Why Jews Might Promote Braziliafication

Why do Jews who run for office ALWAYS do so on the Democratic ticket. I cannot think of a single exception.

I don’t debate Jews act in their own self-interests.

But I do not believe the complete annihilation of the white race and a dim-witted Mulatto population beget from mostly poor members of all races (Brazil’s poor are a composite of Indians and Blacks, more or less, with Mestizos and a few old Portuguese families ruling the roost) will put Jews in a better position.

To begin with, less consumers with less money because of a shrunken middle-class. Blacks don’t watch Seinfeld. Blacks do not watch Ron Jeremy. Etc. Etc. Whites do.

First of all, Jews don’t think. It is a major misconception that Jews think or are logical. They do not and are not. Jews are emotional thinkers with extremely emotional personalities driven by rage, hatred and fear. This is what drives most of their thinking. Jews basically don’t think things through to the end. They make an emotional judgment based on whatever they were thinking at the time and never think about the consequences.

Look at how the Jews blew up Iraq and Libya. Look at how the Jews are now blowing up Syria. Short term thinking. In the short term, it is worth it to destroy all of Israel’s enemies. Iraq and Libya were destroyed in order to destroy Israel’s enemies and for no other good reason. Syria is in the process of being destroyed for the same reason. The Jews tried to destroy Lebanon to get rid of their enemy, Hezbollah.

Jews are not good for much of anything but destroying countries, slaughtering millions of people and sowing mass terrorism and chaos. Apparently it is for these reasons that they have been put on this Earth. They don’t seem to have any agenda other than mass slaughter and destruction of their enemies. This goes back to the Jewish religion. The Jewish worldview is based on Purim. Destroying all those countries in the Middle East and killing millions of people was just an ongoing Purim holiday for the Jews.

As we can see, Jews do not think of consequences for their behavior because they think emotionally, and their dominant emotions are fear, hatred, rage and revenge. There have been many times in the past when the Jews pushed way too far in societies, and warnings went out that the Jews were about to provoke a pogrom. The Jews never heed any of these warnings. They just get furious and scream, “How dare you say Jews cause anti-Semitism!” and they just keep pushing and pushing until it all blows up in their faces, and there’s a pogrom.

But even then they see no role for themselves in the blowblack. It was simply caused by evil, irrational anti-Semites who are diabolical and act for no intelligible reason whatsoever. Believe it or not, this is how Jews think. The official Jewish line is that anti-Semitism is some mysterious, ether-like quality in humans that all Gentiles are afflicted with presumably from birth. There’s no reason for it. Gentiles just persecute and kill Jews for no reason except blind hatred. There’s never been 1% of a reason for any outbreak of anti-Semitism.

Jews actually think this. Almost all of them do.

Now I ask you, are such people capable of logic? Of rational thinking? Of worrying about the endgame? Of course not.

As far as Brazilification goes, ask you average Jew about it. He will get visibly angry, act like he is going to punch you in the face and call you racist. Almost all Jews will say there is nothing wrong with a Braziliafied US, and if you think it’s bad, you are racist.

Jews hate White Gentiles. Not all of them do, some don’t, and I have known them. But a lot of them do. Jews have made statements that said that they were cheering on the day when Whites become a minority in the US because then Jews would never have to worry about a White Supremacist regime ever coming to power here.

A lot of Jews hate us for what we did to them over the centuries. This last time was the worst of all, and the Holocaust has made most Jews half-nuts to this day. They’ll never forgive us for it. The real enemy to the Jew is the White Supremacists. They killed millions of Jews and nearly wiped them off the Earth.

Jews hate any nationalism among White Gentiles. Whenever White Gentiles go nationalist in any way, it’s not long before they go after the Jews because Jews are always the enemies of any White Gentile nationalists because they are considered to be not only not part of the nation but actively hostile to the interests of the blood and soil natives.

Jews prefer diverse countries because historically speaking, diverse countries are less likely to go after the Jews because people need to get together on a common basis to go after a common enemy in order to go after the Jews, and that’s hard to do in diverse country. Jews dislike White countries with one dominant nationality, culture, religion or sub-race because these are the type of White countries that go after the Jews.

Many have noted that Braziliafication would be bad for the Jews. You go find me one Jew anywhere who will agree with that statement. Also this implies that Jews think through the consequences of their emotionally based thinking, and that’s something they have never done historically and still do not do to this very day.

When you point out that Braziliafication will be bad for the Jews, I would answer yes, but most Jews won’t see it that way. Jews will see it only in terms of their short-term interests, which is reducing the White population to a minority so no White Supremacist regime can take power and creating a diverse society that will not go after the Jews.

Jews don’t do long-term thinking. They only think in terms of short-term emotionally driven solutions.

111 Comments

Filed under Africa, Anti-Semitism, Democrats, Iraq, Israel, Jews, Judaism, Lebanon, Libya, Middle East, Nationalism, North Africa, Political Science, Politics, Race Relations, Race/Ethnicity, Racism, Regional, Religion, Sociology, Syria, US Politics, Whites

111 responses to “Why Jews Might Promote Braziliafication

  1. ROBERT Jews in Phoenix – A Response

    An internal migration of Jews from NYC to Phoenix predated the Midwest to Sunbelt migration of the 1990’s by about 20 years. It was considerable.

    Jews can pass for Mexicans but ALWAYS HANG AROUND ANGLO-SAXONS in Arizona. Under all circumstances they will live, associate with and work with other Europeans. None wanted anything to do with Mexicans.

    Arizona “Hispanos” of Colonial Spanish descent who resemble Italian-Americans were often “Conversos” or Jews kicked out of Spain but recent Jewish-American arrivals from NYC wanted zero to do with them either.

    Mexicans of the pale and elite variety from the higher-echelons of Latin American society are descended from the very people who kicked the Jews out of Spain in the first place.

  2. Craig

    What a disgusting, hateful, anti Semite rant..The Jews are wonderful, hardworking, resourceful people, whether it be in Israel or USA. The problem with the Middle East is that curse of Islam and the crazy, hateful, fanatical Muslims who follow that dead criminal Muhammad..What you don’t understand is that Israel is the one shining light in that whole area of war, murder and bloodshed, if Israel were to fall to the terrorists, then all hope is lost for any peace..ISLAM is the problem in the ME as it is becoming in the rest of the world..

    • DarkLegoMan

      Robert’s not antisemetic. Plenty of Semetic ancestry in Syria and the larger middle east. Israel is the oddball, light of Lucifer maybe. Talmud followers are in no position to judge other religions. If jews were logical they wouldn’t be kicked out of nearly every European country. It is often said they have a deathwish.

    • CRAIG

      I am of the opinion that if Rednecks had not voted for Bush no amount of Neocon pressure could have made Al Gore enter Iraq.

      I am furthermore dubious that Israel truly wanted Bush to invade Iraq and create the nightmare from Iraq to Yemen that exists 14 years later.

      I also remember Jews themselves in America being against the invasion of Iraq and not voting for Bush.

      I concur a few Jewish-Americans might have voted but the majority did not.

  3. Yee

    Maybe because the Jews have always been merchants in history. Merchants have been hated in a lot of places.

    In ancient China, merchants were classified low social status, less than farmers and craftsman.

    And merchants do tend to have lower morals compare to other professions. We have word for “Evil merchants” in Chinese, but no “evil farmer” or “evil craftsman”.

    • YEE

      There is parallel between Malays and Chinese merchants in Philippines and that of Jews, isn’t there?

      Chinese are disliked for some of the same reasons in the Philippines.

      • Yee

        Possible…Lots of “evil merchants” in mainland China, too.
        But since we’re the same race, so it become identify by region. The South are more commercial than the North, so Northerner see Southerners “cunning”.

      • Yee

        But unlike Jews, Chinese merchants always try to stay away from politics.

        This preference has good points and bad. On the bad side, they’re powerfuless while face hostility/discrimination; on the good side, those situations seldom push to the extreme.

        • YEE

          Not true in the Philippines, the Chinese-Filipino who threatened me later became a volunteer spokesperson for Duterte.

          In the Philippines the Chinese-Filipinos are more involved in politics.

        • Yee

          Are you sure those are still merchants?

          Normally, they would prefer bribery, not actually getting involved in politics.

  4. YEE Blaming Whites

    Spanish-Filipinos, essentially whites with dual-citizenship like Macau in Portugal, were such horrendously bad politicians that Chinese-Filipinos were seized with some degree of civic duty.

    Chinese-Filipinos also fought against Spain.

    Tensions between Spanish Mestizos and Chinese Merchants exist to this day.

