Whites Are One of the Few People on Earth Who Willingly Give up Their Privileges to Help Outsiders

Jason Y writes:

quote by ep-gah

Any group that gains power seeks advantage for self. Whites do not actively seek disadvantage for non-self. In fact, we’re the only group that considers racism “wrong” and has Affirmative Action, hurting ourselves to help our enemies!

I wonder what Robert Lindsay’s take on this is. Surely this comment is an exaggeration.

Anyhow I don’t think whites are “helping their enemies.” It seems more like some attempt (by the elite class) to buy off an oppressed group, whom otherwise would foment revolution.

Also, anytime you bring up racism, you have to distinguish between racism and “chauvinism and oppression”. Racism being the recognition of racial differences, or dividing mankind on those lines. On the other hand, the other thing, is racism going into overkill.

It is true that we are the only group who will go out of our way to help outsiders. Everyone else just oppresses them and thinks of their own first. Whites are the only group that does not think of their own first and willingly gives up some of their privileges to help outsiders. And Whites are the least racist people on Earth, pretty much.

Everyone else is zero-sum game – everything for us, and nothing for anyone else, our group first – everyone else second or not at all.

Although SE Asians, Central Asians (except some of the Muslims) and Pacific Islanders are not pretty altruistic.

86 Comments

Filed under Anti-Racism, Culture, Europeans, Race/Ethnicity, Racism, Whites

86 responses to “Whites Are One of the Few People on Earth Who Willingly Give up Their Privileges to Help Outsiders

  1. Jason Y

    i think the motive of the white race’s aturism, so to speak, could be coming from an advanced civlilzation. Most of the third world is a less advanced civilization, complete with less advanced morality.

    Note, usually the response you get on why, “We have a right to be selfish, rather than the oppressor white people.” involves some statement like, “We are small, or we are weak.”. The excuse in itself, is very childish. Ultimately, you just get these same excuses, along with bitching on why people should be less racist AGAINST THEM (without they themselves trying to be less racist).

    However, then again, some of the so called “white compassion” is fake. For instance, a lot of the civil rights laws, Great Society etc,. were all measures to “buy off the working class”, specifically non-whites who could forment revolution. For instance, if you actually took a poll, a lot of white people, especially white southern USA people, were opposed to some or all of the “pro-non-white” legislation passed.

    Finally, going back to the original topic, it could be a case of culture, rather than race. If you raised a non-white in a liberal white household, then they’d probably develop white liberal morality. No, I wouldn’t say it “could be”, generally, it is.

    • Jason Y

      Of course though, with money comes more a responsiblity to be kind. A lot of third world people probably figure since they have no money, then they ask, “Why should they be kind?”. On the other hand, people who grow up with money are constantly hounded by others to be “givers” rather than takers. That eventually becomes a part of “rich culture”, so to speak.

      • Jason Y

        One excuse I heard on non-white forums was the fact, they didn’t oppress other non-whites. Hence they have no guilt trip about being racist against other non-white ethnic groups, and believe me they are.🙄

        But again, it’s another childish excuse, mostly coming from the fact they’ve never had money, and hence, as I said above, never developed a heart for generosity (unless it’s for their own literal family (mom, dad, cousins etc..).

        • EPGAH

          Blacks and Mexicans can freely invade territory where whites and our law holds sway, but in areas where Blacks or Mexicans hold sway, the other two groups better stay out if they value survival. Similarly, areas held by Moslem terrorists, Christians can expect to get rocks thrown at them, and the women can expect to get raped, where Christians do not persecute the terror-cult’s adherents in any such form…

          I hope if pushed enough, whites fight back, but so far, it looks like the PC crowd has whites too cowed.

          Also, Oxytocin, the hormone responsible for empathy, ALSO causes tribalistic behavior! Indeed, most scientists believe empathy originally came about to make mammals sacrifice for their OWN FAMILY or their OWN TRIBE, not their enemies!

    • Jason Y

      Note any race will help you out if there is financial gain for them. However, these same people often show no pity for people whom thier help gives them no financial gain.

      For instance, you often see racist remarks by Filipinos against blacks. They just don’t care about the African American struggle and probably laugh at American films where a guilt trip is trying to be layed upon the audience.

      This is odd considering Filipinos, among others worldwide are dirt poor, and if anything should feel empathy for other poor people, but they don’t.

    • Jason Y

      I think though it’s possible that rich non-white person might show more empathy for other races, and be more of a giver, than is usual for his race. Of course, a lot of it may be ego and showing off the cash, but still some heart there, nonetheless.

    • Matt

      Of course this more advanced civilization is completely an accident, a fluke of fate if you will. I just went to bed in a Hobbesian environment of war of all against all, and when I woke up I had an IPhone and a philosophy of human rights and dignity. Weird, man.

