Caucasian Pride Worldwide

Another William Playfair Web writes: Robert –

You believe in Caucasian pride more than what is culturally regarded as “White” pride, do you not?

Actually I do! I do not understand White nationalists who go on and on about who is really White. Jews aren’t White? Spaniards, Greeks, Portuguese and Italians aren’t White? Albanians and Turks aren’t White? White Berbers aren’t White? White Egyptians aren’t White? Arabs aren’t White? Georgians, Armenians, Azeris and the Caucasus people aren’t White? Kurds aren’t White? Iranians aren’t White? Afghans aren’t White? Pakistanis aren’t White? North Indians aren’t White? You sure could have fooled me because they sure look White to me all right!

When I think of White, I think of my basic Caucasoid stock. When I go to the stores around here and see Punjabi Indians, Punjabi Pakistanis and Yemeni Arabs, my first thought is, “This is a member of my family!” That’s because they look like I do. And I believe they may think and behave like I do too, if you want to break the races down into Asians, Caucasians and Blacks.

I do not understand why White nationalists hate those people and say they are not related to them. Those off-Whites look like me! How can I hate someone who looks like me? I can’t. If you look like me, the way I see it is you are a member of my family, and I really feel a sense of joy when I meet members of my racial family out and about…because…it’s like meeting family!

Now granted some Arabs and Berbers are too Black to be considered White. Prince Bandar is simply not a White man. I do not know what he is. Possibly he is a mulatto. A lot of Egyptians seem to be broadly White. We had some Egyptians running a gas station near where I used to live, and I came to know them very well. The guy who ran it was simply a White man, straight up. His sons were just White guys, though their skin was rather dark.

Granted, there are some Afghans who may be too Asian to be White, but most Afghans just look like Whites to me. Surely there are some Pakistanis who are just too…something else…to be considered White, but once again, most Pakistanis just look like regular Whites to me. And the people of North India are surely White. A few North Indians are too Australoid to be White.

As far as the rest of India, you have to look at the person to see if you would classify them as “basically White” or “too Australoid to be White. I don’t give a hoot about skin color. Why should I? If some guy looks exactly like I do in terms of phenotype except that his skin is much browner than mine, why should I hate him? And why should I say he is not a part of my family? If you have a face that looks like mine, you are part of my family, no matter what color your skin is.


Filed under Afghans, Albanians, Anthropology, Arabs, Armenians, Azeris, Berbers, Central Asians, East Indians, Egyptians, Europeans, Greeks, Iranians, Italians, Jews, Kurds, Near Easterners, North Africans, Pakistanis, Physical, Portuguese, Race/Ethnicity, Racism, Sane Pro-White, South Asians, Spaniards, Turks, White Nationalism, Whites, Yemenis

62 responses to “Caucasian Pride Worldwide

  1. Another William Playfair Web

    It seems like the “Southwest Asian” area is most Caucasian. When you get into North Africa, there may be some Sub-Saharan admixture, and if you go to the east, you may get either Asian/Mongoloid ancestry, or Australoid in South India.

    From like Israel to the Punjab, basically anywhere North-South (excluding the Horn of Africa) is Caucasoid, and they are largely biologically and genetically indistinguishable from Europeans;

  2. Another William Playfair Web

    The problem is your average WN/Alt-Righter is too fucktarded to comprehend a face, they can only think about one thing at a time- I.E. Skin Color.

  3. Another William Playfair Web

    Fuck the Alt-Right and WNs.
    Just a bunch of Anti-White race traitors.

  4. This white, brown, yellow black is INSANE. If I saw one person that truly had WHITE SKIN, I’d be quite shocked, I’d think surely they are about to die. I am and all the people that I have ever seen are some shade of tan, brown or black.

  5. jorge

    I always thought in five human races: Amerindians, Australoids, blacks, Mongoloids and whites, not only three.

    • Jm8

      Amerindians are a descendant or early Mongoloids (and are classed with them: There are diverse groups of Mongoloids in Asia as well, some fairly divergent but still within the group, broadly defined; Central Asians, North and South Siberians, North East Asians, South East Asians, Ainus).
      Africa has more than one native race: At minimum, Pygmies, Khoisans, (both very divergent) and and “other Black” African groups (Other Black groups are sometimes different enough to at least border on being distinct races, if not quite) are their own groups.

      Australoids may not be one race (as the the putative groups that make it up have been in their respective regions fro tens of thousands of years and are genetically distinct by now.); Papuans/Melanesians, Australian natives, South Indians/Andamanese, and even the groups of Asian Negritos.

    • Another William Playfair Web

      I don’t think that really refutes this.

    • jorge

      I know that Amerindians are descendants of Mongoloids, but I consider them like a different race. In all case, all races come from some other.

