The Decline and Fall of the American Empire

Jason Y: Most people in the US ignored the MOAB. How did even change day to day life?Also, once it’s massively on Mideast, who would care? Or North Korea?

Not really. I got text messages about it. I saw lots of people talking about it. They were all excited and happy. The guys were all coming in their shorts and the women were all coming in their panties. I tried to criticize this sickening boondoggle and I got shouted down by a chorus of patriotards.

That’s what kind of people we are. We see a Goddamned bomb explosion and the whole nation has a collective orgasm.

Also, once it’s massively on Mideast, who would care? Or North Korea?

Are you kidding? Once the US is massively at war in the Mideast or North Korea, no Americans would care? Are we really that far gone? Wow, this must truly be the last days of the empire. First there’s the decline, then there’s the fall. God knows what stage this is.

We are getting like the Romans who threw Christians into arenas to fight lions to the death and cheered when the man got killed. At some point, you have a nation of decadent, depraved, jaded, orgiastic, wasteful, spendthrift, narcissistic, sadistic, occultist, death-worshiping sick fucks, and at that point, the nation or empire or whatever has got to go.

100 Comments

Filed under Afghanistan, American, Asia, Culture, Middle East, Military Doctrine, NE Asia, North Korea, Regional, Sociology, War

100 responses to “The Decline and Fall of the American Empire

  1. Jason Y

    Well, nobody would care – cause think about it, ground troops won’t be needed much. We can just drop a lot of MOABS. 😆 (dark sarcasm)

    And the concerned cucks or snowflakes, well, they’ll be ignored – especially if more Muslim terror attacks come about.

  2. Jason Y

    Are you kidding? Once the US is massively at war in the Mideast or North Korea, no Americans would care? Are we really that far gone? Wow, this must truly be the last days of the empire. First there’s the decline, then there’s the fall. God knows what stage this is.

    Yeah, that sounds about right. The red states are generally numb to caring about anyone and the blue states just full of minorities wanting government assistance (not saying that’s bad, though). They’re generally selfish people and the ones that do care will be thrown to the lions, as you say.

  3. Jason Y

    Not really. I got text messages about it. I saw lots of people talking about it. They were all excited and happy. The guys were all coming in their shorts and the women were all coming in their panties. I tried to criticize this sickening boondoggle and I got shouted down by a chorus of patriotards.

    That’s as bad as them ignoring it. Either way, they just don’t give a shit and the next thing they won’t care about – is when it’s dropped over major population centers, as it was over Nagasaki, Hiroshima etc..

    Now, the puzzle for conspiracy theorists is, “WHAT is going to trigger the next slaughter?”. Will China or Russia be able to stop it?

    • EPGAH

      That’s what confuses me: If we blow up a few terrorists with ZERO Collateral Damage, there’s bitching about a waste of money.
      If we destroy the major enemy population centers, there’s bitching about Collateral Damage. Make up your minds!

      But all of this overlooks the bigger conundrum: Why care about your enemies? If you don’t care about Conservative voters, then why care about people who are literally trying to kill us all, including Liberals who ease their entry into our countries?

  4. You make a most undue compliment describing America as another declining and falling Roman empire worthy of a future Gibbon’s attention. America never was any kind of Greece nor Rome. Except for the shape of some columns. And even then, many barbarian empires of the antiquity used Greek columns for their monuments, except that they never cared for harmony, as are built the monuments of America. Even when Rome was decadent, it still was a civilization, and that civilization endured way past the empire proper, to the point that even where there had never been any Roman monument or equipment, and the empire had died since centuries, people still dreamed of building and living as by Roman standards, and referred to latin as soon as they endeavoured to think beyond their dialect. Italy as the main heir to the late Roman Empire managed to grow into something even more refined and beautiful right when the Barbarians were in the place.

    America is no Rome. America is Carthage. An empire whose initial formation crystal and central point was the first still renowned stock exchange place having given its name to so many others : the Bursa. Not an agora, not a forum.

    • EPGAH

      What about all the technology America gave the world, and they now use without even a thought while hating those who made it?

      Start with the computer, artificial lights, and affordable cars.

      • (((Beauregard)))

        ECONOMICS
        if you have something that other people want to buy, you will create it, and once your patent expires, others will mimick it and sell it as well.