  2. Jason Y

    Yeah definitely people need a little money, so they can learn to be kind. Ironically, the poor are often the biggest assholes.🙄 Mainly cause they’ve never been layed with guilt trip about having more money than others. So I guess Charles Dickens was wrong, aye?🙄

  3. Jason Y

    Sorry about rambling on. This is my last comment for today on this thread:

    I think poor white people may be just like blacks, Latinos, Asians etc.. A lot of them, especially in the south, are stingy and also show no compassion for other races. They’re the main people to tell “nigger jokes”, and they just don’t give a shit about the African or Latino experience.

    Again, I see the base of this “poor white lack of empathy” to have a root in the fact that the poor white people have never had any money or power. They’ve never been in a position where a guilt trip might be layed upon them.

    • EPGAH

      And yet it still is, relentlessly hounded by idiots preaching “White Privilege”, how they’re “racist” if they don’t let their enemies in and willingly give up their jobs and whatever money they have to their enemies!

    • EPGAH

      Also, the poor and middle class are the ones threatened by nonwhite violence. I would even go so far as to say that only the rich can AFFORD to be so tolerant of the nonwhites’ shenanigans — and even then, only because they’re safely ensconced behind gates and walls and private armies that would make any medieval King jealous!

      Maybe this is an additional reason poor and middle class whites don’t particularly want to fund (AKA ENABLE) their enemies?

  4. The present-day White man is by no means more altruistic by nature, he is so only by learned behaviour, just read about comparative history, especially as regards the history of mentalities founded by late Fernand Braudel. Just a few centuries ago, Western Europe was together with Black Africa and maybe worse the place on earth where nobody would be helped as soon as one manifested the slightest genetic difference, villages were at war one with another on a normal basis. Hospitality for the stranger, xenophilia as it was called (though only for those who had a gentle approach) was on the other hand known in many Semitic countries as well as in Greek-speaking Asia Minor, which are countries you don’t consider particularly White. The present-day apparent altruism of Western Whites towards genetically distant people is the result of a very artificial programming, quite like, though on a lesser scale, the domestication of wolves into well-schooled tame dogs.

    Actually it is the result of no generosity at all, those White that open up most to other races quite often plainly hate their own poor even the more and love the stranger as a precious object as long as he can dictate the terms of the encounter as with sexual encounters with objects of phantasies, as soon as the said stranger no longer behaves as the object of desire imagined, they go back to an even nastier form of racism. That phenomenon was already observed centuries ago among the leisure class of many European cities, where contrary to the mores of nearly everybody around some bourgeois families loved to buy little black or indian children for their own entertainment and as a show of universalism of some sort as per the tenets of abstract Christianity or Stoic Philosophy, but nobody was duped that those people were nastier in general with their employees and their own relatives.

    The inordinately xenophiliac Whites you speak about are actually subject to a process not of apprenticeship into altruism but of mimesis of very intolerant and difference-repellent successful role models, what they want to get nearer to by going towards non-Whites are not the real non-White persons but quite the contrary the dehumanized human objects possessed and promoted by the affluent whom alone the curry the favour of, people are also more and more into race-mixing and international adoption just to use the language barrier and the emotional makeup difference to prevent the proper use of the logos by the other and keep the communications unclear, this is of paramount importance as businesses get shadier and shadier. The great majority of Whites are not more altruistic but more servile to archetypes that call for the obliteration of his own idiosyncrasies. Most Whites that are into altruism towards non-Whites are there for the career, the money or the living, they don’t like them actually.

    Last but not least altruism towards non-whites as a learned behavioural pattern not only just proves the White Man’s better ability to be programmed, but also is bound to be reversed at once as soon as the economic conditions get really bad. This is the case in present-day Russia, which is recovering from the abnormally and artificially anti-racist stance of the Communist era.

    • Jason Y

      The present-day White man is by no means more altruistic by nature, he is so only by learned behaviour.

      It’s mostly an attitude of the “guilty rich”. Note that the “white trash”, “wiggers” (ironically because they’re trying to act black, etc..) who are the least empathetic toward other races. Of course, the non-whites themselves, that is, if thier income is less than the Cosby family, are likely also to be stingy, unempathetic losers.

      With the un-empathetic poor, the main concern is money flowing in thier direction. They never tip at restaurants, assuming they ever go to one anyway. They won’t give to someone in need, unless it’s family, and even then there is a good chance they’re doing it for some “return on their investment”.

      Perhaps the Hindus are right about a lot of the poor. Until they learn to give up at least 5 percent of thier measly income they have now, how will their karma ever improve?

