Cultural Left Theory of Homophobia: The Cultural Left Is Wrong Again

The Cultural Left says straight men are afraid of gay men if they are afraid of being gay themselves or if they have gay tendencies themselves. There is no evidence whatsoever for this, but obviously reaction formation does form in some straight men who have some minor gay tendencies but deny them. There are also a few closeted gay men who are very self-hating such as Omar Mateen, the Orlando shooter. But by and large, it’s just not true.

The corollary of this silliness is if you are secure about your masculinity, you do not fear or hate gay men. So straight men who fear or hate men are not secure about their masculinity. This stupid lie is just not true, though of course it may be true in a few cases where you see some projection and especially reaction formation defenses.

What I have noticed in my life is the opposite: the more masculine or macho the man is, the more he fears or more properly hates gay men. At the very least, they make him very uncomfortable and they do not want to get close to them. They also do not want to be seen out in public with a gay man for fear that people will think that they are gay too.

The masculine the man is, the more uncomfortable he is around gay men. And the most masculine men of all were the most homophobic of all. These were men who straight up say things like, “I hate faggots!” They also tend to vastly overestimate the number of gay men and seem to think that ~20% of the straight male population is gay because they are not masculine enough for these guys. Any straight man who doesn’t measure up in the masculinity department is automatically seen as gay by this type of men.

I have been around an awful lot of men in my life and I have had probably hundreds of male friends. Of course most all of my good friends have been straight because frankly I do not associate with gay men, and I think this is very much for the best because to me they are nothing but trouble with a T.

The interesting thing that I have noticed is that many straight men are not exactly completely straight. They are straight of course because they are maximally attracted to women and much of their lives revolve around women. However, quite a few men like this do have some minor gay feelings.

Of course, the Cultural Left  would say that these men are gay because the Cultural Left scum want to claim as many gay men as possible for their sick Gay Agenda. According to the Cultural Left, any man who has any gay feelings at all is automatically a homosexual! This is absolutely insane, as minor gay feelings among straight men are about as common as weeds. They’re everywhere.

Look at the chart below.

100-0: Maximum heterosexual, minimum homosexual
90-10: Maximum heterosexual, incidental homosexual
80-20: Maximum heterosexual, significant homosexual
70-30: Maximum heterosexual, strong homosexual
60-40: Maximum heterosexual, very strong strong homosexual
50-50: Maximum heterosexual, maximal homosexual
40-60: Maximum homosexual, very strong heterosexual
30-70: Maximum homosexual, strong heterosexual
20-80: Maximum homosexual, significant heterosexual
10-90: Maximum homosexual, incidental heterosexual
0-100: Maximum homosexual, minimal heterosexual

According to the best data that I have, 62% of all men are 100-0’s. Nevertheless, I am convinced that many or most 100-0’s are capable of having sex with males and even enjoying it if the culture opens the door wide for such things. We have only to look at cultures like Afghanistan and Ancient Greece and Rome to see that in some cultures, up to 95% of men engage in homosexuality. No doubt most of them are 100-0’s, assuming the 62% figure is a biological average.

The best study I have seen is that 38% of all men have some level of gay feelings, albeit generally at a low level. Most of these men are 90-10’s and 80-20’s. I am convinced that men like this are everywhere in the straight community, and you can’t spot them. Probably only 6% of men actually lean gay according to one study. Since minor gay feelings are quite common in straight men, why should it be so shocking that some men have issues with these feelings, do not like them, and possibly defend against them via reaction formation? It should not be surprising at all.

I have noticed in my life that the more a straight man was ok with homosexuality, especially to the point of being almost violently ok with it like, “There’s nothing wrong with it! There’s nothing wrong with it! Who cares!” that if I watched that man for a number of years, quite a few of them engaged in gay activities with other men, I would say at least once.

