At age 26, you can get tons and tons of sex if you want to, and you don’t even need any money. Hook up with a woman about 28-34 yrs old with a college education. If you are a student, she will think that you have tremendous potential. If you are out of school and working but not making enough, at least you will be working.
You can actually make some money in your 20′s, especially your late 20′s, even though the whole world is united against you in making money since you are too young. It is here that you understand the war of the Old Men on the Young Men, and how it keeps young men poor.
A woman around 28-34 is at the peak of her sex drive, just about, especially the 34 yr old. Well, if you want to, you can have sex for hours a day or three or four times throughout the day. This is known as acquiring a Sex Maniac Girlfriend.
This age for a man is fantastic, because at age 26, some women are actually letting men bang them all the time who are not their husbands, and they do not even charge for the sex either, which makes no sense in Female Logic, as sex is usually a commodity to be traded to the male for money.
In many cases resulting in a female scam called “all her money is for her and all your money is for her.”
And all this while you are not even married.
These women will hate you in a way for your lack of money and sex mania, but a man that age can easily have sex three or four times a day and even have sex for maybe hours a day, though try not to damage your dick if you do it. It might only last a couple of months, but it will be the best couple of months you ever had in your whole life. And you don’t even have to get married either! Haha!
She will have other guys either dumped on the side or else actively going, and may temp you with stuff like, “This weekend I am going off with one of my other boyfriends. The BLACK boyfriend!”
She will accuse you of being an animal in bed, which will be a truthful assertion.
She will say all that you ever want to do is have sex, which will also be true, and that the only reason you are around all the time is to fuck her, and that is all you even care about. This may be true but requires endless deep contemplation and meditation.
She will suggest that you hate women and that you have been hating them your whole life, even though you have been trying to screw everything that moves and has a skirt for years. This may set off endless worrying, but not necessarily.
Perhaps you do hate women, and if so what of it? It’s actually a love hate thing, and as long as you don’t hit them or insult them too much, it’s pretty fun, and it’s probably not even true anyway.
She will say you are the biggest sex maniac she has ever known, and this is probably true. You may now wear the Sex Maniac button proudly.
You will try to go buy a new Sex Maniac Girlfriend, but they are sort of hard to find, and most of them are getting into the age where they are charging bigtime for the pleasures of banging them. But you will always have memories.
Dr. Brian Sykes and Dr. Anna Nekaris announce that they will examine Dr. Melba Ketchum’s Bigfoot DNA study! Excellent news. I do not know if these two are the scientists that Ketchum referred to in this statement:
I have independent analysis of our data going on. If the outcome of what we are doing supports our analysis, then we are vindicated. If not, then I will announce that also. It involves top level scientists that have volunteered after I released the paper. If their findings are the same, they will go public. So, please be patient. They also will assure upload to GenBank and they can make that happen.
However, Nekaris and Sykes are definitely going to be looking over her data.
Sykes backs out of Western Bigfoot Society meeting in Oregon. Sykes said his travel agent was unable to change Sykes’ plans for that week to he could go to the USA, so he will not be appearing at that meeting. A disappointment.
Video investigates Rick Dyer Bigfoot shooting.
In this video, a man investigates the Rick Dyer Bigfoot shooting. The area is indeed forested. I had no idea that Texas had such think, nearly tropical, forests! He finds a young homeless man who lives in the forest. The man says that Dyer was indeed in the area camping for one week in September along with a film crew. Also there were two large SUV’s present. Incredibly, the man also says that gunshots were heard in the area during that time.
Large piles of scat that look almost like cow pies are seen in the area, however, there are no cows, and it’s too large to be mountain lion scat. Also there are the remains of a couple of killed turkeys in the area.However, the man says he has never seen a Bigfoot in the area. Very interesting video!
Shout out to 2 women in Bigfoot Forums. Very quickly after the Rick Dyer story broke on Bigfoot Forums (and I am the one who broke that story) 2 women on the forum, JackiLB and VioletX, quickly decided that there was something to the story and that Dyer had indeed shot a Bigfoot. They have held to their conviction through 312 pages of threads, enduring quite a bit of bashing in the process.
I don’t know how they decided that the story was true. Possibly pure female intuition. This is one of the things I love about women – the near psychic nature of their intuitive senses. Men are so often caught up in the logic trap that they can’t think from the seat of their pants, from their guts or straight from their hearts.
One way to look at this thinking is to call it the Gestalt. The Gestalt is “I know it when I see it.” It’s where the total is greater than the sum of its parts.
In bird watching for instance, sometimes I see a bird and I just know that it is a such and such species, even if I catch it only for a glance. If you asked me how I arrived at that conclusion, I probably could hardly even tell you! I arrived at that conclusion through some sum total of everything that I had known and learned about the bird via books, observation, discussion and whatnot. But I couldn’t put my finger on what exactly it was that drove me to that conclusion. It was more of a “I know it when I see it” type thing. The bird simply gave off the “smell,” “vibe” or “feeling” of being a such and such species.
This is the way intuition operates. Detectives use their intuition all the time. So do investigative reporters and investigators of all types. Maybe we need more female detectives.
Anyway, shout out to Violet and Jacki. I am confident they will be proven right in the end. You go girls!
Dyer Bigfoot being stored at the University of Nevada Las Vegas (UNLV). I feel that Rick Dyer is in possession of a Bigfoot that he shot and killed. Dyer has hinted that the Bigfoot is being stored at the UNLV somewhere. This has led to all sorts of speculation and accusations that if this is so, someone would have leaked this information by now. I am not sure that is true, and it may indeed be possible that the Bigfoot is at UNLV.
Dyer had an autopsy done on his Bigfoot. Although this was hinted around by the Musky Allen interview in which he said that he had seen incisions and shaved areas where presumably an autopsy had been done, I con now confirm through a source I have who is very close to Dyer that an autopsy on Dyer’s Bigfoot has in fact been done! Very exciting news.
