Why IQ Deniers Are Idiotic and Crazy

At the moment, IQ Denial is the de facto required mindset in Normie society. Even a high percentage of very high IQ people over 150 IQ are, incredibly enough, IQ Deniers.

IQ Denial is rather curious in that no one says that athletic, writing, artistic, musical, mathematical, social, or other forms of talent exist. Apparently the only skill in man that does not exist as a natural talent is intelligence! And you are allowed to brag about anything in the world other than IQ. I would argue that it is not even possible to brag about your IQ anyway because it’s nothing to brag about in that a high IQ isn’t even a good thing. Instead it’s a bad thing. Bragging about IQ is like bragging about being poor or about being a failure with women. It’s not possible to brag about those things because those are bad things, not good things.

There are a lot of standard moronic rejoinders to the IQ argument, all of which say that IQ does not matter or is meaningless.

Here are some of them:

  • IQ measures how well you do on IQ tests.
  • IQ doesn’t measure intelligence.
  • Intelligence cannot be measured.
  • Intelligence cannot even be defined, much less measured.
  • IQ tests only measure one type of intelligence and there are multiple intelligences.
  • IQ tests don’t measure your EQ or Emotional Intelligence Quotient. EQ is your social intelligence or how well you get along with others – in other words, social skills.
  • IQ has nothing to do with success in the workplace. What matters if hard work, not IQ. IQ has nothing to do with it.
  • IQ does not measure creativity.
  • IQ tests are biased, hence the results are meaningless.
  • IQ tests only measure the cultural knowledge of Western Whites. They do measure Black or other intelligence accurately.
  • IQ tests only measure “book smarts” and that is only one aspect of intelligence.
  • IQ scores mean absolutely nothing.
  • IQ tests do not measure wisdom.
  • IQ scores have nothing to do with success in life.
  • IQ scores do not guarantee success in life.
  • Many people with the highest IQ’s of all were considered failures by the metrics of modern society.

That will be enough for now. Now let us go through these idiotic arguments and take them apart one by one.

IQ measures how well you do on IQ tests and nothing else. Wrong. Of courser it measures how well you do on IQ tests, that goes without saying. But it also measures how fast your brain your works.

IQ doesn’t measure intelligence. IQ tests measure how fast your brain works. What this argument says is that intelligence has nothing to do with how fast your brain works. Isn’t that a breathtakingly stupid argument? You really believe that? You really believe that intelligence has nothing to do with how fast your brain works? Wow.

Intelligence cannot be measured. Well, that is just wrong, and almost all psychometric experts would disagree with you.

Intelligence cannot even be defined, much less measured. Once again, that is wrong, and most psychometric experts would disagree with you.

IQ tests only measure one type of intelligence, and there are multiple intelligences. Wrong, IQ tests measure how fast your brain works. They are not set up to measure “multiple intelligences,” whatever those are. Anyway, the correlation between IQ and these multiple intelligences is a lot higher than you think. In other words, a faster brain helps you with these other intelligences too.

IQ tests don’t measure your EQ or Emotional Intelligence Quotient. Correct, but so what? That’s like saying a math test doesn’t measure how well you can play the trombone. Once again, that is correct, but so what? A math test is not supposed to measure how well you play a trombone. A math test is supposed to measure how good you are at math, and it does that pretty well.

EQ is your social intelligence or how well you get along with others – in other words, social skills. An IQ test is supposed to measure how fast your brain works, which is a good metric for raw intelligence. It’s not supposed to measure social skills. If you want to measure EQ, give them an EQ test or a social skills test. And IQ scores do not necessarily correlate with EQ scores, but who ever said they should? No one.

IQ has nothing to do with success in the workplace. What matters if hard work, not IQ. IQ has nothing to do with it. This argument is also rather breathtaking. It states that how fast your brain works has nothing whatsoever to do with success in the workplace. If that’s true, then the modern workplace is even more retarded than it already seems. Why don’t we all just go home and let the robots take over if that is the case?

