An Example of Anti-White Propaganda: “White Men Raped Their Way around Most of the World”

Chinedu: And yet hundreds of millions of people, populating entire continents and regions, are the products of white rape.

That was a long time ago though, was it not? Anyway, the newest theory on Black-White mixes in the US is that most came after the Civil War and most were consensual even before the Civil War. Yes there were rapes but they were not common. Heading up until the Civil War, in the 1830’s-1860’s, there were many White men working for money in the fields next to the slaves. There were many unions derived from this close contact. Further, many Black females desired to have sex with the slaveowners in order to become house Negroes, etc. Southern White culture was very conservative and Southern wives did not take well to their husbands taking up Black mistresses. Most White Black unions post Civil War were obviously consensual.

There is no reason to think that things were any different in Mexico, Honduras, Belize, Nicaragua, Panama, anywhere in the Caribbean, Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Argentina or even Brazil.

We have no reports of mass rapes of Black women by White men in any of those places.

I am not aware of any mass rape of Black women by White men in Colonial Africa, even in South Africa. The problem in the East was exacerbated by Islamic slavery, and I suppose many of those were rapes, or maybe they were consensual. No one seems to be able to figure this out when it comes to slaves. Probably your best case for mass rape of Black women by White men would be in the Middle East, especially Arabia and then Mesopotamia and the Levant. And I am quite sure this was the case in North Africa as well.

There isn’t any more raping of Black women by White men anywhere on Earth and certainly there is no mass raping.

As far as raping Indian women, this is very hard to figure. I know that here in California, many Whites simply married Indian women and become squawmen who were much derided by their fellow men. These unions were quite consensual. There were some rapes in this area and maybe some enslavement but it was mostly consensual. Before we had Spaniards and missions run by priests in which there was almost zero rape. The Spaniards did not even do much to Indians other than capture them and send them to missions.

As far as the rest of the US, I have no idea, but I have not heard a lot of reports of mass rape of Indian women by White men in the records. The breeding seems to be once again White men taking Indian brides and becoming squawmen. In Canada there was little to no rape or mass rape.

It is often said that the mass unions of Mexico were the product of rape but no one knows if this was true. There were very few Spaniard males and many Indian women. The Spaniards hardly had to rape with 100-1 or 1000-1 ratios.

I do not know much about the colonization of Central America to comment. However, Costa Rica tried to keep itself delberately White for a long time. Also the Indians were wiped out very early. Obviously there was mass mixing through this whole region, but I know nothing about the details.

I have not heard many reports of rape or mass rape in the Caribbean. Yes there was mass rape in the beginning in the context of a genocide, but Caribbean people now have little Indian blood. Barbadians are 1% Indian. Cubans are probably even less. Jamaicans, Haitians, Dominicans, Dominican Republicans, etc. have almost no Indian blood. Puerto Ricans have a lot of Indian blood, but I do not know how it got there.

Yes Whites conquered Indian nations in South America. Obviously a process of mestizisation occurred there, but I have no details on it. The wars were short and over with quickly. The mestizisation process appears to have been slow and I have no details on how it even worked. In Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, Paraguay, the Guyanas, I have no details at all. In Brazil what little I heard was that it was mostly consensual. An early Brazilian colonist, a Portuguese man, was reported to have twenty quite happy Indian wives. This was said to be pretty normal. In the 1800’s there was a Banquismo campaign, a very racist compaign intended to mass import Whites from Europe to swamp out and breed out Indians but mostly Blacks. Apparently it worked quite well.

In Argentina, the Black-White mating was so unrapey that many Blacks present in Argentina in the late 1800’s seem to have vanihsed into thin air. Argentines are now 3% Black, so you can imagine what really happened to the Blacks. Much the same happened in Uruguay.

In Mexico it was much the same thing. Mexico was pretty Black in 1820. In 100 years, there was little left. Now there’s almost nothing left and Mexicans are 4% Black. They are quite Blacker in other areas such as Veracruz. It doesn’t sound like a lot of rape went on in these “vanishings.”

In Chile the Indians were slowly bred in after the wars in the late 1800’s and now Chileans are maybe 20% Indian. In Argentina, the Indians were also defeated but many remained in the Pampas and the gaucho was typically a mostly White mestizo, the product of unions between Whites and Indians on the Plains.

Peru and Guatemala are still heavily Indian. Bolivia is probably mostly Indian.

There is not much evidence of mass White rape of non-Whites in Asia either. We have no reports of such from the Russian East or Siberia. We have no such reports from Malaysia, Indonesia or India either, and there were few Whites or Dutchmen anyway. Nor do we have reports of such from Vietnam, Laos or Cambodia. Nor do we have mass rape reports from the Philippines, where Spanish colonists were apparently few in number. There are also no reports from the US colonization of the Philippines.

Although it would not surprise me, I would like to see some data that the mass mixing of Aborgines and Whites in Australia was the result of rape. Aborigines are now 50% White on average and their 85 IQ’s reflect that. The 64 IQ reports are from unmixed Aborigines.

I have not heard any reports of mass rapes of Maori women by Whites in New Zealand.

Hawaii was indeed colonized by Whites, but I have not heard any reports of mass rape.

I do not know much about the history of Polynesia.

Central Asia is mass mixed between Mongol type Asians and Whites but there is no evidence that Whites mass raped Asians. In fact, much of the mixing may have been the other way around, as Mongols mass raped the Iranid Whites already present in those places. So in one place on Earth where we do have evidence of mass rape producing White-non-White mixes, it was the Whites who were getting raped and not the other way around!

Possibly the best case for mass rape of non-Whites by Whites may have been with Aryan Whites and Australoid South Indians in India. There was a lot of interbreeding, but there was also a Hell of a lot of rape especially were South Indian women were enslaved and made to serve as temple prostitutes for Aryan men. Even today Australoid Dalit women are commonly raped by more Aryan and higher caste men.

All in all, I do not think there is much remaining evidence for mass rape of non-Whites by Whites. There were a lot of unions in the last 500 years for sure but most were consensual.

325 Comments

Filed under Aborigines, Africa, Americas, Amerindians, Argentina, Argentines, Asia, Australia, Black-White (Mulattos), Blacks, Brazil, Cambodia, Canada, Caribbean, Central America, Chile, Christianity, Colombia, Colonialism, Cubans, Dominicans, East Indians, Ecuador, Eurasia, Europeans, Guatemala, Guyana, Haitians, Hispanics, History, India, Indonesia, Islam, Jamaicans, Jamaicans, Laos, Latin America, Malaysia, Maori, Mestizos, Mexicans, Mexico, Middle East, Mixed Race, NE Asia, North Africa, North America, Oceanians, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Political Science, Polynesians, Race Relations, Race/Ethnicity, Regional, Religion, Russia, SE Asia, Siberia, Sociology, South America, South Asia, South Asians, Spaniards, Uruguay, US, USA, Venezuela, Vietnam, Whites

325 responses to “An Example of Anti-White Propaganda: “White Men Raped Their Way around Most of the World”

  1. Jason Y

    True, most of the rape stuff is melodramatic propaganda. As I was saying in another thread, it’s mostly pushing a political agenda, and often the natives are as much pigs and the invading Yankees, honkys, pale-faces etc, Even in places like the Phillippines where Robert is saying American troops should go home, he has to admit there is no mass rape going on, and the locals are in on the sex as much as the Gis.

  2. James Schipper

    Dear Robert

    In Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands, Belgium and France, tens of thousands of Wehrmachtskinder were born between 1941 and 1945. They were the offspring of voluntary unions between German military men and women in those countries. Part of the attraction of the German military was that they belonged to the dominant group.

    Women in those occupied countries who entered in relationships with German men were despised, deeply resented and called names. In the Netherlands, they were called moffenhoeren = kraut whores, but that didn’t stop them. White colonialist men in the colonies were also part of a dominant group. For that reason, they probably didn’t have to rape to get sexual partners. We can safely asume that native men resented their white rivals very strongly.

    Regards. James

    • Jason Y

      Well, not all of the colonialist legacy in say the New World was war as we saw in World War II. More than likely a lot of native women fell for the conquerors in times of peace when the resentment wasn’t as strong.

      Of course, women who sell out to Nazis during wartime will be labeled traitors and whores. However, years down the line, assuming Germany had won, then you would see more acceptability for dating Germans.

      • Jason Y

        Note some places went thru long years before the conqueror finally had more mellow relationships with the conquered. For instance, the middle east was originally a pagan land. It didn’t become Muslim for a couple of hundred more years.

      • Barack Thatcher

        Even women who slept with Vichy soldiers during WW2 were treated not only as whores but as sell- outs to the enemy. Many had their hair cut violently in public events after the war ended.

  3. Indians have a massive inferiority complex towards white people and this manifests in the form of an impotent rage and in this impotent rage indians will make up whatever nonsense lies in order to try to demonize white people, who they are oh so jealous of.

    It’s no wonder indians are so crazy. I mean you can’t help but be mentally ill if you have an inferiority complex, a superiority complex, and an impotent rage all mixed in together.

    • Jason Y

      There are more nations like that than India. Much of the middle east is the same way, Northeast Asia, Western Europe (not that they’ve been conquered by US soldiers and culture), as well as many other places I’m sure.

  4. ” There was a lot of interbreeding, but there was also a Hell of a lot of rape especially were South Indian women were enslaved and made to serve as temple prostitutes for Aryan men. Even today Australoid Dalit women are commonly raped by more Aryan and higher caste men.”

    I’ve noticed that white men and light skinned indians all have a thing for dark women with big boobs and big asses, which is basically what south indian women are. So it isn’t surprising that they kept them as prostitutes.

    Meanwhile on the opposite end of the spectrum you have indian men who are obsessed with lighter skinned women whether it’s white women, northeast indian women, or punjabi women.

    • Jason Y

      Right opposites attract. Seems like dark skinned guys I know all want blondes and the light skinned ones want some Asian and a black if more daring.

    • MAGNETO Kashmir males are not going down to Kerala to rape dark-skinned women. Chennai Tamils despise high-caste Northerners so much they would be lynched in the road for attempting such things.

      Dravidian women just are not very attractive and hardly worth gagging, beating and dragging into a bush by high-caste Brahmins to rape. Give me a break, that’s a load of total B.S.

      I’m white but I at least I’ve stayed in India before making such incredibly inaccurate statements.

      Has a low-caste female employee in North India ever been raped or co-erced into sex by their higher-caste employer? I’m sure.

      • Jason Y

        It’s difficult to say what coerced is. A lot of times women are trying to move up, and they may not even mind being taken advantage of, much like some women don’t mind showing their body in public to men (go go bar) and others are repulsed by the thought.

      • S26

        TRASH

        Partially agree on the first half there. Even historically, the whole temple girl tradition had apparently some sort of aesthetic sense it, in the same sense some would argue slave women in Spain were motivated to be talented and more than sex slaves, as a form of elevation of status.

        Brahmin castes aren’t or never were aggressive rapists. Probably one of the lesser ignored facts, is actually that they were some of history’s greatest pedos. There’s more than tons of cases of Brahmin pedo school teachers hurting poor caste kids. Funnily enough, that’s also the same legacy of later visiting priestly caste whites in India.

        • Sex offenders in India invariably low-caste migrants from the Northeast or Punjabi Sikhs with a Muslim or two thrown into the mix.

          Brahmin might molest a young boy but not through violence. They just aren’t violent people.

          But of course all your North Indians are the descendants of rapists and looters, aren’t they.

        • Indian gang rapes will involve Sikhs who are drunk, low-caste village nutcases preying on children or Muslims who grab a woman in a slum.

          They’ll never be Baniya caste because A) these folks have jobs and are making money B) they do not want to be in a filthy jail C) they can pay for sex or get it free anyhow.

          Are some Brahmin child molesters who abuse their positions of power or authority? Probably, but they lack the physical aggression to actually snatch women and rape them in the road.

          Moreover, Brahmin are despised in South India anyhow. They know that if they are locked up in Kerala or Chennai jail for raping a low-caste girl they are going to be dead before morning (And Brahmin are clearer thinkers than lower-castes who are more impulsive).

          Brahmin CAN AFFORD to hire a Russian hooker for $300 who does the “rough stuff” with clients.

    • Donatello

      Whites typically prefer Whites, Indians are dying to breed with blonde Whites. Must be the cultural obsession with fairness.

      • Cultural obsession is with perceived racial superiority of Northwest Europeans-physically and mentally and in the case of Southeast Asian women, penile length/girth.

        Deep down other races recognize the physical beauty and wish to dilute their own genes with.

        Not to say that many Eurasians and Asian females are not attractive.

  5. Chinedu

    Robert,

    In Africa alone, there are millions of “colored” people who are primarily the descendants of white rapists.

    Conquered women have no sexual power. Europeans had had a thousand years tradition of rape after conquest and they carried those values overseas. The colonialists were almost exclusively men. They were going to have sex one way or the other, and they did. Whether through outright rape or coercion or intimidation or blackmail, the unions were generally not consensual. That is to say, those women would not have consented had they had free will. You can’t tell me that a German women who “consented” to sex with Russian soldiers in order to distract their attention from her 11 year old daughter was freely consenting. Or maybe she was starving and wanted food. Or maybe she didn’t want to be killed. The same applies to native women in European colonies.

    Sex with a slave or any subjugated woman is always rape. If a biker gang kidnaps your daughter and impregnates her, are you only going to regard it as rape if she put up resistance prior to the sex acts? Even in this country women are told to not fight back against rapists because the deed will happen regardless and resisting will only maximize the damage and possibly lead to death. So when women find themselves powerless, in a colonial environment where their very survival is at the whim of colonizers, where they have no recourse legal or otherwise, where their men have been emasculated, all sexual relations with the colonizers constitutes rape.

    • “In Africa alone, there are millions of “colored” people who are primarily the descendants of white rapists.”

      http://www.persee.fr/doc/cea_0008-0055_1960_num_1_4_3680

      Actually it was Concubinage. Yes, rape could be possible under these pretenses but this form of union wouldn’t make that exclusive.

      “Conquered women have no sexual power. Europeans had had a thousand years tradition of rape after conquest and they carried those values overseas. The colonialists were almost exclusively men.”

      Well actually if you actually read the History of Coloreds, you would know that the females (at least initially) were actually slaves imported from the pacific or other parts of Africa who would’ve been traded by natives of both those regions.

      Th Griqua people indeed though did contain people known as Basters, a later group of mixed race people that were likely of indigenous roots as well as European. However, their occupations didn’t exactly scream subjugated.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baster#South_African_period

      The next Major Group of African and European mixed would be Zimbabwean Coloureds also known as the “Goffals”, descendants of English and Bantu mixing.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goffal#Zimbabwe

      “There were comparatively few Asians and Coloureds–together, about 0.5 percent of the total population–and they generally regarded the social and political aspirations of the Africans as a latent threat to their own positions.”

      http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a135022.pdf

      This was the best I could find on them, the Source putting their earlier populations at 20,000 versus the 240,000 of whites, chalking it up them

      https://books.google.com/books?id=f6VL-oYFDssC&pg=PA213&lpg=PA213&dq=coloureds+of+malawi&source=bl&ots=geQVn_Uqk8&sig=UpBzALqgckxmRG0cYwDJ8wNrLsk&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi18NeloMfQAhUmrVQKHUZtAOM4ChDoAQhHMAs#v=onepage&q=coloureds%20of%20malawi&f=false

      However, if we are to isolate the “Goffals” properly, they were likely at best 50% of the Coloured population of Zimbabwe on top of only being partially born of white-black mixing, the other being Indian and Black. BTW, seeing how few they were, how Indian lineages were connected to them despite not being slaves like Early Dutch coloureds, and their unions being defined as intermarriage, one can determine they were not predominately the result of rape.

      So, while rape was a possible scenario of mixing, you definitely over generalized it.

      • I made an error, I meant Indian Ocean, not Pacific.

      • PHIL So-called Africkaans whom we tend to associate with White Supremacy often have at least one black or East Indian ancestor.

        This has been the case for Afrikaan presidents who ENFORCED Aparthied.

        In America, whether you are a Nigerian immigrant or a thoroughly mixed descendant of West African slaves…You be black.

        Mexico is sort of the opposite…You are white if you are 80% Spanish with maybe some Indian through Mestizo ancestors (Though Spanish are often so swarthy Antonio Banderas can play Pancho Villa).

    • Jason Y

      This is sort of a lame argument. No duh that women are wanting sex with football players, conquering soldiers and stuff (especially during peacetime). At some point from war to peace, the conqueror turn from monsters to alpha male winners and then the women want them.

      Even in my own family, a close ancestor was a Cherokee Indian woman who liked white guys and despite claims of Indian pride, these women seek out alpha male guys. Same thing I see now on Facebook with one Cherokee lady, fiercely proud of who she is, but always wants to date redneck alpha males.

      • Cherokee males cannot exactly offer their anus to a Scots immigrant with much success…Immigrant men were rarely gay, being tough adventurers.

        So gay or straight, the conquered males are straight-up shit out of luck.

        Conquered women on the other hand even have an advantage over white immigrant females. They are new and unfamiliar sex partners, which is the same instinct that leads men to visit prostitutes. They will settle for less.

        No surprise the Cherokee is more or less “bred out” of Native Americans.

        • Jason Y

          Indians are gay, just like construction workers, cops. and Crocodile Dundee. It’s the whole Village people show.

    • Jason Y

      You mentioned men from Spain in the New World wanted sex that they were determined on getting it. However, it’s a fact that men rape for power, not sexual enjoyment. So if they were trying to “get some” then they were probably going after less resentful targets possibly during peacetime.

