Daily Archives: January 28, 2015

Ukrainians Pull Off Two New False Flag Attacks in Donetsk

There have already been two false flags in the recent Ukraine fighting so far.Actually they were not false flags but instead were cases where Novorussian civilians died via Ukrainian weaponry. In one case, the civilians ran into a land mine and in the second case, the Ukrainians shelled a major city, killing and wounding 130 people. Both cases were probably accidental attacks. The shelling was probably a case of the artillery falling short of its targets.

But they are false flags in the sense that both have been blamed on the Novorussian army. So the Novorussians are being blamed for civilian casualties caused by the Ukrainians. They are also false flags in that both attacks in which the Novorussians were framed are being used to diplomatically attack Russia and Novorussia.

The entire West and every single sleazy Western media outlet has gone along with these outrageous lies. Furthermore, an utterly corrupted criminal organization called the Organization for Security and Cooperation has made two completely false reports of these incidents, in both cases making up facts out of thin air. The OSCE reports were deliberately written to frame the Novorussians.


The first was the supposed Novorussian shelling of a bus at a Nazi checkpoint in Nazi territory. The OSCE, which I am now convinced is an utterly corrupt organization, came out and investigated it and said that they proved that it was a Novorussian shell after all. However, there was no Novorussian shell. The checkpoint was out of reach of Novorussians artillery. This is what really happened according to witnesses, including the bus driver himself:

The bus pulled up the checkpoint. Artillery shells landed about a mile up the road, but we do not know who shot them. The people in the bus panicked and ran out of the bus into a field. There was an antipersonnel mine attached to a tree in the field and the people set off the mine. The mine exploded, causing the casualties. So the OSCE simply lied.

The entire lying Western media, without even the exception of one outlet, stated right away that the bus was hit by a rebel shell. That is what I call a controlled propaganda media. Poroshenko went crying to the Davos meeting in Switzerland carrying a panel of the bus that was hit by his own mine. He demanded that the Novorussians be classified as a terrorist group due to the shelling. The OSCE and the EU said they were looking into it. That makes no sense at all since even if it was a rebel shell (and it wasn’t), they would have been aiming at the checkpoint and not the bus. Collateral damage is not terrorism.

The shelling of Mariupol was another case where the OSCE lied. An eastern suburb of Mariupol was shelled with GRAD missiles and Urugans the other day, causing ~30 deaths and 100 injuries. 100% of the slimy Western press press and all of the sleazy Western governments all immediately said the rebels did it. It turns out that the area was out of range of Novorussian artillery. Also the rebels do not shoot GRAD’s at densely populated cities because those are their own supporters in that city and GRAD’s are not a good weapon to use in a populated city as they will cause too much collateral damage. There were some rebel troops nearly where the missiles hit.

All of the residents stated that the shells came from Ukie territory to the northwest. Whether this was a false flag or simply a shelling that fell short, I have no idea. The rebels seems to think it is a shelling that fell short.

The Ukies very quickly arrested a man on the ground and accused him of being a “spotter for the rebel artillery attack.” He is innocent. And within a day, the Ukies produced another faked “intercepted phone call between two rebel officers taking credit for the attack.” Of course this is the exact same thing they did after the M17 false flag. The fact that they had this fakery made so quickly makes you wonder whether it was a false flag or not. The sleazy and corrupt OSCE came out and almost immediately issues a report that said the rebels did it. The report is a lie. The OSCE is apparently a criminally corrupted organization.

Why the rebels would deliberately shell their own supporters is not stated. However, theories quickly appeared that the rebels are punishing the Mariupol residents because the city rejects the rebels and instead supports the Ukie government. The Mariupol attack was said to be rebel revenge for an attack in Donetsk the other day in which a team of Ukie forward saboteurs in a van fired a mortar inside the city and then drove away. The Ukie government lied like they always do and said that the attack was the rebels attacking their own city, which makes no sense. That was too much of a whopper for even the scummy, evil Western press to buy.

Following the attack and the instant fake OSCE report, many sleazy Western governments started calling for more sanctions on Russia for the Mariupol attack. Considering that neither Russia nor the rebels that they support did the attack, the demand to increase sanctions is awful scummy.

