The abducted children are kidnapped, falsely imprisoned and then either put to work in the sex trade as prostitutes, forced to become slaves in the families of upper caste families, forced into the streets as beggars for their masters, forced into adoption by other families or operated on against their will, with their removed organs used in the organ trade.
Police know about it but do little. In most cases, the cops are probably paid off by criminal gangs. If you have a lot of money, you can pay the police and maybe they will try to find the kidnap victim. If you have no money though, the police won’t even look for them.
More evidence that Indian culture is a the nadir of all humanity. And it’s all because of Hinduism. Hinduism is the religion of India. Hinduism created Hindu culture. Hindu culture is the culture of India. There is a straight line connecting all three of these things.
I understand that slavery, even of children, is also huge in Nepal. Lower caste children are taken from their parents and live their lives as enslaved servants of the upper classes in Nepalese urban areas.
What about Bangladesh and Pakistan? Are children made into slaves there too?
This sort of thing may be happening in America at a higher rate than people think would be the rate in America. If the allegations made in The Franklin Case are true then people in America should be alarmed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_child_prostitution_ring_allegations
http://www.voxfux.com/features/bush_child_sex_coverup/franklin.htm
The above link has an image of a newspaper clipping, very interesting
And I made a post on it here
http://seedofjapheth.wordpress.com/2012/01/22/the-franklin-scandal/
There may be some of this going on, but it is at a very low level. The Franklin allegations have never been proven to my knowledge.
800,000 children are kidnapped and enslaved in India every single year. If the US had the same rate of that as India, 200,000 children would have to be kidnapped and turned into slaves in the US every year, or approximately 600 every day.
THERE IS NO WAY THAT SUCH A THING IS HAPPENING IN THE US.
Man it must be so hard to be a dark skinned “dalit” Robert, imagine the harshness, the unnecessary cruelty, the sheer stupidity & pathetic greed, backwardness & egoism of people that carry out these things so a bunch of lazy ass insignificant upper caste Hindu’s, who are so dirty & scummy & worthless on an unimaginable scale, can live their pathetic ass lives feeling good about themselves. Not only that, but the Dalits are the ones that have to deal with the worse stereotypes of Indian people because they just happen to be of an undesirable color in our wonderful world of colorism. So people’s most negative perception of Indians fall on the lower castes because the upper light skinned castes can pretend to be of someone of a different ethnicity when its really them thats causing all the shit that unfortunately, the lower castes have to deal with on a regular basis wherever they go in the world.
Man when I hear about stuff like this, I want to take a shot gun and blow the heads off all these rich diaspora Indians in the U.S that put this bullshit deceptive image of this “great Indian culture” to Americans. Come to think of it, whenever I have talked or dealt with some of these rich well-off diaspora upper-caste Indians, I somehow smelled the sheer lying bullshit they seem to put off. These people are the biggest scum of the earth that have never done anything significant on a global scale or to forward the human race. To think these people are somehow morally superior or are holy guardians of spiritualism as these people like to tell us, holy shit don’t make me laugh now. I do not want to these people in the U.S or have to deal with them in any way or form. I think Indians need some sort of outside force to come in to fix their culture and show how backwards, dirty, & ugly they are, because they don’t seem to be capable of doing so. Knowing Indians, I know this will never happen, it think it would be a humanitarian gesture to have some sort of genocide or nuking of all upper caste Indians & their areas.
77% of Indians are low caste. All backwards castes, scheduled castes and scheduled tribes are lower caste. There are only 3 upper castes, and apparently they absolutely despise the lower castes. The blame them, especially the Dalits, for all of the problems of Indian society such as the matter depicted above. Apparently it’s Dalits’ fault for letting their kids get kidnapped and enslaved or something.
To what extent does this kidnapping of children and child sex slavery go on with Indian Muslims and Christians?
Well Bangladesh & Pakistan are also complete shitholes that has child kidnapping & slavery on similar scales. So maybe that answers your question? Why are there only a select few upper castes? How exactly do they look like? I think we should just nuke the beezejus out of all three countries as thats the best moral option there is. They will never learn because the people of these countries are too stupid & backwards to figure out why their religions & countries suck so much or the intelligence to question their station in life. They will only bring their third world mentality with them.
