Jared Taylor and White America

It is often said that Jared Taylor, the head of the American Renaissance White Advocacy site, wants to preserve a White America, and I believe that is something that he wants to preserve.

However, what do we mean by that? I do not think that Taylor wants to kick one non-White person out of this country except for maybe illegal aliens who have no business here anyway and probably guest worker scabs who are being used by cynical US corporations to drive down US wages by replacing mostly White US workers with low-wage and  low-quality scab labor imported from Asia.

It is true that both of these groups are mostly non-Whites, but the fact that these non-Whites need to take off not now but yesterday does not mean that all non-Whites need to leave. So I assume that Taylor is ok with letting all of the non-White legal immigrants and citizens of the US stay here in the country. He only wants to limit future non-White immigration and illegal immigration, but that is just border stoppage, not eviction.

So what does Taylor mean when he says he wants to preserve a White America? I know Taylor very well, as he is an acquaintance. I believe that what he wants is the same as we have always had, a White-dominated culture in the US. US culture has always been synonymous with White culture.

Yes, there were Indian cultures, but they were never dominant in the land after White settlement.

Yes, there has been a Black culture in the US for centuries, but it has never been dominant. Even in the South, Black culture has never been dominant even in any single state. White culture has dominated in every way including politically in the South forever now. Not one state is majority Black, not even Mississippi.

Latinos have always been here in the Southwest, but the Southwest has never had a Latino-dominant culture except maybe in New Mexico, and those are pretty much White people.

Now maybe this is changing with the growing dominance of Hispanics in California. But even to this day though I do not feel that California’s culture is dominated by Hispanics, but parts of the state, like my town, are indeed dominated by Hispanic culture. Nevertheless, wealthy Whites have always run this city, and they continue to do so to this day as a politically dominant minority here (the city is 27% White), and I do not see this ending anytime soon.

Yes, there is Hispanic culture in Florida, but Florida culture has not become an Hispanic culture. Florida culture is still pretty much White culture, except maybe towards the South.

Asians have always been here, but Asian culture has never been dominant in the US or in any part of it really except maybe Hawaii.

Furthermore, if you wanted to assimilate in US society, you generally assimilated to some sort of White culture except maybe in a few places like Louisiana or the Rio Grande Valley. Nevertheless, Louisiana culture politically and otherwise, has always been dominated by Whites.

The fear is that as Whites lose their majority, White culture will no longer by the dominant or de facto culture of the country. Also people like Taylor  are afraid of Whites losing their majority. The fear is that Whites are going out, and that in 200 years, there will not be many Whites left in the US. Taylor has made it clear that not only would he like to preserve White culture as the dominant culture of the country but that he would also like to preserve White people as a racial stock.

186 Comments

Filed under American, Amerindians, Asians, Blacks, California, Culture, Fake Guest Workers, Florida, Hispanics, Illegal, Immigration, Louisiana, New Mexico, Race/Ethnicity, Regional, Sane Pro-White, South, USA, West, Whites

186 responses to “Jared Taylor and White America

  1. Yeah, and you should blame your liberal morons who have no clue how your numbers are dwindling. 200 years? Try 75. The biggest problem with most white people(and I noticed this in Canada) is that they are simply unaware, naive or indifferent to minorities filling the land and establishing their culture. I used to work in a factory in Ottawa where just because of 2 muslim workers pork pizza was banned and every white person happily obliged. My landlord(Irish) believes that white people have looted a lot from every indigenous culture and thus its payback. This is the mentality most white people have. Except ofcourse the younger generation who are dumb fucks whose lives revolve around getting laid, drinking beer and playing skyrim.

    • Another William Playfair Web

      The way the IQ bell curves work, there are some non-whites who are beneficial to society, especially when they are from brain drain countries. This is not a liberal/conservative issue, Eugenics is by definition an idea relevant to a socialist society, for it needs it more to function. I honestly don’t worry that much about Muslims, after all, the Middle East ones are Caucasoids.
      They have on the net, been of great benefit to the Americas, and from my observation, disproportionately represented in STEM, and not done much terror since 9/11. I think a lot of frustration boiled up, not with new non-whites, but with blacks getting rights. Among immigrants, Central Americans are bringing bad stuff with them, it seems.

      • Sammy

        “I honestly don’t worry that much about Muslims, …. They have on the net, been of great benefit to the Americas, and from my observation, disproportionately represented in STEM”

        Indeed. I’ve read studies that indicated 70% of them earn over $50k/year, and a third over $100k. Attainment of Bachelors and Advanced degrees also significantly higher than that of the American average. Not exactly the profile of a failed immigrant community.

        http://www.allied-media.com/AM/

        I wonder how Black American Muslims do in comparison to other American Blacks, with regard to income, crime rate, and education… Something I am going to look into.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          Interviews from Pew/Gallup are sorted by language on this link; http://www.pewresearch.org/2009/03/06/why-surveys-of-muslim-americans-differ/ by language. Those who speak English have higher educational attainment than those who don’t. That would be indicative that Converted Blacks, who speak English more, would be more likely to be even more successful than the average Muslims. Of course, it’s not conclusive just indicative.

        • Tulio

          The difference is we have a fairly small amount of Muslims in America which we’ve handpicked from their countries. Whereas in Europe they get the asylum seekers and chain migration. I hear you can’t even walk safely in the suburbs of Paris where the Muslims reside.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          Trulio-
          I get the gist, of that, however, I wouldn’t look to much into it. For example, Muslims’ mistreatment of women is a stereotype, and far-right figures in Europe will milk that with exaggerations.

          Indeed, it is the same people who believe that women shouldn’t have rights (men can be rapists) even on this blog here, that are now criticizing Muslims for the same thing, not exactly credible, although somewhat. I do realize they are other forms of violent crime.

          My Grandfather who was half (or a little bit more) Canary Islander, had very Arabic phenotypes, and was always pissed off. He also had sociopathic tendencies, so he should be fairly high IQ.

          It seems like Middle Easterners are Smart but also high testosterone, sort of the opposite of what is said of Amerindians.

        • EPGAH

          Yes, Tulio, that’s exactly it: If WE pick them, they’ll be the best that country/culture has to offer. If we let THEM decide, we’ll get the shit that even their country would rather kill than host!

        • EPGAH

          Ever think maybe that’s why ¾ of AMERICAN STEM grads are not in STEM jobs?
          http://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2014/cb14-130.html

      • EPGAH

        Please explain what you mean by Eugenics as relevant to Socialism for it “needs more”?

        And as Robert wrote earlier, it’s not the immigrants themselves, but filtering out the bad ones.
        https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2009/07/03/immigration-a-question-of-quality/
        If we took ONLY the Best&Brightest of other countries, even horrible train-wrecks like India, then these things about Moslems raping their hosts, shitting in the pool, burning down the pump-houses, and ridiculous lawsuits would be things I made up.

        But if we allow untrammeled, unfiltered “immigration”, especially this “refugee” bullshit, we’re letting in the worst of that culture.
        Robert’s other article said that scum from India would turn America into Calcutta, presumably including the shit-filled streets, what would Moslem trash turn America into?

        • Another William Playfair Web

          If we lived in a libertarian society, theoretically everyone would just filter to their natural place, it wouldn’t be a cooperative form of government, no need to select who is worthy to have wealth distributed to them (who can handle it) etc.

        • EPGAH

          That’s a great idea, William Playfair. Why hasn’t it happened yet?

        • Another William Playfair Web

          It’s already starting to. The people you see at Trump rallies have filtered to the bottom, and they’re mad, basically saying ‘hey, I’m White, this is wrong!’ and point fingers at the Muslims, who are as Sammy and I showed with sources, are very successful.

    • Guy from Montréal

      What the fuck is Skyrim?

    • Jason Y

      Capitalism doesn’t work in the third world, it only promotes feudalism. As long as third world nations are backward they will coontinue to have a population boom. Note, the USA discourages socialism in the third world, hence hence the USA promotes third world population growth.

      • Another William Playfair Web

        Of course.

      • EPGAH

        Take a closer look at your excuse, it’s self-defeating.

        “third world nations are backward”
        Who MADE those countries backwards? When whites were in direct control, they pushed those countries forward. They now have electricity, Internet, even sewage. So who is responsible for pulling the countries back down, technologically/culturally/socially, AKA keeping the countries “backward”?

        These scum are poor, they aren’t financially stable, right?
        Yet they keep on fucking and popping out low IQ children who will be even less “financially stable”. It doesn’t matter how many of these people Europe/America allows to go there, they will just keep popping out more and more low IQ “financially unstable” people until the whole world is full of them.

        And how will Socialism help? These losers aren’t looking to share each others’ poverty, they want to steal from their betters and ruin them too!

    • EPGAH

      Apathy and tolerance are the “virtues” of a dying civilization.

      Have you asked your landlord EXACTLY what we “looted” from lesser cultures? My understanding, we bought their land, actually DID something with it, they had stagnated for millennia…Payback for what? Making better countries and tech for them to mooch off of and bitch at us on our Internet instead of yelling at us physically?
      Or building stores they can loot and burn?

      And yes, Moslem lawsuits here are getting ridiculous too.
      Moslems got almost a quarter million for driving a beer truck.
      Or Moslems demanding jobs at Targets and other stores that sell–get this–MEAT, INCLUDING HAM AND PORK–then demanding they not have to touch it.
      If you don’t like the job, don’t take the job!

    • Negroess Negroess

      Strange guy your landlord. Irish people were often on the end of being treated badly in the uk and in America. Even in the seventies in the uk comedians would routinely make jokes about Irish people on the BBC. So suddenly he feels this way. He does not know how Irish people wer depicted as savage monkey creatures by both Americans and British people.

  2. Tulio

    Pretty much a pipe dream unless the USA institutes something like the White Australia policy. There are three facts to content with:

    1) Western countries have removed all racial restrictions on immigration.
    2) The high standard of living in Western countries will draw people from poorer countries to rich countries just as water moves from high to low.
    3) The population of (most)non-white countries continues to grow while white countries are either flat or shrinking(mostly).

    So there’s really only 3 ways for Jared’s white dominated culture to survive.

    1) Bring back strict racial restrictions. This will never ever happen here or any other Western country. The era of de jure racism/racial policy is on the ash heap of history. Rather people will use code words like “no more Muslims” etc as a way of trying to accomplish the same thing without explicitly mentioning race.

    2) Find a way to equalize standard of living between Western and 3rd world countries so that there wouldn’t be much reason to migrate. Most people don’t prefer to leave their families and cultures unless their situation is pretty fucked up at home. I don’t think there’s much anyone from the outside can do to bring up standard of living in the 3rd world. I think it’s mostly a matter of human capital. Limiting immigration may help the brain drain loss so that these countries aren’t losing their most talented people. These are the very people that would be agents of development in their home countries.

    3) White people would have to start rapidly ramping up fertility rates. I don’t see this happening though due to feminism and Western women’s educational and career goals. The cat is out of the bag. The modern Western white woman does not want to be a stay at home baby machine like some rural El Salvadorean woman. Not happening outside of a small religious demographic like Mormons.

    Thus my conclusion is Whites are pretty much done for as a demographic. It’s like watching someone slowly bleeding to death. I’m not saying whites will go extinct anytime soon. But I don’t see any reversal of their demographic displacement on the horizon. Especially in America. My best guess is that America’s future will resemble something of an an English-speaking version of Brazil. However unlike Brazil, America has a lot more racial tension. There is racism in Brazil(more like colorism than racism), but there’s not a lot of racial animus. No one there bats an eye at interracial couples. There’s no Brazilian KKK. I don’t hear about any Brazilian Dylan Roofs. I think they’ve embraced a mixed and multi-racial heritage as a defining aspect of their identity. Maybe America will eventually go down the same path. I also don’t necessary thing whites losing their numbers will mean whites losing power. As you see in Latin America, most people are dark hued, yet the people in power tend to be white or near-white Mestizos. Even with a non-white majority, most the wealth will still be held by whites in America, most the presidents will still likely be white. Most the military generals will be white, etc.

    • re 2, really desperately impoverished people don’t emigrate as much…its when the incomes increase towards middle income that you get more people with the resources to leave. So as Africa develops towards Mexican living standards and per capita income, there will be more people wanting to come to Europe. At the same time the population is exploding. Its going to b a long time before Africa gets to western living standards, if ever.

    • White nationalists have entertained the idea of establishing a white homeland in the NW pacific region. Its probably not going to happen but realistically eastern Europe and Russia (a pretty big country) might end up being the last land of white people, who by then will probably be like 3% of the world’s population. The eastern Europeans don’t have colonial white guilt or western political correctness about race and immigration.

      • Another William Playfair Web

        I think that Eastern European/North East Asian racism is probably more intellectual than racism from WASPs here at home, they are less absolute; smarter.
        Honestly there is nothing more Ironic than a White with an IQ in the 80s rambling on about Asians, Mexicans, Muslims, anyone who isn’t Nordic.

