Why Is Alt-Right Called the “Alt” Right? Is There an “Alt-Left”?

Question asked on Quora. Here are some of the answers:

The Alt-Right is properly the Alternative Right. It refers to a loose collection of dissident groups and intellectuals who have either been kicked out of, or have little interest in, the mainstream right as represented by the Republican Party, National Review, and Fox News.

Is there an Alt-Left? Yes. There is a Race-Realist Left centered around AltLeft.com.

This is probably the best answer of them all. And he does call out Rabbit’s site, which is very nice.

The Alt Right is an extremely loose movement, made up of different strands of people connected to white supremacy. One body of adherents is the ostensibly “intellectual” racists who create many of the doctrines and principles of the white supremacist movement. They seek to attract young educated whites to the movement by highlighting the achievements and alleged intellectual and cultural superiority of whites.

They run a number of small white supremacist enterprises that include think tanks, online publications and publishing houses. These include Radix and Washington Summit Publishers, both run by Richard Spencer; Counter Currents Publishing, run by Greg Johnson; American Renaissance, run by Jared Taylor; and The Right Stuff, a political and social blog with a number of contributors.

Another strand of the Alt Right consists of younger racists savvy with social media and Internet communications. In recent months, a number of these Alt Righters have promoted Donald Trump’s* presidential bid, seeing the populist candidate as someone tougher than so-called “cuckservatives,” thanks to his controversial stands on issues ranging from immigration to Muslims in America.

Alt Righters like to try to use terms such as “culture” as substitutes for more lightning rod terms such as “race,” or promote “Western Civilization” as a code word for white culture or identity. They do not make explicit references to white supremacy like the “14 words” a slogan used by Neo-Nazis and other hardcore white supremacists. The “14 words” refers to the expression, “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.” Even though Alt Righters share the sentiment behind the “14 words” they’re more inclined to talk about preserving European-American identity.

This is an excellent answer, although he does not mention the Alt Left. Is it not true though that there are some nonracist parts of the Alt Right such as the HBDsphere and the Manosphere?

Hillary Clinton started calling everyone who opposed her alt-right and now the fake news story about some fake alt right news story is the ammo the censors need/want to censor sites like Breitbart, InfoWars with some legit fake sites sprinkled in. Welcome to censorship part 2 in America. One person’s fake news (insert something like man made global warming or how awesome Trump is here) is another’s truth (insert something like man made global warming or how awesome Trump is here as well.) People should be able to read whatever they want and decode if it’s real or fake or propaganda or not. Don’t need our government becoming like China in this regard.

Edit: There is a real Alt Left & Right.

Alt Left and Alt Right agree on many things like Bernie Sanders and Donald Trumps platform of what’s wrong with America they differ in how you want it fixed.

The first paragraph is completely idiotic, along with the pointless and insane use of the disgusting term “fake news.” Butt the next two paragraphs are at least somewhat correct, although the number of Alt-Rightists who supported Sanders must be very small.

It is an alternative to traditional rightwing conservatives. They are less religious and more socially conservative. They care far less about taxes and are fighting the Regressive Left.

This is correct, although I am really getting sick and tired of the Regressive Left phrase. It’s time to put this crap phrase in the trash can where it belongs. At one time it meant something, but now it’s turning into poison, and idiotic poison at that. The main problem with this phrase is that it is absolutely senseless. I do not see the point in parroting slogans that are completely senseless and irrational right on their face.

There currently is no Alt Left. Although many leftists have fled the Regressive Left into the Alt Right.

The first sentence is not true. And there is that horrible Regressive Left phrase again. I am wondering how many Leftists or even liberals did indeed flee the Regressive Left for the Alt Right. Rabbit seems like one. Were there others?

Alt-Right is a self-selected title which their members started using to distance themselves from the Republican Party

This is straight up correct.

83 Comments

Filed under Conservatism, Democrats, Journalism, Left, Liberalism, Political Science, Politics, Race Realism, Racism, Republicans, US Politics, White Nationalism, White Racism

83 responses to “Why Is Alt-Right Called the “Alt” Right? Is There an “Alt-Left”?

