Democratic Platform Is Still a Landmark Document

Despite its problems, this is the most progressive, leftwing platform that the party has ever produced. The Left is winning! Slowly but surely, we are advancing in America. Perhaps Marx was right that the march of history towards progressive is nearly a law rather than a theory. Anyway, I guess history isn’t over yet, despite proclamations by Fukuyama etc. that clocks now run backwards or freeze and the minute hand and the hour hand no longer move forwards as they always have. I believe the moral here is that as humans, and as individuals in our own lives, we always need to be moving forwards, not backwards into regression and barbarism and not freezing in what we think is equilibrium but is really stasis.

As humans, onward and upward.

As individuals, forward, march!

52 Comments

Filed under Democrats, Environmentalism, Global Warming, Left, Politics, US Politics

52 responses to “Democratic Platform Is Still a Landmark Document

  1. Jason Y

    The democrats are winning because anti-evolutionary forces are at work. All the nerds, wussies, queers, blacks, latinos, women who won’t stay in their place are voting democrat. (sarcasm not being anti-working class, just being an ass, lol)

    No really. If the nation was more white, then it would be less for democrats. However, maybe not. If it was all white, then more whites would be in the lower class and have less to benefit.

    • Jason Y

      All whites cannot possibly be in the middle or upper class, so obviously a reduction in non-whites would lead to an increase of white poor people. However, white supremacists would differ, claiming the higher IQ of whites would make keep whites out of the lower class.

      Kind of like this dumbass remark I heard from some WNs where they said, “Well, instead of getting rid of the elite, why not make everyone the elite ? (meaning make the IQ larger).”

      So was that remark dumb or does it have some promise?

  2. Sam

    If the left would stick to some economic leveling for everyone, keep it within reason by allowing people to get rich if they come up with new technology or products people want, keep out of the business of hating White people, stop forcing people to agree with what they consider perversions and stop the forced influx of immigrants that hardy anyone wants but the rich and politicians they would actually have something.

    If people want to be perverted let them but also allow those who disagree create their own “safe spaces” where they don’t have to have these behaviors in their faces. To put it even more bluntly allow segregation with equal funding. If necessary remove the State from schools and let people have equal funding to be around the people they want to be around. This of course will never happen as the Left and the Right just can’t help but to mind every one else’s business.

    • Another William Playfair Web

      the cultural left has gone off the deep end, you are correct about that (although they will probably come back),
      but, seriously, guy “separate but equal”?
      that actually came true.

      • Another William Playfair Web

        I honestly think perhaps basic transgenderism should be accepted, but beyond that, is obviously just mental illness
        (identifying as a different gender each day of the week🙂 )
        haha……

      • Sam

        “…seriously, guy “separate but equal”?
        that actually came true…”

        Segregation. We already have this for the wealthy. Whether you like it or not it worked. I’m less interested in the lofty goals of the Left or other social engineers than I’m interested in a country that works relatively well.

        Jason Y, part of the Jewish Defense Shield, refuses to note that I covered just such equality of funding by saying that the funding separate from the State if necessary. In many States today you have to pay double for schools if you’re White. You have to pay for public schools, which your kids can’t go to because they will be attacked by Blacks, and you also have to pay for private schools to actually educate your children.

        • Jason Y

          It was already covered in the posts about bullying how white kids were as mean as black kids. It’s all hyper-masculinity. Perhaps we should just shelter weak kids from the meanest kids of any race. However, that idea isn’t practical.

          White nationalists refuse to admit white kids can be mean and evil, which always there is about 20 percent or so that are mean to the point of “nigger mean” so to speak.

        • Jason Y

          Hey at least there is some sick joy in seeing certain white kids humilated by blacks, cause some of those specific white kids would gladly bully weak white kids, given a school with that is all white. 😆 Think about it.

          That’s not Jewish thinking. That’s just payback. ha ha

        • Jason Y

          Also believe it or not, white kids will bully a black kid or somebody with black features at an all white school, especially if they a weak kid or hyper-sensitive. They’ll bully them just like a bunch of black kids would a white guy at a black school.

          The only difference might be they might not beat them up, but they will verbally bully them to the point of making them angry and crazy.

        • Jason Y

          Finally, sorry to ramble on, but black kids are sort of bullying white kids cause they’re white. But in reality, as with boys everywhere, the main reason is the target comes across as weak (or they’re a bitch that runs thier mouth). That’s always the case.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          If the classes are segregated that is hence inherently unequal…..

