The True Story of Rhodesia and Zimbabwe

RL: Yeah, and 1/2 of the Black population was starving. It is not like that now.

Jason Yiddish: This is in reference to Rhodesia? Interesting, sources?

It’s well known and I did a piece on it, actually.

Yeah, sure Rhodesia was a food exporter. Because all their food was going for export! How bout that?

This is not dissimilar to many Latin American countries where half the population is starving, yet they are also “food exporters” because all of the crops grown are cash crops for export on land owned by a few rich people in countries were 2% of the landowners own almost all of the land. All the rest of the people are landless peasants working for peanuts or scraping out a living on marginal land. The country does not grow enough food to feed their people. For a long time the project of the Left down there, described as Communism by the US and the US media, was actually more like, “We are trying to figure out a way to feed our people.” A pretty simple project. Apparently if you are trying to figure out a way to grow food for your people, according to the US government, you must be a Communist.

About 2% of the landowners owned almost all of the good land in Rhodesia. Coincidentally, they were all White people! Gosh, how did that happen? All of these crops were grown for cash exports. The country was not growing enough food to feed their people. All of the rural Blacks were either landless peasants working on White farms for peanuts or forced onto marginal land which they farmed inefficiently, resulting in poor yields. Incidentally, large scale farming on marginal land was causing a lot of erosion, and this was getting to be a serious problem. Much of the country was literally eroding away.

As part of the transition, the 2,000 White farmers who owned all the good land were supposed to sell their land. But the US and especially UK (because the farmers were mostly British) dragged their heels and dragged out the process endlessly. Bottom line is they were not going to sell out for any money, with the support of the US and UK.

Most of Mugabe’s supporters were war veterans. The war veterans wanted the land situation resolved. They were getting increasingly angry about the situation. Mugabe kept warning the Anglos that the situation was getting out of hand, and he would not be able to control his supporters any longer. The Anglos did nothing but continue to drag their heels.

Eventually the situation exploded and the war veterans rioted all across the land, seizing the White farms. It was not as violent as the racists make it out to be. Seven Whites were killed, but that wasn’t all of them. There were 25,000 in the country. Mostly the Whites just left.

The Blacks did not know how to run the farms, so they basically destroyed them and in a pretty moronic way to boot. When this happened, it was what Mugabe had been trying to avoid all this time, but it was his supporters doing it, and he felt he could not go against them, so he cheered it on. He also did not want the farms dismantled by them. Mugabe wanted the Whites to sell out peacefully and then continue to have large farms run more or less by the state or just break them up into small farms. The Blacks did not know how to run large farms. A large farm is a business, and it requires quite a bit of smarts to run one, which the Blacks did not have. But of course the Blacks could grow food crops on small plots! They’d been doing it for millennia! Blacks even started plantation agriculture in East Africa before Discovery.

Unfortunately this turned into a disgusting meme egged on by the corporate media called more or less, “Niggers Are So Stupid, They Can’t Even Grow Food!” Although this meme was rather humorous, obviously that’s not true because that is how they survived there for millennia. Of course all of the White nationalists on the Web continue to flog this dead horse endlessly. Did you know? Black people are so stupid that they can’t even grow food? They’re too dumb to even grow food! How dumb can you get?

You have to admit that this whole mess was pretty racist. The US and UK holding a whole country hostage because 2,000 Whites, who own all the good land, refused to sell out. The Blacks scraping away an existence on marginal land and the country eroding away as a consequence. Half of the Blacks starving and malnourished.

This is a hardcore racist foreign policy any way you cut the cake. And this was going on during the Presidency of Bill Clinton, supposedly a friend of Blacks who was jokingly regarded as the First Black President. So we are still a quite racist country in how we conduct our foreign policy, even when we have a so-called liberal Democrat president! God forbid how we act when Republicans get in. Black people better duck and cover.

For standing up to the US and UK, the two countries put the Zimbabwe under severe financial sanctions. No bank on Earth could deal with them. Of course, after a while this completely ruined the economy. Thing is, Blacks eat better now under Mugabe than they did in Rhodesia.

Mugabe has been beaten to Hell and back by the corporate media and the Anglo governments. Boy, do they hate him. You see, he stood up to us, gave us the finger, and told us to go fuck ourselves. Remember Castro did the same thing. So did the Iranians and Hezbollah.