    Generally, Chinese-Filipinos are active in politics on a grassroots level however.

    I’m not sure one could ever get elected.

    By the way I draw a distinction between Filipinos that are 1/4 Chinese and actual Chinese-Filipinos whose family can prove no Filipino ancestors-and will proudly do so to white people (I know them well, believe me, as usual I engaged in relations with the one female who would allow me to do so).

  5. YEE

    This was true until the incompetency and corruption of the Spanish half-breeds and full-breeds (Like Macau Portuguese they are dual citizens) got so bad that the Chinese-Filipinos got into grassroots politics.

    • Yee

      Dual citizenship is nothing special for Macau. Anyone born in Macau before 1999 handover automatically has Portuguese citizenship. Of course, nobody wants to go to Portugal, let alone a Chinese.

      • YEE

        Only Spanish Filipinos have Spanish citizenship. It is passed down through the generations. Ordinary Filipinos cannot get into Spain at all.

        Spanish are actually unsympathetic to the Philippines. One Spanish Filipino politician stole some money and fled to Spain. Spain refused to extradite him to the Philippines.

        Another Spanish Filipino raped and killed two girls at a mall.

        Why was Portuguese so unattractive? Is it poorer than Macau. This is hard to fathom. After all it is in Western Europe.

        • Yee

          Macau is probably richer than Portugal, as it’s casinos have the largest turnover in the world, larger than Las Vegas. Macau’s treasury is flooded with money.

      • YEE

        Chinese-Filipinos usually have dual citizenship. About 40% are born in China.

      • YEE

        White people did not do anything that impressive in Macau or Philippines. I think this is my point.

        Much is made of how whites created functional societies in tropical countries but the Spanish and Portuguese did nothing impressive in Macau or Philippines.

        In the Philippines residual tension between Chinese-Filipinos and Spanish Mestizos continues to remain thick.

        • DarkLegoMan

          Wasn’t Macau just a flyover fishing town before Portuguese came? What’s impressive is in the eye of the beholder. One person may be impressed most “coolies” came from Macau, another by the culinary imprint. I found it interesting that the small minority of European laborers on Hawaiian plantations were mostly Portuguese, Asians being the standard and most well known.

  6. MACAU SYNDROME

    Chinese just found rule under Spanish Filipinos (Some are half-breeds and some full-breeds but on average they are about 3/4 white and look it) intolerably corrupt and incompetent and indifferent to the situation.

    So they used their money to bribe their way into local politics.

    I would say they are not that much better than the Spanish Filipinos but slightly more conscientious because they actually have interact with Filipinos as a merchant community as oppose to Spanish Filipinos who simply occupy a land-owning class.

  7. Beauregard

    Hate to be “Captain Obvious” here, but it is important to differentiate between “Brazilifcation” and the WN mantra of “White genocide”.

    Jews do not wish to kill off all other Whites and hate the current status of Boers. Rather they just seek a pluralistic society.

    • Beauregard

      and *have the current status of boers

      • BEAUREGARD

        Boers tended to be less wealthy or well-connected then British South Africans. These folks hit the road for Australia very quickly.

        America has a great deal of space and a great deal of venture capitalism so whites are always moving every 30 years further from city centers.

        Those few whites who are too poor to leave places like Flint or Detroit tend to face some of the same issues as white South Africans, though our government in the United States is not black yet.

      • DarkLegoMan

        Beauregard How can jews be “other Whites” if they don’t identify as White themselves?

    • BEAUREGARD

      Tell that to the Jewish thugs in Brooklyn who savagely kicked a Black on foot in the eye until they nearly blinded him.

      Some Jews are pretty vicious racists. Not all of course but the ones that are would give the KKK a run for their money.

      One thing people in Wisconsin don’t realize is that only the few successful Jews manage to get out of their own communities in squalor and live among Anglo-Saxons such as the doctors, dentists, lawyers, surgeons. So of course you are not going to see many poor Jews in Alabama. If they could afford to move out of the Bronx, Greater Detroit, Cleveland or Brooklyn than obviously they are wealthier and better-educated than the average Jew.

      If you actually go into the bowels of the Jewish ghetto in the Bronx or Brooklyn or Brighton Beach or Detroit you’re going to meet some pretty down-and-out characters. They look like Ron Jeremy or Amy Winehouse. Trust me, you would not want to cross them in a dark alley.

      Generally they leave whites alone but they do not co-exist with blacks well, or Asians.

    • Yee

      If Jews indeed have such a big Brazilifcation plan, they must like to do things the hard way. Because surely ther’re better ways to ensure safty than changing a country’s demographics.

    • BEAUREGARD White Genocide

      Whites in Semi-Rural locations are more likely to make decisions that could be judged as stupid.

      How many Jews or Asians are divorced with a kid at age 24? How many Jews or Asians HAVE kids before they are 25? Semi-rural whites will marry at a young age when they are irresponsible and divorce young. Kids will then suffer the consequences of being a child of a 25 year old divorced mother.
      How Jewish women under the age of 30 have out-of-wedlock children unless they are a Lesbian couple who found a gay male friend to be sperm donor? Zero, none. East Asian women? Zero, none. Whites in semi-rural areas? 25%
      How many Jews or Asians do not have a university degree OR a useless degree like mine happens to be? Zero to none, barring a few famous performers.
      How many Jews or Asians do the really stupid drugs like Meth or Oxy? A few heroin junkies in Chinatown. HOTDOG mentioned that some Jews like Ecstasy but they are not mugging somebody for it like a tweaker.

      To be totally truthful, Jews and Asians excel in a data/analytical society and excel as merchants. As colonists, administrators, explorers and sailors they do not. At no time have Jews ever been imperialists, for example.

      But they are not prone to the same bad early decision-making and dysfunction of rural or semi-rural whites.

      Anybody can accuse me of being a Jew for as long as they want, does not matter. I’d say that Jews have even less social pathologies than Jews.

    • Semi-Rural Wish Fulfillment

      Nobody in Dubai wants to immigrate to Kansas. North Koreans have no use for Colorado.

      Perhaps Mexicans might want LA with all of its resources but even they probably don’t want Iowa.

      Sad to say but white semi-rural states just do not seem that attractive. Wisconsin is pretty depressing. How many immigrants want to move into the interior of the U.S.

      This is awesome wish fulfillment on the part of whites.

      As for “cucks”, if they wanted to, most of them could “cuck” the Alpha male in the Flyover. They have a nicer car, more electronic toys, a better education, better stock portfolio, live in an exciting city.

      The white Flyover states are just kinda…grim. There is no ocean. No seaports. No cultural fusion. No wealth. Just a bunch of downtowns that are decaying as e-commerce takes a toll and Wal-Mart does the rest.

      They kind of, well, suck.

    • SpankerofGoys

      There’s no button to exterminate all whites in a room full of anti-white jews. Not every jew wants to kill off ALL other whites. Once we feel good n safe and no longer fear Nazis we’ll stop attacking the white race. Europe will not be the monolithic society it once was and jews will be resented because our leading role.

      • SPANK

        Because Parisian Jews want nothing more than to have Muslims shooting them while they did their grocery shopping in a Kosher deli in Paris somewhere.

        They all assumed that once Muslims were Mayors, Police, Army in Europe and Whites had vanished their position would be one of greater strength.

        …You cannot be for real, man.

        • SpankerofGoys

          Oy fuckinng vey. I knew the blonde Caliphate of Cordoba would turn on us! We push to let Muslims into Europe and this how they repay us. At least whites will guilty. Maybe we can spin this in our favor and get reparations. Maybe we could setup another attack, with proper media coverage and a racist white patsy. If I had a missle for every politician we owned…..

  8. That will prove to be an especially bad move: in a Brazilified society such as Brazil, the various cultures of that multiculturalism cannot agree together safe onto one point: the Jews are the main responsible for the present state of affairs, even people such as the Japanese of Belo Horizonte, the German of Porto Alegre, the Negroes from Bahia and the White Trash rednecks of the chaparral of Sertão can agree on that.

    I am now practicing Portuguese, listening to various videos to study various local accents and slangs, and everybody is inveighing against Jews each one for their different reasons: the Negroes accuse them of having organized the slave trade, which in the specific case of Northern Brazil was true, the rednecks of Sertão accuse them of having geared the whole musical culture of Brazil towards hedonistic and then towards gay values, the well-to-do Portuguese of São Paulo accuse them of having subverted the monarchy to install a de facto British colonialism in the form of a Republic as well as to have destroyed at last the military regime which was the last rampart against the tide of Cultural Leftism everywhere in the intelligentsia, the Germans there are of a type that was never morally bullied into repentance for WWII, and the Japanese, though not big haters of Jews, all want them to be put back into ghettos for practical reasons and accuse them of having organized the whole of Western colonialism in non-White countries and robbed Asia of its traditional technological superiority and intelligence by programming so many other Whites beyond their real innate capacity to feel inventive and superior.

