Category Archives: Bigfoot
List of Bigfoot shootings in chronological order. This post is going to be exclusively about the topic of reported incidents of humans shooting and/or killing Bigfoots from 1829 to the present day. I have a lot of other Bigfoot stuff to write about in my notes, but I am a bit overwhelmed by the many notes that I have. Please bear with me.
This is a post I have been working on for some time. I finally lost interest in it, and it does need a bit of updating with the Sierra Kills and the Shooting Bigfoot Rick Dyer incident. Both of these may be included in the list for this reason: the list is merely of purported or reported shootings or killings of Bigfoots by humans, and Justin and Rick definitely reported shooting Bigfoots and frankly presented us with more evidence than most of the other folks below have.
Anyone who wants to write up the Sierra Kills and/or Dyer incidents in an objective, reporter-style matter of fact way as a police dispatcher would report an incident that someone is calling in (descriptive only) is welcome to try their hand at it. What I mean by descriptive only is you just write down what Justin and Rick said happened in those incidents in reportorial style without commenting on the validity of the claim.
Obviously, none of these claims have panned out yet, but it is pretty amazing that for a creature that supposedly does not exist, we have so many excellent shooting stories, often from otherwise credible, ordinary day to day folks who have never been known to make things up or lie.
This is a good research piece, and nonprofit websites are free to repost it. Feel free to comment if you any new cases or if you can provide more information to any of the cases below.
Note: Long, runs to 61 pages.
Bigfoots Shot At, Shot and Wounded, or Shot Dead by Humans
Unknown date: Klakas Inlet, Southern Alaska. In far southern Alaska on Prince of Wales Island, a Bigfoot was shot and buried at the mouth of a stream on the north side of the inlet. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
Unknown date: Sonora, Mexico. Rich Grumley reported that a hunter shot and killed a Bigfoot, then buried it.
Unknown date: Desoto, Louisiana. A man’s dogs were fighting with a Bigfoot. The man then shot the Bigfoot. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
Unknown date: Lewis, Washington. A sheriff shot at a Bigfoot in a pasture. The Bigfoot tore down a fence while escaping. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
Unknown date: Skamania, Washington. A Bigfoot threw a rock at a truck. The truck driver then fired on the Bigfoot. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
Date unknown, modern era: Location unknown. A wealthy hunter shot and killed a Bigfoot, then paid a taxidermist to stuff it, and the specimen is on display in a ritzy country club on the East Coast. Reported by Ray Crowe.
Unknown date, modern era: Yankton, Oregon. Near the Colombia River north of Portland, a hunter shot a Bigfoot four times between the eyes and killed it. It rolled off the road. The man came back 24 hours later, and the body was gone. There was a set of three tracks, possibly a family group – a male, a female and a juvenile. Reported by Ray Crowe.
Unknown date, modern era, Amboy, Washington. Near Mt. St. Helens, a hunter reported that he shot and killed a male Bigfoot on an old logging road. Upon hearing that there was a $10,000 fine for killing a Bigfoot, the hunter hung up the phone on the researcher. Reported by Ray Crowe.
Unknown date, modern era: Pound, Virginia. Someone shot at a Bigfoot roaring outside his home at midnight with a 12 gauge shotgun. The shot missed. Reported by the Gulf Coast Bigfoot Research Organization.
June 20, 1829: Okefenokee Swamp, Georgia. A team of hunters set out in an attempt to track down and kill a Bigfoot in the swamp. After tracking for two weeks, they were set upon by the Bigfoot one night. The men opened up with all their guns, but it seemed useless. Five of the men were killed by the Bigfoot, who then tore all of the men’s heads off. The surviving men opened up on the Bigfoot, finally killing it. Reported by Augusta Chronicle, March 12, 2000 – “Hunters Told of Swamp Creature’s Attack.”
Mid to late 1800’s: Bexar, Texas. The Legend of the Converse Werewolf. A rancher sent his 15 year old son into the woods to hunt and told him not to come back until he had killed a deer. The boy never came back. People went searching for him and found the boy’s dead and mutilated body. A Bigfoot was standing over it. The rancher fired a shot and chased the Bigfoot into the woods. The others in the search party reported that the rancher never made it back alive, apparently also killed by the Bigfoot. Reported by the Texas Bigfoot Research Conservancy.
1856: Ohio or West Virginia. Possible Bigfoot skeleton found with bullet holes in its skull. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
Late 1800’s: Winston, Alabama. A moonshiner shot a Bigfoot that was following his mule wagon.
October 1879: Williamstown, Vermont. Two men hunting in the woods were surprised by a Bigfoot. One shot and wounded it. The Bigfoot chased them out of the woods. Reported by the New York Times, October 18, 1879.
1882: Inyo, California. A man, Jack Ferral, shot a Bigfoot five times. Reported by the Inyo Register, March 19, 1981 referring to articles in the Bishop Creek Times of 1882, noted in the Bigfoot Co-op April 1981, p.2.
July 4, 1884: East of Yale, British Colombia. In the Fraser River Region, railroad men working on a British Colombia Express Company’s train stopped their train at what appeared to be someone sleeping near the tracks. After they stopped the train, a juvenile male Bigfoot woke up, barked and started to climb up a steep bluff. The workers decided to chase him. One got up above him on the slope and dropped a rock on the Bigfoot. It disoriented the Bigfoot enough that the men were able to get a rope around him, capture him and put him on the train.
They named the Bigfoot “Jacko.” Jacko had bruises on his head and upper body, and they assumed that he had gotten too near the edge of the bluff and had fallen over and landed, stunned, near the tracks. Jacko had been seen in the area where he was captured recently, but residents thought he was either a bear or a stray Indian dog.
Jacko was 4’7, weighed 127 pounds and was covered with shiny black hair. He was extremely strong. Jacko did not communicate other than making half-bark, half-growl sounds. He was fed berries and milk.
There are conflicting reports on what happened to Jacko. Some reports said he was taken into Yale where a man made a pet of him. Other reports said that Jacko escaped from the train before it got to Yale.
There are other reports that say this whole matter was a hoax, but I believe it was true. For one thing, John Green received a letter from Adele Bastin, whose mother remembered that people continued to talk of Jacko long afterward. Reported by The Colonist of Victoria, British Colombia, July 4, 1884. The best analysis of this incident was by Myra Shackley.
There are reports that soon after Jacko was captured, a Bigfoot matching Jacko’s description was shot and killed in the same general area by a group of men.
June 1885: Watauga County, North Carolina. Northwest of Seven Devils, NC. Roughly 15 to 20 miles northwest of Grandfather Mountain. A 13 year old Cherokee girl went to gather food along a creek. Then she heard gunshots. She hid under a bush because at that time it was dangerous for an Indian girl to be caught in the woods by a White man. She heard someone running down the hill.
As something ran past her, to her surprise she noted that it was a male Bigfoot. It seemed to have been wounded by the shots. The Bigfoot went down to the creek and buried itself in a pile of leaves, sticks, dirt and debris to the point where it was invisible. Then she heard the sounds of more people coming. She thought it was the White men so she left. Reported by the Gulf Coast Bigfoot Research Organization.
1890: Brookings, Oregon. Two men shot and wounded a Bigfoot. The Bigfoot retaliated, slamming the men against trees and tearing them apart, killing them. Reported by the Bigfoot Track Record.
1900: Prince of Wales Island, Alaska. An Eskimo shot and buried a Bigfoot. The Eskimo came out of the forest onto the beach and was met face to face with a Bigfoot. He opened fire and killed the Bigfoot. He and two other Eskimos then buried the Bigfoot on the beach. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
1904: Lane, Oregon. On two separate occasions, men shot at Bigfoots that were prowling around their cabins. Both shots missed. In one case, the Bigfoot threw a rock at the man who shot at it. Reported by the Bigfoot Encounters website.
1905: Gardner Canal, British Colombia. On the coast of central British Colombia, a Bigfoot was shot and killed, but there are no further details. Reported on the British Colombia Scientific Cryptozoology Club website.
Summer 1917: Cass, Texas. A family coming home at night in a mule driven wagon was alerted by a screaming, advancing Bigfoot. The man shot at the Bigfoot, missed, and it ran away. Reported by the Texas Bigfoot Research Conservancy.
1917: Nowata, Oklahoma. Men shot at a Bigfoot that had gotten trapped inside of a barn. Reported by the Texas Bigfoot Research Conservancy.
1920’s: Walla Walla, Washington. Hunters shot and wounded a Bigfoot, but the Bigfoot ran away. A second Bigfoot appeared and threw boulders at the hunters. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
1920’s-1930’s: Lake, California. A man hunted red-haired wildmen that lived in caves above a lake. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
1921: Terrebone, Louisiana. Hunters killed a Bigfoot and dumped the body in an old well. Later a skeleton was found and taken to Tulane University, where it disappeared. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
1924: Deschutes, Oregon. A prospector shot a Bigfoot five times, but the Bigfoot was only wounded and ran away. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
1924: Ape Canyon, Washington. Near Mt. St. Helens, miners Marion Smith, Roy Smith, Fred Beck, Gabe Lefever and John Peterson, shot and killed a Bigfoot, which fell off a cliff into a river below. Other Bigfoots retaliated and bombarded their cabin with rocks. Reported by Fred Beck.
1928: South Bentnick Arm, near Bella Coola, British Colombia. On the coast of central British Colombia, George Talleo shot and killed a Bigfoot. He left the scene and did not come back. Reported by the Sasquatch-BC website.
1930: Kwaltwa Kitasu Bay, Swindle Island, British Colombia. Tom Brown saw a Bigfoot in the shallows at night. He shot at it, and it screamed. He went back the next day, but there was no body. Reported by John Green.
After 1937: Green River, Washington. In the Cascades east of Tacoma, a hunter saw a bear grubbing in a log and shot and killed it. Turned out he had killed a Bigfoot. Feeling that he had shot a “hairy man” (a human being), he buried it under a pile of rocks and never told anyone until he confessed on his deathbed. Reported by Datus Perry.
1940’s: Yukon Territory. An man saw a 10 foot Bigfoot and shot at it with a 30.06. Reported by John Green.
1940: Southeastern Missouri. Jared Sparks killed an apparent Bigfoot (he described it only as “like a gorilla”) that had been killing horses and cattle by tearing them apart. Disposition of body unknown. Reported by John Keel in Strange Creatures.
Fall 1941: Near Basket Lake, Manitoba. A 17 year old boy, Paul Shebaga, was hunting out of season shot and killed a Bigfoot that he thought was a moose. He left it in the forest because he thought it was human and because he was hunting out of season. He went back sometime later, and the body was gone. Shebaga has since died. Researchers who interviewed him found him a highly credible witness. Reported on BFRO site.
1943: Georgia, near the South Carolina border. A Bigfoot was shot and killed by shotguns, hit with 60 bullets after it was tracked by a group of men because it was killing sheep and calves by tearing off their legs. The reddish-brown Bigfoot was buried on the outskirts of town. Reported by Rich Grumley. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
Winter 1943: Clarke, Alabama. Three men spotlighting deer in river bottomlands shot a Bigfoot. The Bigfoot may have died, but they did not stay around long enough to find out. Reported by the Alabama Bigfoot website.
1946: Lebanon, Pennsylvania. A man shot a Bigfoot. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
June 18, 1948: Franklin County, North Carolina. A Black family hunting in the woods at night shot and wounded a Bigfoot. It screamed, and they all ran away.
1949: Clackamas, Oregon. A man shot a Bigfoot that was eating a turkey. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
Fall 1949: Coos, Oregon. A man shot a Bigfoot chewing on a live cow. The Bigfoot was wounded and ran off. Reported by the BFRO site.
Early 1950: Near Boston, Georgia. A man shot at a Bigfoot when his dogs cornered it on a porch. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
1950: Indiana, Pennsylvania. People shot a Bigfoot. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
1951: Thomas, Georgia. A man shot at a Bigfoot next to a porch. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
1953: Alder Creek Canyon, Sandy, Oregon. East of Portland, a hunter shot and killed a Bigfoot, then buried the body. Reported by Peter Byrne.
1956: Shasta, California. A man may have shot a Bigfoot. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
1957: Near Jackson, Tennessee. James M. Meacham shot repeatedly at a Bigfoot with no effect. Ivan T. Sanderson, Abominable Snowmen: Legend Come to Life, pp.122-3.
Late 1950’s: Cambridge Springs, Pennsylvania. A group of young people were sitting in a house waiting for a Bigfoot to come back as it had been banging on houses earlier in the night. The Bigfoot approached the house and ran away when people shot at it. Reported by Grover Krantz.
1957: Deschutes, Oregon. A hunter shot and killed a deer. A Bigfoot then ran out, grabbed the deer and started to run away with it. The hunter then shot the Bigfoot, but the Bigfoot was only wounded and made off with the deer. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
1958-1960: Overton County, Tennessee. A Bigfoot stealing chickens was shot dead by the owner of the chickens. They drove it around the area to see if anyone could identify it. Disposition of body unknown. Reported by Mary Green.
1959: Knoxville, Tennessee. A Bigfoot was shot at when it came near a man’s home. Reported by Fifty Years with Bigfoot: Tennessee Chronicles of Coexistence, by Mary Green, p. 192.
1959: Carroll County, Maryland. A police officer shot at a Bigfoot. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
October 1959: South of Tenmile, Oregon. A black Bigfoot chased two boys up a hill and across a ridge. One of the boys shot the Bigfoot seven times with a 30.06 shotgun. The Bigfoot slumped down but then picked itself up and kept coming after them. Reported by John Green, The Sasquatch File, p. 19.
Summer 1960’s: Morris, Texas. Two girls sitting on a bed talking at night looked outside and saw a Bigfoot in their yard. They called their grandfather. He came with a rifle and shot the Bigfoot. The Bigfoot roared and ran away. Reported by the Texas Bigfoot Research Conservancy.
Winter 1960’s: Wildwood, California. A Bigfoot was spotted peeking in the windows at a dance held at the inn. A man ran outside to grab his 30.06 rifle from his pickup truck. He shot the Bigfoot, and it screamed and ran off. Men tracked it to the Trinity River where they lost the trail. Reported by Ben Foster, Williamsburg, Indiana.
1960’s: Douglas, Oregon: In the Cascades west of the Umpqua National Forest, a farmer shot a Bigfoot and then somehow managed to take it back to his house, where he left it outside. Other Bigfoots then came that night and retrieved the body. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
Winter 1960: Watson Bay, Roderick Island, British Colombia. Timothy Robinson and Samson Duncan shot at a small Bigfoot that they saw on a snow-covered beach. They found blood on the snow where it had been but were too afraid to follow the blood trail. Reported by John Green and Bob Titmus.
October 1963: Smith, Texas. Men hunting coons in the woods at night were alerted when dogs treed an animal. A beagle came running back, badly wounded with its guts hanging out of its body. The men came to the tree, and there was a Bigfoot in the tree with hounds circling around the trunk. The Bigfoot was howling and shaking the tree. One of the men shot the Bigfoot twice with a .22, but the Bigfoot only screamed even louder. The men all became frightened and ran away. Reported by the Texas Bigfoot Research Conservancy.
1965: Near Fouke, Arkansas. James Lynn Crabtree, age 14, shot a Bigfoot three times in the face, but the Bigfoot did not die. Reported by BFRO site.
1965: Yakima, Washington. A boy shot a Bigfoot but only wounded it. The Bigfoot then tore the boy apart, crushing his ribcage and killing him. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
1965: Kitimat, British Colombia. On the coast of central British Colombia, a Kitimat man shot and killed a Bigfoot near town. He was trying to drag the body away when other Bigfoots came out and tried to attack him. He barely escaped to his canoe. Reported on the British Colombia Scientific Cryptozoology Club website.
October 1965: Nisqually Hill, near Olympia, Washington. While driving at night, Russell Gels and Dennis Lensgrave saw a white 7 foot Bigfoot in their car headlights and shot at it. The Bigfoot ran away. Reported by The Sunday Olympian, October 24, 1965.
1966: Erie, Pennsylvania. Men shot at a Bigfoot. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
January 1966: Wildwood, California. Bob Kelley and Archie Bradshaw saw a Bigfoot looking in their window. One of the men fired his shotgun at the Bigfoot and thought he hit it. The Bigfoot’s tracks were followed down to Hayfork Creek. Reported by the Redding, California Record Searchlight.
