostrils, yet skinny on the bridge. Weirdest thing is the facial skin not covered in hair is blue. But the eyes are huge and alien looking. Does not look human and does not look like an ape. Oh, and the back of the hand is not hairy, but leathery. It almost looks like an armored glove? Just thought you guys would be interested. They started taking precautions against parasites and diseases, as you saw, and it smelled bad. I think that about sums up about all I know that I am allowed to share. Official confirmation tomorrow. Then wow!

The problem here is that the promised official confirmation never took place, as with so many things Dyer. Rick Dyer and broken promises go together like peanut butter and jelly.

Now maybe Rex saw a real Bigfoot or maybe he saw a dummy, but he saw something for sure because I know for a fact that Rex doesn’t lie. Then again, I do not think Walter lies either, but I don’t know Walter as well as I know Rex.

But Rick has not provided us with any evidence that this Bigfoot exists other than his word, so at the moment, we know nothing.

I know that it was said to be a young Bigfoot, possibly an adolescent, and the sex was not given. It was supposedly shot in Southwest Pennsylvania by the four guys and they all shot at once, so we don’t know who killed it. The Bigfoot was shot at some locale where the residents had been feeling it regularly, so it was semi-habituated to humans, similar to the Bigfoot “Hank” rumored but never proven to have been killed also by Dyer in San Antonio in 2012.

Rick released a photo said to be of the Bigfoot. A friend of mine sent it to me and said it definitely shows the dead Bigfoot, but honestly I could not make out much of anything in the photo. The photo shows Rick and Biff pointing at some furry object lying on the ground with sticks. So that photo is definitely inconclusive.

Rick then released a photo of Rick and Biff standing in front of two trees and what looks like a Bigfoot hanging from the tree in between them. But the Bigfoot’s features are blurred out with a blur tool, so we do not know what it is. Maybe it is a Bigfoot, maybe it’s a dummy, who knows?

But Rick made some big promises about this thing, and then it seems to have vanished off the face of the Earth. He did not fulfill even one of his grandiose early promises including scientific confirmation which adds a layer of dubiousness to the story.

At the moment, there is no good, hard, conclusive scientific evidence whatsoever that Rick has killed a Bigfoot in Pennsylvania or for that matter that he has killed a Bigfoot anywhere at any time.

On the other hand, as with the Hank story, no one has ever proven that Rick did not kill a Bigfoot that night in Texas either, and this story is the same: the naysayers are insisting that this is another hoax, but they have not proven that either. To sum it up, there is no proof that Rick killed this Bigfoot, but on the other hand, there is no proof that this is a big hoax either. The matter, as with so many things Bigfoot, remains frustratingly inconclusive.

Bottom line as with all his claims, is “Prove it, Rick.”

A very in depth and excellent treatment of the matter, including all of the relevant statements and photos, can be found at Randy’s blog here and here.

Sorry this is so brief but I am too tired to write much more and also my back hurts.

56 Comments

Filed under Animals, Apes, Bigfoot, Mammals, Northeast, Regional, USA, Wild