        • EPGAH

          Given what Mexicans and Moslems have done to their countries, which they supposedly care about, isn’t it a good guess they’ll do the same or worse here?

          And isn’t it the blue collar that are honest enough to actually talk about it?
          As opposed to the Mayor of Philadelphia who refuses to admit that Islam is a problem even when a cop-killer brags about doing it in the Name of the Cult?

    • Jason Y

      I’m not really sure Tulio. I saw stuff coming out of Brazil in the media about a black Brazillian newscaster being hated on Facebook for daring to correct a white man,and also a standard of beauty in Brazil is straight hair, which given the context, is racist.

      Fact is, Brazil is full of as many bigots as America, and given the continuing black crime in Rio etc.., it’s not going to stop.

      Also, as you were saying, it seems in the USA, a large mixed raced population is coming about. However, that’s not going to ease racial tension, except in many larger towns in Tennessee etc.., the backwoods people are still incredibly racist and homophobic and becoming more so everyday (as they feel culturally threatened).

      So it seems two cultures are coming about, one large mixed one who is cool about the New America, and a really reactionary angry one in rural counties on the outskirts of cities. I mean, look at all the confederate flag waving out of the back of trucks recently.

      • Jason Y

        Actually a lot of white Americans are so racist, that a decent minded person cannot even be friends with them. You have to adopt their way of thinking or your hated by them. It’s literally become a W. Bush, or Biblical, choose one way or the other scenario. Your either for or against us thing.

        For years, blacks etc.. have used the “victim thing” to justify their feeling, but the scary thing is now whites are doing the same. Therefore, it’s producing a type of hate that’s difficult to stop, because supposedly now everyone should feel sorry for white people. I mean, for gosh sakes, we have a black president, and the media is controlled by groups pushing gay rights and other stuff that is too extreme for rural white people.

        • EPGAH

          Really? What about the SJWs who keep pushing this “White Privilege” bullshit and demand decent minded people be punished for acting better?

        • Negroess Negroess

          Harsh Jason Y. Most white Americans are decent non racist people. Please be more respectful. It is painful to read stuff about people who try their level best NOT to be racist. And waving a flag is just celebrating southern heritage. Nothing wrong in that. The Irish wave lots of nice flags on st Patrick’s day. Same thing. You can project what you want but a southern person would quite righty mighty offended at you assuming that they who have excellent friendships with black people are in the least bit racist.

        • Tulio

          I’m also seeing a lot of victim mindset coming from the manosphere. This thinking that men are oppressed. Some whites think whites are oppressed under a tyranny of Obama and Eric Holder.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          EPGAH- that’s not going anywhere, is it? No, it makes people feel bad, or angry, but nothing more.
          The main problem is freedom of speech. Hegemony peoples (mainly people of European descent) have to be careful what they say, or else they could be blacklisted, the 1st amendment has been cut to it’s bare minimum. That’s 99% of why people are angry in most of the country (Southwest excluded, they are very angry about immigration).

          It has really backfired, too. I often speculate whether or not Trump would have had the capacity to be the front runner if the media had just ignored his initial remarks on Mexicans.

        • EPGAH

          I don’t know if it’s backfired or not. Everyone from Government to Websites are now filtering out “Hate Speech” but only in ONE direction: FROM the people who belong in these countries. Moslems can preach about destroying the infidels, Mexicans can talk about taking over the country, ALL nonwhite groups talk about killing the gringos, especially cops. That’s fine and dandy.

          When whites lash back even in WORDS, it’s thoughtcrime.

          Oh, and don’t forget Government officials covering up rape by the “rapefugees” and even when a thug BRAGS about killing a cop in the Name of the Cult, they deny it!

      • Tulio

        I’d love to see some Brazilians comment on this. I’ve only spent less than 2 weeks of my life in Brazil, most of that in Rio, so I’m no expert on the country. I did acknowledge that there are problems in that country regarding race/colorism. However, I can’t quite put my finger on it, but it feels a lot different than racism in America. For example, I was staying at a hostel there, and had befriended some Irish girls and a German girl. I would go out to the beach and do touristy things with them. Nobody stared at us weird me being a black man hanging with white girls. It seemed to be a non-issue there. However, anytime I’m in the company of white girls(or even just light-skinned Hispanic girls) in the USA even when we are just friends, people are rubber necking at us left and right. I also notice that it’s not a big issue to see people with friends of different skin hues, Whereas in America, whites mostly hang around other whites and blacks hang around other blacks. Even class doesn’t dissolve this because middle class blacks and whites still keep to each other after work.

        I think the difference is that America’s racism is masked by a culture of political correctness. So people may be be racist under the surface, but know hot to act political correct in public. Whereas in Latin American societies, political correctness doesn’t really exist.

        I met a white Brazilian while I was there, and she teasing me about how overly sensitive Americans are about race. She said she has black friends and she calls them cute racial names and they call her racial names too, but they just laugh it off as no big deal. But keep in mind that most the whites in Brazil have a little black in them, and most the blacks have at least a little white in them. They don’t have the racial purity mindset of white Americans. You aren’t likely to see any highly ideological racism in Brazil(or most of Latin America) as you see in America. I think their racism is really simply minded and shallow. They put people on a continuum with lightest skin at the top and darkest skin at the bottom. Neither has to be pure this or that. Many people in Latin America that consider themselves white aren’t pure white, but “white enough”.

        And then like in many Latin societies, class is as much if not a bigger issue than race.

        • Negroess Negroess

          Very interesting.

        • Santoculto

          Brazil is a disaster country with a disastrous people, much more than in USA. I’m not a huge fan of this country but seems pretty obvious that this is a better nation, despising their faults than Brazil, big banana republic with one the of dumbest and misinformed people.

          Brazilian elites, most them composed by whiter ones, tend to be very stupid about this issue, race, biology and behavior. Here we have similar situation than in other western countries. Exponentially huge ideological/political discrepancies, with worst situation where we have increasing favelas, violence and degenerate “culture”. Idiocracy is there.

          I’m strong fan of intelligent/ intellectual culture and Brazil is just the anti matter of this.

          As a certain friend already told me:

          ” I’m not intrinsically anti leftism but anti dumbdism/stupidity”.

          Universities specially in the humanities, there are greater proportion of “leftists” and as happen in USA they are absolutely ignorant about human nature… Less their mastermind. Same agitation and with certain admiration about afro American community because many them think that just with ” similar aggressive approach” that Brazilians blacks will can become “equal” social and economically talking than whites.

          Brazilian cities are dirty, ugly, chaotic, with some exceptions.

          Average Brazilians tend to look “cordial” and if you compare them with Icelandic people for example is likely to be reasonably true.

          But the same spontaneous sympathy tend not to correlate symmetrically with empathy, care about others.

          Brazilians are like many other catholic people around the world. A strange/hypocrite mix between social conservatism at surface and a lot of contradictory behavior.

          For example, people here, many them, are against sex or indecent scenes in soap operas. But most them are not against a naked mulato woman dancing samba in any hour of day in the most popular tv channel, “Globeleza”. Or a blonde tv show with sensual clothes, “Xuxa”.

          Brazil is a absurd country with parasites as “elites”. Right and left wing, people are constantly misinformed about biology issues. Very bad and ugly nation and we know that people and elites that build and sustain a nation. Brazilians are very corruptible, with some exception of course. They don’t care about environment, just superficially, don’t care about “high” culture and there is a increase of “evangelicals”, one of the most dumbest people on earth.

          A tropicalia and cordially rustic image of Brazil that you can have in its head is a great illusion.

          I’m behaviorally more similar with Nordics or east Asians and I can to say for you that Brazil is a nightmare for smarter and sensible people. Is not for someone who have weak gut.

      • EPGAH

        Unless you really don’t read or watch the news, the Confederate flag thing is mostly a backlash against SJWs telling them they can’t have that flag, which is part of their heritage.

        Look at the “RhodesMustFall” campaign, which got the statue of Rhodes taken away from RHODES College–its FOUNDER is somehow “offensive” to the nitwits that go there now?

        Look at the planned removal of statues of heroes of our past…

        Look at the Black Power flag in Chicago

        Why isn’t anyone demanding to tear THIS down, which represents FAR more violence?

        Whites are being culturally and symbolically erased from our own damn country! Blacks, Moslems, Mexicans, are allowed to put their symbols but we’re not? That usually implies CONQUEST, doesn’t it?

        Even Wal-Mart, Lowest Common Denominator if ever there was one, REFUSED to make a Confederate Flag cake, but saw no problem with an ISIS FLAG CAKE! And you see nothing backwards about that?

    • EPGAH

      Boat people are an economic drain, but for whatever reason, noone has the heart to sink the boats. That would eliminate the bad, whether it was genetic, behavioral, or some sort of magic curse.

      1.) Nonwhites will have to stop acting like it’s their RIGHT to invade their betters’ countries. And the nonwhites already here will have to stop calling it “genocide” when WE want control over who enters OUR homeland, rather than let the enemy control it.
      No enemy will ever deny itself entry. If you don’t believe me, leave your door unlocked for about 2 weeks. You won’t even have a computer left to tell me that I was right!

      2.) We’ve been trying to upgrade the Third World over 500 years, but the savages take whatever we build up turn it to squalor.

      3.) As long as OUR taxes pay for Third Worlders to breed massive litters of bastards, even if we WANTED to. BOTH PARENTS HAVE TO WORK TO MAINTAIN A MIDDLE-CLASS LIFESTYLE!
      There’s no more guy works hard, comes home, trips over the ottoman. Neither parent is home enough to BUY the damn ottoman to trip over!

      Of course, that makes the kid grows up on a diet of TV, and believes the whites–even his own parents–are something short of Vampires, and the mega-breeding invaders and losers are somehow heroes.

      THAT is something Brazil doesn’t have either.
      Where’s the Brazilian Black Lies Matter burning down the good parts of town?
      Where are the Liberals who WANT all of Brazil to become favelas, so everyone can be “equal”? That seems to be a uniquely Western Europe and American masochism, doesn’t it?

      • Negroess Negroess

        Monkey lives matter. Researchers need to find better ways to do research. These intelligent creatures do need a better deal from humans in research labs. Actually just leave them in their wonderful jungle homes.

        As for the negro loves matter. Why not stop aborting negroes. These potential baby negros matter too, or is it just Blacks who carry banners that matter. Such hypocrisy.

        • Santoculto

          Scientists who need “prove” or “evidence” about very obvieties and use animals in their stupid experiment are very dumb and morally failed.
          Real philosophy is super important to give a soul to the science.

      • Negroess Negroess

        White cis gendered men are certainly the most opressed group politically. This is obvious. They rank at zero in the oppression olympics giving everyone the right to discriminate against them when it comes to identity politics of the sjw variety.

  3. SHI

    Nevertheless, wealthy Whites have always run this city, and they continue to do so to this day as a politically dominant minority where (the city is 27% White), and I do not see this ending anytime soon.

    The ones like Jared Taylor and David Duke are being unnecessarily paranoid. White people have a tendency to dominate other races even when they’re very few in numbers. Even if whites become a minority in the US or some other places, it won’t affect their lives that much.

    In Latin America, white Hispanics tend to be wealthier in comparison to native American peoples. During my Eurotrip last year (Ah! I can’t stop talking about it, now, can I :)), I spent time with a blonde, Colombian woman in Antwerp who did not speak a word of English. She was accompanied by two Mestizo/Amerindian women who kinda attended her like – shall we say, “maids”? While all of them spoke Spanish to each other and seemed to be one “family”, it was clearly evident that the blonde Colombian was a bit of an upper class snob, and the native Amerindian servant women kinda knew their place. They were at her constant beck and call. Now, I’m a socialist in some matters – I can’t really bring myself to treat another human being like servants or something. It disgusts me. But, I chose not to say anything. Latin America, even today, looks like some kind of ancient plantation culture

    Otherwise, I connected rather well with that blonde Colombian – in French – she happened to be fluent in that language and I would speak in a slow, halting manner. It was the first time in my life that I had to depend entirely on the French language to communicate with another person. In fact, I hardly ever got a chance to use spoken French when in France because almost every Frenchman/Frenchwoman would automatically switch to English with me (although, there are exceptions. I spent some time with two girls from Quebec, Canada and they only insisted on speaking in French.)

    This Colombian blonde was really rich. She wore diamond-studded earrings and asked me to accompany her inside a store where she bought herself a Gucci bag for around 450 Euros. A thought did occur to me, “drug money”? Aren’t all Colombians supposed to make their wealth through cocaine? I even joked with her about this. She was slightly offended but laughed it off.

    We are friends now. In fact, she has invited me to stay at her house (it’s more like a mansion) if I ever travel to Colombia. Heh heh. This was a sinister-looking bitch with a wry smile and it just looked like she’s capable of untold brutalities. Just saying.