  1. I’ve come across a good blog post which mentions the Socialist like nature of the Nazi regime. Although in practice Nazi Germany was quite capitalist (to make concessions to big business), in theory there was a Marxist influence.
    http://wehrmachtcandy.blogspot.com.au/2016/12/preliminary-reflections-on-national.html

    • Barack Thatcher

      MUGABE
      Hitler wanted humans to emulate Animals.
      “Apes trample outsiders. What goes for Apes must go even more for human beings”.

      Humans behaving like apes? You’re right that it’s the “original” politics.

      ‘Gimme a break nigga’.

    • Why is Mugabe calling himself Pumpkin person? That’s identity theft.

    • And Robert Lindsay, I’m gonna email you today.

    • Santoculto

      Iqdiots don’t know they are stupid…

    • Thank you very much Gondwana!

    • Jason Y

      They were also heavy into the occult. A sort of conformist occult thing unlike the anti-conformist thing in rock music. Seems like the devil is playing both sides, the extreme cultural left and extreme cultural right.

    • Jason Y

      I think the fact a lot of alt right etc.. don’t believe the occult exists explains why they have such a negative view of NAM behavior, and it would be a Satanic interest to use the occult to keep NAMS dumb to promote some sort of race war, as the low IQ, possibly demon driven, feeds the hate of the alt-right.

      Keeping whites in a drug induced stupor of drugs and violence does happen but it’s in the better interest of an evil agenda to make the NAMS that way.

      If anyone doesn’t think the occult is out there, then looking at its influence on popular musicians and the movie industry is beyond obvious. Alt right claims it’s Jewish, but a better word is occult influenced.

    • “I think the fact a lot of alt right etc.. don’t believe the occult exists explains why they have such a negative view of NAM behavior, and it would be a Satanic interest to use the occult to keep NAMS dumb to promote some sort of race war, as the low IQ, possibly demon driven, feeds the hate of the alt-right.

      Keeping whites in a drug induced stupor of drugs and violence does happen but it’s in the better interest of an evil agenda to make the NAMS that way.”

      What the hell does this actually has to do with NAMS and the Alt right? I know what you mean with the occult and Nazis, but I’m failing to see where this fit in with the other entities you mention.

      What I’m reading is that the occult influences hypes up NAMs to piss off Alt Rightists. While such a relationship certainly been interpreted in various theories regarding race relations, you still have the underlying differences to begin with regardless of interference.

      BTW, if any group believe in occult influence, many of the Alt Right would compared to others but as you said it’s attributed to Jews.

    • Jason Y

      See that’s the mistake Sam was always making and Trash would often point out. Actually, it’s a very complex situation where we don’t really know who to blame.

      Well, the cultural right are dicks, so they alienate people like Jenny on Forrest Gump and they join the cultural left. On the other hand, a lot of people have free will and have also to some extent have joined the cultural left knowing better. Finally, whoever is selling the stuff isn’t totally to blame for the product (say producers of so-called Satanic rock or motion pictures).

      While I don’t believe in being too sensitive, you know like people crying and having coloring books to cope with Trump’s win, I think things are not always black and white.

    • Jason Y

      Note in response to Phil, I didn’t see on the Satanic rock and Hollywood video that Jews were primarily to blame for anything. The rock stars, actors etc,eagerly practiced spirit channeling etc.. I mean, it’s obvious. There was no gun pointed to their head forcing them.

    • Jason Y

      It’s odd people like David Duke worship Hitler so much but totally ignore the massive Nazi occult practices. Note, David Duke, the KKK, etc.. claim to be Christian.

      I guess it’s a case of believing what you want to believe and ignoring obvious facts.

    • To Jason,

      “See that’s the mistake Sam was always making and Trash would often point out. Actually, it’s a very complex situation where we don’t really know who to blame.”

      Alright, lets here it.

      “Well, the cultural right are dicks, so they alienate people like Jenny on Forrest Gump and they join the cultural left. On the other hand, a lot of people have free will and have also to some extent have joined the cultural left knowing better. Finally, whoever is selling the stuff isn’t totally to blame for the product (say producers of so-called Satanic rock or motion pictures).”

      Okay, I believe you are talking about how the process functions within your explanation makes blame confusing, I’m talking about how it influences WNs to blame NAMs.

      “While I don’t believe in being too sensitive, you know like people crying and having coloring books to cope with Trump’s win, I think things are not always black and white.”