May 1966: Spillimacheen, British Colombia. A man watching two Bigfoots have sex while another watched shot the Bigfoot that was watching the other two but missed. The man was hunting grizzly bears at the time. Reported by the BFRO site.
Summer 1966: Near Richland, Washington: Several boys – Greg Pointer, Roger True, Tom Thompson, Carl and Jim Franklin, John McKnight, Alvin Anderson, Selby Green, Roger Howard, Bob McDonald and Ron Blackburn – saw an 8 foot whitish-gray Bigfoot and shot at it several times with no effect. Reported by John Green, Roger Patterson and Rene Dahinden.
October 1966: Near Yakima, Washington. Mike Corey’s dog was attacked by a Bigfoot. He shot at it as it ran away. Corey’s dog was later mysteriously killed. Reported by Roger Patterson.
Late 1960’s: Chuska Mountains, New Mexico. Two Navajo shepherds shot a Bigfoot. It ran wounded into a canyon. Two other Bigfoots helped it. Reported by a Mrs. Chessman in John Green, The Sasquatch File.
February 1967: Hartley Bay, British Colombia: Two men saw a Bigfoot on an island and shot it. It screamed and ran away. Reported by Bob Titmus.
May 1967: Wasco, Oregon. Dennis Taylor and his friends often watched Bigfoots crossing the highway near the cemetery while going from the hills to the river, usually around 11:30 PM. Several times they shot at them with various weapons. Once one was hit at close range with buckshot and it fell down. It leaped up and crashed through a barbed wire fence, taking out three fence posts. Reported on the Oregon Bigfoot website.
Fall 1967: Winlock, Washington: A grayish Bigfoot had been seen in a necking spot for high school students. Some high school boys went out with a 30.30 and took a shot at it, but it ran away. Reported by the BFRO site.
Fall 1967: By Chehalis River near Chehalis, Washington. Billy Brown was hunting when he saw an 8 foot tall white Bigfoot. He shot it in the head, and it screamed and ran into a swamp. Reported by Roger Patterson.
December 1967: Teton National Forest near Jackson Hole, Wyoming. Two college students from Marshalltown, Iowa – Lyle Bingaman and Mike Burton – shot and killed a Bigfoot, thinking it was a bear. They were terrified that they had killed a human being and that they would be prosecuted for murder so they left it where it fell. Reported by Peter Byrne.
1968: North of Carson, Wyoming. Three men were hired by a rancher to kill a Bigfoot that was killing his cows and sheep by tearing off their legs. Afterward, the body was picked up by a government helicopter and taken to a research facility in Almogordo, New Mexico to be autopsied and studied. Reported by Ray Crowe. Government coverup.
May 1968: Delphi, Indiana: A man and a woman were finishing their breakfast when a 5 foot tall “monkey” (Bigfoot) approached their residence. When the creature was 20 feet away from the door, the man gut-shot the Bigfoot in the stomach. It screamed, held its stomach and ran away. Reported by the Gulf Coast Bigfoot Research Organization.
Autumn 1968: Point Isabel, Ohio. Larry Abbott, his father and Arnold Hubbard saw a 10 foot tall white Bigfoot. The men fired on it. It vanished in a white mist. Reported by Leonard H. Stringfield, Situation Red – The UFO Siege!, pp. 65-6.
After 1968: Alabama. The same man involved in the Carson, Wyoming case above shot another Bigfoot later on. This time the government found out about it and was angry at the man for killing another Bigfoot. Reported by Ray Crowe. Government coverup.
New Years Day, 1969: Franklin, Missouri. Arbie Boyer pumped nine bullets from a .22 rifle into a Bigfoot 20 feet away from his home. It turned and slowly walked away. Then man then shot it with a 45/70 rifle and hit it in the shoulder. Reported on the Bigfoot Encounters website.
1969: San Juan, New Mexico. Shepherds shot a Bigfoot and wounded it. Two other Bigfoots then came to help the wounded Bigfoot away. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
1969: Whiteface Reservoir, Minnesota. A hunter shot and killed a Bigfoot, then put the body on ice and displayed it for awhile before replacing it with a plastic replica. The famous Minnesota Iceman story.
Late February 1969: Khutze Inlet, British Colombia. Ronnie Nyce and two other men shot a Bigfoot that ran screaming into the woods. Reported by Bob Titmus.
November 1969: Burlington, New Jersey. A man shot at a Bigfoot. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
November 1969. Calaveras Big Trees State Park, California. Mike Scott shot a Bigfoot three times from 30 feet away, wounding it. Slate and Berry, Bigfoot.
1969-1972: Homosassa Springs, Florida. A group of teenagers were hanging out at a rock quarry at night when one of them shot and wounded a Bigfoot. Reported by the Gulf Coast Bigfoot Research Organization.
After 1969: Clark, Washington. Neat Mt. St. Helens, a man shot and killed a Bigfoot, then tried to sell it, but stopped when he thought it might have been illegal to kill the Bigfoot. No further details. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
Early 1970’s: Chelan, Washington. Men shot at a Bigfoot holding and biting a 150 pound pig. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
Early to mid 1970’s: Burr Ferry, Louisiana. A coon hunter shot a Bigfoot, and it screamed loudly. Reported by the Gulf Coast Bigfoot Research Organization.
Summer 1970’s: Evangelina, Texas. Fishermen camping on the Neches River heard noises down by their bait box and boat and smelled a bad smell. The grandfather fired in the direction of the commotion and then a terrible scream was heard. Nothing was found the next morning except footprints. The grandfather said he had shot a Bigfoot. Reported by the Texas Bigfoot Research Conservancy..
1970’s: Sylacauga, Alabama, on the slope of Marble Mountain. After a series of incidents involving Bigfoots on a small farm, the sheriffs were called out. A sheriff’s deputy saw a Bigfoot standing near the house. Although he did not know what it was, he emptied his revolver at it. It ran off. The deputy then told the family that he would not come out to the house at night alone again. Reported by the Alabama Bigfoot site. Government coverup.
1970’s: Gray’s Harbor, Washington. A man shot at a Bigfoot. Four Bigfoots then attacked his pickup truck. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
1970’s: Oregon. A man unloaded four rounds from a 30.06 into a Bigfoot, but the shots had little effect on the Bigfoot. Reported by Oregon Archives, University of Oregon.
1970’s: Idaho. Two men fired their rifles, one .22 and one .44 magnum, at a Bigfoot, but the shots had little effect.
1970: Spokane, Washington. Grover Krantz reported that a hunter shot and killed a Bigfoot.
1971-1976: Citrus, Florida. Men shot Bigfoots. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
1972: Citrus, Florida. A man shot a Bigfoot. Possibly the same as the previous incident. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
June 1972: Rusk, Texas. A Bigfoot watched campers at a campfire for about four minutes. The men then opened fire on the Bigfoot, and it ran away. Reported by the Texas Bigfoot Research Conservancy.
1973: Fayette, Pennsylvania. A man shot twice at a Bigfoot. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
June 1973: Maryland. A man shot at a Bigfoot. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
June 1973: Collowash River, Oregon. A man was sitting by a campfire when a Bigfoot walked by. He shot it, and it ran screaming into the woods. Reported by John Green.
July 1973: Greensburg, Pennsylvania. A doctor fired several shots at a Bigfoot that tried to enter his trailer home, but it just walked away. Reported by Pat Morrison, UFOs and Bigfoot Creatures: An Adventure into the Unexplained, p.29.
Fall 1973: Albany, Kentucky. Many people saw a dark 6 foot tall Bigfoot. It killed some livestock in the area. People shot at it, and farmer Charlie Stern finally wounded it, and the sightings stopped. Reported by Loren Coleman.
November 1973. Near Uniontown, Pennsylvania. A man saw a Bigfoot at night and shot at it with his revolver. It ran away. Later he shot it with a rifle. It screamed and ran away. Stan Gordon, “Pennsylvania Creatures Busy,” Shylooh:77, pp.15-16.
1974: Near Stone State Park, Sioux City, Iowa. A man shot and wounded a Bigfoot with a deer rifle. Reported by the Des Moines, Iowa Sunday Register, November 12, 1978.
1974: South Mountain, North Carolina. A 7 foot Bigfoot stood up by a campfire. A man fired at it, and it went away. Reported by John Green.
January 1974: Lee, Florida. A Bigfoot killed a pony. A man then shot at the Bigfoot in response. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
January 9, 1974: Palm Beach, Florida. Patrolman Robert
Hollemeyal shot a 7-8 foot tall, dark Bigfoot. The Bigfoot was only wounded and ran off at 20 mph. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
February 1974: Fayette, Pennsylvania. Men shot multiple Bigfoots. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
February 6, 1974: Uniontown, Pennsylvania. A Bigfoot was shot at and then disappeared. A UFO was seen nearby. Stan Gordon, “Pennsylvania Creatures Busy,” Shylooh:77 pp.14-17
May 1974: North Carolina. A man shot a Bigfoot. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
July-Aug. 1974: Watova, near Nowata, Oklahoma. A Bigfoot was seen many times around the property of Mrs. Margie Lee. She called sheriffs, and Deputies Gilbert Gilmore and Buck Field came out. The deputies shot the Bigfoot, but it was uninjured. Reported by Clark and Loren Coleman, Creatures of the Outer Edge.
Mid-October 1974: Near Holly Springs, Arkansas. A Bigfoot was sighted several times. A man shot it, but it lived. Reported by the Arkansas Gazette, November 2, 1974.
November 1974: Corkscrew Swamp, Collier County, Florida. A group of men hunting at night were being stalked by a Bigfoot. They opened fire on it with their shotguns. It screamed and ran off. Reported by the Gulf Coast Bigfoot Research Organization.
December 1974: Bootlegger Trail, Montana. A coyote hunter shot three times at a 7-8 foot tall Bigfoot with a 30.06. The Bigfoot kept coming at him, and he jumped into a car and escaped. Roberta Donovan and Keith Wolverton, Mystery Stalks the Prairie, p.90.
February 1975: Alachua, Florida. A man’s car hit a Bigfoot on the road and knocked it down. The man got out of his car and shot the Bigfoot. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
February 2, 1975: Cape Coral, Florida. Richard Davis shot a Bigfoot, then later repented. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
September 1975: Nowata, Kansas. Men shot at a Bigfoot. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
September and October 1975: Nolde, Oklahoma. Kenneth Tosh, Marion Parret, Clifford Bentson and Gerald Bullock tried to shoot and kill a Bigfoot on repeated occasions over a 2-month period. They were unsuccessful; the Bigfoot survived. Reported by by Jerome Clark and Hayden Hewes.
Early October 1975: Lummi Indian Reserve near Bellingham, Washington. The captain of the police force shot at a 6 foot+ tall Bigfoot. Reported by John Green, Sasquatch: The Apes Among Us, p. 17.
October 1975: Fayette, Pennsylvania. A man shot at two Bigfoots. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
October 1975: Washington, Pennsylvania. Men shot at a Bigfoot. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
December 26, 1975: Vaughn, Montana. Two teenage girls shot over the head of a Bigfoot. The Bigfoot fell to the ground and was helped into the brush by other Bigfoots. Reported by Roberta Donovan and Keith Wolverton, Mystery Stalks the Prairie, pp.87-9.
1976-1977: Linn, Oregon. A man shot a Bigfoot but only wounded it. A man met two young women in a casino in Las Vegas who told him a fascinating story. Shortly before, they had wanted to go hiking in Oregon so they hired a guide to take them to the forest.
At one point, they came across a Bigfoot, and the guide raised his rifle and fired on it several times, seemingly to no effect. The Bigfoot then tore the man apart, killing him. The man’s body was evacuated via a heavily armed US Forest Service helicopter. The Forest Service grilled the females for seven hours, trying to convince them that the man had been killed by a bear, but they stuck to their story. The ranger then told the women to never come back to the forest again. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record. Government coverup.
1976: Kern, California. A man shot a Bigfoot ten times in the chest with a .22 rifle. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
January 1976: Elm Creek, Texas Panhandle. Three men shot and killed two Bigfoots. The first one charged them, so they shot it. Then another one charged them, so they shot it too. They dropped both of them, a male and a female. They buried the bodies down by a nearby creek. They were afraid they would be prosecuted for homicide. Recently told their story anonymously on a radio show.
April 26, 1976: Near Flintville, Tennessee. A Bigfoot tried to abduct 4 year old Gary Robinson. A 6-man posse made up of Deputy Sheriff Homer Davis, Melvin Robertson, Stan Moore and three others chased the Bigfoot and shot at it. Reported by Jim Brandon, Weird America, p.205
June 1976: Baltimore, Maryland. As unlikely as it sounds, a Bigfoot was reported here in May 1976. Police were called, and K-9’s initially refused to track it. Finally, the dogs tracked it to an interstate tunnel. A police officer then saw it run under the interstate. The next month, US army personnel were called out to deal with the Bigfoot once again. Reports indicate that soldiers captured or killed the Bigfoot. No further information. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast. Government coverup.
July 1976: Citrus, Florida. A man shot a Bigfoot. Possibly the same case as another Citrus case reported above. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
July 1976: Gaston, North Carolina: A man shot a Bigfoot. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
January 23, 1977: Blewett Pass near Ingalic Creek, Washington. David Kernoul and Dean DeWees saw a Bigfoot near a chicken pen and shot at it. Reported by Wenatchee, Washington World, January 26, 1977.
April 13, 1977: Rising Sun, Indiana. Tom and Connie Courter saw a Bigfoot on a hill late at night. Tom fired 12 shots at it, but there was no trace of the Bigfoot the next day. Reported by the Cincinnati Post, April 20, 1977.
May 12-13, 1977: Wantage Township, New Jersey. A Bigfoot visited the Sites family farm and killed some of their rabbits. It came back later, and the family shot at it. Reported by S.N. Mayne, “The Wantage Event,” Pursuit:10-4,,, pp. 124-7.
Summer 1977: Cheshire, New Hampshire. Hunters may have shot at a tan-gray Bigfoot. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
July 1977: Jones, Texas. A Bigfoot threw a rock at a human and hit him. In response, the human shot at the Bigfoot. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
August 1977: Stilwell, Oklahoma. Brian Jones and two boys with the last name Ritchie saw a Bigfoot looking in the window. Jones went outside, and an 8 foot tall Bigfoot picked him up but dropped him when others appeared. The boys fired at the Bigfoot, which responded by throwing rocks. Reported by the Bigfoot Research Society.
August 15, 1977: Sussex County, New Jersey. A man shot a Bigfoot in the front yard of a house with a .22 pistol. The Bigfoot screamed and ran off. Reported by the Gulf Coast Bigfoot Research Organization.
August 20, 1977: Belt Creek Canyon, Montana. Staff Sergeant Fred Wilson and two others saw a 15 1/2 foot tan Bigfoot standing in some bushes. They fired at it, but drove off in their car when it ran towards them. Great Falls Tribune, August 20, 1977.
October 1977: Broward, Florida. A Bigfoot tore at a man’s shirt. In response, the man shot the Bigfoot. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
October 1977: Westmoreland, Pennsylvania. A man shot a Bigfoot. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
October 1-2, 1977. Near Bend, Oregon. Gary Benson and Ronald Kershey said a 7 foot tall black haired Bigfoot with silver shoulders attacked them. They fired four shots at it. Reported by INFO Journal:6-4, p.15.
November 1977: Marion, Florida. A man shot a Bigfoot. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
Mid-November 1977: Ocala National Forest, Florida. A hunter fired 6 times at an 8 foot tall Bigfoot weighing 800 pounds. Ocala Star-Banner, November 19, 1977.
1978: Fort Pierce, Washington. Edwin Godoy, a soldier on the base, shot a Bigfoot in the chest. The Bigfoot moaned and ran off. Reported by the Bigfoot Encounters website.
1978: Fayette, Pennsylvania. A Bigfoot smashed a windshield of a car. A man then fired on the Bigfoot. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
April 1978: Pennsylvania. A man shot a Bigfoot. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
April 1978: Danbury, Connecticut. A boy called deputies out to a farm where he saw a Bigfoot. Deputies came out, saw the Bigfoot and shot at it. Reported by the Bigfoot Encounters website.
June 26, 1978: Crossett, Arkansas. Mike Lofton, age 10, was feeding his dog when his dog began to tremble. Mike then saw a Bigfoot approaching the house from the woods. He ran and got his .22, shot at the Bigfoot, and the Bigfoot ran off. Reported by the BFRO site.