Derek Randles and Dyer have been communicating for months. I was one of the first people to tell Derek about Dyer’s story, and I told him that I thought Dyer had in fact killed a Bigfoot. Surprisingly, Derek had a very open mind about it, and considered that the story might indeed be true. Derek also stated that there was no bad blood between him and Dyer as Derek tries to get along with everyone. But it is interesting that they have been communicating for some time now. It would be great if Derek could see the dead Bigfoot! Whatever anyone thinks of Derek, we know one thing for sure and that is that he is no hoaxer!
Adrian Erickson Bigfoot documentary has funding problems. A phone call by someone on Bigfoot Forums to Erickson revealed that Erickson has funding problems in terms of getting his documentary released, according to Erickson himself.
Ketchum unethical dealings in the apparent bypassing of peer review to get her paper published. There are accusations that Ketchum engaged in unethical behavior by creating a new journal out of nowhere, the Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Exploration in Zoology (this is apparently the journal that she claims to have “bought out”) then dissolving the journal to create her De Novo Journal. It’s not known at all whether Ketchum’s paper passed review at the Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Exploration in Zoology, but it could only have been in review for a week or so there.
She has been accused of scientific misconduct for doing this, however, I am not sure if this qualifies as scientific misconduct. At any rate, this is one case where I will support Ketchum’s unethical behavior to the fullest. She needed to get her paper out there, one way or the other, by hook or by crook, and she did it. If she had to bypass peer review in order to do that, so be it. It’s being reviewed by her peers right now in the media anyway. It’s obvious that mainstream science simply refused to look at her data in a fair way. There was no way on Earth they were going to publish an article on Bigfoot DNA, no matter what it said or who wrote it. If that’s the way they were going to be about it, then peer review needed to be bypassed.
Accusation that Melba Ketchum charged $500,000 for genetic work that should have only cost $100,000. I have no idea what to make of this charge or whether or not she ripped anyone off. The people ripped off in this case would have been Erickson and Wally Hersom. Right now it is just one more accusation lobbed at her.
Excellent Ketchum critique on Jon Downes’ Cryptozoology Online page. Downes showed the paper to two zoologists, and this was their response:
ZOOLOGIST #1
I think their methodology looks weak at best, Just their description of the variation in the morphology of the hairs is enough to make me think they have been analyzing hairs of several different species of animal mixed together. One of the photographs of the hairs looks distinctly human to me, whereas one of the others looks more like a bear. Apart from that the paper has a lot of statements they just expect us to take at face value, That’s simply poor science. I can’t see any scientific journal accepting this.
ZOOLOGIST #2
The English is poorly written. In a normal paper, a high standard of English is assumed, and papers can be rejected based on this. A normal reviewer would jump on this (though obviously small typos and things are found in any paper, as you would expect)
From the introduction, it is obvious that the writers are not writing from a null position. Because good science is hypothesis driven, you need a null hypothesis to act in opposition to the actual hypothesis (for instance, I hypothesize that compared to the average human, there is a significant difference between the sizes of X and Y. The null hypothesis would be that there is no significant difference). Study introductions should review the literature from an unbiased point of view, make hypotheses accordingly, then go into the study. This kinda doesn’t.
“Some photographic evidence also exists such as Figure 4 is a reddish brown Sasquatch sleeping in the forest” (page 2, 4th para) is one heck of a statement to give, especially without a reference to a paper (or at least a book!) demonstrating that it is in fact a ‘squatch. To my knowledge, no peer-reviewed paper does so.
“Video of the same Sasquatch is seen in Supplementary Movie 1 where her respirations are counted at only 6 per minute.” Again, unreferenced assertion of sex and existence of the being as a Sasquatch.
They end the introduction by telling us what the study finds (in their eyes). This is a poor way to write a paper introduction as it indicates the lack of a null position (again).
Methods: no references for much of it. If you “thoroughly cleaned [the samples] in a manner consistent with forensic testing procedures” you need to reference the paper you got this from!
When they talk about “primers”, they don’t show or reference the sequences used! Bad practice.
No actual academics are on the paper, they are all forensic scientists. A potential bias from influence via funders and the private sector perhaps?
In the results section, they make inferences and speculations about the data (eg, “With the wide variety of haplotypes in the study and especially with the majority of the haplotypes being European or Middle Eastern in origin, migration into North America by these hominins may have occurred previous to the migration across the Bering land bridge.”). Again, a stupid thing to do, that is what the discussion is for.
Random crappy readouts from various programs are strewn all over the place with no explanation. Again, shoddy.
They give it a scientific name. With no haplotype. And the name is not in italics. A mistake which is guaranteed to irritate me.
I feel that these are good critiques. The paper was indeed poorly written up, shoddily presented, etc. It does look rather sloppy. However, I feel that her conclusions were sound anyway, and this is all that matters.
Excellent post by Scott Carpenter. I am getting very tired of everyone piling on Ketchum about this study. Look around the Bigfoot community, at the blogs, Facebook pages and forums, and it’s just pitiful the mud they are dragging this woman through. Absolutely sickening! The consensus is that her study and everything surrounding it is a total catastrophe. A lot of Bigfooters are crying in their beer.
I do not agree with much of this criticism. Though there were definitely some issues with the unprofessional way in which the study was written up and presented, I feel that her data is sound and that she has indeed proven that Bigfoots do exist.
Now imagine you are Dr. Ketchum, you know what you have, indisputable scientific proof Bigfoot exist. A major journal (Nature) has delayed you repeatedly with frivolous request and leaked your results to others (Sykes). You know mainstream science is trying to make an end run on you via the Sykes study. Sykes has the political power and financial backing to publish quickly. The collective scientific community has done everything they can to keep you from publishing your findings.
