“The Racism and Hypocrisy of Indians,” by Magneto

The Racism and Hypocrisy of Indians

by Magneto

Let’s address the second major problem that is facing India, and that is the problem of racism. Now, I am not naive. I know that some level of racism or race consciousness will always exist. But I am talking about a whole other level of racism, one that makes slavery in America look like child’s play.

When Africans were enslaved in America, it was done with the excuse that we need them to work on our lands and farm our crops. The caste system in India though is based on religious teachings. The caste system is rooted in the Bhagavad-Gita itself, which is basically the Bible of Hindus. In Chapter 4, Verse 13, Krishna (who Hindus consider the Supreme God) says, “The four categories of occupations were created by me according to people’s qualities and activities.”

So there you have it. How can you argue against a racist slavery system if God himself is promoting it? Because to argue against such a slavery system would automatically mean you are an “atheist,” and the Hindu fanatics will attack you for it. This goes completely against modern Western values such as “All men are created equal”.

Now let me give a few real life examples of this. People in India believe that white skin means that you have good character, and black skin means that you have bad character. And this is very apparent giving the following two examples.

I took a very educated Indian girl out to dinner once. She was working as a software tester or something, she spoke extremely good English without much of an Indian accent, and she was fascinated by western/American culture, telling me how much she likes the TV shows Desperate Housewives, Game of Thrones, etc. So during this dinner she was telling me how you need to be very careful because Africans are in the business of kidnapping your children and then selling them into child slavery in Africa.

She specifically mentioned the country Nigeria. So I mentioned, “Well, I know a few Nigerians, and they are all very nice people,” and she didn’t really know how to reply to that because such a statement basically completely shattered her worldview. I didn’t push it any further than that because I didn’t want to make her uncomfortable, but I myself was shocked that such an educated, intelligent person could harbor in such racist attitudes in the 21st century.

Another time, I met a highly educated lawyer for dinner. Somehow or another, the conversation got around to the topic of, “Do you like black women?” So I replied “Yes, I think they’re very beautiful and sexy.” She then went on to reply, “All the Africans living in India are engaged in the black market, drugs, prostitution or other illegal businesses”.

I then told her, “Well, I have a few African friends in India, and they are all very good people and are certainly not involved in anything illegal. One is a medical student; another is a computer networking system specialist,” and she had no reply to this. Yes, maybe some Africans are involved in criminal activity, but to say all of them are or rather that it is their nature (due to their skin color) to engage in criminal activities is highly racist and backwards.

Once again, I was absolutely shocked that such an educated person could have such backwards racist beliefs in the 21st century. These two girls I met for dinner were not illiterate idiots; they were both highly educated Indians who claimed to believe in modern Western values. Think about that for a minute. If even the highly educated Westernized Indians are so racist, then can you even imagine how racist the backwards uneducated village people must be?

A practical example now of Indian’s racism: a few months ago, there was an incident in the capital of India where an African student had been trying to get a taxi. Three Indian men came along, forced their way in front of him and demanded to take the taxi first. The African said, “I was here first. You guys need to wait in line,” and the three Indian men started attacking him. No other Indians came to help him during this attack. They just stood by and watched. Even the Indian police didn’t stop the attack.

So these three Indian men beat the African guy to near death, and the African guy died on his way to the hospital. This caused a massive protest in India among Africans. A couple of days later, a group of four African men and two African women were attacked by a group of Indians and beaten up but not so badly this time. That is how Indians reacted to their protests. Rather than admit that yes, Indians are a very racist group of people, and they need to change, they simply attacked and beat up the people who were protesting.

This second attack incident against Africans caused such a huge swelling of protest that the Africans in India decided to stage a very large protest in the capital city to protest India’s racism against them. This protest was going to attract at least 3,000 or so Africans, so it would have been a massive protest. Guess what? Two days before the protest, the Indian police decided to deny them permission to protest and said that if any protesters showed up they would be arrested. So in India, if an Indian commits a racist crime against you, you are not allowed to even verbally protest against the racism and criminal behavior of Indians. The hypocrisy of Indians is absolutely sickening.

Another example is in the job market. If two people show up to a job interview and one of them has lighter skin and the other has darker skin, it is almost a guarantee that the lighter-skinned Indian will get hired for the job, never mind that the darker skinned Indian might be more qualified for the job. Darker-skinned Indians literally have no way to economically improve themselves due to the racist caste system that is still being practiced unofficially even in the 21st century!

If any of you has ever spent any time around Indians, you will no doubt have heard them talking about how, “We were oppressed by the British, by White people, and that is the reason India is so backwards today.” No, the reason India is so backwards today and back then too is because Indians refuse to stop following their racist culture and religion, and the caste system is very much part of both of those.

Sometimes you will also hear Indians who live in America, the UK or Australia talk about how White people are so racist towards them.  First, that is 100% untrue. Every White person I ever knew believed in equality and was against racism. Second, are these Indians so stupid that they don’t realize what a hypocritical statement that is? They falsely accuse White people of being racist towards them and then turn around and promote real racism against Africans,  Asians, and the darker-skinned members of their own race. How can Indians be so blatantly hypocritical? Are they really this blind? Are Indians this ignorant that they accuse everyone else of racism, while they themselves are the most racist people on Earth?