August 1978: Near Owensboro, Kentucky. Larry Nelson, his brother and two friends shot 3 .45 bullets into a Bigfoot’s chest. It ran off into the woods unhurt. Reported by Keith Lawrence, “The Fairview Horror,” UFO Report, May 1979, p.30.
Mid-August 1978: Near Owensboro, Kentucky. Several men cornered a Bigfoot beside a pond and shot it at a distance of 10 feet with a pistol. It ran into the woods, leaving no blood trail. Reported by Keith Lawrence, “The Fairview Horror,” UFO Report, May 1979, p.70.
August 14, 1978: Oceana, West Virginia. Policeman Bill Pruitt shot at a Bigfoot. Reported by the Charleston, West Virgina Gazette, August 15, 1978.
August 16, 1978: Fowlerville, Michigan. Gary Browning shot at a Bigfoot that ran out of the underbrush. Reported by the Lansing, Michigan State Journal, August 18, 1978.
October 1978: Colombia, Oregon. Men shot a Bigfoot between the eyes on a road. The Bigfoot rolled off the road, and the men took off. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
April 30, 1979: Dunn Lake, near Barriere, British Colombia. Tim Meissner was fishing with friends when he saw a Bigfoot across the lake. He came back later with a gun and shot at it. Reported by the Vancouver, WA, The Columbian, May 6, 7 and 9, 1979.
Late Spring 1979: South Mountain, North Carolina. A fisherman saw a Bigfoot in the underbrush. He came back later with a gun and shot at it. Reported by Robert L. Williams, “‘Knobby’, North Carolina’s Bigfoot,” UFO Report, September 1979, p.27.
October 1979: Oregon. A Bigfoot put a hand on a boy’s shoulder. The boy ran to the men he was with, who got guns and fired into the woods at the Bigfoot. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
Mid-October 1979: Knox County, Indiana. Two boys who were predator hunting at night with rabbit-in-distress calls called in a Bigfoot. They shot at it, and it ran off. Reported by the Bigfoot Encounters website.
1980: Vinton, Ohio. A man shot a Bigfoot. Bigfoots threw boulders at trailers in response. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
September 1981: Cleveland, North Carolina. A man shot a Bigfoot. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
October 10, 1980: Fleming County, Kentucky. A Bigfoot raided J.L. Turney’s freezer. Turney chased it and shot at it. Reported by the Flemingsburg, Kentucky, Times-Democrat, October 15, 1980.
November 1981: Taylor County, Florida. A Bigfoot approached a camp of hunters in the middle of the night. A man fired a gun at it several times to make it go away. It crashed off into the woods. Reported by the Gulf Coast Bigfoot Research Organization.
1982: Oglethorpe, Georgia. A woman went outside to tend to the dogs and was surprised to see a Bigfoot there. She ran back in the house yelling for her husband. The man was in the bathroom and shot through the bathroom wall at the Bigfoot, hitting it. The Bigfoot ran off. Reported by the Bigfoot Encounters website.
1982: Colombia, Oregon. A fisherman shot a Bigfoot. He followed the blood trail until he lost it. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
Spring 1982: Maryland. A man shot a Bigfoot. Reported by Rick Berry, Bigfoot on the East Coast.
Fall 1982: Cherokee, Texas. A man shot a Bigfoot with a shotgun three times and with a .357 revolver five times. The Bigfoot apparently survived. Reported by the Texas Bigfoot Research Conservancy.
Fall 1983: Morgan-Monroe State Forest, Indiana. A college student was having a drinking party at his house with two friends. Early in the morning, he heard a noise and went outside. He saw what appeared to be a Bigfoot. He went back into his house, got an automatic weapon and shot at it. It ran off into the woods. Reported by the Bigfoot Encounters website.
October 13, 1983: Wilson, Oklahoma. A Bigfoot, apparently mad at a man for some reason, charged into a man’s house and tore the house apart. The man grabbed his shotgun and shot the Bigfoot. Then the man and his family chased the Bigfoot out of the house and barricaded the doors. Reported by the Gulf Coast Bigfoot Research Organization.
November 1983: Tillamock, Oregon. A hunter tried to shoot a Bigfoot, but the gun was empty. The Bigfoot then growled at the hunter. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
Mid 1980’s: Johnson County, Arkansas. A Bigfoot kept taking a farmer’s animals – chickens, pigs and calves – but by fall, he would only take no more than 1/2 the farmer’s animals, leaving the other half for the farmer. The farmer got fed up and one night lay in wait for it with a shotgun. When the Bigfoot appeared, the farmer shot it with a shotgun, wounding it. The Bigfoot ran away and never bothered the farm again. Reported by the Texas Bigfoot Research Conservancy.
Mid 1980’s: Johnson County, Arkansas. Two men were poaching deer with spotlights at night when they spotlighted a Bigfoot. One man shot at it, wounding it. The next day they found blood from the Bigfoot. Reported by the Texas Bigfoot Research Conservancy.
October 15, 1984. Jefferson, Texas. A man was squirrel hunting in Pine Islands Bayou in the Big Thicket National Preserve when his dog started barking. He then noticed a Bigfoot wading in the bayou. His dog charged the Bigfoot, and the Bigfoot threw a log at the dog. The man then fired on the Bigfoot, but he did not know if he hit it or not. The Bigfoot ran off into the underbrush. Reported by the Texas Bigfoot Research Conservancy.
1985: Pierce, Washington. A Bigfoot charged at men. Men then fired on the Bigfoot, got in their car and drove away. The Bigfoot chased the pickup truck as it was driving away. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
1985: Ripley, Oklahoma. A group of people out partying by the Cimarron River saw a Bigfoot. The Bigfoot then crashed off into the brush. Men left to go get guns and came back to shoot at the Bigfoot. They saw it and shot it. It screamed and ran away. Reported by the Gulf Coast Bigfoot Research Organization.
October 20, 1986: Los Angeles County, California. Father and son deer hunters hunting in the San Gabriel Mountains noticed something rustling the brush very forcefully. They fired a few shots at it, then it came out of the brush and stood in front of them. It was a Bigfoot. They both ran away. Reported by the Gulf Coast Bigfoot Research Organization.
1987: Pacific, Washington. A Bigfoot chased rafters along a river for seven miles, throwing rocks at them. A man fired into the brush at the Bigfoot. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
May 1987: Maricopa County, Arizona. A group of men were fishing for catfish. They fell asleep. At 2 AM, one awoke and noticed a female Bigfoot standing only 10 feet away from them. This situation went on for a while, as the one man in the group who had a gun pointed it at the Bigfoot to hold her at bay. At one point, she charged the men, and he opened fire at close range with a single shot shotgun. The Bigfoot grabbed her chest and ran across the lake to the other side, crashing through the brush. Reported by the Gulf Coast Bigfoot Research Organization.
1988: Atoka, Oklahoma. A hunter shot a Bigfoot with a 30.06 rifle, but the Bigfoot was only wounded and ran away. Reported by the Texas Bigfoot Research Conservancy.
1990’s: Nowata, Oklahoma. A farmer shot at a Bigfoot. Reported by the Texas Bigfoot Research Conservancy.
1990: Clark, Washington. A woman shot at a Bigfoot in the brush near her chicken coop. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
May 1990: Cooke County, Texas. Men shot a Bigfoot in the chest with a shotgun while on a camping trip. Reported by the BFRO website.
September 1990: Glenn, California. A Bigfoot that had been shot at by other men ran past a group of men. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
1991: Indiana. Two young men were hunting at night when they saw a Bigfoot. They freaked out and opened fire on it with a shotgun. It screamed and then chased them half a mile through the woods. Reported by Mary Green.
August 1992: Between Westal and Crosstal, Tennessee. A man and his sons were out hunting squirrels in the woods. At 3:30 AM, the father woke up when a Bigfoot was trying to pull him out of the back of his truck. He thought it was one of his sons so he yelled at them to stop. After a bit, he realized it was a Bigfoot. He shot it and wounded it, and it walked away. Later, it came back and walked around the camp breaking branches and menacing the campers. Reported by the Gulf Coast Bigfoot Research Organization.
August 1992: Iowa. Two fishermen camping beside a river saw a Bigfoot walking along the bank on the opposite side early in the morning. One man fired three shots at it with his .22, and it ran over the top of the bank and disappeared. Reported by The Sasquatch Report Issue #84 March 1997.
May 1993: Clark, Washington. Deer poachers shot a Bigfoot and wounded it. Blood was found, but the Bigfoot escaped. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
December 1994: Deschutes, Oregon. Hunters shot and wounded a Bigfoot in the leg and followed the blood trail for several miles. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
November 1996: Coos, Oregon. Spotlight hunters took long shots at a spotlighted Bigfoot. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
May 1997: Mendocino, California. A man shot at a female and some juvenile Bigfoots. Another Bigfoot then attacked the man and broke some of his bones. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
September 1997: Tillamook County, Oregon. A hiker shot at a Bigfoot standing on a rock outcropping early in the morning. The Bigfoot ran off.
July 1997: Jones, Texas. A Bigfoot threw a rock at a man, hitting him. The man then shot back at the Bigfoot but missed. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
October 1998: Madison, Virginia. A man was camping in the woods when he saw a Bigfoot up on a ridge only 80 feet away when he woke up in the morning. He emptied his revolver at it, and it ran off. Reported by the Bigfoot Encounters website.
November 1998: Longview, Texas. Two men were out squirrel hunting in the woods when they came across a Bigfoot. It ran across the trail and took off into the woods. The men decided to leave the area quickly, but five minutes later, they smelled a bad smell. They looked around and 20-30 feet to the side in the woods was the Bigfoot again. One man fired three shots at it, hitting the Bigfoot.
The Bigfoot screamed and then chased the men all the way back to their house. Then it roamed the woods around the house all night, yelling and breaking branches. Later in the night, one of the men fired on the Bigfoot again.
November 4, 1998: Greenbrier, Tennessee. A man out hunting was scared off by a Bigfoot staring in the window of his truck. He drove off quickly, but the Bigfoot had blocked the road with a downed tree. The hunter called his friend to come cut up the tree.
They drove off and came to the main road when they saw some deer. The hunter decided to shoot a deer so he got out. But then the two men saw a Bigfoot heading towards a neighbor’s barn. They fired shots at it, but it kept moving towards the barn. As they fired more, it turned and ran towards them. They jumped into their trucks and drove away very fast.
The hunter and his friend went to their homes, but then they heard the Bigfoot again. The Bigfoot yelled and burst out of the trees 40 feet away. The men unloaded all their guns at it, and it fell to the ground and started crawling away. The hunter told his friend to stop shooting at it because they didn’t know what it was. They followed the blood trail 1/2 mile to a creek where they lost the trail. Reported by the Gulf Coast Bigfoot Research Organization.
April 6, 1999: Hawkins County, Tennessee. A farmer was plowing his field with his tractor when he saw a Bigfoot come out of the trees. He thought it was a bear, so he pulled out his 30.06 rifle and shot it. They tracked it for six hours but could not find it. Reported by the Gulf Coast Bigfoot Research Organization.
September-October 1999: Northwestern Alabama. A woman sighted a Bigfoot and reported it to law enforcement. The next day at 4 PM they saw helicopters flying over the area. The copters had .50 caliber machine guns and were firing into the woods. This went on until midnight. Apparently they hit the Bigfoot because residents heard horrible screams from the wounded Bigfoot. It is not known if the Bigfoot was killed or not.
When people asked law enforcement about the helicopters, citizens were told that the police had been eradicating wild boars in the area. However, there had not been any wild boards in the area for 20 years. Reported by the Southeastern Bigfoot Research Organization. Government coverup.
January 2000: Honobia, Oklahoma. The Siege of Honobia. Bigfoot apparently shot and killed as part of a group that was raiding and harassing a rural residence. Other Bigfoots apparently carried off the dead Bigfoot. Reported by the BFRO site.
August 2000: Fort Mitchell, Alabama. A man and his friend were camping at Rood Creek Park Campground and Boat Landing on the Chattahoochee River, Georgia. One of the men’s dogs started whimpering, and the man went to check on it. Then he saw a Bigfoot coming out of the woods and approaching the camp. The man fired two shots from his pistol at the Bigfoot, but they didn’t seem to faze it. The Bigfoot then grabbed the man’s dog and tore it to shreds. Reported by the Gulf Coast Bigfoot Research Organization.
October 11, 2000: Lewis County, Washington. A mother and two of her children saw a Bigfoot walking across the road. It looked as if it had a gunshot wound in the lower back. Reported by the BFRO site.
April 27, 2001: Orange County, Indiana. A hunter was in a blind calling turkeys in the woods when he heard a noise 50 feet in back of him. He turned around, and after a little bit, a Bigfoot stepped into view. Soon the Bigfoot charged the hunter’s position. The hunter fired one shot at the Bigfoot’s face and hit it. The Bigfoot turned and ran down a steep ravine where it stumbled around for 15 minutes or so. A trail of blood was found leading to the ravine. Reported by the Gulf Coast Bigfoot Research Organization.
October 4, 2001: Woodville, Texas. A woman saw a Bigfoot standing in her backyard. She told her son, who grabbed a gun and took off into the woods after it. Soon he heard two men shouting along with gunshots. Then the men said, “Let’s get out of here!” They had apparently been shooting at the Bigfoot. Reported by the Texas Bigfoot Research Conservancy.
2002: Sawyer, Oklahoma. An old man shot a Bigfoot. Bigfoots then started coming to the house, throwing rocks and sticks at it. One day the old man died of a heart attack. Reported by the Texas Bigfoot Research Conservancy.
Late January 2002: Monster Central, Louisiana. This is a 1,500 acre zone in northwest Louisiana south of Shreveport. A hunter gut shot a Bigfoot and wounded it. Other men with dogs were called in to track the Bigfoot. They tracked it to a tree on the edge of a stream, but it jumped down out of the tree and into the stream. One of the men shot at it again but missed.
Then the men became worried that some of the other Bigfoots might come around to defend the one they shot. Some blood and vomitus were taken for analysis, but the wife of the man who had the samples accidentally threw them away when she found them in the freezer. The results came back “unknown primate.” Reported here.
July 16, 2003: Lincoln County, Tennessee. A man shot a white Bigfoot that was making noise in a yard at night. The Bigfoot stumbled and then ran away. Reported by the BFRO site.
November 12, 2003: Lafollette, Tennessee. A creature had been killing peoples’ animals. A goat and cat at the very least had been killed. A woman called the sheriff’s, they came out with a team of deputies and told everyone to get their pets indoors as they were going to eliminate these animals. They tracked the Bigfoot and shot it dead over the next hill.
There were sirens wailing, and the Bigfoot screamed as it was shot. The woman left the scene. People saw a black body lying in a field the next morning. Ten minutes later, it had vanished. Planes flew around the area night and day for two weeks. Locals reported that there had been a hostile Bigfoot in the area and they were trying to appease it by leaving food out for it so it would not kill their animals. The next day the woman who reported the incident went back to the area, and someone had taken the body away. Reported by Mary Green. Government coverup.
February 2006: Navarro, Texas: At a road crossing, a man shot a Bigfoot twice with a 30.06. The Bigfoot was wounded but walked away. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.
August 2006: Slim Buttes, Pine Ridge Reservation, South Dakota. A Bigfoot that had been named Chiye-tanka was shot and killed on the reservation. It was later given to the School of Mines to study. They sent it back, and it was given a ceremonial burial by Lakota elders. Reported by Ray Crowe. Government coverup.
This is very exciting news! John Titor was a famous time traveler from the year 2036 who returned to Earth for some time around the years 200 and 2001 when he made a number of historic posts to the Internet. Most of those posts have disappeared, but some are available on Internet archives. He wrote in a lot to the Art Bell Show.
During and after his appearance, there was a long controversy about whether or not John Titor was really a time traveler from the future. An Italian TV company hired a private eye to investigate. He felt that John Titor was a hoax originated by Larry Haber, a Florida attorney, and his brother John Rick Haber, an IT expert. This is certainly not true as I am personally convinced that obviously John Titor is a man time traveling from the future.
The real John Titor disappeared from the Net in 2001 to back to the future, and has not been seen since. If this is the real John Titor making his first appearance since then, it is exciting news since it means that he has time traveled again back from the future.