      Moving on.

      “Note in response to Phil, I didn’t see on the Satanic rock and Hollywood video that Jews were primarily to blame for anything. The rock stars, actors etc,eagerly practiced spirit channeling etc.. I mean, it’s obvious. There was no gun pointed to their head forcing them.”

      Then you haven’t read anything on specific theories on Jewish elite, pointing out their representation in Hollywood and Music (not simply talking about Satanic rock), particular assertions regarding them a rap music.

      http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/entertainment_news_5/article_8500.shtml

      “It’s odd people like David Duke worship Hitler so much but totally ignore the massive Nazi occult practices. Note, David Duke, the KKK, etc.. claim to be Christian.

      I guess it’s a case of believing what you want to believe and ignoring obvious facts.”

      That’s assuming that popular beliefs on the topic are fully understood compared to what is academically accepted.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism_and_occultism#Historiography_Concerning_The_Occult_Roots_of_Nazism

    • Jason Y

      It’s difficult to use accusations of demonism as so many people think it’s silly or superstition, and the accusations are easily explained away:

      http://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists/the-10-wildest-led-zeppelin-legends-fact-checked-20121121/jimmy-page-worshipped-the-devil-19691231

      Selling His Soul:

      THE BACKSTORY: Page’s obsession with Aleister Crowley led to whispers that he and Satan were tight; yet another rumor claimed that the members of Led Zeppelin had made a Faustian bargain in exchange for stardom.

      THE TRUTH: There’s no evidence Page was a Satanist, though he believed in Crowley’s philosophy of personal liberation. (He even had Crowley’s dictum “Do what thou wilt” inscribed in the run-off groove of the original vinyl releases of Led Zeppelin III.) Page did little to deflect the rumors throughout Zeppelin’s history, perhaps sensing they were good for business. “I don’t really want to go on about my personal beliefs or my involvement in magic,” he told Rolling Stone. “I’m not interested in turning
      anybody on to anybody that I’m turned on to. If people want to find things, they find them themselves.”

      Buying Crowley’s haunted mansion:

      THE BACKSTORY: Crowley was a British philosopher and occultist who dabbled in black magic in the early 20th century. Page was obsessed with him, amassing a huge collection of memorabilia.

      THE TRUTH: Page did, in fact, purchase Crowley’s former home in Loch Ness, Scotland, in 1971 and later claimed it was haunted – but not necessarily because of Crowley. “There were two or three owners before Crowley moved into it,” Page told Rolling Stone in 1975. “It was also a church that was burned to the ground with the congregation in it. Strange things have happened in that house that had nothing to do with Crowley. The bad vibes were already there. A man was beheaded there, and sometimes you can hear his head rolling down.”

    • Jason Y

      OK, Snoop Dogg dabbles in the occult (Phil mentioned Rap), probably also 2-Pac with his Machiavelli cover and, even if the Jews run the record company, who made the decision to initiate demonic contact?

      Again, the blame is purely on the performer. As I was arguing with Sam and Trash has pointed out, nobody forces the masses, the performers etc.. to do evil. Now, possibly some Jews in the entertainment industry are scum who have also sold out, but that’s not directly related.

    • “OK, Snoop Dogg dabbles in the occult (Phil mentioned Rap), probably also 2-Pac with his Machiavelli cover and, even if the Jews run the record company, who made the decision to initiate demonic contact?”

      Except I’m not blaming anyone, I’m just talking about the theories that exist since you weren’t aware about the ones with Jews.

      “Again, the blame is purely on the performer. As I was arguing with Sam and Trash has pointed out, nobody forces the masses, the performers etc.. to do evil. Now, possibly some Jews in the entertainment industry are scum who have also sold out, but that’s not directly related.”

      The theory is based on not coercion, but misleading and manipulation with pre-known knowledge of the events to come.

      So using free will as an appeal doesn’t lessen the damage, it arguably makes the execution more sidious. Again, I’m talking about the perspective of those who believe it.

    • Minion

      It makes much more sense to blame Flava Flav than the intelligent people that actually dominate the industry. Seriously, it’s from the top down Forrest. Sign your name in blood and bend-over, that’s the price you pay for fame in the rap game.