    Maybe, Elijah Muhammad wasn’t too far off the mark about his observations about the White Devil. Seriously, crackers, you ain’t dying out too soon for the people of color of the world to rejoice🙂

    • Sammy

      SHI: “White people have a tendency to dominate other races even when they’re very few in numbers. Even if whites become a minority in the US or some other places, it won’t affect their lives that much….”

      Perhaps true, as long as — and this is a CRUCIAL “as long as” — there is no pent-up racial hatred or any great animosity toward them. Haiti (and, possibly South Africa, though in slower motion) turned out differently for whites than did Mexico, South America, or the DR.

      • EPGAH

        All it takes is one mulatto to organize a rebellion, then the massacres of their betters isn’t long behind!
        Look at Haiti or South Africa…

        AND YET, there’s Orania, a wonderful all-white 1950s oasis in the middle of squalor and violence. It’s the one area where there is a literal ZERO RAPE RATE! Not even the most vicious of heterogenous Police States can make that claim.

  4. Even when non-Hispanic whites are a minority (and plurality- largest group but not a majority), if you count the white heritage of Hispanics who are a significant amount white and even the 20% whiteness of African Americans or whatever it is, America will probably still remain country where the majority of dna is European.

    • Another William Playfair Web

      So you guys don’t necessarily care about race mixing, as long as it is not with new people?

    • Tulio

      From what I’ve heard, by that measure, DNA of Brazil is about 70% white. Though obviously non of this applies to actual identity. A mestizo even if half European views himself as “a person of color”.

      • Not true. The figure for Brazil is 54% White, though I get where you are coming from.

        A mestizo even if half European views himself as “a person of color”.

        Considering that “social race” exists in Brazil, that statement might not even be true.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          “Social race”..that’s right. I’ve known two Brazilians, both younger women, both came from the slums, both Pure white. Yet they were dirt poor.

          One of the women is a friend of mine’s Stepmother, and he says that she has referenced anti-black racism (her family liked to rise above the ‘poor whites excuses and nonsense’).

          It’s much like the U.S., the Poor Whites use it as a distraction, much like in the U.S.
          http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-34945756

        • Another William Playfair Web

          There’s more wiggle room in Brazil, and poor whites are not revered like here in the U.S.
          I’m almost done trying to decipher it anymore, the appalling ignorance of Hispanics on matters of their own heritage is freighting (full blooded Central American Indians think ALL their ancestors came from Spain, that it’s populace looks like them)…it’s insane.

        • Santoculto

          Robert,

          70% of European genes in Brazilians on average and not self- declared whites.
          But I thought the “%” is likely to be less than 70%.

        • Santoculto

          Just correcting

          54% of Brazilians declared themselves as white or with “white” color.

          70% is the possible % of European genes in the average Brazilian.

        • Tulio

          Check this out: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/02/brazilians-more-european-than-not/#.Vq0AYlLSxYA

          “In all regions studied, the European ancestry was predominant, with proportions ranging from 60.6% in the Northeast to 77.7% in the South.”

  5. James Schipper

    Dear Robert

    There is no such thing as white culture, just as there is no such thing as a white language. The dominant culture in the US has always been American culture, that is the Anglo-Saxon form that existed in the Thirteen Colonies and now exists in the 50 states. To that culture, all others, white or non-white, had to adapt. Granted, immigrants who came from Europe could more easily be assimilated than those who came from other parts of the world, just as speakers of another Germanic language could more easily learn English than those whose mother tongue was non- Germanic.

    It is quite possible that whites will create cultures that are in many ways different from those created by members of other races, but it still doesn’t follow that there is a white culture. Suppose that there were 900 million Russians, and that 500 million of them settled in the US. Would Jared Taylor like that? Certainly not, but a Russian US would still be white. The issue here is to preserve American culture, to which whites and yellows can adapt more easily than some others, but it still isn’t about mere whiteness. If whiteness were the only criterion, then Taylor should be indifferent between the US, Russia, Argentina, Hungary or Greece.

    Regards. James

    • Santoculto

      Indeed.
      But there is a Jewish culture (eugenic culture) at racial sense.

      Old American culture was relatively explicit racial culture.

    • I’m guessing he would vastly prefer Russian to African immigration though.

      • Santoculto

        The idea of white homogeneity from Lisbon to Vladivostok is indeed a fantasy.

        Nordicists very dislike the idea that other non-northern Europeans to be treated equal, and they are very common among white nationalists.

        • Santoculto

          Intra racial conflicts are much more common than inter racial conflicts that tend to be occasional.

  6. As much as it pains me to say it, I have to agree with Tulio’s assessment. Therefore, I think that the real solution is for whites to cultivate a healthy – yet assertive – nationalism.

    There’s no reason why whites dropping below 50% of the population should be regarded as the end of the world. Multiple minorities around the world are able to not only survive, but thrive; they do so because they have strong collective identities and are organized.

    After all, white nationalists are always complaining about the Jews and the undue power that they wield – yet Jews are only 2% of the population.

    I once wrote an article for Alternative Right where I argued that the time has come for whites to abandon radical individualism and other peculiar white American cultural practices. As their numbers continue to dwindle, something tells me that I’ll be proven correct.

    • Another William Playfair Web

      Good luck with Americans…Italians are barely accepted as Whites these days (I’ve known one to have witnessed Italians being called ‘Mexicans’)….this is the case anywhere outside the North East. It’s a joke. It’s Europeans reaching out to HBDers here, and they basically play the Americans like a Yoyo, our national will decline, no matter what.

      White Americans have no problem with Eastern European Immigrants who are coming to the U.K. Europeans have no problem with White Hispanics, how will these discrepancies work?

      My last hope is Asians, I’m not impressed that the average white these days is that smart……I don’t know if it was passion or what that drove the many achievements of the white race.

      • Jason Y

        That’s funny cause Italians view themselves as white, and as any Spike Lee film will tell you, they really hate blacks, and it’s also known they hate Latinos.

        • Negroess Negroess

          How you view yourself is kinda irrelevant. Take Indians for example. Just another type of nigger. A curry nigger in fact. Fine by me. It is not how I see Indians but it is how others see Indians that define Indians for me. And hence defines me. Ok by me.

          So Italians. Some are white and some are not and that kinda gets the whole lot lumped in with non whites. Crazy? Yes!!! But that is how they are seen. I watch a lot of old sitcoms from the sixties and seventies and one can see the prejudice that English people had towards them in a few episodes in the sitcoms where they pop up, and the same goes for the Spanish. Always seen as black haired types so different from the English and prone to lots of emotion. Frankly the write up the British script writers gave them back then is just asking for them to be viewed as dark haired emotional inferiors.

          In one sitcom someone plays a trick by pretending to be italian when he is not. Prejudiced Racial hilarity follows when he try’s to date an English girl, who is in the know, but her brother is not;but all is ok when he finally reveals himself as a local lad from Newcastle who just asked to be called Gino because he was opening a hair salon.

      • EPGAH

        It might have been passion, but also we were PROUD of our achievements instead of feeling guilty over them. If you feel guilty about your past success, you won’t have to worry about future success.
        Glib, perhaps, but it’s a great sum-up of our current problem.

        White achievement is now called “White Privilege” and is treated as something that needs to be destroyed instead of celebrate.
        Thugs commit crime because they don’t have this “privilege”, rather than because they’re scum.
        Whites are ALLEGEDLY treated better by law-enforcement because of this “privilege”, rather than because we COOPERATE with cops instead of fight them.
        Whites have a good reputation due to “privilege” instead of because we’re housebroken.

        It’s bullshit, of course, but it’s widely believed.
        The Bum even apologized to other countries–and the Moslem terrorists–for America’s past successes!

        Now that we’ve stated the problem, how can we reverse it? How can we tell the savages to either shape up or accept being treated like shit because they ACT like shit?

        • Jason Y

          The whole thing is more murky than you think. You as many others also content, say non-whites are violent savages, and whites deserve white privlidge, while ignoring the fact crime and prisons are a business in the USA employing a lot of whites.

          So it’s sort of like whites will bitch about black crime, for example, but notice there is no calls for deportation to Africa. That’s because the whole situation benefits whites as a lot of non-whites, and whites for that matter have turned into “profitable violent nursing home patients”.

          So whoever said antebellum slavery was dead? Non-whites are still a product cause many of them can’t produce. It’s saying if they can’t produce, then they can profit from them as a product. Same logic goes with why social media is free.

          You sure as heck won’t hear that on a David Duke site, but it sure enough is true with tons of facts to back it up.

        • EPGAH

          So you believe in white privilege? You actually believe there is such a thing and it’s not just whites being TREATED better because–on the whole–we ACT better?

          There have been calls for deportation, but not enough…it’s not like the calls for firing cops when cops kill thugs. I don’t see whites rioting in the streets. The ONE thing that could be considered a white riot–the takeover of a Federal hut in Oregon–has been put down with considerable force.
          Now where are the Black Lies Matter thugs getting shot? What’s the Body Count, since that seems to be the only thing savages can learn from?

          If nonwhites are a product, why aren’t we destroying and recycling the defective ones?

        • Jason Y

          Also, let’s remember a lot of non-whites and whites are jailed for non-violent offenses, hence why the USA has the largest prison population on the planet. Again though, we have a whole group that can’t make Orange Juice, so they decided to sell them as “Human Orange Juice”. In other words, they are commodity, much as Negro slaves were back in the day.

          Of course, white nationalists will pin all this resistance to a harsh measure against black crime as the “Jewish influence”, ignoring the fact small town Anglo whites, especially near my home in places like “remote counties in Southwest Virginia”, benefit heavily from the prison industry.

          Some of the Southwest Virginians might have even grown to like the idea of “chaining up so called bad people”. A type of antebellum “We’re imprisoning them for their own good” may have gained popularity. Ultimately, as in the antebellum south, people will make excuses, cause these convicts (human products) are paying the bills. They allow otherwise heavily disadvantaged anglo whites to live middle class lives.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          I’ve never witnessed a Muslim behaving badly, although I’ve only seen probably a few dozen in my life, that means that the proportion of them behaving badly is 0, far lower than Non-Hispanic whites (from what I’ve seen)

          We could non-stop talk about the crime that is committed by non-Hispanic whites, and ignore everything else. There would be enough, and it would be fun to watch.

          Syrians (I assume those are the “moslems”) are White /Caucasian. They’ve been the easiest target, just like how Ashkenazis and Slavs were by Hitler. People get so hysterical they ignore what’s right in front of them, who is white and who’s not.

          A non-white Invader: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Jobs
          Another one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigi_Hadid

          Oh yeah, and don’t forget these four; http://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/rubio-jindal-cruz-santorum-birthers

        • EPGAH

          Where are your facts, Jason Y? You keep SAYING “tons of facts to back it up.” and similar, but you don’t PRODUCE any.

          And yes, putting these animals to work would be best for everyone.
          So why hasn’t it happened yet? Why are thugs blocking off–or burning down–major shopping areas instead of chained up in the fields?
          As a bonus, we have enough thugs, we could jettison the illegals!

          Where is this neo-slavery you think is happening?

        • EPGAH

          There isn’t enough non-Hispanic white crime, though, otherwise, OUR countries would be shit worth fleeing, and MEXICO would be having problems with OUR illegals and self-proclaimed “refugees”, right?

          If Group B commits crime at about 5X the rate of Group A, it makes a LOT more sense for Group A to complain about/defend itself against Group B than Group B to complain about/defend against Group A, right?

          https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2015/12/03/mass-shooting-in-san-bernardino/
          As to the Moslems, I meant things like this.

          If we let a FEW in at a time–WE control the immigration, not the enemy–then they will have to assimilate to us. If any enemy group comes in by the TENS OF MILLIONS, then they will turn some or ALL of America into the Hell they fled.
          https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2015/09/02/white-california-rip/

          Mexicans turned California into Mexico…Do you want some part of America turned into Syria? Maybe Somalia? And if so, what is it about that country that is so worth emulating?

        • EPGAH

          Steve Jobs is German. His ancestors came in LEGALLY! That’s not really high praise, something akin to praising him for being housebroken.
          Where do you get he’s a nonwhite invader?
          Rather than rape and murder his hosts, Jobs created the most popular, if the most proprietary brand of computers. ANDROID machines are superior hardware, but they don’t have the “Cool Factor”.
          Jobs also created a lot of…well, JOBS! While he was in control of Apple, he tried to keep it American, when he stepped down, his replacements outsourced, leading to the joke about “No Cash, No Jobs, and No Hope”!

          Gigi Hadid, father is from JORDAN–whence come the “Palestinian” terrorists that plague Israel–so you might have a point.
          More concrete, the father faces jail time for violating zoning laws.