      • “However, it’s a fact that men rape for power, not sexual enjoyment. So if they were trying to “get some” then they were probably going after less resentful targets possibly during peacetime.”

        To me, that depends on how rape is defined and how a rapist defined in a certain society.

        Not that the motivation justifies it but given out primal actions similar to rape in nature are, to seek power out of it seems a tad abstract given how much impulsiveness is a factor in rape.

        • Jason Y

          True, but I doubt mass rape produced mixed populations in Latin America. Note, even as of now, Latinas seek out mildly sociopathic guys for mating.

        • From what I could tell, it was likely cases with native American Intermarriage like with Sacagawea or Concubinage with African Slaves that made modern descendants in the Americas.

          Though rape likely took place, this article seems to agree with me in that manner.

          https://www.questia.com/magazine/1G1-127727190/the-origins-of-mixed-race-populations-while-rape

        • Gay State Girl

          Sally Hemming?

        • To GSG,

          Basically regarding relations in concubinage, but seeing cases like Sacagewea rape was an open possibility.

        • Jason Y

          Sally Hemming may not have been raped. She may have liked white guys with power and was eagerly volunteered. Even nowadays we all see strippers out enticing guys at go go bars, what makes you think things were different back the?. Seems everywhere in the world, some women are on the lookout for money.

          That’s not saying all women sell-out for money, but a sizeable minority will.

        • Jason Y

          On the movie https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Like_Me_(film) the black-faced white guy is picked up by some white redneck and he comments that he likes to screw black women cause it helps out the black race

          So we see possibly a lot of nigga hos exist throughout time from Jefferson’s time onward, and then white racists who lust after black women go to them, and even justify their fetish by saying they’re doing them a favor<.b> which seems to be a cruel play on words, as the typical imperialist attitude is the same. just ask ep-gah LOL

        • Jason Y

          Speaking of idiot racists who lust after other races. I remember going on this forum which showcased Filipina go go bars, and some of the commenters commented on a picture of a Filipina child and said something like “Well there is a future investment.” 😆

          HA HA What a bunch of a whacked out fools. They’re so in a fantasy and out of touch with reality with their drunken, whore-mongering lifestyle they got going. It’s comical.

        • To Jason,

          Technically Sally Hemings was a quadroon, so she was already mixed.

        • Jason Y

          If Sally was already mixed then her parents were either the products of rape of consensual union possibly with an overseer or something, or maybe local whites from the town, but I don’t know how they would have gotten away with it.

        • “If Sally was already mixed then her parents were either the products of rape of consensual union possibly with an overseer or something, or maybe local whites from the town, but I don’t know how they would have gotten away with it.”

          Her father was her mother’s master,her mother being a mullato, her grand father was a English Sea captain and her Grandmother a fresh slave from Africa.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Hemings

          In Virginia you could’ve as race mixing as been going on their since black Angolan indentured servants mixed with White Women. The reason being that of they married black women their children would be slaves.

          According to the article, it was marriage.

        • To Jason, my mistake.

          Betty, her mother, was a concubine as to her master John Wayles but was originally property to the master’s wife Martha before she died.

          Martha got Betty from inheritance her father Francis, who the Captain John Hemings tried to by her from.

      • JASON Y

        I-5 Killer is back. Good to read your insightful posts.

    • Waltem

      White men aren’t particularly attracted to Black women outside of those with more Caucasian features through artificial methods or interbreeding. This is shown from not just the consistently low ratings granted to Black women by White men ( and Asian men ) in dating sites, but also the lack of White Male on Black Female rape as this picture points out:

      • Jason Y

        Good meme, but perhaps lower class whites are more racist than upper-class or middle-class ones, hence black women who date white men will always end up with “nice guys”.

        If a black woman did happen to date a really bad-ass poor white man, then she might get raped, abandoned, all that good stuff normally attributed to blacks.

        • Jason Y

          On another thought, a white man might be too afraid to be too mean to his black wife for fear of mean blacks who might kick his ass.

        • Hairy bikers and oily Italian mafioso are the sort of whites you will see in NAM neighborhoods in the North like New York or Boston. Their activities are criminal, of course.

          NAM females are usually scared of these whites with good reason and do not really want to be in an Outlaw clubhouse. Therefore they keep their distance, quite wisely.

        • JASON When do you see a black woman with a biker or some other white thug. Sure, those guys will stick their penis into any shade of woman but the NAM female knows the following about “Streak, the Outlaw M.C” :

          White thug has no freaking money and what money he makes has to go to his bondsman and lawyer or up to his chapter captain because he’s a criminal.

          The sex will be painful and include anal with possible injury of her rectum.

          White thug will be a brute.

          White thug will go to jail and when he does it will be for years or decades. Not the good provider type.

          Only middle-class sheltered white girls who are raised in PC homes on ROOTS and were born after 1990 will fall for this sort of thug thing.

        • NAM prostitutes in Northern cities produce a RAINBOW of kids by the 40 men that pay to shaft them in a single week or month.

        • Jason Y

          Hairy bikers and oily Italian mafioso are the sort of whites you will see in NAM neighborhoods in the North like New York or Boston. Their activities are criminal, of course.

          NAM females are usually scared of these whites with good reason and do not really want to be in an Outlaw clubhouse. Therefore they keep their distance, quite wisely.

          Right black women are going to be attracted to nice or bad blacks, or good whites, not bad whites.

      • MEME RESPONSE

        If black women were stupid enough to drink or drug in Outlaw clubhouses in Oakland or Italian social clubs in New Jersey perhaps they might be raped by dirt-bag bikers or low-level street soldiers for Italian “crews”.

        NAM females know the following about ALL DIRTBAGS OF ANY COLOR:

        A) They will not pay for their kids. Period.

        B) The sex will be brutal and might include rough sodomizing of their anus.

        C) The (White) dirtbag will have sex with them 4 times and then be bored.

        D) He will have other mistresses on the side.

        E) He will be a drunk/drug addict/criminal.

        F) He’ll be in jail too often to be a father even if he hangs around.

        NAM females are street-smart and unlike foolish middle-class white girls who were raised on ROOTS in the suburbs do not buy this garbage.

        They see ugly human nature every day.

        • Barack Thatcher

          TRASH yet inner city Black women, will not date White men. They really actually hate White men, as commenter subliminal star as hinted at.

          The type of Black woman, and it’s a small fraction; maybe 5%-10% that dates White men;
          1. Probably came from an at least lower middle class family in a majority or plurality White area.
          2. Is on the path to get some sort of education beyond High School, whether technical (like hair stylist, secretary, etc.) or University.
          3. Does not have a problem with drugs, alcohol, etc.
          BUT may have a problem with debt, and is sub-consciously thinking “White=Rich”

          now of course someone may point out BW-WM offspring have lower IQs than the inverse, but there are two reasons;
          1. Mother’s (racial) line determines IQ more…..mtDNA alleles.
          2. You can bang and have a kid without dating per se, I’m talking about longer term relationships

        • Barack Thatcher

          that is assuming of course that White men exhibit those behaviors at lower rates than Black men.

      • Tulio

        This is a trope that’s been going around for years and it’s been debunked. These black women were from a poll consisting of less than 10 people, a sample size so small that it’s meaningless. The DOJ report shows this asterisk, but the white nationalist will never mention that. Here’s the real scoop:

        http://www.businessinsider.com/stupid-racist-meme-rape-black-men-2016-10

        • TULIO What suicidal white or Hispanic wants to get caught in a black neighborhood raping a black female? Even WALKING THROUGH IT DOING NOTHING IS DANGEROUS.

          You can PAY or OFFER COCAINE to a black prostitute and she will happily give you sex anyhow. What is the point of saving $30 by risking guaranteed death.

        • Chinedu

          Tulio,

          You’ll notice another asterisk after the black on white rape figure.

          *Includes verbal threats of rape and threats of sexual assault.

          From my experiences with white girls/women there are innumerable circumstances under which they will allege being threatened with rape or sexual assault. Even if a black man has no sexual interest in them, or even because a black man has no sexual interest in them, they will allege the opposite (he wants to attack me sexually). Often times it’s ego driven. In other words “how dare this black man not want a white woman like me?” So to assuage their own ego and unwarranted self-importance, they will convince themselves that the black man has not spurned them but rather he will attack them sexually at the first opportunity.

          To be fair, white women will also make false rape or attempted rape accusations against white men. But they are particularly sensitized to the sexual stigma black men carry in this country, consequently they think allegations made against black men will carry more weight. They oftentimes also buy into the false narrative that black men have an all-consuming lust for white women. So a glance, an inadvertent touch or a minor verbal altercation involving a black man can be construed by a white woman as sexual in nature. All that matters is how she feels and her interpretation, not what actually happened.

          This demonstrates the danger of relying on statistics without making an effort to analyse the methodology under which the statistics were complied. Virtually the entire HBD industry is driven by fraudulent or out-of-context statistics.

        • Waltem

          You posted a bunch of twaddle to dance around the observation that Black men engage in sex crimes on White women noticeably more than White men do on Black women. Rape has a significant amount to do with sex, contrary to feminist illusions. Black women just aren’t attractive enough even for lower quality White men (who are the ones doing crime like rape).

        • Chinedu

          Black women just aren’t attractive enough even for lower quality White men (who are the ones doing crime like rape).

          There are attractive and unattractive women in every race. Some white women I wouldn’t touch with a 10 foot pole. Rape? I wouldn’t fuck them if they offered to pay me.

        • Waltem

          So to assuage their own ego and unwarranted self-importance, they will convince themselves that the black man has not spurned them but rather he will attack them sexually at the first opportunity.

          http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/11/23/race-and-the-alt-right/

          http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/07/17/re-why-do-black-people-commit-more-crime/

          Having unwarranted self-importance is a Black habit. As demonstrated there.

          But they are particularly sensitized to the sexual stigma black men carry in this country, consequently they think allegations made against black men will carry more weight.

          Blacks are significantly more represented in sex crimes like rape so go figure they get charged more.

          They oftentimes also buy into the false narrative that black men have an all-consuming lust for white women.

          http://time.com/3302251/9-ugly-truths-big-data-ok-cupid-book/

          http://qz.com/149342/the-uncomfortable-racial-preferences-revealed-by-online-dating/

          https://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/race-attraction-2009-2014/

          http://web.archive.org/web/20111116161156/http://www.thegrio.com/specials/life-and-style/study-reveals-racial-segregation-in-online-dating.php

          http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/emir.kamenica/documents/racialPreferences.pdf

          Studies of the dating scene show Black men consistly leaning towards White women. While White men (and Asian with “Hispanic” men) have low ratings for Black women.

          For more on high regard towards White women:

          http://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2013/07/white-skin-privilege.html

        • Waltem

          Often times it’s ego driven. In other words “how dare this black man not want a white woman like me?” So to assuage their own ego and unwarranted self-importance, they will convince themselves that the black man has not spurned them but rather he will attack them sexually at the first opportunity.

          http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/07/17/re-why-do-black-people-commit-more-crime/

          http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/11/23/race-and-the-alt-right/

          Blacks outperform Whites in having unwarranted self-importance.

          But they are particularly sensitized to the sexual stigma black men carry in this country, consequently they think allegations made against black men will carry more weight.

          Blacks are significantly more represented in sex crimes like rape so go figure they get charged more.

        • Chinedu

          Blacks are significantly more represented in sex crimes like rape so go figure they get charged more.

          Rape is a largely unreported crime, birdbrain. Moreover, the perp is usually known to the victim.

          Anyone that thinks statistics capture the true breadth and scope of rape is an idiot. Anyone that thinks white men are less prone to rape than black men is an even bigger idiot. And let’s not forget the rape of little children, which white men seem to specialize in.

        • Waltem

          Rape is a largely unreported crime, birdbrain.

          And you can’t demonstrate White men are the most represented among those unreported rapists for their population.

          Moreover, the perp is usually known to the victim.

          And yet Blacks are still more represented for their population.

          Anyone that thinks statistics capture the true breadth and scope of rape is an idiot.

          Tells us more on how feelings trump evidence.

          Anyone that thinks white men are less prone to rape than black men is an even bigger idiot.

          Crime stats point otherwise.

          And let’s not forget the rape of little children, which white men seem to specialize in.

          Is that how Europe has the lowest prevalence of child sexual abuse while Africa has the highest?

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_sexual_abuse#cite_note-pereda-13

          Europe has a White majority, yet has the lowest prevalence of child sexual abuse.

          And in America, Blacks are significantly more represented in convicted child molesters than Whites accounting for population:

          https://www.census.gov/population/estimates/nation/intfile3-1.txt

          White population not counting Hispanics in 1994: Around 74%

          Black population not counting Hispanics in 1994: Around 12%

          Hispanic population in 1994: 10%

        • Chinedu

          Waltem,

          And you can’t demonstrate White men are the most represented among those unreported rapists for their population.

          No I can’t. But with the twin epidemics of date rape and campus rape at mostly white universities, it’s safe to assume that it’s primarily white men that are the perpetrators of these rapes.

          Look, white culture is replete with all sorts of deviant and degenerate sexual imagery, stuff that black people find abominable. White culture fetishizes licking out someone’s asshole and rolling around in shit for sexual pleasure, among other disgusting perversions. All the filth that’s produced by whites for whites wouldn’t exist is there weren’t a vast white audience for it. Who is more likely to be rapist, the people that produce and consume sexual perversity or those that don’t?

          And yet Blacks are still more represented for their population.

          As has been demonstrated on this thread, blacks are not more represented.

          Crime stats point otherwise.

          You mean the stats with the big asterisks near the figures? Why do you think they put the asterisks there? They wanted to idiot proof it, but it still sailed over your head. That is to say, those stats are bunk.

          Is that how Europe has the lowest prevalence of child sexual abuse while Africa has the highest?

          Not only are you citing a silly wiki page that I could edit right now, the data is allegedly based on self-reporting. Who the hell interviewed African kids about sexual abuse? Which African kids were interviewed? Where? When? Give me something credible.

          What we know for certain is that white European men not only sexually abuse kids in Europe, they also take the show on the road to foreign countries. Google child sex tourism. All the perps are white men.

          And in America, Blacks are significantly more represented in convicted child molesters than Whites accounting for population:

          And in America, whites are vastly more likely than blacks to escape conviction for any crime. In America, blacks are vastly more likely than whites to lack decent counsel, to be railroaded and falsely convicted in all categories of crime. Yet whites still represent 70% convictions, almost equal to their percentage of the population. Can you imagine what those numbers would be in a fair criminal justice system?

          Despite the unequal criminal justice system:

          Those inmates who were convicted of committing violent acts against children were more like to have been white, a percentage of nearly 70%, than any other race.
          White inmates were nearly three times more likely to have victimized a child than black inmates.

          http://childprotection.lifetips.com//cat/63573/sex-offender-statistics/index.html

        • To Chinedu,

          “No I can’t. But with the twin epidemics of date rape and campus rape at mostly white universities, it’s safe to assume that it’s primarily white men that are the perpetrators of these rapes.”

          See here.
          https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2016/09/10/white-culture-is-one-of-the-least-rapey-cultures-on-earth/#comment-281471

          “Look, white culture is replete with all sorts of deviant and degenerate sexual imagery, stuff that black people find abominable. White culture fetishizes licking out someone’s asshole and rolling around in shit for sexual pleasure, among other disgusting perversions. All the filth that’s produced by whites for whites wouldn’t exist is there weren’t a vast white audience for it. Who is more likely to be rapist, the people that produce and consume sexual perversity or those that don’t?”

          So you are able to make broad generalizations without data, but whites can’t with blacks?

          Also you are mixing up fetishes with rape, those are two different things. Lets play game, lets look at the reported “rape epidemics” between Europe and Africa, have fun with those news articles.

          “As has been demonstrated on this thread, blacks are not more represented.”

          No, it was pointed out that data had limitations for certain subset calculations.

          “You mean the stats with the big asterisks near the figures? Why do you think they put the asterisks there? They wanted to idiot proof it, but it still sailed over your head. That is to say, those stats are bunk.”

          You haven;t proved that regarding general sex crimes.

          “And in America, whites are vastly more likely than blacks to escape conviction for any crime. In America, blacks are vastly more likely than whites to lack decent counsel, to be railroaded and falsely convicted in all categories of crime. Yet whites still represent 70% convictions, almost equal to their percentage of the population. Can you imagine what those numbers would be in a fair criminal justice system?”

          Despite the unequal criminal justice system:

          Those inmates who were convicted of committing violent acts against children were more like to have been white, a percentage of nearly 70%, than any other race.
          White inmates were nearly three times more likely to have victimized a child than black inmates.”

          What was that about “idiot” proofing data? Remeber how I pointed out how Black child molestion of women goes underreported, thus less conviction?

          As well, my link towards the thread on child molestation found cases where victimization risks were higher for Black and Hispanic children.

        • Waltem

          And you can’t demonstrate White men are the most represented among those unreported rapists for their population.

          No I can’t. But with the twin epidemics of date rape and campus rape at mostly white universities, it’s safe to assume that it’s primarily white men that are the perpetrators of these rapes.

          http://time.com/3222543/5-feminist-myths-that-will-not-die/

          http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/false-rape-culture/hey-amandamarcotte-did-you-know-1-in-5-is-really-1-in-5446/

          http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/report-1-in-5-campus-rape-reports-are-false/article/2573324

          http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/more-evidence-that-1-in-5-college-women-have-not-been-sexually-assaulted/article/2557262

          You can’t demonstrate there are rape epidemics in White majority universities. The Rolling Stones Rape Story is a hoax.

