Possibilities for Race Realist Research with Progressive Motives and Possibly Outcomes

We know full well that Blacks commit crime at something like 7-8X the White rate.

We can debate this factoid.

If Blacks are genetically tainted somehow, then one would assume that most Blacks would be like this. I do believe that the Black crime has an elevated tendency towards crime and this is biological. But I doubt if all Blacks have this tendency. I doubt if Tulio, Alpha, Jm8 and Phil do. Or do they?

This is one of the great things about race realism.

Crime is such a problem with Blacks that it needs to be studied. By doing this, we should study that ones who act good.

Why is it that they act so good? Do they have the same genetic tendencies as the criminal Blacks but have somehow overcome them? What is the life history of these good behaving Blacks? Make some figures. Now compare to the criminal Blacks. How did the life history including upbringing home environment, etc. of the well behaved ones differ? Was there something in the life history of the ones that act good that protected them from criminal behavior. What factors are those? Let’s isolate them. I would imagine that the environments of Blacks who act good and criminal Blacks might be pretty different. But how different? What specific events/histories raise the risk of crime for this group and which ones act as crime preventive?

Now suppose we could isolate this thing, whatever it is, that makes Blacks more susceptible to crime. It’s a gene or some repeat or whatever. OK and if you have this, you are four times more likely to be a criminal. OK, now let’s look at Alpha and Tulio, etc. What if they have this exact same risk-raising repeat? See? Wow! Wouldn’t that be interesting? How come this genetic thing raised the risk in these guys but somehow Alpha and Tulio had the exact same gene, but it didn’t raise their risk at all. It was like it didn’t happen. Now why would that be? Did Alpha and Tulio have some protective experiences that kept them from this route. What might those have been? We have so many studies we could do here.

I would think that certain things might set off the gene or cause it to express more. We know that genetic expression is a new field. It’s not so much your genes but the extent to which they express – not at all, a bit, moderately, a lot or fully. So maybe Alpha and Tulio got this repeat but they had these protective experiences such that the gene simply never really expressed all that much in them or expressed so little that they were able to deal without a problem. And we may even be able to measure the degree to which genes express nowadays. So what might those protective experiences have been that kept the gene from expressing in these two but not in others.

A common complaint about this thinking, “Why are you studying Blacks? Whites commit crime too!” Yeah, but in Blacks it is so out of control that it is almost a public health emergency.

Anyway, whatever data we get out of these studies of Blacks, perhaps a lot of it might carry over to Whites. If something raises crime risk in Blacks, it might just do so in Whites, too, right? Sure. But what if it didn’t? Wouldn’t that be interesting? This particular life experiences raises Black crime risk by 4X but Whites with that same experience are not affected. Whoa! Now why would that be? Or suppose some experience raises the risk my Blacks by 7 times but in Whites by only 3 times. Or suppose there was some experience that raised the risk in Whites but somehow Blacks were sort of immune. Wouldn’t that be interesting.

You see there is a lot of really cool research we could be doing with race realism but we can’t even study it because the Cultural Left. And studying this stuff could really help us to ameliorate some difficult and terrible problems. Race realist research could maybe help us to ameliorate some of the serious problems Blacks have, and society has for that matter. So race realism could even help NAM’s and maybe help the rest of us too. Sure it is a dangerous tool but so are most things. In the right hands, we could do some great progressive research along race realist lines.

58 Comments

Filed under Blacks, Crime, Criminology, Eugenics, Genetics, Race Realism, Race/Ethnicity, Science, Sociology, Whites

58 responses to “Possibilities for Race Realist Research with Progressive Motives and Possibly Outcomes

  1. Pingback: Black Male, 113 IQ | Beyond Highbrow - Robert Lindsay

  2. Jason Y

    WNs are always accusing Jews of being evil, yet having a high IQ, so why couldn’t this high IQ/ bad morality thing be true of other races also?

    • Stalin Tonks

      What we really need is a study on white people and cucking. We could use Jason as the prime test subject.

      • Is “cucking” some Yiddish verbiage?

        • TRASH

          What is with the Yiddish thing? If every Jew left America would poor rural Anglo people drive their flatbeds to New York and make a killing on Wall Street or finance Hollywood films.