        • EPGAH

          As to the latter article, birthplace is not an issue when it comes to becoming President. Ask the Bum! Incidentally, Hillary Clinton started the birther thing, and the Bum keeps adroitly bobbing and weaving around it, rather than either confess and resign or open the books so everyone can see he’s American…Plus why does he keep bringing up his INDONESIAN childhood?

          Is the Constitution our Guiding Light or just an “obstacle” for everyone who wants to take power over America and lead it on a path that is counter to American Culture?

        • Negroess Negroess

          I am not white but I do have privilege. Curry nigger privilege. I get called racial names and told to fuck off!

        • Tulio

          Yes, white privilege exists. But the majority of whites don’t see it because privilege is invisible to those who are privileged. As an analogy. There’s a privilege in being a hot, young woman. She probably doesn’t realize that all the breaks and opportunities she gets in life is mostly due to being hot. She probably thinks it’s just normal to have men throwing themselves at her all the time and getting free dinners, free vacations, job offers, etc.

          I saw this white privilege discussion on Facebook the other day and someone made a good statement about it that really makes it easy to understand. I’ll paste it here:

          ” You really mis understand what “white privilege” means.

          It doesn’t mean you haven’t worked hard for what you have or that your life isn’t rough. It simply means that at face value the majority of america has treated you differently and in alot of cases better than it has some other people. To say that stereotypes arent real and that people don’t act on them is ridiculous. To say that people DONT react differently to different ethnicities is ridiculous.

          Take race out of it. Studies show Taller men make more money and are generally more respected/attractive to females than equally deserving short men. That’s a privilege. Doesn’t mean tall guys arent deserving of the money or respect they get and they don’t work hard. It just means at face value people give them benefits that their counter parts DONT get. No body is saying feel guilty about it….but to say its a fairytale is…well…ridiculous.”

          I think the comparison to being tall is very astute. Because studies have shown that most CEOs are over 6ft tall. I’m quite sure there are many 5’8″ men that are as capable of running a company as tall men. Yet why are shorter men discriminated against in positions of leadership? Why wouldn’t men in corporate leadership have the same height distribution of men in the general population? Because tall men get an unearned privilege.

        • EPGAH

          People DO react differently to different ethnicities, but it’s because of how those ethnicities acted in the past.

          The stereotypes are near-universal. Do you understand what that means? If ONE group says X acts Y, then that might be the hangup of that one group. If a VARIETY of different groups say X acts Y, there’s a good chance X DOES act Y!

          http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/05/05/what-china-saw-when-baltimore-shook-with-anger/
          hei ren, or “black person” – attended by a variety of sweeping stereotypes, including a proclivity for violence and crime.
          How do they develop the same stereotypes we have, despite NOT having 50 years of increasing Black crime to cause those stereotypes?

          Have you ever considered, maybe you can’t see the stereotype because you’re the group the stereotype is about? Stop talking about “White Privilege” and start talking about the problems with Blacks that would cause such stereotypes. And more importantly, start FIXING them.

          No, you’d rather “fix” white privilege? Make it so we don’t get treated better because of 230 years of acting better? (And longer than 230 years outside of America!)
          That might make things EQUAL but it won’t make them FAIR.

          Now you can’t conflate that with how “tall” people are treated. 75% of communication is supposedly nonverbal, right? hysical dominance often leads to social dominance. Some people have a thing about them that charges the air around them, even if they’re short&ugly, they DOMINATE an area. Could be pheromones, could be Dark Magic. But normally, tall people DO dominate, then they develop a dominant ATTITUDE.

          Blacks are developing a similar ATTITUDE, apparently being used to calling their opponents “racist” unless and until they get what they want. Being told NO and sticking to it must be an incredibly uncomfortable feeling, huh?

    • Jason Y

      <

      blockquote>As much as it pains me to say it, I have to agree with Tulio’s assessment. Therefore, I think that the real solution is for whites to cultivate a healthy – yet assertive – nationalism.

      Already many are, but it’s more a crutch than anything else.

      • Another William Playfair Web

        That doesn’t matter. Many WASPs just aren’t sure that they are white.
        The Rick Santorum birther movement, the Daily Stormer, are all examples of overtly Anti-Italian sentiment.

        People don’t want to acknowledge it, but it’s there.

    • EPGAH

      Problem is, anytime whites assert ourselves with anything OTHER than voice on the Internet, we get shutdown HARD, with anything from lawsuits that would’ve been dismissed with prejudice 30 years ago, to actual forcible interference, including death.

      Note the rioters from Los Angeles to Baltimore were given “Space To Destroy”, but the whites who took over that little hut in Oregon got shot&killed.

      A “healthy yet assertive nationalism” for whites cannot happen unless white Identity Politics is at least left alone as much as the far more violent and litigious Black/Mexican/Terrorist versions are!
      Collective identity and organization doesn’t matter if the Government is SJW enough to kill YOU, but not your enemies!

      • Jason Y

        The powers that be occasionally tolerate a slave uprising from time to time, and also support organizations which allow blacks etc.. to vent their anger.

        Perhaps the powers that be don’t like white nationalism cause it might end the prison industrial complex. Of course, that doesn’t mean that white nationalism is a good thing though.

        I’m sure back in the day of antebellum slavery, a lot of white racists didn’t like slavery, and I’m sure the slaveowners wanted to “hush those racist people up” cause it threatened their industry.

        • Jason Y

          As funny and odd as it sounds, you may have heard of a campaign for racial harmony actually promoted by southern slaveholders. In other words, they didn’t want a movement to send blacks to Africa. Instead, they wanted to show the positive virtues of slavery and how blacks and whites could get along, even though the whites were obviously dominant.

        • Jason Y

          19th century southern planters backing racial harmony in thier own weird twisted way.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proslavery

        • EPGAH

          Well, that’s obvious, when the savages were completely dominated, they were peaceful. I keep harping that my parents grew up in DETROIT remember? If it wasn’t a peaceful place back then, they would not have survived, I would not exist.

          Look up the STRESS Units that kept the savages under control.

        • Negroess Negroess

          Jason y the prison complex is a drain on national resources. It is drain for the country. It is profitable for companies but not for the government that pays the companies. No government wants an excess of prisons when they could have those same people who are in prison working at jobs and paying the government taxes.

  7. Jason Y

    Trump if he’s elected, which is a high probablity as 20 percent of democrats will vote for him, will make a move in the far right direction, more so than any president before him. However, his plans will more than likely backfire leading to mass violence (ethnic tension). Also, He’s crazy enough to take out Iran, among other foriegn policy nightmeres.

    Trump cannot turn America back to some 1950s white version, but his attempt will cause massive problems.

    • EPGAH

      It will not cause mass violence.
      If there is mass violence, it will be from the savage nonwhites violently resisting America fixing itself–and isn’t that the very enemy that has made America this bad so far?

      • Another William Playfair Web

        You do realize that this is not a white nationalist blog…right?

        • EPGAH

          Yes, I do, why are you asking?
          Our host points out often enough that Blacks cannot behave, and they are their own problems (And problems for others)

          https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2015/11/24/why-race-is-important/
          https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2015/12/07/on-black-male-violence/

          Even this article mentions that “US culture has always been synonymous with White culture.”
          So if there is any violence, by definition, it comes from the enemy that makes certain parts of America look like the Third World, right?

        • EPGAH

          It’s mind blowing to me how the religion of Altruistic Liberalism warps peoples’ reason.

          And such altruism would be fine if it only extended to themselves, they could waste all their money on the invaders, my Blessing!
          But Liberal Altruism is an aggressive “Altruism” which forces others with threats of jail and violence (Not Either-Or) to do things for people whom they have nothing in common with and worse, people who will bring harm to them and their country.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          Yeah, but he also looks down on American culture; “I do not care what happens to this country”….Europeans do as well.

          Roughly the (Logic): If American Culture is really white American Culture, and Europeans look down on it as inferior, then White American Culture is inferior in the eyes of Europeans.

          Here’s Why: Conservative HBDers, don’t like to listen to the idea that, if, Income is a good indicator of intelligence (blacks are very poor, worldwide) that the poor Europeans coming to America in the colonial days, should have been on the lower end of the IQ spectrum….I think you can go to a lot of trailer parks and see that🙂

          The mindset of those with your ideology seems to be: ‘whites* are always great and coloreds are always bad’
          *”whites” means whatever the heell we want.
          Go to a trailer park, you’ll see that’s no true.

          To paraphrase the words of another; ‘Of course there can be brilliant Blacks, and superior Athlete whites, but it is only when we see the entire bell curve, that we notice the gaps, and the distribution’

          Really, the only difference is between you and me is that you are more extreme, and are more concerned with race above IQ…I’m the other way around. Who says a trailer park white is better than a smart black? He’s of less benefit to humanity. And honestly, non-whites are less obnoxious with their idiocy, they’ve been trained to lie low, Stupid Whites and just advertise their stupidity. That’s why they are more dangerous.

        • Jason Y

          William has a point. Not trying to sound like a dickhead snob, but a lot of poor whites are inceredibly repluslive. For one thing they chain smoke even around small children. Also, they’re gigantic hypocrites and backstabbers, often promoting a form of harsh Christian morality, they don’t practice themselves. Again they have no patience or understanding and will kick your ass, or call the cops on you.

        • Jason Y

          Poor whites are so annoying, especially with regards to smoking cigarettes around babies and children 24/7, you almost want to rescue the kids from this horrifying abuse.

          Also, as I mentioned, you can’t trust them. If you get on their bad side, they’ll call the cops on you.

          I could say I believe in treating all people equal, but I wouldn’t allow these people to breed, for the reason of saving the children from all the toxic smoke.

        • Jason Y

          Of course, upper class whites are more healthy than the poor, but their snobby, snooty behavior is quite replusive. While I think upper classes should be allowed to breed, the kids would need to have exposure outside the snobby circle to develop as human beings.

        • EPGAH

          No, Jason, you go out of your way to sound like a dickhead snob, from “I wouldn’t allow these people to breed, for the reason of saving the children from all the toxic smoke.” to turning around and someone you want to FORCE the kids of high-class people to have exposure outside the high-class circle “to develop as human beings.”–So you think the low-class are unstable, even toxic, but the upper-class are not really human either?!

        • EPGAH

          William: Nonwhites are less obnoxious with their idiocy? Black Lies Matter is INCREDIBLY obnoxious, plus the various Black groups who block off major shopping centers, not to mention the ones who burn them down. If you are willing to cast “violent” as “obnoxious”, then the ghetto is more obnoxious than the trailer-park.

          I won’t deny they’re of similar lack of use to civilization, but which one actually ties to get in the way of civilization and/or burn it down? I don’t put race above IQ. I realize there are smart Blacks — some who actually use their IQ for America’s betterment, rather than just their own advantage — and worthless whites, especially the SJW types who sell America out to the thugs, and make excuses for them.

          But on balance, the negative behaviors are more common in which groups? Exceptions can obviously be made on a case-by-case basis, but on the macro-scale, do you not see the same patterns that I wrote about and Robert put in more subtle/nuanced terms?

          TLDR: Both groups have bad behavior individuals, but which has more of them?

          And no, Europe doesn’t care about America. They have their own problems. Part of it may be jealousy. Which country still has credit for most of the inventions we consider part of the First World lifestyle? Now how much does America care about Europe? We bailed them out in WWII, but now American SJW’s — from New York Times on down — are pushing them to ignore the Moslem terrorism and open their borders wider to people who want to destroy them — just as we have! Is this Misery Loves Company or what?

        • Another William Playfair Web

          That’s an isolated incident. There was once a post on this blog about blacks having higher verbal intelligence than overall IQ (must be lopsided), and as Robert Lindsay said, maybe it’s just that they are more fun to be around because of that, I will concede it.

          I was also mainly referring to discourse about politics in this country. Blacks typically only discuss one or two issues, like defending their own race, and a smaller proportion of them use words like “neanderthal” or “Republicunt” or “Repblicant” than whites who use “libtard” and refer to Obama as “thugge” or “monkey”, in your case, “bum”. These whites are taking away from society. You should be concerned about this, it makes conservatism look bad, that’s why there has been intellectual flight from the Republican Party, this is concerning.

          Now, to turn the tables, if you love lower education/intellect whites so much, why don’t you live in Tennessee?

          That’s probably why he is a tad anti-white, he lives in Tennessee.

        • Santoculto

          Anti racist people are very classicist and/or elitist people.

          As happen in Brazil.
          Supposedly Brazilians are not so racist than Americans but they are VERY classicist and this look so bad than racist.

        • EPGAH

          There’s only “intellectual flight” from Republicans because this abuse of the word “Racism” and the new “intellectual” way to phrase it, “White Privilege” are gaining way too much ground and power.

          Before if someone called you a racist, you’d tell him to go fuck himself or the material equivalent. Now even the HINT of the accusation can ruin someone’s career–and the SJWs know it.