        • Jason Y

          Possibly a lot of black kids would want segregation from hyper-masculine black males. In that case, what we do in a white racist society? We can’t put the Steve Erkle kids with the whites, it would be illegal. Put them in a seperate school for the gifted blacks? That would be stupid and for no reason.

        • Jason Y

          The stuff Sam speaks of is old news. Nowadays, it’s less about skin color and more about class. Well to do and decent blacks want to be seperated from ghetto blacks, just like pretty much all the whites do.

    • Jason Y

      Removing the state from schools won’t work for many cause they can’t afford private schools.

  3. Sam

    Look at this picture of Hillary. She’s blowing up like a balloon. Frequently when people look like this they are very sick and it’s inflammation.

  4. SHI

    http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/water-guns-banned-rnc-firearms-won-article-1.2695913

    I don’t understand the logic behind this story. So you’re allowed to bring assault rifles to the Republican National Conventions but super-soakers and soda cans are banned.

    Yanks and their second amendment bullshit is batshit insane. The rest of the world laughs at American obsession with guns. I mean it’s straight from the Wild West Cowboy movies from the 60s. A fistful of dollars anyone?

    Water guns will be banned at Cleveland’s Republican National Convention — firearms won’t be

    That’s some watered-down logic.

    Protesters flooding the streets outside the Republican National Convention in Cleveland won’t be allowed to come with Super Soakers — but they’ll be able to bring a loaded firearm.

    Strict RNC rules call for a ban on soda cans, glass bottles, tennis balls, umbrellas with metal tips and “any projectile launcher” like BB guns, paintball guns and water guns in the 1.7-square-mile “event zone” surrounding the Quicken Loans Arena convention site, where 2,470 delegates will gather to officially name Donald Trump as the party’s nominee.

    But pistol-packing protesters — as per Ohio’s lax open-carry laws — can freely carry in public areas, like parks, within the designated zones around the venue.

    • Jason Y

      Europeans could do with a bit of gun play. That’s why they get all angry at soccer matches, angry to the point of death. Yank bashing? More masculine repression.

      • SHI

        Is this your next President?

        • Sam

          What you are promoting is the same “useless elitist” attitudes that have prevailed throughout all history. Like the Chinese Mandarins that had long sleeves to make their hands useless. Bankers, lawyers all the extractive eaters who use the law and government monopoly to enrich themselves while providing nothing useful or very little use to the population they subsist on. You make fun of Trump but he makes stuff people want. Steaks, buildings, golf courses. Maybe this is why he’s so popular. While maybe most people haven’t put it as bluntly as I have, the extractors vs. the builders, they understand the difference.

        • Thank you for this, Comrade Sam. you have a good understanding of political economics.

        • Jason Y

          People want bankers. People need loans for businesses, college, homes etc.. That’s assuming they can get a loan, but nobody has credit. But you can’t blame the banker. It’s just a business like any other.

        • Jason Y

          Why would builders be inherently good, while bankers would all be scum-sucking vampires? For instance, Sam Walton, the hated globalist who made Wal-Mart was a builder. The businessmen who built the 19th century England hated by Marx and Charles Dickens were builders.

        • Jason Y

          Contrary to what Sam thinks, Trump is a total libertarian and Trump isn’t a racist. What can he benefit the radical left or white nationalism?

          However, Trump isn’t true to his libertarianism. He’s not a copy of Ron Paul, and there is a good chance he will launch a massive conflict in the middle east.

        • Sam

          Robert Lindsay,”Thank you for this, Comrade Sam. you have a good understanding of political economics.”

          Well thank you. I’ve come around to much more of ,let’s say, a workers party type politics.

          I’m afraid you’ve little hope of convincing me to not be a White Nationalist. Not because I hate anyone. I just think races are incomparable with their notions of how things should be run. If there was not this incessant hatred for Whites ginned up by the Jews maybe it could work but I see it as too much a part of our narrative for any reconciliation on part of the different races.

          Sad But True

          I was greatly heartened by your recent post defending White people. It made me very happy. I’m completely fed up with the attacks on Whites. I’m to the point that, depending on the security situation, if anyone ask if I’m racist I always say,”yes”. Then I say, “aren’t all Whites racist”. They don’t quite know what too think of that.