    • Jason Y

      ast but not least altruism towards non-whites as a learned behavioural pattern not only just proves the White Man’s better ability to be programmed, but also is bound to be reversed at once as soon as the economic conditions get really bad. This is the case in present-day Russia, which is recovering from the abnormally and artificially anti-racist stance of the Communist era.

      Right interesting point. You see the Russians are just becoming like these poor whites in the US. Thier attitude is becoming selfish, mainly because they don’t have any money for charity. They’re turning into people with their handout, but unwilling to give even 1 percent of thier low income.

      Somehow, during the Communist era, they promoted anti-racism and a lot of people bought into it. However,minus this propoganda, you find, as i was saying, that most of the poor are the least charitable and empathetic.

    • Jason Y

      Most Whites that are into altruism towards non-Whites are there for the career, the money or the living, they don’t like them actually.

      I don’t think that’s true at all. There is a class of white people, usually middle class or rich, who show genuine compassion toward the poor of any race. You see them giving to St Jude’s hospital, or maybe some “Feed the Children” charity in Africa.

      However, notice though, as I was saying, the poor are much less likely to give (even a few cents) to any charity.

      • We are not speaking about the same bourgeoisie exactly : I am mostly referring to the “bobo” (bourgeois-bohemian) class of Paris and also that of New York, San Francisco and Los Angeles that has been fashioned in the same way, the chattering class as you call it. False representation is their domain, their living, their vocation, and now that they have renounced to tie their fates with the development of social programs, they go for the NGO’s. I acknowledge the North-Eastern “puritan” tradition, that of the first Yankees who settled as religious utopians dead intent to make their lifestyle dreams come true in real daily life rather than only in literary production, and later on fought most for the abolition of slavery in the US, though not perfect, to be far more genuine.

      • EPGAH

        And yet, ironically, it’s the CONSERVATIVES who give more to charity!

    • Jason Y

      That phenomenon was already observed centuries ago among the leisure class of many European cities, where contrary to the mores of nearly everybody around some bourgeois families loved to buy little black or indian children for their own entertainment and as a show of universalism of some sort as per the tenets of abstract Christianity or Stoic Philosophy, but nobody was duped that those people were nastier in general with their employees and their own relatives.

      Were they, or is that just a white nationalist myth? They might have just been kind to any poor person, perhaps taking many as pets. Didn’t the wealthy Romans also keep pet slaves?

      Well, the wealthy (in antebellum times) also kept black slaves on huge plantations. I didn’t see how they treated them as pampered pets, other than the “house slaves”.

      Finally maybe the poor whites were jealous of the “foreign human pets” they had, even if the rich were treating all their “pets”, foreign or non-foreign the same.

      • Jason Y

        As I said the poor are often stingy creeps. Yeah, of course, they hate seeing “darker” slaves getting pampered. It’s because they want the charity. But note, these poor whites, as Iv’e said over and over, don’t want to give charity in the other direction.

  5. Santoculto

    White romans were ”altruistic” when decide ”help” other (celtic) people that ”they” slaughtered in the past.

    or supposed ”altruism” is in the reality a excuse for

    create a delusional collective self (narcisism) among whites,
    and facilitates europe capitulation via en masse immigrazione,😉

    • Jason Y

      When santo-culto mentions whites, he’s only speaking of “rich or upper class whites”. Well, those people should be guilty. I don’t think its narcicism, it’s just a justified guilt trip. However, as I was saying, notice the selfish attitude of the poor, who don’t feel they owe anyone anything.

    • Jason Y

      White romans were ”altruistic” when decide ”help” other (celtic) people that ”they” slaughtered in the past.

      or supposed ”altruism” is in the reality a excuse for

      create a delusional collective self (narcisism) among whites,
      and facilitates europe capitulation via en masse immigrazione,😉

      You can’t group all charity as being the same. There is a big difference in helping poor people who aren’t a threat, say poor black or white people in the USA, and encouraging immigration from a Muslim land.

      Probably the Romans could help out the Celts cause they weren’t a threat no more. At that point, the Romans wanted stability and wanted the Celts to be workers, making the empire more prosperous.

    • Oh you see white altruistic nature is more of a modern era phenomenon.

      Outbreeding is likely a cause of this, inbreeding would create clannish people.

      Also, while I’m not suggesting you have favorites among races, I rarely see you make criticisms towards whites specifically and more often criticize stuff they created (e.i. capitalism).

      • looking back at the scoreboard however I think I have my answer.

      • Jason Y

        It’s not really that poor people of any race won’t give charity, but also about the fact, they don’t have an empathetic side to them at all. They literally hate poor people of other races. They feel they’re in competition with them. They’re always mocking them, insulting them etc..

