Judith Mirville on the Perils of Braziliafication for the Jews

Very nice comment from Judith Mirville showing that if Jews are promoting Braziliafication in the hopes that it will be good for the Jews, they may be sorely mistaken.

That will prove to be an especially bad move: in a Brazilified society such as Brazil, the various cultures of that multiculturalism cannot agree together safe onto one point: the Jews are the main responsible for the present state of affairs, even people such as the Japanese of Belo Horizonte, the German of Porto Alegre, the Negroes from Bahia and the White Trash rednecks of the chaparral of Sertão can agree on that.

I am now practicing Portuguese, listening to various videos to study various local accents and slangs, and everybody is inveighing against Jews each one for their different reasons.

The Negroes accuse them of having organized the slave trade, which in the specific case of Northern Brazil was true. The rednecks of Sertão accuse them of having geared the whole musical culture of Brazil towards hedonistic and then gay values.

The well-to-do Portuguese of São Paulo accuse them of having subverted the monarchy to install a de facto British colonialism in the form of a Republic as well destroying the military regime which was the last rampart against the tide of Cultural Leftism everywhere in the intelligentsia. The Germans there are of a type that was never morally bullied into repentance for WWII.

And the Japanese, though not big haters of Jews, all want them to be put back into ghettos for practical reasons and accuse them of having organized the whole of Western colonialism in non-White countries and robbed Asia of its traditional technological superiority and intelligence by programming so many other Whites beyond their real innate capacity to feel inventive and superior.

It comes to no mystery that cultures in an multicultural environment tend identify with their most reactionary elements, and therefore are more inclined to look for a culprit or archetypal symbol of evil from without. And it turns out that in Brazil the most rabid antisemitic movements are decidedly multicultural chic, not White Power, especially since the traditional White racism of Brazil claimed that the core of the nation was made up of mythical Jewish ancestry.

The Extreme Left to Center Left culture that still refuses most the conspiracy-justified antisemitism is monocultural non-Catholic Portuguese (mildly anti-Black de facto, though praising mulatto women for their supernatural beauty but only in their own role of providers of sentimental entertainment), and they are the ones who communicate the least with other cultures in their own country and prefer to communicate with other White nations in the world (France for the culture, the Anglo-Saxon countries for business) than with their own co-nationals of different hues.

All great antisemitic bouts of the past started out in rather multicultural environments. Austria, for instance, used to be the most multicultural part of Europe, and further back in time, you can find Spain and Portugal, which at one time used to be the most diversified countries: in both cases, mythical antisemitism could develop unchecked for being the only political language common to so many diverse groups even though not the ideal one to that many individuals.

How do the Jews let that happen to the point of loving it as it may seem?

That is very simple: first, as you put it, their intelligence is grossly overrated. They are emotion-driven more than many others. It must also be known that Jewish identification with the intellectual superiority of openness of mind is a very recent and atypical thing in the course of history. That identification began only as a byproduct of the Enlightenment culture and only among Jews that wanted to get free of their traditional ghetto culture, which turned out into a majority at a certain point.

Before that point, intellectual curiosity was far more severely repressed in Jewish culture than in Christian culture, the rabbis had far more tolerance of and liking for magic: even the study of too much geography was deemed dangerous. The general morality among them used to be that one must as an individual make plans for the day, as a family for the week, and as a Jewish community for the year, but NEVER beyond, since all promises of the preceding years were to be overridden at each Rosh ha Shanna. What is good for Jewish prosperity this year only is the real good, the rest is goyish daydreaming.

Even if the consequences of what is done this year are evidently ultra-negative for your own descendants, such as destroying the environment or installing a future millennial totalitarian regime just to make sure your tiny few talents are employed and well-paid, that is none of your business as a Jew. You must think of those descendants as of imaginary non-Jewish beings.

When for instance you adopt Communism as a Jew, the important thing is to enjoy a higher life through it and also a good relationship with many non-Jews for a few years’ space at most. You must not inquire too seriously about the ultimate consequences of your ideological choice. It is a fashion among many others to have to dress your own brain and others as well as their bodies according to a taste that sells right now.

If it turns out that by so doing you will progressively install a Nazi-like regime first courting and then turning against you, so be it, que sera sera, that was God’s intention for you to bring it about. It is a culture based on the principle of pure prostitution and on the faith that such an attitude alone can bring about joyful survival to a group: they are actually not so racist towards strangers provided they share that very same mentality.