          So rather than stand on common-sense principles, the Republicans have to “Avoid Being Racist”…Which means no speaking out against mass immigration from the Third World, about Black criminality, or even Moslem terrorism! Remember that Philly cop who got shot, the thug said he did it in the Name of Islam…and the MAYOR is trying to say there’s a reason other than the Cult?

          I mean, seriously, when “Anti-Racism” has people denying reality, it needs to be ended.
          How many whites have “hilarious” nicknames for Republicans, right-wingers…Or your own use of “trailer trash”?

          BTW, why are the ones you call “trailer trash” a negative to society? To me, at the very worst, they’d be neutral. The ones Robert calls “floaters”.

    • Jason Y

      Oh yeah, it would be easy for Trump to create another industry, the deportation industry. It might even make more than the prison industry. Given Trump’s background he might be successful, but he still won’t be able to stop the backlash.

      • EPGAH

        What backlash? Only the criminals who don’t belong here would be against criminals who don’t belong here going home. And if they are violent enough, we would have reason to silence them, right?

        • Jason Y

          People, especially non-whites, tend to stick up for their own kind. Already I see on social media, legal Mexicans showing hatred for Trump.

        • EPGAH

          Then it shows tribalism for fellow Mexicans, they need to pick a side of the border, get to that side of the border, and stay loyal to it. Teddy Roosevelt said in 1806, “There is room, for BUT ONE LOYALTY in America, and that is TO AMERICA!” If Mexicans want to side with their illegal brethren, then they should be kicked out with them. Friend of enemy is enemy, right? I can’t wait to hear you bloviate on this!

      • Negroess Negroess

        Prison industry.there you go again. It is a drain on national resources. It is costs the government millions. It is a drain. It USA financial drain. Deportation would save billions. Governments needs to use taxes from Americans for Americans. Is is not wrong to deport illegal immigrants. They, illegal aliens are criminals against the American state. It is necessary to punish all criminals and not just the ones that you do not like. Criminals are criminals. An Aryan women who murders her baby should be punished, and not let off because she was a stressed blond Aryan woman with full backing from femenists and WNs and so that excuses her. Crime is crime. Punish her. Punish illegal immigrants. The law should be above who you like and who youn loath. Politicians love illegals because they are potential voters, but that is no excuse. Punish them as well.

    • Another William Playfair Web

      I agree with your points. However, it would be dishonest not to mention that Blacks and (non-white) Hispanics have similar problems, but even more of them do as a proportion.

      The difference is that non-whites have been forced, because of the history of this nation, to lie low, and be cautious, ‘be seen but not heard’ as the cliche goes. The ones that don’t, seem to be from online observation, La Raza and Black Supremacists, who seem to at least be more informed, if not higher IQ.

      Honestly you can not have an economic discussion, with those identifying with the right, most of the time (they are stupid, perhaps the movement is not) or any non-race social issue discussion with these people without the word “libtard” or “librats” or ‘illegal immigrants will raise your IQ but no one else'(from the two possible mathematical perspectives, re centering or not, that’s impossible) comments popping up… I mean look at the description on this video; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ym4Xt0T6fM

      Everything is better with self-identifying liberal whites, not just any whites. The people who identify as conservatives are often very low IQ.
      Come on, I mean Appalachia versus the North East
      U.K. versus France
      It’s not that hard to figure out, it’s just that poor brain dead whites don’t want to admit they contributed less to European civilization than the Sub-Saharans did, since they took away from Europe, rather than being neutral to it, perhaps this is why America is going down to the tubes, our already less genetically intelligent populace is pushed off the intellectual deep end with low-IQ hordes.

      Honestly, I’m trying to leave the U.S. I’d like to come back, but I have no confidence that violent low-IQ whites using unrestrained mob rule is going to work out any better than a brown nation.

      • Jason Y

        The generalization about IQ in Appalachia is a generalization. Who are you speaking of? Whites who live in projects and in trailer parks? That represents all whites in Appalachia? That’s definitely racist against white people.

        Of course I do find it amusing that a lot of these so called “trailer trash” are the most racist against browns and blacks, when they aren’t any different than them.

        My biggest concern with low IQ blacks, browns and whites is thier trashy lifestyle, smoking around kids is one big thing, harms thier own children. They’re raised in a terrible environment of drug use, sex, violent movies and games (many don’t care to let children watch Freddy Krueger).

        Am I a snobby, snooty prick for pointing the faults in their culture? Am I a Yankee for saying so LOL

        • Negroess Negroess

          No you are right in saying the smoking is terrible. I see poor whites in the uk smoking so much around small children, my heart goes out to such innocents having their young lungs full of smoke. But trash is trash.BUT White trash is still better than black trash in the ghetto and the curry nigga trash of Indians in their slums. If one had to choose which trash to be white trash is still the better trash to be.

          Let us imagine a white child growing up in a trailer park. One day out of the blue he starts listening to Tudor music from England. He also hears some French language Tudor music composed by King Henry of England. He is intrigued by this Tudor music culture. He feels a connection to it. He learns more and more and decides to visit England. His eyes are opened. He is touch with something that broadens his horizons. His mind is free of the trailer park and Freddy Kruger. He works out an escape plan. And he becomes physically free by moving away. This is entirely possible. And believe me many whites do just that. The ghetto of the niggers and the slum of the curry niggers is not so helpful.

        • Jason Y

          Lately, in my own family, as we have family members married into poor white people,, a molestation case has come up. I’m not sure if that’s more common among poor southern whites then other white poeple, but I’d put my money on that it is.

          This one groups of clowns my family is married into outdo “The Addams Family”. They look like circus freaks, and their behavior matches it.

          Of course, though blacks and browns all have the same problem also. That’s one thing to consider before marrying into them.

          One white guy I knew, and he is a good friend of mine but I cannot deny the truth, was a totally trashy guy with no standards. Probably his kids grew up watching porn movies for all I know. I know for sure they watched scary movies, breathed cigarettes, listened to vulgar and dirty language from parents, the whole nine yards.

          Gosh, I’m so glad I was raised by 1950s style white parents when I think about that guy. If I was raised by him, I’d be an shit load mess.

        • EPGAH

          I was raised under 1950s values too, that’s why I fight against the invading Third Worlders, and I also hate what the white Liberals have done to our nation’s moral standards to make the nonwhites not seem so bad.

          I mean seriously, when did we go from “Manly Men Loving Women” to sparkly effeminate vampires? When did victims of theft, looting, even outright terrorism go from victims to “They Bring It On Themselves”?

          “If we all act like violent non-housebroken shits, then the nonwhite invaders–even terrorists–won’t seem so bad!” Is that the Liberal strategy?

        • EPGAH

          PS, I am still getting spam from a candidate running on an actual ANTI-Family Values platform!
          The Liberals are suddenly brave enough to OPENLY oppose those 1950s values you claim you were raised with! I guess the Libs just CAN’T be secret about it anymore, if they want to continue their momentum of destroying our values, they have to stop being secret and openly attack them?

        • EPGAH

          If they look and act like Addams Family, how did they seduce your family member? I always wondered that. Who would WILLINGLY marry into a group with known negative values and behaviors, black, brown, white, or other?

          Unless maybe your family wasn’t so high above them as you thought?

        • Another William Playfair Web

          Maybe just prejudiced against Scots-Irish🙂, stereotypical Appalachian people.
          I am part Scottish myself.
          actually, the IQ is not that bad in those states based solely on SAT scores in relation to one another;
          http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/states/USCHARTsat.html

          My mistake.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          Of course participation rates, those taking the test is a factor.

      • EPGAH

        How do Liberals make anything better, exactly?

        And your own ridicule of America’s founding is actually proof that “violent low-IQ whites” DO make a better country than “A brown nation”.
        I choose Mexico, the one directly south of us.

        How are La Raza and Black Supremacists any better to you than the low-IQ whites? What are they “more informed” about? The lies they tell each other to make themselves think they were part of America instead of property or enemies, respectively?
        And if La Raza is so well-informed, why isn’t the country of Mexico as good as America? Just chock-full of La Raza types? Maybe they’re too busy thinking of ways to invade and ruin America, they can’t think of ways to better their own country?

        As to leaving America, where will you go? A lot of people say that the “right wing Americans” are no longer TRUE Americans (Whatever that means by now), that WE should leave. But where to, exactly?
        The countries that were too left-leaning, open to everyone, are currently being punished by Third World invaders.
        The ones that keep outsiders well, OUT, are better off, but would also keep YOU out!

        When you say “North East”, do you include New York?
        Particularly the city that keeps alternating between being an 80s movie waiting for a place to happen and supporting the cops that clean it up–then turning against them again in a cycle that appears like a human version of GAIA?
        http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/cruz-finally-apologizes-people-nyc-his-own-way
        You know, the one Cruz trolled with this “apology” for not conforming to the Liberal vision for the city?

        And the “low-IQ hordes”, are you talking about Americans, or are you talking about the trash the Third World keeps dumping on us, and calling us “racist” if we refuse, however briefly, to be their litterbox?

        And how exactly did the Sub-Saharan population contribute to America?
        You mean they sold some of their lowest-IQ and criminal members to us as property, thus literally losing criminals and gaining useful goods?

      • EPGAH

        The whites self-identifying as Liberals are the ones who ALLOWED, if not CAUSED this shitstorm of nonwhite misbehavior, PLUS let in proven bad actors from other countries, so why are you fleeing?

        I’d have far more respect for Liberals if they didn’t flee when they got what they wanted. Rioting Blacks and Third World invaders, rather than the scum kept in line, and OUT of our country, respectively.

        Why are you fleeing the low-IQ hordes? You and people like you let them into our country!
        Why not stay here and enjoy your handiwork?

        • Jason Y

          Ep-gah has a point. It’s easy to be a liberal in Seattle. It’s easy to love Asians when they give you a job and are kissing your ass 24/7. You would also get a positive view of blacks, if all you ever saw was church going blacks. You’d get a positive view of Filipinos, if you were some pampered tourist, but what if you were one of them, or you happened to be black?

        • EPGAH

          Thank you, Jason. I think that’s actually the problem: Limo Liberals only see the good examples of (Insert Group Here), the ones who behave.
          While ex-military types like myself, or anyone else who actually has to LIVE around them and the shit they cause gets a lot less favorable viewpoint. They’re almost separate species!

          Could we call it “Susan Dlott Syndrome”?

      • EPGAH

        And yes, those who are “guests” in our “house” to use Robert’s metaphor, SHOULD lay low and be cautious. They have their own countries to fuck up, and have done a great job of it. If they fled that, they should not reenact it here!

    • Tulio

      I don’t think a Trump victory is likely. Only 1/3 or his own Republicans support him. The guy is a fucking clown. Utterly ignorant on any issue of substance. Has zero political or military background as all presidents prior have had. He is a demogogue that appeals to people’s base nature. He would be one of the worst things I could imagine ever happening to this country. He’d be GWB on steroids.

      How can anyone take that clown seriously. Yeah, he’s going to make Mexico pay for a border fence. When asked how he’ll do that, oh he’ll figure out a way. Yeah…okay. I’m really gonna vote for this guy.

      He speaks well of Vladimir Putin, a KGB Mafia thug that has had dissidents murdered.

      Ugh…man if Trump becomes president I have lost all hope in this nation. I will not recognize Trump as my president. I’ll refer to him as “the current occupier of the white house.”

      • Another William Playfair Web

        He’ll make HBD even more taboo than it already is. It will be associated with his ‘clownishness’.

  8. SHI

    Many whites that I personally know of have absolutely no interest in starting a family or even populating the world with children. Some black males have no interest in starting a family either but they have no qualms about having bastard kids. Whites have bastard kids too but it’s mostly the lower classes I believe. The educated types are just not planning to reproduce.

    Well, I’m like a white person too. I don’t intend to start a family ever. All the friends I grew up with have 2 kids on average now.

    As Bryan Adams would have said, ’18 till I die” motherfucker.

    • Jason Y

      The lower white classes, the ones that haven’t married into black people or accepted the “New America” are the most dangerous ones. They are the ones where your “one of them” or “your not”. Often these lower classes are full of incredibly unstable people who use race as a crutch to cover up bad personal decisions (choosing to avoid education, getting into drug or alcohol abuse etc..)

      I feel like a lot of white nationalists, including the more educated ones, are using the movement to get back at people, perhaps someone who molested them as a child, or black kids who beat up or mocked them. However, is that a healthy way to deal with such hurt and anger?

      • EPGAH

        Really? Then what motivates the Black violence if not as a crutch to cover up bad personal decisions?

        Have too many kids you can’t afford?
        Get into drugs?
        Attack cops and they fight back?
        It’s all whites’ fault, attack the whites, burn down their commercial centers, try to recreate the Haiti Massacre–then whine if the Civilized World tries to stop this counterproductive behavior! Clearly, the only thing that would motivate punishment of this behavior is “racism” right?

