How Gay and Jewish IdPol Groups Play Games with Identity

EPGAH writes:

Also, they can’t even make up their minds if it’s a choice, a mental illness or genetic defect. If the latter two, America’s Big Pharma could cure it.

Not many people know this about Gay Politics, but it’s a fact.

It’s sort of like the Jews with their masks.

Jew walks into the room:

(Puts on mask) Look! Boo! We’re a religion! We are no more ethnic than Mormons and no more genetically linked than Muslims. Calling us a tribe or an ethnic group is antisemitism!

(Puts on new mask) Boo! Scare ya? Whoops! No we’re not! We’re a tribe,linked by genes and blood! Calling us a religion or an ethnic group is antisemitism!

(Puts on 3rd mask) Surprise! Fooled ya, huh? Wrong again! We’re an ethnic group! No genes required! Come on in and convert! Saying we’re a religion or a tribe is antisemitism!

I first noticed Jews doing this over a decade ago when I was on Jewish newsgroups. There were Jews each arguing that the Jews were either a religion, a tribe, or an ethnic group/culture. And each one was screaming at the other ones and calling them antisemites. It was sort of humorous in a stupid way, but it was also disturbing. Whose great idea was it to let these crazies run our media? At the time, I thought it was just one more lousy thing Jews do and one more reason to be cynical of them.

But then I noticed gays doing the exact same thing! And then I started to think that Jews weren’t doing this just to be ornery, difficult and exasperating. Instead these crazy Identity Easter Egg Hunts were possibly part and parcel of IdPol itself. And one great way to look at the Jews is simply to see them as simply one more IdPol group. Once you plug that IdPol definition into the Jews, so many things about them start making sense.

The Gays do the same thing.

We’re born that way!* We can’t be changed, and it’s illegal to try! We didn’t choose to be gay!

but

Straight people can always choose to be bi! See, we can’t go to your side, but you can all come to our side! Haha! Nice trick or what? Hmm, maybe some of us did choose…

Also:

It’s not a genetic defect, and it doesn’t need to be cured!

but

We are born that way, and can’t be fixed, and it’s illegal to try!**

*We were born that way, but it’s not a genetic defect or anything like that! Huh?

**Obviously if they were born that way and can’t be fixed, it’s a genetic quirk.

I am starting to think it is just normal for IdPol types to play games like this with their identities. Why they do it, I have no idea. I think it is just to make people hopelessly confused so they throw up their hands and leave the IdPol group alone. Or maybe crazy “now you see ’em, now you don’t” games go right along with IdPol itself for some unknown reason.

It’s odd all right. Identity Politics groups can’t even decide what their identity even is!

36 Comments

Filed under Homosexuality, Jews, Politics, Race/Ethnicity, Sex

36 responses to “How Gay and Jewish IdPol Groups Play Games with Identity

  1. Jason Y

    Of course racism is wrong and all that. However, tolerance in America is often manipulated for selfish reasons (by the elite class). Of course, the main targets of tolerance would be blacks and Latinos which the elites profit from either directly or indirectly. However, you can’t be tolerant toward them without being tolerant toward gays. It would seem hypocritical.

    Obviously the elites don’t want a rise in racism cause that would threaten the status quo that they are making a profit from. So that’s why you won’t see crime by black people massively reported etc..

    So I would say tolerance is not really as much about Jews as it seems, but rather is an elite scheme, as with everything else.

    • Jason Y

      Of course, tolerance is great. I’m all for it. I think we should live in a world of nice people. Nonetheless, tolerance is manipulated for sinister reasons. For instance, we don’t want to criticize illegal immigration, it would be a hate crime, and also it would threaten free trade and cheap labor.

      • EPGAH

        It wouldn’t threaten free trade. We’re trying to trade GOODS, not PEOPLE! America, for better or worse, made slavery illegal!
        As to cheap labor, did you ever consider THAT is where the “Income Inequality” comes from?

        As to your tolerance thing, I thought you were going to go for a Jews As Elite Conspiracy Theory.

        • Jason Y

          Jews are not all of the elite. In fact, they might not even make up the majority of the elite. The Jewish members of the elite are not pulling strings either. Everybody, no matter what the race, is in it for the money. Nobody is being forced into anything.