Also remember that Wally Hersom and Adrian Erickson have funded the study to the tune of over $300,000! Your professional reputation is ruined, and you just spent 5 years of your life on this project. You have the DNA, you have the solid proof and GenBank will not allow you to upload your sequences leaving the door open for Sykes or another scientist to zoom in and get the credit! Armed with this knowledge and these circumstances what do you do?
Would you tell Justin Smeja to contaminate his remaining samples so no one else like Sykes could use his political connections and power to beat you and claim discovery for what you already have? Would you have preemptive press releases before your study is published? Would you purchase a journal that has passed your paper only to back out at the last moment due to political pressure in order to preserve the peer reviews and editorial independence?
I have attacked Ketchum for supposedly telling Justin to contaminate the sample to make it unusable. I thought that was sleazy as Hell. But now that Scott has publisher her possible motivation for doing so, I think she may have been correct in fact to do just that! Although it was a dirty thing to do, and I do not like to act dirty myself, this may have been the right thing to do in the end. Why judge her?
Her preemptive press releases and the purchasing of the journal and possible bypassing of peer review also seem more sensible in this light. If this is what she needed to do, then do it. The preemptive press releases and end run around peer review were done in order to head off Sykes at the pass. The scientific community was bypassing Ketchum, but they may not have been willing to bypass Sykes, so in order to beat Sykes to the punch when she was first anyway, and given the frozen mindset preventing her from publishing, she did what she had to do.
Now personally, I would not have the guts to end-run peer review, etc. I do not think I could do that. Granted, it’s pretty dirty. But Ketchum was fighting against some forces acting pretty dirty against her too. Maybe you gotta do what you gotta do.
Scott also gets to the meat of Ketchum’s study here:
In other words the DNA is:
1. NOT Contaminated
2. All from 3 individuals (Bigfoot) not a mixture or contaminated
3. The results are repeatable
4. The SAME results were returned on 3 different samples from 3 different individuals, collected from 3 different locations, and at 3 different times.
5. The lab that ran the data is well respected, accredited, and independent
6. The results are rock solid and indisputable.
Right. And now let Scott explain why he says this:
First let me explain the “Q30″ scores that just zoomed over our collective heads. This is the key, this is why the critics are afraid, VERY afraid. Dr. Ketchum extracted and purified three samples (26, 31 and 140) with large amounts of high quality DNA. (Note that sample 26 came from the alleged killing of two Bigfoot by Justin Smeja aka “The Sierra Kills”).
She then sent these samples off to the University of Texas, Southwestern laboratory for sequencing. The UT laboratory used a widely accepted and proven process known as “the next generation Illumina platform”. The machine that process the the samples is known as a HiSeq 2000 next generation sequencer. Here is an excerpt from the DNA study that explains what a “Q30″ score is and what it means.
From the Ketchum paper: “The HiSeq 2000 next generation sequencer provides scores, Q30, for run quality78. Q30 can also be used to determine if there was any contamination (or mixture) found in the samples sequenced. According to Illumina, a pure, single source sample would have an Q30 score of 80 or greater with an average of 85. However, if there was contamination present in the sample sequenced, the divergent sequences would compete against one another prior to sequencing causing a contaminated sample to have a Q30 score of 40 to 50.
The Q30 scores for the three genomes sequenced had Q30 scores of 88.6, 88.4 and 88.7 respectively for samples 26, 31 and 140. The Q30 is the percent of the reads that have the statistical probability greater than 1:1000 of being correctly sequenced. Therefore, not only were the sequences from a single source, but the quality of the sequences were far above the average genome sequenced using the Illumina next generation sequencing platform.
The high quality of the genomes can be attributed to the stringent extraction procedures utilized whereby the DNA was repeatedly purified. This ultra-purified DNA also allowed for greater than 30X coverage of the three genomes. The summary and of the next generation sequencing generated by the HiSeq 2000 Illumina sequencer is furnished as Supplementary Data 7-10.”
The “Q30″ is a score that tells us how pure DNA is. The manufacture states that anything at or above a score of 80 is pure and NOT contaminated! Again let me repeat the scores were 88.6, 88.4, and 88.7 respectively.
As you can see, based on those Q30 scores, the DNA was not contaminated in any way, shape or form. So the whole contamination canard needs to be thrown out the window once and for all! The DNA was not contaminated! Repeat after me. Over and over now!
Reason for Ketchum not uploading the gene sequences to GenBank. Critics have bashed her mercilessly over this one, but apparently there was a good reason for this too. Apparently GenBank requires a signed release accompany any sequences containing human genes from the person whose genes they are. This is usually not a problem, but Ketchum’s Bigfoot samples contain human genes! So in other words, Melba would have had to get the Bigfoots who gave the samples to all sign release forms releasing their DNA to GenBank.
Apparently none of the Bigfoots whose genes she sampled was able to sign off on any of those papers! Most of them could not even be located, and those that could no doubt could not understand the request, don’t know what paper and a pens are or how to use them, and furthermore, are no doubt not literate enough to know how to sign their names, assuming they even have names in the first place!
However, the scientists reviewing her data told Melba that they will arrange having her DNA uploaded to GenBank.
This is another in a series of articles where I try my hand at Game Theory, which is basically showing guys how to get women. This is a collaborative exercise. In other words, I am not Joe Stud teaching losers who can’t get women how to get one. This is a collaborative effort whereby males share their knowledge and experience as far as what works to get women.
One thing that I would like to say is very painful. It’s this:
You need to get a woman to get women. Or, you need to have a woman to get women. You get one woman, now you get more. See? The problem with this is, What about the guy who has no women, or, worse, who has never had any at all? I don’t want to say he is up the creek, but his prospects do not look too good.