        You do this because you are paid for it, and you can use that to buy food, get laid, whatever you want to do, really.

        • Jason Y

          ECONOMICS
          if you have something that other people want to buy, you will create it, and once your patent expires, others will mimick it and sell it as well.

          You do this because you are paid for it, and you can use that to buy food, get laid, whatever you want to do, really.

          So you’re saying that Thomas Edison and the like didn’t work for the supreme glory of America or the white race or for fame, but just to pay bills?

        • (((Beauregard)))

          not necessarily Edison but technology that served as investments for business- enabled them to do more.

          Like cell phones or personal computers

        • (((Beauregard)))

          JASON
          MY POV Why is a Computer Corporation going to NOT sell to Nigerian businessmen? They’re basically burning money in that case. He may not like Blacks or Africans, but that’s irrelevant.

          Obviously wealthy free-trader Gentile businessmen like Mitt Romney aren’t in love with NAMs. But he’ll do business with their elites no problem.

        • EPGAH

          You mean scammers, right? Nigeria is the only country in the world that has a scam named after it, and Robert has made a few articles about Nigerian scammers.

        • Jason Y

          Money talks…

        • (((Beauregard)))

          “You mean scammers, right?”

          Once again, it’s all about money.
          Computer CEO will not be the victim of the Prince scam. As long as his pockets are lined he really doesn’t care if other Americans are victimized.

        • EPGAH

          What about the animals that use laptops to blow up planes?

          At what point do we have some kind of responsibility to cutoff the bad from technology that they use to hurt us? Not MIGHT use to hurt us, DO use to hurt us!

        • Jason Y

          You mean scammers, right? Nigeria is the only country in the world that has a scam named after it, and Robert has made a few articles about Nigerian scammers.

          Scammers are everywhere and Nigeria is just one big place for it. I don’t like scamming, but it’s impossible to stop, so the elderly especially, and the general public need to be educated. Otherwise, they will undergo a sort of evolutionary weeding out.

      • Jason Y

        It could be argued eventually Asians or high caste Indians might have developed modern technology – if whites didn’t exist.

        • EPGAH

          And savages in America could have made a civilization equal to the ones the Pilgrims made, and Germany could have taken over the world, but they didn’t. Why are you bringing up this Alternate Reality crap?

          China and India stayed way behind England for centuries, what were they waiting for?

        • Jason Y

          Ep-gah, this remark is very dumb. Of course, savages in America were too behind on things to make advancements. However, I was focusing on India and Northeast Asia, places with who were at are rapidly moving toward the right of the bell curve.

        • Jason Y

          Sorry I mean.

          Ep-gah, this remark is very dumb. Of course, savages in America were too behind on things to make advancements. However, I was focusing on India and Northeast Asia, places with who at the time were at are rapidly moving toward the right of the bell curve.

        • EPGAH

          Oh, you meant East India?
          But still, China and East India had stopped at the Feudal Level of tech.
          After creating numbers, India hasn’t really come up with anything major.
          China created the Big 3, Compass, Paper, and Gunpowder, but then stopped.

          Due to tensions between the military and the Emperor, they even burned down their own fleets, so they couldn’t explore and colonize.
          If THAT hadn’t happened, America might be a Chinese colony, and wouldn’t have become the technological hotspot it is now.

          America has an extraordinary record of achievement. We are the most technologically innovative nation in history, and 20th century Americans created a society of unprecedented prosperity and freedom. NASA ALONE has more patents than non-NASA America, and America has more patents than any other country.
          China can only steal and imitate. India can’t even stop shitting in the streets!

        • Jason Y

          You’re way underestimating the power of the right side of the bell curve ep-gah. Note, given time, these inventions would have been invented – even without whites.

        • EPGAH

          I’m not underestimating anything. After making their big inventions, the countries you’re talking about stagnated for thousands of years.They had to be upgraded by the Civilized World centuries later. Centuries of development forced on them almost overnight. Even after being upgraded by the Civilized World, much of both those countries stayed shit.

          Let’s start with India. Did you read Robert’s piece on Designated Shitting Streets?