        People who are that childish and selfish don’t command a lot of respect.

  6. Santoculto

    Real altruism is act via honesty AND sincerity.

  7. Jason Y

    I think religion can possibly make the poor of any race more empathetic. But note religion is a form of “learned behavior”. Empathy has to be literally taught to certain people, cause they don’t have the money to make them feel guilty.

    • When Robert talk’s about the empathy of whites, he’s more talking about the white “elites” or representative population rather than the poor.

      Poor whites, while still whites, play the roles of people who are to be helped rather than the helpers most of the time.

      • Jason Y

        Poor whites, while still whites, play the roles of people who are to be helped rather than the helpers most of the time.

        Yeah, that’s true, but it’s also turned them into selfish narrow-minded people, and I would also say the same for the non-white poor.

        It’s always about “help me” rather than, me, myself giving to someone or trying to get a job to improve myself so I can give to someone (other than giving ot family).

      • Santoculto

        White ”elites” are far to be altruistic. There are some subgroups of europeans and descendants who are very ideacionally altruistic and many them are being used as horse trojan by jewish beast.

        • exactly, and those would be the types who people like EPAGH would be referring to when they bring up this topic.

        • Jason Y

          Right, some friends of poor non-white people, and of poor white people might have a pure loving motivation. Nonetheless, they can be used as a Trojan for more “sinister” plans, so to speak. However, we can all say that if we are cheated for our generosity, then in the next life the cheaters will pay.

  8. Guy from Montréal

    What about all those Hollywood phonies who partake in charities? seems they mostly do it to out of narcissism and self promotion, no they just can’t discreetly donate and be modest about it oh no, it’s always some photo opp event where a bunch of douchebag stars gather together to boast about how much their giving, or boasting about how many third world ethnic babies they’ve adopted (or added to their collection) this is where vanity is passed for altruism.

    • Guy from Montréal

      That’s right Bono you big phonie!

    • Jason Y

      The solution to that problem would be in the BIble. Do the charity in secret! Yeah, definitely it’s an ego boost for the Hollywood Stars, and also, often it doesn’t make a difference. The money just goes to some corrupt political leader.

      • Jason Y

        If a person could control the flow of money himself, then the charity would be more trustworthy. A western union directly to starving African kids would work, assuming you knew the kids would pick it up and buy food with it.

        • EPGAH

          As opposed to buy drugs, smokes, or weapons, which is what happens a lot nowadays? Here’s an idea, the old “Sandwich Test” put to reality:
          Buy the “poor” a sandwich instead of giving him money. If he refuses, he’s in it for something untrustworthy. Remember there was that article about that middle-class guy who panhandled and bragged he made $200-800 a day?

        • Jason Y

          Ep-gah may have a point. However, whose to say they couldn’t sell the food (stuff sent as food not as money to buy food) and then get they want?

          However, my guess in a lot of places they’re pretty hungry, and will accept the money for food (if the money is sent directly to them) or the food itself.

        • Jason Y

          I don’t really believe guys who are out begging by the side of the road. Actually, these guys (except for the ones who truly have thier legs chopped off) could cook or wait tables at the Waffle House (and similar places). It’s a tough job, and they’re always hiring, cause nobody wants to do the job. It’s too tough.

    • Jason Y

      Well, to be honest, rock stars are the most wasteful bastards imaginable. For all the talk of “hippie love”, they literally blow (I mean Cocaine here) millions of dollars which would feed millions of 3rd world children.

      Wasn’t it Robin Williams who said, “A cocaine habit is a sure sign you have too much money.” But then again, what is too much money? There is no such thing. Many needy people need the money.

      • Jason Y

        Look how these rock star creeps trash high priced hotel rooms and think it’s a joke. It would take the poor a whole year just to spend the night in one of those places!

  9. Michael H

    “Western Europe was together with Black Africa and maybe worse the place on earth where nobody would be helped as soon as one manifested the slightest genetic difference.”

    “Hospitality [for the Germanic tribes of the Dark Ages] was obligatory. According to Burgundian Law, ‘anyone who refuses to offer a visitor shelter and warmth shall pay a fine of 3 solidi’…Hospitality was a sacred duty, religious in its essence (both pagan and Christian).” Michel Rouche, A History of Private Life from Pagan Rome to Byzantium, 1987, pages 440-1

    • Santoculto

      The problem to debate with people like J is that they are prolific to create this kind of sentences, in few words they:

      generalize totally (wrong… don’t mistakes averagedization with wrong generalization as ”all/most of young blacks are just like angels in NY”…. a good example of right averagedization= ”many young blacks are not just like angels in NY”) ..

      a bunch of white and black peopleS,

      said historical factoids,
      said genetic factoids,
      said psychological/behavioural factoids (conclusively)

      to ”combat (WHITE) racism”.

