Rabbit, “Adopting a Minimalist Lifestyle for Maximum Political Autonomy”

How do survive as a political dissident and still be able to speak your mind. In other words, how to live very cheaply. This is a good essay for no further reason than for being a good object lesson in living cheaply for whatever reason you wish or need. I’ve had to learn how to do this. It’s not a lot of fun, but it’s better than being homeless.

Adopting a Minimalist Lifestyle For Maximum Political Autonomy

Ellsworth Kelly - Blue and Orange,  1965
Ellsworth Kelly – Blue and Orange, 1965

In many parts of Europe you can be jailed for speaking out on certain topics. In the US however, the government pretty much lets people say whatever they want with the exception of promoting violence and a few other caveats which are deemed off limits. The primary avenues of suppression of speech here are through corporations, academic institutions and social ostracization. The threat of being fired and thus unable to support yourself or family financially, potentially being thrown out of school and diminishing prospects for the future (or having your fraternity group or school club banned), and just general exclusion from various social circles.

There are many strategies to overcoming these obstacles. One of them is of course to play along and keep your mouth shut, climb the corporate ladder as a secret agent and leverage your influence later on when you’re too powerful to bring down easily. This was basically what many of the neoreactionaries advocated. Not everyone is suited for this role though.

Some people have no interest in infiltrating the rat race or spending their lives with their lips zipped. They want to get up in the mix or just be free to say what they want and are not content to just grin in bear it through every employee “diversity training” seminar. So if you’re not rich or planning to be for the forseeable future and don’t have any people depending on you, (wife, kids etc) then adopting a minimalist lifestyle can give you the personal autonomy to engage in activism and withstand the negative consequences for perpetuating thought crime.

Here are some steps to consider and potential lifestyle changes you can implement:

1. First, save up some money. This may mean working a shitty wagecuck job for a few months to a year and keeping your mouth shut. Save as much money as possible during this time, plan for a day when you are going to quit, and most importantly stick to it. That few months can turn into many years of wagecuckery if you can’t work up the nerve to leave (especially if you start to get too cozy and comfortable, which is what they want.)

2. Keep your mandatory living expenses as minimal as possible. I can’t stress this enough. A huge mortgage, rent payment or car payment can make it impossible to speak your mind because you’re too dependent on the system and its institutions for the revenue to sustain yourself in the financial hole you’ve dug, let alone climb out of it. They know this and will relish the chance to bury you as an example if you say something that threatens the PC narrative.

There are many ways to reduce your rent. Get a cheap studio apartment. Move in with a relative that has an extra room. People can make fun of you for living in your aunt’s basement all they want, and their insults may sting, but you won’t get kicked out for offending anyone except her. Find a girlfriend and get her to move into your cheap tiny apartment with you as opposed to getting a giant apartment together (this is what I did.) I had a friend who lived rent free for many years just squatting abandoned houses and traveling. It’s a tough way to live, but if you prioritize your ability to speak freely, then it’s a paradise in its own way. The bottom line is that you want to keep your rent as low as possible, like really low…a few hundred bucks a month or less, zero dollars even.

3. Cut out most unnecessary forms of entertainment, especially ones that directly propagandize against you like sportsball and (((mainstream movies.))) In many cases you are actually paying for a form of entertainment which antagonizes and taunts you while you watch it and uses the money it generates from you to support causes hostile to your interests.

“Insert a dollar into this vending machine to watch an entertaining commercial tell you why you shouldn’t advocate for your own interests”

Don’t pay for (((cable.))) Turn off your TV if you can. To the extent you interact with normie or corporate entertainment, it should be a clinical interaction, where you’re analyzing and dissecting it as a means of the opposition disseminating enemy propaganda and developing effective strategies for countering it. You don’t have to forsake all movies or TV shows. I’d recommend watching older movies and TV shows from an era where media entertainment was less politicized and PC. If you can’t live without sports, you’re better off buying some DVD’s of old football games from the 70’s and 80’s. There are thousands and thousands of enjoyable old games you’ve never seen, and you won’t feel like you’re watching a bunch of subhumans chimping out or being subjected to Black Panther performance art.

If possible, focus on entertaining/amusing yourself in ways that improve you in some way. Self teach yourself a new language. Read books that instruct you about how basic electronics work. Play chess and other games that deal with strategy.

4. Learn to eat cheaply. Instead of going out for expensive meals every meal of the day, start buying groceries and eating like you’re living in the post-apocalyptic world of Fallout 3. Buy things like rice, ramen, and soup. Make peanut butter sandwiches. I won’t dwell much on this because there are whole books written about this kind of thing. I’m also not very good at this one. I eat out a lot of the time due to some digestion and health issues, and I have higher calorie requirements than most people due to my metabolism. However, low calorie diets have show to increase lifespans and have other health benefits. Learn to eat cheaply, and learn to eat less.You want to live like a lean and mean disciplined operative, not a fatass neckbeard.

5. Find alternative sources of revenue. Work odd temporary jobs at festivals to sustain yourself. Do freelance social media work. Sell stuff from thrift stores on ebay or etsy. Offer gigs for money on Fiverr based on whatever skills you have. Beg for donations on your blog. Sell plasma, sell sperm. Learn a trade where you’re able to be self-employed, like handyman or electrician. Become a daytrader. Entire books are available on creating revenue streams. Many of them are written by hucksters and contain useless information, but you can find plenty of free ideas just poking around online. When all else fails, use your imagination.

6. Don’t be a hoarder. Material possessions will only weigh you down. Other than a few mementos, sentimental attachment to personal objects should be discouraged. As a political dissident it’s essential to be as portable as possible. When you’ve got nothing, they’ve got nothing they can take away from you. Keep it simple. All you really need is a laptop, a phone, and a couple of stylish outfits to give your views a worthy aesthetic.

7. Even if you’re anonymous, always live according to the realization that you could be doxed at anytime. You’ve heard the phrase “Live like you’re going to die tomorrow?” Well in this case it’s “Live like you’ve been doxed yesterday and thousands of busybodies are out to ruin your livelihood.” Brace for impact.

8. Have no shame. However “horrible” a person someone tries to tell you that you are because of your “xenophobic” opinions, it shouldn’t affect you as long as you believe your perspective is valid and correct. Sometimes it’s necessary to get nasty and insult your enemies, so don’t feel bad about it. Your enemies don’t care about you and don’t play fair. Remember, their social shaming tactics only work on people that have shame. Have no shame.

9. Most importantly, learn to live with being on your own. Public expression of political opinions that fall outside the Overton window will inevitably lead to losing friends. People you’ve known for many years and even family members may decide never to speak to you ever again. Friends and acquaintances will banish you from their social circles and delete and block you on social media. Assume that you’re on your own and learn to deal with it.

It sounds bleak, but the good news is that being able to stand alone for your beliefs is a quality that people will admire in you. You may find friends in places you didn’t know you had them. The friends and family that accept you are the only ones that matter. Incorporating a minimalist lifestyle isn’t simply a matter of throwing excess jetsam overboard that’s weighing down the ship, it’s also about freeing yourself from the people in your life trying to make your tugboat sink.

Conclusion: That’s it so far. I might write more on this topic later (I haven’t even covered the sexual considerations in this article) or expand it into a shill-able ebook. For now though, go ahead and get on your way. Adopt a minimalist lifestyle today, and you can tell your enemies to fuck off, with impunity…tomorrow.

203 Comments

Filed under Politics, Regional, USA

203 responses to “Rabbit, “Adopting a Minimalist Lifestyle for Maximum Political Autonomy”

  1. Alt left is pretty lonely place to be, especially as a minority.

    • There are a number of wings now that are very friendly to non-Whites, including the biggest wings. Check out some of the Alt Left sites on Facebook. Or start your own Alt Left wing for non-Whites. This movement is sort of a free for all and a “go ahead and form your wing” big tent thing.

      Personally I’d love you have you on board with us.