        Seriously, though, are you telling me the Mike Browns and Trayvon Martins–and the whole Black Lies Matter–aren’t “incredibly unstable people” who just want to lash out at their betters as a crutch to cover up their failures over the past say, half-century?

        • Another William Playfair Web

          I hope I’m not out of line here…
          but EPGAH, you literally are just ignoring his point and throwing Ad Hominems at blacks…..

        • EPGAH

          What is his point? He’s claiming lower-class WHITES are full of unstable people who use race as a crutch to cover bad personal decisions.

          I am pointing out that Blacks do the same but on a much larger, more violent scale. Rather than bitch on the Internet, Blacks take to the streets and choke off or burn down their host cities.
          They CLAIM to have no other way to deal with hurt and anger…
          AND YET, the low-class whites Jason Y mocks constantly seem to NOT burn down their host cities. There’s no Appalachian Ferguson. If sublimating violence outward for self-reproach was a “thing” for whites the way he says it is, the Appalachian Strip should’ve been burning constantly.

          That is not an ad hominem, that is a descriptor of fact, and a direct counter to his point. Ad hominem would be if I called Jason “unstable” or something.

        • EPGAH

          Remember, “Truth be told, it is all this bad behavior and not the color of their skin that causes so much racism against Black people. If Black people looked exactly like they do now but acted like Norwegians or Japanese people instead of how they do act, I do not think many people would hate them simply based upon the color of their skin or or the way they look.”

          In other words, THEY need to shape up instead of SJW “White Knights” like Jason Y blaming — and even projecting — their pathologies onto their white hosts.

          When whites burn down our cities and stores on a Ferguson Level, then sure, I will listen to his “points”. Until then, though, Jason doesn’t really HAVE a point, he’s not only MAKING excuses for Black misbehavior, he’s making UP excuses for Black misbehavior, and trying to say that the white movement to counter this misbehavior is somehow “bad”.

          Are we supposed to punish criminals or not?

        • Jason Y

          quote by ep-gah

          Have too many kids you can’t afford?
          Get into drugs?
          Attack cops and they fight back?
          It’s all whites’ fault, attack the whites, burn down their commercial centers, try to recreate the Haiti Massacre–then whine if the Civilized World tries to stop this counterproductive behavior! Clearly, the only thing that would motivate punishment of this behavior is “racism” right?

          The prison industry doesn’t really care,anymore than the ancient slave industry cared about Rome fighting brutal wars of conquest. lol It just means more prisoners or slaves, so to speak.

        • Jason Y

          quote by ep-gah

          Really? Then what motivates the Black violence if not as a crutch to cover up bad personal decisions?

          Both sides (white nationalists and blacks) are using “covered up” bad decisions as a crutch to some degree, except that bad personal decisions on the part of blacks feed a prison industry.

        • Tulio

          @EPGAH

          Jason is white, and lives in rural Tennessee, so that’s what he’s around. He has the right to criticize his own and what he sees going on with his own eyes in his neck of the woods. If he lived in Baltimore, maybe he’d be railing against blacks, but he doesn’t live in a black ghetto.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          I’m about 7/8 European(although probably more), and grew up near Baltimore. I occasionally am suspicious of blacks, but a lot of ideas people have about them (EPGAH, Tulio) are based purely on hysteria.

        • Tulio

          What hysterical view have I presented about blacks? I generally defend blacks here. I’m black myself.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          ” If he lived in Baltimore, maybe he’d be railing against blacks”
          Not all of Baltimore is that bad, not all blacks are bad.

          I guess if you are indeed black, I am mistaken.

          My point is, people tend to exaggerate (you’re black, you’ve probably known a lot blacks, look through EPGAH’s posts, some of them are so far fetched it’s laughable, even ones about Arabs and Indians too. He refers to Obama as “Bum”.)

          I would be willing to bet most of the German migrant crisis is just cherry-picked cases…sort of like Trump and the Mexicans one doing something bad is proof that they are all bad, since people honestly don’t care about IQ at all, they need something else [I knew a Chimpout.com commenter type guy(website’s description) who railed against blacks, with all the reasons they are bad, IQ was very low on the list). Same with immigrants.

          Notice how typically it’s just stories of all the bad stuff they do without pictures? These people aren’t dark enough to inspire anger, so they just leave it out.

        • Another William Playfair Web

          “if he lived in Baltimore he would feel differently”
          Not all of Baltimore is bad, not all blacks are bad.

          If you are indeed black, I was mistaken. However, that does not change the fact that EPGAH is exaggerating, you’re black, you’ve probably known many black people, are some of his assertions not laughable?

          These blatant exaggerations and hysteria are what drives people away from HBD, HBDers looks like a bunch of nutcases.

        • EPGAH

          Where do you think I’m exaggerating? Were or were not thugs given “Space To Destroy” in Baltimore?

          Noone has yet brought up a white version of Ferguson.

          HBD has been proven, but you’re right, people don’t care about IQ.
          However, bad behavior that you could be the next victim of is something else.
          As to your own exaggeration “one doing something bad is proof that they are all bad”, not quite. It isn’t so much that, but that the others not only don’t punish it, they join in or try to protect it from punishment!
          Whites punish other whites for doing bad. How low do you want to set the bar for better behavior?

          As to the people of India, they really DO shit in the streets. I compare behaving better with being housebroken. In India’s case, it becomes uncomfortably literal!

          As to the Bum, I call him that because he tries to reduce more of America into destitution–Bums! The median income of America is LOWER now than before the Bum took over. More people are unemployed, which is why we have a Tea Party and Black Lies Matter. Idle Hands, right?

        • Tulio

          I was never a supporter of the Ferguson riot, but whites don’t riot because they have nothing to riot about. They are the privileged group. The most they might riot about is if some rock concert gets canceled. I remember back when Guns N Roses was huge and Axl Rose would be an asshole and not show up and riots would break out. Occasionally young white college students in America might have a small riot after a sports game. Whites in Europe take post-game rioting much more seriously.

          But there’s not much of a sociological reason for whites to riot. I suppose if they were living as a minority in a black majority country where they felt oppressed and felt that black cops were shooting them and beating them with the slightest provocation, whites might start rioting against the black run police departments. And I bet you’d support those whites that violently lashed out.

        • EPGAH

          Tulio: So you, speaking on behalf of Blacks, want to claim that whites are “privileged” by anything other than working hard and getting something better out of that?

          And disavow any responsibility for Black thugs getting beaten or shot by cops?

          If your last sentence was correct, whites would riot if a white thug got killed by a cop, especially a BLACK cop, right? Except we don’t.
          Two possibilities:
          1.) Whites view reward and punishment as “natural”. If you do bad things, you deserve whatever you get. Blacks apparently think they should get away with whatever they want and punishment is “oppression”. In other words, we should ignore or even REWARD them for being harmful to our society?

          2.) Whites have a more granular self-image. When a white thug gets beat or killed we are individual enough to say “That thug is not me, it got what it deserved”. Blacks, on the other hand, seem to have a collective or “group” identity instead of individual. “OMG! A Black got beat or shot! That could’ve been me!” Except that they don’t bother looking into what it did to get that punishment. See #1?

          Tell me if I’m wrong, but your dismissal of whites as “the privileged group” is telling. You don’t suppose that we get punishment less because our misbehavior is less?

        • Tulio

          @EPGAH

          “Tulio: So you, speaking on behalf of Blacks,”

          I never claim to speak on behalf of blacks, anymore than Robert speaks on behalf of all whites. I’m just giving my own personal opinion.

          “want to claim that whites are “privileged” by anything other than working hard and getting something better out of that?”

          I suggest you read this: http://www.politicususa.com/2014/01/26/guide-white-privilege-white-people-theyve.html

          “And disavow any responsibility for Black thugs getting beaten or shot by cops?”

          Not every black getting shot or beat down in a thug. In the case Michael Brown, he was a thug. But what about Walter Scott who was shot in the back? What about Freddie Gray?

          “If your last sentence was correct, whites would riot if a white thug got killed by a cop, especially a BLACK cop, right? Except we don’t.
          Two possibilities:
          1.) Whites view reward and punishment as “natural”. If you do bad things, you deserve whatever you get. Blacks apparently think they should get away with whatever they want and punishment is “oppression”. In other words, we should ignore or even REWARD them for being harmful to our society?

          2.) Whites have a more granular self-image. When a white thug gets beat or killed we are individual enough to say “That thug is not me, it got what it deserved”. Blacks, on the other hand, seem to have a collective or “group” identity instead of individual. “OMG! A Black got beat or shot! That could’ve been me!” Except that they don’t bother looking into what it did to get that punishment. See #1?

          Tell me if I’m wrong, but your dismissal of whites as “the privileged group” is telling. You don’t suppose that we get punishment less because our misbehavior is less?”

          The caveat was if everything was reversed. And I mean EVERYTHING. That would mean blacks would be the dominant race that controlled everything, blacks brought whites to America as slaves and subjugated them for 400 years and had a history of brutal racism towards whites. I’m sure with a history like that, whites would be much more likely to riot if they felt they were beating unfairly shot and beaten by black cops. Especially if most of these whites were poor, confined to trailer parks and had little opportunity under a black run America while blacks controlled nearly all the wealth and resources.

          I think sometimes it’s important to do a mental exercise and just imagine if things were the flip opposite and it was blacks in power over a white minority, then how would you feel about what happened. Would you be somewhat more sympathetic of rioters if they were impoverished whites lashing out against an oppressive black power structure?

        • EPGAH

          No, I don’t. And you know why? Because whites were oppressed for 700 years by Moorish invaders into Europe. Not 400, 700!
          Everything was reversed, these savages oppressed us in our own country, made us pay an EXTRA tax just to continue existing–and sometimes killed us even when our Existence Tax (Protection Money) was fully paid up. At risk of oversimplifying, we subjugated savages so they would stop subjugating us. And then we let them go!
          And we still take care of them.

          I don’t know where you get the “400 years oppression” bullshit anyways.
          The first slave was in 1655, slavery was abolished 1865. BY WHITES!
          In fact, the first slave was owned by a Black person. A Black Indentured Servant tried to weasel out of its contract and got sentenced to a LIFETIME of servitude instead.
          That is 210 years. So therefore, if you were TRULY interested in making everything even, Blacks still owe us 490 years of slavery.

          After that, Blacks were no longer whites’ property, so they were 2-legged equivalent of feral dogs. What happens when you kick an animal out that you formerly housed and fed? It turns feral and starts attacking humans, stealing from us to survive. It doesn’t matter if the Federal Government MADE you do it, all that matters is you kicked it out, it’s trying to survive.
          So whites made laws to protect ourselves from these ferals.
          Jason Y is convinced Blacks only burn down their OWN shit, and are somehow kept in a pigpen. In the 1950s, that might have been valid.
          Then we took those laws away, and look what happened. They burn down their betters’ shit, go into the good side of town to look for a victim when they get “bored”, etc.

          So where is the “brutal” racism? We treated Blacks as feral animals because they acted like feral animals. In the 1960s, they started organizing and becoming an actual enemy. “Kill A Cop, Kill A Pig”, remember? Of course, it was Soviet organizers “making” them do it, so you have sort of an excuse there, but it’s still them doing it.

          If you act like an enemy, why should you not be treated like an enemy?
          Why do Blacks take Welfare and STILL attack their hosts?
          You’re not our property anymore, but we’re STILL financially on the hook for the upkeep of Blacks and their massive broods.
          Then you attack us–the ones who pay for your upkeep–and you wonder why we treat you like an enemy?

          Put simply: If you attack any American, you should be put down.
          Why are the rioters of Ferguson, Baltimore, etc. still ALIVE, much less running around the streets instead of in a cage?

          Walter Scott had a knife. If they had let it go, it would have killed someone else. Then it would’ve been the cops’ fault for NOT stopping it, right?
          Freddie Gray just died from a rough ride. And it had a history of insurance fraud, getting hurt on purpose. Ironically, the cops accused of killing Freddie Gray are black themselves, so race is not an issue, right?
          Thugs get what they deserve.

  9. Jason Y

    quote by ep-gah

    Where are your facts, Jason Y? You keep SAYING “tons of facts to back it up.” and similar, but you don’t PRODUCE any.

    And yes, putting these animals to work would be best for everyone.
    So why hasn’t it happened yet? Why are thugs blocking off–or burning down–major shopping areas instead of chained up in the fields?
    As a bonus, we have enough thugs, we could jettison the illegals!

    Where is this neo-slavery you think is happening?

    Some facts:

    http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1998/12/the-prison-industrial-complex/304669/

    Putting them to work? Well, of course. But even if they’re sitting around doing nothing, they’re still another form of “nursing home patient”. Either way, prisons make tons of cash.

    Think about it. The USA has always been strong enough to end violent crime. Why havent’ they?

