Immigration Is Not That Important of an Issue

Stalin Tonks writes:

Fine Robert. Go vote for Hillary and bring in millions of non-whites to depress wages for the average person.

It’s not that important of an issue. I never vote for conservatives ever, for any reason, and I’m not changing. Conservatives are my class enemies. Why should I vote for my enemies? Not only that, but I am opposed to the whole basic conservative way of looking at life and the world, which I think sucks. Yes, the conservatives are more correct on immigration, but even there they are insane (Build a wall and make Mexico pay for it? WTH?). They are right on immigration and wrong on just about everything else. Being right on immigration is not enough to make me vote for them. It’s not important for me to switch my vote.

  1. They’re already here.
  2. 2. The country’s already gone politically on this issue. The whole thing is a dead issue to me as I think US society is totally gone on this issue. US society seems to be majority in support of illegal immigration and high levels of legal immigration, if not H -1B’s. Both parties seem to be dead set in favor of mass immigration, both legal, illegal and Hindu 1B. It’s just hopeless and there’s nothing to be done.
  3. 3. Obama deported more illegals than any other President. More illegals have gone back to Mexico than have come in since 2009, so the # of illegals is actually declining in the US. I know in my area this summer, they said a whole bunch of them left.
  4. 4. We are already dealing with it. The INS was in my town about 1-2 years ago, and they stayed for a month in the Best Western downtown. They raided all over my city the whole month and they rounded up 2,300 illegals. It was brutal – they were stopping mothers walking their kids to school and asking them for papers, etc. This raid occurred under Obama.
  5. 5. It’s already been done and it’s already over with. The country’s already gone on this issue anyway on the ground from my POV. You fail to understand that I live in California. This is already post-White America. We’ve already imported millions of non-Whites to drive down wages. We’ve already imported hundreds of thousands of H-1B’s to drive down upper middle class workers’ wages. Our cities already look like the UN. We’re already living in Mexico or the UN and you are jumping up and down yelling that Hillary is going to turn this place into Mexico and the UN. You are yelling about something that’s already happened. It’s like yelling at a cancer patient that they are going to get cancer. My own city is 67% Hispanic. It’s not great, but honestly, it’s not the end of the world. I can live with these Mexicans. Anyway, in Mexican society, Whites rule, so if you are a White in an Hispanic city, you are ruling class de facto. Mexican is not a race. I could be a Mexican. Or I could turn into one. Just start speaking Spanish and call yourself a Mexican. Real simple. That’s all you have to do. White Mexican culture is not that different from White US culture anyway.
  6. Now, if you can find me a nice leftwing nationalist or even left wing of the Alt Right candidate to vote for, maybe we are talking. Get Marine Le Pen’s ass over here and run her for office. Then I will vote “rightwing” in a New York minute.

34 Comments

Filed under American, California, Conservatism, Culture, Democrats, Fake Guest Workers, Hispanics, Illegal, Immigration, Labor, Law enforcement, Left, Mexicans, Obama, Political Science, Politics, Race Relations, Race/Ethnicity, Regional, Sociology, Urban Studies, US Politics, USA, West, Whites

34 responses to “Immigration Is Not That Important of an Issue

  1. Stalin Tonks

    That’s fine Robert. If and when whites create their own ethnostate in America you can stay in bean nigger occupied territory.

    • Proud squaw

      Ban this junkie asshole.

      • Your vote has been noted. We will need some more votes though if you want to vote him off.

        • Stalin Tonks

          That’s not cool Robert. You’re going to ban me because all the wogs and cucks want me gone? Not cool.

        • I don’t want to do that. I don’t want to be a dictator here. There are commenters here who I don’t like at all, but I don’t bother them because I don’t want to bait them into getting themselves banned. The would rather have the commenters run the place. That’s more democratic, and plus they have handled it well.

      • Any commenter can get voted off the blog by other commenters. I mostly don’t ban people and let them say whatever they want, and I threw the content and behavioral bans over to the commenters. The commenters pretty much run the comments section and in some ways even the site itself, and they can vote off any commenter they don’t like. They usually don’t do it, and most people who get voted off are acting pretty bad or at least they are really pissing a lot of people off.

      • nah let’s “kick him around some more”;

      • yeah the little fuck is starting to get irritating now.

        Sam J. had some unique ideas.
        Epgoon always was pissed off, which was hilarious.

        Stalin is basically copying and pasting and spamming.
        It’s annoying as hell.

        • EPGAH

          Clever misspell of my nick, Chimaf Suicide!

          You never consider I might have a reason to be angry? Like say, America letting in the Third World scum I spent 10 years of my life defending against so others wouldn’t have to?

          Or turning into the very antithesis of itself in my lifetime, from a geopolitical superhero and squasher of troublemakers to supporter of terrorists?

          I’m angry because I KNOW America can do better, it USED to do better, it can again, right? Or do you think we’ve crossed a Point Of No Return, too many Third World poison parasites voting their interests, or just pushing for it with illegitimate force, while Americans are forbidden to fight back, to ever return to our former strength?

        • Stalin Tonks

          Blow me you little queer.

