Bigfoot News February 1, 2014

Hank verified repeatedly! According to an anonymous source who will not be revealed, several scientists have already verified Hank. I know of at least one occasion recently when a scientist came on the weekend and verified some parts of Hank’s body as real, but did not inspect the whole thing. In addition, several media outlets have sent out MD’s to verify Hank before they wrote their stories about him. They all verified him, so the papers all know he is real, but they are playing it coy. I can also report now that another MD is scheduled to see the body this weekend.

Taxidermy job done at Washington university. Hank’s taxidermy job was done by the people at the university in Washington. That is why it is such a lousy job. It was just student and profs winging it at taxidermy. I will not reveal the source for this news.

Complaint filed with US federal authorities against Rick Dyer and Frank Cali for extorting $10,000 from a man across state lines. According the complaint, Frank wrote the letter demanding payment. To date, no action has been taken on this complaint. The FBI will not even look at any extortion below $100,000, so this case may just sit there and never get acted upon. The name of the Purported victim and where they resided is not known. The crime is said to have taken place last summer around June or July. Nothing more is known at this time. Will be updated! The source for this information is anonymous and will not be revealed.

Visitors to Hank. All of the visitors attempting to view Hank came away either 100% convinced he was real or would say “he is very convincing, but we are still not sure.” I know of eight people from our field who went out there and they all felt that is quite convincing. Nevertheless, about 50% of those people are deeply worried that somehow Rick is scamming them and fooling them and that somehow this whole thing is a hoax.That is because no one trusts Rick Dyer (good idea) nor believes a word he says (the right attitude).

No one has seen the body yet who says it is not real.

Dyer charges critics $20,000 to inspect Hank. Two  experts profiled earlier offered to see Hank. One is a Hollywood special effects guy and the other is a famous taxidermist. It was reported that Dyer refused to let them see it, but that is incorrect. Actually, he said he would charge them $20,000 to view it. They declined the offer. Why Rick offered to let them see it for so much $ is not known.

Would haters refuse to verify Hank? This is what Rick is probably worried about. The haters, based only on a few photographs and a longtime belief that this is a hoax, would probably go see Hank and see exactly what they wanted to see – a hoax. This is called confirmation bias. We have already seen several experts chime in to insist that Hank is a hoax based merely on a photograph.

Dyer explains Hank’s teeth. All of Hank’s teeth are made of resin as the real teeth are with the skeleton. Also Hank has had resin coated on his skin.

Musky Allen reveals differences between artist rendering and his description versus Hank now. Musky stated that when he saw Hank, he had been shaved in a number of areas, including around the face. This is why the face looked less hairy. Hair was later glued back on the face and the body where the autopsy was done as the autopsy area was shaved during Musky’s visit.

Washington university revealed? The taxidermy work on Hank may have been done at Central Washington University in Ellensburg, Washington. They have a ANSLAN sign language there that they use to converse with the bonobos at the college. Visitors call it a Chimposium. An excellent place to find lots of primate specialists and host visiting MD’s and scientists.

Gold memberships at Team Tracker utterly useless wastes of money. A TT member reports:

Dyer took down the Team Tracker site, so I have received precisely nothing for my Gold Membership, nor will I receive anything. From what I understand, he is not liable for anything in this regard, as the only guarantee given was that the membership would give the purchaser access to the Gold Members-only page and its content, which it did; technically, he delivered what he promised.

LOL he gave you the page, but there was nothing on it! Suckers! One born every minute, rake, rake, rake, look at my rolls!

Look if you all want to waste money, no problem, but don’t give it to Rick. Give to me instead of flushing it down the toilet or letting it fly away in the breeze.

Lily Dyer cousin works in Special Effects.  A source has just informed me that Rick Dyer’s wife Lily has a cousin who works in the special effects industry. +1 for the hoax hypothesis.

Some Dyer supporters jumping ship? Yes, I can tell you that some of the firmest, hardest and strongest Dyer supporters of all are bailing out and going over to the skeptic side. . I would not say these folks have gone over to the skeptic side, but they are no longer 100% behind Rick. Why they are doing this is not known, but Rick lies so much that they do not know what to believe anymore. This is typical with people like Rick. When people like Rick deal with you, you end up confused because they are such confusing people.

As you twist and turn in your confused and bewildered state, the predator comes in the kill, the wolf after the sheep, just like always. A con man moves in and takes you while you are twirling in helpless senselessness. Usually people wake up and wonder what hit them as it felt like a tornado rolling through

TT members voice doubts. I also know for a fact that there are a number of TT members, including some of Rick’s closest associates, who do not believe 100% that Hank is real. They don’t think it’s a hoax either, and they are surely not “in on the hoax.” It’s just that whatever Rick has shown them so far has gone a long way towards convincing them but was not enough to raise it to the 100% level.