The ones that I followed up had all been predominantly straight when I knew them. They were somewhere  between 90-10’s to 60-40’s. The gay activity phase was in their late teens to early 20’s, and it seemed like they aged out of it after a bit. A few were in it for the money. These were very goodlooking mostly straight men who hooked up with older gay men who became their sugar daddies in order to get nice clothes, lots of money, fancy cars, etc. It was pretty close to being male prostitution. However, even this phase did not seem to last long, and they often aged out of it.

The last I heard about most of them was that they were living in a big house somewhere married to a woman, and they had a couple of kids. In other words, they were regular suburban husbands and fathers. As the obviously leaned straight anyway (so for all intents and purposes were straight) it makes perfect sense that they trended towards marriage, children and a house in the suburbs by their 20’s and 30’s like most straight men.

The gay stuff seemed to be a more  minor interest that they grew out of. Keep in mind that I did not monitor these men closely because very soon after I found out they were having sex with men, I bailed on them because I am not going to associate with you if you are doing such things. Instead I simply heard about what they were up to.

So I am a bit wary of straight men who are vehemently to almost violently “ok” with gay men. I consider it a warning sign of some incipient bisexuality. There just a bit too “ok” with homosexual behavior, wink wink.

Yet, I have noticed  that many regular straight men who were anywhere from 100-0’s to possibly 80-0’s do have some minor gay interest. How do I know this? Because they tried to have sex with me, that’s how! This happened especially when I was young and I was reportedly a very goodlooking man. I had offers to be a male model, and I even interviewed for an agency. As I pointed out, these men are not gay at all (a 100-0 to 80-20 is considered a straight man), but let’s put it this way, an awful lot of straight men, while often extremely heterosexual, are not exactly completely straight if you catch my drift.

Anyway, the Cultural Left line is a lie. The Cultural Left says the more secure you are with your masculinity or heterosexuality, the more ok you are with gay men, and the more worried you are about your masculinity or heterosexuality, the more you fear and hate gay men. This theory is not only wrong, it’s completely backwards!

I have observed that instead of the most uncertain men being the most homophobic, it’s the other way around. The more strongly and solidly to unmovably heterosexual (the type who say they would not have gay sex if you put a gun to their head) a man is, the more uncomfortable he is around gay men, and often the more he dislikes gay men. And there is much better correlation with masculinity. The more hypermasculine or macho the man is, the more he dislikes gays even to the point of hating them.

So the Cultural Left has it backwards. It’s the studs and the he-men who are the most homophobic of straight men, not the men who are most worried about their masuclinity and heterosexuality. And the more accepting a man is of homosexuality, instead of making him more securely straight as the Cultural Left theory says, instead this is correlated with a willingness to engaging in sex with men.


Filed under Afghanistan, Ancient Greece, Antiquity, Culture, Gender Studies, Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, Left, Man World, Roman Empire, Sex, South Asia

71 responses to “Cultural Left Theory of Homophobia: The Cultural Left Is Wrong Again

  1. Same Guy

    Speaking for myself only, I have twice been attracted to other men. It was momentary and I did nothing about it. Embarassment alone would have stopped me if ethics did not. Since neither was observably gay and I thought of each as more masculine than me, I have concluded these impulses were some feminine aspect of my personality responding.

    The gay men I have known always seemed distasteful to me as anything to be touched. In fact, they effect me so much as do men who don’t wash enough that they seem much the same thing.

    The only time a gay man ever frightened me was when a very large black guy in a black Caddy stopped next to me and offered me money to let him suck me. I turned it down and he made no problem. At the time, I was coming back from using the payphone at what I then discovered really was a gay bar.

    The bar name, “Gay Nineties”, put me more in mind of a place with an eight-foot painting of a nude female lying on a couch with a goblet of beer in her hand.

  2. Jason Y

    I’m aware of the type of guy your talking about, as with the women, this type of guy is incredibly homophobic mainly to compenstate for weak or no parents as a child. of course, the Neo-Nazi movement is full of these type of guys, sociopaths etc…

    Of course, the opposite can sometime be true, a Nazi parent will result in kids questioning racism etc.. to get back at the parent.