      • Stalin Tonks

        If the Alt Left is for creating white ethnostates then I’m all for it. Economics is of second importance to me so if the only way I can get my white ethnostate(s) is to have some socialism I don’t want I’m willing to put up with that. In fact there is probably some socialism I’d actually be in favor of.

        • They are not for White ethnostates. Only Rabbit’s wing is, and we don’t even know how large his wing is. There are now several other wings, including mine. The largest newer wings reject the White ethnostate or at least they are not interested in pushing that. In fact, some do not even want to talk about race realism. A couple are explicitly anti-racist.

        • Tulio

          I think it’s important that any alt-left movement disavow racial hostility and openly racist people. There should be no room under any left wing umbrella for that type of thought. It’s one thing to be race realist(which I consider myself), it’s another thing altogether to be an actual racist that goes around using racial slurs and categorically dehumanizing entire races of people. What’s going to happen is the mainstream left is going to see people in Rabbit’s wing of the alt-left and then tar the entire alt-left camp as basically Stormfronters that hate capitalism.

        • Tulio

          Other than some of the racist stuff, I pretty much like everything else I hear from the alt-left. I do think we desperately need a movement that’s pro-science, not beholden to political correctness and economically egalitarian.

        • “Sub-Humans chimping out”,
          Pretty nasty stuff.

          I knew this Rabbit guy was a fruitcake.
          Glad to see everyone else is on board.

        • Theres nothing to be done. Rabbit has that domain name and he’s going to continue to promote his wing. What exactly are supposed to do about Rabbit? Kill him? I mean he’s not going away.

          Got any theories on what the rest of the movement should do, Tulio?

          I know one wing has already explicitly renounced Rabbit and his wing.

        • I just Jewgled Alt-Left to see what comes up.

          It’s bad. His website is first, which would be okay, except none of the other major ones come up as results. This the whole association of this movement.

          Maybe a name change is in the works.

  2. Tulio

    Fuck this Rabbit asshole. Calling blacks subhumans and chimps? No man, he doesn’t not deserve to use the word “left” anywhere in his ideology with that type of rhetoric. That asshole belongs on stormfront.

    • Tulio

      And if he is the best the alt left has to offer, than this alt left movement is destined to be a flop. The number of people that would associate with the word left in any capacity that could yet smugly refer to other races as subhumans is so small as that it would be be able to attain the critical mass necessary for a prominent movement.

      This alt left shit is a joke.

      • The most popular wings are not really racist at all.

      • Maybe I will do a piece on the different wings of the Alt Left.

        I think there are maybe 7 different wings right now – 3 different Facebook groups, 2 websites and 2 allied groups (Realist Left and Old Left). A couple of the wings are explicitly opposed to racism. Most are pretty similar. Rabbit’s is the only one pushing an explicitly racist message. The largest group on Facebook is pretty hazy too.

        This is the first time I have ever seen Rabbit use language like that. In fact, I was going to call him the nicest White nationalist out there because I had never seen him talk like that before.

      • Sami

        I am with Tulio on this. Rabbit is a thoroughly toxic figure, who will thwart any potential that this movement has for growth unless he is completely disavowed by every other “wing” of the movement. I don’t think even Jered Taylor would tolerate such hateful filth, and I would be willing to bet that David Duke himself would probably have reservations (at least with the choice of language).

        The best of the Alt Left is really the old Left prior to the emergence of the SJW insanity, and, as such, could be a movement that I believe has gigantic potential for real growth and influence — the old Roosevelt coalition. Social and economic justice and economic nationalism, minus identity-group insanity, SJW insanity, and Zionism/neoconservativism. AND we can’t continue to accept ANY association with idiots like Rabbit.

        • Sami

          “the old Roosevelt coalition. Social and economic justice and economic nationalism, minus identity-group insanity, SJW insanity, and Zionism/neoconservativism.”

          To be more specific, make that Likud Zionism/neoconservativism, which is just another identity group insanity of its own varietal, and perhaps the most dangerous because of its mega financed influence throughout “our” defense and foreign policy establishments.

        • Jonathan

          I dont think Rabbit is that much of a racist given what he had said. Apart from that racist part I guess he was spot on with every other issues. I cant really blame him for that as that subhuman reference is something that must have come up as he must be realy pissed off with blacks. Its not really unusual given the way blacks are refusing to change their violent ways. This pales out when compared to the vituperative over-the-top racism and bigotry you coming up from the Alt right fags.

    • Jennifer

      I’m pretty happy that there is someone who sees niggers the way are. Niggers are always a bane. Billions of dollars have gone down the drain in this futile exercise. Disingenuous Leftists usually coddle, pander to and abate niggers in spite of realizing it’s a waste of time. So glad Rabbit realizes about the jigaboos. It’s time the Left changes track from Negro coddling especially as Alt Right is catching momentum.

      • Tulio

        Stormfront is that way –>

        • Stalin Tonks

          Actually what she said is too strong for Stormfront (-:

        • Yeah Stormfront bans use of the N-Word.

          When they also banned calling Obama “Obongo” a bunch left and formed VNN.

          The mistake lots of people make is judging ideology by crassness of language. The more polite ones, to me, are more like “snakes in the grass”.

        • Stalin Tonks

          VNN existed long before Obongo became president. I’m sure when Stormfront banned nigger and Obongo some SF posters moved to VNN. I haven’t been to VNN for ages. It seems like a dead forum to me now.

        • Yeah, maybe it was an exodus of Stormfronters than gave VNN prominence, even if it was founded earlier.

          I of course am not a Nationalist or supremacist, but did occasionally look at Stormfront to see what they were up to (as well as Shamren).
          VNN really was not ‘cutting edge’ ideologically, and it was just too nasty for me personally (made me sick).

        • “Yeah Stormfront bans use of the N-Word.”

          ……So I guess that means that I should take Chinedu’s advice and take my racist trolling somewhere else now that there’s opportunity for me at ST, finally I can give The Uncle Tom Party the attention it deserves.

        • Jennifer

          Nope storm front aka spermfart and sites like daily stormer are for ejumacated magic niggers and non whites/jews to pretend like whites and spew their muh dikery and muh cootchiey all over the place. it has become a virtual dump for these mongrels to shit on. Filthy ass Niggers and Jews destroy every site they invade.now that Milo the Jew has been exposed Jews will be desperately trying to put someone else in the mainstream. Watch out. As far as jigaboos are cooncerned they are too lazy to carry their 300lbs ass to get in the internet. They need their Jew boss to guide them everywhere. They only know to exhibit TNB out of their own. Lol

        • To ((Jennifer)),

          For ((your)) own self interest, I suggest ((you ))work on ((your)) speech to stand on ((your)) point on Jews and Niggers pretending to be white. By all means keep ((your)) ideas, but the way ((you)) express them comes off so obvious that it actually reminded me of this post.

          https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2016/03/19/a-jew-pays-a-visit-to-my-blog/

          Just watch ((yourself)) okay?

          *in case I didn’t make this clear, your Kippah is showing.

        • Jennifer

          hey phil boy, Nope i’m not a jew nor a nigger. Niggers are a failed sub-species and jews are spawns of satans. Nice try though. Now go home boy! Yo mama is calling.

        • “hey phil boy, Nope i’m not a jew nor a nigger. Niggers are a failed sub-species and jews are spawns of satans. Nice try though. Now go home boy! Yo mama is calling.”

          It’s a joke that you try to be above places like Dailystormer yet you don’t even talk like a white person, more like a jew trying too hard.

          This is how a white person talks.

          https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2014/03/24/immigration-to-the-west-and-iq-evid/#comment-176425

          You on the otherhand

          http://www.webmd.com/schizophrenia/tc/types-of-schizophrenia-topic-overview

          “Repeating the same activity (word or behavior) over and over again (perseveration).”

          Confirmed, fucking schizo-jew.

          “hey phil boy, Nope i’m not a jew nor a nigger. Niggers are a failed sub-species and jews are spawns of satans.”