    It comes to no mystery that cultures in an multicultural environment tend identify with their most reactionary elements and therefore are more inclined to look for a culprit or archetypal symbol of evil from without. And it turns out that in Brazil the most rabid antisemitic movements are decidedly multicultural chic, not White Power, especially since the traditional White racism of Brazil claimed that the core of the nation was made up of mythical Jewish ancestry.

    The Extreme Left to Center Left culture that still refuses most the conspiracy-justified antisemitism is monocultural non-Catholic Portuguese (mildly anti-Black de facto, though praising mulatto women for their supernatural beauty but only in their own role of providers of sentimental entertainment), and they are the ones who communicate the least with other cultures in their own country and prefer to communicate with other White nations in the world (France for the culture, the Anglo-Saxon countries for business) than with their own co-nationals of different hues.

    All great antisemitic bouts of the past started out in rather multicultural environments. Austria for instance used to be the most multicultural part of Europe, and further back in time you can find Spain and Portugal which at one time used to be the most diversified country: in both cases, mythical antisemitism could develop unchecked for being the only political language common to so many diverse groups even though not the ideal one to that many individuals.

    How do the Jews let that happen to the point of loving it as it may seem? That is very simple: first, as you put it, their intelligence is grossly overrated. They are emotion-driven more than many others. It must also be known that Jewish identification with intellectual superiority of openness of mind is a very recent and atypical thing in the course of History. That identification began only as a byproduct of the Enlightenment culture and only among Jews that wanted to get free of their traditional ghetto culture, which turned out into a majority at a certain point.

    Before that point intellectual curiosity was far more severely repressed in Jewish culture than in Christian culture, the rabbis had far more tolerance and liking for magic: even the study of too much geography was deemed dangerous. The general morality among them used to be that one must as an individual make plans for the day, as a family for the week, and as a Jewish community for the year, NEVER beyond, since all promises of the preceding years were to be overridden at each Rosh ha Shanna. What is good for Jewish prosperity this year only is the real good, the rest is goyish day-dreaming.

    Even if the consequences of what is done this year are evidently ultra-negative for your own descendants, such as destroying the environment or installing a future millennial totalitarian regime just to make sure your tiny few talents are employed and well-paid, that is none of your business as a Jew, you must think of those descendants as of imaginary, non-Jewish beings.

    When for instance you adopt Communism as a Jew the important thing is to enjoy a higher life through it and also a good relationship with many non-Jews for a few years’ space at most. You must not inquire too seriously about the ultimate consequences of your ideological choice. It is a fashion among many others to have to dress your own brain and others as well as their bodies according to a taste that sells right now.

    If it turns out that by so doing you will progressively install a Nazi-like regime first courting you and then turning against you, so be it, que sera sera, that was God’s intention for you to bring it about. It is a culture based on the principle of pure prostitution and on the faith that such an attitude alone can bring about joyful survival to a group: they are actually not so racist towards strangers provided they share that very same mentality.

  9. Reminiscent of the Philosopher’s ramblings over at Pumpkin Person’s.

    • GONDWANA MAN

      I attended university in a remote part of the state that was semi-rural. The whites were really rural.

      In terms of aloofness or coldness there was a feeling among the university students that you just wanted to stay the hell away from the locals.

      A few times I had near misses with them. Once was entering the wrong bar to make a phone-call and having a redneck who was about 6’3 follow me out threatening me.

      On another occasion I was riding a bike near the campus and accidentally cut off a huge hick in an old van who followed me furiously but broke off on the campus line.

      Maybe there were one or two other instances but if to actually spend TIME around white proles in semi-rural areas is to develop feelings of sorrow and pity and revulsion. They are screwed to various degrees.

      • Yes I agree, poor whites are depressing. Almost as much so as poor blacks.

        • GONDWANAMAN

          More depressing in fact. Ghettos have a certain vibrancy before they reach the tipping point of Detroit. There is color, musicality, cheer, vibrancy, good drugs and booze, cheap stolen items, guilt-free affordable sex.

          White trash semi-rural towns and cities are half-deserted and depressing. There is a brooding look of resentment on the faces of the inhabitants in their dirty t-shirts and unkempt appearance. You expect Leatherface to leap out with a chainsaw.

          Blacks have clubs, crack houses and underground dog fights or casinos. Poor whites have a sports bar with the neon sign flickering and pickup trucks with patches and dents.

          Italians and Mexicans have poor neighborhoods but some panache.

          Poor Anglo whites are just grim.

          That is why more horror films are set their than anywhere else.

        • DarkLegoMan

          “Poor whites” aren’t a destructive force. jews push for non-White immigration in White countries and not Israel. Destruction is the jews intent.

        • Jason Y

          GONDWANAMAN

          More depressing in fact. Ghettos have a certain vibrancy before they reach the tipping point of Detroit. There is color, musicality, cheer, vibrancy, good drugs and booze, cheap stolen items, guilt-free affordable sex.

          White trash semi-rural towns and cities are half-deserted and depressing. There is a brooding look of resentment on the faces of the inhabitants in their dirty t-shirts and unkempt appearance. You expect Leatherface to leap out with a chainsaw.

          Blacks have clubs, crack houses and underground dog fights or casinos. Poor whites have a sports bar with the neon sign flickering and pickup trucks with patches and dents.

          Italians and Mexicans have poor neighborhoods but some panache.

          Poor Anglo whites are just grim.

          That is why more horror films are set their than anywhere else.

          I think the dirty t-shirts might be a free-will choice. It’s sort of a hippie look – one that blends in with nature and is just them chilling – being themselves – not being pretty boys all the time.

        • Jason Y

          To be honest, I don’t like looking pretty boy all the time. Who can blame these proles for having the courage to just be themselves?

      • Beauregard

        TRASH
        Problems do emerge if you are someone well traveled or liberal like Jason; you are constantly abused by those who are essentially your inferiors (culturally, not genetically).

        In terms of politics they pride themselves as smarter than “libtards” yet vote against their self interest. This was evidenced by last night’s Saturday night live:

        • BEAUREGARD

          I agree that if you worked in other countries (as I have also done) and returned to be a senior in high school-as community colleges are-to be “bullied” in your 40’s by teenagers the situation would be very depressing.

          Nobody who has worked overseas for years can tolerate being around “townies” very long. In urban environments you are better off but to return to a small city where the local inhabitants appear to lynch inter-racial couples is a culture shock.

          To spend years overseas is to feel involuntary contempt for townies.

          However, I sometimes suspect Jason Y might be putting us on. His accounts border on absurdist.

        • Townies know they are trapped in a specific geography and unless oil bursts from their front yard they themselves will not be leaving it.

          If their geography gets worse, their situation worsens. Which is why so many of them plead for some sort of change while the college educated wonder why the hell they don’t just MOVE. They cannot move. They are trapped like animal.

    • Beauregard

      Indeed.
      His greatest hits:

      Racism is a natural phenomena, therefore it doesn’t exist.

      Trump appeasing neocons is not because he conned alt-rightists, it’s “3 dimensional chess”

      Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn are secret White Nationalists.

      Any Black that succeeds in the White world is automatically and inherently a Jew token.

      along with usual stuff about anyone who disagrees with him being a low-t beta male cuck, cuz you know, women love guys who spend all their waking hours ranting about Jews online.

      • BEAUREGARD WN Erotomania

        Erotomania is that disorder where someone thinks someone else is obsessing about them when they do not give a shit at all. Jews do not give a shit about White Nationalists in Flyover States. It is like Suburban whites do not give a shit about Indians on a Reservation in North Dakota. Jews are not obsessing over how to further degrade the white race. They don’t have to obsess over Alpha Male Alt-right.

        The white liberal or Jew or Asian WITH SOME KIND OF JOB and some money on the East or West Coast. He’s getting more pussy than the Alpha Male WN.

        Sorry, Jews do not give a sweet solitary F8ck about White Nationalists. They do not give a F8ck about their small semi-rural geography with its two-story downtown and tweakers and Wal-Marts and Oxy dealers.

        Because to be honest “Alpha Male Whites” are a non-entity.