  2. Tony Swagger

    Jason, you shouldn’t coddle and cosset up with the jews. Being a Judeophile orPhilo semitic isne helping our white race one a bit. We have been expolited by jewish maggots for years now. The cultural degeneracy and the bad environment often you cite for the country’s degradation is all orchestrated by the jewish monsters. They have thier dirty hands on everything you cite for the environment. porn, drugs, deplorable tv programs, biased news et all. Its time we act collectively and defend our race. If we are still act like a judeophile and coddle up to them, we are just spitting on the grave of our forefathers who made this nation great.

    • Jason Y

      Iv’e heard the same argument before. However, a lot of the so called “degeneracy” can be blamed on the people. That’s what the people want. Anyhow, not all the Jews promote is bad, but a lot of it is. Nonetheless, it’s what people want. It’s supply and demand. We’re talking about grown adults here, not kids.

      • Jason Y

        Human beings by nature want to rebel. That’s why they listen to dirty music, have immoral sex, do drugs, drink, smoke cigarettes as young teenagers etc..

        What kind of dumb argument, no offense Tony, is saying Jews are to blame for a rebellious streak inborn in human nature?

      • Jason Y

        I bet a lot of white nationalists won’t stop listening to rock and roll, even though it’s a fact it was orchestrated to a large extent to destroy family values. The evidence is overwhelming:

        I don’t know if it was Jews behind it, but the music’s goal to a large extent has always been to promote anarchy, even from the start of Elvis.

      • EPGAH

        We are talking about adults, but they grew OLD, not grew UP!
        http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/02/18/leftwing-professor-calls-campus-police-on-fascist-conservative-student-group/

        Seriously? Threatened by Shapiro coming over?

        Or the poop swastika in Mizzou–which turned out to be from one of the “victims” themselves! 20–no, 10 years ago, they’d be telling these overgrown 2 year olds, “SHIT Happens, Get Over It!”

        Why are ANY of these tantruming parasites coddled?

        • Jason Y

          People are free to be fascists if they want, on campus or whatever, but I’m saying it’s a scapegoat. It’s just as much a scapegoat as blacks blaming whitey for all their problems. It’s just an excuse. Doing bad things is a choice people make, Jews didn’t point a gun forcing anyone to do anything.

          Yes, we are speaking of adults most of the time, especially so called “white victims of Jewish porn etc..”, who according to white nationalists (referring to whites) have a higher IQ than a lot of non-whites.

          Hitler was able to capitalize on scapegoating cause it’s in human nature to refuse to accept responsibilty for one’s actions.

        • EPGAH

          That is more so in the ID Politics groups. Queers always talk about being picked on, but forget somehow that waving their perversion in the face of someone who is disgusted by it SHOULD have consequences!

    • Jason Y

      Jason, you shouldn’t coddle and cosset up with the jews. Being a Judeophile orPhilo semitic isne helping our white race one a bit. We have been expolited by jewish maggots for years now. The cultural degeneracy and the bad environment often you cite for the country’s degradation is all orchestrated by the jewish monsters. They have thier dirty hands on everything you cite for the environment. porn, drugs, deplorable tv programs, biased news et all. Its time we act collectively and defend our race. If we are still act like a judeophile and coddle up to them, we are just spitting on the grave of our forefathers who made this nation great.

      It has nothing really to do with the “white race”. Most of what your talking about is just general moral degeneration, and it hurts any race of people. The reason people in the last half century or so have given in to this “new freedom” is because people don’t want traditional values,not because of seduction of sinister Jews.

      Even though it is true Jews play a big role in Hollywood and porn, they wouldn’t be able to do what they do, if they’re weren’t millions of buyers. These buyers want a fix (drugs, porn whatever) and they’re totally to blame for thier problem (for the most part). Well, you might argue one parent homes might play a role a little bit, but generally, you can’t pin on the sellers (Jews, or whoever else is selling it).

      • Jason Y

        OK, imagine we did have a world with “Little House on the Prarie” as the main entertainment. OK, that would be very BORING. So you see in the world of Hollywood, people want excitement so that’s why they like Jewish producers etc.. who provide the forbidden.

