US Foreign Policy Agenda, 1900-Present: Destroy “the Threat of a Good Example”

People talk about the power of a good example a lot. Noam Chomsky says that anywhere on Earth that the US sees a good example, they try to snuff it out due tot what he calls “the threat of a good example.” This has been our policy in much of the world since WW2, given a fake veneer of moral authority at best and even realpolitik necessity at worst. Before the Cold War, this was our policy mostly only in Latin America.

Except now that the Cold War is over, we are still doing the exact same thing that we did in the Cold War. The Cold War was a fake war and the USSR was a fake enemy. The real enemy is progressive politics, real democracy and forms of socialist (democratic by nature) economics. A mask called “Cold War” was put on this agenda from 1946-1991, but after then, the policy stayed the same even though the Cold War mask came off.

We didn’t do all of those horrible things “because we had to due to the Cold War,” the typical lousy liberal excuse (a favorite of my liberal Democrat father). We did all those horrible things because that’s what we do.

Now we are continuing to do all of the same horrible things that we did in the Cold War, except there is no Cold War so we can’t use that as a fake excuse anymore. So why are we doing these things now? We are doing those horrible things now because that is what we do.

And if we did all of those terrible things due to the Cold War, why were we doing them in Latin America for 45 years before the Cold War even started? We did all those things in our backyard in the first half of that blighted century because that’s what we do.

The success of the American model exemplifies what I call “the power of a bad example.”

3 Comments

Filed under Cold War, Economics, Geopolitics, Government, History, Latin America, Liberalism, Political Science, Regional, Socialism, USA, USSR

3 responses to “US Foreign Policy Agenda, 1900-Present: Destroy “the Threat of a Good Example”

  1. Pingback: Why the Republican Party Hates Democracy | Beyond Highbrow - Robert Lindsay

  2. Jason Y

    Again WNs, like ep-gah, would state people should stay in their place, and that their naughty behavior has fucked things up for the white man, all the while recognizing racism as truth, hypocritically being harsh on them for things they have no control over, at least according to race realist doctrines (as interpreted by WNs).

    • Jason Y

      Being a “good example” is basically NAMS getting out of their place which is where WNs want them (or dead, lol) And of course, NAMS would never think of being so uppity if it wern’t for devilish, scheming Jews who brainwash them :lol;

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s