      • The Jews made me smoke pot in junior high.
        The Jews made me vote for George Bush in 2001 (Though most despised him) and spark off the war that created the problem in Syria today.
        The Jews made me jerk off to porn until my marriage fell apart.
        The Mexicans made me take their drugs.
        The Jews made my daughter into a slut who got pregnant at 19 with their media messages.
        The Jews made blacks have a bigger dick than mine through selective breeding as slavers.
        The Jews-who do not want blacks in Brooklyn any more than a Klavern of Klans in their meeting center down in Alabama-want blacks to run America.
        The next time I watch some film written by a Jew in LA over 3 grams of coke and a bottle of Tequila that depicts North Koreans parachuting into Colorado to take over a small Flyover town of no strategic meaning I will believe it is true.
        Therefore I will believe anything is true that I watch on a box.
        The Jews are all child molesters but I am the one whose brother has the sex offense record.
        Jews are convincing white women not to travel back in time to the 1950’s and be housewives again.
        I could afford for my partner not to work if it were not for Jews.

      • Tribalism might not be a natural phenomenon but it could be more or less inevitable.

        Usually between two groups who border on one another. Irish and English, Jews and Arabs, Mexicans and Rednecks, Spanish and Arabs, Vietnamese and Chinese, Pakistanis and Indians.

        If anything groups that are MORE SIMILAR-Jews and Arabs or Irish and English who only experts could distinguish-are more likely to develop deep feelings of dislike for one another.

        • Beauregard

          TRASH
          point is this dumba$$ says that because something is widespread and constantly occurring, it doesn’t exist.

          But he’s an admitted schizophrenic. I guess to him that logic makes ense.

      • SpankerofGoys

        Whites should be less obsessive and tribal, like us jews pretend to be. jews are way more Alpha with girls under 3 as permitted by sacred jewish law.

    • Beauregard

      He believes Jews want to eliminate ALL Whites then flee to Israel.

      The logistics of such are very difficult.

      Such is why I find his hatred of autistics to be very ironic.

      Much of the alt-right worldview is profoundly socially retarded (not necessarily autistic, but still)

      • BEAUREGARD

        This is because the average Jew in Brooklyn who cannot remember the capitol of any state in the Flyover from Wisconsin to North Dakota with all the clubbing he is doing in NYC or Queens and booze/Ecstasy/Weed wants to destroy whites in Des Moines Idaho.

        Since blacks in Brooklyn love Jews so much he thinks that his world would be a better place with no white police officers, security guards, politicians.

        Especially if some Black Muslim had the nuclear codes.

      • SpankerofGoys

        Whaaat? and risk getting rocks thrown at us by Pali kids?

    • Beauregard

      GONDWANA MAN AND TRASH
      Biography of average Pumpkin Person reader (vaguely intelligent alt-rightists)

      Born in a blue state to upper middle class parents. Had some sort of social disorder from the beginning, although never formally diagnosed with it.

      When they reached adolescence their social disorder became exacerbated. They may have been bullied by the ghetto NAMs bused into their school, and were ignored by their White liberal peers.

      However, they do moderately well in school. To compensate for their social inferiority complex, they invest all their time and effort into academia. This is where they are introduced to IQ, and from there, HBD. They already dislike NAMs because they were bullied by them. They are largely indifferent to Jews at this point but that will change.

      They take the SAT and may score around 1200 or 1300/1600, some 2-3 hundred points below Ivy league level. Yet when they are denied admission they blame “Jewish nepotism”, as they were instructed to do so by HBD blogs.

      No longer seeing themselves as geniuses, and social rejects, College is even more depressing than High school.

      After graduating they work a low-level IT job somewhere. Out of anger at their scapegoats and perhaps sheer boredom, they spend most of their free time on HBD and WN blogs to re-instill their superior complex; they no longer rely on academic achievements for their self esteem, but ‘muh heritage’.

      • Beauregard

        I apologize for the off-topic comment.

      • Hahaha! I think there’s a lot of truth to this.

      • BEAUREGARD An HBD Experience

        COLLEGE

        I grew up in a Blue-State Hive city of typical white ethnic lower-upper-middle class: surgeons, doctors, lawyers, businessmen. Mostly Germans, some Irish Catholic families and many Jews (Who were actually less wealthy than the Gentiles in my neighborhood). There were a fair number of Canadians, especially French-Canadians, who had recently moved across the border. One or two Asian families. A scattering of Eastern Europeans lived on the periphery but were poorer and I brawled with some Polish kids I called Polacks a few times.

        There was a black ghetto but it was miles away. There might as well have been a sign hung over it saying: Danger, Black Ghetto. But in urban centers blacks tended to absorb some degree of knowledge by osmosis.

        In terms of violence as children most of the kids brawled. The Koreans had a Methodist community and practiced Tae Kwan Do. Irish and German elementary or junior high kids were often on the boxing team as well as some of the Italians. Jewish kids tended to be hot-tempered and emotional. One sprayed me with a hose in his yard for looking at him the wrong way. I fought a bigger Polish kid a few times and once we actually held him down and spat on him repeatedly, which resulted in punishment.

        But in general in white middle to upper-middle class suburbs violence waned as we got into high school. One Black kid who was 16 went to adult prison for stabbing a grad student and the public schools had more violence but parochial schools tended to have fistfights.

        So I had no exposure to rural whites until I went to university hundreds of miles away in the rural backwaters of the state.

        This was my first exposure to poor semi-rural whites and I was astounded at how ignorant and self-destructive and culturally crippled they were.

        SEMI-RURAL WHITES AND RACE

        My first racial thought was that absolutely no blacks lived in this area. None. Or Jews. Or Italians. Or Eastern Europeans.

        There was a dangerous mixture of silliness and violence about these poor semi-rural whites combined with a foolish cockiness.

        However, while some were quite enormously tall and lanky or fat, I notice that these rural Anglo whites did not usually have the bulging muscles that Blacks, Italians, Germans, Jews can develop or the naturally symmetry. None of them were as athletic naturally as we urban ethnic white college students were or had the upper-body symmetry.

        NO IDENTIFIABLE ROOTS

        In my own city most middle-class whites had identifiable ethnic roots. Our grandparents were bilingual and most of us were made to visit the Old Country a summer or two regardless of our ethnicity. Often relatives from Europe came to visit us in the United States and some of the Polish ones stayed when I was a kid during Communism.

        The rural whites I encountered in college in this semi-rural location were sometimes Appalachian transplants but most often had no idea of their actual nationality. “Part Indian” is what most would say. Their actual roots were a mystery to them. One reason seemed to be that they came from broken families.

        POOR WHITE LACK OF SOCIALIZATION

        My first experience was at a dorm cafeteria when I accidentally walked through an area right in front of the entrance a female janitor who was in her twenties was mopping. She had not put the sign up and spoke directly to me in a confrontational way. I moved on past her but she gave me a look of real slight as if we knew one another. This was my first exposure to rural whites.

        The poor rural whites were cocky and tended to shoot off their mouths recklessly. I worked a labor job that put me into contact with 50 year old white males doing jobs with teenage students and one began insulting me. He was as old as my father but cocky like a teenager might be even though he was fifty years old and doing shit jobs on a college campus. It seemed odd to me that a 50 year old man would lack the insight or wisdom that he seemed to lack.

        NB He was from West Virginia and later broken into a hardware shop of a rival of some sort and dragged his equipment into a parking lot and burned it all in a fire. This I heard somebody mention. Violent outbursts out of proportion seemed common. Another, in his thirties, assaulted somebody over a dispute about a bag of weed I later heard.

        Working off campus I sort of mingled a bit with some of the younger ones and also observed that they could not manage to graduate from high school until they were 19 or 20. It seemed astounding than men the same age as college students would still be roaming the halls of public schools with children as young as 14. Not surprisingly, most of these grown men dated 15 years old girls.

        EARLY SUBSTANCE ABUSE

        In these labor capacities I noticed that many of them had already been into drugs for years and years. Most Blue Hive college kids smoke pot and drink beer of course, but this behavior does not start until their late teens. At an age when middle-class urban whites are sneaking Mom’s cigarette at 14 (Or used as most middle-class whites quit smoking in the 70’s or 80’s) semi-rural poor whites are sneaking joints.

        Recreational screwing and drugs are part of college experience for most of us, but I was shocked when a local laborer mentioned that his 39 year old brother had left his wife to move in with a 17 year old girl (He was a truck driver). Such behavior was unheard of and beastial in Blue Hives. You would probably lose your law or medical practice.

        Semi-poor rural whites usually began using marijuana heavily by high school and many of them had already been to boot camp or rehab by 16 for meth, selling marijuana or pills.

