The Photos That Caused All the Furor

Here’s a webpage trashing me that some retarded woman wasted a couple of hours of her insipid life creating. This stupid lady even blacked out the faces of the girls on the memes because I guess they are “child abuse victims” or some such. That’s so idiotic.

Isn’t that stupid? That has to be the stupidest webpage ever created.

About the “Sometimes you want to break the law meme: Normal men and women DO NOT desire little girls. Any female under the age of 18 — is a CHILD! Robert Lindsay blogs about sexual predators only. He also justifies their desire for young females on his blog and his Facebook. He deleted Facebook pics though and blogged that he was a victim. I can assure you, he is NO victim. He also totally screwed up profiling the women that called him out on being a pervert.

About the girl in the bikini meme: Below he is having a conversation about how this little girl is so developed and nothing wrong with GROWN men wanting her and blah blah… sick SOB goes on and on.

These pics are just a few examples of MANY that he had on his Facebook page and I wish I had gotten more before he hid them for his perverted viewing “pleasure” only. I also wonder if these girls’ parents know he took these pics and I AM THE ONE THAT BLOCKED their faces…He needed to be able to rant on his blog about how he was being bullied by women, so his pervert pictures and comments are now hidden.

Yeah, and guess what? The mental health professionals of the US have agreed in writing that it’s perfectly normal for any adult to be attracted to minors aged 13-17, so her first lines are just wrong.

She’s wrong. Girls age 13-17 are not children. They are adolescents. Adolescents are neither children nor adults. They are in between. Girls that age should be called something like girlwomen because they are in between a girl and a woman.

Next line is wrong. I do not blog exclusively about sexual predators. Was this woman in Special Ed?

The next sentence is true. I do indeed justify the desire of men to have sex with 13-17 year old girls. Absolutely.

Onto the next paragraph. This is correct. The girl in the photo is very well-developed. I wonder how she can get any more developed than that. And she’s not a little girl. She has to be at least 16.

Next, indeed, I do state that there is nothing wrong with grown men wanting to have sex with that girl. Absolutely that is my position.

Then she wonders if those girls’ parents know I took pics of their daughters. LOL! Now I know she was in Special Ed. She should have never graduated. They should have forced her into Special Ed for life. And she blocked out their faces like they are some sexual abuse victims! Idiocy! Of course I didn’t take pics of those girls, you retarded baboon. That’s just some Internet meme. Someone took those pics (probably the girls’ own friends), then some guy made a meme out of the photo. I don’t know those girls. I’ve never met or seen them, and I have no idea where those pics were taken.

Actually my pics and posts are not hidden. It’s just that I’ve blocked most of these screeching harpies from my page. Women like this should not be allowed outside to roam the streets. They’re a threat to public safety. They belong in zoos.

1443538791373

Self-explanatory.

This is one of the photos that caused all the furor when that gaggle of retarded dames mass-reported it to Facebook in an effort to get my page taken down Facebook removed this photo because they said it violated their community standards. It was all women who reported me; no men reported me because men are rational about this sort of thing whereas women are not.

These insipid women said that I stole the pictures of those girls and put them on my  page. LOL those are Internet memes, you idiotic women. Some guy got a hold of that picture and turned it into a meme, and I borrowed it. I have no idea who that girl is, and yeah, I stole her picture off the Internet. I stole it off a meme, you retards.

Good God, women are stupid. This is why you cannot let women run society. If you let women run society, they will make all memes like this illegal, call it pedophilic material or child pornography, and you will get 10 years for posting something like this. Women cannot be trusted in positions of power because once they get into power they are going to make half of life illegal. Basically, women are too stupid in terms of common sense to hold power in society. Society must be ruled by men. Good women can assist us men in ruling society.

Women are incapable of running society, and an society run by women will probably quickly collapse. Women bitch that in every culture and tribe ever studied, men run the show, and women follow orders. Women say this is some evil plot called patriarchy.

I have another theory. I believe many tribes and cultures may have let women run things for a while as a test run. Or perhaps they allowed women to share power with men.