          Or for China, Why do you think China wanted to steal back Hong Kong?
          It’s the area the Civilized World had upgraded most. Now keep going West from the coast, you’ll see areas of China where they STILL live like fucking Nigeria or something

      • Jason Y

        Ep-gah’s argument is the non-white world should kiss the butt-cheeks of the US – (really means the white man) for the technology of the world. Well, any anti-white thing I say here will not be my own thought but what Robert Lindsay has said.

        OK, Robert argued that Arabs didn’t want to be “N-word” in a more advanced nation and also black South Africans didn’t either.

        • EPGAH

          So they’d rather drag the nation to shit status so everyone can be equally poor?

        • (((Beauregard)))

          JASON
          He does have a point about South Africa. But there’s not necessarily a reason to honor Cecil Rhodes of all people of all the Whites.

          Blacks in the U.S., for example, could maybe value a founder who was relatively good to them like Dr. Rush (who thought race was no more than a skin blemish) as opposed to Thomas Jewfferson.

        • EPGAH

          If the country was so horrible to them, why not LEAVE it instead of DESTROY it? Why did they keep pouring in?

          How do you account for Rhodesia being a food EXPORTER, but Zimbabwe is another starving Third World Infomercial Bait?

        • Yeah and 1/2 of the Black population was starving. It is not like that now.

        • Jason Y

          So they’d rather drag the nation to shit status so everyone can be equally poor?

          People would rather be poor economically with pride than a slave with no pride. It’s pretty freaking obvious. There are so many countless examples of what seems to be ingrates – but are only people defending pride.

        • Jason Y

          Look at the English. The US has been pretty good to them, but there are always smartass punks complaining about Americans – mainly cause they have troops there and England is technically nothing now.

        • Jason Y

          So they’d rather drag the nation to shit status so everyone can be equally poor?

          Shit status is normally liveable and it’s the only alternative to being some quivering effeminate Sambo that WNs want. OK, do people in the middle east and places have it that bad? Many are used to that culture and have toughened up about the situation.

        • EPGAH

          I don’t care if they’re quivering Sambos, but if they don’t like how they’re treated in our countries, get the fuck out, go back to the Third World, until they’re cured of their nostalgia or Entitlement Complex or whatever.

          Then come back with a more contrite, grateful attitude, rather than always making demands or attacking their betters!

        • EPGAH

          You’re right, now they’re all starving and illegally immigrating to South Africa and other African countries. Better to be a criminal and live than starve in the Hell of their own creation?

        • EPGAH

          If they don’t have it that bad, and they “toughened up about their situation”, why are they pouring into Civilized World countries by the MILLIONS, rather than staying and wallowing in their own shit–I mean “situations” of their own prideful creation?

          And then why rape and murder their betters once they get in? Is that because of pride too?

        • Jason Y

          Yeah and 1/2 of the Black population was starving. It is not like that now.

          This is in reference to Rhodesia? Interesting, Sources?

  5. Jason Y

    We are getting like the Romans who threw Christians into arenas to fight lions to the death and cheered when the man got killed. At some point, you have a nation of decadent, depraved, jaded, orgiastic, wasteful, spendthrift, narcissistic, sadistic, occultist, death-worshiping sick fucks, and at that point, the nation or empire or whatever has got to go.

    Why should the Leave it to Beaver family care about the rest of the world – especially if their son isn’t going to die in a war – but rather a MOAB will take care of things? Anyhow, I always thought the 60s were phony. People just sympathizing with anti-war stuff cause they’re afraid to die rather than for real idealism.

  6. (((Beauregard)))

    JASON
    Only Allen West type Blacks grovel over Thomas Jefferson. None will do so for Cecil Rhodes.

    Intelligent Blacks like Phil presumably admire more progressive minded White historical figures like Dr. Benjamin Rush or T.Roosevelt.

    Some Blacks hate ALL Whites.
    Mrs. F.W. DeKlerk was killed in a robbery. The irony of such is sad and overwhelming, the perpetrators were probably to ignorant to know who her husband was.

    • EPGAH

      The real irony is that if the country hadn’t been overthrown, she would’ve been safe, right?

      You say she was just a victim of random violence, I say that violence is a product of the overthrow of the country structure that kept the people safe!