The Empire does not tolerance insolent brats among its slave colonies. America usually declares war in some way or other against anyone who has the balls to stand up to us and tell us to fuck off. The US usually organizes guerrilla wars against these countries, tries to topple them with coups, puts them under sanctions to ruin their economies, etc. All the above entities got that treatment. We just won’t tolerate any uppity non-Whites, and we certainly do not tolerate slave rebellions in our colonies. The only appropriate way for most countries to address the US is, “Yes massa?”

Yes, Zimbabwe was screwed up for a long time, but that was 100% due to the sanctions and 0% due to anything else. They have managed to climb out of most of the mess. The farm situation is slowly being resolved. Whites have even been asked to come back to farm lands, under strict regulation of course.

A reporter recently went to the capital of Zimbabwe, Harare, and said it was nothing like how the media described it. It was clean and peaceful. Couples ate lunch in the parks on work breaks. All medical care is free, and he visited a brand new imaging center run by competent physicians. He even went to the worst slums, which were not so great. However, he said that those were probably the nicest looking slums in Africa. In other words, every other country has worse slums than Zimbabwe. Mugabe is a socialist, and the state has all sorts of social programs to help the people, and this keeps the country from collapsing to typical Sub-Saharan levels of chaos.

Mugabe has enjoyed strong support all through this mess. The people stood by him even when the place had completely fallen apart. The Opposition only has the support of 1/3 of the population at most. They are deeply in bed with the US and the UK and their project is full neoliberalism with privatization of all state functions. Zimbabweans have had a taste of Mugabe’s socialism, and they like it. They are not real keen on free market economics (in fact, they are not popular anywhere in Africa), and most African ruling parties have the words socialist, Left, progressive, popular, labor, etc. in their names. In fact, such is the case in most of the world. The US is one of the few populations that actually supports neoliberalism. Everyone else hates it.

The Opposition in Zimbabwe are also seen as Quislings, traitors and sellouts to the West. Mugabe is the man who led an anti-colonial rebellion and liberated their homeland from the colonists. Mugabe gives the people a sense of pride, whereas the Opposition seem like a bunch of sellouts. So here we see as in the Arab World and South Africa that people would rather be poor and free than wealthier and in chains.

The media turned the collapse of the Zimbabwean state then turned into “Niggers Can’t Even Run Countries!” This meme was also populated by the corporate media and both the US and UK. Like everything was going fine when Whites were running the show and growing the food, but everything quickly went to Hell when the country was turned over to Blacks because Niggers can’t run countries or grow food. You know, only White people can do that.

The whole matter is disgusting. Almost no one knows the true story, and the behavior of the US government and the corporate media has been so racist, it is sickening.

86 Comments

Filed under Africa, African, Agricutlure, Americas, Asia, Blacks, Britain, Colonialism, Cuba, Democrats, East Africa, Economics, Europe, Government, History, Imperialism, Iran, Journalism, Latin America, Left, Modern, Neoliberalism, Political Science, Politics, Race/Ethnicity, Racism, Radical Islam, Regional, Socialism, South Africa, US Politics, War, White Nationalism, White Racism, Whites

86 responses to “The True Story of Rhodesia and Zimbabwe

  1. Magneto

    I watched a documentary about water in Israel and Israelis said that if they gave the Palestinians permission to drill into the water below their land, that the Palestinians would completely dry up the water resorviors within 20 years. Whereas Israelis, a more civilized and intelligent race, used science and figured out how to turn salt water into fresh water. So Israelis, instead of destroying the environment by idiotic drilling, figured out how to solve their water problem naturally.

    It’s the same thing in north india, these dummb fucking animals just keep drilling deeper and deeper until one day, the water will simply be gone.

    Brown people are too fucking stupid to understand that if they destroy the environment, they will all die.

    Whites are the only race intelligent enough to be environmentally friendly. So if whites do not stop the brown races from destroying the environment, we are all going to die.It is white people’s duty to save the earth from these dumb brown savages who will literally rape and destroy the environment if they are not stopped.

    • Jason Y

      Conservatives are often environmentally unfriendly and conservatives are often more pro-white. Look how Trump is reversing environmental progress.