Many cultures were ruled by queens, for instance. But it was still men who made the rules of society because women cannot be trusted to do such things. I figure that every attempt to let women run the show collapsed into utter chaos and anarchy, and the tribe or culture rapidly fell apart. Because this is what is going to happen every time you let women run society. They will destroy it because women are simply incapable of running societies, cultures or tribes. All must be ruled by men or at least by the rules, mores and laws of men. Once you let women rule society by the idiotic rules, mores and laws of women, society will rapidly collapse.

They also reported that photo to numerous law enforcement agencies. What a gaggle of idiot broads.

Apparently I violated this retarded standard. I had not the faintest idea that I was violating any standard by posting that pic. It’s pretty innocuous.

Sexual Violence and Exploitation: How we Fight Sexual Violence and Exploitation on Facebook

We remove content that threatens or promotes sexual violence or exploitation. This includes the sexual exploitation of minors and sexual assault. To protect victims and survivors, we also remove photographs or videos depicting incidents of sexual violence and images shared in revenge or without permissions from the people in the images.

Our definition of sexual exploitation includes solicitation of sexual material, any sexual content involving minors, threats to share intimate images, and offers of sexual services. Where appropriate, we refer this content to law enforcement. Offers of sexual services include prostitution, escort services, sexual massages, and filmed sexual activity.

Wow. So that meme promotes the sexual exploitation of minors. LOL! How idiotic. Apparently that meme is somehow defined as “sexual content involving minors,” I guess because she’s wearing a bathing suit!

Really all that meme says is it’s ok for a man of any age to be sexually aroused by this girl. Because that’s true, right? Careful studies in the lab repeatedly find that all normal males are sexually aroused by girls that age. It’s not abnormal at all. The only men who are not aroused by that girl are gay men and dead men. So not only is my statement true, but it’s been validated in many scientific studies.

I am not promoting the sexual exploitation of minors, whatever that means. I’m saying it’s ok for men to get turned on by teenage girls. I’m not saying it’s ok to have sex with them or anything like that. Actually I recommend that all adult men do not have sex or engage in any sexual activity with any female below the age of consent. Not because there’s anything wrong with it. In my opinion, for any man to have sex with a girl like the above is perfectly acceptable to me. But all men adult men need to avoid sexual behavior with girls below consent age because you might get arrested. Actually nowadays you probably will get arrested.

Society has gone berserk on Pedophile Mass Hysteria, mostly due to the insane and retarded conflation of statutory rape of underage girls with actual molestation done by pedophiles and child molesters. A man attracted to teenage girls is called normal, not a pedophile. We in mental health get to make the definitions of things like pedophilia, not a bunch of retarded hags. We have decided that pedophilia has to do with minors age 12-under.

Mental health professionals officially state that sexual activity with minors age 13-17 is not pedophilia. In fact, in the DSM-5 discussions about hebephilia, it was even argued that attraction to girls aged 13-15 was absolutely normal. Not only was it not a disorder called hebephilia, but it wasn’t even abnormal. It other words, mental health professionals decided that attraction to minors age 13-15 was absolutely normal human behavior. That’s all we have to say about it because we only give definitions to mental disorders, not crimes like child molestation. However, I am sure that nearly all mental health professionals would say that adults having sex with minors aged 13-17 is not child molestation. We would define child molestation as sex with minors age 12-under.

This is getting really weird. What if most publishing platforms start making insane rules like this saying that that meme is not permitted because it “promotes sexual exploitation of minors”? That’s dumb. I can see it coming though because Pedophile Mass Hysteria seems to get worse every year, and I do not believe it has peaked yet.

I saw a 22 year old man go down for “aggressive kissing” of a 16 year old girl. He didn’t even have sex with her! He kissed her! Actually, she probably kissed him, as 16 year old girls are little seductresses, and they seduce young men constantly.

Next I saw a 19 year old man go down for having sex with a 17 year old girl! What? Lame.

This is getting nuttier and weirder every year.

12642608_10103755267450847_2856400346531566704_n

Control yourselves, guys.