    • Jason Y

      The definition of hate is often weak. Normally, it’s a whole group but allows for a lot of exceptions.

    • Jason Y

      Sometimes the definition of hate is really distrust. Only a small minority would really hate.

      • EPGAH

        If someone puts a tire around your neck and sets you on fire–ALIVE–what do you call that?

        And if there were laws in place to keep those savages away from you, no matter how “racist”, wouldn’t those laws be good, from a Public Safety standpoint?

        • Jason Y

          If you’re speaking of extremists, whites have their own and would do the same to blacks etc.. – given that they’re in a safe spot to do so (some backwoods in Louisiana or something).

        • EPGAH

          I’m not talking about “extremists”, I’m talking about the way the ANC routinely did to whites and even to fellow savages that supported the whites!

          But you can’t deny that any law that keeps the vicious away from the victims is a good thing, right? Or do you think people should buy their own Gated Communities, and if they can’t afford that, it should Suck To Be Them?

  7. (((Beauregard)))

    EP-GAH
    in response to your point about WMDs you didn’t answer my question about what there is to “win” in Afghanistan.

    We were fighting off an invasion from Japan; toppling the gov’t that did it.

    The Taliban Government which aided Al Qaeda for 9/11 HAS BEEN OUT OF POWER SINCE DECEMBER 2001!

    So once again, I ask what exactly is there to “win”?

    • EPGAH

      I thought I was clear about this: Win an end to the violence.

      If I told you my hometown had been attacked by Indians, you’d say “Wrong Century, Idiot”, right?
      If I told you my hometown had been sneak-attacked by Japan, you’d say “They haven’t attacked us since we subdued them 70 years ago!”
      On some Level, they think their NEXT attack on us will be their LAST attack on anyone, right?

      I want the same thing to be true for the Moslem terrorists. Make them afraid to attack their betters. Make them peaceful like we did to the Indians and Japanese.

      • NPD

        EPGAH

        Muslims lack a Navy, Air Force or anything approximating a truly internation force capable of mounting invasions. And this has been the case since the Middle Ages.

        Japan actually managed to invade Alaska and Native Americans were the ones facing invasion.

    • EPGAH

      Killing enough of them to make them stop attacking their betters.
      You notice we no longer suffer Indian raids or Japanese sneak-attacks.
      That was accomplished by beating them until they stopped attacking us.

    • Jason Y

      Oh, ep-gah is right on some things. Yeah, we can win alright if enough MOABS are used.

    • NPD

      The answer is that Afghanistan was never winnable. It came down to chasing ragtag terrorists around a desert. That is not even a war, it is a police action.

      Afghanistan has not improved or become more of a threat since 2001 and it has now been 16 years.

      • (((Beauregard)))

        Precisely.

        The mountains also make for trouble; it’s more difficult to get surveillance in, etc.
        Iran would be more similar to Afghanistan than Iraq/Kuwait, even more reason not to go in.

      • Jason Y

        It’s winnable if it’s MOABed. It’s sort of like building a railroad tunnel or roads thru tough terrain.

        • (((Beauregard)))

          Jason
          you are essentially saying we could MOAB the place to apocalyptic proportions, essentially killing everybody.

          The problem with that is much of the debris and earth from the bombings travel into the air. Similar to a nuclear winter (although that tends to heat up objects and decompose them, making for more debris/dust).

  8. (((Beauregard)))

    I said AmRen type WNs support neocon wars because they want the browns to suffer no matter what.

    Exhibit A: EP-GAH

    • EPGAH

      I support killing as many terrorists as necessary to make them stop attacking their betters, whether the next terrorist is the last, or every last one.

      They determine by their actions (Stop attacking or keep attacking) whether they suffer or whether they live in peace.
      The choice is theirs.

      • Jason Y

        Yeah, but almost anyone with a brain would note that killing terrorists makes heroes of them – hence, spawning more terrorists Unless, of course, you want to MOAB them into the stone age.

  9. (((Beauregard)))

    Lindsay- If EP-GAH is to return here and shill for the (((endless wars))) he must have brackets 🙂

    • EPGAH

      How many terrorists do we have to kill before they stop attacking us?
      They determine that, not us.

