Monthly Archives: February 2017

Judith Mirville On Feminism and Female Rule

Fantastic. This is the example I was thinking of talking about an African culture where women pretty much run things.

Judith Mirville: There are quite a few traditional cultures like that where all the brainy and managerial work is done by women, and the men keep content with mere physical work and a more childish, happy-go-lucky personality throughout life. That is the case with the Bamileke culture of Cameroon. But these cultures, by their own avowal, never evolve and keep content with a minimalist standard of living. These cultures, though matriarchal in a technical sense, have no use for any form of vindictive feminism or other left-wing ideology.

Women as a rule are conservative, and the societies where they have the highest real say tend to see all form of progress and experimentation as negative. Instead they idolize a mythical past without technical progress.

Women as a rule when having been in power for a few generations tend also to devalue learning in the academic sense. In the societies where they alone access it, learning is devalued except as an utilitarian means of day-to-day economic survival or of social interaction, so such societies prefer to stay backward.

If feminism is to last as a dominant ideology in the West (which supposes it jettisons all references to any resentment-based progressive thought and also to non-standard sexuality), it will turn the countries it rules into underdeveloped ones, so the Winnipeg picture of the women construction business manager with an attaché-case with a construction worker as a servant is a wholly disconnected fantasy.

What you could get instead as a picture of things to come (in the halcyon case everything goes on well for the feminist cause and their beneficiaries grow wise) is a woman open-air market manager with men acting as cowboys in the background (if the Plains of Winnipeg still exist), the only modern businessperson in the further background being a Chinese or Arab. You may also see male tourist adventurers coming to visit Manitoba as a quite primitive country. Whenever women are really at the top for good, they have no taste for construction, and they prefer to look for a greater profit to be made by existing things that require no invention.

Anyway, right now in Winnipeg, construction workers, especially when they are part of criminal organizations and part-time bouncers, make more money and enjoy higher social status than the nerdy people they despise. The bosses they obey are quite often Sicilian ones who have no use for any feminist manager.

That supposes the feminists in question rediscover a morality and also connect to a traditional spirituality approving of their approach. Maybe an Amerindian one, who knows? But that is far from their present-day perspective: these modern feminists are intent on destroying all morality which they resent against as being of male nature. They may be acting at the behest of vested interests who want to establish a dictatorship based on pure corruption.

Once every whiff of past morality is destroyed, all that remains is self-interest, and even feminism ends up waning as all collective identity causes of the past fade away once the elites have effectively succeeded in rooting out all political idealism and no longer need Identity Politics to divide the masses, a kind of late Ottoman imperial regime is installed, and there are no longer state subventions to special interest groups.

Once public ideals are all destroyed, and all what remains is materialistic self-interest, what do these would-be princesses want? Marrying princes or billionaires, preferably from One and  Thousand Nights-style patriarchal countries such as Qatar or Colombia. The fiercest feminists will be the first to revert to pure gangster-style patriarchy. This just like the fiercest Jewish Marxists were the first to turn into the neocons. Most are now before moving even further to the Right as we see in Israel. That country is growing into another Iran or Qatar with a slightly different Semitic religion.

These feminists only object to idealistic men of ordinary revenues doing the kind of non-work they envy like university tenured professors. When they meet gangsters, even of low life, revenue and status, they enjoy having regular sex with them and settle for traditional family life.

Women are also more egoistical by temperament, and feminism can last as long as there is a progressive ideology justifying the cost of their subventions.

But feminism is not as progressive as it seems since normally women don’t side with their less fortunate sisthren. Even the present-day radical feminists don’t object to FGM as practiced in other cultures.

The reality untold is that sexual pleasure itself however carefully mastered is just contrary to any moral decency and ideal. There is such a thing as carnal sin.

13 Comments

Filed under Africa, Anthropology, Cameroon, Canada, Central Africa, Cultural, Culture, Ethics, Feminism, Gender Studies, Labor, North America, Philosophy, Politics, Radical Feminists, Regional, Social Problems, Sociology, Women

“From Andalusia to Far West Texas,” by Alpha Unit

The wild ancestor of modern cattle is the aurochs. This nearly seven-foot-tall beast ranged throughout North Africa and Eurasia. Domestication occurred independently in Africa, the Near East, and the Indian subcontinent between 10,000 and 8,000 years ago. Humans have been raising cattle for their milk, meat, tallow, and hides ever since.

But the practice of raising large herds of livestock on extensive grazing lands didn’t begin until around 1000 CE, in Spain and Portugal. Cattle ranching, in particular, was unique to medieval Spain.

During the Spanish Reconquista, members of the Spanish nobility and various military orders received grants to large tracts of land that the Kingdom of Castile had conquered from the Moors. Pastoralists found that open-range breeding of sheep and cattle was most suitable for these vast areas of Castilla-La Mancha, Extremadura, and Andalusia.

It was in Andalusia that cattle ranching took hold, with cattlemen owning herds as large as 1,000 head or more. Those cattlemen oversaw the first cattle drives. Cattle could be driven overland as much as 400 miles from summer pastures in the North to winter ones in Andalusia. The vaqueros who herded the cattle were freemen hired for the year and paid in coin or in calves.