        • EPGAH

          They’re not just GIVING us what we want, they’re CHOOSING for us what we want. Look at the degradation of our movie heroes, from Manly Men like John Wayne, Clint Eastwood, Schwarzenegger, Norris…To sparkly metrosexuals.

          And sometimes replacing our heroes with some other group. Or in extreme cases, turning the criminals white and the heroes nonwhite. We root against ourselves in effigy, if we buy these movies.

          Did you ever watch the Death Wish series?
          Would it come as TOO much of a surprise to you that in the books the movies were supposedly based off of, the thugs were supposed to be Black&Mexican, not white?

          Or the remake of Equalizer where instead of an insecure white Middle Manager type fighting Black thugs, and not sure if he was REALLY doing the right thing, using mind-games instead of violence to interrogate, they made the main character Denzel Washington, NO hesitation to use violence, interrogation or otherwise, and not even a hint of doubt?

          Or Human Torch becoming Black. Wait, he and Sue Storm are sisters, right? She’s still white…Why wasn’t there a scene where the cuckolded father says “You WHORE!”?

          How about Elysium, where whites took your advice, left, and built a perfect city in space, WITH free healthcare for everybody…and the nonwhites left behind are “Heroes” for bringing the whole thing crashing down?

          Basically, it seems like the movies are trying to get us used to being replaced. Robert admitted it’s a BAD thing for America to become North Brazil, but the movies push that it’s a GOOD thing.

        • EPGAH

          You talk about movies providing our next “fix”…What was the last movie that was pure action “fix”, not trying to push a message, especially an anti-white/anti-American one?

          Last one I can think of was Pacific Rim. That was back in 2013!

        • Jason Y

          Ep-gah, there are plenty of action movies and manly heroes today, and Shrwazenegger was about as “Illuminati sellout” as it gets. Ok, yes he was manly and his movie had action, but it also had a lot of sex in it.

          Also, Eastwood wasn’t as redneck as he’s made out to be. Actually, politically he’s very liberal and a big fan of jazz music. He’s more in common with the “coffee house beatniks” as anything.

        • Jason Y

          I don’t buy it Ep-gah, for instance, Spartacus, even though it has some gay scenes is incredibly manly. The movie Superman (the new versions) were very manly.

          I mean, sure there is some kind of anti-white, anti-macho thing going on in movies, but not as much as you say, and also, that trend has always been going on. I bet there was even metrosexual movies in the 50s.

          Anyhow, if your not into metrosexuality or chick flicks, then just don’t watch them.

        • EPGAH

          Since there are a lot of them, you should have no trouble naming one.
          Let’s hear it!

          And yes, Clint Eastwood has changed as he got older. Last movie that I saw WITH HIM IN IT, instead of gunning down a bunch of thugs, he let THEM kill HIM, so they would get in trouble. Very Jesus-symbolic, but really a letdown. Plus, the animals just got carted off to jail, they’ll get out, they’ll cause more trouble, like the parolee from your own anecdote, right?
          What did you think of his “Empty Chair” speech?

          I noticed he’s in favor of gun registration. That’s great, when will we have a nationwide voter registry? Why is one fought for and the other against? Couldn’t be PROJECTION, could it? Libs are against VOTER registry because since their GUN registry is the first step to taking away guns, the *VOTER registry MUST be the first step to taking away votes?
          Even if it’s from people who aren’t supposed to be voting in the first place, like illegals and felons?

        • EPGAH

          I don’t watch them, but SOMEONE must, otherwise, they’d switch back, right? Or is the idea to gradually wean us toward wimps as heroes?

          Spartacus is historical fiction, and sadly, the historical reality of Sparta was queer sex to give power to the “receiver”. This was simply a ceremony, no love about it, like tattoo ceremonies in modern military, or cybernetic implants in RoboCop. This is also what inspired “Tantric Sex” in Eastern countries: Ejaculation is considered surrendering strength!