      For Australoids I mean native peoples from Australia, New Guinea, part of Oceania (where are mixed, in different levels, with Mongoloids) and part of South Asia (but there they are very mixed with whites and, maybe in the east, with Mongoloids).

      “Negritos” are very difficult to classify to me. Phenotypically are very similar to blacks (look pictures of indigenous from Andaman). Yes, genetically are related to current Southeast Asians because live in the same region, it’s obvious. But I wanna know how much they were related some thousands of years before. The other who I consider very difficult to classify are Pacific Islanders. Maybe they are Mongoloids with different levels of mix with Australoids (in some cases this mix is very clear, like Maoris).

      And natives to almost all Africa to me are blacks. I don’t think in Pygmies or Bushmen like people of a different race. Like there are many differences between Middle Easterners and North Europeans and both are whites, I think in the same way for the case of Bushmen and most part of the rest of blacks.

      • jorge

        And I can consider Inuits like Mongoloids, and maybe some other few peoples from northwest of North America, but not the rest of indigenous peoples of the Americas.

      • Jm8

        “And natives to almost all Africa to me are blacks. I don’t think in Pygmies or Bushmen like people of a different race. Like there are many differences between Middle Easterners and North Europeans and both are whites, I think in the same way for the case of Bushmen and most part of the rest of blacks.”

        This is not the case genetically. Genetic divergence time is a better measure (of race), and Africans have had the most time to diversify. Middle Easterners and Europeans diverged very recently in comparison (genetic tree links).

        Pygmies and Bushmen diverged from the common modern human ancestral group around 100 thousand years ago (give or take). (Most of) the ancestors of most of other Africans and of non-Africans both come from a later diverging branch (as seen in the second genetic tree).

        Also, Amerindians are an offshoot of early Mongoloids, but so are the different Mongoloid groups in Asia e.g.: Central Asians, North and South Siberians, North East Asians, South East Asians, Ainus etc, all considered Mongoloid (though having stayed in Asia, some of them have to a degree—though sometimes not much—mixed/converged with each other more than Amerindians who left Asia long ago)

        • Jm8

          Edit:”…Also, Amerindians are an offshoot of early Mongoloids, but so are the different Mongoloid groups in Asia which are different from each other e.g.: Central Asians, North and South Siberians, North East Asians, South East Asians,…”

        • jorge

          But in this case, African natives can be classified in many races. So, after all, it’s true that there are not only three races.

          And those Asian populations precisely were mixing for thousands and thousands of years with “regular” Mongoloids. Very different than case of Amerindians.

        • Jm8

          “So, after all, it’s true that there are not only three races.”

          I would agree with that (that there are not only three).

        • Jm8

          Edit: “Pygmies and Bushmen diverged from the common modern human ancestral group around 100-150 thousand years ago (give or take)…”

  6. Another William Playfair Web

  7. Eric

    Whites, by definition, are the indigenous peoples of Europe. The term White is rather unfortunate because it implies that skin color is the predominant difference between Whites and the other human sub-species. In reality, there are hundreds, if not thousands, of differences. Skin color is almost irrelevant.

    Caucasoids are NOT WHITE. They are simply… Caucasoid. Here’s the definition of oid: “A suffix meaning “resembling,” “like,” used in the formation of adjectives and nouns (and often implying an incomplete or imperfect resemblance to what is indicated by the preceding element.)”

    That means Caucasoids have an ‘incomplete or imperfect’ resemblance to Caucasians. And therefore even less to Whites.

    Even within the European sphere there are many hybrid groups that can’t really be called White. Parts of the Spanish, Greek, Portuguese and Italian populations are clearly not White.

    And Jews, Albanians,Turks, Berbers, White Egyptians, Arabs, Georgians, Armenians, Azeris, the Caucasus people, Kurds, Iranians, Afghans, Pakistani, North Indians, etc. are absolutely not White. They are not indigenous to Europe. They have significantly different physical and genetic characteristics. Calling them White just demeans their unique qualities.

    White Nationalists are correct to be concerned about these issues. They want a part of the earth to be recognized and accepted as the White homelands. That doesn’t include the Middle East.

  8. Ed

    Wogs start at Calais, Robert.

    • Another William Playfair Web

      Facts are facts, Mr. Ed (see the genographic study I referenced above).

      It was the SUDANESE causing trouble at Calias from what I remember.
      But when one VICTIM does something wrong, the Alt-Right’s low-impulse control comes out in great force and they don’t reason

    • Another William Playfair Web


    • Another William Playfair Web

      looks a lot like Mr.Bean (Rowan Atkinsonofwhite);

      Get it now?
      “You can’t just make stuff up.”