      Michael H,

      be object and ask for him what he think about immigration and miscigenation in Europe*

      Slippy people need to be placed in the front of wall all the time if not they will try ”win” the debate with bad semantic manipulation.

      • Santoculto

        Objective and not object, sorry,😉

      • Beheading is painless

        I have always thought that Jason y is confused as to what he is. He often attacks right wingers but often comes across as a right winger. I am more comfortable with the extremes as you know what you are dealing with. The best people are the extreme left like me.

        • Jason Y

          The extreme left is ludicrous. “Yeah, we should let in everyone into Europe and America.” No, not really.

          However, then again, coming out against non-whites who already live in the west (especially Afro-Americans who have been here since the 1600s), and also saying false things like “Miscegenation is a crime against nature, equal to incest.” is false. The extreme right is also supports other bad things like “support of an end to reasonable welfare”, and social darwinism.

          I don’t see how the extreme left or extreme right can be defended. They’re both incredibly wrong.

          Of course, I did say the genetic theory of IQ did make sense up to a point, and I gave incest as a possible root of it. However, the far right doesn’t like that explanation, cause that would make “low IQ” highly curable, probably even within a few generations. That would threaten white supremacy.

        • Jason Y

          The extreme left has no real answer to crime. At least i gave one, “Let’s improve the environment as much as possible, while at the same time, being as tough as possible on criminals.” It’s a win, win situation.

          Now the extreme right, on the other side, will not have an improved environment cause they think eugenics, apart from reasonable eugenics like the avoiding of incest, will solve all problems, and also deporting every non-white imaginable, even ones who aren’t Latino.

        • Jason Y

          Even the commenter Swank, who was banned, wasn’t totally left wing. He was opposed to immigration, especially since nowadays, it isn’t a “melting pot” immigration. In other words, the new groups are “too ethnic” and they aren’t really becoming American or European etc..

          Of course Swank was trying to say IQ was totally environmental which was wrong. Maybe he just didn’t factor in the incest factor. I mean, if millions of people (and we see this with Arabs as an example) are dating thier first cousin, well, what can you expect?

        • Jason Y

          As ep-gah pointed out, you can’t get tough on crime due to sensitive non-whites. In that case, my idea of improving the environment while getting tough on crime won’t work. Then again it might work, but for sure, any attempt by Trump to deport illegals will plunge the US into chaos anyway.

        • Jason Y

          Trump and his fascist look alikes which will gain power in Europe might plunge those places into chaos, but many people (white people especially) will get jobs and will be sheltered from the stuff going on. However, you can be sure a police state worse than W. Bush will come about.

        • EPGAH

          Consider this: if we got rid of forty million immigrants who take twenty-five million jobs, they would take maybe five million jobs with them. Twenty million jobs would open up for young and other low-skilled persons. Black people would take a disproportionate number of those jobs, which persons with master’s and PhD’s would often put their noses up at.

          Five to ten million dwellings would be vacated, putting downward pressure on rents. Traffic would thin out. Lines at food banks would become shorter as immigrants wouldn’t be in them , nor would many persons who now had jobs.

          ESL and Spanish classes would be reduced in number and general ed classes to a lesser extent. Much of the money saved would be pissed away on football and teachers’ benefits. Still, things like school music programs could be revived. Bonded debts could be paid down.

          I don’t think Black people are blind to this. That’s why Trump’s numbers with black people are so good. I suspect that among those who don’t have a felony record, those who have a vote, the proportion is even higher.

          This is a reprint from Starry Wilk https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2015/09/07/something-wicked-this-way-comes/#comment-239064

        • EPGAH

          Al-Jazeera, the most ridiculous of the Extreme Left “news” Websites, made a claim similar to yours, that somehow getting rid of illegals would spark a civil war.

          http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2015/9/trumps-immigration-plan-is-a-recipe-for-civil-war.html

          It almost sounds like he HOPES for it, and/or veiled threat of it, “And if only a small percentage of the various conspiracist anti-government fringe movements’ members aren’t white supremacists, the detention camps a Trump administration would have to hastily construct would push at least dozens of them over the edge.”

          In other words, you’d better grant amnesty to illegals, or some of my more crazy brethren might go apeshit on you!

          How many of these idiots with bumper stickers saying “No Human Being Is Illegal” are actually willing to take up arms and risk their many comforts on behalf of their cheap Mexican gardeners and maids?

          There’s even a bit where he compares Sanctuary Cities with States Rights. Amazing, when it comes to Queer Marriage, the Left WANTS the Federal Government to walk all over lesser elements of the hierarchy, but when it comes to illegals…people like Harris become the George Wallace of open borders.