There were a couple of surveys done recently asking people what the most racist country on Earth was, and India was the number one racist country on both of those surveys. India is literally the most racist country on Earth by a long shot, so they have no right to accuse anyone else of racism. Indians need to look in the mirror first. Unfortunately, this will never happen because 99% of Indians are not capable of introspection.

I think it’s time that Western countries acknowledge the fact that most Indians are not compatible with Western culture, and thus immigration to Western countries from India needs to be severely restricted.

91 Comments

Filed under Asia, Blacks, Culture, East Indians, Hinduism, Immigration, India, Race/Ethnicity, Racism, Regional, Religion, South Asia, South Asians, Whites

91 responses to ““The Racism and Hypocrisy of Indians,” by Magneto

  1. Jason Y

    I encountered dumb remarks like that in South Korea. Once a Korean woman remarked about how shocked she was to see “so many” black people in NYC. She said something like, “Well I know there were some, but they seem to be everywhere.” 😆 Also, being black in Northeast Asia limits ESL teaching opportunities. One look at the photo and on to another candidate.

    Ironic, these Northeast Asians head to the black areas of LA and NY to set up shop, mainly cause all the good spots are taken up, selling to people they basically hate.

    Pretty blatant racism, but I’m sure Phil or Ep-gah will find some excuse for this attitude.

    • It is hard to run a store in the ghetto if crackheads begin impregnating you at the age of 15 years old and you continue to have 5-6 kids.

      You’ll never have any capitol.

      • Jason Y

        Looking at Detroit, I’d say the capital needed in a black ghetto isn’t much.

        • JASON Y

          Originally it was Jews that owned these stores. Then it was Arabs. Now they are in fact, black-owned.

          MENACE II SOCIETY – era Korean domination of the very meager business market in the ghetto has sort of passed because the Korean children have become dentists or doctors like the children of the Jews in Detroit. So they are gone.

          By and large the Koreans are absent from the ghetto. Gone into the middle-class with Jews, Poles, Germans and Irish before them.

    • “Ironic, these Northeast Asians head to the black areas of LA and NY to set up shop, mainly cause all the good spots are taken up, selling to people they basically hate.

      Pretty blatant racism, but I’m sure Phil or Ep-gah will find some excuse for this attitude.”

      Exactly what attitude in particular? What they think about blacks or that they sell to blacks despite their views of them?

      If the latter then that’s actually integrity to put perception aside and sell. But if you mean they are still racist in selling things to blacks, then you would actually have to give a specific example like kicking them out the moment they see them.

      If the former, well, that’s simply how non-western people think via perception. Hell, even with restrictions western people still have perceptions when you compare perceptions of “Black names” and “white names”.

      And if you here about the shit that happens in Guangzhou, A.K.A “Brown city”, then it’s for a good reason why they have such perceptions.

    • Brian Damage

      “Ironic, these Northeast Asians head to the black areas of LA and NY to set up shop, mainly cause all the good spots are taken up, selling to people they basically hate.”

      Nothing wrong with that. New immigrants with little start up capital usually will go to high risk areas to start businesses. I call that smart. High risk means high reward. Many after that will save up enough capital to start or expand to more mainstream areas, While their kids studied hard and became productive highly skilled citizens that the US needs.

      So what’s wrong with that? Or should they whine like those WNs and complain about jobs taken by non-whites?

    • Pretty blatant racism, but I’m sure Phil or Ep-gah will find some excuse for this attitude.

      How’s Genetic Similarity Theory (GST)? People want to be around others who look like themselves.

      https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/05/16/ethnic-genetic-interests-and-group-selection-does-exist-a-reply-to-jayman-2/

      Outgroup derogation is common due to being genetically dissimilar.

      • Jason Y

        Oh yeah? But whites don’t look like them, no more than blacks do, yet they kiss the ass of whites.

        • Technically asians are closer related to whites than Blacks by being OOA populations.
          Ass kissing =/= people who you prefer to be around. This is merely the case of relations for resources.

  2. Jason Y

    If any of you has ever spent any time around Indians, you will no doubt have heard them talking about how, “We were oppressed by the British, by White people, and that is the reason India is so backwards today.” No, the reason India is so backwards today and back then too is because Indians refuse to stop following their racist culture and religion, and the caste system is very much part of both of those.

    Sometimes you will also hear Indians who live in America, the UK or Australia talk about how White people are so racist towards them. First, that is 100% untrue. Every White person I ever knew believed in equality and was against racism. Second, are these Indians so stupid that they don’t realize what a hypocritical statement that is? They falsely accuse White people of being racist towards them and then turn around and promote real racism against Africans, Asians, and the darker-skinned members of their own race. How can Indians be so blatantly hypocritical? Are they really this blind? Are Indians this ignorant that they accuse everyone else of racism, while they themselves are the most racist people on Earth?

    And the Korean complain about Japanese and Yankee imperalism 24/7, but turn right around and display constant racism towards blacks, denying them jobs, and in when in the US, practicing hypocritical imperalism against them, owning shops taking money from a people they have zero respect for.

    Of course, other Northeast Asians do quite the same, also southeast Asians show childish racism against blacks.

    Blacks, themselves though, show childish, idiotic racism against Mexicans and Asians, but those groups have probably had it coming.

    • Low-caste for the most part. Baniyas do well enough in the West or in Mumbai to give no more thought to a white than you would to a cat.