Andalusian ranchers introduced the use of horses in managing cattle – a necessity in the long overland drives to new pastures. They also established the customs of branding and ear-marking cattle to denote ownership. By the time Columbus left Spain on his first voyage, the cattle industry of Andalusia had undergone a few centuries of trial-and-error improvement. On his second voyage Columbus unloaded some stallions, mares, and cattle on the island of Hispaniola, introducing cattle to the New World.

Conquistadors who arrived in the New World in search of gold continued what Columbus began, turning Andalusian cattle loose throughout the Spanish West Indies and other parts of Spain’s colonial empire.

In 1521 Gregorio de Villalobos defied a law prohibiting cattle trading in Mexico and left Santo Domingo for Veracruz with several cows and a bull, importing the first herd of Spanish cattle to Mexico. Hernán Cortés brought horses and cattle to Mexico as well, and by 1540 Spanish cattle are permanently in North America.

Cortés had set about using enslaved Aztecs to herd cattle. Slave labor to herd cattle was overseen mostly by Spanish missions, which came to dominate ranching. Under Spanish law no Indian slave was permitted to ride horses, but this obviously impractical law was ignored. Aztec Indians became the first vaqueros of New Spain (Mexico), where conditions for raising cattle were even better than those in the West Indies.

By the 1600s there weren’t as many Native slaves, as thousands had died over time from exposure to smallpox, measles, and yellow fever, in outbreaks that began among the Spaniards and to which Natives had no immunity. As a result, the vaquero labor force came to include mission Indian converts, African slaves, and mestizos.

New Spain’s borders spread northward into what is now the US Southwest. The sparsely populated northern frontier regions of northern Mexico, Texas, and California didn’t have enough water for farming but the climate and acres of wild grass and other vegetation made them ideal for cattle ranching. Cattle and horses were now a feature of American life and were beginning to shape American identity.

Beginning in the 1820s, Anglo settlers moved to the Texas region of Mexico in search of inexpensive land. Texas was severely underpopulated, so Mexico had enacted the General Colonization Law of 1824, permitting immigration to all heads of households regardless of race, religion, or immigrant status. Anglo Texans were largely farmers and didn’t warm initially to the Spanish-Mexican concept of large-scale ranching. But ranching became popular among Anglos after immigration agents began promoting it. Texas cattle were so plentiful and cheap that most people could begin raising livestock without a large investment.

Anglo Texan cowhands and their counterparts throughout the US were the latest incarnation of the vaquero that got his start in southern Spain. The vaquero rides on, whether he’s Native, mestizo, Black, Hispano, or Anglo.

12 Comments

Filed under Africa, Agricutlure, Alpha Unit, Americas, Amerindians, Animals, Blacks, Caribbean, Colonialism, Cows, Domestic, Eurasia, Europe, European, Europeans, Guest Posts, Hispanics, History, Horses, Immigration, India, Labor, Latin America, Livestock Production, Mestizos, Mexicans, Mexico, Mixed Race, Near East, North Africa, North America, Political Science, Race/Ethnicity, Regional, South America, Spain, Spaniards, Texas, The Americas, USA, West, Whites

Look What Happens When You Let Women Run the Show

Yee: This is just male chauvinist nonsense. Either rule will work when you enforce it, people learn to adapt. Taliban and Saudi societies are so difference from the Philippines, still people in these places live a normal life.

As for the rulers themselves, as long as they’re good at organizing things, it’s will work. This is the main quality that required to run a society. Females actually are better.

Depends. Are the women ruling according to the rules and mores of women or according to the rules and mores of men. Look what happens when you let women make the law. Prohibition was put in by women. Women’s long-term activism was the only reason that Prohibition was passed at all. Although it came one year after women were given the right to vote, Prohibition was a societal change that was made by the rules and mores of women. All over the world, whenever alcohol is made illegal or restricted, it done most of the time by women.  The result of Prohibition? Total chaos.

That’s what happens when you let women make the rules. And in Communist insurgencies, typically Maoist ones, they often put women in charge of the local village and town governments. What’s the first thing they do? Over and over I have read that the first thing they do is make alcohol illegal. Result of making alcohol illegal?

Chaos.

Sweden is governed according to the rules and mores of women. That’s why it is a nightmare state for men.

Female rulers are fine. You can have an all-female government for all I care. But they must govern according to the rules and mores of men, not women.

Look what happened in California when we let women make the rules. The state of California just voted that on all university campuses, you must have affirmative consent for every sex act. Like you want to kiss her, you have to ask, “Can I kiss you?” You want to touch her tits? You have to ask her, “Can I feel your tits?”

Guess who put those rules in?

Women.

What is the result of this stupid-ass “affirmative consent” nonsense?

Chaos.

Those are the sort of lunatic rules and laws that you get when you let women run the show and govern according to the rules and mores of women. According to the rules and mores of women, that idiot affirmative consent rule is 100% rational. That’s how women actually think. They think a rule like that is completely reasonable and sensible.

