Daily Archives: March 12, 2017

Dumbest Alt Left Phrase Ever: “The Regressive Left”

Calling the SJW Cultural Left Freakshow “regressive” is absolutely senseless. Originally it meant Leftists who supported reaction such as Political Islam. Political Islam or Islam in general is backwards, conservative if not reactionary, and a throwback to an older era that progressives have moved far beyond in the West. Full-throated Left support for reactionary Islam is indeed regressive.

But the Cultural Left Freakshow is anything but regressive. Really it is progressivism run amok.

Radical gay rights is regressive because it harkens back to the golden era of gay rights in the 1800’s when gays had far more rights than they even do now, right?

Radical feminism is regressive because back in the old days when my Mom was growing up, most women were ultra-radical man-hating dykes who pushed far beyond equal rights, correct?

Anti-racism is regressive because it recalls the the 1700’s when Blacks and Indians ruled society and the White man was a downtrodden minority, no?

Transsexual rights is regressive because back in the Ancien Regime in France, 1/200 men and women were transsexuals, there was a transsexual on every block, and French society cheered for genderbenders and called for gender to be abolished, n’est-ce pas?

The Regressive Left is a preposterous and idiotic slur that the Alt Left has made up for the SJW Cultural Left. It makes sense only in that the Cultural Left voices full support for radical Islam. Otherwise it utterly irrational.

The Cultural Left in general isn’t regressive at all. It’s not even reactionary, conservative or even rightwing. It’s not even Centrist, and it gave up liberalism long ago. No, the Cultural Left is nuts because this is an example of leftwing politics going completely off the deep end. Regressive means backwards, reactionary, conservative, primitive, a throwback to an older, ignorant era before modern progress and progressive politics. The Cultural Left is the opposite of regressive.

We just call them that because it sounds insulting, and it is. But it’s also a lie. I don’t see why the Alt Left should stoop to lying and sliming the opposition with sleazy and false slurs like all the rest of the dirty politics out there. We are beyond that; we are too good for that. We can do better. Let’s do it.

Get rid of the slogan “Regressive Left” once and for all. Resign it to the dustbin of recent history.

10 Comments

Filed under Anti-Racism, Cultural Marxists, Homosexuality, Left, Politics, Radical Feminists, Radical Islam, Religion, Sex

Latin American Politics Finally Comes To America

I guess Chile has their version of the mighty keyboard warrior like the US. No shortage of white shit for brains running around say they’re going get rid of all the Jews and blacks.. then you have a fair number of blacks running around saying they’re going to get rid of their white oppressors.. etc. Totally delusional twats. Maybe rightists are a serious problem in Chile but I don’t consider YouTube comments a proper gauge of sentiment and support.

I have been engaged off and on in deep study of this region since 1989. 28 years.

You don’t understand Chile. You don’t understand Latin America.

Really the entire rightwing down there is exactly like this. The rich, elite Whites’ basic attitude in almost every country down there is “All Communists must be killed.” And Communist means anyone even slightly left of center. A huge % of the population in Chile is still pro-Pinochet, and this is precisely how they think.

The Left stages marches and protests all the time, often is support of Allende. Rightists, of whom there are many supporters still meet them and there is wild street fighting. Rightists then stage marches often in support of Pinochet. The Left shows up and there is wild street fighting.

Did some searches.. looks like the bigger demonstrations were over education and state (or lack of it) support. Seem to follow the US model – most of the protests are peaceful but then you have “the hooded ones” raising a ruckus. I couldn’t find anything that indicated there were large counter protests by rightists – not saying that didn’t happen but I just couldn’t find them If you have a link or links I’ll take a look.

Ok, well I think I may have read this some time ago. I do remember reading it, but it could have been a while back. It could well have been years ago, or a decade or more ago. But at one time in recent history, this is how it was.

Perhaps the Left vs. Right riots have quieted down in recent years, but that’s the way it was not long ago.

Protests in Chile have historically been far more riotous and violent than demos in the US. There’s not really any comparison. Anyway, violent riots on the US Left are a relatively new phenomenon. Trump is a corrupt, vicious, evil ultraright dictator ruling in a typical Latin American model. All of the Latin American Right is exactly like Donald Trump. That’s why the Left is so violent down there. Trump has succeeded in finally bringing Latin American ultraright fascism to America. So it follows that we are following the Latin American model in that the Left has grown militant, and Left demos now often turn riotous and violent just as they do in Latin America.

This sort of thing is so predictable that you can write near mathematical laws of political science predicting it. A nation can only go so far to the extreme right and it can only become unequal to a certain level. Once it passes that level, it has crossed some sort of Rubicon and now in most any nation you automatically get a militant, riotous and violent Left. It’s as close to a law as the sort you can get in mathematics and physics.

In Chile, the Indians are treated horribly and engage in continuous demonstrations which usually turn into riots.

I was following Latin American politics a lot on the Net a few years back, and most demos in Chile seemed to turn into the typical Latin American demonstration -> riot progression. Most demos in Latin America turn riotous from my observation, at least in Venezuela, Peru, Chile, Bolivia, Brazil, and even Mexico. The conditions are so insanely unequal down there that any working class demo quickly turns into a riot.

Violence, riots, coups, extremes of Left and Right politics, lack of democracy and extreme instability are typical of the entire region and now we are importing precisely this model to the US.

I am leaving out Argentina, but the Argentine Right was recently calling for a military coup against Kirchner.

In Paraguay, a legislative coup threw out the leftwinger.

