How come there aren’t more chicks named Heidi Van Horny? More like this!
If you think this website is valuable to you, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site.
Woman’s worst nightmare? That’s pretty easy. Novelist Margaret Atwood writes that when she asked a male friend why men feel threatened by women, he answered, “They are afraid women will laugh at them.” When she asked a group of women why they feel threatened by men, they said, “We’re afraid of being killed.”
Unfortunately, this is probably true, though I am no longer so much afraid of women laughing at me. They don’t do it much anyway, but if they did, I would not appreciate it. I would much rather have a woman furious at me, cursing me out, bitching at me, even threatening to hit me or even hitting or trying to hit me in that wimpy way they have than have her laughing at me. Of course I don’t much like men laughing at me either. I don’t like anyone laughing at me. I would much rather men hate me, ignore me or think I am weird than have them laugh at me.
When you go into the World of Women for awhile you realize that they really are terrified of us, and well they ought to be. A woman is no match for a man, and men, most if not all men, have a pretty serious violence potential, even if only in their violently feverish minds. It’s been quite some time since I committed a serious violent act. Another man hit me, so I had to hit him back and a fistfight ensued. Clothes were ripped and my glasses were knocked off. May well have been over ten years ago.
In the World of Men that I live in, I actually do fear most men if not males. I accept that most males have the right to get angry at me or even hit me if I an cruel or disrespectful to them. I also acknowledge that many men may well kill me or seriously damage me if I am too hostile to them. So basically negotiating in the world of Men is all about kissing everyone’s ass, being wimpy or at least avoiding other guys, and trying to suck up to and be as friendly to other guys as possible. Because if I act hostile to another man, his violence potential may well come out, and I have been on the receiving end of lethal male violence a few times in my life. Really now, it is not a place you want to be in, a truly life or death situation.
Now if I am this terrified of other men, my God, how much women feel about us. It must be orders of magnitude worse. And even though I have not committed a serious violent act in maybe a decade, the potential, the brewing and steaming potentially homicidal or assaultive possibilities, have sadly been there nearly every day of that decade.
So I can see why women fear us. I can see why they fear me. They should fear men and they should fear me. Even if the volcano has not erupted in a very long time, it’s usually steaming and sending off ash showers on a regular basis.
We kill women. We try to kill them. We beat them badly. I have already known several women who have had men try to kill them. They are all around 50 years old. I figure if you are 50 and a female, you may well have had a man try to kill you so by now. A few of these women are lucky to be alive.
Beware the volcano!
And sympathy if not empathy at the fragile sex that trembles before it, unknowing, gazing into the steaming cone, trying to read a signal that can scarcely be read amid the noise.
Put yourself in a woman’s shoes for once. They are right to fear us. Become the woman yourself in your mind and teeter in your heels before the glowering, steaming Vesuvius of Man.
I have had a number of girlfriends and females I was dating in my life since I was 16 years old. Although it is hard to wrap them all up with one grand statement, this one has more truth in it than I would like to believe:
When they were good, they were very, very good, and when they were bad, they were horrid.
If you think this website is valuable to you, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site.
One thing that I have noticed is that most true, pure intellectuals tend to be males. That means that there are not a whole lot of female intellectuals. I said this to someone recently and she flipped out, started screaming and yelling and cursing at me. But I believe that I am right.
I do not mean to say that females are not as intelligent as males. Although on average, males are probably 3.5 IQ points smarter than females, it is clear that there are many bright to very bright females. In fact, there are quite a few female geniuses. If we use 140 IQ as a barometer for genius (a good benchmark) then there are quite a few females with IQ’s over 140. My mother and sister both have 140+ IQ, and my mother’s IQ is actually ~150, which is incredible. In recent years, I have met two females with 143 IQ’s and one with a 140 IQ. I have also met some recently with IQ’s around 130, which is gifted.
Yet without naming any names, one thing that I have noticed about many high-IQ or even genius IQ females is that they are not exactly intellectuals. I tried to talk to them about some pure intellectual stuff such as projects I was working on (which to be honest would be right up their interest alley) and they acted like they were bored. What truly interested these female geniuses? People. The world of people, relationships, society, the natural world, emotions and the feeling world.
The high-IQ female trains her genius mind towards ingenious thinking regarding emotions, feelings, natural and sensual things, other people and relationships between people and the world of people (society).
And of course there is nothing wrong with that.
The female mind is a fascinating one, and as a lover of females (I much prefer females to males and have since I was a teenager when most of my friends were girls and women) I love to marvel at the female mind. But the female mind is nothing if not different.