This question though is whether this is the real John Titor or not. It is an excellent question. If it is the real John Titor, then obviously John is still alive and has decided for unknown reasons to return from the future again. However, it could be a very clever imposter who is merely someone from our own time pretending to be the famous time traveler.
His prose style does resemble that of the original John Titor. An expert analysis of the original John Titor’s prose concluded falsely that Titor was a hoax created by one of the Haber brothers. This is wrong because we know for a fact that John is a real time traveler. However, if we could compare his corpus on this site with John’s original posts we could come to a conclusion about whether he is real or not.
One thing that I found very interesting is that the John Titor who showed up on this site has extensive knowledge of obscure facts about early Apple computers. When he showed up before, he also had deep knowledge of this information which is barely known by but a few people. However, all of his Apple trivia subsequently checked out. Now here he is again, spouting Apple arcana.
Whether this is the real John Titor from the future or merely a clever imposter from our own time is not known, but it should be a fun ride.
I also wonder why he chose a Bigfoot post of all things to show up on.
All John Titor appearances showed up on the May 28 Bigfoot News entry.
I will post all of John’s posts here below for your viewing pleasure:
Hello Robert Lindsay, I have come here to go public with the information which I am allowed to divulge.
Bigfoot is actually of the subfamily of primate Homininae and it diverged from the homo exactly 4.2 million years before present, which was 0.73 million years prior to the evolution of Australopithecus afarensis, whose presence in the Horn of Africa was verified by specimen AL 288-1.
Bigfoot was a pseudo-“missing link” between the Austaliopithecines and the Ergaster genus of species agglomerate. Due to its vestigial anatomorphological inheritance from its ancestral Southern Apes, it bore a conspicuous resemblance to Chimpanzees and the so called “Sasquatch” of Sino-Tibetan and Nepalese myths, as well as the Algonquin-Blackfoot indigenous North Americans’ legend of Da-Ne Kasedanuki, leading many leading anthropologists of the first few decades of the 21 st century to assume that Bigfoot was a hoax perpetuated by cryptozoologists.
Bigfoot’s mitochondrial megahaplogroup clusters derive from their Most Recent Common Maternal Ancestor which diverged from the maternal lineage Mitochondrial Eve descends from about 4 million years ago. Therefore, their mtDNA diverges from ours on a rate of 1 out of 1,735 base pairs. By contrast, human nuclear DNA across global populations diverges an average of 1 out of 1,150 base pairs on average.
Their Y-chromosome is more visceral and simian. By analysis of their pseudoautosomal region on their Y-chromosome, which is the outermost fringe region of the chromosome which can recombine with homologous regions on the X-chromosome, (however the bulk of the Y-chromosome is incapable of homologous recombination with the X) we have concluded that about 0.0032 more of their sex chromosome base pairs are capable of recombination.
The deterioration of the pseudoautosomal region in the Y-chromosome has begun since the divergence of the X and Y chromosomes from their ancestral chromosome 166 million years before present. As evidence, most ectothermic vertebrates lack the gender-determining function in their genome, but rather possess an environmentally determined gender system.
The decay of this pseudoautosomal region has been constant at a rate of 12 base pairs per 5 generations, however this is in highly prolific reproducers, and as reproduction has decreased inversely proportional to the increase of cognitive function and prefrontal cortex gerantomorphication, the decay of the pseudoautosomal region has been exponentially retarded. Therefore, we can assume that the paternal lineage of Bigfoot could not have been separate from homo sapiens more than 6 million years, which suggests that paternally, Bigfoots are closer to Bonobos and Lowland Chimpanzees than to humans.
The actual scientific name for Bigfoot is Intermissiosius Panhomonidae. This taxonomical classification was derived from the Latin “intermissio” (in-between) and “Pan” (the scientific terminology for the Chimpanzee-Bonobo genus) “Hominidae” (human). “In between human and ape,” would be the formally equivalent translation.
There are actually two subspecies of Bigfoot, one is passive-aggressive and possesses a capacity for semi cognitive autonomous determination, which is to basically state one is partially capable of free will and self-introspection. This particular one has a reduction in the triad of Machiavellian personality and extroversion, but is able to utilize these characteristics more efficiently, meaning they lie, cheat and kill less, but are able to do this more efficiently than their sister sub-species.
My name is John Titor and I am willing to divulge more information for the return of information on a retrocomputer. The IBM 1500 is the device of which I speak of, and I will leak more information in return for any information on the location and availability of the IBM 1500. Thank you, and I apologize that I must use a proxy, however, I cannot reveal my personal Internet Protocol Address, due to confidentiality reasons
I have an IBM 5100 in my possession. In the IBM 5100 there exists the capability for reading the BASIC and APL coding languages. However, what most computer experts fail to realize is that there exists a debugger code which acts as an emulation perforator for the algorithm on which the APL is based.
In 2025, former CIA Director John Boehner and then Secretary of State Eric Dahmer put their intellectual facilities together to create a series of covert operations which placed nuclear remote detonation devices all over Eurasia. This was used for leverage against the anarchists and Libertarian neoliberals who were preparing for a coup d’etat against the newly formed United European Emirates. These anarchists were radical Christian ultranationalists who opposed the Muslim dominated European government and the mixed market policies they installed.
The locations of these devices were kept in a closed circuit network which was coded with a language based on the APL, but very convoluted and complex. However, it still retained a mirror version of the algorithmic formula used for the APL.
When an inside job succeeded in infecting the network with several viruses, the viruses scrambled our codes based on their own algorithmic formulas, however, these formulas were also mirror versions of the APL’s, because such was a prerequisite to tangibly manipulate the network’s own code. Think of it as a wave. If two opposite waves collide, they cancel each other out. However, when two harmonic waves collide, they synchronize.
The IBM 1500, however, is an instructional computer. It, however, contains a hardware part which can be used to fully connect the 5100 to the network. We would also need the IBM 5125 and the IBM 1700, but we could manufacture those because we retained a complete blueprint.
I already possess an IBM 5100, but I am now in need of an IBM 1500 and a DX-175 microprocessor. I am running out of time, World War Three shall begin next year. I must return to 2036 before the deadline in the current timeline.
In your words, I guess “it really depends”. Bigfoot was examined by District 4 United States scientists after the World War (III) destroyed a significant amount of local flora, forcing some of them into the open. You see, in my timeline, a series of uprisings between 2004 and 2008 led to the secession and breakdown of the United States, causing us to split into 5 separate districts.
We were christened DSUA, or the Districts of the United States of America. Do you remember how when Obama was reelected in 2012 many states threatened to secede? Well in my timeline this occurred in 2008 during his first election and the secession was successful because no petitions were filed to the federal government for secession. As you know, an act of secession is considered illegitimate by the federal government.
Your timeline differs from mine due to my actions. You see, the universe is actually a section of “potential” called a p-brane. Potential is what you refer to as “space-time”, and there are sections of those floating around everywhere outside of the universe, but this is on a scale of 17 dimensions, something your science based on quantum mechanics and string theory would find incomprehensible. When two sections of potential collide, they hypercondense into one dimension.
Afterwards, they hyperinflate into 4 dimensions. This is known as the “Big Bang”. The uniformity of a potential’s section is dismantled and depending on the multidimensional trajectory of collision form its compressed “pockets” of potential. The p-branes eventually tear from the acceleration of expansion, creating infinitesimal Einstein-Rosenberg bridges which periodically collapse, creating “waves” in the p-brane, which converts to “matter”. Baryons, such as protons and antiprotons. Electrons and positrons. These are oppositely charged on the electromagnetic scale and annihilate each other.
Because an elementary particle takes all possible trajectories, the frequency of collision is uneven. Therefore, an imbalance in matter-antimatter is created.
On a “quantum” scale (based on your quantum mechanics), this divergence of trajectories occurs under observation. However, on a macrocosmic scale, this is an unobservable phenomenon. This creates parallel universes.
This Everett-Wheeler interpretation dictates that humans do not choose between whether to eat that apple or orange. They choose both, but in separate parallel worlds. This is termed temporal divergence. This is rated on a scale of 0-100. A divergence in apple/oranges type choices are attributed a point of 0.01. 0.10 would be a divergence in directions, friends, and sleep habits. A 1 is achieved when major world events occur, such as wars or groundbreaking inventions.
Our world temporally diverges from yours by 1.73 and therefore your world has not experienced many of the events ours has.
I deliberately orchestrated events which would prevent the Second Civil War of America. For example, I convinced the Air Force to allow the terrorist attacks of 9/11 to cascade by unimpeded. This caused severe Islamophobia amongst Americans, which led to Islamophobia being labeled as politically incorrect. This led to many leftwing Americans voting for Obama based on both his color and middle name of Arabic origin (though Obama is a Christian).
This prevented the 2008 secession.
I altered your timeline. However, a world war weighs at least 5 points. I must reach 5% divergence prior to the deadline in 2015 or travel back to 2036. I do not know if Bigfoot will be discovered in this timeline. If I am successful in averting world war, it will not be brought to mainstream attention.
In my timeline:
Lupus Erythematosis was cured in October 12th, 2003.
A successful vaccine against 65% of HIV strains was developed in 2011. This vaccine was effective in 85% of the population.
Quantum entanglement was manipulated to teleport information from four protons 10 miles away each successfully in 7/3/2012.
An apparatus for artificial cardiopulmonary animation was developed in 2012. This was composed of organic material as opposed to the artificial hearts consisting of polysaccharides in your timeline.
Also, the attacks of September the 11th never occurred.
World War Three begins in 2015. However, the exact day the first two nations declare war has been delayed due to the 1.73 temporal divergence rate. Unless I achieve a 5 percent divergence rate, the world war will not be averted. A world war or a war fought by more than 3 nations takes a 5 percent divergence to revert, whereas a war fought between two or three nations requires a temporal divergence rate of 1 to nullify.
In my timeline (let us refer to it as timeline A), World War Three began when Petro Poroshenko and Vladimir Putin failed to reach an ultimatum or a compromise. Russia began shipment of oil to China, and Xi Jinping cut off ties to North Korea, deeming Russia as an acceptable substitute. NK leader Kim Jong Chul (Kim Jong Un never ascended to power, his brother did instead) attempted to rehabilitate their relations with South Korea, and merge as a single, capitalist nation.
However, this was thwarted by the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu through District 3 of the United States. District 3 was heavily Republican, and the GOP supported Israel. Through diplomatic negotiations, Israel convinced the United States to plant seeds of doubt in South Korea’s mind as to the authenticity of North Korea’s desires to peacefully merge.
Netanyahu did this because they needed a shipment of North Korean experimental military technology to continue being manufactured under the Communist regime, thereby allowing clandestine export of said materials to the Arab world. This would allow Israel to justify transgressing international regulations by possessing a plethora of nuclear devices themselves, their justification being self defense in the face of impending Arab nuclear incursion. They were employing classical Horkheimerian reverse psychology to convince the world they were justified in possessing nuclear warheads.
However, the Islamic percentage of representation in the parliaments and semi-presidential governments of Western Europe increased over time, and favor shifted from the Judeo-Christian geopolitical axis to the Islamic axis. The world now favored Palestine and Iran over Israel and the Districts of the USA.
The North Korean government felt threatened by the South Korean government’s blatant refusing of their peace offer. The demilitarized zone was breached and the United States District 1 Navy, the South Korean ROK Marines, were deployed into combat after SK declared war.
China wanted nothing to do with either Koreas due to their recent alliance breakup with NK and their sociopolitical contrasts with SK. However, Russia made a last ditch effort to support NK, and attempted to pull China in with them. Xi Jinping lent his support to Putin, which caused massive riots to break out in China, as the Chinese did not want war with SK and their favorable view of Putin had drastically shifted to an unfavorable view.
This led to Taiwan and Nepal’s guerrilla forces invading China as retribution for historical crimes, taking advantage of the weakened Chinese social infrastructure. This caused American Districts to self-manufacture all its goods it once imported from China, and this caused a drastic deflation due to high availability of goods.
However, due to the high availability of jobs, credit, and the sudden increase in the dollar bill due to the deflation, the corporate directors increased the price of goods exponentially, causing a huge inflation and market crash. This could have been prevented by the federal government’s regulations, however there were 5 state governments for the 5 Districts as opposed to a central government. They had difficulty in communications and basically there were too many leaders and not enough followers willing to comply. The amount of legislature approved decreased by 85%.
This resulted in a reunion of the United States to recover the economy. The reunited USA declared war on Iran, NK, China, and Russia, with full Congressional approval. The war efforts would reboot the economy, however, the United States made the mistake of attempting to destroy Russian nuclear warheads by detonating them in Russia through a series of signal scrambling projections.
Nuclear war erupted. Many of the nuclear warheads were destroyed mid flight by United States RIM-161 SM-3s, however there was significant damage to the stratosphere and destruction of wastelands led to ozone depletion, as destructive polyatomic synthetic material went airborne.
After the war, all of Western Europe united into the United European Emirates under Islamic rule.
That is all I can tell you without negatively affecting the timeline should members in positions of power read and believe my statements.
Aaron Arcand spills the beans on Todd Standing, the Alberta Habituation Site, Matt Moneymaker, Melba Ketchum, David Paulides and other assorted sleazeballs. This post will feature the testimony of Aaron Arcand, one of Canada’s top Bigfoot researchers, up there with Sasquatch Ontario and John Bindernagel. I would add Todd Standing, but he is too scurrilous to get a mention.
Here Aaron uncovers the ugly truth about the Alberta Habituation Site now featured in TV shows like Bigfoot North and Survivorman. The location is given as Nordegg, but the actual site is a bit a ways from that town. In this post, Aaron will describe what a scoundrel Todd Standing really is. He will also reveal some sleazy behavior by Matt Moneymaker, Melba Ketchum and David Paulides, no strangers to sleaze and calculated, cunning amorality in the past.
About the Todd Standing – Adrian Erickson – Matt Moneymaker vignette below regarding the Matilda footage, some clarification is in order. Adrian was in fact not there when that footage was taken. It was taken a by a woman in her late 20’s named Sissy who resided on the property. Matt was not involved in any possible hoax that Sissy may have perpetrated, but Matt was probably the one who initially acquired the footage and then sold it to Erickson.
Todd Standing’s Radium Creek, British Colombia research location is apparently the site of Todd’s “Sylvanic” area.
The Alberta Canada Habituation Site
In the heart of Alberta’s foothills of the Rockies, there is a plot of remote wilderness which by some has been described as possibly one of the best Sasquatch research locations in North America. There has been a lot of talk recently in regards to this location, and I would like to set the record straight. I am in the unique position to do this because I am Aaron Arcand, and I am the one who invited Todd Standing and showed him the location but not before spending two and one half seasons there on a regular basis conducting both day and nighttime research.
In the spring of 2011, I met a Sasquatch enthusiast, I’ll call him KW. KW introduced me to an area he had learned about from a trapper friend of his. It has been said that I poached this area from KW. Not true. KW showed me this area with the willingness for me doing research there because he does not go out very often. KW gave me the area. According to KW, the trapper had several notable experiences in this area, described below, before selling the trapline to his cousin or brother or someone like that. The person who bought the line is not trapping it either, come to think of it, I’ve never seen anyone else out there with the exception of the odd quadder down by the river.
Anyway, the trapper according to KW, has had the following sightings and encounters there. I am unsure of how long the trapper trapped there as he apparently stopped trapping there because of Sasquatch issues.
The trapper apparently had seven daytime sightings, and it is possible he saw one or more of them more than once. This does not necessarily indicate that there are seven Sasquatches in the area.
One of the sightings was described by KW to me as follows:
The trapper was out there doing his thing, and he suddenly found himself surrounded by some Sasquatches who were screaming at him. The trapper fired a shot in the air to let them know it was him. Immediately following the shot, a large male Sasquatch came out from behind the trees and began to charge at him. While the male was in full charge, the female also showed herself. When the male saw the female, he stopped dead in his tracks, they looked at each other, verbally communicated, and then disappeared back into the trees. KW said the incident was so traumatizing that it was the last time the trapper trapped in that area.
The above described incident provides a piece of very important intel about Sasquatches, and this is how I interpret what happened. The trapper fired a shot in the air to let the Sasquatches know that it was him. The male Sasquatch thought the trapper had shot his female Sasquatch partner, and charged at the trapper in retaliation. In mid-charge, the female Sasquatch stepped out from behind the trees and showed herself to the male Sasquatch as well as the trapper. Upon seeing the female Sasquatch, the male Sasquatch stopped charging at the trapper. The male and female Sasquatches then communicated and disappeared into the trees.