          Rednecks would still start popping babies out when they were 17 and be unable to learn any sort of skill that allowed them to earn great money. What difference do the Jews make?

  3. Jm8

    Interesting speculations.
    I might not the best example since I am mixed race, though I do have significant (or not insignificant) Black ancestry (probably somewhere between 33-40%). I am predomantly (West and West Central) African and East Mediteranean (mostly Ashkenazi Jewish), but with small bits of Native American (mostly from the American Southeast), French (from the early settlers of Louisiana) and English (from the early settlers of Virginia).

    • Your the fucking Lenny Kravitz of the plains.

      • TRASH

        K.I. The white male of Old British ancestry in the South or Flyover has nothing to shout about. Jews and Italians are better at business and blacks are better at sports in addition to have bigger penises in the bargain.

        At least the Northern Yankee Italians or Jews or Polish can stay in school and out earn the NAMS so that they do not get their ass kicked at the bus stop going to the same Section 8 office.

        I mean what are these Anglo folks in the Flyover actually good at it? They do not perform well like Asians or Jews academically, cannot play sports as well as blacks and cannot learn enough Spanish to pass for Mexican at day labor.

        They are pretty much out of luck aren’t they?

        • alas, it’s not that I hate these poor chaps.

          It’s just that it’s very true and it’s a great comeback to the Reichers.

          You should start your own blog, (((TRASH)))

  4. ujpes_djkd

    A common complaint about this thinking, “Why are you studying Blacks? Whites commit crime too!” Yeah, but in Blacks it is so out of control that it is almost a public health emergency.

    “Almost” only as long as you live far enough from wards where they are the majority, lol.

  5. Jm8

    Interaction between genes and environment are indeed likely to be very complex, and not now well understood.

  6. Tulio

    I can only speak for myself but I’m very much NOT criminal or violent by nature.

    1) I’m very introverted. Meaning I stay to myself and don’t bother other people.

    2) I’m not emotional. I rarely get angry or have a foul temper. I’m even tempered. People have told me I have something of a zen personality. If someone walked up an insulted me, I’d probably just give them a strange look and keep walking unless they began physically threatening me.

    3) I’m risk averse and inhibited. I’m not the ballsy type. I tend to play it safe.

    4) I’m non-confrontational. I hate arguing with people or getting into conflicts. That ties into my introverted nature. I’d rather just withdraw or leave the situation than have to get into confrontations. I could never be a lawyer. Sometimes I have to force myself to stand up for myself and fight back.

    5) I’ve never had my testosterone tested, but I have the feeling I’m a low T type of person. I don’t like competition, I don’t care for sports, I’m not hyper or aggressive or confrontation or alpha male or whatever. I’ve accepted and embraced who I am as I know that most of our personality is in our genes.

  7. Jm8

    I would say the trait Robert mentions (whether not it is biologically in Blacks). is not in me either. I am also very introverted (extremely perhaps). Introverts can also be outwardly demonstrative or sociable, when they are arround people to get along, but I am generally the quiet subdued kind.

  8. So Robert, this gene, the MAOA allele. This basically deals with the breaking down of serotonin in the brain.

    Blacks, proportionately, have the “dangerous variant” much higher than whites, but there could be some form of medical help that could help with Serotonin absorption would likely ameliorate this issue, and yes, this could be carried over to whites.

    • Chinedu

      Blacks, proportionately, have the “dangerous variant” much higher than whites

      Talk to a geneticist instead of continuously making a fool of yourself. Do you really believe all the shit you write?

      • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monoamine_oxidase_A#Aggression_and_the_.22Warrior_gene.22

        Do you bother to even try to refute point?

        Studies have found differences in the frequency distribution of variants of the MAOA gene between ethnic groups:[31][32] of the participants, 59% of Black men, 54% of Chinese men, 56% of Maori men, and 34% of Caucasian men carried the 3R allele, while 5.5% of Black men, 0.1% of Caucasian men, and 0.00067% of Asian men carried the 2R allele.[22][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39].

        • *refute my point.

          More from the section, it elaborates with aggression in terms of reaction and stress handling ability.