    • “It makes much more sense to blame Flava Flav than the intelligent people that actually dominate the industry. Seriously, it’s from the top down Forrest. Sign your name in blood and bend-over, that’s the price you pay for fame in the rap game.”

      That’s all good, I’m just talking about the actual contentions rather than actually taking a side.

    • Jason Y

      Bob Dylan’s Deal:

    • Jason Y

      But then again, a lot of practice within a few months can improve the actually talented. That’s one fault I see with the above video. However, the largest evidence seems to be Dylan and other rock star’s own admission.

  2. Jason Y

    “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.” Even though Alt Righters share the sentiment behind the “14 words” they’re more inclined to talk about preserving European-American identity.

    As with the situation in South Africa etc.., as explained in another post, they want to keep NAMS on the plantation, if there is not a situation the whites can get away from them, and then are puzzled on why the NAMS won’t kiss their ass in gratitude for uplifting them out of the caves. 😆

    Note in all their concern for future white children etc., they totally ignore key reasons of why NAMS create revolution etc.. that threatens unrest (which threaten future white children) Normally dismissing it as Jewish plotted Communism.

    • Jason Y

      And then on top of that, they dismiss people, even more realistic types, who note this key fact as being wusses or cucks.

    • JASON Y

      None of it ever works however and everybody with money leaves town in the end.

      Physical movement is the only language that speaks truth.

      People vote with their feet. They leave.

      You judge a pasture by the number of cows there.

      • Jason Y

        No doubt the educated South African have left or will leave. However, again, there might be a few left behind security fences. Nonetheless, the new South Africa won’t be able to match the old one, but that’s the price of freedom (for the black masses). Anyhow, the old SA couldn’t have lasted as the rulers were a minority and it was surrounded by people who hate them, as with Israel.

    • Yee

      JASON,

      The best scenario for South Africa will be just another Malaysia—the Blacks/Malays control everything except economy, the Whites/Chinese hold all the money but institutionally discriminated in every other aspect, with luck no serious riots.

      We’ve seen it all, just an old movie.

      • Didn’t work in Indonesia and Whites holding all the money in SA would have the same result. If there is a 3rd party like Spanish-Mestizos in Philippines or Tamils in Singapore this sort of offsets things a little bit.

        • You need critical mass before it will work. Indonesia has 1-2% of non-Indonesian. Malaysia on the other hand has 25%+. That’s why Malaysia has the highest GDP per capita after Singapore. Thailand on the other hand is a different story. South Africa is 10% white and 16% non-blacks. It may work like Yee said.

      • YEE Blacks will be about as happy as the Indonesian Malays about this.

        • Yee

          Didn’t I say the best scenario?

          The sentiment in South Africa is the same in Malaysia. “Malaysia is country of the Malays.” And that’s from politicians.

        • Jason Y

          No offense to Yee, but a lot of Chinese come across as arrogant. Perhaps they can’t help it cause of the high IQ. It’s no wonder southeast Asians don’t want to be bossed around by them. Again more condescending “betters”, as ep-gah said.

          OK, people accuse Jews of being arrogant and whatnot, but in reality, any group with a high IQ, when put with lower IQs, will seem that way.

          The worst behavior of the low IQ seems to be smoking tobacco around young children. Note it seems ridiculous in the US, especially considering only 10 percent of the population still smokes. But I’m not health police, though it seems that way, and I don’t care what people do, but the child abuse is sickening. It’s like aborigines eating their young etc..

        • Santoculto

          ”The worst behavior of the low IQ seems to be smoking tobacco around young children.”

          Only ”low IQ”**

          Don’t forget intellectual circles…

        • Jason Y

          Generally, the avoidance of smoking tobacco around kids is seen as square or politically correct among some, and those people are not always low-IQ, possibly they’re just rednecks or old-schoolers who just don’t like the modern health agenda. Nonetheless, anyway, it is very disgusting.

      • YEE

        Malays cannot run an economy for some reason and Spanish and Dutch brought Chinese in for that reason.

        Americans did not want to run the Philippines in the first place, to be honest. Dutch did not want to run Indonesia. British did not want to run Singapore. They are all happy to let Chinese do it, honestly.

        Fuji Chinese can usually return to China or at least Hong Kong if they have to. White South African Boers have been in Africa for 300 years and no white country will accept them.