In addition, residents of Mariupol said that they observed several teams of Ukies changing into rebel uniforms and running around the city. There are now several groups of Ukies in rebel uniforms cruising around the city. Of course there are no rebel formations inside Mariupol. The theory is that these fake rebels may be used to commit another false flag.


Filed under Eurasia, Europe, Journalism, Regional, Russia, Ukraine, War

Dolly Parton, Queen Latifah and Janet Jackson

Leslie writes:

How do you know Dolly Parton, Janet Jackson, Queen Latifah and Alicia Keys are lesbians if they’re ‘closeted’, or as you suggest in Alicia Keys case actually denies it? Lol

This is what the Hollywood in crowd says, and they are usually right about such things. Alicia Keys deserves her own post altogether.

Janet Jackson is bisexual, not lesbian. She has been quoted as saying that she would like to have sex with certain celebrity women. In her divorce, her husband was supposedly doing to spill the beans on her affairs with women, but they make an agreement to keep it from getting to that. He said she had a ravenous, insatiable sex drive and she had sex with both men and women.

Dolly Parton has stated that she has slept in the same bed with her best female friend for the last 25 years of her marriage. She and her husband have separate beds. She came out for gay marriage. Parton’s manager is a lesbian.

Queen Latifah is notorious. At this point, it is pretty much confirmed that she is a lesbian.

Alicia Keys is such a piece of work that she is going to get her own post!


Filed under Celebrities, Homosexuality, Music, Sex

One Day Languages and Two Day Languages

A colleague writes:
Mutual intelligibility is difficult to measure since speakers of two different tongues could meet each other and hardly understand each other at first but after a week of close contact, they can understand each other quite well.
As far as intelligibility goes, it is usually measured blind with only one group at a time. It is uncertain where to split dialect and language, but Ethnologue (SIL) seems to generally split at 90%. Above 90% = dialect. Below 90% = dialect.

With two separate but closely related languages such as Turkish and Azeri, after 3-4 weeks of close contact, they can communicate quite nicely. I would put 3-4 weeks at the barrier of dialect and language.

At the other end, in Africa, speakers of various lects talk of one day languages and two day languages, referring to how long it takes speakers of Lect A to understand speakers of Lect B. These 1 day languages and 2 day languages are best seen as dialects of a single tongue.

Closer to home. it takes one day of close contact for other Spanish speakers who land in San Salvador by plane to completely understand Salvadoran Spanish. It takes Argentines three days to understand Chilean Spanish. So we can call Salvadoran Spanish and Chilean Spanish dialects of the Spanish language. Salvadoran Spanish could be called a 1 day language and Chilean Spanish could be called a 3 day language.

However, with Canarian Spanish and Dominican Spanish of the Dominican Republic, it takes other Spanish speakers about three weeks to catch onto it. So Canarian Spanish and Dominican Spanish are like Azeri and Turkish. I honestly think that Canarian Spanish and Dominican Spanish are separate languages on MI grounds, but it would cause a political firestorm if you tried to split them so no one will.

In Spain, there are various lects such as Asturian, Galician and Andalucian. A Spanish speaker may take two months or so of close contact to learn to understand Asturian and Galician well, and indeed, both are listed as separate languages.

Some Spanish speakers report that Andalucian sounds absolutely insane when they first listen to it and they can hardly understand one word, however, after 2-3 hours of steady close listening, they can understand it quite well. We may call Andalucian a 3 hour language and clearly Andalucian is a dialect of Spanish called Andalucian Spanish.

Once it starts to take as long as 3-4 weeks of close contact for speakers of Lect A to understand Lect B, I think we are looking at two separate languages. Anything less than that, starts to seem a lot more iffy.

1 Comment

Filed under Africa, Americas, Applied, Argentina, Asturian, Central America, Chile, Dialectology, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Europe, Galician, Language Families, Language Learning, Latin America, Linguistics, Regional, Sociolinguistics, South America, Spain, Spanish, Turkish

Which Rock Stars Are Gay or Bisexual?

It might seem hard to believe that any of them are, but there have long been rumors about a number of them. Let’s go through the list.