19 Comments

Filed under California, Europe, Gender Studies, Government, Higher Education, Law, Left, Local, Maoism, Marxism, Regional, Social Problems, Sociology, Sweden, USA, West, Women

Female Rule Doesn’t Work, and Men Are Necessary for Any Societal Achievement

Betty: It’s right that the reaction of these women is exaggerated but to say that they are incapable of running a country is plainly wrong. All war, chaos and problems were and are caused by male presidents like Hitler, Erdogan, Trump, etc. So it’s rather males being drama queens.

Saying that all women would make these memes illegal just because SOME have that point of view is almost equal to saying that all Muslims are terrorists because ISIS members consider themselves Muslims.

On top of that, many years ago when women weren’t allowed to work they were controlling a whole household of like 10 kids while cooking and cleaning every single day without help. So I’d say women are very capable of running a society or country, as for example Maria Theresia reigned Austria instead of her husband, which went perfectly fine.

Women can govern in partnership with men but countries must be ruled by the laws and mores of men. Women are free to help us run countries only as long as those countries are run according to the rules of men.

If you let women govern according to the rules and mores of women, things will fall apart pretty quickly. A lot of Communist groups put women in charge when they took over small rural villages. It was always a catastrophe. The first thing women do when they get in charge is make prostitution, gambling and booze illegal. Those are the three things that men need to make like tolerable enough so they don’t kill themselves, and those are the first things women outlaw. Thanks a lot, ladies. This rule does not work very well. Men are not very happy, but really no one is very happy. Things rapidly become pretty chaotic.

Sweden is currently being ruled by women. It’s under Female Rule – I mean women ruling according to the rules and mores of women along with a bunch of Beta cuck men helping them. It is not going well. The men are leaving in droves to go to Thailand to grab Thai brides because they have had it up to here with Swedish women.

Maria Teresia, many queens, and Thatcher all governed according to the rules, laws and mores of men. That’s not even Female Rule. That’s called Male Rule with Female Rulers – Women governing according to the laws, rules and mores of Male Rule.

Female Rule is when women impose their worldview on society. As long as the male rules of society are kept intact, women are free to take any government position they wish.

There are societies in Africa that are essentially under Female Rule. The men have just said, “The Hell with it, we’re done, here, you ladies take over. Have fun.” Women hold most of the power in these places. There is little violence or crime and actually there are not even a lot of serious disputes. These are sort of peace love dope hippie- type societies.

On the other hand, not much gets done in this places. They tend to stagnate and cruise in stasis. In particular, there is not much education because I suppose most women are just not interested in that. A lot of stuff that needs to get done never gets done, and everything gets put off. So you have societies without a lot of serious conflict, but on the other hand, there is little advancement.

I think women want to find a happy place and just be relaxed and go with the flow there rather than deal with the sturm and drang of continuous progress.

Personally I do not believe women can run societies, or if they do, they have to do so in partnership with good men or according to the rules of good men.

I feel that men are essential for any societal advancement. Women are free to help us men in societal advancement, but if you put them in charge, it’s just not going to work. Women just can’t run societies. There’s nothing wrong with that. Women can’t do everything, you know. So there’s some stuff they can’t do well? So what? There are plenty of things that women are great at. They should focus on those.

85 Comments

Filed under Africa, Austria, Britain, Europe, Gender Studies, Government, History, Left, Man World, Marxism, Masculinism, Politics, Regional, Sociology, Sweden, Women

Are 24% of All Men Pedophiles?

There are studies showing that a majority of men are attracted to prepubescents. In fact, 21-26% of men in two studies score “pedophilic” in the lab. They react just as strongly or stronger to girls 2-12 as they go to females 13+. So are 26% of men pedophiles? No. One wonders how these men rationalize this. I assume that if you have maximal attraction to mature females, you could just blow off the attraction to little girls by ignoring or repressing it. What is more important is exclusivity. In the same studies, .1-1% of men score fixated in the lab. They are strongly attracted to prepubescents and have little to no attraction to matures.

I work in mental health, and I don’t care if someone tells me that little girls turn them on. I want to know if they are fixated on them in that they have little to no attraction to matures or if they retain maximal attraction to mature females. We worry about fixated pedophiles because the only thing that turns them on is little girls. That makes them rather dangerous right there. The only way to fulfill their sex drive is to break the law.

To show you the absurdity of irrational women who insist that if you get turned on by teenage girls, you are a pedophile, we can look at lab studies that showed that ~100% of men are attracted to underage teenage girls. They generally show 100% are attracted, but it may be a bit lower for the youngest teens. One study in Italy showed that “only” 88% of men were attracted to 13 year old girls.

One study I found showed declining attraction by age. In that study all of the men were attracted to females down to age 7! And 100% of men were attracted to 16 and 17 year old girls as strongly as they were to adult females.

The results looked like this:

Female Age Reaction

16+        100%
15         90% of maximum
14         80% of maximum
13         70% of maximum
12         60% of maximum
11         50% of maximum
10         40% of maximum
9          30% of maximum
8          20% of maximum
7          10% of maximum
below 7    Zero

As you can see, as females get younger and younger and look less and less like an adult female, men’s attraction to them decreases in tandem. Men are just as attracted to 16 and 17 year old girls as they are to adult women because girls that age have the fully adult body of a woman. So according to this study, all men are turned on by little girls but only at a relatively low level. As the girls get younger and younger, men are less and less attracted to them as they look less and less like the men’s preference, the mature female. The only thing we can say is that it is quite abnormal to be attracted to females below age 7!