27 Comments

Filed under Americas, Anti-Semitism, Asians, Austria, Black-White (Mulattos), Blacks, Brazil, Brazilians, Christianity, Colonialism, Culture, Europe, Europeans, History, Japanese, Jews, Judaism, Latin America, Left, Marxism, Mixed Race, Political Science, Portugal, Portuguese, Race Relations, Race/Ethnicity, Racism, Regional, Religion, Sociology, South America, Spain, The Americas, White Racism, Whites

27 responses to “Judith Mirville on the Perils of Braziliafication for the Jews

  1. Jason Y

    I bet the Brazilians of the past benefited from the slave trade much like their cousins in the US south. I mean, look how many white southerners died for the Confederacy and still support it to this day – and they know all well that it was about slavery – though they deny it.

    Bottom line, I am no fan of trickle down economics, but it is true sometimes like when King Cotton makes Mississippi rich (once the richest or 2nd richest state in the Union) or King Sugar makes Brazil the same way – all the whites benefit to some degree – or they would have organized a mass revolt against it.

    Jews?? The Jews didn’t make anyone do anything.

    • JASON Y

      One thing that is striking about white Southerners is the degree to which THEY CARE about NAMS.

      In the North, where most whites middle-class neighborhoods are composite of ethnic whites-Jews, Italians, Germans, Irish-Catholic, Polish-nobody really cares WHAT other races did.

      I grew up within 50 miles of the most notorious black ghetto in the U.S. but nobody really cared what the blacks did there. Some of the more intelligent and successful ones moved into my neighborhood.

      The idea of having Africans work in some unpaid servile position seems ludicrous. Who would want an African LIVING in your house or on your personal land? Much less a TRIBE of Africans.

      Even African immigrants in my area did not care about the blacks in the ghetto.

      Much less Koreans.

      So it seems odd that Southern Whites want to get down and dirty in fights with ghetto blacks. What is the point? An assault rap? Why would you be near ghetto blacks in the first place? To eat soul food? Watch a dog fight? Smoke crack?

      • Jason Y

        One thing that is striking about white Southerners is the degree to which THEY CARE about NAMS.

        Well, in the past, they should have. It was their labor giving them 2nd hand jobs (trickle down economics, so to speak). These jobs included fighting in the Confederate army, slave enforcement, middle jobs between the slave’s work and the rich owner etc.. Note, Mississippi was once one of the south’s richest states. Of course, that’s laughable now.

        • Jason Y

          AND it’s also true today… ironically, southern whites are often in law enforcement etc. and identify their honor AGAIN with keeping blacks down – cause it gives the southern whites jobs – especially now we have – for-profit prisons.

          It’s just like how they also get off on shooting Iraqis etc.. and cheering for W. Bush.

        • Jason Y

          White supremacists are well aware of this fact too, ironically. Note, how they mention how Haiti was rich under the French – and that was a GOOD THING – but then the blacks rebelled and turned into the current shit-hole is now.

        • Jason Y

          This is not a condemnation of the white working class – but only an honest realization that a good deal of them, though, not all, benefit heavily from trickle down economics. Note the German working class benefited from the Nazis, the white working class, especially in small towns, benefit from Republican wars…the white working class in the south USA benefited from the Civil War…(until they were losing, of course) yada … yada….

          So trickle down economics, that sinful word to the left, is true – up to a point.

    • JASON Y

      Simpler than that is heat and body mass. It is hot in Alabama and Brazil. Whites simply could not adapt to the climate. Even Indians were not as hardy workers.

      Up North in Massachusetts, Italians and Irish made equally adept dockworkers. So the Northern States never needed blacks because poor Europeans manned their labor force.

      The Pacific states had Asians. Sturdy Japanese and Chinese farmers. They built the railroad tracks.

      This is the reason, economically speaking.

      • Jason Y

        Right, the heat is a good point. You just can’t pay anyone to work in it. Well, you can, but greedy owners won’t do it.

    • Phil78

      “I bet the Brazilians of the past benefited from the slave trade much like their cousins in the US south. I mean, look how many white southerners died for the Confederacy and still support it to this day – and they know all well that it was about slavery – though they deny it.”