  9. Gay State Girl

    Remember that crazy Asian Nationalist Huax who claimed the Sumerians were is Asiatic? That led the WNs to become possessive of the Sumerians’ accomplishments. 🙂

    • Another William Playfair Web

      Don’t you see, the Nordics came down and “rescued” the Sumerians from the evil Ch!nks.
      They did all the great Civilization stuff, but then the great Lord Ograf called them home to Norway, leaving the Sumerians to get raped by the evil Ch!nks.
      Andrew Anglin 2016.

    • Another William Playfair Web

      Looks like Michaelangelo’s David.
      Was Michaelangelo symbolizing he is the reincarnation of the great god Tyr?
      Trump and David Duke discuss next.

  10. Sami

    Bandar of “Saudi” Arabia was the offspring of his father Sultan and a Sudanese maid.

    • Another William Playfair Web

      Well the Saudis had East African slaves, but that doesn’t mean your average Saudi really mixed with them.
      By that logic White-Americans would be mixed with West African.

  11. Jason Y

    Again, don’t care for white pride, cause so much music and whatnot, besides hip-hop, is black. i do like what you would call general American culture, before the advent of hip-hop

    • Jason Y

      I don’t like non-American cultures that much, not even the British one. I mean, it’s fine, for them, but I just wasn’t raised in the UK or Australia etc..

  12. Another William Playfair Web

    The Alt-Right/White Nationalist movement, which abandons many of it’s own brethren in the Middle East (see my above Genetic study links) is completely hypocritical, in that it has done much to divide and fracture Whites. The Alt-Right attempts to portray Syrians as savages who have destroyed their country and can not govern themselves.
    Oh, really, so that’s somehow different than Europe post World War II, with most of it’s countries ravaged?
    The genetic evidence is denied.
    The Alt-Right is not “pro-White” in any sense of the word. The Alt-Right is Anti- well just about everybody. The movement is populated by low-IQ dorky kids jealous of the cool Black kids in public school. Ex-Neo-Cons hoping to “Jump ship” after disastrous middle eastern policies have swept them into a frenzy.
    THINK before you join a mob, or a cult.

    • Jason Y

      They’re definitely jealous. One little gang I ran into loves to make fun of black ways of speaking etc.., but of course, they’re in East Tennessee, so there is no real threat of blacks beating them up.

      Not saying though I don’t find wiggers ridiculous though. But I have to say that there is an assumption that any white person who likes blacks, likes ghetto blacks, and that’s not true. But to the white racist any white guy who likes blacks is a target.

      • Another William Playfair Web

        I do feel genuinely sorry for these kids, I mean they were probably bullied by Blacks as young people, and that fucks with their Psychology, but I mean, you have to have the ability to look at things in retrospect.

        I think part of it is that as Rushton thought, due to shorter Black life expectancies, they matured faster, and hence were more mature than White kids, and bullied them for the Street-wise ignorance (also forwarded by income differences/environment).

        • Jason Y

          Some of it was bullying by blacks, but a lot of it isn’t. I mean, how many black kids are in my neck of the woods? Yet plenty of little cracker kids love to make fun of blacks, or black lovers etc…

          Usually its just assholes who probably had some lame weak negative experience with blacks, nothing like beating up or rape, and then go into white power to get revenge. Well, for one thing, the odds of being beat up or raped by blacks are incredibly low where I live, cause they’re aren’t massive numbers of them.

        • Jason Y

          Or in other cases, it’s just the majority, which where I live is cracker white, making fun of anyone different, gay, black etc… In fact, maybe nothing ever happened negatively with these kids experiences with target groups. Again, they’re just picking on people who are different, possibly to make up for some kind of dorky insecurity issues, and the fact the culture hates blacks and gays also plays a role.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          “Usually its just assholes who probably had some lame weak negative experience with blacks, nothing like beating up or rape, and then go into white power to get revenge.”
          Whenever I went through a phase like that I would go Neo-Con and take great comfort in Blacks that were worth something like, say, just a few years ago; Herman Cain.
          That’s the difference between me and an outright douchebag.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          but now I realize it’s much more in my interests, hell, probably, in everyone’s interests not to give into White guilt for oppression of the Orange people and vote for Trump :);

      • Jason Y

        Some cases exist of white racist kids who were actually beat up by blacks, but a lot of other cases, as you said, are just assholes, jealous of what they feel is special attention given to blacks, and the charisma and coolness of blacks.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          Most think like a certain commenter who I won’t drag into this, that ‘OMG one Black beat up one White kid who didn’t have it coming, OMG we have to send the Blacks back to Africa now you guys’, purposely effeminate sounding, the opposite of how he really is; PISSED OFF (guess who, cough, cough).