          Superman is America’s surrogate. Have you noticed how weak he’s gotten lately? The being who once moved planets out of the way–and spun Earth backwards so time would go backwards (Hilarious bad science, but it worked for the movie)–now struggles to hold up a collapsing oil derrick.
          Do you want to calculate how much force it would take to hold an oil derrick vs. reverse Earth’s rotation?

          Also notice it’s “Truth, Justice, AND ALL THAT” They ditched “The American Way!

        • Jason Y

          I saw no indication of weakness in Superman in the new movies. He’s no more weak then he was when the original movies came out.

          Also, there has always been metrosexuality and so called “feminine role models” even back in the 50s. I don’t see any current movement to make men weak. Now, note there is an anti-white movement, but actually there has been a movement like that since the 60s, or maybe even earlier.

          Myself, I don’t take the anti-white movement too seriously. Most viewers can tell when it goes into over-kill, for instance, some “Rage Against the Machine” song.

          Note, the anti-white movement has never been actually against poor whites, only the rich establishment. The problem is that laws passed to cater to the anti-white movement ultimately hurt and alienate lower class whites.

        • Jason Y

          And yes, Clint Eastwood has changed as he got older. Last movie that I saw WITH HIM IN IT, instead of gunning down a bunch of thugs, he let THEM kill HIM, so they would get in trouble. Very Jesus-symbolic, but really a letdown. Plus, the animals just got carted off to jail, they’ll get out, they’ll cause more trouble, like the parolee from your own anecdote, right?
          What did you think of his “Empty Chair” speech?

          Actually, an old man taking charge like Dirty Harry would have been funny, but not realistic, lol.

          As for the Empty Chair speech, probably Eastwood has gotten more conservative simply cause the liberal agenda has gotten too wacko liberal in the past 20 years. Of course, when I say wacko, I mean Eastwood is probably for Civil Rights and all that, but not for gays in the Boy Scouts etc.. Sounds pretty reasonable to me.

        • EPGAH

          How about that? Anything to mollify the anti-white movement will hurt the lower-echelon whites, not the rich ones. And since it doesn’t help the nonwhites, other than easing their envy a bit, by dragging their betters down to their Level, so any reasonable people should just tell the ones demanding it to shut up, right?

          As to Superman, which Superman movie are you looking at?
          Return of Superman? Man of Steel?

          Start with the 1978 movie, THE iconic scene of all time.

          Superman is able to turn the planet backwards, rewinding time.
          In Man of Steel, he struggles and grunts, barely able to hold up a collapsing oil rig.
          https://www.rt.com/news/224371-oil-rig-berkut-extraction/
          The biggest oil rig is 200 kilotons.
          Earth is given as 5.972 × 10^24 kg
          Let’s convert that to tons, it makes 6.583 × 10^21 tons.
          Do you see the difference? 200,000 vs. 6.583 × 10^21?

  3. Jason Y

    They’re not just GIVING us what we want, they’re CHOOSING for us what we want.

    That’s debateable. Movies are just like any other product and run on ratings. The movie industry gives people what they want. If it is true the movies have become soft and anti-white, then it’s only because the people have become more like that. Of course, that would be true most of the time.

    Off the top of my head, I can think of several new shows and movies, “Duck Dynasty”, the new “Mad Max” movie etc.. which are not metrosexual in the least bit.

    If Jews are in a conspiracy to soften men and make the nation anti-white, then why use thier power to turn ALL movies into some sort of entertainment subversion? Well, they can’t because movie buyers aren’t stupid. They like what they like, and will only pay for what they like.

    • EPGAH

      I don’t know, I think a lot of people will just watch whatever’s on.
      Or if something’s advertised heavily enough–or even complained about enough–they’ll see it just to see what the hubbub is. Take Star Wars 7, PLEASE! (It’s been awhile since I used that joke!)

      I also believe that’s why they’re fighting so mightily against things like DVRS and NetFlix, which allow the viewers to watch what they want and when.

      Consuming goes from passive to active–and the customer takes back control!

    • EPGAH

      PS, if it’s about what the AUDIENCE likes, then why do good shows go off the air, and get replaced with shit?