          I feel that the Whites who are always screaming “racist” at other Whites are really just like retarded Libertarians. Libertarians believe all this stuff that sounds like it would work but doesn’t because it doesn’t take account of human nature. It may be a nice idea for everyone to not be racist but this only works if everyone is going to follow that rule and they don’t. Everyone else on the planet is tribal but they expect Whites to somehow be these special people that should just do whatever makes everyone else happy. We should overlook all their faults but Whites faults should be magnified and emphasized 24/7. I’m done with that.

        • Sam

          Jason Y the (JDS)said,”Contrary to what Sam thinks, Trump is a total libertarian and Trump isn’t a racist…”

          I never said that nor do I believe it. I don’t believe Trump is racist or a Libertarian. His policies are opposed to both.

          As for bankers read this guys, a candidate for President, EXTREMELY excellent platform on taxes and banks.

          http://www.scottsmith2016.com/

          His ideas are extremely good. For revenue instead of getting most from income taxes he would get revenue from settlements. Like every time you buy something or deposit a check in the bank, etc. The value of this is it massively raises the tax base so that the amount of each transaction is minuscule. I read, “For Good and Evil: The Impact of Taxes on the Course of Civilization” by Charles Adams a book on taxes and it talked a lot about raising the tax base in order to lower the percentage taken from each transaction and to spread out where revenues came from.

          Let’ look at the numbers he quotes.

          Payrolls total $15 trillion.
          Not much for filling a $4 trillion federal spending.

          The base for what he calls payments, (transactions), is 3,600 Trillion. Big difference. So using this big difference he would only take a tax rate of just 1/8 of a percent.

          He also would stop charging interest as the money is made and backed by the taxpayers. He would only give banks a service fee. (I don’t agree with this. I think a small interest paid to the Federal Gov. would be helpful providing the majority of it went to the treasury and bypassed the FED and banks.)

          He’s got some great ideas on lots of issues. He’ll never get any publicity from the media with his cut out the FED ideas but they’re worth thinking about. My biggest problem is just how, even with such small percentage of tax, he would keep corporations and the 1% from gaming it so they pay none.

          Another thing Smith wants to do is pay the debt off. He points out that all the debt pays interest so it gets bigger and bigger. There’s a not so evident twist to the debt. Here it is…as soon as the debt is issued it is financialized. It becomes money. It may be debt but in today’s world you can use this promise to pay to raise cash. Therefore the money supply is already inflated by the debt. Get it? Debt becomes cash through financialization.

          He says,”…Coupon stripping would not be inflationary
          because it would replace our existing supply of interest bearing money with non-interest-bearing money…”

          When he says coupon stripping he’s talking about the old time bonds. Here’s a picture.
          

          Each bond has coupons that when torn off at a certain date become money. He says we pay all the bonds off with non interest bearing CASH now instead of letting the debt inflate further. The bonds have become cash already so it’s not necessarily inflationary to turn them into cash.
          
          Here’s another quote,”…Ironically, we would have inflated the money supply less if we had issued new money to pay for the deficit each year rather than selling Treasury bonds. At least ordinary money does not accrue interest…”
          
          That being the case he says we should pay off all debt within five years.
          
          Here’s a link to his pay off the debt page.
          
          http://www.scottsmith2016.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Pay-Off-the-Debt.pdf
          
          I think he’s somewhat right about turning debt into cash not being inflationary but not 100%. Some debt is parked and if they were forced to accept cash I have no doubt they would buy assets for cash causing some inflation. His point over all I believe is sound. That printing cash is less damaging to the economy than continuously expanding debt. Yes there is a limit to this. The damage is less when you have instant inflation than the delayed case of delayed debt. When you have instant feedback from printing cash you also can see the damage and correct it faster. The debt is hidden as it takes some money out of circulation while NOT extinguishing it. When debt is turned to cash it’s influence can’t be stopped as easy.
          

          I don’t know if all his ideas would work but they’re progressive and pro capitalist at the same time. Truly great genius at making compromises without taking to much from either.

        • Jason Y

          Sam is making generalizations about human nature claiming all whites are good and all blacks etc.. are bad.

          True, human nature won’t allow libertarianism, but many whites have the same nature.