    • “And the Korean complain about Japanese and Yankee imperalism 24/7, but turn right around and display constant racism towards blacks, denying them jobs, and in when in the US, practicing hypocritical imperalism against them, owning shops taking money from a people they have zero respect for.”

      Perceptions based on actual trends with people.
      How is it racism if they are SELLING to people they hate? If they are not scamming them, no wrong is done.

      “Of course, other Northeast Asians do quite the same, also southeast Asians show childish racism against blacks.

      Blacks, themselves though, show childish, idiotic racism against Mexicans and Asians, but those groups have probably had it coming.”

      You fucking idiot. Yeah, lets ignore how black racism towards other groups often involve VIOLENCE more than other groups towards them and just label it “idiotic”.

      Also, how did the others “had it coming”? Again double standards.

      • PHIL Italians and Jews in New York and Arabs in Detroit have sometimes inflicted random violence on African-Americans without provocation and/or robbed them. As have Korean drug addicts in LA Korea town when they outnumber a lone black males.

        Southerners do not have the scruffy white ethnic or Asian population centers of the North.

        • “PHIL Italians and Jews in New York and Arabs in Detroit have sometimes inflicted random violence on African-Americans without provocation and/or robbed them. As have Korean drug addicts in LA Korea town when they outnumber a lone black males.

          Southerners do not have the scruffy white ethnic or Asian population centers of the North.”

          You can state anecdotes but if you look at my sentence, I said that blacks use violence against other MORE than others do to blacks. I don;t deny the reverse trend exists.

  3. KsytriaKhalsa

    What does modern mean?

    1000 years ago Iron swords were modern.

    Are you perhaps trying to hide Protestant notions of equality under the guise of being Hindu?

    https://mobile.twitter.com/bhimakarma/status/782298770679721984

    So just another Protestant snake trying to destroy India the same way the west has been destroying itself.

    Hope your identity is unmasked & you’re hung from a pole.🙂

    • SARDAJI Protestants don’t give two shits about Indians or whether they take it up their hairy brown butts EXCEPT when poor low-IQ Sikhs accumulate in Canadian neighborhoods to sell and use drugs, pimp their women, form street gangs and generally turn a nice “Protestant neighborhood into a toilet”.

      U.S. thankfully has such a high-bar to Indians seeking entrance that only high IQ Brahmins, South Asian IT dorks and some Gujarati/Bengali fraudsters scamming their own people can enter.

      • KsytriaKhalsa

        Why is racism bad? You can’t come up with a coherent answer except muh equality.. A core western value. No material benefit.

        Why is racism bad on a spiritual (moral) level? No answer except muh equality.. A core christian value. No spiritual benefit.

        ਜੈਸ਼ਿ੍ਰੀਰਾਮ।।

        • A South Indian Tamil would probably tell you to go back to Afghanistan or Greece or wherever Punjabi people actually trace their roots.

        • Well the good news is that the Punjabi race is slowly dying out. More Sikh girls than ever are marrying outside of their race, specifically to white men. So it looks like you Punjabi bastards’ population will continue to shrink as more and more of your slutty women become cock hungry for white men. Literally, every fucking Punjabi girl I ever met told me she wants to marry a white man.

        • Jason Y

          That would be seen as moving up and also out of poverty.

  4. No Protestant or Jew wants to “take over” India. It’s worthless and overpopulated. Polluted, too.

    Trust me, whites will not be wasting money or time trying to invade India.

  5. Lon Spector

    The Orthodox Hindus worship cows don’t they? They touch their cigarettes in cow dung before they light them. Also the drink beverages made from cow dung and urine.

  6. GerryO

    I will assume both you and Mr. Lindsay have read Kipling. Your thoughts on ‘Kim’ would be appreciated.

    Best regards Gerry O.

  7. Lin

    Racism happens. The main difference with Bharat is the extent of denial and insecurity. As a long time observer of Bharat, here’re some examples:

    1)”Caste system is the spiritual class system”

    http://www.forumforhinduawakening.org/awakening/castsystem-classsystem

    2) Hindutwadis often lambaste Islamic polygamy, but when it comes to the 16,000 wives of Krishna, one of their major gods, again it is called an exercise in ‘spirituality’.

    http://aumamen.com/topic/16000-wives-of-krishna-spiritual-significance

    3) The fastest supercomputer in 2016 is rated at about 0.1 exaflop (One exaflop =10 to the power 18 calculation/sec) or about 100 pentaflops, but Hindu scientists of some seemingly serious establishment claimed Bharat will have the fastest supercomputer at 133 exaflops, ie more than 1,000 times faster than the present champion(an American or Chinese machine). I can understand Hindu insecurity, but bragging in such a manner (just 3 years ago) by senior scientists is simply mind-boggling.

    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/nagpur/India-will-have-super-supercomputer-by-2017/articleshow/19450713.cms?from=mdr

    http://www.deccanherald.com/content/441216/india-working-building-fastest-supercomputer.html

    • Jack

      Bragging seems to be a trait shared by most Indians. Here is an educated Indian woman bragging about India to be a science superpower six years ago.

      • JACK It could be, but that will not lift the standard of living upwards for the average Indian person any more than Neil Armstrong elevated the living standards of a New York shabby Italian neighborhood.