If you had success with females in the past, then typically you can parlay that into more success in the future. So in that case, you don’t need to have a woman to get a woman. If you had a woman, you can get a woman. Or if you had women (better yet) you can get new ones.
The one common requirement here is experience and success. As with so much else in life, what to say to those poor souls who lack either or both? I do not know what to say to such a person.
However, there was a time in my teens when I had little or no success with females. At 16, I had hardly even been kissed. I overheard my father talking to my Mom in bed one night. “I am really worried about him,” my Dad said. “He doesn’t have any girlfriends!” My Mom said, “Don’t worry, he is still young.”
This sent a shiver of terror running down my spine. My own father was worried I was a faggot! This was back in the day when we thought homosexuality was contagious. Basically, all males started out straight but through some distortion of their self-image and sexuality, some straight males simply “turned gay.” A lot of us seemed to be worried about the prospect of “turning gay,” from conversations with my friends. And I read a Playboy statistic back in the 1970′s that said that 62% of all males have worried at some point or another in their lives whether they were gay or not. Probably for most of them it was but a passing worry.
Anyway, after hearing that, I resolved that I better to get myself some chicks right quick lest I turn into a homo! I grew my hair long, started smoking dope and listening to rock and roll. Wild fights with my father, sometimes fistfights, ensued. He as much as called me a faggot. He would sit there glaring at me at the dinner table, finally pounding his fist on the table. “Goddamn it!” he would scream. “You look like Veronica Lake!” Some old days movie star with fine curls. Which I had. Fine curls that is.
Anyway, all it took was the long hair, the dope and the rock and roll and pretty soon the chicks started rolling right on in. My Dad was furious that I was no longer a nerd. I dumped all my idiot, pussy, often somewhat fagged-out nerd friends who had no females in sight. I quit going to Chess Club meetings. Looking back on it, maybe I should not have dumped these nerds. One is now a brain surgeon, and the other owns a factory. Neither of these guys ever got any pussy, but I figure they must have got some by now. They lacked charm being nerds, but money has its own subtle allure you know.
Anyway, at one point in my life, I had zero experience, and pretty soon, I had quite a bit. I am not sure how I did it. It helped that at my age (16) most guys were complete failures as far as girls went. People were kind to me when I joined the hipster club.
At any rate, confidence helps. Even if you have dated 75-100 females, you can reach a point in your life when your confidence is zero. It won’t be appealing.
If you’re not having any success, I would urge you to shut up about it. I learned that awful quick. Back in the 1970′s, you were allowed about 3 weeks with no chick. After that, you were Loser City. Any females found out you had not girl in your life, they would start laughing and humiliating you right to your face. A few times, I offered that I had no chick in my life, and I might want one. I generally just got laughed at by both sexes. “Haha! Loser! Don’t expect me to help you!” That was from the guys. From the females it was crueler if anything.
I learned real quick to shut up about my sex life, and I also learned to lie a lot. My stock answer to every question was, “I don’t talk about my love life.” And I didn’t. That way you keep everyone guessing.
The painful realization that I got out of all of this was that at least at a young age, say early 20′s, pretty much nobody, I mean nobody, I mean nobody, is going to help you get laid. And the longer the incel spree goes on, the worse things get. Your confidence, formerly as high as the clouds, is now down in the mud. After dating 75 females at age 23-24, people were asking me if I was a virgin! They were asking me if I had ever had a date! If I had ever had a girlfriend! I assume they were reacting to what appeared to be possibly the lack of confidence that I was generating.
So now we finally roll around to the subject of the post. After much mucking about, the Whale is finally in sight, waiting to be stuck.
I have noticed in recent years that when there is not much going on female-wise in my life, I turn women off everywhere I go. Especially with young women, the attitude is basically, “Get the Hell away from me!”
As my love life picks up and things get moving along nicely, the women suddenly become way, way friendlier. Even previously inaccessible young women. All of a sudden, there are friendly and sexy females everywhere I go.
You wear your life in your sleeve. It takes a woman to get a woman!
Many men desire to boff a Lolita and would do a murder to bed one (litterally). There is a lot of demand for this, and some offer to accommodate that demand (child prostitution).
What he means is teenage girl prostitution, not the actual prostitution of girls 12-under. I agree that the two things are completely different.
I had sex with so many teenage girls between when I was aged 16-21 that I really don’t have any need to do sort of thing anymore, and it’s illegal anyway. It’s a been there, done that kinda thing.
How Did God’s Gift to Man Ever Get So Silly?
What was odd was that at the time I thought teenage girls were God’s gift to mankind (they did not seem the slightest bit immature to me in general), but as I get older and older, they seem more and more ridiculous, immature and utterly idiotic to me, and it’s an extreme turnoff. I am not sure I would do a 14-17 year old girl even if it was legal!
Even when I look at them, which I admit that I do, I am often thinking about the teenage girls I knew back in the day who were my friends and girlfriends. So even though it looks like I am checking them out, I am actually reminiscing about the old days rather than having lurid fantasies about some 2013 hottie. Sometimes the girl I am looking at even reminds me of a particular girl. My memories are wonderful, but I don’t wish to relive them.
Memories of Underdevelopment
13 year old’s really do look like little girls – especially those baby faces – and that’s an extreme turnoff. 14 year old girls are very interesting creatures, and they are starting to get a woman’s body, so any man wants to look at them more.
But in recent years, I have started to dislike underdeveloped teenage girls. A 14 year old girl’s body doesn’t look that great because it is not well developed yet. Their bodies still look sort of like sticks, and they are just not fully developed. Even a 15 year old girl does not yet have the full hourglass woman figure that a man loves, so even they sort of turn me off lately as underdeveloped. I like a girl best when she is fully developed with a full woman’s body, which appears probably around age 16 or so. 16-17 year old girls look as great as any grown woman.