          “In individuals with the low activity MAOA gene, when faced with social exclusion or ostracism showed higher levels of aggression than individuals with the high activity MAOA gene.[40] Low activity MAO-A could significantly predict aggressive behaviour in a high provocation situation, but was less associated with aggression in a low provocation situation. Individuals with the low activity variant of the MAOA gene were just as likely as participants with the high activity variant to retaliate when the loss was small. However, they were more likely to retaliate and with greater force when the loss was large.[41]”

        • Chinedu

          Which studies? By whom? Where? Sample size? Test subjects? Peer reviews? Contrary opinion. Etc, etc.

          Do you have any curiosity at all or do you just reflexively embrace any piece of junk that strokes your unwarranted white supremacist ego? Yes, I said white supremacist. It makes no difference if you’re actually black.

          Talk to a real geneticist. Find one at your local university. What you claiming is sheer nonsense. You cannot identify a single credible geneticist that will sign off on it.

        • You do see that my quote is referring to actual references on the Wiki page, right?

          Anyways this article has a fast layout of both the studies and the samples used.

          http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/maoa-race-and-crime/

  9. Chinedu

    Robert,

    Why the constant fixation on black people? Black this, black that. Do you know how many socially destructive behaviors white people are responsible for? Or Asians or Latinos?

    • Chinedu

      Why don’t you check the racial distribution of the people being exonerated by DNA evidence after being falsely imprisoned. They’re virtually all black. And that’s just the very tip of the iceberg.

      Crime statistics don’t tell the whole story. If the white population were subjected to the same aggressive scrutiny and aggressive policing prisons would be overflowing. If the white population lacked access to decent counsel, prisons would be overflowing. If the white population was subjected to a racist criminal justice system, prisons would be overflowing. If the white population didn’t get off scott free for the same crimes blacks are imprisoned for, prisons would be overflowing.

    • “Why don’t you check the racial distribution of the people being exonerated by DNA evidence after being falsely imprisoned. They’re virtually all black. And that’s just the very tip of the iceberg.”

      But how much of black criminals do they make up?

      “Crime statistics don’t tell the whole story. If the white population were subjected to the same aggressive scrutiny and aggressive policing prisons would be overflowing. If the white population lacked access to decent counsel, prisons would be overflowing. If the white population was subjected to a racist criminal justice system, prisons would be overflowing. If the white population didn’t get off scott free for the same crimes blacks are imprisoned for, prisons would be overflowing.”

      Proof?

    • Also Chinedu, what about this?

      https://www.osac.gov/pages/ContentReportDetails.aspx?cid=19814

      Probably one of the most advance countries in Africa based on Infrstructure, has a black government, yet has some of the highest crime rates in the world.

      Now, give me evidence of a SSA country that has a lower crime rate than any European or Asian Country. (Data needed). Even if you do, it would be an exception the proves the rule.

      You act like certain things are obvious that “race realist” don’t see….is this a coincidence?

    • Also, for your falsely accussed point, that doesn’t prove much actually.

      What that tells us is that Black often have individuals blamed for wrong crimes more often, in order to support you position it would have to prove that it wasn’t OTHER blacks who did the crime.

  10. Chinedu

    Phil,

    This is what you pasted from Wikipedia

    Studies have found differences in the frequency distribution of variants of the MAOA gene between ethnic groups:[31][32] of the participants, 59% of Black men, 54% of Chinese men, 56% of Maori men, and 34% of Caucasian men carried the 3R allele, while 5.5% of Black men, 0.1% of Caucasian men, and 0.00067% of Asian men carried the 2R allele.[22][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39].

    You have all the annotations at the bottom. Presumably those articles or studies provide evidence for the statement being made. Can you refer me to the specific study that supports the statement being made? Please quote the text from the study.

    • I gave you a link to a site that has the sample size and results of the studies laid out.

    • Chinedu,

      The figures for .1 percent of white men and 5.5 percent of black men come from Beaver et al, 2014

      https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259270974_The_2-Repeat_Allele_of_the_MAOA_Gene_Confers_an_Increased_Risk_for_Shooting_and_Stabbing_Behaviors

      Yes I’ve read the paper of course. I know that child abuse and the like increases the chances for the 2 r allele to be expressed.

      Too lazy at the moment to get the rest of the studies but the figures are definitely legit as I’ve read the same from multiple respective sources.

      • genuine intelligence realist

        This “Realist” is one white supremacist, a real one, who can’t even cope with the fact that he is a Mediterranean white, the 90-average IQ south European type, and spends his life doing, uhm, 3 things.