          The “White Supremacy” part of his spiel is even more ridiculous, as if America’s elites WERE White Supremacist, they would not allow white Americans to dwindle to 60% of our own country! The same passage also says basically, the Left is beholden to the Evil Elites they so hate. Without their “benevolence”, illegals would be at the mercy of their American hosts. Wait, what’s wrong with that?

          Uncle Sam has no problem maintaining military bases all around the globe, assassinating terrorists with drones, or spying on the entire country via the NSA. If the American government really wanted to, they could easily stem the tide of immigration.

          You know a country is in trouble when the IDEA of kicking out invaders prompts comparisons to Hitler and threats of Civil War! However, if this shit keeps pouring in, our country will collapse under Third World deadweight, and then we really WILL have a Civil War!

    • Jason Y

      Hospitality and kindness is what made Europe and America great. Perhaps, what is going on is the fact colonialism and imperalism have ruined much of the world so much, that now all these people are storming into the 1st world to escape. With so many coming in, and many being criminal, it’s nearly impossible to support open borders nowadays.

      • Beheading is painles

        I thought technology and innovation made the west great.

        Any way you say the extreme left has no solutions. Wrong. The solution to poverty is a strong left government, which allows business to flourish while maintaining a total grip on power. We see this in China, and Russia.

        Now we suffer from terrorism in France. But lo and behold the extreme left in Central Asia is completely untouched. How is it that the extreme left is untouched? They know how to deal with the terror threat.

        So now we see two examples of economic success lifting hundreds of millions of people out of poverty and we see the world’s untouched by terrorism in central Asian nations who deal with the slightest whiff of dissent as regards jihad with an iron fist.

        So you are wrong. The extreme left in the countries mentioned actually lift people out of poverty, defend their borders, and fight terrorism effectively.

      • Beheading is painless

        Innovation and technology made the west great.

  10. Antonio G.

    A factor of this may be how society in other cultures view the ways they must teach their young ones. A society might believe that you should help yourself before helping others because your life is important. If one society teaches their young ones this, then those young ones would only do what they were thought, and it may never change. Of course, another factor may be racism between cultures or oppression, but I don’t know.

  11. Beheading is painless

    So Dubya had a police state, which ceded power to a democrat presidents. Sounds like a rubbish police state.

    Jason y you use words as you see fit. This confuses your thinking.

  12. Beheading is painless

    Immigration brings benefits to an extreme left government in terms of votes. Enough votes and one party takes over. Th democrats have tried hard to do this but they have failed. But hopefully in the future the democrats will take over for good.

    As a person Trump is a likeable guy, but his party policies are too right wing. His likability compared to the the miserable personalities in the democrat camp makes for an interesting election.

    What the dens need is strong personality types like Lenin or Stalin, but alas they have Biden and Hilary.

    • Jason Y

      Your saying women can’t be strong? Is this bias due to traditional Islamic thinking?

      • Beheading is painless

        Hilary is strong but a corrupt and a miserable unlikeable type personality.

        I think you are a Hilary supporter right?

        Also she is good for femenism, so that is good, but overall her unlikeable miserable self is a real handicap.

      • Beheading is painlesss

        I am not an Islamic man Jason y. I am not inbred or genitally mutilated. I feel sorry for Muslims and so defend them. I actually see them as physically at a disadvantage due to the mental retardation brought on by microencephalisation due to inbreeding Quite literally they have smaller brains due to inbreeding and less intelligence, and also less sensitive penile matter due to the mutilatiion of their genitals. We need to be helping these unfortunate people.

        No wonder they would rather die and go to heaven. We need to help them see the beauty of zulu lesbian’s riding on unicorns under a rainbow. Help them see the beauty of multiculturalism by extending the gloved hand of friendship with the iron fist of leftie state power.

        They are good for left wing governments to increase power. So as a leftie I am duty bound to support them. Which is ok And quite right. They are a means to an end.

        • Jason Y

          I would like to live in a world where Muslims can be helped. However, they won’t be helped much by multi-culturalism, cause eventually it’s going to to end and be reversed. It’s not really my wish, but just the destiny based on negative factors going on politcally.

          In Latn America and places, we see a move toward the left. However, Europe and America will probably go further to the right.

    • Jason Y

      He’s likable enough to win, but he could be a monster, like the fictional Stillson character on the Stephen King movie “The Dead Zone”. Can you imagine Trump with the finger on a nuclear weapon or weapons?🙄

      • Beheading is painless

        I am not too happy with his Trump as a politician. I am not too happy with Hilary. I think Saunders is the less corrupt than Hilary, but the women’s vote could see Hilary win and then we have a few more years of corrupt dithering indesiveness at the top.