A word about bisexual men. Unfortunately, bisexuality is very common, and I would say that after 40 years of observing males from even the point of view of a straight male that male bisexual behavior is much more common than nearly any straight person realizes.

I figure that for every one gay man, there are ~9 men with a bisexual orientation of one type or another various types and varieties. It is a truism with bisexuals that most lean one way or another. Very few men with a bisexual orientation are completely 50-50 in their attractions – only 5% could be described that way. Furthermore, only 15% of men with a bisexual orientation lean gay. 80% lean straight, and 85% of bisexual men are maximally attracted to women.

So for men with a bisexual orientation, the chart looks like this:

Maximally attracted to females: 90%
Lean Straight:                  85%
Lean Gay:                       10%
Maximally attracted to males:   15%
Full bisexual (50-50)            5%

50 Cent: Lil Kim’s boyfriend says he is on the downlow.

Damon Albarn (Blur): Possible bisexual tendencies.

Phil Anselmo (Pantera): Persistent rumors of bisexuality.

Billie Joe Armstrong (Green Day): Openly bisexual.

Lance Bass (‘N Sync): Either openly gay or deeply closeted, depending on who you talk to.

Marc Bolan (T. Rex): Supposedly out bisexual, truth unknown.

Bono (U2): Rumored bisexual, huge pussy hound, but another male musician claims he had sex with Bono once. Basically heterosexual.

Roddy Bottom (Faith No More): Openly gay.

David Bowie: Former bisexual, later identified as straight. Massive pussy hound, basically heterosexual.

Boy George: Openly gay.

Kenny Chesney: Reportedly long known to be gay, but deeply closeted due to his country music fanbase. Renee Zellweger was his beard, but she divorced him after only four months of marriage due to “fraud.” On the other hand, in interviews, he says he is straight, is hurt by gay rumors and claims to have had sex with over 100 women, which, if true, is certainly not the behavior of a gay man. Very strange case in much need of further research.

Warren Cuccurullo (Missing Persons): Probably bisexual. Has made several porn videos for the gay market (!?), including a few where he is jerking off, and one where he is shoving a pink dildo up his ass (!?). He also posed on the cover of the Brazilian gay magazine G (!?).

Dave Davies (Kinks): Openly bisexual.

Ray Davies (Kinks): Basically heterosexual, experimented with men a bit.

Jonathan Davis (Korn): Bad rumor.

Ronnie James Dio: Straight, bad rumor.

Dr. Dre: Said to be gay and deeply closeted for years.

Ghall (Gorgoroth): Reputed to be gay and said to have a boyfriend who is a male model. Probably true.

Jay Gordon (Orgy): Bisexual tendencies.

Stone Gossard (Pearl Jam): Widely rumored to be a closeted bisexual.

Perry Ferrell (Jane’s Addiction/Porno for Pyros): Openly bisexual.

Ace Frehley (KISS): Straight, experimented with homosexuality a bit.

Rob Halford (Judas Priest): Openly gay.

Kirk Hammett (Metallica): Reportedly out bisexual. Swinger, frequents sex clubs with his wife.

Michael Hutchinson (Xtasy): Straight but said to have experimented with men.

Billy Idol: Basically a straight poon hound, but once he was seen in a bed having sex with a man.

Enrique Iglesias: Unknown.

Michael Jackson: Definitely a gay pedophile or hebephile.

Mick Jagger: Heterosexual, huge pussy hound, rumored to have sex with men one or more times.

Jay-Z: Lil Kim’s boyfriend says he’s on the downlow.

Elton John: Openly gay.

Holly Johnson (Frankie Goes to Hollywood): Known to be gay.

Al Jourgensen (Ministry): Said to be probably bisexual.

Anthony Keidis (Red Hot Chili Peppers): Rumored to be bisexual, false rumor.

Little Richard: Often thought to be gay and frequently calls himself gay, but actually probably bisexual.

LL Cool J: Lil Kim’s boyfriend says he’s on the downlow.

Loon: There is said to be an underground sex tape of him having anal sex with another rap star, Sean Combs.

Marilyn Manson: Reportedly out bisexual, however evidence is lacking. Basically heterosexual.