Although there is quite a bit of overlap, the female and male minds tend to rotate in separate mental solar systems.
Indeed, if a male only lives in his male mind and his world is only surrounded by other male minds, he only inhabits one half of the universe. In a way he is broken. It is like those yin-yang symbols with one half missing.
And likewise for females. The female alone and surrounded by other females is broken, a half of a person. This is one reason why feminism is so intellectually broken, strange and empty. Pure female essence tends to solipsism, emotionalism, petty bickering, endless feuds, depression, major and minor emotional breakdown, clique formation and collapsed projects. The pure female essence needs a male essence around to whole the half and add some discipline and sobriety to all that erratic emotional energy.
That is, while a female with a 143 IQ is obviously just as intelligent as a male with a 143 IQ, the male is probably more likely to be an intellectual. There are obviously female intellectuals. I have met quite a few female professors, grad students, post-docs, etc. that are certainly intellectuals. Female attorneys and physicians are often intellectuals.
The truth is that pure abstract reasoning is pretty much a male thing. Females can do it, but they find it dull and boring. It’s simply not interesting because it is not geared towards the strengths of the female mind.
Otto Weininger wrote a great book called Sex and Character. He is often pilloried for being a misogynist, but I am not certain if that characterization is correct, and anyway, a lot of those severe Germanic philosophers of that era were not so friendly to women (Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, Kierkegaard).
In that book, he opines that only a male can be a genius and all true geniuses of the past have been males. He says it is possible for a female to be a genius, but if she was, she would have to have a masculinized or male-like mind. His actual words that if a female genius existed, she would probably be a genius. There are many feminine intellectuals out there, but I have noticed that quite a few of what I would call female geniuses are either fairly masculine or tomboyish women (Laurie Anderson, Avital Rondell) or they are out and out lesbians (look at all the lesbian intellectuals in the feminist movement).
A friend of mine pointed out that when we males see a female intellectual or a female behaving intellectually, it automatically seems like masculine behavior on her part. He said we males do not find it particularly sexy or attractive and in fact, it is a turnoff.
The Religious Right and the anti-gay crowd have made a big deal about this extremely provocative piece written by homosexual Michael Swift for a gay newspaper in 1987. Indeed, this text is shocking, and when I first read it, I was outraged.
Here is the text of the essay in full:
This essay is an outré, madness, a tragic, cruel fantasy, an eruption of inner rage, on how the oppressed desperately dream of being the oppressor.
We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us.
Women, you cry for freedom. You say you are no longer satisfied with men; they make you unhappy. We, connoisseurs of the masculine face, the masculine physique, shall take your men from you then. We will amuse them; we will instruct them; we will embrace them when they weep.
Women, you say you wish to live with each other instead of with men. Then go and be with each other. We shall give your men pleasures they have never known because we are foremost men too, and only one man knows how to truly please another man; only one man can understand the depth and feeling, the mind and body of another man.
All laws banning homosexual activity will be revoked. Instead, legislation shall be passed which engenders love between men.
All homosexuals must stand together as brothers; we must be united artistically, philosophically, socially, politically and financially. We will triumph only when we present a common face to the vicious heterosexual enemy.
If you dare to cry faggot, fairy, queer, at us, we will stab you in your cowardly hearts and defile your dead, puny bodies.
We shall write poems of the love between men; we shall stage plays in which man openly caresses man; we shall make films about the love between heroic men which will replace the cheap, superficial, sentimental, insipid, juvenile, heterosexual infatuations presently dominating your cinema screens. We shall sculpt statues of beautiful young men, of bold athletes which will be placed in your parks, your squares, your plazas. The museums of the world will be filled only with paintings of graceful, naked lads.
Our writers and artists will make love between men fashionable and de rigueur, and we will succeed because we are adept at setting styles. We will eliminate heterosexual liaisons through usage of the devices of wit and ridicule, devices which we are skilled in employing.
We will unmask the powerful homosexuals who masquerade as heterosexuals. You will be shocked and frightened when you find that your presidents and their sons, your industrialists, your senators,your mayors, your generals, your athletes, your film stars, your television personalities, your civic leaders, your priests are not the safe, familiar, bourgeois, heterosexual figures you assumed them to be.
We are everywhere; we have infiltrated your ranks. Be careful when you speak of homosexuals because we are always among you; we may be sitting across the desk from you; we may be sleeping in the same bed with you.