        • Jason Y

          Many poor whites can be attacked with the same racist generalizations that blacks can, as Robert pointed out, and of course it’s wrong. So we should attack bad members of the group, white, black, whoever, and avoid saying they ALL or most are crap. However, that’s not Sam’s style.

        • Jason Y

          Not all people have had the same bad childhood experiences with (some) blacks that Sam has. Many have grew up around decent blacks. You see Sam’s view is biased by hate. Kind of like how sometimes my view of poor whites is biased by hate cause they were picking on me in middle school. OK, I was called out on being a white hater, but Sam is a black hater.

        • Sam

          Jason the (JDS) said,”…Sam is making generalizations about human nature claiming all whites are good and all blacks etc.. are bad…You see Sam’s view is biased by hate…”

          Once again you’re just making stuff up. My views are based on reason. Blacks commit an enormous amount of crime compared to Whites. My view is to do everything possible to keep them away from me. Of course not wanting to be killed by Blacks is considered hate today so maybe you’re right. I hate living next to Blacks.

        • Jason Y

          Once again you’re just making stuff up. My views are based on reason. Blacks commit an enormous amount of crime compared to Whites. My view is to do everything possible to keep them away from me. Of course not wanting to be killed by Blacks is considered hate today so maybe you’re right. I hate living next to Blacks.

          Not all blacks are ghetto, just like not all poor white are on meth.

    • Sam

      “…Yanks and their second amendment bullshit is batshit insane. The rest of the world laughs at American obsession with guns…”

      So you trust the government and police to have guns but not the people. If you don’t trust the people to have guns why trust them with voting?

      I would rather have the people trusted with guns and take away the guns from the government.

      You also haven’t mentioned the Swiss who have machine guns in most every home. Are they bat shit crazy too?

      • Jason Y

        For some reasons lefties are always for gun control. Robert is already cynical about lefties and the fact they’re always tied to so called cultural marxism,

        Does gun control and left wing thinking always go together?

      • SHI

        So you trust the government and police to have guns but not the people. If you don’t trust the people to have guns why trust them with voting?

        Oh, I forgot. Happy fourth of July. I am aware that the events of 1776 actually got triggered a year back when anal retentive British soliders tried to grab American guns. You can almost feel the weight of events even today, to think that just one single warning shot led to the creation of a brand new country.

        While the events of 1775-1776 will remain a nostalgic figment of US history, times have changed and that argument is become weaker. Today the government doesn’t need to seize your guns to take away your liberty. They have fighter aircraft, missiles, miiltary-grade assault weapons and even atomic bombs. It’s a no-contest from the beginning. Let’s get real, the mass shooting problem in the US is far worse than any other countries. More people die of gun shootings in the US than anywhere in the developed or developing world. Only Liberia, Afghanistan and Iraq have as many civilian gun casualties as the US. Putting guns in the hands of weirdoes is a recipe for trouble.

        Switzerland is an exception because it’s a homogenous society where they don’t really accept too many immigrants. No country can compare to the Swiss.

        For some reasons lefties are always for gun control. Robert is already cynical about lefties and the fact they’re always tied to so called cultural marxism

        I actually consider myself a bit of a right-winger as I support free trade but when compared to the US, my political and fiscal positions would line up with those of the Democratic party. I believe in social security, LGBT rights, gun control but at the same time, free enterprise. So yes, I’m a leftie according to the US definition. I’m very much at home in Canada though. That’s my kind of country.

        • Jason Y

          Most people around the world resent the US due to it’s power. Therefore, I’m wondering if this is biased hate, just like my biased hate toward poor whites, or Sam’s biased hate toward blacks.

          Especially Western Europe feels a special humiliation cause they were once the cradle of civilization and themselves colonial powers.

        • Jason Y

          It’s incredibly difficult to argue with people biased with hate. I saw that so much overseas when interacting with non-Americans. You can’t have a good buddy buddy relationship with them, cause at the core they see you as a snake.

        • Jason Y

          True people hate the US, but the comfort of things, especially in Japan, Korea, Canada, Western Europe comes from civilization which US troops and guns defend. It’s just a fact.

        • Jason Y

          While the events of 1775-1776 will remain a nostalgic figment of US history, times have changed and that argument is become weaker. Today the government doesn’t need to seize your guns to take away your liberty. They have fighter aircraft, missiles, miiltary-grade assault weapons and even atomic bombs. It’s a no-contest from the beginning. Let’s get real, the mass shooting problem in the US is far worse than any other countries. More people die of gun shootings in the US than anywhere in the developed or developing world. Only Liberia, Afghanistan and Iraq have as many civilian gun casualties as the US. Putting guns in the hands of weirdoes is a recipe for trouble.