Little in life is black or white, but most people are too stupid to figure this out. Most everything in life is on a continuum. In other words, everything’s a gray area. But start talking like that around 90% of people and watch as they the voices rise and the fists pound the table. Most humans are simply too dumb to move beyond primitive black and white thinking.

We can clearly see by this study that all normal men react just as strongly to girls age 16-17 as they do to adult women. So these women saying that men who are attracted at this age range are pedophiles are not making sense. These women are stating that all adult men are pedophiles. Do they really wish to stand by this stunning statement? Do they really wish to scream that all men are pedophiles? That’s quire a remarkable statement to make. Why don’t they try it and see what reaction they get?

For fixated pedophiles, the graph no doubt looks quite different. Peak attraction will be around their AOA or Age of Attraction, and AOA will decline as the girls move out of the age of attraction, especially towards the higher end. A number of pedophiles even show non-pedophilic attraction to 13-15 year old girls because girls this age retain enough childlike features to be attractive to them, but the attraction declines with each increasing year of age. By age 16, even most hebephiles refer to girls this age as “grandmas” and voice strong disgust for them.

9 Comments

Filed under Gender Studies, Girls, Jailbait, Lolitas, Man World, Mass Hysterias, Pedophile Mass Hysteria, Pedophilia, Psychology, Sex

The Photos That Caused All the Furor

Here’s a webpage trashing me that some retarded woman wasted a couple of hours of her insipid life creating. This stupid lady even blacked out the faces of the girls on the memes because I guess they are “child abuse victims” or some such. That’s so idiotic.

Isn’t that stupid? That has to be the stupidest webpage ever created.

About the “Sometimes you want to break the law meme: Normal men and women DO NOT desire little girls. Any female under the age of 18 — is a CHILD! Robert Lindsay blogs about sexual predators only. He also justifies their desire for young females on his blog and his Facebook. He deleted Facebook pics though and blogged that he was a victim. I can assure you, he is NO victim. He also totally screwed up profiling the women that called him out on being a pervert.

About the girl in the bikini meme: Below he is having a conversation about how this little girl is so developed and nothing wrong with GROWN men wanting her and blah blah… sick SOB goes on and on.

These pics are just a few examples of MANY that he had on his Facebook page and I wish I had gotten more before he hid them for his perverted viewing “pleasure” only. I also wonder if these girls’ parents know he took these pics and I AM THE ONE THAT BLOCKED their faces…He needed to be able to rant on his blog about how he was being bullied by women, so his pervert pictures and comments are now hidden.

Yeah, and guess what? The mental health professionals of the US have agreed in writing that it’s perfectly normal for any adult to be attracted to minors aged 13-17, so her first lines are just wrong.

She’s wrong. Girls age 13-17 are not children. They are adolescents. Adolescents are neither children nor adults. They are in between. Girls that age should be called something like girlwomen because they are in between a girl and a woman.

Next line is wrong. I do not blog exclusively about sexual predators. Was this woman in Special Ed?

The next sentence is true. I do indeed justify the desire of men to have sex with 13-17 year old girls. Absolutely.

Onto the next paragraph. This is correct. The girl in the photo is very well-developed. I wonder how she can get any more developed than that. And she’s not a little girl. She has to be at least 16.

Next, indeed, I do state that there is nothing wrong with grown men wanting to have sex with that girl. Absolutely that is my position.

Then she wonders if those girls’ parents know I took pics of their daughters. LOL! Now I know she was in Special Ed. She should have never graduated. They should have forced her into Special Ed for life. And she blocked out their faces like they are some sexual abuse victims! Idiocy! Of course I didn’t take pics of those girls, you retarded baboon. That’s just some Internet meme. Someone took those pics (probably the girls’ own friends), then some guy made a meme out of the photo. I don’t know those girls. I’ve never met or seen them, and I have no idea where those pics were taken.

Actually my pics and posts are not hidden. It’s just that I’ve blocked most of these screeching harpies from my page. Women like this should not be allowed outside to roam the streets. They’re a threat to public safety. They belong in zoos.

1443538791373

Self-explanatory.

This is one of the photos that caused all the furor when that gaggle of retarded dames mass-reported it to Facebook in an effort to get my page taken down Facebook removed this photo because they said it violated their community standards. It was all women who reported me; no men reported me because men are rational about this sort of thing whereas women are not.

These insipid women said that I stole the pictures of those girls and put them on my  page. LOL those are Internet memes, you idiotic women. Some guy got a hold of that picture and turned it into a meme, and I borrowed it. I have no idea who that girl is, and yeah, I stole her picture off the Internet. I stole it off a meme, you retards.