  2. Magneto

    If black/brown people succeed at killing off all the whites? Then blacks and browns will be dead within 100 years because they will have destroyed the environment.

    They cannot survive without us whites. But we can easily survive without them. A coming generation is going to make that choice.

    • Thats not entirely true. Think of how dependant we are on their labour and their resources. They did, and can survive without whites, although the quality of life would be…different.

      Besides, its whites who are white peoples worst enemy. We really have little to fear from the other races, but much from our own sell outs.

      • Escargot

        Whites aren’t dependant on non-White labour, we’re better off doing our own labor. The exploiters of non-Whites don’t care about Whites either. We Whites are our own worst enemy today.

        • Jason Y

          A typical WN nerd couldn’t even lift 5 pounds. They can barely get enough energy to type on a keyboard. What a joke.

          Huh, what is there among WNs – but just a bunch autistic psychotic nerd-assholes and, on the other side, a bunch of wife beating rednecks?

        • Escargol

          A bunch of mean rapist woman beating bullies that are also nerds that are too weak to lift 5 pounds or type….. ◔̯◔ What a joke indeed. Stop projecting your sexual fantasies onto others.

        • Hey Snail, you have to donate, ok? You are a regular commenter. $10 minimum and you comment until you drop at the coolest blog on the Net. If that’s a hardship, let me know.

      • Jason Y

        Some sell-outs are bad, like ones exporting jobs, but some like some large women wanting black guys are justly reacting to the really snobby white culture. Finally, it’s very closed minded to say whites cannot enjoy other cultures.

        • Escargot

          If you’re fat and stupid enough, only blacks will fuck you.

        • Jason Y

          A lot of whites open to the WN message are pretty degenerate – as Trash noted.

        • Jason Y

          The definition of fat by US culture is way overkill, meaning women who are just more curvy with big tits and ass. But, blacks, and lucky for them, obviously take advantage of this cultural problem.

        • Escargot

          No sense reasoning with a JewBoy tranny, as BunnyBoy noted. I don’t believe whores are that deep. The White features I like in REAL women will die off if things don’t change, I’m not interested in a fat faggoty jews right to piss on their toilet seat.

        • Jason Y

          No sense reasoning with a JewBoy tranny, as BunnyBoy noted. I don’t believe whores are that deep. The White features I like in REAL women will die off if things don’t change, I’m not interested in a fat faggoty jews right to piss on their toilet seat.

          OFF with the WN pigs head !!! 😆

        • Jason Y

          The fact WNs are so racist is bad enough – but now they want to sneak around screw blacks and browns. This is totally despicable behavior and warrants a firing squad.

        • Jason Y

          The old argument from blacks etc.. is the white man raped their women etc. in times past. Note, we see here from Escargot and Magneto’s comments, that indeed, they did. But I’m not shocked.

        • Escargot

          I just want the current rape of Europe to stop.

        • Dang Jason, you’re such a fag Jew. What’s up with that, man?

        • Jason Y

          People rape in different situations for different reasons. For instance, some slave in the 19th century south is right to yell “Rape” – but so is some poor white guy in a modern US prison. Of course, due to selfish nature, most can only feel pity for one side of the story.

        • Jason Y

          I’m no angel. I like sex like any other guy and I cannot be a spokesman for feminism. Anyway, I’m not interested in spoiling anyone’s fun, but you do see a lot of yapping among the cultural left about rape. But it is true, due to human nature, that guys will screw what’s easy, So should non-whites be up in arms about that?

        • Jason Y

          The true test of a fag is if they like to hug another man. I don’t. I find it massively repulsive. I also don’t like being sweet talked by men or talked to – as though I was a woman. Don’t like it, not one bit.

    • (((Beauregard)))

      MAGNETO
      non-Whites in China going through industrialization are not going to be expected to play by different rules than Whites did with regards to polluting the environment. such is why they are contemptuous.

      Much of Latin America tends to be sparsely populated, so they won’t destroy their environment necessarily.

      Africa, India, etc. probably correct.

  3. Jason Y

    I bet ep-gah will have a lot to say about this. Oh, yeah.

  4. Phil78

    “All the rest of the people are landless peasants working for peanuts or scraping out a living on marginal land. The country does not grow enough food to feed their people. ”

    It makes sense when you consider who they would consider “their people”, though not justifiable.