      • In 2007 when the SHITHOLE SHITndian economy was growing at a “mighty” 7%, the swinging-from-the-trees subhuman curry monkey chimps were (TYPICALLY) bragging and boasting and overall shit talking that “india will surpass China in 2012 and then will surpass the United States in 2015 jai hind!”

        In 2007 the economy of China was 3 times that of SHITHOLE SHITndia. Today in 2016 the economy of China is 6 times that of the subhuman curry monkey chimp land of SHITHOLE SHITndia.

        Meanwhile the economy of the United States is over 8 times the size of 650 MILLION SHITndians SHITTING-IN-THE-STREETS SHITHOLE SHITndia.

        The PER CAPITA GDP of SHITHOLE SHITndia is a “mighty” $1,600. That is on par with Subsaharan African nations. In comparison the PER CAPITA GDP of Nigeria is $2,800 and that of Republic of Congo is $2,100.

        The SHITndian provinces of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar are the heart of “hindustan” on the Gangetic plain. The combined population of the two provinces is around 375 million and the combined PER CAPITA GDP of the two is around $700. That means that hundreds of millions of “mighty” SHITndians have incomes that are equivalent to nations like Rwanda and Uganda and Ethiopia and Sierra Leone and Senegal and Guinea

        “india will surpass the United States as THE greatest superpower to EVER exist in 2015 jai hind!”

        • Hmmmm currymonkeys. Is that really the correct word to use for Indians? I always thought that the proper way to refer to them as curryniggers. Just checking to make sure here.

        • Exactly right, my man. Indians think they are going to be a super power, and yet 50 percent of them still don’t have indoor plumbing.

          India is literally 1000 years behind the West. Africa is only like 200 years behind the West.

          Even Africa is not as big of a shithole as India is. Africans are far nicer people than Indians.

        • That’s all the swinging-from-the-trees subhuman curry monkey chimp SHITndians have is their big shit talking cause they don’t actually back up ALL of their fucking bragging and fucking boasting.

          The South Koreans and Taiwanese and now the Chinese KEPT THEIR MOUTHS SHUT and quietly went about working hard to build up South Korea and Taiwan and China into modern wealthy prosperous countries; meanwhile the fucking big shit-talking SHITHOLE SHITndian monkeys just ape words and fucking brag and fucking boast but the fucking curry monkey apes DON’T ACTUALLY DO ANYTHING THAT ACTUALLY CONTRIBUTES TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF SHITHOLE SHITndia LAND OF 650 MILLION SHITndians SHITTING-IN-THE-STREETS.

          For the SWINGING-FROM-THE-TREES subhuman curry monkey chimps it WAS “india superpower by 2012! jai hind!:”

          THEN it became “india superpower by 2020! jai hind!”

          THEN it became “india superpower by 2030! jai hind!”

          Sometime around 2024 it will become “india superpower by 2040! jai hind!” GUARANTEED.

          Fucking worthless fucking shit talking curry monkey chimps.

    • Pranav

      Hahaha Lin you are really good. That last link is extremely funny. Its an ample proof of hindu delusion at its finest. TOI is one big ultra nationalistic mess.

    • Brian Damage

      We have heard about those bragging for the last 2 decades. Every few years they will revise their bragging because they didn’t come true. I wonder how long before India’s marvelous “demographic dividend” starts to pay off? It seems like a generation of those “demographic shares” have come and gone and where are the dividends? How long must the turtle crawl before it takes over the hare?

      I was LMAOL when I read about India calling for boycotting Chinese products. It will not put a dent on the Chinese economy but rather India’s.
      http://www.indiaspend.com/cover-story/why-boycott-calls-against-china-indias-largest-trade-partner-will-fail-49383

      Jai Hind!

      • Yep, I saw so many posts by indians about how they will boycott Chinese goods. China doesn’t give a fuck. China hates India and rightfully so. My next article will be about China’s plan to break up India into 30 mini-country states.

  8. Tashi

    Another hypocrisy of the Indians is that they are never tired of reminding the Westerners, in particular the Brits of its history of colonialization on the subcontinent. Yet once the Indians became their own master they immediately do what their former colonial master have been doing. To the Indians colonialism is bad only if they are at the receiving end of it. If they can they will never hesitate to bully its neighbors. Here is a partial list of India land grabbing once the Brits left the subcontinent.

    1947 Annexation of Kashmir
    http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/02/06/indias-shame/
    http://thediplomat.com/2015/08/kashmirs-young-rebels/

    1949 Annexation of Manipur
    http://www.tehelka.com/manipurs-merger-with-india-was-a-forced-annexation/

    1949 Annexation of Tripura
    http://www.crescent-online.net/2009/09/the-myths-of-one-nation-and-one-hinduism-in-india-zawahir-siddique-2316-articles.html

    1951 Annexation of South Tibet:
    http://kanglaonline.com/2011/06/khathing-the-taking-of-tawang/
    http://www.mainstreamweekly.net/article2582.html
    http://chasfreeman.net/india-pakistan-and-china/

    1954 Annexation of Nagaland
    http://morungexpress.com/desire-nagas-live-separate-nation-deserved/
    http://nagalandmusings.blogspot.com/2013/01/indias-untold-genocide-of-nagas.html