        Stylistically, they seemed shockingly out-of-date. In 1994 or 1995 they were still wearing mullets and rockin’ the Motley Crue look when everybody was wearing flannel and black glasses and Doc Martin’s. They seemed as if they had stepped out of 1987. The year that I graduated, 1998, Eminem had changed all that and the younger ones began to (Bad pun) emulate wiggers with sleeveless vests and attendant mannerisms.

        The crime locals committed was random and often cowardly, though not always. Once as I was leaving a student house one local 35 yards away called me a “fag” and I crossed the street silently. I was 23 by then. He came up from behind me and pushed me and then ran off. He had to have been in his early twenties or older.

        Mostly though, it was just sudden and Texas Chainsaw Massacre type outbursts of uncontrolled madness: one hick who worked on campus had been driving on a suspended license because he was constantly DUI and when the Meter Maid ticketed him he ran after her in a berserk outburst. Another hick lived downstairs and walked up naked to a student apt. banging on the door about music.

        GEOGRAPHIC LACK OF MOBILITY

        However, there was also an element of geographical cowardice. One redneck in van followed me but sped off as I entered campus, expecting a fight. None wanted to be out of their element and campus was like a church to a vampire.

        One redneck landlord whose apartment I moved out of with no notice because it was so rundown and awful threatened me and I invited him to visit me in my city as he sometimes went South to visit relatives. “A Hillbilly like you is going to feel like a bad country song on my concrete streets you stupid hick.”

        Semi-rural and small city hicks will get fearful like Transylvania peasants at dusk around urban areas.

        Another time I paid a hick contractor to drive me back from Campus and he got really scared as entered my urban environment (Maybe he thought it was squalid, I don’t know) and grew tense. He dropped me off urgently.

        Generally though, i noticed overall that hicks from semi-rural geographies simply DO NOT TRAVEL. In their entire life it is not uncommon for them to have never left the region of their state.

        RURAL DEGENERACY

        Much is made about how bucolic and uneventful these places are but I found that at least around a college campus petty crime was common. Some poor whites would enter a Frat Keg Party pretending to be students and then return and burglarize it. Once every few years a drunken college girl would be pulled into the bushes and gang-raped.

        One college professor’s daughter I knew was a coke whore who lived next door to me in off-campus apartments and she was gang-raped by a bunch of locals whom she bought coke off of (Meth was not as common at that time). I had heard some shouting and these semi-rural hicks burst out her front apartment door and they had DP’d her but she did not want to go to the police because of all the cocaine in her apartment.

        Semi-rural whites practice less restraint in front of their children. I noticed that even after they are parents they continue with the same sort of behavior (Drinking, drugs, casual sex) that college educated middle-class Euroamericans and Asians and Jews will cease when they marry and have children. Even the biggest college pothead will stop smoking pot when his kids are born or do it on vacation. Semi-rural whites won’t. They will get intoxicated or smoke weed in front of their five year old kids. In general they neglect them anyhow. It is hardly any surprise whatsoever that their kids grow up to have few social graces or restraint.

        SEXUAL BEHAVIOR

        I observed semi-rural whites speak often about Christianity and family values while complaining that Jews destroyed them with porn or that porn was destroying their life.

        This does not surprise me because they have a great deal of difficulty not acting out sexually in the first place. They just cannot seem as adults to get a grip on their own sexuality. The women, even far into adulthood, seemed to behave in giggly slutty schoolgirl way and the local campus newspaper was filled with a roster of molestation, statutory rape and aggravated sexual assault.

        Much is also made of the sexual libertine character of Blue State whites but my experience with semi-rural whites was that their sexuality was primitive and sadistic and some of the local women even liked this: I was smoking marijuana with a local couple I barely knew when the woman asked me if I had ever “F9cked a girl in the ass” in a “DP”. Middle-class white males like me back then found gang-bang DP’s to be gay and homoerotic. I never smoked weed with them again.

        Underage sex, however is the underlying theme.

        My college dope-dealer Scott, a telemarketing salesman, had a party and I attended. So did his Dad. One 17 year old girl got into an argument with her boyfriend and this hick left. Scott’s Dad, an ex-convict truck driver who was in his forties, went into the bedroom where she was drunkenly sulking and had sex with her. Scott though it was funny.

        40 year old Lesbians in San Francisco might be having threesomes with some Hipster swinger but none of these people were sexually active under 17 or 18 and none would want to involve underage girls.

        Evangelical Christianity of the Taliban level seems to be the only thing that can restrain the sexual behavior of semi-rural whites and more of their sexual behavior is depraved.

        MOVING UP TO SEX WORK

        The only semi-rural white woman I knew who left was named Danielle. She was a waitress and when she was suddenly absent one day I was told she had moved to Vegas to work in legalized prostitution. This was told to me by another woman who informed me that she was bragging about earning $300 a day. This was HUGE money for semi-rural white women in 1996.

        A few of the semi-rural white women would disappear to the nearest city to work as strippers or prostitutes.

        I am relating experiences that occurred over a 4-5 year period in the 1990’s. So I am sure conditions are even worse for semi-rural whites in this geography. But in general, this was my experience off-campus.

        Afterwards, I never wanted to spend any amount of time around semi-rural whites again.

        • Look Trash, I am banning you, ok? You derail every single thread still. All threads are still getting derailed. A number of people are participating in the derailing, but all the derailing is being started by you. No matter what the thread is about, you immediately derail it into talk about yourself and your favorite obsessions which we have all heard now in various guises thousands of times already.

          Good look in your life.

        • Jason Y

          Right, good stuff – but too much derailing. Don’t want to see him go, though. Maybe a disciplinary action.

        • I have had it up to here with Trash. I have been dying to ban him for the longest time now. IMHO, Trash has been destroying the site for some time now as many other similar commenters did in the past.

        • Yee

          Isn’t there supposed to be a warning first, before banning, when derail?

          The man has lots of rubbish, we all see that, but he also has perspective and lots of truth, as BrainDamaged mentioned before. Besides, he’s responsive. There’s nothing more boring if you post something but ignores by everyone. This is why quite a few people want to keep him, his rubbish can be ignored. No one is perfect.

        • He was warned. You only get one warning. He can petition the ban, but honestly the man simply cannot help himself. He’s out of control. He can’t control his behavior. Also he repeated himself endlessly. He would make a comment and then the next comment would be more or less the same comment as preceded, worded a bit differently. I think this is a human being who is frankly in love with the sound of his own voice, as we say in English.

          If you wish to study Abnormal Psychology, he is Exhibit A. This is what a serious personality disorder looks like. They aren’t really crazy. They’re more sick than nuts. They’re also completely hopeless, incapable of change and most of all, they are quite abrasive. They drive everyone around them nuts. We say it is pathological because it rubs so many people the wrong way and causes so many problems for the person. Otherwise we don’t care about your personality. But a severe personality disorder is a nasty beast indeed.

          Please pray you do not ever get an Axis 2 disorder. Axis 1 is understandable. Anyone can become ill. Axis 2 is so much worse. It’s as if they are permanently damaged at their very core since childhood with no hope of improvement. Axis 2 people are psychiatric disasters IMHO.

          I’ve been wanting to throw him off here forever now and I finally got my excuse. IMHO, he was destroying the site by driving away commenters. I believe he has already driven many people away. There have been many others like him in the past and they all had the same effect. As you can see, some of the best commenters are already coming back, such as Assembly Line.

          It’s going to be a better place, trust me.

        • Yee

          Then, I must congratulate that Indian.

          As I remember, he was the one vowed to get Trash throw out, and he certainly delivery, despite several more try to keep Trash.

        • Beauregard

          What ‘good commentators’?

          Magneto “I hate Indian men because they won’t let me have sex with their women” ?
          Hindutvas?
          Creaders?

          These people, with all respect to them had just as many issues as TRASH.

        • Yee

          I’ve been here some time after Trump’s election. But Trash has been here for a year at least, I saw him on some of the older threads. If he was the cause of some commentators coming less, then it would have happened long before now.

          But an Indian planted the idea in your head, then you go along with him. Rebort, you’re being show how good an Indian is at manipulating.

        • Pranav

          Yee, Trash can still petition the ban. However, as Robert pointed out it appears as if he is having some issues. I pity for him he said this blog keeps him sane. I hope he takes a break and comes back. That brahman guy was the one called for his ban.

        • Jason Y

          Trash’s stuff obviously offends people who are incredibly proud of being white, much like similar talk against blacks would offend people highly proud of being black etc.. (on a black website).