      Difference? I’m pretty sure it was well established how the dominance in slavery was different.

      In Brazil it was mostly Jewish, in the U.S, though disproportionately Jewish, was mainly Gentile.

      So this is an apples and oranges comparison pretty mucb fueled by the thing you love to point out the most…biases.

      When these obviously different races in Brazil are catching on, and the only ones defending them ARE white racists in Brazil, what does that tell you Jason?

      “Note, the negroes also sold their own people into slavery.”

      Then it would hardly be much of the South’s fault by that logic, would it Jason?

      This is The Israel flip all over again.

      “Now in regards to rednecks, have they took notice that the music only sells cause people buy it? Nobody put a gun to anyone’s head and made them accept modern culture – which is humanistic and godless, so to speak. Nobody forces people to reject the traditional Catholic life there.”

      So it is only manipulation when forced?

      “Note, if those people actually followed their religion, they would be even listening to hedonistic music etc.. or stuff in the US that would be called counter-culture or whatever. Let’s not blame the Jews for the sinfulness and laziness of the average people.”

      Yet with white racists in America? Go nuts.

      • PHIL

        Portuguese Jewish immigration to Brazil did occur during a period of deportation in the 1800’s but was relatively minor.

        Brazilian Jews have not every run Brazil. Only in the United States and to a lesser extent Russia has a Jewish population been so influential.

        • Phil78

          “Portuguese Jewish immigration to Brazil did occur during a period of deportation in the 1800’s but was relatively minor.”

          https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1993/10/17/half-truths-and-history-the-debate-over-jews-and-slavery/6b2b2453-01da-4429-bd50-beff03741418/?utm_term=.ae0b1b00368f

          -“This New World economy of sugar and slaves — of vast, labor-intensive plantations — began in earnest in Brazil during the 1500s, according to historians. The involvement of Jews in black slavery began there also.

          Brazil. The Portuguese were the first to colonize Brazil, and Sephardic Jews from Portugal were among these early settlers. “In its early years,” writes Seymour B. Liebman in “New World Jewry, 1493-1825,” “Brazil was built by Negro slaves (400,000 between 1570 and 1670) and the acumen, hard work and calculating perseverance of the Jews.”

          Some background is essential. The Sephardim — that is, the Jews of Spain and Portugal — had flourished for centuries in the Iberian peninsula. By 1497, they made up an estimated 20 percent of Portugal’s population of 1 million. But that year, the king of Portugal compelled the Jews to convert to Christianity. (Spain had similarly forced its Jews to convert or flee five years earlier.) While many Jews left Portugal, others indeed were baptized and became “New Christians.” Despite the church’s persecution, some continued to practice Judaism in secret; they came to be known as “Marranos.”

          “Brazilian Jews have not every run Brazil. Only in the United States and to a lesser extent Russia has a Jewish population been so influential.”

          You have it backwards particularly in regards to dominance in slavery between U.S and Brazil regarding Jews.

          Furthermore I doubt the U.S, proportionately speaking, had a higher Jewish population than Brazil unless you are going to make the distinction between Ashkenazi ans Sephardi Jews.