This is the other one that got reported. Those girls are probably 16-18 at the youngest. Does this meme somehow “promote sexual exploitation of minors?” I would say that it doesn’t since while the meme itself seems to promote that, my words below that say, “Control yourselves, guys.” That encapsulates my position that while it is perfectly normal to want to break the law and have sex with those girls, men need to control themselves and not do it, as there’s too much risk of arrest.

Actually the meme itself doesn’t promote sexual exploitation of minors. All it says is it’s ok to want to have sex with those girls. Well, of course it’s normal to want to do that. Any normal man would feel that way. So I don’t see how this meme violates Facebook‘s wussy standards. Who runs Facebook anyway? Men or wusses? I think it’s mostly wussy men and women who seem to run the company. I guess there’s not one real man in the whole company. Nothing but girly-boys in the whole company. What a pity.

55 Comments

Filed under Girls, Idiots, Jailbait, Lame Cunts, Law, Losers, Mass Hysterias, Moralfags, Pedophile Mass Hysteria, Pedophilia, Psychology, Sex, Social Problems, Sociology, Vanity, Women

55 responses to “The Photos That Caused All the Furor

  1. Jason Y

    Note, certain aspects of the cultural left have gone overboard, but that doesn’t mean I don’t sympathize with the core of it.

    Anyhow, the remark on the top of the web page is utterly (no pun intended) ridiculous. Men shouldn’t be attracted to girls under 18? Well, what about 17 and a half? 😆

    Note, in times past, and ironically also those cowboy days when Christian married at 13, lots of guys felt no guilt at being attracted to young girls – seeing as they thought adulthood sort of began at puberty.

  2. Jason Y

    Normal men and women DO NOT desire little girls. Any female under the age of 18 — is a CHILD! Mr. Lindsay blogs about sexual predators (only) because that’s what he is into as well. He also justifies their desire for young females on his blog and his facebook etc.

    He ranted on his blog about being picked on by mean women. He deleted facebook pics before the blog rant so that his readers could feel bad for him (I assume many of them are also perverts). I can assure you, he is NO victim. He also totally screwed up profiling these women who called him out for being a pervert. I see that he does not take on men, so here I am.

    ???

    Below he is having a conversation about how this little girl is so developed and nothing wrong with GROWN men wanting her sexually and blah blah… sick SOB goes on and on. These pics are just a few examples of MANY that he had on his facebook page etc and I wish I had gotten more before he hid them for his perverted viewing “pleasure” only. I also wonder if these girls’ parents know he took these pics and I AM THE ONE THAT BLOCKED their faces. He needed to be able to rant on his blog about how he was being bullied by women, so his pervert pictures and comments are now hidden to validate his bogus and childish rant. Grow up old man and get a different shrink–your desire for young females–NOT NORMAL.

    • Jason Y

      Sorry this was a quote – now quoted:

      Normal men and women DO NOT desire little girls. Any female under the age of 18 — is a CHILD! Mr. Lindsay blogs about sexual predators (only) because that’s what he is into as well. He also justifies their desire for young females on his blog and his facebook etc.

      He ranted on his blog about being picked on by mean women. He deleted facebook pics before the blog rant so that his readers could feel bad for him (I assume many of them are also perverts). I can assure you, he is NO victim. He also totally screwed up profiling these women who called him out for being a pervert. I see that he does not take on men, so here I am.

  3. Jason Y

    Another thought regards the fact young girls are parading their bodies, but nothing wrong with that, so how are adult males supposed to respond?

  4. Jason Y

    Good God women are stupid. This is why you cannot let women run society. If you let women run society, they will make all memes like this illegal and call it pedophilic material or child pornography and you will get 10 years for posting something like this. Women cannot be trusted in positions of power because once they get into power they are going to make half of life illegal. Basically, women are too stupid to hold power in society. Society must be ruled by men.

    Women are incapable of running society, and an society run by women will probably quickly collapse. Women bitch that in every culture and tribe ever studied, men run the show and women follow orders. Women say this is some evil plot called patriarchy. I have another theory. I believe many tribes and cultures may have let women run things for a while as a test run. Or perhaps they allowed women to share power with men.

    Male religious fundamentalists would do the same. Possibly WNs would to the same. Note WNs group sexual freedom along with all the other cultural left things they despise. Ironically, both feminism and sexual freedom both came from the cultural left.