          Meanwhile in Africa:

          http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/258446.stm

          In a related survey conducted among 1,500 schoolchildren in the Soweto township, a quarter of all the boys interviewed said that ‘jackrolling’ – a South African term for recreational gang rape – was fun.

          Go figure from Blacks.

          Look, white culture is replete with all sorts of deviant and degenerate sexual imagery, stuff that black people find abominable. White culture fetishizes licking out someone’s asshole and rolling around in shit for sexual pleasure, among other disgusting perversions. All the filth that’s produced by whites for whites wouldn’t exist is there weren’t a vast white audience for it. Who is more likely to be rapist, the people that produce and consume sexual perversity or those that don’t?

          Meanwhile Blacks produce garbage like rap music and are more represented (for their population of course) among bastard births with teenage births, prostitututes, buyers of prostitues, and pimps:

          http://www.ejhs.org/volume11/brewer.htm

          http://www.statisticbrain.com/prostitution-statistics/

          https://www.google.com/amp/reason.com/blog/2014/03/14/economics-of-sex-work-in-american-cities/amp?client=ms-android-verizon

          http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/unmarried-childbearing.htm

          You can’t demonstrate that any of what you posted is socially acceptable among Whites. And Black men are significantly more represented in HIV cases and confessions of fucking other men:

          http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/msm/bmsm.html
          https://www.cdph.ca.gov/HealthInfo/discond/Documents/Fact_Sheet_AfrAm_STD.pdf
          http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/19/black-gays-lgbt-community_n_1989859.html
          http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/03/magazine/double-lives-on-the-down-low.html?pagewanted=all
          https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/11/131111144014.htm

          By the way, tell Blacks that fucking virgins or babies won’t get rid of their HIV:

          http://web.archive.org/web/20100902072358/http://articles.cnn.com/2009-06-04/living/cnnheroes.betty.makoni_1_young-girls-raped-youngest-girl?_s=PM:LIVING

          http://web.archive.org/web/20030429032318/http://www.aegis.com/news/suntimes/1999/ST990401.html

          http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/southafrica/1362134/South-African-men-rape-babies-as-%27cure%27-for-Aids.html

          http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1680715,00.html?xid=feed-yahoo-full-world

          You mean the stats with the big asterisks near the figures? Why do you think they put the asterisks there? They wanted to idiot proof it, but it still sailed over your head. That is to say, those stats are bunk.

          African countries rank among the lowest in safety of women and rape:

          https://feministsofwestminster.wordpress.com/tag/violence-against-women/

          http://www.womanstats.org/newmapspage.html

          And let’s not forget child marriage:

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_marriage#cite_note-unicef12a-16

          Not only are you citing a silly wiki page that I could edit right now, the data is allegedly based on self-reporting. Who the hell interviewed African kids about sexual abuse? Which African kids were interviewed? Where? When? Give me something credible.

          They’re more qualified than what you’ve been posting

          What we know for certain is that white European men not only sexually abuse kids in Europe, they also take the show on the road to foreign countries. Google child sex tourism. All the perps are white men.

          You can’t demonstrate statistics that account for population. By the way, Muslims have been fucking boys even in Whites countries:

          http://gatesofvienna.net/2013/02/homosexuality-in-iraq-and-saudi-arabia/

          http://www.familyresearchinst.org/2010/07/frr-jun-2010-western-gay-rights-islamic-pederasty/

          https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Islam_and_Pedophilia#Muslim_Statistics_on_Pedophilia

          http://www.vdare.com/posts/the-normalcy-of-pederasty-among-pakistanis

          And in America, whites are vastly more likely than blacks to escape conviction for any crime.

          https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256079484_No_evidence_of_racial_discrimination_in_criminal_justice_processing_Results_from_the_National_Longitudinal_Study_of_Adolescent_Health

          http://greyenlightenment.com/the-persistence-of-the-black-white-iq-gap/

          http://criminal-justice.iresearchnet.com/crime/intelligence-and-crime/3/

          http://www.science20.com/news_articles/psychologists_link_iq_to_criminal_history_of_fathers-150278

          http://web.archive.org/web/20071217052907/http://www.crimetimes.org/96b/w96bp5.htm

          http://www.gnxp.com/blog/2007/04/intercourse-and-intelligence.php

          Accounting for IQ, the arrest gap fades. Blacks have a significantly lower average IQ than Whites, so it’s not a surprise they’re more represented in violent crime and sex crime.

          In America, blacks are vastly more likely than whites to lack decent counsel, to be railroaded and falsely convicted in all categories of crime. Yet whites still represent 70% convictions, almost equal to their percentage of the population. Can you imagine what those numbers would be in a fair criminal justice system?

          Despite the unequal criminal justice system:

          Those inmates who were convicted of committing violent acts against children were more like to have been white, a percentage of nearly 70%, than any other race.
          White inmates were nearly three times more likely to have victimized a child than black inmates.

          And yet the actual listings of convicts who were specfically convictdd for child molestation have Blacks more represented for their population.

        • Tulio

          Waltem said:

          You posted a bunch of twaddle to dance around the observation that Black men engage in sex crimes on White women noticeably more than White men do on Black women. Rape has a significant amount to do with sex, contrary to feminist illusions. Black women just aren’t attractive enough even for lower quality White men (who are the ones doing crime like rape).

          It’s not twaddle, it’s a factual rebuttal to the claim that zero white men have raped black women. WNs are basing this off a misinterpreted data. When you read the fine print, you realize that these memes are built upon shaky foundations. Yes, blacks commit more crime. Yes, blacks are more likely to rape a white woman than a white man to rape a black woman. You can hold that view and still question the interpretation of the DoJ data in that WN meme.

          Also, you would expect it to be higher black on white than the other way around. Even if black men and white men had the same rate of rape per capita and selected their targets randomly in the population with no regards to race, you’d have more black men raping white women than white men raping black women. This is because the pool of potential white targets is about 6x higher than the pool of potential white targets as whites are the majority.

          As for your attractiveness argument. Rape has very little to do with that. Elderly women and ugly women get raped as well. Most rapes are actually acquaintance rapes. Most rapes involve alcohol between two people who are acquainted. Most are things like data rape, college jocks putting roofies in women’s drinks, assaulting a date while she’s passed out. Contrary to public perception, the scenario of a guy jumping out of the bushes in a dark parking lot and dragging a woman off to his van because is the exception. It really doesn’t happen very often.

        • Tulio

          Waltem said:

          Studies of the dating scene show Black men consistly leaning towards White women.

          From the conclusion of the study in your link:
          “That said, any interpretation of our results on the racial preferences of blacks must take into account the fact that they are based on a small sample.”

          Well that’s that. I see black men and black women together everywhere. There are quite a number of black women in my office. Every single one of them is either dating, engaged to or married to a black man. Hell, not even one of them is single. Your conclusions are ludicrous.

        • “Well that’s that. I see black men and black women together everywhere. There are quite a number of black women in my office. Every single one of them is either dating, engaged to or married to a black man. Hell, not even one of them is single. Your conclusions are ludicrous.”

          While I agree with your other notes Tulio on the study’s small sample, and your skepticism of Waltem’s impression of black men “by and large” leaning to black women, this approach is faulty.

          You are looking at the partners of black women rather than the partners of black men, which would give different results. By your approach, this would be in accordance with black women having a smaller portion of white partners compared to Black men.

          Technically based on relationship data, black males have more white partners than females, but this is relatively speaking.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interracial_marriage_in_the_United_States#Black_and_White

          This however, was in 2007 so I have no idea what the rates are now.

      • Chinedu

        White men aren’t particularly attracted to Black women outside of those with more Caucasian features through artificial methods or interbreeding.

        Then why do white men travel to Africa specifically for the purpose of fucking underage black girls?

        Child sex tourism thriving in Kenya’s port city of Mombasa

        http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-03-19/child-sex-tourism-thriving-in-kenya's-port-city-of-mombasa/6333440

        Kenya’s hidden sex tourism in Malindi

        http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-27427630i

        • Funny how you sort of try to ignore the point how at least two cities in Kenya is thriving through native marketing.

          Second I’ve already gone through Sex Tourism with you in regards of how SES would obviously play a role,

          https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2010/05/05/myth-whites-are-more-likely-to-be-pedophiles-and-child-molesters/#comment-265517

          but in this case nothing more is to be made obvious than that 3rd world countries have more prominence in the ability for sex among children.

        • Waltem

          Demonstrate that White men are the most represented in those who commit sex crimes on Blacks girls and use them for prostitution in Africa for their population. Even the BBC site you posted noted that the Italian men were late middle aged to elderly, putting them beyond the ages that are desirable to fertile White women and fitting in the observation that lower quality White men pursue Black women (or West African women). Anyway, it’s White countries and lands under White rule or influence that raised the age of consent to 18.

          And West African women (who form the major stock of Blacks in the West) aren’t regarded as attractive by White men (and men of other races like Asian men) There’s porn star demographics and how Black women lack representation in the most popular female stars:

          http://urbandemographics.blogspot.com/2013/02/porn-star-demographics.html?m=1

          Listings of women by sex appeal:

          http://worldsmostbeautifuls.com/worlds-most-beautiful-women-2016-poll/

          http://worldwideinterweb.com/1517-the-20-most-beautiful-women-in-the-world-according-to-google/

          http://www.maxim.com/women/2015-hot-100

          http://www.askmen.com/specials/2016_top_99/adele.html

          http://www.ranker.com/crowdranked-list/most-beautiful-women-of-all-time

          https://www.google.com/amp/www.maxim.com/.amp/women/2015-hot-100-readers-choice-post

          http://thebestpoll.com/the-most-beautiful-women-in-the-world-2016/

        • Jason Y

          Then why do white men travel to Africa specifically for the purpose of fucking underage black girls?

          Child sex tourism thriving in Kenya’s port city of Mombasa

          Interesting.

        • CHINAEDU Rarely. Southeast Asia is more popular for this than Kenya.

          African girls are sexually active and fully mature at 15, 16. You’d have to be referring to 13 year old girls to really call these men child molesters.

          Blacks lack the funds to ever travel anywhere but if they did you might see the same sex tourism in Russian backwaters with poor white peasants.

          He can do so easily if he wishes because African governments are too bankrupt and corrupt to really care to arrest him. If he is arrested, he can buy his way out.

        • Chinedu

          Trash,

          African girls are sexually active and fully mature at 15, 16. You’d have to be referring to 13 year old girls to really call these men child molesters

          European white girls are sexually mature by the age of 8 and start fucking by the age of 9. Prove me wrong. I have as much evidence to support that statement as you have for yours.

          Blacks lack the funds to ever travel anywhere

          Blacks do not lack the funds to travel. Black Americans are among the wealthiest people in the world. Black Africans are globetrotters. You’ll find them everywhere on the planet. The difference is that these black men are traveling for business and pleasure, whereas a healthy percentage of whites book flights and travel to foreign locales specifically to sexually abuse and rape little boys and girls.

        • CHINAEDU White males do not hang around younger black girls smoking “blunts” with them when they are 20 years old and in some local community college as African-American males do with teenage white girls.

          White males at 18 or 20 are in a state college or the military or have some kind of job so most are not having sex with teenage black girls.

          Nor are white males trying to get teenage girls of any race addicted to crack so they can pimp them out on dirty city roads. White males simply do not have to resort to such petty crime-White pimps run international call girl rings with Russian $1,000 a night thoroughbreds, not inner-city Mulatto girls with herpes in the inside of their mouths and sores on their lips from a crack pipe.

          White teenage girls of 16 who are having sex with black males have problems at home and problems at school. In college of course, the black-white relationships involve young adults.

          Black teenage girls become addicted to crack cocaine at such a young age-16 or 17-that only they have to resort to prostitution in the parked cars of older white males for $30 an hour…SADLY, I DO AGREE THAT SUCH OLDER WHITE MEN EXIST WHO WISH TO MAKE A YOUNG BLACK FEMALE ADDICT SUCK THEIR PENIS FOR CRACK COCAINE…WHICH THE YOUNG BLACK FEMALE DOES FOR A ROCK.

          White teenage girls suck 40 or 50 black penises a week to fund a crack cocaine addiction are extremely rare.

        • Chinedu

          Waltem,

          Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and informed by conditioning. An African tribe seeing a white Miss America type for the first time would find her grotesquely ugly. An idea of beauty also changes over time. During the Renaissance in Europe fat women (Rubenesque) were in.

          We’ve also seen an evolution of the idea of beauty even in the West. The bastion of white people no longer considers traditional white looks ideal. Ethnic looks are in. Dark skin, full lips, a round ass and exotic (non-European features). A pale faced white model with a flat ass and no lips isn’t going to have much of a career.

          On that note, black/white hybrids are considered by whites to be more attractive than pure whites:

          Why are mixed-race people perceived as more attractive?

          https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20301855

          Mixed-race people most attractive finds British study:

          http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1265949/Mixed-race-people-attractive-finds-British-study.html

        • To Chinedu,

          “European white girls are sexually mature by the age of 8 and start fucking by the age of 9. Prove me wrong. I have as much evidence to support that statement as you have for yours.”

          https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/04/02/the-role-of-leptin-and-sexual-maturity-in-black-girls/

          “Blacks do not lack the funds to travel. Black Americans are among the wealthiest people in the world. Black Africans are globetrotters.”

          Two different populations that have two different wealth vs. travel incidences, so fallacy on your part.

          “You’ll find them everywhere on the planet. The difference is that these black men are traveling for business and pleasure, whereas a healthy percentage of whites book flights and travel to foreign locales specifically to sexually abuse and rape little boys and girls.”

          And if you read about child domestic workers in these places of Africa that also participates in trafficking, they are also abused sexually.

          http://www.ecpat.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/confronting_csec_eng_0.pdf

          http://arrow.dit.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=aaschsslarts

          “A 1996 Eastern and Southern African Regional
          Consultation on CSEC (a preparatory consultative meeting for the First World Congress against CSEC), observed that, “apart from commercial sexual abuse of children, there were more alarming occurrences of the non-commercial sexual abuse of children in the form of domestic violence and incest … far more attention needs to be paid to abuse in the home as both a primary cause of commercial sexual exploitation and as a far more serious problem in itself” (Unicef & ANNPCAN, 2001, p. 8). “

        • CHINAEDU Why would white males “rape” black females of any age when they can arrive in the ghetto with $500 and some drugs and make an “arrangement” with a street hustler?

          “Hello Tyrone the Bone I have $500 and would like to see a 9 year old black child suck a German Shepherd’s furry penis while her mother puts a dildo up my ass…”

          Tyrone would say: let me have some crack cocaine and 4 minutes on the cell phone along with $500. The deal goes down.

          White men can PAY for ANYTHING in the ghetto.

          Certainly this is a form of ECONOMIC RAPE.

    • Waltem

      The rest of your post is feminist garbage lacking in research on female sexuality.

  6. In the tribal-racial-gang structure women are going to “cross” over to the winning side.

    In the case of Southeast Asian or Amerindian women, foreign males offered both a better living standard and bigger penis sizes.

    South Africa may have had more instances of rape and penis size is not such an attraction BUT they brought a higher standard of living.

    • Jason Y

      Possibly white chicks who want blacks are looking for a larger penis. I don’t think the main attraction is some sort of liberal compassion or guilt trip, though the white women might delude themselves into believing that stuff.

      • Most white chicks who want blacks:

        A) Have drug problems with ghetto drugs (Crack, heroin) which white males generally do not sell (Weed, pills, mushrooms, LSD in the past, meth).

        B) Are poor and living in areas within proximity of blacks on Section 8.

        C) Want to rebel against their parents and will probably end up marrying a white male after the “crazy college days” pass.

        D) Are hideously fat and ugly and shapeless.

        • Jason Y

          Fat is an opinion. Some guys like more full and curvy women and they are not desperate. Also, skinny girls just don’t have tits and ass.

        • Jason Y

          Though it sounds comical, I’d like to see a few strippers who are BBWs because the same old ones are boring. However, the BBWs have such low self-esteem, they won’t sign up for such a job.

        • Chinedu

          Most white chicks who want blacks:

          A) Have drug problems with ghetto drugs (Crack, heroin) which white males generally do not sell (Weed, pills, mushrooms, LSD in the past, meth).

          B) Are poor and living in areas within proximity of blacks on Section 8.

          C) Want to rebel against their parents and will probably end up marrying a white male after the “crazy college days” pass.

          D) Are hideously fat and ugly and shapeless.

          Sure, Trash. Keep telling yourself that. You do understand that there is a significant percentage of white women that are desperate for black men, right? Often times they’re frustrated because we’re not easy to find. There are too many of them and too few of us. Among them are the best looking and highest quality white women. They don’t want garbage like you. Your username is actually quite apropos.

          Since my teens I’ve been fucking white girls/women that someone like you can only dream about: beautiful, smart, interesting, well-educated white women from good families.

          I don’t know what kind of alternative reality you racialists dwell in but you ought to try to come to terms with the real world. Virtually nothing you believe is real or true.