This can only mean one thing: the Sasquatch is a logical thinker. Once the male Sasquatch realized that no harm had come to the female Sasquatch, he backed off.
According to KW, the trapper also attempted to get pictures with a game cam using a pile of coyotes which is favored dish of the squatches. The first game cam got destroyed, smashed to bits and pieces which were scattered in the bush in the surrounding area, no SD card was found, and the coyotes were all gone. A second setup with two game cams was put
in place. Now, if the smashed camera was done by a Squatch that tells me that Sasquatches can sense the electromagnetic frequencies coming from electronic equipment, and they do not like it.
The two camera setup also provides some interesting intel. The first game cam was set up on the coyote pile while the second game cam was setup on the first camera. Upon return, the trapper discovered that something approached from behind camera two and physically turned the
camera on the tree to face away from camera one. Something actually grabbed the camera and turned it away from camera one. There were even scrape marks on the tree from the friction of the game cam being turned. As for game cam one, aimed at the pile of coyotes. Destroyed. No SD card found, and the coyotes were gone. This, if done by the Squatches, also provides some very interesting intel depending on how you want to interpret it.
That’s all I was told from KW about the trapper, however I am leaning towards betting that the trapper has had other encounters and most likely knows more about the behavior of the Sasquatch than any other Sasquatch researcher.
KW showed me the location and a few of the structures along the road that goes into the area. He also showed me some pictures of a dome shaped type structure that was also discovered along the road about ten yards in the bush which was surrounded by stool samples of which KW had collected a large quantity. KW had given me a small bag from what they had collected, and it is now in my freezer.
KW also told me of campers in the past that had made remarks about hearing strange howls in the area, and some have been scared out of the area. KW also ran into a pair of hunters who were on their way out of what I call Ground Zero Sasquatch Country. KW could see it in the hunters faces and body language that something was wrong. The hunting pair asked KW if he was going into that area and warned him that if he goes back there, he may get killed.
They went on to say that it was not safe to go into that area, we are leaving, and we are never returning anywhere near here again. Well, knowing what he knows about the area, KW assumed that the pair of hunters had some sort of close encounter with one or more Sasquatches. I agree with KW that something strange happened to these two guys and it involved the Sasquatch phenomenon.
So after introducing me to the area, KW asked that I keep the location secret, especially from Matt Moneymaker and the BFRO. And I did. For the seasons of 2011-July 2013, when, due to the strong activity and aggression I experienced, I did not feel safe being there by myself, so I asked KW if I could bring Todd Standing there. KW said no.
After KW said no, I was going to respect his decision even though I really did not need his permission because the location is Crown Land. But next I was told that KW was attending the 2013 BFRO Alberta expedition, and plans were for KW to bring the BFRO there. When I learned of that, all bets were off. So I contacted Todd Standing via his website, and I invited him out to my area.
Now, some may ask why the hell would I invite Todd Standing? He is a liar, a fraud and a hoaxer. Well, I am the type of person who judges people by what I know of them and not what others say, so I invited Todd Standing so I could judge him for myself. As it turns out, that was the biggest mistake I ever made in my life.
In the 2nd week of July 2013 I contacted Todd Standing and invited him to come out to my area and check it out. So Todd came out there as a guest, I made it clear to him he was a guest, and he understood that. We spent the weekend there, I showed him everything that KW showed me as well as all the tree breaks I had discovered, and in addition, we had some activity of our own as well. I have brought this to the attention to the world of Sasquatch researchers, and since then Todd has been calling me a liar but has unable to prove his claims. However, I am able to prove that Todd is lying to everyone, including Jeff Meldrum, John Bindernagel and Les Stroud.
These are his lies:
Todd is passing the area off as his discovery, found via his research. This is a lie. Todd did not discover this area. He was a guest of mine after I had been researching the area for three years. The proof of this lie can be found in the first episode of Survivorman Bigfoot as well as on his Bigfoot North show.
Todd stated on his Bigfoot North show that he had been researching the site for six months prior to bringing Jeff and John there. This too is a lie. The first time Todd was there was in the second week of July 2013. Proof of when I first brought Todd to the area is on an Internet forum, and I will tell Robert Lindsay where to find it so he can confirm it. I will not state its location in this article for fear of that post being removed in an attempt to discredit me.
Todd has claimed to be the one to discover the tree structures and tree breaks. Also a lie. The tree structures were shown to me by KW, and I showed them to Todd. The tree breaks he claims he discovered were discovered by me and shown to him. Even when we were out there together, new tree breaks and a new 13 inch track was discovered by me. He was there at that time also; however, I was the one to see and point out these things.
Proof of this is also online and again, Robert Lindsay will confirm. After showing the area to Todd, he has been passing of the research findings of KW and myself as his own. He is using our research findings to vindicate himself of his earlier hoaxes. He is unethical, has no morals, and is a media hound who is trying to get rich off Sasquatch.
Bottom line. Todd Standing is a liar.
Above are three proven lies told by Todd. If you fuck a chicken once, ok. Twice, fine. Fuck a chicken for a third time and people will call you a chicken fucker. Well Todd has publicly told three proven lies, and the only conclusion anyone can come to is that Todd is a liar, and his credibility is once again tarnished. There is not one person out there who can prove anything I said is a lie.
However, I can prove that everything I have stated in this article is 100% true. So, Todd Standing, if you are reading this, Even though it is Crown Land, you are not welcome there and, if I see you there I will have you arrested and removed from the site. I have done the research and know exactly how to accomplish this. Stay away, for you are not welcome there.
A Dentist Comes to the Habituation Site
On my second outing with Todd Standing, he invited a man by the name Brian S., a dentist from Calgary – Todd’s own dentist as a matter of fact. Brian S. arrived at my primary research area prior to Todd. I was caught off guard because I was unaware that Brian S. or anyone else for that matter was coming out there. However, Brian and I hit it off right away. We have spent many hours together out in the field since we met that day, and much of that was with just he and I without Todd.
Truth be told, Brian was invited to meet John and Jeff and he is fully aware of everything that that has transpired. Brian also thinks that what Todd did to me was a really shitty thing to do, and he also knows that everything I have stated is the truth. Brian and I have done lots of research together, and we have some big plans for this summer that do not include Todd Standing. Brian is a dentist. He has a doctor title. He is a pillar of his community. Does this sound like a person who would go out in the remote wilderness alone with a delusional crazy lunatic who tells nothing but lies? I don’t think so.
On the first outing with Todd Standing in my primary research area, he had many things to say about other Sasquatch researchers. Now a lot of what he had to say I had already heard before. It was the usual hate talk that goes on in the world of Sasquatch research. However, there was one very interesting thing he had to say on the topic of Dr. Melba Ketchum and the Erickson Project which also involves Matt Moneymaker. Here is what he had to say.
Todd told me that he went down to the states to do some research with Dr. Melba Ketchum and her psychic boyfriend who I have been told is apparently none other than David Paulides. While he was there, Melba apparently put forth a strong effort to get Todd to divulge his financial backer. Todd thinks she was trying to poach his financier. At one point during his visit with them, he noticed her Paulides looking at the tags on his luggage. Paulides later tried to use the information that gleaned from the tags in a phony effort to convince Todd that he really was psychic – all part of an effort to get Todd to give them some money to Paulides and Ketchum.
Now for the juicy part.
This involves the Erickson Project. Todd also told me that he saw Adrian Erickson’s footage while visiting Adrian at his home. He stated that while watching it on Adrian’s big screen, he noticed the closeup face shot of Matilda, which to me looks like a Chewbacca mask. According to Todd, he noticed that when Matilda’s mouth moved, you could see the teeth bend which would suggest a mask and therefore a hoax. He pointed this out to Adrian. Adrian agreed and responded by calling Matt Moneymaker and giving Matt crap about their discovery in the footage. Matt responded by saying, “Oh, just edit out the last 2 or 3 seconds. Then it will be ok.”
Now, if what Todd told me is in fact true, then this would mean that Adrian was not present when the closeup footage was taken, and it also suggests that the footage was hoaxed and that Matt Moneymaker was involved. Interesting!
In conclusion, I would like to state that I have already proven that Todd Standing is a liar and therefore it is possible that he is lying about these incidents as well. But on a second note, what if he actually told me the truth about this Adrian Erickson stuff? I doubt it, but if he did tell me the, WOW, what blockbuster news.
Todd’s Research Areas
When Todd and I were out, another topic he discussed was his research sites in Montana and near Radium Creek, B.C. These were discussed in the context of the upcoming Les Stroud show. He was moaning about how he was not sure if he was going to be able to take Les to his sites due to problems with both research areas. At the Montana Site, apparently a younger Sasquatch took over the group from the older one, and the new group leader moved the group out of Todd’s area to some other unknown location. Radium Creek was apparently was destroyed by the devastating floods in the spring of 2013. After I heard that, I did some research. The flooding did not affect the Radium Creek area. Another lie By Todd Standing.
I think it is sad that Todd Standing is getting recognition for the research findings of KW and myself. Now everyone can know the truth. I am very happy that John and Jeff were in my research area and got to experience this amazing habituation site. In fact, prior to me inviting Todd Standing, I have emails and LinkedIn conversations between Jeff and me on the subject of my research area, and I suggested my research area as a trial ground for the Falcon Project.
Amazingly, all this could have been avoided. All Todd Standing had to do was come to me and say, “Hey Aaron, I have made arrangements for Jeff Meldrum and John Bindernagel to come to look at your research area. They are going to be here from this date to this date. Come out during that time and join us. Oh and by the way, Les Stroud is also coming to film an
episode of Survivorman Bigfoot. You will not be in front of the camera, but we would still like you to come out with us.” Had this happened, I would have welcomed it with open arms, and Todd Standing’s reputation with me would have been golden.
But no, he had to be deceitful about the whole thing. He did not even mention my name to these people. He just passed everything off as his research findings. What a piece of shit he is.
Conclusion, Todd Standing is a proven liar.
Apology. I am very sorry there have not been any updates in a long time. I am extremely tired, and I can barely even function at all these days. The only thing that helps me is allergy shots. This is a very bad time of year for me.
Ray Crowe book review of David Paulides’ latest Missing 411 book.
Book Review, 4th Paulides Missing 411-The Devil’s in the Details
Once again Dave Paulides has published a blockbuster of a book about the sad stories of missing people. Disappearances seem to occur in clusters, and Dave has included a large United States wall map showing where the poor people vanished. It’s revealing – the east and west coasts are almost darkened with missing cluster tags. This time around, Dave has gone international, including lists of missing people from six continents.
As in earlier books, the little preteens seem to be the largest group targeted by some entity that concentrates on kidnapping and leaving the victims often either dead or alive, and missing articles of clothing or shoes without any indication of molestation. Usually the victim has no idea what occurred, is dazed, or can’t communicate what happened to them. Dave mentions that the last-in-line of hiking groups often disappears, and comments on the number of missing people found at the base of steep cliffs, near water or swamps, in brier patches (victims often found with horrible scratches), having traveled many miles or having unknowingly traveled uphill.
Often their pets disappear with them and either come back confused or never do return. Search dogs cannot find their scent of the missing, and bloodhounds and cadaver dogs appear baffled. And in so many cases, an area previously searched multiple times eventually turns up a victim that’s in plain sight.
The first book chapters cover another large batch of missing people, running the total from the 411 books up another 174. On May 18th, the release date of the book, Dave was a guest on George Knapp on Coast-to-Coast radio, and he mentioned that his total was up to 1,240 now. I wonder what that would amount to in the number of gallons of shed tears?
Look at “Devil’s Detail,” an introductory page that has a long listing of place names with the word devil in them. Other significant detailed charts and statistical information elsewhere in the volume highlight fascinating cases that boggle the mind: Little 7 year old Jack who in two days managed to get 50 miles from where he was lost. And he was found in good condition! How can that be?
Another 11 people were found 20 or more miles from where they had disappeared. Not all of them were as lucky as Jack.
Many other interesting listings are tabulated: Weather conditions turn inclement when lost; occasions when the first or last in a line of hikers vanishes; there are those that turn up missing and were last seen inside of a home (in one case a house alarm failed to ring) or from a locked car with no inside door handles (go-figure that one out), the puzzling cases of the disabled who go missing, and the “climbers”-those that when lost go uphill, often being found on top of a barren peak (20 in four books climbed 1,000 feet or more). These and several other “Devil’s Detail” categories are listed under Dave’s final “Conclusions” chapter.
Impossible cases are cited, like 2 year old Ryan, sleeping with his sister Shawna next to the wall. On awakening, his family discovered that he was gone, only to be later found dead under a dock at a nearby lake.
And then there was the mystery of Megumi. Hiking on a well used trail in New Mexico, when lost she simply dialed 911 on her cell phone (needed to triangulate). She was forwarded to the non-emergency dispatcher…not once but seven times! Unbelievable! It has never happened before or since! Finally routed correctly, search teams found Megumi. It started to snow! A helicopter was called in for evacuation of the cold and weak graduate student in physics, nanotechnology and optics. The tail rotor of the helicopter hit a tree! In a debris field 800 feet down the 12,000 foot mountain, the bodies of the pilot and Megumi were found. It appears that at times the well-educated are targeted!
What’s happening to all these people? Dave wisely doesn’t speculate. It’s just too crazy. In one case you think a Bigfoot kidnapped them. Then in the next a UFO abducted them, or they vanish into a dimensional hole or orb, or the culprit is an entity that reaches through from a black hole, grabs them and transports them for miles, dragging them unmercifully through briers. I can only scratch my head and ponder. Don’t know how much just plain old bad luck is involved either.
One can only offer a silent prayer for all the unfortunate missing people, past and present, especially the children…the poor little babies, Amen. And those left behind to suffer: wives, siblings, mothers, grandparents, girlfriends…all of those and more. I feel saddest of all for them.
Ray Crowe, May 26, 2014
Warning: Long, runs to 37 pages.
Dyer vows to soldier on. Although many idiotic Dyer skeptics say that the whole Dyer affair is over and has been proven to be a hoax, that is actually not true. Not all skeptics and haters feel this way, as some haters have noted that this Dyer is not over yet by a long shot. This is indeed correct, for all that has been proven to be a hoax is the Bigfoot prop that Rick took on his tour of the US. Indeed, it has been outed as a prop produced by a special effects artist in Washington state.
In addition, the scan which fooled some of us so well has also been proven to be part of the hoax. According to Chris Russell, the prop maker, that is some sort of a scan of the clay model that was used to model the fake Hank. A number of folks were fooled by the prop, including apparently two MD’s who were brought along by Jeff and Jack, the Facebook Find Bigfoot guys.
The two men, after validating the prop as real via their physician friends, gave Rick at least $58,000 for his US tour. It is not known how the MD’s were fooled, whether there are two bodies, a real Hank used to fool the investors and the fake Hank prop to take on tour, or whether the investors were simply fooled by the fake. In addition, at least three other Bigfooters verified the prop as real.
However, it has come to light that Rick would not let anyone, including the MD’s, touch the prop. According to Jeff and Jack, whatever it was they saw had incredible detail, including veins, scars, fingerprints, moles, etc. If the prop maker managed to put that much detail into the prop, then he could not have been such a bad prop maker after all.
Rick says that the prop was made based on the real body. That is an interesting theory and it does explain why the prop was more anatomically accurate than any Bigfoot prop I have ever seen. The scan also had more anatomical accuracy than I have seen in any Bigfoot prop. Rick said he provided Russell with photos and drawings which Russell used to make the prop.
However, Rick states that although the prop is fake, he insists that he still shot and killed a Bigfoot in San Antonio with Morgan Matthews of the BBC on September 6, 2012. He also says that he shot the Tent Video earlier on the same day and that MM was present at that filming also. He said that he retains possession of the body and that the body will be revealed at some point. In addition, Rick said that MM will come out at some point and admit that Rick killed a Bigfoot during their filming.
Rick seems very confident; in fact, he is riding a high horse, which seems odd for someone who supposedly has nothing at all.
Rick also fired almost everyone in his Team Tracker. Those he did not fire simply quit over the hoax revelations. Andrew Clacy went back to Australia and Lynk Paul went back to Trinidad. Both men are furious at Rick and both recorded lengthy statements about their nightmarish time with Rick. Apparently Rick paid them almost nothing for their time, has terrible hygiene, was terribly abusive, cheated or tried to cheat on his wife most of the time, dumped RV sewage on the highway, laughed when the RV ran over a dog, and in addition, is a terrible parent to his children. Rick claims that both men were paid handsomely but this is not true.