But let’s sit back and examine this amazing argument. You just argued that how fast your brain works has nothing whatsoever to do with how well you will do at work. Wow. What an amazing argument. I think most people would look at that argument and decide that it is absurd. A fast brain ought to be a real benefit in many workplaces.

IQ does not measure creativity. Correct, but it is not supposed to. It is supposed to measure how fast your brain works. And believe it or not, faster brains do indeed seem to be more creative than slower brains, all other things being equal. And extremely gifted creative people typically have above average IQ’s.

IQ tests are biased, hence the results are meaningless. No, they’re not biased. They measure how fast your brain works. Or maybe they are biased. They are biased against people with slower brains. I would agree with that.

IQ tests only measure the cultural knowledge of Western Whites. They do measure Black or other intelligence accurately. That’s not true. They measure how fast your brain works. And no one has ever designed a non-culturally biased test that these lower scoring groups score higher than Western Whites on. So that implies that the tests are not biased. Also Asians, who are not White and are completely alien from Western culture, actually score higher than Western Whites on these tests that are supposedly biased in favor of Western Whites. Clearly the tests are not biased in favor of Western Whites, or Asians would not score higher.

IQ tests only measure “book smarts,” and that is only one aspect of intelligence. No, they don’t. They measure how fast your brain works. You are making an argument that the only value of a faster brain is for book knowledge. That statement seems incorrect on its face. I would think logically that a faster brain would benefit you in many areas of life, not just in book smarts.

IQ scores mean absolutely nothing. Wrong. They measure how fast your brain works. You just made the argument that how fast one’s brain works means absolutely nothing in a modern society. Do you actually believe that? That argument seems absurd right on its face.

IQ tests do not measure wisdom. Correct, but they are not supposed to. They are supposed to measure how fast your brain works. And indeed it is true that people with faster brains do seem to be wiser than people with slower brains. Nevertheless, this is not always true, and some people with fast to very fast brains can be remarkably unwise.

IQ scores have nothing to do with success in life. This once again is rather breathtaking statement. You just argued that how fast your brain works has nothing to do with your success in life. If that is true, than the Idiocracy is already upon us.

IQ scores do not guarantee success in life. Correct, but they are not supposed to measure that. They are supposed to measure how fast your brain works. And while IQ correlates well with success in life, it is not a perfect correlation, and it is not unusual at all for high and very high IQ people do not do well in life or even to fail in life. That is because having a very fast brain is no guarantee against doing poorly or even failing in life. The reason for this is because there is more to success in life than having a fast brain, though a fast brain surely helps. It just doesn’t help everyone who has one.

Many people with the highest IQ’s of all were considered failures by the metrics of modern society. This is correct, but there may be good reasons for this. They may well have been too smart. It is quite possible to be too smart for modern society. We are talking about people who are so smart that they are almost like people from another planet.

Also when you get above 150 IQ, IQ starts to become a hindrance because people start getting weirder. Above 150 IQ, 40% of people have a mental disorder. In addition, the rates of Aspergers seem to up a lot in IQs above 150, especially in the men. Many people with IQ’s this high, especially the men, are extremely shy and profoundly introverted, live alone, work at menial jobs, rarely date and are celibate most of the time.

26 Comments

Filed under Asperger's Syndrome, Autism, Idiots, Intelligence, Neuroscience, Psychology, Race/Ethnicity, Science

26 responses to “Why IQ Deniers Are Idiotic and Crazy

  1. Jason Y

    A lot of blacks, take jazz drummers for instance, have slower brains being black, but it hasn’t hampered creativity.

  2. Jason Y

    Has anyone considered that brain speed (IQ) can be improved via work? Isn’t that why all these brain enhancing games are popular nowadays (like luminosity.com for instance) I know bodybuilding is mostly about effort, why wouldn’t the brain be any different. But even in bodybuilding there are limits based on genetics, unless of course, you want to do steroids or eat really weird unhealthy nutritional drinks.