        1) Venting his own complexes of inferiority on Blacks.As compulsive-obsessively as complexes of inferiority are to be vented.
        His latest is on how bad Blacks smell.

        Now, it’s possible that that is true, and even if were not true one should be free to claim it if he willed.
        Same for propension to crime, same for intelligence, some for whatever split hair.
        But if this is all one does, writing on imaginary or real bad qualities of Black people, and reciting every day how less intelligent they are, that’s speaks troubles on the part of the blogger more than Blacks.

        2) This individual believes he pursues truth regarding cross-race differences. A “realist”.
        Now, highlighting a fraction of reality, that which happens to agree with our ego’s needs, is way easier an endeavour than facing the whole of reality — racial differences reality, here.

        If you are a Southern European whose mind is brilliantly clear as to black-White differences, your mind had better be likewise clear as to Mediterranean/Latino European – North European (Nordid) differences.
        First of all, in intelligence.

        If intelligence difference explains the diversity of Portugal, Greece, Spain, South Italy from Africa, than what is to explain the difference between them and Switzerland, Germany, the Benelux, Norway, England…

        The “Race realist” you have here, belongs to the 90IQ-average area, that is as underdeveloped and lagging behind compared to 100-IQ Europe as one expects to be — and would be even more so, if they hadn’t received trillions of $ of “help for development” by the 100-IQ European guys over DECADES (needless to say, to no developmental effect. Just like “help” sent to Africa).

        You’d expect him to admit truth even when it comes to his own ethnicity and area of origin, or wouldn’t you?
        Nah.
        That would be uncomfortable.
        Smart “realists” look away as quickly as everybody else when reality turns discomfitting for their troubled egoes.
        WHat he does when it comes to stuff he feels as personal is, he transmutes into a master of straw-catching, one from whom the folks at Salon would have one or two things to learn

        :))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

        3) Giving a look at his blog will reveal how this guy is a racist, not by hypocritical leftist thought police standards, but by any sensible standard.
        A racist with an obsession against Blacks.

        Moreover, you’ll notice how his magnified super-big graph of the Bell Curve of intelligence for Blacks and Whites lacks the diagrams for Ashkenazi Jews, Mongolids, and Mediterranean European (average IQ 90. Very similar to South America, where they migrated in myriads, and integrated much better than in North America).

        • This “Realist” is one white supremacist, a real one

          Citation needed.

          the 90-average IQ south European

          Citation needed. Who says it’s 90 in Southern Europe?

          Venting his own complexes of inferiority on Blacks.As compulsive-obsessively as complexes of inferiority are to be vented.

          …Where do you gather this from? Provide evidence for your assertion please.

          His latest is on how bad Blacks smell.

          Did you read my article or not? If you would have, you’d have seen me say:

          “You can also see that blacks have more chloride in their sweat. Now, I’ve never encountered this myself, but I’ve seen numerous people say that blacks smell worse than whites or East Asians. This does have a biological basis, and it has to do with pore size, pore type and amount of chloride excreted by the sweat glands.”

          So I said, personally, I’ve never experienced it. But there is a biological basis.

          But if this is all one does, writing on imaginary or real bad qualities of Black people, and reciting every day how less intelligent they are, that’s speaks troubles on the part of the blogger more than Blacks.

          Please provide evidence for the bolded assertion. Can you also explain the “troubles on the part of the blogger” that you speak about? Because you know absolutely nothing about me except what I blog about.

          This individual believes he pursues truth regarding cross-race differences. A “realist”.

          That’s correct.

          If you are a Southern European whose mind is brilliantly clear as to black-White differences, your mind had better be likewise clear as to Mediterranean/Latino European – North European (Nordid) differences.

          What about it? What references do you have to show an actual intelligence gap between North and South Europe??

          If intelligence difference explains the diversity of Portugal, Greece, Spain, South Italy from Africa, than what is to explain the difference between them and Switzerland, Germany, the Benelux, Norway, England…

          How big of an intelligence gap? Citation?

          90IQ-average area

          Citation needed.

          that is as underdeveloped and lagging behind compared to 100-IQ Europe as one expects to be — and would be even more so, if they hadn’t received trillions of $ of “help for development” by the 100-IQ European guys over DECADES (needless to say, to no developmental effect. Just like “help” sent to Africa).