Paul Masvidal (Cynic): Openly gay.

Ricky Martin: Openly gay.

Maxwell: Rumored to be gay. Latest album was shelved by his record company because they were upset by all the gay references.

Mark McGrath (Sugar Ray): Bisexual.

Meegs (Coal Chamber): Possibly bisexual.

Freddie Mercury (Queen): Supposedly bisexual, actually gay.

Method Man: Rumored to be gay. Q-Tip is his possible boyfriend.

George Michael (Wham): Openly gay.

Brian Molko (Placebo): Openly bisexual.

Steven Morrissey (The Smiths): Obviously gay but closeted.

Bob Mould (Husker Du): Openly gay.

Dave Navarro (Jane’s Addiction, Red Hot Chili Peppers): Openly bisexual.

P. Diddy: There is said to be an underground sex tape of him having anal sex with another rap star, Loon.

Mike Patton (Faith No More): Widely rumored to be bisexual.

Joe Perry (Aerosmith): Rumored bisexual, false rumor. Pussy hound. Basically heterosexual.

The Pet Shop Boys: Openly gay.

Iggy Pop: Supposedly an out bisexual, but that is actually a completely false rumor.

Prince: Completely heterosexual, even if many find that incomprehensible. Insatiable pussy hound. Continuous gay rumors were due to his gender style, not his sexual orientation.

Q-Tip: Reputed to be gay. His rap lyrics are supposedly full of gay references. Boyfriend may be Method Man.

Redman: Reputed to be gay.

Lou Reed: Out bisexual, later identified as straight.

Sean Reinert (Cynic): Openly gay.

Nick Rhodes (Duran Duran): Rumored to be bisexual, said to share his male lover with his wife. Probably true.

Busta Rhymes: Reputed to be gay.

Ricki Rockett (Poison): Rumored bisexual, false rumor.

Henry Rollins (Black Flag): Bizarrely enough, there have been rumors about him for years. Unknown, but he has had many girlfriends over the years. This may just be a bad rumor, but people who knew him back when he was a starving musician in the New York East Village music scene in the mid to late 1970’s say he was well known to be bisexual to the point of being out about it. The rumors appear to stem from this period in his life. Definitely a mystery.

Gavin Rossdale (Bush): Rumored to be bisexual.

Rostam (Vampire Weekend): Openly gay.

David Lee Roth (Van Halen): Longstanding, persistent and widespread rumors that he is bisexual, however these may be false rumors and have more to do with his gender behavior than his sexuality. Says he is straight in interviews. However, his bandmates, when asked if he is bisexual, say “Dave is into a bit of everything.” Heterosexual poon hound who stages orgies at his mansion and often holes up there with a small harem. Known to take on mother-daughter groupie teams!

Ja Rule: Lil Kim’s boyfriend says he’s on the downlow.

Fred Schneider (B-52’s): Unknown.

Pat Smear (Germs, Foo Fighters): Openly bisexual.

Robert Smith (Cure): Rumored bisexual, unknown.

Billy Squier: Unknown.

Paul Stanley (KISS): Married, two kids, but apparently bisexual. He was also one of the biggest pussy hounds in all rock and roll. Although some vigorously dispute the charge, Ace Frehley, Frehley’s wife, the rock groupie site on the web (which is almost always correct), and two people in the music industry have all said he is bisexual. He is very much in the closet about it though. I would say he leans straight though, looking at all of his womanizing.

Al Stewart: Unknown.

Rod Stewart: Bisexual rumors, never proven but suggestive. Major pussy hound. Basically heterosexual.

Michael Stipe (R.E.M): Openly bisexual or maybe gay.

Justin Timberlake (‘N Sync): Rumored to be bisexual.

Pete Townshend (The Who): Supposedly out bisexual. Strange rumor.

Steve Tyler (Aerosmith): Rumored bisexual, false rumor. Huge pussy hound. Basically heterosexual.

Luther Vandross: Long known to be gay in the Black community and of course with his band-mates. Deeply closeted.

Phil Varone (Skid Row): Bisexual.

Sid Vicious: Supposedly out bisexual, but once again looks like a bad rumor.

Scott Weiland: Rumored to be bisexual.