  5. Yee

    Age of Consent

    16 – Britain, Cyprus, Finland, Georgia, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Switzerland, Spain
    15 – France, Czech, Denmark, Greece
    14 – Austria, Germany, Portugal, Italy
    14 – Brazil, Peru, Paraguay, Ecuador and Colombia
    China 14
    Iraq 18
    Japan 13

    Bahrain, it is set at 21 for women who want to marry without their father’s consent,
    Saudi Arabia, all sex outside of marriage is illegal but there are no laws limiting the age at which you can get married.
    Chile –  the minimum age of consent is 14, but there are legal restrictions on sexual activities up to the age of 18, and homosexual sex is illegal before that age.
    Australia, 16 and 17 depending on which territory
    America where it ranges from 16 to 18 between different states.
    In Angola, the age of consent is just 12.

    http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/what-age-consent-around-world-2802173

    • Tulio

      Keep in mind that even in countries with lowered age of consent, there may still be stipulations that the man they are having sex with can’t be more than X years older. So a 30 year old man having sex with 16 year old might still get you in trouble, whereas if she had sex with a 20 year old guy there would be no issue.

      Also the US law actually follows you anywhere you go if you’re a US citizen. If you go to a country where the age of consent is low, the American law still applies to you. Say for example an adult male has sex with a 15 year old in Mexico. If that girl’s parents find out and report you, you’ll be arrested by US officials when you come home. I think this was put in place to crack down on pedophiles who fly to places like Southeast Asia to exploit children(I’m talking true pedophiles here having sex with actual children, not 16 year olds).

      Honestly there’s really no need to go below 18. It’s not like a girl is anymore attractive at 16 than she is at 19. If she’s hot at 16, she’s still hot at 19. Hell, she’ll still be hot at 24 most likely. I just don’t even see any logical point in going for an underage girl. It offers little benefit with huge risks. And sex with a girl that age would probably be awful anyway due to their inexperience. Why bother?

      • Yee

        Age of consent means one is old enough to be able to enjoy sex. If she is able to enjoy it, she can decide if she wants it.

        What age their partner think to be acceptable, is another matter, so is prostitution because it’s not about enjoyment.

  6. Pingback: 27 Feb: Mary Leavitt .. Robert Lindsay – EoP v WiP NWO Neg

  7. Jonathan

    Good lord, these Indiana scumbags are totally worthless..

  8. TJF

    To Rob:

    So I don’t see how this meme violates Facebook’s wussy standards. Who runs Facebook anyway?

    It’s possible that the removal of the photo didn’t even involve a human being and was performed by AI or if it was removed by a human it involved Raj in Bangalore allotted a whole 15 seconds to decide if the photo met Facebook’s loose definition of community standards.

    You probably remember this photo:
    http://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2016/09/10/493454256/with-napalm-girl-facebook-humans-not-algorithms-struggle-to-be-editor

  9. TJF

    To Rob:

    It’s possible that some (or all) of these women or their children have been victims of child molesters. There are, apparently private Facebook support groups for victims of child abuse. I was unfriended (later refriended after 3 month) by someone I knew very well because I made a few comments on one of her Facebook posts suggesting we shouldn’t pass judgement so quickly on Joe Paterno and his role as athletic director for Penn State when the accusations against Jerry Sandusky first came to light. Mind you, I wasn’t saying don’t investigate – I basically just said not to quickly pass judgement and let the investigation run it’s course etc. on Paterno since pedophiles like Sandusky can hide their true nature from friends, family, co-workers etc. My comments apparently really upset several of her friends, all of whom had been molested as children – so she unfriended me for a period of time. Mind you all of these women live in SF Bay Area and have Bachelor’s degrees or higher so they aren’t a bunch of uneducated hicks. Of course as it turns Paterno seems to have been criminally negligent and may have squelched or hindered investigations into Sandusky on several occasions.

    Point being is that these women, who are accusing you, may be completely rational in all other aspects of their lives but if they or their children have been molested then they can become quite angry over something that most of us find perhaps tawdry but innocuous. Because of SJWs, triggered is an overused word but I think it may apply here if these women are victims of pedophiles.

