How Much “Welfare” Do US Local Governments Dish Out Anyway?

Take my word for it people don’t want their property values destroyed by NAM’s; they don’t want to their kids getting involved with the “wrong sort of crowd”, they don’t want the stress and fear that comes with living in a bad area, so they vote Republican.

When you put the milk out the cats come, and local GOP types promise not to put any milk out at all. Local politicians unlike say national leaders actually do follow through with what they say.

Local GOP types promise not to put any milk out. Milk means welfare.

Almost all welfare programs (you still have not told me what you mean by this – you need to define welfare programs) are run at the federal level last time I checked. Local governments run few to no welfare programs, unless I am wrong. Please detail the welfare programs that local governments dish out that bring the NAM’s to your local area. I’m not aware of any.

Show me how voting GOP at the local level means they are going to cut off the welfare and keep the nigs and beaners out of town.

I live in a city in California that is majority Hispanic. There’s a fair amount of crime around here, but it’s survivable. I even go out for my walks at 10 or 11 at nite around here and nobody bothers me. This town is 67% Hispanic, 29% White and 4% Black. Actually, my complex allows Section 8, but not everyone in here is a Sec 8 tenant. Some are and some are not. There are some bad people around here, but they are pretty easily avoidable.

Please explain to me why I should vote Republican at the local level? What are the local Republicans going to do to make my town a nicer place to live in? How are they going to force the nigs and spics out and help some nice White folks to move in here again?

13 Comments

Filed under Blacks, Europeans, Government, Hispanics, Politics, Race/Ethnicity, Republicans, US Politics, Whites

13 Responses to How Much “Welfare” Do US Local Governments Dish Out Anyway?

  1. Conquistador

    You’re technically right that local governments must comply with federal law but here’s the kicker there are ways around that. For example the police aggressively ticketing and arresting NAMs. The purpose is to send a message to unwanted types that they’re not welcome. High real estate prices (by limiting development) also keeps undesirables out. Similarly the rise of HOAs and their high dues also serve as a deterrent.

    “I live in a city in California that is majority Hispanic. There’s a fair amount of crime around here, but it’s survivable.” – Robert

    Do you a wife? Children? You’d feel very differently if you did. “Survivable” isn’t somewhere most people want to raise families.

    “Actually, my complex allows Section 8, but not everyone in here is a Sec 8 tenant. Some are and some are not. There are some bad people around here, but they are pretty easily avoidable.” – Robert

    My parents are landlords and let me tell you nobody wants section 8 tenants as renters or neighbors. One time we rented out to them and neighbors complained of loud parties, strange even shady looking people coming in and out of the property, marijuana was even spotted being grown in the backyard. The tenants themselves were also a headache to deal with.

    “Please explain to me why I should vote Republican at the local level? What are the local Republicans going to do to make my town a nicer place to live in? How are they going to force the nigs and spics out and help some nice White folks to move in here again?” – Robert

    At 67% Hispanic your town is already too far gone. That’s why most of the remaining white areas in otherwise very diverse states (high class and low class white alike) overwhelmingly vote Republican. It’s about protecting who they are and what they have not directly through white nationalism but through “market forces”.

    • Tulio

      “For example the police aggressively ticketing and arresting NAMs. The purpose is to send a message to unwanted types that they’re not welcome.”

      People like you are frightening. It’s nice to see you have no regard for the Constitution, particularly the 4th amendment in this case. You think the purpose of the police is the intimidate and arrest people of the wrong color, rather than enforce the law and uphold justice. Maybe you should should just leave the USA since you don’t believe in its founding principals. Nazi Germany would’ve been utopia for you.

      “High real estate prices (by limiting development) also keeps undesirables out. Similarly the rise of HOAs and their high dues also serve as a deterrent.”

      Really? So does California have the highest real estate prices in the country yet attracts the most non-whites? While some of the cheapest places to live are mostly white? Why aren’t non-whites coming to Idaho and W. Virginia en masse? Doesn’t look like your plan is working. Besides, Hispanics are known to pool resources and live 2 families to a house to make the mortgage if they have to. So your plan won’t work.

      • Dota

        “” You think the purpose of the police is the intimidate and arrest people of the wrong color, rather than enforce the law and uphold justice. Maybe you should should just leave the USA since you don’t believe in its founding principals. Nazi Germany would’ve been utopia for you.”"

        Or he could check out India where the police routinely bully dalits and lower castes in the rural areas. This kid’s a disgrace to western civilization.

      • Conquistador

        The laws are being enforced Tulio. Unfortunately for you blacks and Hispanics commit the most crimes so nothing illegal is occurring just very aggressive enforcement.

        Non-whites (by this you mean Hispanics) are flowing into SoCal due to proximity with Mexico. It’s the same for the rest of the south west as well. The areas which they’ve taken over are the working white class neighborhoods. This is why prole whites vote GOP where as the affluent whites in Beverly Hills (who are never exposed to Mexican or black criminality) are SWPL who happily preach “diversity”.