          For instance, whites don’t want to be called white trash – just like blacks don’t want to be called big-lipped watermelon eating fools. 😆 Who are we kidding here?

          Nonetheless, there is a dark sort of revenge and enjoyment at seeing WNs being mocked the same way they constantly mock other races. Of course, Trash’s words are directed against all poor whites, and of course, that’s wrong, but again, note how WNs direct their mockery and hate against ALL poor blacks, not just really mean ones.

      • In reply to Beauregard

        What ‘good commentators’?

        Magneto “I hate Indian men because they won’t let me have sex with their women” ?
        Hindutvas?
        Creaders?

        These people, with all respect to them had just as many issues as TRASH.”

        I agree.

        The Hindutvas were stirring sh!t and they took out the most vulnerable one who had first hand experience about their country and tell it like it is.
        Trash should be suspended for an amount of time. He should just park his thought in Open Topic if he needs to vent about his India and Philippine stuff after the suspension and respect Robert’s blog.

        Everyone got issues. The one with an agenda and issues is the one you look out for. I don’t think Trash has an agenda. Unlike WN Magneto with his RAHOWA mentality.

        That’s my off topic post. Sorry. I don’t post often so can I get a few freebies? I just hate to see Trash go. He just need to focus on the subject and not go rambling on off topic stuff.

        • Beauregard

          BRAINDAMAGE
          Racial nationalists are inherently about “safe spaces”.

          They need “safe space” away from those of different races and those of their own races who aren’t racial nationalists……………
          the hypocrisy is mind-numbingly apparent.

        • I am not going to ban any of you guys for OT. Anyway, Trash is topical.

          I will allow Trash to stay as long as he only posts in Open Topic and in no other places. Is that ok with you guys?

  10. About Schizoids?

    Well I must confess having no desire to be in a remote semi-rural part of the U.S. again.

    I can recall watching Texas Chainsaw Massacre and thinking that was not unlike real rural degeneracy you might encounter among white trash animals in the more remote parts of the United States.

    The word white has to be used loosely as they were mostly Amerindian to some degree.

    • Jason Y

      I love Trash.. (not in a gay way, though) but looking at the above post we see more comical stereotypes. So he is saying any white trash behavior must come from Amerindian blood when obviously most so-called white trash has no significant amount of it. But of course, then Trash would say it’s not Injuns making them wild, it’s that barbaric Scots blood from the days of Braveheart…

      Well, of course, I do admit Amerindians cannot handle alcohol and have a temperament like blacks, but certain “pure” whites in the south can get quite wild – and I’m not sure if it’s a genetic component from Scotland or just the environment.

    • Jason Y

      The obsession with Amerindian blood among southern USA people is moronic. Most have little of it and if they want to see real injuns or somewhat mixed ones – they can just travel over to Western North Carolina, Northern Georgia and around Chattanooga.

  11. James Schipper

    Dear Robert

    Jews are certainly not the only ones who approach politics emotionally rather than rationally. Complete rationality in politics is the exception, not the rule. If politics were rational, would the plutocratic Republicans receive a majority of white votes? Certainly not.

    One can discern 4 basic irrationalities in politics:
    1 – tendency to exaggerate the harm caused by and the dangerousness of people outside one’s own group
    2 – tendency to minimize the harm caused by and the dangerousness of one’s own group
    3 – tendency to overestimate the benefits accruing to other people
    4 – tendency to underestimate the benefits received by ourselves

    The combined effect of these tendencies is to increase the level of insecurity and resentment among voters. If people were more objective in politics, the level of satisfaction would increase and the number of conflicts would decrease dramatically. More self-criticism and less criticism of others would go a long way in reducing group conflicts.

    Regards. James

  12. Jason Y

    I don’t think race mixing is wrong – per se – whatever that means. But as was in the movie Braveheart, it’s sort of a thing where a group might try to breed out a hostile group. I could possibly see that happening. Nonetheless, I think the threat is exaggerated.

    Note, the reason Brazil is race-mixed, and there is nothing wrong with that BTW, is that it’s simply reaping its long history in which the business interests and white Brazilians sought to improve the economy – and riches from Sugar with definitely trickle down and do that. And also because of Christians, not Jews, sought to convert the heathen savages.

    So, of course, I obviously see this whole attempt to scapegoat Jews as baloney.

    • Phil78

      “So, of course, I obviously see this whole attempt to scapegoat Jews as baloney.”

      Aside from their prominence in the slave trade there itself, this article isn’t discussing whether or not Brazil is mixed because of Jews but whether they would support such a situation for whites out to lower nationalism.

      • Jason Y

        Well, yeah. Who in the hell wants white supremacists with power? And of course, Jews, of all people don’t the most.

        Anyhow, and this isn’t noted in the article, we must say that mulattoes are not a majority in Brazil AND the place is already mixed. The whole whitening of Brazil thing happened a long time ago – yet whites are still the vast majority in Brazil – just like they are in the US (note with Hispanics not being put in the stats). So again, the fear of mulattoes is just racial and political hatred – fueled by WN groups.

        • Phil78

          “Well, yeah. Who in the hell wants white supremacists with power? And of course, Jews, of all people don’t the most.”

          So a white population with a strong culture automatically means “WS power”?

          What nerve, no other choice but flood them with Muslims who hate them more…wait.

          “Anyhow, and this isn’t noted in the article, we must say that mulattoes are not a majority in Brazil”

          Yet at this point and time Mulattoes and Blacks, both often identifying as Afro-brazilian, currently do.

          “AND the place is already mixed.” But it wasn’t at one point, so that really doesn’t effect the argument that it COULD.

          However, do I think it’s currently the case via mixing in the West? No, really just a demographic shift in immigration rather than mixing.

          “The whole whitening of Brazil thing happened a long time ago – yet whites are still the vast majority in Brazil”

          Where the fuck did you get that impression? EVen years prior it was hardly a “vast” majority.

          https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/nov/17/brazil-census-african-brazilians-majority

          Also a significant amount of said “white brazilians” are immigrants from Europe, not the original portuguese who clock in at around 5 million.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portuguese_Brazilians

          “– just like they are in the US (note with Hispanics not being put in the stats). So again, the fear of mulattoes is just racial and political hatred – fueled by WN groups.”

          You are again confusing “brazil” with “brazilification” as addressed in the article as a general population shift weakening white gentile prominence.

        • Jason Y

          The Muslim problem is terrible because – we don’t really need them and the presence of them justifies hate not only against Muslims but also blacks, mixed raced people, etc.. – the other.

          Basically, the Muslim threat gives credibility to WN thinking from ordinary whites who otherwise would vomit at their hate. Of course, 2nd in line after Muslims are gays – their agenda is also promoting massive hate against ALL.

        • Jason Y

          Phil

          Well, the modern situation in Brazil is a new ballgame – mostly the result of the green revolution and advances in healthcare. As with much of the world, and especially Africa, there are just way too many people – and we have nowhere to send them to, not Mars, nowhere.

          Possibly nobody would care about lower IQ people increasing if there was some place to dump them. Note, in the 1500s to 1800s, it was just common to use the New World as a dumping ground.

        • Jason Y

          However, eventually the food could run out if the population won’t stop – but until then possibly blacks and others would have to invade other lands in some fashion for more “living space” ironically quoting Hitler.

        • Jason Y

          Phil

          WNs are obsessed with IQ, but really it means diddly squat, in a sense. People have lived all thru history with a lower IQ. For instance, I doubt if even white settlers to the US, most of them, were that bright – compared to modern people. Note, the bottom line is food. As long as the people are fed, then IQ isn’t that important.

          I mean, of course, there will be things like crime etc.. but generally life goes on and people bred on and on – generation to generation. Look at the aborigines. They carried on for thousands of years with a very low IQ.

        • Jason Y

          Unfortunately, I guess.. evolution drives out the poor white and forces him to end up breeding with NAMS, as in the case of Brazil and other places. There isn’t enough money so he can shelter himself away from them like the middle-class Latin-Americans, high caste Indians etc.. do.

          There is nothing that can really be done. It’s all money and there isn’t going to be a return to segregation.

        • Sambo

          Phil is the model commenter. He’s very objective and looks at both sides. Everyone has biases, we should look at other perspectives with an open mind. One can be Jew wise &or admire Whites without being an evil hater. One can be hip to working class White flaws &or admire Jews and not be cucked cattle. We should all drink from opposing wells, spitting out some of each.

        • I agree that Phil is a model commenter.