        • To Chinedu,

          “I don’t know what kind of alternative reality you racialists dwell in but you ought to try to come to terms with the real world. Virtually nothing you believe is real or true.”

          http://paa2008.princeton.edu/papers/80046

          “As previously mentioned, women are more likely than men to state a racial preference. They are also more likely to prefer to date whites only; among those with an expressed preference, approximately 64% of white
          women prefer whites only compared to only about 29% of white men. Accordingly, white women are more likely then white men to exclude certain racial groups from dating consideration. Indeed, over 90% of white women who state a racial preference prefer not to date
          East Indians, Middle Easterners, Asians, and blacks. White men, in contrast, only prefer not to date one group at levels above 90%: black women. Thus, not only do white women and men exclude groups at different rates, the hierarchies of who they prefer to date vary considerably. ”

          And

          “Among white women, one of the most striking findings is that white women who describe themselves as slim, slender, athletic, fit or average are nearly seven times as likely to exclude black men as dates as women who describe themselves as thick, voluptuous, a few extra pounds, or large. “

      • FREEWAY’S teenage character summed up what most white girls who are attracted to blacks ARE: Not in college prep classes or sororities on campus.

        That film summed it up in 14 minutes of the running time.

        • Jason Y

          I don’t know I’ve seen white girls and black holding hands on campus. But otherwise, you have a point. By the way, as Robert was saying, why does everyone have to be in college? Isn’t that liberal elitism which brought Trump to power?

      • Optimus Prime

        Jason might be right. Also black men naturally have a good humour sensee which is another advantage. But somehow well built white men appear to be the living embodiment of masculinity.

        • Jason Y

          Blacks seem to have loads of self-confidence and cool which attract women and also the body and penis.

          Plus the blacks seem to “go after” what they want. They’re not chicken like whites or Asians.

      • JASON Y Do I really seem like the I-5 killer simply because I point out some inherent base truths?

        • Jason Y

          It has a creepy tone to it, though comical.

        • Jason Y

          Another dark comedy film would be “Falling Down”. No, not really an official comedy, but a dark comedy in every scene. You got the homeless beggar, the Neo-Nazi gun owner etc…

  7. Barring a few attractive boys, males from the tribe or race on the “losing side” are shit out of luck. Cherokee “Braves” could not offer their anus to Scots immigrants in the Appalachians and African Zulu could not offer their anus to Dutch farmers drunk on a Saturday night in S.A.

    Most male immigrants are not gay either. They tend to be young or middle-aged, tough, ambitious or desperate, high-testerone.

    Females from the less advanced civilization will admire the power in man and machine-the wealth, the masculinity of the soldier or settler, the 7 inch average white penis size to smaller native penis size.

    Reproduction ensues.

  8. PHILIPPINES EXAMPLE

    Foreigners are fantastically rich by native standards.

    Foreigners are like John Holmes by native standards.

    Foreigners can sometimes produce nicer-looking kids (Africans seem to understand this too).

    Ergo, race-mixing.

    • Jason Y

      Right, the Nation of Islam hates race mixing, but then a lot of their members lust after light skinned black ladies. What hypocrisy.

      • Jason Y

        Actually, race mixing created most of the Nation of Islam. Muhammad Ali would not have looked like he did if not for massive race mixing. And a lot of ladies liked his looks and he liked the way he looked. Again, hypocrisy.

  9. British, Mexicans, Eastern Europeans to various degrees, South Africans to various degrees, Indians…all are the mixed-race products of sex between conquering males and local females.

    • Jason Y

      British are mixed race? I bet WNs don’t like that comment.

      • Technically mixed cultured between Romans, Normans, and various celtic groups.

        • …later Anglo-Saxon tribes from West Denmark, Norwegians from French Viking colonies, possibly Flemish all intermarried to form the basis of the race we refer to as WASP.

        • Jason Y

          The Brits are a mixed race, but they have become a different race, like the Mexicans, so there is no real mixed race; mixing only produces another race.

        • “The Brits are a mixed race, but they have become a different race, like the Mexicans, so there is no real mixed race; mixing only produces another race.”

          Uum no, genetically speaking they are merely a mixed of different rubraces, not macro-races.

          As for “mixing only producing another race”, that depends on how they mix, mainly whether or not selection take place.

        • Jason Y

          Uum no, genetically speaking they are merely a mixed of different rubraces, not macro-races.

          As for “mixing only producing another race”, that depends on how they mix, mainly whether or not selection take place.

          What the hell does that mean, lol? You have to say whatever it takes to disagree.

          The English are a mixed race. Get over it. Possibly the Scots, Irish, Welsh though are purer. Yet, it’s always been the mongrel English bossing people around, contrary to race realist logic.

        • “What the hell does that mean, lol? You have to say whatever it takes to disagree.”

          No, because you know I mean. The groups that make up modern brits were all European West eurasian, most of which were Northern European minus The Romans but it’s debatable how much even they contributed to the modern Genepool.

          I’m pretty sure this is obvious yet you disagree just to force some sort of argument against HBD for the sake of HBD.

          Those are not “races” as in “macro races”, those are sub-races which are divisions within a “race”.

          “The English are a mixed race. Get over it.”

          No they are not in the biological sense regarding macro races in which it is usually applied.

          “Possibly the Scots, Irish, Welsh though are purer. Yet, it’s always been the mongrel English bossing people around, contrary to race realist logic.”

          You mean logic that you can’t even understand.

    • Jason Y

      Deport the sub-human mongrel Brits !!! Keep our land pure. BTW, they’re taking our jobs too…:lol:

      • JASON Y You Southerners ARE Brits. I do not buy this stuff about Cherokee grandmothers or great-grandmothers. Ninety percent of you are pure British.

        • Jason Y

          Mostly, but not my family. Yeah, of course, there are people with Cherokee that isn’t noticeable, yet the brag about it. But they sure wouldn’t brag about any black ancestry, lol.

          Cherokee though goes out quickly. My father and his family look part-Indian, but as the family goes away from that point, we look less and less like that, to the point where it’s not really important. Maybe a few members will look more Indian than others. Some have an Italian look, but some just don’t look much different than the surrounding Scottish population etc.

        • Jason Y

          I think most of the hate against the red man seems to be out in the west. In the south, Indians aren’t hated that much. Possibly it’s because they’re aren’t many around, so they’re viewed nostalgically, kind of like an endangered species.

          I bet the Blowing Rock thing is making all sorts of bigots out west angry. Cause they think Amerindians are a drag on society, like many in the south view blacks.

    • peterparker123

      True. I definitely agree with you. Most of the hindutva people forget this key point. They don’t want to accept this.

  10. Jason Y

    Robert mentioned squaw men, but to PC NAM nationalists any sexual contact, even consensual or even marriage between a NAM and white is rape. It’s similar to the ridiculous hatred the commentator Sam J. has for ANY black who dares touch a white female.

  11. Jason Y

    OK, when are they going to make a board game like Monopoly addressing this stuff?

    Call White Rape Your Way Around the World😆

    You roll the dice and you have to make choices on each imperialist stop. The one who rapes the most is the winner. I think this would be a best-seller. I guess the antagonists on the game trying to stop you would be these sissy SJWs or feminists or something.

    • Jason Y

      The Jews would be big antagonists (liberals etc..), but then again, they also own the sex trade. I guess they would be playing both sides on the game.

  12. JASON Y

    Everybody in Oklahoma or Kansas is race-mixed with Native Americans. According to them.

    They’d do better than rural whites who would complain about it. East Asians would do better to. Also East Coast Irish Catholics.

    Fact of the matter is that this is probably IQ, street smarts, education, culture.

    • Jason Y

      Right, mixed with Amerindian is a thing of pride, and mixed with black is a thing of shame, not mentioned. This is true except among extreme WNs who hate other races period.

      • Jason Y

        Did you know we had a great uncle who was a negro? isn’t that so cool ?😆 Maybe we can invite some of his ancestors over to the family reunion, NOT.

      • Optimus Prime

        But aren’t Amerindians called as red nigger in WN circles?

        • White Southerners HAVE NO EUROPEAN HERITAGE BECAUSE THEY’VE BEEN IN AMERICA SO LONG.

          Northern whites like Italians in Brooklyn, Germans in Detroit, Swedes in Minnesota, Irish in Boston have only been in the U.S. 100 years and therefore they have traditions.

          Also, they migrated to cities with vast populations and economy supporting them.

          Amerindians themselves refute claims by rural whites that they are part-this or part-that by calling them “Pretendians”.

          True Amerindians are fairly clearly Asian. Lot’s of blonde, blue-eyed whites claim Indian blood. It’s just a claim.

        • Jason Y

          White southerners who haven’t degenerated into white nationalism often look fondly at Amerindian ancestry, bragging about it, or at least not being ashamed of it.

        • Jason Y

          Bluegrass and other music show a strong Celtic background, so I don’t think Scottish-Americans have lost touch with their home nation.

      • White Southerners have been in the U.S. for so long that you really do not have a mother country from which to claim ethnic pride. The majority of you are from the Lake Country on the Scottish border or Amagh, Northern Ireland but this is sooo distant few of you even know.

        Unlike Northern Whites who moved to cities with thousands of Irish, Germans or Jews who had an economy and a culture around ethnic identity Southern whites don’t have this.

        Barring the Acadians in Louisiana.

  13. RollD

    Indians were the ones with the rape culture, not whites. There was no concept of “rape” to them.

    • Mike

      Was it not the white tape culture, indians would have remained the majority

      • RollD

        Wrong. It was the sheer number of settlers. Also, there were never that many Indians to begin with, that plus settlers plus reproduction out-populated the Indians. Rape was far more common among the Indians however, both intra-racial and inter-racial.

        • ROLL D

          I’d describe Indians as “settlers” from various Asian migrations as oppose to immigrants who join colonial economies.

          Siberians, Northeast Asians and Pacific Islanders did not have steam-ship companies ferrying 100000 people a month from Italy or Poland to New York.

        • ROLL D Indians themselves are composite of various Asian and Russian tribes with perhaps some Pacific Islander thrown into Central/South America for good measure.

          Inuit showed up from China thousands of years after the Amerindians from Siberia and they raped one another all the time.

  14. Gay State Girl

    Lindsay

    So how do you propose we deal with culture wars?

  15. GAY STATE GIRL

    We don’t have to, per se. Liberals concentrate on the West and Northeast coasts or in Canada. Some during the Trump presidency will immigrate to Australia or simply live overseas like I have.

    Republicans are the sort of people that live in the center of a country’s interior, cannot easily go anywhere or would go anywhere. So these people will continue to live in places like Alabama or West Virginia or Kansas in smaller-sized cities that liberals generally do not live anyhow.

    If North America were as small as Israel or Britain (Who have have their own culture wars) we would have problems.

    Republicans cannot travel. They will sit in West Virginia or Northern Michigan despising gays who voted for Obama but they are not going to do anything. They have too many kids to travel, too many bills, too little money.

    Liberals will live or move to California, Toronto, Boston, San Francisco. None of them will care what somebody from a small city in Arkansas feels about them. Why should they?

    • Jason Y

      Oddly enough, though, California is in a mess due to low IQ Latinos and crime due to them. So it seems like California would gradually become less liberal and more like South Africa, where it shares a similar climate and predicament.

      Also, NYC is full of lower IQ blacks and crime, yet is still liberal. There are examples everywhere for conservatives to justify their bigotry.

      • Latinos self-segregate, with the paler-skinned elite preferring to live next door to other whites.

        You will know when you are in a Spanish-speaking neighborhood in L.A. Usually, though not always, if you walk around with your head down and it is the middle of the day you will not be randomly shot or robbed.

        Latinos do not want you in their barrios or invite whites there and certainly you will be robbed or killed eventually.

        Enough Asians, Whites and other groups live in California to somewhat counter-balance the vast Latino influx.

    • Jason Y

      Republicans are the sort of people that live in the center of a country’s interior, cannot easily go anywhere or would go anywhere. So these people will continue to live in places like Alabama or West Virginia or Kansas in smaller-sized cities that liberals generally do not live anyhow.

      Oddly enough, there are no blacks for them to hate there. On the other hand, some white living in Atlanta or Chicago might have real reasons to be racist.

      • JASON Y Whites in Chicago or any Northern city arrived LONNGG after the civil war (Usually early 1900’s) from Germany, Italy, Poland, Ireland, Scandinavia.

        NAMS do not seem to care much in the North about foreign whites or the children or grandchildren of foreign whites like Charles Bronson who are obviously not Anglo-Saxon in any case. They dislike “crackers”.

        White Southerners have delusions of “controlling” NAMS, which is stupid and ludicrous. Poles in Wisconsin merely avoid and ignore them, for example.

        I cannot speak for Atlanta, however. NAMS have a eerie importance to white Southerners. Grandchildren of European immigrants do not give a shit about them.

        Unless you are a drug addict, a sex-mad prostitute user, a fence or in the mafia…you will have no reason to interact with NAMS in Chicago.

        Additionally, poor “crackers” are the ones who seem to trapped in such poverty that they have to live in Section 8 housing amidst NAMS. No matter how desperately poor the Chicagoan’s Russian-Lithuanian grandparents were, he is usually middle-class and has some sort of occupation that allows him to live in the suburbs.

        • Jason Y

          Some arguments by liberals against the so called “liberal elite persecution” make sense:

          http://www.opednews.com/articles/Why-Liberal-Elites-Hate-by-James-King-080905-289.html

          As for their “small town values,” the vaunted “Christian” values of compassion, tolerance and forgiveness… how often have these values been selectively applied? There are still small towns across this country in which minorities could not own homes for fear of violence. As Hillary Clinton’s campaign illuminated, there are many small-towners who will refuse to vote for a person simply because their skin is dark. They oppose abortion yet support the death penalty, fear terrorism yet care little when the citizens of other nations endure poverty, starvation, oppression and genocide. Small-towners believe that things like habeus corpus, due process and human rights don’t apply to people who oppose American interests, regardless of validity. Small-towners believe that government should not force them to subsidize the building of roads and schools via taxation but SHOULD force people to share their “values.” They ignore one of the most basic rules of a healthy human existence… that your rights end where someone else’s begins.

  16. JASON X

    Oddly enough, those whites behave in a similar way and find themselves in similar situation with proximity to the NAM underclass.

    The whites who live near NAMS are often drug addicts, or uneducated, or have children too young, out-of-wedlock. Similar to NAMS.

    So they find themselves living near NAMS and attending poor public schools where their children (Or they as children) are beaten by NAMS.

    Chicago is ethnically segregated. There are NAM neighborhoods, white middle-class ones, even a few ethnic white neighborhoods. A vast Hispanic population.

    • Jason Y

      Often middle-class or lower middle-class white bigotry against NAMS and especially gays in their neighborhoods are just as vicious . My sister was constantly bullied in the 60s and 70s for having curly hair like blacks. Note, you may not get killed,but sometimes white peers drive certain individuals to commit school shootings.

  17. Most depressed whites shoot themselves.

  18. brian

    In Argentina, Amerindians remained mainly in the north. The Pampean region is the less Amerindian of all, especially towns and small cities.

    • BRIAN I’ve never met a single Argentinian overseas who was not Italian. Most of the engineers, students and even the wives of Americans identify-and look-totally Italian from Buenos Aries.

      I’ve never met an Argentinian Indian.

      Even Che-champion of the Mestizo and downtrodden Indio-was of Irish and Spanish descent and obviously had not a single Indian hair on his body.

      • brian

        Che champion? What the fuck is that?

        And probably you met only middle-class and upper-class Argentines, and from Buenos Aires. You have to come here to know reality.

        Working-class and lower-class Argentines don’t migrate to another countries, except a little part of working-class and some well educated students that are carried by foreigner universities.

        For example, this are pictures of some people watching some football matches (of the last football World Cup, in 2014) of the Argentine national team in a giant screen in a square of the downtown of Buenos Aires.

      • brian

        Now I understand, you was talking about Che Guevara…

        He was from a middle-class family from Rosario and was descendant of Europeans.

        • All Marxists in Latin America seem to come from wealthy Spanish families and attended expensive schools before becoming radical communists who championed the rights of Mestizos or blacks.

        • BRIAN In North America we do not associate Italians with wealth or privilege.

          How did they gain wealth and privilege in Argentina?

        • Jason Y

          All Marxists in Latin America seem to come from wealthy Spanish families and attended expensive schools before becoming radical communists who championed the rights of Mestizos or blacks.

          Could it be a guilt trip over all the money? Isn’t it ironic Castro took all the land from Cuba’s rich when that rich class included his parents and relatives?

  19. Tulio

    Robert, do some more posts on Trump. This nation is about to be engulfed by fascism.

  20. TULIO Trump is 1st generation American (Dad the child of German immigrants, mother a Scottish-born immigrant) who is going to have little influence over Latinos in barrios whose families have been in the U.S. 100 years longer than his have.

    Mass deportations? Who is going to co-operate in Law Enforcement in Laredo?

    Build a wall? With what budget? Use illegal labor perhaps.

    Tariffs? Great, people drive the same car for 10 years.

    Ban a few Arabs on watch lists? So what?

    Another war? Who will show up for that after we did not even get Iraq’s oil?

    Rubbish.

  21. S26

    Most of such anti-white propaganda, wouldn’t sustain itself without willing whites promoting it themselves. There’s quite a few Eastern European whites out there, who would pride in “conquering” the native males and “dominating” local females, even though they’ve probably never colonized anyone. Just another macho identity thing for many.

    • Eastern European males are the ones whose sisters, daughters and even a few wives are sucking penises in Dubai or Mumbai or London for $30 an hour, 40 penises a week.

      I’d say they are conquered. The triumph of capitalism and free-market exploitation has turned them into the slaves.

      • Jason Y

        Eastern European males are the ones whose sisters, daughters and even a few wives are sucking penises in Dubai or Mumbai or London for $30 an hour, 40 penises a week.

        That’s funny Trash, cause you know libertarian blowhards are sucking 10,000 penises a week on Facebook, for free😆

        • I lack the intelligence for abstraction and do not get the joke JASON.