          Ahahahahaha. Why do you cite things that prove my point?

          Sub-Saharan Africa CAN have a 10 to 13 point increase in IQ by getting rid of their malnutrition, parasitic load and disease. Environmental factors almost depress it 1 SD!!! So if environment can explain more than 2/3rds of a SD gap for Africa, why not southern Italy?

          However, when using a PURER measure of intelligence testing–Raven’s Progressive Matrices– NO difference in intelligence is shown.

          So the 2006-9 PISA data–that Lynn uses– shows a relevant decrease between the North and the South. Hmmm. What could be at work here? Could it be that migrants reach Sicily and Southern Italy first, get counted as citizens and then get counted in the data? It’s very plausible. Could THIS be why there was a relevant difference? That the migrants went northward?

          Source: Problems in deriving Italian regional differences in intelligence from 2009 PISA data

          You’d expect him to admit truth even when it comes to his own ethnicity and area of origin, or wouldn’t you?

          You don’t even know what you’re talking about. When I first read the paper two years ago I believed it. But as I did more research into IQ, I found that the data Lynn presents is faulty. People change their views with new information, I do all the time. I read things against my view all the time.

          Smart “realists” look away as quickly as everybody else when reality turns discomfitting for their troubled egoes.

          No. Smart “realists” (to use your scarequotes) look at both sides of the argument and make their own conclusions once enough is read and one has a full understanding of both sides. That’s what one does when searching for truth. And Lynn is wrong here.

          Eventually I’m going to write on Lynn’s Equatorial Guniea numbers. He used a sample of retarded Spanish school children as EQs sample. Oh no but wait!!! I must be an Equatorial Guinean who doesn’t want to accept a 59 IQ average for my country of origin!!!

          That’s your logic.

          WHat he does when it comes to stuff he feels as personal is, he transmutes into a master of straw-catching, one from whom the folks at Salon would have one or two things to learn

          Nope. So today I learned that looking at both sides of a discussion (like i do with everything) means I build strawmen and Salon can learn from me Riiiiight.

          Giving a look at his blog will reveal how this guy is a racist, not by hypocritical leftist thought police standards, but by any sensible standard.

          Show me references from my blog that back your (baseless) claim.

          A racist with an obsession against Blacks.

          Obsession? Racist? Define the term ‘racist’ please then use examples from my blog to back your assertion. A hobby I do in my free time writing 3 articles on average per week is an ‘obsession’. Got it bro.

          Moreover, you’ll notice how his magnified super-big graph of the Bell Curve of intelligence for Blacks and Whites lacks the diagrams for Ashkenazi Jews, Mongolids, and Mediterranean European

          …… That’s clearly just for blacks and whites as that gap is the best studied.

          Mediterranean European (average IQ 90.

          Citation needed.

          Very similar to South America, where they migrated in myriads, and integrated much better than in North America).

          Ahahahaha!!! Do you know anything about Italian migration in the 20th century? I know people from Argentina and Uruguay. They are nothing like people from Brazil and other SA countries. Because they are ITALIAN and genetics DON’T change when you’re born across an ocean.

          And I already rebutted Lynn’s notion of IQ 90 for S. Italy. So you need a better reference than Lynn.

          https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/01/31/northsouth-differences-in-italian-iq-is-richard-lynn-right/

          Nice try Santoculto. You tried hard to conceal your identity but I know this is you. Your anti-southern-Italian bias is showing.

        • Robert can you please approve the previous comment I just made. Thank you.

        • Chinedu

          I agree with you completely. RaceRealist is a hardcore racist with a twisted obsession with black people. But he’s not very smart. Someone like me would pay him to keep writing if he wasn’t doing it for free. People like this guy don’t understand that they are the biggest enemies of the cause they are trying to champion.

        • Chinedu

          RaceRealist,

          Why try to deny you’re a racist? Are you trying to become mainstream or acceptable? Well that’s never going to happen, you’re wasting your time. You have an entire blog devoted to anti-black racism. Trying to dress it up in ridiculous pseudoscience is only going to work against other dumb racists, not the public at large.