Who is in on the hoax? No one is, as there is no proven hoax. But if there is a hoax, it is Rick Dyer’s and Rick Dyer’s alone. He would be doing this alone and would have no one backing him on this. I know this because just about every Dyer supporter that I know actually believes that Dyer has a Bigfoot. You can call them ignorant and stupid all you want, and perhaps they are gullible, but they are not in on any crime. Certainly, Musky Allen and the FB/FB guys are not “in on the hoax.”

Rick either has a real Bigfoot or he has done a masterful hoax that is fooling a very large number of people somehow. That’s your two choices.

Rick Dyer as quintessential Bigfooter. I am getting a lot of flack for this, but it’s just true. It’s not a compliment about Rick; instead it’s a slam on the rest of us. Yep, we really are that bad. We look in the mirror and there is Rick Dyer staring back at us and that’s how you get sites like Randy’s blog. No one wants an ugly reflection.

It’s not that Dyer is horrible, and of course he is, but it’s more that Dyers are dime a dozen in this biz. It’s the non-Dyers who stand out and make you think, “Whoa! What are you doing in this sleazy game?”

Randy’s blog excellent on other Dyer stuff. Randy and I are friends and we work together. I send him stuff both ways, especially that works for his hypothesis. The way I see it is we are pushing alternate hypotheses. May the best man win! Aside from the notion that this is all a hoax, that site is superb for outlining the other less than illustrious aspects of Dyer career and mindset. The endless scamming, the endless lying, the cheating, the sleaziness and nefariousness, the nonstop hucksterism, the constant grubbing for every spare buck, it’s all there.

You either like Rick Dyer or you don’t. Rick even admits that he is crazy and an asshole. Well, it’s one thing to be an asshole, but it’s quite another to be proud of it, but I have known a few. First rule is know yourself.

The commenters often have excellent insight into Rick’s personality, which I have already dealt with on this site. The World of Success is full of Cluster B types just like Dyer. Sadly, personality disorder is compatible with wealth, fame, greatness. The greatest men in history for better or for worse were often fucked in the head.

Sykes nefariousness redux. Via a well known source in the Bigfoot community, an explanation for the bizarre and paradoxical behavior of Dr. Brian Sykes, who looks awful sneaky and political to me anyway.

“I know for fact Dr. Sykes and those working with him had access to the DNA Study. The Bigfoot hair morphology was discussed in great detail including photographs and supplements. The fact that only a few hairs were tested out of 100’s that were sent in to Dr. Sykes is a puzzling aspect of the “Bigfoot Files” TV Specials.”

I have a theory that Dr. Sykes was aware of this unique property that Dr. Ketchum had discovered about the Bigfoot hairs. He knew if he tested true Bigfoot hairs he would not get any mtDNA. He had already professed himself to be the expert and able to extract “pristine DNA” from only a hair shaft, so he has a dilemma on his hands.

If he processes known Bigfoot hair and gets no mtDNA then he has to admit one of two things:  1 – He is incompetent and unable to extract mtDNA from possibly dozens of “clean and pristine” hair samples or 2 -That the hair must be from a Bigfoot or an unknown hominin after the mtDNA failed to amplify from dozens of hair samples. This by default confirms Dr. Ketchum’s DNA Study finding’s and validates her study.

Since both these scenarios is unpalatable, Dr. Sykes opted to just test a handful of hairs he knew where known animal. Surely you do not believe that Dr. Sykes was so inept that he did not have the hairs pre-screened by a forensic hair expert. It is costly to run DNA testing on these hairs, at least $1,500 if not more per sample.

Surely the hair expert Dr. Sykes used was not so incompetent that he gave Dr. Sykes known animal hairs of Bear, Dog, Raccoon, and Wolf?  If so, then Dr. Sykes should be suing this hair expert to recoup the thousands of dollars spent on wasted DNA testing. This would explain why only “seven of the best samples were selected for testing”.

In my opinion who ever screened the hairs for Dr. Sykes made sure to exclude any known Bigfoot hairs. This way Dr. Sykes would only be testing known animal hair and avoid having to explain the lack of mtDNA amplification.

This is a “kill two birds with one stone” scenario. Dr. Sykes discredited the Bigfoot researchers in the United States and avoided confirming Dr. Ketchum’s DNA Study. Mission accomplished Dr. Sykes, mission accomplished.