    1961 Annexation of Goa:
    http://goa-invasion-1961.blogspot.in/2013/09/india-pirated-goa-china-is-regaining_16.html

    1962 Annexation of Kalapani, Nepal:
    http://www.eurasiareview.com/07032012-indian-hegemony-in-nepal-oped/
    http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1239348
    http://www.sharnoffsglobalviews.com/land-disputes-116/

    1962 Aggression against China:
    http://gregoryclark.net/redif.html
    http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/news-events/podcasts/renewed-tension-indiachina-border-whos-blame

    1971 Annexation of Turtuk, Pakistan:
    http://www.openthemagazine.com/article/nation/suddenly-indian

    1972 Annexation of Tin Bigha, Bangladesh
    http://www.dhakatribune.com/op-ed/2014/feb/20/killing-fields

    1975 Annexation of Sikkim (the whole country):
    http://nepalitimes.com/issue/35/Nation/9621#.UohjPHQo6LA
    http://www.amazon.com/Smash-Grab-Annexation-Sunanda-Datta-Ray/dp/9383260386
    http://asiahouse.org/sikkim-tale-love-intrigue-cold-war-asia/
    http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/annexation-of-sikkim-by-india-was-not-legal-wangchuk-namgyal/1/391498.html

    1983 (Aborted) Attempted invasion of Mauritius
    http://thediplomat.com/2013/03/when-india-almost-invaded-mauritius/

    1990 (Failed) Attempted annexation of Bhutan:
    http://www.nytimes.com/1990/10/07/world/india-based-groups-seek-to-disrupt-bhutan.html

    2006 Annexation of Duars, Bhutan:
    http://wangchasangey.blogspot.in/2015/11/different-kind-of-anxieties-on.html#comment-form

    2013 Annexation of Moreh, Myanmar
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nehginpao-kipgen/easing-indiamyanmar-borde_b_4633040.html

    • Ancient Tamils apparently inhabited Sri Lanka and the Sinhalese from Bengal invaded (Though we think of them as natives these days).

      Indians invaded the Maldives.

      Indians tried to invade Bangladesh.

      And so on.

  9. Here’s Jason’s argument, dealing with the topic of hypocrisy and racism.

    “Other people are just being nasty snobs towards blacks for the sake of it, but if blacks treats others badly they deserve it. If blacks can’t elevate due to discrimination, they are victims. If Whites can’t elevate due to limitations, they are lazy and don’t study enough.”

    A position that he defends with little statistical evidence or reasoning, relying heavily upon his own anecdote.

    If I were to him the inevitable consequences of IQ he would poorly and impulsively try (and fail) to circumvent it by using his own poorly constructed ideas and repeat them no matter how many times I take them down, indicating his only motive is to preserve his status quo thoughts rather than actually engage in the topic.

    If he had any real principle based on insight he wouldn’t justify the discrimination of Boers in South Africa.

    When you get down to it he always maintains that blacks were “put” somewhere by others, but actual evidence suggest the opposite. But when whites are a comparable predicament, he openly admits to their own aptitude being the cause but of course not going into genetic reasons so he could maintain some sort of consistency.

    I could understand arguments about how it could affect the individual, or being against specific extremes done to handle the issues, or the specific nature of the racism, yet with Jason it is of too one sided which I owe to being illiterate to data and lack of experience.

    • Jason Y

      If he had any real principle based on insight he wouldn’t justify the discrimination of Boers in South Africa.

      I never said such anti-white discrimination was justified, though historical events say the whites had it coming.

      I mean, punishing people for the fuck-ups of the past isn’t a kind way to deal with people, and often it isn’t constructive, not leading to a better situation.

      When you get down to it he always maintains that blacks were “put” somewhere by others, but actual evidence suggest the opposite.

      Evidence depends on the speaker, whether he’s a cultural Marxist (which isn’t always a bad thing) or if he is alt-right, right wing (Fox News Crowd), alt-left, mildly liberal, or neutral.

      That’s something our Physics professor brought up. He was saying college courses have no real answers cause they’re so relativistic and biased. Therefore, a liberal professor might give an A to a liberal, but a B to someone else.

    • Jason Y

      Note me or Phil might bring up some opinions with a strong backing in sources, but even those attempts at proving the truth are up to strong debate. Go to any college history, sociology, psychology etc.. department and students are writing papers backing various “opinions” and often many of them have strong backing. So which opinion is right?

      I mean, for instance, it’s standard thinking on college campuses that blacks are oppressed, or is it ??? Depends on the professor.

    • Jason Y

      Perhaps saying South Africans had it coming, doesn’t mean the same thing as anti-Boer discrimination is justified. Yeah, the constant actions viewed as opporession by the blacks lead to a giant snowball which eventually crashed on the whites. That’s a fact. However, whether or not seeing whites suffer as revenge is fun is an opinion.

    • “I never said such anti-white discrimination was justified, though historical events say the whites had it coming.

      I mean, punishing people for the fuck-ups of the past isn’t a kind way to deal with people, and often it isn’t constructive, not leading to a better situation.”

      The point is you didn’t treat the discrimination of Boers in the same light as blacks, when realistically it’s worst, thus indicating a double standard.

      “Evidence depends on the speaker, whether he’s a cultural Marxist (which isn’t always a bad thing) or if he is alt-right, right wing (Fox News Crowd), alt-left, mildly liberal, or neutral.