          BTW, learn how to fucking use capital letters you crazy ass jew.

      • My IQ dropped from reading this comment thread. Jennifer, I advise you get an education and actually learn what you’re talking about. You really have no idea what you’re talking about.

      • Jennifer

        nignog phil, daily stormer used to be good but they allowed non-white trolls and many nigger filth to infilter the website also the insane trump worship anglin is into, gets on to people’s nerves. stormfront is a cointelpro always was and still is. (damn keyboard). i know robert lindsay is a leftist, for a good alt right website refer the article
        http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2016/08/25/what-is-the-alt-right/.
        i am not a jew. try again nigger filth.

  3. Lon Spector

    The ancient Greeks said, “The door is open.” When push comes to
    shove,” the final solution is to do yourself in rather then to harm others.

  4. Sami

    Is that Ellsworth Kelly piece supposed to be art?

  5. Another issue is this mofo owns the Alt-Left domain name.

    That’s going to scare lots of potential, ‘recovering cucks’ away.
    We have to understand that a lot of these Liberals will gradually convert; there aren’t tons of crazy Chimpout type White Nationalists just sitting at Democratic rallies, it’s simply not reality.

    • Stalin Tonks

      The Alt Right has attracted some former liberals and democrats and even Obongo voters. Any white person that supports their own displacement and “slow” genocide is at best ignorant and at worst a fucking idiot.

      • Precisely my point.
        They made it possible by having the most prominent Reichers as moderates, or at the very least behave civilly.

        Rabbit seems incapable of moderating his ideology or behaving civilly.

        • Stalin Tonks

          This is why I don’t rag on people like Richard Spencer or Jared Taylor. People like this are much more appealing to normies than someone who talks like Jennifer all the time. Once normies digest what people like Taylor say they can then find out about the Goddamn kikes.

        • I’m not alt-left and I red some of what Richard Spencer says and was not really terrified.
          He’s good.

          BUT Jared Taylor and AmRen are really sub-par imho.
          Convincing “Cucks” to join them because ‘Obama doesn’t understand White culture’s love of guns’….
          yeah, the Epitome of White culture (obviously guns) is being destroyed by a guy raised in White culture…LOL
          and the commenters are goddamn morons. I’ll provide them if requested, I don’t want to rant.

        • I’m not alt-right I mean.
          I suppose I am alt-left, at least for now.

        • Speaking of such it’s a natural expectation that Lefties aren’t going to shit on Blacks and Hispanics as much as Alt-Righters, partially because it is that we look out for all those at a disadvantage, whether Whites, Blacks, etc.
          We’re to the left, in general

        • Stalin Tonks

          Sorry, what’s the problem with Jared Taylor? He’s too extreme?

        • No, not that.

          It’s just that his thought processes are very flawed/illogical most of the time, a lot make no sense, as I explained above.

  6. “The mistake lots of people make is judging ideology by crassness of language.”
    I think this should apply here, as I think shouldn’t need to make a Trump controversy about the use of words in this piece.

    Though I have made the point before that i more desensitized relative to other Blacks when it comes to slurs, the bluntness of Rabbits words caught my eye me too but after reading his thoughts and criticisms and comparing it to my observations from Unz, Stormfront, and similar skirmishes on this blog I wouldn’t knock Rabbit yet.

    https://altleft.com/2016/09/09/a-framework-for-identity/

    As for his actual thoughts on race, these are the clearest thoughts I could find.

    ” ‘Race neutrality’ or ‘colorblindness’ is itself an expression of white identity(this is one reason why SJWs always accuse people who advocate race neutrality as white supremacists.) Blacks and other groups advocate for their own unapologetically and see race everywhere. They readily exploit your altruism while you are busy being “neutral.” To try to “teach” them not to do this(or insinuate that you can teach them anything) and focus strictly on individual merits will be seen as supremacist paternalism and a denial of the uniqueness black experiences .Of course, there may be the occasional oddball Black or Mexican that rejects identity politics, but even then usually if you ask them a few probing questions you’ll find they still accept the underlying premises(“US was never a white country,” “We are a nation of immigrants,” etc.) Their identity is still there bubbling below the surface.

    Not only that, when a city or a country becomes 70-80% non-white, it will most certainly not retain any “race neutrality” toward white people. Imagine being the white guy in an 80% black country who says “Guys, we’re all just one race, the human race. Here’s what I think we all should do about problem XYZ which would help everyone rather than focus on awarding reparations.” They will basically just laugh and be like “Whitey, sit your ass down and shut up. We’re in charge now.” Only it won’t actually be you of course. It will be your children and their future that you sold out for nothing but a bit of virtue signaling. Do you want your kids to live in a city that looks like Baltimore or Detroit or the shitty parts of Oakland? Do you want them to go to a high school where they get taunted by mobs of low IQ mestizos, because the school is 95% Mexican? Have you ever felt while walking through a ghetto neighborhood late at night that you had nothing to worry about because this was a “race neutral” environment? In South Africa, whites are running for their lives. Perhaps that wouldn’t happen here, but at the very least don’t expect going to the movies to be a quiet and pleasant experience.

    As the white population grows smaller and hordes of people from the third world continue to increase in both number and political clout, the prospect for race neutrality will continue to decrease even further as these groups consolidate their power to squeeze whatever advantage they can out of the system.

    It would be nice to go back to the way things were in the 60’s, but it won’t happen because we don’t have the same demographics that we had in the 60’s. Perhaps we could have abandoned identity politics if we had maintained the level of homogeneity of that time period. We could probably have found away to cope with the diversity we had, assimilated to the extent that was possible, and ended up with something that looked more or less like the multiracial social cohesion depicted in Battlestar Galactica(70’s version.) Now of course it’s too late, and we’ll get Battle for the Planet of the Apes instead.

    Of course, thanks to some very misguided immigration policies, the US is too diverse now to return to even 1980s racial demographics. That doesn’t mean we have to just “suck it up” and learn to live with it though. Almost nobody in the pro-white community is still invested in the nation of “America” as it is conceptualized today. Most are already thinking in terms of post-America and the likely Balkanization of the country, a breakup along various regional and ethnic lines. Basically whites in general have 4 options:

    Avoid identity politics and focus on class and other unifying issues(in other words, “beg for mercy from the new non-white majority 20 years from now and hope the country doesn’t turn our like South Africa or Brazil”
    Advocate for your own racial group unapologetically and see what part of the country, if any, can be salvaged for western civilization

    Try to eke out a living and keep your head down. Try to interact as little as possible with invaders and instead run out the clock until you die.
    Flee the country to somewhere less pathologically ethnomasochistic and less hostile to white interests(Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Antarctica.)
    My view on dealing with minorities is that you should for the most part treat people as individuals on a personal level, enjoying each of them for who they are. A nation making policy though has to look at the big picture and recognize patterns at the group level when considering broader implications of policy decisions relating to large scale demographics.

    Well I would say that He would be best categorized as “Somewhat Alt Right” in terms of assertiveness in tackling ethnic issues, but somewhat Alt Left in terms of flexibility for solutions and intuition.

    He comes off as more thrifty and abstract with his solutions while even the “best” of Alt rights just tend to reinforce/intellectualize the logic their trademark ones.

  7. Well, at very least get under his skin and do what the more centrist Alt-Right does to the Daily Stormer;

    What offends a person who refers to Blacks as “sub-humans” than this?

    • Stalin Tonks

      Chiune, just curious…

      Are you non-white or just another white cuck?

      • are you a real Nazi or just a 14 year old /pol kid?

        • Stalin Tonks

          I guess I’m a real nazi. Now, are you a white cuck or just another self interested non-white?

      • Nah Just messing with you.

        I believe I am of European Descent.
        They tell me I look like Ruffalo;

        I have an Autosomal DNA test coming in soon.

      • LOL he’s a White cuck I guess. I suppose all of us nonracists and antiracists are pretty cucked out. Being a cuck ain’t so bad anyway. Hell, I’m a transnigger myself!