Possible evidence that the fake Hank may indeed have been modeled on the real Hank. From a source:
I have compared many of the details and micro-features of:
1. Hank before the autopsy.
2. The preserved remains of Hank.
3. The recently released hairless scan of Hank’s head.
There are match-ups on the micro-features (scars, wrinkles and hair patterns), on the macro features, and on the facial proportions as well.
There is no reason why you should take my word on any of this, but you should take a close look yourself at the existing images, and you will see the same match-ups that I am referring to.
All of this will come out eventually, but the controversy will never cease because of the egos, reputations and big money involved with all the various researchers and enthusiasts.
The “preserved remains of Hank” was actually a prop, and the hairless scan was apparently part of the prop.
I am having a bit of a problem with this statement. How did the source have access to images of Hank before the autopsy? Which images is he referring to? I don’t get it.
Probably no one poked around at Hank for hours. I did receive some reports that verifiers had poked around at Hank (apparently at the prop) for hours before they verified it. Apparently these reports were simply not true as anyone who poked around at that thing for hours would have obviously concluded that it was a prop.
Do CT scans, MRI scans and the Autopsy video of Hank exist? Perhaps they do, but the men who told me that they saw these things when they verified Hank also told me that they poked around Hank (apparently the prop?) for hours. How could they have poked around at it for hours and not known it was real? So perhaps they were not telling the truth about poking around at it.
If they were not forthcoming about that, then we have consider that their reports of seeing the CT and MRI scans and Autopsy video might also not be accurate. Perhaps there are CT and MRI scans and an Autopsy video of Hank. Perhaps there are none. At this point, the evidence for the existence of these things is not reliable.
Names of the two men who uncovered the prop. I can now reveal for the first time the names of the two men who uncovered Rick’s prop. One of them was Musky Allen. I had heard that Musky was flying down to Florida on the Florida leg of the tour, but I did not understand why. The other man was Jack Barnes from FB/FB, who also showed up in Florida.
The men along with Clacy had been getting increasingly suspicious of the prop, especially since Rick forbade anyone from touching it. At one point, the glass was either lifted or broken by Musky and Jack, who immediately determined it to be a fake. Musky immediately had a huge falling out with Rick over the prop that apparently continues to this day as Musky did not know it was a prop. Jack also cut off his relationship with Rick as he had no idea Hank was a prop either. Clacy immediately took off for an airplane back to Australia. At some point, Lynk was simply dumped by the side of the road while the RV continued on its way.
Jeff and Jack’s opinion about Dyer. Jeff and Jack are described as crestfallen and deeply depressed over the hoax. They now believe that there is perhaps a 5% chance that Rick has a real dead Bigfoot somewhere. The one silver lining is that both men continue to believe that the Tent Video and the Shooting Bigfoot scenes show actual Bigfoots. But that is as far as the men will go.
The men are out ~$58,000 minimum due to funding the hoax tour. Rick did take in some money from the tour, but it is not known if Jeff and Jack got any of it. Jeff also gave Rick $8,500 to pay a back child support bill for Rick because it was going to warrant. I reported this earlier but that has now been confirmed by Clacy (I thought I am always wrong?).
Theory that there may have been two Hanks – one to show verifiers and investors and another to take on the road. A source suggests this:
PS: It is possible that what the MD’s saw was the real Hank, before Rick had the prop made. Rick may have felt that he was being stiffed to some degree by not having access to the real body when he was in financial straits and came up with a quick money-making scheme out of desperation. That may be why he felt he was “telling the truth” about having “two Bigfoot bodies”, i.e. one real, one fake. In his mind, a minor distinction.
Dyer: “No more evidence for Bigfoot than there is for the tooth fairy.” Why did Rick make this odd statement? Skeptics say he made it because he has been hoaxing all along and has never believed in Bigfoot. However, a source offers another theory:
Re: Rick’s “tooth fairy” statement- I agree somewhat with the above analysis of your friend that he is just saying this to get the haters stirred up. As I wrote earlier: “And Rick may just say anything at all to keep the controversy and attention on himself, hoping to capitalize on it somehow. He is a con artist and will work either side of the issue for profit. No scruples, no moral compass, just a drive for survival at any cost.”
The Rick Dyer saga continues. After admitting to the hoax, Rick fired his whole team and then said he was reconstituting it with a whole new team, starting up Team Tracker again with platinum, gold and silver memberships. In addition, there will be new DVD sales and more paid outings. In other words, he is starting the whole thing up all over again. Many people are mystified at how the saga could be continuing as Rick just admitted that Hank was a prop. However, I can now reveal Rick’s plans for the future.
Rick’s future plans. According to sources close to Rick Dyer, the Dyer reboot as detailed above will be the second leg of the tour, but this time it will include the real body. I asked my source why anyone would believe that this second body is real since the first one was fake and the source said that the much-discussed press conference will take place before the second leg of the tour and this would prove that the body is real. The source stated that the second leg is already completely booked and that since it will have the real body, security will be tight. The second leg is supposed to occur sometime this summer.
This actually goes along with what I heard earlier which was that the conference would only happen after the first leg and before the second leg of the tour.
I have no idea if this second leg of the tour will occur at all or if it does, if Rick will actually have a real dead Bigfoot or not. I also have no idea if this press conference will occur before the second leg or ever for that matter. Maybe these things will happen, maybe they won’t. At this point, we would be foolish to put faith in anything that Rick Dyer says. We should only lend credibility to Rick’s statements when they are backed up by 3rd party statements, and even then, we need to consider the source as Rick’s associates have themselves lied many times too (consider Frank Cali).
A source lays out Rick’s plans for the future here:
He still maintains that “…at the end of the day I will have the last laugh, and it will be fuckin’ hilarious because we have an actual Bigfoot body.” I quote that from his Blogtalk show which aired last night. He says “If you think I’m cocky now, just wait ’til the real thing comes out,” and that he’s “already started getting my regular pay from my old investors.”
He says the actual Bigfoot will go on display in the Summer. He’s still going to tour it. It’s not going to be broadcast. It’s going to be advertised by the parties who have paid to book the individual events. They each have put down a minimum deposit of $5,000, and Dyer and his investors will receive a cut from the admissions.
He says that these deposits were paid well before the fake Hank reveal, and none of them have asked for refunds.
I asked the source why people would believe that this new Hank is the real Hank, and here is what he responded:
Obviously they plan on doing the press conference and everything else before the second leg. Since these appearances were booked last year, it seems apparent that Rick decided he didn’t want to have to wait until summer to make money, so he had the fake made. I’m guessing he’s fairly bummed he wasn’t able to keep it on the road longer. But it would explain why the investors paid for the bus and trailer. He just figured he’d get some use out of it before summer. Someone paid for those vehicles and it wasn’t just to drag a fake body around.
Dyer’s story about paying $112,000 for the bus and trailer is another lie. Via the always excellent Ed Brown:
No… Rick and Lynk flew from Texas to Florida to pick it up. Paid exactly $13,000 for the bus. I interviewed these guys three times! Their story did not change once! I believe these guys with all my heart! Clacy and Boswell said Rick paid only $13K for the bus and maybe $15K for the trailer.
Well, what do you know? Rick Dyer lied again. Say it ain’t so, Joe!
Dyer’s original investors back in the picture. Dyer said that his original investors are back in the game as apparently Jeff and Jack have bailed after being burned on a hoax.
Hank Williams III may not have been the original investor. This is what I was told for some time, but now the same source has come back to me and said it was not actually this man, but instead it was another man who is a friend of Rick’s mother. Dyer’s mother worked in aerospace and apparently came into some money.
She also knows Hank Williams Jr. In addition, she befriended a wealthy man who made a lot of money as a factory owner. Whether this man has a connection to the Hank Williamses is not known. It is instead this man who has supposedly been funding all of Rick’s Bigfoot hunting expeditions, and he may have owned Hank. If Roski does own Hank and bought it off anyone, he may have bought it off Roski.
Dyer sends out After the Shot DVD’s. Rick supposedly mailed out two of the DVD’s on Friday, April 18. The rest were mailed out on Monday, April 21. The people who complained will get theirs last on April 25. No one has any idea what will be on these DVD’s, however, Dyer stated many times that After the Shot would contain 45 minutes of footage of Hank after he was killed.
I do not know of anyone who has received their DVD’s yet, but the Monday ones should be arriving on Friday, April 25. I know two people who ordered this DVD, and it will be interesting to see their reports of what was on it. If the DVD’s do not contain the footage he said they would contain, one would think there would be grounds for a fraud lawsuit.
Dyer’s PayPal account closed, grand larceny charges filed against Dyer by PayPal. From a hater site, reports that PayPal has closed Dyer’s account, issued refunds to many customers who ordered the DVD and asked for their money back and has now filed grand larceny charges against Rick.
His former President and VP went on the air with Racer X in October and also did several interviews with Steve Kulls and also Shawn Evidence and told all of the people who bought the DVD to contact PayPal for a refund. Most of them did. PayPal shut down Dyer’s account then. They brought charges of grand larceny against Dyer.The money people paid for the DVD, which never even was recorded, as he never shot a Bigfoot was spent to pay for the fake Bigfoot dummy in October. All this was brought to light 6 months ago by Cali.
Dyer never gave one cent back to anyone. Everyone who got a refund earlier got it through PayPal, not from Rick. This is why Rick lost his PayPal account.
Hmm, looks like Rick is committing some more fraud, this time regarding the DVD’s. Well, what else is new. Rick Dyer is a criminal, a con man, a fraudster.
There may be nothing much of significance on the After the Shot DVD. A source says that he doubts there will be dead Bigfoot footage on the DVD.
If the DVD contained footage of a dead BF, I doubt Rick would be saying, “You’ll get a kick out of it.” I’m sure that refers to footage of him and MM fighting or some such. That’s probably what he means by footage starting on 9/7/12.
In other words, the DVD may be a whole lot of nothing.
Edward Roski, Jr., Jane Pisano and the Los Angeles Museum of Natural History. I reported earlier than Roski was the name of the billionaire who purchased Hank (but bought it from whom?), Pisano was the name of the woman to present the Hank press conference and the Los Angeles Museum of Natural History was the name of the museum that would sponsor the conference and where Hank was to go on display.
My source for all of that information was Musky Allen. Adding weight to the possibility that that information might be true is a letter that I found found Jack Barnes of FB/FB to Pisano alluding to her, Roski and the museum and offering his help. The letter was written in December.
However, Musky Allen has now said that he lied when he told me all of those things. If that is true, then maybe Musky was also the source of the information that Jack Barnes got. I do not believe at all that he lied to me, but as long as Musky is stating that he lied, his testimony is more or less impeached and the information about Roski, Pisano and the museum is not coming from a good source and hence is not verified and may be true or may not be true.
Ed Roski, Jr. spotted at Las Vegas facility attempting to buy Hank in February 2012. A source has come forward who was at the Vegas facility where Hank was purportedly stored at this time. This man has told me that he saw a man who he believes is Roski inspecting Hank in the company of some other men at this date. Roski was said to be there trying to buy Hank. He was reported to have had a physician with him to verify Hank. The doctor verified the body within less than 2 minutes. I asked him if he was sure that that man was Roski and he did hedge:
Source: “I saw a man who I now believe to be Roski there at that time negotiating to buy Hank, and yes, he did have a doctor with him.”
RL: “Are you sure it was Roski.”
Source:“Well it was a while ago, but I now believe that it was him.”
I haven’t the faintest idea how accurate this source is. I would place maybe 90% belief in this person.
Why did Rick take the fake Bigfoot on tour? A source opines:
Perhaps Rick is just in an increasingly degrading set of circumstances. He says that his bank account was down to $100 when he took the replica on tour. So it is probable that he felt justified and desperate enough to put on the hustle to make some dough.
Even if Rick does have a dead Bigfoot, he may have blown it so bad by his criminal behaviors that it may never see the light of day. So says a source, who has a most interesting theory:
At this point though, it is also probable that if there is anything to the rest of his story about the scientific workup, he has probably alienated everyone involved, and they may back out of the scientific media conference, not wanting to be associated with his lies and hoaxing. So the truth of this matter may not be known for quite some time, if ever. And Rick may just say anything at all to keep the controversy and attention on himself, hoping to capitalize on it somehow. He is a con artist and will work either side of the issue for profit. No scruples, no moral compass, just a drive for survival at any cost.
If it never shows up due to Rick’s crime spree, the mystery will perhaps never be solved.
A source takes apart the attacks on the Shooting Bigfoot footage.
Skeptics say that there is no evidence that Rick killed a Bigfoot in that footage, but there is also no evidence that he did not kill a Bigfoot, or at least shoot one. And when you see the Bigfoot footage from Morgan Matthews in Shooting Bigfoot, it’s hard to imagine how it was possible for those to not be Bigfoots. There’s never been anything like it as far as state of the art likeness goes. I don’t think skeptics will ever be able to adequately explain how those were costumes.
I agree with that 100%. I don’t see how those are costumes.
Dyer is shooting live bullets during the Shooting Bigfoot footage. MM reported that Dyer was shooting live bullets during that filming. Do people honestly think that Dyer would shoot live bullets at stunt men in the middle of the night? That’s crazy.
Enhanced scenes from Shooting Bigfoot. The Bigfoot in the first sequence is very impressive. I like especially the way it is walking. Before Dyer fires his third shot, he seems to have his scope right on or very close to the Bigfoot when he fires. Assuming those are real Bigfoots, and I say they are, and Rick is shooting live bullets (we know he is), it is certainly possible that he could have hit that Bigfoot with one or more of his bullets. If he hit it, he could have either wounded it or killed it. I fail to see how that is beyond the realm of possibility.
If Dyer’s stunt man beat up MM, why didn’t MM sue Dyer? The hoax theory implies that Rick hired men to run around the woods in monkey suits in the middle of the night. One of these stunt men then badly beat up Morgan Matthews, a famous film director. If Rick’s stunt man beat up Morgan, why didn’t Morgan sue him.
MM seems to imply that there were no stunt men or suits used in the movie. For the Shooting Bigfoot footage to be fake, there would had to have been stunt men, costumes, CGI or special effects in the movie. In the new footage added to the end of Shooting Bigfoot, there is footage of the homeless man who was there at the time of the filming. The homeless man insists that that the film crew had no costumes or masks with them during the filming. If the film crew had no costumes or masks, who supplied the costumes or masks to hoax the footage.
Stunt men in monkey suits running around in the woods in the middle of the night with no flashlights? In order for the hoax theory to be true, you have to have at least two stuntmen running about in the middle of the night in thick woods in total darkness with no flashlights. How could they see to move around? It makes no sense. Rick has a flashlight on his rifle and MM had a light on his camera. The two men used those lights to get around in the woods at night.
No stunt men, costume designer, special effects of CGI credits in the movie. At the end of Shooting Bigfoot as the credits roll, there are no credits for any of these things. If MM hoaxed the Bigfoot footage in SB, why then are there no credits at the end of the movie listing the above?
Where are the stunt men for Shooting Bigfoot? It has been quite some time now. Why have they not come forward. Indeed. We now need two different stunt men just for the last five minutes of the movie. Where are they? Where are the suits and masks that the stunt men wore? Why can’t we find their suits and masks somewhere?
Morgan Matthews’ cryptic statements. Much has been made of a statement made by Matthews where he was asked, “What knocked you over in the movie?” MM answered: “I do not believe it was a Bigfoot.” Skeptics have gone crazy with this remark, as is supposedly proves that MM knows he was knocked over by something other than a Bigfoot that night. However, a source asks me to consider another possibility:
Mathews states “I don’t believe it was a Bigfoot” Is this because he knows it was a Bigfoot?
Skeptic charge that the Bigfoot that attacked MM in Shooting Bigfoot can be seen “adjusting its mask.” A source feels that there are three Bigfoots in the movie, Hank, Hank’s female partner (let us call her Hanna) and a juvenile Bigfoot.
The Sasquatch they say is “adjusting the mask” is the juvenile in the background that appears just before Hanna’s arm can be seen. The juvenile is separated by a sizable distance over too short a period of time to be the same individual as Hanna, and anyway the face is different.
