“The Only Thing I Hate More Than Communists Are Anti-Communists”

First of all, I want to say that I agree somewhat with a famous Russian dissident who said, “The only people I hate more than Communists are anti-Communists.”

Sure, Communism has some issues to be sure, and I’m not exactly a Leninist myself. But however bad Communists are, anti-Communists are so much worse. By anti-Communism I do not mean reasonable people who simply feel that Communism is a lousy idea. I mean the anti-Communist fanatics, most of whom are about as insane as any other fanatic. Anti-Communists lie, and they are crazy. Most of what they say about Communism is nothing but lies. Communism has a pretty serious downside, and you would think they could limit themselves to the facts and still make their case, but no, they have to lie like all ideologues. First of all, truly socialist or Left anti-Communists are not common. I do not mind such folks myself. You would be interested to know that most of the Cuban dissident groups (last time I checked there were 250 different groups) are actually socialists, albeit social democrats. Socialist anti-Communists are fairly common in places like the Czech Republic, Poland, Germany and honestly most of Europe nowadays. Most of Europe has been socialist for a long time now, but it is a ty0pe of socialism (social democracy) that is pretty hostile to Communism.

The nutcases in Europe are the psychos who run the North Atlantic Terrorist Organization (NATO), most people in the Baltics, far too many East Europeans, way too many Finns and the entire political caste of the UK, where there has not been any Left since Tony Blair destroyed it in the 1990’s. The NATO maniacs are actually fascists and they have long had links to Nazi and fascist organizations all over Europe.NATO set u the Gladio Network or Stay Behind Network which was supposed to conduct guerrilla war in case of a Soviet takeover of Western Europe. Unfortunately almost everyone in Gladio was either a fascist or an out and out Nazi. During the Cold War, the Gladio Network was not somnolent but was actually active. They carried out assassinations all over Europe for decades and in Italy they set off many false flag bombings which they blamed on the Left during the Strategy of Tension. The US, NATO and the CIA were up to their necks in all of this insanity.

The US-backed Nazi government in Ukraine is based on the Gladio Network in that region.

Anti-Communists are almost always rightwingers, and they are some of the worst, that is murderous, rightwingers of all. And they have a curious definition of Communist. You raised the minimum wage? You are a Communist who needs to be removed in a coup or shot, and the CIA will help us do just that. You a member of a labor union? You are a Communist who needs to be killed. Are you anyone who is leftwing in any way? You are a Communist. Everyone on the Left from the wimpiest reformist to the guerrilla with an AK-47 is a Communist who needs to be killed.

Anti-Communists are truly the worst. And the tragic and enraging part is that anti-Communists have been running the US state via the Deep State since World War 2, and since World War 2, US culture has been based on the same insane anti-Communist philosophy as the ideologues. The true religion of America after 1945 was Anti-Communism.

10 Comments

Filed under American, Britain, Conservatism, Cuba, Culture, Economics, Europe, Fascism, Geopolitics, Germany, Italy, Left, Marxism, Poland, Political Science, Regional, Socialism, Ukraine, USA

10 responses to ““The Only Thing I Hate More Than Communists Are Anti-Communists”

  1. Pingback: “Evil Commies Killed 10, No 20, No 40, No 60, No 110 Million People!” | Beyond Highbrow - Robert Lindsay

  2. Jason Y

    You gotta wonder though why eastern europeans would be anti-communist psychos. Could it be a reaction to the fact Communism failed in their lands, and was also associated with Russian/Soviet imperalism?

    Anti-Communists are almost always rightwingers, and they are some of the worst, that is murderous, rightwingers of all. And they have a curious definition of Communist. You raised the minimum wage? You are a Communist who needs to be removed in a coup or shot, and the CIA will help us do just that. You a member of a labor union? You are a Communist who needs to be killed. Are you anyone who is leftwing in any way? You are a Communist. Everyone on the Left from the wimpiest reformist to the guerrilla with an AK-47 is a Communist who needs to be killed.

    If the Oliver Stone movie, Salvador is a guide, it seems like these vicous right wing regimes have some weird plan to improve the lot of the poor population without Communism.

    Perhaps they would want to resort to methods like Hitler implemented in Germany, massive nationalism, shutting down the border. The idea being the extreme national pride would motivate people to work harder at things (education, job training etc..) without taking their rage on the upper classes.