        • Stalin Tonks

          I’m not sure you qualify as a cuck Robert. I’d call you a cuck if you say something that warrants it. I don’t understand your reasoning sometimes. Now you be good now or else I’m going to force you at gunpoint to supply teach those schools full of black kids again.

      • TRASH

        STALIN Poor rural Anglo-Saxons with some small amount of raped Native-American female DNA on their maternal side cannot be Nazis and German-Americans in the Northern states and Canada cringe at their claims to “Nordic” heritage.

        I’m German-American from the U.S./Canada border and there is no “Nordic” blood in whites from the rural South/Flyover “Who got a little injun in us” and are basically Celts.

        Their silly swastikas are laughable. Why not the British flag.

        Or Mongolia, because all of them have Native American blood.

  8. You guys never answered my question about what is the Alt Left supposed to do about Rabbit? He’s got the domain, he’s clearly one of the wings, I mean what are we supposed to do? You guys are yelling at us but you haven’t told us what to do. You’re essentially telling us to make Rabbit go away.

    One of the wings has already explicitly disassociated itself from him and I believe a couple of others state in their core principles that they are against racism.

    Rabbit is here. He ain’t going away. What exactly is it you guys want us to do anyway?

    • In all honesty I don’t think this is worth the fuss. Sure his phrasing is bordering things, but I haven’t read this kind of negativity in any of his other writings so I really just see this as a fluke.

      Anyone else can see his blog and feel free to disagree.

      • Tulio

        That’s not a fluke. It’s an admission. He doesn’t have to be spewing piss and vinegar at blacks every single day to be a racist.

        • “That’s not a fluke. It’s an admission. He doesn’t have to be spewing piss and vinegar at blacks every single day to be a racist.”

          True, but you have to admit, some sort of consistency and magnitude would be required to justify “dealing with him”. And as I said, looking at his blog and race I haven’t found anything bordering the same degree.

          “My view on dealing with minorities is that you should for the most part treat people as individuals on a personal level, enjoying each of them for who they are. A nation making policy though has to look at the big picture and recognize patterns at the group level when considering broader implications of policy decisions relating to large scale demographics.”

          This is the clearest Statement about him that refers to his ideas with race overall aside from his talk of obvious negatives regarding population percentages.

          However, I do agree that the phrasing of “subhuman” wasn’t called for as. I could understand “chimping” not exactly meaning chimp but slang for “nigger moment” in the context of it’s use.

          Looking at his Twitter, the closest I could find to anti-black racism are just reported events of black Misbehavior (I believe I have counted on store looting, 2-3 BLM violence, thug violence).

          https://twitter.com/alt_left

        • phil- Yeah but it’s certainly something that doesn’t just “pop out” casually.

        • REGARDLESS,
          (Alt) Leftism aka Socialism + Nationalism = National Socialism= Heil Shitler

        • Tulio

          Well, I see way more “chimping” in the nearly all white NHL than I do in the NBA. Yet nobody ever uses this chimpout language when white hockey players are beating each other to a pulp(something I rarely if ever see in the NBA) while being cheered on by the audience.

          This is another example of blacks always being judged by their race while whites are judged as individuals.

        • Oh he freely admits to being a racist! I mean he’s a White nationalist. Let’s get real, man. How many of those guys are NOT racists?

          I guess I’m old-fashioned. I don’t really mind if someone is racist. It’s your life after all. And I would rather have people come right out and admit to being racist rather than sneak around and pretend to be nonracist and be secretly racist.

          But I think even racists should use polite language, at least in public, such as public writings on the Net. It’s a matter of decorum. Also your racism isn’t really hurting anyone IMHO. How is one person’s racism hurting much of anyone in the scheme of things. But when you start using that sort of poisonous language, you really are hurting people. You are harming other human beings.

          But hey, maybe I am old-fashioned.

        • I would like to credit you though, Tulio, for standing up for your people. I always love it when you do that. Hell, even Phil believes in standing up for Blacks when they are attacked like that.

          That’s one reason why I don’t ban racists in these comments. We have a lot of antis on here, and I prefer that they just take the racists on themselves. Most real racist types don’t stick around here a long time. The atmosphere on this site is not real friendly towards them. Speech should not be banned. It should be countered with other speech.

        • I actually like the rest of his writing. It’s clear, lucid and free of hostility towards non-Whites. I was thinking of posting a lot of it up here, but I am afraid my commenters would lynch me.

          😮

        • Numerous people have called him a National Socialist. I guess he is the National Socialist wing of the Alt Left. However, the rest of us are free to say that we have nothing to do with racism or National Socialism for that matter.

        • “phil- Yeah but it’s certainly something that doesn’t just “pop out” casually.”

          Well, based on what I could find, what I can say he only really complains about Black thugs and BLM from what I could find on his twitter. I guess we could add aggressive personalities tolerated by Media to that.

          I would take more issue with this of it wasn’t for the fact that compared to the generalizing I’ve seen elsewhere, his isn’t as broad and consistent.

          Also, he pretty much had this complaint before and made an article discussing this exact type of situation. So even of I was as upset as Tulio about this, there’s nothing we can do.

          All we can do is just understand three things.

          A. He’s Pro-white, thus translating to him being less tolerant f negative trends of other groups and wants Activism.

          B. In terms of his balance of complaining versus actual focus on preservation, he simply focuses on major events and not every single reported article of black Misbehavior. So given the circumstances of his beliefs, he’s pretty much as good as it gets.

          C. Despite his acknowledgement of trends in ethnic groups, he does accept the idea of even minorities being individuals.

        • B. In terms of his balance of complaining versus actual focus on preservation, he simply focuses on major events and not every single reported article of black Misbehavior. So given the circumstances of his beliefs, he’s pretty much as good as it gets.

          Phil is correct. Rabbit is about as good as a White nationalist gets. But that’s not a very encouraging statement.

          ALL THESE GUYS ARE RACIST AS HELL. ALL OF THEM.

        • I make a point about using the term “chimping out” when Rednecks act up.

      • I have never seen him use this kind of language before. In fact, he has always been remarkably civil when talking about non-Whites. I was starting to think of him as the nicest White nationalist you will ever meet.

      • “Well, I see way more “chimping” in the nearly all white NHL than I do in the NBA. Yet nobody ever uses this chimpout language when white hockey players are beating each other to a pulp(something I rarely if ever see in the NBA) while being cheered on by the audience.

        This is another example of blacks always being judged by their race while whites are judged as individuals.”

        I’m not going to lie, that’s actually a good point.

        The only arguments against that would be

        A. Compared to Blacks in other professions, an “arrogant” or “aggressive character” is more contained within hockey With Whites.

        B. Overall, flipping the argument into saying it’s right for whites to feel that way with other whites than with Blacks/

        • Stalin Tonks

          The NHL has more fighting because the nature of the game involves hitting people but not hitting them too hard. Players get pissed off at each other and start fighting which the crowds love and bring in big ratings. Most teams have one player whose job is mainly to rough up selected players from the other team.

        • So basically my thinking regarding argument A,

          Thanks ST

    • There’s nothing that can be done, except troll/satire him like the Goddamn K!kes that we are……make it clear he’s not one of us.

      • Stalin Tonks

        You’re either a white cuck or a typical anti-white kike. I’m guessing kike.

        • Jonathan

          you are typical firebreathing -in-the -internet but cocksucking secret faggot in real life.

        • TRASH

          Jews do not behave like fools on the street. Neither do Asians. When you see a Caucasian 30 feet away who is white, 16 and has 3 kids you know it is probably a white Southern woman who is Protestant.

          Even Catholic whites (Italians, Poles) have their act together slightly better than the poor rural white with his meth habit, his children out of wedlock, his lack of education and his reliance on food stamps.

          …But most of you are part Native American anyhow.

        • TRASH-
          the extent of Jewish misbehavior can be seen in a place where there are tons of them (the bad behaving ones are statistical outliers); New York.