      That’s something our Physics professor brought up. He was saying college courses have no real answers cause they’re so relativistic and biased. Therefore, a liberal professor might give an A to a liberal, but a B to someone else.”

      That’s totally irrelevant to my point. If a point is to be made, no ifs or buts, evidence is needed by form of a study or reason, you lacked both.

      What a person’s politics proves is what KIND of evidence he gives, not the actual validity of it. What makes evidence valid is the testing of the two positions under experimentation and/or analysis and seeing which gets more replications, my position doing it more of so than yours.

      “Note me or Phil might bring up some opinions with a strong backing in sources, but even those attempts at proving the truth are up to strong debate. Go to any college history, sociology, psychology etc.. department and students are writing papers backing various “opinions” and often many of them have strong backing. So which opinion is right?”

      “Strong debate”, more like I constantly making the stronger case with my logic and you just being persistently against it.

      An opinion can be verified by the data that supports it or the theoretical logic behind each in application. Me again succeeding in those areas.

      “I mean, for instance, it’s standard thinking on college campuses that blacks are oppressed, or is it ??? Depends on the professor.”

      Actually it depends on what the actual records reflect of reality in terms of objectivity, you are rambling on about perception amongst that masses which isn’t the same thing.

      “Perhaps saying South Africans had it coming, doesn’t mean the same thing as anti-Boer discrimination is justified. Yeah, the constant actions viewed as opporession by the blacks lead to a giant snowball which eventually crashed on the whites. That’s a fact. However, whether or not seeing whites suffer as revenge is fun is an opinion.”

      First of all that’s not how the idiom is used.

      http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/92617/i-had-it-coming

      Fact- When blacks gain power their idiotic rule limited mobility for boers and responded poorly to violence towards them by others. Causing them Boers to emigrate, they eventually realized that they needed them back and started begging.

      http://whitegenocideproject.com/black-politician-calls-for-whites-to-come-back-to-south-africa/

      http://qz.com/458137/mugabe-is-asking-back-the-white-farmers-he-chased-away/

      Fact- It’s simply not just about oppression. Yes, Boers did establish the apartheid but it didn’t result in race relations into barbarity and lack of efficnecy such as this despite the the limitation it set up for nonwhites.

      This was witnessed in the American South when new opportunities for Blacks opened for them.

      https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2010/06/10/negros-in-negroland-a-fascinating-book/

      This is a reflection of incompetence.

      • Jason Y

        Fact- When blacks gain power their idiotic rule limited mobility for boers and responded poorly to violence towards them by others. Causing them Boers to emigrate, they eventually realized that they needed them back and started begging.

        Possibly the black government wants to fight crime against whites, but cannot cause it’s weak. Also, since they’re somewhat biased in favor of helping blacks, they would be slow to move to action.

        • Barack Thatcher

          That’s part of it, but obviously it’s a bias against the Whites, too.
          Ask GSG, she has family there.

          Anyhow, it does bring up the point that when a group with a strong majority starts ‘flexing it’s muscle’ so to speak, with powerless minority groups, shit hits the fan. This is perhaps part of why there is a ‘double standard’ with Whites and non-Whites in the U.S.

        • Jason Y

          It goes both ways. When whites ran South Africa, as also when the ran the South USA. they act like assholes somewhat. However, the situation in South Africa and in the South USA was mostly motivated by fear of an expanding population which was a crime threat, economic threat, and political threat.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Africa_under_apartheid

          in racial terms, of access to economic, social, and political status.[25] Most white South Africans, regardless of their own differences, accepted the prevailing pattern. Nevertheless, by 1948 it remained apparent that there were occasional gaps in the social structure, whether legislated or otherwise, concerning the rights and opportunities of nonwhites. The rapid economic development of World War II attracted black migrant workers in large numbers to chief industrial centres, where they compensated for the wartime shortage of white labour. However, this escalated rate of black urbanisation went unrecognised by the South African government, which failed to accommodate the influx with parallel expansion in housing or social services.[25] Overcrowding, spiking crime rates, and disillusionment resulted; urban blacks came to support a new generation of leaders influenced by the principles of self-determination and popular freedoms enshrined in such statements as the Atlantic Charter. Whites reacted negatively to the changes, allowing the Herenigde Nasionale Party (or simply National Party) to convince a large segment of the voting bloc that the impotence of the United Party in curtailing the evolving position of nonwhites indicated that the organisation had fallen under the influence of Western liberals.[25]

          Note, in areas like Southern Appalachia where there aren’t a lot of blacks, but some, the fear and hate are far less.

        • Jason Y

          Now the whole idea is a joke, but in the days of Jim Crow, the blacks were like the Mexicans and seen as “breeding like rabbits” So the KKK and all that, like with the SA aparthied movement, was just a move to protect against what was seen as a threat on all fronts.

        • “Now the whole idea is a joke, but in the days of Jim Crow, the blacks were like the Mexicans and seen as “breeding like rabbits” So the KKK and all that, like with the SA aparthied movement, was just a move to protect against what was seen as a threat on all fronts.”

          ….how could you say it’s a joke when you observe what’s actually happening now?

          “It goes both ways. When whites ran South Africa, as also when the ran the South USA. they act like assholes somewhat. However, the situation in South Africa and in the South USA was mostly motivated by fear of an expanding population which was a crime threat, economic threat, and political threat.”