There will be no compromises. We are not middle-class weaklings. Highly intelligent, we are the natural aristocrats of the human race, and steely-minded aristocrats never settle for less. Those who oppose us will be exiled.
We shall raise vast private armies, as Mishima did, to defeat you. We shall conquer the world because warriors inspired by and banded together by homosexual love and honor are invincible as were the ancient Greek soldiers.
The family unit-spawning ground of lies, betrayals, mediocrity, hypocrisy and violence–will be abolished. The family unit, which only dampens imagination and curbs free will, must be eliminated. Perfect boys will be conceived and grown in the genetic laboratory. They will be bonded together in communal setting, under the control and instruction of homosexual savants.
All churches who condemn us will be closed. Our only gods are handsome young men. We adhere to a cult of beauty, moral and esthetic. All that is ugly and vulgar and banal will be annihilated. Since we are alienated from middle-class heterosexual conventions, we are free to live our lives according to the dictates of the pure imagination. For us too much is not enough.
The exquisite society to emerge will be governed by an elite comprised of gay poets. One of the major requirements for a position of power in the new society of homoeroticism will be indulgence in the Greek passion. Any man contaminated with heterosexual lust will be automatically barred from a position of influence. All males who insist on remaining stupidly heterosexual will be tried in homosexual courts of justice and will become invisible men.
We shall rewrite history, history filled and debased with your heterosexual lies and distortions. We shall portray the homosexuality of the great leaders and thinkers who have shaped the world. We will demonstrate that homosexuality and intelligence and imagination are inextricably linked, and that homosexuality is a requirement for true nobility, true beauty in a man.
We shall be victorious because we are fueled with the ferocious bitterness of the oppressed who have been forced to play seemingly bit parts in your dumb, heterosexual shows throughout the ages. We too are capable of firing guns and manning the barricades of the ultimate revolution.
Tremble, hetero swine, when we appear before you without our masks.
As you can see, it is totally outrageous and embarrassing to sane gay people, or sane people period for that matter. The problem is that you need to look at the first line of the essay. The first line appears to indicate that this is a satirical work – it is not serious. Most pro-gay websites and groups claim that this is a satirical work and it is not serious. Nevertheless, the Gay Lobby tells many a lie, so one wonders. However, on the balance of the evidence, this seems to be more of a joke than a serious piece.
The anti-gays treating this like it is serious are basically idiots.
However, I do not think Swift should have written this provocative piece as it’s basically raw meat for the haters. Seems like a dumb move by Mr. Swift. Way to go, Einstein.
But how much of it represents the way that gays feel deep down inside? No one knows. I have been around many gays in my life and have lived and worked very close to large gay neighborhoods in big US cities, so I know these folks pretty well. In addition, some of my girlfriends have had so many gay friends that they were virtually fag hags.
Fag hag is a difficult term.
The number of women who have gay male friends is very large, and where one draws the line between a normal heterosexual woman and a fag hag is not known. All or almost all fag hags, curiously enough, are heterosexual in orientation. They are said to be heterosexually repressed, but that has definitely not been my observation. They seem more like nymphos to me.
Based on my observations and those of the fag hags I have known, I really do feel that most gay men want everyone, especially men, to be gay.
The Seven Sisters are seven historical women’s colleges back East that were established in the 1800′s. All are relatively elite institutions. They include Mt. Holyoke, Bryn Mawr, Smith, Barnard, Radcliffe, Vassar and Wellesley. Radcliffe merged with Harvard, and Vassar started accepting male students a while ago. However, all of these colleges are now accepting a certain kind of “male” student, as this post will make clear. Famous grads range from anthropologist Margaret Mead (Barnard) to actresses Stockard Channing (Radcliffe) and Meryl Streep (Vassar) to Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (Wellesley).
There have definitely been some major changes at these colleges in recent years. For instance, one of my mother’s best friends went to Wellesley in the 1950′s. At that time, there was little lesbianism at that school or at most women’s colleges for that matter. However, in recent years, almost all historical women’s colleges in the US have become heavily swarmed with lesbians. It’s not that everyone at Wellesley and other schools is lesbian or bisexual (there are many straight female students there) but the lesbian element is very strong there, and if you are a student there, you will be aware of the lesbians constantly.
What has happened? Are there more lesbians in the US now than there were then? Who knows?
But the experience at women’s colleges has definitely changed, and there is much more lesbianism there than there used to be.
Transmen are female to male transsexuals. Usually they start out taking male hormones and then they move onto surgery. Breast removal, a frightening procedure to contemplate for a woman for sure, is quite common. The final step is the construction of a fake and non-functioning appendage-like penis.