        • I live in Central California. This whole area is basically Hispanic now, so it ain’t just So Cal. If you’re a working class White in California and you’re mad about Hispanicization, how does voting Republican at any level benefit you?

        • Conquistador

          The central valley is good example of what I’m talking about. It used to be nearly all white in it’s heyday. Yes there were plenty of Mexican farmhands but not like today’s numbers. What was once a prosperous farming region is now economically impoverished. The foreclosure capital of America is Stockton, California. Crime is rampant, businesses flee, as do socially mobile whites, and the area just gets poorer and poorer, because NAM’s can’t produce wealth. Then we’re told racism is the problem.

          GOP lawmakers at the local and state level actually do take a hardline against illegal immigration and follow through with action. Just look at Arizona for example. They also support “tough on crime” laws in other words laws mostly aimed at protecting people from NAMs.

        • Tulio

          “GOP lawmakers at the local and state level actually do take a hardline against illegal immigration and follow through with action.”

          No idiot. It was Reagan that passed amnesty for illegals. Obama has deported more illegals than Bush, his father or Regan ever did.

          http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/12/obamas-record-high-deportations-draw-hispanic-scorn/

          You see, this clown Conquistador is exactly what’s wrong with this society. These are the type of low-information voters that believe in political party mantras rather than actual policies at the ground level. Republicans = anti-immigration = good. Democrats = diversity = pro illegals = bad. Look Bubba, real life is much more complicated than that.

          “Just look at Arizona for example. They also support “tough on crime” laws in other words laws mostly aimed at protecting people from NAMs.”"

          Ironically, it’s liberals that will be patting you on the back for this statement. This is exactly the image they want to portray of Republicans, as hate-mongering gestapos that target people of color. Something that moderate conservatives would like to brush aside.

        • Conquistador

          “No idiot. It was Reagan that passed amnesty for illegals. Obama has deported more illegals than Bush, his father or Regan ever did.

          You see, this clown Conquistador is exactly what’s wrong with this society. These are the type of low-information voters that believe in political party mantras rather than actual policies at the ground level. Republicans = anti-immigration = good. Democrats = diversity = pro illegals = bad. Look Bubba, real life is much more complicated than that.” – Tulio

          Are you brain dead? I specifically said GOP politicians AT THE LOCAL AND STATE LEVEL. Try again.

          Oh and Barry has little to do with the increase in deportations. Pressure on the issue from Republicans in Congress has only arisen recently (like 2007 with the border fence debate) and Obama himself supports amnesty and the “Dream Act”.

          “Ironically, it’s liberals that will be patting you on the back for this statement. This is exactly the image they want to portray of Republicans, as hate-mongering gestapos that target people of color. Something that moderate conservatives would like to brush aside.” Tuilo

          Enforcing the law is “hate mongering fascism”, LOL. This is why the left is out of touch and continually loses elections. The “moderate conservatives” you refer to are all greedy businessmen undermining American labor. .

        • Ken S

          “greedy businessmen undermining American labor”

          So much for market forces. Maybe American labor isn’t all that it’s cracked up to be? How do you justify the protection of this labor without some sort of nationalism that ends up looking awfully ‘racist’?

  2. Pat M

    Conquistador- “One time we rented out to them”? I do Sec. 8 for a living and your comment is exactly what I hear from the folks like yourself. You had one bad experience so you generalize about everyone who receives the benefits of the program. 95% of my participants are good, upstanding, non-partying, non drug addicted, honest people who unfortunately have fallen victim to a rigged economic game in a community with very few opportunities and have little to no chance of getting out of the circumstances they are in.

  3. baloocartoons

    The reason for voting Republican on the welfare issue is simply that while both parties are big on handing out freebies to everybody, the Democrats are more enthusiastic about it and committed to it. They’re like the walrus and the carpenter. Both of them ate the oysters.
    http://ex-army.blogspot.com/

  4. Daniel

    >>At 67% Hispanic your town is already too far gone

    >>I live in Central California. This whole area is basically Hispanic now,

    And you can blame the REPUBLICANS and the REPUBLICAN Pete Wilson for these circumstances. This is the untold story. And f**k you to the likes of Victor Davis Hanson. You wanted those Hispanics when you thought they were going to be good and cheap to pick your raisins.

    We reap what we sow.

    I can’t wait until the Zetas and Gulf Cartel start asserting their power in California del Norte. This is going to be a wonderful century.

  5. I think be it on a National or local level, Republicans have ‘defined’ welfare as ‘a burden on the Government to those not deserving’.
    No one sees themselves as not deserving regardless of whatever Government programs they may benefit form, so they see the Republicans as ‘protecting’ the hard earned taxes we pay from being spent on others who aren’t deserving.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s