        And Jason y this is real life not Hollywood epic. But perhaps if Trump wins things certainly could be more dramatic, but if Hilary wins we will have more of the same bland dithering consensus politics, we have had from Obama, who was quite good at racial, gay, Islamic politics, and climate change politics and these area good ways to increase government power. Tried and tested ways of increasing governmentcontrol. But he is yesterday’s man now. The first mullato to president was an interesting thing. We still have not true negro president birthed from a black womb. His mom was a white woman, Ann Dunham.

        If only a true extreme left wing candidate like Bernie could win, but he has no chance. Still that is politics.

        • Jason Y

          I am against people coming to power simply cause they’re non-white to prove a point, like America can have a black mulatto president, it’s something that can happen.

          Also, actually, in the long run, Obama hurt liberalism, cause it simply gave white nationalists etc… more of a reason to claim a “victim status”, even though, despite the Obama presidency, the standard of living on non-whites in the US did not improve.

        • Jason Y

          A strongly left wing guy won’t win. Even if he gets the nomination, he won’t win the whole thing. The destiny is for Trump to win in America, and similar fascists to win in Europe. At that point WNs will feel satisfied as they have thier people in power.

          However, thier won’t be a transition away from so called “Jewish multi-culturalism” without riots, war etc.. on a mass scale.

        • Jason Y

          About Trump, this may seem like the rambling of some idiot who thinks alens from outer space are going to invade🙄. No, I think my predication will come true, as the west moves toward the far right, as negative poltical factors (a backlash to immigration etc..) boil over.

        • Jason Y

          Will Trump cause a race war? 🙄

          His plans:

          Build a wall that spans the entire southern border.
          Triple the number of ICE agents and enforce a nationwide E-verify policy.
          Deport all criminal aliens and end catch and release policies at the border.
          Cut off federal funding to sanctuary cities.
          Enhance Penalties for immigrants who overstay their visas.
          Use ICE agents to help police departments crack down on gangs.
          Put an end to birthright citizenship and deport all so-called “anchor babies.”

  13. Jason Y

    In another post, santo-culto brought up the idea that “white nationalists call things as they see it”. In other words, they proudly have 10 year old morality, and see it as a positive good.

    However, “calling everything as you see it” isn’t always good. Some stuff people have no control over. Someone retarded for instance, was born that way. That’s why it’s not cool to make fun of the retarded.

    On the other hand, if say my professor scolds me over missing a test, well, that’s a different matter. However, in some PC circles they might say the professor is being mean or cruel.

    • Santoculto

      Jayson

      Its called logical truth but not rational truth. What hurt people include white nationalists, is to say logical/pragmatic truth. I like euphemisms when they are being used correctly.

      People dislike to hear logical truth because generally you will Compare individuals, groups and situations starting by unilateral perspective or arbitrary. And to finalize with “golden key” people still will used binary/ dualistic approach. If most of African populations don’t build civilizations so we will generalize them negatively-comparatively of course.

      We still don’t go from caves.

      Everyone know that down syndrome people for example have mental retardation as well everyone can recognize a fat woman walking in the street. It’s excessive, counterproductive and unnecessary emphasizes this obvious facts. Most of human socialization is based on name calling or bio- hierarchical marker.

      • Jason Y

        I don;t get what your saying here. Generally speaking, it’s not nice or cool to make fun of people for stuff they have no control over. Of course, it’s debateable how much control people have over different things.

        For instance, non-white people have no control over how they look, but they have control over how they behave. Gays maybe responsible for being gay, or maybe not.

        Finally some people might purposely try to go against norms to give the middle finger, or rebel against people judging them.

        Some WNs are purposely saying cruel mean things to push the limit of free speech. Ok, fine. However, you could run the risk of getting in a fight, if somehow the victim can fight back, or they could sue for harassment whatnot.

  14. Jason Y

    quote by santo-culto

    be object and ask for him what he think about immigration and miscigenation in Europe*

    It is not sin to race-mix. It’s not a sin against nature, like incest, nor is it wrong. However, if certain groups do feel threatened, then they’re free to avoid race mixing if they want. However, that’s their choice, just as it is a free choice for others to choose race mixing.

    As far as immigration goes, yes, I’m against massive immigration to Europe and the United States. Those places can’t handle more people.

    • Santoculto

      Even incest is not “against nature”.

      It’s perfectly possible that races can be produce without incest 😏

      Jayson,
      You desire that white race disappear??

      • Jason Y

        The white race won’t disappear because of miscegeniation. However, It might get vastly outnumbered via outside immigration.