Transmen often look very much like boys or men. There are some photos of transmen at the link, and it is a shock to see them. One transman is now growing a beard!
The presence of transmen on campus has created quite a controversy at these schools. For one thing, the constitutions of the schools have had to be changed and the word “they” substituted for the word “she.” In addition, instructors are told to refer to transmen as “he” and “him.” Transmen often introduce themselves by saying, “Hello, I am Jim, and I use male pronouns.”
The problem is that all of these schools are all girls colleges. Except that now transmen are there too. And a transman is…what? A male? A female? A heshe? A whatsit? Who the Hell knows what they are!
However quite a few female students think they should not be there because they have no business as virtual males having a presence at an all-girls’ school. A common question is, “If they wanted to turn into men, why in the Hell did they enroll at an all-girls school?”
To me, transmen are very odd, but perhaps this is acceptable.
There are two types of transsexuals. One type seems biological, freaks of nature. They claim to have felt like the opposite sex from a very early age. I am sympathetic to these folks. The condition appears to be innate and is incurable.
There is a second type which in my opinion is simply an extreme form of homosexuality. In the case of many transmen, they simply have an extreme form of lesbianism. I am not so sympathetic to this second type because they do not seem to innately of the wrong gender and freaks of nature. To me they seem more like “flakes of nature.”
Readers, how do you feel about this. What is your reactions to the article. Personally, I look at those transmen and while I may support their decision, the whole phenomenon looks bizarre as Hell.
Miss International 2013, whatever that is. Never even heard of that contest before.
She sure is beautiful, isn’t she?
A video from 2003 called The Gift by Louise Hogarth. A very bizarre video about gay men who try to get HIV (bug chasers) and men who have HIV and try to give it to others (gift givers). It sounds completely insane and really it is, but it is not so nuts and nihilistic and it sounds.
These are young gay men who are sick and tired of worrying about whether or not they are going to catch HIV or not. They are tired of worrying about it. So they are just going to get HIV and get it over with. Then they can have all the wild sex they want to without worrying about anything anymore. Unfortunately, that is understandable. The problem is that some of the bug-chasers in this video not only got HIV, but they got quite sick very quickly after they got it. It doesn’t seem to have been worth it.
The bug-chasing and gift-giving community numbered about ~15,000 in online communities when this movie was shot. The phenomenon was increasing in the early 2000′s, but no one knows if it is still increasing. It probably isn’t or at least not by much, but it’s still going on.
Another problem is that once you are HIV-positive, by no means are all of your worries over. For one thing, you can get multiple infections of different clades of HIV, or more commonly in the US, different strains of HIV. The multiple strains tend to make the illness more virulent, and you can die a lot faster than you would have with just one strain. Multiple-clade infections are more common outside the US, such as in Africa where most of the clades are still evident. Cameroon in particular seems to harbor almost all of the clades. In the US, only Clade B is generally present.
Also you can acquire a drug-resistant strain of Clade B, which is what is happening in the US. And different clades are combining to form multiple-clade recombinant forms of the virus which are particularly hard to deal with.
There are other factors at work here. The gay community has developed a PC phobia of attacking positive men as it will hurt their feelings. Therefore, you can’t even say that it’s good to be HIV-negative as it will hurt positive men’s feelings. Crazy or what? But it’s typical PC lunacy. PC after all is simply the pathological fear of hurting somebody’s feelings. So because of this, the gay community can’t say that being HIV-positive is bad (in fact, there are repeated messages of how one can live a great life with HIV which are not really true). Also they can’t say it’s better to be HIV-negative than HIV-positive as this will discriminate and hurt feelings. It’s all nuts.
The community has gone PC-nuts, and it’s possible that PC insanity is contributing to a second wave of the HIV epidemic.
There are other things involved. Some HIV-negative partners of HIV-positive men are distressed because they are not HIV-positive too. They want to be HIV-positive so they can be the same as their lovers. Other HIV-negative men in long term relationships with HIV-positive men are sick and tired of worrying about getting it from their partners so they just want to get it over with.
Others want to be HIV-positive because they are lonely, and if they are positive, they can fit in with a whole new large crowd of HIV-positive men, many of whom have large organizations with quite a feel of camaraderie.
PC is covering up this bug-chasing and gift-giving thing by saying that it hardly even exists. That’s not so. It’s not a huge percentage of the gay population, but it is definitely out there.
Some HIV-negative men are even throwing “conversion parties,” where they invite up to 15 guys positive to come and gang bang them.