Good God, women are stupid. This is why you cannot let women run society. If you let women run society, they will make all memes like this illegal, call it pedophilic material or child pornography, and you will get 10 years for posting something like this. Women cannot be trusted in positions of power because once they get into power they are going to make half of life illegal. Basically, women are too stupid in terms of common sense to hold power in society. Society must be ruled by men. Good women can assist us men in ruling society.

Women are incapable of running society, and an society run by women will probably quickly collapse. Women bitch that in every culture and tribe ever studied, men run the show, and women follow orders. Women say this is some evil plot called patriarchy.

I have another theory. I believe many tribes and cultures may have let women run things for a while as a test run. Or perhaps they allowed women to share power with men.

Many cultures were ruled by queens, for instance. But it was still men who made the rules of society because women cannot be trusted to do such things. I figure that every attempt to let women run the show collapsed into utter chaos and anarchy, and the tribe or culture rapidly fell apart. Because this is what is going to happen every time you let women run society. They will destroy it because women are simply incapable of running societies, cultures or tribes. All must be ruled by men or at least by the rules, mores and laws of men. Once you let women rule society by the idiotic rules, mores and laws of women, society will rapidly collapse.

They also reported that photo to numerous law enforcement agencies. What a gaggle of idiot broads.

Apparently I violated this retarded standard. I had not the faintest idea that I was violating any standard by posting that pic. It’s pretty innocuous.

Sexual Violence and Exploitation: How we Fight Sexual Violence and Exploitation on Facebook

We remove content that threatens or promotes sexual violence or exploitation. This includes the sexual exploitation of minors and sexual assault. To protect victims and survivors, we also remove photographs or videos depicting incidents of sexual violence and images shared in revenge or without permissions from the people in the images.

Our definition of sexual exploitation includes solicitation of sexual material, any sexual content involving minors, threats to share intimate images, and offers of sexual services. Where appropriate, we refer this content to law enforcement. Offers of sexual services include prostitution, escort services, sexual massages, and filmed sexual activity.

Wow. So that meme promotes the sexual exploitation of minors. LOL! How idiotic. Apparently that meme is somehow defined as “sexual content involving minors,” I guess because she’s wearing a bathing suit!

Really all that meme says is it’s ok for a man of any age to be sexually aroused by this girl. Because that’s true, right? Careful studies in the lab repeatedly find that all normal males are sexually aroused by girls that age. It’s not abnormal at all. The only men who are not aroused by that girl are gay men and dead men. So not only is my statement true, but it’s been validated in many scientific studies.

I am not promoting the sexual exploitation of minors, whatever that means. I’m saying it’s ok for men to get turned on by teenage girls. I’m not saying it’s ok to have sex with them or anything like that. Actually I recommend that all adult men do not have sex or engage in any sexual activity with any female below the age of consent. Not because there’s anything wrong with it. In my opinion, for any man to have sex with a girl like the above is perfectly acceptable to me. But all men adult men need to avoid sexual behavior with girls below consent age because you might get arrested. Actually nowadays you probably will get arrested.

Society has gone berserk on Pedophile Mass Hysteria, mostly due to the insane and retarded conflation of statutory rape of underage girls with actual molestation done by pedophiles and child molesters. A man attracted to teenage girls is called normal, not a pedophile. We in mental health get to make the definitions of things like pedophilia, not a bunch of retarded hags. We have decided that pedophilia has to do with minors age 12-under.

Mental health professionals officially state that sexual activity with minors age 13-17 is not pedophilia. In fact, in the DSM-5 discussions about hebephilia, it was even argued that attraction to girls aged 13-15 was absolutely normal. Not only was it not a disorder called hebephilia, but it wasn’t even abnormal. It other words, mental health professionals decided that attraction to minors age 13-15 was absolutely normal human behavior. That’s all we have to say about it because we only give definitions to mental disorders, not crimes like child molestation. However, I am sure that nearly all mental health professionals would say that adults having sex with minors aged 13-17 is not child molestation. We would define child molestation as sex with minors age 12-under.

This is getting really weird. What if most publishing platforms start making insane rules like this saying that that meme is not permitted because it “promotes sexual exploitation of minors”? That’s dumb. I can see it coming though because Pedophile Mass Hysteria seems to get worse every year, and I do not believe it has peaked yet.

I saw a 22 year old man go down for “aggressive kissing” of a 16 year old girl. He didn’t even have sex with her! He kissed her! Actually, she probably kissed him, as 16 year old girls are little seductresses, and they seduce young men constantly.

Next I saw a 19 year old man go down for having sex with a 17 year old girl! What? Lame.

This is getting nuttier and weirder every year.

12642608_10103755267450847_2856400346531566704_n

Control yourselves, guys.

This is the other one that got reported. Those girls are probably 16-18 at the youngest. Does this meme somehow “promote sexual exploitation of minors?” I would say that it doesn’t since while the meme itself seems to promote that, my words below that say, “Control yourselves, guys.” That encapsulates my position that while it is perfectly normal to want to break the law and have sex with those girls, men need to control themselves and not do it, as there’s too much risk of arrest.

