Allow 8-10,000 Muslim Immigrants into the US Every Year

I would support allowing 8-10,000 Muslim immigrants into the country every year. The reason is that we let in 1 million immigrants per year. Muslims are now only .8% of the population. If we let in 8,000 Muslims per year, then the Muslim population will not grow, as we are only letting in Muslims as a precise percentage of their already existing population.

The main issue with Muslims in my opinion is to not increase the population in the US. In other words, going from .8% Muslims to 2% Muslims would be a bad idea. Going from .8% Muslims to 5% Muslims would be much more of a problem along the lines of what a number of West European countries are experiencing now. If the Muslim population stays at .8%, then letting 10,000 Muslim in a year will not budge that figure one bit. They will remain ~1% forever at that rate.

On the other hand, their population could grow due to a high birth rate. But once again, the issue with Muslim immigration is that Muslim immigration in and of itself should not increase the % of the population that is Muslim in the US. As long as Muslim immigration is low enough that it is not increasing the Muslim population as as % of the whole, then Muslim immigration is not a problem.

24 Comments

Filed under Immigration, Islam, Legal, Regional, Religion, Sociology, USA

24 responses to “Allow 8-10,000 Muslim Immigrants into the US Every Year

  1. Shawn

    I would support reversing the poz by sending Muslims back to their home countries. Create a safe zone for Syrians in neighboring Muslim countries.

    • EPGAH

      That sounds great! They would change their tune within a few hours of some “refugees” camping out in their front yards!

      Come to think of it, why DON’T their fellow Moslems want them around? Saudi Arabia could afford it, but all they’ve offered to do is pay to build Mosques in their new host countries, not pay their upkeep or anything!
      Maybe they don’t want troublemakers any more than we do?

      • It’s not true at all that their fellow Muslims do not want the Syrians. Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey are swarming with Syrian refugees right at this moment, and Jordan has had Iraqi refugees for a long time, millions of them. The Syrian refugees are not causing many problems in Lebanon , Turkey and Jordan. They are pathetic victims more than anything else. The Iraqi refugees also caused few problems in Jordan.

        As far as why the Saudis and the Gulf states won’t take them, I have no idea.

        • EPGAH

          You forget that Jordan’s castoffs are HAMAS. Syrian “refugees” probably won’t cause any problems in other Moslem Cult countries, because they won’t get away with the same shit in Moslem Cult countries that they do in France, Germany, UK, etc.

          There won’t be any shooting up theaters, any demands to live in the better areas of town, any bitching about their accommodations and food.
          Or those savage “refugees” will simply stop existing…And they know it.
          They know they can get away with that shit in the Civilized World.

        • EPGAH

          And then, of course, there’s suicidal idiocy like this:
          http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/12/10/sessions-senate-moves-ratify-immigration-foreign-muslims-civil-right/
          Making invasion of America a “Civil Right”?

          Why give our rights to our enemies? The only ones NOT getting rights are the Americans ourselves!
          No wonder the savages think they can get away with anything!

        • EPGAH

          In the last five years, according to Department Homeland Security data, the U.S. issued 83,000 green cards to Iraq, 83,000 green cards to Pakistan, and 11,000 to Afghanistan.

          As Sessions declared in his remarks:

          The rights that have been neglected by this Congress are the rights of the American people. The rhetoric today would have you believe we have been operating some kind of closed-door immigration policy. The opposite is true. No nation on earth has ever let in more people over a shorter period of time. We have admitted 59 million immigrants since 1965. We have admitted 1.5 million immigrants from Muslim countries since 9/11. We have the largest foreign-born population in our history as a raw number, and soon the largest percentage of non-native-born in the history of the Republic. As a share of population, it will soon eclipse every historical record. Meanwhile, large companies are exploiting programs to replace American workers and undermine their wages. Poor screening has resulted in thousands of crimes against Americans. Our entitlement programs are stretched. Wages have been flattened for decades. Every year, we admit another 1 million permanent immigrants, nearly 100,000 refugees and asylees, and 700,000 foreign guest workers. Though it appears that day will not be today, perhaps we should have a conversation soon about how to help the tens of millions of Americans who are only just barely scraping by.*
          Sounds like what I’ve been writing, except more elegant.

          Sessions, Cruz, and Vitter, were the only ones who voted against it!

        • EPGAH

          There are also 2.3 MILLION “Economic Refugees” from Turkey in Germany who refuse to leave or assimilate, so I think Turkey has exactly ZERO room to bitch about refugees.
          Especially since their own people are taking “refuge” not from religious or political persecution, but their OWN BAD DECISIONS which made them poor. Usually the “decision” to breed more than they could afford. They want to steal and use all the tech of the Civilized World EXCEPT birth-control tech, apparently?

          Either way, “Economic Refugee” is a horrible twisting of the language.

  2. Toe Jam Football

    To Rob:

    I would support allowing 8-10,000 Muslim immigrants into the country every year.

    I don’t know these Kurdish women look pretty oppressive:

    And man Iran looks even worse:

  3. EPGAH

    You forget, Moslems breed way more than other groups, ESPECIALLY ON OUR DIME!
    Start with the Iranian “OctoMom”.

