Just like unrestrained economic liberty and for similar reasons, sexual liberality produces phenomena of absolute pauperization. Some men make love every day; others five or six times in their life or never. Some make love with dozens of women; others with none. It’s what’s known as ‘the law of the market.’ In an economic system where unfair dismissal is prohibited, every person more or less manages to find their place. In a sexual system where adultery is prohibited, every person more or less manages to find their bedmate.
In a totally free economic system, certain people accumulate considerable fortunes; others stagnate in unemployment and misery. In a totally free sexual system, certain people have a varied and exciting erotic life; others are reduced to masturbation and solitude – Michel Houellebecq
Study after study has found the 80-20 ratio. For instance, a study on a dating site found that 80% of women were chasing only 20% of the men. These were probably the top 20%. The bottom 80% were simply being ignored.
The remaining 80% of men (probably the lower 80%) had to consign themselves to fighting over 20% of the women.
It’s not stated, but probably the 80% of the women corresponds to the better women. The 20% of the figure may include some of the better women, but realistically, it probably corresponds more to the bottom 20% of the women.
The pic above is related. However, it suggests that men who are 5-below have no women after them or available to them at all. I am not sure if that is exactly the case. However, many men who are 5’s and 6’s in looks say the only women available to them are say women who are 1-3. These men state that they are looking for women who are at the same level they are or even above. The men who are 5’s and 6’s say that they do not want to settle for uggos and landwhales who 1-3, and why should they? I believe they do have a point.