Don’t Call Us Kids
I always hated calling teenagers “kids,” because it seemed to be such an insult to someone who is honestly neither a kid nor an adult. I hated it when I was a teenager and people called me a kid. I yelled at them, “I am not a child!” “Young man” and “young woman” seems so much more respectful. But every year as I get older, teenagers of both sexes seem more and like the “kids” that everyone calls them. It disturbs me to think of them this way because it seems insulting, but that’s how they seem as I grow older.
College Girls Really Are Girls
In the last five years or so, I have even increasingly found young women aged say 18-23 to be increasingly insipid, ridiculous, empty headed, immature, and idiotic. They literally seem like they have nothing in the brains, and their emotions seem vapid and poorly attuned. Although they are beautiful of course, and I love to look at them, almost all of them want nothing to do with me, and I am quite aware of that. I would not object to sex with one, but it’s not something that I honestly even care about at my age.
It’s gotten so bad that I even find some women in their late 20′s to be ridiculous, overemotional, immature and empty headed. I was involved with a 27 year old at one point in recent years (she was even talking about marrying me), and I started thinking she was a silly young woman. I liked her a lot, so it pained me to think of her that way, but that’s how it went. It’s amazing that women continue to mature emotionally even past the late 20′s!
Respect for the Older Woman
So yeah, I have a new respect for older women. Women age a lot worse than men physically. God is obviously a sexist male pig as far as most women are concerned, and he’s probably a misogynist too. A lot of women my age don’t look that great anymore, but some still do. Nevertheless, one has to be realistic. I do judge women on looks, but fair is fair. I judge a 45 year old woman based on 1-10 for other 45 year old women. You judge a 55 year old woman 1-10 compared to other 55 year olds.
I know a woman in her 60′s. I have known her well from age 62-66. From 62-65, she looked knock out, drop dead gorgeous. And I told her this on a regular basis. She always corrected me by saying, “But Bob, you’re crazy! I’m an old lady!” Yeah, a hot old lady! Recently she has been battling a very serious illness, and sadly she is at last starting to look her age. I would say for a 65-66 year old though, she looks damn good.
If you have a brain at all, you want someone you can talk to. You can’t have sex all day anyway, and at my age, a lot of people aren’t even doing it anymore. I have a very high IQ, and I like intelligent conversation. Teenage girls are disaster zones as far as that goes, and young women are not much better. I have befriended some college girls in recent years (platonic friendships), and I even found the extremely bright ones to be vapid, ridiculous, child-like and preposterous. Extreme turnoff. You’re much more likely to have an intelligent conversation with a woman late 20′s-up.
A Porn Revelation
The other day I was downloading porn. Yeah I still do that. I had a ton of movies on my drive over a few hours. I was literally going nuts, out of control, addicted. Then I sat back and realized what the Hell I had been doing. Most of the movies involved older women aged 40-60. True they were with younger partners (that’s all you need to know), but they were older for sure. And the older they were, the more I was into the movie! The ones where there were late 40′s into 50′s were hottest of all.
I lay back in my chair and blinked my eyes hard. My God, I had been searching older women porn for hours! What in the Hell had come over me? My jaw dropped. I was officially an old man now.
A Man Wants a Woman, Not a Girl
I am a dirty old man, and of course I have a taste for young women. But there comes a time in his life when a man wants a woman, not a girl. Grown women act way too much like empty-headed, idiotic, overemotional, immature teenage girls as it is. Why on Earth would you want the real thing, which is obviously orders of magnitude worse?
Jaipal, the Hindutvadi in the comments section, has been spamming the blog for a long time now about the horrors and evils of the religion called Islam. This is typical for Hindutvadis and even Hindus. I have found that even average Hindus have a hatred for Islam and Hindus that is so extreme that it is nearly pathological.
As a note, spamming the comments section is not yet banned. I already ban on way too much as it is.There is a downside to banning other than the humanitarian one that the commenter’s human rights have been violated. That is that after every ban of a regular commenter, commenters quit commenting for awhile, as the ban has an inhibitory effect on other commenters. That is, they now fear that they will be banned.
Dota has stated that Islam has to be understood in its historical context. Jaipal has spammed responses to that saying that endlessly that Islam is nothing but the Quran and the Hadiths and anything that goes above and beyond that is simply not Islam.
Jaipal is guilty of reductionist thinking typical of fundamentalists. In voicing this line, Islamophobes are similar to Al Qaeda and the rest of the fundamentalists.
The fundies all say that Islam is frozen in time forever in the 7th Century and cannot be updated. They were even murdering vendors of ice in Iraq because there was no ice in the time of Mohammad. They were murdering children playing soccer because they believe Islam says it is sinful to play sports. They killed sellers of music CD’s because they think Islam says that music is evil.
Actually most of these beliefs stem from the extreme beliefs of Wahhabi Islam from Saudi Arabia. This austere creed started around 1800 in the center of Arabia and then spread out and conquered the peninsula. This is the official creed in Saudi Arabia and all state preachers are Wahhabis. It is a particularly toxic and wicked form of Islam.
Nevertheless, Saudi Arabia has an extremely low crime rate and is a well ordered and functioning society. If you go there, you think you are in suburban Phoenix. No one is starving or shitting on the ground, there are no little girl temple whores and everyone has health care and the benefits of a very generous welfare state. Criminals are treated brutally, often executed by pubic beheading which is a grotesque and evil way to deal with criminals. There have been some injustices, as recently a Filipina maid was beheaded when a child died in her care. But these injustices are not so common. The muttawa religious police bother people, but mostly they just harass you and make you go home.
Some girls died in a girls’ school recently in a fire and this caused outrage in Saudi society and reforms were made. A princess was badly beaten by her husband and this once again caused outrage in Saudi society about the beating of women. Once again, reforms were made. Despite misogynistic restrictions on women, women are not murdered for dowries and do not have acid thrown in their faces. Millions of female children are not murdered every year by starvation and suffocation. It is arguable whether women are treated better in India or Saudi Arabia. In some ways, women have it better in Saudi Arabia!