    • “Has anyone considered that brain speed (IQ) can be improved via work?”
      I could cite some studies that have suggested this and debunk it, but I’ll just do it within your comment.

      ” Isn’t that why all these brain enhancing games are popular nowadays (like luminosity.com for instance) I know bodybuilding is mostly about effort, why wouldn’t the brain be any different.” Those Brain enhancing games just make people get used and adjust to that kind of format, they don’t increase your ability to actually succeed. Also, a Brain and skeletal/Cardiac muscles involved in bodybuilding are significantly different in terms of their biological composition, that a apples and oranges comparison. Even then, BOTH have potential differences ased on genetic

      “But even in bodybuilding there are limits based on genetics, unless of course, you want to do steroids or eat really weird unhealthy nutritional drinks.”

      So why even bother bringing it up?

      “Iv’e seen a lot of the online IQ tests are about putting together puzzles or figuring out sequences. Well, those things can be learned, The brian can be trained to do them faster. Therefore, it seems like lower or average IQ is curable.”

      Again, online IQ test are no good. They are too limited

      http://www.themarysue.com/iq-tests-how-do-they-work/

      Also, what do you mean “they can be learned”. In IQ testing, patterns are “recognized” in the sense that they remember the patterns from a previous lesson but the point is to analyze the pattern to figure out what it is without already being familiar with it.

      Plus, IQ test are typically done without much prep to make sure that people actually use this type of ability. And even if you argue that prep would give people of allegedly different potentials the same scores thus making meaningless, the difference would be in their ability to retain that knowledge of a long periods of time.

  3. Jason Y

    Iv’e seen a lot of the online IQ tests are about putting together puzzles or figuring out sequences. Well, those things can be learned, The brian can be trained to do them faster. Therefore, it seems like lower or average IQ is curable.

  4. Tulio

    I read that Hitler banned IQ tests because Jews were scoring higher than Gentiles.

    • Another William Playfair Web


      All from Tevye’s creative mind.

    • Yes, and the Sovjets also voiced their aversion against IQ testers — which did not hinder them eitther to apply IQ tests on a larger scale. The Nazis used Binet-Simon IQ tests to decide whether special needs kids were still “capable of education” or “unfit for life” (http://www.t4-denkmal.de/Ausgrenzung-Kinder). This is the context against or for which Hans Asperger, who actively participated in the selection process of the killing facility Spiegelgrund in Vienna and is supposed to have been himself on the autism spectrum, wrote his treatise about higher-functioning “autistic psychopaths”.

      There is in fact a certain traditon that people have a limited problem with IQ testing. Did you know that Albert Binet himself transformed the initial test methods, because – shockingly ! – girls performed better than boys? The differences sehad been even very pronounced in some age groups. They adjusted the tests in that way that girls and boys performed equally.

      According to Richard Lynn women perform now 5 points lower than men on IQ tests. But I guess that is not, because of the further alterations the tests have undergone since Binet (although the alterations go into the same direction), but because women really got more dump. After all, can you name any woman who has strongly collaborated in any major scientific achievement since Marie Curie (Robert Curie), Mileva Einstein (Albert Einstein: “OUR work on the relativity movement”, “OUR theory” etc.),Clara Immerwahr (Fritz Haber) and Lise Meitner (leader of the team around Otto Hahn, proposed the explanation for the nuclear fission, although Ida Noddack had advanced it before her) ? Does any work of a woman in the realm of social sciences equals Harriet Taylor Mill s work (with John Stuart Mill insisting so much on her more than full co-authorship apart from his work on inductive reasoning)? And which woman has authored works like Emilia Lanier under the name of Shakespeare or Cornelia Goethe under her brother s name (https://de.pinterest.com/gertrud4617/kainsmal-goethe-keinen-bruder-habe-ich-erschlagen/)? As for me at least, I do not consider works written by Brecht s women or by Thomas Mann s sister, as genious as are the works of a “Shakespeare” or a “Goethe” (although the Buddenbroks for which according to Thomas, his sister had contributed a detailed report about their aunt, one central figure of the novel, is rightly the work for which he has mainly received the noble price). No, it is very clear: female intelligence is in decline.