          Some gang violence at night, smoking on the street corner, etc. are about the extent of their deviance.

          You’re not going to see lots of “White trash” Jews acting like idiots on the street.
          “White trash” are only second to Blacks in harrassing random strangers.
          Hispanics and Jews are certainly better than them in this regard.

        • “Even Catholic whites (Italians, Poles) have their act together slightly better”

          Implying Italians act any differently. GTFO with this garbage. Really, you seem pretty damn ignorant from your comments.

          Read a book and stop basing what you think on your emotions.

        • He hates Anglos, too, as well as Meds.

          I suspect the only people he approves of are Scandinavians, Germans, Ashkenazis, and NE Asians.
          lol

      • TRASH

        Brooklyn has a few rough Jewish neighborhoods with some drug dealing gangs and hookers around after dark, sure.

        Unless you are trying to buy drugs or mouthing off at night on Brighton Beach you are probably not going to be bothered by them.

        They have attacked NAMS, from time to time however.

    • Sami

      It’s not rocket science, Robert. It’s time to disavow the phuker. Publicly and unequivocally.

      • Sami

        Robert, if you want to see this develop into a serious movement, there is absolutely no alternative to complete, unequivocal, and public disavowal. THAT’s what needs to be done. Nothing short of that. It shouldn’t even be hard. Can you see ANY positive benefit that Rabbit brings to the table? He is a buffoon even on the subject of art, for goodness sakes…

      • On what authority? What kind of official council or whatever exists to disavow Rabbit considering he coined the Alt left.

        And regardless, Robert is obviously not motivated to do such.

  9. The “Sub-Human” line gets tiresome; in reference to genetic relations to other apes it’s simply nonsense.

    Blacks broke off first, and we broke off from them. They evolved in a climate similiar to apes, while we didn’t, that does not imply genetic distance whatsoever, since we are an equal time distance from apes.

    Kosher reason 13,456 of why HBD is censored from society.

    • Bernardista

      Yes, I agree. Also, we share a common ancestor with apes and are not directly descended from them.

    • Tulio

      Robert has written about this topic. I’m not expert on it, but I believe he has stated that blacks did not break off first. That modern Negroid blacks are a more recent development. The first humans were more like the San people of southern Africa, who are a somewhat Mongoloid-looking people.

      • Tulio

        Everyone automatically associates Africa with black, but there are more indigenous races to Africa than blacks.

      • Negroids like Tulio are a new race. They are probably one of the most advanced races if not the most advanced race to come out of Sub-Saharan Africa, unless you consider Horners to be separate from Negroids. Also I am not so sure that Horners are more advanced than Negroids. Ethiopia is pretty screwed up and Somalia is a basket case.

        Negroids were formed on 6-12,000 YBP in the context or organized agriculture. There was sort of a competition for women too which resulted in high testosterone and large, bulky, athletic bodies. Papuans have high testosterone also. Sort of like the meanest, nastiest, ugliest bastard and his buddies rose to the top, ruled the group and tended to monopolize the females. Not an unusual scenario among humans actually.

      • Erik Sieven

        My impression is especially West Africans are a real outlier. When you take the worldwide human average they are extremely selected for male attractiveness, extroversion, high self-esteem etc.

      • Jm8

        (some of the)The first humans may also have in some ways resembled/had features in common with remaining indigenous hunter gatherer tribes of East Africa such as the Hadza, Akie, or Sandawe (who are generally darker skinned, but sometimes—at least the latter two—may seem to have some vaguely Khoisan/pseudo-Khoisan like features), (or maybe—at least in some respects— with certain Nilotic/Nilo-Saharan speaking types native to east Africa.
        But the Khoisan apparently, having branched off early, likely preserved some traits lost in other groups, while continuing to adapt to their environments.

        Most non-Khoisan (and non-Pygmy) Africans and non-Africans share a common ancestry that diverged later in, likely in/toward East Africa (maybe not too long before the time of the OOA migration). Those common ancestors may have (in different ways) looked somewhat like one or more existing indigenous E. African groups, like the Hadza, the native (usually now Nilo-Saharan speaking types) of the South and Central Sudan, and/or the tribes of the horn that still have little Eurasian admixture (e.g. certain Omotic speaking ones like the Hamar or Ongota)

        http://www.nature.com/nrg/journal/v5/n8/fig_tab/nrg1405_F1.html

      • Jm8

        Edit: “Many-most non-Khoisan (and non-Pygmy) Africans (and non-Africans) share a predominant common ancestry…”

      • If you looks at pictures of homo erectus or homo ergaster they look more like bantu people than san.

        @Robert,

        how are black people a new race? what people did they evolve from? aren’t they just an evolution of homo erectus but with modern human sized brains? Apart from the head size, they look the same, unless the artists depictions are biased.

    • I do not mind calling human beings who act like the scum of the earth subhumans. Or criminals for that matter. Especially if they are viciously attacking me. Because as far as I am concerned, my enemies ARE subhuman. That’s how much I hate them.

      But calling whole races or nationalities subhuman? Come on, man, I would never do that.

      • Stalin Tonks

        I bet if I forced you at gunpoint to live and work in a black enough area for a couple years I could get that smile of yours to turn upside down.

        • “I bet if I forced you at gunpoint to live and work in a black enough area for a couple years I could get that smile of yours to turn upside down.”

          Except that’s nothing new to him. He knows how shit those places are. Keep in mind he said “whole race”. That includes the people he had addressed.

        • Stalin Tonks

          Yeah I know that Robert has been in that position before. If I could force him to go back I guarantee in a few weeks Robert will go full fash.

        • TRASH

          STALIN TONKS Why an earth do whites do it? Live and work in black areas? It must be a high salary?

          I should add that most of them in the North or South of the U.S. are poor white Anglo people. Italians, Jews, Irish and Germans move out after a generation or two but the poor whites who trace their roots to the South seem to have some need to be around blacks.

        • TRASH

          Why DO whites choose to live and work in black neighborhoods? What sort of industry or high-tech white collar work pays that much money?

          If you were poor and on welfare wouldn’t it be smart to “take a bath” on your house investment and leave before your son becomes a pimp and your daughter a crack whore after years of public school beatings.

          WTF hang around?

    • A thing is is that, in terms of Archaic ancestry, SSA including Khoisan and Pygmy have 13% of a species that Expanded from Africa 120,000 years ago the basically non-existent in other population and 2% from a species from a species similar to the possessor of the the Kabwe Skull.

      However..there are problem in the inference from this,

      A. That 13% was technically Very close to Sapien, basically labelled “premodern”.

      B. That two percent in mostly concentrated into Capoids like pygmies and Bushmen admixed Blacks compared to more Fully blacks like Yoruba or Mandingos.

      C.Iwo Eleru, a Nigerian Skull that anatomically matches as a Hybrid of the two species, suggest that introgression worked a the species of the 13% percent absorbed the people that made up the 2% first. If that’s the case, then that decrease the 120k hominid genes in full negroids compared to Capoids,

      D. With that noted, I think latter selection explain the behavior of blacks in terms of the more “cruel” behaviors. Pygmies were observed to lack cannibalism (excepted when learned from blacks and even then when they only did that with enemies), sacrifice, and though they stole they weren’t as cruel overall as blacks and actually had better cooperating skills despite having less technology.

      This could be explained by Monogamy, as they are noted to be more monogamous than blacks.

      http://www.unz.com/pfrost/origins-of-black-africans/

      See chapter one of this book.

      https://books.google.com/books?id=FmdHAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA483&lpg=PA483&dq=pygmies+cruel+negroes&source=bl&ots=9oNwt7L45A&sig=CW0MDbKGQmO58p0-G87GaKTBp90&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwihwuGruMvPAhUGeSYKHUZyAaIQ6AEIQjAI#v=onepage&q=pygmies%20cruel%20negroes&f=false

    • Tony Swagger

      Bill, you and Jason are getting cuckier and cuckier by the day. You guys are taking cuckiness to a new level..