    • Santoculto

      I’m not against mixing race. I’m against en masse racial miscigenation. 🙆

      • Santoculto

        Jayson,
        You know that genuine leftist non-white are very rare?? And greater majority of real “leftist” people are whites???

        If you believe that behavior are firstly and essentially inherited or at least based on biological input so miscegenation will be finish with this recessive genuine lefties, people who not have any racial second intentions when defend leftist platform ( despising en masse immigration judenpolitik/ tikkun olan) 🏁

        • Jason Y

          Also looking at non-white areas you see no en masse micegeniation. Africa is pretty much black, incereasing in population and expected to stay black. As far Asia goes, south, southeast, and northeast, I see no genetic change in the near future. As far as Latin America goes, again, there was so called “miscegenation in colonial times” but since no change genetic variation.

        • Jason Y

          Jayson,
          You know that genuine leftist non-white are very rare?? And greater majority of real “leftist” people are whites???

          Well, of course, I know that. In fact, probably they would be more like me, center/left. Yeah, I’m well aware non-whites are incredibly racist., but two wrongs don’t make a right.

          But then again it’s an exxageration. For instance, I traveled to Charleston SC, and I met some punks who didn’t like white people, but I also met all kinds of people who were exceptionally friendly.

          Of course, again, and this applies to white nationalists, if you go around advertising yourself as a redneck and/or believer in white supermacy/seperation, it will provoke MORE hate (like 1000 times more) from non-whites, then if you don’t. At least it would in an area dominated by non-whites.

      • Jason Y

        Yeah, but en masse racial miscigenation isn’t happening. Everyone I know from school that is white, is dating white people. The thought that en masse miscigenation is happening is WN paranoia.

        You know back in the south, in the 50s and 60s, they brought up the same stuff, and sure enough what they said didn’t come true. In the end, only big women, ones most guys didn’t want anyway, ended up dating black guys. In other words, it never became a fashion accepted by most people, except maybe in some kind of fake lip service (due to some liberal guilt trip or sympathy).

  15. SHI

    It is true that we are the only group who will go out of our way to help outsiders. Everyone else just oppresses them and thinks of their own first. Whites are the only group that does not think of their own first and willingly gives up some of their privileges to help outsiders. And Whites are the least racist people on Earth, pretty much.

    Everyone else is zero-sum game – everything for us, and nothing for anyone else, our group first – everyone else second or not at all.

    Although SE Asians, Central Asians (except some of the Muslims) and Pacific Islanders are not pretty altruistic.

    I wonder where Indians would fall on a 0-10 scale of altruism. Not very high I guess. One might say, “Are you fucking kidding me? Indians and altruism makes as much sense as ISIS and female emancipation.” Now that kind of thing would have been really funny except it’s not a joke but the stark reality of the nation called India. Indians are the meanest, stingiest most heartless assholes on the face of this planet.

    Here’s what a North-Eastern blogger has to say about the mainstream nation. Frequently derided as “chinkies” owing to their Mongoloid features, North-Easterners face a lot of discrimination in India. Feel for the dude, he must be putting up with a lot of crap at the hand of ignorant, Northies Indians.

    Cunning, Scheming, Selfish, Arrogant, Dishonest, Thieving, Shirkers, Herd Mentality, Discriminatory, Rude and Impolite. Which group of people in the world can be described so perfectly with these adjectives except the Indians? I am from the northeast India living in the capital since 1983 and since junior level school days in 1975. I live among them for decades and have seen them at close angles for decades. I know them more than they know themselves. They think too much of themselves without realizing how dumb and dishonest they are. They are immoral in unprinciple group of people whose habit is to lick the boots of people whom they look up to and kick anyone who cannot fight them back. That is the reason why Kashmir, northeast India and tribal states in central India are muffled and murdered silently. Indians are the most beastly people on earth and they will receive their reward from the universal principle of justice. Neither Modi nor Rahul can save them or their make-believe economic growth can save them. It is only a matter of time. Western Imperialism/ colonialism are hated as an economic system at a very broad level. The wretchedness of Indians pertains to their horrendous individual traits and characteristics. They are the silent killers of the world. Only China can teach them a lesson of life for the second time.

    • Beheading is painless

      Would you like to murder all Indians in a genocide preferably by the Chinese? Just asking.

      We need to deal with most silent killers in the world, which you have correctly identified as Indians. Perhaps we need to kill them even more silently than the silence loving Indian killers by killing all of them ever so quietly before lunch on the 27 of December 2015. It will be called the hushed genocide in honour of the silent manner in which it was executed.

      Sometimes it is good to let the genocide of a over billion people out into the open for a decent hearing; but not amongst polite company; at a New York art gallery cocktail party for example. A good place would be at the “Let us kill over a billionaire Indians silently” HQ located in your bedroom.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s