    • First of all, please never say again that platitude as to Haiti (or rather, Santo Domingo as it was then called) having been so prosperous and so sweet to live in under French rule, just before the revolted slaves turned it over into the hell-hole we know of nowadays, otherwise I will require RL to ban you. Please keep in mind that Santo Domingo was definitely the harshest place for any black slave (and also for any white servant or prostitute) to end up in throughout all Middle Passage, it was the island with the shortest survival span for Negroes. It was actually a kind of extermination camp though accelerated exhaustion where negroes judged to indocile to be sold to English American planters or to Portuguese Jews (Jews were indeed involved in slave trade and utilization in the Portuguese colonies — contrary to English American where they kept content with the financing of the antebellum Southern enterprises — but were also known to be more humane masters) were sold to a kind of buyer of last resort. When the slave masters of Early Dixieland really wanted to scare recalcitrant manpower into submission and productivity, they threatened to sell them to Santo Domingo and made an example out of two or three. It was called the “Pearl of the Indies” not because of its enchanting setting, charming though it was then, but because of the highest and surest return shareholders in Europe expected from there, the best contemporary translation would be Blue Chip. The revolution took place because those slaves knew they were in that Island to die anyway. It took exactly twelve years and a quarter to unfold, from 14 August 1791 to 18 November 1803, and as it unfolded the Napoleonic regime ordered Final Solution (as it was called) through 100% extermination. About one twentieth survived. Among the favourite methods were the “pontoons” : decommissioned ships used as gas chambers : the hulks were filled up to the brim with prisoners to be killed with fumes emanating from burning sulphur and thrown into the sea so as to make room for another cargo. France sacrificed her whole colonial empire in America, selling Louisiana to the Jefferson’s US among others, just to devote all the necessary logistical resources to that grisly enterprise as if it were her most sacred duty (Napoleon wanted to make his empire renowned for yet another thousand years repeating Crassus’ exploit against the revolt of Spartacus), and it failed : the extermination camp had run so well that all tropical diseases and pests brought about by the authorities to make the place mortal for any fugitive or guerilla ended up killing all the precious seaworthy French troops that were sent there too, and that would have been badly needed at Trafalgar (the voodoo legend also speaks of black magic used to that effect : given the fact that most of Haitian black magic is about poisons, this comes to no contradiction).

      Lamenting the French regime in Haiti as a kind of prosperity never to dream on any more is tantamount to lamenting the good old days when Warsaw, Krakow and Auschwitz were German and under sound industrial management before entering the doldrums of East European post-war Communism.

  2. Jason Y

    And the Japanese, though not big haters of Jews, all want them to be put back into ghettos for practical reasons and accuse them of having organized the whole of Western colonialism in non-White countries and robbed Asia of its traditional technological superiority and intelligence by programming so many other Whites beyond their real innate capacity to feel inventive and superior.

    Oh, you mean, they hated it so much they copied it and launched World War II. HA 😆

    Also, the Japs have benefited from imperialism etc.. which has obviously made them rich from World War II onward toward the 80s and now they aren’t so great, but the place isn’t poor for sure.

    OK, the moral of the story is some are alpha and go out into other lands, people generally are greedy and want money – and again the Jews have zip to do with it.

    • In my experience in a neighborhood with affluent East Asians and later employed in Asia it is nearly impossible for East Asians to distinguish between white groups at all. A Jew and a Methodist are equally occidental.

      This is coming from someone who lived in Asia for decades.

  3. Jason Y

    The Negroes accuse them of having organized the slave trade, which in the specific case of Northern Brazil was true. The rednecks of Sertão accuse them of having geared the whole musical culture of Brazil towards hedonistic and then gay values.

    Note, the negroes also sold their own people into slavery.

    Now in regards to rednecks, have they took notice that the music only sells cause people buy it? Nobody put a gun to anyone’s head and made them accept modern culture – which is humanistic and godless, so to speak. Nobody forces people to reject the traditional Catholic life there.

    Note, if those people actually followed their religion, they would be even listening to hedonistic music etc.. or stuff in the US that would be called counter-culture or whatever. Let’s not blame the Jews for the sinfulness and laziness of the average people

    • JASON

      Jewish slavers deliberately BRED the MALES WITH THE BIGGEST PENIS SIZE so that they would poor Southern white women would lust after being penetrated by BBC, right?

      This is way they could create a Brazil and confound White Men with the lust White women possess for BBC’S.

    • Do JEWISH WINOS in the Bronx and Hunt’s Point (None of you know this section of NYC, probably) JEWESS crack whores BLAME GENTILES for their behavior.

      WINEHOUSE’S dealer was a white Brit Christian, did Jews blame him for her death?

      Are Jews blaming RON JEREMY for THEIR DIVORCE RATES?

      But has HOTDOG as mentioned, I am sure that Jews warn their own children against consuming their cultural trash as non-Kosher food.

      “Don’t watch that interracial gang-bang bukkake son, that’s so we can poison the Goy’s mind”.

  4. Jason Y

    Wasn’t the original bullshit given to justify negro slavery, whether in the US or in Brazil, was that – it was to convert the heathen blacks ?? What in the hell does that have to do with Jews ?? Someone clue me in.

    • JASON Y

      No. The original reason was that Amerindians and vagrants from Glasgow in Virginia or Portugal derelicts in San Paulo made lousy slaves as they were less hardy.