As you can see from the above, in many ways, even Saudi Arabia, perhaps the nadir of what we can expect from Islam outside of war zones and the Taliban, has even managed to produce a far more functional and even civilized society that the chaos, filth and Hell of Hindu India. So while I dislike both religions, I am not sure that Islam is worse than Hinduism. At least Islam creates working, functional and wealthy societies. Hinduism only seems to create filth and injustice ridden utter Hells. Look at India. India is what Hindus create.
Anyway, Dota is correct. What is practiced as Islam is Islam. Not the Koran. Not the Hadiths. Not both. Islam is what Muslims do, wherever and whenever they do it. As with socialism and everything else, theory is for ideologues. “Actually existing Islam” is like “actually existing socialism.”
Islam is whatever is practiced in whatever country is practicing Islam. Saudi Islam is what is practiced in Saudi Arabia. Shia Islam is what is practiced in Iran. Alevi Islam is what is practiced by Alevis in Turkey. Indonesian and Thai Islam is what is practiced in Thailand and Indonesia. Islam actually differs markedly in all of these places and regional traditions and religious accretions have formed syncretistic traditions.
In addition, moral codes and laws also differ widely across the Muslim World. The mullahs in Iran have sanctioned transsexual operations, and prostitution is nearly legal in the religious city of Qom. The mullahs for some time have been talking about setting up legal prostitution under the temporary marriage rubric. The head mullah of Lebanon’s Shia ruled that female masturbation was permissible and even desirable if she was single or her husband was not present. Everywhere they live, Shia take lovers outside of marriage under the temporary marriage custom. One prominent Iranian woman has had up to 5o lovers, many of them high ranking mullahs.
The Shia in particular believe as the Catholics do that Islam has to be continuously reinterpreted over the centuries to keep up with the times. So they reject the notion that Islam was frozen in time in the 7th Century. That is much more of a Sunni thing – the fascination with the 600′s AD.
In Mali, a group of Al Qaeda fundamentalists impose fierce Islamist rule that horrified that locals, who had a tradition of a much looser and more liberal Islam typical in the Sahel. Which one is the “real Islam.” Al Qaeda and Jaipal would say the Al Qaedists, but that is an illusion. But groups were practicing different forms of Islam, and neither one was the “real Islam,” because there is no such thing as the real Islam, as I note above. Islam varies geographically and historically it is varied temporally.
Islam is whatever people practice as Islam, whenever they do it and wherever they do it. That’s the definition of Islam as well as any other religion. Always has been, always will be. All else is cant and propaganda fit for ideologues who live in towers, not in realis.
In recent years, I have joined dating sites. Over that period, I have turned down dozens of women who messaged me with flirts and whatnot.
I would get a message saying, “Hottie210 sent you a flirt!” You go to the page, and it says, “Hottie210 wants to chat!” You look in the box and there is some lame opener she picked out of a choice of canned openers. I look at her photo, frown and say, “Ugh, get out.”
A wicked smile creeps across my face. I am getting revenge. Yes! Revenge for all those bitches who turned me down, treated me like crap and dirt, called me a creep or worse, threatened to call the cops on me tried to throw me out of their workplaces, filed sexual harassment charges against me, refused to even speak to me. Thousands and thousands of humiliations minor to near-suicide inducing.
The page asks, “Do you want to chat with Hottie210?” It gives you a choice: “Accept” or “Decline.”
A diabolical smile worms across my face, made of sheer malice and wickedness, the weight of 40 years of humiliation. What goes around, comes around, bitches!
The mouse moves up to the “Decline” button, and I click it, bam! The page tells me, “You just declined a conversation with Hottie210.”
I leap out of my chair and clap my hands and jump up and down like a schoolboy. I run around my apartment laughing and singing and thrusting my arm in the air.
Believe it or not, life is transactional, though if you’re a heterosexual male, you wonder how that’s so. Women tempt fate and justice their entire lives. Usually what comes around, goes around (the justice or “paybacks” aspect of the transactional nature of life), but not here. For females, the dues never come around, much less get paid. Women are sexual scofflaws. Women commit the equivalent of sexual first degree homicide against us men their whole lives, and there’s no calling them to account. In fact, the more of us they kill, the more their status rises.
I am in my living room, dancing a jig like a drunken paddy. “Karma’s a bitch, ain’t it, ladies?” I shout at the sky. I lick my lips, and the revenge tastes good there.
I fired a shot for the boys! For the sins of her sisters, she had to pay.
By the way, speaking of morals and whatnot, what morals does Western society increasingly have?
Skyrocketing divorce rates, with no real family values or respect for the basic functional unit of society, namely the family.
Out-of-Wedlock births and a growing bastard population,
increasing welfare dependency parasites on the dole, a drug and gun culture where a shooting now takes place every now and then?
Growing Christian Evangelism which emphasizes irrationality over reason like the creationism versus evolution debate.
What about gay marriage permissiveness. Should be the last to talk about morals!
Surely the low morals of America are vastly trumped by the devastatingly low morals of Indians. As humans, Indians are probably by far some of the morally lowest humans on the face of the Earth.
1. Of all humans on Earth, no humans care less about their fellow man than Indians. This is the most serious form of condemnation. Further, India has always been this way. As far back as we can go in history, Indians have never cared one whit about their fellow man.
2. One of the most viciously racist societies on Earth. India has actually instituted the most cruel and savage racism into every single crevice of its society in the form of the caste system. Is India the most racist society on Earth? In terms of the racist abuse doled out to its citizens, it may well be. In racist terms, what you have in India is nearly an entire nation of Nazi-like racists. And it is no wonder that Indians have long revered Hitler and the 3rd Reich.