Wow! Thanks for nothing, Bryan! Smell ya later! Oh and thanks for coordinating it with the insulting British TV show. Charming move, and so wrong. And thanks to Rhettman Butthead or Bigfootology whoever for bringing this clown over here to contaminate us for no reason at all. Back across the pond with ye, Bryan! They don’t have Bigfoots in England. We know, we know, we know. But we are bloody colonials, and we have them here in the vast forests of North America, and we don’t care if some asshole TV host believes that or not.

Sasquatch Ontario. Wow. I am convinced that this is 100% real. That is because there is some of the physical evidence that simply not faked because hoaxers have never been able to fake this stuff. There are real footprints and other prints out there, not faked. I do not believe the little weavings are faked either. If most of it’s not faked, then none of it is probably.

The recordings are the most controversial and insane as it sounds, I think these are real vocalizations and the thing is actually trying to speak our language for some reason. Well hominids can pick up a foreign tongue you know. I also know some people who worked with him (he does not always work alone) and they confirmed that that is really an active habituation site with real Sasquatches wandering about. If that is true, then there is no need to hoax.

You are actually looking at a Sasquatch the whole time in this video, incredible as it seems. And that Sasquatch is utterly terrifying. I am still traumatized from seeing it. I assume that anyone who sees one of these things is traumatized for life in some way. The damn things are monsters!

The guy behind Sasquatch Ontario is very controversial, and none of the other researchers in Ontario like him and he won’t work with any of them and apparently doesn’t get along with them. Just a rather difficult individual who wants to do his thing all alone out there and not deal with the rest of the researcher scene, which is basically full of individuals who are either insane or bad or both.

If you think this website is valuable to you, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site.


Filed under Animals, Apes, Bigfoot, Canada, Mammals, North America, Regional, USA, Washington, West, Wild

22 responses to “Bigfoot News February 1, 2014

  1. Ray Crowe

    Was taxidermy done at Central Washington University in Ellensburg, WA? They have an extensive lab that uses AMSLAN Sign language to converse with bonobos, for visitors they call it a Chimposium. An excellent place to find lots of primate specialists and host visiting MDs and scientists.

    • J

      I know Central Washington U just got rid of their Champanzee Family that they had been working with due to lack of funding. The Chimapanarium is no longer in use as of last Fall. I was very sad this happened as I was just recently planning to learn more more of their research they were doing there related to language and ccomunication with the Champanzee Family.

  2. wookieehunter

    So u have a find of the century and u let inexperienced students In another state do the taxidermy job….and you have all these ppl who have seen it and allegedly say part of him is real…..and all these researchers who have seen him.some say he is real some say he isn’t.most ppl have an nda when going to a hot spot as to not reveal a location…u have a find of the century and u get inexperienced ppl to do whatever to it and tell everyone who goes to verify it they can’t talk…sounds about right lmfao…

    • Big G

      its not the find of the century. cant you read ,nobody has said it isnt real. These people are inexperienced at taxidermy. not scientific , primate , research. it doesnt matter how hank looks. that mount of hank is only for the skeptads that need to see a body. the important work is being done on the bones and tissue samples taken from organs. they have only begone thier work. well it looks as though dyer has a bigfoot. shut down your site randy and let the mob disbanned.I dont speak for the rest of the group over here but the attacks with no proof is getting a bit 1800ish. I dont go to your website and post stupid shit so the adult thing to do is dispand the mob. you lost the fight. Anything further would be a serious mental problem.

    • rmls34

      I absolutely agree with you! So you find/kill a Sasquatch, proving it’s existence, and you supposedly have a major investor, but you have an inexperienced/amateur team do the preservation of it? BS! Also why would the media be inclined to “playing it coy” as stated above? If this is a verifiable specimen it could be verified by genuine scientist, anthropologist, and MD’s. You wouldn’t cart it around the country in a plywood/plexiglass box…hell you could sell it to the Smithsonian and they could display it at all of the top Museums around the world. I believe in bigfoot, but I DO NOT believe Rick Dyer has one, or has ever seen one, or shot one. There has not been one shred of real evidence to date, just delay, after delay, with a story that changes more often than Dyer changes his underwear. I believe that Ockham’s razor theory applies here… the simplest explanation is probably the most likely and accurate…in this case being that Dyer has hoaxed again simply to make a bunch of cash. End of story.

      • Big G

        the simplest explanation isn’t a hoax. the simplest explanation is dyer got lucky and a bigfoot came in for an easy meal and got shot. then they had no plan. he wasn’t calling the shots for 6 months or more.