  10. Bernardista

    Robert, you can’t do anything about Rabbit.

    Think about how long it took for Alt Right and all of its wings to evolve into an entity strong enough to launch the Democratic nominee into a diatribe against Pepe the Frog.

    Then imagine the stampede of people rushing to find the ‘deep dark recesses of the internet’ (or whatever it was she called it) to find the Alt Right, and in doing so, begin to shed their cuckness?

    Hopefully she will do the same favor for the Alt Left. And hopefully it will be your blog that people see first and not Rabbit’s.

    ‘ It would be nice to go back to the way things were in the 60’s, but it won’t happen because we don’t have the same demographics that we had in the 60’s. Perhaps we could have abandoned identity politics if we had maintained the level of homogeneity of that time period.’

    No, no , at least we can still attempt to staunch the flow instead of just sitting there waiting for the inevitable Balkanization. For example,enacting some pre-1965 immigration policies could help a lot.

    Vetting may help somewhat, but how successful is it? And for how long and for how many generations?

    As Bernie himself said, you can’t have a nation state without borders.
    A more Alt-ish viewpoint (mine) is that you can’t have a nation state where you don’t consider your countrymen first and foremost. If Americans don’t respect their own border, who on earth will?

    • “Hopefully she will do the same favor for the Alt Left. And hopefully it will be your blog that people see first and not Rabbit’s.

      That’s the crux of the issue. It’s not just that Tulio, I, or whomever are being crybabies. It’s bad for the movement that he has the domain name.

    • O would like to post that stuff he wrote in that one post that you just quoted. I would like to see what the readers believe about that. Is Rabbit onto something. Are non-Whites going to oppress us in the future? Are Tulio and Alpha going to be on one side of the barricades and me on the other? It’s an interesting question. Rabbit seems certain this is the future, but I am not so sure.

      • Stalin Tonks

        Are you high Robert? Of course blacks and browns will not treat white people fairly when they become the majority of the population. Christ, they will oppress each other when their numbers grow big enough that the white man doesn’t matter.

        • I don’t know. Brown and a few Blacks are a majority in all of Latin America and Whites are not oppressed by Brown majorities in any of those lands. In fact, they rule those places.

          I understand that there are a few Whites left in the Caribbean and they are not mistreated.

        • TRASH

          Asian-Black societies have collapsed or erupted into racial turmoil several times when the White factor was removed.

          East Africa’s Idi Amin regime demonstrates this.

          Los Angeles seems to have neighborhoods following that trend.

          No white people?

          Gee, won’t those places look lovely?

        • TRASH-
          I would think that’s because those societies were like 99% Black, 1% (Lw caste) East Indian, not a healthy mix.

          The Blacks Dominated. That won’t be the case here.
          I predict Balkanization with Asians, Mestizos, and Blacks, where Asians may take a few Hispanics for grunt work but keep out Blacks all together.

    • He’s got that domain name and he ain’t getting rid of it. To his credit, he was one of the first Alt Leftists. However, the later wings that have sprung up mostly want nothing to do with racism.

      • Stalin Tonks

        You make a a good point about Mexico and South America. However, whites are like a tiny rich minority in those countries and they have always been ruled by rich white people from day one.

        Race relations are already way worse in America than South America and whites aren’t even a minority yet.

        • Colombia is 20-25% White. Brazil is 50-60% White. No one is oppressing anyone down there.

          We will still have most of the money. We will be a moneyed elite like in Latin America even when we are a minority.

          We are a minority here in California, and nothing is happening and no one cares. Anyway, Mexicans don’t care about Whites because you can be White and Mexican. Mexican is not a race and a lot of Mexicans are pretty damn White.

        • Stalin Tonks

          Brazil is not fifty to sixty percent white. That is horseshit. It is closer to five to six percent white.

        • The genome is 50-60% White and 55% of the people identify as White. But in Latin America, you can be as low as 75% White and you are still White.

          Whites are everywhere in Brazil. I met a few of them on the Net. They were not difficult to find. The South in particular is mostly White, about 70-80%.

        • Stalin Tonks

          Someone who is one three quarters white and one quarter black is not white by any sane definition of what a white person is. You may as well say Obama is white for fuck sakes. There are definitely white people in Brazil and the southern part is the whitest. BTW, I read they had a referendum in that part and 95% of the people voted to secede from the rest of Brazil. I hope it’s true and they do secede.

        • by the strictest definitions 51% White= White.

        • Sami

          Mexico has at least 10-15 million people who any American would consider to be “fully” white. If you define the term a bit more loosely to encompass those whose heritage is majority European, say 70% or above, you are probably looking at 20-25 million. You have obviously never travelled through the northeastern states of Mexico, such as Nuevo Leon. Monterrey is a mostly-white city

        • Whites in Latin America say that if you are at least 75-85% White down there, you’re considered White.

          The Whites who said this were THE LATIN AMERICAN WHITES ON STORMFRONT.

          That’s good enough for me. I have seen people from Arab groups that are up to 20% Black such as Yemenis and they just look White to me. 20% Indian Chileans just look like White people. My former best friend was 25% Chinese. He just looked like some White guy.

          IF YOU LOOK WHITE AND YOU ACT WHITE, YOU’RE WHITE.

        • TRASH

          Don’t ask me why Mexicans save their anger for pasty Anglo but not slightly tan Spanish Mexicans like Antonio Banderas or Andy Garcia.

          It is the Mediterranean whites who force Indians and blacks and Mestizos to fight for their bread crumbs in Latin America and not Anglo-Saxons.

      • Tulio

        I always think of Latin America when some white nationalist starts talking about how dark races are going to oppress whites in the future. I’ve known plenty of white Mexicans. None of them are oppressed or mistreated in Mexico. The dark Mexicans haven’t risen up and killed them. They don’t even seem to think about doing so. At worst you might see grumblings about whites actors being too prominent in media and TV shows and showing dark people as maids. You get this a lot in Brazil as well. I’ve only been to Brazil once but I’ve talked to many non-white Brazilians and I don’t sense any hostility on part toward whites other than perhaps lamenting the lack of representation of dark people in media and concentration of wealth in whiter hands(at the most). But we see some of the same complaints in the US. Yet whites in Latin America seem to be just fine to me.

        If there is a difference between the US and Latin America, it the US’s culture of political correctness and identity politics. So maybe there’s a slight chance of more racial hostility in the US due to this. And perhaps it stems from America’s creed of equality, all men are created equal, democracy, etc and thus any lasting inequality is seen as a structural problem.

        • TRASH

          ROBERT We rarely see many Spanish in America, actually. Whether from Latin America or Madrid, their numbers are small.

          I’ve met maybe two pure Spanish white Mexicans in America in my entire life.

          There are a few Spanish communities in Arizona and Texas of Basque people, that is all.

          Cuban Americans in Florida are often third generation Spanish but in the main, most Latin Americans are black or Indian Mulatto.

          Why?

        • Mestizos are brainwashed to some degree, to think that lilly White mofos like Pitbull are there kin. It’s insane, I’ve never seen anything like it.

          I think Latin America is an oddball in this regard.

  11. Erik Sieven

    that´s a very good collection of tips!
    for point 8 and 9 it helps me to think how culture has changed over time, so that what people thought of as normal in 1800 is considered cruel or horrible and the other way round. Then I realize how ridiculous many of the rules are that most people follow today, and that probably 99% of all people who ever lived have not followed those rules. Also it helps me to think of other cultures, many of those things which are seen as sacred in western countries (black males, female promiscuity etc.) are not regarded as sacred in other countries like Saudi Arabia or India

  12. Would Rabbit distance himself from (((Robert))) if (((Robert))) told him about his (((ancestry)))?

    • Well no, considering how he already like Robert. Did Robert evenr mentioned his ancestry having a jewish trace?

      https://altleft.com/2015/11/14/a-clockwork-greenshirt-introducing-the-alt-left/

      Reading this the only Problem I see with Jews is their anti-whiteness. Robert, regardless if he has some jewish roots, is very pro-white. Plus he has already commended Robert for his standing already.