          The Fall of Communism produced a great many prostitutes-most previously nurses or technicians in Russia or Eastern Europe-who will have sex with anyone in Mumbai or Dubai or London for $30 an hour.

          Sex work is of course the monster in Capitalism’s dank basement and in a free market many Communist women have leaped like a giant kangaroo into this industry.

          Porn companies are out-whoring their labor to Eastern Europe where according to industry figures from Rocco the Anal Destroyer films the average Polish or Hungarian female will receive penises up the anus to the point of prolapse for $1000.

        • Street Jews and Trailer Trash females who once ran the U.S. porn industry are now being horrendously undercut by Out-whoring because the average Czech nurse-turned-porn-star will take two 10 inch penises in her anus for $400 US Dollars.

          The Sex Industry-the monster in Capitalism’s dank cellar-has proven tremendously successful since the fall of the wall.

          Dubai is built on prostitution. Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.

        • Jason Y

          I lack the intelligence for abstraction and do not get the joke JASON.

          I mean alpha redneck Facebook posters suck donkey dicks on a daily basis.

        • Jason Y

          Porn companies are out-whoring their labor to Eastern Europe where according to industry figures from Rocco the Anal Destroyer films the average Polish or Hungarian female will receive penises up the anus to the point of prolapse for $1000.

          It’s way worse in a US prison where a penis up your ass might only get you a candy bar. 😆

  22. S26 Eastern Europeans are the ones who send their women out to have sex in places like Jo Jo, Dubai or New York.

  23. brian

    “All Marxists in Latin America seem to come from wealthy Spanish families and attended expensive schools before becoming radical communists who championed the rights of Mestizos or blacks.”

    In all case, they championed for working-class and lower-class in general, not for blacks and Amerindians.

  24. brian

    “In North America we do not associate Italians with wealth or privilege.

    How did they gain wealth and privilege in Argentina?”

    They are not associed with this. Just are many in middle-class, but also are many in working-class from central region of the country (the most populated).

  25. Waltem

    In regards to American slavery, the source of Caucasian admixture in Black Americans apparently isn’t really from slaveowner rape:

    Evidence is also available indirectly from the censuses of 1850 and 1860. The enumerators of these censuses listed the color of slaves as black or mulatto. The percentage of mulattoes reported in the slave population was 7.70 in 1850 and 10.41 in 1860. [. . .]

    Historians have implicated all social classes in miscegenation. Slaves lived in closest contact with owners and overseers, and unmarried owners and overseers on absentee estates may have been most heavily involved. According to Stampp, “Men of the nonslaveholding class were responsible for much of the miscegenation . . . Female slaves were quite accessible to both rural and urban nonslaveholders.” Contacts were usually casual but relationships sometimes evolved into concubinage that lasted sev- eral years and occasionally for life. [. . .]

    The estimated regression is used to calculate the probabilities that a slave child was mulatto. The probabilities are an index of the relative frequency of sexual relations. The chances that a child was a mulatto declined with the size of the holding and the number of slaves per dwelling, and they increased with the proportion mulatto among adults aged 15-49 on the plantation, the proportion white among males aged 15-49 in the county, and with city size. The probabilities were relatively higher on sugar plantations as compared with cotton plantations, in urban areas, in the slave exporting states, and on small holdings where no slave dwellings were listed. The probability was lower on rice plantations as compared with cotton plantations.

    Several explanatory variables are positively related to the chances that a slave woman would have encountered a white who did not live on the holding, which suggests that a high proportion of sexual contacts were not attributable to the owner. Increasing the proportion white among males aged 15-49 in the county from .45 to .55 nearly triples the probability that a child was mulatto. The probability was also low in rice agriculture where the density of white settlement was low, and was high in urban areas where the density of white settlement was high.

    [Richard H. Steckel. Miscegenation and the American Slave Schedules. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Vol. 11, No. 2 (Autumn, 1980), pp. 251-263.]

    one out of every four Negroes living in a southern city was a mulatto. But among rural slaves, who constituted 95 percent of the slave population, only 9.9 percent were mulatto in 1860. For the slave population as a whole, therefore, the proportion of mulattoes was just 10.4 percent in 1860 and 7.7 percent in 1850. Thus it appears that travelers to the South greatly exaggerated the extent of miscegenation because they came into contact with unrepresentative samples of the Negro population. They appear to have had much more contact with the freedmen and slaves of the urban areas than with slaves living in the relative isolation of the countryside. Far from proving that the exploitation of black women was ubiquitous, the available data on mulattoes strongly militates against that contention.

    The fact that during the twenty-three decades of contact between slaves and whites which elapsed between 1620 and 1850, only 7.7 percent of the slaves were mulattoes suggests that on average only a very small percentage of the slaves born in any given year were fathered by white men. [. . .]

    Measurements of the admixture of “Caucasian” and “Negro” genes among southern rural blacks today indicate that the share of Negro children fathered by whites on slave plantations probably averaged between 1 and 2 percent.

    [Fogel and Engerman. Time on the cross: the economics of American Negro slavery.]

    • Jason Y

      Almost all African Americans are products of miscegenation. Is it a bad negative term? Is it a sin against god? If so, then a large percentage of our population is an abomination.

      • JASON Y ROOTS demonstrated that for an African female who would have otherwise spent life in a wooden hut in the jungle, a nice servant’s quarters and a big Scottish penis every night and clothes on the back instead of a loin cloth were not really THAT BAD.

        Many AFRICAN FEMALES would have chosen to make the voyage to the U.S. to have a clean servant’s room in a nice plantation house, clothes, jewels and a Hard Scots-English penis in the vagina every evening (All black women like sex and do not care what color the penis is).

        African males-except for a few gays who were willing suck and be bummed by desperate English soldiers or sailors in the Colonial South-could not expect such luxuries in the fields.

        I SUSPECT that just as many African females were raped on plantations by AFRICAN MALES as by English ones.

        • Jason Y

          Given what I saw in the Phillippines I’m quite cynical on the whole matter. Nonetheless, as Robert stated, on the whole, I don’t think there was mass rape. But we cannot say there wasn’t any. Perhaps 20 percent rape to 80 percent being left alone.

        • Jason Y

          However, your typical Klansmen, upon viewing Roots, would say it’s all a bunch of Jew propaganda and no rapes occurred at all. In fact, would say Scots never owned slaves, only Jews did, even though clearly Scots and other non-Jews owned most slaves and also fought to defend slavery.

          What a bunch of nonsense from David Duke etc..

        • Jason Y

          It is true with movies like Django Unchained and 12 Years a Slave we do see a liberal bias, but those accounts are somewhat true and so was Roots.

          Perhaps maybe 20 percent of slaves endured abuse as portrayed on those movies, cause in reality 20 percent of anyone is abused and 20 percent of any population are sociopaths. A person would be a fool to say all systems of doing things are without error and wonderful.

        • Jason Y

          hmmmmm ???? 😆

          The problem must be approached from market-oriented, racially neutral, biblical, constitutional and pro-American ways. I studied antebellum slavery and determined it was not as horrific for the average slave as our modern media portrays it. This is confirmed on a Library of Congress website where about 2,300 Slave Narratives gathered from 1936 to 1938 are posted. For each horror story of antebellum slavery, there is an ex-slave who remembered the Old South fondly, usually because they had good owners. Modern research proves that slavery was economically efficient, productive and profitable for the slaveholders. Many plantations were self-sufficient in food, clothing, and shelter. The slaves commonly had good healthcare, adequate food, clothing, and shelter, no financial worries, were in superb physical condition, did not use alcohol or drugs to excess, did not kill each other nearly as much as they do today, worshiped fervently, had fun holidays that Frederick Douglas recognized kept slave discontent down, were never incarcerated, displayed Christian virtues and had many children. Slaves consumed 88% of their own economic production. Slave children were more likely to grow up in a two-parent family than modern American kids.

          Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/5340002

        • To Jason,

          Well if it can be supported by slave narratives and modern examination of slave economics, then what exactly was the error in terms of details? At least from an economic perspective it makes sense, as African slaves per head were worth at least 10 Irish indentured servants so they were expensive.

          http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-irish-slave-trade-the-forgotten-white-slaves/31076

          The Lawyer doesn’t even say horror stories never happen, but that they weren’t as exclusive as a predicament as it was made out to be.

          Hell, that’s not too far off from Booker T.’s experience. Start at page 12.

          https://books.google.com/books?id=xN45ZsUMgKEC&q=slavery#v=snippet&q=slavery&f=false

        • Jason Y

          To Jason,

          Well if it can be supported by slave narratives and modern examination of slave economics, then what exactly was the error in terms of details? At least from an economic perspective it makes sense, as African slaves per head were worth at least 10 Irish indentured servants so they were expensive.

          http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-irish-slave-trade-the-forgotten-white-slaves/31076

          The Lawyer doesn’t even say horror stories never happen, but that they weren’t as exclusive as a predicament as it was made out to be.

          Hell, that’s not too far off from Booker T.’s experience. Start at page 12.

          https://books.google.com/books?id=xN45ZsUMgKEC&q=slavery#v=snippet&q=slavery&f=false

          True, psychos exist on every platform, from modern day US parents to antebellum slave-owners, maybe constituting 20 percent. I doubt if abuse was the norm in the antebellum period, at least in the US, because it wasn’t good for profit.

        • Jason Y

          Perhaps though the Irish had a massive advantage as they could not be whipped. Whippings of black slaves were quite brutal as any Roots sort of movie can attest.

          I guess it boils down though to whether whippings or starving to death is better. However, at least Irish had freedom of movement and maybe some job choice, so it wasn’t a “Work well for me or starve to death” situation.

        • “Perhaps though the Irish had a massive advantage as they could not be whipped. Whippings of black slaves were quite brutal as any Roots sort of movie can attest.”

          …..That would be false because A). The Irish were viewed as being at least significantly different from Anglo-Saxons on top of being Catholic in a predominately protestant nation B).That would go against what my source points put about damage to expensive property. In comparison, The Irish would’ve had less repercussions if whipped.

          “I guess it boils down though to whether whippings or starving to death is better. However, at least Irish had freedom of movement and maybe some job choice, so it wasn’t a “Work well for me or starve to death” situation.”

          Where did you get this regarding indentured servitude? Granted, yes, in times of assimilation Irish had more leniency compared to blacks for obvious reasons, but you’re underestimating the apathy they would’ve gotten at least by common people specifically.

          Still the point how their slavery wasn’t hereditary or for life were advantages I do agree with, as was seen for Angolans in Virginia.

        • Jason Y

          What a lot of what rednecks (at least who are called redneck by liberal elite types, some for good reason, lol) think is that being under the threat of the lash wasn’t a big deal. Irish were not being whipped for disobedience that I know of.

          I mean, come on, even super-manly men nowadays couldn’t even really handle a few strokes of a whip. I doubt if many slaves could have handled much back then either, even though 12 Years a Slave had a part where slaves were threatened with 100 lashes😆

        • To Jason,

          “What a lot of what rednecks (at least who are called redneck by liberal elite types, some for good reason, lol) think is that being under the threat of the lash wasn’t a big deal. Irish were not being whipped for disobedience that I know of.”

          http://www.encyclopediavirginia.org/indentured_servants_in_colonial_virginia#its6

          They were whipped if trying to attack their master.

          “I mean, come on, even super-manly men nowadays couldn’t even really handle a few strokes of a whip. I doubt if many slaves could have handled much back then either, even though 12 Years a Slave had a part where slaves were threatened with 100 lashes😆”

          From what I read, though general said that black could take it better than whites, whoch could have some truth because the layers of the skin are more compact in blacks on top of many West/Central Africans going through scarification, the people Like the Krus or Eboes were said to be very reactive to pain while ones like the Ashantis weren’t, hence the latter was desirable for it’s endurance but not for it’s behavior as they were known to cause riots often.

    • Jason Y

      I suspect that neo-Confederates secretly want to bone black women. It’s a hunch. It’s like Trash was saying, the certain southerners are obsessed with controlling NAMS, “The White Man’s Burden” sort of thing. In other words, oppress them in public, rape them in secret.

      • …white Southerners even in the North are more likely to have bad experiences with NAMS than the average Italian, Polish, German, Irish, Jewish or Asian-American on the East or West Coast.

        I’d say this is because White Southerners have a heritage in the U.S. spanning centuries whereas Korean-Americans or Russian-Lithuanians whose grandparents immigrated do not believe that blacks are anybody’s burden but their own. They just don’t give a shit.

        Now this don’t give a shit attitude has led to pogroms of Jews, Koreans and Arabs during racial riots but on a daily basis NAMS are less obsessed with a Charles Bronson than Jeff Foxworthy.

  26. brian

    “Could it be a guilt trip over all the money? Isn’t it ironic Castro took all the land from Cuba’s rich when that rich class included his parents and relatives?”

    It’s preferible this that continuing with the oppression, don’t you think?

    • BRIAN Regimes change but Spanish rulers stay the same in Latin America with a load of Mestizo soldiers, police and technocrats to control the blacks and Indians.

      Show me any Latin American country where the Indian is running things and Spanish or Italians or Portuguese are cutting sugarcane.

      Cuba DID have a great many poor Spanish from Northern Spain who flocked during Franco and no Indians whatsoever so there was more racial equality than in Mexico.

      However, most of the prostitutes and poor and prisoners in Cuba will be blacks or Mulatto. I’m sure of that.

    • No, Spanish are trying to enforce power and a regime on Mulatto and Mestizos no matter what their political philosophy.

      Thus Cubans who fled Batista-era overthrown were all white Spanish business owners who wanted no part of hard work in sugar cane fields.

      • brian

        Not. “Spanish are trying to enforce power and a regime on Mulatto and Mestizos no matter what their political philosophy”… Completely ridiculous.

        You are obsessed with the racial question.

        • BRIAN Why DO SPANISH LATINOS USUALLY END UP RUNNING THE REGIME AND INDIANS AND BLACKS END UP SCURRYING IN THE NIGHT ON RAFTS INTO AMERICA?

          Pinochet? Spanish parents, Indians in torture chambers.

          Fidel Castro? Son of Spanish soldier and a Spanish woman born in Cuba to Spanish parents.

          Che? Spanish father and Irish-Spanish mother.

          Salvador? Romero, a Spanish priest’s illegitimate son.

          PLEASE EXPLAIN.

  27. Ghetto life is so brutal and NAMS do unconcerned with which orifice receives insertion that I suspect being in prison for them is less of a punishment than it is for the white meth junkie who ends up doing 40 years for his third property offense and came from a middle-class suburban home.

  28. BARACK Inner-city crack-addicted black prostitutes will commonly have light-skinned babies from one of the 40 men that paid to shaft her that week.

    It is common for black street prostitutes to give birth to babies that are half-white in Northern U.S. cities.

    • Jason Y

      give birth to babies that are half-white in Northern U.S. cities.

      So what Trash? It’s also common in mostly white areas like Appalachian coal country (not referring to hookers tough). It’s also common across our land, nearly anywhere, for black guys to date or marry white women and bear mulatto kids.

  29. BARACK White men in the North do not date black women. Their sexual activity involves some money, a crack pipe, a quick screw…they’re gone.

    It’s not unusual for black street prostitutes who are 40 years old and have been smoking crack for a quarter of a century since 1991 to have 2 or 3 light-skinned white babies from one of the 1,000 white males that paid $30 to shaft them over the years.

    They do not care if they screw white men for a crack rock and do not care if a baby pops out of their vagina 9 months later that is light-skinned. Not one bit.

    But as far as “dating” is concerned NAM females in the ghetto are too unsocialized for this.

    • Barack Thatcher

      Ah yes well it does show something interesting;
      “Race mixing” is not really what WNs object to. It’s having kids with a non-White in lieu of having kids with a White. If they just bang both, like the White men with these Black prostitutes, we see more White genes overall, aiding their cause, etc.

      And just look at Africa now; if the Chinese have kids with the Blacks a lot would improve. At least there won’t be village hackings and as much starvation.’Genetically’Latin American Amerinds have IQs barely above Blacls- but Latin America is by almost any count a helluva lot better than Africa.

      • Chinedu

        How the Myth of the “Irish slaves” Became a Favorite Meme of Racists Online

        That’s a lie. WN oppose race mixing period. But why don’t these sexually frustrated weirdos go out and get laid instead of obsessing over who other people are sleeping with? It’s none of their fucking business.

        if the Chinese have kids with the Blacks a lot would improve.

        Yeah, and the improvement could come from the black genes.

        • Jason Y

          Yeah, and the improvement could come from the black genes.

          Good one Chinedu 😆 However, in what was do you mean? Maybe they’d be more compassionate?

          That’s a lie. WN oppose race mixing period. But why don’t these sexually frustrated weirdos go out and get laid instead of obsessing over who other people are sleeping with? It’s none of their fucking business.

          Like religious fundamentalists, they absolutely don’t believe in freedom and even want to make science, beauty, and religion force people into having a guilt trip over sinning against their racist beliefs.

          The worst example would be calling mixed raced kids “Garbage Pail Kids” on Daily Stormer.

        • Jason Y

          The whole idea of sinning against political correctness is way less worse than sinning against white nationalism. PC at it’s worst just keeps some guys at the bar from telling black jokes. Of course, some say PC is a block to real scientific thought, but I’ve seen no case of it as racists haven’t come up with more than pseudo-science.

        • Jason Y

          Possibly Chindeu might be saying that creativity might improve among Asians with race mixing as they seem to have a deficit there and it might be genetic.