    • EPGAH

      That’s just it, I don’t want the wars to be endless.

      I’m tired of the terrorists attacking us, we punish them, then they attack us to “punish” us for punishing them, and so on.

      I said that in the other thread. If we kill enough of the terrorists, they’ll stop fucking with us. Then we shall have peace.

      • Yeah but you support The Wars for the Jews, right?

        2003 invasion of Iraq
        Attacks on Yemen
        Support for Israli invasion of Lebanon
        Overthrow of Ghaddafi
        Threatening Iran
        Supporting Syrian rebels and now attacking Syria and thereatening to overthrow their leader.
        Saying that Hezbollah is the enemy of the US and needs to be destroyed.

        Those are all Wars for the Jews. They don’t benefit anyone else. So if you are for The Wars for the Jews, EPGAH, you probably need to wear brackets yourself. It’s sort of like a yellow star, you know?

        • EPGAH

          I did not support the invasion of Iraq. I supported clear-cutting it.
          If Clinton had continued bombing it…if the bombing had been more than a distraction away from Lewinsky. Cue Laugh Track
          Putting our people in the enemy country is basically giving the enemies targets in a shooting gallery. We need a one-sided war where they have nothing of ours they can shoot or kill, and we can kill who/whatever opposes us. Hence Air Power. This is in no way because I’m ex-Air Force.

          I care not if Isreal kills their own damn terrorists. In fact, I encourage it.
          I encourage any country other than America to kill the terrorists so that America doesn’t have to. As a side-bonus, they’ll quit bitching of what America has to do to the terrorists once they find out “Fighting Terrorists Is HARD! We Should Let America Do It!” (Or some variant of that.)
          Conversely, the reason no other country fights the terrorists is BECAUSE they “know” America’s “Got This”™!

          Iran keeps herassing our navy and kidnapping our people, they need to be taught a lesson. I think if Russia weren’t backing them, we could sink their whole pirate fleet 30 seconds from declaring Weapons Hot.

          Gaddafi was trying to steal from America and the whole Civilized World, he got what was coming to him.

          Syria is cock-blocking our “allies” pipeline, they have but to accept that and magically Assad will be the Rightful Ruler again. It would also stop Russia from being able to blackmail Europe with access to oil and gas.
          It really is all about resources and influence.

          Hezbollah is a terrorist organization, it needs to be beaten into pacifism.
          (See above)

    • EPGAH

      Why do you put brackets on yourself? Do you want the wars to be endless?

      Me, I’d rather blast the terrorists into submission, until Moslem attacks are as ridiculous as Indian attacks, and for the same reason: They’re afraid to attack their betters, knowing there WILL be reprisals!

      • It’s just a joke. We are making fun of antisemites. We do this in lots of ways. We call ourselves Jews a lot and we call other commenters Jews. Right now I am calling myself a Jew. In an excellent move, Beauregard also decided to call himself a Jew. We are sort of getting in touch with our Inner Kikes, you know. Everyone has a little Jew in them.

    • I can’t put them on him myself. Actually is not 100% keen on Jews. He doesn’t hate them though. He’s just Jew-wise like any intelligent human should be.

      I don’t call them The Endless Wars. I call them The Wars for the Jews.

      😉

      • Beauregard

        He just said “Iran needs to be taught a lesson…”
        How can one reconcile that with being “Jew-wise”?

        To be clear, I don’t think he’s a Jew but I do suspect he’s fan of Pamela Geller.
        I also suspect he likes monster trucks, lives in the flyover, and thinks Obama was a homosexual.

  10. Jason Y

    I think the word “bossy” is the key. NAMS and also white people, and well, anyone, generally doesn’t like being bossed around by condescending people. But ep-gah cannot understand that idea. In his mind, people should be grateful. But, it just isn’t real human nature – and the countless nationalist wars and ungrateful teenagers show that’s true.

    • EPGAH

      If they don’t want to live under our rules, why invade our countries by the millions/tens of millions?
      If you want to live under our roof, live under our rules.
      Or STAY THE FUCK OUT!

    • EPGAH

      Savages want to live in white countries…why?
      Because they’re safer countries?
      Because they’re better countries?
      Because freebies?