      Then there is Jean Piaget, a collaborator of Binet, whose work on cognitive development was inspired by the inappropriateness of Binet s IQ tests to take into account a child s cognitive development. The IQ tests actually test mainly capacities on the earlier cognitive stages, and not on the latest one, which is associated with “post-conventional morality” and with the capacity to develop solidarity with people quite different from oneself (something like “cognitive empathy”, see Adam Smith e.a., “The Emapthy Imbalance Hypothesis…”). So people with a pervasive developmental disorder, who have remained longer in the earlier stages of cognitive development might actually perform better. And – SURPRISE ! – this is exactly what is happening: Those with a very high IQ are very often on the autism spectrum, and are therefore more egocentric.

      Likewise Laurent Mottron and Michelle Dawson emphasize the different nature of the intelligence of still “lower functioning autists” and are working on a new generation of IQ tests that take even further into account non-verbal intelligence. So IQ tests are going to be even more handicap freindly when they already are. Isnt that good news?

      It is obvious who is developping and applying the current IQ tests most ardently and refusing to see their all too obvious downfalls, and it is obvious why they are doing this (at least it is obvious for those WITH cognitive empathy): It is those with the bigger minority complex, the bigger self-hate and therefore hate against lower-functioning people on the spectrum and the bigger anixety issues (and ASD is highly associated with anxiety issues) , and they do it, because they are craving for a big enough ego defense mechanism.

      • Another William Playfair Web

        IQ test do not correlate perfectly with g.
        Norms of reaction and the interactions of G and E make it so………………….

        IQ is good in predicted outcomes in controlled environment- but if you placed people tested in the U.S. with IQs of x, y, and z (with x being lowest, z highest) and placed them somewhere far away and isolated (different culture) there is no correlation between their life outcomes from their.

        But, the vast majority of the time, it can be useful.

    • Another William Playfair Web

      the reasons the cultural left censors things like IQ, are sound.

      It’s obvious, that despite the FACT that Jews, NE Asians score consistently higher, SE Asians in the first world score about the same (and have the innovative farming practices to back it up), apparently the Alt-Right STILL thinks Whites are superior
      because;
      1. “I’m not autistic, cuck”.
      2. Chinks are boring and not creative.

      Get it now?
      so easy to manipulate, into political opportunist bullshit.

  5. Gay State Girl

    There’s more to IQ than speed right?

  6. Not only do IQ tests measure one’s brain speed, it also measures one’s ability to analyze abstract patterns.

  7. Noneofmany

    Uplifting.

    Wish they would do something like this for physical fitness/beauty.

    A choir type adaptation of songs like this would be great.

    It’s the genetic lottery game! You win or your screwed.

    • Another William Playfair Web

      pro-White.
      But Orientals have higher IQs…?
      on the median, as is implied.

      14-88 but Jews have higher IQs…?
      ?
      If you like statistics your “autistic”

      but what could we expect from the beautiful alt-right?

    • Another William Playfair Web

      Does anyone actually believe that people actually examine IQ differences- and spin the facts to be more pro-White (as opposed to pro-Asian) are actually doing it out of pure intellectual curiosity?
      I mean obviously they are not prejudiced or politically motivated racists?

      • Some in the comment section of that video thanked the creator saying “Thanks for not saying Jews were smarter than us, they’re not”.

  8. kareem

    Physical fitness is mostly controllable though. Yeah to be world class you need the right genes, but barring rare genetic defects, even the most out of shape fucker can get a nice body if they exercise consistently and eat right. A person with a 70-90 IQ is going to have problems in school no matter how much they study.

    This is why fat apologists are really stupid when they said stuff like “big boned”

  9. Baruch

    Porky face is not a jenies as he think…

    So sorry.

    It’s hour to grew up. 😁

  10. Dave Mowers

    Good piece Robert.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s