        • To Jason,
          “The whole idea of sinning against political correctness is way less worse than sinning against white nationalism. PC at it’s worst just keeps some guys at the bar from telling black jokes. Of course, some say PC is a block to real scientific thought, but I’ve seen no case of it as racists haven’t come up with more than pseudo-science.”

          Your example of “at it’s worst” doesn’t seem to match what Robert has written on such topic.
          You having effectively prove this by scientific means.

          To, Chinedu

          “Yeah, and the improvement could come from the black genes.”

          Are you Joking or taking race mixed traits seriously?

        • To Jason,

          I meant that you haven’t proven pseudo-science based on the non “PC” info I gave.

        • Waltem

          Yeah, and the improvement could come from the black genes.

          Considering the lack of accomplishments by Blacks in the actual sciences, the track record of Black majority lands, and how the only African country with significant efforts in advancing civilization has never been Black majority (Egypt) I doubt it.

        • Chinedu

          Considering the lack of accomplishments by Blacks in the actual sciences, the track record of Black majority lands, and how the only African country with significant efforts in advancing civilization has never been Black majority (Egypt) I doubt it.

          Your stupidity is showing.

          Here’s the thing. I’m 100% black. I’m pretty sure I’m significantly more intelligent than you. I’m more intelligent than most whites and Asians I come across. Therefore my genes have the potential to create a more intelligent kid than your genes. So you cannot a assume that in an interracial coupling the genetic contribution of the black parent will not be the one that has the most positive impact on the child’s intelligence.

          Does that clear it up for you?

        • Chinedu

          Considering the lack of accomplishments by Blacks in the actual sciences, the track record of Black majority lands, and how the only African country with significant efforts in advancing civilization has never been Black majority (Egypt) I doubt it.

          Your stupidity is showing.

          Here’s the thing. I’m 100% black. I’m pretty sure I’m significantly more intelligent than you. I’m more intelligent than most whites and Asians I come across. Therefore my genes have the potential to create a more intelligent kid than your genes. So you cannot a assume that in an interracial coupling the genetic contribution of the black parent will not be the one that has the most positive impact on the child’s intelligence.

          Does that clear it up for you?

        • “Your stupidity is showing.

          Here’s the thing. I’m 100% black. I’m pretty sure I’m significantly more intelligent than you.”

          Perception, far from a substitute of legit comparison/ psychometrics, but lets just play along for the sake of your example.

          “I’m more intelligent than most whites and Asians I come across. Therefore my genes have the potential to create a more intelligent kid than your genes.”

          In an individual scenario, yes.

          “So you cannot a assume that in an interracial coupling the genetic contribution of the black parent will not be the one that has the most positive impact on the child’s intelligence.”

          Does that clear it up for you?”

          Well one you are merely looking at an individual phenotypical trait, not that of multiple people of a group attached with a particular average. Once that is made more specific (say the type of black background versus the type of chinese background) then extrapolations would be more clear.

          Second, total IQ alone isn’t the only significant heritable factor if you are to look at HBD, but also IQ subtests

          http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/09/21/blacks-and-whites-with-the-same-iq-still-differ-a-lot/

          Personality

          https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/04/19/differential-k-theory-and-iq-the-evolution-of-conscientousness/

          medical issues,

          https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/05/08/sickle-cell-anemia/

          and physiology

          https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/08/17/muscle-fiber-typing-hbd-and-sports/

        • Chinedu,

          Basically when those facts are gather for certain groups, whether “macro-races”, sub races, or some other group within a population and set them to comparison with another then we could get a clearer picture.

        • CHINAEDU Without frustrated white males the ghettos would be even more economically deprived because many black women rent their vaginas or offer oral services in the street-something like $1,000,000 USD funnels into Chicago or New York from the customers of black prostitutes who are often white “tricks” unable to find a partner but able to get $30.

          On the downside much of this money goes to crack cocaine dealers.

        • Barack Thatcher

          Here’s the thing. I’m 100% black. I’m pretty sure I’m significantly more intelligent than you. I’m more intelligent than most whites and Asians I come across. Therefore my genes have the potential to create a more intelligent kid than your genes. So you cannot a assume that in an interracial coupling the genetic contribution of the black parent will not be the one that has the most positive impact on the child’s intelligence.
          Does that clear it up for you?

          We’re talking overall,Chinedu, obviously wide scale/wide spread…..

          Anyhow there’s an Alt-Left facebook page that has now overtaken (((Rabbit))) as the #1 search result for “Alt-Left” (thank God). It’s a wing that doesn’t talk about HBD.
          It just attracts too many Nazis. Folks are not mature enough for it.

        • What is the name of that Facebook Alt-Left group?

        • Barack Thatcher

          https://www.facebook.com/alternativeleft/

          It comes up first if you type in “Alternative Left”

        • Barack Thatcher

          my antivirus blocks Rabbit’s site.

          I have no idea why it does this.

      • Look at the career of the average NAM street prostitute in 2016:

        1991 At the height of crack epidemic she was 15 years old and smoked crack for the first time.

        1993 Full-fledged prostitute, usually usually oral but frequently half-and-half.

        1995 Faceless white trucker blows wad in her vagina. She is too busy to get an abortion, continuing to suck penises or screw for crack into third term.

        1996 Half-white baby born.

        1998 Black baby born with black customer.

        2004 Hispanic baby born.

        2006 Reaches the tail end of reproductive years.

    • Waltem

      Your stupidity is showing.

      Keep on chimpingout.

      Here’s the thing. I’m 100% black. I’m pretty sure I’m significantly more intelligent than you.

      I’m sure your PHD in African Feminist Studies impresses you but this is the internet so none of us are here to watch you wave around your cock.

      I’m more intelligent than most whites and Asians I come across.

      And Whites in America to Australia have a significantly higher average IQ than Africa even when counting the Caucasoid North.

      Therefore my genes have the potential to create a more intelligent kid than your genes. So you cannot a assume that in an interracial coupling the genetic contribution of the black parent will not be the one that has the most positive impact on the child’s intelligence.

      You seem to have issues grasping the notion of an average and other plays with statistics.

      Here’s a bonus:

      http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/iq-of-sub-saharan-africa/

      • U.S. is actually one of the less successful British former colonies, sadly.

        Canada, Australia, New Zealand have a better standard of living, education, health, wage etc. etc.

        Why is this?

        • My guess is homogeneity relative to each other. While these other nations have their own history with non-whites, of the top of my head it’s not as complex as the Western Hemisphere was.

      • Mike

        I am sure your dwelling at your white supremacist leaders anus and eating their excrement is doing things to your brain. Nobody is here to see playing around with your own poop. Alternativehypothesis?? lol.. Why don’t you go ahead and refer stormfront or daily stormer to support your claims.

        • MIKE I am sure you are a lower-caste or middle-caste Indian.

        • MIKE America has not yet allowed lower-caste Indian Hindus or Muslims to immigrate or we would have the same problems Canada does.

          Think about it.

        • Mike

          Sorry your assumptions are wrong, try again man-whore

        • Your spelling and punctuation errors seem to reflect a South Asian background but perhaps you are East Asian. I doubt you are Hispanic or black.

          Enlighten me Mike. Are you another one of these Singaporean descendants of Fuji peasant coolies whose grandfather mated with a Malay?

          Not white and not an African-American.

        • Lol. Bro. Stormfront and dailystormer are really lowbrow. Andrew Anglin doesn’t science. There are some intelligent people on his forum, but for the most part they’re low IQ idiots.

          I use the dailystormer to discuss race and the like. Most of the people on the dailystormer don’t even science or even keep up with the newest science. They’re ignorant to genetics and Genetic variations.

          Bring your idiotic accusations elsewhere please. Address the information in the article, don’t attack the source. That’s idiotic. Should I wave away a source because it comes from Quora or Slate? No, if I disagree I should deconstruct it myself. That makes logical sense though.

  30. Jason Y

    Where I live there is no scientific backing to racism. People just make fun of liberals and blacks, using shouting “nigger” at them out of cars, simply out of pure hatred of anyone who goes against the “normie culture” in my area. It’s no different than Beevis and Butthead walking around town saying everyone sucks.

    • Jason Y

      Basically, racism is an anti-sensitivity movement tied in with alpha male dominance. In my area, they hate anyone sensitive, so wussies, blacks, latinos, gays, and liberals are all a target for mockery and hatred. As I said above, I doubt if most of the foot soldiers of racism are aware or care about race realism, they don’t have enough brain power to comprehend it.

      Nonetheless, racism isn’t the only anti-sensitive movement, you could say the same for South Park or Beevis and Butthead.

      • Barack Thatcher

        “As I said above, I doubt if most of the foot soldiers of racism are aware or care about race realism, they don’t have enough brain power to comprehend it.”

        Maybe they’ll get the last laugh, but the hardcore alt-right (NOT including Trump, his policy advisers, folks just fed up with “PC”/soft alt-right, people supporting his populist economics), are truly some pathetic bastards.

        I’m talking Richard Spencer, Jared Taylor, etc.
        Their nigga wins yet their on life support because they think some schmuck who lost his factory job in Michigan is okay with “heiling Hitler”…..

        This is why they are actually better called the “aut right”.

    • JASON Y Why do Southern Whites care about NAMS? They have zero-utterly zero-interest in the culture, genetics, history or any other aspect of European culture.

      They do not waste their time obsessing over whites at all.

    • JASON Y One poster calls me a dirty Jew, another calls me a serial killer…finally I am being called a “man Whore”.

    • Are you refering to the article or a flame war in the comments?

      As for the article it mentions this.

      “It is important to note that the study has several potential biases that should be taken into account such as the socio economic status of those who might have purchased the test and as Carl Zimmer reported in his piece, the fact that people of mixed race are more likely to get the test out of curiosity. Nevertheless, the large sample size lends unique credibility and the trove of data will no doubt continue to yield very interesting results about how the ethnicity of the current American population came to be.”

      Plus looking the author’s profile he’s no WN as for one his name appears to be Indian, “Arvind Suresh”, and all of his other articles seems to be biology oriented in general.

      • Barack Thatcher

        No I was referring to the;
        -‘They’re using European as a monolith, which it isn’t, so Whites still aren’t really pure’.

        -“WE DON’T WANT YOU BLACK AND BROWN SAVAGES GO BACK AND STOP TAKING OUR WELFARE”

        LOL!

        • Jason Y

          A lot of whites are on welfare.

        • Ah, I see. I usually don’t say much because I see myself as typically repeating what others already say, but this reminds me of something that occasionally happens.

          If I had to go off my memory of the type of WNs you see in Comment Sections of general non-political blogs, they would 10% analyst blogger material, 30% Mantra blog material, 40% SJW commenter counterparts, 20% softcore ones/ apologists. This one being the 40%

          It’s the prevalence of that 40% that people don’t take them seriously, the mantra ones create the perception of a political threat. The 20% and the 10% are mixed as extremes, as one their own they both can be viewed logically but it’s the prevalence and popularization of the other 70% that holds them back and, quite frankly, gives me more permeability than the Alt Left.

          The Issue though is that there’s a trade off between the Alt Left and Right. The Alt Left, as of now for those that identify as such, has greater solidarity Though that could be due to it’s lower numbers due to the specific “selection” for Alt Left, in that regard the Alt Right and WNs sacrifices solidarity for relative numbers.

          As of now, they have a leg up compared to previous years, though that’s mainly morale and probably won’t last long. They may get some things through but it’s been made somewhat obvious that Trump sincerity is weak.

          As I said, nothing new on my end.

        • Barack Thatcher

          The alt-left does not exist in that it’s really not as much a deviation from “normie” political views as the Alt-Right is.

          While the Alt-Right has some pretty damn hardcore White Nationalists (very few would pass up the opportunity to scrap the 14th amendment and deport non-Whites; including Blacks), the Alt-Left is simply Democratic Socialism (more mainstream, even Obama actually defended it in an interview), with a rejection of cultural relativism.

          I don’t think this is something that’s too unpopular with lots of folks. An alt-left figure could perhaps win a statewide election in the states that went for Obama in ’12 but Trump in ’16.

          The Alt-Right can not win outright, but has to run ‘psuedo’ candidates like Trump or Allen West.

    • BARACK Clearly enough white females from Northwestern Europe immigrated to America that white males of a lower sort did not resort to shafting Africans or Native Americans with the result that a European standard of living has remained intact while Spanish who went to Mexico or Portuguese to Brazil impregnated blacks and Indians.

      • Barack Thatcher

        No, no, no. You’re wrong here.

        They men DID bang the NAM women. But the offspring were completely cast out of White society, and did not even form their own societies;
        they were and are treated as 100% NAMs.

        get it?

        • “They men DID bang the NAM women. But the offspring were completely cast out of White society, and did not even form their own societies;
          they were and are treated as 100% NAMs.”

          That depends on what era in US history you;re talking about. Pre “one group rule” times were more variable regarding that though probably leaned by an large to what you are saying.

        • “One Drop”, not “one group”.

        • Jason Y

          Given human and nature and especially from what I saw in the Phillippines, it seems men will bang available women no matter the color and having power makes it 80 or 90 percent more likely.

          However, as Trash said, often there were enough white women in the US to offset breeding with NAMS.

        • Gay State Girl

          Would I be considered white to these people?

        • Jason Y

          I don’t get what Gay State Girl is saying here, unless she thinks curly hair, as my sister does, makes her black😆

          What ridiculous nonsense.

          If it’s about being Jewish, it seems most people view Jews as whites except for wacko racists.

        • GSG,

          I’ll put it like this, even “white people” don’t have a consensus regarding Jews, but I would guess the closest thing to one for those who would care I would say on a cultural level, no.

          Genetic Level? Ashkenazi Jews are 60 percent European, mostly Southern with some Eastern European admixture, and 40% Levantine from what I’ve read and the later is very close to Mediterranean Europeans as well, so genetically that can be supported.

          Issue? Mutual distinguishment between Jews and Gentiles keeping such a perception of being real.

          In my opinion, that probably depends on how you view towards their ethnocentrism and from what I could tell probably yes.

  31. Chinedu

    You gotta feel sorry for this white supremacist troll Phil, who’s on 24/7 hair trigger alert to respond to my posts. Of course 100% of the time, his response is total bullshit.

    Get some help, Phil. Professional help. There’s definitely something seriously wrong with you. I’m sure I’m not the first person to tell you that.

    • “You gotta feel sorry for this white supremacist troll Phil, who’s on 24/7 hair trigger alert to respond to my posts.”

      Is that really the best you got? How about the one how said “Uuumm, not going to debate you Phil” yet did anyway?

      “Of course 100% of the time, his response is total bullshit.”

      Funny how, as of now, you haven’t responded to me pointing out your bullshit or even elaborated to the same extent as me to explaining why my response is bullshit.

      “Get some help, Phil. Professional help. There’s definitely something seriously wrong with you. I’m sure I’m not the first person to tell you that.”

      Trying vainly to convince someone that he’s mentally ill despite my overall, even agreeing occasionally with some of your observations, you act as if I’m 100% against you.

      https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2009/09/07/black-immigration-to-europe-and-other-musings/#comment-279792

      https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2010/05/05/myth-whites-are-more-likely-to-be-pedophiles-and-child-molesters/#comment-281828

    • I feel sorry for anyone who has to resort to childishly referring to other posters as “Trash apropos” or using profanity like yourself.

      However, I am confused about your own nationality. You’ve claimed to be Hebrew, African-American. Which is it?

      • He’s a Nigerian-American of a ethnic group called the Igbo.

        • Nigerians admittedly are more intelligent than the average U.S. black (Actually a Mulatto product of degenerate English and Scots shafting African girls in the colonial South) because of immigration requirements.

          Chances are his parents had decent jobs qualifying them to be legal immigrants of the United States, passed the citizenship exams, paid for decent schooling etc. etc.

          This is a far cry the average black American upbringing.

        • Indeed. Funny thing, when I lived in Florida my neighbors were immigrants from Central Africa, one of the Congo Nations (was 11 when I left so I couldn’t remember which one, as I wasn’t taught specific African Nations at that time).

          I was friends with their son who name was either “Gariel” or “Gabriel”, but he went by “Sonny”.

          They were, from my memory, very relatable people and it was sad when I left. At the time I didn’t realize what a great opportunity .

          BTW, I lived in North Florida to be precise with region, Jacksonville.

  32. CHINEDU Defining “Trash”

    TRASH MINORITY himself has the “White Daddy” who is the taxpayer that funds 18th century descendants of West African girls who were impregnated by degenerate Scottish and English peasants during the Colonial era.

    TRASH MINORITY upsets the middle-class accountant by having sex with his daughter when she is 16 and this minority “trash” is 17,18. Usually he is smoking “blunts” at 15 and introduces her to the glories of weed and sex underage (Sometimes he is far, far older than her and already in his 20’s).

    TRASH MINORITY attends community college and is 20 while still hanging around high school white girls. If he attends a State university he drops out in a year and returns to his “Hood” to aimlessly hang around.

    TRASH MINORITY’S mother was a single-parent so he has the advantage of understanding female psychological needs and insecurities at a far younger age than his white male counterparts who had two parents…He uses these readily to manipulate white girl’s with Daddy Issues because their father was constantly working to provide for his family….Unlike the county who was TRASH MINORITY’S “DADDY”.

    TRASH MINORITY feels white girls are more attractive than black females.

    TRASH MINORITY spends most of his time in pursuit of sexual relationships, weed, watching basketball games and other frivolous past-times so when he is 30 he has nothing. No career, no resume, no experiences outside his birthplace.

    That is MINORITY TRASH.

    You.

    • Jason Y

      TRASH MINORITY himself has the “White Daddy” who is the taxpayer that funds 18th century descendants of West African girls who were impregnated by degenerate Scottish and English peasants during the Colonial era.

