The Alt Left on the “Right to Judge”

Jason Y writes:

I don’t really like flaming behavior, but I’m not God, just an ordinary nobody. Also, I don’t have the time to police behavior.

Didn’t the Bible say we should work on our own faults before judging others?.

Can I ask you something? What is wrong with “judging?” The Cultural Left and it seems a lot of this PC-addled young generation are all against “judging.” A woman I was dating was basically an alcoholic. I call her out on her drinking shit. I’m “judging.”

A female friend is being tormented by her alcoholic male roommate who for all intents and purposes is sexually harassing her (either you fuck me, or I throw your ass out on the street). She puts up with this Hell for a long time, and then next thing I know, she has had sex with the idiot a few times.

“Why’d you do it?”

“I dunno. I felt like that.”

“That sucks. You should not fucking that idiot. Bad idea. Plus he’s been treating you horribly. You basically caved in to a sexual harasser. Plus he sucks. He stinks, and he doesn’t even take showers.”

“Stop judging!”

So in other words, every time I don’t like something, I’m “judging.” We have to jump up and down and cheer and yell and scream for every idiot, perverted, sick and deviant behavior that comes down the pike? What for?

Why don’t we have the right to not like things?

Most straight men don’t like the idea of gay sex? That’s “judging?” Bull.

Most straight men are not even really keen on the idea of gay men. At least they don’t want to be around them too much, and most straight men have no desire to have a gay friend. That’s “judging?” Why?

Most straight men do not like sissy, faggoty, flaming, strongly effeminate behavior in men. Guess what? A lot of gay men don’t like it either! Why do we have to like it? If we don’t like it, why are we “judging?”

And the most important question of all is, what in God’s name is wrong with judging? We have a right to like or dislike anything on God’s green earth. We don’t have put a stamp of approval and jump up and down and start screaming and yelling about every weird behavior that humans engage in.

In a larger sense, this is one of the core principles of the Alt Left: “The right to judge.”

Because this is one of the core ways the Cultural Left has destroyed modern society – it has promoted the notion that no one has a right to disapprove of anything. This is behind cultural relativism and really the whole crazy ball of wax. This is why liberals and Lefties scream that I have no right to blast India on here they way I do – I have “no right to judge.” Black pathologies – the wreck call the ghetto? No right to judge. Islam backwards, woman-hating, homophobic, regressive and just anti-liberal and reactionary? Hey, stop hating. Don’t like Hispanic culture all that much, or maybe you might like to criticize it even for being hyper-Catholic, anti-abortion, morally backwards, regressive, reactionary, stupid, racist, patriarchal, misogynistic, violent, wife-beating, idiotically hypermasculine or deliberately ignorant? How dare you judge them!

Happen to notice that Gypsies are a race of thieves, in addition to being probably the worst ethnic group on Earth. How dare you judge those poor people! Why, they’re just victims! Africa a Hellish swamp where human values go to die? How dare you criticize those people. They’re just poor! If you were poor, you might act like a depraved animal yourself! Nigerians are a race of thieves in a continent of wickedness and base behavior? Hey, leave those people alone! Those are sun people! They have black skin so they can soak up the godly chemical melanin. How dare you icemen criticize us sunny melanin-enhanced superpeople?

As usual, every time someone says you are “judging,” there are aggressive, even violent screams and even threats of racism. “Sexist! Racist! Homophobe! Bigot! Regressive! Conservative! Reactionary! Nazi! KKK! White supremacist! Jew! Zionist! Pakistani! Transphobe!”

Nowadays, these are just fancy ways of calling a human being an evil person.

There are a lot of other typical feints. The usual one is, “You do it too.” Want to criticize Blacks or the ghetto mess? Whoops, you can’t! Why not? Because it turns out that all of things we accuse ghetto Blacks of, we Whites do them too! So we have no right to talk, see?

Want to criticize India? Can’t! Americans do it too! Although I am still waiting for someone to show me how a typical American city street looks anything like what you will find in New Delhi. Calling out a nation for being corrupt? Whoops! Can’t do that! Why not? We Americans are corrupt too! But…aren’t there degrees of such things, I mean, a little bit corrupt to real corrupt to stark raving crazy off the charts corrupt? Nope. It’s all the same. Citizens United = all the corruption in India.

This is the rhetorical poison that liberal rhetors have foisted on us in the past several decades. What started out as a liberation movement turned into:

apologism for the worst of human behaviors, to put it mildly,

a ban on critiquing any and all human behavior above the level of the individual,

the obviously insane notion that all cultures are equally good,

the profoundly dubious, even on its face, notion that all of the races are created equal (a misreading of the Founding Fathers, by the way),

a torrent of hatred, rage, abuse, discrimination and career-wrecking against anyone who tries to argue from a point of view of higher human values or achievements to criticize another human group on the basis of lower human values or achievements.