          No one cares if you’re a racist. This site if full of racists, some of whom even claim to be black. Robert is a racist although he claims to be a liberal. Well, then he’s a liberal racist. They do exist. So revel in your racism. You haven’t tried to hide your racism in your blog or in your writings so why do it here? This is not the New York times comment section. This essentially is a racist blog in light of the comments that are allowed and the type of people that write those comments. So you have many fellow travelers here whom I’m sure will applaud your racism.

        • To RR,

          Is this Santoculto? His english seems very different.

        • Chinedu, you can’t call me a racist on here. It’s my contention that I am not a racist. If you keep calling me a racist, I will ban you.

        • RaceRealist is a hardcore racist with a twisted obsession with black people.

          Why do you keep calling me a ‘racist’? What ‘twisted obsession’ do I have with black people? Having an interest in genetics, psychology, nutrition, obesity IQ and evolution means I’m a ‘racist’. You’re just making baseless claims.

          But he’s not very smart. Someone like me would pay him to keep writing if he wasn’t doing it for free. People like this guy don’t understand that they are the biggest enemies of the cause they are trying to champion.

          I’m pretty smart. Biggest enemy? The ‘biggest enemies’ are people who actively deny human racial differences when they’re physically apparent</em?.

          Why try to deny you’re a racist? Are you trying to become mainstream or acceptable? Well that’s never going to happen, you’re wasting your time. You have an entire blog devoted to anti-black racism. Trying to dress it up in ridiculous pseudoscience is only going to work against other dumb racists, not the public at large.

          Show me anything on my blog that is anti-black racism.

          No one cares if you’re a racist. This site if full of racists, some of whom even claim to be black. Robert is a racist although he claims to be a liberal. Well, then he’s a liberal racist. They do exist. So revel in your racism. You haven’t tried to hide your racism in your blog or in your writings so why do it here? This is not the New York times comment section. This essentially is a racist blog in light of the comments that are allowed and the type of people that write those comments. So you have many fellow travelers here whom I’m sure will applaud your racism.

          Reading books on racial differences, writing articles on racial differences, accepting innate racial differences as a lion’s share for the disparity between blacks and whites in IQ, knowing of all of the distinct skeletomuscular differences between races, must mean I’m a racist.

          This also helps me in my line of work, but you wouldn’t know that.

          Phil, I’m sure it’s Santoculto. I know how he types.

      • To Genuine,

        actually you’re the one that’s venting.

        One,

        “Venting his own complexes of inferiority on Blacks.As compulsive-obsessively as complexes of inferiority are to be vented.
        His latest is on how bad Blacks smell.”

        I’ve actually read it, the only race he “singled out” were East Asians for like the first half of the article, and even when he mentioned Africans they were joined with Caucasians, so you’re wring in that regard.

        “Now, it’s possible that that is true, and even if were not true one should be free to claim it if he willed.
        Same for propension to crime, same for intelligence, some for whatever split hair.
        But if this is all one does, writing on imaginary or real bad qualities of Black people, and reciting every day how less intelligent they are, that’s speaks troubles on the part of the blogger more than Blacks.”

        He actually doesn’t single out Blacks on his site overall. At least not in some form of projection, as matter if fact he only mentions them in regards of intellect average differences and instability of their crime rate. The only thing that’s arguably vented by him is his frustration of these facts being denied.

        “This individual believes he pursues truth regarding cross-race differences. A “realist”.
        Now, highlighting a fraction of reality, that which happens to agree with our ego’s needs, is way easier an endeavour than facing the whole of reality — racial differences reality, here.

        If you are a Southern European whose mind is brilliantly clear as to black-White differences, your mind had better be likewise clear as to Mediterranean/Latino European – North European (Nordid) differences.
        First of all, in intelligence.”

        The closest he has ever came to denying this is his investigation of IQ differences in North and South Italy stemming from environmental effects. If anything, he makes a goods case about it.

        Also, he even provide southern Itlains improving in IQ more than Blacks have, though achievement has not increased as well as he’d explained.

        He never went as far though to claim that to be the case with all Mediterranean countries.

        Even then, he went as far as describing environmental factors that suppresses the IQ of Black Africans.

        “3) Giving a look at his blog will reveal how this guy is a racist, not by hypocritical leftist thought police standards, but by any sensible standard.
        A racist with an obsession against Blacks.