There are parties only for HIV-positive men and others only for HIV-negative men. But many of the sex clubs no longer test or inquire about your status if you go there, which seems irresponsible to me. Some men run party houses where they throw wild gay sex parties. They say, “Just assume that everyone here is HIV-positive.” That seems like a reasonable approach to take.
The interviews are striking. A number of guys say that of their sex partners, no one ever even asks if you are HIV-positive or HIV-negative. It’s seen as rude to ask or perhaps people just do not want to know.
The number of men barebacking (anal sex with no condoms) is estimated to be 80% by some interviewees. That would not surprise me one bit.
Some interviewees note that the anti-HIV messages are just not working, so we need to do something else. What else?
There is footage of a support group of middle aged gay men who are HIV-positive and also have developed heart conditions due to ART anti-HIV therapy. It is true that these drugs are toxic to the heart, however, HIV is also toxic to the heart, so there is not much of a choice there now, is there? These men are some of the most sane men in the whole footage. They think it is insane that any young men are seeking to get HIV or that people are so reckless as to not care whether they get it or not. I had a lot of admiration for these guys, who seemed to be some of the most mature and sane of all of them.
Gay men aged 18 now have a 50% chance of being HIV-positive by the time they are age 50. That is a pretty stunning figure. The rates for Black and Hispanic gay men have always been higher than for straight men, but no one knows why.
Here is a video about the second HIV epidemic from 1995. It is true that there has been a secondary HIV epidemic among gay men, but the rates are not nearly as high as in the first wave.
Actually the alarmists were wrong about the ever exploding HIV epidemic. HIV incidence (number of new infections per year) peaked in 1983 and has been declining ever since. The prevalence rate (percentage of people infected with HIV) peaked in 1993 and has been declining since, so prevention has had some good effects.
Women are notoriously paranoid of STD’s, especially HIV, and this is one thing that limits the spread of such things in the straight community. In a sense, straight women force straight men to act good, responsible, etc. In an all-male community, all of that goes out the window. The inhibitions of women are good for something after all.
Down vote me if you want but if this guy has luck like me, it won’t end up good. I was in an altercation just like this about 2 years ago. She beat the living hell out of me (hit me in the face with a broad head arrow and made me bleed) she hit me in the face, throat, stomach and anywhere else.
After about 45 minutes of her beating the hell out of me, I grab her arms to get her to quit and pushed her away from me. Boom, next day I’m in county under felony assault on a female.. It looked bad because I’m 6’5″ and she is about 5′. I got out of it with a misdemeanor because I could have just left. The felony is still on my record and its keeping me from continuing with life. The woman is 100% in the wrong, but I’ve got a feeling it’s not gonna be good for the guy…
…Story time. One of my co-workers was recently married (at the time), just bought a new house, and invested everything he had into it. Within a month the mother in law had moved in with them. One day he gets into an argument with the mother in law, goes upstairs to take a shower to cool off. 10 minutes later the police are at the front door and arrest him for assault on a female (with zero proof except for the mother in laws word).
He spends 72 hours in lock up and by the time he gets out the wife and mother in law already have a restraining order, so he can not get back into his own house. A year worth of criminal trials, tens of thousands of lawyer fees he is finally cleared of the charges. Oh they also took the house, and half of everything he had.
Turns out the mother in law has been married and divorced four times, every time under similar circumstances. This is what she does for a living, and once she got too old for her scam, she trained her daughter to do it. All it takes is one women to SAY, “he hit me” to ruin your life, no proof necessary.
I am supposed to say that the equity feminists are ok this, but I am not so sure. The truth is that 100% of the mainstream feminist organizations supported the insane laws that made these guys go to jail, and to this day, they will never say that this man was not in wrong.
Feminism has damaged most American women in quite a few ways. Even women who are obviously not gender feminists, even older women, those in their 70′s and 80′s, they all support this stuff. They are all insane. All of the feminist organizations are insane. All women who think this guy needs a criminal record are insane. In a word, society itself has gone insane, and feminism is part of the reason for it.
I would also argue that feminism has surely done some good things for men, women and society, but then there this whole huge downside.
If any woman hit me with an arrow (!) so hard that I started bleeding, I would hit her as hard as I could, and maybe even more than once. I just hope I wouldn’t kill her is all, but even that would be tempting.
In my world, pretty much anyone of either gender who attacks me with that much ferocity gets pounded, or at least I try to pound them. If they make me bleed, I pound them a few extra times just for that sin right there.