What they are trying to accomplish is two things.

1. Apology for sin. I guess there’s no such thing anymore. Except racism. And sexism. But only White males can be that way. And wait. Rape. But only when White men to do it. And sexual harassment – you know, when straight men try to have sex with women? They need to be castrated!

Bottom line is that the Left has decided to apologize for just about every sinful, depraved and wicked behavior on Earth, as long as it is engaged in by some protected class. And in many cases, the Left has turned former sins into virtues. The homosexual who takes 100 penises and a dozen fists up his anus a year while sampling the entire Pharmacopeia and living a life of utter, base depravity is now the pinnacle of human virtue. Incredible. Protection of the bad, and the inversion of sins into virtues.

2. Assault on the good. When people try to suggest that Gypsy thieves, Nigerian internet grifters, Black rapists, welfare mothers with 75 IQ’s and 10 kids, murderous gang members, petty criminals, venal and corrupt people, perverts and deviants, people who set widows on fire and treat other humans as “untouchable” and in general, crooks, thugs, maniacs and more commonly liars, cheaters, thieves and even more trivially, base, degraded, vulgar, apathetic, morally vapid humans are acting like bad or at least somewhat lousy people, then those good people who called out the bad people are now attacked, assaulted, abused, fired, fined, sued, and generally ruined for the crime of favoring the good over the bad.

So while the Left now protects and even extols the bad, it condemns the good and again inverts morality, in this case turning virtue into sin.

This post has been a bit long getting to the point, but if you have followed this far, I think you catch my drift. Suffice to say that the Alt Left is opposed to the trends of the Cultural Left elucidated above.

33 Comments

Filed under Cultural Marxists, Culture, Ethics, Left, Liberalism, Political Science, Scum

33 responses to “The Alt Left on the “Right to Judge”

  1. RockT

    Judging is good. Nobody seems to say, “yeah, I am not a right-winger, but who am I to judge them.” But for anything else everyone (except Robert) is afraid to “judge.”

  2. Ultra Cool

    The right the judge is is a basic human right, as long as people don’t try to ban harmless actions they don’t like or act violent to harmless people they don’t like.

  3. Horatio

    Great post. Something that’s been troubling me, that few people address.

    Mainstream “progressive” media will back the worst behaviour of “oppressed” classes, excusing Muslims who want to kill us, Africans who want to beat us, some forms of criminality, reprobates and extreme deviants (a little deviancy is OK). To them, no one is at fault ,and therefore no one can be held accountable.

    They treat minorities like inferior human beings. They act as if blacks cannot uphold a Western standard of behiaviour and culture. They act as if they can’t help it.

    Mainstream “Conservatives” will back the worst behaviour of the ruling class. The 1%, the greedy, the Pinochets, the rent seekers, the parasitic class. They act as if this is OK behaviour, that predation, narcissitic behaviour is just part of human nature and A-OK.

    It’s similar on both sides, but the Left has a bigger, vastly bigger group of losers to bat for.

    • Jason Y

      Exactly, the Saudis for instance, need to be called out for having a barbaric government. Actually, I did comment that Saudi Arabia was barbaric on one internet forum, but then I got the typical response from a Muslim (from UAE) basically saying it was none of my business and that I got my ideas from Fox News.

      He then went on to say some really stupid hypocritical shit about how we should respect all religions, creeds, races of people 😆 WTF Was he Martin Luther King? Considering sharia law he’s one to talk.

  4. I am sick and tired trying to get his thing to work, so just remove my name off of your list, Thank you Myrtle

  5. Jason Y

    Some behavior does deserve condemenation, especially in regards to child abuse. One thing I brought up was how poor classes, often white as much as non-white, chain smoke around young children.

    However, if some dude acts all sissy and whatnot, ti’s not really bothering anyone, unless that guy is sexually harassing gay or straight guys, or molesting kids. I feel that people who target people who aren’t a real threat are just trying to stir up drama.

    Yeah I feel the pain of judging others to no avail. My chain smoking around children hatred only got hateful and sarcastic comments from the parents and often it’s just flat out ignored.

    For instance this one tobacco using woman called me an ass, jokingly, even though she criticizes things about me like my hair, stuff that isn’t important. How would hairstyle possibly be vastly more important than forcing children to breathe cancerous, black lung making, smoke?

    • Jason Y

      Generally nobody likes wussy baby-ish behavior. It’s seen as immature, Nonetheless, that could be different than sissy behavior. For instance, a guy might act womanly but otherwise have a very mature outlook on life.

      Generally people would only criticize a crybaby, but not necessarily a feminine man.