    • Jason Y

      My cousin for instance, is incredibly nice and tolerant, given the fact she comes from bascally people who live in trailers. How she became like that? Well, she got fed up with her grandpa and his racism, racist jokes etc… She’s also a pretty high IQ girl, college educated, but that stuff doesn’t always equal being as tolerant as she is.

      • Another William Playfair Web

        Many Spatially oriented people are treated as nerds, hence are outcasts and hence have racial views on opposite ends of the spectrum, either they

        1. Hate Blacks because Blacks are “cool”, or
        2. Identify with Blacks because Blacks are looked down upon

        which depends on

        1. Time period.
        2. Where they grew up.
        3. How they grew up.
        • Another William Playfair Web

          Back in the day in W.V. more Spatially oriented people who were outcasts were more progressive towards Blacks than others.
          Hopefully, that doesn’t flip flop all the way.

          Verbally oriented people were more with the status quo, so now, they’re generally more pro-Black.

        • Jason Y

          East Tennessee has a lot of white refugees from New Orleans and these people really HATE blacks. They are the most difficult and most smartass people. Of course, that’s in combo with already redneck people living way up in certain hollers who still live in 1850.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          From my observation, Southern Blacks (like the ones in Louisiana) are extremely groveling people (at least towards Whites) and do not have any prejudice towards Whites. Why people would hate them is pretty much a mystery. Perhaps it’s that they tolerate poverty (much like Hispanics) and although they are not mean or particularly violent, bring down the standards of living for everyone?

        • Jason Y

          Sometimes true. But in bigger cities like New Orleans they have been shown to be quite savage to quote ep-gah. No and that’s not sarcasm, the ones in New Orleans are pretty despicable,

        • Jason Y

          Yeah in response to small town blacks, I can’t understand why people would hate them. For instance, where I live there are always a few white assholes in hollers who hate obscenely hate blacks.

          I think a lot of it is cause they’ve never had no exposure to black people, and also they come from strongly alpha male backgrounds. Perhaps some of them have went to prison and had trouble with blacks.

        • Jason Y

          Perhaps Louisiana people etc.. are afraid the small town blacks will become like the New Orleans ones, so they think keeping them in their place and fearing them is the way to go.

    • Jason Y

      Actually though, I can understand why weak and/or trashy parents could create a Nazi. It’s because the home life of these kids is very unstable, immoral, and these kids are longing subconciously for a real man to take charge and be a parent. It never happens, and later this desire transfers to obsession with racism, homophobia.

      • Another William Playfair Web

        What about a boxing coach (like Mickey Goldman in the Rocky movies) or Jesus? why Hitler?

      • Jason Y

        It can create several types of personalities, but all of them are very insecure hateful ones.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          Well? We don’t want to look like some Latinate country or all listen to the Jews and be Gay?!?!?!?!?!?!

        • Jason Y

          Well, I am no rush to be Richard Simmons, but then again that’s an extreme example.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          HOLOCAUST WAS OKAY BECAUSE OF EGIs………………………………..



          CUZ EGIs, CUCK…

        • Another William Playfair Web

          I’m basically just copying and pasting from this thread;

          What a scary time we are living in!

        • Jason Y

          Good think these WN freaks have no power, and mathematical probability says they never will.

        • Jason Y

          Leave the WNs in the freak show circus. That’s pretty much their destiny for eternity given popular opinion of them. They can stand there next to the two headed men and bearded ladies.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          They’re getting there. January 20, 2017 at 11:59 A.M. EST. The end of the world as we know it.