      Portugal did deport and force a few Jews to work in the mines but they simply became merchants.

      Try telling a Scot or Portuguese Jew to be a slave. “No, give me a calculator and I will be an accountant”.

    • JASON Y

      Nope, Amerindians and Scots made less hardy slaves. Scots also got freedom under British law after 7 years.

      Portuguese Jews were tried in Brazil. Along with local Indians. Africans proved hardier.

      This is why African slaves were never needed on the docks of Massachusetts with Irish and Italians.

  5. Jason Y

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_whitening

    This article pretty much talks about Brazi’s race-mixing, but it was done from a white supremacist angle – mainly to make them (blacks) disappear without actually killing or deporting them.

    Again, no Jewish political angle and, of course, it was founded and done nearly a hundred years ago or more,

    Brazil on the other hand did not have the barrier of segregation, and the Portuguese were more accepting of miscegenation. Also Brazil was already a multicultural society that already had a mixed-class. When scientific racist beliefs and ideas became more prominent in the 1850s, Brazil’s society felt they needed to find their place in the social order and to do this they needed to solve their problem with the supposedly inferior races. Because they already were a multicultural society, the Whitening ideology was a perfect solution. Most Brazilians thought this approach was a far better one than what the United States had done. A Brazilian statesman compared the United States and Brazil by saying,

    “ Now comes the necessity to devise some method of dealing with it [the Negro problem]. You of the United States are keeping the blacks as an entirely separate element, and you are not treating them in a way that fosters their self-respect. They will remain a menacing element in your civilization, permanent, and perhaps even after a while a growing element. With us the question tends to disappear, because the blacks themselves tend to disappear and become absorbed…[1]

    • Phil78

      And…moot point sense that was never a contention made by anyone here.

      “Southern Europeans have always been obsessed with slavery. Look at Rome with all it’s slaves – so Brazil is just a continuation. And as in Rome, the idea was to enslave and then assimilate – as Rome was a melting pot.”

      No….Rome was a empire that would need slave Labor. The “Slave Mixing” stuff wasn’t an actual trend.

      http://www.geocities.ws/racial_reality/romans.html

      “No data indicate the subsequent large-scale infusion of new genetic material into the populations of these regions except in the case of southern Italy and eastern Sicily, which is explained by the well-documented Greek migrations there. … But if a population of 3 million slaves, representing as much as 40 percent of Italy’s inhabitants in the first century B.C., was successfully reproducing itself, it would surely have left its mark on the genetic makeup of contemporary Italians. That it did not argues strongly for a very low rate of natural reproduction among Italy’s slaves, which in turn is difficult to reconcile with the hypothesis that the number of slaves ever grew large enough to comprise 40 percent of the Italian population.”

      The Bulk of the genetic imput in Rome/Italy past it’s formation was from Invaders rather than slaves of different type, each having certain limits on how they effect Italy’s regions.

      Overall genetic history
      http://www.unz.com/gnxp/italy-from-top-to-boot/

      |comment on slaves here
      http://www.unz.com/gnxp/italy-from-top-to-boot/#comment-1254143

  6. Jason Y

    Southern Europeans have always been obsessed with slavery. Look at Rome with all it’s slaves – so Brazil is just a continuation. And as in Rome, the idea was to enslave and then assimilate – as Rome was a melting pot.

  7. But Southern Europeans did not practice slavery in the U.S. South. Brits did. Even though slavery at that time was illegal in Great Britain.

  8. Ken

    “…. accuse them of having organized the whole of Western colonialism in non-White countries and robbed Asia of its traditional technological superiority and intelligence by programming so many other Whites beyond their real innate capacity to feel inventive and superior.”

    I find this statement interesting,but i’m not entirely sure what you mean by it, would you mind elaborating please?

  9. (((Beauregard)))

    ROBERT
    it is no COHENcidence that you banned (((TR@SH))) on the first night of Passover.
    The (((Angel of Death))) will not spare you. But (((TR@SH))), with minions (((Jason Y))) and (((Beauregard))) will be spared!

    • BEAUREGARD

      I would be derailing this thread to claim that I am not Jewish. But I insist that I am not Jewish and not a Nazi either.

      I self-identify as German-Catholic.

      On the subject of Zionism I am completely ignorant.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s