Actually the meme itself doesn’t promote sexual exploitation of minors. All it says is it’s ok to want to have sex with those girls. Well, of course it’s normal to want to do that. Any normal man would feel that way. So I don’t see how this meme violates Facebook‘s wussy standards. Who runs Facebook anyway? Men or wusses? I think it’s mostly wussy men and women who seem to run the company. I guess there’s not one real man in the whole company. Nothing but girly-boys in the whole company. What a pity.

55 Comments

Filed under Girls, Idiots, Jailbait, Lame Cunts, Law, Losers, Mass Hysterias, Moralfags, Pedophile Mass Hysteria, Pedophilia, Psychology, Sex, Social Problems, Sociology, Vanity, Women

Please Look at My Facebook Profile

Hi readers. I am under attack by a swarm of retards. Female retards. Conservative married women with a couple of kids retards. Retards from the most retarded flyover red state I’ve ever seen in my life. It numbs the mind how retarded the people in this state are. They are literally the most retarded Americans I have ever met. No wonder they love Mike Pence.

Anyway, these insane conservatard women are all up in arms about my Facebook profile. They say it is disgusting and creepy. They have been mass reporting me to Facebook authorities trying to get my profile shut down. And they keep saying I need to be reported to the authorities due to the content on my profile. They claim there is “pedophilia” on my profile, “pictures of young girls,” and “pictures of little girls.”

I have been on Facebook for years now and I have never had one single slight complaint about my profile. Not even the tiniest peep. Now all of a sudden there’s an uproar about it. Color me baffled.

And no one has ever told me that my profile is sick, creepy and disgusting because of its “pedophilic” content. They claim I went around to various websites “stealing pictures of little girls” to put on my “pedophile site.”

I saw that Facebook was investigating my page today, but it seems like they left me up.

They are apparently referring to my Photos section, which I never look at anyway. It’s just photos posted over from the website.

I have just gone over my Photos with a fine tooth comb, and for the life of me I cannot see any pedophilic content. Please go to my Facebook page and point out the “pedophilic”, disgusting, creepy pedophilic photos. Don’t worry, there’s no real CP up there. I have nothing to do with that stuff. I don’t even look at it, much less collect it. All the content up there is 100% legal. It’s not even gray area. It’s not even porn. It’s not even anything.

Anyway, for the life of me I cannot understand what these screeching retarded baboons are going on about. Come to think of it, the whole state seems to be populated by baboons. Trash has an incredible amount of hatred for these people and I am finally starting to get it. Red staters are horrific. I think we need a divorce from these autistic subhumans. This marriage ain’t going to work.

Once again, I have never seen so many out and out retards as in this one state. Are there any states in the US with as many retards as this state? What about your state, Jewson? What about yours, Juan? What about that retarded state you grew up in, Trash?

Goddamn these people are stupid! Did this whole state get hit by a Retard Virus?

Please go to my page and try to see why these monkeys are reporting me to the police. I don’t get it. Can you figure out what the Hell these orangutans are talking about? I mean, I know they’re retarded, but still. What’s making these apes so upset?

Here’s the profile itself? See anything creepy?

Here’s the photos that have got them screeching and banging their cages. See anything creepy, objectionable or “pedophilic?” See anything that should be reported to the authorities? Eeek eeek! Oook oook!

212 Comments

Filed under Idiots, Losers, Lunatics, Mass Hysterias, Midwest, Moralfags, Pedophile Mass Hysteria, Regional, Ridiculousness, USA, Vanity

The Case for Linking the Delphi Murders with the Evansdale Murders

Note to commenters: Please stop referring to Unsub as a pedophile. He may well be one, but that’s something that can be determined from this crime as it was not a pedophilic offense. Instead, this was a hebephilic offense. And the perpetrator could certainly be seen as a hebephile, although he’s not necessarily one. If you want to refer to the nature of the offense, use the word hebephilic instead of pedophilic. If you wish to refer to Unsub’s paraphilia, please refer to him as a hebephile and not a pedophile.

Thank you so much for this. I am getting tired of words being misused. And now we are being scientific on the board.

Note 2 to commenters: I am really getting sick and tired of saying this, but most of the material below is made up of rumors and my own opinions and theories. None of that is represented as fact. The only thing that is represented as fact as statements sourced from LE or the media.

And incidentally, the way I wrote up the case is precisely how detectives work a case. Detectives do not work cases using the scientific method. If they did, they would hardly solve one case. It’s more “We believe this for now…this is true for now…at the moment, this is what we think happened…we believe…” They are throwing out endless theories about what really happened and accepting them as (temporary) facts. They are then continuously revising and throwing out theories and creating new ones.

Being  a detective is about being wrong. Not just once, but being wrong over and over so many times your head will want to come off. If you can’t handle being wrong, then detective work is surely not for you. Finally detectives arrive at enough information to file a case against someone, but a lot of that is not factual either. They believe he did the crime. They believe that this, that, or the other happened with no way to really prove it – it’s just what they conjecture.

If he is convicted, then the theory that he did the crime is validated as fact, but I am not sure what other evidence is. And even court decisions are not scientific fact because they get overturned all the time. There are not a whole lot of 100% certain, clear scientific facts in LE work, detective work on the judicial system itself. A good portion of the decisions made turn out to be theories, temporary but unstable facts, beliefs, hunches and guesswork, all represented as fact in the court.