  3. Mary Ritter

    In defense of the FBI, it’s not their call to determine if a case should be prosecuted. The U.S. Attorney’s Office has a set of rules called Prosecutive Guidelines which the FBI must abide by. I’ve seen cases involving over $1 million that have been turned down because there are “bigger fish to fry.”

  4. That audio was great if its real! Thats the kinda research we need more of! As for RD, I hope he has the thing re-done by professionals. He claims he’s getting the fully articulated skeleton in march. Thats what I want to see.

  5. woodchucker

    Anything attached to Dyer is a useless waste of money. And his tales are a waste of time. He is the coldest thing in bigfootery. Yawn.

  6. Rumferlife

    Its real except for all the fake parts, now you’re just being retarded

  7. Not true, two of the people who personally verified Hank to their own satisfaction are the two guys from Facebook/Find Bigfoot. They believe this story with 100% confidence.

    Sorry homeboy, banned.

    Head on over to Racer’s site now.


  8. Washington university revealed? The taxidermy work on Hank may have been done at Central Washington University in Ellensburg, Washington. They have a ANSLAN sign language there that they use to converse with the bonobos at the college. Visitors call it a Chimposium. An excellent place to find lots of primate specialists and host visiting MD’s and scientists.

    Revealed by who?

    If someone wants to it be easy just to ring them to find out if they know of a Rick dyer?

    Its doubtful the scientists would be able to remain silent for much longer if the university has been named. That’s why i think it be interested if you told us who revealed the university, Robert.

    It would go a long way to finding out if this story is a hoax?

    Who are the supporters that have gone over to the Skeptic side?

    • Revealed by no one.

      I am just guessing at the name of the university or the university involved. I have no idea whatsoever where this was done. That was simply one of the suggestions. Whether it is right or wrong, I have no idea.

  9. fwiw – read recently that Sasquatch are what humans would have evolved into if our DNA had not been altered by outside agents. Which takes a few steps in the direction as to why those Sassies might have been talking and singing. God, this whole thing just makes me feel ill as a member of the somewhat human race.

  10. Antonamouse

    I don’t like the whole Sykes drama as stated here.
    I got the impression he used the TV series as a source of funding for the testing of Bigfoot samples. He was obliged to show the results of a handful of tests on the show and he claimed to have shown only samples that had previously been labeled as unknown. By choosing obvious examples he was able to kill two birds with one stone. He helped the show’s agenda by debunking America’s Bigfoot community and he was able to keep any true DNA samples to himself. He has a paper up for peer review and didn’t want to show anything ahead of the published results.
    I also believe he had prior knowledge of the Ketchum study but will claim the discovery as his own. The science community may back him at first claiming a lack of peer review on Ketchum’s study, but sooner or later Ketchum should get the recognition she deserves. Her end run of putting her results online has him boxed in.
    Hopefully the results of Dyer’s Bigfoot DNA will be published first and relegate Sykes to the back of the bus. It will also be interesting to see if whoever gets through peer review first will acknowledge Ketchum. Or will she have to hit them over the head with that Bigfoot arm bone she was wielding at her press conference.

    • woodchucker

      Sykes took the EP plan of collecting field research from many sources but went Global with his call for submissions. The EP beat Sykes to the punch by getting NA’s best field research samples IMO. Sykes is focusing on the best info he got, obviously not from NA. Melba has opened the door for science to look at this DNA process closer. Its just a matter of time before some one can repeat it. How do we know Sykes is a believer? when he started off he claimed he was putting this search for BF to rest once and for all. It never happened and he’s still looking at it by the comments above.

  11. big g

    Nothing is for sure. The involvement of the university and the fact that they have the bones and organs. They are processing DNA and until I see their findings nothing is 100 percent sure. I do however put a considerable amount of belief in Roberts unnamed group. All of which state that dyers animal is real.

  12. Peter Säbom Inventor

    Regarding Hank

    Please note that I am now speculating, but I do find a possible answer to some of the strange parts of this disgusting story.

    What if, this Rick Dyer fellow shot a female pregnant Sasquatch in the back. How brave would that have been?

    Rick Dyer seem to be an ignorant and unpleasant type of man, that would probably have no clue about anatomy, human versus other primates. Human females have a unique anatomy of the genitals compared to all other primates, so it would not be strange if Sasquatch females would look more like most other primates than us. The modestly sized penis of Hank, may not be a penis at all and then, the name Hank would become a problem.

    If this man has his mind fixed on, that he shot a Sasquatch male, he may not be receptive to the information that he actually shot a pregnant female. The question is, How well would this promote his tour and heman reputation?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s