      Degenerate? Maybe it was real love. Anyhow, Trash has been to the Phillippines taking on Filipinas at every chance. Do I see a bit of hypocrisy here?

      Why would men go the PI, unless they were handicapped or in some other way repulsive (degenerate) or were degenerate sex addicts with a military money or pension ???

      • Jason Y

        Note I’m not mocking the handicapped. I don’t want to do the Sam Kinison mistake of mocking the unfortunate (the Ethiopian starvation joke)😆 I’m just trying to leverage what Trash is saying logically.

      • JASON Y Economic immigrants. Many whites live in Asia for other reasons than prostitution.

      • JASON Y

        In the case of American white males the reason is NOT CARING about the U.S. and NOT WISHING TO LIVE IN A NAM NEIGHBORHOOD AS SENIOR CITIZENS.

        If you are a poor veteran, what choice do you have?

  33. CHINAEDU I have not lived in the U.S. for nearly 20 years because I cannot stand to be around minorities, pay taxes, care about PC or anything of that nature.

    White males go overseas because WE CAN. We have other former white colonies like Australia or can live cheaply in Asia.

    White male reasons for leaving America are rarely sex tourism but Americans like you whom we do not care to be around.

    Unlike Black people, we feel no attachment to a “hood”. The world is our colony to live in and play in.

    Few of us are sex tourists of any age.

    We just despise the American underclass of any minority and wish to find greater opportunity elsewhere.

    Black Americans cannot live for 20 years overseas. They lack the qualifications to earn a living in another country and cannot get Section 8 or other government funding from Australian or Asian counties.

    So moving overseas is the last resort for the European-American male who simply has no interest in the condition of minorities in America, the state of the country or anything else.

    We leave because we hate you, your culture, your behavior, your poverty, your social problems, your religions, your drug addictions.

    Elite white males and even lower middle-class ones would rather be in South France or Australia or Asia, thanks.

    • Mike


      “I cannot stand to be around minorities,”

      Yet go strut around whoring yourself to non white areas like Thailand, India. etc….

      • MIKE

        Few White Americans who leave U.S. permanently do so for prostitutes. We simply want to get away from the stupid, dangerous, dirty centers of population minorities have created for themselves.

        Australia and New Zealand have more whites and therefore they are cleaner, less polluted, less dangerous…and you pay less useless taxes to support stupid teenage girls who let a Dindu or Indio blow his worthless beans up her.

        White males leave the U.S. because IT IS A PAIN IN THE ASS. We can do or say or feel however we want in Asia.

        Minorities make Northwest Europeans sick, less so Asians. Your ever-expanding populations of teenager mothers who cannot support their children and the stupid drugs you choose to do are disgusting to us.

        So we move overseas and do not care.

        • Mike

          You make no sense Trash, if you dont want to live around blacks and NAMS, you must move to parts of scandinavia and live in a homogeneous white area you wish. You whore around asia and africa and complain about blacks destroying your living space in US, doesnt it sound odd? Look majority of sex tourists in places like Thailand are white man whores like you.

      • Better believe it…Asians are not the problem. You are safer in India or Korea or Thailand as a white than in East Los Angeles or Atlanta.

        White males feel no guilt or responsibility to blacks or Hispanics. None. Zero. We do not want to subsidize them at all.

        Australia and New Zealand are wonderful countries because they are white.

        White males do not care about “the hood”. We do not care about black history or slavery 50 years before our ancestors immigrated from Europe.
        We only care about quality of life.

        Which minorities get in the way. Certain minorities.

        If every minority was a Japanese-American, it would not matter/

      • MIKE Asians have IQ’s somewhat higher than other minorities.

        They certainly are not the problem in the United States. We know who is.

        White males just do not care about the problems other races face, so sometimes if we have money we leave.

        Thus, White Flight. Whites pack up and move. Many now are moving to other countries because minorities totally disgust us with their culture, their babies, their music, their food, their behavior, their lack of intelligence which makes communicating abstract ideas difficult, their drug addictions (To stupid cocaine and baking soda concoctions!, their ugly street prostitutes who suck penises 5 times a day for their stupid drugs, their domestic violence.

        Sorry Mike, white men do not feel like paying taxes.

        Now IF EVERY WHITE LEFT tomorrow and MINORITIES HAD NUCLEAR WEAPONS we would be in terrible trouble. They’d use them.

        • Jason Y

          Not trying to sound anti-white working class, but there is a large group of whites who are equally repulsive and other whites will try to flee them once enough cash is at hand.

    • Chinedu

      Trash says:

      CHINAEDU I have not lived in the U.S. for nearly 20 years because I cannot stand to be around minorities, pay taxes, care about PC or anything of that nature.

      White males go overseas because WE CAN. We have other former white colonies like Australia or can live cheaply in Asia.

      White male reasons for leaving America are rarely sex tourism but Americans like you whom we do not care to be around.

      Actually, white males do leave America for sex tourism. Some leave America specifically for sex tourism and for no other reason. For many white males who leave America on a permanent or semi-permanent basis, sex with young boys and girls is just an added perk. Their prime motivations are to hide or protect their assets, avoid onerous taxation, enjoy a better lifestyle and live “free”. In many developing countries it is not inconceivable to live like a multi-millionaire on a few thousand dollars a month. I see these people on my travels. I was recently in Panama and before that I was in Cyprus. Yes, in many ways such countries do offer a better less stressful lifestyle than the United States.

      I’m familiar with the “escape artist” movement because I too want to protect my assets from an overbearing and overreaching U.S. government. While I haven’t left America, I have bank accounts, corporate entities and corporate trusts overseas. Why? Because you cannot truly own anything in this country unless you have it on your person or in a safe hiding place. The money you have in the bank is not yours. Your home is not yours. Your business is not yours. None of your assets are truly yours because they can be seized or levied at any time by the government or even by private individuals. Anybody can file a lawsuit against you and if you fail to respond (they can lie about serving you), one day you’ll wake up and all your bank accounts are frozen. But foreign jurisdictions are not bound to honor any U.S. lawsuits. Now, in recent times the U.S. government has begun to strong arm foreign banks into reporting on their American customers. But those accounts are still much safer for Americans than U.S. based accounts.

      Because I’m familiar with why Americans become expats, I know that their motivation has little to do with escaping blacks or other minorities. In fact many of them end up settling in majority black countries in Africa and elsewhere.

      • CHINAED I’d no more live in a white rural area than I would choose to live in a black ghetto or a barrio (I judge Mestizos as the most dangerous and hostile to outsiders).

        On $1,000 a month I can live as well as somebody with $60,000 salary in New York. But without the aggravation.

        Probably the shift of the economy to Asia and the destruction of small businesses in the U.S. are as responsible for reducing it to a second-world country than anything else.

  34. brian

    TRASH

    “BRIAN Why DO SPANISH LATINOS USUALLY END UP RUNNING THE REGIME AND INDIANS AND BLACKS END UP SCURRYING IN THE NIGHT ON RAFTS INTO AMERICA?

    Pinochet? Spanish parents, Indians in torture chambers.

    Fidel Castro? Son of Spanish soldier and a Spanish woman born in Cuba to Spanish parents.

    Che? Spanish father and Irish-Spanish mother.

    Salvador? Romero, a Spanish priest’s illegitimate son.

    PLEASE EXPLAIN.”

    Now you are talking about other thing.

    Whites are more percentage when higher is the social class? Yes.

    But what the fuck have this to do with that idea that “whites are trying to enforce power on mulattoes and mestizos”?

    • YOU just EXPLAINED why Ladrinos accept pale Pitbull and Al Pacino and Fidel elites to continue ruling them under ANY regime.

      If White Americans could figure out how to make the black and Mestizo underclass accept their socio-economic dominance as easily as they accept pale Spanish elites in Latin America, we Anglo people would have an easier time of things.

      Now I have noticed that light-skinned Hispanics in North America do not run barrios like they run Latin countries. People from Spain are not moving to East Los and pushing Mestizos around and Cubans are not pushing around blacks in Florida.

      • brian

        You think that regimes think in this racial questions?

        Pitbull? Al Pacino? What the fuck are you saying? They are Americans, and they are artists, so what the fuck they have to do with politicians? You always miss the point.

        Politicians usually come from middle-class or upper-class, so is normalseing white politicians.

        But there is not some “plan” to prevent that non-whites occupy important charges, in fact there are a lot, even presidents. Evo Morales is Amerindian for example. Peru had other Amerindian until a while ago… Even Argentina had a very mestized white, like Carlos Saúl Menem, who, by the way, was a disgusting motherfucker neoliberal that suck cock from American governments and FBI (he was a excellent president for our elite)…

        Examples like that are a lot.

        In Latin America there is not much racial segregation (like in United States). Exists, but sociall class and ideology are more important. If a president is neoliberal, he will be supported by the elite of their country, no matter his race. In case of being white, if he tries to make moves for a more socialized state organization, or try to touch some interests, he will be attacked, no matter his race … This are the rules.

        And politicians try to get support from the working class and, less, from the lower class, no matter the race of the people. And people in these social classes often support political parties that are historically beneficial to them (at least in theory), or politicians who promise things to them… Right-wing politicians gain some support from these social classes usually through the media, and even with this, win political power by voting is difficult for them.

        • BRIAN

          We WISH Latinos coming to America were Spanish creoles like Fox or Pacino or Antonio Banderas instead of Indios or Mulattos. Barrios would be more like Madrid instead of like Medellin.

          There’s nothing wrong with Italians from Buenos Aires who immigrate to America. They are not members of MS-13 (They are not even mafioso like our own New Jersey Italians).

          I am saying that Latin Americans running things LOOK LIKE Pitbull or Al Pacino or Vincente Fox (They are Southern European but still white).

          Hugo of Venezuela was obviously an Indian and so was Noriega. Indio men are usually hideous and some Spanish pretty boy probably gets Mexican votes mostly because he is easier on the eyes than Danny Trejo.

        • Barack Thatcher

          nah. I wouldn’t want a bunch of Pitbulls coming here either……..

          I’d prefer a Hard Working Indian over Pitbull…maybe.

        • Sami

          “Carlos Saúl Menem, who, by the way, was a disgusting motherfucker neoliberal that suck cock from American governments and FBI (he was a excellent president for our elite)…”

          As a Lebanese American, I am VERY sorry to admit that Menem (derived from Moneim) was a Lebanese/Syrian ‘disgusting motherfucker neoliberal (who sucked) cock from American governments and FBI….

          Aside from that, it does appear to me that in most Latin American countries, social class is somewhat more important than race. Though, sadly, race also probably matters more than we might wish it would.

    • BRIAN Well Hispanic whites SURE DO enforce power on blacks and Indians, don’t they?

      Even when the Spaniard tells the Indian or black he is dismantling the class system for Socialism blacks and Indios STILL end up picking tea or coca leaves on his huge plantation.

      Yet Indios and blacks and Mestizos basically accept Pitbulls or Al Pacinos running their country and making them pick tea for nothing on huge plantations. I’m not sure why.

      • WHY WHITE MEN LIVE IN ASIA – ULTIMATE WHITE FLIGHT

        1) Underclass people (All races but Asia-American) make babies they cannot afford and our tax money is wasted supporting them.

        We do not wish to pay underclass teenagers to screw.

        2) Our European grandparents came to the United States not as “colonists” but as immigrants and small businessman so we do not wish to concern ourselves with matters relating to race or Civil War or white crimes against Natives.

        We can leave easily and often do because we do not have the long history of the Southern white. Moving to Australia like our grandfather moved to America does not bother us as much.

        3) We want to get away from NAMS who usually cannot afford to live overseas for extended periods of time.

        4) We don’t care about P.C.

        5) We do not wish to marry a white female knowing that divorce rates are 50%.

        6) We do not believe that white people will fix America by breeding more children. You will simply have more white poor with less resources to spread. R-strategy won’t work and black women have higher sex drives so semi-frigid white chicks cannot compete.

      • brian

        In Latin America, people don’t think about race for support (or not) some politician…

        And, about the rest, your point of view is extremely generalized, like from the colonial era.

        • BRIAN Yet it is Indios and Mulatto who end up in the U.S. creating dangerous neighborhoods, not Spanish Creoles the color of Antonio Banderas or Fidel Castro or Al Pacino.

          I’d add that no Italian-Argentinian is in the news for heading up MS-13 or some other Central American gang. These are all jungle Indians, not Creoles.

          Anglo people WISH that every Latino immigrant who immigrated illegally or not was a Creole with a college education and banking degree. You’d never hear a complaint if Fox’s entire family immigrated to Texas.

          Batista-era Cubans actually have not caused the problems in Florida that Mestizos have in California. They’re quite well-behaved.

        • BRIAN That’s probably a good thing for the tiny Spanish elite. In terms of sheer numbers the Indios and Mulattos could have killed them off generations ago but somehow they manage to stay on the top of the Latin American tree.

  35. brian

    TRASH

    “We WISH Latinos coming to America were Spanish creoles like Fox or Pacino or Antonio Banderas instead of Indios or Mulattos. Barrios would be more like Madrid instead of like Medellin.

    There’s nothing wrong with Italians from Buenos Aires who immigrate to America. They are not members of MS-13 (They are not even mafioso like our own New Jersey Italians).

    I am saying that Latin Americans running things LOOK LIKE Pitbull or Al Pacino or Vincente Fox (They are Southern European but still white).

    Hugo of Venezuela was obviously an Indian and so was Noriega. Indio men are usually hideous and some Spanish pretty boy probably gets Mexican votes mostly because he is easier on the eyes than Danny Trejo.”

    Have you read what I wrote? You miss the point again.

    Elites are more interested in ideology of politicians that in their race.

    In fact, during the last right-wing dictatorships of various Latin American countries, who were persecuted were mainly left-wing sympathizers, that many of them were whites from middle-class. There was not some special persecution against Amerindians or blacks.

    • BRIAN Agreed, Mestizos and Blacks do not seem to be well-educated in Latin America. Political prisoners jailed in South America will probably be from Spanish or Portuguese families who are journalists, university student protesters or homosexuals.

      Blacks and Indios-mostly Mulatto or Mestizo now-seem to be random victims of oppression or misery in Latin America. They have not openly challenged the elite as journalists or writers or lawyers (Like Castro was).

      Despite their capacity for physical violence, there is a weird passivity about the Indio/Mestizo or Black/Mulatto which makes the occasional Noreiga or Chavez unusual.

      I’ve noticed MOST Indios like Noreiga or Chavez came up the ranks through the military and not as intellectuals.

  36. brian

    TRASH

    “Yet it is Indios and Mulatto who end up in the U.S. creating dangerous neighborhoods, not Spanish Creoles the color of Antonio Banderas or Fidel Castro or Al Pacino.

    I’d add that no Italian-Argentinian is in the news for heading up MS-13 or some other Central American gang. These are all jungle Indians, not Creoles.

    Anglo people WISH that every Latino immigrant who immigrated illegally or not was a Creole with a college education and banking degree. You’d never hear a complaint if Fox’s entire family immigrated to Texas.

    Batista-era Cubans actually have not caused the problems in Florida that Mestizos have in California. They’re quite well-behaved.”

    There was a time when there were Italian mafias in United States.

    And Argentines in United States come from middle-class, so obviously they will not form part of gangs. And here, even in our crime culture did not exist this kind of gangs (like American ones).

    And many Mexicans from gangs that I see in your country, are white (usually mestized, but much more white than Amerindian).

    • BRIAN You’ll never meet one pure Spanish Creole in an LA barrio street gang.

      • brian

        Not? “Pure” like Vicente Fox (that you named like a pure white)? Are you sure?

        • Spanish immigrants rich or poor to the U.S. just do not get involved in street crime. Period. Neither do Portuguese. There’s more of them than Spanish immigrants.

          I do not know why, but street crime and drug-dealing are the territory of the Indio, Mulatto or Mestizo.

        • Barack Thatcher

          TRASH
          Pitbull has made it seem like little Havana is a shithole ghetto.
          “You know ese I was raised on the wrong side of the tracks in little Habana”

          Is he lying for his image?
          Have you been to Miami?

  37. The Italian mafia continues to run New Jersey.

    A few white Cubans are involved in drug-distribution in Florida-we have all seen SCARFACE. They are not really street operators selling crack cocaine on the corner.

    Portuguese in New England do not exhibit the behavior of Brazilians either.

    American Mestizos are known as Cholos.

    You’ll never find a 100% pure Spaniard in an LA street gang. Never.

    Pure Indians sometimes belong to street gangs but more often these people are more likely to be illegals working somewhere with no desire to actually commit a crime because they are supporting a family in Mexico.

    • brian

      Brazilians are not trouble makers in United States.

      Only in Brazil.

      The same with Argentines.

      About Portugal, it’s a country with low crime comparing with Latin American, besides that poor Portuguese don’t migrate to United States (in this case, the same thing with Argentina and Brazil, that our working-class and lower-class don’t migrate to other countries).

      Mexicans and Central Americans that migrate massively to United States are from all social classes, but mainly from the lower ones also, so obviously is people with much more problems and desesperation.

      And in Mexico and most part of Central America, whites are less than in Argentina or Brazil, and their social differences with the other races are more pronounced.

  38. brian

    TRASH

    “Spanish immigrants rich or poor to the U.S. just do not get involved in street crime. Period. Neither do Portuguese. There’s more of them than Spanish immigrants.

    I do not know why, but street crime and drug-dealing are the territory of the Indio, Mulatto or Mestizo.”

    Italians are no white?