Yogi (Buckcherry): Rumored to be bisexual.


Christina Aguilera: Open bisexual.

Joan Armatrading: Either lesbian or bisexual, possibly true.

Joan Baez: Bisexual, probably true.

Toni Braxton: Lesbian, closeted. Had an affair with Courtney Love.

Tracy Chapman: Out lesbian.

Sheryl Crow: Bisexual, apparently true.

Ani DiFranco: Out bisexual.

Melissa Etheridge: Out lesbian.

Marianne Faithfull: Out bisexual.

Whitney Houston: Straight but experimented with women.

Chrissie Hynde (Pretenders): Rumored bisexual.

Janis Ian: Out bisexual.

Janet Jackson: Definitely bisexual, closeted.

Joan Jett: Definitely lesbian, but she does not discuss it.

Grace Jones: Out bisexual.

Janis Joplin: Out bisexual.

Wynona Judd: Unknown.

Alicia Keys: Closeted lesbian, tries to deflect rumors by making homophobic comments, has a male beard.

K. D. Lang: Out lesbian.

Courtney Love (Hole): Openly bisexual. Had an affair with Winona Ryder.

Madonna: Out bisexual. Has had affairs with other celebrity women.

Me’shell N’Degeocell: Out bisexual.

Joni Mitchell: Out bisexual.

Queen Latifah: Lesbian, deeply closeted.

Olivia Newton-John: Rumored bisexual.

Stevie Nicks: Well known to be bisexual, closeted.

Sinead O’Connor: Bisexual or lesbian, apparently true.

Dolly Parton: Lesbian, closeted.

Bonnie Raitt: Straight-leaning bisexual, apparently true.

Rhianna: Rumored bisexual.

Linda Ronstadt: Lesbian or bisexual, apparently true.

Winona Ryder: Confirmed bisexual. Had an affair with Courtney Love.

Dusty Springfield: Openly lesbian.

If you think this website is valuable to you, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site. Donations are the only thing that keep the site operating.


Filed under Celebrities, Homosexuality, Music, Rock, Sex

Zionists, Nazis and a Bit of History

I agree with the general tone of this article by the Saker.

Zionists, Nazis and a Bit of History

The Zionists

Oh this is too good!!!  My two “favorite” Russia-hating Uber-Zionists join forces in the New York Times to call for the salvation of the Nazi Junta in Kiev by a massive injection of capital.


Here is what they wrote: (full text)

Save the New Ukraine

A NEW Ukraine was born a year ago in the pro-European protests that helped to drive President Viktor F. Yanukovych from power. And today, the spirit that inspired hundreds of thousands to gather in the Maidan, Kiev’s Independence Square, is stronger than ever, even as it is under direct military assault from Russian forces supporting separatists in eastern Ukraine.

The new Ukraine seeks to become the opposite of the old Ukraine, which was demoralized and riddled with corruption. The transformation has been a rare experiment in participatory democracy; a noble adventure of a people who have rallied to open their nation to modernity, democracy and Europe. And this is just the beginning.

This experiment is remarkable for finding expression not only in defending Ukraine’s territorial integrity from the separatists, but also in constructive work. Maidan’s supporters have moved from opposition to nation building.

Many of those in government and Parliament are volunteers who have given up well-paying jobs to serve their country. Natalie Jaresko, a former investment banker, now works for a few hundred dollars a month as the new finance minister. Volunteers are helping Ukraine’s one million internally displaced people as well as working as advisers to ministers and in local government.

The new Ukraine, however, faces a potent challenge from the old Ukraine. The old Ukraine is solidly entrenched in a state bureaucracy that has worked hand in hand with a business oligarchy. And the reformers are also up against the manifest hostility of Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin, who wants at all costs to destabilize Ukraine.

One drawback is that the new Ukraine is a well-kept secret, not just from the rest of the world but also from the Ukrainian public. Radical reforms have been hatched but not yet implemented.

It is instructive to compare Ukraine today with Georgia in 2004. When he became president that year, Mikheil Saakashvili immediately replaced the hated traffic police and removed the roadblocks used to extort bribes from drivers. The public recognized straight away that things had changed for the better.