        • Jonathan

          Yup Sam’s posts have lots of information and depth in spite of heavy doses of VNN style anti-semitism . EPgah too has lots of good ones to say. This little stalin critter has nothing of value to add. May be he can go and bleach ANglin’s bunghole of a website

    • rw95

      And what exactly is the plan to create that “white ethnostate?” I hear a lot of talk about it, but no plan and no action.
      Also, for something to be an “ethno-state” there needs to be an ethnicity first. “White” is not a race, ethnicity or nationality. It’s a skin tone. Period.

      • Stalin Tonks

        I have come up with a plan to create white ethnostate(s).

        One. A white country decides to vote in a government that will turn the country into a white ethnostate.

        Two. part of a country secedes either peacefully or violently from the rest of the country and becomes an ethnostate. This is the Harold Covington plan.

        Three. White Nationalists from around the world migrate to one small country and take it over through sheer numbers. Sort of a Zionist state project for white people.

        Four. A large group of WN make an offer to a country like Poland. The deal is this. Let us buy about 10 to 20 miles square of land and let us set up our own country on it. In exchange, we will pay you a yearly tribute (to be negotiated) and also be a good customer for your goods and services.

        All the above plans require more WNs. The more we have, the easier to carry about these plans.

        White is a race not a skin color. My skin color is closer to pink than white.

        • rw95

          No, it’s not a race. I realize you’re illiterate and refuse to acknowledge reality, but there is no such thing as “the white race.”
          Deal with it.

        • Stalin Tonks

          rw95,

          I’m not interested in arguing semantics with you you fucking tard.

        • Jonathan

          ” A white country decides to vote in a government that will turn the country into a white ethnostate.”

          LOL US already has a black president. Times have changed, its 2016 not 1960. Polls indicate its time for a woman president

          “Two. part of a country secedes either peacefully or violently from the rest of the country and becomes an ethnostate. This is the Harold Covington plan.”

          HAC hardly has any supporters these days. Nobody wants to move to Pacific Northwest as HAC suggests. May be you can ask Axis Skanky.

          “Three. White Nationalists from around the world migrate to one small country and take it over through sheer numbers. Sort of a Zionist state project for white people”.

          Good luck with that. May be you guys should move back to Europe then. But wait isn’t Europe becoming increasingly nonwhite. I guess you guys are running out of luck.

          “Let us buy about 10 to 20 miles square of land and let us set up our own country on it”

          Craig Cobb tried it already and failed miserably. SO what next?

      • Lin

        I suugest the US gov should include skin bleaching in Obama Care for the disadvantaged minorities

  2. matt

    You’re right on almost everything here, Robert. As for Stalin Tonks, I don’t care if you ban him or not. If I wer to ban him, it would be for being boring. He’s basically memorized a page of alt right talking points, and communicates them with no particular talent or originality.

  3. jorge

    Roberto Gomez is joking.

    You have to be in all this forums in internet to have some 1% of chances of know a woman to loose your virginity. Is have to be a solidarity campain haha.

  4. jorge

    “That’s not cool Robert. You’re going to ban me because all the wogs and cucks want me gone? Not cool.”

    Roberto Gomez is joking.

    You have to be in all this forums in internet to have some 1% of chances of know a woman to loose your virginity. Is have to be a solidarity campain haha.

    And you make people happy, like a monkey in the circus hahaha.

  5. Brian Damage

    Is there really a post-white America or a post-decolonization America? The idea of racial consciousness had always been a colonization tool in order to expand and control the vast territories. Once the de-colonization process started around the 50s, the only way to maintain white supremacism is to work with the “non-whites” while asserting cultural superiority over them. That is what the liberals were doing. Even that is not sustainable. At least it was until recently.

  6. jorge

    “I’m sure America is a better country having you in it.”

    For girls sure haha

  7. The ultimate irony is, and I can’t reiterate this enough, is the Alt-Right IS in many ways fast tracking us to becoming a banana Republic!

    Trump is threatening to put his political opponents in jail, and will surely do so.
    Jason has already said a popular comeback from Trump supporters to Trump opponents is “Trump will deport you!”

    If you believe in such a concept, White Liberals, not just any old Whites are the master race!
    Duh!
    #altleft

    • EPGAH

      They only threaten that to illegals and rioters, right? Deporting foreign criminals should be the right and duty of any country that wants to be healthy, including America regaining its health. HBD Investor and another poster already said that the mass invasion of America is reversible!

      Maybe we have different ideas of what Banana Republic means. To me, it means a poor, violent shithole of a country run by NAMs. I was stationed in several. Where the national bird is Dirt, starvation is a real thing except for the largesse from the Civilized World, electricity is a luxury (and not even a reliable luxury!), but savages still kill each other over the stupidest things.
      That’s what I want to avoid America turning into.

      If you’re TRULY concerned about the loss of political freedom, what effect do you think a few dozen MILLION illegals all voting Democrat will have? Democrats will never lose, and noone else can ever win, America will become a one-party country…Just Like Mexico.
      That’s why immigration is so important to me.

      As to your White Liberals comment, do you mean Classical Liberals, or the modern definition? Classical Liberals are actually what America calls Conservatives, the Government is supposed to protect us from outside threats, protect us from cheats and lawbreakers within, and provide infrastructure, in that order.

      Modern liberals, though, are collaborators with criminals at home and foreign invaders, from spreading the “Hands Up Don’t Shoot” LIE to the “Breaking Up The Families” canard. Either way, we’d be better off without rioting scum, foreign invaders, and their collaborators.

      Which did you mean?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s