    • guy from Montréal

      A pregnant woman at my work smokes, and no one says anything! I felt like saying something but I felt I was just inviting one big clusterfuck of a shitstorm on my head so I just turned a blind eye, I made enemies with my stupid Lebanese neighbors because another neighbor and I called out their rude, obnoxious and overall shitty behavior at the swimming pool. Judgement has always been necessary in any society to establish some level of acceptable behavior, without it we are turning into a society of “anything goes” As much as I hate people who judge everything just because it’s or they’re different (like the way normal fags do) I really think we should be able to freely judge any and all shitty behavior.

      • Jason Y

        You should judge the woman. Of course, it is tough to quit the habit, but she should make an effort, or at least try vaping for the sake of the child.

        • guy from Montréal

          Thing is she was already vaping for awhile and went back to smoking before she got pregnant! It was quite common for women to smoke while pregnant up until the 1960’s or early 70’s, you can’t blame that generation because they didn’t know any better, but today it’s just inexcusable.

        • Jason Y

          A lot of people still live in the 70s as far as smoking is concerned. They act like the smoke doesn’t hurt kids.

      • Jason Y

        Right, being sissy isn’t normal, so normal fags want to take a shot at the odd-balls. .

  6. Jason Y

    2. Assault on the good. When people try to suggest that Gypsy thieves, Nigerian internet grifters, Black rapists, welfare mothers with 75 IQ’s and 10 kids, murderous gang members, petty criminals, venal and corrupt people, perverts and deviants, people who set widows on fire and treat other humans as “untouchable” and in general, crooks, thugs, maniacs and more commonly liars, cheaters, thieves and even more trivially, base, degraded, vulgar, apathetic, morally vapid humans are acting like bad or at least somewhat lousy people, then those good people who called out the bad people are now attacked, assaulted, abused, fired, fined, sued, and generally ruined for the crime of favoring the good over the bad.

    Some is a result of the environment, but some is totally the fault of the accused person. For instance, I mentioned chain smoking around 2 year olds. Well, obviously it’s laziness causing the problem, in fact, they are so lazy, they won’t even vape around the kids.

    I think the problem is the left focuses too much on the environment, while the right focuses too much on choice and genetics.

    • Jason Y

      Happen to notice that Gypsies are a race of thieves, in addition to being probably the worst ethnic group on Earth. How dare you judge those poor people! Why, they’re just victims! Africa a Hellish swamp where human values go to die? How dare you criticize those people. They’re just poor! If you were poor, you might act like a depraved animal yourself! Nigerians are a race of thieves in a continent of wickedness and base behavior? Hey, leave those people alone! Those are sun people! They have black skin so they can soak up the godly chemical melanin. How dare you icemen criticize us sunny melanin-enhanced superpeople?

      It is possible to tell the truth in a way that is more positive. For instance, you wouldn’t want to bash Africa too much, in the wrong way, otherwise you would run the risk of insulting ALL people of African origin etc..

      For instance, a guy bashing Africa would just be seen as a racist honky who doesn’t take into account western greed causing westerners to buy slaves, (even if it was from African tribes), nor the constant oppression (Jim Crow etc..) layed at the feed of African people in the USA, and the often self serving colonialism in Africa.

      Also, note the Africa bashing also goes into overkill, often unjustly attacking mixed raced people in a most insensitive and cruel manner.

      Anyhow, It’s about diplomacy and knowing the right things to say to bring out the best outcome.

      • Jason Y

        Note, and no offense, but Robert bashes India for having the untouchables, yet admits that certain groups, like Africans, often behave like sub-humans and hence deserve to be treated in a different matter, which ultimately might mean segregation or imprisonment.

        The whole Hindu argument for having a caste system is because they think certain groups, who in some ways are like Africans in Africa, have to be kept down for public safety and for eugenics purposes.

      • EPGAH

        So you think it’s good to judge smokers, but not to judge Third World invading parasites, or people who behave VIOLENTLY subhuman?

        If you act like an animal, why shouldn’t we treat you like one? And is there ANY positive way to spin that that doesn’t involve basically forgiving the savages everytime they attack us?

        Africa IS a shithole, and it isn’t poverty or their geographic location, as Appalachian whites are poor as shit, but have HALF the crime of the national average (Do a quick Google search on it), and whites were able to build good countries IN AFRICA, until the violent subhumans overthrew the countries and trashed the place.
        But your argument is that somehow us BUYING slaves from savages makes it our fault?!

        • Jason Y

          You can’t judge the damage to a society by the crime stats. Plenty of damage is done to families in Appalachia without seeing all the crime statistics which are so out in the open in black urban areas.

          Yeah, there is crime in Appalachia, not much violent crime, but it’s crime which destroys families, causes broken homes. causes child abuse, child molestation, you name it, every bad thing under the sun.

          If really wasn’t a big deal, I wouldn’t want to pull out a gun and tell the “bad side of the family”, the druggie side, to go fuck off for all time.