      Honestly Chiune he’s not as bad as he seems, read what he says of the alt right here.

      https://altleft.com/2016/08/12/postcards-from-xenophobia-black-pill-summer/

      “Finally, in the AltRight and various other edgelord sects, tons of people hate each other. There is constant drama between various individuals and factions. Often people get doxed and face the worst attacks not from SJWs but from people supposedly on their side or loosely allied. Tons of people are complete assholes and you wonder if we ever won anything whether you’d even want most of them as neighbors.”

      • Nah this remark does appear to be a fluke to be completely honest.

        It’s just that he says that the U.S. needs to be no more than 15% NAM.

        How do we expediently reach that goal?
        -White immigration (considering the welfare state over there, and similiar economic outlooks, I doubt that’s going to happen).
        -Deportation? that’s what is scary.

        • “-Deportation? that’s what is scary.”

          Well that depends. In the case of Hispanic disambiguating illegal immigrants could help because, while Aframs do grow significantly due to R selection, Hispanics are the ones doing the major Displacement. Though with “natives”, the only one I would consider is with unstable criminals.

          Still, that alone wouldn’t work. Another Idea could be abortion clinics and paying participants, basically with parents that would be irresponsible. As long as it;s voluntary I don’t see the real harm.

          Hell, that could actually help African Americans with a more K style of selection to grow proportionately.

    • Stalin Tonks

      Is Robert a jew? I don’t think he is.

  13. Chinedu

    LOL. A bunch of “all-powerful” keyboard warriors are going to deport people, restrict immigration and regulate neighborhoods.

    Thanks for the laughs, guys.

    • “LOL. A bunch of “all-powerful” keyboard warriors are going to deport people, restrict immigration and regulate neighborhoods.

      Thanks for the laughs, guys.”

      And where do you read that “we” would do it? And if you read it closely, I wasn’t even generalizing with what people by race or culture should be deported.

      “In the case of Hispanic disambiguating illegal immigrants could help because, while Aframs do grow significantly due to R selection, Hispanics are the ones doing the major Displacement. Though with “natives”, the only one I would consider is with unstable criminals.”

      So I only mentioned
      A. people who have arrived by illegal means to begin with.
      B. specifically dangerous criminals.

      Plus Chinedu, you are in no position to laugh because, despite saying your above the nonsense and racism on this blog, you seem to be compelled to coming back and back.

    • Any sort of deportation other than of illegals would essentially require scrapping the 14th (and 15th) amendments.

      Quotas are useless because as I said above White Europeans aren’t going to want to come here.
      IDK, maybe Slavs/Eastern Euros will come.
      And if you’re like Robert and are a Caucasianist, maybe some folks from SW Asia will help some.

      • I do reject the “We’re a White nation”, at least in terms of blood.

        We had tons of Blacks, and recruited Chinese to come here, to build the intercontinental railroad as well as conquered/incorporated lots of Mestizos.
        BUT it was, and is the dominant culture. To keep it that way is the best.

        • TRASH

          Chinese have not yet had a detrimental effect even to the degree of Italians with their organized crime and corruption, much less NAMS.

        • TRASH

          ALL RURAL WHITES CLAIM to have Native American blood.

        • My maternal Grandfather (from Kentucky, ancestry from N.C.) did.

          My maternal Grandmother said any non-White ancestry he had was probably Black, since his ancestors owned slaves. She never said this to his face.

          LOL

        • Jason Y

          <blockquoteALL RURAL WHITES CLAIM to have Native American blood.

          Some have a better claim than others. For instance, does one of the parents look like an Amerindian?

        • Jason-
          I’m pretty sure Med English or Black ancestry is the source of those looks, not Native American blood.

          If you say you look “Mulattoe” maybe you have Black ancestry or have med English (Curly haired South Italian) ancestry.
          You should get a DNA test.

          The Med English are Anglos with higher rates of ancestry from the Roman rulers around the turn of the first Millenia.

        • Jason Y

          Some say the Irish have curly hair, and a lot of scotch-Irish here, I doubt if it’s black.

      • TRASH

        It is sad that America had diminished so greatly in two generations that Germans, Scandinavians and even Italians no longer want to immigrate because their standard of living is higher in Europe. Or they immigrate to Australia or elsewhere.

    • TRASH

      CHINEDU A bunch of Chinese, Indians and Hispanics who visit this site get a good idea of what goes on in the European mind.

      Plus other Europeans need to know how the Chinese have damaged Southeast Asia as a warning of what massive immigration would do.

    • TRASH

      No, whites will always leave. Neighborhoods, countries and even regions. Then you have the Philippines, Haiti and Africa.

      Anybody who has dropped in on Southeast Asia has to be unimpressed with how Chinese run things there. Lord helps us if they ever run North America.

      • Jason Y

        The Chinese run everything as an elitist mafia family. I know cause I lived around them on Saipan. Plus, they hate or massively distrust anyone not Chinese, viewing them as a threat. They’re the ultimate imperalists staying in lands where they own everything, exploit everything, while at the same time hate and distrust the locals.

  14. Matt

    Rabbit apparently doesn’t mind going on Robert Stark and chatting with Stark and 1 1/2 Jews.

  15. TRASH

    Just what harm can “Joos” really do? They do not force people at gunpoint to fight for their homeland? Some make some stupid movies but so does Mel Gibson. Porn?

    Sorry, I fail to see the full extent of harm they are doing sitting in a cheap apartment in Brooklyn.

  16. It really would not be a stretch to call TRASH a White Nationalist.
    He’s just ‘off-White’ (1/4 Ashkenazi) and an elitist, but otherwise what differences are there?

    He’s said it’s ‘self-preservation’ that non-NAMs are isolated from NAMs.

    • Chinedu

      Urban ghettos breed crime. White urban ghettos of the past (Jewish, Irish, Italian and WASP) were also wracked with criminal activity. Wild West towns of the 19th century were essentially urban ghettos. They were 100% white and often lawless. Crime spiraled out of control during the recent oil boom in North Dakota tracking with increased urbanization. North Dakota is practically 100% white.

      I’ve lived in several mixed neighborhoods. I’ve lived with blacks, whites, Middle Easterners, Asians and Hispanics. Everybody got along and there was virtually no crime. That’s because we were all of similar socio-economic and educational status. So while HBD and race-realist nincompoops insist that genes account for criminal behavior or lack of same, the real world has presented no such evidence.

      • Robert has made the point that the murder rate in Medieval England was 10x modern day Honduras.

        This absolutism of White= Good, non-White= Bad grunt, grunt is obviously bullshit and only retarded WNs latch onto it.
        BUT the law of averages is important as well.

        • Yeah, true.

          But if we are to consider time periods, then we must acknowledge two things.

          We should compare also with Africans of that point and time (obviously new world blacks didn’t exist at that time).
          Rate of progress in expelling such violence on a domestic level.

        • That’s true as well.

          But I have heard that rural Africa (even now) has reatively low crime.

          It also appears plenty of other tribes weren’t as violent, as say, the Ashantis, including Chinedu’s people; The Igboes.

        • “That’s true as well.

          But I have heard that rural Africa (even now) has reatively low crime.”

          Well that follows with the Urban/rural relationship but keep in mind in terms of rural crime relative to other places. Plus poverty I’ve heard is actually increasing in rural areas, so that won’t stay for long.

          “It also appears plenty of other tribes weren’t as violent, as say, the Ashantis, including Chinedu’s people; The Igboes.”

          The Ashantis…..no. They WERE fairly advance for their time, but peacefulness wasn’t an attribute. Keep in mind that they werea miliatarized empire as well as on of the biggest contributors in west African slave trading.

          With Igboes it varied.