    Mind you, I am not defending their actions – attempts at public shaming and threats of prosecution because you reposted memes that are legal and widely available on the internet are ridiculous but I am suggesting a different approach to get them to remove the webpage they created.

  10. CarA

    I’m a 44 yr old female from Indiana and I have appreciated your insight into the Delphi killings. I’ve enjoyed reading your blog. People don’t have to read what you post. It’s pretty simple, they can move on if they don’t like it!

    • Not all women are cunts. There’s real women like you and there’s cunts. I love real women. I love them to death, way more than I like men even.

      The cunts? Don’t ask. As far as I am concerned, they’re lucky to be alive. We men hate them soooo much! You have no idea……

      • ROBERT

        In my underage youth at 17 I had sex with a grown woman of 40. She taught me how to eat pussy.

        It has not torn me up inside and I do not feel like my world has been scarred by getting my adolescent cock sucked and putting it in the vagina of a grown woman.

        I have not required therapy.

        Why is it that grown women sometimes have sex with more or less physically mature males under 18 and this is not frowned upon?

        In the old days, prostitutes thrived on horny adolescent males.

      • S. Smith

        I’m glad that you updated your definition of cunt. Especially since you may not realize how many female readers actually completely agree with your views on sexuality. However, many women do know how to remain silent in agreement and participate in supporting your blog without comment — if they think mistakenly think you’re a woman hater with deep seated mommy issues — that wouldn’t give two fucks about their approval or not. (How is that for a run on sentence?) Now, based on your updated clarification that your view on cunts does differtiate and does not encompass all of the female gender, it’s a relief! You’re a good writer, Robert. Don’t throw away the appreciation of your female audience with sweeping generalizations. Likewise, toss in a criticism of the idiot male species on occasion — not out of fairness, but out of necessity. Open minded acceptance of sexuality is not something every male is instinctively in touch with. They also don’t all keep their opinions under control. You are more evolved and able to articulate and communicate with verbal and written language. That is definitely not a cultural norm. So please don’t give credit to all males and criticism to a majority of females. Your approval audience and their like-mindedness may have a gender ratio that you’d never expect. Trust me on this, Sir. Your personal and professional growth will be enhanced by less assumption about who is on your team. That’s a compliment. Humanity is, tricky like that.

        • Mommy issues? Oh no. I love my mother. She’s the smartest woman in the whole world, too. I don’t do obey her or do everything she wants anymore, but that’s normal. My Mom’s a real woman. She’s not a cunt. That’s why I love her.

          I actually like women more than men. I’d rather hang around women than men. But those would be real women. I wouldn’t hang around cunts if you paid me.

          I’m 59 years old and I’ve never hurt a woman much in my life. I pushed my Mom down on some stairs once, but she slapped my face. I hit a gf once, but she tried to hit me 350-400X that night. And I didn’t even hit her hard.

          But it’s the behavior of these cunts in part that makes men hate women. Now there are a lot of reasons for misogyny and many or most of them are quite unfair, but if even regular men like me feel like killing those cunts for the way they look at us, think how men with much lower controls and morals feel?

          It doesn’t pay to wage war on men unless we have done something quite bad. Men are dangerous. Very dangerous. I don’t want to make men mad. I’m terrified of men, so I kiss their asses everywhere I go. You women should not want to make men mad either. Or at least you should not go out of your way to do so.

          I complain about women, but men are way worse. At least women are not violent. 95% of violent crime is by men. Women’s violence is psychological and verbal. Men’s is physical and deadly. Men are much worse than women in that regard. Men are an out and out menace.

        • Thanks. Glad to see a real woman in on board here. Actually I can’t stand men. They’re too violent and they scare me. If I had my way, I would just hang around women all the time.

          I know my gender pretty well. Men are BAD. Or way too many of us are anyway. And it’s an out and out crime all the violence we subject innocent women to in their lifetimes.