      BUT the more savages that come in, the less safe, the less better they become on any axis you can name, and the people move to the right and try to kill the Freebie Machine so the invaders stop benefiting–like cutting off leeches.

      So the savages literally destroy what they come to steal!
      All that could be solved by just staying in their own countries, fucking them up as much as possible, letting us enjoy the better countries we created!

      • Jason Y

        More exaggerated extremists rhetoric. No shit, everyone on this site, including myself, doesn’t want more Latino immigrants – which by the way are often these humble people driven out by bullies in their own land – the real assholes you’re referring to – and let’s not forget the US fucks up various places creating places that spawn refugees.

      • Jason Y

        Savages want to live in white countries…why?
        Because they’re safer countries?
        Because they’re better countries?
        Because freebies?

        They’re coming out of desperation due to factors the US created and, of course, they’re going to want freebies, and also, of course, the US cannot afford welfare for them as it can for regular citizens.

    • EPGAH

      Yes, but “nationalist” wars are usually to cleanse the Other out of YOUR nation, not to take over a nation someone else built, which is what happened in South Africa!

      Or is it their fault for letting so many savages in? Is ownership of a country determined by its demographic makeup rather than who built it?
      And if so, why should any white country ever let savages live within their borders, knowing that the savages outbreed us AT OUR EXPENSE and we’ll ultimately be the minority in all our own countries, and the savages will fuck up our countries as bad or worse than the Hells they invaded from?

      • Jason Y

        Nobody asked those fuckers to come to South Africa, anyhow AND the blacks or whoever are not interested in being little sambos for them. Robert did a post on this and feel free to ask him directly.

        Now, on a less extreme note. OK, there is some hypocrisy. Yeah, the US was founded in the same way. But the South African blacks had more immunity to western disease. So the situation there is – that the blacks are there – they will never go away and they’re not interested in being 2nd class citizens in a more advanced society.

        Just like Palestinians don’t want to be servants of Israelis and Koreans servants of Japanese etc.. etc…

        • EPGAH

          The Blacks WEREN’T there to start, though, that’s the thing.
          Whites turned a blank land into a country, savages poured in until they became the majority, then once they were the majority, they overthrew the country. You can’t pour into someone else’s country, then bitch that you’re not in charge.

        • Jason Y

          It’s too late. The blacks overran the place and made it their own, just like the Arabs came in and took over Palestine after the time Jesus Christ was on the Earth. Now it’s their land and the area is too geographically close to other African lands to ever expect a peaceful white country.

        • Jason Y

          Note, though, the WN double standard of feeling pity for Palestine, but not South Africa – when basically it’s the SAME situation. Again, more identity politics.

        • Jason Y

          OK, whites have overrun North America, but the white people are highly convinced it’s their land and Mexico is conquering them.

          Sound familiar ep-gah?

          OK, I’ll take the non-liberal view that the statute of limitations has past and the whites of the USA, Canada have a right to the land.

    • EPGAH

      Why don’t we have a nationalist war to kick the violently ungrateful savages out of our country if they can’t live under Our House, Our Rules?

      • Jason Y

        If Europe and the USA would work on quitting the screwing up of the Middle east and Latin America, then they’d have no reason to migrate out of desperation.

  11. EPGAH

    You know, since Saving Face is THE most important thing in Asian culture, NK could save face if a big nuclear “accident” took out a main part of their program and some top leaders, don’t even have to get Kim. China would go in, clean house and quietly get rid of the insane administration.

    • Lin

      Most people misunderstand what Asians mean by ‘face’. It is just observing certain hierarchy and not to outstep oneself. A typical example would be a son/subordinate should not criticize his father/superior in front of other people/in public.Otherwise such desire as to maintain a certain position would be no different from that of other ethnic groups. Its definitely not attempt to project an undeserving image nor to brag. Modesty is a highly valued Confucist virtue.

    • Jason Y

      China doesn’t like the US. Again it’s more identity politics. In other words, China will trade with the US etc.. but there is always a distrust. China is obviously using NK in some sort of chess game and the US is also using SK in a chess game.