      • YEE Bear and mind Malays and Chinese are both Asian. Sure they look different and Chinese are 40 IQ points above them in intelligence but they are all Asian.

        Blacks and whites are separate races with no love lost at all.

        • Yee

          Chinese in SE Asia have also settled for hundred years, most of them have nowhere to go. Besides, who can leave everything behind and just go?

        • Jason Y

          Trash’s argument means little. For instance, the Japanese and Koreans hate each other a billion times more than blacks and whites in the US. Note, it’s not about race. That’s where WNs get it wrong. It’s all about nationality.

          I could give countless other examples: French vs English, different Amerindian tribes fighting, India and Pakistan.

        • “Trash’s argument means little. For instance, the Japanese and Koreans hate each other a billion times more than blacks and whites in the US. Note, it’s not about race. That’s where WNs get it wrong. It’s all about nationality.”

          Technically your examples aren’t really the best way to measure contempt by group comparison.

          To advance it, the method would be by multiple ratings of one group to others and see if there’s an association between contempt and race.

      • Jason Y

        Groups with all the money, like the Jews in Weimar Germany, are often hated and sometimes, as with Germany or Indians under Idi Amin, are wiped out.

  3. Tulio

    I think “regressive left” was brought to the forefront by alt-righter Paul Joseph Watson, a close affiliate of Alex Jones. I don’t listen to Jones, but he probably uses the term himself.

    I am hearing the term “alt left” coming more and more from the mainstream, typically referring to people such as Bernie Sanders and his anti-Clintonian followers. It bears no resemblance to the meaning of the word set forth by you and Rabbit. I guess you guys better come up with a new word for your movement.

  4. Barack Thatcher

    I suspect a lot of the alt-left is in the “Authoritarian left” quadrant (Economically left, Socially right) or at least not very “libertarian” in social issues but reasonably far left economically.
    I took the test the other day and got -4, -1 “libertarian left”

    • Barack Thatcher

      MUGABE
      You like to use Gandhi’s “The people of a nation prefer their own incompetent governance to the more competent governance of a foreign power” to justify your ideology.
      Now…..I understand that with regards to Jews.
      But Mexicans run stuff? (No). African Immigrant stock? Obama- but he’s reasonably controlled. Asians? Only in STEM.

      • Barack Thatcher

        MUGABE
        I’m also more receptive to Trump than most Alt-Lefters although I didn’t vote and probably couldn’t have brought myself to vote for him..

        this says a lot…https://www.politicalcompass.org/images/us2016.png

        and if you understand the meaning behind my username you’ll see that Hillary would likely have enabled an extension of these monetaristic policies- low interest rates trigger low growth because there is no risk taking investments….as I’ve said before.

      • Hi Pumpkin. New policy. All regular commenters have to donate to the site. $10 minimum and you can comment forever. If that’s a hardship to you, write to me and we will see if we can work something out.

        Thank you for your cooperation.

    • Barack Thatcher

      Essentially, Mugabe, one mindset is that ‘if you can’t beat them, join them”….
      which of course as I discussed with Phil is why Neoliberals/Latinization quells leadership among “deplorables”

      A bunch of mentally-ill fucktards chimping out over the internet is basically all this “populist revolution” is at this point. There leader isn’t one of them and may not have an investment in them….at least you’re smart enough to realize that

    • Yeah but the trust fund only pays out very little, like $900/month. It is a spendthrift trust too, so I cannot touch it. He set it up so that it would pay just barely enough for me to survive, but so little that if I wanted to live well, I would have to work. He didn’t want me kicking back on a trust fund my whole life.

      Guest posters pay $20 to guest post. $20 and you can run as many guest posts of yours that I am willing to run.

    • Barack Thatcher

      except if I was a neoliberal I would probably not comment here.
      If I did under those circumstances it would probably be as a “concern troll” which shows intelligence.

      Try again.

    • It is not in my control at all. The trust is controlled by a bunch of assholes called “trustees.” I think they work for some bank. Anyway, they dole that money out however they see fit and I cannot do a single thing about it. I cannot call them up and say, “Hey give me $10,000 of that money.” They won’t do it. They only give out what they want to every month and there is nothing I can do about it. It’s a spendthrift trust unfortunately so I have no control over it whatsoever.