          More things are at play then just guns. You got poverty and ethnic problems. You got bullying and homophobia which in the US the vicitms can fight back, by well, fucking killing the bullies, lol

          Oh, well so much for bullying’s character development.

        • Sam

          “…the mass shooting problem in the US is far worse than any other countries. More people die of gun shootings in the US than anywhere in the developed or developing world…”

          It’s by and large Blacks and Hispanics that push our numbers so high. If you want it to stop ban Blacks and Hispanics.

          Notice California just passed really strict gun control laws but the Governor VETOED making stealing firearms a felony.

          There used to almost ZERO gun crime in New York State but they had a law that said if you committed a crime with a gun you got the death penalty. Fast too. No long drawn out multi-trials. There was also a lot less crime over all. Villains knew not to have guns but the shopkeepers knew they didn’t have them and would defend themselves with baseball bats. Made crime a much less paying proposition.

        • Sam

          “…They have fighter aircraft, missiles, miiltary-grade assault weapons and even atomic bombs. It’s a no-contest from the beginning…”

          Then why haven’t we rolled over Iraq and Afghanistan?

          If there was a fight between the US government and the people who would win? There’s more people with hunting licenses in Pennsylvania than there are troops in the entire US military. How long would the US military have those tanks, bombs and airplanes? I suggest a great deal of the soldiers would go to the other side and they would be outnumbered fairly quickly.

        • Sam

          “…Switzerland is an exception because it’s a homogenous society where they don’t really accept too many immigrants. No country can compare to the Swiss…”

          You’re just completely filled with falsehoods, misdirection and out right lies. You make these blanket statements that are never backed by anything but Jewish propaganda and smoke.

          So here’s the truth.

          “…The number of foreigners in Switzerland currently stands at 23 percent…”

          http://www.newsweek.com/switzerlands-sudden-fear-immigrants-232430

          So let’s compare that to the United States.

          “…Between 1790 and 1980, whites ranged from 80 to 90 percent of the population…”

          https://newrepublic.com/article/120370/five-graphics-show-why-post-white-america-already-here

          See I just did a comparison. If you want to stop gun violence it’s simple. Deport all these violent people. Give the rest the death penalty when you catch them. Problem solved. Really you have a different agenda which is making Whites even more powerless than they are in their own countries.

        • Jason Y

          It’s by and large Blacks and Hispanics that push our numbers so high. If you want it to stop ban Blacks and Hispanics.

          Notice California just passed really strict gun control laws but the Governor VETOED making stealing firearms a felony.

          There used to almost ZERO gun crime in New York State but they had a law that said if you committed a crime with a gun you got the death penalty. Fast too. No long drawn out multi-trials. There was also a lot less crime over all. Villains knew not to have guns but the shopkeepers knew they didn’t have them and would defend themselves with baseball bats. Made crime a much less paying proposition.

          certain NAMs push the gun crime rate up, true, but also certain whites also push it up.

          Note, while it is true more blacks are in prison in proportion to population, still a huge group of whites, one nearly equal to one in blacks is also in prison:

          http://www.drugwarfacts.org/cms/Race_and_Prison#sthash.Fqr84JVS.dpbs

        • Jason Y

          So you got an equal number of blacks and whites in prison and the white number is larger than the Latino number.

          That doesn’t speak well of blacks, but not of whites either. People like Sam deny that dysfunctional mean whites exist.

        • Jason Y

          Sam’s attempts to bash blacks come upon my cynical ears mainly because in my family there are so many people addicted to drugs and with broken families etc..

          So this isn’t some kind of Jewish person with some grudge speaking, but rather just a white guy that sees reality.

        • Jason Y

          A massively degenerate culture has destroyed many blacks and whites. I don’t know what to say, except that the people will just to get rid of the culture to change things. Of course, there are oppression factors at work, but also it’s about free-will.

        • Jason Y

          http://www.drugwarfacts.org/cms/Race_and_Prison#sthash.Fqr84JVS.dpbs

          It’s interesting to note that among females, actually the white number is more than double the black number for US prisons.