  11. Donkey Kong Jr.

    I have not laughed this hard in forever!!! Thank you for using the c-word, the r-word and every other curse word all in one paragraph!! 🙂

  12. Betty

    It’s right that the reaction of these women is exaggerated but to say that they are incapable of running a country is plainly wrong. All war, chaos and problems were and are caused by male presidents like Hitler, Erdogan, Trump, etc. So it’s rather males being drama queens.
    Saying that all women would make these memes illegal just because SOME have that point of view is almost equal to saying that all muslims are terrorists because ISIS members consider themselves muslims.
    On top of that, many years ago when women werent allowed to work they were controlling a whole household of like 10 kids while cooking and cleaning every single day without help. So I’d say women are very capable of running a society or country, as for example Maria Theresia reigned Austria instead of her husband, which went perfectly fine.

    P.S. The girl in the first pic neither looks like a little child nor does she look fully developed

    • BETTY

      When men and women are reduced to trading their most base sexist feelings towards the other gender (Women have them too, of course) or posting pictures that people used to hide under their underwear it simply demonstrates how social media has since deconstructed our society.

      Thatcher was competent as well. No quarrel but we have not gotten the right particular woman. Hillary was herself not as capable as her husband, philander that he may been in.

    • Juan

      Female leaders are so rare that the ones who do come to positions of power are ‘better selected’ than men.

      Part of the reason many are not elected is a charisma gap- women can’t be loud/obnoxious without sounding shrill/bitchy in the minds of most people.

      • JUAN

        They usually get by to begin with on their looks and latch on to some asshole politician as his hubby to begin with. I’m not sure why Bill wanted Hillary but she must have been able to do something in the sack.

        These fade and those that manage to get a toehold are hardened by then.

        In middle age they become steely.

        Men on the other hand can roll in with good ole boy charisma at 45 like Clinton.

        • Juan

          TRASH
          this is a why Stefan Molyneux is wrong about ‘librats being r-selected’.

          What ugly woman joins the Republican party to be mocked by confederate flag waving bubbas?
          They don’t.

          Although that surely does come into consideration- it’s not as much as Republicans. All they talk about is ‘how hot Michelle Malkin is’ not her great achievements.

          Many NAMs, especially Blacks, worship White women and would have sex with ones unattractive to us Whites.

    • BETTY

      Disagree that all wars have been waged by male dictators and as Madeline Albright has said “you forgot what high school was like if you think that.”

      Women who do become leaders in middle age will have a great deal of baggage. Early in life they had to rely on their looks as office staffers or whatever, which involves some fairly hardening experiences with sexist older men. Later in life they have had juggle children, careers, husbands or ex-husbands. By the time they get into office, they have learned to be pretty mean.

      Thatcher was a fine leader. More female leaders who are fine will come and go.

      But this will not resolve chaos and conflict.

      • Juan

        some people claim Maggie was a lesbian.

        • JUAN

          Rubbish, she had a flaming affair with some other politician and was married with kids to the husband. Some minor politician himself.

          Don’t let the porno fool you, eating pussy is something most women enjoy far less than the average male. You might tolerate rimming a woman’s anus because males are wired that way, but most women do not want to feel the ridges of another woman’s asshole on their tongue.

          Imagine some guy with his penis in your mouth and hairy balls up against your chin? Disgusting isn’t it.

          Of course she married UP, being the daughter of a grocer. That is common with women to try and marry above their income-bracket. So will dudes if they can do so.

          But I think she liked the old big penis inside her vagina.

        • Juan

          TRASH
          I was under the impression scissoring was the big lesbian thing.

          But what I know about Lesbians I could fit into the head of a pin.

      • Betty

        No, they haven’t learned to be mean but to be strong and to not get dominated by men. Many people see that as mean because they are not used to see strong women but really in the most cases they are just being defensive.
        On top of that which female politician began war? I dont know any. And I didn’t say that women would resolve chaos and conflict, just that most of these and war were caused by men because Robert said that countries run by women would be in complete chaos.

        • BETTY

          Wrong choice of words but you see what I mean. Men can get by on their charisma, a nice head of hair like Clinton, a nice line.

          Women usually end up in politics much older and more experienced.

      • “No, they haven’t learned to be mean but to be strong and to not get dominated by men. Many people see that as mean because they are not used to see strong women but really in the most cases they are just being defensive.”