          It’s sad

        • Jason Y

          Trump will destroy the US, but not cause of white nationalism. It’s because his whole scene will just be an outright disaster, a real judgement for the USA.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          But that’s his base, it’s riling people up. So before he nukes the world, I have some ideas. I’m White, but not a “real” White (a non-White who mysteriously looks White and has White skin, probably Jew magic). So, if I move to an urban area and remain largely anonymous, I won’t get lynched. I’ve seen people who are outwardly/obviously Italian and Dutch harassed as “Mexicans” by Trumpkins. It’s not even really about race. It’s just hysterics, basically all reason has gone out the window.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          This whole “nobody wants to be Trump’s running mate” is going to backfire.
          If he gets unpopular (what President has it) – the risk increases that he will go full reality T.V. and start doing outrageous things for attention (like sending nukes all over) and will be impeached as a precaution, which means his obscure/nutty VP (since no one wanted the job in the strong event that he loses/their integrity/ after he’s President) will take over –
          Ben Carson! It should be interesting…

        • Jason Y

          Trump / Duke 2016 😆

        • Another William Playfair Web

          Dump and Puke.

          The problem is that Trump couldn’t nominate a “preserve our cultural European heritage type” because the Trad-Cons think the Europeans (at least modern day ones) are just a bunch of sissies (other than perhaps some proud Highland Scot).

          He’ll go for some Ted Cruz type populist Tea party Obstructionist (both populist and religious appeal) from the Rust Belt – Senator Pat Toomey of PA. That’s my prediction.

  3. cheez121

    i don’t think you can always judge on the outside, haven’t there been many hompphobic people on the down low? i never believed it was true in every case, but i think extreme homophobia for no reason is due to repressed feelings a lot of the time. i am not talking about masculinity either

    • I do not know much about Down Low Black men. Are a lot of them homophobes? Sure sometimes homophobia is a reaction to denied and rejected homosexual feelings via the mechanisms of Denial, Projection and especially Reaction Formation, but that’s not always the case.

      What I have noticed in my life is that there is a direct correlation between strength of heterosexual identification (“I wouldn’t have sex with a man if you put a gun to my head”) and masculinity with homophobia. The more strongly heterosexual a man was, the more homophobic he was. The more masculine a man was, the more homophobic he was. It’s a pretty good general rule. It’s not perfect and there are a lot of exceptions, but there is something to it.

      I live with a bunch of Mexicans right now. This culture is fanatically homophobic. Most men are very strongly heterosexual (as in they are the last man on Earth you would think to do gay stuff). In addition, all men must be very macho, which is called machismo or machisimo or machista. If you’re a not a machista in this culture, you’re screwed. I don’t know how you even get laid, much less get married. Someone needs to explain that to me.

      I have observed very little homosexual behavior in this town, out or obvious gays are not common at all and generally restricted to certain places and these Mexicans REALLY hate gay men. I mean REALLY hate them. Mexican culture is one of the least gay cultures out there. I really doubt if these machistas around here are all repressing homosexual desires.

  4. Another William Playfair Web

    Don’t you get it yet, Robert? Jews make White men and women homosexual.
    There’s so much evidence because EGIs. EGIs. EGIs. EGIs. EGIs…………. ……………………………………………………………EGIs.

  5. Another William Playfair Web

    Jews aren’t White because they have their Y-chromosome from the Middle East (which despite Nat Geo data is NOT at ALL related to Europeans!).

    Jews are turning White people gay! It’s in their EGIs…no matter if they actually are similar to Whites…

    Never mind that Jews hate Muzzies – Their the ones bringing many of them into Europe – the Charlie Hebdo capture at a Jewish grocery store was faked! AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH……..JEWS EVERYWHERE………………..EGIs, EGIs, EGIs, 1488. ALL backed by Science. IF you deny it, you are a Jew defending your EGIs.

  6. RockT

    If gays can be self-hating, then that is a problem inherent in their community. It is not due to straights, society or Xtianity; too bad.

    As for this statement:

    “The corollary of this silliness is if you are secure about your masculinity, you do not fear or hate gay men. So straight men who fear or hate gay men are not secure about their masculinity.”

    This is the old “prove you don’t fear us by letting us have our way at all times” gambit.