  12. EPGAH

    But hey, NK has no problems with illegals, Muslims, H1B1s, BLM, Antifa, etc.. I’m guessing they have a very low murder and rape rate. Do they even have locks on their homes? By 2030 they will remain the most monolithic nondiverse culture on the earth, meanwhile we will be having daily bombings, regular mass shooting/vehicular terrorism and every citizen will be scanned to enter any building.

    If NK is smart they will go the route of NZ and encourage wealthy folks to buy and build massive homes there on the beautiful coasts. I imagine if you can convince 100,000 good people to move in to the tune of BILLIONS of dollars, that NK will allow special “Tourist Zones.” Could become the preferred exclusive vacation destination for the ultra wealthy.

    • Problem here is that until the hostility against them dies, this would not be a good idea, unless those people could only hang out in those special zones and not go to the interior. One thing I will say about NK is that those guys have that place locked down GOOD. We have a very hard time getting spies in there, and honestly the CIA does not even know much about that place. So that is one good thing about an efficient police state. If they were not allowed to leave the zone, it might be ok. Also the coasts may be beautiful but the air and water is quite cold and it rains a lot.

    • Jason Y

      I’m guessing inbreeding will finally do NK in. 😆 They’ll become so retarded that they’ll shoot a missile at themselves.

  13. Jason Y

    In response to this war with ep-gah, a lot of this stuff is identity politics. OK, South Africa had been overrun with blacks when originally it was a desert with a few African tribes. So Apartheid SA became this hated state in a sea of nearby African nations, sort of an Al Queda base in redneck Louisiana. 😆 So, no shit, there will be a lot of hostility.

    So logically speaking, you could say well, the blacks should leave SA cause they were not originally there. But then again, you could argue the Arabs were not originally in Palestine but rather it was the land of King David and Moses.

    But, again, there is more identity politics which basically says “fuck them n-word-s”, “fuck them Yankees”, “Fuck them, honkeys” So people are not going to listen to reason, but rather side with their own group – mainly cause they want to fit in with their own group – be loved by their own group.

    • Jason Y

      I’m sure the reasoning of blacks overrunning an originally marginally populated South Africa are similar to the ones white Americans had when taking over the US. Of course, the biggest one is simply evolution. The stronger tribe gets what it wants cause it’s stronger – and for no other reason.

    • Jason Y

      Oh speaking of that idea. If you go on Aztlan, a Latino nationalist site, you see one big argument they use is that whites have given over to homosexuality. So, in their mind, it stands to reason they are weak and deserve under-population. In that case, of course, the more macho Latinos have a a right to overrun the US.

      Note, I’m not saying they’re right in this logic, but it just the way they think.

  14. (((Beauregard)))

    JASON
    Robert lives in a town that is around 70% Hispanic, yet he says White non-Hispanics are most of the city administrators, etc.

    We are looking at Brazil, not an extension of an Olmec Indian reservations like La Raza nutjobs believe.

  15. (((Beauregard)))

    La Raza does not deserve to be taken seriously. The likes of Hillary Clinton want to delude Latinos into thinking they are the ones calling shots.

    Big business wanted amnesty, so Obama granted it. It was not a ‘non-White march on the system’.

  16. (((Beauregard)))

    EPG@H
    “VICTORY”
    A 45 year old Afghani peasant stuck in the 12th century is busy arranging a marriage to a 9 year old girl for a dowry of goats. He cares nothing for “Jeffersonian democracy”.

    This Afghani may have fought as a child soldier against the Soviets with AMERICAN GUNs.

    He truthfully does not really know much about America and is too isolated from American troops to have done anything to them.

    But MOABs will surely foil him from trekking to join his peers in American-bound gun boats at Karachi.

    We are saving Myrtle beach vacationers from Arab gunboats!

  17. (((Beauregard)))

    Seriously, bro, radical Islamic groups are not successful at directly smuggling terrorists in/out.

    The terrorists are lone-wolf attackers with sympathies, a croc-pot, and some nails.

    The MOAB makes no difference.

    • Jason Y

      In that case, it’s not really about terrorism – but is a show – for future plans to scare and kill third world populations into submission.

  18. (((Beauregard)))

    Jason/NPD
    “an exercise in futility”
    When asked “what there is to win” EPG@H continually says how we can “win” but not what we win.

    If bombing countries is a sexual experience I can only assume this is his problem:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s