Unfortunately, Ukraine has not yet found a similar demonstration project. Kiev’s police force is to be restructured, but if you need a driver’s license, you must still pay the same bribe as before.

Mr. Saakashvili was a revolutionary leader who first stamped out corruption but eventually turned it into a state monopoly. By contrast, Ukraine is a participatory democracy that does not rely on a single leader but on checks and balances. Democracies move slowly, but that may prove an advantage in the long run.

The big question is, will there be a long run? Although Russia is in a deepening financial crisis, Mr. Putin appears to have decided that he can destroy the new Ukraine before it can fully establish itself and before an economic downturn destroys his own popularity.

The Russian president is stepping up the military and financial pressure on Ukraine. Over the weekend, the city of Mariupol came under attack from forces that NATO said were backed by Russian troops, undermining the pretense that the separatists are acting on their own.

Ukraine will defend itself militarily, but it urgently needs financial assistance. The immediate need is for $15 billion. But to ensure Ukraine’s survival and encourage private investment, Western powers need to make a political commitment to provide additional sums, depending on the extent of the Russian assault and the success of Ukraine’s reforms.

The reformers, who want to avoid the leakages that were characteristic of the old Ukraine, have expressed their wish to be held accountable for all expenditures. They are passing extensive legislation but also want the International Monetary Fund to go on exercising oversight.

Unfortunately, just as democracies are slow to move, an association of democracies like the European Union is even slower. Mr. Putin is exploiting this.

It is not only the future of Ukraine that’s at stake, but that of the European Union itself. The loss of Ukraine would be an enormous blow; it would empower a Russian alternative to the European Union based on the rule of force rather than the rule of law. But if Europe delivered the financial assistance that Ukraine needs, Mr. Putin would eventually be forced to abandon his aggression. At the moment, he can argue that Russia’s economic troubles are caused by Western hostility, and the Russian public finds his argument convincing.

If, however, Europe is generous with its financial assistance, a stable and prosperous Ukraine will provide an example that makes clear that the blame for Russia’s financial troubles lies with Mr. Putin. The Russian public might then force him to emulate the new Ukraine. Europe’s reward would be a new Russia that has turned from a potent strategic threat into a potential strategic partner. Those are the stakes.

The way the NYT presents these two bloodthirsty clowns is also typical. One, Soros, is a “philanthropist,” while the other, Levi, is a “philosopher”. They might as well have presented them as modern-day saints.

Clearly, the Neocons and their Zionist allies are in a full war mode, they fear that their Russophobic Nazi regime in Kiev is going to tank, and they are terrified at the consequences. As they should.

The Nazis

Well, just as predicted, the Rada in Kiev has declared Russia an “aggressor state“.

Now all that is needed to “prove” their point is a major false flag to show that hordes of Spetsnaz GRU throat-cutters are slaughtering babies in their cribs (Kuwait), blowing up peaceful shoppers (Markale market), committing genocide (Srebrenica), massacring villages (Racak) or using Viagra as a weapon of war (Libya). Then Putin needs to be upgraded from “new Stalin” to “new Hitler” (or both) and, voilà, the US and NATO will have to “shoulder their historical burden” of having to defend “civilization, human rights, freedom and progress” against the revanchist Russian aggressor.

I am sorry to have to say that, but I consider a large-scale false flag a virtual inevitability by now. God willing, the Junta is in too much disarray and chaos to make it happen, but I think that everybody in the Novorussian resistance needs to go to “red alert” for some crazy move by the Junta.

The Belly Is Still Fertile from Which the Foul Beast Sprang

Guys, I am constantly getting a flow of comments about “Jews this, Jews that”, “Nazis this, Nazis that”, and the “killer argument” of “Jews cannot be Nazis, and Nazis cannot be Jews”. Guys, think again. Look at all Zionists and Nazis have in common:

1) the belief in the existence of races/ethnicities
2) the belief in the superiority of their own race/ethnicity
3) the morbid obsession with blood and racial purity
4) a phenomenal propensity to use violence to achieve their goals
5) the belief that their opponents are not really human
6) a morbid interest for the occult (Ahnenerbe, Kabbalism)
7) a rabid hatred for Russia, Russians and Orthodoxy

Now, of course, they also happened to hate each other. So what? Trotskists hated Stalinists and vice versa, the SS hated the SA and vice versa and the Jesuits hated the Lutherans and vice versa. But in each case these movements spring from the same well (Bolshevism, National-Socialism and Frankish Papism).