      There was like $500-700,000 in it at first, but it’s a lot lower now. I think it might still be $300,000 or so, but that’s useless to me as it’s only coming to me doled out in tiny pieces a month at a time.

    • LOL look up spendthrift trust in Wikipedia. My hands are tied. My Grandpa thought I was a wastrel so he made it spendthrift so I could not blow through it all at once like I probably would have. I can’t touch that money.

  5. Jason Y

    The hate of cultural left didn’t come from nowhere. People bullied these fringe groups, making them revolutionary and militant and also pushing the cultural left into becoming the extreme cultural left which I find ridiculous (transgendered Eskimo rights, gays in the boy scouts, etc..) 😆

    • Jason Y

      Extreme normie conformism creates a backlash making the cultural left. I don’t see anything wrong with people being different in some ways, to some extent.

  6. Yee

    JASON,

    Europeans are every bit as arrogant when they go to other continents, even more perhaps. I’ve never seen TRASH showing any respect for us, for example. Neither have I seen….never mind. Nobody is a saint, Jason.

    For all our flaws, we have never used force to gain upper hand in any new lands. Just hard work and intelligence. If even these are unacceptable for people, then they don’t deserve respect.

    Do you respect someone in your country who hates doctors or engineers because they earn more? If you don’t, why should we?

    But then, jealousy is just human nature too. Blaming others for anything goes wrong in one’s life is far easier than blaming oneself , a lot of people can’t help it.

    Therefore, many things are predictable. My prediction for South Africa will be at best another Malaysia.

    The Blacks are as unwilling to let minorities run anything as the Malays are. But neither are well organized people themselves.

    You’re an idealist, Jason, very romantic. But in the real world, when it’s time to pay the price for freedom, people are reluctant.

    • YEE

      True and if Chinese left Koreans would replace them in a minute. Or Japanese.

    • If whites ran Southeast Asia it would be like Hawaii with a resentful underclass of natives who felt completely left out of their own society but with a higher living standard for everyone.

      There would be less drugs problems because whites would not make or sell shabu like Chinese.

      There would be less corruption and political turmoil.

      Malays would simply sip booze and live on welfare.

      • Yee

        Never miss an opportunity to emphasize you’re better, do you?

        • “Better” is impossible to define. Chinese have not resorted to violence as you say except in Taiwan so only a Malay could decide who he enjoyed have run the economy.

          Spanish Mestizos did not bring much industry or development to the Philippines.

          So I’m not sure “better” is quite easy to determine.

  7. Actually “Mestizo” Filipino Spanish truly unimpressed me and Chinese Fuji immigrants are a step-up from the colonial caste system run by a few Spanish-blooded land owning families.

    Nor do Malays likely miss Dutch or British with any great desire to have them running the economy again.

    If whites were “better” in the eyes of Malays they’d be pleading to join the West.

    Duterte is telling Americans to get out of his country and seeking more Chinese investment.

    So “better” is debatable.

    • Yee

      Duterte is very clever. He just catch the right time trying to bargain better deals for his country.

      No Chinese believes Philippines will stay ally to us from now on. We expect Duterte to go back on his words, then again and some more.

      Philippines is more complicated than you believe on world politics level. She won’t kick away the US for real, at least not in next 20 years.

      • YEE Nobody wants to subsidize and aid Southeast Asian countries so if Chinese were not willing to build up the economy Americans would not move there to replace them.

        High-class Filipinos are a bunch of lazy Latinos, Chinese and Americans know this.

      • YEE CHALLENGES OF HELPING FILIPINOS I’ve lived there

        WHAT IF TRUMP (AND OTHER WHITES) CANCELLED WORK VISAS FOR FILIPINO (WE CAN GET OUR OVERSEAS LABOR FROM ANYWHERE). BYE BYE REMISSIONS.

        The women want out. Any Filipino woman who can leave, will. So will anybody willing to wipe asses in a nursing home as well as doctors, engineers etc.
        Filipinos are a bit like Africans. They have their first child at 18 and then the father never assists and the grandparents raise the kid. Actually Filipino women will have kids with 3 different fathers on average.
        Malays generally make terrible stupid life decisions. They lack consequential thinking. They will steal, lie and usually behave in an idiotic manner.
        They are alcoholics, drug addicts. Kill shabu dealers, heroin comes in.
        Spanish-Mestizos own all the land.