          See my article here.

          https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2016/02/23/niger-delta-beaters-by-phil/

      • Sami

        Mostly agree. People forget that Detroit, in 1970, with a 45% Black population, was a very nice place — economically, culturally, and spiritually, as well as relatively low crime, before “we” decided to become a post-industrial, globalized wasteland.

        Whites have been dealing, all too often, with this new hopeless by either committing suicide, becoming heroin addicts, or by working for Walmart and retreating into Evangelical irrationalism, among other things; Blacks, all too often, by becoming gangsters. Is this partly genetic, these divergent ways of coping with distress? I don’t know. But I, for one, would much rather avoid the issue all together by rebuilding a healthy economy based on a large productive sector, with the large, healthy, and prosperous middle class that springs forth from that economic model that used to, in large part, define who and what we are.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_system_of_manufacturing
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_System_(economic_plan)

        • Sami

          This was how I meant to structure that first paragraph:

          Mostly agree. People forget that Detroit, in 1970, with a 45% Black population, was a very nice place — economically, culturally, and spiritually, as well as relatively low crime — before “we” decided to become a post-industrial, globalized wasteland.

        • TRASH

          SAMI I’m sad to admit that a certain Darwinian model occurred in Detroit. HAMTRAMCK Polish-Americans and other whites who were were intelligent simply sold their property and left for jobs in Chicago or Canada.

          Those that are too old, to uneducated, to drug-addicted or simply too lazy with too many children remained in Flint or Detroit. Some whites even became gangsters themselves, as well as a few Arab thugs.

          The intelligent, fit, young and qualified simply left so the tax base shrunk to nothing.

    • “Urban ghettos breed crime. White urban ghettos of the past (Jewish, Irish, Italian and WASP) were also wracked with criminal activity. Wild West towns of the 19th century were essentially urban ghettos. They were 100% white and often lawless. Crime spiraled out of control during the recent oil boom in North Dakota tracking with increased urbanization. North Dakota is practically 100% white.”

      Well it is known that Urbanization does increases crime, with factors such as population density for one.

      Two things not noted though

      A. differences in subgroups are notable, but not without genetic explaination as well.

      B. Magnitudes, how does this compoare with data compare to balck under same conditions.

      I’ve lived in several mixed neighborhoods. I’ve lived with blacks, whites, Middle Easterners, Asians and Hispanics. Everybody got along and there was virtually no crime. That’s because we were all of similar socio-economic and educational status. So while HBD and race-realist nincompoops insist that genes account for criminal behavior or lack of same, the real world has presented no such evidence.

      “I’ve lived in several mixed neighborhoods. I’ve lived with blacks, whites, Middle Easterners, Asians and Hispanics. Everybody got along and there was virtually no crime. That’s because we were all of similar socio-economic and educational status. So while HBD and race-realist nincompoops insist that genes account for criminal behavior or lack of same, the real world has presented no such evidence.”

      A. SES and credentials acts as a filter for certain traits, so to begin with the samples you been with were not representative. Variation exists with overlap with Groups.

      B. As I have already shown you, even with SES, differences still exist statistically, so you have debunked nothing.

      https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2016/10/05/why-fixating-on-black-problems-is-important-for-liberals/#comment-275282

      • “B. Magnitudes, how does this compoare with data compare to balck under same conditions.”

        I mean, in terms of magnitude, how does data of those white groups actually compare to blacks?

        • Chinedu

          Stop your anti-black trolling, Phil. You’re embarrassing yourself.

          If this was my blog I’d ban your ass for your relentless racist trolling.

        • To Chinedu,

          Well, too bad then. So now you moved on from accusing me of trolling to empty threats.

          Sure, I’m the one embarrassing myself.

      • TRASH

        Crime in North Dakota would be on Amerindian reservations, primarily.

      • TRASH

        It is not morality so much as intelligence. Koreans and Italians and Greeks have gangs but they are discreet, clever, wary, distrustful and organized far beyond what NAMS organize.

        Similarly if they want sex, they call an escort service and pay the $400 to have great sex with a beautiful woman whom they lubricate with a little cocaine or Molly during her visit to a nice hotel.

        NAMS who are always poor have no choice but to rape, seduce very young girls with alcohol. Their crimes are crude and reckless because they are not as clever as the Korean mafia or Italian Cosa Nostra importing heroin into Jersey docks.

        Does this mean they are more ruthless than a Yakuza? I don’t believe so.

      • I don’t ban for racism on here. I prefer to like the antis take on the racists. Ugly speech should be fought by other speech.

    • TRASH

      “White Nationalists” have so much Amerindian and even African blood in them that it is a real stretch to call them White.

      You can see the Amerindian in American rural whites from the interior of the United States like Kansas or Oklahoma.

      I’m whiter than most of them.

      Conversely a great many blondes from the South claim to have “some Indian” which I do not believe.

      • Looking at Dna maps of whites with Black blood in the south, the highest ones would be in South Carolina and i believe Lousiana. Even then it’s not that high so I’m unsure if it’s a stretch to call them “whites”.

        • Jason Y

          Whites that mix with blacks drift into the black community. That’s why you don’t see mixed black/whites among whites.

        • But then that would still mean that those highloy admixes would identify as “white”, which is what we are basing white on.

        • Jason Y

          Right, the white/black mixes almost always identify as black in the USA, especially in the past when the “one drop rule” thing was going on.

          Black/white mixes almost always have drifted into the black community cause black was always thought of as shameful, but Amerindian blood for some odd reason is not.

    • TRASH

      I speak facts and not opinions. Whites, Korean-Americans and Jews feel equally uneasy in a barrio or ghetto.

      Even A FEW Italian-American neighborhoods are slightly unsafe in New Jersey or Brooklyn-not because they will rob you but because they are macho and will beat you easily for little reason.

      • You’ve never been in majority Italian neighborhoods. I’ve lived around Italians my whole life. My family is Italian. You have no idea what you’re talking about.

        • Jason Y

          Trash does go off on the Italians like he does southern white people, but most of this ramblings are based on stereotypes of some “extremist” Italians and Southern whites.

          It’s sort of like what I was saying in another post. The loud mouth cunts give each ethnic group a bad name, you cannot base your opinion of a particular group on observations of these blowhard types.

          You can bet most blacks find Cornell West to be an idiot. You can bet most whites have a low opinion of Stromfront or Ted Nugent.

        • Jason Y

          It seems like Trash has seen too many Mafia and Spike Lee movies, and so thinks all Italian-Americans are criminals and working class bonehead racists.

        • They will not beat someone passing through.

          Maybe if one of their buds act up, they will, but that’s how guys behave everywhere.

          Jews would do that, too, TRASH.

        • Jason Y

          The Italians might beat up a black passing thru, but that was probably only along time ago, say in the racially charged 1960s or something, or maybe I just watched “A Bronx Tale” too many times.

        • TRASH

          An insult that a WASP would shrug off can result in receiving serious violence in an Italian neighborhood.

          Usually you will not be shot as Italians settle things with brutal fistfights.

          I would add that although most of them are not tall they are very strong and very good at fighting.

          Its best to simply keep out of Italian neighborhoods unless you are Italian and lived there your entire life.

        • What kind of Italians do you see that aren’t tall? I’ve never had a problem in an Italian neighborhood. Italians are tough, but they are not like blacks when it comes to violence.

        • TRASH

          RACE REALIST

          Blacks DO SENSE that Italians are generally strong and good at fighting…they will call a redneck a “cracker” but most will think twice about calling somebody a “Swamp Guinea” in an Italian-American neighborhood.

        • Exactly. They know better.

        • TRASH

          RACE REALIST I’ve been around enough Sicilian-Americans to know that minding your manners around them is the best decision and that they take even accidental insults fairly seriously.

          Blacks seem to sense this too and few of them will call an Italian a “Swamp Guinea” as quickly as they would call a redneck a cracker.

    • TRASH

      Elitist? I’m as populist as it goes. I just represent the white lower middle class and not NAMS.

      Yes, it is self-preservation that keeps non-NAMS living in neighborhoods that are not in the barrio.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s