        • Jason Y

          Another question is, “Did the white man who got beat up, or the woman who was raped have it coming?” Did they. In many cases, it’s a big yes, so it’s difficult to muster sympathy for them, as WNs do.

        • Jason Y

          You could easily switch the argument around and bring up some severely retarded black guy beat up by skinheads.and say, “Boy this sure justifies black racism against whites.”

        • Another William Playfair Web

          I found an old will from my family’s past bequeathing a “Negro boy…”.
          White guilt is a natural emotion.
          Fuck the Alt-Right.
          You can’t White-wash sociopathy

  13. Ken

    I’m suspicious of middle eastern people who label themselves as ‘white’, Does anyone remember Xera? he was an Egyptian-American who saw him self as med, and acted like a white nationalist. From some reports and data ive looked at, middle eastern people, like egyptians and Iranians, are only about 20% med and 3% anglo.

  14. Ultra Cool

    Best post ever. No point in excluding non-Euro Whites from our Caucasian family, down with Euro-elitism and Nordicism! Caucasian Pride forever!

    All Caucasians are in,as long they look Caucasian, even if they have a lot of non-Caucasian ancestry, maybe even hardcore wannabe Whites can get in, Nazis and Stormtards are out because they exclude 90% of our family.

  15. Another William Playfair Web

    I’ve seen the Web Analytics data for this site, plenty of East Indians are here.
    With that being the case, please support, my blog;

  16. Those White-nationalists hating off-white Asian Caucasoid are seriously insecure bunch. They are jealous when they find a jewess, pakistani, ,punjabi,pashtun girl looks far sexier/fine-Caucasoid than their own stocks.
    I don’t support race-mixing either & honestly speaking i find our Asian Caucasoids far appealing than theirs. I love those slick, smooth,fine-caucasoid jewess the most.

  17. Reblogged this on Exposing india & indians and commented:

    We can’t/don’t need to force anyone to accept our opinions but just logic

  18. David

    Careful, you don’t want to get caught up in the Caucasoid trap way of thinking. Many still think Ethiopians are Caucasoid. And Egypt is really two types. The Egyptians have some sorta lying issue going on, many of the Egyptians I know are dark, like Sandy black, not dark. And they will tell u so. Berbers are at war with themselves trying to say who was first, dark or white Berber. Though many Indians seem Caucasoid, they call southern ones Negroid, even though that seems ridiculous. For one, Nigger, Negro, etc comes only out of West Africa as the Igbo called themselves Nigger, means of high blood I think.

    Don’t believe too many Arabs about what they are, a guy who was jet black got mad with me when I asked him if he was African, and he lived in S. Arabia. They hate being called black. Even the black ones…so weird. Egyptians too. They don’t identify as black or white unless they are super white or super black. Cairo and Alexandria do not represent all Egypt like you think it does. Zahi Hawass was actually fired for lying and stealing trying to link DNA from old Egypt to Europe even. Even still, since I have part white in me does that make me “Caucasoid”?

    • Ultra Cool

      Most natives from Europe, North Africa, West Asia and North India are White (Caucasian), these non-Euro Caucasians aren’t any less White than Euros, though there are some people with extremely Caucasian features and dark skin and I’m not sure wether they are White or not.

    • William

      Now, personally, I believe the only people PURELY part of the “White Ethnicity”, are descended from Europe, parts of Turkey, the Canary Islands and Azores, Lebanon/Syria, and probably Sephardic Jews. These are what the genetic and aesethic facts bear out.

      However, regardless, it denounces White Supremacist nonsense;
      1. Both groups are mixed with SW Asian.
      2. Med genes are abundant everywhere. It’s not a case of “pure” and “unpure” there’s no imaginary line.

      That being said if “genetic interests” are real, you are going to feel a lot more altruism towards Caucasians, regardless of color, based on facial features.
      I.E. I was at a Burger King near Baltimore, MD. and briefly looking around everyone behind the counter was Dark Black, a woman cleaning up the eating area was Dark Black, one of the three people eating were Dark Black, but the other two were light skinned East Indian, at that moment, those two guys were surely family in my mind!

      and I’m sure that when Jason was in Korea and saw a somewhat semitic looking Whiteperson, he was not going to deny the obvious and say “your different from me”.
      It’s silly.

    • William

      to borrow of off someone elses work;

      “Ultimately, White Nationalists don’t care about ‘the truth’, White Nationalists don’t even acknowledge ‘the truth’ exists. Facts are White Nationalists’ enemies.”

  19. Raja Hindustani

    Robert what do you say about this Indian guy from Bengal who says White people are unique and different from other Caucasians and East Asians?
    Very interesting

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s