Without the original hi-res footage things are unclear, but there does not seem to be any adjustment, just distortion of the image. In the frame sequences, there is not enough of a time elapse for such an action (an adjustment) to occur, that would take a more than a few frames. As I mentioned above, the expression on Hanna’s face changes- so it is not a mask.
As you can see, the source points out that Hanna’s face does indeed move, refuting a skeptic charge that since no movement can be seen in her face, she must be wearing a mask.
More reasons why the “hoax filmed with multiple takes” skeptic theory makes no sense at all. Big G opines:
I believe those five minutes at the end of Shooting Bigfoot were a complete surprise to Dyer and Mathews. We can hear dyer wanting to see the video and Dyer wanting to take the video. Seems strange that he wouldn’t want Mathews to put his (hoax ) into a movie. Why would dyer want the filming of a hoax. No audience, no hoax.
A hoax that dyer filmed in one take I might add. Hollywood doesn’t do anything in one take, and that’s with a cooperative camera man during the day with real actors and props.
So there are 2 options.
- Dyer had Mathews film the best hoax footage of all time in one take with a non cooperative camera guy and no night vision.
- They filmed a bunch of bullshit for a couple of days till a Bigfoot wandered into camp and Mathew filmed the only five minutes that made the whole movie.
I believe it to be the latter.
I like that. Big G hit another homer out of the park with that one.
Skeptic nonsense logic about homeless people and lying in San Antonio. One of the bedrock convictions of the skeptics is that there is no way that a Bigfoot could possibly have been on that small parcel in San Antonio. However, this contention runs into serious problems because the famous San Antonio Bigfoot 911 call in 2009 came from precisely that very area.
The woman who made the call actually appears in Shooting Bigfoot. Skeptic reply to this inconvenient fact by saying that she is a liar. However, her male partner also saw the Bigfoot that night and in addition, three motorists passing by also saw the same Bigfoot. They all called in the sighting to the police. Ok, now the woman, her partner and three different motorists are all lying. See how these skeptics don’t make sense?
If you ask them why the woman and her partner are lying, they say, “Homeless people lie!” However, the skeptics star witness is the man who was interviewed by a Bigfoot videographer. He stated that there were multiple takes of the scene with the Bigfoots running around that night. However, he also said that the film crew had no masks or costumes with them, so that theory makes no sense. So homeless people always lie, except for the skeptics’ star witness, who is not lying! Homeless people always lie, except when they don’t! Makes no sense.
The homeless man and his “multiple takes” theory of Shooting Bigfoot. When this guy is talking about multiple takes and the rest of his lies, I assume that blanks were fired in the multiple takes of this fake shooting with stunt men running about in costumes, etc. With cameramen and stuntmen stumbling around in total darkness, why would anyone anyone be firing live rounds!?
Yet MM states that Rick was shooting live bullets that night.
I do not believe that there were multiple takes done that night. The footage that is shown does not look like the refined footage one might get from multiple takes. Further, documentarians do not do multiple takes of a live scene. I think it is a violation of documentarian ethics. Once again, MM states that live bullets were being fired by Rick. No way were those guys doing multiple takes in total darkness with cameramen and various stunt men in full costumes and masks running about in total darkness while Rick Dyer was firing live ammunition. No way.
Big G, one of our finest commenters from the Comments section, on what we have learned recently in the Comments discussions and also via the Rick Dyer story:
I think we are going in the right direction if we listen to others and not Dyer. Yet not everybody in this story lied and those that did didn’t lie 100 percent. Hell I don’t think Dyer lied 100 percent. Everyone wants to know the truth. Because for many the Bigfoot myth would become real.
Thru this mess or web of lies we’ve learned some things.
We’ve learned Bigfoot regularly visit suburbia like other foragers, raccoons for instance (a reference to the fact of Bigfoots using the San Antonio site, proven by 9-11 call, Tent Video and Shooting Bigfoot footage.
“Inventor” in the comments threads stating that Melba’s science is good but the interpretation is in question (A commenter named Inventor, a biologist, has looked at Melba Ketchum’s DNA data and says it appears to be real data, but what it all means is uncertain.)
Regardless of what the skeptics say we have some film that we can evaluate for years to come (reference to the Shooting Bigfoot footage).
What is the backstory on the events of September 7, 2012? A source fills me in on Dyer’s account of that day.
According to Dyer, only he, Amber and MM with the dead Bigfoot until Rick made the call and guys working for the investors flew out. They came out and a truck was rented. They had Hank in a U-Haul until they were able to rent the reefer truck.
I am not saying that that is actually what happened, but this is how Dyer’s story goes.
Dallas of Dallas and Wayne reports that Rick Dyer shot two Sasquatches at Minneola, Texas! In this Blogtalk interview with Steve Kulls, Dallas makes the shocking claim that Rick shot two Sasquatches at Minneola, killing one and wounding another one. The dead one was apparently carried off by the other Bigfoots. After Rick shot the two Bigfoots, Dallas said he ran away in terror.
This story is completely wild and I have no idea if it is true or not, but I will check into it. You can hear it at the 1:08 mark in the interview here. Bizarro!
Explanation for why I use anonymous sources:
I could easily give names for many of my sources. In fact, most of them are big names in the Bigfoot community with easily recognizable names. However, I often encourage them to be anonymous sources. Many times, I offer them the option of being quoted or being anonymous and I strongly encourage them to be anonymous sources. Most of them readily agree to be anonymous. There is nothing mysterious about any of these folks. If you saw their names, you would probably recognize most of them.
However, a lot of info I get is under strict anonymity, as in, if I blow their anonymity, the source is going to be stark raving furious. So I have a duty to protect these folks.
I most use the “anonymous sources” thing because it makes so many people so hopping furious. I cannot count the number of Bigfooters who have ranted and raved at me and my “sources.” The fact that I use unnamed sources really makes them pop a blood vessel. Every time I see a Bigfooter about to stroke out about my sources, I vow to use them even more.
So you see the reason why I use anonymous sources. I just do it to make people mad! I love it when people almost have a heart attack while screaming about my “sources.” I just love to piss these people off.
Idiotic charges that I am not a real journalist, have no journalism degree and never worked in the field.
I actually have a BA in journalism (Cal State University Long Beach about 35 years ago ) unlike I assume 100% of my critics in Bigfootery who claim I am “not a journalist.” I worked on my university papers and magazine, and out of 50 students, my article along with 4 others was chosen for the magazine. I used to do interviews with huge rock bands all the time in Hollywood music industry offices. One of the bands I interviewed is named Judas Priest.
I worked in the field as a proofreader for an academic journal publisher and also as an assistant editor of a well known large circulation national computer magazine in the early 1980’s. The name of the publisher was Sage Publications and the office was in Beverly Hills, California.
In addition, I freelanced a bit for money and I wrote a lot for free papers.
In high school, I won an award from a major California university for Best Column for a High School Newspaper in California that year.
I have also published fiction in literary magazines.
This research takes a lot of time, and I do not get paid anything for it. If you think this website is valuable to you, please consider a a contribution to support more of this valuable research.
Let us go through these.
- Hank was not real. Dumbass claimed numerous times that there was absolutely no way that Hank was a fake. Of course near the end his confidence started dwindling and he plateaued at around the 50% mark of believing in Hank.
In my opinion, it could not have been a faked, but I was wrong about that, I agree. I now believe that its accuracy was due to it being modeled on the body of a real dead Bigfoot. Photos and drawings of this dead Bigfoot were provided by Dyer to the special effects man.
Never before has a Bigfoot prop been created that replicated certain aspects of known Bigfoot features this well. In other words, this model was best likeness of a real Bigfoot ever created, feature-wise. Sure it looks fake, but all the other models look fake too. The problem is that the other models do not replicate Bigfoot features as accurately as this one does. However, I was wrong about Hank being real. I will admit to that. Rick fooled a lot of us.
- There is no hotel billionaire from Vegas funding Rick’s fake teddy in a box.
I never said that the billionaire from Vegas paid for Rick’s prop. The man is not a hotel magnate, and he is not even from Las Vegas. I continue to believe there is a real body, and this man owns it. This has not yet been disproven so I am not wrong.
- There is no curator from the Museum of Natural History speaking at the press conference.
That is because there has not yet been a press conference. I am confident that one was scheduled with this person to speak at it at one time. I continue to believe that a press conference may well occur. This has not yet been disproven so I am not wrong.
- There was and will never be a press conference.
I said there would be one at some point in the future. This has not yet been disproven so I am not wrong.
- There were no MD’s that analyzed the body. Even Dumbass changed his story in his last post to say it was a couple of friends that saw the body.
Not true. Jeff and Jack stated that they brought 2 MD’s with them to view some sort of a Hank figure. The MD’s stated that they thought it was real according to Jeff and Jack. If the Hank prop fooled them, those are two more people who got fooled by Rick’s prop. I am not wrong in this case as the charge is not true. The MD’s were indeed there.
- Hank is not the epitome of special effects. Okay, this is just an opinion but c’mon Dumbass, do you really think that Hank is the BEST that mankind can produce for a fake body. Bloody moronic logic on your part.
I never said it was the best we can do. However, this prop represented actual Bigfoot features more accurately than any other Bigfoot prop I have ever seen. The other Bigfoot props are not exactly masterpieces either if you have noticed, and they all look fake.
- There was no additional video shown at the Alamo.
Jeff and Jack were originally supposed to show a 40 minute video of them verifying Hank. However, I found out that this was cancelled at the last minute and I did report that.
- There were no investors at the Alamo. Jeff and Jack (the investors) were supposed to speak at the Alamo, but about a week before, plans were changed and they pulled out. I reported that.
1 for 8! Pretty pitiful!
The rest mentions something about me being supported by my mother and my aunt. My aunt never gives me one single nickel for anything. Not that she should, but that is just the way it is. My mother doesn’t “support” me. I live on my own and pay my own bills every month and have lived this way for a very long time.
However, I come from a very generous extended family. People are always loaning and giving other family members money for this and that. My family is very close-knit, and that is just the way we are. Further, most people I know are getting money from their parents. These people are aged 40-52, and their incomes range from 12-30,000/yr. Yes, their parents do help them out, mostly for large expenses in the $2,000-3,000 range, although one friend had a wealthy father who was helping the family survive while the son was out of business. Further the father had given out large gifts for various things, such as $10,000 to start a business.
In fact, most of the wealthy people I know continue to get quite a bit of money from their parents. That is, while these people are wealthy ($200-300,000/yr), their parents are stinking filthy rich. Most every person I ever knew who came from a wealthy family continued to receive a lot of money from their parents far off into adulthood.
Can someone explain to me why this is some gigantic problem? Is there something wrong with close-knit families who help each other out? If wealthy parents continue to shower money on their children far off into adulthood (as is the norm) why is it so horrible that non-wealthy families might do this too.
Personally, I also have very generous friends who help me out financially in various ways, and for most of my life, I have had many very generous girlfriends who have spent a lot of money on me.
I fail to see why this is such a problem!
The rest of the post goes off in the usual direction, but I will say that one thing I have noticed is that 100% of my haters are Republican conservatives. I haven’t seen a single progressive person among the haters yet. So apparently a lot of this beef is political.
Anyway here is a personal message to the folks who put up this site, especially Laura, along with the idiots at this site.
GG Allin RIP forever!
If you think this website is valuable to you, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site.
I figured it would go down. The last activity there was on April 6, 9 days ago. I would love to comply with this idiot’s directives so he won’t make fun of me anymore, but how do I go about doing it? It’s obvious that he thinks just about everything I write about everything is ridiculous and stupid. Therefore, I really do not see how someone like this can be accommodated. Really, all of this comes from lunatic Bigfooters, and they all hate me because I believe that Rick Dyer killed a Bigfoot. That is really all it is about.
There is not a lot of activity at this stupid site either, also run by insane moronic Bigfooters. They too hate me because I believe Rick and for no other reason. They were stealing a lot of my copy so I filed a DMCA takedown order against them and got most of the copyright-infringing material removed.
If you think this website is valuable to you, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site.
100 Bigfoot Nights. This very interesting video shows what are supposed to be Bigfoot vocalizations from a habituation site. I know nothing about the people making these recordings, but obviously the vast majority of idiots in our field with the hater mindset are going to insist that it is a hoax. I am not so sure. Notice how much these vocalizations sound like Sasquatch Ontario’s vocalizations? I think that is because experts say that Bigfoots vocalize on the inhale instead of on the exhale as we do. Site is here.
The pieces of the Rick Dyer mystery start to fall together. One of the strangest mysteries of the Rick Dyer story is how Rick was able to get seven different Bigfoot experts, including possibly 2 different MD’s, to verify his fake Hank prop as a real taxidermied Bigfoot. We know that Jeff and Jack came out to Las Vegas in early January to inspect Hank. They had an entourage of seven including one or maybe two MD’s. This group verified Hank as real. But if it was such an obvious fake prop, as could be determined immediately by the two men who unveiled Hank in Daytona, then how did it fool seven men including two experts.
The answer is that Rick would not allow Jeff and Jack’s entourage to touch the body! I am not sure if it was under the glass case or not – perhaps it was. But if they could not touch the body, it makes more sense that they might have confirmed it as real, especially since in my opinion it had to be modeled on a real Bigfoot specimen, and I believe the Hank prop was indeed modeled on a real Bigfoot specimen.
Hank best Bigfoot prop ever made. Despite the fact that it was cheap and fake looking, Hank looked more like a real Bigfoot than any prop that has ever been made by any of the big Hollywood blowhards like Doug Hudson. There are certain things that all Bigfoots have that these prop-makers always get wrong. I will not go into them because I do not want to help them make better props to confuse us even more!
The only way anyone could have made that prop is if they knew exactly what a real Bigfoot looks like. But even then it might be hard. It would be so much easier if you had a real dead specimen to work with. There is no evidence that Rick Dyer has extensive knowledge of what a Bigfoot looks like. Of course Chris Russell does not either. The only way they could have made this prop so accurate is if they had access to a real Bigfoot.
Now we know why Rick kept covering up the feet and hands of Hank. Hank’s hands looked pretty bad, as the skeptics kept pointing out, but a recent photo of Hank’s feet on Randy’s blog shows that the feet looked terribly fake. That’s why he kept covering them up – because they looked so fake!
Efforts to prosecute Dyer for fraud going nowhere. I did not think these would amount to much of anything, but I certainly encourage the effort. I signed the petition myself.
Haters are lunatics. See here and here for a couple of hater efforts to insult, abuse, threaten, libel, harass, defame and stalk me on the Internet, set up by haters. I have been on the Net for a long time, and I have run into lots of lunatic types for typical lunatic groups like various nationalists, Zionists, Republicans, rightwingers, gay activists, Black nationalists, and all sorts of other fanatical nutballs.
I must say that all the hassle I got from them was no more than 1% of the headaches I have gotten from these lunatic Bigfooters. The only reason these Bigfooter kooks hate me is because I believe Rick Dyer. There is no other reason. People say that my treatment is normal, but it’s not. As I said, I have been on the Net forever being as provocative as ever, and I never ran into 1% of these level of harassment and weirdness.
The only conclusion is that a large % of Bigfooters are simply insane; worse than that, they are dangerously insane. You wonder why people like Rex Dutton keep dropping out of Bigfootery, well, that’s why.
- Bigfooter hater kooks almost gave poor old Larry Surface a heart attack.
- Haters stalked Rick Dyer at his various residences and spied on him from work vans on lunch hour.
- Haters broke into Rick’s apartment and completely trashed it.
- Another hater broke into Rick’s place and confronted Rick – a great big fistfight ensued.
- Haters killed one of Dyer’s dogs, possibly by poisoning it.
These are the type of the people the hater scums are – insane nutcases who are worse than Dyer by orders of magnitude. The haters make Rick Dyer look like Mother Theresa.
Morgan Matthews’ statements in an interview after the showing of Shooting Bigfoot. Here are the statements:
“Something quite surprising happens at the end of the film.”
“It ended up taking us somewhere quite interesting, extreme and unexpected.”
“Something very extreme happens at the end of the film which may or may not have been a close encounter (with a Bigfoot).”
An extreme incident happens at the end of the film. And that extreme incident is…Rick Dyer hoaxed Morgan!? I do not think so!
Lindsay is always wrong. The haters insist that I am always wrong and I have never been right about anything. But this is not true. I have been right many times. Consider for example when I broke the story about how Rick Dyer confronted Jeff and Jack with a warrant for $8,000 and some odd in back child support. One of the pair immediately broke out his checkbook and wrote Rick a check on the spot.