        • http://www.drugwarfacts.org/cms/Race_and_Prison#sthash.Fqr84JVS.dpbs

          It’s interesting to note that among females, actually the white number is more than double the black number for US prisons.

          Jason, are you sure you are good at math? There are two White women for every Black woman in prison, but there are FIVE White women for every Black woman outside of prison.

          Get it? Black women are overrepresented in prison by 150%.

    • Sam

      “…Water guns will be banned at Cleveland’s Republican National Convention — firearms won’t be…”

      Water causes guns to rust. We can’t have that.

      • SHI

        It’s by and large Blacks and Hispanics that push our numbers so high. If you want it to stop ban Blacks and Hispanics.

        You’re just completely filled with falsehoods, misdirection and out right lies. You make these blanket statements that are never backed by anything but Jewish propaganda and smoke.

        You, Sir, are a disgusting racist.

        I’m proud to say I don’t share your jaundiced views. Extreme racism is a mental illness which can be cured like any other mental illness. Please check out this link if it benefits you in anyway.

        http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1071634/

        The number of foreigners in Switzerland currently stands at 23 percent

        True, but a vast majority of them are from other EU countries. Or as you like them, “White people.”

        In fact, Swiss are the least likely to shelter refugees from, say, Africa and Syria. In fact, one Swiss village chose to pay £200,000 fine instead of accepting a paltry number o f10 war-fleeing refugees. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/30/swiss-village-chooses-to-pay-200000-fine-instead-of-accepting-10/

        Now Switzerland isn’t like Germany. I certainly don’t support the open doors policy of Angela Merkel. It’s insane to open the floodgates completely to every foreigner that lands on your soil but there’s no going back on humanitarian obligations that your country agreed too

        These UNHCR refugees don’t get blanket access to any wealthy country, not the least Switzerland which has the most notoriously difficult entry mechanisms for war-fleeing refugees. Currently, there are only 38,000 refugees in the country, less than 0.5 percent of the population. Most of them are thoroughly screened before entering the country. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-europe-migrants-swiss-idUSKCN0RL0TU20150921

        In fact, the Swiss have started seizing assets from the few refugees that remain to cover costs. Some wealthy nation this. Who seizes assets nowadays anyways. Those who apply for asylum are exercising a fundamental right. That must not be linked to costs, even in cases were applications are rejected

        https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jan/15/switzerland-joins-denmark-in-seizing-assets-from-refugees-to-cover-costs

        Most refugees are in fact, bypassing Switzerland, for other countries.
        http://www.thelocal.ch/20150908/syrian-refugees-bypass-switzerland-for-eu-states

      • Sam

        SHI ,”…You, Sir, are a disgusting racist…”

        A meaningless statement if there ever was one. It really means,”You don’t agree me so I’ll call you names”.

        In my case it’s correct that I don’t believe all races act the same. They don’t have the same level of intelligence or temperament. People like yourself go on and on about how we should let others flood into White countries. Well if you’re so good and perfect why don’t you go to their countries and serve them there instead of forcing the rest of us, who want nothing to do with them, to have them move in with us?
        Why is it that only White countries are flooded with people from other countries? Why can’t you start calling other races racist because they don’t flood, and I do mean flood, their countries with foreigners?

        As for mental illness you seem to suffer from a shrunken amygdalae. It’s a proven fact that people who have the same views as you suffer from this malady. Symptoms are reduced recognition of danger in the environment. This is a serious impairment of many people in this country.

        Young Whites in the USA are already a minority. Have you noticed any, any at all, behaviors from the other races now being packed into the diversified USA that they will behave anything like Whites or have any love for Whites? On the contrary they’ve shown extreme hostility. Other races can go into White neighborhoods but if Whites go into other races neighborhoods or to their schools they are frequently violently attacked. Is this what you want? If not what do you intend to do about it? And don’t tell me Whites need to do this or that we just need to keep these people out and we won’t have the problem in the first place. Its up to them to conform to our standards of behavior. We shouldn’t have to change our country to suit them. If you disagree then why not more to these vibrant areas yourself and leave the rest of us in peace?

      • Jason Y

        We shouldn’t ban waterguns for kids,😆 What kind of wuss liberal would do that? And that’s not sarcasm.

  5. Jason Y

    http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/07/15/2300321/mcdonalds-buget-low-wage/ – OK, the capitalists are making excuses for why workers have low wages.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s