Charles Lincoln Commentary on White California RIP: The Death of a Dream

Charles is a very good friend of mine, although he is quite to the right of me politically. Nevertheless, we agree on more things than you would think. I do not agree with his lament about California declining into socialism, since as a socialist, I consider that an upgrade and not a downgrade. Charles is also one of the smartest people I know. He has a PhD in Anthropology and Archeology from Harvard and he also has a law degree. He reblogged my article, White California RIP: The Death of a Dream, with this commentary below. Let me know what you think of it.

Reblogged this on TIERRA LIMPIA by Charles Lincoln and commented:

Robert Lindsay is a raging liberal…far, far, far to the left on most issues. It’s very interesting to see his perspective here…I would beg to differ with him on one point however: Cultural and racial diversity and both unambiguously good, positive features of both biological and cultural evolution as well as world history. I would go so far to say that the generation of diversity is the heartbeat of all kinds of evolution and history.

But the California melting pot (and globalism generally) create the antithesis of diversity. A world of the dichotomous Rich and Poor, of those who shop on the Monte Carlo Riviera, London S.W. 7, Paris Rive Gauche, and Beverly Hills 90210 especially Rodeo Drive, against those who shop exclusively at CVS, Target, and Walmart, is not an evolving world. It is a frozen world. A world where all cultures come together and become one, a world where all races come together and become one, is standing at the end of history in my opinion.

California does seem to me to be in an apocalyptic moment, about to fall, willingly, into a millennium of degraded human slavery called Socialism. Governor Brown, A.G. Harris and Senators Boxer and Feinstein are the apostles and acolytes of this Horrible Brave New World. The California soup is now so dark…there is no room for light.

Even during my high school years in the early 1970s, Los Angeles was mostly a White Christian city, with what we then thought was “admirable” tolerance for Buddhists, Jews and Muslims who were still distinct and very small minorities. In fact, it was in the 1980’s that I really saw the change, when I came back with my soon-to-be wife (a Greek-born UCLA cheerleader interested in Maya archaeology), the city was still majority White but Reagan had unleashed the floodgates – yes, Ronald Reagan, whose name is so reviled by the multi-culti crowd…is the one who really did the major damage to White California…

12 Comments

Filed under California, Christianity, Culture, Democrats, Economics, Politics, Race Relations, Race/Ethnicity, Regional, Religion, Republicans, Social Problems, Socialism, Sociology, Urban Decay, Urban Studies, US Politics, USA, West, Whites

12 responses to “Charles Lincoln Commentary on White California RIP: The Death of a Dream

  1. Another William Playfair Web

    Robert-
    “A world of the dichotomous Rich and Poor, of those who shop on the Monte Carlo Riviera, London S.W. 7, Paris Rive Gauche, and Beverly Hills 90210 especially Rodeo Drive, against those who shop exclusively at CVS, Target, and Walmart, is not an evolving world. It is a frozen world. A world where all cultures come together and become one, a world where all races come together and become one, is standing at the end of history in my opinion.”

    Although I hesitate to compare my own ideas to that of a PHD, that’s what I was trying to get at with “non-Whites are the victims”.
    They are disproportionately the ones shopping at Walmart, as is referenced.

  2. Jason Y

    I don’t think diversity overall is bad for California or anywhere else. The main problem with the 1965 act was the fact it’s bringing in too much of one type of immigrant, Mexican. That’s mainly what people are mad about. Who really cares if some Chinese people set up a restaurant?

    Of course, some are also angry at East Indian competition to jobs, but really that’s not related to immigration. The East Indians don’t have to leave India to take American jobs.

    As another thought, blacks have always been a problem. But most of them are not immigrants, but rather descendents of slaves who have been here longer than many whites.

    • Jason Y

      I think pretty much the US is fucked. So the best thing to do is leave. Groups that wish to change the demographic of the US, probablity speaking and even with Trump on their side, cannot win.

      Maybe Bin Laden was right in the US is cursed. It’s pretty much a situation it brought on itself. But of course, I’m praising 9/11 or anything and have the deepest respect, but the US has been on a bad path for many years.

    • Another William Playfair Web

      Well, Trump supporters basically hate anyone who isn’t non-Hispanic, Non-Jewish, non-Balkan White European.

      But people who have the right to be taken seriously are more concerned about Mexicans and non-White Caucasoid (“terrorist”) immigration.

      I think more than Mexican crime it’s that Mexicans are content living in poverty and cause a decline in infrastructure, etc.

    • Another William Playfair Web

      It certainly is an interesting question, that if only “good people” were allowed in, would anyone actually care.

      Some might, solely because they are sub-human and can and will achieve nothing so they have to jealously hate, but others won’t.

      I got comments deleted from AmRen saying “Why the hell should I care if a non-White IQ immigrant comes here and contributes to society, regression from the mean aside?”

      It’s just silly that they are insecure about non-Whites being smarter than they are. They are really quite stupid and emotionally children.

      • Another William Playfair Web

        regression to the mean;
        1. If additive heredity is valid (Probably not)
        2. if they have children.

        • EPGAH

          You just said Mexicans are content living in squalor, so why wouldn’t it just get worse as more are bred? As in fact, it HAS.

          And although the “Fertility Gap Is Narrowing”, the fact that there IS a Fertility Gap at all means that the worse people will breed more than the better ones. In short, your #2 is a given. If we neutered Mexico’s invaders as soon as they invaded, the decline of California would be something I made up, right?

          http://www.unomaha.edu/news/2015/01/fertility.php

  3. Jason Y

    Maybe Reagan didn’t envison the white birth-rate would go down, while the birth-rate of Mexicans would go up or stay the same. It was still the baby boomer generation in the 60s – 80s, so I’m assuming he thought the trend would continue.

    OK, if whites are having low birth-rates, then wouldn’t that make them the main source of the problem?

  4. SHI

    Can you really capitalize “white”, “black” or “brown”? I am confused about which convention to follow.

    Consider the following sentences.

    I have a whitedog

    Rachel is multiracial. In Brazil, she would be seen as white but in the United States, she’s just another brown person.

    Blacks are three times more likely to commit murder and rape compared to Whites or other races.

    AS AGAINST

    Is she white? No, she’s an Arab from Palestine.

    White people don’t need a law against rape, but if you fill this room up with your normal blackbucks, you would, because niggers are basically primitive animals. – David Duke, former Klansman in 1975

    Note how David Duke decides to capitalize whites but not blacks.

    • How I would fix this:

      I have a white dog

      Rachel is multiracial. In Brazil, she would be seen as White, but in the United States, she’s just another brown person.

      Blacks are three times more likely to commit murder and rape compared to Whites or other races.

      AS AGAINST

      Is she White? No, she’s an Arab from Palestine.

      White people don’t need a law against rape, but if you fill this room up with your normal Black bucks, you would, because niggers are basically primitive animals. – David Duke, former Klansman in 1975

      Note how David Duke decides to capitalize Whites but not Blacks.

  5. Lon Spector

    U.S.A. R.I.P. Carnage to beggar description in September.
    U.S. not mentioned in the Bible. Europe shocked back to it’s
    senses. “They” are mentioned in the Bible.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s