    • Actually it’s not even true as the article points out. In my life, I have noticed that homophobia is correlated with masculinity and solidity of heterosexuality. The most hyper-heterosexual and hypermasculine men seem the most homophobic of all, and then the homophobia seems to decline as men get less masculine and especially start seeming like they might be open to this behavior (less solidly heterosexual).

      It’s like their whole theory is not only wrong, but it’s actually backwards!

      • RockT

        Most of their theories are wrong, and I don’t think they care. Life is not real to them.

        As for the “phobia” aspect; do you think these guys are afraid, or disgusted?

        • As for the “phobia” aspect; do you think these guys are afraid, or disgusted?

          Both! Most men find homosexual behavior to be repulsive and also sort of frightening and most men find the idea of gay men hitting on them to be repulsive, infuriating and also quite scary.

          But as far as fearing gays themselves, not so much.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          Those are the only REAL men who don’t drink the Jew Kool-Aid! Cuck!

        • Jason Y

          White hypocrite men hate guys kissing etc.. but want to see lesbian porn. HA HA. What a joke.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          Who legalized porn, Gayson?!?!?!?!?

          It’s a double win for these Joos, make money on the Porn and turn women lesbian!!

        • Another William Playfair Web

          that is one of the greatest pictures I have ever seen.

        • Jason Y

          Jews aren’t responsible for men’s dicks. Guys make the choice to look at porn. They don’t have to buy it.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          Ur a sheeple, Gayson.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          Santoculto was one of the guys pushing the Jews pushing homosexuality notion. I straight up asked him, “Did the Jews make you gay, Santo”. I was rather proud of myself 🙂

        • Jason Y

          No I just accept responsibility for my actions like a real man

          I mean what’s worse? Blacks blaming the white man or WNs blaming the Jew man?

        • Jason Y

          What do you mean?

        • Another William Playfair Web

          A sizable chunk of Whites have a victim complex/sulk about (just like they accuse Blacks of doing). The difference is they don’t get to benefit from it, i.e. Society doesn’t accept “White victims” but does “Black victims”.

        • Jason Y

          Victim thinking in any case often leads to pussy douchebag behavior. It’s nor very masculine.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          I’ve been reflecting upon the poor working class (3rd class, not 4th class) Whites and how they feel about being spat down upon/ignored. They have it bad, but what about the hard-working Black who was to deal with the insistent assumption that he is on welfare?

        • Jason Y

          Any kind of stereotyping can be annoying. I suppose it would get bad if it seemed like it was going on all the time.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          Well, that’s the thing, I’d say a lot of mainstream Republicans believe that
          It’s not some fringe WN thing.

        • Jason Y

          It depends on the Republicans. Most of the Republicans believe white people are victims to some extent. However, WNs take it a lot further by saying whites are extreme victims, mixed race anything is totally wrong, blacks and Mexicans should be deported, and being gay deserves beheading etc..

        • Another William Playfair Web

          Of course I respect those who are voting for Republicans for their own interests (i.e. they’re rich or they have some investments, etc.) and the Religious Right, but the rest are so Goddamned fooled it’s unbelievable.
          INCLUDING the Alt-Right.

          It’s part of why the Alt-Right (not that they don’t have a large SD of intellects – especially non-verbally) are so repulsive and basically just memorize talking points, their fiscally conservative views combined with racialist/evolutionarily primitive viewpoints really gives them low IQ’s on the median.

        • Jason Y

          Basically WNs are sociopaths with morally repulsive views.

        • Jason Y

          Of course some WN views like the ones about mixed race are way more morally repulsive than other ones, which probably just seem like Republican views.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          they’re simply, by and large, dipshits.

          ‘East Indians are worthless in America and have not contributed to the tech boom’
          -Mann Coulter (cheered on by the zombies).
          Plus, the correlation between IQ and achievement are not perfect.

          Another blog:
          Me: ‘There is no evidence Anglos are lined up to take these high-tech jobs, East Indians are doing good work’.
          Response:’Try again. It doesn’t matter who uses the technology but who makes it’.