  7. Jason Y

    The left goes into overkill, but the far right does also. For instance, how are mixed raced people and mixed marriages hurting anyone? You can be assured, and the Jim Crow south and Nazi Germany will back me up on this one, that a far right regime is bad, maybe worse, than a politically correct one.

  8. Kareem

    They are programmed to think that whenever you judge X’s group of shit behavior that you’re only talking about the symptoms and ignoring the causes. I.E systematic racism and police bias is the root cause of black crime.

    • Jason Y

      That’s the whole conservative and far right mindset.

    • Jason Y

      A lot of the crime stuff is beyond help. Possibly though a super-environment could prevent future criminals from spawning. However, the far right etc.. doesn’t believe a super-environment can prevent a world full of criminals.

      • EPGAH

        In order to MAKE a super-environment, you have to get rid of the criminals in the first place. Otherwise, behavior in the NEW location = behavior in the OLD location.

        Take any city or country that USED to be a good place to live, UNTIL Blacks took it over – note I don’t even say “Until Blacks Became The Majority”, I EXPLICITLY link it to Blacks having CONTROL in the area. Whites were even able to keep Black violence down in Detroit–until Coleman Young pretty much abolished the police!

        If we had shot the rioters in Ferguson and/or Baltimore, there would’ve been a lot less damage, and probably no further riots. But instead, because of this “Don’t Judge” bullshit, (Because judging is “systematic racism”, right?), we had to give them “Space To Destroy” – and boy did they! It’s not “beyond help”, you just have to be willing to punish the bad and tell the “Don’t Judge” idiots to either live there and take the crimes of the scum they’re White Knighting for, or shut the fuck up.

        • Jason Y

          Of course, EPGAH, you misunderstand me. If course, I want to get rid of the criminals. I’m not really a liberal in the sense, like most of them, where I would be saying we’re not going to get rid of troublemakers.

          However, I would make sure after the clean-up, that a new society that wouldn’t produce future criminals would come into being, and I wouldn’t even need eugenics or genocide to produce it.

        • Jason Y

          You have to get rid of criminals to produce the super-environment. However, after that is over, we can focus on not producing more criminals in the future, and we don’t even need eugenics to do it.

      • EPGAH

        TLDR: Even the most virulent “Don’t Judge” bitch becomes very willing to judge when THEY are the victim of the bad group they were formerly defending. Did you ever look up “Susan Dlott”?

        Sadly, we can’t rely on Karma or whatever to punish these idiots into recognizing bad instead of defending it.

        • Jason Y

          Well, I wouldn’t argue with you there. It seems like a lot of people are tolerant of groups as long as they far, far, away from them.

          As in the case of my brother it’s laughable. He likes gays, but sure didn’t like faggots in college. He used to like blacks, until he moved into a ghetto area, so now his hateful rhetoric matches a Klan person.

  9. James Schipper

    Dear Robert

    I agree that the reluctance to express disapproval to others is often pure cowardice. However, criticism is best done privately and as politely as possible. Those who are ready to judge others should be prepared to be judged themselves. Few people are more irritating than those who are always eager to criticize others but who become very indignant when they are on the receiving end of criticism.

    Self-criticism is the highest form of criticism, and by that I don’t mean the collective pseudo-self-criticism practiced by political correcties. That is more virtue-signalling than genuine self-criticism. It is easy to say that we white Gentiles have often behaved in a beastly fashion toward other races and Jews. Far more difficult, and far more important, is to say, “At that time and at that place, I behaved very unjustly toward that person”.

    Regards. James

  10. Jason Y

    What Robert fails to understand is a lot of judging is just blowing hot air. Your not going to make your target, change his ways. Your talk is just as good as what the Westboro Baptist Church says.

    Actually, a lot of viscous condemnation has the opposite effect. The people you condemn will begin to defend and solidify thier behavior even more ! It’s kind of like how banning the Confederate flag makes people want to fly one.

    • EPGAH

      We can if it becomes law. Think of if the scum were actually punished instead of getting to whine “racism” and magically getting their punishment reduced/eliminated.

      Like any guilty child, they will use emotional manipulation to get out of punishment–but it’s only effective if you LET yourself be manipulated!

      • Jason Y

        It depends on the situation. Some legit cases of racism or homophobia exist and some don’t.

        Well, for one thing, a lot of blacks are incredibly racist, but complain about racism against them. I saw the same thing in South Korea. For that matter, it seems to be the case among all ethnic groups, a sort of “I will NOT look at the beam in my own eye, before judging my brother’s eye.”

  11. Another William Playfair Web

    Judging is okay if one knows what they are talking about.
    Many people (mostly on the cultural left) refuse “Judging” with hypocrisy

  12. Stary Wylk

    How dare you be so evil as to espouse the good?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s