        Please China, take these idiots. Subsidize their awful existence. America does not want them.

        • Yee

          Of course the Philippines doesn’t worth a shit economically, but she is at such a strategic location that she’s destiny to become a chess piece. This is her bargaining chip, any president will use it. Only the stupidest one settle for aids, he will try for something sustainable. That’s what Duterte is trying.

  8. Can anyone give a brief explanation of what the Alt Left is, and what their positions on government is? Do they believe in big government, minimal government, no government, or what? Are they supporters of the cultural Marxist agenda like feminism, pro-homosexuality, immigration and multiculturalism, etc?

    I understand what the Alt-Right’s position is. I’m just trying to understand what the Alt Left is, and how they differ from the Alt Right, if at all?

    • Alt Right has a double-edged meaning: “Alt” means extreme, and “outside of the mainstream” at the same time. There is a difference between just being extreme and being out of the mainstream. The Alt Right is both, or tends to be both.

      Alt Left doesn’t mean extreme Left. It just means outside the mainstream left. Most Alt Lefts would say they are very left economically, but diverge from the PC Left, the SJWs, and the centrist DNC Corporate Dems in major ways. They hold beliefs that would get them booted out of the DNC- like race realism, hatred of identity politics, etc.

      • so basically they are economic liberals that support socialism and they reject cultural liberalism, aka cultural Marxism?

        • Yes they are leftwing on economics for sure. They love Big Government at least in the economic sense.

          On cultural issues, they are to the right of the Cultural Left, but they also dislike the social conservatism of the Republican Party. So they are in between the Cultural Left and social conservatives on cultural issues.

          And yes, some are race realists and a few are even White nationalists, but most of the movement seems to be rejecting both race realism and certainly White nationalism. They tend to be pretty dubious about feminism. They support equity feminism but oppose gender feminism. Some of them are even MRA’s.

          They are “brocialists.” They are “conservative Leftists.”

        • I wouldn’t say they reject cultural liberalism. I’d say they reject it when it goes too far into Loon Left Land. Moderate cultural liberalism is OK. Minority,women’s and gay rights- OK (within reason). Hatred of white straight males- not OK. Regulate guns, don’t ban them. Abortion: safe, legal and rare.

          Also, they might diverge from the Far Left on foreign policy, rejecting pacifism and military weakness, and being a doormat, aren’t totally opposed to intervention or nationalism. Left of center on Israel. Zero-sum, real politics. Harbor no illusions about dictators, right or left-wing. Speaking for myself on foreign policy, BTW.

    • and you wrote this comment to me on this article why?

  9. Barack Thatcher

    You’re saying there are ways to get around the monetarism I discussed above?
    I never said there wasn’t.

  10. Barack Thatcher

    MADAME PUMPKINPERSON
    regardless of my own ‘abilities’ or prole upbringing I believe I am in a unique position to speculate on the problem’s of today’s society.

    I can observe how “Latinization” which my ancestors lived through is now effecting Appalachia where I grew up…

    you on the other hand are an ivory tower intellectual!

  11. BARACK Latinization? Your Indian.

    • Barack Thatcher

      who says?

    • Barack Thatcher

      commenter MUGABE is very sensitive about his South Asian ancestry for some reason.
      Race: South Asian
      IQ: High Average
      Sexuality: Gay
      Occupation: Grunt

      Racial identity: NW European
      IQ identity: 160
      Sexual identity: Straight
      Occupational identity: Actuary

  12. Barack Thatcher

    TRASH
    I never said I was Indian.
    My father was a <octoroon Cuban (tiny but not insignificant Black ancestry) and my mother is German-American.

  13. Barack Thatcher

    TRASH is correct that I am Indian.

    Mugabe hates me because I am a Brahmin. He is not.

  14. Barack Thatcher

    I do agree though that commentator “Philosopher” from pumpkinperson’s is a concern troll.

    He seems to think the Daily Mail is “almost Alt-Right”. He has said the same about Teresa May.

    ‘Trust me Goys, I’m alt-right’
    ‘but…’
    ‘schizophrenic rant about “Zion” ‘.

    I should’ve seen it before.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s