          Quasi-illiterate fucks.

          They have like an average IQ of 85 (conservative and racist), on White norms.
          I don’t see why people give them the time of day. The openly say their views are for their own personal gain (Defending their “EGIs”).

        • Another William Playfair Web

          they are not sociopaths. They just repeat mantras, non-stop. It’s going to be proven in about 3 seconds by the ‘Ur just a dum Joo’ remarks by Sam.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          There was the Schizo on pp’s blog who had these great lines to offend someone:

          1. They have a low IQ
          2. They’re sociopaths
          3. They’ll end up in jail
        • Another William Playfair Web

          Aome are autistic and half-decent at programming, perhaps deriving a high Standard deviation, but on the median they are fucktarded. Seriously.
          Even their leaders get by more by charisma (that super hilarious awesome great frog meme) than actual smarts.

        • Jason Y

          I’m sure they would need programmers as I’m sure enemies would like to shut their websites down with DDOS attacks. Basically that’s when a lot of people login to the website at once with the goal of causing a shut down.

        • Jason Y

          They sure sound like sociopaths to me.

        • Jason Y

          Most WNs have warped minds beyond hope kind of like Hannibal the Cannibal.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          I see…I’m not really too familiar with a lot of computer stuff. But those people, they truly believe (perhaps because they are like, in some trailer park) that East Indians are all on welfare…They don’t know the definition of “White” and certainly not “Caucasian”. I’d rather die than live under Alt-Right rule.

          I will proudly go to the Gas chamber with the Jewish people…

        • Another William Playfair Web

          Said a few bad things about Melania Trump for the Enquirer – the Autist Sociopaths at the Alt-Right responded with this. This would make the best attack ad for Hillary Clinton

        • Another William Playfair Web


  7. TJF

    To Jason Y:

    Trump / Duke 2016

    I know you are joking but according to some Jews Trump has more ties to the Jewish community than any of the GOP candidates.

    Of his three married children two are married to Jews (His son Eric and Ivanka who also converted to Judaism) and apparently his Jewish son in law has a strong hand in running his campaign.

  8. Another William Playfair Web

    Ultimatley, the WNs are……
    1. Attempting to turn back time, undoing actions of Whites that put us in the situations we have now (i.e. Send Black people back, etc.)

    Correct on one or two issues, but making the rest up. I.E. Jared Taylor says “Blacks and Whites have different fingerprints, so that one’s race could be identified by them”, first of all that sounds suspicious, second of all, that’s nice, Blacks are different so, Syrians/Lebanese must be different too, since they are genetically basically the same, it would show that they would not fall under the category/ could not be distinguished from a Euro but for all that all that talk of “science” and “realism” he ignores that.
    Exaggerating the situation (oh my god, the U.K. is 8% non-British- some of which are other Europeans, Syrians/Lebanese, AHHHHHHHHH!!!!)

    4.Asians (in fairness, not all WNs bash them)- seriously? IQ and genes matter until they don’t.

    They lie- it’s about culture, so because of that we have to deport all non-Whites, (no we can’t just have a pro-White society like the Alt-left wants).
    Autistic as f*%k. Ever seen “Uncuck the Right”. Seriously.
    Are people under other circumstances you would NOT want to hang out with, have your children befriend, etc.
    Manufacturing crises. The Syrians and Mexicans (obviously of vastly inferior stock cuz Blacks are stupid) have killed 100 people this past week- just in your neighborhood.

    These people are generally liars and are not realists whatsoever. The latch onto one or two statistics about Blacks, primitive instincts of low IQ Whites, and then all of sudden are great intellectuals who know everything.

  9. Another William Playfair Web
    Alt-Reich dolt of the day.
    This is one of the smartest things this guy has ever said.
    Obama assassinated Neo-Con newsman Andrew Breitbart because he had footage of Obama being born in a Kenyan

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s