      What happened to SLIDERS, VR5, FireFly, Brimstone, Traveler, W.I.T.C.H., Jericho, Recall 2070, Adventures of Brisco County, Jr., Profit, Tru Calling, Viewtiful Joe, ANY of the Spider-Man cartoon continuities, MEGAS XLR, Cyber 6, ALPHAS, and SymBionic Titan?

      If you can think of others that were killed too soon, put’em up here, I’ll give you full credit.

      • Hasdrubal

        Yeah the greatest sit-com of all time Arrested Development.

      • Jason Y

        Well, how do you know the general public hasn’t become lame? If the public is lame, then serves to reason supply and demand will provide crappy shows for the aquarium fish to enjoy.

        But different people have different tastes. Some might like action, while grandma might like the Hallmark Channel.

        Oh yes, I’m all for people watching whatever they want to via DVR, DVD, but I think people have always been able to do that.

        Of course, they do have “Eastbound and Down”, it’s very vulgar and cutting edge, but the show is making fun of alpha male southerners. So I’m assuming WNs would just say that feeds the so called “Jewish anti-white agenda” big time. It is a funny show though.

        Oh yeah, plenty of macho shows do exist that do glorify men. All kinds of reality shows about monster trucks, fixing up junk, living in Alaska. OK, so where is the anti-male bias here?

        • EPGAH

          Different groups DO have different tastes, but that’s why we have different channels.

          That said, how did the public become lame?

          That’s the other question: Is the media leading or following?
          As to DVR/DVD, there are some shows that just don’t exist anymore.
          The only proofs that exist of them are bootlegs, with video quality somewhere around Loch Ness Monster pictures.

          Why are there shows making fun of alpha males? Why is that “funny”?
          But queers are praised to the heavens, right? Noone would DARE make fun of them anymore, some bimbo who tried, got disqualified–and actually she didn’t even make fun of them, she just said marriage should stay heterosexual. Do you remember that incident?

          As to reality shows, that’s kinda the Bargain Basement of TV, so why should alpha males be relegated to THAT?

  4. Jason Y

    I have seen some sissy stuff on the Disney Channel, some of the sitcoms etc.. It seems like they’re trying to be “too nice” and the dialogue isn’t funny, only seems that way due to canned laughter.

    However, I don’t think that’s the norm in movies, though it might be that way in TV shows.

    Of course, we don’t have to turn shows in vulgar shows of racism and homophobia to be funny, maybe just add some stories from real life, because real life isn’t that politically correct, because people are still quite brutal (or being real, so to speak). Even a family show from the 70s, was devoid of dirty talk and humor, but the storylines were more believable cause they mirrored real life. For instance, Good Times or All in the Family, would have been an example.

    • Jason Y

      Sorry, meant to say “Mama’s Family” or some show like that. All in the Family was pretty on the edge. Oh, ALF from the 80s was a funny show.

      • Jason Y

        I’m not advocating trash talk for shows, like you’d see on “Married With Children”, “Beevis and Butthead”. or “White Men Can’t Jump”. I’m just saying the shows are fake. The dialogue doesn’t mirror real life. That’s why the shows are lame.

        I mean, the kids sitcoms on Disney are geared toward kids, but even me, with no writing experience could write better stuff. I don’t think even kids find it funny, maybe even the actors and actresses don’t.

      • Jason Y

        Trash talk is normal in certain environments (usually sports or maybe some forum or blog etc..). In a school, it is not. It’s a form of massive disrespect. OK, if people can trash talk other students, especially if their strangers, then why can’t they trash talk the teacher? It’s not a matter of good comeback in those situations, but rather eliminating the situation totally.

      • Jason Y

        Trash talk beyond a certain point is incredible disrespect and a form of hate. However, you know in all families, brothers and sisters kid around a little bit. It isn’t the same thing as trash talk. So perhaps shows could show a little kidding around, not trash talk mind you, so they would seem more realistic.

        Of course, on “White Men Can’t Jump” busting each other balls is just seen as normal talk, but I doubt if it really is, even in a black neighborhood. Such language is probably always grounds for fighting or worse.

        • EPGAH

          Trash-talk in sports E-Sports competition is normal.
          Do you understand the difference between sports and school?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s