    If we NEUTERED them as they entered, THAT would keep their percentage of the population static, but if healthcare is considered a “right” in America, then breeding even MORESO, right?

    There’s also a documented progression of how Moslem terrorist behavior changes — for the worse (for us) — as their percentage of a country’s population increases!

    https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20101108011156AAhk4Xs

  4. EPGAH

    “In these riots, we saw Muslims who don’t practice the Islamic religion in their daily lives standing up for their culture and religion in a very aggressive way. Copenhagen was smoking for an entire week due to several hundred of fires, and the police and firemen trying to calm the situation down were also attacked. A big part of the rioters ended up in the prison where I worked, and I therefore I had the chance to talk with them. Almost all of them were Muslims, and they all claimed that what they have done—starting fires, attacking the police etc.—was justified since Danish society, through its pressure on integration and through reprinting the Mohammed cartoons, has proven itself to be racist and against Islam and Muslim culture. ”

    This is from your own article in 2010!

    How do we avoid Moslems “standing up for their culture” in America like they did in Denmark, and continue to do in France, Sweden, Germany, even the UK?

  5. EPGAH

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/12/10/joy-brighton-sharia-is-already-here-and-growing-in-america/
    Hilariously, even the FEMINISTS are against the Moslems now, which they formerly supported to smash the Evil White Male Hegemony (Or something like that)!

    Bottom line at the end of the day, feminism is about POWER. She recognizes that Moslems also want POWER, to rule absolutely, and that is a serious threat to feminist ambitions.

  6. SHI

    I have nothing against Muslims as a “people”. They’re human beings just like everyone else. As long as they’re actively willing to distance themselves from Islam and all it stands for, I’ll treat them just like I treat others. I’ve known more than a few apostates and ex-Muslims. It turns out I found each one of them a superb, amazing person.

    There’s something seriously wrong with Islam as a religious ideology. It’s like just another brainwashing cult similar to Westboro Baptist Church or the Ku Klux Klan. Just that it has gathered more than 1.2 billion followers which makes it appear more mainstream.

  7. SHI

    Some amazing testimonies from people who successfully renounced the Islamic death cult

    http://www.skeptical-science.com/people/people-leave-islam-exmuslim-stories/

    This girl’s message is very heartfelt. Indeed, Islam can “damage the core being of any individual”. The sooner one wakes up from this poisonous belief system, the better.

    Sonia Wahab, UK
    This is Sonia Wahab. The current statement is my testimony that I am now an atheist and an apostate of Islam. I am from Pakistan which claims to be an Islamic republic state but really struggling hard to fit the frame of democracy in Islam. I have seen horrors of religion from a closer eye because Jihad is the main spirit behind suicide bombing which takes tolls on life of thousands every year. Islam is a religion of submission and those who do not submit against the power are subject to killing. I testify here that Islam has damaged the core of my being and have taken away some real opportunities to experience the life in free and secure environment. Wherever Islam is there is fear and deadly silence. Although I have left Islam but I think Islam will never leave me. My fight against Islam will never end.I appreciate networking through social media and share my experiences of leaving Islam with other Ex-Muslims, otherwise, it is impossible for me to be my real self in a sick and decayed Islamic system. Islam is a monster of 21st Century and we all have to resist its violence under any fear or threat.

  8. asdsad

    Muslims are different, it is kind of pointless to say all muslims would cause problems – it is mostly arabs and those african muslims that would cause problems if they would move to USA. South-East Asian, Central-Asian and even Middle-East Shia muslims probably would not cause that much problems especially if it is “selected immigration”

    • EPGAH

      We are no longer a young nation trying to build a population, at this point we should only be taking immigrants that fill a need and are a benefit to US. Yes, there are poor, abused, needy people all over the world but we can’t take in all of them. We can’t save the world. We are at the point where empathy for foreigners should not be to the detriment of our own citizens. And that has been the case for some time, we are being flooded with Hispanics who don’t assimilate and become a drain on society, and now that has expanded to TERRORISTS that are not only a drain but present a real danger!

      Stop all immigration, from any and all. We don’t NEED them anymore — if we ever did. 10 year pause and then re-evaluate. Then let in only the ones that are a benefit to US!

  9. Halal Butcher of Lhasa

    As a wealthy magnet to N African refugee,there’s a way for the americans to solve the migration crisis. Both US and the arabs have history of slavery.I suggest the americans can offer the arab refugees permanent abode in exchange of 7 yrs of bonded labor or slavery at US$1/hour which certainly is cheaper than the cost of maintaining industrial robots. What better way to revive manufacturing and infrastructure building? That will also help corporate America to depress wage. To promote arab social change and human rights,like the previous example of admitting gay Cubans, the majority of them should be gay or herectic(like ismailis)muslim arab. Israel actually is a magnet to gay arabs. The white nationalists can also ease their demographic/sexual worry since those gay arabs would have much lower possibility of impregnating white women and procreation

  10. Budgie

    Muslam:
    1. Puts women in their place.
    2. Executes homophiles.
    3. Allows men to marry little girls.

    What exactly is the problem?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s