Zionism and Nazism are born from the same fetid womb: 19th European secular nationalism and, as Brecht so well put it: the belly is still fertile from which the foul beast sprang. This is also the root of Ukrainian nationalism, Russian pan-Slavism, and many other ideologies. Most of them have lost traction and have been repudiated, but in Israel Zionism is still the main official state ideology, and the same is true for the part of the ex-Ukraine run by the Nazi junta in Kiev.

Now, since there are apparently quite a few of you who still hold on to racist/racialist ideas, I feel the need to repeat here what I wrote in my post AngloZionist: Short Primer for the Newcomers:

Now this might seem basic, but so many people miss it that I will have to explicitly state it: to say that most US elites are Anglos or Jews does not mean that most Anglos or Jews are part of the US elites. That is a straw man argument which deliberately ignores the non-commutative property of my thesis to turn it into a racist statement which accuses most/all Anglos or Jews of some evildoing. So to be very clear: When I speak of AngloZionist Empire, I am referring to the predominant ideology of the 1%ers elites which form this Empire’s “deep state”.

By the way, there are non-Jewish Zionists, (Biden, in his own words) and there are (plenty of) anti-Zionist Jews. Likewise, there are non-Anglo imperialists, and there are (plenty of) anti-imperialist Anglos. To speak of “Nazi Germany” or “Soviet Russia” does in no way imply that all Germans were Nazis or all Russians Communists. All this means it that the predominant ideology of these nations at that specific moment in time was National Socialism and Marxism, that’s all.

This is why the listing of Jews in power in Kiev because what is missing from the picture is either a list of all Jews who are not in power in Kiev or the list of all non-Jews who are in power in Kiev, or both.

Zionism is to Jews what National Socialism is to Germans and what Communism is to Russians: a pathology triggered by a slight but crucial modification of these nation’s “spiritual DNA”. This is like comparing healthy tissue to a malignant tumor: very similar but different enough to be fatal.

The real enemy:

The real enemy is not the Jew, the German or the Russian, of course. The real enemy is evil, satanic ideologies. As Saint Paul so eloquently put it: For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms (Eph. 6:12). He did not say the “1%ers” of course, but if you ask me, this is close enough.

I recently got an email from a friend who asked me to stop using the word “Ukie,” and I decided to follow his advice because even if some or even most Ukrainians nowadays might support the regime of freaks in Kiev, some, even maybe most, do not.

Yes, Soros and BHL are Jews. Really evil, bloodthirstily and ugly buffoons who I despise from the very bottom of my heart. And yes, their ideology is the kind of Neoconservative Zionism which has become so popular in the USA and in the past decades in Israel (the original Zionists were dramatically different, socialists, secularists, and actually, I think – honest if mistaken idealists). Oh, not that I believe for one second that either one of them sincerely cares about his fellow Jews or about Israel. Not at all. Contrary to the popular belief, one does not need to care for Israel at all to be a Zionist. Are you shocked by that statement? Okay, hear me out. Here is what I wrote in my “primer”:

Let’s take the (hyper politically correct) Wikipedia definition of what the word Zionism means: it is “a nationalist movement of Jews and Jewish culture that supports the creation of a Jewish homeland in the territory defined as the Land of Israel”. Apparently, no link to the US, the Ukraine or Timbuktu, right? But think again.

Why would Jews – whether defined as a religion or an ethnicity – need a homeland anyway? Why can’t they just live wherever they are born, just like Buddhist (a religion) or the African Bushmen (ethnicity) who live in many different countries?

The canonical answer is that Jews have been persecuted everywhere and that therefore they need their own homeland to serve as a safe haven in case of persecutions. Without going into the issue of why Jews were persecuted everywhere and apparently in all times, this rationale clearly implies if not the inevitability of more persecutions  at the very least, a high risk thereof.

Let’s accept that for demonstration sake and see what this, in turn, implies.