    So the powers that be don’t really give a fuck if they burn down shopping centers, do drive-bys or randomly rape all kinds of people. They might get a little worried if they get outside the ghetto, but otherwise most people are secure in SuburbiaLand.

    It would be an interesting study to see if criminals are really draining the USA or just feeding an industry. Actually, I think, and it isn’t a conspiracy theory to say so, that food stamps, college financial aid, nursing home industry, disabled care industry etc.. are all done for a profit. So who is really getting drained?

    When some white middle class Republican is complaining about his money being drained, what he’s really saying is he’s mad his money is feeding some industry and he didn’t approve of the transaction.

    • Jason Y

      All thru history from Ancient Rome onward, people have made slaves of worthless people. Why would it be any different now? Of course, that’s better than killing them, at least it’s humane.

      • EPGAH

        OK, if criminals are feeding the industry, then why weren’t the rioters “fed” to the nearest jail?

        Remember, the rioters came in buses, and piled back in after they’d done their damage. So the Prison Industrial Complex–if your Conspiracy Theory is correct–could’ve just commandeered the buses!
        Shit clumps for easy removal, right?

        In another thread, you were saying how inhumane slavery was. Now you’re saying it’s MORE humane? Please make up your mind!

        But if it’s REALLY about money, Planned Parenthood showed a far better way to make money: Chop the scum up for spare parts. Call the thugs “fetuses”, people will gladly leap to the defense of the “industry”, even to the point of claiming they’re not human. Call it Retroactive Birth Control, or a really, really, really, really, really, REALLY Late Term Abortion?

        No need to buy or rent space to store the scum, no worries about escape…Where’s the downside?

        And yes, ANY theft is technically feeding “some industry”, but the idea of EARNING money is YOU get to spend YOUR money where YOU want, so of course you’ll resent it being stolen!

        • Jason Y

          No, it’s never that obvious, and ti’s not a conspriacy theory. Major industries make a huge sum with the Prison Industrial Complex. This isn’s some hair-brained “Invaders from Mars” conspiracy. Look up the facts yourself. It’s not hard to find.

        • Jason Y

          quote by ep-gah

          And yes, ANY theft is technically feeding “some industry”, but the idea of EARNING money is YOU get to spend YOUR money where YOU want, so of course you’ll resent it being stolen!

          I don’t get what your saying here. All I know is that, sure criminals do bad things, mostly to people of their own ethinic group. and society has a right to punish these people. However, the whole situation, taken in a broader context, is exploited for slave labor.

        • EPGAH

          How many of the Ferguson, Baltimore or even Los Angeles, if you can remember that far back, businesses that got torched were RUN by Blacks? They don’t destroy their own. And if they did, there would be LESS reaction to it. No one cares if you destroy your own shit, you only get punished for destroying someone else’s. As to “look up the facts yourself”, you’re the one making this harebrained claim, so you should be the one to prove it. I worked in a jail for 2 years, I didn’t see them rent or lease any of the scum out.

          As to the other thing I said, how do you not get it? Didn’t your parents ever tell you, “Once you make your own money, THEN you get to make your own decisions”? That’s why most kids can’t wait to grow up and get their own job, right? People want to stay in control. Even scum whose entire life is subsidized by someone else, wants to make his or her own decisions, even though they’ve been repeatedly proven bad ones. (If people on Welfare were suddenly denied self-determination, especially the right to vote, you’d see a lot of them shape up and get off Welfare at light speed!) How much MORE then, should someone who makes their OWN money resent someone ELSE spending it for them?

        • Negroess Negroess

          True some of them were not part of the hood. There were even white liberals egging the rioters on. There was a sjw violence racket going on.

    • Jason Y

      More info. Below made 2.9 billion in 2010 alone. Of course, they pull strings in the politcal arena big time of course.

      Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) and the GEO Group (formerly Wackenhut Corrections Corporation).

  10. Jason Y

    quote by RobertLindsay

    Yes, there has been a Black culture in the US for centuries, but it has never been dominant. Even in the South, Black culture has never been dominant even in any single state. White culture has dominated in every way including politically in the South forever now. Not one state is majority Black, not even Mississippi.

    The US tolerates subcultures because they were making people a lot of money. Anyhow, that subculture’s music (rock and blues) is blasted on all our radios 24/7 and white people love it.

    Mark my word, once a subculture doesn’t produce cash for somebody, then they’re booted out.

    • Interesting, can you cite a case in which that happens?

      • Jason Y

        Well, we all know Muslims are in Europe cause Europe’s aging population can’t work. However, what if they could? Would the Muslim still be allowed to stick around? It’s highly unlikely.

        • Negroess Negroess

          They are refugees from war.

        • Negroess Negroess

          Brown Muslim countries have huge birth rate problems. The UN sees the same low demographics hitting them. Tunisia, Iran, turkey etc have some of the lowest birthrates in the world.

          Low birth rates are everwhere among the brown Muslims; except of course in wonderful black Somalia. Somalia will always show the way forward for the brown Muslims. Even Bangladesh is calming down. I think Pakistan is doing well on the demographic front for now. So the poorer and blacker and more illiterate you are as a Muslim determines how you are doing demographically.The middle east is in a bad way demographically speaking according to the UN due to its wealth and literacy impacting young women in the same way it does in Europe.

  11. Jason Y

    quote by ep-gah

    What is his point? He’s claiming lower-class WHITES are full of unstable people who use race as a crutch to cover bad personal decisions.

    I am pointing out that Blacks do the same but on a much larger, more violent scale. Rather than bitch on the Internet, Blacks take to the streets and choke off or burn down their host cities.
    They CLAIM to have no other way to deal with hurt and anger…
    AND YET, the low-class whites Jason Y mocks constantly seem to NOT burn down their host cities. There’s no Appalachian Ferguson. If sublimating violence outward for self-reproach was a “thing” for whites the way he says it is, the Appalachian Strip should’ve been burning constantly.

    That is not an ad hominem, that is a descriptor of fact, and a direct counter to his point. Ad hominem would be if I called Jason “unstable” or something.

    The point is it doesn’t matter if low IQ whites are less violent than black ones. All in all, they’re all potential candidates for the corrections industry. I don’t think the government wants to help out low IQ anyone, but rather let them rot until it’s time to arrest them.

    • Jason Y

      Blacks who burn down buildings generally are hurting their own kind. That’s why nobody cares. In the end, most of these violent blacks just end up in the corrections industry anyhow, making corporations rich.

      • Negroess Negroess

        But making the government poorer.

      • EPGAH

        That’s the problem, though; They don’t burn THEIR OWN things.
        They burn their BETTERS’ properties. Then outsiders whine about mass leaving of an area. “White Flight”–but some don’t want to use that term because it’s “racist”, right?

        Everyone who’s worth anything leaves that city, and the scum have the city to themselves, but they can’t make anything of it.

        I guess you could say in the ULTIMATE sense they’re hurting themselves, but in a more immediate sense, they hurt everyone BUT themselves.
        After all, how many of the Blacks are robbing the stores, and how many own a store TO rob?

        • Jason Y

          So what does it matter? It’s like pigs in a stall wallowing in their own shit. In the end, they get made into pork. In this case, the blacks simply get fed into the highly profitable prison industry.

          Yeah I’m sure at one time the blacks burned down some good property. However, it’s been years since any property in the ghetto has been worth anything, and everybody going in (Korean store owners for instance) knows the risk.

          Again, the government does not care, cause the whole ghetto is simply a pig-pen to raise more human property for the corrections industry.

        • EPGAH

          No, it’s more like the pigs in a stall breaking out and breaking down your house.

          And cities like Ferguson and Baltimore–oh, and Los Angeles–where the scum went OUTSIDE the ghetto looking for better things to burn.
          Or when those three Black thugs in Texas went OUTSIDE the ghetto looking for someone to kill because they were “bored”?

          I would totally buy your story if we even had LAWS keeping the thugs in the ghetto still. I would of course, prefer a physical WALL, like in a certain Kurt Russell movie, or a force-field, whether powered by science or magic.

          The ghetto might be a pigpen, but pigpens are fenced in for a reason…

    • Negroess Negroess

      The industry is different from the government. The industry does not care about the inmates The government does not want to spend millions on prisons.

      EPGAH is right poor whites and poor blacks do behave differently regardless of how the authorities, whether the prison providers or the government views them. Giving a simple description means you look at the description and judge whether it is correct.Do not go off on the response that the authorities give. Facts are facts. There is no white Ferguson. And that is the truth regardless of the official response. Just deal with that fact. There are no white Fergusons. Do not go off on a tangent. Deal with that descriptive fact.

      • Jason Y

        That’s interesting. No drug using whites won’t burn down things, but they will steal and lie. We have already seen the massive child abuse they do via their second-hand smoke. Thier culture makes the TV show “Married with Children” look like “Leave it to Beaver”. lol They live in another age, those silly hillbillies..

        • Jason Y

          Of course, in the 70s and 80s smoking around children didn’t seem so bad, but now it’s an abomination. I would literally like to shove one of those cigarettes in those smokers faces.

        • EPGAH

          This is hilarious. Or at least it would be if it wasn’t so damn sad.
          To you, secondhand smoke is bad? What about secondhand smoke from savages burning down their betters’ stores?

          And if you’re feeling exceptionally lucky, go ahead and shove their cigarettes into their faces, but I think that would work out about as well as trying to confiscate the Blacks’ weapons. I.e., it would go badly for you.

        • Jason Y

          This is hilarious. Or at least it would be if it wasn’t so damn sad.
          To you, secondhand smoke is bad? What about secondhand smoke from savages burning down their betters’ stores?

          Burnt down stores you breathe once. Secondhand smoke slowly accumliates over the years, and that would be especially bad on the children’s lungs.

        • EPGAH

          You breathe ONCE? I’m sorry, do you not get the sheer difference in mass between a store and even the biggest box of cigarettes?
          Was there a gigantic air purifier involved in EITHER Ferguson cleanup and rebuild effort? I’d say NO. So the smoke will linger, plus piles of ash that will be kicked up by any activity in the area.

          But again, as much as I hate smoking, I’d say burning down a store that will be used by EVERYONE is much worse than smoking.
          Smoking is literally only hurting themselves and their own kids. Burning down a store is hurting someone else and their kids. From physically to financially.

          And why haven’t you or anyone else come up with a white version of Ferguson? I mean some SJWs mention these sports fans having mini-riots, but to compare the two is to compare a sidearm, even mine, to a field artillery piece. Far different in scale, scope, even purpose, right?

        • Jason Y

          And if you’re feeling exceptionally lucky, go ahead and shove their cigarettes into their faces, but I think that would work out about as well as trying to confiscate the Blacks’ weapons. I.e., it would go badly for you.

          LOL, and I’m sure a lot of child molesters could kick my ass too. They’re all not wimpy limp wrists. So the question remains, “Despite the possible danger should i take a stand against child abuse?”

        • EPGAH

          That depends on if you value your safety over others’.

          I worked in the military, I worked in a jail, I even defended my house from scum. So you can say I put aside my own survival (Or more precisely, the chance of it ENDING!) to keep others safe(r). Why can’t you?

          That’s that altruism that Liberals always preach, but Conservatives end up practicing more. Isn’t that an interesting pattern?

        • Jason Y

          quote by ep-gah

          And why haven’t you or anyone else come up with a white version of Ferguson? I mean some SJWs mention these sports fans having mini-riots, but to compare the two is to compare a sidearm, even mine, to a field artillery piece. Far different in scale, scope, even purpose, right?

          Actually, they have, but not much in this century. All your major revolutions, French, Russian etc.. involved burning and bloodshed. So actually what the blacks are doing is simply formenting some type of primitive revolution, in the guise of “blowing off steam”.

          These blacks are pissed off due to poverty, being clods in some prison/industrial complex, having neglected schools whatnot. They don’t respect the government (a key component of any revolutionary mode), so they riot.

        • EPGAH

          But that’s the thing, it’s NOT the same as whites’ revolution. Revolutions get put down HARD, from the Whiskey Rebellion to the Civil War. Remember those?

          If you want their riots to be considered the same, then they need to be TREATED the same. Otherwise, we’re treating the animals with kid-gloves and slapping our own people down hard…Of course they’re going to think–and worse, EXPECT–they’re “SPECIAL”, and expect us to keep putting up with their shit.

          They don’t respect the Government only because the Government hasn’t beaten some respect into them. Whites are always taught “REBELLION WILL BE PUT DOWN”. Savages are taught “You’re just ‘blowing off steam’, so we’ll put up with your shit!”
          See the difference?

  12. Negroess Negroess

    Treat people with respect. If the infrastructure is bad. It is not their fault. If they burn down everything in sight it is their fault. The bigotry of low expectations is hurting blacks and it is hurting white women who get to behave stupidly on college campuses with their safe spaces full of pink things and play dough. Treat negroes and white women as adults and not as children.