3. Callous abuse of women. Of all societies on Earth, women are less safe in India than most other countries. Rapes are out of control, and possibly this has been the case for hundreds of years. For millenia, widows were set on fire on the streets of India. There are many 1000′s of cruel and horrific dowry murders of women every year in India. These murders are supported by the majority of the Indian people.
4. Child abuse. There is a long standing tradition of child abuse in India, actually sanctioned by Hindu priests. Hindu temples have been havens for the open sexual abuse of female children and even boys for hundreds of years. There are almost no arrests for these crimes, and they continue in vast numbers to this very day.
5. Slavery. Everywhere you look in India, you see frank and obvious slavery. Many millions of Indians are slaves, bonded into unpaid labor to higher castes for perpetuity. Many children are also slaves. Most of the women in Indian brothels are sex slaves, trafficked into slavery.
6. Callous abuse of traffic laws. There are few traffic laws in India, and what laws there are are violated by almost everyone. This is one of the worst countries on Earth to be a driver of a vehicle or a pedestrian on foot or bicycle. Indian drivers simply do not care and will gladly run into or over any pedestrian or bicyclist who gets in their way. There is no consideration of other drivers, and you take your life in your hands every time you step on the gas.
7. Widespread fraud, thievery and scamming. India has a business community in which ethics are nearly nonexistent. Indian businessmen constantly steal from each other, so no one trusts each other. There are no criminal prosecutions for fraud because all Indian politicians are criminals themselves. You can pursue the civil suit route, but it will take years to decades. Most Indian judges are corrupt criminals themselves, so there is no guarantee of any justice.
8. Corruption everywhere. Whether there is a single honest politician anywhere in India would be a great question. It is automatically assumed that all or nearly all politicians are criminals. This level of governmental crime is not seen much in the world outside of parts of Africa.
9. The worst starvation on Earth. India has the worst malnutrition and starvation figures on Earth. The only country that is worse is Ethiopia, and they live in the desert. Indians starve because their fellow Indians don’t care whether they starve or not or whether they live or die. India grows enough food to feed all of its people, but it is not distributed properly. Indian government programs to feed the poor are handed over to corrupt locals. Probably 95% of the food aid is then stolen by these locals and diverted to the open market.
10. A medical system based on callous abuse of the sick and dying. There are few places on Earth where you have to pay the doctor to keep you alive. India is one of those places. If you don’t pay the doctor, you get no treatment. You either live or die, or get better or worse. The only way to assure that you get any kind of treatment of all is to pay off the doctor-criminal.
11. Shit and piss everywhere. 600 million Indians lack toilets, so half a billion Indians shit and piss outdoors every day. The sidewalks and fields of India are covered with shit. It is difficult to walk in many Indian cities because there are shits everywhere you step on the ground.
Indian men piss openly, often on walls of cities. Many walls in cities smell horrifically of piss. If you look around big Indian city in the daytime, you will see city walls along sidewalks with dozens to scores of men lined up pissing on the wall. The piss rolls off the wall, down the sidewalk and into the gutters. The rich and middle class walk by carrying briefcases and care nothing whatsoever about the men pissing right next to them. No one will give these poor wretches toilets or build pubic restrooms because the Indians that have money don’t want any of it going to poor people, and the Indian state exists to serve the rich and only the rich, forever.
12. The most horrific beggars anywhere on Earth. In any Indian city, you will see beggars. You will see young boys, completely covered in shit, trying to steal food to survive. You will see men and women living on the streets, covered in in filth and degradation. You will see human skeletons everywhere, begging for food. If you give any of these wretches food, many Indians will rush up to and demand to know why you gave food to the “scumbag beggar.” According to Indians, giving food to beggars “only encourages them.” Instead of giving it to him, you should have given it to them instead.
13. If you go to the Indian holy city on the Ganges, you will see countless Indians drinking, bathing and swimming in the filthiest river the world has ever seen. Dead bodies float everywhere on the river, bloated, rotting, sickening. Crows perch on the bodies, gnawing on the dead. The rotting bodies loll up onto shore, where packs of roving dogs hound in on them and feast on the rotten corpses. This is India. This is the holiest city in all of India, the holiest city in Hinduism, the citadel of Hindu India.
14. Crabs in a barrel, dog eat dog, the law of the jungle. India has been this way as far back as anyone can remember. This is normal for India. Every man for himself, fuck everyone but me and mine. India is a nation of 1.2 million Mitt Romneys.
15. Nonexistent schools. Many villages lack schools. The state is only for the rich, so they don’t want to build villages for the poor. In many Indian villages, the schools have no toilets, so the children shit and piss outside all through the day. In many of these schools, the teachers simply never show up. They collect a paycheck for many years, but they never spend a day in class. This situation often goes on for many years.
16. The worst religion on Earth. One reason why Hinduism is the worst religion can be exemplified by Hindu temples. All Christian churches, especially Catholic churches, are mandated to give many to most donations to the poor. The churches also raise money to serve the poor. Mosques are also mandated to serve the poor.
Muslims must tithe a certain portion of income to the mosque, which is then distributed to the needy. Mohammad himself mandated this tithe and the destination of its funds. Mosques and Islamist groups often run all manner of social services agencies from schools to day care to hospitals for services for the poor and needy. Islam is essentially a socialist religion, and this impulse dates back to Mohammad himself, who was actually a bit of a 7th century socialist.
Buddhist societies have cultures that mandate a lot of distribution of income to the poor and needy. Buddhism is at core a socialist or Communist religion, which is why forms of these economic systems were easily implemented in Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, China, Korea and Japan.
In contrast, the Indian rich give their money to Hindu temples with the comforting knowledge that not one penny of those riches will ever go to the poor. For the Indian rich, if any of their money went to the poor it would be seen as wasted. So all of their money goes to the temple instead. Hindu temples accumulate vast riches, but not one dime of it goes to the poor. For the Indian Hindu, this curious dispensation is the proper one.