    “The media turned the collapse of the Zimbabwean state then turned into “Niggers Can’t Even Run Countries!”

    If you mean supporting themselves with the resources they have, then yeah I can see the meme as inaccurate especially when they could do it in pre-colonial times. However if running is used to the level of standard and efficiency of other modern nations then it becomes issue.

    The core issue really being nationalism being embraced in general, though SE Africa mainly having similar ethnic groups compared to West Africa aleviates this.

  5. Jason Y

    You have to admit that this whole mess was pretty racist. The US and UK holding a whole country hostage because 2,000 Whites, who own all the good land, refused to sell out. The Blacks scraping away an existence on marginal land and the country eroding away as a consequence. Half of the Blacks starving and malnourished.

    Yeah, again more condescending, selfish rich people, in this case, white rich people, but in Haiti, it might be mulattoes. Anyway, the same old story. There is something wrong with these landowners and their arrogance. I even see this in my own family.

    • Jason Y

      What might be some theories on why the White Rhodesians would want to export crops while locals are starving?

      • More profitable?

        Australia is doing the same thing with natural gas. Despite our vast reserves, thanks to neoliberalism and ‘free market’ ideology, we’re exporting it instead, where they might get a few dollars more. This is creating a risk of a shortage of energy in Australia where we might have to face blackouts and brownouts in the near term future.

        • Jason Y

          Yeah, but they could reinvest profits in creating solar energy which – especially due to Austrailia’s sunshine – would never end.

        • Jason Y

          The idea being that profits from cash crops sold elsewhere would come back to Zimbabwe creating jobs – jobs that would allow Africans to survive, However, the trickle down idea maybe didn’t work in this instance – creating the anger of the Mugabe supporters.

          However, WNs would normally bring up some overpopulation argument. So how weak is that argument?

        • OrangeNoser

          Not all Africans belong in South Africa. South African Khoisans, for example, may be dominated by other African tribes. Native tribes better off ruled by Dutchman with connections to SA, may be better off than ruled by a rival tribe or group with no connection to SA.

        • Phil78

          “Not all Africans belong in South Africa. South African Khoisans, for example, may be dominated by other African tribes. Native tribes better off ruled by Dutchman with connections to SA, may be better off than ruled by a rival tribe or group with no connection to SA.”

          Sorry, but this really doesn’t follow. You start off with certain africans not belonging in SA originally. then extrapolate that to a dutch rule being better than a non-dutch rule.

        • Jason Y

          South Africa wasn’t an empty place. Wasn’t there Zulus there? But then again, obviously, there are more Africans there now, possibly due to migration and population increase due to the Green Revolution etc..

        • Phil78

          “South Africa wasn’t an empty place. Wasn’t there Zulus there? But then again, obviously, there are more Africans there now, possibly due to migration and population increase due to the Green Revolution etc..”

          SA, as in the colony not the region, did have zulu but only westward, in it’s eastw coast origins there wasn’t much disturbance till say the latter portion of the 1870s from wither the boers or british.

        • Jason Y

          Eastern SA isn’t that attractive, mostly desert, so no wonder few blacks until after the whites built up the place.

        • Jm8

          I think some Khoisan Khoi Khoi/Hottentots lived in the East and the southern cape region but they (I believe) generally had very small sparse populations/low population densities (compared to the black tribes further north for instance), and even more so compared to Europeans.

        • Jm8 you are in the spam filter also. For the life of me, I have no idea why you are in there, and you have been in there forever. Just so you know you are not banned or on moderation.

        • Phil78

          To Jm8,

          Indeed, boers I believed made deals with the Khoi-speaking populations there though many became slaves and concubines partially through trade with Bantus there IIRC from researching the subject of mixed population’s roots.

        • Phil78

          To Jason,

          scratch that, Eastward was where Zulu lived, Westward was where the euro colonies started.

          I was thinking along the lines of “Manifest destiny”
          and misplaced that with SA expansion history due to political parallels.

  6. Jason Y

    The Opposition in Zimbabwe are also seen as Quislings, traitors and sellouts to the West. Mugabe is the man who led an anti-colonial rebellion and liberated their homeland from the colonists. Mugabe gives the people a sense of pride, whereas the Opposition seem like a bunch of sellouts. So here we see as in the Arab World and South Africa that people would rather be poor and free than wealthier and in chains.