          But Sambo, have you donated? You have to donate as a regular commenter. Minimum $10 and you comment for life. If that’s a hardship, email me and we can talk about it.

        • Jason Y

          One can be hip to working class White flaws &or admire Jews and not be cucked cattle.

          The thrill of the cuck sexual fetish is you want to have sex, but you can’t have it. it has nothing really to do with being a white and/or male pushover – but is just a way to get off – mainly because porn addiction is so depraved that it gets to a point where that might me be all that gets you off.

        • Jason Y

          Phil is the model commenter. He’s very objective and looks at both sides. Everyone has biases, we should look at other perspectives with an open mind. One can be Jew wise &or admire Whites without being an evil hater. One can be hip to working class White flaws &or admire Jews and not be cucked cattle. We should all drink from opposing wells, spitting out some of each.

          I don’t think he looks at both sides. Note, on the other hand, I do tend to go off on tangents – blah blah blah – so Phil does seem more objective. Anyway, name even one time in which you can say he ever strongly came out against whites?

        • Phil78

          Phil

          “WNs are obsessed with IQ, but really it means diddly squat, in a sense. People have lived all thru history with a lower IQ.”

          We got where we are currently with higher IQ people.

          “For instance, I doubt if even white settlers to the US, most of them, were that bright – compared to modern people. Note, the bottom line is food. As long as the people are fed, then IQ isn’t that important.”

          You do understand that, in the case of America, alot of the advancements were brought by LEADERS to make feeding possible, settlers weren’t just by themselves. You mean they weren’t of a higher IQ?

          “I mean, of course, there will be things like crime etc.. but generally life goes on and people bred on and on – generation to generation.”

          But “crime” doesn’t simply go away that easily, if anything that process alone would accumulate it if any direct effect.

          “Look at the aborigines. They carried on for thousands of years with a very low IQ.”

          In the raw savage wilderness with a raw savage lifestyle. Think I’m harsh? Look up Robert’s article covering Child rearing.

          “Unfortunately, I guess.. evolution drives out the poor white and forces him to end up breeding with NAMS, as in the case of Brazil and other places.”

          In America? Doubt it seeing how few NAms actually populate to resort to that.

          “There isn’t enough money so he can shelter himself away from them like the middle-class Latin-Americans, high caste Indians etc.. do.”

          Who ,likely wouldn’t even live in the same communities as them to the point of inducing mixing.

          “There is nothing that can really be done. It’s all money and there isn’t going to be a return to segregation.”

          You seem to have an awful time not understanding Brazilification means in this Article.

          “I don’t think he looks at both sides. Note, on the other hand, I do tend to go off on tangents – blah blah blah – so Phil does seem more objective. Anyway, name even one time in which you can say he ever strongly came out against whites?”

          Name one time I came out strongly against Blacks? You mean crime and IQ? I was string regarding the data itself, not the people directly.

          I being “against whites” isn;t the issue, my issue is your obvious bias by your experience in bullying influence your opinion on whites yet ignoring similar actions by other groups.

          “The slave trade made the white people of Brazil, not rich, but with a profitable economy with a lot of money in circulation, sort of like Miami in 1979. Fuck this sort of scapegoating stuff – the whites, in general, were making a killing. Let’s not be politically correct here and act like the white population, in general, didn’t support it.

          Where did I deny that? All I’m talking about is WHO CONTROLLED IT. BTW, an empire is obviously going to benefit somehow from slave labour.

          “Same was true in the south or anywhere else. Note also how WNs admit that the slave trade made Haiti rich and was lamenting how the negroes destroyed the island. But then, hypocritically, in some other statement, these same WNs are blaming Jews for the slave trade – saying it was evil.”

          You see, this exactly what I’m talking about, shoehorning in “the South” for hardly a good reason just to make an allusion to Brazil but missing the point.

          That point being, no Matter how bad you hate the racist culture of Southern Whites that isn’t going to change the involvement of Sephardi Jews South of the U.S .

          Hell, if we applied your logic of “negroes selling slaves” then wouldn;t the South be free of charge like Brazilian Jews?

          “But then there is the myth of states rights and other crap, a distraction from the fact trickle down economics made it obvious most of the whites liked so-called Jewish slavery.”

          Again, derailing.

        • Beauregard

          Obviously U.S. slavery was deplorable, but the more I look into it the Meds/Sephardi Jews were FAR worse.

          According to a source I found from wikipedia, the Spanish crown attempted to reform slavery as to appease Blacks/abolitionists in Cuba (Jefferson had similar goals in the U.S.)

          One of the changes was supposed to be about eliminating 20 hour workweeks for slaves….and the Cuban planters objected.

        • Beauregard

          20 hour work-days, 120 hour work-weeks, should read.

        • Jason Y

          Phil

          “WNs are obsessed with IQ, but really it means diddly squat, in a sense. People have lived all thru history with a lower IQ.”

          We got where we are currently with higher IQ people.

          “For instance, I doubt if even white settlers to the US, most of them, were that bright – compared to modern people. Note, the bottom line is food. As long as the people are fed, then IQ isn’t that important.”

          You do understand that, in the case of America, alot of the advancements were brought by LEADERS to make feeding possible, settlers weren’t just by themselves. You mean they weren’t of a higher IQ?

          “I mean, of course, there will be things like crime etc.. but generally life goes on and people bred on and on – generation to generation.”

          But “crime” doesn’t simply go away that easily, if anything that process alone would accumulate it if any direct effect.

          “Look at the aborigines. They carried on for thousands of years with a very low IQ.”

          In the raw savage wilderness with a raw savage lifestyle. Think I’m harsh? Look up Robert’s article covering Child rearing.

          “Unfortunately, I guess.. evolution drives out the poor white and forces him to end up breeding with NAMS, as in the case of Brazil and other places.”

          In America? Doubt it seeing how few NAms actually populate to resort to that.

          “There isn’t enough money so he can shelter himself away from them like the middle-class Latin-Americans, high caste Indians etc.. do.”

          Who ,likely wouldn’t even live in the same communities as them to the point of inducing mixing.

          “There is nothing that can really be done. It’s all money and there isn’t going to be a return to segregation.”

          You seem to have an awful time not understanding Brazilification means in this Article.

          “I don’t think he looks at both sides. Note, on the other hand, I do tend to go off on tangents – blah blah blah – so Phil does seem more objective. Anyway, name even one time in which you can say he ever strongly came out against whites?”

          Name one time I came out strongly against Blacks? You mean crime and IQ? I was string regarding the data itself, not the people directly.

          I being “against whites” isn;t the issue, my issue is your obvious bias by your experience in bullying influence your opinion on whites yet ignoring similar actions by other groups.

          “The slave trade made the white people of Brazil, not rich, but with a profitable economy with a lot of money in circulation, sort of like Miami in 1979. Fuck this sort of scapegoating stuff – the whites, in general, were making a killing. Let’s not be politically correct here and act like the white population, in general, didn’t support it.

          Where did I deny that? All I’m talking about is WHO CONTROLLED IT. BTW, an empire is obviously going to benefit somehow from slave labour.

          “Same was true in the south or anywhere else. Note also how WNs admit that the slave trade made Haiti rich and was lamenting how the negroes destroyed the island. But then, hypocritically, in some other statement, these same WNs are blaming Jews for the slave trade – saying it was evil.”

          You see, this exactly what I’m talking about, shoehorning in “the South” for hardly a good reason just to make an allusion to Brazil but missing the point.

          That point being, no Matter how bad you hate the racist culture of Southern Whites that isn’t going to change the involvement of Sephardi Jews South of the U.S .

          Hell, if we applied your logic of “negroes selling slaves” then wouldn;t the South be free of charge like Brazilian Jews?

          “But then there is the myth of states rights and other crap, a distraction from the fact trickle down economics made it obvious most of the whites liked so-called Jewish slavery.”

          Again, derailing.

          Always the argument with Sam, you, and others is who controlled it. But what about who participated in it as middlemen?. And especially, what about the millions of gentiles buying it?

          Also, the thing about states rights wasn’t derailing. States rights is another one of those things to take people’s attention away from the “trickle down/economics exploitation thing”.

          I being “against whites” isn;t the issue, my issue is your obvious bias by your experience in bullying influence your opinion on whites yet ignoring similar actions by other groups.

          I know for sure other groups bully, harass etc.. I just don’t mention it much. However, Sam has mentioned it, and I brought up his plight a few times.

        • Jason Y

          “There isn’t enough money so he can shelter himself away from them like the middle-class Latin-Americans, high caste Indians etc.. do.”