A legislative coup just threw out Rouseff, the left president of Brazil.

There have been many coup and quasi-coup attempts in Venezuela. You could well say there has been a continuous coup since 2002.

In Colombia, yes, left demos usually turn violent or riotous. On the other hand, if you are on the Left down there, you can be murdered by the government at any time.

There was a military coup in Honduras, and now anyone on the Left can be killed at any time. Death squads have killed over 1,000 people.

A US coup removed Aristide in Haiti. The new US installed government quickly murdered 3,000 people.

Why the commenter is trying to polish this Latin American turd is beyond me.

96 Comments

Filed under Americas, Amerindians, Argentina, Brazil, Caribbean, Central America, Chile, Colombia, Conservatism, Fascism, Haiti, Hispanic Racism, Honduras, Latin America, Latin American Right, Left, Marxism, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru, Political Science, Politics, Race/Ethnicity, Racism, Regional, Republicans, South America, US Politics, Venezuela

Death To All SJW’s

I am getting creamed over and over by Queera (Quora) moderation. It’s all on questions about homosexuality. I guess gay men are reporting my answers all over the place.

The following post violated a Queera rule called Be Nice, Be Respectful. I looked up the rule and tried to figure out how I violated it. Apparently I said things that were not 100% positive about homosexuals. You can’t do that on Queera. Any and all criticism of fags on Queera gets you a violation and a threat to get thrown off their website.

I wrote the below post when I was trying very hard to be nice to gay men.

I made the following statements which were “homophobic.”

  • All straight men are homophobes in the sense that they are averse to male homosexual behavior. This aversion is so extreme it has to be seen to be believed. FACT.
  • Gay men are not much liked in straight society. FACT.
  • Straight male society only works when 100% of the men are straight or at least fake it. FACT.
  • Any hint of bisexuality among straight men is a turd in the punchbowl that destroys any gathering of straight men. FACT.
  • I have met a number of straight men who told me they would rather eat a bullet than have gay sex. FACT.
  • The main reason straight men are uncomfortable around gay men is because they won’t stop trying to have sex with us. FACT.
  • Even if they don’t try to have sex with you, having another men look at you like you’re dinner is upsetting to most straight men. FACT.
  • An incredible % of homophobia among straight men is caused by gay men incessantly hitting on us. We are not just being bigoted. We are sick and tired of them trying to have sex with us! FACT.
  • After being hit on by gay men about 10,000 times, I decided I want a divorce from them. I just don’t want to be around them anymore. This is bad how?
  • I just want gay men to stay a bit away from me. This is bad how?
  • Gay men and straight men cannot be friends. FACT. 
  • Why do gay men even want to be friends with straight men anyway? GOOD QUESTION.

Gay politics is really starting to make me angry. I am about ready to join on the homophobic bandwagon and oppose gays. Give me one reason why I shouldn’t.

Here is the evil homophobic post.

All, I mean all straight men are homophobes in the sense of having a mild to extreme aversion to the thought of male homosexual behavior. They seriously hate it, and the aversion is so extreme that it has to be seen to believed.

Gay men are not much liked in straight society, but they generally have their own crowd to hang out in, so it’s not a problem.

Straight male society only works when the men are all 100% straight or at least act like it. Any hint of bisexuality among straight-leaning men is the turd in the punchbowl that ruins any party or gathering.

Straight male society only works because most of the men have agreed not to: a) kill each other b) beat each other up and c) fuck each other. Even preserving a and b is a tall order in straight male society, and tremendous energy is expended to simply keep straight males from murdering each other. Even fights are bad because such fighting can get serious and even deadly very quickly. Straight female society seems to be far more aggressive than straight male society, as verbal and psychological aggression is poorly controlled, while there are extreme controls on this in straight male culture.

Most straight men make exceptions for biologically gay men and support full rights for them. Now these same straight men have told me that if given a choice between death and gay sex, they would gladly eat a bullet. That’s how extreme the aversion is.

Probably the main reason a lot of straight men are also uncomfortable around gay men is because they won’t stop trying to have sex with us. Even when they do not do that, you typically get a strong sexual vibe off most any gay man that says he is sexually attracted to. The vibe is the same you get from a woman who is turned on by you. Having another men right in your face obviously thinking you’re a T-bone steak for dinner tonight is disconcerting for most straight men. On the other hand, gay men cannot be blamed for feeling any more than straight men can be blamed for feeling sexual around women.

But an unbelievable amount of (well-earned) homophobia is created by gay men coming after straight men sexually. It is probably happened to me over 1,000 times. About the 1,001′th time, I decided I had had it and wanted to avoid gay men from now on.

I don’t hate them. I just want them to stay a bit away from me.

I am on the mailing list for gay political causes which I participate in enthusiastically, as I strongly support gay rights. I do have a couple of gay men I am friends with, but this is on a professional or intellectual level. They keep their sexual feelings for me out it, and we get along like peaches and cream.

My general feeling is that gay men and straight men cannot be close friends. The few stories that I am familiar with were catastrophic, and my own experience has been mostly a total disaster. I don’t see how it works. Perhaps in the future we can become so relaxed and open that gay-straight male friendships are possible, but we are ages away from that.

Why do gay men even want to be friends with us anyway? They can hang around their gay and bi male friends and their straight women fag hag friends, which are legion. Most every straight women has a few fantastic gay male friends. They’ve got our women and their own kind for friendships, so what the Hell they want to hang around us for? I don’t get it.

13 Comments

Filed under Cultural Marxists, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, Man World, Politics, Scum, Sex