          Assholes with something to fear. See South Africa todat and my reference to the South that Robert actually noted on during “Radical Reconstruction”.

      • “Now the whole idea is a joke, but in the days of Jim Crow, the blacks were like the Mexicans and seen as “breeding like rabbits” So the KKK and all that, like with the SA aparthied movement, was just a move to protect against what was seen as a threat on all fronts.”

        …..Blacks do breed at a higher rate than whites.

        “Possibly the black government wants to fight crime against whites, but cannot cause it’s weak. Also, since they’re somewhat biased in favor of helping blacks, they would be slow to move to action.”

        “Weak”, “Somewhat”? Nice sugar-coating. Let me tell you Jason, No interest what so ever for whites as it barely knows what to do for Blacks.

        They are incompetent, nothing to ponder or investigate.

  10. Tulio

    I think I have to see India once before I die. I know it’s one giant heap of steaming garbage, but I think it’s the closest I’ll get to visiting an extraterrestrial world. I’ve heard India is a complete mindfuck that will leave you disoriented. I’m curious to see what it’s like first hand. As a germophobe, going to India would probably be the hardest thing I ever do.

    • Jason Y

      Japan is pretty extraterrestrial, though rich.

    • Pranav

      It will be a mind fucking experience, tulio. If you visit the north, you will be in for a cultural shock by the apathy and callous regard for human life. South is not that bad. Dravidian South has a great culture and people here are very hospitable.

      • Jason Y

        Yeah, but the North has more people. Isn’t it always the case urban areas are less human?

      • PRANAV Cochin is doing well and Banglalore. I’m not sure Chennai is such a great place, however.

      • PRANAV Nair people kicked out Brahmin, to begin with. Their semi-socialist government sort of works because so many people from Kerala send money back from the Arab Gulf.

        Tamil Nadu and its offshore war in Ceylon is a different matter.

        Bangalore is nice because foreign IT built it up.

        Goa of course is a mixed-race Latin place.

        • Pranav

          Trash, as far as Chennai is concerned, it depends on the tourists’ perception. Chennai is a very conservative city. Foreign tourists aren’t raped, groped nor even pestered like what they experience in the northern part. People in Chennai are friendly and hospitable for the most part. If you’re a Brit, you’ll be surprised how much love Chennai has for you. Many streets, monuments, memorials, parks built by the British has retained their original names and people in Tamil Nadu don’t have that visceral hatred for the foreigners like other Indians do.
          But the unrelenting heat in Chennai might be too hard for a westerner to take unless he comes from a similar tropical region. Language is another important issue. Most of them aren’t good even with basic English. That’s probably one of the main reason tourists don’t want to revisit Chennai. You’re correct about Kerala and Bangalore. Both the cities have an edge over Chennai in these departments. The South, in general is safe and clean for the most part. They have I am not sure whether foreigners visit Andhra as much as they visit the other states in the south.

      • I would say that South Indians as a rule are less violent and more intellectual than say, Punjab.

        A Gora in Punjab can get thrashed by Sikhs simply because they feel mean.

        You are safer in South India from physical attacks because Dravidian people are smaller, more mild-mannered, less aggressive.

        I attribute this to the fact that North Indians are not Asian but a composite of Aryan, Arab, Greek, Afghani, Mongol and so on.

    • Brian Damage

      You know you will most likely will get dysentery. You know they wipe their asses with their bare hands and wash with water. Use those hands to prep food.

      • Tulio

        I’d probably survive off potato chips, bread and bottled water.

        • Brian Damage

          Just watch out for those brown bits in your bread.

        • In India I tried that. If you do not eat some sort of fresh veggies or chicken you will become malnourished after a week.

        • Barack Thatcher

          Oh yeah, India is supposed to be hot as hell.
          You would probably get dehydrated, weak, etc.
          Without proper nutrition the consequences could be very, very bad.

          I’m not sure which is better….that or dysentery🙂

      • BRAIN DAMAGE I contracted dysentery from eating infected pork in the Philippines.

        Fecal matter in food will usually lead to Ecoli.

        • India isn’t that backwards. At least if you stay in decent areas and avoid the shithole areas. Unfortuantely most western tourists are hippies without very high standards. Either way it’s not hard to eat healthy. Breads are not pure at all here, it’s all processed poison. Buy a rice cooker for 1500rs and a steamer machine for 2500rs. Then buy rice and vegetables, cook the rice and steam the vegetables in the machine, add salt and pepper or whatever spice and you’ve got a decent meal. You can also steam fish, and chicken I believe. You can also buy ground mutton meat or ground chicken meat and fry burger patties.

          I’m eating a lot better and more healthy here than I ever ate in the West, for sure. Although as for GMOs or chemicals in the vegetables, well that I am not sure of, but there are organic shops too.

        • Brian Damage

          Yup. The Phillipines is just as fucked up as India. Similar inferiority complex and ultra sensitivity to the slightest criticism but without the delusional bragging on non existent achivements.

    • “I’ve heard India is a complete mindfuck that will leave you disoriented.”

      Indeed it is. It takes at least 6 months to one year to fully adjust to this country. Whereas with Thailand or some other Asian country, you can adjust within one month or so.

      • MAGNETO Depends where you live and what you do. If you are simply working in Andheri or Cochin then you won’t be quite as “mindfucked”.