        Define “mean” versus “strong” with an example of a particular female politician.

        “On top of that which female politician began war? I dont know any.”

        http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2016/01/european-queens-waged-more-wars-than-kings.html

    • Juan

      BETTY
      THATCHER & THE FALKLAND ISLANDS, INDIRA GANDHI & OPERATION BLUE STAR, ETC.

      inferiority complexes.
      Women, especially in the realm of law and order want to compensate for the fact that they quite literally don’t have balls.

      I do not say this as an insult, it often does make for a strong leader.

      • JUAN

        Other women dislike them to.

        • Juan

          TRASH
          women in Britain were not going to abandon the labour party just because Maggie was running, just as Sarah Palin did not help John McCain on that front.

          Indira was center-left economically but center-right socially.
          White women are warned about the risk of rape in India, it is remarkable to think they had a Female Premier as early as 1966.

      • Betty

        Yeah but it rather occurs to males as they are mostly the reigning ones and not females. For example Erdogan has inferiority complexes therefore he does weird stuff to show that he’s soo strong and awesome bla bla bla.

        • “Yeah but it rather occurs to males as they are mostly the reigning ones and not females. For example Erdogan has inferiority complexes therefore he does weird stuff to show that he’s soo strong and awesome bla bla bla.”

          Numerically or proportionally? The differences being if we were to say that there were 500 male executive leaders in history versus 50 women, and they had the complex at 12% of men and 20%, men would have more numerically but females would would have more proportionately.

        • Betty

          Proportionally wouldn’t make sense here would it.

        • Juan

          If men are 90% of leaders but cause 95% of frivolous wars then it could.
          But it’s inherently going to be a weaker argument.

        • “Proportionally wouldn’t make sense here would it?”

          Why would it not make sense? You said that due to males reigning the most, the complex would happen to males as opposed to females.

          But I’ve pretty much explained that even if the number of males, in total, with the complex in a position of power was higher than the same measure for females, that doesn’t rule out females leaders having a higher proportion of those who had it out of all female executive leaders.

          It’s basically the same logic as the link I just gave on European Queens being more prone to war then men.

      • JUAN

        Thatcher was defending Britain’s sovereign territory.

        She happened to be in office.

        • Juan

          TRASH
          ???
          many felt that it was the ‘last remnants of the colonial age’ and that it should be let go, much like how the French just simply gave up their African holdings without a struggle in the 1950s.

          The British had been struggling with some of their colonies for 20 years at this point, and lost.

  13. Juan

    WARS AND CONFLICTS WON UNDER FEMALE PREMIERS
    1588- Elizabeth I of England versus Spain.
    1713 Anne I of Britain versus France in Spanish war of Succession
    1971 Indira Gandhi of India versus West Pakistan in Bangladesh Liberation War https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangladesh_Liberation_War
    1973 Golda Meir of Israel versus Coalition of Arab States
    1982 Margaret Thatcher of UK versus Argentina in Falkland War
    1984 Indira Gandhi of India versus Sikh Guru Rebel and followers

    • Betty

      Oh okay I didnt know about them. Well anyway approximately 6 out of many wars were won under female reigning. The rest were men. I still believe most of them were the real drama queens in history. Not all of them course.

      • “Oh okay I didn’t know about them. Well anyway approximately 6 out of many wars were won under female reigning.”

        How would that bear any significance in terms of statistics seeing how you don’t provide an actual sample number?

        “The rest were men. I still believe most of them were the real drama queens in history. Not all of them course.”

        MOST of them the real drama queens…versus women? I think the link that compares the two would speak otherwise.

        • Betty

          Lol, there’s no need to say a number, it’s clear that most of the wars were made by men.

        • Yet you said WON by a reigning female, no MADE.

          “Well anyway approximately 6 out of many wars were won under female reigning. “

        • Betty

          Ah okay I see now what you meant. I said won because this other person listed wars that were won by women, not made.

        • Alright, I didn’t figured that because the way you phrased it seemed like you were referring to all wars in general won by women than the ones Juan pointed out.

  14. JUAN

    I think you might be right.