          Who , likely wouldn’t even live in the same communities as them to the point of inducing mixing.

          OK, my bad. A lot of poor US whites live in rural areas where race mixing isn’t as likely.

          Though this may seem like derailing though, ever notice poor whites leading the charge in racism? Note, they’re the least likely to feel compassion for blacks – even when it’s obvious NAMS deserve it. It’s like they shut their eyes to it.

          Also, they supported segregation in places like Mississippi, but they refused to call for expulsion. I mean, if they don’t want to breed with them, then why not just make them get lost? I suppose the upper classes would be to blame – needing the cheap labor for cotton – even in the early 1900s.

        • Not a derail, guys. Carry on. None of you are really derailers. There’s only one really bad derailer. 😦

        • Phil78

          “Always the argument with Sam, you, and others is who controlled it. But what about who participated in it as middlemen?. And especially, what about the millions of gentiles buying it?”

          Me, Sam, and others? More like others against you as you mere the main opposition.

          And I believe the resolution was the the Gentile dominance in the Northern New World and the relatively stronger presence South by Sephardi populations.

          “Also, the thing about states rights wasn’t derailing. States rights is another one of those things to take people’s attention away from the “trickle down/economics exploitation thing”.

          It is when I pointed out it does nothing in effect of refuting who organized it in Brazil.

          “OK, my bad. A lot of poor US whites live in rural areas where race mixing isn’t as likely.

          Though this may seem like derailing though, ever notice poor whites leading the charge in racism?”

          Seeing how people like minorities or immigrants since the late 19th century to early 20th century had been WORKING CLASS the yeah it would make sense, but doesn’t justify, from the perspective of competition.

          Also, I thought you once mentioned earlier about Southern ELITES fueling it anyway?

          ” Note, they’re the least likely to feel compassion for blacks – even when it’s obvious NAMS deserve it. It’s like they shut their eyes to it.”

          Nothing to do with the logic of slavery’s dominion in the New World, but solififies my point with you and Southerners.

          BTW Jason, but that on the global comparison of who feels compassion for blacks.

          “Also, they supported segregation in places like Mississippi, but they refused to call for expulsion. I mean, if they don’t want to breed with them, then why not just make them get lost?”

          Well one they were naturalized prior to established segregation,second at that point there wasn’t a clear way to send them back to Africa because there wasn’t clear borders like in China aside from Liberia which was voluntary.

          “I suppose the upper classes would be to blame – needing the cheap labor for cotton – even in the early 1900s.”

          So OK, my bad. A lot of poor US whites live in rural areas where race mixing isn’t as likely.

          Though this may seem like derailing though, ever notice poor whites leading the charge in racism? Note, they’re the least likely to feel compassion for blacks – even when it’s obvious NAMS deserve it. It’s like they shut their eyes to it.

          “Also, they supported segregation in places like Mississippi, but they refused to call for expulsion. I mean, if they don’t want to breed with them, then why not just make them get lost? I suppose the upper classes would be to blame – needing the cheap labor for cotton – even in the early 1900s.”

          With that settled, lets get back to BRAZIL.

        • Phil78

          On the topic of me criticizing whites in some form, That mainly came up in discussions between me and William on WN but that was awhile a go.

          See my comment here on “Jewamongyou”.

          https://jewamongyou.wordpress.com/2016/11/29/what-is-the-alt-right/#comment-44697

          Which in turns links to my “Negro Problem” article that verifies me for authorship. That Article devote a section showing how typical converting practices failed on behalf of white attempts compared to Muslims.

      • Jason Y

        Phil:

        Aside from their prominence in the slave trade there itself, this article isn’t discussing whether or not Brazil is mixed because of Jews but whether they would support such a situation for whites out to lower nationalism.

        The slave trade made the white people of Brazil, not rich, but with a profitable economy with a lot of money in circulation, sort of like Miami in 1979. Fuck this sort of scapegoating stuff – the whites, in general, were making a killing. Let’s not be politically correct here and act like the white population, in general, didn’t support it.

        Same was true in the south or anywhere else. Note also how WNs admit that the slave trade made Haiti rich and was lamenting how the negroes destroyed the island. But then, hypocritically, in some other statement, these same WNs are blaming Jews for the slave trade – saying it was evil.

        But then there is the myth of states rights and other crap, a distraction from the fact trickle down economics made it obvious most of the whites liked so-called Jewish slavery.

        • Jason Y

          If anything, black nationalists have a right to think whites are as much devils as Jews – at least – the whites who lived in areas where negro slavery was widespread. Let’s be honest here.

        • Phil78

          “If anything, black nationalists have a right to think whites are as much devils as Jews – at least – the whites who lived in areas where negro slavery was widespread. Let’s be honest here.”

          Jason, you being aware of the habits of generalization of WNs Ironically expect Black ones to be restraint enough not to generalize the “White Devil” idea.

          So…if they can be pissed at shit a century ago, why not Whites towards Ghetto blacks today?

          And again, what happen to Negros selling Negros? where’s their blame in this, again, from your logic?

        • Jason Y

          I see what you’re saying Phil, but mind you, some whites, due to the specific geographic area are more guilty than others. Do you agree? For instance, Trash’s hate of blacks is distasteful, no doubt, but then again, he’s not in an area, nor his ancestors, where he directly participated in the whole “trickle down economics/exploitation thing” with blacks.

        • Jason Y

          Oh yeah, of course, some black assholes, like the white ones, are going to expand generalizations beyond people are actually deserve it.

        • Phil78

          “I see what you’re saying Phil, but mind you, some whites, due to the specific geographic area are more guilty than others. Do you agree?”

          You mean Modern populations that did nothing themselves in Slavery, then no.

          Sure, Jim Crow, Klan and other progressive Era acts possibly but not Slavery by a direct relationship.

          Furthermore I don’t see what is to gain with attributing guilt for past actions if it doesn’t lead to any closure.

          Even with my Ghetto blacks example, my value isn’t guilt but closure to the situation.

          “For instance, Trash’s hate of blacks is distasteful, no doubt, but then again, he’s not in an area, nor his ancestors, where he directly participated in the whole “trickle down economics/exploitation thing” with blacks.”

          ?????? I can tell you from a history of reading comments, being able to distinguish malice from being blunt, that Trash is more Blunt than hateful in the case of blacks.

          He more often derides the aggressive whites subgroups that blacks live near than Black themselves, most of the crude stuff are his impressions.

        • DarkLegoMan

          Arabs, Turks, jews, and many other groups including Black Africans were involved in slavery. Arab enslavement of Africans was going on centuries before Whites acted in kind, though Whites didn’t make eunuchs out of them.

  13. Sexual genocide was carried out as late as former Yugoslavia.

  14. Wasn’t it Kissinger who said that any group of people who have been persecuted for 2000 years, have to be doing something wrong?

    I’ve met a lot of WN types in my life, and many think the Jews are grand schemesters who think 100 years ahead, and conspire and plan perfectly to suit their agenda. Then I’m reminded of Napoleons quote about how you shouldn’t attribute to malice what you can to stupidity. Applicable here.

    Look at how Jews have supported mass immigration into Europe, only to have to now leave their neighbourhoods because those immigrants are more anti-semitic than even the neo-nazis. Wise?

    White Nationalists keep saying that Jews are working hard to secure their dominance, yet they have fewer and fewer allies these days.

    If this is what success looks like, I’d hate to see failure.

    Jews are driven by a siege mentality, and this siege mentality colours what they do, which is mostly lashing out at others, being professional victims and waging war against all. And if there are no attacks against them, they have to stage them themselves by painting swasticas on their own synagogues.

    • DarkLegoMan

      Malice and stupidity. Tim Wise telling Whites “Tick tock” and Barbara Spectre saying what SpanktheGoy said are windows into the anti-White jews true feelings. More clever jews would better hide such feelings.

  15. Robert,

    You certainly must be aware of the Hardy-Weinberg principle: genetic traits that have no impact on a population’s ability to reproduce will maintain the same frequency from one generation to the next. This will ensure that there will be at least a few “pure” individuals (genotypically and phenotypically) in any population that undergoes thorough mixing. What’s even more interesting is that the parents of these individuals don’t need to be pure themselves– a pair of brunettes with swarthy skin can give birth to Shakira if they both pass on their recessive genes.

    Middle-class Anglos will probably be affected by this more than anyone else, but it becomes really difficult to have sympathy for these folks once you remember that they were the ones who fled inner cities for the safety of the suburbs in the 1970s. Last time I checked, AIPAC was not the most powerful lobby in American politics: it’s the AARP.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s