First, that implies that Jews are inherently threatened by non-Jews who are all at least potential anti-Semites. The threat is so severe that a separate Gentile-free homeland must be created as the only, best and last way to protect Jews worldwide.

This, in turn, implies that the continued existence of this homeland should become an vital and irreplaceable priority of all Jews worldwide lest a persecution suddenly breaks out and they have nowhere to go.

Furthermore, until all Jews finally “move up” to Israel, they better be very, very careful as all the goyim around them could literally come down with a sudden case of genocidal anti-Semitism at any moment. Hence all the anti-anti-Semitic organizations a la ADL or UEJF, the Betar clubs, the network of sayanim, etc.

In other words, far from being a local “dealing with Israel only” phenomenon, Zionism is a worldwide movement whose aim is to protect Jews from the apparently incurable anti-Semitism of the rest of the planet. As Israel Shahak correctly identified it, Zionism postulates that Jews should “think locally and act globally” and when given a choice of policies, always ask THE crucial question: “But is it good for Jews?“.

So far from being only focused on Israel, Zionism is really a global ideology which unequivocally splits up all of mankind into two groups (Jews and Gentiles), which assumes that the latter are all potential genocidal maniacs (which is racist) and believes that saving Jewish lives is qualitatively different and more important than saving Gentile lives (which is racist again). Anyone doubting the ferocity of this determination should either ask a Palestinian or study the holiday of Purim, or both. Even better, read Gilad Atzmon and look up his definition of what is brilliantly called “pre-traumatic stress disorder”.

So we need to be very careful here.

First, we cannot fight an Empire whose nature and essence we do not understand.

Second, we cannot fight an enemy who we cannot even name. I therefore submit that speaking of the AngloZionist Empire is not only correct but even crucial: “Anglo” refers to historical roots and geopolitical reality, “Zionist” refers to its ideological world view. HOWEVER, as soon as we start “counting Jews” or saying that Nazis and Jews cannot be in the same junta, we are immediately falling back into a completely discredited 19th century West European ideology which has triggered many millions of deaths in all the major wars of the past couple of centuries.

This is bull. Acting like a bull. In a corrida.

Personally, I don’t even believe in the word race. Here again, I will quote my “primer:”

First, I don’t believe that Jews are a race or an ethnicity. I always doubted that, but reading Shlomo Sand really convinced me. Jews are not defined by religion either (most/many are secular). Truly, Jews are a tribe. A group one can chose to join (Elizabeth Taylor) or leave (Gilad Atzmon). In other words, I see “Jewishness” as a culture, or ideology, or education, or any other number of things, but not something rooted in biology. I fully agree with Atzmon when he says that Jews are racist but not a race.

Second, I don’t even believe that the concept of “race” has been properly defined and, hence, that it has any objective meaning. I therefore don’t differentiate between human beings on the basis of an undefined criterion.

But I am aware that there are people out there who consider themselves as Jews or Jewish (never understood the difference between these two terms, but never mind). I say – let them. But let’s not paint them as the enemy when the enemy is a tribal ideology which is shared by millions of people who do not consider themselves as Jews (US Evangelicals, for starters, millions of them).

If we miss the real target and get distracted by the fake one put in front of us by the real enemy, we will act just like a bull in a Spanish corrida: we will always miss the real enemy who will exhaust us and then kill us.

Let us please be smarter and stop constantly chasing the wrong enemy. Let’s hit the real enemy where he really is, where he hides, where it will really hurt him. Let’s accurately name him. His name is “Legion” because he has many ideologies and manifestations, and he shows up in any and all human groups.

Please read the above post carefully, please re-read my “AngloZionists: a short primer” for a fuller discussion.

Kind regards to all, cheers,

The Saker


Filed under Anti-Semitism, Conservatism, Economics, Ethnic Nationalism, Eurasia, Europe, Fascism, Geopolitics, Georgia, Israel, Jewish Racism, Jews, Journalism, Middle East, National Socialism, Nationalism, Nazism, Near East, Neoconservatism, Political Science, Race/Ethnicity, Racism, Regional, Russia, The Jewish Question, Ukraine, USA, War, Zionism