If you have issues with theories, opinions and what not, just quit reading and get the Hell off my site right now and never come back. I am really getting sick and tired of this BS.

The Case for Unsub Involvement in Both the Delphi and Evansdale Murders

I believe the Delphi, Indiana double homicide Unsub was involved in the Evansdale, Iowa double homicide of two girls aged 8-10. They also disappeared in the woods in a park named after five bridges, which are all in the park. There may be railroad bridges there also. They were also found by a stream as in this case. They were dumped in another regional park 20 miles away.  The bodies were discovered in very poor condition near a stream. The bodies were in such poor condition that there was no way to determine whether the girls had been sexually abused. Neither was it possible to determine mode of killing.

However, if the MO in Delphi was throat-slitting, perhaps it was in Evansdale also. As at least one of the Delphi girls was raped, the Evansdale girls were probably sexually abused too. As Unsub is a pedophile, it makes little sense for him to abduct girls only to murder them. His primary motivation in these crimes is sexual and sexual assault is surely a necessary factor in his attacks. He is also motivated by homicidal tendencies. I believe he kills the girls for a sadistic thrill rather than to get rid of witnesses. Part of the whole reason for abducting the girls is to kill them.

Here are the commonalities between the two cases:

  • Bridges, especially railroad bridges.
  • Bodies of water, especially streams.
  • Small regional parks with the above in them.
  • Young girls aged 8-14.
  • Pairs of girls.
  • Attacks occur on the 13th of the month, perhaps because 13 is an unlucky number. So it’s the “unlucky day” for the girls who his victims. He thinks this is funny as he has a sick sense of humor.
  • Same general region of Iowa and Indiana, about 350 miles east to west.
  • Body dumps near streams
  • Probable rape or sexual abuse in both cases. Present at Delphi, probable at Evanston.

If you think this website is valuable to you, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site. Donations are the only thing that keep the site operating.

33 Comments

Filed under Crime, Criminology, Girls, Iowa, Midwest, Pedophilia, Regional, Serial Killers, Sex, Sociology, USA

Question: “Robert, How Do You Know So Much about Serial Killers, Pedophiles, Hebephiles and Sexual Sadists?”

I sometimes get involved in websleuthing. I don’t do it all the time, but I’ve been doing this for years.

I have also worked in real life with detectives attempting to solve an attempted homicide of a policeman in New Jersey in the 1960’s or 1970’s. I worked with detectives from California and New Jersey on that case. I had a good POI, and they were very interested in this case. I was very impressed with all three detectives in the case.

I am very interested in this sort of thing, and I have researched heavily a few cases. I have never caught anyone yet though. I wish I had. I am particularly interested in serial killings involving rape of women and molestation of girls. Basically rapist-murderers or child killers. In almost all such cases, the children are sexually molested. Repeat child killers are almost always sexually motivated. We are dealing with a sadistic pedophile in these cases. In the case of women, we are almost always dealing with a sexual sadist. In almost all such cases, we are dealing with sociopaths or psychopaths, probably the latter. I’m not interested in sleuthing out any other sort of cases, sorry. I have studied serial killers for many years, and I know a lot about them.

My counseling practice deals heavily with people who are consumed by thoughts of child molesting, violence against others, or homicide. I have to do differential diagnosis to determine pedophilia vs. no pedophilia and dangerous person versus non-dangerous person all the time.

As part of this work, I had to do a lot of research on violent people, especially murderers and serial killers. I have also done a lot of research into psychopathy and sexual sadism. I had to do a lot of research into pedophilia, which even included studying pedophile and hebephile websites where these people post.

These sites are on the Open Internet, and really there is no real child pornography on these sites. It’s mostly just gray area stuff and pedophiles/hebephiles talking about their common sexual interest. As a result, you can learn quite a bit of how these people think. It’s a valuable experience if you wish to understand pedophilia or hebephilia.

Confessions of molesting children on these forums are rare. I have only seen four confessions, and two involved 13 year old girls, which is arguably not even pedophilia.

It is a mistake to think that everyone on those boards is a pedophile or hebephile. Pedophile boards often consist of about 1/2 pedophiles and 1/2 pedophile-haters who abuse and threaten the pedophiles. So at least half of the people on those boards are not even pedophiles. They are the opposite.

If you think this website is valuable to you, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site. Donations are the only thing that keep the site operating.

5 Comments

Filed under Crime, Girls, Law enforcement, Mental Illness, Pedophilia, Personality Disorders, Psychology, Psychopathology, Serial Killers, Sex, Sociopathy

What Is Grey Area Child Pornography?

If you research pedophiles, you are going to end up on pedophile bulletin boards where pedophiles talk about their sexual orientation. It’s one of the best ways to study these people, and on open boards, 50% of the posters are pedophile-haters threatening and abusing the pedophiles, so it hardly makes you a pedo to go to such sites.