    Something ep-gah cannot understand – unless of course, it’s some situation where he can live and eat better – but has to live among liberal elitists in Washington State.

  7. Jason Y

    The Blacks did not know how to run the farms, so they basically destroyed them and in a pretty moronic way to boot.

    Yeah, but they could always hire sympathetic whites to run them, maybe some hippie liberals from the US or something.

  8. Homer Simpson

    I suppose China can come to the rescue & yet revive the agricultural sector for Zimbabwe, also to provide capital for more investments in Africa’s economy, as the chinks are all too willing to invest in Africa & also due to the fact Africans, perhaps justifiably, still aren’t able to trust their white ex-colonial masters. Maybe the chinks will be kinder masters than the Europeans were!

    • Phil78

      “Maybe the chinks will be kinder masters than the Europeans were!” That gives a somewhat inaccurate impression

      They would likely put bias before profit, but likely wouldn’t have much concern beyond that point.

    • Jason Y

      Asians hate blacks, the disabled etc. way worse than whites. And they get away with such thinking – cause people only assume a subset of whites are capable of being like that.

    • Jason Y

      The lack of empathy of Asians toward NAMS is appalling. They’ve way outdone the meanest WNs – at their own game!

      • Escargot

        Trannies often lack empathy towards women, whom they want be. Jews lack empathy toward Whites, whom they view as competitors.

        • Jason Y

          Just cause Jews hijack cultural and economic left movements to get vengeance for spilled milk – doesn’t mean such things are necessarily wrong. It’s sort of like someone with a grudge jumping on some bandwagon cause it’s useful to them. It’s “The enemy of my enemy is my friend” thing.

    • Jason Y

      It was noted by Rush Limbaugh that China would have in no way put up with the Rodney King riots, killing the protesters – on the spot. And I have no reason to say he’s misinformed.

    • (((Beauregard)))

      there was a guy who once commented here called “HBD investor”….I doubt the cynical Chinese are optimistic about “nation building” economic or otherwise in Sub-Saharan Africa.

      It seems they build high-ways/infrastructure to get raw materials out of the African countries, and occasionally stadiums or schools as favors to African bureaucrats.

      Africans buy finished products from developed nations, sometimes even China, to give them the little bits of modernity that they have, hence the trade deficits.

      Basically, it’s a colonial relationship for the modern age, just without the European-style micromanagement.

      • Yee

        China wants Africa to develop, although for a selfish reason. But Africa is getting something out of it too.

        China wants Africans to get a little richer, so they can afford TVs, smartphones, refrigerators, washing machines etc., stuffs we make a lot. In order for the Africans to get richer, they need to have jobs, so China build infrastructures which is crucial for setting up factories.

        Since some labor intense industry are moving out of China anyway, why not move to Africa? Plenty of people there, and they don’t believe in saving, they love to spend every penny they earn. Plus, China has good relations with Africa for a long time.

        • (((Beauregard)))

          “China wants Africans to get a little richer, so they can afford TVs, smartphones, refrigerators, washing machines etc.,”

          Lol, Yee, I was under the impression Asians see Africans as inferior and that they can’t run their own countries/economies. Creaders thinks this.

        • China is treating Black Africa very well, much better than the US or Europe ever did. It’s pretty much a win-win thing based on solidarity is my understanding. The ChiComs are still Communists, and I doubt if they are really into having exploitative imperialistic relationships with Africans. And the Africans like it.

          If the Chinese should be doing better, what exactly should they be doing better? They are treating the Africans better than anyone else ever has.

          Pretty rich that Americans are screaming about how evil the Chinese are for imperialistically exploiting their new colonies in Africa. Except it’s not imperialism and it’s not colonialism. China doesn’t do imperialism or colonialism. Relationships are supposed to be based on solidarity.

          Anyway, do you have any idea how crappy the US, Portuguese, Germans, French, Belgians and British treated Africa and the US, French and British do to this very day? They treated the Africans very badly and we continue to do so to this very day.

        • Jason Y

          True, Robert, but you see, and it’s obvious, the reason the Europeans did that is cause the blacks had a low IQ. So they’re using the Magneto reasoning for dealing with people – the one you see in India. They figure, well these are retarded people and they also have a tendency for violence, so it’s the best call of action to be rough with them.