I have also noticed Hindu’s aren’t allowed to eat cows, chickens or meats of any sort. Was this an ingenious plot by these Aryan invaders to somehow substitute the population into servititude by making sure they are weak, immasculated, frale and shortly built?
The upper castes pretty much look like everyone else. But in an individual state, the upper castes might tend to be lighter than the lower castes. But an upper caste from Southern India would be darker than a lower caste from northern India.
The Aryans ate meat and there’s plenty of textual evidence for it. The vegetarianism was Jain and Buddhist influence which came much later on.
Dota what ethnic group founded the Jain religion? It is admirable that the aryans decided to stop eating meat.
@ Seed
Actually I know very little about the history of the Jains. Modern Jains are a mercantile community with commerce dominating their commercial activities. Haven’t really read much about them and neither have I known too many personally. Jains refuse to kill. I remember my mother’s friend would never kill scorpions, instead she would insist her gardener gingerly pick them up and place them outside the premises.
“It is admirable that the aryans decided to stop eating meat.”
The Brahmins did, the other castes didn’t entirely give it up. The Gujaratis of the trader caste also refuse to eat meat, again this is Jain influence I believe as non Brahmins enjoy their chicken. The Brahmins believe that meat consumption arouses lust, which interferes with their asceticism. Whether this is scientifically valid, I know not. Curiously, I’ve read somewhere that some of the old Chinese belief systems also held this view. But Huax might be able to tell you more about that.
Thanks for telling me that, Dota. Looks like I definitely need to eat more meat then.
There is more to it though then the belief meat contributed to lust. That aspect was a major part of it however another major part of it was empathy felt for other beings. They genuinely didn’t want to hurt fellow beings through eating meat.
Amazing that they don’t want to hurt other human beings but only if it isn’t a dark skinned lower caste member
@Xera
“Well Bangladesh & Pakistan are also complete shitholes that has child kidnapping & slavery on similar scales. So maybe that answers your question?”
Exactly that is what I wrote in the previous post about India although would have also added Afghanistan.
To answer Lindsay’s question on whether child labour and sex slavery exists among the Christians and Muslims, yes, it does exist but to a smaller extent. It also depends on the culture, with the culture of some parts of India far more regressive than the others. Generally, the more Hinduism is entrenched in the culture, the more regressive it is. I don’t know a lot about Pakistan, but from what I have seen of Bangladeshis, they are desis first and Muslims second (even though they like to pretend otherwise).
“…who are so dirty & scummy & worthless on an unimaginable scale..”
On a moral level. On a physical level, the Brahmans are generally wealthier and have access to more resources than the Dalits, so they can afford a better way of life and sophistication than the lower caste, who are generally too poor to afford civilised norms of hygiene and sophistication. I have observed during my time in North America that the lower caste don’t have it too good in the United States either, socially atleast, because of the vibes of cheapness and swarthiness they give off. So in a way, a lot of commenters here who are outraged at the Brahmans would end up further victimising th lower caste Indians in the real world, because of their outrage which should ideally have been directed to the perpretators, not the victims.
The same is true for Pakistanis as well. Pakistani culture however is dominated by peasant culture, as a lot of Muslim Punjabis were converted from the peasant caste, or so I’ve read in some places. The preservation of ‘honour’ and face saving are the most salient characteristics of the Indian peasant. There’s also some Persian influence in their etiquette protocols. Ironically the Pakis despise the very Hindu culture that is so entrenched in their society.
Honour and ‘face saving’ is a big thing even among non-Hindu Asian cultures, like South East Asians, Chinese or Arabs.
It is definitely true that 77% of all Indians are low caste. However, Dalits only make up 15% of India’s population.
The “backward castes”, as you refer to them, did not receive the same treatment as the Dalits. Historically, the backward castes were allowed to enter Hindu temples and were not considered to be untouchable.
In fact, there were numerous times in Indian history when backward-caste kings held power. Chandragupta Maurya, India’s first emperor, came from a caste of peacock-tamers. Chhatrapati Shivaji, who fought back against the Mughal Empire, also came from a backward-caste background.
Shivaji had to bribe a Brahmin to invent a Kshatriya ancestry for him as the Brahmins refused to let a shudra (peasant) ascend the throne. This is how he assumed the mantle of Chatrapati. At any rate, these cases were the exception and not the norm.
I think*