In terms of images, Open Internet pedophile forums are generally pretty clean. There are lots of pictures of little girls, but these are mostly completely legal photos of fully clothed girls. Nevertheless, it is still a bit disturbing at least for me to look at that photo of that little girl and realize that the men on that site regard her as a sex object. It’s a weird, creepy feeling.

There are images on these sites, but it is all or almost all gray area stuff. This is good because it means you can use these sites for research without worrying about going to jail for “illegal looking.” Most of the gray area stuff is clothed posed models and cartoon child pornography. While both of these types of images are disturbing, at least to me, they are generally legal.

Clothed Posed Models

A clothed posed model is what to me looks like a little girl dressed up in very sexy clothes posed very provocatively. The girls are fully clothed, and the FBI has long stated that if they are posing  alone and they have all their clothes on, it’s not child pornography. Nevertheless, I find the clothed models to be very disturbing to look at. I don’t mind looking at little girls, but not if they are dressed and posed like that. There’s something creepy about it. As far as whether it’s a turn on, I usually think,  “Why in the Hell would anyone get turned on by that?”

I’m not sure the age of the posed model girls. It may be 10-13. They are heading into puberty, but they are still disturbingly  young. Most of them seem to come from Russia, often the rural parts of Russia. Both the girls and their mothers are very enthusiastic about this modeling, probably because the mother can earn quite a bit of money that way and the girl gets to indulge her narcissism.

Many of the girls  have given interviews later when they were adults. In all cases, they vehemently defend their child modeling days. The mothers are all unrepentant too. I don’t quite know what to do about this. Maybe this stuff needs to stay legal even if it is creepy. There’s all sorts of creepy material like beheading videos out there that is 100% legal. It’s hard to make a case that clothed posed models are more disturbing or creepy than beheading videos.

Not one single person has gone down for mere possession of this stuff, much less for illegal looking. Two men have been convicted of mass distribution of clothed child models, but that case was extremely controversial because clothed posed models were not known to be illegal at the time and the state had to make a new case that this material was illegal. Many of the now-grown girl models have come to these men’s defense.

Both men had researched the law carefully and felt they were operating within the law as clothed posed models were legal at the time. They were legal at the time. They were legal until the state decided that they were illegal, which is messed up.

You can’t break a law that you don’t know exists. Vague laws are unconstitutional. Laws must be written so it is pretty clear to people what is legal and what is illegal. Therefore, citizens who wish to obey the law can know what the limits of the law are. If we don’t know what’s legal and what’s illegal, how can we operate in society. If everything is legal until the state arbitrarily and without passing a law decides something is illegal, this is not democratic, and you’re not living in a free country. That is totalitarianism.

In the meantime, clothed posed model sites are all over the Net as far as I can tell. They took down two of the toadstools, but 500 new ones have sprung up. Although clothed child models are disturbing images, I suppose they should remain legal. Just because something is creepy or disturbing doesn’t mean it should be illegal.

The threat of going to prison has not fazed many people though and it seems there are hundreds of posed model sites out there. Perhaps there is money to be made on the stuff.

Clothed posed models are essentially legal unless you are hosting a huge website grossing millions of dollars per year. But why anyone would want to look at such stuff is beyond me.

Cartoon Child Pornography

Cartoon child pornography is gray area legal, although I admit it is disturbing to look at. Some of it is actually rather horrible. As far as whether it’s a turn-on, my reaction is the same as above, “Why would anyone get turned on by that?” I actually like cartoon porn a lot. It’s one of my favorite types of porn. But not with little girls in it! Gross and weird!

The cartoons are not all little girls, and some of the girls are more teens with developing women’s bodies and breasts. I will admit that once the girls in the cartoons start looking like women, I start getting interested in them. A big market with this material has sprung up in Japan. I believe it is called Loli or Manga. I don’t need to tell you what the cartoons features. They’re hardcore pornographic cartoons with little girls. That’s all you need to know. Use your imagination.

The only cases tried so far are for the artists who draw this material. Obviously, all of these artists are pedophiles. However, some are married with highly supportive wives. There have been a number of attempts to try men for drawing cartoon child pornography, but almost all have been stricken down by courts who have decided that this material is constitutionally protected by the First Amendment freedom of expression. I believe in one case, a artist was convicted for drawing this material. However, that case has been quite controversial.

My reaction to this stuff is that why anyone who want to look at such cartoons is beyond me. A lot of them are rather sick.

Not one person has ever gone down for mere possession of this material, much less for “illegal looking.” Cartoon child pornography is quite disturbing, much worse than clothed child models at least for me. Nevertheless, they probably need to stay legal. You can’t make everything creepy or disturbing illegal you know. Still I would be terrified to put one of these cartoons on any website of mine. I don’t need to be hosting material like that.

Bottom line is that cartoon child pornography is basically legal, as creepy as it is. Even though it is legal, my understanding is that  almost zero websites in the US want to carry it. Even though it’s legal, they think it’s too messed up to put on their site. I don’t blame them. Most of the material appears to be hosted out of Japan.

10 Comments

Filed under Art, Asia, Child Porn, Eurasia, Girls, Japan, Law, Lolitas, NE Asia, Pedophilia, Pornography, Regional, Russia, Sex, Social Problems, Sociology