        • Jason Y

          According to Magneto and other WNs, respect is only based on IQ. You cannot respect another group like the Chinese do, unless they have the same or higher IQ.

        • Yee

          Beauregard,

          Chinese don’t consider being dumb deserves contempt, it’s being lazy that does. Our teaching is, if you’re hard working, it’ll more than make up for not being smart.

          You’ll see Chinese criticize other groups being “lazy”, or “lazy and dumb”, but seldom “dumb” alone.

          But all of those don’t matter, including how I see the Africans, government still must try to improve people’s living standards. They have obligations other than stealing public money. Learn something from the Chinese corrupt officials, at least they have done good work.

        • Jason Y

          How sweet, Yee. 😆 Maybe you should be a special education teacher.

        • Jason Y

          Possibly, the European annoyance with Africans in times past wasn’t due to the fact they thought African were mentally inferior. Perhaps the actual reason was cause the Africans just didn’t want foreigners there, mainly cause foreigners are bossy and abuse the people the from time to time.

          Note, when Columbus colonized Santo Domingo, the natives were angry cause the Spaniards were bossy assholes and they raped and took advantage of native women.

  9. Jm8

    Kenya has a class of native landowning farmers skilled in modern methods that are a significant part of its economy: including many in tea, coffee, and dairy farming—which seem to do ok, (both many small and larger farms, with the trading aspect, and maybe others, in certain cases mangaged cooperatively—there are also state-run elements in some aspects of tea export for instance); and often of the Kikuyu, Meru, and Kamba ethnic groups (which seem to be some of the more industrious and entrepreneurial tribes, which also tended more to acquire modern skills leading up to independance).

    Some farmers having reacquired ancestral lands (usually non-violently—after independance—and relatively gradually, and with compensation), from certain white land owners after independence.

    The black farmers govt. policy at the time under Jomo Kenyatta tended favor were often Kikuyus with knowledge of modern methods, though there was an element of political favoritism as well, but relations with whites are better there and white farmers do still exist. Kenya overall seems to have done a better job (or fared better) than Zimbabwe.

  10. Jm8

    Edit: “…(both small and large farms, with the trading aspect, and maybe others, in certain cases mangaged cooperatively—others privately…”

  11. Jm8

    Edit” Kenya has substantial class of native farmers skilled in modern methods…”

  12. Jason Y

    Ep-gah’s argument of why black Rhodesians should be slapped for not “minding their betters” will be based on overpopulation.

  13. Eddy

    this is nonsense. the whites did not have better land than the blacks. they just knew how to do manage it without burning the soil. something blacks are incapable of comprehending.
    blacks like white liberals think in simplistic terms: the whites got rich because the stole the goods from the innocent, hardworking negroes. that’s nonsense. they are not even convinced now that they are starving to death like the rest of independent africa…whites should not get involved in bailing out africans any longer. it was africans that murdered thousand of whites and chased other hard working, intelligent white people out of africa. now they want to go go on welfare and collect a paycheck from white countries.

    • Jason Y

      OK, Robert, we have a dissenting opinion here. Should gay Jewish commentators correct him – or should you do the job?

      • It’s not true. Everything I read said that 2,000 White farmers had all the good land in Zimbabwe. And the situation in South Africa was not that different. All of the Blacks were forced onto marginal lands which proceeded to erode away, hence Zimbabwe and South Africa started eroding away due to Apartheid.

        this is nonsense. the whites did not have better land than the blacks. they just knew how to do manage it without burning the soil. something blacks are incapable of comprehending.

        Is this a reference to slash and burn agriculture. Humans have been doing this all over the world forever now. It actually works.

        Anyway this argument sounds suspiciously like Niggers Are So Stupid, They Can’t Even Grow Food!

    • (((Beauregard)))

      EDDY
      That may be true about White libs/NAMs but alt-rightists like yourself tend to not be able to hide that they are naïve autistics.

      The European overlords were generous the Blacks, who they saw as inferior, and equally divvied up good land…LOL, no.

    • Look Eddy, I am banning you. You can’t talk like this on here, sorry. Just not acceptable.

      HAND!

    • The Jew fags already chimed in. Good job (((sweethearts))).