  15. Human beings for the last 50,000 years were wrong.

    We are the enlightened ones. We are the FIRST generation, in all of creation to get morality right. We are the FIRST generation, in all of the history of the genus Homo to deduce what is right, what is wrong, and what we should be. All of recorded history was nothing more than a struggle to reach were we are today.

    Well, thats kind of what the Politically Correct ‘tards believe.

    I think women lack a sense of perspective. My female manager drives me nuts, not necessarily because she’s a bitch, but because she makes a deal of things which aren’t a deal. She can’t assess risk. She can’t find proportionate responses to problems. The bans or disallows things for no other reason than she ‘feels’ that way. I’ve had other female auditors and managers who were like that too. They were against something, not for any practical or explainable reason, but just because they felt is should be that way.

    I can’t help but see the link here.

    • ASSEMBLY LINE

      True but males tend to see thing in Black and White. We, myself and I, tend to have a pig in a rut way of solving problems.

  16. S. Smith

    I replied further up with a veiled compliment to Robert (that was wrapped in an admonishment) to enlighten him that he has a much, much larger core group of female readers that completely agree with him. To a degree that he’d liken truly never imagine.

    They are creatures with many layers and an intelligence that can be so fine tuned that they even know when to comfortably remain invisible under the cloak of negative stereotypes.

    While other random females are busy yapping and adding to the stigma, the cleverest are taking advantage of this distraction time and making moves, devising plans, and ‘getting things done’.

    If anyone thinks that greatest OR worst male leaders didn’t have the ideas and opinions of a female (wife, mistress, or mother) being whispered in his ear, then they don’t truly know history. I’d never be so bold as to say whether those words resulted in mistakes or success. Unless you’re privy to the conversation, there is no way to assess. But you’d be a fool to ignore the truth of the statement. It is a tale as old as time, dating back to rulers of every period.

    Now for the scary truth!

    Have any of you read the COMMENT SECTION of a Facebook group post (regarding the murders of the Delphi teen girls) where someone asks if “the murderer would be able to get a fair trail”? THAT ONE POST WILL GIVE YOU AN INSIGHT ON THE FEMALE MIND UNLIKE ANY OTHER. It does NOT give weight to the typical ‘females in charge cause chaos’, because that statement is too generalized. However, it certainly does tie it in to the concensus about female decision making and choices being SO hard core– that as a species — we wouldn’t know how to handle it in any consistent capacity.

    Go read it, tell me what you discover. A majority of the female responses are not just about throwing the trial by jury system out the window. It’s not just heavily laced by females that want retribution for their own memories of molestation. No, it’s a laundry list of ideas on how to torture, maim and decimate this murderer. The words typed are filled with such force and deserved (?) cruelty, it makes one wonder if it was females who INVENTED horrors such as scalping and skinning alive. The female instinct to protect and nurture becomes a weapon of mass destruction when threatened. It takes female lion to a level of “honey you ain’t seen nothing yet”.

    After reading it, the summary is clear. Don’t touch children. Don’t harm children. Women carry them for nine months and the phenomena apparently can cultivate a mindset –that if fucked with– will create a homicidal rage so intense that no serial killer or murderer could compete. Are women actually the true barbarians? Has time and evolution tempered it, but a chemical is released in the brain upon the loss of that imaginary umbilical cord? It would appear so.

    It’s 2017 and the women in that thread would become base level predators seeking to eviscerate the murderer if given the chance. In full public view they would relish ripping his head off and they’d wear it as a crown while dancing with his corpse.

    And, I can’t help but to quietly applaud the sentiment. It’s a fun read, if your in to horror flicks. 😉 I encourage everyone to check it out. Robert, thank you for providing this forum for us to give feedback on the matters at hand. I love your blog.

    • There’s cunts and there’s real women. If you are with us good men who love women on the big questions, like sexuality for instance, we will love you like our own family. These women saying essentially the all men are pedophiles are the enemy. They’ve declared war on us. Any woman who thinks all men are pedophiles is a cunt. Any woman who thinks that is nuts is a real woman.

      Glad to have a real woman on the site, S. Smith. Welcome aboard!

    • Wow a fantastic comment by a real woman! Welcome to the site!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s