And you see this story of mine has been confirmed by Andrew Clacy:
Andrew Clacy Tuesday, April 08, 2014 8:32:00 PM
The investor already paid him $9,000 to pay off child support. The dirt bag so was do far behind in paying.
Why is Morgan Matthews speaking in riddles? One of my sources offers this:
IF a Sasquatch was shot and killed while MM was there, those in charge of the body would likely make him (= $$) sign a non-disclosure agreement, so that they (and not he) would have control over the release of information. In that case, MM would be forced to speak in riddles.
It certainly makes sense to me. If Rick simply hoaxed Morgan or if Rick and Morgan hoaxed the end of the video, why would MM be speaking in riddles all this time? It makes no sense.
Christopher Noel’s new position. This theory from one of my sources, which closes resembles where Noel is right now with this story:
However, I still don’t think Rick Killed a Bigfoot!! He may have had an encounter, that was caught on film, but I don’t think he killed one. The one in the film does look an awfully lot like the one in the tent video!! Let me lay out a possible scenario for you….
Rick has a real encounter!! He doesn’t kill it, but wants to be famous. So he creates an elaborate hoax around an actual encounter. This would make more sense to me, but just speculation!! What do you think?
In short, Noel believes that the 9-11 call was real, the Tent Video is real and that the Shooting Bigfoot sequences are real. However, he now believes that Rick did not shoot and kill a Bigfoot that night. Instead, he shot at one and missed and then he decided to construct an elaborate hoax around the idea of shooting a Bigfoot. Here is a video laying out Noel’s position:
Where most of Rick’s supporters are at now? Most of them are at about the same place I am:
1. 9-11 call was real.
2. Rick shot the Tent Video showing a real Bigfoot.
3. There are real Bigfoots running about at the end of Shooting Bigfoot, and Rick is shooting live bullets at them. A real Bigfoot knocks over Morgan.
However, beyond that, they are not sure of much of anything. Some of them still believe he killed a Bigfoot, but they acknowledge that there is little good hard evidence for that yet, which is the truth.
Lynk Paul and Andrew Clacy issue lengthy statements regarding the Hank tour. Both men have issued long statements regarding the tour. Both are absolutely furious at the way Rick treated them and both say that Rick is now lying about both of them. The statements are quite illuminating. Overviews of these statements can be found on Randy Filipovic’s blog. Lynk’s statement can be found on Ed Brown’s superb site here. Ed is one of the few standup guys in this business. Hat off to him.
Lynk Paul knew Hank was a prop early on. From his statement, we now know that Lynk discovered it was a prop early on, but Rick offered him carrots and sticks (rewards and threats) in order to shut up about it. Rick had Lynk over a barrel and was threatening to have him deported if Lynk revealed the truth. I do forgive Lynk for his involvement in this Hank tour hoax. I think Lynk and Andrew are just two more victims of a con artist named Rick Dyer.
The Rick Dyer saga is not over. In particular, the skeptics have not been able to prove
1. That the 9-11 call in San Antonio was fake. Most of these fools are now insisting that the 911 call was fake also.
2. That the Tent Video is fake. The skeptics have been trying to prove that the Tent Video was fake ever since it came out. They have been completely unsuccessful. In order to prove this, they will have to show how it was done and hopefully either find the costume or the man who was wearing it. Good luck with that one!
3. That the Shooting Bigfoot scenes were faked. They have not yet proven that Rick was chasing and shooting at a man in a costume and/or that MM was attacked by a man in a costume with a mask. In order to do that, they will need to find the costume, the mask and the man or men who wore them. In addition, a statement from MM that he was either the victim of a hoax or that he was in on a hoax would be helpful. Good luck with that one!
4. That Musky Allen’s testimony was made up. It is interesting that after all this time, Musky has not yet recanted his testimony. Most liars would have recanted by this time.
More weirdness from Jeff and Jack’s verification visit to Hank. When Jeff and Jack’s team inspected Hank, he had the following characteristics:
“The specimen has
- hair patterns
- open sores
- veins just below the skin
- injuries to the hands, fingers and toes
- what looks like scars on the forehead from likely impact with branches and trees.”
What? Chris Russell constructed a “cheap prop” with veins visible below the skin, actual open sores, hair patterns, scars on the forehead, fingerprints (!), injuries to the hands, fingers and toes (!), moles and blemishes? What?
I have never in my life seen a prop that had any of these things. If Russell created this super-prop with all of these characteristics, #1, it is not a cheap prop, and #2, it is the greatest Bigfoot prop or really any prop I have ever heard of. Who is Chris Russell? A supergenius? Or is there something else going on here? This really doesn’t make sense.
Patterson/Gimlin footage a hoax? A source of mine recounts the following facts about the expedition:
I think Patterson and Gimlin had been in the wild for going on 2 weeks searching, based on reports and footprints which had come out of that area. They were nearly out of supplies and ready to call it quits when they got the footage.
So…they had been searching for 2 whole weeks, were running low on supplies and were about ready to call it a day…when…one of them decided to put on a monkey suit and run across a creekbed while the other filmed it?!
The skeptic idiots (basically the hater mindset) who insist that Patterson and Gimlin hoaxed this legendary footage simply do not make any sort of sense. You might want to know that these skeptic haters nearly ruined Gimlin’s life. Gimlin went into hiding from publicity for nearly a decade due to all of the abuse and threats he was getting from skeptic hater morons.
A bit of history. This is from Facebook/Find Bigfoot’s original interview with the mysterious person (later determined to be Rick Dyer) who uploaded the Tent Video.
It was posted by a strange geeky looking guy without a name and with the following statement:
Below is FB/FB’s Q & A w/ Filmer of “#9/79 “CAMPER” video. Not an iphone after all! Better name might be “Camper films Sasquatch from tent w/ a Galaxy Note” Much more to the story…. read his statement below.
I’m very well respected in my field and wouldn’t risk my reputation. There are inconsistencies popping up on blogs all over the net.
- I have never communicated with anyone that hasn’t contacted me first.
- The first video was filmed with a Galaxy Note.
- The cell phone film was intentionally altered.
- The cell camera was the first to start filming. There are many other moving parts.
- People this is more than Sasquatch caught on film, This is Irrefutable Historical Evidence of the existence of Sasquatch.
Q. Is this a hoax?
A. There are many different people and organizations with unstable relationships involved to ever be a hoax.
Q. When and where will it be released?
A. There will be a full press conference TBD.
Q. Will any of your films show a detailed body?
A. Yes eating, walking, running and more!
You can tell from the terrible grammar and spelling that this is none other than Rick Dyer. Dyer is widely respected in his field? LOL. The press conference, like all of Dyer’s pressers during this story, of course never occurred.
Some important questions to ask about the Shooting Bigfoot sequence, from my comments section:
1. Is the footage real or was it staged with someone in a fake BF outfit? Does the up close still of the attacking BF resemble any other previous BF photos or match eyewitness accounts?
2. Why has Morgan Matthews been coy about that BF sequence? Is it in his character to orchestrate a “Blair Witch” type of hoax? Would Dyer be capable of staging a hoax of this magnitude?
3. Have you tried to interview Morgan Matthews about this film footage?
Excellent questions. One at a time.
1. Is the footage real or was it staged with someone in a fake BF outfit? I do not see how this footage is faked. That’s a real Sasquatch attacking MM at the end of the film or I will eat my hat.
2. Does the up close still of the attacking BF resemble any other previous BF photos or match eyewitness accounts? I am not sure. It looks like a Bigfoot to me. It also looks like no mask or costume I have ever seen in my life and the skeptics have had over a year now to find the mask/costume and stunt man, and they have utterly failed. I assume that no such mask/costume or stunt man will ever be found.
3. Why has Morgan Matthews been coy about that BF sequence? In my opinion, he has been forced to sign an NDA after Rick killed a Bigfoot. As a result, he is not allowed to discuss the killing of the Bigfoot in the movie. Hence the coyness, speaking in riddles, etc. I cannot see how any other explanation makes sense.
4. Is it in his character to orchestrate a “Blair Witch” type of hoax? It is absolutely not in his character at all to orchestrate any sort of a hoax. One of my sources told me, “MM would not be a party to any sort of a hoax in any way, shape or form.” This man starred in one of Morgan’s documentaries. During that shooting, Morgan stayed at the source’s house for 2 weeks and my source came to know MM very well. If MM was in on any sort of a hoax in any way whatsoever, I feel that his career would be shot. The skeptics are saying that that makes sense that this guy would blow his whole career by hoaxing a movie, but to me that is simply nonsense. I don’t believe it.
5. Would Dyer be capable of staging a hoax of this magnitude? I do not believe it. Where was the stunt man? Or the two stunt men? Were they there the whole time? Where were the costumes? A prime witness (Ron, who is featured in the documentary) says says that the team had no costumes whatsoever during the shooting. Further, the sequence looks completely unrehearsed. Would Rick have been able to pull all of this off in a single take? No.
6. Have you tried to interview Morgan Matthews about this film footage? No I have not, and I assume that he would not want to speak with me, hence I have not even bothered to contact him.
If you think this website is valuable to you, please consider a contribution to support the continuation of the site.
I suppose I ought to answer some of this nonsense that the Bigfooter haters peddle about me. Truth is that just about everything they say about me is a lie.
I am a sexist. No. I am a Leftist, and I support the Equity Feminist movement. In fact, I am on some feminist mailing lists. There is no sexism on this site. I am a former member of the National Organization of Women. However, as an MRA, a member of the Manosphere and the PUA/Game part of the Net, I would point out that 100% of the guys writing on that part of the Net are constantly accused of sexism, misogyny, etc. And everyone accusing me of this is a Republican!
I am a racist. I do not see any racist posts on this site. If you find a racist post, please point it out to me. I try very hard not to write any racist posts on here and I watch my language very carefully. I am a Leftist and I support the Civil Rights movement and voted for Obama twice. I support most of the goals of the Congressional Black Caucus, that is, I support Blacks politically. I very much oppose the overtly racist agenda of the Republican Party.
One of the reasons I vote Democrat is because they are for the Blacks. I am also on the mailing list of some Black and antiracist organizations so I support minority political causes. However, I am a race realist, and all race realists are constantly attacked for being racists. Keep in mind that the idiots calling me racist are all Republicans!
I am a pedophile. This is the weirdest one of the all. I have no more interest in girls 12-under than any other man. They really are nothing to me. I am a teliophile like most men – I am mostly strongly attracted to mature females. I have no idea where this nonsense started.
I believe that it is normal for a man to want to have sex with girls 12-16. I never said that. However, it is true that I believe it is normal for men to be sexually attracted to girls of that age. As a therapist, I have teenage boys and young men coming to me all the time worried that they are turned on by teenage girls and that this means that they are pedophiles. I tell them, “Congratulations! Teenage girls turn you on. That means you are normal!”
Is it normal to want to have sex with them? I suppose it is…but most normal adults move past that stage and focus on older women. Thoughts are not important. The people making this accusation are puritanical filth. They are reactionary worms. These people would actually like to put you in jail for the stuff you think about! If you believe in freedom of thought, these scums need to be fought to the death with every ounce of your energy.
I live with my mother! This is the craziest one of them all. I have never lived with my mother in my entire life. However, some folks my age are moving back in with elderly parents to take care of them. I have thought of that, but the stigma of living with my mother really keeps me away from doing that. My mother lives 33 miles from me. I do eat dinner with her once a week or so. Often other relatives are there too. On rare occasions, I spend 1-3 nights over there for a visit, but that is quite rare actually. I have lived with my mother and father before (lived with my parents). But that was a very long time ago. I have been living on my own forever now.
My mother makes my dinner. Well, I suppose once a week she does? Is that ok with everyone?
My mother pays my bills. My mother certainly does not pay my bills. I pay my own bills every month.
I don’t have a car. True, right now, I do not have a car. However, I have owned a vehicle since I was 16 years old. This is the first time in 40 years I will be without a vehicle. But I should have a vehicle in a few weeks or so. Anyway, why is it a crime to not own a vehicle?
I panhandle for donations. People deserve for be enumerated or paid for the work that they do. I do a lot of work on this website, and I feel that I deserve to be paid for that work. It is not panhandling to ask to be paid a fair wage for hard work. And I do receive some income from that – around $500/month so far.
I am unemployed. Not true. I do not have to work as I have a trust fund, but I also work at all sorts of jobs and I have a variety of sources of income.
I do not have a regular job. True, but I have a hard time understanding why this is so terrible?
I am a shut-in. It’s not true. In fact, I travel to stay with friends and stay with them for weeks at a time and I have friends come here to stay with me on a regular basis. Friends have stayed with me here for up to one week at a time. I have lunch and dinner out with friends and dates regularly. I also travel with and take vacations with friends and lovers.
I say the only way you can get HIV is from anal sex. I never said that. Many cases are transmitted via vaginal sex male to female.
I can’t get laid. Truly hilarious. Ask anyone who knows me.
This website “spews hate.” That is news to me. Can someone point out to me how this site “spews hate?”
I am a bigot. I doubt it. Most Leftists are not like that. We are not supposed to be that way, so we try hard not to be that way. And everyone calling me bigot is a Republican!
Believe I am a genius because I say so. A genius IQ is 140+. My IQ is 147. It was measured in high school. The counselor’s name was Mr. Stanford. He showed me the score. I retook the test at age 29 and got a score of 140+ (he did not break it down further). If you have a genius IQ, you’re a genius. Not that it’s anything to brag about. Trust me.
Believe my sources cannot be lying to me. As a general rule, most of them have not deliberately lied to me. The only ones that lied to me were sent by the haters themselves!
I call Dyer skeptics evil, sociopathic and Satanic because they go after Rick Dyer. I never said that. Of course I do not believe that. The haters, who go after not only Rick but everyone who believes him like me, are indeed Satanic, sociopathic and evil, and they can hurry up and die for all I care. However, there are Dyer skeptics who simply focus on Dyer and leave the rest of us out of it like Randy Filipovic who I have no hard feelings toward at all. In fact, the Dyer skeptics have done a great job in helping to untangle this mystery.
Claims to be an academic. I never said that. I am an independent scholar. One of my articles just made it through peer review at a peer reviewed academic journal. Just wondering if any of you scums can claim to have done anything that important?
Claims to be a journalist. I am a journalist. I have a BA in Journalism from California State University Long Beach. Do any of you scums possess such a degree?
Claims to be a journalist, but is not working in the field. Right. Many of us journalists are not presently employed in the field. If you have a degree in Journalism, you get to call yourself journalist for the rest of your life. Anyway, my blogging is journalism, and at the moment, I am actually making money as a journalist!
Claims to have worked as an editor of a magazine, but is lying. I did indeed work as an editor of a magazine. It was a well known and widely read computer magazine that was out in the 1980’s (similar to Byte).
Uses computers at my Mom’s house. Well, when I visit over there, I do use the computer at times as I do not have a laptop. I fail to see why this is a crime.
Eats food at my mother’s house. Indeed, when I visit once in a while, I definitely eat food there! Can someone tell me why it is a crime to visit your Mom and eat food at her place? I am having a hard time understanding these garbage people.
Thinks teenage girls still want him. At my age, most teenage girls are not interested in me anymore. They were after me for most of my life, but that really started to peter out around age 47. At the moment, definitely 99% of teenage girls do not seem to be interested in me. However, there is the rare one now and then.
My glasses are grannies glasses from the 1980’s. Fail to see why this is important, but I have a new pair now anyway.
I creep out women. Not really, but at my age, you “creep out” most young women if you so much as try to talk to them, so it’s not much of a charge. I do great with women and have for most of my life.
I “creeped out” a young female bank teller. Not true. She was very friendly the whole time I saw her at the bank, and she also would not stop looking at me. I just think she didn’t want to go out with me is all, maybe due to age difference. I suppose she just liked to look at me but doesn’t want to actually go out with me.
Talks about how women give him “that look:” Women have been giving me come-on looks most of my life. Granted, it doesn’t happen so much anymore, but it still happens sometimes. This has been happening less and less as I have gotten older.
I am a Commie. Sort of.
I am a socialist. Damn right.
Can’t afford to buy another car. Pretty much. Is this a crime or something?
Can’t afford $2,500 to fix his car. True, but why is this a crime? I hardly know anyone who has $2,500 lying around. Anyway, the car is going to be fixed.