      • Jason Y

        I don’t like being called sweetheart. I guess I’m a homophobe in that sense. And I don’t want to sit on daddy Robby’s lap. 😆

      • Jason Y

        I didn’t see necessarily what was wrong with what he said – or that it justified banning. But it was a differing opinion that needed answering. I guess it was too far right-wing economically.

        • Um, you do not get to come on here and deny that 2,000 White farmers had all the good land and that’s why the Blacks were starving and malnourished. It’s not true and it’s really not acceptable.

          Then he lunged into Niggers are So Stupid, They Can’t Even Grow Food! And that’s just insulting. I hate that line so much. You hear it in WN circles endlessly. Yeah, if they’re so stupid that they can’t even grow food, how the Hell did they survive in Africa for the last 10,000 years?

          Look Africans are not exactly Einsteins, but they’re not too stupid to grow food! For God’s sake man, it’s not real difficult.

        • Jason Y

          It take it your eaten alive on Stormfront.

      • (((Beauregard)))

        Robert-
        “aut rightists” talking of everyone else being beta males/cucks is really just projection.

        I mean, they just spend all their time online ranting about Jews, not actually taking a hit to their own livelihood/reputation by trying to do anything about it. Doesn’t that by definition make them betas?

        • Jason Y

          Good point. It’s the Jew Card. I mean when will WNs get off their asses like real men and work?

        • (((Beauregard)))

          They jerk off to Lolis because their tiny cocks could never satisfy a fully-developed woman.

      • Jason Y

        Indians call people sweetheart (no, I think it’s dear), even males. That sounds funny.

    • Please go back to the left side of the bell curve. You are trespassing.

    • Frito Pendejo

      But in order to be successful in anything modern, you’ve first of all have got to have in the least the innate intelligence to be able to accomplish what needs to be done, secondly the education or the right kind of training in order to do all those things right. & best of all the experience, which I see african blacks,generally speaking, not quite having even the 1st attribute. Sure they maybe be a few black framers who may be capable, but as tends to be the case, the local elite sets things up as so only they & their friends benefit, most notably seen in present day Zimbabwe.

  14. Jason Y

    Still no answer to overpopulation – which is the only possibly intellectual argument WNs can give for Rhodesia’s starvation problem under white rule.

    • Yee

      Zimbabwe is not overpopulated. It’s a landlocked country with only 15 million people, the same as my city. Population density about the same as USA, way lower than UK.

      It’s rich in platinum and gold, it has enough land. Not that difficult to support only15 million people.

      It sure was unacceptable for people to go starve with this much land.

  15. Jason Y

    Well, of course, I’m a gay Jew. 😆 I’m always hanging around my best friend, a large black lady.

  16. SHI

    I’m new to all this. Jeez, I didn’t have the complete picture of the Zimbabwe situation.

    Robert Mugabe is like the cannibal version of Mahatma Gandhi. Here, he’s on a phone conversation with Donald Trump (SNL Live’s Alex Baldwin).

    • His people love him. He led a successful revolution against apartheid colonialists and he’s seen as patriot, a nationalist and a hero. The Opposition are seen as a bunch of sellout traitors. Mugabe’s a socialist and he does all sorts of great things for his people within his financial limits. Mugabe’s like Castro. He’s sitting there giving a huge middle finger to the US and UK, and they can’t do anything about it. His people love him for that.

      The Opposition only has 30% support. They are country-sellers who want to sell out the country to the Anglos, privatize everything, let multinationals take over the place are run a full neoliberal economy. And now he is asking White farmers to come back, but they have to lease the land, not own it.

      The guy’s got a bad rap. He’s been demonized in the frankly RACIST Anglo press.

      Mugabe is a proud African Black man standing up to the rich and arrogant Whites and saying FUCK YOU and getting away with it. He’s real popular down there.

      I actually SUPPORT Mugabe lol. That really makes people mad when I say that.

      • Frito Pendejo

        Sure he maybe. But that still shouldn’t take away the fact he eventually turned into a classic african kleptocrat, as did much of post colonial African rulers after they achieved liberation from their European colonial masters. I guess I can see with him wanting to drive out the white landowners for whatever negatives they did to the black Zimbabwean population, those memories still just vivid enough with all of them. But you still ought to make sure your leaders have the intelligence & talent to make things better,right!?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s