        If you get drunk/stoned in Goa all day for six months or backpack around sleeping in cheap huts then indeed you will get a little out of it.

  11. Tulio

    Scenes like this make me ponder if would be better if humans simply didn’t exist:

    • Brian Damage

      Tulio, How do you embed pictures in the post?

    • Certain races of humans would be better off not existing.

      Strange how you don’t see huge piles of shit in white countries? The white race and the East Asian race are the only two truly civilized races on this planet. And both are being attacked and depopulated at an alarming rate.

      • Northeast Asia has the advantage of being so far-flung that anybody who wanted to be there would have to be able to pay for a plane ticket with a return as well as purchase a passport.

        That sort of rules out refugees.

      • Jason Y

        What? Trashy white people don’t exist ? I know for a fact that’s not true.

        • Few trashy whites could make a go of it in Seoul or Tokyo. Occasionally some ex-GI with a local wife gets busted for selling dope to college kids and gets deported.

          Mostly its American high-class hookers who work in Geisha bars and hook up with some low-level Yakuza.

          But even they eventually get used up and end up back in the U.S. or Canada.

          But they’d have to show up with 10 Grand to rent, meet people and find some sort of living in legal or illegal in Japan or Korea.

  12. Jason Y

    I don’t think the opinions of extremists reflect the population anywhere, usually. Something to take into mind if Hindu extremists are saying things on here.

  13. Jason Y

    Sure the racism in India is more extreme than in the west, but the west still has a lot of racism. That’s why people can point thier finger at racism against other non-whites that is coming from non-whites, only so much.

    So a Northeast Asian or East Indian look down on a black person, but only 50 years ago such an attitude was common in the United States, or at least a viscous racist attitude was common..

    • Racism exists everywhere but no where else can even compare to the extreme level of racism that exists in India. That is the whole point of my article. And India will never change or evolve because Indians are mostly a bunch of backwards, illiterate, braindead race of people who see modern western civilized culture as an “attack” against them, due to them having been brainwashed by the indian educational system from day 1 that “white people are the enemy”.

      Even schools in Muslim countries that teach “Jews are the enemy” are not this bad.

      • MAGNETO Again, Parsi and Brahmin did fine during the British Raj so most of them care nothing for “Goras” or English people.

        Gujarati people will trade with blacks, whites, Chinese or anyone who will make them money.

        Low-caste to lower-middle get obsessed with whites.

        Sikhs generally get into one-to-one machismo conflicts but are too dense to really know or care much about history. They live in a perpetual present.

        If they DO business in Europe or live there for two years they leave and return to India.

      • Jason Y

        White people are the enemy, yet they kiss the ass of a typical white person and demonize the black.

      • Indians live on top of one another whereas a Redneck who despises JOOOS is not going to have the money (or the balls) to drive up to Coney Island on a busy Sabbath and start mouthing off to 8,000 street rough people.

        Likewise Hyman might have opinions about Arabs but will not enter the Syrian quarter of NY and say anything with thousands of them around.

        U.S. has too much distance between people who cannot stand one another.

        • Jason Y

          I think it’s good that sometimes people are directly exposed to other cultures. That way they can get a taste of reality they’re not going to see simply viewing other cultures and groups via television or printed media.

          For instance, where I live if you want to see another culture, one hostile to redneck views, then you can just travel to Atlanta or Charleston SC. It’s only a 4 to 6 hour drive to each place.

    • JASON Y Two reasons.

      U.S. is large so groups that despise one another are too distant to conflict. One group would have travel hundred or thousands of miles in an organized campaign with arms, food and transportation supply lines.

      Let’s see “Sam J” or any other rural white stomp into a crowded Coney Island slum neighborhood and call somebody a “k*ke” with 8000 large, lower-class, street-rough Russian Jews around.

      Or an Indian who hates Columbus say something in New Jersey about Italians.

      Likewise an NY Jew show up in East Detroit’s Arab quarter where the mayor, cops, thugs, shops, schools are all Middle Eastern and say something they do not like.

      • Jason Y

        Note these racists, and the same would go with their NAM or liberal counterparts, will only bully “the enemy” in their own neighborhood where these pussies have more self-confidence.

  14. matt

    Imagine all the soul searching if something like those incidents happened in Europe or America. Here’s an ad slogan for India: Five times the racism, none of the self reflection!

    • Exactly, you summed up what I was about to say. Indians are at least 10 times more racist than any other group of people in the world, but they refuse to admit this because they lack any capacity for introspection, which seems to suggest that indians do not possess a conscience.

      What a vile, disgusting, evil race of people. I’m good friends with Africans, Asians, Mexicans, Russians, and we all have one thing in common- we hate the majority of indians. So one day, the races of the world will unite and get rid of this cancer called the indian race.

      • Jason Y

        The racism of other parts of the world is pretty vile, and in some places, is muffled by political correctness (or maybe not in the case of right-wing Facebook blowhards). I understand India is the worst of the worst, mainly cause there are more vile racists in proportion to the population, and they will not repent of their deeds.

        • Jason Y

          The west would be the place where racism is unacceptable in public, except among right wing Facebook dillholes.

        • Jason, you are extremely intellectual dishonest if you are going to try to even remotely compare racism in other parts of the world to the level of racism that exists in India.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s