    • Jason Y

      Meant to say: The idea being the extreme national pride would motivate people to work harder at things (education, job training etc..) without taking their rage out on the upper classes.

      Note, however I think such an idea is baloney. Your typical right-winger, like santo-culto hates the real Latin American poor, viewing them as ugly mongrels who need extermination. At least that’s the case in Brazil, but it may not be in El Salvador, as more of the upper and middle class may be mongrel (Not using mongrel as a dirty or insulting word though).

      • Jason Y

        True, Nazi regimes in Latin America would gain more popularity if the middle and upper classes were the same race as the poor. That way the poor would buy into their Trump / Hitler plan for national prosperity. Make El Salvador great again !! LOL

        • Another William Playfair Web

          Fascism is a bad idea in general.
          It means aggravating the people to suit your political needs, but when they are aggravated, there is no stopping. The leaders have to continually compensate (i.e. Hitler) for the growing extremism of the stupid people, and then you scare everybody/make them resent you, mess with foreigners, and boom your cities look like Dresden did….

        • Another William Playfair Web

          Your typical right-winger, like santo-culto hates the real Latin American poor, viewing them as ugly mongrels who need extermination

          He’s on pumpkinperson’s blog now. I talk with him occasionally. He doesn’t seem that extreme….

        • Jason Y

          He thinks mixed raced people are ugly, something that’s very subjective. In general, he’s a cruel person who hates the poor,, especially of mixed decent. WIth people like that, it’s no wonder Latin American fascists can’t win the hearts and minds of Latin America’s poor.

        • Jason Y

          HItler type fascism might be impossible in El Salvador because there are no racial minorities, everyone is a mongrel. However, that’s a plus to fascists who can somehow train the poor to thinking the government is on thier side, and also that the upper classes are on their side.

          On the other hand in Brazil, the rich disdain and cruelty toward the poor whom are despised partly due mixed race, causes an alienation which draws the poor toward Communist movements.

        • Jason Y

          Meant to say fascism might be possible in El Salvador being that all the classes of people are more the same, mongrel.

  3. Latias

    Anti-Communists are almost always rightwingers, and they are some of the worst, that is murderous, rightwingers of all. And they have a curious definition of Communist. You raised the minimum wage? You are a Communist who needs to be removed in a coup or shot, and the CIA will help us do just that. You a member of a labor union? You are a Communist who needs to be killed. Are you anyone who is leftwing in any way? You are a Communist. Everyone on the Left from the wimpiest reformist to the guerrilla with an AK-47 is a Communist who needs to be killed.

    These people are truly the scum of the earth. I would say that they worse than child molesters.

    During a period of red terror, when there is no strong, established legal system*, I would sentence many of these scum to shot. They would not be shot solely because they oppose the proletarian revolution, but because in their opposition, they demonstrated a complete lack of empathy, sympathy, and benevolence towards other human beings, except their relatives. They have no humanity because of their lack of pity. They are rabid dogs, and a bullet is a measure the revolution’s dispassionate mercy and discipline, because during the fervor of the revolution, I would incline to make them punitively suffer, but we are not savages.

    During the red terror, during their execution, their hands should be bound to prevent any Miguel Pro-like posturing occurring. They are dogs and unworthy of a very dignified death. Being shot is dignified enough.

    There should be some rudimentary “legal” procedure to determine whether one should be executed. What evidence would be accepted by some a panel of revolutionary jurists? What is mitigating evidence worthy of preventing death and allowing some the opportunity for rehabilitation?. Funding death squads that kill unarmed sympathizers of the revolution, organizing death squads, and being clergy that support their activities would be grounds for being shot. It is only just because they are murders, while we are the ones dispensing justice.

    It should be known to the world why there being shot; they should know the extent of the crimes of the executed and their inhumanity. We would be concerned about the propaganda that misrepresents the executions as senseless brutality, while ironically, represent discipline and restraint.

    The Yezhovschina, but not the Russian Red Terror, was tragic because it hundreds of thousands of innocent people, who were not recently involved in counterrevolutionary activity (but have had some past association with counterrevolutionary groups) were murdered due to the failure of the Soviet legal system. The Yezhovshchina was, ironically, not the expression of Soviet power, but rather its failure and absence of Soviet power. Stalin did not orchestrate the Yezhovshchina, but it was due to the lack of restraint and criminality of the NKVD under Nikolai Yezhov.

    The Red Terror was less tragic because there was not much of an edifice of a legal system.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s