    Irish were not white in times when they were problematic?

    And there are not poor Spaniards or Portuguese migrating to United States and never were.

    • BRIAN Actually Italians from Buenos Aires or Chile are far more educated and civilized than the thugs or mafia you’d meet in New Jersey on the street.

      Irish and Italian street thugs are more skin-on-skin tough guys who fight with fists than drug importation urban terrorist gangs doing drivebys.

      Portuguese in Massachusetts are fishing communities (MYSTIC PIZZA was a film about them) and they are poor (By U.S. Anglo standards) and the fishermen are tough but if unless you made trouble with them they won’t bother you. Steve Tyler (Not his real name) of Aerosmith was the son of a Portuguese fisherman.

      Some small East Texas Canary Islander Spanish communities have existed since it was a Spanish colony (They were given land grants). These are safe and there are no gangs (Mestizos and Indians and Mulattos do not mix with actual Spaniards in America).

      • Barack Thatcher

        TRASH the Canarian folks are mainly around New Orleans- when that was a Spanish colony, not Old Mexico, iirc.

        Anyhow i there were a few of these on stormfront and there was a debate whether or not to accept this because canary islanders are a mix of Spanish invader and Berber. They were leaning towards doing it anyway but I’m not sure.

        • BARACK

          Sometimes you’ll see a Spanish actor PLAYING a Mexican criminal or thug (NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN, Javier Bardem).

          But in REAL LIFE, no Spanish whites do not join barrio street gangs. You’ll never see Spanish nationals like Penelope Cruz joining Spanish-speaking street gangs in East Los or El Paso or calling one another “Ese”.

          Uruguayan and Argentinian Italians might SPEAK SPANISH and BE FROM SOUTH AMERICA but they will never be seen selling crack-cocaine dime bags at Circle K gas stations in the Southwest.

          These are Indians with no more white blood than the average Reservation Indian in Maine with one Viking ancestors 20 generations ago.

          You can draw a parallel between a Mexican-American’s criminal activity and the degree of Spanish blood he has.

          Gang-bangers will be almost pure Indian or 60% Indian. The hardcore ones like MS-13.

          Cubans and Mexican middle-class immigrants who look like Ricky Martin will hold a job and live in the suburbs.

        • BARACK There is more Arabic blood in a New Jersey Sicilian than in a Latino or Hispanic.

          You CAN SEE IT in Sicilians. The long scimitar nose, thick bushy hair, deep olive tans, women in black veils.

        • BARACK

          New Jersey has more Arabic/Berber blood in Sicilian-Americans (Most are from Eastern Sicilian grandparents 120 miles West of Tunisia) than in any group of Latinos.

          Look at their scimitar noses and olive skin. Put a burka on Sicilian woman. They’ll pass for Arab.

  39. BRIAN Steve Tyler of Aerosmith (Not his real name) is the son of Portuguese Americans-fisherman, actually.

    There are a million of them in Massachusetts (Mystic Pizza was a film about their community). Some are tough fisherman who will hurt you if you make trouble in their wharf bar but they are not criminals or drug dealers.

    Italians from Argentina are BETTER-BEHAVED than Italians from New Jersey or Brooklyn where there is a powerful mafia and some street thugs.

    Spanish have never immigrated to any great extent to the United States directly. So you cannot make any generalization about them at all.

    Canary Islanders who have a few towns in Texas-they are known as Tejanos-are not known for rampant crime anyhow.

    Massive gang violence and crack cocaine distribution is a Mestizo, Mulatto or Indio pathology in the South U.S. I’d say Aztec more than anything else, to be really specific.

    • brian

      You said that Spanish immigrants were not involved in crime, and I told you that never were many Spaniards migrating to United States (much less, poor).

      About Italians, you are responding to yourselve.

      And do you think that all Mexican Amerindians are Aztecs or descendants of Aztecs? You are wrong.

      About they participation in drug dealing, probably it’s because powerful Mexican drug cartels have some of their people (of the same nationality) in United States also.

    • Sami

      Are Argentines primarily from Southern Italy, as with Italian Americans?

      • SAMI No, they are from Naples, mainland Italy.

        Greeks and Arabs of various civilizations with some Lebanese thrown into the mix from Phoenicia had sex to create the modern-day Sicilian who has little or no Roman blood.

        As a result, they have proved more troublesome in great population centers of the East Coast.

        Sicilians are not Italians. They are North African, Greek, Phoenician and later became part of Italy politically.

        American Sicilians are from the East of Sicily about 140 miles West of Tunisia. They were an Arab colony beginning with Carthage and then Phoenician, Moorish, Greek.

      • SAMI My personal experience has been that many Argentinian people in America are of Naples extraction. Sicilians-who possess a great degree of Arab and Phoenician blood-never immigrated to Argentina.

        South Italians have always proved more troublesome than Northern Italians due to the proximity of Eastern Sicily (Where “Italian-Americans” are from) to Tunisia.

        At the height of Italian immigration to the U.S. there were some notorious Naples gangsters like Al Capone.

        But in the main, Sicilian-Americans have been a minor social problem (Not so much now but up to the 1970’s) because of the admixture of Arab and North African blood.

      • brian

        From both (northern and southern Italians), but a bit more from northern ones. During 19th century, Italian immigrants in Argentina were mainly farmers from the north. During 20th century, Italian immigrants were mainly from the south.

        During 19th century arrived more Italians that during 20th century, so, ancestry from north Italians is a bit bigger.

        An anecdote: it is said that, in 1882, in La Boca (neighborhood of Buenos Aires populated, at those time, almost entirely by Italians -especially Genoese- or sons of Italians), strikers that disliked the Argentine government of those years, have decided to declare La Boca as an independent republic, and even designed a flag (for the Independent Republic of La Boca) and hoisted it, so the Argentine president had to arrive with police, objurgate this strikers and replace their flag for the Argentine one.

        And one of the nicknames of Boca Juniors (most popular and famous football club of Argentina -founded in 1905- that is located in this neighborhood) is “xeneize”, that is a deformation from “zenéize”, word that means “Genoese” in the Genoese dialect of the Ligurian language. Comes precisely from the high population of Genoese that had this neighborhood until early 20th century.

  40. Jason Muniz

    Can you write about the presidential election coming up in France. Seems like some crazy convergence is happening between laissez-faire libertarianism and traditionalist catholicism in the person of François Fillon. It reminds me a lot of the Republican party in the US.

    • I need to do some research on this first of all. I was afraid of this for a long time now, and here it is. The nightmarish American model, which is really an anti-model or something to avoid, is spreading across the globe. Of course it will cause more of the same horror and misery that it has here when it is done over there. But there seems to be a market for this idiocy these days for some reason. Perhaps humans are going through one of their crazy phases ideologically speaking.

      • ROBERT This will only leave FLYOVER LAND MORE BACKWARD AND REMOTE while California, Manhattan and Canada continue to remain progressive.

        Red states become like Russia bordering on Finland.

  41. Sami

    Come on, guys … you tip waiters and bartenders, don’t you? Well, Robert’s been giving you something far more valuable than liquor, overpriced food, and ridiculously overpriced coffee. He’s made it clear he’s holding out on us because we’ve been holding out on him. Let’s, please, step up to the plate a little bit; fair is fair.

    • SAMI We are all broke cynics with useless overpriced degrees on this site who have no money.

      • Come on Trash, Sami at least just gave me $20. And by the way, thanks Sami!

        Can’t you at least kick down a few bucks to show your commitment to the site?

        Even $1-3 would be fine as a gesture of support at least. I actually have commenters who give me contributions along those lines, believe it or not.

        • Chinedu

          I would if I could do it anonymously.

        • You can donate anonymously through PayPal, correct? If not, you can mail me cash via the mail and put a fake name for your return address on there. Just fold the money in paper so no one can see it in the envelope. I have gotten a lot of money this way so far and none of it has been stolen in the mail yet. If you want information on where to mail me, contact me via email please.

          I really value your contributions here, Chinedu. You’re very smart and I like smart people. I don’t agree with you, but I still like you more than a lot of folks I agree with. That’s because you’re a hard person to dislike. You’re just too pleasant and civilized.

        • Gay State Girl

          I’m really depressed right now.

        • I am way, way, way, way, way beyond depressed and I have been for 2 weeks now. It started out really bad, but it just gets worse and worse every day. That’s one of the other reasons I am not writing. I am literally too depressed to write.

        • Gay State Girl

          I hope Germany still feels guilty about the Hollowcause and lets me immigrate, because I don’t want to go to Israel.

        • Sami

          Return addresses are optional. And cash folded up inside an empty piece of paper inside an envelope gives anonymity. Drop it off via your local post office’s drive thru.

          I am also paranoid about Big Brother/Whore of Babylon.

        • Sami

          GSG, if you have a STEM degree, Germany would take you in a heartbeat, but you have to learn German to be a licenced professional in one of those fields. Germany is recruiting engineers from all over the place because they are not having enough babies, and haven’t been for a generation. If I were in my 20’s instead of my 30’s, I would have jumped at that. I went back to school at age 33.

          After I get three years of experience in my STEM profession (I’m an ME), I am thinking of going to the Persian Gulf for a few years to get caught up on where I should be moneywise (but that may not be an attractive option for you (understandably) [though Dubai or Oman would be liveable, probably.

        • Sami

          Happy to help, Robert, as this is one of my favorite places to visit. However, I won’t always be able to give $20 every month, at least til I get hired on as a “permanent” employee by an firm. I am still working via short term contracts (usually 3 months), as I am still working on getting my career off of the ground.

          How many regular readers do you have, Robert? 500? 1,000? 2,000 If all of these contributed $5-10 every month (ie, the value of an espresso or 2), would you be comfortable?

        • Not sure how many regular readers I have, but I get 6,000 hits/day and 4,250 visitors/day. Not sure how many of those 4,000 visitors are regulars though.

        • Chinedu

          Thanks Robert.

          Address please.

        • Hi Chinedu. Email me from the Contact page to get my mailing address.

        • Tony Swagger

          GSG, Germany is waking up from its slumber, kikes best bet is always Israel.

        • Gay State Girl

          Sami

          My degree is pure Mathematics and I haven’t had much luck, but I’m looking to get some kind of IT certificate. What would you recommend?

  42. BARACK

    White Hispanics-Catalan people like Pitbull or Fidel Castro or Andy Garcia from the Northwest Spanish coast-seem great at creating shit-hole ghettos for blacks and Indians while they themselves live in a nice Hacienda.

    Blacks and Indian-blooded underlings have it pretty rough in their corrupt rigid racial pyramid and the fact that Cuban whites just don’t care if Haitians or Colombian Indians or their own blacks live in third world squalor makes it worse.

    Somehow it is imprinted in the Caribbean black or Indian or Mestizo to respect their corrupt Mediterranean under-the-table oligarchy mentality and so Pitbull or Ricky Martin do get the ire Anglo-Saxons do, even if they are brunettes.

    Blacks and Indians basically HATE Northwestern Europeans. They are down with Eye-talians and Hispanics slightly more, even though these folks hate them more than WASPS do.

    • Barack Thatcher

      TRASH
      African-Americans, specifically, like Italians and think White Hispanics aren’t really White.
      Mestizos like Italians too, thinking they are “the new Italians” and whatnot.

      Some of the Blacks like Jews because Jews were victims of Germans (to them, evil racists), but others see Jews as the “YT establishment” and hate them more for it.

      Hispanics generally dislike Jews from a religious angle.

      A lot don’t even differentiate between varying types of YT….
      like Chinedu.

      • Some Mexicans and Hispanics claim descent from Spanish Jews. Especially in the Southwest U.S.

        Hispanics probably deem Jews and Asians to be more clever than Anglo people and therefore a greater threat in terms of overall influence.

        • Barack Thatcher

          TRASH
          Some tortilla cooking grandmother on the Aztec plains is unconcerned bout her Jewish ancestry.

          Despite the fact that she is an Indian, she is still a proud Catholic
          regardless of her former religious ancestry, whether that be Jewish or Aztec sun worshippers.

          Your stuff is great man you just turn a blind eye when it comes to your own people;
          Ashkenazis and Germans.

    • Sami

      “White Hispanics-Catalan people like Pitbull or Fidel Castro or Andy Garcia from the Northwest Spanish coast-seem great at creating shit-hole ghettos for blacks and Indians while they themselves live in a nice Hacienda.”

      Well, they sure paid the price for this attitude, didn’t they, from 1959 onward?

      • Sami

        “Somehow it is imprinted in the Caribbean black or Indian or Mestizo to respect their corrupt Mediterranean under-the-table oligarchy mentality and so Pitbull or Ricky Martin do get the ire Anglo-Saxons do, even if they are brunettes.

        Blacks and Indians basically HATE Northwestern Europeans. They are down with Eye-talians and Hispanics slightly more, even though these folks hate them more than WASPS do.”

        But, despite my previous post, this hypothesis is interesting.

    • brian

      You can dislike Fidel Castro, but you can’t say that he created ghettos. And I think that, in Cuba, everybody have the same social class, no matter if are white or blacks. Maybe people from countryside live a little worse, but I am not sure.

      • BRIAN Half the Spanish whites in Cuba left for Miami anyhow. Blacks came much, much later and were usually more often criminals than the whites in Miami (Though of course Pacino was an example of an exception).

        Black Cubans are no different than Jamaicans or Haitians.

        • brian

          I know some people that knew Cuba (and not only the touristic areas) and everybody said that is quiet as Hell. You can’t compare anybody there with people from Jamaica or Haiti. And practically there is no differences between blacks and whites.

          And is not the same thing Cubans in United States, that Cubans in Cuba.

  43. Gay State Girl

    Is Hacienda around?

    I miss the old bastard.

  44. GAY STATE GIRL The word is Spanish for Plantation and in the Latin social structure the Spanish lived in plantations while Indians and blacks worked in the fields.

    • Gay State Girl

      Hacienda was a Korean incel who used to comment here awhile back. Lindsay banned him but id love to hear his take on current affairs.

  45. GAY STATE GIRL Germany is a depressing place. I’ve been there to visit relatives a few times. Germany is Britain with more anal-retentiveness and less humor or charm. It is also expensive, cold, dreary.

    I would not say the job market is that great.

    Germany is not where you want to immigrate. Australia or New Zealand are better.

    • Australia is damn expensive. It’s great, if you’ve got a high wage. Otherwise, it’s dull and dreary. If you want to live anywhere civilised, you’re looking will over half a million for a modest home. There isn’t much to do except follow sports and you’re way away from everything, and everything is 10-20 years behind.

      I’d prefer Germany to be honest.

      • You wouldn’t prefer Germany now. Kurdish Turks have been ghettoizing the place for 50 years to be fair, but now its dangerous.

        Anglo-Saxon countries are always dull and dreary which is preferential to the “excitement” of being White in East Los Angeles where you can expect rape, robbery and even random murder as a distinct possibility in your life.

        Now I would not want to live on an aboriginal reservation in Alice Springs either and my understanding is that these folks are also violent.

        Rural white Americans are generally well-behaved self-harm types (addiction, suicide) but the problem is that their economy is far worse than Australia, New Zealand, Canada or other white former British colonies.

        • Perhaps you’re right. It’s been several years since I’ve been there. It was less enriched at the time.

          However, excitement doesn’t just come from being raped and murdered, it can also come from culture, architecture and dare I say it, diversity of culture. True diversity (ie, like the subcultural regions with Germany, not just different coloured peoples crammed together).

          A life where you just live in a suburb with other worker drones, where peoples view of life is nothing more than shuffling from their dormitory suburbs to work and back, watching Netflix and discussing the latest acquisition in consumer goods or investment property is pretty much death. There isn’t much else to do.

          Perhaps its just me.

          I just remember walking around cities which were still alive after dusk, the history, pedestrian and people friendly cities. I’ve met people who moved here who regretted it. They all say the same thing. It costs far, far more than they expected. Far more. It’s boring. There is not love of life. It’s too regulated.

          Australian suburbs where great when I was a kid. But those places are gone now. All gone.

  46. BARACK I have no idea what your nationality is either.

    I do not believe Jewish people are conspiratorially attempting to destroy Anglo-Saxon culture (British have had Jews for longer than the U.S. has and they are not complaining about it).

    Go to any courtroom. Majority of defendants will be black of course, with a variety of serious charges. Minority will be white: child molestation or stat rape, drunk driving with an ounce of meth discovered in the car, property theft related to meth addiction, half-ass burglary of a house (Jewish and Italian career criminals rarely get caught, though they exist).

    Rarely will you get an Asian or a Jew in court (Though in New York or LA there are enough that some will appear).

    Rural Anglo white populations are generally decaying for internal reasons:

    1…Getting a girl pregnant at 20 instead of attending college or even dropping out of high school.

    2…Getting hooked on meth at 15 and then waking up at 30 to start blaming Jews or Asians for everything.

    3…Going to jail for drunk driving with an ounce of meth in the glove compartment or other petty stupid criminal charges.

    4….Obsessing over games African-Americans play better.

    5….Never marrying the girl they do impregnate so that their kids have a lousy single-parent family with no father.

    6….Impregnating multiple girls of whom you cannot support so that your kids depend on a dwindling government assistance.

    7…Molesting children (How many Jews or East Asians are in a court for this).

    East Asians, Indians and Arabs are not complaining about Jews or blaming them for anything. The reason rural whites blame Jews is because Jews generally make better life decisions (Education, delayed marriage and reproduction, solid family structure, religion, tradition).

    Rural whites are often stupid. Let’s face it.

  47. Nonim

    Did you ever have your DNA tested?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s