        Moreover, you’ll notice how his magnified super-big graph of the Bell Curve of intelligence for Blacks and Whites lacks the diagrams for Ashkenazi Jews, Mongolids, and Mediterranean European (average IQ 90. Very similar to South America, where they migrated in myriads, and integrated much better than in North America).”

        How much should we trust your intuition when you incorrectly perceived his article on racial differences in smell for example? You have actually made a larger venting from him for his writings and race than he ever did with his writings towards blacks.

        Think I’m stupid? See both this paper AND the comment section.

        https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2015/11/28/response-to-daily-stormer-article-black-africans-are-genetically-closer-to-bonobos-than-to-white-humans/

  11. Fun fact:
    Even Whites whom sympathize with WNs don’t give a rat’s about the average IQs of any group.

    ‘It’s crime, stupid.’…is one way to put it

    Blacks could have IQs below room temperature but if they had an OK crime rate, Reicher numbers would be greatly diminished.

  12. The main reason I don’t identify with WNs at all (no, not my Jewish ancestry 😉 ) is that you can’t hold the actions of say, 4% of Blacks against all 100%, that’s retarded.

    iirc, the crime differences between Whites and Blacks is that 1% of us Whites are violent, versus 4% of the Blacks.

    So you’re going to hold that against 100% of Blacks?
    How about the NAMs get to chose 25% of Whites to hate?

    • but those differences do make the difference in where one decides to live; not around Blacks, if they can help it, etc.

    • “The main reason I don’t identify with WNs at all (no, not my Jewish ancestry😉 ) is that you can’t hold the actions of say, 4% of Blacks against all 100%, that’s retarded.”

      While that could be argued, they could still argue against the portion that defend their actions, such are much larger that 4%.

      Plus there’s amorality that technically not illegal.

      • Yes about “amorality”.
        Subjective, but it could generally be agreed upon that the most “classically evil” people in recent history were Hitler, Pol Pot, Saddam Hussein, etc.

        A diverse group, but all male and no Blacks.

        • Well…..that more of an issue of

          A. Undertpeporting
          B. Those people being in countries that would have some sort of sociological relevance from their actions.

          In place like Africa for example actions such as their own are just done on a smaller scale due to the lack of solidarity in the actual nations themselves to cause instant widespread rife. It’s less organized and more chaotic.
          And when it does (Rwanda) bloodshed occurred at horrifically high rates.

        • *meant underreporting

        • Yeah availability to be able to be brutal is a major part.

          The Rwandan Genocides, Sierra Leone axe killings, and diamond mines, etc. are all very true.

          Not that this expresses support for him, but David Duke was right when he told Ray Saurez that the Bantus and Aztecs had reputations as blood thirsty killers long before the European World Wars.

        • “Yeah availability to be able to be brutal is a major part.

          The Rwandan Genocides, Sierra Leone axe killings, and diamond mines, etc. are all very rare.”

          I do make note of that, see my comment again.

    • genuine intelligence realist

      Even though, or if, you aren’t one of the many Jews holding deep anti-White animus — and this seems to be the lucky case here —, your Jewish ancestry still impacts on your thinking.

      It must be, like everyone’s ethnic belonging should. Minorities, especially minorities living in fear of suddenly becoming… very unwelcome (as it must always be the possibility for over-achieving minorities, even more than under-achieving), will sympathize for one another.
      In part, out of an instinctive feeling.

      In part, out of conscious thinking: if no other minority but Jews were left, it’s practically certain that Whites would turn nationalistic, which in turn would lead to them retrieving their ethnic pride, which in turn would make them want, and badly want, to send away the over-achieving minority.

      This is why multi-racialism is the most expedient system humans have engineered to multiply racial animus, racial fear (which turns into animus fast), racial angst (which turns into animus, too) and tension.
      Want to increase the mutual struggle to the maximum? Put all of them together, and, on top of that, start telling the underachieving that their underachieving is due to some obscure conspiratorial injustice done to them by the others.

      Two things only make sense: a one-nation world, or a world where nations are ethnic states (who welcome smarter people like Jews as immigrants, if the chance to host them comes, but don’t let minorities work to weaken their ethnic-national identity).
      The world is headed towards neither solution, just prolonged, never-ending conflict.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s