    • Jason Y

      Blacks are treated with high expectations. In the workforce and especially at university, no favors are given and standards are high, unless the course is highly based around opinions. For instance, perhaps a literature teacher might give pretty girls a higher grade without justification. That’s my brother said was happening, but that might have been BS.

  13. Jason Y

    No I don’t think the government is getting drained by our prison problem, cause they’ve simply found a way to make money from it. It’s pretty much a no-brainer. It’s the same thing which exists in the medical industry. It certainly isn’t a conspiracy theory.

    Yes, the government makes money, and also the corporations do so. Think about it. Why won’t they take a harsh “Chinese style” move against crime? Is it cause of some Jews pushing some sinister “We must love everyone.” agenda? I doubt it.

    It’s all about the money, as with everything. I doubt if any of the programs Republicans bitch about drain anyone, cause everything is an industry. As they say, “There is no free lunch”.. Nobody is giving away real charity. It’s all done from an angle to gain a profit.

  14. Jason Y

    I mentioned really snobby whites being as bad as so called “white trash”. It is true. These upper class whites lived trapped in a fantasy world of snobbery. While true, they are more healthy and are less likely to lie and cheat etc.., they have no heart. Thinking your better than other people definitely has a dark side to it.

    The upper class is often self righteous, pointing out losers won’t work or get an education. While that is often true, sometimes such words can be over-kill.

    Of course, the worst snob would be the actual rich, whom view almost everyone as garbage. However white nationalists aren’t far off, with some even harsh on white trash (like the commenter Ben Stiegamann on here) as well as on blacks, browns etc..

    • EPGAH

      Now you’re being hypocritical!
      YOU have said the reason whites are poor is because they’re lazy or uneducated. Now all of a sudden you’re turning against your own words?

      • Jason Y

        No, I’m just looking at the issue more realistically (from a moral standpoint). True whites are poor due to the reasons I stated, but there is no need for assholes to rub it in.

        • EPGAH

          Well, you’re one of those assholes on other threads, so are you going to punish yourself, or just shove your earlier statements under the rug?

          Or are you admitting whites are worse off because we get the low-IQ refuse of nonwhites, not just the good ones WE handpick?

          Or look up at William Playfair’s comment that he’s going to leave America, and that low-IQ whites aren’t much different than a brown nation?

  15. Another William Playfair Web

    Won’t let me post in the right spot, so….

    Tulio- “if he lived in Baltimore he would feel differently”
    Not all of Baltimore is bad, not all blacks are bad.

    If you are indeed black, I was mistaken. However, that does not change the fact that EPGAH is exaggerating, you’re black, you’ve probably known many black people, are some of his assertions not laughable?

    These blatant exaggerations and hysteria are what drives people away from HBD, HBDers looks like a bunch of nutcases.

  16. Negroess Negroess

    So we have second smoke from trash whites and second smoke from the neighbourhood bein burnt down from blacks. Hmmm. No contest. Here one can learn to smoke outside the house with a bit of push from school authorities. But building up an entire neighbourhood after it has been trashed is tough. Detroit never recovered from the race riots of the late sixties and the accompanying white flight.

    Smoking and burning down a neighbourhood are not the same thing. Maybe a curry nigger or a South Korean might open up a grocery in a burnt out negro neighbourhood but whites are ususually too traumatised by the violence to hang around.

  17. Jason Y

    quote by ep-gah

    If they look and act like Addams Family, how did they seduce your family member? I always wondered that. Who would WILLINGLY marry into a group with known negative values and behaviors, black, brown, white, or other?

    Unless maybe your family wasn’t so high above them as you thought?

    Our family has low values in that branch of the family cause my dad, who was a conservative guy like you, could not bond with his daughter. Plus she was also bullied at school cause of her looks. So she became a rebel.

    The downside to conservative dads is they’re often too harsh and cynical in some ways. Of course, that stuff works well in the military, but you have to put on a little romance with the family to seem human.

    • Jason Y

      A dad who drinks all the time, as a lot of 50s era dads and military dads do, doesn’t help the situation either.

    • Jason Y

      Our family does not have a low IQ with one family member even making 200,000 USD a year. The branches of the family which went bad, did so cause of rebellion, mostly rebellion with a root in an over-bearing alcoholic military dad.

      • EPGAH

        Wow, rebelling against the rules causes your life to go to shit.
        Who would have possibly imagined that?
        Oh, wait, that’s exactly what I tried to tell Tulio.
        Our “White Privilege” is because most of us follow the rules and we developed a REPUTATION of rule-following over the last 230 years.

        Why was she bullied at school?
        Girls were usually off-limits for bullying. UNLESS they develop breasts early, in which case the gloves indeed come off…but it’s other GIRLS who bully them, not even the most disgusting of males bully them.
        Herass, yes, bully, no.

  18. Jason Y

    Yeah, I agree some of ep-gah’s tough love solutions are good ideas. However, the point the ep-gah (I always put a dash cause of spam filters) doesn’t get, is that the US government does not want to help black people (among others). if they really did, they’d impose some more “tough love” solutions.

    Think about it. We can bomb the hell out of Iraq etc.., then why can’t we do harsh measures in black neighborhoods?

    Even the socialist things Robert speaks of, don’t really work to their best capacity, mainly cause the black environment is so bad, and it is so bad, because the US government does not really want to help black people.

    The government does want to help poor people, because it’s more profitable to throw them into the prison/industrial complex.

    • Negroess Negroess

      Really? It is all about profits. What profits. Any figures. How about the cost deducted from the taxes paid. Is that a profit? You got profit on the brain up to to the point where the government picks up the tab from taxes paid by the rest of society. There is no profit in throwing people in prison when it costs at the end of the day in huge tax hikes to pay for it all.

      I think I will write to the prime minister in Finland and see if he can dig this piece of American lunatic thinking. He can throw the working classes in prison instead of them being gainfully employed.

      Where is the rationality in taxes being deducted from the people to pay for all these jailbirds?

  19. Jason Y

    quote by ep-gah

    How many of the Ferguson, Baltimore or even Los Angeles, if you can remember that far back, businesses that got torched were RUN by Blacks? They don’t destroy their own. And if they did, there would be LESS reaction to it. No one cares if you destroy your own shit, you only get punished for destroying someone else’s. As to “look up the facts yourself”, you’re the one making this harebrained claim, so you should be the one to prove it. I worked in a jail for 2 years, I didn’t see them rent or lease any of the scum out.

    As to the other thing I said, how do you not get it? Didn’t your parents ever tell you, “Once you make your own money, THEN you get to make your own decisions”? That’s why most kids can’t wait to grow up and get their own job, right? People want to stay in control. Even scum whose entire life is subsidized by someone else, wants to make his or her own decisions, even though they’ve been repeatedly proven bad ones. (If people on Welfare were suddenly denied self-determination, especially the right to vote, you’d see a lot of them shape up and get off Welfare at light speed!) How much MORE then, should someone who makes their OWN money resent someone ELSE spending it for them?

    Anyone going into a black neighborhood, whether a middle class or upper class black, or non-black, knows the risk of setting up shop in a ghetto. Nobody’s that dumb. So when things go down, then that was one thing that had to be taken into consideration.

    Another example, would be people building hotels on a beachfront (hurricane risk etc..)

    All this stuff about welfare you mentioned means nothing, cause welfare is just another profit making scheme, much as prisons are. I don’t know any case of real charity. A case where profit isn’t being made.

    For instance, probably US farmers have some deal where they get some advantage sellings to government agencies etc..

    • Jason Y

      Mistake in HTML above, so here is my response to ep-gah again:

      Anyone going into a black neighborhood, whether a middle class or upper class black, or non-black, knows the risk of setting up shop in a ghetto. Nobody’s that dumb. So when things go down, then that was one thing that had to be taken into consideration.

      Another example, would be people building hotels on a beachfront (hurricane risk etc..)

      All this stuff about welfare you mentioned means nothing, cause welfare is just another profit making scheme, much as prisons are. I don’t know any case of real charity. A case where profit isn’t being made.

      For instance, probably US farmers have some deal where they get some advantage sellings to government agencies etc..

      • EPGAH

        OK, so what you’re saying is NOONE should set up shop–literally–in Black areas. Only pawnshops and liquor stores?

        Then the savages have to go into the GOOD side of town to get their food, right? You think they will somehow behave because they’re out of their pen? And this doesn’t strike you as THE recipe for disaster?

        Welfare as profit centers? I brought this same thing up earlier, but only the people who distribute the money are profiting. They take a vig for “Administrative Costs”™

    • EPGAH

      Also, your excuse about the ghetto only works in Los Angeles. Only the Asians were stupid/brave enough to build in the Ghetto Black side of town in Los Angeles.

      BUT in Ferguson, Los Angeles, Detroit, Baltimore, Black thugs came to the GOOD side of town to loot and burn. CVS and old-folks’ homes would never go into the ghetto. In the latter case, zoning is all wrong.

      Thus negating your idea of the ghetto as pigpen OR staying out of the ghetto as self-preservation “strategy”. Or are you saying we should designate whole CITIES as ghettos, “Black Reservations” in all but name, and no storeowner should build there? If so, can you Name which cities are ghettos?

      How are they going to get their food or other Needful Things?
      And what will Tulio say about that? Starvation would qualify very well as “oppression”!

  20. Jason Y

    quote by Tulio

    The caveat was if everything was reversed. And I mean EVERYTHING. That would mean blacks would be the dominant race that controlled everything, blacks brought whites to America as slaves and subjugated them for 400 years and had a history of brutal racism towards whites. I’m sure with a history like that, whites would be much more likely to riot if they felt they were beating unfairly shot and beaten by black cops. Especially if most of these whites were poor, confined to trailer parks and had little opportunity under a black run America while blacks controlled nearly all the wealth and resources.

    I think sometimes it’s important to do a mental exercise and just imagine if things were the flip opposite and it was blacks in power over a white minority, then how would you feel about what happened. Would you be somewhat more sympathetic of rioters if they were impoverished whites lashing out against an oppressive black power structure?

    Any time you see colonialism, this situation always comes up. Ep-gah cannot understand the effect that colonialism has on certain groups.

    However, ironically white nationalists do think they are being colonized by Jews. However, in that case, they believe the white nationalist resentment of Jews is justified. But isn’t that hypocritical?

    Basically white nationalists don’t believe blacks are a colonized people. They only think, they, themselves, white nationalists, are colonized, particularly by Jews.

    Also, in some weird way, sometimes white nationalists try to make it seem like any so called “colonialism of blacks” was really “colonialism by Jews” This phenemonen is also seen among racist black groups like the Nation of Islam etc..

    Again, going back to the topic, many blacks are full of poverty, but ep-gah doesn’t think such a situation will cause massive resentment against a white power structure.

    • Jason Y

      Mistake in above post. Meant to say “Again, going back to the topic, many blacks are full of poverty, but ep-gah doesn’t think such a situation should cause massive resentment against a white power structure.

    • EPGAH

      Whites did not make them breed more than they can afford.
      We provide Welfare for the savages.
      We provide free education.
      We TRY to provide law-enforcement.
      The latter two they fight against. So their poverty becomes their fault, not ours. We can PROVIDE all the facilities, but they actually have to WANT to use them!

      Read what Phil wrote. He’s a high-performing Black who seems to be ashamed not to be Black, but of fellow Blacks who smear the group’s reputation.

      And no, I don’t believe Blacks are “colonized”, otherwise we would have to treat them as feral abandoned pets. Instead, because they claim to be our equals, they’re basically immigrants. Sure their entry to America was against THEIR will rather than ours, but still, they’re in America, and therefore ahead of at least 40% of the world’s population. They are BORN with a prize (Living in the Civilized World) that MILLIONS of savages would kill or die to get–in one case, one killed its whole family to get to the Civilized World for “free” DENTAL CARE!
      But I guess familiarity breeds contempt, and now Blacks want to live here WITHOUT the annoying “rules” in the way.

      Why don’t they leave and make room for people who want to come in so badly, they’ll actually obey the rules? We have a 7-year immigration backlog, right? I’m sure if we run through the files with a fine enough filter, we could find non-criminals who would obey OUR rules, don’t you?

  21. Jason Y

    quote by ep-gah

    No, I don’t. And you know why? Because whites were oppressed for 700 years by Moorish invaders into Europe. Not 400, 700!
    Everything was reversed, these savages oppressed us in our own country, made us pay an EXTRA tax just to continue existing–and sometimes killed us even when our Existence Tax (Protection Money) was fully paid up. At risk of oversimplifying, we subjugated savages so they would stop subjugating us. And then we let them go!
    And we still take care of them.

    The Moors were not Sub-Saharan Africans, the ones whom Europeans enslaved. In fact, the Moors enslaved Sub-Saharan Africans.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s