One gives money to the temple in the pagan tradition of trying to buy favors from the Gods. You give the Gods money, and they give you stuff and money in return. It’s analogous to the buying of indulgences in Medieval Catholicism, and it’s as corrupt, backwards and primitive as human religion gets.
*****
As you can see, America has none of these problems. Sure, American society has some serious moral transgressions, but at its core, it is a profoundly more decent, moral, cleanly and functional society than we see in India. America is a much more moral society than India, though things are on a downswing. India is much more morally degenerate.
America is a more moral country because Americans are morally superior people. India is a depraved and vicious country because Indians are immoral, savage and animal-like people.
Societies are a reflection of the people who live in and create them. Mexicans created Mexico. Mexico blows for one reason and one reason only. Mexico blows because it’s full of Mexicans. Everywhere a Mexican goes in the world, he can only recreate the disaster that is Mexico. This is because this is what his culture has programmed him to do.
80% of Mexico wants to come to America. If we let 90 million more Mexicans flood our heaving shores, America will become Mexico North by default.
400 million Indians want to come to the US. If we give in and let them in, America, the shining city on the hill, will be gone. In its place will be Calcutta from sea to shining sea.
Another excellent documentary from Vice, this time on the Gaza Strip. They finally got into the Strip in 2011 and get their first glimpse of Hamas rule. Hamas rules with an iron fist, and things are relatively well-run for such a poor 3rd World country. There are neighborhoods of Fatah supporters still in the Strip, and they are persecuted regularly by Hamas for minor code violations and whatnot.
The Strip is now overrun with all sorts of new armed groups. Fatah has basically laid down its arms and is pursuing a long-term cease-fire with Israel. This is along the lines of Abu Mazen’s peaceful approach to Palestinian rights. But many Palestinians do not feel that Mazen’s peaceful approach is working out very well, hence, many have turned to armed actions. Many of the new armed groups are radical Salafi jihadist groups, often aligned with Al Qaeda. In some cases, it appears that non-Palestinian jihadis have been migrating to Gaza specifically for the purposes of fighting Israel. Hamas has had a hard time reining in some of these groups. The group that holds a press conference is a new armed group, part of the Liberation Movement, but I know almost nothing about them.
Basically what has occurred in Gaza is the Islamicization of the Gaza Strip. Women are often forced to wear headscarves when they go outside the home, and women’s rights activists and seculars are not happy at all. Note the anti-Hamas Black woman who is interviewed halfway through the show. She is actually a 100% Palestinian Arab. There have long been a few Blacks among the Palestinian Arabs. They have migrated to Palestine from Africa, often from the Sudan, or they may be descendants of slaves.
Hamas claims that women have total freedom in the Strip. They can work at any job they want to, they can drive cars, they can hold office.
But women do not have total freedom. Hamas activists go to public places where young men and women are socializing together and tries to determine the relationship between the males and females. If they are unrelated and unmarried, presumably, Hamas wants them to separate. In the section on the women’s prison, there is a woman who received a 6-year sentence for having a child out of wedlock. Is it normal in the Arab and Muslim World for a woman to receive such a harsh sentence for bearing a child out of wedlock?
The Strip is still overflowing with drugs, even though Hamas hates drugs. The drugs, cocaine, hashish and opiate pills, come in through the same tunnels from Egypt that everything else comes in through. Hamas’ jail is full of drug offenders, both users and dealers.
All in all, this was a very depressing documentary. No one here seems very happy. Everyone looks depressed and pissed off.
At one point, the crew goes to the local park to talk to some young men who are hanging out there with nothing to do.
“Are you worried about another war?” They ask the men.
“We don’t even care anymore. Who cares? We are numb.”
“Aren’t you afraid of dying if there is another war?” the crew asks.
One man pipes up desperately. “I hope there is another war!” he says. “I hope there is another war, and it kills all of us! Anything is better than this. We can’t go on living this way…”
I was talking to a woman from Venezuela once, and she kept asking me if I wanted to see her (Spanish word for hangers). Well, I looked up the word in my Spanish dictionary, and all I got was “hangers”. You know, the things you hang clothes on? It took me another 5-10 minutes or so of my half-assed Spanish to figure out that “hangers” means tits in Venezuelan Spanish slang. Haha.
Anyway, there is more to boobs than sex appeal. These organs are used to feed babies, and many women and girls have enormous complexes about them. How to prevent sag? What causes sag? At what age to breasts begin to sag and why? To wear a bra or not to wear a bra? Plastic surgery? Flat-chested women? Effects of pregnancy and breast-feeding on breasts? And on and on.
I remember once, when I was 20, I was having sex with an 18 year old woman.
“Nice tits,” I remarked while nuzzling one of them.
She cried out plaintively, “They’re too small!”. She obviously had a complex.
“But they’ve got a really nice shape,” I said honestly. And they did. Not too large, true, but perfect, round and firm.
Well, look no further than 007Breasts, everything you always wanted to know about boobs and then some. Written by feminists who oppose the commodification of breasts as only a sex symbol and nothing more, this site is the end-all and be-all of Tit Sites.
It’s especially useful for females who worry and wonder about their boobs. I didn’t find it particularly erotic, but then I’m 55, and maybe I’m hooked on porn boobs, which don’t look a heck of a lot like average boobs at all. I especially liked the galleries showing the many shapes and varieties of the human female breast at various ages and in various females.
They come in all shapes and sizes. Small and round, small and saggy, medium and saggy, medium and firm, skinny and long, fat and wide, fat and long, big and saggy, big and full, tubular, small little bumps, you name it.
Alpha Unit
jacobbauthumley
Robert Lindsay
